Should Pop rest the big 3 in Game 4?

[ElNono]

If the Spurs find themselves up 3-0, and given that we're going to be playing a game every other day, should Pop rest the big 3 in Game 4 and avoid a potential quick turnaround to the NBA Finals?

Discuss.


DISCLAIMER: the fact that there was one of these kind of threads for the previous two series is purely coincidental.

[G-Nob]

[Reck]

ElNono padding his post stats.

[SA210]

A few threads/suggestions that were tiring from the very first time they were ever suggested.

1) Should we "fear" x team
2) Should we tank/rest players
3) Should we lose a game

[OldSilentHill]

Big history does not recognize resting.

[spurspokesman]

Let's just go for the juggular if we are blessed to be up 3-0.

[Dex]

I think we should lose the first three games to give Oklahoma a false sense of security, then get down big in game 4. Then 4th quarter comes....BAM! RIGHT IN THE KISSER!

[Interrohater]

I think we should lose the series ironically, just to show how little the Spurs care for accolades.

[ElNono]

I think we should lose the series ironically, just to show how little the Spurs care for accolades.

"You might be onto something there"

[Agloco]

Rest hasn't been shown to prevent injury or improve performance tbh iirc imo tbh

[Budkin]

We should rotate resting one of the big 3 each game of the series just to prove how great we are.

[DesignatedT]

[Phenomanul]

Pop should troll the Thunder by trotting out a starting lineup consisting solely of players from his bench...

E. Ginobili
G. Neal
T. Splitter
S. Jackson
M. Bonner / D. Blair

This will give the Thunder starters a big head, they will play complacently and will shatter their game plan...

All of a sudden Pop rolls out his starting unit... wait for it...
.
.
.
.
.
.
ALL at once!

Good tactic... would be about as memorable as employing the "Hack-a-Shaq" strategy on a season opener...