What's the early line?
That's not me you ing idiot. Don't know who you are thinking of but I've never posted one single thing about White.
What's the early line?
FAP86 ranks all time greats based on skill level and technical ability instead of accolades and accomplishments.
You're wasting your time discussing the subject with the guy![]()
This post affirms my point, if you want to beat the Patriots using the offensive route, you have to be steady from the 1st quarter on like the Eagles did last year... you can't just punt away the first half like the Chiefs did in both meetings with the Pats this year, and expect to score enough points in the 2nd half to storm back and win.
Let's also not ignore there were several occasions where Peyton choked early before he had the chance to lose to Brady (losing to Billy ing Volek in 2007 and a mediocre Colts team in 2014 just to avoid losing to Brady in the next game).
You must be confused. I'm talking about the re ed timeout Reid called towards the end of the first half, when the Patriots looked content to run out the clock. After that timeout, they promptly drove downfield and turned what should have been a 7-point game at the half into a 14-point game.
It's this kind of stupidity that defines Reid's teams in the playoffs. That, and blind loyalty to bad coordinators like Sutton. Bottom line is that the Chiefs had to play catchup against the dynasty Patriots because of Reid's ty coaching in the first half, and that's just not going to work most of the time.
Sure thing son.![]()
My book has Patriots -2..all over that..
I don't, but even if I did, ranking players by their actual individual abilities instead of the accomplishments got with teams efforts is really such a bad thing to do?![]()
This could have been a great betting weekend if the NFL didn't rob me in the Saints game..need to get a class-action suit going![]()
I have 17000 posts. Not one of them has ever mentioned White. Go find the post you're talking bout and link it. I don't even post upstairs anymore. Been a handful of posts probably in years.
Link the thread.
My post on the last page in response to this is identical, but yes
How is being on the same team as a defense that played really well against Brady not a team accomplishment? Your logic is inconsistent.
Oh man that's too easy.
Lol easy
You talking about my Mannings being Brady's daddies comment? That's just trolling son. It's like bragging rights, you don't care how you got them, you just got them.
Peyton would have demanded a trade away from a coach who didn't let him call his own plays, so there's no scenario where he and Belichick have the illustrious run that Brady and Belichick have.
I think Brady leads the 2006 Colts and 2015 Broncos to super bowls (not saying much since neither team needed anything out of its QB) and probably the 2005 Colts + the 2013 Broncos for that matter.
There's not a ing chance Peyton comes back from 28-3 against Atlanta though, we've seen what happens when his team gets off to a bad start in the superbowl (lubing up his asshole and saying "Thank you sir may I have another!" to Pete Carroll)
the thought of Peyton having the mental for ude to erase a 25 point deficit against a superior team
If it were him in that game he would have lost 42-3 then had Bill Polian cry about how rule changes were needed in the offseason![]()
Yeah that's Peyton's problem, he loses to Billy ing Volek in 2007 just to avoid possibly having another playoff L against Tom Brady so he win the completely meaningless "winning record against Brady in the playoffs!" trophy![]()
Why are you acting as if Brady wasn't a 200th pick?
Brady on any other team might have never got the chance of starting in the NFL.
So that's your argument now, Peyton is better because he was drafted higher![]()
Using where he was drafted to try to win the argument
Just Stop. Please. My sides are hurting from
'ing too much
He also wouldn't lose to Billy Volek or 2014 Andrew Cuck out of fear of having a losing playoff record against Manning either![]()
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)