Stein: Spurs Have Emerged as as Trade Suitor for Avery Bradley

[DAF86]

I don't know if I would do Green for Bradley straight up. that trade.

[Budkin]

that . I'd much rather have Green than Bradley. Bradley only makes sense as a way to salary dump Fifty.

Same. That is a horrible deal.

[monkeypunk]

I'm not in favor of losing Danny for Avery but Derrick White would seem to be a decent replacement for Danny on the cheap.

I would trade Forbes and a first for him though. That kid is an abysmal defender and when he's not hitting shots, he's worthless.

[SAGirl]

Hmmmmmm adding a first was unnecessary in any trade of this kind but regardless, these rumors are starting to just give me a different vibe altogether.

The Spurs aren’t going to pay to retain Danny this summer and have included him in trades since this last summer. Originally he was rumored to have a high asking price and to only be in play for a star. Now his name is around in swaps of one roleplayer for another (and lesser roleplayer).

[Dre_7]

Green >> Bradley

I usually have the Spurs font office's back, but if they trade Green AND a 1st for Bradley I won't be able to defend that one.

Patty for Bradley? Maybe. But not Green.

[coachmac87]

As you should, I can take it

No you can’t...

What cannot I not take? You made a bs post when the Spurs won by 50 and I called you out..must’ve struck a cord??

You got offended by my post of saying Bradley is better than Mills and told me to “leave”...

You can’t even defend yourself...and you’re making my point that you’re a baby back ..

[duncan2150]

Imo the spurs will never trade green just for bradley. 99.9%.

[DAF86]

Lou Williams is having a better year than Danny and just signed for the MLE. Who knows. I can see Danny playing one more year for that money.

Danny Green and a 1st round for Lou Williams. Is that even possible?

[Dre_7]

Hmmmmmm adding a first was unnecessary in any trade of this kind but regardless, these rumors are starting to just give me a different vibe altogether.

The Spurs aren’t going to pay to retain Danny this summer and have included him in trades since this last summer. Originally he was rumored to have a high asking price and to only be in play for a star. Now his name is around in swaps of one roleplayer for another (and lesser roleplayer).

Stanley Johnson has all star potential though. I would have loved that move. I still would love that move. I think Stanley is who the Spurs need to target this year.

[Big Empty]

Bradley can guard all the PGs and ca dribble. I like him more than Green. As long as the 1st rounder is lottery protected.

[DPG21920]

Danny Green and a 1st round for Lou Williams. Is that even possible?

It’s not - not at this point in time.

[Amuseddaysleeper]

No you can’t...

What cannot I not take? You made a bs post when the Spurs won by 50 and I called you out..must’ve struck a cord??

You got offended by my post of saying Bradley is better than Mills and told me to “leave”...

You can’t even defend yourself...and you’re making my point that you’re a baby back ..

You didn't mention the Spurs won by 50 thing up until an hour ago.

My "leave" comment was in response to you saying " in' Spurstalk" I (like many posters should) think Bradley >> Mills, never said otherwise

You can't even read or comprehend posts come on man

[Amuseddaysleeper]

Bradley can guard all the PGs and ca dribble. I like him more than Green. As long as the 1st rounder is lottery protected.

No way, Danny Green >>>>> Bradley

[cd98]

Stanley Johnson has all star potential though. I would have loved that move. I still would love that move. I think Stanley is who the Spurs need to target this year.

I'd almost be okay with Spurs giving up a first for him, but it's hard to know where the Spurs pick will be. If it was the 28th pick, I'd say trade it, but if it is something in the early 20s or lower, I'd say keep it.

[coachmac87]

You didn't mention the Spurs won by 50 thing up until an hour ago.

My "leave" comment was in response to you saying " in' Spurstalk"

You can't even read or comprehend posts come on man

Oh man I didn’t know I was the first to criticize SpursTalk..my apologies..I guess since I don’t trash PATFO or a player fan I don’t get a pass...

I mean you can’t even enjoy a 50pt win for sake..what does that say about you?? You’ll about anything..

[SAGirl]

It doesn't make sense that PATFO would turn down a Danny-for-Avery trade to the Pistons only to make the deal with the Clip-jobs.

I would assume it’s other teams asking for Danny and PATFO saying no.

They called the Clippers to see if they would take someone different than Danny in exchange and they said no, plus added a pick just bc...

[Hoops Czar]

I wouldn't give up a 1st for Bradley but the amount of posters defending D-league at this point is laughable. Dude is a flat out scrub and hoping and praying he'll return to his 2012-14 form is an exercise in futility.

Meanwhile... .

[sasaint]

I would assume it’s other teams asking for Danny and PATFO saying no.

They called the Clippers to see if they would take someone different than Danny in exchange and they said no, plus added a pick just bc...

I totally agree. That proposed "construction" had to come from the Clips. Hence my comment.

[SAGirl]

Sounds like no one here has really thought of this.

I think its sensible to imagine that Marc Stein got his info from the Clippers. And Clippers purposely informed Stein about the high end of their asking price (or discussion) with the Spurs to inflate Avery Bradleys' value the last hours of the deadline. That's all it is. The Clippers wanted to get that information out to the public for their own benefit.

Even with the mistakes they made last summer, I don't think RC/Pop would be that dumb to trade Danny for Avery Bradley -- I'm not even talking about the 1st.

If Spurs were really going to do this dumbass trade, the deal would be done already.

Definitely leaked by The Clippers.

[Dre_7]

I wouldn't give up a 1st for Bradley but the amount of posters defending D-league at this point is laughable. Dude is a flat out scrub and hoping and praying he'll return to his 2012-14 form is an exercise in futility.

I know you're a troll but come on. Scrubs don't make All-Defensive teams.

[Budkin]

Definitely leaked by The Clippers.

No doubt.

[SAGirl]

No one has remarked about the Spurs wanting to add another 6’2” guard to their rotation???

[Hoops Czar]

I know you're a troll but come on. Scrubs don't make All-Defensive teams.

And Dejounte Murray and Kyle Anderson are the best defensive PGs and SFs in the league because DPRM says so.

https://www.espn.com/nba/statistics/...RPM/position/1

https://www.espn.com/nba/statistics/...RPM/position/5

Meanwhile...

[Ed Helicopter Jones]

No one has remarked about the Spurs wanting to add another 6’2” guard to their rotation???

At least we'd have 1 who can play defense. Watching Mills, Forbes and Parker play defense is cringe worthy stuff. Even against the point-guard-less Suns last night it was sad.

[TimDunkem]

At least we'd have 1 who can play defense. Watching Mills, Forbes and Parker play defense is cringe worthy stuff. Even against the point-guard-less Suns last night it was sad.

If the Spurs were really in it to win it, they would move TP before Green, imo.