Democrats Looking To Ramp Up The Fascism

[Chris]

lol bad takes and not admitting it was a bad take

[Winehole23]

You're worried about professions respecting the flag. Remind us your stance on NFL players not standing for the national anthem?No one is required to salute the flag; it's also optional to alter it to glorify yourself.

Neither goes without social approval/disapproval, both are and should be allowed.

[Spurtacular]

No one is required to salute the flag; it's also optional to alter it to glorify yourself.

Neither goes without social approval/disapproval, both are and should be allowed.

Sure, let them go to the locker room and pout if that's what they want to do.

[Winehole23]

It's arrogant and disrespectful. A cop's life is no more hallowed or respectable than anyone else's. Cops grabbing the glamour of the US flag and the patriotism it signifies especially for themselves, is obnoxious.

[Winehole23]

Sure, let them go to the locker room and pout if that's what they want to do.I don't want to regulate anyone, but you want to send players to the locker room.

So much for free speech warriors like you.

[Spurtacular]

I don't want to regulate anyone, but you want to send players to the locker room.

So much for free speech warriors like you.

They're in a business. Businesses regulate their own sense of propriety.

Free speech doesn't not have restrictions while on the job as you well know, blakehole. Don't waste my time stupid shit.

[Winehole23]

That the free speech right does not extend to employment does not mean that it may not be honored there also, nor that it must be abridged.

Lol using legalism as a shield...


...against free speech. :lol

[FuzzyLumpkins]

these people are loons to trust any poll these days... i don't care who they favor either they're all bullshit.

The polls the day before the election have been really accurate these past 5 years. You likely fixate on the stuff in the months beforehand because you don't understand how polling works.

[Winehole23]

lol bad takes and not admitting it was a bad takenah, you're just a badge-licker

[Chris]

https://cdn.streamelements.com/uploads/f99fde71-ba74-45f0-81de-1aacd668bb8b.jpg

"POLICE ARE DEFACING THE AMERICAN FLAG!"

[ChumpDumper]

It looks like the thin blue line is dividing the US. That's unintentionally appropriate.

[TheGreatYacht]

Obama Team Can't Fathom Why The Left Wants Medicare For All

https://youtu.be/FH3YWbZS5G4

[koriwhat]

The polls the day before the election have been really accurate these past 5 years. You likely fixate on the stuff in the months beforehand because you don't understand how polling works.

i understand polling is a crock of shit to begin with and your cunt hillary didn't make the cut! :tu

[Chris]

https://twitter.com/RealSaavedra/status/1192941002761351171?s=19

[Trey Gowdy]

lol bad takes and not admitting it was a bad take
lol lacking self awareness

[Chris]

https://twitter.com/DavidJHarrisJr/status/1192949213568606208?s=19

[koriwhat]

https://twitter.com/RealSaavedra/status/1192941002761351171?s=19

i can't believe anyone married that hag. she looked like a grandma already at like age 19. imagine getting a blowjob and that's the face you're going to look down at. ugh :vomit:

[Chris]

lol lacking self awareness

lol troll accounts

[Trey Gowdy]

i can't believe anyone married that hag. she looked like a grandma already at like age 19. imagine getting a blowjob and that's the face you're going to look down at. ugh :vomit:
says the incel :lmao

[koriwhat]

^^^ this faggot thinks igaf to read his dribble, lame attempts at humor, or his limp wrist jabs. :lmao

[FuzzyLumpkins]

i understand polling is a crock of shit to begin with and your cunt hillary didn't make the cut! :tu

The polls the day before the election have been really accurate these past 5 years. You likely fixate on the stuff in the months beforehand because you don't understand how polling works.

[Chris]

https://twitter.com/Lrihendry/status/1193008186145624064?s=19

[ChumpDumper]

lol that is not communism

[Winehole23]

Pobrecito Chris

[Winehole23]

Dull-witted trolling for Trump is his whole game. Wonder what he'll do without his alpha.

[ElNono]

If only Qhris would've stayed at school...

[Chris]

https://twitter.com/prageru/status/1195606427332534272?s=19


I don't think the Democrats are taking Hillary's loss very well.

[ElNono]

https://twitter.com/prageru/status/1195606427332534272?s=19

The founders allowed every state to allocate their electoral votes as they see fit. That part is apparently missing from the video, so it can trigger Qhrisbots...

[Spurtacular]

The founders allowed every state to allocate their electoral votes as they see fit. That part is apparently missing from the video, so it can trigger Qhrisbots...

So you don't think it's perverting the process to water down the votes of the voters in those states?

:lol The cognitive dissonance

[ElNono]

So you don't think it's perverting the process to water down the votes of the voters in those states?

:lol The cognitive dissonance

What part of "The founders allowed every state to allocate their electoral votes as they see fit" is not clear? If the people in any of those states do not like that arrangement, they can also vote to change the authorities.

Good old democracy. What you don't like about it?

[ElNono]

Plus, I don't get your complaint, Spurt... you were complaining how some electors might not want to select Trump in states he won. And you called that perverting the process.

So Democrats pull that move to avoid exactly the same thing you were complaining about, and it's wrong?

[Spurtacular]

What part of "The founders allowed every state to allocate their electoral votes as they see fit" is not clear? If the people in any of those states do not like that arrangement, they can also vote to change the authorities.

Good old democracy. What you don't like about it?

I don't think the founders had in mind unaccountable votes dictating my vote. Maybe you foolishly think that, or maybe you're just for perverting the process.

[Spurtacular]

Plus, I don't get your complaint, Spurt... you were complaining how some electors might not want to select Trump in states he won. And you called that perverting the process.

So Democrats pull that move to avoid exactly the same thing you were complaining about, and it's wrong?

That's not at all why they did it. Geez, try a modicum of intellectual honesty tonight.

[ElNono]

I don't think the founders had in mind unaccountable votes dictating my vote. Maybe you foolishly think that, or maybe you're just for perverting the process.

How you feel about the founders doesn't matter at all. Everybody has an opinion. What matters is that the founders knew what they were doing because if they wanted States not to be able to choose as they wanted, they would've spelled it out. They didn't.

Presuming to know what the Founders were thinking 200+ years ago is stupid. What we have is what they wrote.


That's not at all why they did it. Geez, try a modicum of intellectual honesty tonight.

Why do you think they did it? I mean, the compact itself doesn't kick in unless exercising it does flip the election. It's not automatic.

[ElNono]

Now, a great argument about this is if it's Constitutional under Article I, Section X... and I think that's much more debatable...

I actually think it would be difficult to ascertain this is not an interstate compact.

[Spurtacular]

Why do you think they did it? I mean, the compact itself doesn't kick in unless exercising it does flip the election. It's not automatic.

Rigging the popular vote is already what they do. If you're being honest with yourself, you'll come to terms.

[Chris]

Almost all states allot all their electoral votes to the winning candidate in that state, no matter how close the candidate's win.

Electors are typically required to pledge to vote for the winning candidate.

[ElNono]

Rigging the popular vote is already what they do. If you're being honest with yourself, you'll come to terms.

Your bitching is entirely partisan and more in line with current realities than history. Heck, dubya won the popular vote 3 elections ago. Historically, the popular vote has swung around towards both parties more or less equally.

Your position is not uncommon though. Back in the 80s, Republicans were all in on the popular vote, because they had a popular president (And we're talking about Reagan, who passed the largest illegal alien amnesty this country has ever seen).

Even dating further back people have been generally against the Electoral College. See: https://news.gallup.com/poll/2323/Americans-Historically-Favored-Changing-Way-Presidents-Elected.aspx

I stand by what I posted earlier, if voters don't like the arrangement, they can kick the state authorities out. Pure democracy. And let's not forget some of those states had GOP governors not long ago, not a stretch in the least.


Almost all states allot all their electoral votes to the winning candidate in that state, no matter how close the candidate's win.

Electors are typically required to pledge to vote for the winning candidate.

The arrangement is entirely decided by the States. While traditionally it has been done as you mention, certain states like Maine or Nebraska have used different systems (ie: Proportional vote).

If we're talking about the Founders and ancient history, back in the 1800's electors were chosen by state legislatures, and, normally as a slate of partisan electors at that.

Hell, if Trump wins the electoral vote, and he automatically wins California, you'll be lapping it up like no other.

[Spurtacular]

Your bitching is entirely partisan and more in line with current realities than history. Heck, dubya won the popular vote 3 elections ago. Historically, the popular vote has swung around towards both parties more or less equally.

Your position is not uncommon though. Back in the 80s, Republicans were all in on the popular vote, because they had a popular president (And we're talking about Reagan, who passed the largest illegal alien amnesty this country has ever seen).

Even dating further back people have been generally against the Electoral College. See: https://news.gallup.com/poll/2323/Americans-Historically-Favored-Changing-Way-Presidents-Elected.aspx

I stand by what I posted earlier, if voters don't like the arrangement, they can kick the state authorities out. Pure democracy. And let's not forget some of those states had GOP governors not long ago, not a stretch in the least.



The arrangement is entirely decided by the States. While traditionally it has been done as you mention, certain states like Maine or Nebraska have used different systems (ie: Proportional vote).

If we're talking about the Founders and ancient history, back in the 1800's electors were chosen by state legislatures, and, normally as a slate of partisan electors at that.

Hell, if Trump wins the electoral vote, and he automatically wins California, you'll be lapping it up like no other.


Rigging the popular vote is already what they do. If you're being honest with yourself, you'll come to terms.

[ChumpDumper]

:lmao derp's bolded buzzword blather

[Spurtacular]

Jump-in buzzwording from Chump. Par.

[Spurminator]

1195837926539706369

[ElNono]

:lmao derp's bolded buzzword blather

There's just no counterpoint. The "I know better, believe me" has zero weight, plus it makes no sense to bitch about it.

People complain about low voter turnout and how their vote don't count on solid blue/red states. But this actually changes the game in those states.

Any red vote on a blue state or the other way around all count towards the popular vote majority.

There's better arguments to be made about the legality of the arrangement, but in practical terms it doesn't help one party or the other. It does empower voters whose say was previously limited.

[ElNono]

Not to mention that according to derp himself, Dennison is an extremely popular president. This arrangement literally turns the election into a popularity contest, so I don't get why acting scared of it.

[Spurtacular]

There's just no counterpoint. The "I know better, believe me" has zero weight, plus it makes no sense to bitch about it.



There's plenty of evidence. But none of that suits your political leanings, obviously; and I don't waste time convincing someone that doesn't want to be convinced.

[ChumpDumper]

There's plenty of evidence. But none of that suits your political leanings, obviously; and I don't waste time convincing someone that doesn't want to be convinced.I'm right but I'm folding anyway just to prove how right I am!

lol derp

[Spurtacular]

I'm right but I'm folding anyway just to prove how right I am!

lol derp

Chump making stuff up. Par.

lol dump

[Winehole23]

Jeez y'all this is shit, please stop

[Chris]

I'm sure the forefathers envisioned cities being the deciding vote for entire States on the other side of the country. Totally logical and not asinine.

[Spurtacular]

I'm sure the forefathers envisioned cities being the deciding vote for entire States on the other side of the country. Totally logical and not asinine.

They did. Just ask ElNono

:lmao

[ElNono]

I'm sure the forefathers envisioned cities being the deciding vote for entire States on the other side of the country. Totally logical and not asinine.

You don't know shit about the forefathers or the Constitution, that much is clear. The forefathers let the States do with electors as they pleased. You have no counter to that, because that's exactly what they did.

[ElNono]

There's plenty of evidence. But none of that suits your political leanings, obviously; and I don't waste time convincing someone that doesn't want to be convinced.

Not only you don't give me a counterpoint, you snip half my post and don't address it and you don't bring any of this 'evidence' your building your futile argument around.

Let's discuss your 'evidence' once you bring it forward.

[Spurtacular]

Not only you don't give me a counterpoint, you snip half my post and don't address it and you don't bring any of this 'evidence' your building your futile argument around.

Let's discuss your 'evidence' once you bring it forward.

There's all kinds of evidence from the driver's license issues, illegals, computerized voting, union/mob involvement. Again, none of this suits your agenda. There's really no need for a discussion. You're hunkered in.

[ChumpDumper]

There's all kinds of evidence from the driver's license issues, illegals, computerized voting, union/mob involvement. Again, none of this suits your agenda. There's really no need for a discussion. You're hunkered in.But you don't think that could possibly happen in Bolivia.

lol

[Spurtacular]

But you don't think that could possibly happen in Bolivia.

lol

You already told this lie; and I already corrected you.

lol Sloppy Dump

[ChumpDumper]

You already told this lie; and I already corrected you.

lol Sloppy DumpYou also failed to back up your claim that many people said the election was fair.

[Chris]

https://twitter.com/gatewaypundit/status/1195927189566435329?s=19

[Spurtacular]

You also failed to back up your claim that many people said the election was fair.

Chumpbot Mode

[Winehole23]

https://twitter.com/gatewaypundit/status/1195927189566435329?s=19You're a bigot, Chris.

Too bad for you the US Constitution probibits any religious test for office -- Article VI, clause 3, mofo.

[Winehole23]

Amend the US Constitution if you don't like it.

[ElNono]

There's all kinds of evidence from the driver's license issues, illegals, computerized voting, union/mob involvement. Again, none of this suits your agenda. There's really no need for a discussion. You're hunkered in.

Where is the evidence? The problem with "massive voter fraud!" is that when you ask people like you to back it up, it never happens.

Heck, your Dear Leader put together a commission to investigate it and came up empty handed.

[Chris]

You're a bigot, Chris.

Too bad for you the US Constitution probibits any religious test for office -- Article VI, clause 3, mofo.

I see you have no idea what CAIR is.

[ElNono]

You're prisoner of your own paranoia, derp. Has nothing to do with anybody's else 'agenda'...

[Winehole23]

I see you have no idea what CAIR is.I know what CAIR is. You're full of shit.

[Spurtacular]

Where is the evidence? The problem with "massive voter fraud!" is that when you ask people like you to back it up, it never happens.

Heck, your Dear Leader put together a commission to investigate it and came up empty handed.

Kennedy stole his election. That sh** was not an anomaly either.

[ElNono]

moar conspiracies... back it up.

[Spurtacular]

moar conspiracies... back it up.

You don't even know sh** that is common knowledge to anyone who hasn't turned off their ears.

[Winehole23]

threadbare assertion is Spurtacular's MO

[Spurtacular]

Blakehole looking for attention again.

[ElNono]

lol common knowledge... high up there with "gut feeling" and "connecting the dots"... when reality doesn't agree with you, make up your own!

[ElNono]

Are we supposed to just take your word for it? No thanks.

[Spurtacular]

Very common knowledge. You can stay ignorant; you're good at it.

[Winehole23]

Very common knowledge. You can stay ignorant; you're good at it.Humor us.

Link to the very common knowledge.

[ElNono]

You're prisoner of your own paranoia, derp. Has nothing to do with anybody's else 'agenda'...

[ElNono]

:lol rememba when Dinesh D'Souza thought voting fraud was easy? Demos do it all the time! Ended up in the can until Dear Leader commuted his sentence. Good times.

[ChumpDumper]

Derp had to go back sixty years to find vote fraud and still won't back up his claim.

:lol

[Spurtacular]

Humor us.

Link to the very common knowledge.

Humor me by not pretending you don't know this sh**.

[Spurtacular]

:lol rememba when Dinesh D'Souza thought voting fraud was easy? Demos do it all the time! Ended up in the can until Dear Leader commuted his sentence. Good times.

Obama did much much much worse stuff to financially cheat during the 2012 election. Again, that willfully ignorant thing. DD gives you the easy target you need though.

[Winehole23]

Humor me by not pretending you don't know this sh**.Most posters will give a link when asked. It's hard to know what you're even talking about without more information.

[ChumpDumper]

Obama did much much much worse stuff to financially cheat during the 2012 election.Like what?

[Spurtacular]

Most posters will give a link when asked. It's hard to know what you're even talking about without more information.

So most will waste their time you say? Are you saying that this the first you're hearing of cheating in the 1960 election?

[Spurtacular]

Like what?

Check into how he was able to get that illegal Euro money.

[Winehole23]

So most will waste their time you say? Are you saying that this the first you're hearing of cheating in the 1960 election?Nope.

What source would you offer to a person who hasn't heard of it?

[Spurtacular]

Nope.

What source would you offer to a person who hasn't heard of it?

I wouldn't offer it. You're familiar with it and you're still insisting on wasting my time. Thanks for giving everyone a first-hand example on why I don't waste my time with that shit.

:lmao Dumb Ass Blakehole

[ChumpDumper]

Check into how he was able to get that illegal Euro money.I am by asking you.

Let's see your links.

[ChumpDumper]

I wouldn't offer it. You're familiar with it and you're still insisting on wasting my time. Thanks for giving everyone a first-hand example on why I don't waste my time with that shit.

:lmao Dumb Ass BlakeholeSo you're just going to waste your time filibustering and trying to distract with personal attacks.

[Spurtacular]

I am by asking you.

Let's see your links.

And I'm giving you a lead. Not gonna do anything with it?

Let's see your effort.

[Winehole23]

I wouldn't offer it. You're familiar with it and you're still insisting on wasting my time. Thanks for giving everyone a first-hand example on why I don't waste my time with that shit.

:lmao Dumb Ass BlakeholeNo supporting information offered. Makes the authority of your claims indistinguishable.from bullshit.

Your choice.

[Spurtacular]

So you're just going to waste your time filibustering and trying to distract with personal attacks.

Giving pertinent examples is "fillibustering"

:lmao Psychopav Chump

[Spurtacular]

No supporting information offered. Makes the authority of your claims indistinguishable.from bullshit.

Your choice.

My authority is you already know this shit, and you still insist on wasting my time. You're the criminal here, blakehole. You fucking putz.

[Winehole23]

Criminal? :lol

[ChumpDumper]

:lol derp doubling down on filibustering and personal attacks

Just say you don't really know what you're talking about and you're getting upset about it.

[ChumpDumper]

Criminal? :lol:rollin

[Winehole23]

My authority is you already know this shit, and you still insist on wasting my time. You're the criminal here, blakehole. You fucking putz.I can't be sure what you're talking about unless you, you know, actually talk about it.

[Spurtacular]

I can't be sure what you're talking about unless you, you know, actually talk about it.

You are sure of what I'm talking about. You're looking for something to nitpick rather than just furthering the conversation. I wasn't looking at a link when I brought it up; I most certainly am not going to go searching for shit for you to trifle with. Don't waste my time, blakehole; I don't put up with that shit.

[Winehole23]

Search for shit? Are there no ready sources for very common knowledge?

lol bitching all day about nothing, then refusing to provide a link because you don't have the time.

[Spurtacular]

Search for shit? Are there no ready sources for very common knowledge?

lol bitching all day about nothing, then refusing to provide a link because you don't have the time.

You are versed in the purported 1960 election fraud?

Yes or no.

[ChumpDumper]

You're the criminal here:lmao

[Spurtacular]

:lmao Ankle Biter Chump

[ChumpDumper]

:lmao Ankle Biter ChumpYour calling a poster a criminal is the acme of ankle-biting tbh.

[Spurtacular]

So you're just going to waste your time filibustering and trying to distract with personal attacks.

:cry Personal attacks
:cry You're so intolerant of my non respectful insistence

:lmao Faggot Chump

[Winehole23]

You are versed in the purported 1960 election fraud?

Yes or no.Versed? Nope.

I've heard it mentioned, but don't recall it distinctly. Something to do with Cook County, IL?

[Spurtacular]

Versed? Nope.

I've heard it mentioned, but don't recall it distinctly. Something to do with Cook County, IL?

Texas and Illinois.

[Winehole23]

Texas and Illinois. What happened in Texas?

[ChumpDumper]

:cry Personal attacks
:cry You're so intolerant of my non respectful insistence

:lmao Faggot Chump:lol filibustering and personal attacks

[ElNono]

Obama did much much much worse stuff to financially cheat during the 2012 election. Again, that willfully ignorant thing. DD gives you the easy target you need though.

That's whataboutism that doesn't dispel the point: voting fraud is exceedingly rare AND prosecuted. Something that you will waive off because your hatred towards blue teamsters makes it impossible for you to acknowledge people vote the way they do.

Not being 'in' into every one of your absurd conspiracy theories is not ignorance either, it's being pragmatic. It's actually the exact opposite of ignorance.

[Spurtacular]

That's whataboutism that doesn't dispel the point: voting fraud is exceedingly rare AND prosecuted. Something that you will waive off because your hatred towards blue teamsters makes it impossible for you to acknowledge people vote the way they do.

Not being 'in' into every one of your absurd conspiracy theories is not ignorance either, it's being pragmatic. It's actually the exact opposite of ignorance.

:lmao Whataboutism

That's really convenient. We're talking about a sitting president scamming for many millions vs. a single guy sloppily skirting a dumb law.

The point is that your crying was trite when compared to actual corruption.

[ChumpDumper]

:lmao Whataboutism

That's really convenient. We're talking about a sitting president scamming for many millionWalk us through that, derp.

It's your claim-- tell us what he did.

[Spurtacular]

Walk us through that, derp.

It's your claim-- tell us what he did.

I won't walk you through it; but if you want to find out the scam, try learning about it by researching how Obama altered the card donation process so it could not be checked if donations were coming from overseas. That said, I fully expect you to simply sperm shield.

[ChumpDumper]

I won't walk you through itDerp folds.

[Spurtacular]

Derp folds.

Oh, you won't be researching it, sperm shielder?

Color me surprised.

lol Dump

[ChumpDumper]

Oh, you won't be researching itYou already folded, derp. Don't try to bite ankles now.

lol

[Spurtacular]

You already folded, derp. Don't try to bite ankles now.

lol

:lol Doing your hero's approach of accusing others of doing the exact thing you're doing. :lol

[ChumpDumper]

:lol Doing your hero's approach of accusing others of doing the exact thing you're doing. :lolHuh?

I asked you to back up your claim and you folded.

This is nothing new.

Why do you always fold?

[Spurtacular]

Huh?

I asked you to back up your claim and you folded.

This is nothing new.

Why do you always fold?

You're the one ankle biting. I gave you a lead, and now you're just being a little bitch instead of looking into it. :lmao

[ChumpDumper]

You're the one ankle biting. I gave you a lead:lmao homework assignment.

I already know about the relevant federal case. Unfortunately for you, Trump's DOJ says you're full of shit.

How do you like being shit on by Trump, derp?

[Spurtacular]

:lmao homework assignment.

I already know about the relevant federal case. Unfortunately for you, Trump's DOJ says you're full of shit.

How do you like being shit on by Trump, derp?

Maybe you should do your homework. You might get smarter.

[ChumpDumper]

Maybe you should do your homework. You might get smarter.Nope, Trump took a wet shit on your conspiracy theory. Nothing you post changes that.

How does it taste?

Salty?

[Spurtacular]

Nope, Trump took a wet shit on your conspiracy theory. Nothing you post changes that.

How does it taste?

Salty?

I have no idea what you're talking about; I don't think you have any idea what you're talking about, tbh. :lmao

[ChumpDumper]

I have no idea what you're talking about:lmao Exactly :lmao

You never do.

If you knew anything about this you would know about the Trump DOJ's case about it in federal court.

You don't.

Thanks for confirming your complete ignorance of a subject you brought up.

:rollin

[Spurtacular]

:lmao Exactly :lmao

You never do.

If you knew anything about this you would know about the Trump DOJ's case about it in federal court.

You don't.

Thanks for confirming your complete ignorance of a subject you brought up.

:rollin


:cry There's stuff I like know about that you don't :cry
:cry This is a big tiny W. Like really big :cry

:lmao Desperate Chump :lmao

[ChumpDumper]

:cry There's stuff I like know about that you don't :cry
:cry This is a big tiny W. Like really big :cry

:lmao Desperate Chump :lmao:lol don't get mad, derp.

You brought up the subject.

Now you admit you're completely ignorant about the federal case that addressed it.

You must feel really stupid right now.

lol too bad.

[ElNono]

:lmao Whataboutism

That's really convenient. We're talking about a sitting president scamming for many millions vs. a single guy sloppily skirting a dumb law.

The point is that your crying was trite when compared to actual corruption.

It's actually convenient for you, not for me. I'm not the one attempting to excuse one factual conviction with another alleged crime. "Dumb law" is not a defense either.

The whole spectrum in full display here: whataboutism followed by moral relativism. Add in a sprinkle or two of paranoia, conspiratardism and hate... yahtzee.

Again, you're the one with the gullibility problem, not me.

[Spurtacular]

It's actually convenient for you, not for me. I'm not the one attempting to excuse one factual conviction with another alleged crime. "Dumb law" is not a defense either.

The whole spectrum in full display here: whataboutism followed by moral relativism. Add in a sprinkle or two of paranoia, conspiratardism and hate... yahtzee.

Again, you're the one with the gullibility problem, not me.

I never excused it; I did downplay it, as it's obvious that it's a politically motivated conviction and it's really nothing compared to serious corruption. You cling to your stuff that is nothing in the run of things if you must; it complements your willful ignorance, tbh. Also :lol @ gullibility.

[ElNono]

I never excused it; I did downplay it, as it's obvious that it's a politically motivated conviction and it's really nothing compared to serious corruption. You cling to your stuff that is nothing in the run of things if you must; it complements your willful ignorance, tbh. Also :lol @ gullibility.

^ moar conspiracies. He broke the law, he had his day in court, he was convicted by a jury of his peers. He wasn't tried by an administration, that's delusion talking.

Trying to excuse crime A with crime B *is* both whataboustism and moral relativism. Breaking the law is bad in *all* cases, regardless of party colors, etc.

And yes, gullible describes you to a T... how else can you describe somebody buying in all sorts of conspiracy theories and dogma? That's exactly what a gullible person is.

[ChumpDumper]

^ moar conspiracies. He broke the law, he had his day in court, he was convicted by a jury of his peers. He wasn't tried by an administration, that's delusion talking.

Trying to excuse crime A with crime B *is* both whataboustism and moral relativism. Breaking the law is bad in *all* cases, regardless of party colors, etc.

And yes, gullible describes you to a T... how else can you describe somebody buying in all sorts of conspiracy theories and dogma? That's exactly what a gullible person is.
https://media.giphy.com/media/w2spEHAltsCU8/giphy.gif

[Spurtacular]

^ moar conspiracies. He broke the law, he had his day in court, he was convicted by a jury of his peers. He wasn't tried by an administration, that's delusion talking.

Trying to excuse crime A with crime B *is* both whataboustism and moral relativism. Breaking the law is bad in *all* cases, regardless of party colors, etc.

And yes, gullible describes you to a T... how else can you describe somebody buying in all sorts of conspiracy theories and dogma? That's exactly what a gullible person is.

I've never excused anything. Have I said DD shouldn't have paid consequences?

You're trying to break this down to a trite logic rather see reality for what it is. Obama is obviously a big hypocrite here. He is a very dishonest man, and he's your hero.

[ChumpDumper]

I've never excused anything. Have I said DD shouldn't have paid consequences?

You're trying to break this down to a trite logic rather see reality for what it is. Obama is obviously a big hypocrite here. He is a very dishonest man, and he's your hero.Yeah, you still haven't said what he actually did to break the law.

We can only assume you're making shit up.

Which you are.

lol

[ElNono]

I've never excused anything. Have I said DD shouldn't have paid consequences?

You're trying to break this down to a trite logic rather see reality for what it is. Obama is obviously a big hypocrite here. He is a very dishonest man, and he's your hero.

Of course you did. You called it a politically motivated conviction. As if his conviction had nothing to do with breaking the law.

You brought up Obama, not me, that's your hobby horse. We were discussing the claim that "massive voter fraud!" is both prevalent and unpunished. Neither is the case. That's why I mentioned DD.

[Spurtacular]

Of course you did. You called it a politically motivated conviction. As if his conviction had nothing to do with breaking the law.

You brought up Obama, not me, that's your hobby horse. We were discussing the claim that "massive voter fraud!" is both prevalent and unpunished. Neither is the case. That's why I mentioned DD.

It was. Turning an academic enemy with no criminal record into a felon was quite beyond the pale. A plea deal / slap on the wrist was what the non politically motivated outcome would've been.

I brought up Obama to show how sanctimonious your outrage ultimately is; it bothers you to be called out; but that's not my problem.

[ElNono]

It was. Turning an academic enemy with no criminal record into a felon was quite beyond the pale. A plea deal / slap on the wrist was what the non politically motivated outcome would've been.

It was a plea deal. This is why posters here keep saying you talk out of your ass. He plead guilty to the felony for a lower sentence.


I brought up Obama to show how sanctimonious your outrage ultimately is; it bothers you to be called out; but that's not my problem.

Called out for what? You brought up Obama to move the goalposts, and despite it didn't work the first time, you keep trying. I've been plenty of outraged at Obama during his presidency. But that's neither here or there considering what we're discussing.

I think the biggest problem you have with me is that I don't hate Dems the way you do. That, again, it's your problem, not mine.

[Spurtacular]

It was a plea deal. This is why posters here keep saying you talk out of your ass. He plead guilty to the felony for a lower sentence.



Called out for what? You brought up Obama to move the goalposts, and despite it didn't work the first time, you keep trying. I've been plenty of outraged at Obama during his presidency. But that's neither here or there considering what we're discussing.

I think the biggest problem you have with me is that I don't hate Dems the way you do. That, again, it's your problem, not mine.

Not a slap on the wrist; a felony. That just means they were going even harder. Felonies are reserved for real crimes for first time offenders. Totally politically motivated; very symbolic of the Obama presidency. I think your worst problem is that you are willfully ignorant for your Dems; this has nothing to do with my "hate".

[ChumpDumper]

lol derp didn't know it was a plea deal

[TheGreatYacht]

Jimmy Dore: until we fix Democratic Party elites' corruption, we won’t defeat Trump's

https://youtu.be/ufduP0bLfAY

[koriwhat]

Jimmy dore zZzZ...

[DarrinS]

Leftist college students vs folding tables. :lmao


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qlA66l91j8U

[ChumpDumper]

Man, these people scare the shit out of Darrin.

[DarrinS]

Man, these people scare the shit out of Darrin.

Chump like a moth to a flame when I post lately.

[ChumpDumper]

Chump like a moth to a flame when I post lately.Darrin immediately changes his own subject.

[spurraider21]

:lol rememba when Dinesh D'Souza thought voting fraud was easy? Demos do it all the time! Ended up in the can until Dear Leader commuted his sentence. Good times.
wasnt dsouza in the can for campaign finance stuff?

[TheGreatYacht]

Obama Goes After "Left Leaning Twitter Feeds"

https://youtu.be/a-emrsUkcvA

[Nathan89]

Obama recognizes that left went full lunatic tbh. Props to him for calling out these people. It won't stop anything but props for speaking up nonetheless.

[ChumpDumper]

Obama recognizes that left went full lunatic tbh. Props to him for calling out these people. It won't stop anything but props for speaking up nonetheless.Didn't you used to support the far left candidate?

[Nathan89]

Leftist college students vs folding tables. :lmao


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qlA66l91j8U

Blatant racism and the crowd of ardent "anti-racists" stays silent. I'm shocked.

Also these are the big brain college voters that the left wears as some sort of badge of honor.

[Nathan89]

Man, these people scare the shit out of Darrin.

The system that radicalized these lunatics that infringe on the rights of others should scare everyone. You trying to turn the tables on Darrin for highlighting this lunacy is part of the problem tbh

[ChumpDumper]

The system that radicalized these lunatics that infringe on the rights of others should scare everyone. You trying to turn the tables on Darrin for highlighting this lunacy is part of the problem tbh
Do those people scare you?

[Nathan89]

Do those people scare you?

Hoards of lunatics that infringe on the rights of others should scare any same American tbh.

[ChumpDumper]

Hoards of lunatics that infringe on the rights of others should scare any same American tbh.Do those people in that video scare you?

[Nathan89]

"Does this group of lunatics that are so intolerant of your speech that they shut it down scare you?"

Stop asking stupid questions.

[ChumpDumper]

"Does this group of lunatics that are so intolerant of your speech that they shut it down scare you?"

Stop asking stupid questions.You haven't answered this question.

Do the people in that video scare you?

Yes or no.

[Nathan89]

"Does this group that has people comfortable with open racism and is currently infringing your rights scare you?"

[ChumpDumper]

"Does this group that has people comfortable with open racism and is currently infringing your rights scare you?"Do the people in that video scare you?

Yes or no.

[DarrinS]

Man, these people scare the shit out of Darrin.


Do those people scare you?


Do those people in that video scare you?


You haven't answered this question.

Do the people in that video scare you?

Yes or no.


Do the people in that video scare you?

Yes or no.



ChumpBot activated

[ChumpDumper]

ChumpBot activatecYou people never answer.

If you aren't scared of those people you're certainly scared of simple questions.

[DarrinS]

Here's a question. Why are college students so triggered by conservatives EXISTING on their campus?

[DarrinS]

By the way

Folding tables: 2
Woke moonbats: 0

:lmao

[ChumpDumper]

Here's a question. Why are college students so triggered by conservatives EXISTING on their campus?They're young and stupid.

Just like the young and stupid conservatives.


In short, young people are largely stupid.

[DarrinS]

They're young and stupid.

Just like the young and stupid conservatives.


In short, young people are largely stupid.


It wasn't like that in the past. Something changed.

[ChumpDumper]

It wasn't like that in the past. Something changed.:lol no

Young people have been stupid for a long time.

There's just more of them now and you consume their hijinx on social media.

[DarrinS]

:lol no

Young people have been stupid for a long time.

There's just more of them now and you consume their hijinx on social media.



While I agree that college kids do stupid shit, this recent aggressive behavior based on ideology is different. And it seems to mostly come from leftist students unable to cope with ideas that conflict with their own.

I went to college when Clinton was running for president. There were college democrats and college republicans, but no crazy hostility.

[ChumpDumper]

While I agree that college kids do stupid shit, this recent aggressive behavior based on ideology is different. And it seems to mostly come from leftist students unable to cope with ideas that conflict with their own.

I went to college when Clinton was running for president. There were college democrats and college republicans, but no crazy hostility.As I said, there were fewer kids overall back then. You were at one college with no social media.

[Spurtacular]

As I said, there were fewer kids overall back then. You were at one college with no social media.

Were the kids really stupid at your college, Chump?

[ChumpDumper]

Were the kids really stupid at your college, Chump?Yep.

They were kids.

[DarrinS]

Were the kids really stupid at your college, Chump?


Yep.

They were kids.


No. Something different is going on, starting around 2013.

[Spurtacular]

Yep.

They were kids.

Ah okay. I didn't go to college with total dumb asses; but I guess you do what you do.

[ChumpDumper]

No. Something different is going on, starting around 2013.What's your theory?

[ChumpDumper]

Ah okay. I didn't go to college with total dumb asses; but I guess you do what you do.Were they as terrified of simple questions as you are?

[DMX7]

Ah okay. I didn't go to college with total dumb asses; but I guess you do what you do.

And where exactly did you go to college?

[Winehole23]

No. Something different is going on, starting around 2013.

btw, the trope of conservatives pinning broad social ills on campus radicals was a motif in the mid 80s when I was in college.

seemed overblown to me then, still does now.

what happened in 2013 that was such a game changer?

[Spurminator]

While I agree that college kids do stupid shit, this recent aggressive behavior based on ideology is different. And it seems to mostly come from leftist students unable to cope with ideas that conflict with their own.

I went to college when Clinton was running for president. There were college democrats and college republicans, but no crazy hostility.

If you went to college today, you'd see that it's largely the same.

The only thing that changed is you started watching a lot more cable news. You're paranoid, out of touch, and dumber than you were 20 years ago. Good job!

[ChumpDumper]

And where exactly did you go to college?Some place he's too ashamed to post here.

[TheGreatYacht]

While I agree that college kids do stupid shit, this recent aggressive behavior based on ideology is different. And it seems to mostly come from leftist students unable to cope with ideas that conflict with their own.

I went to college when Clinton was running for president. There were college democrats and college republicans, but no crazy hostility.

The sheep calling the kettle black :lol


https://youtu.be/BAmkMndtH24

College sensitive snowflakes have always existed. It's just that someone had the genius idea of coming up with the snowflake boogeyman so that people like Nathan89 can fall prey to the clickbait.

Frankly, the "you see, the left doesn't believe in freedom of speech. Come join our side!" era is coming to an end. That is why the America FIRST patriots (Groypers) are gaining popularity because these new Gen Z's are starting to see through the bullshit and hypocrisy of establishment right-wing Zionist hacks like Ben Shapiro, Steven Crowder, and Jordan Peterson.

[ChumpDumper]

Seriously, if we survived the 70s we'll survive whatever is triggering Darrin and Nathan.

[spurraider21]

No. Something different is going on, starting around 2013.
https://www.spurstalk.com/forums/showthread.php?t=281111&p=9924276&viewfull=1#post9924276

[ChumpDumper]

https://www.spurstalk.com/forums/showthread.php?t=281111&p=9924276&viewfull=1#post9924276:lol he made sure she would be safe from Antifa.

[Winehole23]

Seriously, if we survived the 70s we'll survive whatever is triggering Darrin and Nathan.We've not seen the likes of the 1970s for crime and terrorism since, tbh.

[Spurtacular]

And where exactly did you go to college?

One that wouldn't let David Hogg go to it. He was one of Chump's really stupid people. :lmao

[ChumpDumper]

We've not seen the likes of the 1970s for crime and terrorism since, tbh.Just the volume of bombings alone was astounding. Most weren't targeting people so I guess it doesn't make the historical cut.

[Spurminator]

https://www.spurstalk.com/forums/showthread.php?t=281111&p=9924276&viewfull=1#post9924276

:lmao

[ChumpDumper]

One that wouldn't let David Hogg go to it. He was one of Chump's really stupid people. :lmao:lmao derp is so ashamed

[Spurtacular]

:lmao derp is so ashamed

Ashamed that I'm smarter than your heroes?

lol Dump

[ChumpDumper]

:oink

[ChumpDumper]

Ashamed that I'm smarter than your heroes?

lol DumpYou are ashamed to say where you went to school.

I will prove it.

Where did you go to school?

[ElNono]

Not a slap on the wrist; a felony. That just means they were going even harder. Felonies are reserved for real crimes for first time offenders. Totally politically motivated; very symbolic of the Obama presidency. I think your worst problem is that you are willfully ignorant for your Dems; this has nothing to do with my "hate".

They're not 'my' dems, and you're totally mistaken how our justice system works. The prosecutor has to throw the book at them, the sentencing is done by the judge, based on what the jury finds.

He got probation and house arrest out of it, how much more of a slap in the wrist you want it to be? And he agreed to the plea bargain.

BTW, you can thank your GOP congresscritters for the inane sentencing guidelines for voter fraud. I suppose they didn't figure it was going to be an idiot conservative that was going to get caught up in it.

[ElNono]

wasnt dsouza in the can for campaign finance stuff?

yeah, he was funneling money from third parties illegally, IIRC.

[DMX7]

One that wouldn't let David Hogg go to it. He was one of Chump's really stupid people. :lmao

David is attending Harvard, so clearly you didn't go to Harvard (as if we didn't already know, LMAO). Where did you go to college? Are you too ashamed to tell us?

[Chris]

https://twitter.com/dbongino/status/1197516788331884546?s=19

[Chris]

https://twitter.com/DailyCaller/status/1197561543220748288?s=19
https://twitter.com/Clonmackin/status/1197531930343956480?s=19

[ChumpDumper]

Damn, so many things trigger Qhris at once.

[Chris]

https://twitter.com/robbystarbuck/status/1197601625214476291?s=19

[spurraider21]

https://twitter.com/robbystarbuck/status/1197601625214476291?s=19
if the decision went the other way, different victims would be crying. but you wouldn't care about them.

also as usual, nothing to do with fascism

[Nathan89]

if the decision went the other way, different victims would be crying. but you wouldn't care about them.

also as usual, nothing to do with fascism

Because a male not being allowed to change with females wouldn't be a victim.

[Nathan89]

https://twitter.com/robbystarbuck/status/1197601625214476291?s=19

If conservatives said this would happen years ago I guarantee they would have heard "slippery slope fallacy". Now that it occurs it's "there would have been victims with the other ruling as well". Lol

[Nathan89]

https://twitter.com/charliekirk11/status/1197552644119613440?s=20

When are the propaganda media outlets going to report on these lunatics continuously stepping on the rights of American citizens? Seem to recall Starbucks as national news for a week plus.

[TheGreatYacht]

https://mobile.twitter.com/michaeljknowles/status/1188291112894697474?lang=en

[Nathan89]

Minorities attacking whites for voicing an opposing opinion seems to be increasing.

[ChumpDumper]

Minorities attacking whites for voicing an opposing opinion seems to be increasing.Because you're looking for tweets to that effect.

[Chris]

If conservatives said this would happen years ago I guarantee they would have heard "slippery slope fallacy". Now that it occurs it's "there would have been victims with the other ruling as well". Lol

Not sure where he heard det one...Jimmy Kimmel? :lol

[Nathan89]

Because you're looking for tweets to that effect.

Well it for damn sure won't be covered on mainstream media.

And it's just an observation from tweets of lunatics attacking people. I don't hunt for tweets with minorities.

[Winehole23]

Well it for damn sure won't be covered on mainstream media.You should move to England, they can't get enough there.

[ChumpDumper]

Well it for damn sure won't be covered on mainstream media.Tiny incidents generally don't get carried by national news. Sorry.


And it's just an observation from tweets of lunatics attacking people. I don't hunt for tweets with minorities.You hunt for grievance tweets and post them here.

[Chris]

Tiny incidents generally don't get carried by national news. Sorry.

lol


https://thumbs.gfycat.com/KaleidoscopicShockingAlligatorgar-max-1mb.gif

[spurraider21]

Because a male not being allowed to change with females wouldn't be a victim.
do you understand the distinction between gender and sex?

[Chris]

There are only two genders. Anything else is a mental condition.

[spurraider21]

chrisbot doesnt know what the word generally means

[spurraider21]

There are only two genders. Anything else is a mental condition.
thats a different question

do you understand the distinction between sex and gender?

[ChumpDumper]

lol


https://thumbs.gfycat.com/KaleidoscopicShockingAlligatorgar-max-1mb.gifGenerally.

Do you understand the term?

Yes or no.

[Chris]

Generally.

Do you understand the term?

Yes or no.

I understand you just shit yourself.

[Spurminator]

https://twitter.com/charliekirk11/status/1197552644119613440?s=20

When are the propaganda media outlets going to report on these lunatics continuously stepping on the rights of American citizens? Seem to recall Starbucks as national news for a week plus.

You think this confrontation is national newsworthy?

It's a douchebag and a crazy person, and the worst thing that happened was someone got slapped by a piece of paper.

You are a monumental pussy. :lol

[ChumpDumper]

I understand you just shit yourself.Nope, you're just angry that you still have your own shit all over yourself.

You certainly shut the fuck up about indictments, didn't you?

:lol

[Chris]

Minorities attacking whites for voicing an opposing opinion seems to be increasing.

white man is the new n***er Media pulled the trigger

[Spurminator]

"Our top story tonight on ABC Nightly News: Terror on college campus as leftist activists yells at conservative yuk-monkey for invading her safe space. Are conservatives under attack? Please be warned, the following footage contains mild violence and may not be suitable for young viewers. Here to comment is Twitter celebrity and favorite of incels with limited skepticism, Charlie Kirk."

[ChumpDumper]

white man is the new n***er Media pulled the triggerYou're really failing at white man, Qhris. It's still the easiest gig in town.

[Winehole23]

white man is the new n***er Media pulled the triggersaved for posterity

[Winehole23]

You're really failing at white man, Qhris. It's still the easiest gig in town.

Nominal legal equality and changing aocial mores feel like oppression to Chris.

[Chris]

saved for posterity

freestyle

[Winehole23]

freestyleself-pity and white identity. all idpol, all the time.

it's funny that you bear such a strong resemblance to what you claim to hate.

[Chris]

self-pity and white identity. all idpol, all the time.

it's funny that you bear such a strong resemblance to what you claim to hate.

What were my claims?

[Winehole23]

What were my claims?"White man is the new n*****"

[Chris]

"White man is the new n*****"

No...you said I claimed to hate something. What were my claims?

[Winehole23]

You claim to hate SJWs and idpol, but your own politics are straight white grievance.

[Nathan89]

You think this confrontation is national newsworthy?

It's a douchebag and a crazy person, and the worst thing that happened was someone got slapped by a piece of paper.

You are a monumental pussy. :lol

If Starbucks is national news for a week plus then this happening consistently is news worthy. People should be aware of this ideology that wants to infringe on the rights of others. This isn't a lone wolf tbh

[Chris]

You claim to hate SJWs and idpol, but your own politics are straight white grievance.

Show me a link to my claims.

[Winehole23]

Just did.

Happy to link to the previous page if you can't find it.

[Nathan89]

White grievance is the narrative of those that want to deny the growing white hatred within the left.

[Winehole23]

You've got it bad, too.

One of the worst cases I've ever seen.

[Nathan89]

Tiny incidents generally don't get carried by national news. Sorry.

You hunt for grievance tweets and post them here.

I see it all the time. Starbucks was national news. A high school kid smiling at an asshole Indian beating his drum in his face was national news.

But yes the propaganda outlets aren't going shine light on a growing toxic ideology that pushes people to attack people based on having a different opinion.

[Nathan89]

You run with that narrative. Reality will hit you in the future.

[koriwhat]

You claim to hate SJWs and idpol, but your own politics are straight white grievance.

what a cop-out. anyone who isn't on the left is a nazi or white supremacist worried about to eventual demographic change to come where whites are the minorities.

you live for identity politics tbh.

[Chris]

Just did.

Happy to link to the previous page if you can't find it.

So you were talking out of your ass.

Let us proceed...

[DarrinS]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lye1lzneSnQ

[spurraider21]

darrin randomly stumbling upon 2017 videos about sjws

[Winehole23]

So you were talking out of your ass.

Let us proceed...Ripped off schtick.

You don't have an original bone in your body, do you?

[Spurminator]

If Starbucks is national news for a week plus then this happening consistently is news worthy. People should be aware of this ideology that wants to infringe on the rights of others. This isn't a lone wolf tbh

How is this an ideological infringement of rights? She told him to go away. He didn't have to. He wasn't forced to by anyone with authority. He posed for his buddy's camera basically to say "I'm with stupid" and she made him move. This happens 1000s of times every day for 1000s of different reasons. He is free to sue her for assault and would probably win, but he'd look like a tool.

Stop being such a pussy.

[Nathan89]

How is this an ideological infringement of rights? She told him to go away. He didn't have to. He wasn't forced to by anyone with authority. He posed for his buddy's camera basically to say "I'm with stupid" and she made him move. This happens 1000s of times every day for 1000s of different reasons. He is free to sue her for assault and would probably win, but he'd look like a tool.

Stop being such a pussy.

She infringe on his speech. She stole signage and committed battery. That's what these assholes always do.

[TheGreatYacht]

Obama Tells Dems Don't Be "Too Far Left"

https://youtu.be/H6JM7dKRWX8

[Nathan89]

Imagine not thinking a seemingly growing segment of this country consistently shutdown the speech others is never news worthy.

[Nathan89]

Props to Obama tbh

[Chris]

You claim to hate SJWs and idpol, but your own politics are straight white grievance.

Still waiting on that link.

[spurraider21]

Still waiting on that link.
do you support SJWs and identity politics or are you against those?

[Chris]

do you support SJWs and identity politics or are you against those?

Linky-link. Choppy-chop.

[spurraider21]

Linky-link. Choppy-chop.
always afraid to state your beliefs...

[ElNono]

"Our top story tonight on ABC Nightly News: Terror on college campus as leftist activists yells at conservative yuk-monkey for invading her safe space. Are conservatives under attack? Please be warned, the following footage contains mild violence and may not be suitable for young viewers. Here to comment is Twitter celebrity and favorite of incels with limited skepticism, Charlie Kirk."

The fact that it says ABC Nightly News makes it fake, tbh

[ElNono]

white man is the new n***er Media pulled the trigger

such a racist, angry poster... smh

[ElNono]

White grievance is the narrative of those that want to deny the growing white hatred within the left.

Plenty of LGBQT are white people and plenty of white people are also on the left, tbh... I think you mean conservative hatred...

[ElNono]

She infringe on his speech.

Only government can infringe your speech rights. Ignorance is not an excuse.

[Winehole23]

what a cop-out. anyone who isn't on the left is a nazi or white supremacist worried about to eventual demographic change to come where whites are the minorities.

you live for identity politics tbh.
I'm not worried about demographic change.

Are you?

If so, why so? Are you afraid whites will be treated as they've treated others on this continent for the last 400 years?

[Winehole23]

Afraid the US racial caste system will be perverted to the point where others are insitutionally, socially and materially equal to white folks?

Why is that scary?

[Nathan89]

Plenty of LGBQT are white people and plenty of white people are also on the left, tbh... I think you mean conservative hatred...

Yeah, and they have an out-group bias because they don't like whites.

[Nathan89]

Afraid the US racial caste system will be perverted to the point where others are insitutionally, socially and materially equal to white folks?

Why is that scary?

That's a straw man. Have fun playing with it.