Reply With Quote
Your thoughts on this Pusher? It goes completely against those "facts" you claimed.
I specifically said it wasn't well thought out.right wingers trying to paint what he said as some well thought out analysis of the black community.
Your thoughts on this Pusher? It goes completely against those "facts" you claimed.
How does it go against the facts in the article I posted?
And weren't you directed to not discuss this matter any further?
It clearly states this on the deleted page, did you even bother opening the link?
Specifically this claim as fact:
"Another project comes close. But not that close: Bundy’s home in the Mojave desert is closer to the Dry Lake Solar Energy Zone, a corridor that has been slated for renewable energy development. The BLM is planning a mitigation strategy that may stretch toward the area where Bundy has been grazing his cows. But even there, the maps don’t match up closely enough to suggest that Bundy’s specific grazing land was the intended site of a solar facility. Also, the Chinese company ENN had not been planning a facility in the Dry Lake area.
Where Reid’s agenda and Bundy’s cattle grazing do overlap: Bundy’s cattle have been grazing on land that Reid and Rep. Steven Horsford, D-Nev., have targeted for future wilderness protections. Both Reid and Horsford have filed legislation to turn the Gold Butte area into a national conservation area. But this is entirely separate from the solar project. A conservation status discourages development, and it’s near impossible to greenlight a solar project on conservation land."
From the deleted BLM page discussing Bundy's cattle: http://archive.today/nvlzr#selection-213.0-213.313
"Non-Governmental Organizations have expressed concern that the regional mitigation strategy for the Dry Lake Solar Energy Zone utilizes Gold Butte as the location for offsite mitigation for impacts from solar development, and that those restoration activities are not durable with the presence of trespass cattle."
Explain to me why the page was deleted on Apr. 4th.
Pretty su ious. Nice work super sleuth.
Why does Harry Reid's crooked ass matter here? Bundy didn't want to pay to graze on land he didn't own. LOL ancestral claims to the land when his family bought the ranch in the 1940s. 's hilarious that this stupid story keeps bouncing around the right wing echo chamber as if the BLM is doing this got a wrong.
What ever the facts are, one fact remains.
The government authoritarians over reacted.
That account is still locked.
This is bigger than Bundy.
Still crofling.
Take a screenshot of the massage you got.
I can't log in to get screenshots of the PMs. I was digging around too much and contacted some people I shouldn't have. They "asked" me to stop and I did.
lol PMs to an account you can't access.
How did you read them in the first place?
I received the PM's discussing the matter and then my account was locked.
Like I've said all along, this is much bigger than Bundy. The BLM is out of control, there's another land grab going on in Texas/Oklahoma as we speak. More people are about to lose their land by these BLM crooks who weren't even elected in to their positions. I know most of you don't see it cause you're a bunch of basement dwellers but our public land is being taken right before our eyes. Do some research on your own, I'm not going down that route again and getting another account locked. If you want some interesting pieces to read send me a PM and I'll email them to you from a separate email. Andat anyone thinking Harry Reid isn't a crook of the upmost importance. Follow the money.
What do you mean digging?
Who sent you a pm?
in b4 "I was just trolling!"
http://www.politifact.com/punditfact...dy-ranch-pers/
http://www.snopes.com/politics/conspiracy/nevada.asp
Conspiracy theorists are 0-2.
.....could happen.....his account was locked by the Ellis-Alex Jones-Soro-Koch gang...
in b4 "I was just trolling!"
take your got ass back to goldman sachs shill. this isn't about racism, stop trying to derail the threat with your rick santorum troll you JIDF mother er. it's about the people standing up to an increasingly oppressive and authoritarian federal government which overreacted and overstepped it's boundaries.
in b4 "I was just trolling!"
keep it up and see what happens
So when the militia types were showing up with semiautomatic rifles and pistols and the guy who lost in court keeps reminding officials that he has gun and that he will resort to a range war if need be, then what is a proper response.
Ever since Jay Edgar Hoover and later WW2, US federal policy is to meet opposition with overwhelming force. Quite frankly had this been the 1960s, then the national guard would have been sent in.
The proper response should be a writ declaring him in contempt of multiple court orders and arresting the man. Let him or any of those under his authority who follow along sit in the can for 6 months.
And if anyone thinks that the Occupy Wall street people should have been sent to jail, then this guy should be strung up a tree for the he is pulling. Quite frankly, once I learned that his family didn't even move to NV from AZ until the 1940s I would feel like an ass for believing his bull and moved on. Dumbasses seem to like to double down.
You are so full of . They went for a pass on people that were advertising their multiple accounts. All manner of accounts were banned and you were an asshat that advertised who your trolls are. I am not stupid and mine are still good. Critical thinking.
At this point it would be nice if you weren't making up. Then maybe someone would really assassinate you for us.
Last edited by FuzzyLumpkins; 04-27-2014 at 04:57 AM. Reason: intelligibility
I would just like to say that you are a fool. Ever since the 90s, the feds have had a boner over militia groups. I expect you are trolling but even if you are earnest, spewing that pro militia threat and talk of armed revolution is just asking for attention you do not want. If you are earnest then you are doubly stupid because with insurgency, discretion is the better part of valor. You don't strike me as even savvy enough to hide behind proxies.
"this isn't about racism" "oppressive and authoritarian federal government"
Actually the two are deeply intertwined in the Repugs/A er Southern Strategy, appealing to racist Confederates (expanded to all dumb paranoid gun fellatin rednecks and inflammable rabble) to be against the Warriors of Northern Aggression, but only when those warriors are Dems, Dems being the party of today's otta-be-slaves-for-their-own-good.
What the Repugs love above all about ignorant assholes like m>s, TSA, etc in their is their malleable ignorance.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions