i don't either. But I don't see CCW'ing a gun any different than carrying jumper cables in your car. YMMV.
Yeah how much would that suck trying to sit comfortably with a gun on you, trying to concentrate on the movie but you can't because you're scouting the theater for potential shooters
i don't either. But I don't see CCW'ing a gun any different than carrying jumper cables in your car. YMMV.
I support 100% the 2nd amendment as a matter of law. I don't like/trust guns though (even though I grew up around them, even shot some). Like you said, YMMV.
40 on troubled loner
It was said off the cuff. A business can do as they please. I'm on the side of just ignoring the sign all together. Are you aware in some states these signs have no force of law for those with permits?
lol Bobby Jindal with the "we need to pray" demagoguery at the scene of the crime...
Does your phone bother you in your pocket and are you always thinking about if someone is going to call you?
I understand not liking guns, but how do you not trust an inanimate object?
Well regulated militia is about to be defined.
If you can't take away the element of surprise, then you have to take away the guns. Period.
Why would being an inanimate object matter? Even something as innocuous as a wire on a wall can kill you.
Can't do that state-wide.
So you don't trust certain people with guns, or do you literally not trust the inanimate object gun?
First of all when you pull the trigger its not a inanimate object. Then an asshole with a gun can kill alot of people in seconds. Then when said asshole surprises you, it doesn't matter how many guns you have. He will shoot and kill you first. So guns have to go.....and they will.
Man you'd have to be a re to not see the Snake on that got.
A sell out. Real indians hate him too.
He's a real snake
It's a matter of risk management for me. I'm just unwilling to risk accidental discharge, be it through malfunction or otherwise, and the best way to do that is to simply not to be willingly around guns for long.
Now that's a personal thing, and I know people that feel differently about it. My associate, for example, would be described by boutons as a "gun-fellator", does compe ive shooting, is a cool cat, and there's nothing wrong with that, IMO.
Just a matter of time before "more guns would have prevented this" crap comes and here you go.
You're the arbiter of the "terrorist" label. What say you? Is this guy a "terrorist"? Oh wait, the answer is obvious. He's not a muslim. So no. He's a "lone wolf". He has "mental problems". Got it. Thanks for your input.
i am? i just copy-pasted a definition i found.
stop putting words in my mouth. the "troubled loner" was a clear joke but you're too caught up in your hysteria/biases to take note
If you are Muslim your iden y is released, but if a white male iden y is withheld.![]()
So someone jumps up and starts shooting. You got 30+ people between you and the shooter.
Do you shoot?
Is he a terrorist? Yes or no.
No mention of "terrorism" of course either.
What a ing pussy
![]()
Well no when the trigger is pulled it isn't inanimate, hence the word inanimate. So said asshole always wins...you sure about that? And no, guns aren't going anywhere, learn to deal with that as I have.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)