Reply With Quote
Piss St is going to crush gy this week, expose them for the fraud team they are. Easy money.
Yeah same to you...good luck.
As far as the game goes...Manny Diaz is going to have his hands full. On defense, I predict a lot of wide open Aggy receivers in the middle of the field tonight. It's been a problem every week for us. The "no Speedy Noil" is definitely going to help MS State...but the Aggy receiver unit as a whole is pretty damn good anyways. I know it's a simple thing to say, but we've got to allow FGs instead of red zone touchdowns to have a shot at winning.
On offense, we're just not nearly as explosive as last year. We really miss our RB Robinson. (Lil Bowling Ball
I predicted Aggy to win this game at the beginning of the year....and I guess I"m sticking to my original prediction. I would guess by a touchdown tbh....
Last edited by Silver&Black; 10-03-2015 at 12:35 PM.
Piss St is going to crush gy this week, expose them for the fraud team they are. Easy money.
Our redzone offense has been very meh this year. Been having lots of trouble getting the ball in the end zone when getting down there. Most our scores come from 30+ yard big playsOur FG kicker is also very suspect. Could definitely be the difference in the game.Yeah same to you...good luck.
As far as the game goes...Manny Diaz is going to have his hands full. On defense, I predict a lot of wide open Aggy receivers in the middle of the field tonight. It's been a problem every week for us. The "no Speedy Noil" is definitely going to help MS State...but the Aggy receiver unit as a whole is pretty damn good anyways. I know it's a simple thing to say, but we've got to allow FGs instead of red zone touchdowns to have a shot at winning.
On offense, we're just not nearly as explosive as last year. We really miss our RB Robinson. (
I predicted Aggy to win this game at the beginning of the year....and I guess I"m sticking to my original prediction. I would guess by a touchdown tbh....
:Lol over 105 pts in live play
Mahomes = top 4
Smh bad day -$100
+50 on the year
$100 on UCLA -14 vs. ASU, yay or nay?
Bit the bullet, UCLA -14.
I got -13 but I still don't like it much
I think I'll take Oregon after all at -6.5 @ Colorado. I wasn't gonna touch it but they're begging us to take Oregon so I will. $50
ing Nebraska. Dumb coach, dumb refs, dumb state
WKU 49
Rice 10
Yeah, I blew chunks in that one. I know better than to bet on games where I barely know one of the teams and I did it any way.
If I was a still a betting man, I would bet on UTEP-UTSA. Line was UTSA -3 at the start of the week but not sure what it is now. Either way it shouldn't be a close game...UTEP has a load of injuries and barely squeaked by Incarnate Word last week.
Still 5-10 mins before kickoff.
Well yeah UCLA looks like trash so far.
Dear god where was this ty UCLA playcalling last week.
That helped get me to -$50 on the day.
+$100 on the year (minus juice)
Saban and Bulimic directly contradict themselves in the whining about injuries.
The SEC is changing in style of play just like much of the nation. So they can stop it with the hatred of the spread creating more injuries while they are the most brutal conference in the land because of ground and pound.
Pgardns Oregon damn it Blake.
And I actually take that Wisconsin game played again. QB fell over backward at the 1 and fumbled. Comedy of errors. But this is why the game is so tough.
Oregon was the obvious play , how could anyone have debated it...???
Don't put too much into "last weeeks game" ya wanna look at recent history when dealing with ATS, ok?
Oops sorry.
It was not ATS that won the game. It was halftime adjustments. That game was tied at halftime and the "new" coaches for both teams( not apart of the 5-0 ATS decided it for you.)
I knew Colorado was dead when the D coordinator and head coach got into it on the sideline. The head coach actually moved him back like a player away from the field. The team watches that crap. Colorado meltdown, I suggest you watch the games.
I knew Colorado was dead when Oregon got off the plane as I said.
Here it's all about the cailber of athletes that play at Oregon vs a Colorado. The first thing that jumps out at ya is team speed. Oregon was sooooooooooo much faster all over the field.
It wouldn't have mattered what the Buffalos did (and I saw every snap) they were simply out manned. It was only close in the first half because it took the Ducks that long to get serious.
Dude, do you simply not understand ATS wagering?
Big name programs are public teams (a Coloradoi is not) when they struggle we always see a funky over reaction line the following week especially on the road, ok guy? File that away.
Last edited by Avante; 10-04-2015 at 10:10 AM.
Colorado moved the ball with complete ease the first half. Oregon is absolute on defense as Blake noted. I perfectly understand the historical ATS you used on this game. There are other much more telling stats like home dogs against the spread etc that make much more sense and mean so much more than individual head to head when the teams competing have completely new teams. It's absolutely stupid IMO to use ATS for head to head when the teams and even venues are not even comparable. The large sample size ATS example that I stated are much more statically significant.
And I completely agree with the last statement (retread my post on the game after you went along with my assessment) and used the same in my thinking. But ATS, it's laughable. The 5-0 made you comfy, fine. It means to me.
Add to that its just ONE game.
It does not make either of us sages.
Last edited by pgardn; 10-04-2015 at 12:06 PM.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
