Reply With Quote
tranny fantasies
A hard right Republican asshole is who you'd get in his place. I'll take Manchin.
Kavanagh thread -Brett is being overtly political
This thread -
Tranny has needs, bruh.
if Ginsburg does go, you better bet Trump is going to wait until mid January to start nominating again... House has no bearing on SCOTUS nominations, and he'd like to avoid a narrow-victory fiasco like with Kavanaugh.
They can easily pick up 5 seats in 2020, it’ll just require a gaff. If it becomes obvious that Trump is in bed with Russia and a GOP controlled senate refuses to proceed with impeachment, there could easily be backlash in 2020.
The Russia stuff is equally as dumb and out-there as the Birther stuff. That honestly needs to die. The dems would be smart to ditch Russia and focus on actual issues like what Trump has done wrong for X people and such. Eliminating those deductions for state income taxes would be a start.
I’m not saying it has a high likelihood of happening, I’m saying something like that would likely flip the senate.
i hope this injury pushes her to retirement. is 85 yrs old and shouldn't be deciding our future anyhow. she can't even stay awake on the bench half the time either. out with the old!
i can't wait to see a repeat of that show by the liberals called "New Supreme Court Appointee Hearing".
yup. half the time. totally
How many SCOTUS sessions have you personally attended to see her asleep in them?
She isn't going to retire. Like McCain, she will cling to her job le until death.
Breyer, on the other hand, has said in the past that he intends to retire eventually and doesn't care who is in power when he decides to do it.
but yeah, Dems have to be thankful that Manchin has been able to win a senate seat multiple times in a state where most of the people think procreation with your full-blooded sibling is better than procreating interracially.
That surprises me, as Breyer has always been the anti-Scalia. He's wrote many do ents on why the consistution should be a living, expandable do ent. I had to write a 5-page paper freshman semester of college on why Breyer's ideology was superior to Scalia's (professor was very liberal).
It doesn't take much faculty to be a liberal zombie judge.
Funny how me wanting SS age to be 70 is criticized in another thread but RBG holding on till 87 is fervently wished for in this thread.
Oh yeah it's a ing riot LOL
Why do you want it to be 70?
i'm not seeing the connection. if she wants to work until she's 90 good for her. what does that have to do with social security?
I'm not stuck on 70 - it's just the next round number - I think it's currently 67? for those born after 1960? I just think it should be raised - we are all living longer - I don't think the program was originally intended to fund people for so long.
Notorious RBG has a job
The vast majority of seniors 65+ have been laid off by agism, and have trouble finding jobs that pay them a living wage AND pay their Medicare copays / co-insurance and pills
Last edited by boutons_deux; 11-08-2018 at 05:49 PM.
what does that have to do with RBG wanting to work longer?
Also, I think you are penalized if you continue to work and collect SS (cannot delay starting past 70) at the same time. It's also the age that you must start taking required minimum distributions from 401k.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions