Reply With Quote
my favorite troll bit from Chris, no one does it better.using the Bible as scientific evidence
How fast do they calculate the movement of tectonic plates to have been, Chris?
my favorite troll bit from Chris, no one does it better.
I was. Just piggybacking on your point.
Chris has made it abundantly clear he doesn’t do “the troll thing” so not sure what you’re referring to.
It's true: I don't do the troll thing, but I will defend my religion.
nu uh planes move fast and nobody dies, checkmate atheisteverything on earth would be dead if plates moved that fast.
What are you toasting?
Trying to do a bit with ST personalities when they basically say the opposite.
Extending this flaw in your brain beyond politics and conspiracy.
Excellent.
I’m toasting Chris
K
Its your thing.
Radical Republicans don't give a about the the rest of us are dealing with. Naive Dems still haven't figured out how to use political power on their adversary, like the adversary.
The involvement of main Justice was confirmed in the court’s Feb. 21 opinion, which states “any requirement that Epstein carry out his obligations under the [non-prosecution agreement] was delayed while he sought higher-level review within the Justice Department.”
Further corroboration was provided by Acosta at his July 10 press conference, where he stated that people from main Justice were involved early in the development of the Epstein case and were aware of its progression. Acosta declined to state who at main Justice was involved in the Epstein case. I have names.
Court records show that post-plea-deal decisions went up to Deputy Attorney General Mark Filip, who, according to one former DOJ official, has a stellar reputation. Filip was informed of reasons to approve the continued prosecution of Epstein if he didn’t comply with the non-prosecution agreement. Judge Marra noted that Filip reviewed the Epstein matter and determined that federal prosecution of Epstein was appropriate if he did not “comply with the terms and conditions of the agreement.”
Another high-level Department of Justice official who had his fingerprints on the case is Andrew Oosterbaan, then-chief of the Child Exploitation and Obscenity Section. A privilege log filed on June 23, 2015, references several emails from 2007 between the Florida federal prosecutors and Oosterbaan regarding an “Epstein meeting” and “changes to the draft indictment and status of plea negotiations.”
The same do ent shows emails from 2008 with Oosterbaan concerning a “continued delay in presenting case to grand jury due to failure to receive decision from D.C., the status of grand jury presentation and ongoing investigation” and a “meeting in DC” concerning the case.
Additionally, these records appear to show Epstein’s attorneys reached out to Andy Lourie in May 2007 to arrange a meeting to discuss the Epstein investigation. Lourie was the acting chief of the Public Integrity Section of the Criminal Division in Washington in 2006, before becoming the acting principal deputy assistant attorney general and chief of staff to the Criminal Division by 2007. In 2007, he was also an assistant U.S. attorney in the Southern District of Florida. Lourie was kept in the loop on possible federal coercion and enticement charges, proposed changes to the indictment, “finalizing details with State Attorney’s Office,” and “final revisions to indictment package.”
There are also notations of 2007 emails from Florida federal prosecutors to Myesha Braden, who was serving as a trial attorney for the Child Exploitation and Obscenity Section of the DOJ’s Criminal Division, regarding securing a pre-indictment consultation contract. This correspondence took place months before Epstein signed the non-prosecution agreement.
In other words, main Justice was well-informed with the investigation and status of the case.
The involvement of main Justice raises the question of who made the ultimate decision on Epstein’s sweetheart deal. Was Acosta following orders from main Justice? If so, who issued the orders and how high did it go? Who did Filip and Oosterbaan report to?
And why did main Justice have such an interest in a South Florida child sex offender?
This quote from Acosta, cited in a July 9, 2019, Daily Beast article, may provide the answer: “I was told Epstein ‘belonged to intelligence’ and to leave it alone.”
THE DEMOCRAT WHO LET JEFFREY EPSTEIN GET AWAY
Why is no one talking about Barry Krischer?
https://www.frontpagemag.com/fpm/274...IfSONg.twitter
Trash, the REPUBLICAN who ed Epstein's girls
“Lawyers involved with the various Epstein cases said there is virtually no chance that the president will be required to testify in a matter in which both sides agree his involvement was tangential.”
https://www.washingtonpost.com/natio...=.db1b28bc3159
lmao someone's nervous that their golden god billy boy might go down with epstein and many other dems too... where's the popcorn at?
Deep background
see? this guy only pretends to care about abused children when there's a partisan angle
Your butthurt is showing
Sounds like the Dems' newly discovered border crisis.
the manufactured crisis at the boarder is that suddenly, now, the hordes and "caravans" of illegal immigrants are about to destroy the country to the point that we have to send the military and built the great wall of trump before we all dieSounds like the Dems' newly discovered border crisis.
now, if you're going to stick them all in under-supplied camps, continue family separation policies, etc, then you are creating a humanitarian crisis
Nice try. The crisis was always that the system was overwhelmed.
Also the Dems refusing to fund it because orange man bad was a pretty big crises. Are they still blocking funds?
Sounds like the Dems' newly discovered border crisis.
i think if you try harder you just might be able to make an ever more overbroad comment
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions