, can't believe I'm saying this, but I'd rather have Cunningham back than Lyles. Especially if it's for the minimum vs the MLE (whole or partial).
Primary way the Spurs improve is through the development of Murray, White, and Walker. Naturally all 3 are Spur draft picks. Morris was the obvious free agent target and they had an agreement before they didn't. Are they supposed to sue him now? Dump Murray for nothing to get back at his agent because that'll really show them who's boss? As for Lyles, meh. If you're worked up about Trey Lyles, close the laptop. You need to be done for the day.
, can't believe I'm saying this, but I'd rather have Cunningham back than Lyles. Especially if it's for the minimum vs the MLE (whole or partial).
Exactly. People acting like signing Lyles was the only thing they could do. Not giving up youth or picks when you got Morris made sense. They were able to really improve the team without needing to be too aggressive via trade.
But once they lost Bertans and Morris? The option was not overpay a bad player; it was fire up the aggression and start making trades for a Morris-like player you know raises the ceiling.
Not just “aw shucks” it. I, even with Morris signed, wanted SA to push and make moves so it’s not just a reaction to this. The Lyles thing was just a bad move all around. It can be salvaged if SA pulls off a legit trade which they need to be heavily pursuing (and I think they are, but I have lost confidence with this Lyles move).
we've got ourselves a 6-10 bomber! hehehe
Lyles is trash and this is a lottery team...
Does this preclude any trade(s)?
No I get that; cant control everything this year. Was talking about why being so cavalier like SA has with dead money is not something to just ignore. If Lma gets injured this year we are screwed this year, but no reason to even put anything on the books for a non-difference maker past one year. Just no excuse IMO even if it’s not a “big” deal.
Dont you dare rob![]()
Cunningham, Lyle's does it make a difference?
Thats fair.
I am fine with not boycotting them. To me boycotting means everything is cut off. That’s not what I am saying should have happened. I am saying you only deal with them or show interest in clients that mean something. Today, next year or beyond.
You are under no obligation to pay bad players in their stable is what I am saying and that is not a boycott to stay away from bad players tied to them.
The one good thing about having a contract with partially guarnteed money in year 2 is that if they sit on it and decide to make a move after December it becomes a good piece for salary matching.
If he can teach the young Jedi, Luka S some new tricks, then that's fine by me, lol
hahahahahahaha
Who do the Spurs trade to aquire such player?
Ha, nah. I'd rather have Lyles. At least he has potential to be something useful even if its low. Cunningham is just the kind of player Pop can't help himself with at times.
I'm thinking that's on. this was more bout the MLE and having to spend it on a FA.
SPURS WILL WIN THE 2020 NBA LE!
bbbbbbbbbboooooooooooooooooooooookkkkkkkkkkkkk it
My man DPG21920. It's like when Sting joined NWO, come on over brotha![]()
I think it’s fair to say that anyone questioning why someone would give SA a C- for the offseason also needs to look at things. I agree the jump and best shot for big improvement is from within and have said so all Summer. I even love the youth and Im confident they will leap.
Having said that though, if evaluating the results of the off season, SA didn’t do anything really to help their young guys out and I feel they should have been extra aggressive in the trade market after Morris fell through. Lyles feels like a white flag to the off season.
I had them at a C- with the initial grade and bumped them to an A with Morris. Now that it’s Lyles instead of Morris it’s back to a C- and I think that is fair.
Hopefully they are not done and trades are coming because they need to. Not saying dump the young guys for nothing but try to get a difference maker with picks and non core players.
Dont you mean hogan
youre wrong but ok.
First round picks are pretty damn valuable and SA has a ton of promising youth already. I dont want to just give up picks for nothing, but if you can get a legit starting level player to raise the ceiling? You use expiring, non-core contracts plus a few future picks.
DPG is like 5"5 though, more like the LWO tbh
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)