Wow, I didn't know his contract was THAT bad.
May I ask that how can you tell Spurs used the remaining MLE to sign Blair? I don't understand the rules on this part.
Wow, I didn't know his contract was THAT bad.
Haislip's contract is the most interesting.
Most of us assumed he was a lock for the team but it doesn't look that way at all. If he doesn't pan out then it's a good bet they hold on to Bonner.
And I just want to mention that it's still too early to judge.
If Celtics won the championship next season, the Rasheed signing still >>>>>>>>>> Dyess signing.
^^^^which means we still have the lle to sign Bowen.
haha...i keed i keed
I'm feeling way too damn good that we divided MLE signing Blair and Dice with some partially-guaranteed years.
To expand, if second round picks get more than the minimum salary, that money must come from either cap space, the MLE, or the LLE. The Spurs have no cap space, so that is not an option. The LLE can only be used for contracts up to 2 years in length, and since Blair signed a 4-year contract, the money must have come from the MLE.
Nice exposition.
McDyess + Blair still isn't the full MLE, surprisingly. If these figures are correct, there's still $500K of the MLE left. This means the Spurs have about $1M more in cash (not cap space) than we thought they would, due to the luxury tax.
McDyess and Blair were steals for those prices, IMO, especially Blair. The 50% guarantee on McDyess in 2011-2012 will make that contract very tradeable. Great work, FO! And thanks to Bruno and ShamSports for the info!
Sham has changed his notes.
The player who has $50K guaranteed is Hairston and not Haislip.
Haislip with $50K guaranteed was really surprising.
IMO, Haislip salary is fully guaranteed.
That makes more sense financially for Haislip.
Thank you guys.![]()
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)