Another don't rape PSA

[Pauly D]

When gamers with no lives collided with equally no lived social justice warriors

Kinda thought so. I've heard about it before but never knew specifics. Did it have something to do with the supposed lack of female characters?

[FuzzyLumpkins]

Ok



No grey area?!?! Are you a ing virgin? Sex isn't a contract. It's a spontaneous, emotional series of events that not once allows time to "go over the details of consent." This bevy of recent sex assault cases is BECAUSE women are told that it's not about saying "no", it's about "never having said yes." It's phony rape. Regret the morning after or "feeling like you were pressured" doesn't give a woman the right to ruin a guy's life.

And what the is gamergate

google is hard under that rock I guess.

Different states have different statutes governing the threshold for rape. It's what is behind the movement you guys are whining about. Forcible entry statutes are being replaced with explicit consent statutes. It eliminates all that grey area that dead fishing and such brings to the table. Unfortunately for you NOW is a lot more organized than you can ever hope to be.

As for your childish characterization of sex, it gives me the impression that the extent of your experience is porn or one night stands. Personally, I love turning a woman on and letting them know what is coming later. Some women respond very well to anticipation. Even in the spontaneous moment I still know how to get explicit consent without having to resort to 'can I you?' Bottomline though: sex as a myriad of types of events and not your 'its all the same of one type' characterization.

[Pauly D]

lol

[FuzzyLumpkins]

When gamers with no lives collided with equally no lived social justice warriors

Funny that you are saying the exact same thing as the children hiding behind twitter handles. Thanks for underlining my point for me.

They went after 3 female game developers. It was really cute when they tried justifying Hentai and the like. I'm fine on being on the other side of you despite your petulant characterizations.

[Pauly D]

google is hard under that rock I guess.

Different states have different statutes governing the threshold for rape. It's what is behind the movement you guys are whining about. Forcible entry statutes are being replaced with explicit consent statutes. It eliminates all that grey area that dead fishing and such brings to the table. Unfortunately for you NOW is a lot more organized than you can ever hope to be.

As for your childish characterization of sex, it gives me the impression that the extent of your experience is porn or one night stands. Personally, I love turning a woman on and letting them know what is coming later. Some women respond very well to anticipation. Even in the spontaneous moment I still know how to get explicit consent without having to resort to 'can I you?' Bottomline though: sex as a myriad of types of events and not your 'its all the same of one type' characterization.

, you sound like a beta. All of the phony rape claims come from one night stands so of course I'm talking about those. Do you really think there's always obvious signs of discomfort, especially when a lot of times both people are drunk?

Go get a mattress to carry on your back, "victim"

[FuzzyLumpkins]

, you sound like a beta. All of the phony rape claims come from one night stands so of course I'm talking about those. Do you really think there's always obvious signs of discomfort, especially when a lot of times both people are drunk?

Go get a mattress to carry on your back, "victim"

cannot argue the point so you go completely ad hominem. Meanwhile NOW is making the changes I am talking about. You can call me beta or whatever you like but your position is losing it's ass politically. I prefer results over digs and machismo.

[Pauly D]

You're argument is no better than mine. We vehicle changed the definition of rape and we've created more victims and ruined even more lives because of it.

"I SUPPORT A POSITION BECAUSE IT HAS MOMENTUM!"

[FuzzyLumpkins]

You're argument is no better than mine. We vehicle changed the definition of rape and we've created more victims and ruined even more lives because of it.

"I SUPPORT A POSITION BECAUSE IT HAS MOMENTUM!"

You should try to be a bigger misogynist bag. I get this is your way of trying to be 'alpha' but it just strikes me as insecure. Keep making it about me if it makes you feel better.

Meanwhile NOW is changing laws. I don't need to make an argument. You are impotent to do anything about what's happening. That was the point I was making, dimwit.

[Pauly D]

You should try to be a bigger misogynist bag. I get this is your way of trying to be 'alpha' but it just strikes me as insecure. Keep making it about me if it makes you feel better.

Meanwhile NOW is changing laws. I don't need to make an argument. You are impotent to do anything about what's happening. That was the point I was making, dimwit.

Your continued use of "NOW" is really making my point for me. And it's really not about being alpha at all. It's about our culture changing for the worst and this one area. Conservatives love fear mongering about "subhuman gays and that kraaazy marijuana" and liberals love fear mongering about "systemic racism the evil rapey men!" Enough. Live and let live. Everyone wants a cause and/or to be a cause

[FuzzyLumpkins]

Your continued use of "NOW" is really making my point for me. And it's really not about being alpha at all. It's about our culture changing for the worst and this one area. Conservatives love fear mongering about "subhuman gays and that kraaazy marijuana" and liberals love fear mongering about "systemic racism the evil rapey men!" Enough. Live and let live. Everyone wants a cause and/or to be a cause

The change to rape laws has been going on since the 1970s. Your descent of man theory lacks empirical basis.

NOW has been the leading proponent of these changes over the decades. I am dealing with reality not the ideology I wish was true but really boils down to song lyrics.

[Pauly D]

The change to rape laws has been going on since the 1970s. Your descent of man theory lacks empirical basis.

NOW has been the leading proponent of these changes over the decades. I am dealing with reality not the ideology I wish was true but really boils down to song lyrics.

We get it. You're a proud member of NOW. They've been very successful. I'm not even arguing otherwise.

So rape laws have been changing since the 70s...ok? My point about enabling victim mentality still stands

[FuzzyLumpkins]

We get it. You're a proud member of NOW. They've been very successful. I'm not even arguing otherwise.

So rape laws have been changing since the 70s...ok? My point about enabling victim mentality still stands

It stands on what? This forum and its trolls?

Rape statutes from before used to allow for roofies and dead fishing. You go ahead and stand on that.

[Pauly D]

It stands on what? This forum and its trolls?

Rape statutes from before used to allow for roofies and dead fishing. You go ahead and stand on that.

A roofied girl doesn't kiss back, embrace, and take off your clothes or her own. Let's not be so dramatic. No one, not even the people who do it, would actually defend that. And what the is dead fishing? I tried looking it up. Is that a NOW thing? I hope I'm not triggering you with all these questions

[FuzzyLumpkins]

A roofied girl doesn't kiss back, embrace, and take off your clothes or her own. Let's not be so dramatic. No one, not even the people who do it, would actually defend that. And what the is dead fishing? I tried looking it up. Is that a NOW thing? I hope I'm not triggering you with all these questions

A roofied girl doesn't resist and indicate a forcible penetration either. That was the point.

Whether or not you defend it, your way allows it.

[Pauly D]

A roofied girl doesn't resist and indicate a forcible penetration either. That was the point.

Whether or not you defend it, your way allows it.

If she willingly takes roofies then that's true. I never said anything about tricking someone into unconsciousness. I don't get where you're going with this. How is "my way" allowing roofies?

[Jacob1983]

The part about saying you can't buy it was hilarious. So if you pay a pros ute for sex and she consents to screw you, it's still rape? Wtf?

[FuzzyLumpkins]

If she willingly takes roofies then that's true. I never said anything about tricking someone into unconsciousness. I don't get where you're going with this. How is "my way" allowing roofies?

You prefer the status quo or former standard of forced penetration as opposed to the affirmative consent standard that is being reformed across the nation.

Your way means passed out girl is fair game. Your way means that girls that freeze when they panic are fair game. It is what it is.

[Pauly D]

You prefer the status quo or former standard of forced penetration as opposed to the affirmative consent standard that is being reformed across the nation.

Your way means passed out girl is fair game. Your way means that girls that freeze when they panic are fair game. It is what it is.

Wow, you're teaching me things I didn't even know about myself.

Just because I think this "affirmative consent" thing is bull doesn't mean I think unconscious women or women not participating should be advanced on. You're stretching so hard right now. If it weren't for women like that ćunt "mattress girl" I wouldn't even have had anything to argue about

[FuzzyLumpkins]

Wow, you're teaching me things I didn't even know about myself.

Just because I think this "affirmative consent" thing is bull doesn't mean I think unconscious women or women not participating should be advanced on. You're stretching so hard right now. If it weren't for women like that ćunt "mattress girl" I wouldn't even have had anything to argue about

If you are against a change then you are for the status quo. It's how policy works. Dissemble harder on ignorance feigned or otherwise.

What you call bull is the standard used to prevent the things I talked about. It is what it is.

[Jacob1983]

Consent. I'm sorry but the rape and consent lines that Peta and Harold had were hilarious. All of the guys in the PSA are liars. You know all of them have jacked off to porn and got hard while checking out women in public. Liars, liars, liars.

[m>s]

So tired of radical feminists

[m>s]

When you sign up to live in a skin country rape is pretty much expected. ing dumbasses, these are the same people who want Muslim immigration. Complete delusional disconnected morons.

[Jacob1983]

I just think it's hilarious but sad that American society has to remind people "don't rape".

[Biernutz]

Nah it's radical women's groups setting up innocent horny guys!

It's easy for guys to sometime think they are being set up by groups. Take the false rape story that was published
in the Rolling Stone. When the story came out it said that 7 guys from FI Kappa Psi frat house at the
University of Virginia gang raped a woman at a frat party. Many campus groups including the NOA, called for the closure
of all the male frat houses at UAV. All the guys at the frat house were guilty till proven innocence. All their
lives will be tainted because of the story. As we now know this story turned out to be false, but there was no
front page apology's to each Fi Kappa Pi members. How many false rape claims are made by women who get
caught in one night stands and had second thought's about it. In England two or more rape claims are proven
to be false each month. The guy's face and name are put on the front page and dragged in the dirt but will the get front
page coverage when the claim is proven to be false? Having women sign disclaimers is the extreme but having
a wing man along can be prudent.

There are guys who are s rapist who need to be put away for a long time. There is no doubt that the number of rapes far
exceeds the false rape claims. Look at how many years Bill Cosby got away with it. But story's like the Rolling
Stone and false claims hurt prosecution of true assaults.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A_Rape_on_Campus

http://www.theguardian.com/law/2014/...pe-allegations

[mrsmaalox]

It's easy for guys to sometime think they are being set up by groups. Take the false rape story that was published
in the Rolling Stone. When the story came out it said that 7 guys from FI Kappa Psi frat house at the
University of Virginia gang raped a woman at a frat party. Many campus groups including the NOA, called for the closure
of all the male frat houses at UAV. All the guys at the frat house were guilty till proven innocence. All their
lives will be tainted because of the story. As we now know this story turned out to be false, but there was no
front page apology's to each Fi Kappa Pi members. How many false rape claims are made by women who get
caught in one night stands and had second thought's about it. In England two or more rape claims are proven
to be false each month. The guy's face and name are put on the front page and dragged in the dirt but will the get front
page coverage when the claim is proven to be false? Having women sign disclaimers is the extreme but having
a wing man along can be prudent.

There are guys who are s rapist who need to be put away for a long time. There is no doubt that the number of rapes far
exceeds the false rape claims. Look at how many years Bill Cosby got away with it. But story's like the Rolling
Stone and false claims hurt prosecution of true assaults.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A_Rape_on_Campus

http://www.theguardian.com/law/2014/...pe-allegations

I don't take issue with the case you've used as an example, and I have no doubt that some guys get ed over big time by flaky chicks who feel remorse in the morning. But the hilarity I found that I quoted is not because of those cases, but at the notion that there are organized groups of radical women whose mission is to set up guys with false rape claims. That's ing hilarious