PDA

View Full Version : Spurs fielding trade calls for Parker



Pages : 1 2 3 [4] 5

DesignatedT
06-23-2011, 01:05 PM
Devin Harris and the 12 for Tony? lmao that's fucking disgraceful.

If Utah even wanted to make a serious deal it would have to be along the lines of this to even get the Spurs interested.

Harris
Al Jefferson
#12

for
Tony
R Jefferson

Aggie Hoopsfan
06-23-2011, 01:06 PM
#4 and their unprotected 1st rounder next year would be worth trading for. Cleveland has made stupider moves in the past.

True. I think we'd have to take salary back. I'd do your scenario along with Jamison (he expires after this coming season).

Somehow I'm guessing they'd want to give us garbage like Varejao and Gibson back though, or maybe Baron Davis and the three years he has left.

Ditty
06-23-2011, 01:06 PM
#4 and their unprotected 1st rounder next year would be worth trading for. Cleveland has made stupider moves in the past.

i doubt they throw there unprotected pick next year but,throw in Varejo, and there trade exception..hmmm

will_spurs
06-23-2011, 01:07 PM
Cavs reportedly trying to get Parker now too. I'm guessing they're dangling #4 and some players, that'd free them up to take Williams #1.

I don't see anyone from that squad that would be worth it. Pass.

Given the Cavs huge trade exceptions a lot of scenarios can work.

Parker + RJ (+ Blair?) for Varejao + Gibson (or Session) + #4 pick + trade exception

etc etc. The possibilities are endless.

SenorSpur
06-23-2011, 01:07 PM
I'd love to have Biyombo; not at the expense of Parker, but if the team can get him cheaply then yes. However, dude has no offensive game whatsoever. All he could do in the Nike Hoop Summit was score on put backs. If he can't put moves on high-schoolers I don't see him taking Kevin Garnett on the block. Still, what a phenomenal defender this guy will be after a couple of years in the league.

I wouldn't sacrifice Parker for him either - but George Hill? In a New York minute.

DesignatedT
06-23-2011, 01:07 PM
Cleveland?

Sessions
Varajeo or Jamison
#4

for
Tony
R Jefferson

SenorSpur
06-23-2011, 01:08 PM
Devin Harris and the 12 for Tony? lmao that's fucking disgraceful.

If Utah even wanted to make a serious deal it would have to be along the lines of this to even get the Spurs interested.

Harris
Al Jefferson
#12

for
Tony
R Jefferson

Al Jefferson is slow-footed and a terrible defender. No thanks.

DPG21920
06-23-2011, 01:10 PM
CLE taking TP with Baron and Sessions there doesn't make sense. It's not the same as drafting Irving bc of the size of the contracts

DesignatedT
06-23-2011, 01:10 PM
Al Jefferson is slow-footed and a terrible defender. No thanks.

He'd still be the best thing next to Duncan since Robinson and could definitely take a huge load offensively. You could actually call "4 down" for someone other then Tim for once. I'd consider it.

Duncan2177
06-23-2011, 01:11 PM
CLE taking TP with Baron and Sessions there doesn't make sense. It's not the same as drafting Irving bc of the size of the contracts

Baron and Varajeo

Mugen
06-23-2011, 01:12 PM
the thought of TP going to Utah cracks me up.

DesignatedT
06-23-2011, 01:12 PM
I forgot about Baron lol.

DPG21920
06-23-2011, 01:14 PM
Also, Varejao isn't garbage and I believe Baron has 2 years left on his deal

Aggie Hoopsfan
06-23-2011, 01:16 PM
From Stein:


Draft Buzz: Cavs tryin to get 3rd lottery pick. Offering to take back contract to facilitate. Kings/Pistons are targets

Interesting.

Could be they are going all youth, or maybe they're trying to get another pick to do a deal with us. Two lotto picks + Varejao + Sessions for Parker and our first or something like that?

will_spurs
06-23-2011, 01:18 PM
Also, Varejao isn't garbage and I believe Baron has 2 years left on his deal

CLE has 3 point guards, so any deal with them has to send of them down to SA:
- Baron has 2 years left, $14m per year (ouch)
- Session has 2 years too, $4m per
- Gibson also has 2 years, $4m per

The best would be to get Session back, but I assume any trade involving RJ will have to involve Davis in return.

The numbers for TP+RJ vs Davis+Varejao match almost exactly. CLE has a large trade exception from Lebron, and both teams have small (< $1 milion) trade exceptions. So the Spurs could easily add a scrub for CLE's 4th pick.

Would be fun seeing TP going to CLE and getting another ring before Lebron :lol

DPG21920
06-23-2011, 01:19 PM
Caves are in a great spot. With getting Irving at 1 & then possibly getting the best big in the draft at 4 (Jonas), they prob won't deal.

baseline bum
06-23-2011, 01:21 PM
I like Varejao, but he's more a player you trade for to win now as opposed to rebuilding around.

The ADMIRAL 50
06-23-2011, 01:22 PM
From Stein:



Interesting.

Could be they are going all youth, or maybe they're trying to get another pick to do a deal with us. Two lotto picks + Varejao + Sessions for Parker and our first or something like that?

You must be an aggie if you think that trade makes any sense for Cleveland. 2 lotto picks and varejao? Get real.

DPG21920
06-23-2011, 01:23 PM
Well I'm not as sold on if TP is moved it means no title shot (although I agree that is by far the most likely outcome), so Andy could really help if a few things panout.

Aggie Hoopsfan
06-23-2011, 01:33 PM
You must be an aggie if you think that trade makes any sense for Cleveland. 2 lotto picks and varejao? Get real.

Yeah, must be an Aggie because of that. I agree it doesn't make any sense, but Cleveland is a bunch of retards, and we're apparently shopping Parker as part of a package/salary dump for RJ.

Tell me how that makes sense. :rolleyes

Just trying to embrace the Spurs drug induced worldview of the moment, and add in the stupidity of the Cavs as an organization.

Aggie Hoopsfan
06-23-2011, 01:38 PM
Old news but:


There was talk the Spurs have offered point guard Tony Parker to Sacramento for forward Omri Casspi, swingman Francisco Garcia and the Kings' No. 7 pick. San Antonio would select Lithuanian center Jonas Valanciunas.

Mr.Bottomtooth
06-23-2011, 01:39 PM
Would wonder if they planned on using Garcia to try to solve the 3 spot alongside Casspi, or if he was just a filler.

Mr.Bottomtooth
06-23-2011, 02:01 PM
@WojYahooNBA
Adrian Wojnarowski
Kings have made it privately clear that they expect to trade 7th pick, sources say. "They're confident they have deal," one official says.

http://twitter.com/#!/WojYahooNBA/status/83971106117136385

Ohhh noes.

Fpoonsie
06-23-2011, 02:01 PM
[nervous gulp]

ABrooks111
06-23-2011, 02:03 PM
Please God no...

Mr.Bottomtooth
06-23-2011, 02:03 PM
There's not even a guarantee Valanciunas will be there at #7. What the hell?

ChumpDumper
06-23-2011, 02:04 PM
its confirmed parker to kings

Here's the latest: According to Wojo at Yahoo..the Spurs believe 7-footer Jonas Valanciunas could be the replacement for Tim Duncan and will draft him with the 7th pick in a deal with the Kings.Link?

DPG21920
06-23-2011, 02:04 PM
Not true

MaNu4Tres
06-23-2011, 02:05 PM
There's not even a guarantee Valanciunas will be there at #7. What the hell?

There's not even a guarantee that Spurs are trading Parker to the Kings for that pick.

spursfan09
06-23-2011, 02:05 PM
:wow

NASpurs
06-23-2011, 02:05 PM
http://twitter.com/#!/WojYahooNBA/status/83971106117136385 (http://twitter.com/#%21/WojYahooNBA/status/83971106117136385)

Ohhh noes.

Wonder who it is... makes me nervous as hell too.

lmbebo
06-23-2011, 02:05 PM
its confirmed parker to kings

Here's the latest: According to Wojo at Yahoo..the Spurs believe 7-footer Jonas Valanciunas could be the replacement for Tim Duncan and will draft him with the 7th pick in a deal with the Kings.

No such quote...

Agloco
06-23-2011, 02:06 PM
its confirmed parker to kings

Here's the latest: According to Wojo at Yahoo..the Spurs believe 7-footer Jonas Valanciunas could be the replacement for Tim Duncan and will draft him with the 7th pick in a deal with the Kings.

Jesus Fucking Christ.

NASpurs
06-23-2011, 02:06 PM
There's probably a reason why he can't start threads. I think we know why.

ChumpDumper
06-23-2011, 02:08 PM
http://www.facebook.com/ticket760/posts/10150215457341006

Thanks.

But where did Wojo say it for them to post?

tdunk21
06-23-2011, 02:08 PM
@ticket760
Ticket 760
Yahoo Sports is reporting that the Kings are expecting to trade the 7th pick. Is it to the Spurs? For Tony?

tdunk21
06-23-2011, 02:09 PM
@WojYahooNBA
Adrian Wojnarowski
Kings have made it privately clear that they expect to trade 7th pick, sources say. "They're confident they have deal," one official says.

NASpurs
06-23-2011, 02:09 PM
Did Woj ever say anything like that? I've been reading his articles and tweets and I haven't seen such a thing.

TimmehC
06-23-2011, 02:10 PM
Kings trade deal is rumored to most likely be with Denver. Woj did not say that the deal is with the Spurs.

Fpoonsie
06-23-2011, 02:10 PM
There's not even a guarantee Valanciunas will be there at #7. What the hell?

This is what I don't understand (assuming RocketFan's not completely full a' shit). Weren't there rumblings that CLE had their eye on him at #4?

DPG21920
06-23-2011, 02:10 PM
For those asking I don't think it's true but Spurs only make the deal contingent on if the player the Spurs want is still there. There would be no risk the spurs make a deal and miss their guy.

DBMethos
06-23-2011, 02:11 PM
All this speculation for such a shitty draft.

Fpoonsie
06-23-2011, 02:11 PM
For those asking I don't think it's true but Spurs only make the deal contingent on if the player the Spurs want is still there. There would be no risk the spurs make a deal and miss their guy.

Oooooooh.

Ok.

NASpurs
06-23-2011, 02:12 PM
Yep. He tweeted that a bit ago.

Oh I meant what the ticet760 is reporting specifically.

Agloco
06-23-2011, 02:12 PM
For those asking I don't think it's true but Spurs only make the deal contingent on if the player the Spurs want is still there. There would be no risk the spurs make a deal and miss their guy.




http://www.sactownroyalty.com/2011/6/23/2239680/cavs-to-derail-kings-spurs-trade-several-teams-believe-the-san



Cav's to derail Kings/Spurs trade

"Several teams believe the San Antonio Spurs’ desire to get the Sacramento Kings’ pick at No. 7 centers on a desire to draft Valanciunas as a future replacement for Tim Duncan, and now Cleveland must draft Valanciunas at the No. 4 spot, or risk losing him all together."

will_spurs
06-23-2011, 02:13 PM
@WojYahooNBA
Adrian Wojnarowski
Kings have made it privately clear that they expect to trade 7th pick, sources say. "They're confident they have deal," one official says.

In other words: Kings have a deal finalized and fully expect that the draft target in the trade will still be available by #7.

Or they are putting pressure on other teams to get rid of their #7 pick.

DPG21920
06-23-2011, 02:13 PM
There was never a mention the deal is w SA

Vic Petro
06-23-2011, 02:13 PM
Of course they're not going to agree to any deal unless Valanciunas (or whoever they want) is sitting there at 7.

NASpurs
06-23-2011, 02:13 PM
http://sports.yahoo.com/nba/news?slug=aw-wojnarowski_nba_draft_cavaliers_irving_062311&expire=1


Several teams believe the San Antonio Spurs’ (http://sports.yahoo.com/nba/teams/sas) desire to get the Sacramento Kings’ (http://sports.yahoo.com/nba/teams/sac) pick at No. 7 centers on a desire to draft Valanciunas as a future replacement for Tim Duncan (http://sports.yahoo.com/nba/players/3173), and now Cleveland must draft Valanciunas at the No. 4 spot, or risk losing him all together

nkdlunch
06-23-2011, 02:13 PM
:lol cavs

NASpurs
06-23-2011, 02:14 PM
Cavs are trying to cock block the Spurs. :lmao

Fpoonsie
06-23-2011, 02:14 PM
Kinda sucks to think that SA'd be sending off their All-Star PG for a player that won't even play w/ them for at LEAST another year or so.

:depressed

Mr.Bottomtooth
06-23-2011, 02:15 PM
Seriously? Cockblocked by the fucking Cavs?

DarkGinobili
06-23-2011, 02:15 PM
Lol

TDMVPDPOY
06-23-2011, 02:16 PM
looks like a few teams tryin to cuckhold us

nkdlunch
06-23-2011, 02:17 PM
cuckhold? Valanciunas or whatever his name is won't even come for a couple of years. fuck that stash in europe shit. What an insult to Duncan

DPG21920
06-23-2011, 02:18 PM
I hope CLE takes who the Spurs want at 4 if this is true.

NASpurs
06-23-2011, 02:18 PM
Spurs are probably saying Valanciunas as a smoke screen for a cockblocker when they probably have someone else in mind. Typical CIA Spurs. :lol

DPG21920
06-23-2011, 02:19 PM
Spurs better dump RJs ass if this is true

DesignatedT
06-23-2011, 02:19 PM
What's the updated situation regarding the buyout on Valanciunas? Any chance he plays in the NBA next season?

DPG21920
06-23-2011, 02:21 PM
From everything I've seen, no. ^

Fpoonsie
06-23-2011, 02:22 PM
From everything I've seen, no. ^

So, she's NOT hot?

TheProfessor
06-23-2011, 02:23 PM
What's the updated situation regarding the buyout on Valanciunas? Any chance he plays in the NBA next season?
Current buyout with his team precludes his coming to the NBA next season. Just how final that arrangement is, is currently uncertain. But it would be unlikely that he comes over immediately.

NASpurs
06-23-2011, 02:23 PM
So, she's NOT hot?

I think he meant to say that she's not a BYU cheerleader.

Fpoonsie
06-23-2011, 02:24 PM
Ah.

TDMVPDPOY
06-23-2011, 02:25 PM
lol if they do manage to trade parker for euro stash

then get rid of rjs contract

duncan might as well go retire...

any excuse to tank....


ps. what happens if theres no nba season, would there also be another draft? how would it be arrange?

MaNu4Tres
06-23-2011, 02:25 PM
So, she's NOT hot?

She's pretty, nothing amazing though. imo

timvp
06-23-2011, 02:27 PM
That TP trade with the Kings looks horrible. If the Spurs do it, it'd be time to blow everything up.

NASpurs
06-23-2011, 02:27 PM
She's alright if that's her

http://www.sportsgrid.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/2-220x187.jpg

stealthjbravo
06-23-2011, 02:30 PM
She's alright if that's her

http://www.sportsgrid.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/2-220x187.jpg

Thanks but no thanks

will_spurs
06-23-2011, 02:32 PM
So Valanciunas is going to be drafted by... Cleveland, Detroit, Kings/SA, Bucks and Warriors. That's quite a few teams. Actually, that's too many teams, the kind of attention that turns a draft prospect into a decoy and makes him slide 5-10 spots.

will_spurs
06-23-2011, 02:33 PM
I wouldn't have used the word smoking, but she's cute.

Hard to tell before meeting her for real. Charm doesn't translate well to photography.

DPG21920
06-23-2011, 02:34 PM
I literally don't see any kings trade that can be beneficial this year by itself unless it includes Cousins. Even if they do dump RJ with TP the best you get back is Casspi 7th Garcia. Awful

TDMVPDPOY
06-23-2011, 02:35 PM
the decoy only works if we can get that lottery pick or that team to pick for us...other then that bless ur hatchings

Mr.Bottomtooth
06-23-2011, 02:38 PM
Best trade we can do? Add in the picks.

http://games.espn.go.com/nba/tradeMachine?tradeId=68gjfs5

DPG21920
06-23-2011, 02:41 PM
I'd do that. It's 1000x better than what's being discussed.You aren't getting Cousins for TP though ESP if you are taking RJ

TheProfessor
06-23-2011, 02:42 PM
Best trade we can do? Add in the picks.

http://games.espn.go.com/nba/tradeMachine?tradeId=68gjfs5
I think Cousins and Pop on the same sideline would make for an excellent sitcom.

baseline bum
06-23-2011, 02:47 PM
That TP trade with the Kings looks horrible. If the Spurs do it, it'd be time to blow everything up.

Including the fucking front office? :pctoss

timvp
06-23-2011, 02:47 PM
What I could see happening with Kings:

Tony Parker and Richard Jefferson for Omri Casspi, Jason Thompson, Francisco Garcia and the 7th overall (which I think the Spurs would actually realistically target Klay Thompson).

This trade still isn't very good and would end any championship hopes ... but the FO would pull the trigger just to dump RJ's contract while still getting decent talent in return.

Agloco
06-23-2011, 02:49 PM
Cavs reportedly trying to get Parker now too. I'm guessing they're dangling #4 and some players, that'd free them up to take Williams #1.

I don't see anyone from that squad that would be worth it. Pass.

Varejao perhaps?

We'd need a PG too though.

timvp
06-23-2011, 02:50 PM
Including the fucking front office? :pctoss

Yeah if the FO only semi blows this team up and ruins any chance of a quick rebuild, that'd be inexcusable.

Mr.Bottomtooth
06-23-2011, 02:51 PM
I seriously don't get why they're after Thompson so hard. Neal has a long time ahead of him since his job is just to shoot, and there's potential with Anderson. Do they honestly think Blair and Splitter could be the frontcourt of the future? :vomit: It has to be Valanciunas. It just has to.

will_spurs
06-23-2011, 02:52 PM
Varejao perhaps?

We'd need a PG too though.

Varejao is the best player they can include in a trade. And they have 3 PGs (see previous page for more info), but Baron Davis is their RJ and they probably want to move him before moving any of the other 2 PGs (Gibson and Sessions).

Agloco
06-23-2011, 02:52 PM
Including the fucking front office? :pctoss


What I could see happening with Kings:

Tony Parker and Richard Jefferson for Omri Casspi, Jason Thompson, Francisco Garcia and the 7th overall (which I think the Spurs would actually realistically target Klay Thompson).

This trade still isn't very good and would end any championship hopes ... but the FO would pull the trigger just to dump RJ's contract while still getting decent talent in return.

Would either of you be opposed to seeing Cousins come over instead of Thompson?

ace3g
06-23-2011, 02:52 PM
WojYahooNBA Adrian Wojnarowski
There's sense Kings could be leveraging Spurs with leak of possible deal in place for 7th pick. Kings don't want Jefferson in Parker deal.

loveforthegame
06-23-2011, 02:52 PM
WojYahooNBA Adrian Wojnarowski
There's sense Kings could be leveraging Spurs with leak of possible deal in place for 7th pick. Kings don't want Jefferson in Parker deal.
51 seconds ago

Dex
06-23-2011, 02:52 PM
The Richard Jefferson signing just starts to look worse and worse and worse.

Mr.Bottomtooth
06-23-2011, 02:53 PM
@WojYahooNBA
Adrian Wojnarowski
There's sense Kings could be leveraging Spurs with leak of possible deal in place for 7th pick. Kings don't want Jefferson in Parker deal.

http://twitter.com/#!/WojYahooNBA/status/83985544522121216

Sacramento can be hustling us. Fucking Sacramento.

manufan10
06-23-2011, 02:53 PM
WojYahooNBA Adrian Wojnarowski


There's sense Kings could be leveraging Spurs with leak of possible deal in place for 7th pick. Kings don't want Jefferson in Parker deal.

Ditty
06-23-2011, 02:53 PM
What I could see happening with Kings:

Tony Parker and Richard Jefferson for Omri Casspi, Jason Thompson, Francisco Garcia and the 7th overall (which I think the Spurs would actually realistically target Klay Thompson).

This trade still isn't very good and would end any championship hopes ... but the FO would pull the trigger just to dump RJ's contract while still getting decent talent in return.


Take Garcia out, and I would like that.I would love for the Spurs to try to trade the 7th pick to Bobcats for the 9th and 19th pick...Spurs can get Biyombo, and Harris with those pick,and Spurs could use Tony's TE for a point guard. That could go well, and Spurs can still use George Hill as an option for a trade with Utah. I doubt though Spurs would want 4 1st round draft picks.

DPG21920
06-23-2011, 02:53 PM
:lmao Klay Thompson. This is a nightmare. Spurs can't be this foolish. I know RJ sucks, but it's Parker we are talking about.

If they want K:lolay Th:lolmpson they don't need to give up TP for him.

While replacing RJ w Casspi/Garcia (if healthy) is an immediate upgrade, and Thompson is serviceable, wasting a pick on Thompson deflates everything and the gap between hill and TP is likely too large to overcome

manufan10
06-23-2011, 02:53 PM
:lol

Everyone posts at the same time.

manufan10
06-23-2011, 02:54 PM
:lol

Double post

TheProfessor
06-23-2011, 02:54 PM
Cockblocked by Cleveland and hustled by Sacramento. Fun times.

Agloco
06-23-2011, 02:54 PM
Varejao is the best player they can include in a trade. And they have 3 PGs (see previous page for more info), but Baron Davis is their RJ and they probably want to move him before moving any of the other 2 PGs (Gibson and Sessions).

As is the case with Parker for us (sorry to the CoM :lol). Seems apropos no? And I was thinking that Sessions would be the best fit at PG in that scenario.

Ditty
06-23-2011, 02:55 PM
Tell Kings to suck it then, while they stay horrible, if they don't want RJ, they certainly not going to get better with Felton as there point guard.

Mr.Bottomtooth
06-23-2011, 02:55 PM
Cockblocked by Cleveland and hustled by Sacramento. Fun times.

All but concludes a horrible draft night we can already foreshadow.

Mr.Bottomtooth
06-23-2011, 02:56 PM
Tell Kings to suck it then, while they stay horrible, if they don't want RJ, they certainly not going to get better with Felton as there point guard.

The way rumors have been swirling I wouldn't doubt San Antonio giving in at all.

timvp
06-23-2011, 02:57 PM
Would either of you be opposed to seeing Cousins come over instead of Thompson?

I'd take Cousins over Thompson ... but the Kings are very doubtful to give up Cousins. He's a building block for them.

will_spurs
06-23-2011, 02:58 PM
As is the case with Parker for us (sorry to the CoM :lol). Seems appro pos no? And I was thinking that Sessions would be the best fit at PG in that scenario.

Well tbh if the Spurs managed to get back Varejao AND Sessions AND the 4th pick (and a good chunk of their trade exception) for TP+RJ I'd say they'd pretty much be raping the Cavs. I don't see it happening. Replace Sessions with Davis bloated contract and it wouldn't be so lopsided any more (but then the Spurs wouldn't pull the trigger).

nkdlunch
06-23-2011, 02:58 PM
I hate Cousins. And I only seen him play 3 games.

NASpurs
06-23-2011, 03:00 PM
Spurs always seem to be used as leverage. Nothing new.

baseline bum
06-23-2011, 03:00 PM
Would either of you be opposed to seeing Cousins come over instead of Thompson?

Cousins shooting 43% last year is a huge red flag, but I'd have to seriously consider that deal since he's still just a kid and has outstanding size.

timvp
06-23-2011, 03:01 PM
:lmao Klay Thompson. This is a nightmare. Spurs can't be this foolish. I know RJ sucks, but it's Parker we are talking about.

If they want K:lolay Th:lolmpson they don't need to give up TP for him.

While replacing RJ w Casspi/Garcia (if healthy) is an immediate upgrade, and Thompson is serviceable, wasting a pick on Thompson deflates everything and the gap between hill and TP is likely too large to overcome

There's a lot more wrong with that trade than picking Klay Thompson. Who the Spurs pick there is pretty much irrelevant. It's an era buster no matter who the Spurs select.

Fireball
06-23-2011, 03:01 PM
I hate Cousins. And I only seen him play 3 games.

Cousins has a bad work ethic ... and after the first thing that goes wrong in a game he either argues too much or loses interest. But this guy also dominated the Lakers frontline in a game I watched. Anyway, I do not think the Kings would let him go ...

baseline bum
06-23-2011, 03:03 PM
There's a lot more wrong with that trade than picking Klay Thompson. Who the Spurs pick there is pretty much irrelevant. It's an era buster no matter who the Spurs select.

I just cannot see trading him this year. Certainly Parker will be able to command a lottery pick next season when there are guys actually worth drafting.

Mr. Body
06-23-2011, 03:03 PM
I can't believe the Spurs so badly want to get rid of Jefferson they'd be willing to take this trade.

Kool Bob Love
06-23-2011, 03:05 PM
:nerd

Thank you Spurs for helping me forget about my problems. No Lebron james.

joshdaboss
06-23-2011, 03:05 PM
Comparing a complete scrub and bust like Jason Thompson, to a top-tier prospect like Cousins, is laughable at best.

objective
06-23-2011, 03:05 PM
This is a pathetic disaster.

Not because it would end their title window, that window is already closed. But because the idiotic, preventable mistakes of the past (Jefferson) are hurting the future.

Mr.Bottomtooth
06-23-2011, 03:06 PM
@DraftExpress
Jonathan Givony
Teams calling Sacramento about the #7 pick are being told it's already been moved. Problem is, no one knows to who, or for which player.http://twitter.com/#!/DraftExpress/status/83989004382502912

Vic Petro
06-23-2011, 03:06 PM
There's a lot more wrong with that trade than picking Klay Thompson. Who the Spurs pick there is pretty much irrelevant. It's an era buster no matter who the Spurs select.

I don't like the trade, but I don't think the "era" should have anything to do with it. The era is over already. Time to reinvent. Not with this shite trade though.

manufan10
06-23-2011, 03:06 PM
DraftExpress Jonathan Givony


Teams calling Sacramento about the #7 pick are being told it's already been moved. Problem is, no one knows to who, or for which player.

DPG21920
06-23-2011, 03:06 PM
If you get Cousins + the 7th it's ok.

DesignatedT
06-23-2011, 03:07 PM
If it's Casspi and the 7for Tony I'm going to kill someone. literally

timvp
06-23-2011, 03:08 PM
Maybe the Kings can throw in Mitch Richmond . . .

NASpurs
06-23-2011, 03:08 PM
http://twitter.com/#!/DraftExpress/status/83989004382502912 (http://twitter.com/#%21/DraftExpress/status/83989004382502912)

:wow:wow:wow

I guess we'll find out in a couple of hours who the mysterious team is

baseline bum
06-23-2011, 03:08 PM
If you get Cousins + the 7th it's ok.

I'd be shocked if it was that. Spurs fans, bend the fuck over.

baseline bum
06-23-2011, 03:09 PM
Maybe the Kings can throw in Mitch Richmond . . .

I'd rather get KJ. The Spurs have enough shooting guards.

Mr.Bottomtooth
06-23-2011, 03:10 PM
@GeryWoelfel
Gery Woelfel
Bucks appear to have deal with Sacamento for No. 7http://twitter.com/#!/GeryWoelfel/status/83989949619245056

Woops.

DesignatedT
06-23-2011, 03:10 PM
good.

DarkGinobili
06-23-2011, 03:10 PM
Lol

DMX7
06-23-2011, 03:11 PM
lol

The Btown Spur
06-23-2011, 03:11 PM
Bucks are moving up from 10 to 7?

NASpurs
06-23-2011, 03:11 PM
http://twitter.com/#!/GeryWoelfel/status/83989949619245056 (http://twitter.com/#%21/GeryWoelfel/status/83989949619245056)

Woops.

If that's true, I feel relieved tbh.

baseline bum
06-23-2011, 03:11 PM
@GeryWoelfel
Gery Woelfel
Bucks appear to have deal with Sacamento for No. 7
http://twitter.com/#!/GeryWoelfel/status/83989949619245056



Woops.

Please let this report be true.

DPG21920
06-23-2011, 03:11 PM
I just cannot see trading him this year. Certainly Parker will be able to command a lottery pick next season when there are guys actually worth drafting.

I agree and I wasn't making Klay the focal laughing point of the deal but pointing out it's an extra kick to the junk if that happens.

objective
06-23-2011, 03:11 PM
I might be starting to come around on a Parker trade, only including Ginobili instead of Jefferson. This way, the Spurs still get crap back, causing Duncan to retire. Send Splitter with them, because playing him as a Spur just "wouldn't be fair to the team".

Then Pop & RC can enjoy the next 3 seasons of wretched existence playing out with Jefferson and Bonner as their centerpieces. That should be their punishment. Same with the pro-RJ and pro-Bonner brigades on this board. They deserve it.

:lol

Bruno
06-23-2011, 03:12 PM
I may be wrong but I doubt Spurs will trade Parker. I would be less optimistic about Hill's future in SA.

Mr.Bottomtooth
06-23-2011, 03:13 PM
Does a broken down Parker trade trigger more desperation to get rid of Hill for a lesser pick?

Mr. Body
06-23-2011, 03:14 PM
I may be wrong but I doubt Spurs will trade Parker. I would be less optimistic about Hill's future in SA.

It sure looks like they'll trade one or the other. Since no one will take RJ with Parker, George Hill gets the boot.

objective
06-23-2011, 03:14 PM
Bucks boards are wondering if Jennings is going to be the Kings point. Maybe they're on the hunt for Jimmer?

DPG21920
06-23-2011, 03:15 PM
I agree, Hills value (whether real or not) should be at an all time high with what he's proven, a weak draft and all the TP trade talk.

joshdaboss
06-23-2011, 03:16 PM
If they trade Hill, that's a huge mistake. Parker is 29-years-old and plays 0 defense. The Spurs could get away with that with a prime Duncan back there correcting all of his mistakes. You keep Hill, he's far and away the better defender and isn't a slouch on offense. He's also about 10 years younger, and Parker yields more on the market. If you wait, whose to say Parker won't be just viewed as a bad contract that no one wants? Trade his ass, now. The writing is all over the damn wall, in bright red spray paint.

baseline bum
06-23-2011, 03:17 PM
If Parker plays 0 defense than Hill plays -2 defense.

joshdaboss
06-23-2011, 03:18 PM
If Parker plays 0 defense than Hill plays -2 defense.

HAHAHAHAHAH. You're saying Parker is a better defender than Hill? Is that what you're saying here????

baseline bum
06-23-2011, 03:19 PM
HAHAHAHAHAH. You're saying Parker is a better defender than Hill? Is that what you're saying here????

Yes

DPG21920
06-23-2011, 03:19 PM
My prediction: Hill to Utah for their pick.

baseline bum
06-23-2011, 03:20 PM
My prediction: Hill to Utah for their pick.

I don't like that at all unless Biyombo is still there at 12. I can't think of anyone else I'd be excited about at that number.

NASpurs
06-23-2011, 03:20 PM
http://twitter.com/#!/WojYahooNBA/status/83992112156254208

Woj: Milwaukee has a three-way deal with Charlotte and Sacramento, sources say.

MaNu4Tres
06-23-2011, 03:21 PM
I wouldn't mind a Hill to Indiana for their 15th.

baseline bum
06-23-2011, 03:21 PM
That makes my day to know the Spurs aren't landing fucking Omri Casspi for one of the franchise legends.

joshdaboss
06-23-2011, 03:21 PM
Attention: Is there one person on this entire message board, besides baseline bum, that says that Tony Parker is a better defender than George Hill?

MaNu4Tres
06-23-2011, 03:22 PM
Over or under this thread to reach 55 pages by nights end?

Bruno
06-23-2011, 03:22 PM
My prediction: Hill to Utah for their pick.

Well, it's been rumored on twitter by a radio guy an hour ago...

timvp
06-23-2011, 03:22 PM
Sounds like TP to the Kings is not going to happen.

Good.

baseline bum
06-23-2011, 03:23 PM
Attention: Is there one person on this entire message board, besides baseline bum, that says that Tony Parker is a better defender than George Hill?

You should stick with your old act of bitching about lack of ref love to the Miami Heat (of all teams :lol).

Mal
06-23-2011, 03:24 PM
Fuck me, Parker for Jennings + pick + fillers.

baseline bum
06-23-2011, 03:25 PM
What does anyone see in Hill's defense besides his long arms? It's hilarious (in a sad way) watching guys like Nash and Ray Allen mercilessly run this guy through screens for wide open shots all day.

ace3g
06-23-2011, 03:26 PM
WojYahooNBA Adrian Wojnarowski
Partial of deal: The Bucks get Stephen Jackson, Shaun Livingston, sources say. Charlotte gets the 7th pick and Corey Maggette.

damn I wanted SJ

MaNu4Tres
06-23-2011, 03:26 PM
WojYahooNBA
Partial of deal: The Bucks get Stephen Jackson, Shaun Livingston, sources say. Charlotte gets the 7th pick and Corey Maggette.

baseline bum
06-23-2011, 03:27 PM
Fuck me, Parker for Jennings + pick + fillers.

Que?

timvp
06-23-2011, 03:27 PM
Parker defends point guards about 23423 times better than Hill does.

DarkGinobili
06-23-2011, 03:27 PM
This thread is going to be huge. lol

Mugen
06-23-2011, 03:27 PM
I'd love for the spurs to trade Hill for a pick that becomes Singleton or Honeycutt.

backup pg is a need for this team regardless if Hill stays or is traded.

i wouldnt mind a trade with PHX:

RJ
Hill

for

Childress
13th
future pick/throw in

DPG21920
06-23-2011, 03:27 PM
Well, it's been rumored on twitter by a radio guy an hour ago...

I know. There's a lot of rumors out there and I was picking the one I saw as the most realistic.

Ditty
06-23-2011, 03:28 PM
George Hill is a better defender than Parker, but I would take Parker's defense IQ over George's anyday, how to defende a simple pick n roll..Please Spurs trade George Hill, and get Chris Singleton, or Tobias Harris.

baseline bum
06-23-2011, 03:28 PM
WojYahooNBA Adrian Wojnarowski
Partial of deal: The Bucks get Stephen Jackson, Shaun Livingston, sources say. Charlotte gets the 7th pick and Corey Maggette.

damn I wanted SJ

I wanted Jack all the way until this year, but I'd much rather have talented youth now. Trading Parker for a lesser vet would be horrible.

joshdaboss
06-23-2011, 03:28 PM
The deal we need to make is with Toronto. If we can get Calderon back, there won't be as much slippage at PG as one might think. It actually may be better for the team. He's a pass-first PG, which is what a PG is supposed to be. Obviously the pick is an added bonus and if we could somehow get Bargnani back, wow......... we stacked.

timvp
06-23-2011, 03:28 PM
Bobcats in ultra tank mode.

objective
06-23-2011, 03:29 PM
I'm so pissed off that Jackson is now unobtainable. If there was ever a chance to move Jefferson it was for him. But Charlotte preferred Maggette and his stupid contract + 7 over Jefferson's worse play + Hill which I guess would be the Spurs best offer, and I can't blame them.

nkdlunch
06-23-2011, 03:30 PM
What does anyone see in Hill's defense besides his long arms? It's hilarious (in a sad way) watching guys like Nash and Ray Allen mercilessly run this guy through screens for wide open shots all day.

Hill is bad at chasing ppl through screen. Parker is no better.

Hill is a better defender when the opponent has the ball.

overall Hill - mediocre defender. Parker - poor defender.

Cane
06-23-2011, 03:30 PM
Hill is a much better overall defender than Parker and who doesn't get burned by Nash and Ray Allen? They make young guys in their prime look out of shape and have skills that won't leave til they retire if ever.

ace3g
06-23-2011, 03:30 PM
WojYahooNBA Adrian Wojnarowski
Milwaukee's 10th overall pick goes to the Kings, source says.

chadfordinsider Chad Ford
Hearing Bobcats-Bucks-Kings deal includes Bucks get Beno Udrih and the No. 9 and 19 picks Bobcats.

chadfordinsider Chad Ford
The Bobcats get No. 7 pick from Sac. & Maggette. Kings will get John Salmons and the No. 10 pick.

baseline bum
06-23-2011, 03:31 PM
The deal we need to make is with Toronto. If we can get Calderon back, there won't be as much slippage at PG as one might think. It actually may be better for the team. He's a pass-first PG, which is what a PG is supposed to be. Obviously the pick is an added bonus and if we could somehow get Bargnani back, wow......... we stacked.

You're just full of horrible ideas. Bargnani is like a rich mans Bonner. If they trade with Toronto I'd much rather get a rebounder with some size like Ed Davis. With Johnson and Bargnani already there he could probably be had too.

timvp
06-23-2011, 03:31 PM
I'm so pissed off that Jackson is now unobtainable. If there was ever a chance to move Jefferson it was for him. But Charlotte preferred Maggette and his stupid contract + 7 over Jefferson's worse play + Hill which I guess would be the Spurs best offer, and I can't blame them.

Why care about getting Jackson if the era is already over? If you think the Spurs have no shot at another run, Buckets is the last player you should want on this team.

joshdaboss
06-23-2011, 03:32 PM
Hill is bad at chasing ppl through screen. Parker is no better.

Hill is a better defender when the opponent has the ball.

overall Hill - mediocre defender. Parker - poor defender.

I would agree mostly. I think Hill is a good defender, but the key is that he has potential to get much better, whereas Parker is only going to decline even more.

DPG21920
06-23-2011, 03:32 PM
What does Sac get for their pick

crc21209
06-23-2011, 03:32 PM
WojYahooNBA Adrian Wojnarowski
Milwaukee's 10th overall pick goes to the Kings, source says.

chadfordinsider Chad Ford
Hearing Bobcats-Bucks-Kings deal includes Bucks get Beno Udrih and the No. 9 and 19 picks Bobcats.

chadfordinsider Chad Ford
The Bobcats get No. 7 pick from Sac. & Maggette. Kings will get John Salmons and the No. 10 pick.

:lol So Salmons goes back to the Kings?

baseline bum
06-23-2011, 03:33 PM
According to this site Hill isn't a point guard. Against the league's best shooting guard the first two times they played Hill was a big part of holding Kobe to 13 of 45 shooting from the field. I'd like to see Parker try that.

Hill can defend one and only one type of player: a selfish guard who wants nothing but isolations. He's phenomenal in that role. Every other type of player he's lousy guarding.

loveforthegame
06-23-2011, 03:33 PM
As a Kings fan as well I don't get this trade for them. They couldn't wait to get rid of Salmons before and they're now taking him back? Desperate to get rid of Udrih maybe? He was actually one of the few bright spots last year.

joshdaboss
06-23-2011, 03:34 PM
You're just full of horrible ideas. Bargnani is like a rich mans Bonner. If they trade with Toronto I'd much rather get a rebounder with some size like Ed Davis. With Johnson and Bargnani already there he could probably be had too.

Bargnani is 7' tall. He blocks shots. He stretches it to the 3 as a 7' PF/C. He can put it on the floor. Ed Davis doesn't have the basketball IQ to play for a team like the Spurs.

joshdaboss
06-23-2011, 03:35 PM
Hill can defend one and only one type of player: a selfish guard who wants nothing but isolations. He's phenomenal in that role. Every other type of player he's lousy guarding.

Parker is pretty good at guarding Luke Ridnour. Just kidding, Ridnour torches him. lol @ Parker's defense.

baseline bum
06-23-2011, 03:35 PM
Bargnani is 7' tall. He blocks shots. He stretches it to the 3 as a 7' PF/C. He can put it on the floor. Ed Davis doesn't have the basketball IQ to play for a team like the Spurs.

Bargnani doesn't have the nutsack to play for the Spurs.

objective
06-23-2011, 03:35 PM
Why care about getting Jackson if the era is already over? If you think the Spurs have no shot at another run, Buckets is the last player you should want on this team.

Pretty simple answer: I want to be able to enjoy watching the Spurs as much as possible, entertainment-wise.

Jefferson sucks the life out of that when he's on the court. So does Bonner.

Even regular season games, watching them just plain sucks.

I would enjoy watching Jackson trot around like old days with the big three, even though he'd be limping and shooting like .167 or some other awful number.

Seeing Jefferson on the court SUCKS.

nkdlunch
06-23-2011, 03:35 PM
Bargnani doesn't have the nutsack to play for the Spurs.

do Bonner + RJ?

baseline bum
06-23-2011, 03:36 PM
Bargnani is 7' tall. He blocks shots. He stretches it to the 3 as a 7' PF/C. He can put it on the floor. Ed Davis doesn't have the basketball IQ to play for a team like the Spurs.

:rollin :lmao :rollin :lmao

LOL @ Bargnani blocking 0.7 shots a game in 36 minutes while Davis gets 1.0 in 25 minutes.

baseline bum
06-23-2011, 03:36 PM
do Bonner + RJ?

So we need more of that? I'm not following.

Cane
06-23-2011, 03:37 PM
LOL @ Bargnani blocking 0.7 shots a game in 36 minutes while Davis gets 1.0 in 25 minutes.

Lol @ thinking Parker's a better defender than Hill

nkdlunch
06-23-2011, 03:37 PM
So we need more of that? I'm not following.

Spurs signed both. Them signing Andrea is a possibility.

ace3g
06-23-2011, 03:37 PM
WojYahooNBA Adrian Wojnarowski
Here's one thing I'm double checking again: Salmons' inclusion in the deal. Hold tight. Getting conflicting info from sources on him.

crc21209
06-23-2011, 03:38 PM
OK so to sum it up here it is:

Bobcats get No. 7 pick and Corey Maggette.

Kings get No. 10 pick and John Salmons.

Bucks get No. 9 pick, No. 19 pick, Beno Udrih, and Stephen Jackson, and Shaun Livingston.

joshdaboss
06-23-2011, 03:40 PM
Bargnani doesn't have the nutsack to play for the Spurs.

A lot of the same things I heard about Nowitzki I hear about Bargnani. Granted, I know that he will never reach Nowitzki's level, but he's definitely a similar player, skillset wise. And with how much people hate Bonner on this board(unjustly, I might add), it would basically signify the end of all of his playing time, which would be a good thing in the eyes of most.

objective
06-23-2011, 03:41 PM
not sure I'm understanding this deal for the Kings. Move down 3 spots to swap out 2 years of Beno for 4 years of Salmons?

joshdaboss
06-23-2011, 03:42 PM
:rollin :lmao :rollin :lmao

LOL @ Bargnani blocking 0.7 shots a game in 36 minutes while Davis gets 1.0 in 25 minutes.

I'm not sure why you're comparing Ed Davis and Bargnani's shot blocking. I said Bargnani blocks shots, which he does. lol @ reaching for anything you can.

Vic Petro
06-23-2011, 03:42 PM
And the Bucks now have Jennings, Beno, and Livingston? Glut of PGs

Mr.Bottomtooth
06-23-2011, 03:43 PM
Ticket 760
BLOCKBUSTER TRADE IN THE MAKING STAY TUNED!

Ticket 760 STILL GETTING THE DETAILS BUT IT DOES AFFECT THE SPURS
http://www.facebook.com/ticket760 Woops again!

loveforthegame
06-23-2011, 03:43 PM
I thought the Kings were wanting a pg? BS? Maybe have something else lined up?

baseline bum
06-23-2011, 03:44 PM
By your definition I could call Richard Jefferson or Tony Parker shotblockers. :lol

cheguevara
06-23-2011, 03:44 PM
wtf

timvp
06-23-2011, 03:44 PM
Pretty simple answer: I want to be able to enjoy watching the Spurs as much as possible, entertainment-wise.

Jefferson sucks the life out of that when he's on the court. So does Bonner.

Even regular season games, watching them just plain sucks.

I would enjoy watching Jackson trot around like old days with the big three, even though he'd be limping and shooting like .167 or some other awful number.

Seeing Jefferson on the court SUCKS.

No offense, but if I just wanted entertainment, I'd watch an NFL game. :)

When it comes to the Spurs, I want championships. That's why I'm either for one more run or the start of a total rebuild. Some sort of hopeless farewell tour or a halfway rebuild would be the two worst scenarios in my book. In fact, that would end up taking away any entertainment value for me personally.

That said, I see where your coming from ... and the Spurs may very well do it just to sell tickets. For example, even if it makes perfect sense to trade Ginobili, I could see Holt vetoing the idea just so there wouldn't be a total financial collapse.

NASpurs
06-23-2011, 03:44 PM
Those motherfuckers are going to give me a heart attack.

crc21209
06-23-2011, 03:44 PM
Basically the TP to Kings deal is dead now that Sacramento has dealt their 7th pick to Charlotte. I was reading earlier that Charlotte is very high on Thompson from Texas, and we're worried Detroit would take him with their 8th pick, so this is probably why they wanted Sacramento's 7th pick so bad....

Mr.Bottomtooth
06-23-2011, 03:45 PM
Those motherfuckers are going to give me a heart attack.

:lol

joshdaboss
06-23-2011, 03:45 PM
By your definition I could call Richard Jefferson or Tony Parker shotblockers. :lol

Look at the 2 years previous to that. He's up over a block a game. I never claimed he was an elite shot blocker, just that he can change shots on defense.

NASpurs
06-23-2011, 03:45 PM
It affects the Spurs as in the deal with the Spurs is dead?

baseline bum
06-23-2011, 03:46 PM
That said, I see where your coming from ... and the Spurs may very well do it just to sell tickets. For example, even if it makes perfect sense to trade Ginobili, I could see Holt vetoing the idea just so there wouldn't be a total financial collapse.

Short term profit over the long term viability: the story of America.

baseline bum
06-23-2011, 03:47 PM
Barngani makes Bonner look like Dwight Howard on defense. No thanks.

crc21209
06-23-2011, 03:47 PM
It affects the Spurs as in the deal with the Spurs is dead?

Pretty much. It didnt say it "involved" the Spurs....

DPG21920
06-23-2011, 03:48 PM
It affects spurs bc they don't deal w sacto

NASpurs
06-23-2011, 03:48 PM
:lol

Your "Woops!" isn't helping either. That's twice in a row. :toast

DPG21920
06-23-2011, 03:48 PM
Bargnani has talent.

joshdaboss
06-23-2011, 03:49 PM
Barngani makes Bonner look like Dwight Howard on defense. No thanks.

If Parker is being traded, you don't agree that more offense will be needed? Bargnani scored 21 a game last year, and he scored those 21 in a variety of ways.

baseline bum
06-23-2011, 03:49 PM
Bargnani has a bigger vagina than Jefferson.

fify

crc21209
06-23-2011, 03:49 PM
:lol So now that I look at this 3-team deal, Sacramento got John Salmons (maybe) and the No. 10 pick, and traded Beno? What happened to wanting a veteran PG to lead the team?

ace3g
06-23-2011, 03:49 PM
Ticket 760
Here's the trade according to Chad Ford: 2 former Spurs Beno and Stephen Jax along with Shaun Livingston and the 19th pick go to Milwaukee. Charlotte gets the #7 pick and Corey Maggette and the Kings get John Salmons and the 10th pick

lol they are so behind, lol

baseline bum
06-23-2011, 03:50 PM
If Parker is being traded, you don't agree that more offense will be needed? Bargnani scored 21 a game last year, and he scored those 21 in a variety of ways.

If Parker is being traded I believe that tanking will be needed.

Mr.Bottomtooth
06-23-2011, 03:50 PM
@aamcneill48MoH
Andrew A. McNeill
If SAC does move the 10th and Salmons to SA for TP and RJ, RJ makes about $6 mil more over next 3 years. Salmons' 4th year is unguaranteed.http://twitter.com/#!/aamcneill48MoH/status/83999832741658624

I'm open for change, but please God no.

crc21209
06-23-2011, 03:50 PM
Ticket 760
Here's the trade according to Chad Ford: 2 former Spurs Beno and Stephen Jax along with Shaun Livingston and the 19th pick go to Milwaukee. Charlotte gets the #7 pick and Corey Maggette and the Kings get John Salmons and the 10th pick

lol they are so behind, lol

:lol Idiots....

DarkGinobili
06-23-2011, 03:51 PM
:lol:lol

crc21209
06-23-2011, 03:51 PM
http://twitter.com/#!/aamcneill48MoH/status/83999832741658624

I'm open for change, but please God no.

The 10th pick and Salmons for TP and RJ? HELL NO. If the Kings wanted TP so bad they would have offered their 7th pick when they had it, and a couple of their players.....

timvp
06-23-2011, 03:52 PM
Trading for Bustnani is the worst of the worst case scenarios. He's literally the worst defender in the league. Trying to rebuild around him, which Pop would probably try to do seeing how he loves Bonner so much, would be a colossal mistake.

Stay far away.

ElNono
06-23-2011, 03:52 PM
I don't think you can match a pick + Salmons for both RJ and TP. Some other players would need to be involved. Maybe Caspi?

joshdaboss
06-23-2011, 03:53 PM
If Parker is being traded I believe that tanking will be needed.

Why? I hate this attitude amongst Spurs fans. You realize if Manu didn't get hurt in the last game of the regular season(Popobitch should be fired), that we could very well have been hoisting another banner last year? If you don't believe that, you're just entirely too pessimistic. We're a better team than the Mavs.

objective
06-23-2011, 03:53 PM
No offense, but if I just wanted entertainment, I'd watch an NFL game. :)

When it comes to the Spurs, I want championships. That's why I'm either for one more run or the start of a total rebuild. Some sort of hopeless farewell tour or a halfway rebuild would be the two worst scenarios in my book. In fact, that would end up taking away any entertainment value for me personally.

That said, I see where your coming from ... and the Spurs may very well do it just to sell tickets. For example, even if it makes perfect sense to trade Ginobili, I could see Holt vetoing the idea just so there wouldn't be a total financial collapse.

I don't see it from a ticket-selling viewpoint. They can't sellout games now even with the big 3. I also haven't spent any money on the Spurs for tickets or merchandise since the re-upped Bonner, as I swore I wouldn't as long as he's on the team.

I just don't enjoy seeing slugs like RJ or Bonner stinking it up, regardless of contender status. The Spurs don't have to be contenders for me to enjoy watching them. Some of my fondest memories as a fan was the injury-laden lottery year. I watched nearly every game, and even though they were getting crushed, it was worth watching. There was intrigue . . . was Cory Alexander developing before my eyes . . . could Jamie Feick turning into a legit player . . . Wow, this Sasser kid isn't very good, is he? Oh well, he's not tied up long term or anything . . . Hey, the lottery's coming up! Maybe we can get that Colgate kid to help Robinson with our 5th pick or whatever . . .

Jefferson crapping around for 30 minutes? That's no mystery there, or hope. All misery. Bonner tooling about for 22 minutes, a constant reminder of front office mistakes . . . all misery.

MaNu4Tres
06-23-2011, 03:53 PM
I think I'm setting a personal record on the clicking of the refresh button tbh..

loveforthegame
06-23-2011, 03:53 PM
http://twitter.com/#!/aamcneill48MoH/status/83999832741658624

I'm open for change, but please God no.

No thanks!! :bang

That's worse than what the rumored offers before.

joshdaboss
06-23-2011, 03:53 PM
Trading for Bustnani is the worst of the worst case scenarios. He's literally the worst defender in the league. Trying to rebuild around him, which Pop would probably try to do seeing how he loves Bonner so much, would be a colossal mistake.

Stay far away.

I don't see many busts putting up 21PPG.

lmbebo
06-23-2011, 03:54 PM
if we are still trading with Sac for the 10th pic.

Then I expect it will be GHill for 10 and Casspi.


edit: Ghill and Danny green for Casspi works on espn trade machine due to Jerrels trade exception

ElNono
06-23-2011, 03:54 PM
Trading for Bustnani is the worst of the worst case scenarios. He's literally the worst defender in the league. Trying to rebuild around him, which Pop would probably try to do seeing how he loves Bonner so much, would be a colossal mistake.

Stay far away.

That would be the epic turd towers... Ginger + Bustnani! Both standing in the perimeter shooting 3 pointers while Manu and Neal play PF and Center. Brilliant!

NASpurs
06-23-2011, 03:54 PM
http://twitter.com/#!/JMcDonald_SAEN/status/84000639612493825 (http://twitter.com/#%21/JMcDonald_SAEN/status/84000639612493825)


McDonald: Guessing Kings-Bucks-Cats deal means Tony Parker remains in SA for time being. Unless something else is cooking.

Gee ya think?

baseline bum
06-23-2011, 03:55 PM
It blows me away how underrated Parker has been on this forum for so long. First it was Parker = Chris Whitney. Then it was "let's throw him away and hand the team over to Beno" and now it's George Hill mania. Unbelievable. Part of me would love to see the Parker haters get their wish to come true so they could see how bad the team would be in their scenarios, but I'll still be the one sporting black and silver when they go back to not giving a shit like the old days when you couldn't get 5000 people in Hemisfair Arena.

timvp
06-23-2011, 03:56 PM
Salmons and #10 for TP and RJ? WTH? Suddenly that Casspi trade looks good in comparison.

ElNono
06-23-2011, 03:56 PM
I don't see many busts putting up 21PPG.

In Toronto?























:lmao

Ditty
06-23-2011, 03:56 PM
I'm hoping it's Hill & Jefferson for #10 and Salmons

joshdaboss
06-23-2011, 03:57 PM
It blows me away how underrated Parker has been on this forum for so long. First it was Parker = Chris Whitney. Then it was "let's throw him away and hand the team over to Beno" and now it's George Hill mania. Unbelievable. Part of me would love to see the Parker haters get their wish to come true so they could see how bad the team would be in their scenarios, but I'll still be the one sporting black and silver when they go back to not giving a shit like the old days when you couldn't get 5000 people in Hemisfair Arena.

Yet -- the team seemed to do just fine while he was out and Hill was the starter. Just imagine getting pieces back on top of that. Real talented pieces. Case rested.

ElNono
06-23-2011, 03:58 PM
It blows me away how underrated Parker has been on this forum for so long. First it was Parker = Chris Whitney. Then it was "let's throw him away and hand the team over to Beno" and now it's George Hill mania. Unbelievable. Part of me would love to see the Parker haters get their wish to come true so they could see how bad the team would be in their scenarios, but I'll still be the one sporting black and silver when they go back to not giving a shit like the old days when you couldn't get 5000 people in Hemisfair Arena.

Truth be told, I don't think other teams are that high on Parker either.

baseline bum
06-23-2011, 03:58 PM
And Bonner does?

I'm not getting this reasoning at all. Because the Spurs have a Bonner and a Jefferson on the team already, they should trade good assets to get more Bonners and Jeffersons?

joshdaboss
06-23-2011, 03:58 PM
In Toronto?























:lmao

You don't score over 20 a game if you're a bust, I don't care what team it is. You're playing the same players that everyone else is. That should be common sense, but I guess it isn't.

DesignatedT
06-23-2011, 03:58 PM
Kings getting rid of a PG in Beno. Interesting.

MaNu4Tres
06-23-2011, 03:58 PM
George for Kings 10th?

DesignatedT
06-23-2011, 03:58 PM
I'd do Hill and RJ for Salmons and the 10th. No way I do Tony though.

objective
06-23-2011, 03:58 PM
http://twitter.com/#!/JMcDonald_SAEN/status/84000639612493825 (http://twitter.com/#%21/JMcDonald_SAEN/status/84000639612493825)



Gee ya think?

Maybe McDonald hit up those happy hour margaritas a little early today.

baseline bum
06-23-2011, 03:58 PM
Truth be told, I don't think other teams are that high on Parker either.

Parker should still get a top 10 pick next year as long as the team doesn't try to throw Jefferson in as an add-on.

objective
06-23-2011, 03:59 PM
George for Kings 10th?

Hope so.

Maybe Hill for the Bobcats' 9?

ElNono
06-23-2011, 04:01 PM
We'll be rolling out the all-softie Spurs team next season:

Calderon, Hill, RJ, Bonner, Bargnani

ElNono
06-23-2011, 04:01 PM
We'll be rolling out the all-softie Spurs team next season:

Calderon, Hill, RJ, Bonner, Bargnani

DesignatedT
06-23-2011, 04:01 PM
Parker hits 30 years old next year. His value will start to diminish but you don't get rid of him for John Salmons.

Mr.Bottomtooth
06-23-2011, 04:01 PM
Any Sac deal involving Salmons now for Jefferson is pretty much lateral, aside from contracts. Now it will only make sense if TP is involved. Salmons is basically a little less expensive Jefferson, so trading for him and the 10th with Hill doesn't really make the team better.

Spurs Brazil
06-23-2011, 04:01 PM
At the end of the day I want Parker to stay and Hill gone

NASpurs
06-23-2011, 04:01 PM
40 pages of draft chat when later tonight it'll be:

"With the 29th pick, the San Antonio Spurs select *insert unknown foreign guy's name*"

and a lot of "WHO THE FUCK?" posts.

It's going to be so anti-climatic. :lmao

baseline bum
06-23-2011, 04:01 PM
Yet -- the team seemed to do just fine while he was out and Hill was the starter. Just imagine getting pieces back on top of that. Real talented pieces. Case rested.

There are no talented pieces being offered for Parker that we have heard of. Only lousy pics and mediocre players.

DesignatedT
06-23-2011, 04:02 PM
Any Sac deal involving Salmons now for Jefferson is pretty much lateral, aside from contracts. Now it will only make sense if TP is involved. Salmons is basically a little less expensive Jefferson, so trading for him and the 10th with Hill doesn't really make the team better.

I'll take Salmons over Jefferson. Isn't saying much though.

DBMethos
06-23-2011, 04:02 PM
I truly believe that TP will still be a Spur by the end of the night. My only hope is that he uses these trade talks as motivation to get out there and bust ass next year. Especially when everyone in the media (who obviously never actually watch the Spurs) believes that Hill would be a competent PG replacement.

loveforthegame
06-23-2011, 04:03 PM
40 pages of draft chat when later tonight it'll be:

"With the 29th pick, the San Antonio Spurs select *insert unknown foreign guy's name*"

and a lot of "WHO THE FUCK?" posts.

It's going to be so anti-climatic. :lmao

I know. :depressed

timvp
06-23-2011, 04:03 PM
It's open season on Parker hating. A bad playoff run plus dumb comments = the haters are going to dominate the conversation. Spurs fans with half a brain understand his value.

You'd think that Ginobili getting hurt four years in a row in the playoffs and thus killing the team's chances would have some of the venom aimed at him ... but it just doesn't work that way.

baseline bum
06-23-2011, 04:03 PM
Parker hits 30 years old next year. His value will start to diminish but you don't get rid of him for John Salmons.

Can it really diminish any worse than Parker for shitty pick + shitty scrub? Any of the deals mentioned here are already worst-case moves.

joshdaboss
06-23-2011, 04:03 PM
We'll be rolling out the all-softie Spurs team next season:

Calderon, Hill, RJ, Bonner, Bargnani

Why is it those guys are soft? What's the criteria for that? A guy like Bonner hustles his ass off and tries as hard as he can on every play. He mixes it up. To me, that's the exact opposite of soft. Games aren't won by having a roster of 12 players with 40" verticals.

ElNono
06-23-2011, 04:03 PM
I would take Salmons over RJ in a second. I don't care if he ends up being a bust too. At least his last year isn't guaranteed.

ohmwrecker
06-23-2011, 04:03 PM
This love for Casspi is troubling. I would think Spurs fans would have learned their lesson with Turkoglu.