Horowitz has found Carter Page FISA Warrant was legal

[djohn2oo8]

1197882409238368256



:lmao :lmao :lmao TSA

[boutons_deux]

:lmao :lmao :lmao TSA

Of course, the right wing hate media will only run with only the fact that an HATED FBI DEEP STATER made a (insignificant) change, and of course that's all the ignorant, inflammable cult mob will hear and remember.

rightwingnutjobs/Fox/etc LOVED the DEEP STATE FBI when it trashed Hillary's campaign and elected Trash.

[djohn2oo8]

TSA

[TSA]

1197882409238368256



:lmao :lmao :lmao TSA

:lol buried lede
:lol WaPo

If it were true it’d be the fucking headline of the article. You are so fucking gullible.

[ChumpDumper]

:lol buried lede
:lol WaPo

If it were true it’d be the fucking headline of the article. You are so fucking gullible.

TSA's last line of defense. Straight denial.

:lol

[djohn2oo8]

1197909085020012545

[djohn2oo8]

Where’s the FISA abuse?

[TSA]

:lol getting burned for years by WaPo on Russian collusion and running straight back to the well

No reason for Horowitz to even release the report WaPo’s sources under criminal investigation already have the conclusions.

:lol gullible fucks

[TSA]

Devin Barrett being amplified by Natasha Bertrand is all you need to know to instantly call bullshit. This is what they do and you fall for it every time.

[Spurs Homer]

So...


no super deluxe nuclear game changing


BOOOOMMM!!!


:elephant

[Winehole23]

Sources under criminal investigation?

Erstwhile op-ed columnist John Solomon's Ukrainegate sources are under felony indictment.

[Winehole23]

Who else is being criminally investigated for corrupt dealings in Ukraine?

The president's personal attorney, shadow Ukraine ambassador and sometime oppo researcher Rudy Giuliani.

[djohn2oo8]

:lol getting burned for years by WaPo on Russian collusion and running straight back to the well

No reason for Horowitz to even release the report WaPo’s sources under criminal investigation already have the conclusions.

:lol gullible fucks
No FISA Abuse. Lawd!

[TSA]

No FISA Abuse. Lawd!

This claim will go as well as your Trump family going to prison for colluding with Russia :rollin

[spurraider21]

so basically there was some misconduct in some form or another, but not to the extent that the validity of the application/warrant are called into question

[TSA]

so basically there was some misconduct in some form or another, but not to the extent that the validity of the application/warrant are called into question

Can you link me to the report? k thx

[Spurs Homer]

so basically there was some misconduct in some form or another, but not to the extent that the validity of the application/warrant are called into question

not “misconduct”

like bribery or extortion

but misconduct from an fbi attorney typing wrong info on a form
that changed nothing on the validity of the fisa procedures


but her emails!

[djohn2oo8]

1197983936330252289


:lmao :lmao :lmao TSA

[djohn2oo8]

1197984893298450434

[djohn2oo8]

1197986729862615041


:lmao :lmao :lmao TSA

[ChumpDumper]

Lordy!

[djohn2oo8]

Literally all of his talking points dead

[TSA]

This claim will go as well as your Trump family going to prison for colluding with Russia :rollin

[ChumpDumper]

TSA, what are you saying/praying will happen here?

Call your shot.

I'm saying you're going to be incredibly disappointed and will furiously kick the can a couple years down the road.

[ElNono]

Can you link me to the report? k thx

It’s the same link you provided proving your claim 302s were altered :lol

[djohn2oo8]

Damn. He couldn’t say anything else

[TSA]

Damn. He couldn’t say anything else

How's this...where's my 2 grand you welching faggot?

[spurraider21]

It’s the same link you provided proving your claim 302s were altered :lol
:lmao

[spurraider21]

How's this...where's my 2 grand you welching faggot?
:lol i gotta give you props for how you handled this in the NFL forum tbh

[djohn2oo8]

How's this...where's my 2 grand you welching faggot?
Everything has gone wrong for you. Everything. You are tempting fate with this one.

[djohn2oo8]

You have no reason to be confident. But I do.

[Reck]

:lol buried lede
:lol WaPo

If it were true it’d be the fucking headline of the article. You are so fucking gullible.

So you're contending it is false because it's not the headline. :lol TSA on some next level of stupid.

[TSA]

Everything has gone wrong for you. Everything. You are tempting fate with this one.:lmao

You welched on a 2 thousand dollar bet you lost to me and then I ran you out of the ST fantasy football league when I said I'd collect any of your winnings from the commissioner. I neutered you in front of the entire board. You've lost all credibility and are nothing but the butt of an ongoing joke here. You're my little broke bitch now and I'll remind you and everyone else here of that any time I feel like it and you can't deny it.

[djohn2oo8]

:lmao

You welched on a 2 thousand dollar bet you lost to me and then I ran you out of the ST fantasy football league when I said I'd collect any of your winnings from the commissioner. I neutered you in front of the entire board. You've lost all credibility and are nothing but the butt of an ongoing joke here. You're my little broke bitch now and I'll remind you and everyone else here of that any time I feel like it and you can't deny it.
Trump was never exonerated

[djohn2oo8]

Mueller said he could charge him after he left office. Doesn’t sound like exoneration. Who btw is right in the middle of impeachment :lol

[djohn2oo8]

1198008290426458112

[Winehole23]

Get ready for the lit crit.

There's bound to be derogatory information that makes TSA declare victory and spike the football again.again

[DMC]

It's interesting to watch the sides and those pretending to not take sides take small victories from the minutia of political goings on, as if any of it changes your life one iota :lol

[Reck]

It's interesting to watch the sides and those pretending to not take sides take small victories from the minutia of political goings on, as if any of it changes your life one iota :lol

Why even make these types of comments when you do the same thing you're blaming others of doing, yellow hands?

You're not impartial here, faggot.

[DMC]

Why even make these types of comments when you do the same thing you're blaming others of doing, yellow hands?

You're not impartial here, faggot.

Nerve struck! Exhibit A: Lap taker^

:lmao

[spurraider21]

i have no problem with lisa page getting jail time if she actually altered an email.

but lol if that's gonna be the big slam dunk victory for the muh deep state crowd

[Winehole23]

It's interesting to watch the sides and those pretending to not take sides take small victories from the minutia of political goings on, as if any of it changes your life one iota :lol
It's also amusing to watch people who profess not to care mock and belittle those who do.

It's sort of an epigonism of puny gloating.

[Spurs Homer]

BOOOOMMM!!!!


:elephant:elephant:elephant:elephant:elephant

[djohn2oo8]

Should be fun to see who is else was incidentally collected in those intercepts :)

[djohn2oo8]

1198020321393160192

NONE

[ElNono]

It's interesting to watch the sides and those pretending to not take sides take small victories from the minutia of political goings on, as if any of it changes your life one iota :lol

It actually speaks clearly of their lives...

[ElNono]

i have no problem with lisa page getting jail time if she actually altered an email.

but lol if that's gonna be the big slam dunk victory for the muh deep state crowd

Yup

[pgardn]

It actually speaks clearly of their lives...

It really does. You nailed it.
DMC will have his coffee in the morning.

And those of us in the US on this board will not suffer a bit.

But this is clearly getting serious for the future. We have a guy who completely wants to change the power of the president.
Who could have predicted a narcissistic, lying, buffoon could be so divisive. These are clearly very different times.
I guess it shows if you are relentless and yield to nothing you can make things happen. And very likely crash and burn.

[DMC]

It really does. You nailed it.
DMC will have his coffee in the morning.

And those of us in the US on this board will not suffer a bit.

But this is clearly getting serious for the future. We have a guy who completely wants to change the power of the president.
Who could have predicted a narcissistic, lying, buffoon could be so divisive. These are clearly very different times.
I guess it shows if you are relentless and yield to nothing you can make things happen. And very likely crash and burn.

We read El's comment differently. I read it as "they have no life". You seem to have read it as "their lives are in danger".

[DMC]

BOOOOMMM!!!!


:elephant:elephant:elephant:elephant:elephant

Rub your cock on it.

[Winehole23]

Rub your cock on it.Face it, DMC, this is is your life too.

Wasting your time on puny taunting and gloating, for people you don't care about, on topics that change nothing
In your life.

Que pobrecito, DMC.

[Winehole23]

Teasing addled blockheads like Spurs Homer.

Weak sauce!

[ElNono]

We read El's comment differently. I read it as "they have no life". You seem to have read it as "their lives are in danger".

Bingo. But not necessarily no life. More like sad life. If what makes you tick is same gotcha win in the interwebs, that's some sad place to be IMVHO.

[Winehole23]

:lmao

You welched on a 2 thousand dollar bet you lost to me and then I ran you out of the ST fantasy football league when I said I'd collect any of your winnings from the commissioner. I neutered you in front of the entire board. You've lost all credibility and are nothing but the butt of an ongoing joke here. You're my little broke bitch now and I'll remind you and everyone else here of that any time I feel like it and you can't deny it.Then you did the same to yourself here. Repeatedly.

You'll probably deny it, but few will believe you.

Pobrecito TSA did himself in.

Just wait, he's about to declare victory when he sees a speck on the horizon.

Again. :lol

[DMC]

Face it, DMC, this is is your life too.

Wasting your time on puny taunting and gloating, for people you don't care about, on topics that change nothing
In your life.

Que pobrecito, DMC.

^long winded version of "I know you are, what am I?"

[pgardn]

We read El's comment differently. I read it as "they have no life". You seem to have read it as "their lives are in danger".

No.

I read it as we live comfortably. We do not appreciate the ability to even engage in this crap.

Then added possible future consequences.

[Winehole23]

Pobrecito DMC, nothing to say on topic. It's all personal.

[pgardn]

Bingo. But not necessarily no life. More like sad life. If what makes you tick is same gotcha win in the interwebs, that's some sad place to be IMVHO.

And I read my thoughts into it based on the above.
But I still like my amended version that is wrong.

[ElNono]

And I read my thoughts into it based on the above.

I don't disagree with the whole uber expansion of presidential power, which is dangerous. But we're mostly only allowed to use one tool: vote. And then hope our representatives raise above the fray (something that has been sorely lacking in the past few decades, at least).

But DMC is correct in the notion that picking and winning/losing an e-battle here won't change anybody's life. That's why the occasional personal butthurt is pretty sad/hilarious, tbh

[pgardn]

I don't disagree with the whole uber expansion of presidential power, which is dangerous. But we're mostly only allowed to use one tool: vote. And then hope our representatives raise above the fray (something that has been sorely lacking in the past few decades, at least).

But DMC is correct in the notion that picking and winning/losing an e-battle here won't change anybody's life. That's why the occasional personal butthurt is pretty sad/hilarious, tbh

Now as I go back and reread the whole thread that would be the more appropriate response. It’s not in a thread involving a 3rd world country which was the way I was thinking. Poor Americans.

[DMC]

No.

I read it as we live comfortably. We do not appreciate the ability to even engage in this crap.

Then added possible future consequences.
You still read it wrong.

[DMC]

I don't disagree with the whole uber expansion of presidential power, which is dangerous. But we're mostly only allowed to use one tool: vote. And then hope our representatives raise above the fray (something that has been sorely lacking in the past few decades, at least).

But DMC is correct in the notion that picking and winning/losing an e-battle here won't change anybody's life. That's why the occasional personal butthurt is pretty sad/hilarious, tbh

What's interesting are the victory laps taken by each side for tiny revelations by the 24/7/365 media machine. It's very much a team sport.

[DMC]

Now as I go back and reread the whole thread that would be the more appropriate response. It’s not in a thread involving a 3rd world country which was the way I was thinking. Poor Americans.

You're a bit special though so I expect you to be a bit long on drywall, short on stud.

[DMC]

Pobrecito DMC, nothing to say on topic. It's all personal.

ironical

[Winehole23]

You're underscoring my point.

[boutons_deux]

"we're mostly only allowed to use one tool: vote"

bullshit. BigMoney picks and finances their candidates. The Biggest Money candidate wins 90% of the time, eg, America is For Sale

eg, anti-BigMoney "The Squad" is "like what? 5 people and twitter -- Pelosi"

and BigMoney DNC screwed Bernie in 2016 and will screw him again in 2020, along with screwing Liz, both way too progressive for the BigMoney oligarchy.

gerrymandering, voter suppression, counting fraud complemented by foreign meddling says one person one vote / every vote counts is a fucking joke of a charade.

"winning/losing an e-battle here won't change anybody's life"

the frogs have been boiled for 40 years, 100M Americans "enslaved" (aka no freedom) to poverty, shitty jobs, financial precarity, so their lives as defined, controlled by the oligarchy have certainly been "changed" for the worse.

[ElNono]

What's interesting are the victory laps taken by each side for tiny revelations by the 24/7/365 media machine. It's very much a team sport.

So is politics for that crowd.

[Spurs Homer]

No

BOOM

yet?

[DMC]

No

BOOM

yet?

That would be the sonic boom of your head popping out of your ass.

[Spurs Homer]

That would be the sonic boom of your head popping out of your ass.


Is McCabe in prison?
Comey?
Strock?
Page?
Ohr?
Deeeeep State unearthed?


then kindly...STFU

[DMC]

Is McCabe in prison?
Comey?
Strock?
Page?
Ohr?
Deeeeep State unearthed?


then kindly...STFU

It's not about prison. It's about illustrating to the audience that the investigative agency and agents had ulterior motives and were less than forthright. Not everything is about jail, just fyi.

[Spurs Homer]

It's not about prison. It's about illustrating to the audience that the investigative agency and agents had ulterior motives and were less than forthright. Not everything is about jail, just fyi.


There is common sense among reasonable people - I will venture to say you are amongst those people as am I -


The intel community unanimously concluded Russia attacked.
The Mueller report conclusively established that russia attacked with a clear favorite being Trump and a clear foe being HRC.
The Mueller report concluded that Trump team WELCOMED Russias help and lied about its contacts and its efforts to collude with Russia against the USA.

The new report by Horowitz was MAINLY opened and conducted to appease a spoiled infant in chief and his enablers who just wanted to equivocate and try to muddy the waters to find something - SOME conduct to exonerate their spoiled unpatriotic cult hero.

It failed because there was NEVER a question that what trump team did was wrong and un-American.

Fast-forward to today...

Trump is doing the SAME unpatriotic and illegal cheating scheme with ANOTHER country and his supporters have the gall to defend him AGAIN.

WHY?


When will it stop?

Will ANOTHER investigation of the investigators be necessary now?

or will you and the rest of the enablers admit that the corrupt dishonest problem here is

NOT - the fbi, intel, dems, congress, cia, investigators,etc


but the fraudulent, lying piece of shit con man traitorin the oval office?

[DMC]

There is common sense among reasonable people - I will venture to say you are amongst those people as am I -


The intel community unanimously concluded Russia attacked.

That's hyperbole. The US is well known for tampering in elections. Tampering and attacking aren't the same things. Your verbiage is biased toward an outcome, but that's nothing new around here. Why should anyone give what you say any more credence than what Boutons posts if you're going to use hyperbole?


The Mueller report conclusively established that russia attacked with a clear favorite being Trump and a clear foe being HRC.

Same hyperbole.


The Mueller report concluded that Trump team WELCOMED Russias help and lied about its contacts and its efforts to collude with Russia against the USA.

Sure. Both sides would have welcomed anything that got them elected. More hyperbole with "against the USA". I suppose the Clintons are the "USA"? What if Bernie was the USA? Did the DNC collude with the Clintons against the USA? Was CNN complicit? Things that make you go "hmmmm".


The new report by Horowitz was MAINLY opened and conducted to appease a spoiled infant in chief and his enablers who just wanted to equivocate and try to muddy the waters to find something - SOME conduct to exonerate their spoiled unpatriotic cult hero.

There's no reason to read or consider your partisan hack mental droppings. If you want discourse you would present facts, not so many opinion laced tirades. What people you and I are among are those who no one really gives a shit about their opinions, but we can both present facts and then from those facts discuss our opinions. When you lace facts with your hyperbole, you automatically distance the reader who isn't already on your side.


It failed because there was NEVER a question that what trump team did was wrong and un-American.

Fast-forward to today...

Trump is doing the SAME unpatriotic and illegal cheating scheme with ANOTHER country and his supporters have the gall to defend him AGAIN.

WHY?


When will it stop?

Will ANOTHER investigation of the investigators be necessary now?

or will you and the rest of the enablers admit that the corrupt dishonest problem here is

NOT - the fbi, intel, dems, congress, cia, investigators,etc


but the fraudulent, lying piece of shit con man traitorin the oval office?

Rub your cock in it.

[Spurs Homer]

That's hyperbole. The US is well known for tampering in elections. Tampering and attacking aren't the same things. Your verbiage is biased toward an outcome, but that's nothing new around here. Why should anyone give what you say any more credence than what Boutons posts if you're going to use hyperbole?

Same hyperbole.

Sure. Both sides would have welcomed anything that got them elected. More hyperbole with "against the USA". I suppose the Clintons are the "USA"? What if Bernie was the USA? Did the DNC collude with the Clintons against the USA? Was CNN complicit? Things that make you go "hmmmm".

There's no reason to read or consider your partisan hack mental droppings. If you want discourse you would present facts, not so many opinion laced tirades. What people you and I are among are those who no one really gives a shit about their opinions, but we can both present facts and then from those facts discuss our opinions. When you lace facts with your hyperbole, you automatically distance the reader who isn't already on your side.


Rub your cock in it.

Everything i posted was 100 percent factual.


no sense in wasting any more time with a cultist.

[RandomGuy]

:lmao

You welched on a 2 thousand dollar bet you lost to me and then I ran you out of the ST fantasy football league when I said I'd collect any of your winnings from the commissioner. I neutered you in front of the entire board. You've lost all credibility and are nothing but the butt of an ongoing joke here. You're my little broke bitch now and I'll remind you and everyone else here of that any time I feel like it and you can't deny it.


'If we had had confidence that the president had clearly not committed a crime, we would have said so'


ex·on·er·ate (ĭg-zŏn′ə-rāt′)
tr.v. ex·on·er·at·ed, ex·on·er·at·ing, ex·on·er·ates
1. To free from blame.

Mueller did not say so.

Therefore:

They have confidence that the president committed a crime.

Take that to any arbitrator worth their salt, and you would lose. I would be willing to even pay the fee, just to see the look on your dumb ass when you lose.

$180 dollars.

https://home.arbfile.org/ArbitrationForums/media/resources/homepage/FeeSchedule.pdf

[RandomGuy]

The Mueller report conclusively established that russia attacked with a clear favorite being Trump and a clear foe being HRC.


[thats just ]hyperbole.

---------------------------------------------------------------------



hyperbole[ hahy-pur-buh-lee ]
obvious and intentional exaggeration.


The Russian government interfered in the 2016 presidential election in sweeping and systematic fashion.

As set forth in detail in this report, the Special Counsel’s investigation established that Russia interfered in the 2016 presidential election principally through two operations. First, a Russian entity carried out a social media campaign that favored presidential candidate Donald J. Trump and disparaged presidential candidate Hillary Clinton. Second, a Russian intelligence service conducted computer-intrusion operations against entities, employees, and volunteers working on the Clinton Campaign and then released stolen documents.

Seems to be pretty much spot on, with no exaggeration that I could find.

Maybe you could wow us with your brilliance here and tell us exactly what was exaggerated.


A little help, not that I hold out any hope you will get off your lazy ass and do the work:

https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2019/04/18/us/politics/mueller-report-document.html

[TSA]

Mueller did not say so.

Therefore:

They have confidence that the president committed a crime.

Take that to any arbitrator worth their salt, and you would lose. I would be willing to even pay the fee, just to see the look on your dumb ass when you lose.

$180 dollars.

https://home.arbfile.org/ArbitrationForums/media/resources/homepage/FeeSchedule.pdfThat was never the bet.

Hey djohn2oo8 get your ass in here...RandomGuy is willing to pay an arbitrator $180 to make himself look like a dumb ass while helping me collect $2000 from you.

djohn2oo8 said Mueller would put Trump, Trump Jr, Ivanka, and Kushner in prison---$500 a head. Mueller closed his investigation without putting Trump, Trump Jr, Ivanka, or Kushner in prison. Mueller is now a private citizen.

Therefore:

You are one dumb motherfucker :lmao

[Spurtacular]

1197882409238368256



:lmao :lmao :lmao TSA

We're talking about the guy who was implicated in Pedo Island?

:lmao :lmao :lmao :lmao Chumpette outrage about their pedos selective. Par.

[Spurs Homer]

---------------------------------------------------------------------



Seems to be pretty much spot on, with no exaggeration that I could find.

Maybe you could wow us with your brilliance here and tell us exactly what was exaggerated.


A little help, not that I hold out any hope you will get off your lazy ass and do the work:

https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2019/04/18/us/politics/mueller-report-document.html

yup

which is why i stated to dmc that everything i posted was factual


none of these facts are disputable anymore -

now it just comes down to this;

are you on the usa side

or

russias side

period.

[Spurs Homer]

No BOOM yet?

:cry:cry:cry:cry

[djohn2oo8]

1199774046654750720

[djohn2oo8]

1199776157794738178

[djohn2oo8]

TSA

[spurraider21]

The Unraveling

[spurraider21]

Grassley Letter

[Splits]

Huber.


WHAT ABOUT JOHN HUBER!!!????

[djohn2oo8]

Huber.


WHAT ABOUT JOHN HUBER!!!????
:lol

[TSA]

1199774046654750720

I’ve lost track of how many times you’ve posted an article without reading it and allowing me to shit all over you :lol

“For one, agents had an informant, an academic named Stefan A. Halper, meet with Mr. Page and Mr. Papadopoulos while they were affiliated with the campaign.” :lol

“The F.B.I. did have an undercover agent who posed as Mr. Halper’s assistant during a London meeting with Mr. Papadopoulos in August 2016.” :lol

“Mr. Halper focused on eliciting information from Mr. Page and Mr. Papadopoulos about their ties to Russia.

Mr. Barr has suggested that the F.B.I. assigned other informants as well to figure out whether any Trump associates were working with the Russians.” :lol

:lol undercuts the spying accusation
:lol New York Times

[TSA]

TSA

Hey djohn2oo8 get your ass in here...RandomGuy is willing to pay an arbitrator $180 to make himself look like a dumb ass while helping me collect $2000 from you.

[Chris]

TSA

Natasha lying her ass off :lol


https://twitter.com/dbongino/status/1199800895548076032?s=19

"debunk" :lol

[djohn2oo8]

mah FISA abuse? :lmao :lmao

[djohn2oo8]

Huber prosecuting Comey :lmao

[djohn2oo8]

:lmao “they spied on the Trump campaign”

[TSA]

Huber prosecuting Comey :lmao

Betting $2000 on Mueller putting the Trump family in prison :lmao :lmao :lmao

[TSA]

:lmao “they spied on the Trump campaign”

:lmao being stupid enough to post an article that says exactly that

[TSA]

:lmao “they spied on the Trump campaign”

“For one, agents had an informant, an academic named Stefan A. Halper, meet with Mr. Page and Mr. Papadopoulos while they were affiliated with the campaign.”

“The F.B.I. did have an undercover agent who posed as Mr. Halper’s assistant during a London meeting with Mr. Papadopoulos in August 2016.”

“Mr. Halper focused on eliciting information from Mr. Page and Mr. Papadopoulos about their ties to Russia.

Mr. Barr has suggested that the F.B.I. assigned other informants as well to figure out whether any Trump associates were working with the Russians.”

https://www.nytimes.com/2019/11/27/us/politics/fbi-trump-campaign-inspector-general.html

:lmao

[Chris]

:lmao being stupid enough to post an article that says exactly that

:lol

[koriwhat]

told you djohn was a stain on his ethnicity.

[TSA]

:lol

poor fella is in the midst of a serious meltdown after det one

[Spurminator]

“For one, agents had an informant, an academic named Stefan A. Halper, meet with Mr. Page and Mr. Papadopoulos while they were affiliated with the campaign.”

“The F.B.I. did have an undercover agent who posed as Mr. Halper’s assistant during a London meeting with Mr. Papadopoulos in August 2016.”

“Mr. Halper focused on eliciting information from Mr. Page and Mr. Papadopoulos about their ties to Russia.

Mr. Barr has suggested that the F.B.I. assigned other informants as well to figure out whether any Trump associates were working with the Russians.”

https://www.nytimes.com/2019/11/27/us/politics/fbi-trump-campaign-inspector-general.html

:lmao

Jesus, dude, we can all read the article and see the sentences around these snippets that you conveniently left out.

We're not all koriwhat/Chris level retarded.

[djohn2oo8]

:lmao Dossier actually not used for FBI investigation

[TSA]

Jesus, dude, we can all read the article and see the sentences around these snippets that you conveniently left out.

We're not all koriwhat/Chris level retarded.

You are such a whiny bitch. If I posted the whole article you’d cry about a wall of text. Those snippets are clearly spying. Nothing written before or after changes that fact.

[djohn2oo8]

:lmao FISA warrant legal

[djohn2oo8]

:lmao “but dey spied on the Trumps” :cry

[Spurminator]

You are such a whiny bitch. If I posted the whole article you’d cry about a wall of text. Those snippets are clearly spying. Nothing written before or after changes that fact.

Bolded are the sentences TSA conveniently and dishonestly left out.

What a fucking liar. :lmao


“Mr. Trump and his allies have pointed to some of the investigative steps the F.B.I. took as evidence of spying, though they were typical law enforcement activities. For one, agents had an informant, an academic named Stefan A. Halper, meet with Mr. Page and Mr. Papadopoulos while they were affiliated with the campaign.”

“The F.B.I. did have an undercover agent who posed as Mr. Halper’s assistant during a London meeting with Mr. Papadopoulos in August 2016. And indeed, another Trump adviser, Peter Navarro, reportedly pushed Mr. Halper for an ambassadorship in the Trump administration.

Mr. Halper turned down the job and told the F.B.I. that Mr. Navarro had made the overture, according to a person familiar with the offer. Mr. Horowitz found no evidence that Mr. Halper tried to infiltrate the Trump campaign itself, the people familiar with the draft report said, such as by seeking inside campaign information or a role in the organization. The F.B.I. also never directed him to do so, former officials said. Mr. Halper focused on eliciting information from Mr. Page and Mr. Papadopoulos about their ties to Russia.

Mr. Barr has suggested that the F.B.I. assigned other informants as well to figure out whether any Trump associates were working with the Russians. The F.B.I. gave Mr. Horowitz’s team extraordinary access to its informant database, and his investigators examined other F.B.I. informants with possible ties to the Trump campaign.
In each case, they found that the F.B.I. had not deployed those people to gather information on the Trump campaign itself, the people said. "

https://www.nytimes.com/2019/11/27/us/politics/fbi-trump-campaign-inspector-general.html

:lmao


:lmao
You're such a pathetic loser.

[djohn2oo8]

1199812876669718536

[djohn2oo8]

^ :lmao TSA

[Spurminator]

:lmao Needing personal validation so badly that you lie for free on behalf of your lying, idiot President. After destroying your reputation by pushing Pizzagate.

You really, really need a new hobby, TSA. This is fucking pathetic.

[Spurminator]

You are such a whiny bitch. If I posted the whole article you’d cry about a wall of text. Those snippets are clearly spying. Nothing written before or after changes that fact.

You literally posted a sentence that was in the article as a "Trump claim" and presented it as a finding of the report.

That's lying. You're a fucking liar. Why?

[Spurminator]

"But muh $2,000!" :cry

[Spurs Homer]

so

BOOM!!!

maybe?

still hopeful?




bwahahahahahahahahahahaha!!!!!!!



:elephant:elephant:elephant



Carter Page: "I went to Russia. I gave a speech in Russia, TO Russians, against the USA, to Russians...in RUSSIA..spoke about the EVIL USA -but but - do NOT investigate my Russian ties!!!!"


Right wing GOP/Russians/CULT: "Our entire Trump Team Gods - teamed up with Russia....welcomed their help...cheated the 2016 election...with Russia's help...received stolen emails...most of trump team is in prison ...we are now cheating with UKRAINE for 2020 ...but - but - how dare you SPY on team russia - er team trump!!!!


:lmao:lmao:lmao

[TSA]

Bolded are the sentences TSA conveniently and dishonestly left out.

What a fucking liar. :lmao




:lmao
You're such a pathetic loser.

You just highlighted a bunch of shit saying Halper wasn’t trying to get inside information on the Trump campaign as if that someone proves there wasn’t spying. :lmao

The NYT admits there were informants and undercover agents that were spying :lmao

[djohn2oo8]

so

BOOM!!!

maybe?

still hopeful?




bwahahahahahahahahahahaha!!!!!!!



:elephant:elephant:elephant



Carter Page: "I went to Russia. I gave a speech in Russia, TO Russians, against the USA, to Russians...in RUSSIA..spoke about the EVIL USA -but but - do NOT investigate my Russian ties!!!!"


Right wing GOP/Russians/CULT: "Our entire Trump Team Gods - teamed up with Russia....welcomed their help...cheated the 2016 election...with Russia's help...received stolen emails...most of trump team is in prison ...we are now cheating with UKRAINE for 2020 ...but - but - how dare you SPY on team russia - er team trump!!!!


:lmao:lmao:lmao
:lmao

[TSA]

You literally posted a sentence that was in the article as a "Trump claim" and presented it as a finding of the report.

That's lying. You're a fucking liar. Why?

What sentence are you even talking about?

[djohn2oo8]

You just highlighted a bunch of shit saying Halper wasn’t trying to get inside information on the Trump campaign as if that someone proves there wasn’t spying. :lmao

The NYT admits there were informants and undercover agents that were spying :lmao
You called the NYT “fake news” :lmao

[Spurminator]

Article:

"Investigators find no evidence of underground pedophilia ring involving Democrats

There is an underground ring of human trafficking and pedophilia run by elite Democrats, including the Clintons, according to many fringe incel communities on the internet. Today, the FBI stated that these rumors have no basis in fact."

TSA reposts snippet from article:

"There is an underground ring of human trafficking and pedophilia run by elite Democrats, including the Clintons"

TSA claims victory.
:lmao

[TSA]

1199812876669718536

You literally just posted an article that said they were spying on the Trump campaign. Or are you now going to claim informants and undercover agents isn’t spying?

[djohn2oo8]

You literally just posted an article that said they were spying on the Trump campaign. Or are you now going to claim informants and undercover agents isn’t spying?
Show me where Horowitz said there was spying

[spurraider21]

“For one, agents had an informant, an academic named Stefan A. Halper, meet with Mr. Page and Mr. Papadopoulos while they were affiliated with the campaign.”

“The F.B.I. did have an undercover agent who posed as Mr. Halper’s assistant during a London meeting with Mr. Papadopoulos in August 2016.”

“Mr. Halper focused on eliciting information from Mr. Page and Mr. Papadopoulos about their ties to Russia.

Mr. Barr has suggested that the F.B.I. assigned other informants as well to figure out whether any Trump associates were working with the Russians.”

https://www.nytimes.com/2019/11/27/us/politics/fbi-trump-campaign-inspector-general.html

:lmao
:lol why did you stop quoting right there?

doesn't it immediately go onto say that horowitz found no evidence that Halper tried to infiltrate the campaign itself? or that the FBI never directed him to do so?

and that after the "Barr has suggested" line it goes on to say "In each case, they found that the FBI had not deployed those people to gather information on the Trump campaign itself"

[Spurs Homer]

Comey in Prison?
McCabe?
Ohr?
Strock?
Mueller?





no BOOM?


Trump team in prison jumpsuits?


YUP

:cry:cry

[Spurminator]

:lol why did you stop quoting right there?

doesn't it immediately go onto say that horowitz found no evidence that Halper tried to infiltrate the campaign itself? or that the FBI never directed him to do so?

and that after the "Barr has suggested" line it goes on to say "In each case, they found that the FBI had not deployed those people to gather information on the Trump campaign itself"

Because he's a liar.

He has nothing else but lies.

[TSA]

:lol why did you stop quoting right there?

doesn't it immediately go onto say that horowitz found no evidence that Halper tried to infiltrate the campaign itself? or that the FBI never directed him to do so?

and that after the "Barr has suggested" line it goes on to say "In each case, they found that the FBI had not deployed those people to gather information on the Trump campaign itself"The NYT is pushing “infiltrate the campaign” to obfuscate and gaslight the public.

“Mr. Horowitz found no evidence that Mr. Halper tried to infiltrate the Trump campaign itself, the people familiar with the draft report said, such as by seeking inside campaign information or a role in the organization. The F.B.I. also never directed him to do so, former officials said. Instead, Mr. Halper focused on eliciting information from Mr. Page and Mr. Papadopoulos about their ties to Russia.”

[spurraider21]

i mean maybe the NYT report turns out to be wrong, but lol at disingenuously pretending that its saying something else

[spurraider21]

The NYT is pushing “infiltrate the campaign” to obfuscate and gaslight the public.

“Mr. Horowitz found no evidence that Mr. Halper tried to infiltrate the Trump campaign itself, the people familiar with the draft report said, such as by seeking inside campaign information or a role in the organization. The F.B.I. also never directed him to do so, former officials said. Instead, Mr. Halper focused on eliciting information from Mr. Page and Mr. Papadopoulos about their ties to Russia.”
yes. that is what they were supposed to do. that's what they were investigating.

[TSA]

Because he's a liar.

He has nothing else but lies.

You’re full of shit. Point me to the sentence you said I lied about.

[TSA]

yes. that is what they were supposed to do. that's what they were investigating.

So then you agree using informants and undercover agents to elicit such information would be “spying”.

[TSA]

i mean maybe the NYT report turns out to be wrong, but lol at disingenuously pretending that its saying something else

The article is trying to spin the spying as being about inside campaign information, that was never the spying accusation. The spying accusation was that informants and undercover agents were sent at the Trump campaign.

[djohn2oo8]

Wanna know what was legal? The FISA warrant

[spurraider21]

So then you agree using informants and undercover agents to elicit such information would be “spying”.


The article is trying to spin the spying as being about inside campaign information, that was never the spying accusation. The spying accusation was that informants and undercover agents were sent at the Trump campaign.
:lmao :lmao

[spurraider21]

The article is trying to spin the spying as being about inside campaign information, that was never the spying accusation. The spying accusation was that informants and undercover agents were sent at the Trump campaign.
:rollin :rollin

997095653875617792

:rollin :rollin

997474432443707393

:rollin :rollin

999096013674680321

[TSA]

:rollin :rollin

997095653875617792

:rollin :rollin

997474432443707393

:rollin :rollin

999096013674680321

Are you so dense you don’t understand the difference between inside campaign information and eliciting information from Mr. Page and Mr. Papadopoulos about their ties to Russia?

[spurraider21]

nobody doubts they were looking into ties to russia. that was the whole point of the investigation :lol

spygate was about it being more than that, and done for political purposes to get info on his campaign.

[TSA]

You literally posted a sentence that was in the article as a "Trump claim" and presented it as a finding of the report.

That's lying. You're a fucking liar. Why?

This is the only Trump claim mentioned I quoted. You ready to eat shit for having poor reading comprehension?

—————-
“Mr. Trump and his allies have pointed to some of the investigative steps the F.B.I. took as evidence of spying, though they were typical law enforcement activities. For one, agents had an informant, an academic named Stefan A. Halper, meet with Mr. Page and Mr. Papadopoulos while they were affiliated with the campaign. The president decried the revelation as an “all time biggest political scandal” when it emerged last year.

The F.B.I. did have an undercover agent who posed as Mr. Halper’s assistant during a London meeting with Mr. Papadopoulos in August 2016.”

—————-

Trump didn’t claim the bolded dipshit, the NYT revealed it.

https://www.nytimes.com/2019/05/02/us/politics/fbi-government-investigator-trump.html

I can see why you were confused though, that was the whole point of the NYT article. So in the end I didn’t lie and you can’t read.

[TSA]

nobody doubts they were looking into ties to russia. that was the whole point of the investigation :lol

spygate was about it being more than that, and done for political purposes to get info on his campaign.

To get info on his campaign? :lol

And you can’t even get yourself to type the words spied on his campaign.

:lol “looking into”

[TSA]

djohn2oo8, RandomGuy, and Spurminator all stroll into the thread with their chests puffed out and immediately get bitchslapped. :rollin

[spurraider21]

To get info on his campaign? :lol

And you can’t even get yourself to type the words spied on his campaign.

:lol “looking into”
ok. instead of "looking into" ties to russia, rephrase that to "investigating" ties to russia.

and if the wording is that important to you, then by all means, rephrase line 2 to: "spygate was about it being more than that, and done for political purposes to spy on his campaign"

which is something you tried to walk back in this thread. :lol "that was never the spying allegation" :lol

of course, the word "spy" doesnt have much legal meaning in this context, much like "collusion" (legal term was conspiracy)... its about whether their was inappropriate surveillance

[djohn2oo8]

djohn2oo8 (https://www.spurstalk.com/forums/member.php?u=14870), RandomGuy (https://www.spurstalk.com/forums/member.php?u=1813), and Spurminator (https://www.spurstalk.com/forums/member.php?u=45) all stroll into the thread with their chests puffed out and immediately get bitchslapped. :rollin
That’s what Horowitz did to your theories

[Spurs Homer]

To get info on his campaign? :lol

And you can’t even get yourself to type the words spied on his campaign.

:lol “looking into”


Yes, genius...

because every agent that asked trump team a question -

got...


lies...

lies...
lies...
more lies...

deflections....


lies x1000


and...


lies!

So the FBI was supposed to stay at home and allow an enemy foreign government to attack our elections, allow trump team traitors to have meetings, receive stolen emails, run an internet disinformation propaganda scheme, coordinate and collude against the USA, and NEVER send anyone inside to INVESTIGATE.

BECAUSE?


because ORANGE MAN HONEST PATRIOT!!!!


Go fuck yourself comrade.

[spurraider21]

That’s what Horowitz did to your theories
can will be kicked to huber/durham

[TSA]

ok. instead of "looking into" ties to russia, rephrase that to "investigating" ties to russia.

and if the wording is that important to you, then by all means, rephrase line 2 to: "spygate was about it being more than that, and done for political purposes to spy on his campaign"

which is something you tried to walk back in this thread. :lol "that was never the spying allegation" :lol

of course, the word "spy" doesnt have much legal meaning in this context, much like "collusion" (legal term was conspiracy)... its about whether their was inappropriate surveillance

Once again, you’re falling for the false narrative being presented by the NYT.

“Mr. Horowitz found no evidence that Mr. Halper tried to infiltrate the Trump campaign itself, the people familiar with the draft report said, such as by seeking inside campaign information or a role in the organization.”

I’ll simplify it for you, were informants and undercover agents sent at Trump’s campaign? Yes or no.

[TSA]

That’s what Horowitz did to your theories

Horowitz report isn’t even out yet you stupid fuck :lol

You know’s who’s report did come out? Mueller’s and he shit the fuck all over your theories :rollin

[TSA]

can will be kicked to huber/durham

Horowitz can’t prosecute anyone and Durham is the one with an open criminal investigation(s) so not sure how that would be kicking the can to him.

[spurraider21]

Once again, you’re falling for the false narrative being presented by the NYT.

“Mr. Horowitz found no evidence that Mr. Halper tried to infiltrate the Trump campaign itself, the people familiar with the draft report said, such as by seeking inside campaign information or a role in the organization.”

I’ll simplify it for you, were informants and undercover agents sent at Trump’s campaign? Yes or no.
gaslighting tbh


:rollin :rollin

997095653875617792

:rollin :rollin

997474432443707393

:rollin :rollin

999096013674680321

[TSA]

gaslighting tbh

I’ll ask you again, were informants and undercover agents sent at Trump’s campaign? Yes or no.

[Spurminator]

djohn2oo8, RandomGuy, and Spurminator all stroll into the thread with their chests puffed out and immediately get bitchslapped. :rollin

Who do you think you're fooling, liar?

The article is linked for everyone to read.

[Spurminator]

TSA thought he could blatantly mistepresent the findings and the article but didn't count on people reading the article.

Or he's just repressing facts he doesn't want to believe, because his self validation hinges on this stuff.

I don't know which is sadder.

[spurraider21]

I’ll ask you again, were informants and undercover agents sent at Trump’s campaign? Yes or no.
changing the allegation tbh

lets just wait for horowitz report to see how they lay it out

[TSA]

Who do you think you're fooling, liar?

The article is linked for everyone to read.

Do you not think people can read where you got your shit pushed in and are now ignoring it like it never happened?

[TSA]

changing the allegation tbh

lets just wait for horowitz report to see how they lay it out

Nothing was changed. You guys are such pussies about admitting when you were wrong :lol

[djohn2oo8]

Horowitz report isn’t even out yet you stupid fuck :lol

You know’s who’s report did come out? Mueller’s and he shit the fuck all over your theories :rollin
3-4 Major publications have all stated his report will find no wrongdoing by the FBI. None. No bias. Everything legal. Oh and No FISA abuse :)

[djohn2oo8]

Maybe, just maybe, to not be under US Surveillance, don’t get fucking buddy buddy with the Kremlin

[spurraider21]

Nothing was changed. You guys are such pussies about admitting when you were wrong :lol
you're watering down the spygate allegation to a ridiculous degree as evidenced by the tweets i posted for your reference

[koriwhat]

you're watering down the spygate allegation to a ridiculous degree as evidenced by the tweets i posted for your reference

so tweets are ok now as long as chris doesn't post them? :lmao

[koriwhat]

Maybe, just maybe, to not be under US Surveillance, don’t get fucking buddy buddy with the Kremlin


https://youtu.be/xHmyKksPois

[spurraider21]

so tweets are ok now as long as chris doesn't post them? :lmao
nothing wrong with posting tweets tbh, its a useful means of getting some info across.

chrisbot just posts tweets and has no comment on anything and nothing to add to the conversation

[djohn2oo8]

https://youtu.be/xHmyKksPois
Funny. Because Trump is the one under a Counterintelligence investigation

[koriwhat]

Funny. Because Trump is the one under a Counterintelligence investigation

nah, trump is under a coup d'état.

it's also funny how you see no problem with the corruption of our past admin... says a ton about you and your lack of spine.

[ChumpDumper]

Once again, you’re falling for the false narrative being presented by the NYT.

“Mr. Horowitz found no evidence that Mr. Halper tried to infiltrate the Trump campaign itself, the people familiar with the draft report said, such as by seeking inside campaign information or a role in the organization.”

I’ll simplify it for you, were informants and undercover agents sent at Trump’s campaign? Yes or no.
TSA: wrong about spygate

[koriwhat]

Funny. Because Trump is the one under a Counterintelligence investigation

nah, trump is under a coup d'état.

it's also funny how you see no problem with the corruption of our past admin... says a ton about you and your lack of spine.

[Spurs Homer]

No

BOOM?


lolol

[spurraider21]

Horowitz can’t prosecute anyone and Durham is the one with an open criminal investigation(s) so not sure how that would be kicking the can to him.
so the can is already kicked :tu

after quite literally years spent posting about OBAMA APPOINTED IG suddenly that was never supposed to be the big boom :lol

[koriwhat]

so the can is already kicked :tu

after quite literally years spent posting about OBAMA APPOINTED IG suddenly that was never supposed to be the big boom :lol

you want a big boom? BOOM 3+ yrs wasted on a hoax your shitlib pol party pushed... BOOM more time wasted on more conspiracies your shitlib pol party is pushing.

tbh, to make america great again we need to burn that dem party to the fucking ground!

[spurraider21]

you want a big boom? BOOM 3+ yrs wasted on a hoax your shitlib pol party pushed... BOOM more time wasted on more conspiracies your shitlib pol party is pushing.

tbh, to make america great again we need to burn that dem party to the fucking ground!
^not a republican

[Spurs Homer]

Lol

still no


BOOM!

[ElNono]

Nothing was changed. You guys are such pussies about admitting when you were wrong :lol

Another extremely ironic post :lol

[djohn2oo8]

So TSA has gone from “the report will be damning” to “Horwitz can’t prosecute” :lol

[djohn2oo8]

nah, trump is under a coup d'état.

it's also funny how you see no problem with the corruption of our past admin... says a ton about you and your lack of spine.
All the indictments and prison sentences have come from this current administration. Yet you want to talk about corruption :lol

[Splits]

you want a big boom? BOOM 3+ yrs wasted on a hoax your shitlib pol party pushed... BOOM more time wasted on more conspiracies your shitlib pol party is pushing.

tbh, to make america great again we need to burn that dem party to the fucking ground!

What about BENGHAZI?

[djohn2oo8]

Remember. KW was a HS dropout. He is Trumps base.

[djohn2oo8]

Another way you know he is Trumps base, he likes to threaten to kill people online.

[Spurs Homer]

Remember. KW was a HS dropout. He is Trumps base.


:lol:lol


K:lolRi-Twat!

[koriwhat]

:lol:lol


K:lolRi-Twat!

Ah boohoo you fucking retard

[koriwhat]

^not a republican

Cry some more pussy :cry

[koriwhat]

All the indictments and prison sentences have come from this current administration. Yet you want to talk about corruption :lol

This dumb fucking asian :lmao

[Winehole23]

so the can is already kicked :tu

after quite literally years spent posting about OBAMA APPOINTED IG suddenly that was never supposed to be the big boom :lolthe pivot to instantaneous talking points is instant. never admit you lost.

[Winehole23]

the only way to get away with being wrong repeatedly is insisting you've been right all along.

[Spurtacular]

TSA's last line of defense. Straight denial.

:lol

Chump puts a lot of stock in his pedo lawyers. :lmao

[Spurs Homer]

No way to spin it.

The FBI had a LEGIT reason to investigate trump team - as trump team was openly inviting Russia into our elections to cheat their way into the white house - and they succeeded.

Boiled down: Trump is a piece of shit traitor who sold out to Russia.

but some of us called it back in 2016.

[RandomGuy]

djohn2oo8, RandomGuy, and Spurminator all stroll into the thread with their chests puffed out and immediately get bitchslapped. :rollin

I see you have given up trying to defend Trump's Ukraine stuff.

It may sadden you to know I have no clue what you are talking about here, and don't really care enough to find out what new sputtering talking point turd someone handed you is about. Feel free to polish it or fling the turd as you will. Just try not to eat it, ok?

(edit)

I finished rolling through quotes and so forth, see below)

[RandomGuy]

That was never the bet.

Hey djohn2oo8 get your ass in here...RandomGuy is willing to pay an arbitrator $180 to make himself look like a dumb ass while helping me collect $2000 from you.

djohn2oo8 said Mueller would put Trump, Trump Jr, Ivanka, and Kushner in prison---$500 a head. Mueller closed his investigation without putting Trump, Trump Jr, Ivanka, or Kushner in prison. Mueller is now a private citizen.

Therefore:

You are one dumb motherfucker :lmao

Hmm. If that is the bet, you are still years too early.

The statute of limitations on the felonies Trump has committed have not run out, and whatever shielding efforts that the Trump administration has undertaken to keep them out of prison will stop, and investigators and the FBI finally get a chance to parse out what happened.

Depending on the exact wording though. Pesonally, I wouldnt' rely on your representations of that wording, and neither would an arbitrator.

[TSA]

Hmm. If that is the bet, you are still years too early.

The statute of limitations on the felonies Trump has committed have not run out, and whatever shielding efforts that the Trump administration has undertaken to keep them out of prison will stop, and investigators and the FBI finally get a chance to parse out what happened.

Depending on the exact wording though. Pesonally, I wouldnt' rely on your representations of that wording, and neither would an arbitrator.


The Mueller investigation is over and he's a private citizen now. Mueller didn't put Trump, Trump Jr, Ivanka, or Kushner in prison. The statute of limitations has nothing to do with the bet djohn2oo8 and I made.

Shut the fuck up, take your L, and move on.

[boutons_deux]

Mueller didn't put Trump, Trump Jr, Ivanka, or Kushner in prison.

that wasn't his role, that was up the to Dems, and they fumbled, aided by the DoJ OLC bullshit immunizing the President

The Mueller report is alive and well, no statute of limitations there, containing several 9? documented cases of Trash impeachable-y obstructing the investigations, including his obstructing the Dems NOW from obtaining the evidence on which Mueller report is based.

[TSA]

that wasn't his roleIt was his role concerning our bet.

[spurraider21]

It was his role concerning our bet.
do u have a link to the posts where the bet was laid out? more curious than anything

[RandomGuy]

The Mueller investigation is over and he's a private citizen now. Mueller didn't put Trump, Trump Jr, Ivanka, or Kushner in prison. The statute of limitations has nothing to do with the bet djohn2oo8 and I made.

Shut the fuck up, take your L, and move on.

Not really my "L" dude. I am simply trying to figure out if you, as usual, are thumping your chest, and what the facts actually are. Don't really care that much tbh, so my efforts will stop there. Either you can show the wording of hte original bet or not.

My guess is that you put together an easily mis-intepreted, ill-defined bet, based on what I know of your general attitude to such things. If you can't actually prove your case, I see little reason to take you at your word.

[Winehole23]

So much of what TSA posts relies on barely supportable inference, innuendo -- and frankly, goofy, made up bullshit he cops from others because it flatters his priors -- small wonder he so often ends up pounding his chest and maxing out on emojis.

[Chris]

https://twitter.com/bennyjohnson/status/1201663029651398657?s=19

[spurraider21]

https://twitter.com/bennyjohnson/status/1201663029651398657?s=19
poor barr

[ChumpDumper]

https://twitter.com/bennyjohnson/status/1201663029651398657?s=19:lol let's see his report.

[Winehole23]

Pobrecito Barr

[Winehole23]

https://twitter.com/bennyjohnson/status/1201663029651398657?s=19Not rhetorical, why do you think IGs are appointed to investigate the DOJ?

Seems to me toadies like Barr who craft judgment to suit the boss are one of the big reasons why.

[ElNono]

https://twitter.com/bennyjohnson/status/1201663029651398657?s=19

https://i.imgflip.com/3i8jmr.jpg

[Winehole23]

formerly secret memos from the Mueller probe:

https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/jasonleopold/mueller-report-secret-memos-2

[Winehole23]

The interview summaries released Monday include Trump's former personal attorney Michael Cohen, former White House chief of staff John Kelly, former campaign manager Corey Lewandowkski, former adviser Hope Hicks, deputy campaign manager Rick Gates and former political aide Omarosa Manigault.

The cache of interview summaries released last month contained explosive details that were not cited in Mueller’s report. For example, in an April 2018 interview with the special counsel’s office, Gates told investigators that while Paul Manafort was running Trump’s campaign, he had pushed the unfounded theory that it was Ukraine, not Russia (https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/zoetillman/trump-paul-manafort-ukraine-dnc-hack), that had hacked the Democratic National Committee’s servers. That theory has been thoroughly debunked by the US intelligence community, but Trump still cites it — most notably during the July 2019 call with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, which is at the heart of the current impeachment investigation.

The 302s are just the beginning. BuzzFeed News is pursuing five separate lawsuits (https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/jasonleopold/mueller-investigation-foia-requests-barr-redactions) to pry loose all the subpoenas and search warrants that Mueller’s team executed, as well as all emails, memos, letters, talking points, legal opinions, and financial records it generated. In short, we asked for all communications of any kind that passed through the special counsel’s office. We also requested all the documents that would reveal the discussions among Attorney General Bill Barr, former deputy attorney general Rod Rosenstein, and other high-ranking officials about whether to charge Trump with obstruction.

In response, Justice Department lawyers claimed the volume of records requested could total 18 billion pages (https://twitter.com/JasonLeopold/status/1151122370175758337) and take centuries to produce.

[boutons_deux]

Barr's total 4-pager LIE about the Mueller report destroyed his credibility as law enforcement officer

Barr attacking Horowitz' report is DOA as nothing but a "personal lawyer's" defense of his client Trash.

[Spurs Homer]

Barr's total 4-pager LIE about the Mueller report destroyed his credibility as law enforcement officer

Barr attacking Horowitz' report is DOA as nothing but a "personal lawyer's" defense of his client Trash.

Traitor Barr is squirming because he knows that a report that exonerates the investigators means one thing:

Trump was selling out the USA and the investigators had the legal right to investigate the traitors who sold out the usa.


Barr knows that if the investigation was legal and proper - the american citizens - and HISTORY -
will show that although the CULT did not mind being invaded and taken over by Russia

the 60% of us -

tried to warn the country and get rid of the traitors who helped russia attack the usa.

[Splits]

https://i.imgflip.com/3i8jmr.jpg

:lmao

[TSA]

Not really my "L" dude. I am simply trying to figure out if you, as usual, are thumping your chest, and what the facts actually are. Don't really care that much tbh, so my efforts will stop there. Either you can show the wording of hte original bet or not.

My guess is that you put together an easily mis-intepreted, ill-defined bet, based on what I know of your general attitude to such things. If you can't actually prove your case, I see little reason to take you at your word.

Showing how much you don't care by offering to pay $180 for an arbitrator :lmao

https://sportige.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/L-by-Drake.jpg

[Spurminator]

https://twitter.com/bennyjohnson/status/1201663029651398657?s=19

I was told this wasn't the finding.

Make up your minds, losers.

:lol

[spurraider21]

I was told this wasn't the finding.

Make up your minds, losers.

:lol
:lol AG begging for a finding that his own department was corrupt

[TSA]

I was told this wasn't the finding.

Make up your minds, losers.

:lol

https://mobile.twitter.com/KerriKupecDOJ/status/1201694855610687489?s=20

[TSA]

I’m surprised Spurminator came back to this thread after the shit sandwich I force fed him.

[ChumpDumper]

https://mobile.twitter.com/KerriKupecDOJ/status/1201694855610687489?s=20TSA with the prayingdog.jpg post.

[Chris]

I’m surprised Spurminator came back to this thread after the shit sandwich I force fed him.

the turd that won't flush

[RandomGuy]

Showing how much you don't care by offering to pay $180 for an arbitrator :lmao

https://sportige.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/L-by-Drake.jpg

(shrugs)

My only concern would be seeing something you claimed actually hit an official process. Keep trying though. It amuses me.

[boutons_deux]

If DoJ is so ecstatic over the OIG report, why is shitbag Barr disputing it?

[Spurminator]

I’m surprised Spurminator came back to this thread after the shit sandwich I force fed him.

Self delusion is very powerful with you, isn't it?

Do you think there's any universe where I or anyone else with an above 5th grade reading level would come away from that exchange believing you won it?

Probably the same universe where small business owners coordinate pizza-shaped logos to attract pedophiles.

[Spurminator]

https://mobile.twitter.com/KerriKupecDOJ/status/1201694855610687489?s=20

So you're saying Chris' tweet was a lie?

Again, make up your minds. You can't keep your unraveling stories straight.

[TSA]

Self delusion is very powerful with you, isn't it?

Do you think there's any universe where I or anyone else with an above 5th grade reading level would come away from that exchange believing you won it?

Probably the same universe where small business owners coordinate pizza-shaped logos to attract pedophiles.


You literally posted a sentence that was in the article as a "Trump claim" and presented it as a finding of the report.

That's lying. You're a ing liar. Why?Is the bolded what you think is a "Trump claim" that I presented as a finding of the report?

“Mr. Trump and his allies have pointed to some of the investigative steps the F.B.I. took as evidence of spying, though they were typical law enforcement activities. For one, agents had an informant, an academic named Stefan A. Halper, meet with Mr. Page and Mr. Papadopoulos while they were affiliated with the campaign. The president decried the revelation as an “all time biggest political scandal” when it emerged last year.

The F.B.I. did have an undercover agent who posed as Mr. Halper’s assistant during a London meeting with Mr. Papadopoulos in August 2016.”

[Spurminator]

Is the bolded what you think is a "Trump claim" that I presented as a finding of the report?

“Mr. Trump and his allies have pointed to some of the investigative steps the F.B.I. took as evidence of spying, though they were typical law enforcement activities. For one, agents had an informant, an academic named Stefan A. Halper, meet with Mr. Page and Mr. Papadopoulos while they were affiliated with the campaign. The president decried the revelation as an “all time biggest political scandal” when it emerged last year.

The F.B.I. did have an undercover agent who posed as Mr. Halper’s assistant during a London meeting with Mr. Papadopoulos in August 2016.”

Yes. Trump claimed it was evidence of spying and a scandal. You then presented the quote from the article as though the article claimed it was evidence of scandalous spying.

We already know you're going to toe the Trump line when it comes to what you consider spying. You're a Trump sycophant through and through. So there's no need to be disingenuous about who's validating you.

[TSA]

Yes. Trump claimed it was evidence of spying and a scandal. You then presented the quote from the article as though the article claimed it was evidence of scandalous spying.

We already know you're going to toe the Trump line when it comes to what you consider spying. You're a Trump sycophant through and through. So there's no need to be disingenuous about who's validating you.

You are so full of shit it's sad. Now you are lying about what your claim was :lol



You literally posted a sentence that was in the article as a "Trump claim" and presented it as a finding of the report.

That's lying. You're a ing liar. Why?

“For one, agents had an informant, an academic named Stefan A. Halper, meet with Mr. Page and Mr. Papadopoulos while they were affiliated with the campaign.”

This was never a Trump claim and I didn't present it as a finding in the report, it was commentary on previous reporting by the same NYT author.

https://www.nytimes.com/2019/05/02/us/politics/fbi-government-investigator-trump.html


Enjoy another shit sandwich courtesy of TSA :bobo

[Spurs Homer]

Boom!

oh nvm

comey,mccabe, et all not in prison!

:rollin

[djohn2oo8]

1202368150572085249


:lmao :lmao :lmao TSA

[djohn2oo8]

1202374500823838724

[Spurminator]

You are so full of shit it's sad. Now you are lying about what your claim was :lol




“For one, agents had an informant, an academic named Stefan A. Halper, meet with Mr. Page and Mr. Papadopoulos while they were affiliated with the campaign.”

This was never a Trump claim and I didn't present it as a finding in the report, it was commentary on previous reporting by the same NYT author.

https://www.nytimes.com/2019/05/02/us/politics/fbi-government-investigator-trump.html


Enjoy another shit sandwich courtesy of TSA :bobo

Enjoy your self delusion. You tried to present standard operating procedure as evidence of a conspiracy against the President. It's right there for everyone to read. I don't need to go back and forth with you on it.

Incidentally your goalposts have moved a long way from wiretapping.

[djohn2oo8]

1202378200027762689

[Spurs Homer]

1202374500823838724

but but -


BUREEESMA!!!

That is the NEW - SCANDALLLL!!!!!!


Forget Russia -

its


Bureeeezmaaaahhhh!!!!!!!

[spurraider21]

The Unraveling

muh goodlate letters
muh grassley letters
muh woods procedures
muh obama appointed IG
muh durham
muh huber

[djohn2oo8]

TSA

[ChumpDumper]

TSA's gonna kick the can saying he was a WESTERN intel asset from some unknown country he can't even venture to guess because they are so good at making Mifsud look exactly like a Russian asset.

[spurraider21]

TSA's gonna kick the can saying he was a WESTERN intel asset from some unknown country he can't even venture to guess because they are so good at making Mifsud look exactly like a Russian asset.
attacking the investigation as illegitimate was such an unnecessary leap tbh... and only reeked of insecurity. better thing would have been to let it play out. mueller's report ultimately made no finding of collusion. that should have been a slam dunk on its own*. instead they doubled down on this shit which is just going to backfire.

*notwithstanding the obstruction of justice... more self-inflicted wounds

[ChumpDumper]

attacking the investigation as illegitimate was such an unnecessary leap tbh... and only reeked of insecurity. better thing would have been to let it play out. mueller's report ultimately made no finding of collusion. that should have been a slam dunk on its own*. instead they doubled down on this shit which is just going to backfire.

*notwithstanding the obstruction of justice... more self-inflicted woundsShit, just don't fire Comey in the first place.

[TSA]

1202368150572085249


:lmao :lmao :lmao TSA

Claiming Mifsud was a Russian agent and then thinking you scored a point refuting a claim never made

:lmao :lmao :lmao djohn2oo8

[boutons_deux]

The Curious Case Of Joseph Mifsud’s Lost Passport And Wallet

A lost passport at a Portuguese airport is the latest bizarre clue in the search for the elusive Maltese professor.

Last month, nearly two years to the day he vanished, three Italian news outlets — La Repubblica, Corriere della Sera and Adnkronos — received an audio recording (https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/albertonardelli/joseph-mifsud-audio-recording) out of the blue from someone claiming to be Mifsud.

The voice in the recording categorically denies any wrongdoing and knowingly having any links to intelligence services. He repeatedly insists that he was just a “networker” who brought people together.

“I tried to do nothing else except as I have always done, put A in contact with B, B in contact with C, for purely academic purposes,” the man says in English.

https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/albertonardelli/joseph-mifsud-passport (https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/albertonardelli/joseph-mifsud-passport)

[TSA]

Enjoy your self delusion. You tried to present standard operating procedure as evidence of a conspiracy against the President. It's right there for everyone to read. I don't need to go back and forth with you on it.

Incidentally your goalposts have moved a long way from wiretapping.

What's right there for everyone to read is how far you keep moving the goalposts in order to try and save face.


You literally posted a sentence that was in the article as a "Trump claim" and presented it as a finding of the report.

You were full of shit. The only reason we are going back in forth is because you are too much of a coward to just admit it and move on.

[TSA]

attacking the investigation as illegitimate was such an unnecessary leap tbh... and only reeked of insecurity. better thing would have been to let it play out. mueller's report ultimately made no finding of collusion. that should have been a slam dunk on its own*. instead they doubled down on this shit which is just going to backfire.

*notwithstanding the obstruction of justice... more self-inflicted wounds

The only one's doubling down are those in this thread swallowing up the report from WP by Devlin Barrett who is receiving leaks from those implicated in the IG report. The same thing happened with reporting from the Devlin Barrett during the Mueller investigation when he was receiving leaks from Peter Strzok and Lisa Page, how did that turn out? It's the same people leaking to him now.

[RandomGuy]

1202374500823838724


our review did not find evidence to connect the political views expressed in these messages to the specific investigative decisions that we reviewed; rather, consistent with the analytic approach described
above, we found that these specific decisions were the result of discretionary judgments made during the course of an investigation by the Midyear agents and prosecutors and that these judgment calls were not unreasonable.

[RandomGuy]

We concluded that Comey’s unilateral announcement
was inconsistent with Department policy and violated
long-standing Department practice and protocol by,
among other things, criticizing Clinton’s uncharged
conduct. We also found that Comey usurped the
authority of the Attorney General, and inadequately and
incompletely described the legal position of Department
prosecutors.

Comey fucked up in commenting on uncharged issued relating to Clinton.

[RandomGuy]

We found no evidence that the
conclusions by the prosecutors were affected by bias or
other improper considerations; rather, we determined
that they were based on the prosecutors’ assessment of
the facts, the law, and past Department practice.

[RandomGuy]

With respect to these investigations, we agreed with the
FBI’s chief ethics official that McCabe was not at any
time required to recuse under the relevant authorities.


we did not find that Kadzik released
non-public information or misused his official position.

[RandomGuy]

Can you link me to the report? k thx

https://www.justice.gov/file/1071991/download

Knock yourself out pizza boichik. 500+ pages.

Longer than the Mueller report you haven't read yet. :rollin

[RandomGuy]

so basically there was some misconduct in some form or another, but not to the extent that the validity of the application/warrant are called into question

Pretty much.

They even concluded that the decision not to prosecute Clinton, was pretty well supported by policy and generally held prosecutor principles, i.e. not politically motivated.

[boutons_deux]

Comey fucked up in commenting on uncharged issued relating to Clinton.

... violated longstanding FBI protocol that if no indictment, then silence.

He went on a much-hyped, much-anticipated national TV event to trash Hillary.

And then w/o reading emails found on Huma's PC, told FUCKING Nunes who then, of course, leaked to the public, 10 days before the election, with Silver reporting movement away from Hillary in the 3 states that EC elected Trash, by 80K votes out of 130M+ votes.

Fuck Comey to hell.

[TSA]

https://www.justice.gov/file/1071991/download

Knock yourself out pizza boichik. 500+ pages.

Longer than the Mueller report you haven't read yet. :rollin

Are you trolling or do you think this IG report from 2018 is the one we are discussing?

[Spurs Homer]

So mccabe and comey NOT in prison?


:lmao:lmao

[Chucho]

What's right there for everyone to read is how far you keep moving the goalposts in order to try and save face.



You were full of shit. The only reason we are going back in forth is because you are too much of a coward to just admit it and move on.


Real talk, no troll, but can you explain what you think is happening right now with everything going on with the President and what you think the end result will be; re-election, impeachment, etc.?

Very interested to see what you think is going to happen and your take on what's going on now.

[TSA]

Pretty much.

They even concluded that the decision not to prosecute Clinton, was pretty well supported by policy and generally held prosecutor principles, i.e. not politically motivated.

Holy shit you do think we are discussing the previously released report :lmao

[TSA]

Real talk, no troll, but can you explain what you think is happening right now with everything going on with the President and what you think the end result will be; re-election, impeachment, etc.?

Very interested to see what you think is going to happen and your take on what's going on now.

I'm not even 100% sure the house votes to impeach, the purpose of the hearings was to sway undecideds and they have been a total flop having had the opposite effect on independents. Even if they vote to impeach it's DOA in the Senate.
The IG report will show Trump was targeted by the intelligence community before, during, and after the election and he'll maximize the findings politically and be re-elected in 2020.

[RandomGuy]

Are you trolling or do you think this IG report from 2018 is the one we are discussing?

Hmmm.

Nope. Made that exact mistake.

Tried to find "OIG report text" and didn't look at the date on the cover page.

I was wondering why it didn't talk much about the FISA applications you seemed to be talking about which makes sense in hindsight.

[TSA]

Hmmm.

Nope. Made that exact mistake.

Tried to find "OIG report text" and didn't look at the date on the cover page.

I was wondering why it didn't talk much about the FISA applications you seemed to be talking about which makes sense in hindsight.

:lol

[Chris]

https://twitter.com/paulsperry_/status/1202615417015033856?s=19

sorry if this was posted but seems pretty serious

[RandomGuy]

:lol

I will always cop to mistakes. This was one.

[RandomGuy]

I'm not even 100% sure the house votes to impeach, the purpose of the hearings was to sway undecideds and they have been a total flop having had the opposite effect on independents. Even if they vote to impeach it's DOA in the Senate.
The IG report will show Trump was targeted by the intelligence community before, during, and after the election and he'll maximize the findings politically and be re-elected in 2020.

Trump's campaign was targeted because it had an unusual amount of Russian contacts, as well as its candidate actively stating he wanted help.

I have little doubt the IG report will be used to spin by Trump for the gullible dolts that comprise his base.

"he'll maximize the findings politically and be re-elected in 2020" is a statement that will haunt you.

life outside the bubble looks a lot different. Keep drinking the coolaid.

http://sandiegofreepress.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/republicans-drink-the-kool-aid.jpg

[boutons_deux]

"Trump's campaign was targeted because it had an unusual amount of Russian contacts"

Feds knews Trash was involved with Russia in the 1980s.

[Spurs Homer]

I'm not even 100% sure the house votes to impeach, the purpose of the hearings was to sway undecideds and they have been a total flop having had the opposite effect on independents. Even if they vote to impeach it's DOA in the Senate.
The IG report will show Trump was targeted by the intelligence community before, during, and after the election and he'll maximize the findings politically and be re-elected in 2020.


:rollin:rollin:rollin:rollin:rollin:rollin:rollin: rollin:lmao:lmao:lmao

[spurraider21]

The only one's doubling down are those in this thread swallowing up the report from WP by Devlin Barrett who is receiving leaks from those implicated in the IG report. The same thing happened with reporting from the Devlin Barrett during the Mueller investigation when he was receiving leaks from Peter Strzok and Lisa Page, how did that turn out? It's the same people leaking to him now.
so then what's with that other report of Barr disagreeing with IG's conclusions?

[spurraider21]

The only one's doubling down are those in this thread swallowing up the report from WP by Devlin Barrett who is receiving leaks from those implicated in the IG report. The same thing happened with reporting from the Devlin Barrett during the Mueller investigation when he was receiving leaks from Peter Strzok and Lisa Page, how did that turn out? It's the same people leaking to him now.


https://twitter.com/paulsperry_/status/1202615417015033856?s=19

sorry if this was posted but seems pretty serious
sorry TSA, leaks are good now

[TSA]

so then what's with that other report of Barr disagreeing with IG's conclusions?

Also written by Devlin Barrett. And it wasn’t conclusions, it was a conclusion, that the FBI had enough information in July 2016 to justify launching an investigation into members of the Trump campaign.

Within the same article “Justice Department spokeswoman Kerri Kupec said in a statement that the inspector general investigation “is a credit to the Department of Justice. His excellent work has uncovered significant information that the American people will soon be able to read for themselves. Rather than speculating, people should read the report for themselves next week, watch the Inspector General’s testimony before the Senate Judiciary Committee, and draw their own conclusions about these important matters.”

Devlin has consistently been who Strzok, Page, etc run to leak to when they need spin. This was all revealed when their text messages were published. Have you learned nothing from the leaks that were bullshit during the Russia investigation? Same shit now.

[TSA]

sorry TSA, leaks are good now

It’s not about good or bad but accuracy.

[Chucho]

I'm not even 100% sure the house votes to impeach, the purpose of the hearings was to sway undecideds and they have been a total flop having had the opposite effect on independents. Even if they vote to impeach it's DOA in the Senate.
The IG report will show Trump was targeted by the intelligence community before, during, and after the election and he'll maximize the findings politically and be re-elected in 2020.

Thanks. How long have you been pimping this IG report? Is this a new report, or is this the one you went "all-in on" months and months ago?


And I think he somehow pulls re-election off, too.