Mueller Delivers Report on Russia Investigation to Attorney General [Archive] - Page 4

Spurs Homer

04-04-2019, 11:31 AM

Trump is just toying with you and the Dems right now making you think the report won't be released. The stupid fucks are already threatening to subpoena it and all of this frothing at the mouth will only bite them in the ass when it's released. You took a massive L. Time to man up, admit it, and move on. You guys are fucked in 2020 if you keep trying to push the collusion angle.

Only idiot traitors like you - who still believe a con man who has lied to your face over 9000 times -

swallowed that latest "exoneration" and "no conspiracy" CON JOB

Trump knew the report was about to end his presidency and decided to jump on the narrative because all he has is idiot traitors like you swallowing his con jobs --

so his henchman who has ZERO credibility - spun out a favorable narrative and idiots like you watching Fox news -

blew their loads and spiked the football.

Only now that the truth is being unearthed -

you are in a panic again and hoping your con man cult leader can pull some OTHER con out his ass.

Has your con man leader DENOUNCED RUSSIA YET?

yes or no?

TSA

04-04-2019, 11:34 AM

Only idiot traitors like you - who still believe a con man who has lied to your face over 9000 times -

swallowed that latest "exoneration" and "no conspiracy" CON JOB

Trump knew the report was about to end his presidency and decided to jump on the narrative because all he has is idiot traitors like you swallowing his con jobs --

so his henchman who has ZERO credibility - spun out a favorable narrative and idiots like you watching Fox news -

blew their loads and spiked the football.

Only now that the truth is being unearthed -

you are in a panic again and hoping your con man cult leader can pull some OTHER con out his ass.

Has your con man leader DENOUNCED RUSSIA YET?

yes or no?
"[T]he investigation did not establish that members of the Trump Campaign conspired or coordinated with the Russian government in its election interference activities.”

Spurs Homer

04-04-2019, 11:45 AM

"[T]he investigation did not establish that members of the Trump Campaign conspired or coordinated with the Russian government in its election interference activities.”

already explained it

had to waste a fuckin crayon on a traitor

Spurs Homer

04-04-2019, 12:28 PM

"[T]he investigation did not establish that members of the Trump Campaign conspired or coordinated with the Russian government in its election interference activities.”

example;

”TSA claims to sexually go both ways - men and boys -and the investigation revealed several videos of TSA sucking adult male cocks in a park, but no videos of TSA involved with any minors - therefore the investigation did not establish that TSA
is a pedophile”

Barr’s “summary”

“[T]he investigation did not establish that TSA is a pedophile”

lolololol

DMC

04-04-2019, 12:34 PM

example;

”TSA claims to sexually go both ways - men and boys -and the investigation revealed several videos of TSA sucking adult male cocks in a park, but no videos of TSA involved with any minors - therefore the investigation did not establish that TSA
is a pedophile”

Barr’s “summary”

“[T]he investigation did not establish that TSA is a pedophile”

lolololol

You came back just to say stupid shit like that? How long did you lurk while banned before you tried to register another account?

TSA

04-04-2019, 12:36 PM

From what Mueller's investigators, who no longer have to keep silent, have to say, you are not going to like what comes out of the final report.

I thought you would have learned something after finding out you fell for two years worth of bullshit, there is still time though. Out of all the Russiagate pushers I believe you will be the first to admit you were wrong the entire time. All the others will just pretend it didn't happen or just stop posting all together.

Be wary of anonymous reports alleging Mueller's team is unhappy

"Members of special counsel Robert Mueller’s team say Attorney General William Barr has soft-pedaled their investigation into whether the Trump campaign conspired with Russia during the 2016 election and whether the president committed an obstruction-of-justice offense, according to the New York Times and the Washington Post.

Be wary of these reports. We have spent the last two years watching similarly momentous Russian collusion “scoops” fall apart and from the exact same newsrooms."

"Like the Times, the Post’s article doesn’t directly quote or even paraphrase members of Mueller's team. Rather, the article attributes its findings to “people familiar with the matter,” “two people familiar with their reactions,” and “people familiar with their responses.”

You’ll forgive my skepticism. I’m going to wait until someone goes on the record or provides evidence to back up what these unnamed “government officials” suggest. That's based on the track record of such anonymous Mueller bombshells, which previously guaranteed prosecutions or even impeachment."

"The “familiar” sources declined to elaborate what, specifically, Barr downplayed. We don’t even know how many members of the special counsel’s team allegedly feel this way. There’s also nothing in either report indicating that the sources have even glimpsed the Mueller report. All we know is that “government officials” who are “familiar” with other people’s thinking claim certain members of the special counsel’s team are supposedly upset with Barr’s assessment of their work. Upset about what, exactly, we don’t know.

Meanwhile, Mueller himself has not disputed Barr's assessment. And Mueller has gone on the record before to refute mischaracterizations of his team’s findings. If Barr has undersold the special counsel’s investigation, Mueller has picked a funny time to go silent."

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/be-wary-of-anonymous-reports-from-unhappy-mueller-team-members

Spurs Homer

04-04-2019, 12:37 PM

You came back just to say stupid shit like that? How long did you lurk while banned before you tried to register another account?

DoxxxMC is triggered

TSA

04-04-2019, 12:38 PM

Spurs Homer

04-04-2019, 12:40 PM

You're a lost cause. Seek help.

so which of those sentences would place you in a more favorable light?

#1- the truth

or

#2- the one that your handpicked hack released in your favor?

TSA

04-04-2019, 12:47 PM

so which of those sentences would place you in a more favorable light?

#1- the truth

or

#2- the one that your handpicked hack released in your favor?

I don't deal with lost causes.

Spurs Homer

04-04-2019, 12:49 PM

I don't deal with lost causes.

because i exposed your stupidity of you

assuming

there is no conspiracy and swallowed the con mans lies

TSA

04-04-2019, 12:51 PM

Silverblk Mystix

spurraider21

04-04-2019, 12:57 PM

why cant we just wait for the report to actually be released?

TSA

04-04-2019, 12:58 PM

why cant we just wait for the report to actually be released?

No one is forcing you not to.

spurraider21

04-04-2019, 01:30 PM

why cant we just wait for the report to actually be released?

No one is forcing you not to.

TSA

04-04-2019, 01:35 PM

So you want everyone else to stop talking about it and wait for the report because, you

:lol ok

TSA

04-04-2019, 01:39 PM

Tell me why you think Trump doesn't want to release the full report.

Trump's had you looking at squirrels for years, here's another example.

"In our earlier talk, Dowd stressed that the Trump White House fully cooperated with Mueller's investigation, and that on more than one occasion Trump instructed Dowd to inform Mueller that the president respected the prosecutor's work. But how could one say Trump fully cooperated when the president was, at the same time, loudly denouncing the probe as a "witch hunt" and a "hoax," and bashing Mueller's prosecutors as "17 angry Democrats"?

The answer lay in Trump's longtime habit of operating on two levels. On the surface, Trump sets off controversies, often using Twitter to say something outrageous that sets the media agenda and leaves some commentators with their hair on fire. At the same time, below the surface, Trump is actually taking steps to get a particular job done.

That was true with the Russia probe. For public consumption, Trump was denouncing Mueller and trashing his team. Behind the scenes, Trump was cooperating and making sure his staff did the same. The Trump White House offered everyone (except, of course, the president himself) to be interviewed, and reams and reams of documents that other White Houses might have withheld on the grounds of executive or other privilege. So Trump simultaneously attacked and cooperated.

Asked about the attacks, Dowd said Mueller understood that Trump had to mount a political defense on the Russia issue. "Bob understood this, it was political," Dowd said. " [Trump] had to handle the political side, and that was his way of doing it with his tweets and his comments ... Bob was a big boy about the political side of it. He understood the president had to address the politics of it. He couldn't just say nothing. People were pounding him about this thing every day, both privately and publicly, and he had to take [Mueller] on."

Mueller's only real concern about the president's rhetoric, Dowd said, was the worry that it might send a message to Trump's side not to cooperate.

"Early on, when the president started teeing off on Mueller, Mueller indicated to me that he was worried that some people might not cooperate," Dowd said. "I said, well we've encouraged everyone to cooperate, and if you want me to say something publicly about that, and the president, we're happy to do it. And we did. We encouraged everyone who was asked to cooperate ... Bob was satisfied with that. It never came up again."

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/columnists/byron-york-from-former-trump-lawyer-candid-talk-about-mueller-manafort-sessions-rosenstein-collusion-tweets-privilege-and-the-press

spurraider21

04-04-2019, 01:40 PM

So you want everyone else to stop talking about it and wait for the report because, you

:lol ok
i asked.

im just seeing all these posters talk about what they think the mueller report said when we know its going to be released in the near future. its just a waste

ChumpDumper

04-04-2019, 01:43 PM

Trump's had you looking at squirrels for years, here's another example.

"In our earlier talk, Dowd stressed that the Trump White House fully cooperated with Mueller's investigation, and that on more than one occasion Trump instructed Dowd to inform Mueller that the president respected the prosecutor's work. But how could one say Trump fully cooperated when the president was, at the same time, loudly denouncing the probe as a "witch hunt" and a "hoax," and bashing Mueller's prosecutors as "17 angry Democrats"?

The answer lay in Trump's longtime habit of operating on two levels. On the surface, Trump sets off controversies, often using Twitter to say something outrageous that sets the media agenda and leaves some commentators with their hair on fire. At the same time, below the surface, Trump is actually taking steps to get a particular job done.

That was true with the Russia probe. For public consumption, Trump was denouncing Mueller and trashing his team. Behind the scenes, Trump was cooperating and making sure his staff did the same. The Trump White House offered everyone (except, of course, the president himself) to be interviewed, and reams and reams of documents that other White Houses might have withheld on the grounds of executive or other privilege. So Trump simultaneously attacked and cooperated.

Asked about the attacks, Dowd said Mueller understood that Trump had to mount a political defense on the Russia issue. "Bob understood this, it was political," Dowd said. " [Trump] had to handle the political side, and that was his way of doing it with his tweets and his comments ... Bob was a big boy about the political side of it. He understood the president had to address the politics of it. He couldn't just say nothing. People were pounding him about this thing every day, both privately and publicly, and he had to take [Mueller] on."

Mueller's only real concern about the president's rhetoric, Dowd said, was the worry that it might send a message to Trump's side not to cooperate.

"Early on, when the president started teeing off on Mueller, Mueller indicated to me that he was worried that some people might not cooperate," Dowd said. "I said, well we've encouraged everyone to cooperate, and if you want me to say something publicly about that, and the president, we're happy to do it. And we did. We encouraged everyone who was asked to cooperate ... Bob was satisfied with that. It never came up again."

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/columnists/byron-york-from-former-trump-lawyer-candid-talk-about-mueller-manafort-sessions-rosenstein-collusion-tweets-privilege-and-the-pressFull cooperation would've been answering questions under oath.

TSA

04-04-2019, 01:53 PM

i asked.

im just seeing all these posters talk about what they think the mueller report said when we know its going to be released in the near future. its just a waste

welcome to online discussion boards :bobo

Spurs Homer

04-04-2019, 02:00 PM

Trump's had you looking at squirrels for years, here's another example.

"In our earlier talk, Dowd stressed that the Trump White House fully cooperated with Mueller's investigation, and that on more than one occasion Trump instructed Dowd to inform Mueller that the president respected the prosecutor's work. But how could one say Trump fully cooperated when the president was, at the same time, loudly denouncing the probe as a "witch hunt" and a "hoax," and bashing Mueller's prosecutors as "17 angry Democrats"?

The answer lay in Trump's longtime habit of operating on two levels. On the surface, Trump sets off controversies, often using Twitter to say something outrageous that sets the media agenda and leaves some commentators with their hair on fire. At the same time, below the surface, Trump is actually taking steps to get a particular job done.

That was true with the Russia probe. For public consumption, Trump was denouncing Mueller and trashing his team. Behind the scenes, Trump was cooperating and making sure his staff did the same. The Trump White House offered everyone (except, of course, the president himself) to be interviewed, and reams and reams of documents that other White Houses might have withheld on the grounds of executive or other privilege. So Trump simultaneously attacked and cooperated.

Asked about the attacks, Dowd said Mueller understood that Trump had to mount a political defense on the Russia issue. "Bob understood this, it was political," Dowd said. " [Trump] had to handle the political side, and that was his way of doing it with his tweets and his comments ... Bob was a big boy about the political side of it. He understood the president had to address the politics of it. He couldn't just say nothing. People were pounding him about this thing every day, both privately and publicly, and he had to take [Mueller] on."

Mueller's only real concern about the president's rhetoric, Dowd said, was the worry that it might send a message to Trump's side not to cooperate.

"Early on, when the president started teeing off on Mueller, Mueller indicated to me that he was worried that some people might not cooperate," Dowd said. "I said, well we've encouraged everyone to cooperate, and if you want me to say something publicly about that, and the president, we're happy to do it. And we did. We encouraged everyone who was asked to cooperate ... Bob was satisfied with that. It never came up again."

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/columnists/byron-york-from-former-trump-lawyer-candid-talk-about-mueller-manafort-sessions-rosenstein-collusion-tweets-privilege-and-the-press

lolololol

what an idiot to believe this fantasy

lolololol

TSA

04-04-2019, 02:05 PM

If you Russiagate pushers read this and understand this before the report comes out the rest of us will not have to deal with so much crying.

Jerry Nadler’s Mueller report subpoena isn’t legit without impeachment inquiry

The House Judiciary Committee on Wednesday exceeded its bounds in issuing a subpoena for the full report from special counsel Robert Mueller on Russian skullduggery concerning the 2016 elections.

Attorney General William Barr should release as much of the Mueller report as possible, as soon as possible, because the public has a right to see what all the fuss was about. Yet if he determines that some information within it is either classified or subject to grand jury secrecy rules, he is duty-bound to redact it. Unless Congress passes, and President Trump signs, a new law waiving grand jury secrecy rules, then existing laws protecting that secrecy should take legal precedence over Congress’ subpoena authority.

This is decidedly not a similar situation to the 1998 investigation of, and eventual impeachment of, then-President Bill Clinton. That investigation was led not by a special counsel, which is what Robert Mueller was, but by an independent counsel, Kenneth Starr. The difference is significant.

Under the independent counsel statute, which has since lapsed (and always was of dubious constitutionality anyway), such counsels were creatures of, and reported to, Congress. They existed independent of, and separate from, the ordinary lines of authority within the Justice Department and the executive branch. When House Speaker Newt Gingrich and company made the foolish decision to post the full Starr report immediately on the Internet, they had full power to do so because Starr’s report was specifically theirs to use as they saw fit.

Special counsels are different. Special counsels, while enjoying a modicum of separation from ordinary lines of authority in the Justice Department, are nonetheless still ultimately part of the department and the executive branch as a whole. They report to the attorney general (or his designee), and they must follow all ordinary rules of civil and criminal procedure.

Under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 6(e), neither the attorney for the government nor anyone else may “disclose a matter occurring before the grand jury.” The exceptions involve disclosure to another federal grand jury or to an attorney for the government pursuing another criminal matter in certain circumstances, or to certain national security officials if the information involves foreign intelligence, terrorism, or threat of attack. If petitioned by the government or a defendant in another judicial proceeding, the court can also permit release in the other proceeding. Absent such very limited circumstances, Barr would run afoul of this almost blanket prohibition, and could be sanctioned by contempt of court if he disclosed to Congress any grand jury information in the Mueller report under Fed. R. Crim. P. 6(e)(7).

Judiciary Committee Chairman Jerry Nadler, D-N.Y., and the Democrats surely know this, but seem not to care about the rule of law, the sanctity of the grand jury process, or the lack of any impeachment authorization in the House that could be considered a “judicial proceeding” to support their subpoena.

The Democrats are not seeking the grand jury information “to avoid a possible injustice in another judicial proceeding,” Douglas Oil Co. v. Petrol Stops Nw., 441 U.S. 211, 222 (1979). Nor are they seeking grand jury information to support articles of impeachment, as the House has not authorized such inquiry, unlike 1974 when grand jury information was produced to the Judiciary Committee related to its impeachment inquiry of President Richard M. Nixon. (Haldeman v. Sirica, 501 F.2d 714 — D.C. Cir. 1974). Likewise, the impeachment proceedings of federal district Judge Alcee Hastings provided the basis for the 11th Circuit to consider such congressional efforts a “judicial proceeding” and thus the House Judiciary Committee could subpoena grand jury documents related to Hastings’ indictment. (In re Request for Access to Grand Jury Materials Grand Jury 81-1, Miami, 833 F.2d 1438 — 11th Cir. 1987).

If Nadler wants to subpoena any grand jury information contained in the Mueller report, he first needs a majority of the House to authorize the Judiciary Committee to investigate impeachment of President Trump.

Somehow, it doesn’t seem as if Speaker Nancy Pelosi wants to open that can of worms, at least not yet.

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/columnists/jerry-nadlers-mueller-report-subpoena-isnt-legit-without-impeachment-inquiry

Spurs Homer

04-04-2019, 02:11 PM

^ tldr

translation: “we scurred to release the truth”

ChumpDumper

04-04-2019, 02:13 PM

Damn, TSA moving the goalposts like a good little soldier.

Releasing report bad now.

Spurs Homer

04-04-2019, 02:13 PM

Damn, TSA moving the goalposts like a good little soldier.

Releasing report bad now.

ChumpDumper

04-04-2019, 02:14 PM

"the sanctity of the grand jury process":lol

Why can I see Bill Clinton's grand jury testimony on YouTube right now?

spurraider21

04-04-2019, 02:19 PM

welcome to online discussion boards :bobo
fair nuff

TSA

04-04-2019, 02:25 PM

Damn, TSA moving the goalposts like a good little soldier.

Releasing report bad now.

Nothing in that article even hints at not wanting the report to be released you dipshit. Did you skip over the second sentence? "Attorney General William Barr should release as much of the Mueller report as possible, as soon as possible, because the public has a right to see what all the fuss was about."

ChumpDumper

04-04-2019, 02:27 PM

Nothing in that article even hints at not wanting the report to be released you dipshit. Did you skip over the second sentence? "Attorney General William Barr should release as much of the Mueller report as possible, as soon as possible, because the public has a right to see what all the fuss was about."Word is there are already declassified summaries that were prepared by Mueller's team that have no "sanctity" violations.

Where are those?

And why can I see Bill Clinton's grand jury testimony on YouTube right now?

Sanctity?

TSA

04-04-2019, 02:32 PM

"the sanctity of the grand jury process":lol

Why can I see Bill Clinton's grand jury testimony on YouTube right now?

I'm assuming it's because Bill Clinton was actually accused of criminal wrong doing, unlike Trump.

ChumpDumper

04-04-2019, 02:35 PM

I'm assuming it's because Bill Clinton was actually accused of criminal wrong doing, unlike Trump.Oh, so if someone is just accused of criminal wrongdoing, there is no sanctity?

That's how it works?

TSA

04-04-2019, 02:36 PM

Word is there are already declassified summaries that were prepared by Mueller's team that have no "sanctity" violations.

Where are those?

And why can I see Bill Clinton's grand jury testimony on YouTube right now?

Sanctity?

"word is" :rollin

Post your source you fucking pussy.

ChumpDumper

04-04-2019, 02:37 PM

"word is" :rollin

Post your source you fucking pussy.Saw it earlier. Will try to find it again.

If such summaries exist, what does that tell you about Barr's summary he says isn't a summary?

TSA

04-04-2019, 02:39 PM

Oh, so if someone is just accused of criminal wrongdoing, there is no sanctity?

That's how it works?

You should probably study up on this topic if it interests you. Let us all know what you find out, I'm curious as well. For the time being I'm okay accepting what others that are far more knowledgeable on the subject than myself have to say.

Reck

04-04-2019, 02:39 PM

You haven't been right about anything and just had two years of the narrative you pushed blow the fuck up in your face :lol

Says the guy who posts the most outrageous, retarded conspiracies ever.

Also which always end up dying with a whimper. :lol

TSA

04-04-2019, 02:41 PM

Saw it earlier. Will try to find it again.

If such summaries exist, what does that tell you about Barr's summary he says isn't a summary?

If such summaries don't exist, this line of conversation is meaningless and there is no reason to play a game of hypotheticals with you.

ChumpDumper

04-04-2019, 02:41 PM

"word is" :rollin

Post your source you fucking pussy.Here's a source talking about it generally.

951246172265631744

Now what do you say, pussy?

ChumpDumper

04-04-2019, 02:42 PM

If such summaries don't exist, this line of conversation is meaningless and there is no reason to play a game of hypotheticals with you.:lmao what a complete pussy Trump has made you.

TSA

04-04-2019, 02:43 PM

Says the guy who posts the most outrageous, retarded conspiracies ever.

Also which always end up dying with a whimper. :lol

You believed and fell for the largest bullshit conspiracy theory in the history of the United States, where does that leave us?

TSA

04-04-2019, 02:46 PM

Here's a source talking about it generally.

951246172265631744

Now what do you say, pussy?

I didn't ask you for a source talking about it generally. Provide your sources for word is there are already declassified summaries from Mueller's team.

TSA

04-04-2019, 02:49 PM

:lmao what a complete pussy Trump has made you.

Ahh someone's mad no one will discuss a "word is" rumor that might not even exist.

ChumpDumper

04-04-2019, 02:50 PM

I didn't ask you for a source talking about it generally. Provide your sources for word is there are already declassified summaries from Mueller's team.McCarthy bad now.

Hypothticals bad now.

TSA pussy now.

ChumpDumper

04-04-2019, 02:50 PM

Ahh someone's mad no one will discuss a "word is" rumor that might not even exist.Sorry, you've wishcasted with ifs and mights more than anyone here, pussy.

TSA

04-04-2019, 02:55 PM

McCarthy bad now.

Hypothticals bad now.

TSA pussy now. The only pussy here is you. I'm not distracted by your attempts to move the conversation elsewhere. It's obvious to anyone reading along.

Word is there are already declassified summaries that were prepared by Mueller's team that have no "sanctity" violations.

Show your source pussy.

TSA

04-04-2019, 02:56 PM

Sorry, you've wishcasted with ifs and mights more than anyone here, pussy.

Ahh someone's mad none of his wishcasting ever comes true.

DMC

04-04-2019, 02:58 PM

Ahh someone's mad none of his wishcasting ever comes true.
He professed to be a homophobe. He switched accounts and hopes for a fresh start but as far as I am concerned, he burned his bridges. I have to cut my losses.

ChumpDumper

04-04-2019, 02:59 PM

Ahh someone's mad no one will discuss a "word is" rumor that might not even exist.

“There was immediate displeasure from the team when they saw how the attorney general had characterized their work instead,” according to one U.S. official briefed on the matter.

Summaries were prepared for different sections of the report, with a view that they could made public, the official said.

What is obstruction of justice?
With the term whirling around Washington, a former federal prosecutor explains what to know about the criminal charge of obstruction of justice. (Jenny Starrs/The Washington Post)

The report was prepared “so that the front matter from each section could have been released immediately — or very quickly,” the official said. “It was done in a way that minimum redactions, if any, would have been necessary, and the work would have spoken for itself.”

Mueller’s team assumed the information was going to be made available to the public, the official said, “and so they prepared their summaries to be shared in their own words — and not in the attorney general’s summary of their work, as turned out to be the case.”

https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/limited-information-barr-has-shared-about-russia-investigation-frustrated-some-on-muellers-team/2019/04/03/c98e8a02-567a-11e9-814f-e2f46684196e_story.html?utm_term=.7201f0996494

I believe the NYT has a similar story. Would you like to move your goalposts further, pussy?

ChumpDumper

04-04-2019, 03:00 PM

He professed to be a homophobe. He switched accounts and hopes for a fresh start but as far as I am concerned, he burned his bridges. I have to cut my losses.What losses? You can't use homosexual slurs anymore?

What about disabled slurs?

:lol DenialMC

Spurs Homer

04-04-2019, 03:26 PM

I'm assuming it's because Bill Clinton was actually accused of criminal wrong doing, unlike Trump.

Clinton did not have a corrupt Attorney General cutting off the balls of the investigators and burying facts - and Clinton had the balls to testify under oath.

Barr (if you bother to read his 19 page "president is incapable of committing crimes" memo) shut down Muellers investigation prematurely and Barr made sure to NOT allow Mueller to force Trump to testify under oath -it is all in Barr's memo regarding a president being compelled to testify

so I give your corrupt traitors credit for playing the game - as dirty as that is -more corruptly than Dems

but now -

the FULL Mueller report will come out one way or another and these corrupt actions and this criminal cover up will have to be exposed.

Nothing you can do about it - except keep defending the traitors.

Chris

04-04-2019, 03:57 PM

"Federal law bars the release of material presented to a grand jury, including testimony and evidence, to protect the rights of the accused."

Suck it.

boutons_deux

04-04-2019, 04:13 PM

One of America’s top Republican Senators just demanded the public release of the Mueller Report

Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-IA) is one of the more influential members of the GOP Senate caucus outside of leadership,

which is why the nation was surprised to see him take to Twitter in support of releasing the Mueller Report,

especially considering

his colleagues have blocked efforts to release the report five times so far. (https://thehill.com/blogs/floor-action/senate/437414-paul-blocks-resolution-calling-for-release-of-mueller-report?fbclid=IwAR1ZHA3sCckLmR1SytmyALA2bpMe5eOv9Q PxFHEoBmITDnuiAKY05QtZkF4)

https://washingtonpress.com/2019/04/04/one-of-americas-top-republican-senators-just-demanded-the-public-release-of-the-mueller-report/?fbclid=IwAR1bgvVrwIpdXQxM1EFHwpBatIgRFt5nN6JnVKmk kUbQScJITAfYQg2e_ik (https://washingtonpress.com/2019/04/04/one-of-americas-top-republican-senators-just-demanded-the-public-release-of-the-mueller-report/?fbclid=IwAR1bgvVrwIpdXQxM1EFHwpBatIgRFt5nN6JnVKmk kUbQScJITAfYQg2e_ik)

ain't gonna happen, but WTF has gotten into senile Grassley from shithole IA?

Reck

04-04-2019, 04:14 PM

You believed and fell for the largest bullshit conspiracy theory in the history of the United States, where does that leave us?

"I fell for" :lol

We haven't even seeing the full report yet you speak as if Trump and his ilk are fully exonerated.

I wonder if you dont have your conspiracies crossed up. The fact that Barr refuses to release the full report (Which claims Trump is free of guilt) or that you think Mueller concocted a false investigation that somehow turned into a conspiracy that saw the main perpetrator not found of any wrongdoing.

:lol TSA

Chris

04-04-2019, 04:16 PM

GOP senators alert Barr to allegations that Mueller team misrepresented emails

https://a57.foxnews.com/media2.foxnews.com/BrightCove/694940094001/2019/04/04/931/524/694940094001_6022573057001_6022569542001-vs.jpg?ve=1&tl=1

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/gop-senators-alert-barr-to-allegations-that-mueller-team-misrepresented-emails

boutons_deux

04-04-2019, 06:10 PM

Mueller’s Team Says There Is Compelling Evidence Of Trump/Russia Collusion

Robert Mueller’s team is frustrated and speaking out because the Mueller report is said to contain compelling and alarming evidence on collusion and obstruction of justice.

NBC’s Ken Dilanian reported:

He said that was a factor in his decision NBC news has not only confirmed these reports, but I think we’ve taken it a little further.

There are members of Mueller’s team are frustrated that William Barr stepped in and cleared the president of obstruction

when Robert Mueller didn’t do that.

It was unclear his intent that he didn’t do that.

The intent was to allow Congress and the public to make their own decision about the evidence.

You know, Mueller didn’t make a call, and

he left the field clear for William Barr to come in there and pronounce there was no prosecutable case for obstruction

we don’t know to what extent Barr consulted with Robert Mueller about this decision.

We are told that members of Mueller’s team are frustrated and as the post and the times are reporting,

how Barr depicted the state of the evidence on obstruction

there’s compelling evidence once we see the report is.

We’re hearing from a separate U.S. Official that says the evidence on collusion while not establishing a criminal conspiracy is compelling.

Some of it may be classified, to the extent we get to see it Mueller’s report talks about those contacts between the Trump campaign and Russia and

whether the trump campaign was manipulated by a sophisticated Russian operation.

https://www.politicususa.com/2019/04/04/muellers-team-says-there-is-compelling-evidence-of-trump-russia-collusion.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+politicususa%2FfJAl+%28Politi cus+USA+%29 (https://www.politicususa.com/2019/04/04/muellers-team-says-there-is-compelling-evidence-of-trump-russia-collusion.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+politicususa%2FfJAl+%28Politi cus+USA+%29)

Chris

04-04-2019, 07:12 PM

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/D3WBNqgX4AA09A_.jpg:large

pgardn

04-04-2019, 07:15 PM

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/D3WBNqgX4AA09A_.jpg:large

And Manafort sheds a tear.
The self created swamp trembles.

Chris

04-04-2019, 07:23 PM

And Manafort sheds a tear.
The self created swamp trembles.

Yeah that thing Manafort did with Podesta like a hundred years ago is totally relevant.

Chris

04-04-2019, 07:25 PM

https://twitter.com/PrisonPlanet/status/1113947195278004227

TSA

04-04-2019, 07:30 PM

“There was immediate displeasure from the team when they saw how the attorney general had characterized their work instead,” according to one U.S. official briefed on the matter.

Summaries were prepared for different sections of the report, with a view that they could made public, the official said.

What is obstruction of justice?
With the term whirling around Washington, a former federal prosecutor explains what to know about the criminal charge of obstruction of justice. (Jenny Starrs/The Washington Post)

The report was prepared “so that the front matter from each section could have been released immediately — or very quickly,” the official said. “It was done in a way that minimum redactions, if any, would have been necessary, and the work would have spoken for itself.”

Mueller’s team assumed the information was going to be made available to the public, the official said, “and so they prepared their summaries to be shared in their own words — and not in the attorney general’s summary of their work, as turned out to be the case.”

https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/limited-information-barr-has-shared-about-russia-investigation-frustrated-some-on-muellers-team/2019/04/03/c98e8a02-567a-11e9-814f-e2f46684196e_story.html?utm_term=.7201f0996494

I believe the NYT has a similar story. Would you like to move your goalposts further, pussy?

:lol falling for the same shit from the same anonymous sources from the same publications that got it dead wrong for two years

You just can’t help yourself. I love it, just more shit to shove down your throat, again :lol

TSA

04-04-2019, 07:31 PM

"I fell for" :lol

We haven't even seeing the full report yet you speak as if Trump and his ilk are fully exonerated.

I wonder if you dont have your conspiracies crossed up. The fact that Barr refuses to release the full report (Which claims Trump is free of guilt) or that you think Mueller concocted a false investigation that somehow turned into a conspiracy that saw the main perpetrator not found of any wrongdoing.

:lol TSA

I don’t need to read the full report to know there was no collusion with Russia as Mueller’s report already clearly stated that.

Take your L and disappear upstairs again like you did on election night.

Reck

04-04-2019, 07:43 PM

I don’t need to read the full report to know there was no collusion with Russia as Mueller’s report already clearly stated that.

Take your L and disappear upstairs again like you did on election night.

Of course you dont need to read anything to claim there is a massive conspiracy with whatever QAnon feeds you. You're a brainless and shameless idiot who adopts instantly debunked conspiracies. That we know.

Chris

04-04-2019, 07:46 PM

Of course you dont need to read anything to claim there is a massive conspiracy with whatever QAnon feeds you. You're a brainless and shameless idiot who adopts instantly debunked conspiracies. That we know.

The irony/hypocrisy/projection here is off the charts ^ :lol

Reck

04-04-2019, 07:53 PM

The irony/hypocrisy/projection here is off the charts ^ :lol

^ Believes in a made up pedo island.

Chris

04-04-2019, 07:55 PM

^ Believes in a made up pedo island.

lol "made up"

Never change Reck. :lol

TSA

04-04-2019, 08:07 PM

Of course you dont need to read anything to claim there is a massive conspiracy with whatever QAnon feeds you. You're a brainless and shameless idiot who adopts instantly debunked conspiracies. That we know.

Those were Mueller’s words saying no collusion with Russia not Qanon. I forgot how dumb you were, nice to have you back.

TSA

04-04-2019, 08:07 PM

lol "made up"

Never change Reck. :lol

:lol poor fella

Chris

04-04-2019, 08:08 PM

:lol poor fella

:lol

TSA

04-04-2019, 08:12 PM

:lol

He came out of the woodworks once he heard the Mueller investigation was wrapping up thinking he’d be able to run his mouth again talking shit and just ended up eating a pile of shit :rollin

Chris

04-04-2019, 08:13 PM

He came out of the woodworks once he heard the Mueller investigation was wrapping up thinking he’d be able to run his mouth again talking shit and just ended up eating a pile of shit :rollin

He's a national treasure :lol

Chris

04-04-2019, 08:14 PM

Damn King Solomon destroys that NYT article:

https://twitter.com/jsolomonReports/status/1113961681749725185

in2deep

04-04-2019, 08:28 PM

Russiagaters are looking stupider by each passing hour

Reck

04-04-2019, 08:34 PM

Those were Mueller’s words saying no collusion with Russia not Qanon. I forgot how dumb you were, nice to have you back.

:lol Barr's report.

You haven't read the report to know to what extent Russia's meddling went. Not enough evidence and no collusion aren't the same thing.

Also "does not exonarate" :lmao

Reck

04-04-2019, 08:35 PM

TSA

04-04-2019, 08:39 PM

:lol Barr's report.

You haven't read the report to know to what extent Russia's meddling went. Not enough evidence and no collusion aren't the same thing.

Also "does not exonarate" :lmao

The extent of Russia’s meddling has nothing to do with Mueller stating their was no collusion with Russia from the Trump campaign. You aren’t very bright.

TSA

04-04-2019, 08:39 PM

Literally my first post here was post Mueller report, you dumb cuck.

That makes you look even more pathetic :rollin

Reck

04-04-2019, 08:41 PM

The extent of Russia’s meddling has nothing to do with Mueller stating their was no collusion with Russia from the Trump campaign. You aren’t very bright.

And how would you know that?

You wouldn't. The summary report itself doesn't say there was no collusion.

It only states it does not establishes one pertaining to Trump, not say... his idiot sons and others.

You're aren't very bright. (I'll pretend I'm shocked)

Reck

04-04-2019, 08:42 PM

That makes you look even more pathetic :rollin

Did you read it? No.

Or maybe yes, but forgot and are too stupid and lazy to go to the first page and look.

TSA

04-04-2019, 09:17 PM

And how would you know that?

You wouldn't. The summary report itself doesn't say there was no collusion.

It only states it does not establishes one pertaining to Trump, not say... his idiot sons and others.

You're aren't very bright. (I'll pretend I'm shocked)

[T]he investigation did not establish that members of the Trump Campaign conspired or coordinated with the Russian government in its election interference activities.”

:lmao you stupid fuck you make this too easy

Spurs Homer

04-05-2019, 12:37 AM

[T]he investigation did not establish that members of the Trump Campaign conspired or coordinated with the Russian government in its election interference activities.”

:lmao you stupid fuck you make this too easy

I already schooled your stupid ass - on what

[T]

means - so stop peddling this misinformation you traitor.

DarrinS

04-05-2019, 09:00 AM

https://thehill.com/opinion/white-house/437496-note-to-team-mueller-if-you-dont-indict-you-cant-incite

Pavlov

04-05-2019, 09:17 AM

https://thehill.com/opinion/white-house/437496-note-to-team-mueller-if-you-dont-indict-you-cant-inciteThere are literally thousands of pages of Clinton investigation grand jury testimony you can look at right now that shits on you and this editorial.

Release everything that isn't classified or part of an ongoing investigation.

Spurs Homer

04-05-2019, 01:09 PM

Day 14 of the criminal cover up

trump not exonerated - still furiously burying the mueller report

trump still has not denounced russia
gop has not denounced russia

the cult still not holding a traitor accountable

the criminal traitor is still at large and working for russia

spurraider21

04-05-2019, 01:14 PM

https://thehill.com/opinion/white-house/437496-note-to-team-mueller-if-you-dont-indict-you-cant-incite
how seriously would you consider a kyle griffin op-ed piece?

TSA

04-05-2019, 01:26 PM

how seriously would you consider a kyle griffin op-ed piece?

Trying to compare John Solomon to Kyle Griffin :lmao

spurraider21

04-05-2019, 01:31 PM

Trying to compare John Solomon to Kyle Griffin :lmao
im talking about the credibility of a partisan figure's op-ed piece

DMC

04-05-2019, 02:39 PM

im talking about the credibility of a partisan figure's op-ed piece

You're not involved in the discussion and wanted everyone to stop talking about it, but you saw an opportunity to point out a contradiction in someone's stance so you couldn't resist.

spurraider21

04-05-2019, 02:46 PM

You're not involved in the discussion and wanted everyone to stop talking about it, but you saw an opportunity to point out a contradiction in someone's stance so you couldn't resist.
more ankle biting

DMC

04-05-2019, 02:48 PM

more ankle biting

Biting the ankle of the ankle biter is justified.

TSA

04-05-2019, 02:55 PM

im talking about the credibility of a partisan figure's op-ed piece

Then you couldn't have picked a worse person to compare Solomon to.

spurraider21

04-05-2019, 02:56 PM

Then you couldn't have picked a worse person to compare Solomon to.
you dont think solomon has a right leaning bias?

TSA

04-05-2019, 03:01 PM

I already schooled your stupid ass - on what

[T]

means - so stop peddling this misinformation you traitor.

This will be a fun one to watch you bend over backwards to defend.

1114223483968524288

1114227656529260544

Why would Mueller's team leave that out of the court filing?

TSA

04-05-2019, 03:02 PM

you dont think solomon has a right leaning bias?

I never claimed that. Of course Solomon has a right leaning bias, but he is also credible, unlike Kyle Griffin.

spurraider21

04-05-2019, 03:11 PM

This will be a fun one to watch you bend over backwards to defend.

1114223483968524288

1114227656529260544

Why would Mueller's team leave that out of the court filing?
huh? the court filing specifically said "no commitments should be made at that point"

spurraider21

04-05-2019, 03:14 PM

and papa signed the stipulation :lol

TSA

04-05-2019, 03:14 PM

huh? the court filing specifically said "no commitments should be made at that point"

And why did Clovis say no commitments should be made at that point?

TSA

04-05-2019, 03:15 PM

and papa signed the stipulation :lol

You'd sign whatever they told you to if you had the choice between lying to the FBI or being charged as an unregistered foreign agent.

spurraider21

04-05-2019, 03:18 PM

The preceding statement is a summary, made for the purpose of providing the Court with a factual basis for my guilty plea to the charge against me. It does not include all of the facts known to me regarding this offense. I make this statement knowingly and voluntarily and because I am, in fact, guilty of the crime charged. No threats have been made to me nor am I under the influence of anything that could impede my ability to understand this Statement of the Offense fully.

I have read every word ofthis Statement of the Offense, or have had it read to me. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11 , after consulting with my attorney, I agree and stipulate to this Statement of the Offense, and declare under penalty of perjury that it is true and correct.

signed,
Papa G

:lol

so did Papa G commit perjury?

spurraider21

04-05-2019, 03:20 PM

https://i.imgflip.com/2xvdyk.jpg

TSA

04-05-2019, 03:35 PM

Pavlov

04-05-2019, 03:40 PM

PAPA G LIED AND/OR LIED ABOUT LYING SO WE MUST BELIEVE HIM

spurraider21

04-05-2019, 03:40 PM

According to Papadapolous, yes, he did. He said he was threatened with being charged as an unregistered agent of Israel.
so convicted felon for making false statements to the FBI who should also be charged with perjury. great. such a reliable source of information

In your rush to make a meme you skipped a question. And why did Clovis say no commitments should be made at that point?
no, the meme is perfectly justified even without addressing the question

the email says they wanted to get everyone on the same page before committing

Spurs Homer

04-05-2019, 03:41 PM

boutons_deux

04-05-2019, 03:56 PM

Pelosi says she will sue the full force of Speaker's office get the Mueller report released in full

btw, Trash's obstruction extends to getting of his loyal assholes a top job in the IRS

Chris

04-05-2019, 04:28 PM

https://twitter.com/RepMattGaetz/status/1114224011452375041

:tu

Reck

04-05-2019, 04:35 PM

https://twitter.com/RepMattGaetz/status/1114224011452375041

:tu

I wonder why he acted at lightning speed. :lol Chris mushy mushy

TSA

04-05-2019, 04:45 PM

so convicted felon for making false statements to the FBI who should also be charged with perjury. great. such a reliable source of information

no, the meme is perfectly justified even without addressing the question

the email says they wanted to get everyone on the same page before committing

Get who on the same page?

TSA

04-05-2019, 04:56 PM

Pelosi says she will sue the full force of Speaker's office get the Mueller report released in full

btw, Trash's obstruction extends to getting of his loyal assholes a top job in the IRS

The best part about all the crying from the Dems about releasing the report is that the procedures changed because of Starr's report on Bill Clinton :lmao

========================================

“Of the many criticisms that were launched at the special prosecutor legislation, a frequent one was that the report requirement was unfair to people who got caught up in investigations but were not charged with anything,” Harriger tells TIME. “You can have a lot of facts that don’t look good but they don’t add up to a crime. The rationale that prosecutors always use is that we speak with our indictments, and if we don’t indict, we don’t speak, because there are lots of people who get investigated but never get prosecuted. That criticism was a frequent one.”

The lurid detail in Starr’s report heightened that criticism, contributing to what she calls a “bipartisan sense of unfairness.”

It happened that the 1978 statute expired in 1999, just a year after the impeachment — and so it followed that the procedures for a special prosecution were changed accordingly. In place of the old statute, the Department of Justice enacted internal regulations for a Special Counsel’s work. Those regulations included giving the Attorney General more power to decide how much of the final report of the investigation would be released to the public, if anything. The section regarding the release of the Special Counsel report says, “At the conclusion of the Special Counsel’s work, he or she shall provide the Attorney General with a confidential report explaining the prosecution or declination decisions reached by the Special Counsel.” Another section says the Attorney General “may determine that public release of these reports would be in the public interest, to the extent that release would comply with applicable legal restrictions.”

Not included was a statute requiring Special Counsel investigations to be disclosed to Congress or the public. In a March 2019 memo summarizing the current regulations, the Congressional Research Service linked that omission, and the new “approach in limiting the release of the Special Counsel’s report” to the “detail and scope” of the Starr report.

“It’s important for people to understand the difference between the statutory requirement of the report and the reaction — which is how I’d describe the regulation, as a reaction to the feeling that some of those special prosecutors went overboard in terms of what they revealed,” Harriger says. Back then, it seemed wrong to make all that information public. Today, to many, it seems problematic not to make sure the public gets that information. The situation, she says, echoing the Department of Justice, “is a good reminder too that there’s no perfect solution here.”

http://time.com/5558083/mueller-report-release-starr/

§600.9 Notification and reports by the Attorney General.

(a) The Attorney General will notify the Chairman and Ranking Minority Member of the Judiciary Committees of each House of Congress, with an explanation for each action—

(1) Upon appointing a Special Counsel;

(2) Upon removing any Special Counsel; and

(3) Upon conclusion of the Special Counsels investigation, including, to the extent consistent with applicable law, a description and explanation of instances (if any) in which the Attorney General concluded that a proposed action by a Special Counsel was so inappropriate or unwarranted under established Departmental practices that it should not be pursued.

(b) The notification requirement in paragraph (a)(1) of this section may be tolled by the Attorney General upon a finding that legitimate investigative or privacy concerns require confidentiality. At such time as confidentiality is no longer needed, the notification will be provided.

(c) The Attorney General may determine that public release of these reports would be in the public interest, to the extent that release would comply with applicable legal restrictions. All other releases of information by any Department of Justice employee, including the Special Counsel and staff, concerning matters handled by Special Counsels shall be governed by the generally applicable Departmental guidelines concerning public comment with respect to any criminal investigation, and relevant law.

Pavlov

04-05-2019, 04:59 PM

Hiding report good again.

spurraider21

04-05-2019, 04:59 PM

Get who on the same page?
everyone. i'm quoting the email directly.

TSA

04-05-2019, 07:02 PM

everyone. i'm quoting the email directly.

Who’s the everyone Clovis specifically mentions that Mueller’s team left out?

spurraider21

04-05-2019, 07:09 PM

Who’s the everyone Clovis specifically mentions that Mueller’s team left out?
dunno

TSA

04-05-2019, 07:24 PM

The best part about all the crying from the Dems about releasing the report is that the procedures changed because of Starr's report on Bill Clinton :lmao

========================================

“Of the many criticisms that were launched at the special prosecutor legislation, a frequent one was that the report requirement was unfair to people who got caught up in investigations but were not charged with anything,” Harriger tells TIME. “You can have a lot of facts that don’t look good but they don’t add up to a crime. The rationale that prosecutors always use is that we speak with our indictments, and if we don’t indict, we don’t speak, because there are lots of people who get investigated but never get prosecuted. That criticism was a frequent one.”

The lurid detail in Starr’s report heightened that criticism, contributing to what she calls a “bipartisan sense of unfairness.”

It happened that the 1978 statute expired in 1999, just a year after the impeachment — and so it followed that the procedures for a special prosecution were changed accordingly. In place of the old statute, the Department of Justice enacted internal regulations for a Special Counsel’s work. Those regulations included giving the Attorney General more power to decide how much of the final report of the investigation would be released to the public, if anything. The section regarding the release of the Special Counsel report says, “At the conclusion of the Special Counsel’s work, he or she shall provide the Attorney General with a confidential report explaining the prosecution or declination decisions reached by the Special Counsel.” Another section says the Attorney General “may determine that public release of these reports would be in the public interest, to the extent that release would comply with applicable legal restrictions.”

Not included was a statute requiring Special Counsel investigations to be disclosed to Congress or the public. In a March 2019 memo summarizing the current regulations, the Congressional Research Service linked that omission, and the new “approach in limiting the release of the Special Counsel’s report” to the “detail and scope” of the Starr report.

“It’s important for people to understand the difference between the statutory requirement of the report and the reaction — which is how I’d describe the regulation, as a reaction to the feeling that some of those special prosecutors went overboard in terms of what they revealed,” Harriger says. Back then, it seemed wrong to make all that information public. Today, to many, it seems problematic not to make sure the public gets that information. The situation, she says, echoing the Department of Justice, “is a good reminder too that there’s no perfect solution here.”

http://time.com/5558083/mueller-report-release-starr/

§600.9 Notification and reports by the Attorney General.

(a) The Attorney General will notify the Chairman and Ranking Minority Member of the Judiciary Committees of each House of Congress, with an explanation for each action—

(1) Upon appointing a Special Counsel;

(2) Upon removing any Special Counsel; and

(3) Upon conclusion of the Special Counsels investigation, including, to the extent consistent with applicable law, a description and explanation of instances (if any) in which the Attorney General concluded that a proposed action by a Special Counsel was so inappropriate or unwarranted under established Departmental practices that it should not be pursued.

(b) The notification requirement in paragraph (a)(1) of this section may be tolled by the Attorney General upon a finding that legitimate investigative or privacy concerns require confidentiality. At such time as confidentiality is no longer needed, the notification will be provided.

(c) The Attorney General may determine that public release of these reports would be in the public interest, to the extent that release would comply with applicable legal restrictions. All other releases of information by any Department of Justice employee, including the Special Counsel and staff, concerning matters handled by Special Counsels shall be governed by the generally applicable Departmental guidelines concerning public comment with respect to any criminal investigation, and relevant law.

Doubly fucked by Ginsburg years ago :lmao

1114197715951419392

Chris

04-05-2019, 07:25 PM

Remember when they wanted to block the Nunes memo?

Pepperidge farm remembers.

spurraider21

04-05-2019, 07:51 PM

Doubly fucked by Ginsburg years ago :lmao

1114197715951419392
huh? that's Douglas Ginsburg and the ruling was issued today, not years ago

TSA

04-05-2019, 07:56 PM

huh? that's Douglas Ginsburg and the ruling was issued today, not years ago

well then i done fucked up. my bad. mea culpa.

I’m still :lmao at Cummings and Swalwell

spurraider21

04-05-2019, 07:57 PM

Remember when they wanted to block the Nunes memo?

Pepperidge farm remembers.
the nunes memo carried no legal weight behind it. it was just a congressman whining about what he perceived to be abuses of process. the more typical course of action is for the committee to issue a report.

the rationale behind blocking it was because it served no legal purpose. nunes wasn't pushing to #releasethememo out of some stand for transparency. its purpose was to discredit an ongoing investigation.

spurraider21

04-05-2019, 07:57 PM

well then i done fucked up. my bad. mea culpa.

I’m still :lmao at Cummings and Swalwell
:tu

TSA

04-05-2019, 08:00 PM

:tu

I blame the Pliny the Elders I’m sipping on. :bobo

TSA

04-05-2019, 08:03 PM

the nunes memo carried no legal weight behind it. it was just a congressman whining about what he perceived to be abuses of process. the more typical course of action is for the committee to issue a report.

the rationale behind blocking it was because it served no legal purpose. nunes wasn't pushing to #releasethememo out of some stand for transparency. its purpose was to discredit an ongoing investigation.

It was a congressman telling the American people the investigation into Trump was bullshit. Think of the tens of millions of people who if they’d not laughed at it and digested what he was saying would have been saved from the meltdowns we have seen since the investigation closed with no collusion.

spurraider21

04-05-2019, 08:03 PM

I blame the Pliny the Elders I’m sipping on. :bobo
cheers

TSA

04-05-2019, 08:12 PM

cheers

Thanks bro been a while since I’ve enjoyed a beer.

Been a rough two weeks for me. Wife’s been out of town for business and my 15 month old and I both got the Norovirus. I got to spend a night hooked up to an IV in urgent care. These are the things you can look forward to in marriage :lol

Th'Pusher

04-06-2019, 08:58 AM

I blame the Pliny the Elders I’m sipping on. :bobo

RUSSIAN river brewing

Figures...

Spurs Homer

04-06-2019, 10:25 AM

RUSSIAN river brewing

Figures...

Comrade TSA - :lol:lol

Spurs Homer

04-06-2019, 12:09 PM

Day 15 of the criminal cover up

did i not call it when i said barr was a piece of shit- months ago
did we all not see with our own eyes the 19 page unsolicited memo, barr refusing to say he would recuse at his confirmation hearing?

did we not see/hear with our own eyes/ears trump firing sessions because he would not protect him?

did we not hear trump say he wants his “roy cohn” as AG?

are there any patriots with balls left in the fbi who will do their duty and leak this report?

time to hold hearings in full public view of;

mueller
muellers investigators
fbi agents

how do you stop criminals in power who are getting away with treason and crimes and are now in the middle of a criminal cover up?

by exposing everything

put the investigators under oath and force the courts to make a decision on unearthing the investigation evidence.

shameful that americans are watching these criminals and are still sitting doing nothing

djohn2oo8

04-06-2019, 12:32 PM

1114580314179895301

that didn’t take long

djohn2oo8

04-06-2019, 12:33 PM

Would be a shame is Mueller’s report didn’t clear him like he thought lol

baseline bum

04-06-2019, 12:38 PM

I blame the Pliny the Elders I’m sipping on. :bobo

How's it compare to Stone Ruination?

djohn2oo8

04-06-2019, 12:39 PM

1114571524386770944

TSA

04-06-2019, 12:46 PM

RUSSIAN river brewing

Figures...

lol

@realDonaldTrump

04-06-2019, 12:47 PM

The FAKE NEWS MEDIA claims that I have “dingle berrys” after I poop. TOTAL LIES! I have the best turds, they come out so clean that I rarely need to wipe. Good for environment!

TSA

04-06-2019, 12:48 PM

How's it compare to Stone Ruination?

On another level.

And out of all the breweries here in SD Stone is at the bottom for me in terms of their own beers. The brewery itself and grounds are awesome.

TSA

04-06-2019, 12:51 PM

Would be a shame is Mueller’s report didn’t clear him like he thought lol

It already did you broke bitch welcher. Time to pay your debts faggot.

TSA

04-06-2019, 12:53 PM

Andrew C. McCarthy: Partisan Democrats Mueller recruited don't want to play by time-honored rules

According to The New York Times, some of Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s investigators are grousing, anonymously of course, that Attorney General William Barr has “failed to adequately portray the findings of their inquiry.” Mind you, they are not saying that the attorney general has misrepresented the special counsel’s conclusions; only that Barr declined to render these findings by incorporating the investigators’ spin.

For a prosecutor, however, the bottom line is the only thing that matters when formal criminal charges are not alleged.

There were three matters that called for investigative judgments. No one disputes that Barr has faithfully reported the special counsel’s bottom line. Mueller found, first, that Russia did interfere in the 2016 campaign; and, second, that there was no criminal conspiracy between the Trump campaign and the Kremlin. On the third issue, obstruction, Mueller did not recommend that a criminal charge be brought against President Trump, but he stubbornly refused to state the obvious: If a prosecutor does not recommend charges, that means there should be no charges. Leaving this inescapable assessment to Barr, the special counsel abdicated on the main question he was appointed to decide.

What’s fascinating about this is that Mueller’s carping staffers are openly elevating the narrative (not their job) over prosecutorial conclusions (their only job). A prosecutor has one legitimate concern: Is there enough evidence to charge or isn’t there? If there is not, the public customarily gets no information about the evidence gathered.

If a prosecutor wants to spin an unsavory narrative about the suspect in an investigation, he or she much charge the suspect with a crime. The suspect then has all the rights the Constitution gives him to challenge the case – to show that the prosecutors cannot actually prove a crime.

The partisan Democrats Mueller recruited do not want to play by these time-honored rules.

This is exactly the issue I wrote about when Barr first announced Mueller’s conclusions. The problem for these political activists masquerading as investigators is that this is the first time since their probe started that they are not in control of how their written reports and allegations are presented to the public. As I said after Attorney General Barr’s letter was issued:

As far as the special counsel’s report goes, because of the way the regulations work (at least when the Justice Department deigns to follow them), we now have Mueller’s bottom line, but not his reasoning and the underlying facts. It is the opposite of the Trump opposition’s preferred Roger Stone and George Papadopoulos scenario, where Mueller’s team spins pages and pages of “Gee, sure seems like a lot of almost-collusion here” before you flip to the end and find that there’s no case – just a campaign hanger-on who lied to an investigator long after the imaginary espionage conspiracy occurred. At the moment, we just have Mueller’s conclusion: There is no basis to indict the president for a crime – not collusion, not obstruction, not false statements. The collusion-peddlers, who took great umbrage at the suggestion that “VERIFIED” FISA surveillance-warrant applications should be disclosed, now demand Mueller’s full report so they can get to the familiar work of obscuring the bottom line and spinning the spin.

This is what we’re dealing with.

Remember, throughout Mueller’s investigation, he filed indictment after indictment that had no collusion charges – usually just process crimes of misleading investigators, committed long after the purported Trump-Russia conspiracy took place. Yet, Mueller was never content to file the usual, short one-or two-page indictment, alleging that agents were misled. Instead, he would include – either in the indictment itself, or in a “statement of the offense” accompanying the indictment – a long narrative statement that would tantalizingly hint at possible collusion but never come out and claim there was any. (See, e.g., indictments of Michael Flynn, George Papadopoulos, and Roger Stone.) Much of this information in these narratives was irrelevant to the relatively trivial process charges that Mueller actually indicted. This practice, however, fueled the collusion narrative for over a year … in the absence of any actual collusion crime.

This is what Democrats want, and it is what some of Mueller’s staffers are anonymously caterwauling about. They are not claiming that Barr is misrepresenting Mueller’s bottom-line findings; they just resent the fact that Barr is not playing their game of spinning their bottom line with a lot of heavy breathing about almost-collusion.

https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/andrew-c-mccarthy-partisan-democrats-mueller-recruited-dont-want-to-play-by-time-honored-rules

Pavlov

04-06-2019, 12:58 PM

So he doesn't know what's in it either.

Spurtacular

04-06-2019, 01:00 PM

So he doesn't know what's in it either.

:lol Blake Zero

baseline bum

04-06-2019, 01:04 PM

On another level.

And out of all the breweries here in SD Stone is at the bottom for me in terms of their own beers. The brewery itself and grounds are awesome.

Thanks, I'll have to check it out some time. But bottom of the barrel? That's pretty harsh for a brewery that makes Arrogant Bastard.

djohn2oo8

04-06-2019, 01:13 PM

It already did you broke bitch welcher. Time to pay your debts faggot.
Says who? Who did it exonerate when it’s not even out yet? The shit has got your boy in a panic :lmao

djohn2oo8

04-06-2019, 01:14 PM

13 Days ago Mueller “honorable”

13 days later not so much

hmmmm what changed?

djohn2oo8

04-06-2019, 01:15 PM

Trump no longer wants it released :)

djohn2oo8

04-06-2019, 01:17 PM

TSA

why did Barr backtrack?

djohn2oo8

04-06-2019, 01:19 PM

1114580314179895301

that didn’t take long
:)

Spurs Homer

04-06-2019, 01:20 PM

Says who? Who did it exonerate when it’s not even out yet? The shit has got your boy in a panic :lmao

plus -

jr and javanka are not free and clear yet -

although Barr will probably try to kill the SDNY investigation also - the way he killed the Mueller investigation -

djohn2oo8

04-06-2019, 01:22 PM

plus -

jr and javanka are not free and clear yet -

although Barr will probably try to kill the SDNY investigation also - the way he killed the Mueller investigation -
Barr walked it back quick. Real quick.

Spurs Homer

04-06-2019, 01:26 PM

Barr walked it back quick. Real quick.

But he will force the Dems to go to court to release it -

The public - will not see it for a long time -

but legally - the DEMS will see the 100% full report and I am calling it here -

There is fucking conspiracy - I cannot believe EVERYONE is parroting that "Mueller found no conspiracy" bullshit

THAT was BARR putting his bullshit on the report -

Mark my words - there was conspiracy and there was obstruction.

djohn2oo8

04-06-2019, 01:28 PM

But he will force the Dems to go to court to release it -

The public - will not see it for a long time -

but legally - the DEMS will see the 100% full report and I am calling it here -

There is fucking conspiracy - I cannot believe EVERYONE is parroting that "Mueller found no conspiracy" bullshit

THAT was BARR putting his bullshit on the report -

Mark my words - there was conspiracy and there was obstruction.
The public will see it sooner rather than later. And it won’t be an exoneration :lol

Spurs Homer

04-06-2019, 01:42 PM

The public will see it sooner rather than later. And it won’t be an exoneration :lol

If it leaks - yes -

otherwise - Congress will see the full report and begin impeachment

only question is - will they see it BEFORE the 2020 election?

I also feel strongly - and I am calling it now also -

BARR - found a way to curtail the Mueller report and this will come out. There is ZERO chance that Mueller was legitimately finished or even close to finishing. As soon as BARR was confirmed - what happened?

As soon as he was confirmed - we heard reports of Mueller's investigators carrying boxes and returning to their regular jobs - and that they were "wrapping up"

this was BARR doing trumps dirty work.

Why would Mueller wrap up when the Stone case and the mystery internet company case was still ongoing and - even today - all of that info is REDACTED - WHY?

Because Mueller was not done - but BARR made sure to cut the investigation short.

This will come out.

Whenever the country and the dems decide to wake the fuck up and - understand -

that we are dealing with CRIMINALS - and they will do everything in their power to escape justice - will we begin to unearth this criminality.

djohn2oo8

04-06-2019, 07:00 PM

Reck

04-06-2019, 07:31 PM

It already did you broke bitch welcher. Time to pay your debts faggot.

What kind of naive faggot thinks anyone on an anonymous board is going to shell out 5000 dollars to another random? Degenerate gambler and a cuck.

Spurs Homer

04-06-2019, 07:32 PM

But as Barr’s self-imposed deadline to submit a copy of Mueller’s report to Capitol Hill fast approaches, Trump’s confidence in its “complete and total exoneration” of him has waned, according to one Republican close to the White House

:rollin of course it has

barr will submit a report with everything redacted and force dems to go to the courts

meanwhile more time is wasted and a criminal sits in the white house

boutons_deux

04-07-2019, 05:24 AM

https://images.dailykos.com/images/661382/story_image/MuellerBarrcartoon.jpg?1554399637

djohn2oo8

04-07-2019, 08:59 AM

barr will submit a report with everything redacted and force dems to go to the courts

meanwhile more time is wasted and a criminal sits in the white house
Then Trump shouldn’t be worried. But he is.

1114888062884954114

He called Mueller honorable but his tune has sure changed...

djohn2oo8

04-07-2019, 09:00 AM

The real report will come. The memos will come out too.

djohn2oo8

04-07-2019, 10:09 AM

:lmao 8 tweets about Mueller and his team since yesterday

Spurs Homer

04-07-2019, 10:13 AM

:lmao 8 tweets about Mueller and his team since yesterday

Wonder how long before Barr realizes he put a noose on his own neck by protecting the criminal -

wonder if Barr will start pulling at that noose before he runs out of air?

Winehole23

04-07-2019, 10:16 AM

The real report will come. The memos will come out too.When they do, our political surroundings will look very similar.

Rivers of emotive prose will be emptied to celebrate or dismiss its findings, but the result will remain what it was always going to be: the only solution for DJT before 2020 is impeachment and removal; the Republican majority in the Senate will not vote to remove DJT, ergo, the ostensible solution remains to beat DJT in 2020.

An investigative Hail Mary is less probable than ever. Trump never stopped campaigning. There's little time to be wasted in puny rhetorical strife over the Mueller Report, if the point is to beat DJT. JMO.

djohn2oo8

04-07-2019, 10:28 AM

When they do, our political surroundings will look very similar.

Rivers of emotive prose will be emptied to celebrate or dismiss its findings, but the result will remain what it was always going to be: the only solution for DJT before 2020 is impeachment and removal; the Republican majority in the Senate will not vote to remove DJT, ergo, the ostensible solution remains to beat DJT in 2020.

An investigative Hail Mary is less probable than ever. Trump never stopped campaigning. There's little time to be wasted in puny rhetorical strife over the Mueller Report, if the point is to beat DJT. JMO.
You are right that’s the only way he is removed before 2020. Public interest in the report is pretty high though. When the report does come out, and it has damaging information regarding Russian intelligence and the Trump campaign the pressure from the public will be enormous. Those in the Senate, the GOP will have that choice to make right before 2020. Hell of a decision they have.

Winehole23

04-07-2019, 10:32 AM

You are right that’s the only way he is removed before 2020. Public interest in the report is pretty high though. When the report does come out, and it has damaging information regarding Russian intelligence and the Trump campaign the pressure from the public will be enormous. Those in the Senate, the GOP will have that choice to make right before 2020. Hell of a decision they have.They won't think twice, their voters will look exactly the same the next morning.

The GOP will back Trump. How could they not?

pgardn

04-07-2019, 10:41 AM

When they do, our political surroundings will look very similar.

Rivers of emotive prose will be emptied to celebrate or dismiss its findings, but the result will remain what it was always going to be: the only solution for DJT before 2020 is impeachment and removal; the Republican majority in the Senate will not vote to remove DJT, ergo, the ostensible solution remains to beat DJT in 2020.

An investigative Hail Mary is less probable than ever. Trump never stopped campaigning. There's little time to be wasted in puny rhetorical strife over the Mueller Report, if the point is to beat DJT. JMO.

Imo it is very likely DJT will go down 2020 to Bugs Bunny.
But it would help the blue team if the report was not released.
More lies and slight of hand never hurts in this case.

Health Care is the issue. Let them keep repealing whatever and prices continue to rise whatever they do. It's sad, but some people really have to get hurt for change to occur.

DarrinS

04-07-2019, 02:13 PM

Public interest in the report is pretty high though.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=COcbQsisNDQ

:lmao

Pavlov

04-07-2019, 02:20 PM

There is literally nothing Trump could do that would cause Darrin to stop supporting him.

Reck

04-07-2019, 02:23 PM

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=COcbQsisNDQ

:lmao

Right.

So Trump was hated before and after. Nothing is going to change that.

Suckers like you will continue to be on their knees for Trump and those that do not like the guy, will continue to dislike him.

Yet for some reason, this makes you laugh. Ok..

Spurtacular

04-07-2019, 02:50 PM

Right.

So Trump was hated before and after. Nothing is going to change that.

Suckers like you will continue to be on their knees for Trump and those that do not like the guy, will continue to dislike him.

Yet for some reason, this makes you laugh. Ok..

Does sperm shielding that hard put you in peril of going back to your trans days?

koriwhat

04-07-2019, 04:25 PM

So Trump was hated before and after. Nothing is going to change that.

you're a fucking sheep who started hating on trump due to the MSM. period!

your statement above proves exactly what i claim about you and your sheeple ways.

trump was celebrated in movies, music, tv, books, etc and by the very same people today who shit on him. he was recognized by institutions and was given awards in the past by the very same people who shit on him today.

you're just a spineless pos loser and it shows in all your bs posts here so go tuck your little dick back between your legs and put some more makeup on you fucking pig!

Pavlov

04-07-2019, 04:27 PM

you're a fucking sheep who started hating on trump due to the MSM. period!

your statement above proves exactly what i claim about you and your sheeple ways.

trump was celebrated in movies, music, tv, books, etc and by the very same people today who shit on him. he was recognized by institutions and was given awards in the past by the very same people who shit on him today.

you're just a spineless pos loser and it shows in all your bs posts here so go tuck your little dick back between your legs and put some more makeup on you fucking pig!Do you celebrate Trump?

koriwhat

04-07-2019, 04:29 PM

Do you celebrate Trump?

i don't hate him. i'm not some dipshit like yourself nor a feMALE like yourself either. you gonna keep crying pavTheFag?

Pavlov

04-07-2019, 04:30 PM

i don't hate him. i'm not some dipshit like yourself nor a feMALE like yourself either. you gonna keep crying pavTheFag?Do you celebrate Trump?

koriwhat

04-07-2019, 04:33 PM

Do you celebrate Trump?

i'm not playing your fucking faggot ass games today you fucking little bitch. idgaf about you at all pav. you're a fucking bitch and bitches get no love!

Pavlov

04-07-2019, 04:34 PM

i'm not playing your fucking faggot ass games today you fucking little bitch. idgaf about you at all pav. you're a fucking bitch and bitches get no love!And yet here you are respondong to me like your life depends on it.

lol kori

koriwhat

04-07-2019, 04:36 PM

And yet here you are respondong to me like your life depends on it.

lol kori

https://memegenerator.net/img/instances/41192093/you-sir-are-a-pussy.jpg

boutons_deux

04-07-2019, 08:51 PM

Mick Mulvaney Says Democrats Will Never See Trump’s Tax Returns (He’s Lying)

“Keep in mind they knew they’re not going to get these taxes.

They know what the law is. :lol

They know that one of the fundamental principles of the IRS is to protect the confidentiality of you, and me, and everybody else who files taxes.

They know that. They know the terms by which under law that the IRS can give them the documents, but political hit job is not one of those reasons, so they know they’re not getting it.”

“Oh, no. Never. Nor should they, keep in mind that’s an issue that was already litigated during the election.

The law says the IRS will have to turn over Trump’s tax returns

Trump himself has been under the delusion that he gets to decide if he turns over his tax returns. (https://www.politicususa.com/2019/04/04/trump-thinks-its-up-to-him-to-give-congress-his-tax-returns-its-not.html)

Mulvaney was engaging in political spin for the Fox News audience

by avoiding the reason why Democrats are asking for the tax returns.

Under the law, the IRS has to turn over the tax returns because Democrats are investigating whether or not the IRS is following correct auditing procedures with Trump. (https://www.politicususa.com/2019/04/03/democrats-outsmarted-trump-and-made-it-impossible-for-him-to-hide-his-tax-returns.html)
The law is clear. The IRS must hand over Trump’s returns. This isn’t a request. It is a legal obligation.

https://www.politicususa.com/2019/04/07/mick-mulvaney-says-democrats-will-never-see-trumps-tax-returns-hes-lying.html (https://www.politicususa.com/2019/04/07/mick-mulvaney-says-democrats-will-never-see-trumps-tax-returns-hes-lying.html)

boutons_deux

04-07-2019, 08:55 PM

Barr screwed up by forcing Democrats to subpoena the Mueller report and now Trump is in more trouble: ex-prosecutor

https://www.rawstory.com/2019/04/barr-screwed-forcing-democrats-subpoena-mueller-report-now-trump-trouble-ex-prosecutor/ (https://www.rawstory.com/2019/04/barr-screwed-forcing-democrats-subpoena-mueller-report-now-trump-trouble-ex-prosecutor/)

boutons_deux

04-07-2019, 10:11 PM

Trump’s ex-White House lawyer admits he’s heavily cited in the Mueller report

Former White House counsel Don McGahn teased a possible tell-all deposition during a GOP luncheon

McGahn said he spent two years being shouted down in the same way former Homeland Security Secretary Kirstjen Nielson was.

Trump would fly into a rage (https://www.rawstory.com/2019/04/trump-infuriated-officials-tell-cant-break-law-led-kirstjen-nielson-firing-nyt/) when he was told that something was illegal or that he couldn’t do something because the law barred him from it.

. “And you may soon read about some of the more spirited debates I had with the president.”

While McGahn mostly praised Trump int the lunch, Axios reported he “hinted at the brutality” of the president.

Trump runs the White House with a “hub and spokes model,” giving several people the same task. It ultimately means there’s no true chief of staff running the operation.

Bob Woodard book Fear, nailed the president as a paranoid leader who believes (https://www.cnbc.com/2018/09/04/new-bob-woodward-book-shows-worried-president-trump-after-mueller-nod.html) “everyone is out to get me.”

president that doesn’t trust a “gatekeeper,” according to McGahn, and can’t stand intermediaries. Trump famously proclaimed during the 2016 election, “I alone can fix it.”

https://www.rawstory.com/2019/04/trumps-ex-white-house-lawyer-admits-hes-heavily-cited-mueller-report/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+TheRawStory+%28The+Raw+Story% 29 (https://www.rawstory.com/2019/04/trumps-ex-white-house-lawyer-admits-hes-heavily-cited-mueller-report/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+TheRawStory+%28The+Raw+Story% 29)

So Trash has been ordering the WH to commit crimes,

and that began only in the WH, or has he been coupablizing his employees for 40 years?

Trash is deplorable, despicable pretext of a human

TSA

04-08-2019, 11:13 AM

Thanks, I'll have to check it out some time. But bottom of the barrel? That's pretty harsh for a brewery that makes Arrogant Bastard.

I’m not a fan of Arrogant Bastard. Used to be able to drink it but that was years ago before I knew any better :lol
The only beer I drink from Stone is the Delicious IPA and that’s if it’s the only IPA someone has on tap. Stone basically started the craft brew scene in San Diego and it’s kind of funny that the beers never kept up with all the progession.

TSA

04-08-2019, 11:13 AM

1115258328236605440

Your turn Jerry.

boutons_deux

04-08-2019, 11:21 AM

Stonekettle@Stonekettle
(https://twitter.com/Stonekettle)
Trump could utterly shut down any opposition in a single stroke.

Release his tax returns.

Release the Mueller report.

If those documents show what he says they do,

then Trump would defang his enemies in one stroke.

No one would ever believe them ever again.

https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/529019115768279040/po4EVHoc_bigger.jpeg (https://twitter.com/Stonekettle)Stonekettle@Stonekettle
(https://twitter.com/Stonekettle)

Stonekettle@Stonekettle (https://twitter.com/Stonekettle)

https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/529019115768279040/po4EVHoc_bigger.jpeg (https://twitter.com/Stonekettle)Stonekettle@Stonekettle
(https://twitter.com/Stonekettle)

(https://twitter.com/Stonekettle/status/1114902184687173632)

Again, Bro, you could own them all.

It's easy, release the report. Unredacted. Unedited. In full.

If it says what you say it does, then you'll own them all forever and clinch your reelection.

Simple. Boom. One strike.

If it says what you say it does.

baseline bum

04-08-2019, 12:36 PM

I’m not a fan of Arrogant Bastard. Used to be able to drink it but that was years ago before I knew any better :lol
The only beer I drink from Stone is the Delicious IPA and that’s if it’s the only IPA someone has on tap. Stone basically started the craft brew scene in San Diego and it’s kind of funny that the beers never kept up with all the progession.

Those are fighting words man :lol

Spurs Homer

04-08-2019, 12:55 PM

1115258328236605440

Your turn Jerry.

In time, grasshopper - in time.

First - get the 100% mueller report.

Then get Mueller in front of the world to testify on all of Trumps treason.

Spurs Homer

04-08-2019, 12:57 PM

Day 16??

of the criminal cover up -

The traitor is panicking - fired head DHS nazi lady yesterday -

today trump fires the US secret service director

DISTRACTION DISTRACTION

Panic panic --

"but - but - EXONERATION!"

:lol:lol:lol

spurraider21

04-08-2019, 01:34 PM

for all we know this could end up like the clinton matter.

have them explain a list of stuff they did wrong but ultimately decide they dont have enough for charges to be pressed

TSA

04-08-2019, 01:41 PM

Those are fighting words man :lol

Too malty for my taste. I've been on a hazy IPA kick the last year. I can't even keep up with all the breweries popping up around me it's almost overwhelming :lol

Reck

04-08-2019, 02:26 PM

CitizenDwayne

04-08-2019, 03:03 PM

Chris

04-08-2019, 03:18 PM

"There were stories written in the papers years before he decided to even run for president."
https://proxy.duckduckgo.com/iu/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fthetyee.ca%2FOpinion%2F2016%2F03% 2F30%2FIdiot-610px.jpg&f=1

ChumpDumper

04-08-2019, 03:20 PM

You don't think stories were written about Trump before he ran for president?

:lol that's where tiny hands came from

Chris

04-08-2019, 03:29 PM

You don't think stories were written about Trump before he ran for president?

:lol that's where tiny hands came from

No simpleton. It's obvious people wrote stories about Trump before he was President. Reck posting it like it's come kind of revelation is the dig. You may be just as dense as he.

ChumpDumper

04-08-2019, 03:33 PM

No simpleton. It's obvious people wrote stories about Trump before he was President. Reck posting it like it's come kind of revelation is the dig. You may be just as dense as he.So you know he's always been a joke:tu

TSA

04-08-2019, 04:57 PM

In time, grasshopper - in time.

First - get the 100% mueller report.

Then get Mueller in front of the world to testify on all of Trumps treason.

You still don't understand how the procedures were changed after Clinton/Starr. Educate yourself.

1115250255237394433

Reck

04-08-2019, 05:11 PM

No simpleton. It's obvious people wrote stories about Trump before he was President. Reck posting it like it's come kind of revelation is the dig. You may be just as dense as he.

There is a difference between writing glossy stories about him and stories about exposing his greed...which there were plenty of before.

Not surprised that point went well over your head.

Spurs Homer

04-08-2019, 05:15 PM

You still don't understand how the procedures were changed after Clinton/Starr. Educate yourself.

1115250255237394433

I know that - but that won't matter to a court when the only remedy to this situation is this;

Congress must decide if the President committed impeachable offenses -

and Congress needs to have 100% of the evidence to conduct their Constitutional duty.

Everything else is irrelevant.

Chris

04-08-2019, 05:41 PM

There is a difference between writing glossy stories about him and stories about exposing his greed...which there were plenty of before.

Not surprised that point went well over your head.

Link me to the stories exposing his greed.

AaronY

04-08-2019, 05:43 PM

https://memegenerator.net/img/instances/41192093/you-sir-are-a-pussy.jpg
I'm like 75-80% sure Rod Serling never said that

spurraider21

04-08-2019, 06:04 PM

I'm like 75-80% sure Rod Serling never said that
lol of course not... its actually a trend i've noticed from my conservative friends on facebook. they take stock photos of celebrities that they look up to and then write in their own quote about libs and snowflakes. i've seen it over pictures of clint eastwood, sam elliott, morgan freeman (in a thikning pose), tyler durden (not brad pitt generally, only as that role). its pretty funny tbh

Reck

04-08-2019, 06:13 PM

Link me to the stories exposing his greed.

https://www.nytimes.com/2005/05/19/nyregion/trump-proposes-putting-up-2-towers-at-trade-center-site.html

Literally just type Trump greed into google and this pops up. :lol Chris

Trump has and is viewed as a shit stain for the State of New york.

Reck

04-08-2019, 07:15 PM

https://media.tenor.com/images/529aed02dae515a28de82141cfd0b019/tenor.gif

https://www.nytimes.com/2005/05/19/nyregion/trump-proposes-putting-up-2-towers-at-trade-center-site.html

Literally just type Trump greed into google and this pops up. :lol Chris

Trump has and is viewed as a shit stain for the State of New york.

TSA

04-08-2019, 07:57 PM

I know that - but that won't matter to a court when the only remedy to this situation is this;

Congress must decide if the President committed impeachable offenses -

and Congress needs to have 100% of the evidence to conduct their Constitutional duty.

Everything else is irrelevant.

The rule of law is not irrelevant no matter how much you cry about it.

1114914443991945216

TSA

04-08-2019, 08:04 PM

1115413896196775936

ChumpDumper

04-08-2019, 08:20 PM

Man, TSA really cheerleading secrecy and nondisclosure now.

Chris

04-08-2019, 08:20 PM

https://www.nytimes.com/2005/05/19/nyregion/trump-proposes-putting-up-2-towers-at-trade-center-site.html

Literally just type Trump greed into google and this pops up. :lol Chris

Trump has and is viewed as a shit stain for the State of New york.

Um..you said there were stories and I asked for some links.

This link is not about Trump's greed.

Link me to the stories exposing his greed, or admit you were talking out of your ass.

ChumpDumper

04-08-2019, 08:21 PM

Um..you said there were stories and I asked for some links.

This link is not about Trump's greed.

Link me to the stories exposing his greed, or admit you were talking out of your ass.Do you think Trump is greedy, Qhris?

Yes or no.

Chris

04-08-2019, 08:21 PM

Do you think Trump is greedy, Qhris?

Yes or no.

Link me to the stories exposing Trump's greed pre-election.

ChumpDumper

04-08-2019, 08:22 PM

Link me to the stories exposing Trump's greed pre-election.You didn't answer the question, Qhris.

Do you think Trump is greedy, Qhris?

Yes or no.

Reck

04-08-2019, 08:49 PM

Um..you said there were stories and I asked for some links.

This link is not about Trump's greed.

Link me to the stories exposing his greed, or admit you were talking out of your ass.

Wanting to build Trump buildings and charging people for it on the back of a national tragedy not greed enough? You’re disgusting.

Chris

04-08-2019, 08:50 PM

:yield

ChumpDumper

04-08-2019, 08:51 PM

:lmao Qhris can't even deny Trump's greed.

TSA

04-08-2019, 08:54 PM

Man, TSA really cheerleading secrecy and nondisclosure now.

Should AG Barr not follow the rules of law set in place after Clinton? Yes or no.

Chris

04-08-2019, 08:58 PM

:lmao Qhris can't even deny Trump's greed.

Link me to the stories exposing Trump's greed pre-election.

ChumpDumper

04-08-2019, 09:00 PM

Should AG Barr not follow the rules of law set in place after Clinton? Yes or no.If it's the law it's the law.

Should you cheerlead for secrecy and nondisclosure?

Yes or no?

TSA

04-08-2019, 09:01 PM

If it's the law it's the law.

Should you cheerlead for secrecy and nondisclosure?

Yes or no?

Sorry question pending. Should AG Barr not follow the rules of law set in place after Clinton? Yes or no.

ChumpDumper

04-08-2019, 09:02 PM

Sorry question pending. Should AG Barr not follow the rules of law set in place after Clinton? Yes or no.I said if it's the law it's the law.

Should you cheerlead for secrecy and nondisclosure?

Yes or no?

TSA

04-08-2019, 09:04 PM

I said if it's the law it's the law.

Should you cheerlead for secrecy and nondisclosure?

Yes or no?

Sorry, a yes or no question pending. Should AG Barr not follow the rules of law set in place after Clinton? Yes or no.

ChumpDumper

04-08-2019, 09:06 PM

Sorry, a yes or no question pending. Should AG Barr not follow the rules of law set in place after Clinton? Yes or no.If it's the law, sure.

I have the answer for my question.

You are a cheerleader for secrecy and nondisclosure when it comes to Trump.

You will support Trump forever in any situation.

You're a shill.

TSA

04-08-2019, 09:08 PM

poor fella couldn’t even muster up the courage to say yes the Attorney General should follow the law :rollin

Pavlov

04-08-2019, 09:10 PM

poor fella couldn’t even muster up the courage to say yes the Attorney General should follow the law :rollin:rollin poor fella can't understand the word "sure"

ChumpDumper

04-08-2019, 09:11 PM

Oh, sorry.

:rollin poor fella can't understand the word "sure"

Why do you hate openness and disclosure now?

Muh conditions incoming.

TSA

04-08-2019, 09:15 PM

Oh, sorry.

:rollin poor fella can't understand the word "sure"

Why do you hate openness and disclosure now?

Muh conditions incoming.:lol good dog

I never claimed to hate openness and disclosure that was just a false narrative you attempted to cook up. I’m just enjoying watching the left cry about procedures put in place after crying about what happened to Clinton.

Pavlov

04-08-2019, 09:19 PM

:lol good dog

I never claimed to hate openness and disclosure that was just a false narrative you attempted to cook up. I’m just enjoying watching the left cry about procedures put in place after crying about what happened to Clinton.So you hate openness and disclosure for anything having to do with Trump.

:lol little cunt

koriwhat

04-08-2019, 09:34 PM

What a cluless take. Trump is a known shithead in New York. There were stories written in the papers years before he decided to even run for president.

Trump conned the crackheads like yourself because you're easy pickings.

Lmao revisionists like you are nothing short of bs.

Pavlov

04-08-2019, 09:35 PM

Lmao revisionists like you are nothing short of bs.:lol it's not revisionist when that is actually what happened back then.

koriwhat

04-08-2019, 09:35 PM

He was celebrated? My god man just suck his dick already, you are smitten

Truth slaps you in the face and you shrivel up. Too funny!

Movies, tv, rap songs and other genres, etc... keep pretending though!

koriwhat

04-08-2019, 09:37 PM

:lol it's not revisionist when that is actually what happened back then.

Wgaf what contractors and the like have to say... movies, tv, books, rap, etc... keep dismissing reality you fruitcake.

ChumpDumper

04-08-2019, 09:39 PM

Wgaf what contractors and the like have to say... movies, tv, books, rap, etc... keep dismissing reality you fruitcake.Notoriety isn't the same as celebration.

He's been a divisive figure his entire public life.

Sorry.

AaronY

04-08-2019, 09:41 PM

https://imgflip.com/i/2y3q25
lol of course not... its actually a trend i've noticed from my conservative friends on facebook. they take stock photos of celebrities that they look up to and then write in their own quote about libs and snowflakes. i've seen it over pictures of clint eastwood, sam elliott, morgan freeman (in a thikning pose), tyler durden (not brad pitt generally, only as that role). its pretty funny tbh

https://i.imgflip.com/2y3q25.jpg
https://imgflip.com/i/2y3q25https://imgflip.com/i/2y3q25

Spurs Homer

04-08-2019, 10:20 PM

Should AG Barr not follow the rules of law set in place after Clinton? Yes or no.

Barr can do whatever he wants right now -

it is when this goes to a court that Barr will have to get the fuck out of the way and he will then be unable to continue to protect the criminal in chief.

You can also protect the traitors all you want - the

"rule of law"

is what will eventually expose all this criminality.

Has Trump denounced Russia yet?

Yes or NO?

koriwhat

04-08-2019, 10:24 PM

Notoriety isn't the same as celebration.

He's been a divisive figure his entire public life.

Sorry.

Revisionism strikes again!

koriwhat

04-08-2019, 10:25 PM

Barr can do whatever he wants right now -

it is when this goes to a court that Barr will have to get the fuck out of the way and he will then be unable to continue to protect the criminal in chief.

You can also protect the traitors all you want - the

"rule of law"

is what will eventually expose all this criminality.

Has Trump denounced Russia yet?

Yes or NO?

Lmao you're unhinged!

Spurs Homer

04-08-2019, 10:29 PM

Lmao you're unhinged!

Yes or No -

has trump denounced Russia?

If he has been exonerated as he falsely states - then he is vouching for the Mueller report.

If the Mueller report (according to Trump) exonerates him -

the Mueller report also confirms that Russia attacked the USA (according to Barr)

then why has he not denounced Russia for attacking the USA?

Because he is still working for Russia.

Piece of shit traitor.

ChumpDumper

04-08-2019, 10:33 PM

Revisionism strikes again!Guess the year.

http://ichef.bbci.co.uk/news/976/cpsprodpb/C6A1/production/_92994805__88576149_shortfingered.jpg

boutons_deux

04-08-2019, 10:57 PM

https://images.dailykos.com/images/660997/story_image/1432ckCOMIC-lil-william-barr.png?1554298277

djohn2oo8

04-09-2019, 08:21 AM

1115574596625993729

:lmao

djohn2oo8

04-09-2019, 08:24 AM

Normal move for someone “exonerated”

Spurs Homer

04-09-2019, 08:29 AM

Normal move for someone “exonerated”

He will denounce Russia's attack any minute now...

OJ will capture the "killers" any minute now...

:lol:lol

Chucho

04-09-2019, 08:29 AM

Normal move for someone “exonerated”

Kinda like hiding from a message board because you were afraid to look stupid is "normal".

Spurs Homer

04-09-2019, 08:36 AM

Kinda like hiding from a message board because you were afraid to look stupid is "normal".

Serious questions;

Do you believe Trump has acted honorably and has held the interest of the USA at all times?
Do you believe Trump has accepted any money from any foreign gov't?
Do you believe it is ok to lie to the American people daily when you are the (fraudulent) President?

TSA

04-09-2019, 12:23 PM

Normal move for someone “exonerated”

What's the normal move for a broke bitch welcher to make after losing a bet?

koriwhat

04-09-2019, 05:46 PM

Yes or No -

has trump denounced Russia?

If he has been exonerated as he falsely states - then he is vouching for the Mueller report.

If the Mueller report (according to Trump) exonerates him -

the Mueller report also confirms that Russia attacked the USA (according to Barr)

then why has he not denounced Russia for attacking the USA?

Because he is still working for Russia.

Piece of shit traitor.

Fuck your yes' and no's pavLite! You're a fuck8ng loon who warrants no more of my time.

koriwhat

04-09-2019, 05:50 PM

Guess the year.

http://ichef.bbci.co.uk/news/976/cpsprodpb/C6A1/production/_92994805__88576149_shortfingered.jpg

Why do you need 2 accounts here ya bitch? 2 face just like in real life.

Spurs Homer

04-09-2019, 06:05 PM

Fuck your yes' and no's pavLite! You're a fuck8ng loon who warrants no more of my time.

translation: koritwat is pavlovs bitch

got it!

Nbadan

04-10-2019, 01:28 AM

Barr Dances Around Question When Asked If WH Has Seen Mueller Report
Source: Talking Points Memo
By Kate Riga
April 9, 2019 10:22 am

Attorney General William Barr performed some verbal contortions Tuesday when asked if the White House has seen Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s report.

“I said what I am going to say about the report today. I have issued three letters about it,” Barr said when asked at a House hearing whether the White House had been briefed on the report beyond Barr’s letters. “And I was willing to discuss the historic information of how the report came to me and my decision on Sunday. But, I have already laid out the process that is going forward to release these reports.”

“I’m not going to say anything more about it until the report is out and everyone has a chance to look at it,” he added during his testimony in front of a House Appropriations subcommittee.

Read more: https://talkingpointsmemo.com/muckraker/barr-will-not-answer-question-white-house-seen-mueller-report