Are you going to do this often?
Did the PATFO pass on him b/c of the cap space issue (for LMA) since he wasn't a draft & stash guy? He can play passable defense especially for a backup (better than Marco) & can handle the ball (better than Danny). He would have be a bargain replacement for Marco instead of being a dead weight like Jimmer![]()
Are you going to do this often?
Simple answer dude...The spurs needed players willing to be stashed. There was going to be tons of roster uncertainty post draft and it was wise to get someone that was willing to be stashed.
He has a bad case of ImSmarterThanPATFOitis.
Kawhistorm is a much better poster than the gots who never actually talk about basketball here. Poster number 4 and 2..Just rding other people's opinions.
OP is actually one of the better smart posters in this site.
Clearly spurs wanted cap space to throw at LMA and to resign some guys. Draft was b4 free agency and they even had to trade Tiago so yea, getting RJ, not in the line of possibilities.
Im better than Jimmer tbh
You're a ty poster and cannot judge the posting of anyone else since you are a ty poster who can't help but post shtick.
I like Hunter. IMO, he would've been a good pick. He probably was a single or double pick. Perhaps, the Spurs were swinging for a homerun with Mulitnov though.
You doing your latest hate Jimmer thread and then opining on the smokescreen topic. You're not fooling anyone, got.
I was a little upset we passed on Hunter, seems like a legit NBA 3 point shooting threat..
Have you heard of Vassilis Spanoulis?
Spurs missed out on an upgraded Marco replacement
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)