First of all: I haven't seen the game, but when I'm looking at the net-ratings, I'm wondering. Poeltl had the best net-rating (6.8) behind McBuckets (23.7), being only one of three positive players. He had the most rebounds, the most contested shots and Mitc Robinson was non-existent. How could he have been so bad or have lacked effort? Worse than Collins, who had a negative net-rating (although he played with McBuckets, Richardson & St. Johnson, who all shot over 60%) and didn't rebound at all?Poeltl was largely unimpressive. Offensively, he was a beat or two out of rhythm and the Knicks showed him little to no respect on that end. Poeltl was better on defense and rebounding-wise but he was rarely able to move the needle. I won’t say he lacked effort but I will say Poeltl lacked grunt against the Knicks. On this night, the Austrian was clearly the second best center on the Spurs.

Reply With Quote
