Page 287 of 376 FirstFirst ... 187237277283284285286287288289290291297337 ... LastLast
Results 7,151 to 7,175 of 9382
  1. #7151
    The Dude minds DPG21920's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Post Count
    77,863
    The only thing that makes sense is a trade moving more salary than we take back thereby giving us greater cap space to use on someone before we resign out guys....
    There is no cap space. Gay already signed his deal and it was the Non-Tax MLE. So that means, they cannot use cap space this year. A trade could still be possible and depending on whether or not SA is taking on salary it could be the hard cap is the reason Pau is not signed.

    But Mills makes even less sense to me in this context as to why he's not formally signed.

  2. #7152
    Veteran ace3g's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Post Count
    40,447
    They could also wait till they evaluate: Milutinov & Dangubic.

  3. #7153
    bandwagoner fans suck ducks's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Post Count
    74,377
    Could you imagine gs facing ok,Houston and then spurs in playoffs

  4. #7154
    The Dude minds DPG21920's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Post Count
    77,863
    They could also wait till they evaluate: Milutinov & Dangubic.
    Sure, but no matter what SA can only offer the min contracts or limited exception they have. Shouldn't matter unless there is no actual agreement that Pau will be back which seems HIGHLY unlikely.

  5. #7155
    Veteran mo7888's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Post Count
    6,909
    There is no cap space. Gay already signed his deal and it was the Non-Tax MLE. So that means, they cannot use cap space this year. A trade could still be possible and depending on whether or not SA is taking on salary it could be the hard cap is the reason Pau is not signed.

    But Mills makes even less sense to me in this context as to why he's not formally signed.
    If we trade Tony somewhere and attach a pick but take back no salary, doesn't a move like that open up around 15M in space to use elsewhere?

  6. #7156
    Veteran ace3g's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Post Count
    40,447
    ^ I agree, there is either a salary cap order to signing certain players, future moves still in the works, or a combination of both.

  7. #7157
    The Dude minds DPG21920's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Post Count
    77,863
    If we trade Tony somewhere and attach a pick but take back no salary, doesn't a move like that open up around 15M in space to use elsewhere?
    It could, but not really. Maybe I'm wrong, but I'm 99% certain it was reported that Gay already signed his deal and it was the NTMLE used to sign him.

    I don't think you can retroactively use cap space to sign Gay, but maybe I'm wrong.

  8. #7158
    Veteran mo7888's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Post Count
    6,909
    It could, but not really. Maybe I'm wrong, but I'm 99% certain it was reported that Gay already signed his deal and it was the NTMLE used to sign him.

    I don't think you can retroactively use cap space to sign Gay, but maybe I'm wrong.
    I'm not sure either but, it's the only thing that makes sense to me. If it didn't work like that then there no plausible reason for them to delay sign g the guys they are bringing back.

  9. #7159
    Veteran Ron Swanson's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Post Count
    9,270
    LeBron is never coming to San Antonio.
    That won't stop us from having a 400 page thread about it next summer.

  10. #7160
    Machacarredes Chinook's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Post Count
    32,115
    It could, but not really. Maybe I'm wrong, but I'm 99% certain it was reported that Gay already signed his deal and it was the NTMLE used to sign him.

    I don't think you can retroactively use cap space to sign Gay, but maybe I'm wrong.
    Pretty sure they can't. But they might not have filed the contract with the league yet.

  11. #7161
    e^(i*pi) + 1 = 0 MannyIsGod's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Post Count
    57,943
    I read some stuff about a hard cap (assumption being the NTMLE) on twitter but it could very well be wrong.

  12. #7162
    e^(i*pi) + 1 = 0 MannyIsGod's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Post Count
    57,943
    Does Pau's opting out leave a cap hold?

  13. #7163
    e^(i*pi) + 1 = 0 MannyIsGod's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Post Count
    57,943
    So, the Spurs aren't over the cap yet unless you count cap holds, so how would they be able to use the MLE unless there's someway to transition from the MLE to capspace instead? There has to be some kind of provision built in that if they don't end up over the cap from resigning their own free agents then they'd have to leave enough cap room to fit that Gay contract, right?

  14. #7164
    The Dude minds DPG21920's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Post Count
    77,863
    Does Pau's opting out leave a cap hold?
    A massive one.

  15. #7165
    The Dude minds DPG21920's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Post Count
    77,863
    So, the Spurs aren't over the cap yet unless you count cap holds, so how would they be able to use the MLE unless there's someway to transition from the MLE to capspace instead? There has to be some kind of provision built in that if they don't end up over the cap from resigning their own free agents then they'd have to leave enough cap room to fit that Gay contract, right?
    it's the opposite. You only have cap space if you actually renounce the cap holds. the cap holds are the guaranteed thing here.

  16. #7166
    e^(i*pi) + 1 = 0 MannyIsGod's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Post Count
    57,943
    Sure, but what happens then if the Spurs reounce all their free agents today and then sign everyone to min contracts and end up under the cap?

  17. #7167
    The Dude minds DPG21920's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Post Count
    77,863
    Sure, but what happens then if the Spurs reounce all their free agents today and then sign everyone to min contracts and end up under the cap?
    They can't if we are to believe that Gay signed using the MLE. SA could renounce Pau and is cap hold is gone, but that alone would not put them far enough under the cap to not have the MLE still in play IIRC

  18. #7168
    The Dude minds DPG21920's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Post Count
    77,863
    But in theory, since it's not official, if SA renounced let's say Pau/Manu/Simmons/Mills cap holds, I'm assuming Gay's contract would then become in violation and it would be converted to cap space. But not sure.

  19. #7169
    e^(i*pi) + 1 = 0 MannyIsGod's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Post Count
    57,943
    If they renounced everyone I think they only have about 85 million in salary and are under the cap by way more than the MLE though.

  20. #7170
    Veteran Chillen's Avatar
    My Team
    Chicago Bulls
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Post Count
    2,391
    LeBron is never coming to San Antonio.
    If LeBron wants to play for Pop it will. Of course he would have to handle the situation good like tell the Cavs fans I will be back and end my career as a Cavalier. San Antonio Spurs is the only team LeBron could leave Cleveland for and he won't get ripped by the fans and the media. So it's your opinion, ain't impossible but I wouldn't bet the farm on it either.

  21. #7171
    e^(i*pi) + 1 = 0 MannyIsGod's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Post Count
    57,943
    But in theory, since it's not official, if SA renounced let's say Pau/Manu/Simmons/Mills cap holds, I'm assuming Gay's contract would then become in violation and it would be converted to cap space. But not sure.
    Yeah me either but it does seem as though there has to be a way to convert MLE deals to capspace deals in this type of situation.

  22. #7172
    Believe. Dancelot's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Post Count
    770
    Could you imagine gs facing ok,Houston and then spurs in playoffs
    Yeah, they would definitely have their work cut out for them having to injure all those players.

  23. #7173
    Veteran Chillen's Avatar
    My Team
    Chicago Bulls
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Post Count
    2,391
    Yeah, they would definitely have their work cut out for them having to injure all those players.
    Some team needs to have a brawl vs those Warriors, pretty sure Curry would go hide behind Durant. Warriors are so soft, Green with his big tough guy act. ZaZa deserves to get tripped out there for what he did to Kawhi. Of course violence doesn't solve anything and it's not a good way to resolve problems it's just that todays NBA is softer than jello. I wish some team vs Warriors would not take their crap with Green and ZaZa.
    Last edited by Chillen; 07-10-2017 at 12:12 AM.

  24. #7174
    Hope springs eternal. SAGirl's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2015
    Post Count
    27,774
    Well, I know that, I'm just not sure why the hold up. With Gay being signed using the non-taxpayer MLE and them operating over the cap, all they have left are minimium level contracts and one other small-exception they can use. They are fixed costs.

    So signing Mills/Pau/Simmons now doesn't impact anything since they dont need their cap smaller cap holds (like Mills/Simmons) for cap space purposes. Regardless of what Mills/Simmons are signed to, the exception/min contracts SA has left after using the NTMLE are fixed.

    I'm assuming the hold up with Pau is the hard cap that is now in place because they used the NTMLE to sign Gay.

    Mills number appears to be fixed though so they should sign him now theoretically. Simmons is not a fixed cost so I can see them waiting there & same with Pau. Depending on if they use that other exception to add to the team could take away from what they pay Pau this year, but really not sure.
    I don't understand any of that honestly.
    Can you put in simple, non CBA terms for me... like:
    are you suspecting a trade is happening...
    I tend to attribute the hold up to JSimms...

  25. #7175
    Veteran BG_Spurs_Fan's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Post Count
    5,931
    I don't understand any of that honestly.
    Can you put in simple, non CBA terms for me... like:
    are you suspecting a trade is happening...
    I tend to attribute the hold up to JSimms...
    The hold up is most likely due to Simmons. They'll try to fit in his new salary + Pau's + Gay's and stay below the tax. They may even want to pay Manu if there's some room left.

    Depending on the other contracts it's also possible that Mills's contract could be a bit less than originally announced, just like Danny Green eventually got a bit less in 2015.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •