LOL Stephen "I Wanna Be Kobe" Curry

[Fat Hands]

OP's takes..

Curry is a chucker
Curry isn't a chucker
Kerr is a good coach
Kerr isn't a good coach
Donovan is a good coach
Donovan is a short timer
Thnder will beat the Warriors
Warriors will beat the Thunder
Klay is the best
Steph is the best
Durant is the best
Westbrook needs to go
Westbrook needs to have the ball
Westbrook needs to pass the ball

on and on and on

How can you not be right all the time?>

[DMC]

^It depends on which time you're referring to. The situation is in flux, much like your breasts.

[StrengthAndHonor]

Still wrong, Old dirty faggot :lol

[HarlemHeat37]

HarlemHeat37

:lol haven't logged in to ST in 3 weeks..have 20 mentions from lefty in my notifications, tbh..

Sorry, bro..it's over..

[LkrFan]

I bet DMC feels like:

https://cleanupjamaicaqueens.files.wordpress.com/2015/08/shit.gif

for making this thread! :rollin :lmao :rollin

[DAF86]

lol no.

You haven't had a discernible take in this entire thread. I've written the keys to success and they were followed by Kerr two years later. Don't try to gaslight me Philo.

Two years ago the "overrated chucker" Curry took 17 shots per game, this year he takes 20 shot per game. Apparently the key to sucess was having the "overrated chucker" take more shots. :lol

[DMC]

Two years ago the "overrated chucker" Curry took 17 shots per game, this year he takes 20 shot per game. Apparently the key to sucess was having the "overrated chucker" take more shots. :lol
I may have overstated his chucking slightly. Good to see he took it to heart.

[StrengthAndHonor]

I may have overstated his chucking slightly. Good to see he took it to heart.
Yeah, how about that. Spread on all 4's and take it all in and make sure you wipe it, cause it's bleeding Lol

[DAF86]

I may have overstated his chucking slightly. Good to see he took it to heart.

A somewhat of a meaculpa. I'm proud of you son.

[DMC]

Yeah, how about that. Spread on all 4's and take it all in and make sure you wipe it, cause it's bleeding Lol

I said I'd be the first to admit it if Steph changed. He did.

[StrengthAndHonor]

I said I'd be the first to admit it if Steph changed. He did.
:worthy:

That post, it deserves it...

[DMC]

:worthy:

That post, it deserves it...

:toast

[DAF86]

I said I'd be the first to admit it if Steph changed. He did.

In what way did he change? If anything, he's being even more of a chucker now.

[DMC]

In what way did he change? If anything, he's being even more of a chucker now.

His shots come in the flow of the offense now. The are no longer the team with the fewest passes before a shot. They move the ball well. Steph passes up looks now to get looks for others. His passing has improved in leaps and bounds. He's able to drive the paint now, one of the best in the league as you saw at the end of the 1st half and the end of game six. Credit Steph because he bought in to a change when they were fairly successful how they were. It's hard for a team with relative success to change how they operate. Kudos to the Warriors for doing so with a new rookie coach.

[DAF86]

I don't agree with that. Curry has always played within the rythm of the offense, outside a heat-check here and there. Mark Jackson's offense being shit is a different thing, tbh.

[DMC]

I don't agree with that. Curry has always played within the rythm of the offense. Mark Jackson's offense being shit is a different thing, tbh.

We'll have to agree to disagree, obviously. Even in 2013 I blamed it on Mark. Mark made Curry a chucker, for as much as he was.

[spurraider21]

tbh this has probably been curry's biggest chucking season of his career... most shots per game, a lot of his pull-up 3's off crossovers, etc. it just so happens to also have been his most prolific scoring season

[DMC]

tbh this has probably been curry's biggest chucking season of his career... most shots per game, a lot of his pull-up 3's off crossovers, etc. it just so happens to also have been his most prolific scoring season
So now you're calling him a chucker. Philo is going to Philo.

[spurraider21]

So now you're calling him a chucker. Philo is going to Philo.
no, it's just the closest he's been to being a chucker

[DMC]

no, it's just the closest he's been to being a chucker

If you say so.

[ambchang]

Got the under-performance in the Finals part down pat.

[TDMVPDPOY]

difference between kirb and curry,

cripple does stupid fade away 3s, t he other takes off balance 3s...

they make fluke shots look easy, while make easy shots look hard...why? sportscenter faggots?

[Thread]

difference between kirb and curry,

cripple does stupid fade away 3s, t he other takes off balance 3s...

they make fluke shots look easy, while make easy shots look hard...why? sportscenter faggots?

You fucked up again. Big deal.

tee, hee.

[DMC]

It never ends

[Clipper Nation]

This faggot was chucking like Jamal Crawford tonight.

[DMC]

He'll start up next season on fire again and they'll pour a 10 game lead on the league by mid February and they'll have learned from it and he'll get fewer minutes. That 73 RS wins debacle they chased this year was off script, and Kerr knows it, and he was complicit and that's his cross to bear.

[HarlemHeat37]

:lol DMC takes it for this year, tbh..he earned it..

Curry was never the same after leaving the Rockets series..had a historically great RS where he looked like the 2nd best PG of all-time to a top 10 player that can be great, but not consistently dominant..

Warriors as a team can look great, but not dominant without peak Curry..

[lefty]

DMC :lol

[lefty]

DMC :wow

[Killakobe81]

Steph went down not to the best player in the world but uncle drew ...

[Thread]

He'll start up next season on fire again and they'll pour a 10 game lead on the league by mid February and they'll have learned from it and he'll get fewer minutes. That 73 RS wins debacle they chased this year was off script, and Kerr knows it, and he was complicit and that's his cross to bear.

Media just has to figure a way to get that back to 72-10 and with MJ.

tee, hee.

[whitemamba]

DMC waiting to bump this thread like he about to eat for the first time.

[spurraider21]

28-49 from 3 in his last 3 games

absurd

[FrostKing]

28-49 from 3 in his last 3 games

absurd
Not really. I've shot better alone in an open gym which Curry essentially enjoys in Today's NBA and especially playing on the Warriors whom win whether his shot goes in or not. Like I said: alone in an open gym completely pressure free

[Monostradamus]

Not really. I've shot better alone in an open gym
:lmao :lmao :lmao :lmao :lmao :lmao :lmao

[FrostKing]

:lmao :lmao :lmao :lmao :lmao :lmao :lmao
90s Bulls practices were more grueling than Today's Warriors games

[Broly]

Not really. I've shot better alone in an open gym which Curry essentially enjoys in Today's NBA and especially playing on the Warriors whom win whether his shot goes in or not. Like I said: alone in an open gym completely pressure free
Log off.

[Corporal_Upham]

"Draymond doesn't fit"

[Corporal_Upham]

The evidence is there. You don't even need to acknowledge it.

Just because you can make those doesn't mean you should shoot them, especially in a playoff game. People like you swoon at that shit, but when it gets ugly, you join the chorus.
I can't believe this was actually a serious take

:lol

[Brazil]

this thread is one of the worst ST take ever tbh...

:lol DMC

[Killakobe81]

this thread is one of the worst ST take ever tbh...

:lol DMC

And the winner is ...:lol
the best part he defended the take and writes with an air superiority :lmao

[Corporal_Upham]

Don't compare Curry to Ray Allen. Pure shooter, perhaps, but his shots need to come within the flow of the offense.

You will eventually see it my way, you'll just be behind the crowd when that happens.


It’s like the buffet of horrible takes.

[Brazil]

And the winner is ...:lol
the best part he defended the take and writes with an air superiority :lmao

this is his usual self even when full of shit, be aggressive and arrogant as fuck about it... :lol what a fucking clown

[140]

:lmao

[spurraider21]

wasn't trying to dunk on DMC, but this had been the "official steph curry" thread of sorts, so i used this one

but :lmao at frosty... yeah i wonder if he saw all those "open gym shots" when curry had to get shots up and over anthony davis right in his face... the exact opposite of being open

[RD2191]

Not really. I've shot better alone in an open gym which Curry essentially enjoys in Today's NBA and especially playing on the Warriors whom win whether his shot goes in or not. Like I said: alone in an open gym completely pressure free

Uncle Rico?

[AaronY]

wasn't trying to dunk on DMC,
I am atm tbqh fwiw

[AlexJones]

Never ever forget DMC

[spurraider21]

"draymond needs to be benched or traded. he doesn't fit" was stealthily another incredibly shitty take buried within this thread

[spurraider21]

I personally think Draymond Green needs to be traded or just benched. He doesn't fit.


No team with Draymond green would ever succeed. :lol

Not to mention the warriors top two players are easy to defend.

What the hell are the warriors going to do when they Play the Spurs? Or the Bulls ( also overrated but will match up well with the warriors)

:lol


They are all getting better and better, he doesn't fit into their scheme. He's the odd man out. Trust me on this.


He's too short to be an effective 4, and as a small forward, he's a good defender but he shot 33% from 3 last year but he still takes shots. He's getting minutes because Lee is injured, but he'd be starting on another squad (one with lower playoff hopes). He doesn't fit for that reason, not because he's not a good player, but because the Warriors need a true PF, not a taller than average SF who hybrids into the role. Think Blair/center.

[timvp]

http://i.imgur.com/2pxugop.gif

[AlexJones]

DMC (https://www.spurstalk.com/forums/member.php?u=20665)

You should've punted the site June 2015.

[timvp]

To be fair, I thought the 2013 Spurs were trash (relatively speaking, of course) for barely being able to beat the 2013 Warriors. Turns out that the 2013 Warriors were a dynasty in the making and it was completely reasonable for the 2013 Spurs to struggle to put them away. Tough times in the prognosticating world, it was.

[midnightpulp]

To be fair, I thought the 2013 Spurs were trash (relatively speaking, of course) for barely being able to beat the 2013 Warriors. Turns out that the 2013 Warriors were a dynasty in the making and it was completely reasonable for the 2013 Spurs to struggle to put them away. Tough times in the prognosticating world, it was.

And the game has changed massively since then as well. Generally speaking, teams still prized bigs over all other players, and Will Hunting's point guard theory was still intact.

[timvp]

And the game has changed massively since then as well. Generally speaking, teams still prized bigs over all other players, and Will Hunting's point guard theory was still intact.

True, true. No one saw the seismic changes coming at the time.

[DMC]

"draymond needs to be benched or traded. he doesn't fit" was stealthily another incredibly shitty take buried within this thread


few people on this forum would argue that Curry is better than Parker. Parker hasn't exactly been on his a-game this year, but he's still the guy you'd rather have in a playoff game

[DMC]

True, true. No one saw the seismic changes coming at the time.



Therein lies my point: This Warriors team is misshapen compared to what they should be or could be. Some might think this is their pinnacle, but I've seen signs from them to suggest otherwise (saw it last season tbh). However, Steph plays the important role in the imaginary "could be" team, he just doesn't rely on bail out shots to do so because he has a game plan and executes it.

[spurraider21]

Yup. TP was the best point guard in the league for about 2 years or so

[illusioNtEk]

Wow... Curry is the best point guard in NBA history now. Nice thread bump... back in 2013 nobody saw this coming.... it's ok DMC

[R. DeMurre]

Even the best scouts and basketball minds are wrong about potential a good percentage of the time. It's an educated guess, and more knowledge is better than less, but it's still a guess. You can't see into a player's mind and know for sure how determined they will be, and you can't know for certain how or when their mindset or emotions might suddenly change for the better or the worse. Hasheem Thabeet and Anthony Bennett were consensus lottery picks, agreed upon by most experts, and Jokic and Draymond were seen as absolute outliers. Hell, Jonathan Bender might've been a superstar if his knees had held up. That being said, this 63 page thread does read like a thesis on basic humility and hubris.

[Pavlov]

:lol gotta love the love retcon and deflection attempts after using the word "chucker" in no less than 100 posts ITT.

[ambchang]

Thabeet was widely known to be a questionable pick and a project at best. It was a hugely questionable pick as the second pick, but it was at a time when bigs were supposed to be of some value.

Bennett was a huge WTF pick. Nobody expected him to go first in that draft, or any draft for matter. Granted it was one of the worst draft in a long while (nobody expected Antetokoumnpo to be what he is today), but picking Bennett was widely panned, even Bennett himself was surprised.

[DAF86]

To be fair, I thought the 2013 Spurs were trash (relatively speaking, of course) for barely being able to beat the 2013 Warriors. Turns out that the 2013 Warriors were a dynasty in the making and it was completely reasonable for the 2013 Spurs to struggle to put them away. Tough times in the prognosticating world, it was.

Not for everybody, tbh:


If he keeps this up Curry is a top 3 player in the NBA.

[DMC]

Yup. TP was the best point guard in the league for about 2 years or so

Tony wasn't the best PG in the league in 2014. :lol

Oh so now you understand statute of limitations.

During that 2 years Curry was ousted from the playoffs, once by the Spurs and then in the 1st round by someone else. It wasn't until Mark was replaced that the team began to play as I suggested 2 years prior.

:lol Philo needing a mulligan on this one.

[spurraider21]

Tony wasn't the best PG in the league in 2014. :lol

Oh so now you understand statute of limitations.

During that 2 years Curry was ousted from the playoffs, once by the Spurs and then in the 1st round by someone else. It wasn't until Mark was replaced that the team began to play as I suggested 2 years prior.

:lol Philo needing a mulligan on this one.
No mulligan needed. TPs play fell off during the course of that season. Curry being an overrated chicken and draymond needing to be traded we’re never accurate takes.

:lol desperately backpedaling out of your abortion level takes after dozens of pages of shitting in yourself

[DMC]

No mulligan needed. TPs play fell off during the course of that season. Curry being an overrated chicken and draymond needing to be traded we’re never accurate takes.

:lol desperately backpedaling out of your abortion level takes after dozens of pages of shitting in yourself

Chicken curry is overrated but I never called Curry a chicken. I called him out for being a chucker. Plenty here jumped aboard that wagon as the seasons progressed until Kerr was hired.

"Parker hasn't exactly been on his a-game this year, but he's still the guy you'd rather have in a playoff game"

Philo wanting to employ a double standard - expiration date for this take but keeps bumping a 6 year old take.

[LeGiannis]

Chicken curry is overrated but I never called Curry a chicken. I called him out for being a chucker. Plenty here jumped aboard that wagon as the seasons progressed until Kerr was hired.

"Parker hasn't exactly been on his a-game this year, but he's still the guy you'd rather have in a playoff game"

Philo wanting to employ a double standard - expiration date for this take but keeps bumping a 6 year old take.

LOL There is no expiration date when you call a future first-ballot hall-of-famer an overrated chucker. This shit will stick to you for as long as Spurstalk exists LMAO.

[spurraider21]

Chicken curry is overrated but I never called Curry a chicken. I called him out for being a chucker. Plenty here jumped aboard that wagon as the seasons progressed until Kerr was hired.

"Parker hasn't exactly been on his a-game this year, but he's still the guy you'd rather have in a playoff game"

Philo wanting to employ a double standard - expiration date for this take but keeps bumping a 6 year old take.
thats not a double standard. parker was declining, but he was still the more known commodity than curry at the time. over the course of the season it became more clear that parker was declining and not merely slumping, while curry kept ascending.

but you called him an overrated chucker, wannabe kobe, and thought green needed to be traded because he didnt fit. its not as though green wasn't fitting in at the time either :lol. that didnt make sense then or now.

[ambchang]

Chicken curry is overrated but I never called Curry a chicken. I called him out for being a chucker. Plenty here jumped aboard that wagon as the seasons progressed until Kerr was hired.

"Parker hasn't exactly been on his a-game this year, but he's still the guy you'd rather have in a playoff game"

Philo wanting to employ a double standard - expiration date for this take but keeps bumping a 6 year old take.

Chicken curry is not overrated. It’s the second best curry behind curry beef brisket when done right.

I’d have thought you’d at least get food rankings right.

[DMC]

thats not a double standard. parker was declining, but he was still the more known commodity than curry at the time. over the course of the season it became more clear that parker was declining and not merely slumping, while curry kept ascending.

but you called him an overrated chucker, wannabe kobe, and thought green needed to be traded because he didnt fit. its not as though green wasn't fitting in at the time either :lol. that didnt make sense then or now.

Philo, take your loss. You never even showed up during the years Curry shit the bed. You just pop in for crumbs now and then. Boring.

[DMC]

Chicken curry is not overrated. It’s the second best curry behind curry beef brisket when done right.

I’d have thought you’d at least get food rankings right.

It was a play on Philo using "chicken" instead of "chucker".

Don't they have humor on that caravan toward the US?

[ambchang]

It was a play on Philo using "chicken" instead of "chucker".

Don't they have humor on that caravan toward the US?

Well duh.

[spurraider21]

Philo, take your loss. You never even showed up during the years Curry shit the bed. You just pop in for crumbs now and then. Boring.
:lol oh ok. Tell me which years i didn’t show up

or have you already waived your white flag and are just attacking a phone typo?

[Will Hunting]

And the game has changed massively since then as well. Generally speaking, teams still prized bigs over all other players, and Will Hunting (https://www.spurstalk.com/forums/member.php?u=17032)'s point guard theory was still intact.
The only year you could reasonably say was an exception to my PG theory is 2015, and even then Curry played like shit in the finals getting guarded by Dellavad:lolva, but they were playing against a Cavs team with the 2nd and 3rd best player injured so the giant talent disparity was enough to overcome his poor play. The stars aligned for Golden State that year. No healthy OKC team to give them any kind of challenge in the West, and without Irving or Love the Cavs were maybe an even worse finals team than the 2007 Cavs were.

I’ve also never denied that there isn’t the occasional transcendent talent, team loaded with talent up and down its roster where it just so happens the PG is the most talented of the bunch, or team that is in the right place at the right time and wins in a historically weak year (in the case of the 2015 Warriors, it’s all of the above). The Warriors are perfectly constructed to prevent all of the defensive tactics that might actually stop Curry. Klaynus takes away any ability to put a bigger defender on Curry because of his size and how good he is at shooting over smaller players. The other wings Golden State has won with (Iggy, Durant, Harrison Barnes) are also all 6’6” and over which more or less forced the other team to put its PG on Curry.

Curry is also unique in that he can influence the game as a PG without needing to dominate the ball the way nearly every other elite PG does. The success of guys like Irving and Westbrook is almost inversely related to their team’s success because them having a big night means no one else was touching the ball. Curry is able to be part of an offensive scheme that emphasizes ball sharing and fluidity to get open shots.

[spurraider21]

The only year you could reasonably say was an exception to my PG theory is 2015, and even then Curry played like shit in the finals getting guarded by Dellavad:lolva, but they were playing against a Cavs team with the 2nd and 3rd best player injured so the giant talent disparity was enough to overcome his poor play. The stars aligned for Golden State that year. No healthy OKC team to give them any kind of challenge in the West, and without Irving or Love the Cavs were maybe an even worse finals team than the 2007 Cavs were.

I’ve also never denied that there isn’t the occasional transcendent talent, team loaded with talent up and down its roster where it just so happens the PG is the most talented of the bunch, or team that is in the right place at the right time and wins in a historically weak year (in the case of the 2015 Warriors, it’s all of the above). The Warriors are perfectly constructed to prevent all of the defensive tactics that might actually stop Curry. Klaynus takes away any ability to put a bigger defender on Curry because of his size and how good he is at shooting over smaller players. The other wings Golden State has won with (Iggy, Durant, Harrison Barnes) are also all 6’6” and over which more or less forced the other team to put its PG on Curry.

Curry is also unique in that he can influence the game as a PG without needing to dominate the ball the way nearly every other elite PG does. The success of guys like Irving and Westbrook is almost inversely related to their team’s success because them having a big night means no one else was touching the ball. Curry is able to be part of an offensive scheme that emphasizes ball sharing and fluidity to get open shots.
yeah, in game 2 where he shot 5-23.

in the other 5 games he averaged 27 ppg, shot 49% from the field, 46% from 3... still averaged 5 rebounds 6 assists and 2 steals the whole series. thats the most overblown narrative in recent history tbh... mostly believed by casual white american fans who want delly to get credit for being an actual nba player

[midnightpulp]

The only year you could reasonably say was an exception to my PG theory is 2015, and even then Curry played like shit in the finals getting guarded by Dellavad:lolva, but they were playing against a Cavs team with the 2nd and 3rd best player injured so the giant talent disparity was enough to overcome his poor play. The stars aligned for Golden State that year. No healthy OKC team to give them any kind of challenge in the West, and without Irving or Love the Cavs were maybe an even worse finals team than the 2007 Cavs were.

I’ve also never denied that there isn’t the occasional transcendent talent, team loaded with talent up and down its roster where it just so happens the PG is the most talented of the bunch, or team that is in the right place at the right time and wins in a historically weak year (in the case of the 2015 Warriors, it’s all of the above). The Warriors are perfectly constructed to prevent all of the defensive tactics that might actually stop Curry. Klaynus takes away any ability to put a bigger defender on Curry because of his size and how good he is at shooting over smaller players. The other wings Golden State has won with (Iggy, Durant, Harrison Barnes) are also all 6’6” and over which more or less forced the other team to put its PG on Curry.

Curry is also unique in that he can influence the game as a PG without needing to dominate the ball the way nearly every other elite PG does. The success of guys like Irving and Westbrook is almost inversely related to their team’s success because them having a big night means no one else was touching the ball. Curry is able to be part of an offensive scheme that emphasizes ball sharing and fluidity to get open shots.

The theory was definitely valid at the time, given the way the game was played. Post-Magic and pre-Curry, no title team really had a PG that could be considered a top 10 (or even 20) player in the league. Let's see: BJ Armstrong, Sam Cassell, Avery Johnson, Derek Fisher, Speedy Claxton (:lol), Billups, Tony Parker, who was probably the best of the group, but is overrated, the corpse of Jason Kidd, and Mario Chalmers. Now it's essential a team has a top 20 PG or pseudo-PG (Harden). They might not always necessarily be the alpha, but a Derek Fisher or Avery Johnson level PG would probably be too big of a roster deficiency to overcome unless the other 4 starters were superstars.

[HarlemHeat37]

The PG as your best player theory is still perfectly valid..

As Dok said, the reason Curry is different is due to his off-ball dominance.. he's one of the only players in league history who consistently gets doubled without even having the ball in his hands..

There will be plenty of emulators coming up, but you won't get another one like him..

[Will Hunting]

yeah, in game 2 where he shot 5-23.

in the other 5 games he averaged 27 ppg, shot 49% from the field, 46% from 3... still averaged 5 rebounds 6 assists and 2 steals the whole series. thats the most overblown narrative in recent history tbh... mostly believed by casual white american fans who want delly to get credit for being an actual nba player
So you took away his worst game in a 6 game stretch and the numbers look really good...cool. I could do the same thing in the other direction. If you take away his 37 point game 4, he averaged 23.8 points on 41% shooting.

I'll admit that saying he "played like shit" is an overstatement but his play wasn't the big reason they won that series, their elite defense was.

[Will Hunting]

The theory was definitely valid at the time, given the way the game was played. Post-Magic and pre-Curry, no title team really had a PG that could be considered a top 10 (or even 20) player in the league. Let's see: BJ Armstrong, Sam Cassell, Avery Johnson, Derek Fisher, Speedy Claxton (:lol), Billups, Tony Parker, who was probably the best of the group, but is overrated, the corpse of Jason Kidd, and Mario Chalmers. Now it's essential a team has a top 20 PG or pseudo-PG (Harden). They might not always necessarily be the alpha, but a Derek Fisher or Avery Johnson level PG would probably be too big of a roster deficiency to overcome unless the other 4 starters were superstars.
Calling Harden a "pseudo-PG" is a gimmicky way to try to argue with the PG theory, especially since there clearly is a PG on that team who's subordinate to Harden as the top option. No reasonable person would argue the Rockets are a team where the PG is its best player. One of the biggest factors behind my opinion of PGs is their size and the fact that you can't consistently rely on the shortest player on the court to close playoff games against elite defensive teams. Slapping the label of "point guard" on a wing who handled the ball a lot was something people who (for reasons I'll never really understand) got uncontrollably enraged every time my PG theory got brought up.

I don't disagree that winning a championship with someone like Fisher or Avery Johnson as your starting point guard would be difficult now and that your PG does need to be an offensive weapon to a larger extent, but that doesn't invalidate my theory. It's not like my theory was "you should have an unathletic slug playing point guard if you want to win championships".

Every team other than the Warriors that's trying to build around a PG as its best player right now has obvious flaws. The rest of the Celtics can't mesh with Irving, the rest of the Thunder can't mesh with Westbrook, the Blazers are choking away huge leads because Lillard gets thrown around like a rag doll and runs out of gas by the 4th quarter (they also overachieved getting to the WCF because of lucky playoff seeding), and there aren't any other top 8 teams I can think of with a PG as the best player. While I agree that you can't have a gaping offensive liability at PG anymore, I'd say its even harder to win as a PG dominated team now than it was 10 years ago. There's such an emphasis on ball movement that an offense where a PG runs around calling for pick and rolls would get run off the court by a team like the Bucks.

[Will Hunting]

The PG as your best player theory is still perfectly valid..

As Dok said, the reason Curry is different is due to his off-ball dominance.. he's one of the only players in league history who consistently gets doubled without even having the ball in his hands..

There will be plenty of emulators coming up, but you won't get another one like him..
Exactly, the fact such a physically un-intimidating player commands off ball double teams is transcendent and unlikely to be replicated.

If the people who like arguing against the PG theory just for the sake of it want me to change the theory from "Teams with a PG as their best player aren't built to win championships" to "You can't win with a PG as your best player unless said PG is a transcendent shooting talent who gets double teamed off-ball, but you'll still need to have a 6'7" 20+ point scorer at SG who's also a historically efficient off-ball scoring threat to make sure that larger defenders can't be switched onto said PG" then I guess I can concede that :lol

[spurraider21]

So you took away his worst game in a 6 game stretch and the numbers look really good...cool. I could do the same thing in the other direction. If you take away his 37 point game 4, he averaged 23.8 points on 41% shooting.

I'll admit that saying he "played like shit" is an overstatement but his play wasn't the big reason they won that series, their elite defense was.
its disingenuous to say "he played like shit in the finals" when he played like shit for 1 game out of 6 and otherwise played up to his standards.

nobody says hurr durr dirk played like shit in the 2011 finals because he shot 9-27 in one game and 6-19 in another.

[Will Hunting]

its disingenuous to say "he played like shit in the finals" when he played like shit for 1 game out of 6 and otherwise played up to his standards.

nobody says hurr durr dirk played like shit in the 2011 finals because he shot 9-27 in one game and 6-19 in another.
I already said it was incorrect to say he played like shit. Are you just arguing now for the sake of it?

[spurraider21]

I already said it was incorrect to say he played like shit. Are you just arguing now for the sake of it?
thats my MO

though tbh i didnt read past the first line, my bad :lol

[midnightpulp]

Calling Harden a "pseudo-PG" is a gimmicky way to try to argue with the PG theory, especially since there clearly is a PG on that team who's subordinate to Harden as the top option. No reasonable person would argue the Rockets are a team where the PG is its best player. One of the biggest factors behind my opinion of PGs is their size and the fact that you can't consistently rely on the shortest player on the court to close playoff games against elite defensive teams. Slapping the label of "point guard" on a wing who handled the ball a lot was something people who (for reasons I'll never really understand) got uncontrollably enraged every time my PG theory got brought up.

I don't disagree that winning a championship with someone like Fisher or Avery Johnson as your starting point guard would be difficult now and that your PG does need to be an offensive weapon to a larger extent, but that doesn't invalidate my theory. It's not like my theory was "you should have an unathletic slug playing point guard if you want to win championships".

Every team other than the Warriors that's trying to build around a PG as its best player right now has obvious flaws. The rest of the Celtics can't mesh with Irving, the rest of the Thunder can't mesh with Westbrook, the Blazers are choking away huge leads because Lillard gets thrown around like a rag doll and runs out of gas by the 4th quarter (they also overachieved getting to the WCF because of lucky playoff seeding), and there aren't any other top 8 teams I can think of with a PG as the best player. While I agree that you can't have a gaping offensive liability at PG anymore, I'd say its even harder to win as a PG dominated team now than it was 10 years ago. There's such an emphasis on ball movement that an offense where a PG runs around calling for pick and rolls would get run off the court by a team like the Bucks.

Yeah, that's basically my point. 10-20 years ago, if I were building a team, PG would probably the last position I'd be overly concerned about filling. Today, I would first try to find an athletic wing who can shoot or be developed into a shooter and then find an athletic 3 point shooting PG to complement. I think the Rockets' Achilles heel is the fact Chris Paul's game is still stuck in the early 10s, too midrange centric. So being an elite PG isn't enough, either (his game impact metrics are always solid over the regular season, top 15 in RPM). You have to be an off-the-dribble threat from 3. The Giannis+Bledsoe is probably the boilerplate duo now (Giannis is of course listed as a PF, but he plays like a wing), and if/when Giannis develops a 3 (I think for the Bucks to take it to the next level [don't see them beating GS], he's going to have to. His game will be too prone to paint packing), we could be looking at the next dominant NBA team.

[midnightpulp]

thats my MO

though tbh i didnt read past the first line, my bad :lol

"Philo'ing." :lol

[Will Hunting]

Yeah, that's basically my point. 10-20 years ago, if I were building a team, PG would probably the last position I'd be overly concerned about filling. Today, I would first try to find an athletic wing who can shoot or be developed into a shooter and then find an athletic 3 point shooting PG to complement. I think the Rockets' Achilles heel is the fact Chris Paul's game is still stuck in the early 10s, too midrange centric. So being an elite PG isn't enough, either (his game impact metrics are always solid over the regular season, top 15 in RPM). You have to be an off-the-dribble threat from 3. The Giannis+Bledsoe is probably the boilerplate duo now (Giannis is of course listed as a PF, but he plays like a wing), and if/when Giannis develops a 3 (I think for the Bucks to take it to the next level [don't see them beating GS], he's going to have to. His game will be too prone to paint packing), we could be looking at the next dominant NBA team.

I think the Rockets have the same issue Portland has, they don't have a long scoring wing. As you said, if you were building a team today, an athletic wing who can score from anywhere on the court would be the player you build around, and imo the Rockets don't have it.

[midnightpulp]

I think the Rockets have the same issue Portland has, they don't have a long scoring wing. As you said, if you were building a team today, an athletic wing who can score from anywhere on the court would be the player you build around, and imo the Rockets don't have it.

Harden is only like 6'3", so they should just move him to PG full time and trade CP3 for a wing, picks, assets, whatever. The Harden/CP3 duo is flawed. I don't even know what CP3's role on that team is anymore? Harden pretty much runs the show, so CP3 is reduced to an undersized SG who can pass. Kind of like when Manu and Parker used to share the court. Manu was the PG, while Parker was basically the SG.

[lefty]

1130682135248023553

[DMC]

"Philo'ing." :lol

:lmao

[LkrFan]

LOL... fucking overrated chucker
This thread aged well:
1130683951134076928
:lmao

[LkrFan]

Harden is only like 6'3", so they should just move him to PG full time and trade CP3 for a wing, picks, assets, whatever. The Harden/CP3 duo is flawed. I don't even know what CP3's role on that team is anymore? Harden pretty much runs the show, so CP3 is reduced to an undersized SG who can pass. Kind of like when Manu and Parker used to share the court. Manu was the PG, while Parker was basically the SG.

CP3's contract is trade prohibitive. Nobody touching it. :)

[AlexJones]

If durant didnt join this thread would've gotten the naruto treatment every day for the last 3 years

[DMC]

This thread aged well:
1130683951134076928
:lmao

This thread was started the last time your team was in the playoffs.

Consider that, pendejo.

[LkrFan]

This thread was started the last time your team was in the playoffs.

Consider that, pendejo .
:lol

-20 points for even creating this thread to mock the great Kobe Bean Bryant. :lol

[Chucho]

Turned out Steph is one of the players pushing Kobe out of the Top 15 of All Time...not that he ever belonged, but good to see Today's NBA pushing out yesterday's over hype.

[spurraider21]

Turned out Steph is one of the players pushing Kobe out of the Top 15 of All Time...not that he ever belonged, but good to see Today's NBA pushing out yesterday's over hype.
i dont think he's there. at his peak kobe was also a great defender. curry is a decent defender but he's not a standout, and he's not somebody that you can ever put on the other team's best player... if its a small guard klay usually takes over. thats why houston would aggressively target him (seems like they did so more last year). curry isn't an awful defender, but he doesn't have a prayer against elite players like harden. kobe would usually be up to the task when the chips were down

offensively is a different story

[DMC]

i dont think he's there. at his peak kobe was also a great defender. curry is a decent defender but he's not a standout, and he's not somebody that you can ever put on the other team's best player... if its a small guard klay usually takes over. thats why houston would aggressively target him (seems like they did so more last year). curry isn't an awful defender, but he doesn't have a prayer against elite players like harden. kobe would usually be up to the task when the chips were down

offensively is a different story

But like Kobe, Steph has seen other players take the Finals MVP, while he has none (yet). Kobe finally got one during ring 4. This could be ring 4 for Steph. Will he get the MVP if so?

[DMC]

:lol

-20 points for even creating this thread to mock the great Kobe Bean Bryant. :lol

Not coincidental you're defending a bean.

[LkrFan]

Not coincidental you're defending a bean.

:lol

[Arcadian]

It's really close between Bryant and Curry right now, but Curry is definitely on pace to surpass him. It doesn't even matter how good or bad he is on defense. We don't rank players by going skill-for-skill down a checklist. We compare them based on who was more dominant. Curry is more dominant than Kobe ever was.

[timvp]

Curry already passed Kobe, IMO.

-Curry winning three championships with the Warriors is more impressive than five championships with the Lakers. The built-in advantages the Lakers have (glamour team, best market, best place to live if you're rich, best team for marketing purposes) means they should always be elite. The Warriors were the laughing stock of the NBA until Curry arrived.

-More impressive peak. Curry getting dat unanimous MVP, breaking the all-time win record and becoming virtually unguardable is more impressive than anything Kobe did, tbh.

-Kobe in his prime not being able to make the playoffs is a more embarrassing low than anything Curry has experienced.

-Better leader. Didn't drive away his Hall of Fame teammate and cause his Hall of Fame coach to hate him. Pretty much did the exact opposite: welcomed a Hall of Fame beta and turned his head coach into a Hall of Famer.

-Speaking of Durant, Kobe was arguably the original Durant in that he demanded to be traded to the Lakers even before he was drafted instead of taking the alpha road of leading the Hornets to championship success.

I don't even think it's that close, tbh.

[TD 21]

Curry already passed Kobe, IMO.

-Curry winning three championships with the Warriors is more impressive than five championships with the Lakers. The built-in advantages the Lakers have (glamour team, best market, best place to live if you're rich, best team for marketing purposes) means they should always be elite. The Warriors were the laughing stock of the NBA until Curry arrived.

-More impressive peak. Curry getting dat unanimous MVP, breaking the all-time win record and becoming virtually unguardable is more impressive than anything Kobe did, tbh.

-Kobe in his prime not being able to make the playoffs is a more embarrassing low than anything Curry has experienced.

-Better leader. Didn't drive away his Hall of Fame teammate and cause his Hall of Fame coach to hate him. Pretty much did the exact opposite: welcomed a Hall of Fame beta and turned his head coach into a Hall of Famer.

-Speaking of Durant, Kobe was arguably the original Durant in that he demanded to be traded to the Lakers even before he was drafted instead of taking the alpha road of leading the Hornets to championship success.

I don't even think it's that close, tbh.

Don't necessarily disagree with the take and have always despised Bryant, but to be fair . . .

- Curry hasn't won a legit championship yet. The first, they didn't play a single elite team and the one they would have, their 2nd best player played less than 1 game, while the 3rd played 0. The next two they had the widest talent gap between them and the next closest team than any team probably ever.

- The unanimous MVP was in part because it was the first year were votes had to be made public. The other part was his being probably an unparalleled media darling. To be sure, he deserved it, but so have others.

- Begging an even greater player to join what was already probably the best team in the league, is an embarrassment. They all showed an astonishing lack of competitiveness, confidence and security.

[timvp]

Curry hasn't won a legit championship yet.

:lmao

[TD 21]

:lmao

Harlem, is that you?

At least I have legit reasons, unlike you claiming a title is automatically less impressive because of the city it was won in. Great logic.

[DMC]

It's really close between Bryant and Curry right now, but Curry is definitely on pace to surpass him. It doesn't even matter how good or bad he is on defense. We don't rank players by going skill-for-skill down a checklist. We compare them based on who was more dominant. Curry is more dominant than Kobe ever was.

Except Curry isn't the best player on his own team unless Durant is out. Curry would be the best player without Durant, but they reached out to him and Curry subsequently took a backseat. In my opinion that denotes a win first mentality, not a "me" first mentality, however in the halls of greatness where pundits argue about legacy, allowing someone to usurp your alpha role for 3 years (maybe a 3peat) puts Curry as a 2nd fiddle to Durant and 2nd fiddles aren't in the top 15 all time.

[Arcadian]

Except Curry isn't the best player on his own team unless Durant is out. Curry would be the best player without Durant, but they reached out to him and Curry subsequently took a backseat. In my opinion that denotes a win first mentality, not a "me" first mentality, however in the halls of greatness where pundits argue about legacy, allowing someone to usurp your alpha role for 3 years (maybe a 3peat) puts Curry as a 2nd fiddle to Durant and 2nd fiddles aren't in the top 15 all time.

He was the top guy in '15, and he might win FMVP next month.

[DAF86]

If the Warriors win it all, Curry will be only the 6th player in history to win at least 4 championships and 2 regular season MVP's (Russell, Kareem, Magic, MJ and Timmy). No shit he's already higher than Kobe in the all-time list.

[AaronY]

The only year you could reasonably say was an exception to my PG theory is 2015, and even then Curry played like shit in the finals getting guarded by Dellavad:lolva, but they were playing against a Cavs team with the 2nd and 3rd best player injured so the giant talent disparity was enough to overcome his poor play. The stars aligned for Golden State that year. No healthy OKC team to give them any kind of challenge in the West, and without Irving or Love the Cavs were maybe an even worse finals team than the 2007 Cavs were.

I’ve also never denied that there isn’t the occasional transcendent talent, team loaded with talent up and down its roster where it just so happens the PG is the most talented of the bunch, or team that is in the right place at the right time and wins in a historically weak year (in the case of the 2015 Warriors, it’s all of the above). The Warriors are perfectly constructed to prevent all of the defensive tactics that might actually stop Curry. Klaynus takes away any ability to put a bigger defender on Curry because of his size and how good he is at shooting over smaller players. The other wings Golden State has won with (Iggy, Durant, Harrison Barnes) are also all 6’6” and over which more or less forced the other team to put its PG on Curry.

Curry is also unique in that he can influence the game as a PG without needing to dominate the ball the way nearly every other elite PG does. The success of guys like Irving and Westbrook is almost inversely related to their team’s success because them having a big night means no one else was touching the ball. Curry is able to be part of an offensive scheme that emphasizes ball sharing and fluidity to get open shots.
it's dead man. move on

[AaronY]

And the "no big deal DMC was wrong in 2013. so what. nobody saw this coming back then" ignores the fact that DMC argued about it for YEARS and YEARS and YEARS after the fact even when it was beyond clear already. Kind of the whole point of bumping it now

[AaronY]

Anyway came here to post this:

"The Steph Curry (https://www.cbssports.com/nba/players/playerpage/1685204/stephen-curry) vs. Kevin Durant (https://www.cbssports.com/nba/players/playerpage/1231866/kevin-durant) debate rages on as the Warriors (https://www.cbssports.com/nba/teams/GS/golden-state-warriors/) are now 5-0 in these playoffs with Durant on the shelf. That mark is actually 6-0 as the Warriors were losing when Durant went out in Game 5 against the Rockets (https://www.cbssports.com/nba/teams/HOU/houston-rockets/) before Curry and Co. led a second-half comeback. The Warriors are now 31-1 in their last 32 games in which Curry plays and Durant doesn't, and since Durant arrived in 2016, they are 34-4 in such games.

In the four-game sweep of Portland, Curry averaged 36.5 points on 48-percent shooting including 42.6 percent from three. He has scored 33 or more in every game Durant has sat. He is back to being the primary playmaker, stretching defenses in the way only he can with the ball in his hands, and it looks like the old Warriors now with Draymond Green (https://www.cbssports.com/nba/players/playerpage/1992792/draymond-green)and Co. taking advantage of that space and the extra ball movement to find their own rhythm."

[Will Hunting]

it's dead man. move on
Great counter argument.

[AaronY]

Great counter argument.
Thx m8.

[AaronY]

th I actually really like DMC at this point so it was funny rereading first 15 pages of this thread just now lol. Forgot how involved I was in this thing at the beginning

[Clipper Nation]

Curry already passed Kobe, IMO.

Curry passed Kobe on draft day 2009, tbh.

[TDfan2007]

Curry already passed Kobe, IMO.

-Curry winning three championships with the Warriors is more impressive than five championships with the Lakers. The built-in advantages the Lakers have (glamour team, best market, best place to live if you're rich, best team for marketing purposes) means they should always be elite. The Warriors were the laughing stock of the NBA until Curry arrived.

-More impressive peak. Curry getting dat unanimous MVP, breaking the all-time win record and becoming virtually unguardable is more impressive than anything Kobe did, tbh.

-Kobe in his prime not being able to make the playoffs is a more embarrassing low than anything Curry has experienced.

-Better leader. Didn't drive away his Hall of Fame teammate and cause his Hall of Fame coach to hate him. Pretty much did the exact opposite: welcomed a Hall of Fame beta and turned his head coach into a Hall of Famer.

-Speaking of Durant, Kobe was arguably the original Durant in that he demanded to be traded to the Lakers even before he was drafted instead of taking the alpha road of leading the Hornets to championship success.

I don't even think it's that close, tbh.

Bbbbut Mamba Mentality...he was a killer :cry

In all seriousness, it's closer than anyone in Al-Kobe will admit to. They were both 1bs on multiple title teams, and Steph's like title without KD came against a hilariously depleted Cavs team kind of like how Kobe's alpha titles came in possibly the weakest Western conference in modern NBA history.

One quick point: until this WCF series, Curry had yet to have a signature playoff series to his name. Kobe has had many, including a few series against us, tbh (2001, 2008)

[ambchang]

The two biggest knocks against curry are:
A) he can only win on stacked teams; and
B) he never had a legacy setting/ career defining / dominant finals

So when you compare his career to kobe ... wait, what does kobe has going for him again?

[Killakobe81]

no qualms with amb's post above

but if true why cant KD have a similar case over Bird?

he has as many Finals MVp's as Bird two less regular season ones.
More scoring titles better shooting#'s

The only tangible things bird is clearly better at than KD is Passing and rebounding

Heis also a better leader (tbh) but that is intangible.

KD is the better:

Dribbler
Shotblocker
snooter
Deeper range
Better in transition
Pull up jumper
Fade away jumper
Faster
Taller
better dunker

his career numbers will dwarf Bird's.

[DMC]

If the Warriors win it all, Curry will be only the 6th player in history to win at least 4 championships and 2 regular season MVP's (Russell, Kareem, Magic, MJ and Timmy). No shit he's already higher than Kobe in the all-time list.

So THAT's the criteria that just came from your asshole.

Good to know.

[DMC]

The two biggest knocks against curry are:
A) he can only win on stacked teams; and
B) he never had a legacy setting/ career defining / dominant finals

So when you compare his career to kobe ... wait, what does kobe has going for him again?

Bullshit

You cannot call a team stacked because they drafted well. Klay, Green and Curry were all drafted. They won a ring without Durant. Iggy from the bench != stacked team.

[DMC]

no qualms with amb's post above

but if true why cant KD have a similar case over Bird?

he has as many Finals MVp's as Bird two less regular season ones.
More scoring titles better shooting#'s

The only tangible things bird is clearly better at than KD is Passing and rebounding

Heis also a better leader (tbh) but that is intangible.

KD is the better:

Dribbler
Shotblocker
snooter
Deeper range
Better in transition
Pull up jumper
Fade away jumper
Faster
Taller
better dunker

his career numbers will dwark

KD didn't play against Magic and Micheal or any of the legit centers of the NBA past other than some of his early years when he wasn't making as much noise.

Bird didn't quit and join Mike or Magic. By his own admission KD isn't as good as those guys.

[DMC]

Curry already passed Kobe, IMO.

-Curry winning three championships with the Warriors is more impressive than five championships with the Lakers. The built-in advantages the Lakers have (glamour team, best market, best place to live if you're rich, best team for marketing purposes) means they should always be elite. The Warriors were the laughing stock of the NBA until Curry arrived.

-More impressive peak. Curry getting dat unanimous MVP, breaking the all-time win record and becoming virtually unguardable is more impressive than anything Kobe did, tbh.

-Kobe in his prime not being able to make the playoffs is a more embarrassing low than anything Curry has experienced.

-Better leader. Didn't drive away his Hall of Fame teammate and cause his Hall of Fame coach to hate him. Pretty much did the exact opposite: welcomed a Hall of Fame beta and turned his head coach into a Hall of Famer.

-Speaking of Durant, Kobe was arguably the original Durant in that he demanded to be traded to the Lakers even before he was drafted instead of taking the alpha road of leading the Hornets to championship success.

I don't even think it's that close, tbh.

The 1st was impressive. The next 2 were no-brainers after stacking with Durant and all the leg riders that showed up.

[ambchang]

no qualms with amb's post above

but if true why cant KD have a similar case over Bird?

he has as many Finals MVp's as Bird two less regular season ones.
More scoring titles better shooting#'s

The only tangible things bird is clearly better at than KD is Passing and rebounding

Heis also a better leader (tbh) but that is intangible.

KD is the better:

Dribbler
Shotblocker
snooter
Deeper range
Better in transition
Pull up jumper
Fade away jumper
Faster
Taller
better dunker

his career numbers will dwark

Because bird man a three time championship team. He has the biggest one season turnaround in his rookie year until Robinson came along.

There’s no question bird was the man and the Celtics were built around him. Durant joined a team built around curry.

[ambchang]

Bullshit

You cannot call a team stacked because they drafted well. Klay, Green and Curry were all drafted. They won a ring without Durant. Iggy from the bench != stacked team.


Why is drafting well not allowed to stacked teams. You just have to have a bunch of great players to have a stacked team. Doesn’t matter if it’s through drafting or free agency.

On the topic of this thread though, some fatso are starting to admit he was wrong about curry. Maybe you should join the line.

https://www.nbcsports.com/bayarea/warriors/charles-barkley-admits-he-was-wrong-about-steph-currys-rank-nba

[DAF86]

So THAT's the criteria that just came from your asshole.

Good to know.

You trying to clown people, in general but, on this thread, especifically. :lol

[LeGiannis]

LOL... fucking overrated chucker

How dare you disrespect Steph Carry like that. Do you even pay attention to the games lol?

[RD2191]

Bullshit

You cannot call a team stacked because they drafted well. Klay, Green and Curry were all drafted. They won a ring without Durant. Iggy from the bench != stacked team.

This might be one of your worst takes. And that's saying something all things considered.

[spurraider21]

yeah it makes no sense given the argument.

nobody said "curry can only win with high priced free agent and trade acquisitions"... the argument was that curry can only win when his team is flooding with talent. whether that talent was drafted or later acquired is irrelevant to the argument.

[Mugen]

Dafuq...Steph had Kirby in his rearview about 2 seasons ago :lol

[DMC]

yeah it makes no sense given the argument.

nobody said "curry can only win with high priced free agent and trade acquisitions"... the argument was that curry can only win when his team is flooding with talent. whether that talent was drafted or later acquired is irrelevant to the argument.

:lmao

First Klay is a scrub now having him stacks the team.

Philo :lol

[DMC]

How dare you disrespect Steph Carry like that. Do you even pay attention to the games lol?

Another faggot alt

[spurraider21]

:lmao

First Klay is a scrub now having him stacks the team.

Philo :lol
a) when did i call klay a scrub?

b) i didnt say i even agree with that argument. but your post about players being drafted vs signed was completely irrelevant with respect to the argument that was posed

lol DMC

[DMC]

a) when did i call klay a scrub?

b) i didnt say i even agree with that argument. but your post about players being drafted vs signed was completely irrelevant with respect to the argument that was posed

lol DMC
You don't know what the fuck you agree or disagree with. You're a weird motherfucker.

[spurraider21]

You don't know what the fuck you agree or disagree with. You're a weird motherfucker.
changing the subject.

whether i agreed or disagreed with the argument was irrelevant. your bringing up the fact that the players were drafted and not signed/traded for was completely irrelevant, and still is, irrespective of my personal opinion.

now that deflection didnt work, i'm sure your next move is to boggle the discussion down into a debate of semantics

[DMC]

changing the subject.

whether i agreed or disagreed with the argument was irrelevant. your bringing up the fact that the players were drafted and not signed/traded for was completely irrelevant, and still is, irrespective of my personal opinion.

now that deflection didnt work, i'm sure your next move is to boggle the discussion down into a debate of semantics

You come and disagree with the words I use then cry foul when I point you in the right direction. :lol "semantics" coming from a fuckin' lawyer who's using semantics in his argument.

[spurraider21]

You come and disagree with the words I use then cry foul when I point you in the right direction. :lol "semantics" coming from a fuckin' lawyer who's using semantics in his argument.
i'm not disagreeing with your word choice.

your point that the players were drafted by the warriors was a completely irrelevant side point. your argument was flawed, not the specific word choice. but cry more about it, instead of just saying "yeah, that wasn't a good point" and moving on like a normal person

[DMC]

i'm not disagreeing with your word choice.

So you then are disagreeing with my thoughts? :lol


your point that the players were drafted by the warriors was a completely irrelevant side point. your argument was flawed, not the specific word choice. but cry more about it, instead of just saying "yeah, that wasn't a good point" and moving on like a normal person
In order for a team to be stacked, someone has to stack it. You don't stack through organic growth. You stack by compiling established superstars. You can have a strong team (Spurs) without stacking.

You're just misusing the term and then trying to cover your tracks by predicting I will call you out on it.

Just admit you follow me around like some little love struck girl trying to get some attention, you disagree without even reading (proven) and then you try to talk your way out of it by accusing others of doing what you're doing, being philopolemic.

[DMC]

You trying to clown people, in general but, on this thread, especifically. :lol

wtf

[DMC]

This might be one of your worst takes. And that's saying something all things considered.


Yup, pretty much ruined his legacy. Sad thing is he probably rings sooner than later had he stayed in OKC.


I can't wait for the day donkey is off the warriors. He'd be an absolute scrub anywhere else.


Damn, I had forgotten about that. Dubs are the biggest asterisk champions in NBA history.


No way in hell they get past the Spurs without KD. Kawhi was hitting his MVP stride before zaza took him out.


He's right. The dubs are one of the softest teams in league history. They'd fold like lawn chairs against the pistons.

:cry "but they stacked"

[DAF86]

wtf

Resorting to cellphone induced typos vs non-1st language speakers of English :lol

[DMC]

Resorting to cellphone induced typos vs non-1st language speakers of English :lol

:cry "muh fone"

That's the espirit

[DAF86]

:cry "muh fone"

That's the espirit

We can chat in Spanish if you want. That would save me the problem of editing every other word I type, tbh.

[DMC]

We can chat in Spanish if you want. That would save me the problem of editing every other word I type, tbh.

Saying Curry needs a stacked team to ring is estupid. He's never been on any other team. Who's in the stack? Himself?

[DAF86]

Saying Curry needs a stacked team to ring is estupid. He's never been on any other team. Who's in the stack? Himself?

You quoted the wrong comment, tbh.

[DMC]

You quoted the wrong comment, tbh.

No I didn't.

[spurraider21]

As a very fitting microcosm of this entire thread, DMC continues to double and triple down on stupid and goes down with the ship

[AaronY]

As a very fitting microcosm of this entire thread, DMC continues to double and triple down on stupid and goes down with the ship
hey man i dunno why everyone givin DMC a hard time I mean just because he had a bad take in 2013

..and then kept it going into 2026 is not really you know a thing or whatever

[DMC]

As a very fitting microcosm of this entire thread, DMC continues to double and triple down on stupid and goes down with the ship

Philo trying to narrate like anyone gives a fuck what he says. :lol

[DAF86]

No I didn't.

Ok, so why the fuck did you reply that to me?

[DMC]

Ok, so why the fuck did you reply that to me?

You wanted a discussion.

[spurraider21]

Philo trying to narrate like anyone gives a fuck what he says. :lol
yup. either deflection or heavy emphasis on semantics.

[Millennial_Messiah]

Kawhi will sting the fuck out of Eliancito next month. The Dublets got him in '17, but they couldn't hide forever.

[AaronY]

Kawhi will sting the fuck out of Eliancito next month. The Dublets got him in '17, but they couldn't hide forever.

Wtf does all this mean? (srs)

[RD2191]

:cry "but they stacked"

Epic meltdown, fat hands.

[DMC]

Epic meltdown, fat hands.

Mexican Bonnerific ^

[Millennial_Messiah]

Wtf does all this mean? (srs)

Kawhi will shut Elian Gonzales (Stephenie Carry) the fuck down. Raptors in 6.

[DMC]

Kawhi will shut Elian Gonzales (Stephenie Carry) the fuck down. Raptors in 6.

Who will shut down Klay Thompson? Danny Green is a good defender but he's not going to be able to stay with the movement of those two who seem to never stand still.

Kawhi is a great defender, but if Steph could be shut down by defense he would have been by now. He's not an X factor, he's the one they plan for if Durant is out. If Durant plays, it's going to get pretty ugly.

[Jonnyblue19]

No one is going to stop Steph. They will pick and roll the Raptors to death like they do every team. They aren't going to let Steph go one on one against Kiwi if he guards him. Gasol or Ibaka will switch once they have Looney set a screen.

This isnt the Bucks who go give the ball to Giannis and have him try to go 1 on 4. The Warriors actually have ball movement and shooters. They also cut to the basket too. Which is something the Bucks rarely did. If Draymond sets the screen and rolls he will destroy the Raptors with his passing or attacking the basket.

[Gagnrath]

i dont think he's there. at his peak kobe was also a great defender. curry is a decent defender but he's not a standout, and he's not somebody that you can ever put on the other team's best player... if its a small guard klay usually takes over. thats why houston would aggressively target him (seems like they did so more last year). curry isn't an awful defender, but he doesn't have a prayer against elite players like harden. kobe would usually be up to the task when the chips were down

offensively is a different story

Kobe wasn't ever regularly a top defender..... He had a few games or a series where he put forth effort and looked like a very good defender.... The rest of the time he basically caught his wind on that end. Kobe was less of a defensive talent than lebron.... Was he good when he wanted to be? Yes but Kobe's defense is like Aldridge's post game..... You see if often enough to kniw its there especially in the big publicity games but it's awol so often that you can never count on it.

[whitemamba]

Kobe wasn't ever regularly a top defender..... He had a few games or a series where he put forth effort and looked like a very good defender.... The rest of the time he basically caught his wind on that end. Kobe was less of a defensive talent than lebron.... Was he good when he wanted to be? Yes but Kobe's defense is like Aldridge's post game..... You see if often enough to kniw its there especially in the big publicity games but it's awol so often that you can never count on it.

Lol he has 9 first team all defenses. 12 Overall, wtf are you talking about. Lebron is at 5.

[LeGiannis]

Who will shut down Klay Thompson? Danny Green is a good defender but he's not going to be able to stay with the movement of those two who seem to never stand still.

Kawhi is a great defender, but if Steph could be shut down by defense he would have been by now. He's not an X factor, he's the one they plan for if Durant is out. If Durant plays, it's going to get pretty ugly.

Kawhi could shut down Steph Carry if he really wanted to. But it would take all of his energy on the defensive end. Kawhi would be too tired to be much help on offense.

[lefty]

Bump

[DMC]

Bump

Philo gets quiet when it suits him.

[lefty]

Iverson 2.0

[DMC]

Look at all the recent conversions. :lol

[DAF86]

This is still a very bad thread, tbh. Just let it die. :lol

[DMC]

This is still a very bad thread, tbh. Just let it die. :lol

You created a thread calling Curry a choker.

This thread is prophecy pure and simple. It's an insight you'd never get in your 3rd world shithole.

[LeGiannis]

Curry had his share of good and bad performances this postseason. He receives more defensive attention than any other point guard in the league. The other guys on the team benefit greatly from his presence, even when he doesn't have big scoring nights. Is he on the same level as Lebron James. HELL NO. But who is? Give it a break and just recognize Curry as one of the top point guards in the game (if not the top). Honestly, what other point guard would you rather have on your team? Kyrie The Cancer? CP-Choke? WestBrick? D'Snitch? Lollard? Give me a break. Curry is the best point guard in the league. He's probably in the top 10-15 players overall.

[DMC]

Curry had his share of good and bad performances this postseason. He receives more defensive attention than any other point guard in the league. The other guys on the team benefit greatly from his presence, even when he doesn't have big scoring nights. Is he on the same level as Lebron James. HELL NO. But who is? Give it a break and just recognize Curry as one of the top point guards in the game (if not the top). Honestly, what other point guard would you rather have on your team? Kyrie The Cancer? CP-Choke? WestBrick? D'Snitch? Lollard? Give me a break. Curry is the best point guard in the league. He's probably in the top 10-15 players overall.

Eh go fuck yourself coward.

[LeGiannis]

Eh go fuck yourself coward.

LOL. I interpret your remark as an admission of defeat. I won the argument.

[DMC]

LOL. I interpret your remark as an admission of defeat. I won the argument.

You have Giannis in a Warriors jersey, and you coattailed a losing effort. I'd say you lost before you started.

[spurraider21]

Philo gets quiet when it suits him.
he played poorly. that doesnt make him a chucker.

i've already been vindicated when the guy won consecutive MVP's and has been an elite player for over half a decade now

[Will Hunting]

Curry had his share of good and bad performances this postseason. He receives more defensive attention than any other point guard in the league. The other guys on the team benefit greatly from his presence, even when he doesn't have big scoring nights. Is he on the same level as Lebron James. HELL NO. But who is? Give it a break and just recognize Curry as one of the top point guards in the game (if not the top). Honestly, what other point guard would you rather have on your team? Kyrie The Cancer? CP-Choke? WestBrick? D'Snitch? Lollard? Give me a break. Curry is the best point guard in the league. He's probably in the top 10-15 players overall.
I call bullshit on him receiving so much attention. Klaynus and Durant make it impossible for the other team to switch bigger defenders into him and doubling him isn’t an option with a fully healthy Warriors team.

[DAF86]

You created a thread calling Curry a choker.

This thread is prophecy pure and simple. It's an insight you'd never get in your 3rd world shithole.

How's this for prophecy? :lol


I would still have GS as slight favourites but if they meet in the finals it will be tight as hell, and if the Raptors get HCA (which I think they can easily get), watch out.

If last year's Rockets team almost got them, then this Raptors team can definitely do the same. Toronto has a better Superstar than the Rockets have, and much, much deeper team.


Jesus Christ you're fucking stupid.

[spurraider21]

your "prophecy" had you picking the warriors to win the championship :lmao

with the caveat that they also might not win

[DMC]

How's this for prophecy? :lol

Saying you're fucking stupid was indeed prophecy.

[DMC]

your "prophecy" had you picking the warriors to win the championship :lmao

with the caveat that they also might not win

If they were at full strength they would have probably won in 5. Without their big stars they aren't at full strength. What was your position exactly? Oh that's right, ankle biting faggot.

[spurraider21]

If they were at full strength they would have probably won in 5. Without their big stars they aren't at full strength. What was your position exactly? Oh that's right, ankle biting faggot.
I had the warriors winning the series without Durant. I was wrong. Ankle biting faggot

[DAF86]

your "prophecy" had you picking the warriors to win the championship :lmao

with the caveat that they also might not win

I didn't mean my post, I meant DMC's implied take that the Raptors didn't have a chance in hell of ringing.

[lefty]

:D

[spurraider21]

16 3PM from breaking all time record

[Michael Jordan.]

Lmao this thread

[DMC]

Lmao this thread

Lmao Flynn. Get back to your vomit in the political forum, DJohn. :lol

[DMC]

16 3PM from breaking all time record

James Harden is number 4.

It's a 3pt shooting league now. Of course it will be broken.

[spurraider21]

James Harden is number 4.

It's a 3pt shooting league now. Of course it will be broken.
except nobody is currently on pace to surpass steph. oh, and...

steph will never win

draymond green needs to be traded. he doesnt fit. as opposed to david lee

:lol

[MultiTroll]

Chunko getting regulated in yet another thread. :lol

[ambchang]

This thread was a really low reward High risk type of take. Curry was haven’t ankle injuries back then and didn’t even get the max extension so even if fat hands was right it wasn’t some kind of insight told you so type of take that he could brag about.

Just not sure why it was made.

[Neo.]

http://i.imgur.com/WkkXIwQ.jpg
^The hand of a retarded faggot.
:lmao

[DMC]

except nobody is currently on pace to surpass steph. oh, and...

steph will never win

draymond green needs to be traded. he doesnt fit. as opposed to david lee

:lol
This doesn't make any sense. James Harden will likely surpass Ray Allen as well. No one ever said Steph wasn't a great shooter. I said it from the start.

[Arcadian]

This thread is an interesting time capsule of 2013 Spurstalk.

[spurraider21]

This thread is an interesting time capsule of 2013 Spurstalk.
me defending Steph Curry and Russell Wilson circa 2013

https://media3.giphy.com/media/3og0IHyZMxZNkNOWT6/giphy.gif

[DMC]

me defending Steph Curry and Russell Wilson circa 2013

https://media3.giphy.com/media/3og0IHyZMxZNkNOWT6/giphy.gif

https://wandervogeldiary.files.wordpress.com/2015/03/prison-rape-3.jpg

You until 2015 (that's you against the wall btw)

[spurraider21]

Good thing spacetime didn’t end before 2015

[lefty]

lol that ovation/game stoppage was over the top, he didn’t cure cancer ffs

But it’s fitting he beat the record in the arena where he had his breakout game

[DMC]

Good thing spacetime didn’t end before 2015

Your asshole cherry did though.

[DMC]

lol that ovation/game stoppage was over the top, he didn’t cure cancer ffs

But it’s fitting he beat the record in the arena where he had his breakout game

No, that mountain in California did that.

[spurraider21]

Your asshole cherry did though.
typical dmc fantasizing about male posters

[DMC]

typical dmc fantasizing about male posters

:lol

[Isitjustme?]

lol chucking faggot chucked his team out of their last chance



Golden State Warriors


STARTERS
MIN
FGM-A
3PM-A
FTM-A
OREB
DREB
REB
AST
STL
BLK
TO
PF
+/-
PTS


Harrison Barnes (http://espn.go.com/nba/player/_/id/6578/harrison-barnes), SF
31
4-10
0-2
1-2
1
3
4
1
0
1
1
1
-8
9


Andrew Bogut (http://espn.go.com/nba/player/_/id/2747/andrew-bogut), C
20
1-3
0-0
1-2
0
7
7
1
0
0
1
1
-8
3


Festus Ezeli (http://espn.go.com/nba/player/_/id/6587/festus-ezeli), C
23
0-2
0-0
2-4
2
5
7
1
1
0
1
4
-1
2


Stephen Curry (http://espn.go.com/nba/player/_/id/3975/stephen-curry), PG
40
10-25

2-8
0-0
1
3
4
6
1
1
3
2
-19
22


Klay Thompson (http://espn.go.com/nba/player/_/id/6475/klay-thompson), SG
42
4-12
2-4
0-0
0
0
0
3
1
0
3
1
-2
10


BENCH
MIN
FGM-A
3PM-A
FTM-A
OREB
DREB
REB
AST
STL
BLK
TO
PF
+/-
PTS



David Lee (http://espn.go.com/nba/player/_/id/2772/david-lee), PF
12
4-10
0-0
1-1
2
3
5
2
1
0
1
2
-3
9


Carl Landry (http://espn.go.com/nba/player/_/id/3217/carl-landry), PF
17
4-8
0-0
3-5
3
3
6
1
1
0
1
4
-7
11


Andris Biedrins (http://espn.go.com/nba/player/_/id/2427/andris-biedrins), PF
12
0-0
0-0
0-0
2
2
4
1
0
1
0
5
-1
0


Draymond Green (http://espn.go.com/nba/player/_/id/6589/draymond-green), SF
8
0-3
0-1
0-0
0
1
1
1
0
0
1
2
-3
0


Scott Machado (http://espn.go.com/nba/player/_/id/6644/scott-machado), PG
1
0-0
0-0
1-2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
-1
1


Jarrett Jack (http://espn.go.com/nba/player/_/id/2768/jarrett-jack), PG
32
6-12
0-1
3-3
0
2
2
1
2
0
0
2
-5
15


Kent Bazemore (http://espn.go.com/nba/player/_/id/6637/kent-bazemore), SG
1
0-0
0-0
0-0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
-2
0


Richard Jefferson (http://espn.go.com/nba/player/_/id/1006/richard-jefferson), SF
DNP COACH'S DECISION


TOTALS

FGM-A
3PM-A
FTM-A
OREB
DREB
REB
AST
STL
BLK
TO
PF

PTS



33-85
4-16
12-19
11
29
40
18
7
3
12
25

82



38.8%
25.0%
63.2%





No offense but you bumping this thrad is like making sure you have your fly unzipped before leaving the house in the morning..

:lmao

[TDMVPDPOY]

basically its him vs cp3 for mvp this season?

[lefty20]

1-13 from 3 today :wow

[lefty]

1-13 from 3 today :wow
Curry usually takes a lot of shots but it's ok because he usually makes them (except in the Finals of course), but this season he has been taking way too many shots, probably a bad habit he has gotten from chasing the 3 pt record

But it's not just "bad" shots he has been missing, he's also missing wide open 3's

His penetration and midrange games seem to have declined

I think Kerr should give him a game off tbh

[DMC]

Curry usually takes a lot of shots but it's ok because he usually makes them (except in the Finals of course), but this season he has been taking way too many shots, probably a bad habit he has gotten from chasing the 3 pt record

But it's not just "bad" shots he has been missing, he's also missing wide open 3's

His penetration and midrange games seem to have declined

I think Kerr should give him a game off tbh

He took a lot of threes last year but had a higher average. He'll be ok.

[DMC]

DMC dude is usually more right than wrong imo. I'ma go ahead and say his theory will be proven right or wrong in round 2. When he faces an above average defense and defensive strategy.

I'ma go ahead and say DMC will be proven right in round 2.

Hater called it (again). Warriors lost in round 2 after Curry chucked them out of the game.

[littleavery1948]

Steph Curry passes Kobe for most 20-point quarters in NBA history, per Warriors broadcast (Bob Fitzgerald is one of the worst of all-time). This is patently false, as Wilt Chamberlain and MJ are not included on any list. "NBA History" must mean since 1996-97.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hwKTTPhpXSQ

[MultiTroll]

Extremely stupid of Porter Jr.

Kevin Porter Jr.'s trash talk fuels Stephen Curry's fourth-quarter explosion in win vs. Houston Rockets (espn.com) (https://www.espn.com/nba/story/_/id/33190930/kevin-porter-jr-trash-talk-fuels-stephen-curry-fourth-quarter-explosion-win-vs-houston-rockets)

[spurraider21]

Antoniobanderas.gif

[Isitjustme?]

:lmao

[Isitjustme?]

Curry usually takes a lot of shots but it's ok because he usually makes them (except in the Finals of course),

Oh, naturally

[lefty]

Oh, naturally

I meant down the stretch

Yea he had a big game yesterday but again his teammates made the big shots

[DMC]

Antoniobanderas.gif

10 years later :lol

[Isitjustme?]

I meant down the stretch

Yea he had a big game yesterday but again his teammates made the big shots

lmao at him not making any big shots in that game

[lefty]

lmao at him not making any big shots in that game

Ok I lied


But it was about damn time

[Mark Celibate]

i dont particularly like/dislike Steph Curry either way, kinda neutral, but when did this "humble superstar" narrative begin to become a thing? not sure how somebody who stops to do the stanky leg after every made three while staring down fans, benches, etc can be called a humble player

[MultiTroll]

i dont particularly like/dislike Steph Curry either way, kinda neutral, but when did this "humble superstar" narrative begin to become a thing? not sure how somebody who stops to do the stanky leg after every made three while staring down fans, benches, etc can be called a humble player
His humble schtick is an act. He's a pompous asshat.

Just like he goes back and forth from ebonics depending on the interview / setting.

Fagic pulled the same fake bullshit.

[Thread]

His humble schtick is an act. He's a pompous asshat.

Just like he goes back and forth from ebonics depending on the interview / setting.

Fagic pulled the same fake bullshit.

...your Pop pulls the same stunt as well, Mult.

You've nary room, kid.

[Rummpd]

Most despised NBA stars/superstars

Green - carpet bagger
Irving - simply weird dude
Simmons - quitter
Curry / mouth guard, antics, wife who thinks lot hotter than is
LeRoid / could have stood against China now counts his rumored billion absolutely convinced he did roids and or HCG and probably still does
Davis - another quitter with vaginitis
Durant - great shooter but peripatetic ways and attitude just rubs me wrong way

Rest In Peace Kobe you would have made list

[LkrFan]

bZhPiw6yTts

[spurraider21]

10 years later :lol
Was an equally dumb thread then tbh

:lmao draymond doesn’t fit

[DMC]

curry lived up to this thread today, tbh


curry validated OP today, got bailed out badly through most of the 4th



ur giving a kobe fan's argument tbh... he played a pretty bad game, made some big shots, and they were able to win.

for the warriors sake, curry needs to clean up his act and go back to how he was playing during the regular season


You're starting to see the light.


his performance today was pretty indefensible, but it was also uncharacteristic


It was uncharacteristic of his play this season, but not two seasons ago. He used to do that all the time. He didn't just now invent it.

:lol

Bandwagon fan

[ambchang]

...your Pop pulls the same stunt as well, Mult.

You've nary room, kid.

Phil Jackson complained about officiating all day. So you have no room to complain about people complaining about officiating?

[Thread]

Phil Jackson complained about officiating all day. So you have no room to complain about people complaining about officiating?

Only pussies & assholes blame the officiating.

[Neo.]

i dont particularly like/dislike Steph Curry either way, kinda neutral, but when did this "humble superstar" narrative begin to become a thing? not sure how somebody who stops to do the stanky leg after every made three while staring down fans, benches, etc can be called a humble player

never understood it either tbqh

[JamStone]

Steph flexes damn near as much as Draymond now that he weighs more than 150 pounds. And the put em to sleep celebration is as obnoxious as the rock the baby Russ does. Not a fan of the “new” Steph.

But I guess...

“You either die a hero or live long enough to see yourself become the villain.”

[daslicer]

Most despised NBA stars/superstars

Green - carpet bagger
Irving - simply weird dude
Simmons - quitter
Curry / mouth guard, antics, wife who thinks lot hotter than is
LeRoid / could have stood against China now counts his rumored billion absolutely convinced he did roids and or HCG and probably still does
Davis - another quitter with vaginitis
Durant - great shooter but peripatetic ways and attitude just rubs me wrong way

Rest In Peace Kobe you would have made list

Green and superstar in the same sentence is laughable.

[spurraider21]

:lol

Bandwagon fan
i think curry is great

when curry had a bad game, i said he had a bad game but it was uncharacteristic of him

i still think curry is great

BANDWAGON!

[ambchang]

Only pussies & assholes blame the officiating.

Mult complains about curry being fake humble, you say he has no room because pop did it.

You complain about people complaining about officiating. Phil Jackson does it all the time. You keep doing it. Either you are a hypocrite or you keep doing things you have not room doing.

[daslicer]

i dont particularly like/dislike Steph Curry either way, kinda neutral, but when did this "humble superstar" narrative begin to become a thing? not sure how somebody who stops to do the stanky leg after every made three while staring down fans, benches, etc can be called a humble player

He looks like he's 10 years old, so they look passed his antics when it comes to showboating.

[KobesAchilles]

I’m just glad they stopped shoving his wife down our throats. As if she was an actual talented person we should give a fuck about. Every damn interview a couple years ago was Steph is great but let’s talk about the real star and the real mvp in his wife. Let’s give her a cooking show and a platform and ask her opinions on random shit that she knows nothing about and just praise her constantly bc she is Stephs wife.

[ambchang]

You guys don’t know what you’re talking about. According to ESPN curry is like mr. Universe playing basketball

https://www.espn.com/nba/insider/story/_/id/34061374/the-secret-strength-fuels-stephen-curry-golden-state-warriors

[Isitjustme?]

Steph flexes damn near as much as Draymond now that he weighs more than 150 pounds. And the put em to sleep celebration is as obnoxious as the rock the baby Russ does. Not a fan of the “new” Steph.

But I guess...

“You either die a hero or live long enough to see yourself become the villain.”

Nah many to most people still love him it's just a small group of die hard NBA fans. many are just mad that he beats their teams...or their narratives. Some of them would also seem to love basketball going some unwritten code thing where you can't celebrate ever and become as fucking boring as baseball is

[DMC]

i think curry is great

when curry had a bad game, i said he had a bad game but it was uncharacteristic of him

i still think curry is great

BANDWAGON!

You validated it. You said so right there. I have you dead to rights.

[DMC]

You guys don’t know what you’re talking about. According to ESPN curry is like mr. Universe playing basketball

https://www.espn.com/nba/insider/story/_/id/34061374/the-secret-strength-fuels-stephen-curry-golden-state-warriors

Well their other hero didn't make the playoffs again, and the backup is growing flowers on the side of a hill somewhere in California, from the mind of Kobe Bryant.

[DMC]

Philo missing after that turd Steph laid in the last game, and how they won anyhow.

[DAF86]

Philo missing after that turd Steph laid in the last game, and how they won anyhow.

Dude, nothing that happened from the moment you created this thread till now, will ever make you right. This is one of the worst takes of all time. Just be smart and let it die. Don't ever respond here again.

[DMC]

Dude, nothing that happened from the moment you created this thread till now, will ever make you right. This is one of the worst takes of all time. Just be smart and let it die. Don't ever respond here again.

:lol you spotty motherfucker, you couldn't boss a hair on my balls.

[DAF86]

:lol you spotty motherfucker, you couldn't boss a hair on my balls.

Dude, it has been almost an entire decade. Just take the L and walk away. :lol

[DMC]

Dude, it has been almost an entire decade. Just take the L and walk away. :lol

I'm not the one who bumped it, dipshit. Learn to read.

[Isitjustme?]

I'm not the one who bumped it, dipshit. Learn to read.

1536081459953295360

[Thread]

1536081459953295360

I God's.

Though I wonder if he'd give that Finals MVP up to put ma & pa back together again.

[spurraider21]

https://media1.giphy.com/media/12A3hKKsewxtGE/giphy.gif

[DAF86]

I'm not the one who bumped it, dipshit. Learn to read.

Yeah, but you keep trying to save face everytime it gets bumped. Just don't answer anymore and folks will get bored of bumping this shit. :lol

[lefty]

https://media1.giphy.com/media/12A3hKKsewxtGE/giphy.gif
:lol tbh

[spurraider21]

:lmao savage

1537673590879010816

[DMC]

Yeah, but you keep trying to save face everytime it gets bumped. Just don't answer anymore and folks will get bored of bumping this shit. :lol

Or option 2, you can go fuck your mother some more.

[Ef-man]

Dude, it has been almost an entire decade. Just take the L and walk away. :lol

Chunko keeps getting bukkaked ITT for not taking the L! :lmao :lmao :lmao

[Neo.]

:lmao savage

1537673590879010816

lol seemed pretty intentional too. but with all of the extracurriculars that smart instigates, he had it coming

[Isitjustme?]

Or option 2, you can go fuck your mother some more.

1538964823311908864

[DMC]

1538964823311908864

Interesting that you think any of this bothers me. :lol

[Ef-man]

https://media1.giphy.com/media/12A3hKKsewxtGE/giphy.gif

[spurraider21]

<3