Flying subpoenas before they lose that authority.
Calling it now:Flying subpoenas before they lose that authority.
this will be one of those "things you really didn't want to know"
after the truth is revealed -
that basically - they are just policing russian propaganda unlike in 2016
because Congress asked them to!
Republican priorities:
1. Shove new SCOTUS through at the last minute
2. Congressional hearings with the Twitter guy
.
.
.
.
.
?. Economic stimulus
This is gonna look great to voters. I'm all for it.
This guy should shut the up.
He himself has millions of followers and is able to get his own message accross. Grifter biting the hand that is feeding him.
I'd approve a good Shapiro twitter banning.
reasonable take
imagine going to harvard law and then publicly claiming that twitter poses a first amendment threat
thats how you know he's a hack. he knows better and chooses to lie
Trump just admitted to ordering a hit on an American citizen using deputized US Marshals
social media won't spread all the lies this time
Sounds good to me.
This dumb story will stay in the Fox echo chamber where it belongs and no one will care.
Another nothingburger.
The only reason anyone gives a about either Facebook or Twitter is because many of you can't stop using those ty platforms. If everybody wouldn't go so ape over them you could just stop giving them your business and capitalism would take over. You should not need government intervention in a capitalist society where the marketplace can regulate businesses based on desired outcome.
I mean if you want socialism, sure, ask for government regulation every time the market doesn't agree with you which means you don't have enough collective agreement to force the market to change directions.
socialism doesnt mean you cant have market forces dictating decision-making of firms, nor does it inherently mean the government regulates them any more.
Mad at twitter and facebook? Blame socialism!
Lol nancy
It certainly isn't capitalism.
The justifications for censorship will never end. That's why it's not a "slippery slope" and is just a logical conclusion.
What's untrue about what I said? Twitter and Facebook are private businesses. If you're all about capitalism then you should be happy private businesses are making their own decisions based on profitability. If you want government regulations on private businesses are you really capitalist?
Mad at twitter and facebook? Blame socialism!
Lol nancy
Let me see the day fire rains on these anti-american companies.
And then there's this:
18 U.S. Code § 1030.Fraud and related activity in connection with computers
U.S. Code
Notes
prev | next
(a)Whoever—
(1)having knowingly accessed a computer without authorization or exceeding authorized access, and by means of such conduct having obtained information that has been determined by the United States Government pursuant to an Executive order or statute to require protection against unauthorized disclosure for reasons of national defense or foreign relations, or any restricted data, as defined in paragraph y. of section 11 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, with reason to believe that such information so obtained could be used to the injury of the United States, or to the advantage of any foreign nation willfully communicates, delivers, transmits, or causes to be communicated, delivered, or transmitted, or attempts to communicate, deliver, transmit or cause to be communicated, delivered, or transmitted the same to any person not en led to receive it, or willfully retains the same and fails to deliver it to the officer or employee of the United States en led to receive it;
(2)intentionally accesses a computer without authorization or exceeds authorized access, and thereby obtains—
(A)information contained in a financial record of a financial ins ution, or of a card issuer as defined in section 1602(n) [1] of le 15, or contained in a file of a consumer reporting agency on a consumer, as such terms are defined in the Fair Credit Reporting Act (15 U.S.C. 1681 et seq.);
(B)information from any department or agency of the United States; or
(C)information from any protected computer;
(3)intentionally, without authorization to access any nonpublic computer of a department or agency of the United States, accesses such a computer of that department or agency that is exclusively for the use of the Government of the United States or, in the case of a computer not exclusively for such use, is used by or for the Government of the United States and such conduct affects that use by or for the Government of the United States;
(4)knowingly and with intent to defraud, accesses a protected computer without authorization, or exceeds authorized access, and by means of such conduct furthers the intended fraud and obtains anything of value, unless the object of the fraud and the thing obtained consists only of the use of the computer and the value of such use is not more than $5,000 in any 1-year period;
Im a socialist. I still respect their decisions as long as they are unbiased and consistent. They are not.
Pretty simple. No need to drag socialism into the equation
Socialism doesnt mean government is involved in every business decision of private companies
Last edited by hater; 10-15-2020 at 05:26 PM.
sure. markets arent exclusive to capitalism.
distinction is whether the business is owned privately or otherwise (worker owned, or publicly/state owned)
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
