Page 5 of 15 FirstFirst 123456789 ... LastLast
Results 101 to 125 of 365
  1. #101
    right about pizzagate Blake's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Post Count
    83,638
    When is the last time you saw Ku Klux Klan randomly marching thru a neighborhood

    Sort of the point here
    When was the last time you saw a KKK member begging a cop to let him breathe

  2. #102
    right about pizzagate Blake's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Post Count
    83,638
    If it is a private street the homeowner would own the street in conjunction with the other residents. My house at the lake is on a private street and my deed clearly defines the metes and bounds of the property that is exclusively mine and the metes and bounds of the property (including the street) that I own jointly with my two neighbors..
    The HOA probably owns and maintains the street, so no, the castle doctrine doesn't apply that way.

  3. #103
    Alleged Michigander ChumpDumper's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Post Count
    154,407
    If it is a private street the homeowner would own the street in conjunction with the other residents. My house at the lake is on a private street and my deed clearly defines the metes and bounds of the property that is exclusively mine and the metes and bounds of the property (including the street) that I own jointly with my two neighbors..
    You have the right to shoot someone walking down your street if you feel trhetened?

  4. #104
    #FreeDerp Monostradamus's Avatar
    My Team
    Dallas Mavericks
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Post Count
    5,560
    This message is hidden because Spurtacular is on your ignore list.

    still replying to me

  5. #105
    wrong about pizzagate TSA's Avatar
    My Team
    Sacramento Kings
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Post Count
    22,596
    This message is hidden because Spurtacular is on your ignore list.

    still replying to me
    I’ve got you beat with Chumpdumper still replying to me for now over a year

  6. #106
    Alleged Michigander ChumpDumper's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Post Count
    154,407
    I have to quote the stuff I'm commenting on. Would be confusing without the context. I can take the post number out so it doesn't trigger the poster I guess.

  7. #107
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Post Count
    43,448
    See, this is why I had to make it so I only see notifications from my friend's list.

    What a ty system where you still get quotes from people you have on your ignore list.

  8. #108
    bandwagoner fans suck ducks's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Post Count
    74,377
    "And, what it says is that you have the right to defend yourself, the lives of your family members, your home, and your property. That extends to your property. So, this is on private property," he said.

    Schmitt noted that in a time where residents are calling to defund the police and "violence [is] spinning out of control" in places like St. Louis, "somebody [has] got to do something about" prosectors like Circuit Attorney Kim Gardner who are "targeting law-abiding citizens for exercising their fundamental right of self-defense."

  9. #109
    non-essential Chris's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Post Count
    39,908
    if protesters were actually getting on their property or threatening the couple, this would be quite different. if an angry mob walked right by your house, much like how you dont have the authority to just snipe passer-byers off, you also dont have a right to point your weapon at them in a threatening manner. it's just a lesser offense.
    You actually do have the right to brandish your weapon. You didn't read my post from the AG...

  10. #110
    Mr. John Wayne CosmicCowboy's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Post Count
    44,134
    The HOA probably owns and maintains the street, so no, the castle doctrine doesn't apply that way.
    I didn't call castle doctrine. I said if it was a private road the mob was clearly trespassing.

  11. #111
    I am that guy RandomGuy's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Post Count
    51,121
    You actually do have the right to brandish your weapon. You didn't read my post from the AG...
    no.

  12. #112
    I am that guy RandomGuy's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Post Count
    51,121
    #MobRights #TrespasserRights
    Feel free to show where anyone was actually on their property. None of the available footage shows that. If they were smart they would have had their own cellphones out instead of guns. lawyers.



    Mus stain on her shirt was a nice touch.

  13. #113
    Believe.
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Aug 2018
    Post Count
    12,591
    Feel free to show where anyone was actually on their property. None of the available footage shows that. If they were smart they would have had their own cellphones out instead of guns. lawyers.



    Mus stain on her shirt was a nice touch.

    fat is lucky someone didnt shoot her the moment she began pointing the weapon

    and

    it would have been a justified killing

  14. #114
    Mr. John Wayne CosmicCowboy's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Post Count
    44,134
    By definition brandishing a weapon means you pointed it at someone. Based on the video both of them actually pointed their weapons...her more than him but they both did it.

  15. #115
    Savvy Veteran spurraider21's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Post Count
    100,825
    You actually do have the right to brandish your weapon. You didn't read my post from the AG...
    HQ special

  16. #116
    6X ST MVP
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2015
    Post Count
    81,091
    Feel free to show where anyone was actually on their property. None of the available footage shows that.
    Are you ing re ed? You can see it right off the bat. That's their property the rioters are on. That's not the street, which is way further back.
    TheGreatYacht See, these chumpettes don't bother to learn the simplest things as they call for their mob justice.

    Last edited by Spurtacular; 07-21-2020 at 03:46 PM.

  17. #117
    Veteran SpursforSix's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2015
    Post Count
    21,159
    By definition brandishing a weapon means you pointed it at someone. Based on the video both of them actually pointed their weapons...her more than him but they both did it.
    Wrong per Merriam Webster.

    I'll file this one just under your cow fart take.

  18. #118
    Savvy Veteran spurraider21's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Post Count
    100,825
    nothing there demonstrates that any of the protestors were on their property. looks like they were on the sidewalk at best. in fact its clear they were just walking by it and moving along the whole time, all the while these people are pointing guns at them

  19. #119
    non-essential Chris's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Post Count
    39,908
    be better

  20. #120
    Savvy Veteran spurraider21's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Post Count
    100,825
    is it your opinion that the prosecutor is making this case political and the AG is not?

  21. #121
    non-essential Chris's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Post Count
    39,908
    is it your opinion that the prosecutor is making this case political and the AG is not?
    that's obvious

  22. #122
    Veteran SpursforSix's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2015
    Post Count
    21,159
    nothing there demonstrates that any of the protestors were on their property. looks like they were on the sidewalk at best. in fact its clear they were just walking by it and moving along the whole time, all the while these people are pointing guns at them
    agree. looks like the sidewalk.

  23. #123
    Mr. John Wayne CosmicCowboy's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Post Count
    44,134
    The HOA probably owns and maintains the street, so no, the castle doctrine doesn't apply that way.
    The HOA has nothing to do with the technical ownership of the private street. They might administrate the repairs and make the assessments but the homeowners own the streets.

  24. #124
    Savvy Veteran spurraider21's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Post Count
    100,825
    sad to see it

  25. #125
    Veteran SpursforSix's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2015
    Post Count
    21,159
    The HOA has nothing to do with the technical ownership of the private street. They might administrate the repairs and make the assessments but the homeowners own the streets.
    LOL. You don't know that unless you've read that particular HOA's do ents in light of Missouri state law. Which I doubt you did.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •