I like Rasho more than Nazr. Rasho could at least catch better than Nazr under the basket. Should be an easy basket, but a bobbled pass turns into a turnover. I do not recall that happening as much with Rasho.
I didn't follow the Spurs all that much back when they were on the team, so I was just curious how everyone thought they compared. I'm talking overall, overall D, overall O, help D, one-on-one D, passing skills, clogging the lane. Chem with Timmy, all of it.
I personally remember Rasho in a more favorable light, but I could be wrong.
I like Rasho more than Nazr. Rasho could at least catch better than Nazr under the basket. Should be an easy basket, but a bobbled pass turns into a turnover. I do not recall that happening as much with Rasho.
Rasho was a more skilled player offensively, defensively he knew how to play team defense. Once in a while he'd manage a block or two. He had the tools, he just wasn't aggressive enough, specially on the offense.
Nazr, I'd cringe whenever he had the ball in the paint. The best thing he could do was use his strength to get rebounds.
For 2/3 months Nazr was better than Rasho has ever been and all his weaknesses were neglected by an inspired play. Then he faded away.
Offense - Tie. Nazr, when he actually caught the ball, could finish better than Rasho around the basket, and was more aggressive, probably too aggressive for his skillset. Rasho was more skilled but didnt use it much.
Rebounding - Nazr. More agile, athletic and aggressive on the boards.
Defense - Rasho. He was a better help defender. One-on-one defense is probably a tie though. Nazr could hold his own.
Overall - Rasho. Just. Better IQ, didnt miss rotations, and was a pretty good passer when given the opportunity. Also defended Yao better than anyother C in the L. Nazr doesnt look like much now, hes fallen off quite a bit.
Nazr is more aggresive... but for the team's current necessity... Rasho>Nazr
Narz played great starting in that back to back OT wins Clippers and Warriors, when TD was out because of the uncle, until game 7 of the Finals. It was a very good run and I thought we had our starting center for the next 4-5 years.
But then in 06 he misses a lot of time in training camp and was up and down the whole season, and in the 1st game of the playoffs against the Kings the game was over and he made a triple. That was the end for him
Funny as , Pop chewed his ass, I couldn't believe it.We were up 40 or something by that time.
At this point... Rasho without a doubt.
He always needed more just a little more confidence and he could be a badass starting center in the NBA. He has all the skills (still does). He is just too timid.
this thread brings a tear to my eye
I did too. I remember when Nazr went for 30 and 15 in a road game versus the Suns. There's no doubt that he was a difference-maker throughout that grueling NBA Finals series versus the Pistons - especially Game 7.
With his energy, hustle and rebounding, I could've lived with his bad hands. However, he never seemed to grasp the defensive rotations and frustrated coaches and teammates because he always seemed to be out of position.
Rasho was a solid rebounder, shotblocker and post defender. He could score when he was open. His problem was he rarely played aggressively. It just wasn't his nature.
Nazr is the only guy I ever saw airball a dunk, and he did it twice.........both times in the Finals against Detroit.
I would definitely take the Rashostein monster back before Nazr.
Not sure of the point of the thread. Nazr is definitely not going to be bought out.
lol how does that look?![]()
Wow, this is like a time machine. 2005/2006, is that you?
Nazr was a beast on the offensive boards, put up some points and was able to block shots as a Spur (never had high bpg on other teams). Rasho was a much better overall defender, less prone to mistakes and mental blocks and a better passer.
Teams had to pay much more attention to Nazr when defending the Spurs but they would worry about Rasho more when trying to score.
I feel Nazr's contributions are a little bit forgotten during the 2005 le run. At that time, I felt that Nazr was better, and gave the Spurs a bit of toughness and a bit more at ude and agressiveness offensively... but right now, Rasho has him beat, and would gladly accept him back on the team at a cheap rate.
Amen!
That was the strange thing about Nazr. He had the worse hands this side of Malik Rose. Absolute brick hands. But he was an absolute terror on the offensive glass.
Rasho>Nazr
Nazr has the worst hands in the league. I don't think there was a single pass he didn't fumble around with or just straight up lose when the ball came his way........
Pus Rasho has a nice jumper and blocks a decent amount as well.
Oh goodie, a topic that's not been done to death:
http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/showthread.php?t=12265
http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/showthread.php?t=13542
http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/showthread.php?t=13655
http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/showthread.php?t=15654
http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/showthread.php?t=20829
http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/showthread.php?t=21300
http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/showthread.php?t=21714
http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/showthread.php?t=22485
http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/showthread.php?t=32887
http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/showthread.php?t=35849
http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/showthread.php?t=39885
http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/showthread.php?t=53048
http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/showthread.php?t=62886
http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/showthread.php?t=53429
http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/showthread.php?t=23014
And these are just the ones with Rasho&Nazr in thread le...
Next up: Tony vs. Manu.
I would take Rasho for the long haul. Despite his complete lack of offensive aggressiveness, he was the most solid defender we've had inside since Robinson left. His rotational defense and positioning were always outstanding.
Nazr had a great run in '05, but I think was a prime example a player that was intellectually up to par with the Spurs system. As soon as he started to overthink things, it went downhill from there. That, and he couldn't catch a cold.
Yes...as others have pointed out Nazr had terrible hands on offense. He was more athletic and quicker than Rasho (that's not saying much). I'd go with Rasho though, he made less mistakes on defense and had a better overall offensive game.
I remember that 30 point game for Nazr but the Suns love giving career high nights to the C playing next to Duncan, that's always been the case. I remember Oberto having a 22 point game against us two years ago.
But yeah when I watched Nazr in 2004-2005 I thought he'd be a decent Robinson replacement. Of course I knew he wasn't as good as Robinson but he could attack the offensive boards extremely well and found ways to score when matched up against a smaller player. He was a huge factor in the 2005 Suns series.
But like a lot of SA role players, another team offers them a huge longterm contract that SA doesn't even think about matching and their career falters.
Didn't Oberto have his points on 11/11 shooting or something similarly ridiculous?
I never thought I'd see a Rasho vs Nazr thread again.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)