Democrats Looking To Ramp Up The Fascism

[Chris]

Very substantial thoughtful posts. Thanks for sharing.

[spurraider21]

Very substantial thoughtful posts. Thanks for sharing.
https://i.gyazo.com/6f8e41b4ce0016275f69ec4f5b3929ac.png

from the derp approved merriam-webster dictionary

hope this helps you figure out what is or isnt fascistic. sincere apologies for not having it in tweet form

[Chris]

"forcible suppression of opposition"

Yep, sounds like the modern day Democrat and BTCs. :tu

[spurraider21]

"forcible suppression of opposition"

Yep, sounds like the modern day Democrat and BTCs. :tu
explain how reparations as a campaign policy (or any of your recent posts in this thread) amounts to fascism given the definition above. and then man up and answer if you believe tax cuts are something of value

[Chris]

Oh look. A homework assignment. I've never seen this before. "man up" Never heard that before.

[spurraider21]

only you would consider explaining yourself a homework assignment. well, you and derp

[Spurtacular]

no.

:lol Oh, it starts without that incentive.

Thanks, Lite :tu

[spurraider21]

:lol Oh, it starts without that incentive.

Thanks, Lite :tu
look up what fascism means. i posted it here for your convenience. then explain to me how you think that a tweet about student loan debt is fascist

[Spurtacular]

https://media1.tenor.com/images/83116dac5575fef19f9a39e17984e7bd/tenor.gif?itemid=9264828

[spurraider21]

no, those were exactly the goalposts. your refusal to discuss your own post ins't me moving the goalpost

:lol derp

[Pavlov]

I agree with Gohmert and Gaetz, and have already posted as such. Not my fault trolls and ignorami can't keep up.
What did they actually call for, Qhris?

In your own words, please.

[Winehole23]

only you would consider explaining yourself a homework assignment. well, you and derpSputacular explain himself more?

You are more magnanimous than I. ::bobo

[Winehole23]

There's a bill that's been proposed by a Republican Senator from Missouri, apparently it is of little interest to Chris, he shrugged it off dismissively.

It stipulates that five political appointees referee the political neutrality of "big tech companies."Astonishing, to me.

Trump'll appoint em first if it passes.

[Spurtacular]

no, those were exactly the goalposts. your refusal to discuss your own post ins't me moving the goalpost

:lol derp

Nope. None of the posts replied to were about the definition of fascism. That was just you lashing out.

[spurraider21]

Nope. None of the posts replied to were about the definition of fascism. That was just you lashing out.
this entire thread is about fascism, and the democrats supposed role in "ramping it up"

when somebody posts a random 3 year old hillary tweet, its perfectly rational for me to question how that tweet is indicative of fascism

[FrostKing]

this entire thread is about fascism, and the democrats supposed role in "ramping it up"

when somebody posts a random 3 year old hillary tweet, its perfectly rational for me to question how that tweet is indicative of fascism
The Left stands for equality & climate. But there are more pressing issues in a 1st World Society 2019. That is why the ideology thrives in College class rooms....

[spurraider21]

The Left stands for equality & climate. But there are more pressing issues in a 1st World Society 2019. That is why the ideology thrives in College class rooms....
even if i take your post at face value and assume it to be true, still has nothing to do with fascism

[FrostKing]

even if i take your post at face value and assume it to be true, still has nothing to do with fascism
The lefts approach to environment is fascist

[spurraider21]

The lefts approach to environment is fascist
Elaborate

[Spurtacular]

this entire thread is about fascism, and the democrats supposed role in "ramping it up"

when somebody posts a random 3 year old hillary tweet, its perfectly rational for me to question how that tweet is indicative of fascism

It was explained to you how it relates to fascism. You just threw yourself into a tizzy.

[spurraider21]

It was explained to you how it relates to fascism. You just threw yourself into a tizzy.
which part of this addresses "fascism"

feel free to bold it. FYI, fascism doesn't mean "things i disagree with"

The Left stands for equality & climate. But there are more pressing issues in a 1st World Society 2019. That is why the ideology thrives in College class rooms....

[Chris]

https://twitter.com/dbongino/status/1143937024115793922?s=19

^^case in point

[Pavlov]

:lol still no examples of fascism.
:lol Qhrisbot retweets

[Spurtacular]

which part of this addresses "fascism"

feel free to bold it. FYI, fascism doesn't mean "things i disagree with"



I felt free to tell you you were lashing out and still are. Consider that highlighted.

[spurraider21]

I felt free to tell you you were lashing out and still are. Consider that highlighted.
as usual, derp folds when asked to explain anything

[Spurtacular]

as usual, derp folds when asked to explain anything

You're lashing out has been explained/highlighted/etc.

[spurraider21]

You're lashing out has been explained/highlighted/etc.
you didnt highlight or explain anything. you just repeated your conclusion.

derp: it's fascism
me: how is it fascism?
derp: because its fascism. i just explained it.
me: you never explained it
derp: i already explained it. you're just lashing out

[Spurtacular]

you didnt highlight or explain anything. you just repeated your conclusion.

derp: it's fascism
me: how is it fascism?
derp: because its fascism. i just explained it.
me: you never explained it
derp: i already explained it. you're just lashing out

You can't even recall a simple order of events. You asked how it was fascism. I explained it. And then you lashed out about needing to know the definition of fascism instead of giving any proper rebuttal. You should stop trying to be the heir apparent to Chump. It's a waste of time. You should already know that just by watching him.

[spurraider21]

You can't even recall a simple order of events. You asked how it was fascism. I explained it. And then you lashed out about needing to know the definition of fascism instead of giving any proper rebuttal. You should stop trying to be the heir apparent to Chump. It's a waste of time. You should already know that just by watching him.
nope

[Pavlov]

Looking for a SpursTalk Trumpista's straight answer to any question:

https://media.giphy.com/media/3o7aTskHEUdgCQAXde/giphy.gif

[Chris]

https://twitter.com/RepDanCrenshaw/status/1144057944599871490?s=19

[Winehole23]

Dan Crenshaw is an obnoxious boob, that's so hot right now

[Pavlov]

https://twitter.com/RepDanCrenshaw/status/1144057944599871490?s=19What is Constitutional free speech as it applies to Google, Qhris?

[Spurtacular]

Looking for a SpursTalk Trumpista's straight answer to any question:

https://media.giphy.com/media/3o7aTskHEUdgCQAXde/giphy.gif

:cry Nobody's playing 20,000 questions with me. :cry

:lmao

[Spurtacular]

nope

You received a direct answer to a direct question and then you lashed out and have been ever since. Par.

[koriwhat]

https://twitter.com/dbongino/status/1143937024115793922?s=19

^^case in point

spot on bongino :tu

[koriwhat]

Dan Crenshaw is an obnoxious boob, that's so hot right now

ah i see... anyone who speaks truth as they keep their composer is just another boob to the "feelings" retards on the left. :tu

[Chris]

https://twitter.com/RepDanCrenshaw/status/1144294143943950341?s=19

[Chris]

https://twitter.com/SaraCarterDC/status/1144299491089997824?s=19

[Chris]

https://twitter.com/RealSaavedra/status/1144346712137330688?s=19

[Spurtacular]

https://twitter.com/RealSaavedra/status/1144346712137330688?s=19

Tight frame shot to try and make twenty-two people seem like a real crowd. :lol

[Pavlov]

When are you guys going to post something about fascism?

[Spurminator]

When are you guys going to post something about fascism?

Typical fascist sociopath response from someone who's obviously a criminal.

[Psychopav Chump]

When are you guys going to post something about fascism?

There's been zero on it in this thread.

[Winehole23]

ST de Blasio stans, sound off!

[Winehole23]

There's been zero on it in this thread.

You underrate your own contribution, you stressed social media censorship, the ongoing universal conspiracy to conceal the truth, which lo and behold miraculously coincides with your duly stated opinion.

[Winehole23]

...as well as the inexorable pillow talk

[Psychopav Chump]

You underrate your own contribution, you stressed social media censorship, the ongoing universal conspiracy to conceal the truth, which lo and behold miraculously coincides with your duly stated opinion.

Pipe down, minion.

[Chris]

https://twitter.com/FaithGoldy/status/1145090586459955200?s=19

[Nathan89]

https://twitter.com/MrAndyNgo/status/1145116276605329408?s=20

https://twitter.com/Jimryan015/status/1145067852375851008?s=20

https://twitter.com/MrAndyNgo/status/1145068311048101888?s=20

[Psychopav Chump]

https://twitter.com/MrAndyNgo/status/1145116276605329408?s=20

https://twitter.com/Jimryan015/status/1145067852375851008?s=20

https://twitter.com/MrAndyNgo/status/1145068311048101888?s=20

How is that fascism?

[Pavlov]

https://twitter.com/FaithGoldy/status/1145090586459955200?s=19
That mayor quote was from last year.

The crowd was dispersed and three arrests were made.

[spurraider21]

How is that fascism?
that's a good question. it's not a state actor or a state endorsed action, so it would be incorrect to consider it fascism

[Nathan89]

This thread is used for things beyond fascism tbh

[Spurtacular]

that's a good question. it's not a state actor or a state endorsed action, so it would be incorrect to consider it fascism

Yea, the state is to play no role in protecting the safety of the citizens.

:lol Lite

[Nathan89]

https://twitter.com/PortlandPolice/status/1145106839618502656?s=20

[DarrinS]

Nice

1145185967860379648

[Thread]

"Reliable Sources" on CNN hit this story this morning & condemned that action & only 1/2 begrudgingly. tee, hee.

[Pavlov]

This thread is used for things beyond fascism tbh It's certainly devoid of any actual fascism, so I guess general Trumpista snowflake whining will have to do.

[DarrinS]

It's certainly devoid of any actual fascism, so I guess general Trumpista snowflake whining will have to do.

Is Andy Ngo a fascist?

[Nathan89]

https://twitter.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1145336255787364352?s=20

There are people on this forum that support antifa and think throwing milkshakes at people you disagree with is comical.

[Nathan89]

https://twitter.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1145336257670606848?s=20

Starbucks was national news for a week plus.

[Pavlov]

Is Andy Ngo a fascist?Not that I know of.

Who made that claim here, Darrin?

Explain yourself.

[spurraider21]

This thread is used for things beyond fascism tbh
Almost exclusively tbh

[Pavlov]

https://twitter.com/EricRWeinstein/status/1145336257670606848?s=20

Starbucks was national news for a week plus.First national story I found....

https://cbsnews2.cbsistatic.com/hub/i/r/2019/06/30/c65e4c79-5693-407c-aef8-00c77d802768/thumbnail/620x413/b234317b344f57d5755b6af8f5cffe19/gettyimages-1152905746.jpg
An unidentified right aligning man receives medical assistance after being brutally attacked by the Rose City Antifa at Pioneer Courthouse Square on June 29, 2019 in Portland, Oregon.

:lol You guys are so eager to play the victim you want to play the victim about not being called victims when you're actually called victims.

[Nathan89]

https://twitter.com/tomselliott/status/1145124981304713216?s=20

The media hard at work trying to live up to the label "enemy of the people".

[Pavlov]

https://twitter.com/tomselliott/status/1145124981304713216?s=20

The media hard at work trying to live up to the label "enemy of the people".It's a shame they're not supporting the violent neo Nazis, eh?

[DarrinS]

It's a shame they're not supporting the violent neo Nazis, eh?

Who supports violent neo Nazis?

[boutons_deux]

all y'all white male supremacist thugs should realise that pushback can hurt, and the more it hurts, the better.

Let us know when antifa does their own Charlottesville parade.

[Pavlov]

Who supports violent neo Nazis?I asked him. I think he does, so here's his chance to deny it.

I think the Antifa douchebags who let themselves get trolled every three weeks and use violence are stupid and reprehensible.

Who here said Ngo was fascist, Darrin?

You never answered that question.

I guess you never will for some reason.

[DarrinS]

I asked him. I think he does, so here's his chance to deny it.

I think the Antifa douchebags who let themselves get trolled every three weeks and use violence are stupid and reprehensible.

Who here said Ngo was fascist, Darrin?

You never answered that question.

I guess you never will for some reason.


I never claimed anyone here said Ngo was a fascist. I just asked if he was and you already answered. Why do you think antifa attacked him?

[Spurminator]

Not sure I've ever seen the typical beta incel whining/trolling illustrated more perfectly than in this tweet thread. (Wait for it)

:lol Daily Caller

https://i.imgur.com/uaeigRo.png
https://i.imgur.com/8YvEZiO.png
https://i.imgur.com/6NqfRSr.png
https://i.imgur.com/b7dS2Ky.png
https://i.imgur.com/y51HaPK.png
https://i.imgur.com/0tqSh1P.png
https://i.imgur.com/vinJtbK.png

:lmao

[Pavlov]

I never claimed anyone here said Ngo was a fascist. I just asked if he was and you already answered. Why do you think antifa attacked him?I suspect it's because they're dumbasses.

Are you afraid of Antifa, Darrin?

[koriwhat]

Who supports violent neo Nazis?

wtf are the neo nazis tbh? 4chan nerds stuck at home? the make believe world where all these nazis/neo-nazis reside is hilarious hyperbole. :tu

[Pavlov]

wtf are the neo nazis tbh?I go with a recent example: John T. Earnest.

He's one.

[koriwhat]

I go with a recent example: John T. Earnest.

He's one.

you know, the extreme is sickening and this dude is the extreme. on the flipside, not diminishing that guys sickness, antifa, if left to their own devices will become worse than the story you linked to. antifa is an anonymous mob world wide who have been more emboldened by the day to use more violence but you want to dismiss a mob because there's all these "nazis" and "neo-nazis" surrounding us all.

i come on ST and you know who posts about the horrors of zionism... jews... not the "nazis" and "neo-nazis".

in time your dismissal will become a reality you can't turn a blind eye to any longer. today it's quick-crete milkshakes but tomorrow it could easily be mass murder.

what really needs to be done is to get a grip on extremists from both sides and weed them out of society.

[Pavlov]

you know, the extreme is sickening and this dude is the extreme. on the flipside, not diminishing that guys sickness, antifa, if left to their own devices will become worse than the story you linked to. antifa is an anonymous mob world wide who have been more emboldened by the day to use more violence but you want to dismiss a mob because there's all these "nazis" and "neo-nazis" surrounding us all.

i come on ST and you know who posts about the horrors of zionism... jews... not the "nazis" and "neo-nazis".

in time your dismissal will become a reality you can't turn a blind eye to any longer. today it's quick-crete milkshakes but tomorrow it could easily be mass murder.I'm not dismissing Antifa. They're stupid douches who are easily trolled into violence.

Neo Nazis are committing mass murder.

Often.

[koriwhat]

I'm not dismissing Antifa. They're stupid douches who are easily trolled into violence.

Neo Nazis are committing mass murder.

Often.

i don't know man... you say often but i just don't buy it. often would be like weekly which if you look towards the north there's black men(and others) getting murdered every damn second of the day with no MSM pushing their headlines.

when you get a muslim killing gays in a club and screaming allah akbar you get a spin from the MSM that it had nothing to do with islam. when you get a black dude strolling down the street in search of his next victim you get a spin from the MSM that it wasn't race related.

it's all about perspective imo and how the MSM operates to push its agenda currently.

besides this nazi/neo-nazi nonsense let me ask you something... do you believe all of trump's base are deplorable red necks? do you really believe trump's base is a bunch of racist nazis? the same could be said of anyone by their opposition. it's all in how you spin it.

ex; antifa = antifascists ... but they silence the oppositions voice, use violence, etc... how is that exactly antifascist?

[Spurminator]

Koriwhat when Antifa throws milkshakes:


on the flipside, not diminishing that guys sickness, antifa, if left to their own devices will become worse than the story you linked to. antifa is an anonymous mob world wide who have been more emboldened by the day to use more violence but you want to dismiss a mob because there's all these "nazis" and "neo-nazis" surrounding us all.

i come on ST and you know who posts about the horrors of zionism... jews... not the "nazis" and "neo-nazis".

in time your dismissal will become a reality you can't turn a blind eye to any longer. today it's quick-crete milkshakes but tomorrow it could easily be mass murder.

what really needs to be done is to get a grip on extremists from both sides and weed them out of society.

koriwhat when an American citizen gets chopped up by Saudi Arabia:


I still don't care about khashoggi.


let me restate that so it's much more clear for you. i don't care that he's dead!

How do you have the energy to be so painfully stupid AND a piece of shit?

You're a garbage person, dude. How do you sleep?

[Pavlov]

i don't know man... you say often but i just don't buy it. often would be like weeklyOh, so it has to be weekly murders for it to be a problem.

Then Antifa will never, ever be a problem -- so you can stop worrying about them forever.

[Spurtacular]

Then Antifa will never, ever be a problem -- so you can stop worrying about them forever.

:lmao Sperm shielder chump.
:lmao Par.

[Winehole23]

Step one: Quillette publishes an pseudonymous article by "Lenihan" using Twitter connections to prove journalists are "connected to" Antifa.

Step two: 8chan and Stormfront trolls threaten and harass the journalists named in the article.

Step three: Quillette editor on chief Andy Ngo is enthusiastically greeted by Antifa in Portland.

[Winehole23]

Andy Ngo was released from the hospital this morning in critical but stable condition.

It could have been worse: sugar dissolves concrete, I hear.

[Winehole23]

I heard 111%ers were threatening to shoot Oregon state police if they had dared arrest runaway legislators, what ever happened with that?

"Send bachelors, heavily armed"

[Winehole23]

I guess coconut milkshakes and beating down Andy Ngo for singling out journalists who write about fascism and anti-fascism, to fascists, are scarier to some people than the Oregon GOP getting their more lumpen militia buddies to shut the government down.

[Winehole23]

That's part of the context of this whole confrontation

[DarrinS]

Step one: Quillette publishes an pseudonymous article by "Lenihan" using Twitter connections to prove journalists are "connected to" Antifa.

Step two: 8chan and Stormfront trolls threaten and harass the journalists named in the article.

Step three: Quillette editor on chief Andy Ngo is enthusiastically greeted by Antifa in Portland.

Wtf?

[Chucho]

I'm not dismissing Antifa. They're stupid douches who are easily trolled into violence.

Neo Nazis are committing mass murder.

Often.

LOL, really? This century?

[koriwhat]

How do you have the energy to be so painfully stupid AND a piece of shit?

You're a garbage person, dude. How do you sleep?

lmao! you obviously haven't been paying attention... idgaf about muslims. fuck khashoggi!

ps: i sleep great! thanks for asking. :tu


Oh, so it has to be weekly murders for it to be a problem.

Then Antifa will never, ever be a problem -- so you can stop worrying about them forever.

protests happen more than mass murder. it's only a matter of time and if you can't see this i don't know what will open your eyes. it was first glitter bombs, then piss in bottles, then bike locks to the back of heads, to beating on people with sticks, and now quick-crete milkshakes...

[koriwhat]

LOL, really? This century?

the dude's a dumbass making a mountain out of a molehill but that's basically the pattern for libs so he's just being who he's supposed to be tbh.

[Chucho]

the dude's a dumbass making a mountain out of a molehill but that's basically the pattern for libs so he's just being who he's supposed to be tbh.


He said "mass murders" happen constantly because of Neo Nazis. That's derp levels of stupid, tbh. Whenever a white man kills anyone other than a white man, it's major news.

I can think off the top of my head less than a handful of NeoNazi murders post-Hitler. If "mass murder" happened even once since the rise of an ultra minority fringe group that is over sensationalized by the media, everyone would know if it and it'd be another ST Trope for everytime we have a gun debate or race debate.

[koriwhat]

He said "mass murders" happen constantly because of Neo Nazis. That's derp levels of stupid, tbh. Whenever a white man kills anyone other than a white man, it's major news.

I can think off the top of my head less than a handful of NeoNazi murders post-Hitler. If "mass murder" happened even once since the rise of an ultra minority fringe group that is over sensationalized by the media, everyone would know if it and it'd be another ST Trope for everytime we have a gun debate or race debate.

exactly... not the best of analogies but, it's like you buy a new car, never seen it on the road before, and now all of a sudden you see it everywhere. the MSM acts the same by over sensationalizing what they want to push as truth like "the nazis are here!" and their stupid audience eats it up and now sees "nazis" in every facet of their pitiful lives.

[Nathan89]

https://twitter.com/Lucet_Veritas/status/1145348576710709249?s=20

There are people on this forum that support antifa. Many media members have shown their support. The normalization of a domestic terrorist group in the US. This is fine.

[Nathan89]

Get rid of the electoral college though so these groupthink blue bubbles can dictate the direction of the country.

[Nathan89]

https://twitter.com/Timcast/status/1145666686454063105?s=20

[Winehole23]

Get rid of the electoral college though so these groupthink blue bubbles can dictate the direction of the country. like red majorities haven't been in power for years. where are the GOP's policy ideas?

[Nathan89]

Remember when a kid in a maga hat smiling at a native American beating a drum in his face was national news for a week plus? The media was pushing the narrative that this was a prime example of the cancerous culture caused by Trump. Here we have blue city domestic terrorist groups beating people with crowbars, their fists, and throwing milkshakes with cement mix. All while people try to normalize it.

[koriwhat]

like red majorities haven't been in power for years. where are the GOP's policy ideas?

i have yet to hear anyone here in texas tell me they're a socialist. :lmao

[Winehole23]

i have yet to hear anyone here in texas tell me they're a socialist. :lmaoRG has confessed, there may be others.

Kinda like how all the Republicans turned into independent voters and libertarians after 2006.

[koriwhat]

RG has confessed, there may be others.

Kinda like how all the Republicans turned into independent voters and libertarians after 2006.

randomguy? yeah, i don't pay much attention to that dude at all so i would've never seen his confession.

as for all the people i come into contact with on a daily basis not one has told me anything other than being a liberal or republican but never ever a marxist commie scumbag socialist like i came across in LA not even 2 months ago.

[Pavlov]

LOL, really? This century?
You're LOLing synagogue shootings?

Different strokes, I guess.

[Winehole23]

One shouldn't rule out that kw is legit unaware of white power terrorism in the USA.

[Pavlov]

Or are you narrowing your definition of mass murder, Chucho?

Ok Neonazis are shooting and killing groups of people often.

Which I consider worse than what Antifa has done, however contemptible their actions may be.

Will Antifa ever get to "shooting up places of worship" bad? Dunno. I do know they haven't done that so far. Give them time?

[Chucho]

You're LOLing synagogue shootings?

Different strokes, I guess.


Were the shooters proven Neo Nazis?

[Chucho]

Yup. Nvmnd. Answered my own question. I'll see myself out.

[koriwhat]

One shouldn't rule out that kw is legit unaware of white power terrorism in the USA.

so we have a few cases here and there of individuals but i'm not seeing this whole movement that you're seeing. whereas we have a horde of people worldwide becoming more emboldened to escalate violence in antifa.

how do we deescalate both?

on one hand we have individual cases who end up murdering others due to a bs ideology of supremacy. i believe these individuals found a group who would accept them no matter how egregious that group is. it's hard to find these individuals because they're like sleeper cells in a way. there might be signs on social media, boards they visit, etc but still a needle in a hay stack.

on the flip side, you have hordes of people violently hurting others in the name of tolerance and peace. their ideology is the backbone of some of the worst regimes ever and they are more emboldened by the day to escalate the violence they cause. i may be wrong but soon we'll probably have a thread here about a mass murder by antifa. on top of all that, antifa is welcomed by local gov't as they stand down and watch the violence they cause escalate.

i don't know what the answers are and it's sickening on both cases.

[Pavlov]

so we have a few cases here and there of individuals but i'm not seeing this whole movement that you're seeing. whereas we have a horde of people worldwide becoming more emboldened to escalate violence in antifa.

how do we deescalate both?

on one hand we have individual cases who end up murdering others due to a bs ideology of supremacy. i believe these individuals found a group who would accept them no matter how egregious that group is. it's hard to find these individuals because they're like sleeper cells in a way. there might be signs on social media, boards they visit, etc but still a needle in a hay stack.

on the flip side, you have hordes of people violently hurting others in the name of tolerance and peace. their ideology is the backbone of some of the worst regimes ever and they are more emboldened by the day to escalate the violence they cause. i may be wrong but soon we'll probably have a thread here about a mass murder by antifa. on top of all that, antifa is welcomed by local gov't as they stand down and watch the violence they cause escalate.

i don't know what the answers are and it's sickening on both cases.Hordes?

Really?

I can't believe you're trying to downplay multiple mass shootings. This is what it's come to.

[koriwhat]

Hordes?

Really?

I can't believe you're trying to downplay multiple mass shootings. This is what it's come to.

It's not about downplaying... it's the same as everyone claiming 50 school shootings a year. It's hyperbole man and it's still sickening no matter what.

[Pavlov]

It's not about downplaying... it's the same as everyone claiming 50 school shootings a year. It's hyperbole man and it's still sickening no matter what.How is saying neo Nazis are responsible for several mass shootings hyperbole?

And "hordes" somehow isn't hyperbole.

lol kori

[koriwhat]

How is saying neo Nazis are responsible for several mass shootings hyperbole?

And "hordes" somehow isn't hyperbole.

lol kori

You're getting confused... hyperbole is this white supremacy movement.

Hordes of antifa isn't hyperbole whatsoever. They travel in hordes and are worldwide including correspondence with each other and planned attacks.

[Pavlov]

You're getting confused... hyperbole is this white supremacy movement.

Hordes of antifa isn't hyperbole whatsoever. They travel in hordes and are worldwide including correspondence with each other and planned attacks.So Robert Bowers walking into a synagogue, shooting 17 people and killing 11 of them is hyperbole?

Explain your thinking here.

[Nathan89]

"hyperbole is this white supremacy movement."

Seems he is saying there is no significant white supremacy movement. There isn't. Meanwhile there is mainstream support for antifa.

[Pavlov]

"hyperbole is this white supremacy movement."

Seems he is saying there is no significant white supremacy movement. There isn't.Oh, so Charlottesville didn't even happen?

The synagogue shootings didn't happen?

Dylann Roof never happened?

Explain.

[Nathan89]

Oh, so Charlottesville didn't even happen?

The synagogue shootings didn't happen?

Dylann Roof never happened?

Explain.

Show me mainstream support for any of these anomalies. You won't find it. Sorry, but the white supremacy movement is irrelevant in this country. The movement has dwindled to complete irrelevance. That being said it may return in the future because of politicians selling the country to illegals which will essentially wash out the American conservative vote. But that's just a possibility. Currently the movement is irrelevant.

[Nathan89]

Elizabeth Warren calls on big tech to censor users. Don't you just love when elected politicians urge virtual monopolies to silence Americans?

[spurraider21]

Elizabeth Warren calls on big tech to censor users. Don't you just love when elected politicians urge virtual monopolies to silence Americans?
Det time trump urged the nfl to silence it’s players

[Spurminator]

I remember the good old days when we had three tv channels and the government never pressured them to censor anything.

[Spurminator]

Meanwhile there is mainstream support for antifa.

Bullshit.

:lol You lying pieces of shit know the only way the Antifa scaremongering works is if you can tie it to mainstream leftism, so you try your damndest to do so.

[Pavlov]

Show me mainstream support for any of these anomalies. You won't find it. Sorry, but the white supremacy movement is irrelevant in this country. The movement has dwindled to complete irrelevance. That being said it may return in the future because of politicians selling the country to illegals which will essentially wash out the American conservative vote. But that's just a possibility. Currently the movement is irrelevant.How is it irrelevant when it's responsible for so many deaths?

Explain.

[koriwhat]

Bullshit.

:lol You lying pieces of shit know the only way the Antifa scaremongering works is if you can tie it to mainstream leftism, so you try your damndest to do so.

spurm, there's def support for antifa from the MSM. there's even compilations of videos of their support so you can keep scoffing all you want but it's reality whether you accept it or not.

and pav, Nathan was right. i am speaking about a movement. with that said, i don't have the answers to these problems and they're indeed getting worse. the mass murders are going up as are antifa's violent tactics. it's sad that there's people out there who think killing others is a solution because they're weak individuals who have nothing to offer this world as well as hordes of losers brainwashed to believe anyone who opposes them are "nazis". what a sick state of affairs our country is in.

[koriwhat]

Det time trump urged the nfl to silence it’s players

there's a huge difference but conflating the two is always the job of a good little lefty.

1) nfl players have a code of conduct that was never enforced & they aren't politicians working on our tax dollars.

2) warren is advocating to silence the opposition to kamala "fake african american" harris. you don't see the issue with this?

ps: either way, i don't watch football anyhow so i don't really give a fuck about what they do or don't do tbh. gay sport for gay men who love slapping each other on the ass.

[spurraider21]

there's a huge difference but conflating the two is always the job of a good little lefty.

1) nfl players have a code of conduct that was never enforced & they aren't politicians working on our tax dollars.

2) warren is advocating to silence the opposition to kamala "fake african american" harris. you don't see the issue with this?

ps: either way, i don't watch football anyhow so i don't really give a fuck about what they do or don't do tbh. gay sport for gay men who love slapping each other on the ass.
twitter/facebook/youtube have a code of conduct too

:lol koritwat

[koriwhat]

twitter/facebook/youtube have a code of conduct too

:lol koritwat

they do don't they? they're also teetering between section 230 and losing it due to their nefarious ways. you want an open platform or a tech giant acting as big brother and throwing our constitutional rights right out the door as they make billions off our data?

[Spurminator]

spurm, there's def support for antifa from the MSM. there's even compilations of videos of their support so you can keep scoffing all you want but it's reality whether you accept it or not.

A video edit of talking heads downplaying Antifa is not the same as "mainstream support."

:lol @ taking lessons on "reality" from you

[Spurminator]

you want an open platform or a tech giant acting as big brother and throwing our constitutional rights right out the door as they make billions off our data?

You sound like Elizabeth Warren now. One of the first smart things I've seen you say.

She got your vote?

[Pavlov]

they do don't they? they're also teetering between section 230 and losing it due to their nefarious ways. you want an open platform or a tech giant acting as big brother and throwing our constitutional rights right out the door as they make billions off our data?What constitutional rights are YouTube throwing out the door?

What do you want big government to do about it?

[koriwhat]

A video edit of talking heads downplaying Antifa is not the same as "mainstream support."

:lol @ taking lessons on "reality" from you

downplaying? lol you can downplay if you want but they weren't downplaying anything. praise be to the anti-fascists facists!


You sound like Elizabeth Warren now. One of the first smart things I've seen you say.

She got your vote?

i sound nothing like her tbh... warren just a week ago, if that, said we should breakup the tech giants but now a week later she is advocating for silencing her and her parties opposition. she's def a politician seeing how she talks out both sides of her mouth. almost as good as her fighting for the less fortunate while she lives in a mansion. she's a damn fraud just like the rest of them.

[koriwhat]

What constitutional rights are YouTube throwing out the door?

What do you want big government to do about it?

1st amendment. i want to see all social networks crash and burn tbh. they're a plague on society and societies mental wellness.

[Pavlov]

spurm, there's def support for antifa from the MSM. there's even compilations of videos of their support so you can keep scoffing all you want but it's reality whether you accept it or not.

and pav, Nathan was right. i am speaking about a movement. with that said, i don't have the answers to these problems and they're indeed getting worse. the mass murders are going up as are antifa's violent tactics. it's sad that there's people out there who think killing others is a solution because they're weak individuals who have nothing to offer this world as well as hordes of losers brainwashed to believe anyone who opposes them are "nazis". what a sick state of affairs our country is in.This is complete bullshit.

Cable news is not the end all be all of America.

No wonder your worldview is so distorted.

lol "hordes"

I am scoffing you and will always scoff anyone citing pundits who get watched by a few hundred thousand people at most as the voice of all media everywhere.

[Pavlov]

1st amendment.No 1st amendment rights on YouTube,


i want to see all social networks crash and burn tbh. they're a plague on society and societies mental wellness.ST is a social network.

What do you want big government to do about YouTube?

[koriwhat]

This is complete bullshit.

Cable news is not the end all be all of America.

No wonder your worldview is so distorted.

lol "hordes"

i don't watch cable news pav. i see clips here and there but i mainly watch citizen journalists hitting the streets to see where the real mess is. you think you got me pegged but you have no clue what you're talking about. how about we just agree to disagree then?

[Pavlov]

i don't watch cable news pav:lol doesn't consume MSM but comments on MSM without reading or watching.

[koriwhat]

ST is a social network.

indeed it is... it's not in the same realm as say FB. lets not kid each other.

[Pavlov]

indeed it is... it's not in the same realm as say FB. lets not kid each other.But people get banned here all the time.

What about their "1st amendment rights"?

[koriwhat]

:lol doesn't consume MSM but comments on MSM without reading or watching.

if yall didn't post, i probably wouldn't know half the shit yall speak about. it's on yall, i just try to catch up.

[Pavlov]

if yall didn't post, i probably wouldn't know half the shit yall speak about. it's on yall, i just try to catch up.Antifa is our fault now:lol

[koriwhat]

But people get banned here all the time.

What about their "1st amendment rights"?

yeah, i think it's bs too. most get banned for being total and utter idiots while social networks are wide sweeping bans due to political party affiliation. big difference though i think both are horrible.

as well, you're acting like timvp & kori are raking in billions while manipulating people day in and day out. why do conflate things all the time?

[koriwhat]

Antifa is our fault now:lol

never said that. i've seen some antifa stuff here but not a lot tbh. i see a lot more in those videos i claim to watch by citizen journalists. again, you present the truth you want to accept.

[spurraider21]

yeah, i think it's bs too. most get banned for being total and utter idiots while social networks are wide sweeping bans due to political party affiliation. big difference though i think both are horrible.

as well, you're acting like timvp & kori are raking in billions while manipulating people day in and day out. why do conflate things all the time?
their wealth has no bearing on whether or not you believe they are violating 1st amendment rights (they aren't. the first amendment only binds government, not private individuals or companies)

[Spurminator]

Tell me more about the sweeping bans against people for their political affiliations, koriwhat, that seems like something I would have noticed on my feeds.

Or are you using hyperbole again?

[Pavlov]

yeah, i think it's bs too. most get banned for being total and utter idiots while social networks are wide sweeping bans due to political party affiliation. big difference though i think both are horrible.I think you're lying about the political party affiliation part tbh. You'll have to prove that.


as well, you're acting like timvp & kori are raking in billions while manipulating people day in and day out. why do conflate things all the time?You're the one who said all social networks.

If you want to except several social networks for some reason, that's up to you to clarify your stance.

[Pavlov]

never said that. i've seen some antifa stuff here but not a lot tbh. i see a lot more in those videos i claim to watch by citizen journalists. again, you present the truth you want to accept.So have you watched any citizen journalist coverage of synagogue and mosque shootings and the fact they influence further attacks?

Do you want to accept the truth that they have happened?

[koriwhat]

their wealth has no bearing on whether or not you believe they are violating 1st amendment rights (they aren't. the first amendment only binds government, not private individuals or companies)

indeed it does though SR but you just have no clue. section 230 is something they're going to lose and then you'll see your theory crash and burn before your own eyes and will have to accept that your truth is nothing but rose colored glasses.

[spurraider21]

indeed it does though SR but you just have no clue. section 230 is something they're going to lose and then you'll see your theory crash and burn before your own eyes and will have to accept that your truth is nothing but rose colored glasses.
its not rose colored glasses. it's the constitution. the first amendment prevents government from limiting free speech. it does nothing to prevent private actors from limiting free speech. its not my theory its established constitutional law. private actors can limit free speech as much as their heart desires, and its not a first amendment issue.

if i invite someone to my house and tell them "no guns allowed" i'm not violating the 2nd amendment either.

[koriwhat]

their wealth has no bearing on whether or not you believe they are violating 1st amendment rights (they aren't. the first amendment only binds government, not private individuals or companies)

i'm all for free speech even if it hurts your feelings. with that said, you're talking about a couple individuals vs a multi-billion dollar corporation data mining and being propped up by section 230. there's a huge difference SR.



So have you watched any citizen journalist coverage of synagogue and mosque shootings and the fact they influence further attacks?

Do you want to accept the truth that they have happened?

of course i accept the truth that both of those happened. wtf? and yes, i've seen a bit on both of those incidents.

[koriwhat]

its not rose colored glasses. it's the constitution. the first amendment prevents government from limiting free speech. it does nothing to prevent private actors from limiting free speech. its not my theory its established constitutional law. private actors can limit free speech as much as their heart desires, and its not a first amendment issue.

if i invite someone to my house and tell them "no guns allowed" i'm not violating the 2nd amendment either.

you have no clue. they operate under section 230 because they claim they're a "public forum". look into it and get back to me.

[koriwhat]

Tell me more about the sweeping bans against people for their political affiliations, koriwhat, that seems like something I would have noticed on my feeds.

Or are you using hyperbole again?

it's silly to even list anything when this is basically the biggest news there is out there besides trump shaking kim's hand the other day. breaking up tech giants for this practice isn't a new concept that just hit the streets.

you acting ignorant to this is ridiculous.

[spurraider21]

you have no clue. they operate under section 230 because they claim they're a "public forum". look into it and get back to me.
i dont think you know what section 230 does, tbh

it shields them from liability for comments made by users. so if somebody posts kiddie porn and legitimate death threats on twitter, twitter itself wouldn't be criminalized for that content.

it says nothing about twitter being liable or not liable for violating other users' first amendment rights. whether 230 is there or isnt there, twitter is still a private actor and not the government, and therefore is impossible for twitter to violate a user's first amendment rights.

[Spurminator]

it's silly to even list anything when this is basically the biggest news there is out there besides trump shaking kim's hand the other day. breaking up tech giants for this practice isn't a new concept that just hit the streets.

you acting ignorant to this is ridiculous.

Sweeping bans against people for their political affiliation is big news?

Show me one link.

[koriwhat]

Sweeping bans against people for their political affiliation is big news?

Show me one link.

https://duckduckgo.com/?q=banning+conservatives&t=ffab&atb=v167-1&ia=web

[koriwhat]

i dont think you know what section 230 does, tbh

it shields them from liability for comments made by users. so if somebody posts kiddie porn and legitimate death threats on twitter, twitter itself wouldn't be criminalized for that content.

it says nothing about twitter being liable or not liable for violating other users' first amendment rights. whether 230 is there or isnt there, twitter is still a private actor and not the government, and therefore is impossible for twitter to violate a user's first amendment rights.

"public forum" my friend... they aren't that!

[Will Hunting]

Just curious...which poster on this website has posted stuff that openly supports and encourages Antifa? The only mention of Antifa I’ve seen on this website is conservatives propping it up as some big threat to society and liberals responding with confusion/indifference since Antifa is such a tiny group of people who don’t matter.

[spurraider21]

"public forum" my friend... they aren't that!
what is your understanding of "public forum" and how it relates to their ability to be held liable for first amendment violations?

if you repeal 230, or refuse to offer those protections to facebook/twitter/youtube, all you're going to see is a VAST increase in censorship (as they are now facing liability for posts of their users), and it STILL wouldn't be a first amendment issue, because it is STILL not state/government censorship (which is the only kind protected by the first amendment)

[spurraider21]

i mean, here's section 230 in its entirety... i dont know what you're trying to drive at, koriwhat

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/47/230

[Spurminator]

https://duckduckgo.com/?q=banning+conservatives&t=ffab&atb=v167-1&ia=web

Jesus, dude... A search results page for a "banning conservatives" search doesn't prove that conservatives are being banned for their political beliefs.

"Look, here's proof that wizards and goblins exist! https://duckduckgo.com/?q=wizards+and+goblins+really+exist&t=hp&ia=web"

Show me a reliable article that proves sweeping bans against conservatives for their *political affiliation.*

If it helps, racism is not a political affiliation. Physical threats are not political affiliations. Homophobia, disinformation, and bigotry are not political affiliations. Breaking the code of conduct is not a political affiliation. What you suggested is that social networks are banning conservatives simply for being conservative.

[koriwhat]

Just curious...which poster on this website has posted stuff that openly supports and encourages Antifa? The only mention of Antifa I’ve seen on this website is conservatives propping it up as some big threat to society and liberals responding with confusion/indifference since Antifa is such a tiny group of people who don’t matter.

not sure who here on the board if anyone. and antifa isn't tiny.


what is your understanding of "public forum" and how it relates to their ability to be held liable for first amendment violations?

if you repeal 230, or refuse to offer those protections to facebook/twitter/youtube, all you're going to see is a VAST increase in censorship (as they are now facing liability for posts of their users), and it STILL wouldn't be a first amendment issue, because it is STILL not state/government censorship (which is the only kind protected by the first amendment)

if they stuck to their principles of being an "open forum" then none of this would matter. take away 230 and i hope censorship sky rockets and all the platforms burn to the ground. it would be a dream come true. :tu

[spurraider21]

if they stuck to their principles of being an "open forum" then none of this would matter. take away 230 and i hope censorship sky rockets and all the platforms burn to the ground. it would be a dream come true. :tu
a) and none of that would implicate first amendment rights of users, regardless of whether 230 is there nor not. as long as you recognize that, we're on the same page

b) their protections under 230 aren't contingent on them being an "open forum." to get protections under 230, all they have to be is an "interactive computer service" which the code defines as:

(2)The term “interactive computer service” means any information service, system, or access software provider that provides or enables computer access by multiple users to a computer server, including specifically a service or system that provides access to the Internet and such systems operated or services offered by libraries or educational institutions.

nothing about being an "open forum" or "public forum"

[koriwhat]

Jesus, dude... A search results page for a "banning conservatives" search doesn't prove that conservatives are being banned for their political beliefs.

"Look, here's proof that wizards and goblins exist! https://duckduckgo.com/?q=wizards+and+goblins+really+exist&t=hp&ia=web"

Show me an article that proves sweeping bans against conservatives for their *political affiliation.*

If it helps, racism is not a political affiliation. Physical threats are not political affiliations. Homophobia, disinformation, and bigotry are not political affiliations. Breaking the code of conduct is not a political affiliation. What you suggested is that social networks are banning conservatives simply for being conservative.

there's a lot of smoke and mirrors. some(right) are banned for going against the ToS while others aren't(left). you go against the ToS then ok but why not apply it equally? they kind of just started doing so but not really. once again, smoke and mirrors.

then you have those who speak about certain issues and they're demonetized, silenced, or banned altogether.

there's numerous paths the tech giants go down to silence their opposition.

you can claim whatever you'd like but hearing it straight from dorsey and his lawyers mouth was all the proof i needed. they were the first to really expose themselves while the others sit in their ivory castles lying through their split tongues.

[Spurminator]

Just curious...which poster on this website has posted stuff that openly supports and encourages Antifa? The only mention of Antifa I’ve seen on this website is conservatives propping it up as some big threat to society and liberals responding with confusion/indifference since Antifa is such a tiny group of people who don’t matter.

I don't know about this forum, there is some sentiment of "They're punching Nazis? Okay cool" on Twitter that I don't think is entirely accurate or justified. They tend to create chaos when none is necessary.

I don't really know much about Ngo, but he sounds like more of a dickish provocateur than an all-out Nazi... and while I don't lose a lot of sleep when people who try to incite violence have violence thrust upon them, I don't think these guys help themselves (or anyone) when they take the bait.

[Nathan89]

Det time trump urged the nfl to silence it’s players

I don't support that but that has no systemic impact. It's like Trump trying to leave a few drops of water on the kitchen floor and Warren is trying to flood.the kitchen.

[Pavlov]

not sure who here on the board if anyone. and antifa isn't tiny.How many people are in Antifa total?



if they stuck to their principles of being an "open forum" then none of this would matter. take away 230 and i hope censorship sky rockets and all the platforms burn to the ground. it would be a dream come true. :tuI thought you didn't want censorship.

[Will Hunting]

not sure who here on the board if anyone. and antifa isn't tiny.
How big is Antifa member-wise?

[Will Hunting]

I don't know about this forum, there is some sentiment of "They're punching Nazis? Okay cool" on Twitter that I don't think is entirely accurate or justified. They tend to create chaos when none is necessary.

I don't really know much about Ngo, but he sounds like more of a dickish provocateur than an all-out Nazi... and while I don't lose a lot of sleep when people who try to incite violence have violence thrust upon them, I don't think these guys help themselves (or anyone) when they take the bait.
I'm not denying Antifa exists, I'm denying how influential it is.

Your example even is kinda my point. They tweeted a few things that aren't accurate or justified. Fine. How is that "creating chaos"?

The Antifa rallies I've seen on youtube look like nothing more than a bunch of manchildren in their late 20s/early 30s who live at home and haven't had anything to do since Occupy Wall Street was a thing.

[koriwhat]

How big is Antifa member-wise?

Wtf knows but videos definitely tell a different story of their size than y'all claim. This isn't just a Berkley or Portland thing either but worldwide too. Shit, we got antifa hacks in ATX for fucks sake.

[koriwhat]

How many people are in Antifa total?


I thought you didn't want censorship.

I'm don't... as for social networks, I'd like them to be a thing of the past going forward. Y'all make them out to be something good but they aren't and we all know that.

[Pavlov]

I'm don't... as for social networks, I'd like them to be a thing of the past going forward. Y'all make them out to be something good but they aren't and we all know that.So you don't know how many people make up the "hordes" and you're praying for the end of social media on a social media site.

:tu

[ElNono]

https://twitter.com/FaithGoldy/status/1145090586459955200?s=19

Police bad now. Blue lives don't matter anymore?

[Spurminator]

I'm not denying Antifa exists, I'm denying how influential it is.

Your example even is kinda my point. They tweeted a few things that aren't accurate or justified. Fine. How is that "creating chaos"?

The Antifa rallies I've seen on youtube look like nothing more than a bunch of manchildren in their late 20s/early 30s who live at home and haven't had anything to do since Occupy Wall Street was a thing.

I was addressing your question about support for Antifa. To some extent, the violence is celebrated on Twitter, but I would never call it significant or "mainstream."

What I'm saying was inaccurate is the idea that Antifa is only about punching Nazis. Ngo is a douche, but not sure he's a Nazi.

And the chaos I'm talking about isn't the tweets. An example is a rally in Dallas over confederate monuments that was completely peaceful until a few masked idiots started throwing shit at cops. It was like they wanted things to get out of control. They're small in number but their contribution to the narrative is significant.

[Chris]

"not sure he's a nazi" :lol

[Spurminator]

"not sure he's a nazi" :lol

I've literally never heard of him before this week, so I can't say for sure. As someone who's up on his conservative shit-slingers from retweeting them and posting them for hours every day, I'm sure you know more about him. You should appreciate that I'm giving him the benefit of the doubt.

[koriwhat]

I've literally never heard of him before this week, so I can't say for sure. As someone who's up on his conservative shit-slingers from retweeting them and posting them for hours every day, I'm sure you know more about him. You should appreciate that I'm giving him the benefit of the doubt.

you know who the nazis were though right? it wasn't just an ideology but also a ethnicity thing too and Ngo doesn't fit the bill. you probably should know the difference when talking about this subject.

[koriwhat]

"not sure he's a nazi" :lol

asian gays are the new blonde blue eyed whites of the 1940s!

[Nathan89]

https://twitter.com/RealSaavedra/status/1146143587811258370?s=20

Their fascism is starting to bloom folks. Of course this forum will deny it. Just like they were pretending open borders wasn't a common position for Dems just a few months ago. Now we have an entire stage of Dem candidates campaigning for defacto open borders. This will inevitably catch them by surprise.

[spurraider21]

prosecuting people for making fun of congress would not only be illegal, but (for once in this thread) would also shift us toward fascism. in that video, she did go onto clarify that she was referring to people making threats and attempting to intimidate congress. now, random twitter posts likely wouldn't qualify as a legitimate threat that could be prosecuted

[Nathan89]

Small steps. This what happens when you start embracing censorship. Elizabeth Warren was asking big tech to censor citizens the other day. Apparently it's unacceptable to make fun of politicians. It will get worse. The boat isn't turning around.

[spurraider21]

Small steps. This what happens when you start embracing censorship. Elizabeth Warren was asking big tech to censor citizens the other day. Apparently it's unacceptable to make fun of politicians. It will get worse. The boat isn't turning around.
big tech can do whatever they want, as they are not the government. private companies making those decisions isn't "fascism"

as long as wilson's comments were geared toward legitimate threats and attempts to intimidate, then she's right and prosecution is legally on the table without fascism encroachment concerns. she seemed to go towards that direction.

[Nathan89]

big tech can do whatever they want, as they are not the government. private companies making those decisions isn't "fascism"

as long as wilson's comments were geared toward legitimate threats and attempts to intimidate, then she's right and prosecution is legally on the table without fascism encroachment concerns. she seemed to go towards that direction.

I realize that. It's the fact that Dems lean on big tech to silence citizens that makes it worth mentioning.

If her comment was focused on comments that are threats then it was a very low iq decision to start the comment with how unacceptable it is that American citizens are allowed to make fun of elected politicians.

[Nathan89]

Russians engaging is social media is bad.

Dem senators telling big tech to silence Americans is good.

[spurraider21]

I realize that. It's the fact that Dems lean on big tech to silence citizens that makes it worth mentioning.

If her comment was focused on comments that are threats then it was a very low iq decision to start the comment with how unacceptable it is that American citizens are allowed to make fun of elected politicians.
and trump wants to make it easier to sue the press, chilling free speech. you just turn a blind eye when it doesn't fit your narrative, and childishly point and pretend its all the dems fault

im not touting wilson as a brilliant congresswoman who is or should be a leading voice for the party or country. there are a lot of stupid people in elected office

[Pavlov]

I realize that. It's the fact that Dems lean on big tech to silence citizens that makes it worth mentioning.

If her comment was focused on comments that are threats then it was a very low iq decision to start the comment with how unacceptable it is that American citizens are allowed to make fun of elected politicians.:lol you're begging to be a victim
:lol white people

[Spurtacular]

:lol white people

:lol Cucklov
:lol Par

[FrostKing]

Where do I purchase my 2020 Trump hat?

[Pavlov]

Where do I purchase my 2020 Trump hat?Gee, if there were only some kind of metaphorical engine that could search computer networks using phrases like "2020 Trump hat" -- someone could make some money developing that....

[koriwhat]

big tech can do whatever they want, as they are not the government. private companies making those decisions isn't "fascism"

same ol' lame duck loony lefty position. grow a spine you loser!

[koriwhat]

:lol you're begging to be a victim
:lol white people

your white guilt is proof of your "victimhood". loser!

[Pavlov]

same ol' lame duck loony lefty position. grow a spine you loser!:lol that's a laissez faire position if there ever was one.

What do you want the federal government to do about YouTube?

[Pavlov]

your white guilt is proof of your "victimhood". loser!What do you want the federal government to do about YouTube?

[spurraider21]

same ol' lame duck loony lefty position. grow a spine you loser!
I’m just telling you how the first amendment works. Grow a spine and stop being a pussy about it

[koriwhat]

What do you want the federal government to do about YouTube?

blow it up! fuck bigTech. btw, yt is google and google is in a heap of trouble.


I’m just telling you how the first amendment works. Grow a spine and stop being a pussy about it

you keep claiming this 1st amendment shit when you want "private companies" to silence opposing ideas. you're not really for free speech and more for a world of bigGov and bigTech to control your life. lame!

[spurraider21]

you keep claiming this 1st amendment shit when you want "private companies" to silence opposing ideas.
its not what i want them to do. but it's their product and their prerogative. my point is that it's not a "freedom of speech" issue unless its the government limiting speech. a company enforcing its terms of service isn't "fascism." in a thread about fascism, that's something pretty relevant to point out


you're not really for free speech and more for a world of bigGov and bigTech to control your life. lame!
i'm absolutely for freedom of speech. you're the one who wants more bigGov by having them control private businesses like twitter and youtube

[Pavlov]

blow it up!What does that mean?


fuck bigTech. btw, yt is google and google is in a heap of trouble.Explain the heap of trouble.

Using words.

[koriwhat]

its not what i want them to do. but it's their product and their prerogative. my point is that it's not a "freedom of speech" issue unless its the government limiting speech. a company enforcing its terms of service isn't "fascism." in a thread about fascism, that's something pretty relevant to point out


i'm absolutely for freedom of speech. you're the one who wants more bigGov by having them control private businesses like twitter and youtube

you're missing the point altogether. you prop up bigTech because they have a ToS and you claim they're abiding by it but they aren't. they're biased and their bias are out in the open yet you choose to turn a blind eye.

you want an eye opening experience, watch the joe rogan podcast with tim pool, jack dorsey, and jacks stupid sjw lawyer who doesn't know shit about shit.

[spurraider21]

you're missing the point altogether. you prop up bigTech because they have a ToS and you claim they're abiding by it but they aren't. they're biased and their bias are out in the open yet you choose to turn a blind eye.

you want an eye opening experience, watch the joe rogan podcast with tim pool, jack dorsey, and jacks stupid sjw lawyer who doesn't know shit about shit.
i'm not propping them up. i'm just saying their censorship isn't a first amendment or fascism issue

[Pavlov]

i'm not propping them up. i'm just saying their censorship isn't a first amendment or fascism issue:lol how many times do we have to explain this simple fact?

[koriwhat]

i'm not propping them up. i'm just saying their censorship isn't a first amendment or fascism issue

it most def is and i am going to assume at this point that you're unwilling to hear it right out of their damn mouths in that JR podcast. so be it...

[Pavlov]

it most def is and i am going to assume at this point that you're unwilling to hear it right out of their damn mouths in that JR podcast. so be it...No, you need to explain in your own words how it is a first amendment issue and fascism.

Your claim.

Your burden of proof.

[koriwhat]

No, you need to explain in your own words how it is a first amendment issue and fascism.

Your claim.

Your burden of proof.

i literally don't have to explain shit to you chump. not a god damn thing whatsoever just like you don't explain shit to me... still waiting in that other thread and i'll keep waiting. i don't give one fuck about you, your demands, or anything to do with you.

[Pavlov]

i literally don't have to explain shit to you chump. not a god damn thing whatsoever just like you don't explain shit to me... still waiting in that other thread and i'll keep waiting. i don't give one fuck about you, your demands, or anything to do with you.
:lol cop out.

You literally can't explain how it's a first amendment issue or fascism because it's neither.

You will literally have time to cry like a little bitch about it.

[koriwhat]

:lol cop out.

You literally can't explain how it's a first amendment issue or fascism because it's neither.

You will literally have time to cry like a little bitch about it.

i literally wasn't even talking to you in the first place. move along, sign off ST, and go spend more time with that whale of wife of yours.

ps: have you watched that podcast either? then stfu!

[Pavlov]

i literally wasn't even talking to you in the first place. move along, sign off ST, and go spend more time with that whale of wife of yours.:lmao the literal crying begins

It's not a first amendment issue.

It's not fascism.

That's all.

lol kori

[koriwhat]

:lmao the literal crying begins

It's not a first amendment issue.

It's not fascism.

That's all.

lol kori

you can run around all day acting like the child that you are while deflecting left and right... it's all good. at the end of the day i hold nothing in my heart for you, no sympathy, empathy, love, hate, etc. you literally mean nothing to me pav. when you ask of me i add my 2 cents but you mostly demand of me and i just don't care for bitches nor their demands. move along if i upset you you fucking girl.

[spurraider21]

you cant talk about the first amendment unless you've listened to that one joe rogan podcast!

[Pavlov]

you can run around all day acting like the child that you are while deflecting left and right... it's all good. at the end of the day i hold nothing in my heart for you, no sympathy, empathy, love, hate, etc. you literally mean nothing to me pav. when you ask of me i add my 2 cents but you mostly demand of me and i just don't care for bitches nor their demands. move along if i upset you you fucking girl.:lmao more crying.

You literally had the time to explain how this is a first amendment issue and fascism.

You literally chose to cry.

lol kori

[Pavlov]

In short:

Not a first amendment issue.

Not fascism.

No Trumpista here has ever made an actual argument supporting the idea they are either.

They never will.

lol

[koriwhat]

you cant talk about the first amendment unless you've listened to that one joe rogan podcast!

watch the podcast or don't. stay blind!


:lmao more crying.

You literally had the time to explain how this is a first amendment issue and fascism.

You literally chose to cry.

lol kori

i want yall to hear verbatim but yall won't do it and that's on yall. same reason yall probably watch cnn.

[Chris]

big tech can do whatever they want

Good goy!

[Pavlov]

watch the podcast or don't. stay blind!



i want yall to hear verbatim but yall won't do it and that's on yall. same reason yall probably watch cnn.So you demand we watch a podcast.

You literally had time to explain it yourself again.

[Pavlov]

Good goy!Weird Jew-baiting aside, what do you want the government to do about YouTube?

[koriwhat]

btw, yall are bitching about how i want yall to hear the words verbatim out of one of the biggest tech giants out there including his lawyer but yall refuse to do so. why is that?

aside from that, yall are dismissing that podcast because i suggested it or because 2 big libs are running the show? i don't get yalls bs pov.

[Pavlov]

btw, yall are bitching about how i want yall to hear the words verbatim out of one of the biggest tech giants out there including his lawyer but yall refuse to do so. why is that?

aside from that, yall are dismissing that podcast because i suggested it or because 2 big libs are running the show? i don't get yalls bs pov.I'm dismissing it because it has nothing to do with your explaining how this is a first amendment issue or fascism.

If you can't explain it yourself, just say so. We will believe you.

[koriwhat]

So you demand we watch a podcast.

You literally had time to explain it yourself again.

you want short snippets? nah, it's better in its entirety but whatever. you choose to dismiss it and that's fine. you choose to claim bigTech isn't silencing their opposition with fascism but they are. it's all good.

[koriwhat]

Weird Jew-baiting aside, what do you want the government to do about YouTube?

i've read goy from you before too... who's the real racist tbe?

[koriwhat]

I'm dismissing it because it has nothing to do with your explaining how this is a first amendment issue or fascism.

If you can't explain it yourself, just say so. We will believe you.

not going to explain it because i'm not going to fuck with their words. go listen/watch for yourself or don't. be informed or stay dumb like you are. it's all good either way.

[Pavlov]

you want short snippets? nah, it's better in its entirety but whatever. you choose to dismiss it and that's fine. you choose to claim bigTech isn't silencing their opposition with fascism but they are. it's all good.I want you to explain how this is a first amendment issue and fascism.

You don't need any video for that. You claim to be a man; be a man and speak for yourself.

[Pavlov]

i've read goy from you before too... who's the real racist tbe?Where?

I'm pretty sure I've only quoted that when Qhris uses it.

[Pavlov]

not going to explain it:lmao then shut up about it.

[koriwhat]

I want you to explain how this is a first amendment issue and fascism.

You don't need any video for that. You claim to be a man; be a man and speak for yourself.

i did so yesterday. today, i give you straight up proof you and another member here are refusing to accept and just want to turn a blind eye too. it's all good. like i said before, stay dumb, uninformed, and psychotic like you are.

[Pavlov]

i did so yesterday.Link?

I'd love to read it if it's your own words.

You could have lead with this instead of melting down.

If you just posted a YouTube, lol you.

[koriwhat]

:lmao then shut up about it.

i did shut up and you kept on. the left's tactics are easy to point out just like this stupid game you're playing of me continuing on when i did so because yall keep dragging this out. i would've dropped this posts back.

[koriwhat]

Link?

I'd love to read it if it's your own words.

You could have lead with this instead of melting down.

there's a search feature above. learn how to walk on your own two feet you big ol' baby.

[Pavlov]

i did shut up and you kept on. the left's tactics are easy to point out just like this stupid game you're playing of me continuing on when i did so because yall keep dragging this out. i would've dropped this posts back.You didn't prove it's a first amendment issue or fascism.

We've just been laughing at you ever since.

[Pavlov]

there's a search feature above. learn how to walk on your own two feet you big ol' baby.It's your claim.

Now you're not backing up another claim.

You made the post. Just link it. I'll read it.

That's how it works.

[koriwhat]

You didn't prove it's a first amendment issue or fascism.

We've just been laughing at you ever since.

i've been laughing at you since day 1 pav/chump/bitch whatever your handle is.

[koriwhat]

It's your claim.

Now you're not backing up another claim.

You made the post. Just link it. I'll read it.

That's how it works.

dude, my claim was the fact that idgaf about what you ask of me or demand of me. as well, i was talking with another poster here not you but you chose to make it about you. move along pussy.

[Pavlov]

dude, my claim was the fact that idgaf about what you ask of me or demand of me. as well, i was talking with another poster here not you but you chose to make it about you. move along pussy.:lmao

You made claims you can't back up.

This isn't a first amendment issue.

It isn't fascism.

You didn't prove it is either.

You never will.

lol kori

[koriwhat]

:lmao

You made claims you can't back up.

This isn't a first amendment issue.

It isn't fascism.

You didn't prove it is either.

You never will.

lol kori

same old tired ass shtick...

you won't watch nor listen to a podcast easily available to you in order to hear exactly the words verbatim out of jack dorsey and his lawyers mouth but somehow that's my problem?

pav, idc if you do or don't watch/listen to that podcast tbh. idc what you ask or demand of me either.

you are nothing to me pav. we're not friends here nor in real life and will never be either so why do you insist on keeping up your childish games? just move along.

idc if you think i'm a schmuck, a simpleton, i live in a basement, etc... doesn't matter just like you don't matter. just move along.

[Pavlov]

same old tired ass shtick...

you won't watch nor listen to a podcast easily available to you in order to hear exactly the words verbatim out of jack dorsey and his lawyers mouth but somehow that's my problem?

pav, idc if you do or don't watch/list to that podcast tbh. idc what you ask or demand of me either.

you are nothing to me pav. we're not friends here nor in real life and will never be either so why do you insist on keeping up your childish games? just move along.

idc if you think i'm a schmuck, a simpleton, i live in a basement, etc... doesn't matter just like you don't matter. just move along.You made claims you can't prove.

That's all.

muh 3.5 hour podcast isn't proof of anything

YOU can't make an argument it's a first amendment issue.

YOU can't make an argument it's fascism.

Because it isn't.

lol kori

[Chris]

https://twitter.com/RealSaavedra/status/1146488035208552449?s=19

[Pavlov]

https://twitter.com/RealSaavedra/status/1146488035208552449?s=19
Also not fascism.

[koriwhat]

You made claims you can't prove.

That's all.

muh 3.5 hour podcast isn't proof of anything

YOU can't make an argument it's a first amendment issue.

YOU can't make an argument it's fascism.

Because it isn't.

lol kori

look girl, i watch full depos, testimonies, and the like... while you beg and beg for things you can simply watch/listen to in their entirety. i'd be doing a disservice by putting jack dorsey's and his lawyer's words into my own. you simply don't want to watch nor listen and that's fine but you'll continue to go on as if i didn't provide you full context when i have tried time and time again. you're a lost cause.

[koriwhat]

https://twitter.com/RealSaavedra/status/1146488035208552449?s=19

god all these "dudes" are exactly the same weak no spine having betas. :vomit:

[Chris]

god all these "dudes" are exactly the same weak no spine having betas. :vomit:

Surprised he didn't say it in Spanish.

[Chris]

https://twitter.com/Breaking911/status/1146504623840256000

[Pavlov]

look girl, i watch full depos, testimonies, and the like... while you beg and beg for things you can simply watch/listen to in their entirety. i'd be doing a disservice by putting jack dorsey's and his lawyer's words into my own. you simply don't want to watch nor listen and that's fine but you'll continue to go on as if i didn't provide you full context when i have tried time and time again. you're a lost cause.Look, kori -- I asked YOU to back up YOUR claim using YOUR words.

Your demand that I watch a three and a half hour YouTube is a cop out. The first amendment is one sentence long.

All you have to do is explain how it applies to YouTube's terms of service and content decisions.

It's your claim.

Back it up with your words.

[Chris]

https://twitter.com/allidoisowen/status/1146197361443692544

[Pavlov]

https://twitter.com/allidoisowen/status/1146197361443692544What do you want the government to do about Youtube, Qhris?

[spurraider21]

https://twitter.com/Breaking911/status/1146504623840256000
good

[spurraider21]

Good goy!
big government good now

[koriwhat]

Look, kori -- I asked YOU to back up YOUR claim using YOUR words.

Your demand that I watch a three and a half hour YouTube is a cop out. The first amendment is one sentence long.

All you have to do is explain how it applies to YouTube's terms of service and content decisions.

It's your claim.

Back it up with your words.

i know lawyers, paralegals, etc... i used to work for a company which i recorded depo's for. i'm not going out of my way to "explain in my own words" what you can watch/listen to for yourself. when others tell me this or that is going on i don't take their word for it and i seek out the whole quote, the context, etc from numerous outlets including video too. it would be a disservice to you and others no matter how much you beg for me to do so.

watch/listen or don't; it's that simple.

but you acting like i am not supplying the info or where to find it in its entirety is ridiculous and it's a bs tactic you use time and time again. this is why i say you're not a genuine person. this is why i can't stand dealing with you. this is why we'll never see eye to eye. just move along, put a smile on your face, and go about your day for once.

[Pavlov]

i know lawyers, paralegals, etc... Yeah, I don't give a shit about that.

I asked YOU to back up YOUR claim in YOUR words.

It doesn't take three and a half hours to explain how the first amendment would apply to YouTube's content decisions if they did actually apply.

The simple fact is they don't and never will.

Period.

No number of hours of YouTubes will ever change that.

You can't back up your claim because your claim is bullshit.

Prove yourself right.

[koriwhat]

Yeah, I don't give a shit about that.

I asked YOU to back up YOUR claim in YOUR words.

It doesn't take three and a half hours to explain how the first amendment would apply to YouTube's content decisions if they did actually apply.

The simple fact is they don't and never will.

Period.

No number of hours of YouTubes will ever change that.

You can't back up your claim because your claim is bullshit.

Prove yourself right.

my claim was never yours to question in the first place. you butt in as usual and make everything about you because your insecurities have you doing so. what are you insecure about in real life? considering how insecure you act around here i can only assume everything.

[Pavlov]

my claim was never yours to question in the first place.:rollin

What kind of pussy tactic is that?

:cryYou can't call me out on my made up bullshit I post publicly because everything I post publicly is a private conversation with only designated people!:cry

:lmao

[koriwhat]

:rollin

What kind of pussy tactic is that?

:cryYou can't call me out on my made up bullshit I post publicly because everything I post publicly is a private conversation with only designated people!:cry

:lmao

how's it made up? if you didn't care to be told about the nazis, never wanted to see a documentary about them, etc would it be make believe just because you chose to dismiss it? you're the idiot who won't seek the truth. i'm the idiot for putting up with you.

[Pavlov]

how's it made up?Because it's not true.

This is not a first amendment issue.

It's not fascism.

You have done fuck all to back up your claims.

Because they can't be backed up.

They are made up bullshit.

[koriwhat]

Because it's not true.

This is not a first amendment issue.

It's not fascism.

You have done fuck all to back up your claims.

Because they can't be backed up.

They are made up bullshit.

you say all this while refusing to watch/listen to that podcast. it's hilarious how you can claim such nonsense when you aren't even open to the possibility of truth that in fact resides in that podcast.

you're such a good little lib. keep those blinders on why don't you, your fingers in your ears, and keep screaming la la la la la like the child that you are.

[Chris]

https://twitter.com/RealCandaceO/status/1146514813687930880

[Pavlov]

you say all this while refusing to watch/listen to that podcast.I will not watch muh podcast. I asked you to explain in your words.

You said you literally didn't have time to explain over an hour ago.

You lied.

You can't back up your bullshit claim.

Period.

[koriwhat]

I will not watch muh podcast. I asked you to explain in your words.

You said you literally didn't have time to explain over an hour ago.

You lied.

You can't back up your bullshit claim.

Period.

i didn't say anything of the sort.

[koriwhat]

what other lies do you have in your arsenal pav?

[Pavlov]

i didn't say anything of the sort.Ok.


You just chickened out.

My bad.

Pussy.

lol kori