we need to ship her ass back to somalia so she can their up instead. that dumb !
these PR stunt congressional women need to go already... guess what side they all are a party to? em all!
It would have taken you 33 seconds to watch the video and see that Saavedra's tweet doesn't match what she said.
Instead, you came here and posted it in a new thread.
No, because she's clearly a massive positive for.this country. Japan and China won't be able to compete now that we have her.
wtf are we importing all these idiots in the first place? so ing dumb!
For some reason people recognize you need standards when a corporation hires someone but no standards are fine when it comes to a country.
She doesn't want borders. She says deporting is inhumane. She wants to fight back against the criminalization of illegals. How is she not for open borders? Keep defending these s bags because you'll be electing a lot more in the future.
he/she is just scared about being labeled "islamophobic"... idgaf! illhan and her ilk!
She didn't say that.
She didn't say that either.She wants to fight back against the criminalization of illegals.
I never said she wasn't, I said the 33 second video in the tweet you posted doesn't match the tweet you posted.How is she not for open borders?
You reading comprehension is for , dude.
Tell me more about electing s bags, Trump lover.Keep defending these s bags because you'll be electing a lot more in the future.
Oh, she's fine with deportation but her problem is the rampant inhumane deportation. Yeah, we should not deport inhumanely.
i'm for open borders too... open the border up enough to ship out the trash like illhan!
"We need to fight back against the criminalization of immigrants"
What does this mean?
There you go, I see you finally got around to watching the video you posted a thread about.
Good work, whitey!
Being an immigrant is not inherently illegal and should not be treated as such.
See? Progress! Good job, Nathan, you're doing swell!
No, that's not what she means. This is the problem with conflating illegal immigrants with legal immigrants to terrify people.
That's really a generous interpretation tbh
She specifically said immigrants. Ryan added "illegal" and you followed suit. You are the one who's conflating. So I actually agree with your second sentence, you're just too stupid to realize that you're the one conflating them.
It's a literal and accurate interpretation, based on the actual words she used and not the words you want her to use so you can justify your loser white rage.
I suppose it's a step in the right direction that you dumbasses aren't calling these comments anti-semetic too.
I don't care what he added. That's a reasonable interpretation given they don't use illegal so they can terrify legal immigrants. Didn't realize we currently had a major issue of criminalizing legal immigrants. Apparently it's a major issue though.
I'm just glad she spoke out against all that criminalization of legal immigrants that's been running rampant across the country.
I live in central Cali, we need the Mexicans because whites/blacks will not work the fields.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
