2000-2005 Who's better, Kobe or T-Mac?

[Double-Up]

Stats from the two during the 5 year period:

Tracy McGrady: 74.6 Games | 44.3% FG | 35.2% 3FG | 6.8 rpg | 5.3 apg | 1.6 spg | 0.9 bpg | 2.6 topg | 27.6 ppg

Kobe Bryant: 72 Games | 45.2% FG | 33.3% 3FG | 5.9 rpg | 5.4 apg | 1.7 spg | 0.6 bpg | 3.2 topg | 27.1 ppg

[BadOdor]

Roxx fan is bipolar. Just when you think they agree with the rest of us that lazy eyes is a no good loser bum, he comes up with a thread like this.

[blink]

Early 2000s, it was a legit arguement.... Now, not so much

[Double-Up]

Roxx fan is bipolar. Just when you think they agree with the rest of us that lazy eyes is a no good loser bum, he comes up with a thread like this.

Someone brought it up at work and though I'd get the board's opinion.

[usdane]

Stats from the two during the 5 year period:

Tracy McGrady: 74.6 Games | 44.3% FG | 35.2% 3FG | 6.8 rpg | 5.3 apg | 1.6 spg | 0.9 bpg | 2.6 topg | 27.6 ppg

Kobe Bryant: 72 Games | 45.2% FG | 33.3% 3FG | 5.9 rpg | 5.4 apg | 1.7 spg | 0.6 bpg | 3.2 topg | 27.1 ppg

3 rings vs. 1st round exit

Now tell your co-workers to go back to work.

[Will Hunting]

3 rings vs. 1st round exit

Now tell your co-workers to go back to work.

1st round exit sums up Kobe perfectly w/o Shaq and Gasol.

[ffadicted]

3 rings vs. 1st round exit

Now tell your co-workers to go back to work.

Oh right, because the thread clearly stated "2000-2005, Who's team was better, Kobes or T-Macs?

[iggypop123]

all this proves was there was a debate until 2005, then it died a quick death

[21_Blessings]

Double Up, why did you forget to list the 5 All-NBA Defensive teams Kobe was on between 2000-2005?

Early 2000s, it was a legit arguement.... Now, not so much

No it wasn't a legit argument to anyone who knows anything about basketball.

[Pero]

No it wasn't a legit argument to anyone who knows anything about basketball.

Exactly, it was clearly Tracy.

[Double-Up]

Double Up, why did you forget to list the 5 All-NBA Defensive teams Kobe was on between 2000-2005?

Good point...I never thought about it, basically just looking at the numbers for the years above not rings or other accomplishments.

[21_Blessings]

Exactly, it was clearly Tracy.

Only ignorant people that never touched a basketball in their lifetime believed that.

[Will Hunting]

Only ignorant people that never touched a basketball in their lifetime believed that.

Yeah 21_Palins like you've ever played basketball you fat crack baby.

[baseline bum]

That's like asking Duncan or Webber.

[Smooth Criminal]

That's like asking Duncan or Webber.

I love T-Mac...but pretty much this

[cobbler]

1st round exit sums up Kobe perfectly w/o Shaq and Gasol.

No round to begin with for 20 years sums up the Celtics w/o KG or Ray. And as with your post.... has nothing to do with the OP's question.

[Will Hunting]

No round to begin with for 20 years sums up the Celtics w/o KG or Ray.

So when the Celtics made the ECF in 2002 that's "no round to begin with"?

[Mavs_man_41]

No round to begin with for 20 years sums up the Celtics w/o KG or Ray. And as with your post.... has nothing to do with the OP's question.

17 rings > 15 rings just about sums up the lakers/celtics rivalry

[Will Hunting]

17 rings > 15 rings just about sums up the lakers/celtics rivalry

It's 17 rings > 10 rings

[TheMACHINE]

17 rings > 15 rings just about sums up the lakers/celtics rivalry

just like 1 > 0 sums up the miami/dallas rivary

[Will Hunting]

just like 1 > 0 sums up the miami/dallas rivary

What's funny is that has nothing to do with Boston or LA.

[Will Hunting]

17 rings, got.

[Venti Quattro]

It's 17 rings > 10 rings

Lakers have 15 rings as a franchise.

But sure, 10 of them were won in LA.

[TheMACHINE]

What's funny is that has nothing to do with Boston or LA.

whats funny is your stats has nothing to do with this thread.

[Will Hunting]

whats funny is your stats has nothing to do with this thread.

The fact Kobe didn't do w/o Shaq from 2000-2005 is very related to this thread.