Reply With Quote
Why not? It's always worked in the past.....
no but i just saved a ton of money on my car insurance
They killed 3000 Americans on 9/11.
They've killed over 1000 American soliders in Iraq.
They've killed - what? - 20,000 Iraqis, many of them civilians.
They know that many of them will be going to prison or the gas chamber for treason under President Kerry.I wouldn't put it past them - I don't seriously doubt that they wouldn't.
Nothing is too horrible for repukes.Isn't is a sad state of affairs that this scenerio can't automatically be
ruled out due to some point of ridiculuousness?
It is sad because this scenerio CAN be considered a possibility with these thugs controlling OUR government.
No sane person could rule this out, considering how they are willing to kill THOUSANDS based on proven lies - or haven't you noticed that we are currently engaged in Iraq?
Why not? It's always worked in the past.....
wow, a forum message board posting from democraticunderground.com...very insightful
Might as well give it a try..it worked for the Democrats with Pearl Harbor.
Those guys comments make me proud to be an American in a way though..even they know one thing that separates us from...well from Spain...
If we get attacked before the election we will elect the war monger, to go inflict an even bigger asskicing up on our enemies...not the capitulator.
Thank you W and my fellow Americans for sending the terrorists the message that attacking us will only make us more determined to continue this war. If our other recent presidents had sent that message September 11th might never have happened.
Dang... I read about half a dozen posts... those are some of the most idiotic people I've seen on the net... of course, I don't usually go to Moveon.org or democratic underground often, so my exposure to that level of stupidity is limited...
i disagree. if we get attacked again before the election, why would anyone in their right mind still believe Bush is better at keeping america safe? if it did happen, that would be twice that we got attacked, on our soil, on his watchIf we get attacked before the election we will elect the war monger, to go inflict an even bigger asskicing up on our enemies...not the capitulator.
Don't look for logic from whottt. It's like trying to speak "ducks".
You're right Bandit...I keep forgetting the messages that the democrats send to our enemies with their protesting and conspiracy theories...Yeah the terrorists probably think we would back down because of that, .
He'll they might even do it as a way of saying thanks to their American supporters who burn our flag just like they do..No doubt Michael Moore would pop a cork of champagne because he'd have another 200 million dollar film to make off an epic tragedy.
I mean let's face it...if we got nuked 99% of the Democratic party wouldn't blame the terrorists...they'd blame the Republicans did it as an election ploy. It might even lead to a civil war with the way Democrats are already attacking republicans property and disrupting the country. Yeah...there is a reason for the terrorists to want to nuke us before the election. Thanks.
what the are you talking about? you are the one who brought up the issue of "if we get attacked again the american public would overwhelmingly support Bush", and i told you what i think would happen instead...theres nothing conspiracy about itYou're right Bandit...I keep forgetting the messages that the democrats send to our enemies with their protesting and conspiracy theories...Yeah the terrorists probably think we would back down because of that, .
and your basis for this ASSumption is from postings on a message board just like this one??I mean let's face it...if we got nuked 99% of the Democratic party wouldn't blame the terrorists...they'd blame the Republicans did it as an election ploy.
yeah, like the way democrats harrassed a Bush supporter at a Kerry rally and tore up his sign, making his daughter cry, right?It might even lead to a civil war with the way Democrats are already attacking republicans property and disrupting the country
terrorists want to nuke us because thy disagree with our foreign policy and support of israel...you act like the only reason they hate us so much is because Bush is in office and that really ticks them off...no wonder our country is in such deep with people who think like you in powerYeah...there is a reason for the terrorists to want to nuke us before the election. Thanks.
That forum is where danny boy gets a lot of his material. It's a bit telling that a majority of participants in that thread took it seriously.
See MB? Look at that happened when I just tried to agree with a democrat...there's just no pleasing some people. Glad I switched parties.
That's one for you...yeah, like the way democrats harrassed a Bush supporter at a Kerry rally and tore up his sign, making his daughter cry, right?
Here's 20 for me:Who says America doesn't have terrorists?
Sadly no...my basis for this assumption, among other things... is Lardass911 and it's popularity with the left. And they do burn our flag...just like the terrorists.and your basis for this ASSumption is from postings on a message board just like this one??
So we should adopt the foreign policy they want for the US? Dumb.terrorists want to nuke us because thy disagree with our foreign policy
Don't worry, Whottt, this can be fun. Your filibusttters are much more enjoyable to read in this forum.
Okay, I can't believe you guys wasted this much bandwidth on demoncraticunderground.com.
That's scary.
Nothing like sturring up a little democrat hate before the debate.
As Marcus has shown, DU is to much for some people.
Let a professional do it.
too much stupidity yes I agree.
Who is the site's founder, Michael Moore?
Hey, conservatives have their own kooks at Freerepublic.com
Nothing like brainwashing your kids early.FREEPER RESEARCH/ESSAY ASSIGNMENT
My 10th grade daughter is enrolled in an Advanced Placement (AP) World History class at her public high school. The teacher (a "friendly" who shares conservative Christian views with my family, but has to play it down the middle in class) recently introduced a concept known as the "Conrad-Demarest Model of Empires." This model discusses the conditions which give rise to empires, the major results of empires, and why empires fail.
This Monday the class will engage in a student-led discussion of whether the United States is an empire and if so, whether we are on the rise or in decline.
Freepers, my daughter often stands alone in these class discussions defending reason and liberty. Most of her classmates are little lib Kool-Aid drinkers. I would LOVE for her to have some "shock & awe" information to use in this discussion.
Properly equipped, I know my daughter can handle this. Last year she was lead defense counsel in a mock war crimes trial of Napoleon Boneparte. She got an acquittal. The kids were itchin' to lop off a head since the teacher had already placed a cardboard guillotine in the classroom, so they executed him anyway! Tough crowd.
What I'm looking for are citations to references (preferably on-line) which support the proposition that America is not an empire. Of course, any essays you write yourselves will be highly valued.
You're nuts, danny.
That's your example of a conservative equivalent to demoncraticunderground?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions