Reply With Quote
Funny, because that old man is the defending champion, moron.
That would be a good message: "Come play for San Antonio, where we not only underpay you your whole career, but then after you've helped us win 4 rings, won a FMVP, and led the team in scoring and assists in the regular season and playoffs for God-knows how long, then we'll trade you for some unproved PG who had to be carried to the playoffs by Lebron."
Funny, because that old man is the defending champion, moron.
Ungrateful little moron. You don't deserve to wear the label of a Spurs fan.spurs ... guts to trade Parker ... (assorted nonsense) ...
If Pop didn't have the balls to bench porker when he was obviously dragging the team down, you really think he'd have the balls to trade him?
We would've won the championship easy if we had Chris Paul over this bag.
Parker is a spur for life, kids.
He's now 38 years old..
SPURS should consider trading TP during regular season when his performance is good. I doubt SPURS have the gut to do so though
Lol, yah I'm sure that he would have won the championship even though he couldn't get to the WCF with Griffin putting up 26 PPG, 13 RPG, 6 APG on 51% shooting. Hahahahaha! When's the last time Parker had someone on his team play that good in the postseason? (besides himself)
I'll answer the question: Duncan in 2003, who put up 26 PPG, 15 RPG, 5 APG on 53% shooting.
Right. Or the "Spur fans" here that were fine with Parker taking pay cuts year after year, and when he has a bad season/playoff run after years of pay cuts, they pull out the dagger and show no appreciation. These are the same guys that will be upset if Manu or Tim don't get the Spurs a huge discount, even though they've been doing that for years.
Parker is not going, anywhere. his role may change, but it will take a few years. At some point we will have to develop a PG for the future. Maybe, this year's draft. When Manu retires, TP will take the offense from the bench role. Pop will limit him to 20-25 min per game to extend his career. As such, look for the Spurs to try and find a big PG (6-4 or 6-5) who at times will play along TP. All things considered, it is the most logical conclusion.
For next year there's a talented guy named Manu Ginobili who would fit this bill.
Trade him for who?
If there's any front office that is still living in the past, it's the Knicks..
well they did scout PG/SG D'Angelo Russell...given the chance I'd flip Parker for the 3rd/4th pick if and when Duncan and Ginobili don't come back
I'd flip Parker for a #4 pick especially if Tim is coming back.
Nobody, not even the Knicks, is giving us a Top 5 pick for Tony Parker. The league knows he's a third of the player he once was. That's not Spurs corporate knowledge.
We'll have to wait for Pop to retire before Parker can be let go.
No one has the GUTS to even try it, Pork could dismantle the menace in seconds by playing 48 minutes for the other team thats 6 vs 4, Im sorry but thats impossible.
A trade involves offering a player to a team, and that team accepting the player in exchange for money or other player etc. with just one team saying no HE WILL KNOW IT!
So we have only one chance out of 30, too risky.
Parker's not going anywhere.
Pop's not going anywhere.
Deal with it.
possibility may not equate with certaintybut if enough people want it, and management suddenly becomes aware that we the fans want it so muchwho knows?
No.
This has become the elephant in the room it seems
They traded Sean and Brent Barry. I'd like to see them trade Tony, but they won't as long as the other two are there. If those two left, I think Tony is a goner.
Trade him for what? Just to get rid of him and then start who??? 33 on his downside nobody will give anything of value for him at this point in his career.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
