Idiotic.
Career FG%
Iverson - 41%
Parker - 49% (Last 3 years 51%)
Get the out of here. You're an idiot who's never watched the Spurs play.
Not only #1. I think he's third to Jesus and Ghandi in terms of the greatest human beings of all-time.
Ah. You want Calderon for Parker, yes? A better player, yes?
2009 Assists per Game:
Calderon - 8.9
Parker - 6.9

at you. You're trying to trade away a player averaging 7 assists per game for a season while stating he's not a passing PG or that he can't get assists. Even in the Spurs multiple pass offense, Parker got 7 dimes per game this year.
Some players who DID NOT average 6.9 assists per game:
Andre Miller
Chauncey Billups
Ramon Sessions
TJ Ford
Luke Ridnour
Rafer Alston
Mike Bibby
and the list goes on.
By the way, the Spurs have 4 players in the top 100 and two in the top 50 in Assists per game for the NBA last year, and that's without Manu being there due to injury DQ.
Parker destroyed Billups this year in almost every single statistical category. He his FG% was higher by 10. TEN PERCENT. He actually REBOUNDED BETTER than Chauncey. And despite his penetration ability, he shot less FTs than Billups by almost 100. If Parker were given the calls other PGs in the league got, he'd average 28 a game, not just in the playoffs.
So, he scores better than Billups, scores more efficiently, gets more assists, outrebounded him for the season, but Billups is a better PG because "he doesn't dominate the ball". GTFO.
Now that your argument has been shredded, I want to hear your logic with a response. Come on. Bring it, oh-fan-of-the-stats.
Congratulations. You fail.
You continue to be one of the worst posters on Spurstalk. Sweet. It's amazing how wrong you can be about so many things. You're talking about Parker from 5 years ago when he didn't play defense.
6.9 ing assists this year, . GTFO.