Mueller Delivers Report on Russia Investigation to Attorney General

[johnsmith]

Revisionism strikes again!

You’re not very good at this.

[boutons_deux]

Redaction of Mueller Report Halted as Barr Passes Out from Sharpie Fumes

https://g8fip1kplyr33r3krz5b97d1-wpengine.netdna-ssl.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/GettyImages-969762766-714x476.jpg

WASHINGTON —The redaction of the Mueller report stalled on Monday after the Attorney General, William Barr, passed out from inhaling fumes from multiple Sharpie markers.

Barr, who

had been working around the clock to redact the report before its release,

reportedly

lost consciousness

while trying to black out a seventy-four-page section

detailing Donald Trump, Jr.,’s contacts with more than three dozen Russian individuals.

“You cannot use that many Sharpies, for hours on end, without proper ventilation,” a Justice Department staffer, speaking on condition of anonymity, said.

“This was a disaster waiting to happen.”

The insentient Barr was rushed to Walter Reed medical center, where

a grim-faced hospital spokesperson described his condition as “Ben Carson–like.” :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol

At the White House, the press secretary, Sarah Huckabee Sanders, offered a more upbeat assessment.

“We expect Attorney General Barr to make a swift and full recovery, so that he can get to work on the President’s taxes,” she said.



https://www.newyorker.com/humor/borowitz-report/redaction-of-mueller-report-halted-as-barr-passes-out-from-sharpie-fumes (https://www.newyorker.com/humor/borowitz-report/redaction-of-mueller-report-halted-as-barr-passes-out-from-sharpie-fumes)

[DarrinS]

Crossfire Hurricane

https://media1.tenor.com/images/570cd349309fa0abd08f4dd562040765/tenor.gif

[spurraider21]

more like... BACKfire hurricane

amirite?

[Pavlov]

Darrin all in on the DEEP STATE conspiracy theory.

[TSA]

Barr just backtracked his "i think there was spying"

now he says he said:

I said I had "concern" that unauthorized surveillance might have occurred.

Won't matter -

the whacko rt wing will spin and lose their shit in...5...4.....3.....

The only one losing their shit is you and it happens daily. You should take a cue from djohn2oo8 and go into hiding to save yourself from further embarrassment.

[Spurs Homer]

The only one losing their shit is you and it happens daily. You should take a cue from djohn2oo8 (https://www.spurstalk.com/forums/member.php?u=14870) and go into hiding to save yourself from further embarrassment.

has trump denounced the enemy that attacked our 2016 election?

yes or no?

run away from the question again like a bitch in 5...4...3...

[DarrinS]

Lol

1116004579114721282

[TSA]

has trump denounced the enemy that attacked our 2016 election?

yes or no?

run away from the question again like a bitch in 5...4...3...

I don't know and don't care. It doesn't matter if he publicly denounces Russia, his actions against Russia speaks volumes. You'll ignore this like you always do.

2018

Nov 26
Statements –
In response to dangerous escalation in the Kerch Strait

Secretary of State Mike Pompeo and U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations Nikki Haley condemned Russia’s decision to intercept, fire on, and seize three Ukrainian navy vessels in the Black Sea.
Oct 19
Indictments –
In response to attempted interference in U.S. political system

A Russian woman was charged for her alleged role in a conspiracy to interfere in the U.S. political system, including the 2018 midterm election.
Oct 4
Indictments –
In response to malicious cyber-related activities

7 officers of the Russian military intelligence service (GRU) were charged for their involvement in hacking Olympic athletes, anti-doping organizations, and chemical weapons monitors.
Sep 20
Sanctions –
In response to malicious activities

33 Russian individuals and entities were sanctioned for their role in U.S. election interference and their involvement in supporting military operations in Syria and Ukraine. A Chinese entity and its director were also sanctioned for purchasing jet fighters and missiles from Russia.
Sep 12
Executive Order –
Imposing sanctions for election interference

President Trump signed an executive order imposing sanctions on any nation or individual who authorizes, directs, or sponsors meddling operations in U.S. elections. The order would allow for the freezing of assets and the limiting of foreign access to U.S. financial institutions, as well as a cutoff of U.S. investment in sanctioned companies.
Sep 6
Statement –
In response to Salisbury attack

The United States issued a joint statement with France, Germany, Canada, and the United Kingdom, reiterating its outrage at the use of a chemical nerve agent in Salisbury and expressing full confidence in the British assessment that the suspects were officers of the Russian military intelligence service (GRU).
Aug 21
Sanctions –
In response to malicious cyber-related activities

2 Russian individuals, a Russian company, and a Slovakian company were sanctioned for helping another Russian company avoid sanctions over the country’s malicious cyber-related activities.
Aug 21
Testimony –
Assistant Secretary of State A. Wess Mitchell before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee
Aug 8
Sanctions –
In response to Salisbury attack

The U.S. administration announced it would restrict remaining sources of foreign assistance and arms sales to Russia, and deny U.S. credit to Russia, including through the Export-Import Bank. Restrictions would also prohibit the export of security-sensitive goods and technology.
Jul 25
Testimony –
Secretary of State Mike Pompeo before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee
Jul 25
Declaration –
Secretary of State Mike Pompeo issues Crimea Declaration

Secretary of State Mike Pompeo announced a formal policy reaffirming the U.S. rejection of Russia’s annexation of Crimea. The announcement was released an hour before his scheduled testimony to the Senate Foreign Relations Committee.
Jul 16
Meeting –
Trump-Putin Summit in Helsinki, Finland
Jul 13
Indictments –
In response to malicious cyber-related activities

12 Russian intelligence officers were sanctioned for their involvement in hacking the Democratic National Committee and the Clinton presidential campaign.
Jul 11-12
Meeting –
NATO Summit in Brussels, Belgium
Jun 11
Sanctions –
In response to malicious cyber-related activities

5 Russian entities and 3 individuals – all closely linked to Russia’s Federal Security Service (FSB) – were sanctioned.
Apr 6
Sanctions –
In response to worldwide malign activity

7 Russian oligarchs and the companies they own or control, 17 senior Russian government officials, and a state-owned Russian weapons trading company (and a bank it owns) were sanctioned for their roles in advancing Russia’s malign activities – including the continued occupation of Crimea, engaging in cyberattacks, and supporting Assad’s regime.
Mar 26
Expulsions –
Russian intelligence officers in Washington and Seattle

48 Russian intelligence officers from the Russian embassy in Washington were expelled, and the Russian consulate in Seattle was ordered to close, in response to the Skripal poisoning in the United Kingdom.
Mar 25
Expulsions –
Russian intelligence officers in New York

12 Russian intelligence officers from the Russian Mission to the United Nations in New York were expelled for actions deemed to be abuses of their privilege of residence.
Mar 15
Sanctions –
In response to election meddling and cyberattacks

5 Russian entities and 19 individuals were sanctioned for conducting a series of cyberattacks and interfering in the 2016 U.S. elections.
Mar 15
Alert –
In response to Russian government cyber activity

The Department of Homeland Security and FBI issued a joint Technical Alert on Russian government actions targeting U.S. government entities, as well as organizations in the energy, nuclear, commercial facilities, water, aviation, and critical manufacturing sectors.
Mar 15
Statement –
In response to Salisbury attack

The United States issued a joint statement with France, Germany, and the United Kingdom strongly condemning the Salisbury nerve agent attack and suggesting Russia was responsible for it.
Mar 14
Statement –
In response to Salisbury attack

The U.S. administration issued a statement expressing its solidarity to the United Kingdom over the nerve agent attack in Salisbury, and sharing its assessment that Russia was responsible for it.
Mar 4
Statement –
In response to Russian and Syrian regime attacks on Eastern Gouta, Syria

The U.S. administration condemned the military offensive that the Assad regime, backed by Russia and Iran, had been conducting in Syria’s Eastern Ghouta region.
Mar 4
Poisoning –
Sergei and Yulia Skripal in Salisbury, England
Feb 16
Indictments –
In response to election meddling and cyberattacks

3 Russian entities and 13 individuals were indicted for conducting information operations to influence the 2016 U.S. elections.
Feb 15
Statement –
In response to “NotPetya”

The U.S. administration condemned the Russian military for launching a destructive cyberattack in June 2017, also known as “NotPetya.”
Feb 13
Statement –
Proposing sanctions on Latvian bank involved in illicit Russian-related activity

The Department of the Treasury’s Financial Crimes Enforcement Network proposed a new rule to ban ABLV Bank AS, Latvia’s third-biggest bank, for its involvement in illicit Russia-related activity.
Feb 7
Military Action –
In response to attack on U.S.-held base in Deir Ezzor, Syria

U.S. troops killed hundreds of Syrian forces backed by Russian mercenaries (as well as Russian private military contractors). The American bombing was launched in response to a surprise attack on a U.S.-held base in the oil-rich Deir Ezzor region in Syria.
Jan 29
Release –
Russian ‘Oligarch list’

The Department of the Treasury released a list of the most significant senior foreign political figures and oligarchs in the Russian Federation that could potentially be at risk of sanctions (114 senior political figures close to Russian President Putin and 96 oligarchs with a net worth of $1 billion or more).
Jan 26
Sanctions –
In response to Ukraine conflict

21 individuals and 9 entities were sanctioned in connection with the conflict in Ukraine and Russia’s occupation of Crimea.
Jan 19
Release –
National Defense Strategy

The Department of Defense released its National Defense Strategy, identifying Russia and China as strategic competitors to the United States.

2017

Dec 22
Announcement –
Provision of lethal weapons to Ukraine

The U.S. administration approved a plan to provide Ukraine with enhanced defensive capabilities to help it fight off Russia-backed separatists.
Dec 20
Sanctions –
Global Magnitsky Act

52 people and entities from Russia, Ukraine, Uzbekistan, and elsewhere were sanctioned for alleged human rights violations and corruption.
Dec 19
Export restrictions –
In response to INF Treaty violation

The Department of Commerce announced new licensing and export restrictions on Russian companies Novator and Titan-Barrikady over production of a cruise missile prohibited by the Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces Treaty (INF).
Dec 18
Release –
National Security Strategy

The White House released its National Security Strategy, identifying Russia and China as adversarial to the United States.
Nov 10-11
Meeting –
APEC Economic Leaders’ Summit in Da Nang, Vietnam
Oct 27
Release –
Guidance on CAATSA Section 231(d)

The Department of State issued public guidance on the implementation of Section 231 of the Countering America’s Adversaries Through Sanctions Act of 2017 (CAATSA). The guidance specified 39 entities that the Department of State determined are part of – or are operating on behalf of – the Russian defense or intelligence sectors.
Sep 13
Ban –
Government use of Kaspersky Labs software

The U.S. administration banned the use of Kaspersky Labs software on government computers due to Kaspersky’s ties to Russian intelligence services.
Aug 2
Legislation –
President Trump signs Russia sanctions bill into law (CAATSA)

President Trump signed into law the Countering America’s Adversaries Through Sanctions act (CAATSA), enacting new sanctions on Russia, Iran, and North Korea.
Jul 7-8
Meeting –
G-20 Summit in Hamburg, Germany
May 26-27
Meeting –
G-7 Summit in Sicily, Italy
May 24-25
Meeting –
NATO Summit in Brussels, Belgium
Mar 15
Indictments –
In response to 2014 Yahoo hack

Three Russian individuals were charged for the 2014 Yahoo hack, including two officers of the Russian Federal Security Service (FSB).

https://www.brookings.edu/blog/order-from-chaos/2018/09/25/on-the-record-the-u-s-administrations-actions-on-russia/

Trump deploys TANKS to Estonia as NATO builds up HUGE army on Russian border - Express, Feb 7 2017

Trump launches attack on Syria with 59 Tomahawk missiles - CNBC, Apr 6 2017

U.S. Rejects Exxon Mobil Bid for Waiver on Russia Sanctions - NYT, Apr 21 2017

Trump to promote U.S. natgas exports in Russia's backyard - Reuters, Jul 3 2017

Trump Urges East Europe to Loosen Russia's Grip With U.S. Gas - Bloomberg, Jul 6 2017

Trump signs bill approving new sanctions against Russia - CNN, Aug 3, 2017

Justice Dept Asks Russia's RT to Register as Foreign Agent - Newsmax, Sep 13 2017

US 'to restrict Russian military flights over America' - Independent, Sep 26 2017

Trump signs into law U.S. government ban on Kaspersky Lab software - Reuters, Dec 12 2017

Trump gives green light to selling lethal arms to Ukraine - The Hill, Dec 20 2017

U.S. Punishes Chechen Leader in New Sanctions Against Russians - NYT, Dec 20 2017

Sputnik Partner 'Required To Register' Under U.S. Foreign-Agent Law - RFERL, Jan 10 2018

Trump says Russia is helping North Korea avoid sanctions - CBSNews, Jan 17 2018

Trump's 'energy dominance' strategy is undercutting Russia's influence and business in Europe - Reuters, Feb 9 2018

Trump looks to deter Russia, China with $686B ask for Pentagon - The Hill, Feb 12 2018

American General In Syria Confirms US Forces Killed Hundreds Of Russians In Massive Battle - The Drive, Mar 16 2018

Trump orders expulsion of 60 Russian diplomats, closure of Seattle consulate - CBS, Mar 26 2018

Trump vows periodical dispatch of US troops to Baltic states, step up air defense - Lithuania Tribune, Apr 3 2018

Trump opposes Nord Stream II, questions Germany - AA, Apr 4 2018

Trump just hit Russian oligarchs with the most aggressive sanctions yet - Vice, Apr 6 2018

Trump orders missile strike on Syria military targets - CBSNews, Apr 9 2018

Aluminum Stocks Jump As Trump Sanctions Target Putin Pal - Investors, Apr 9 2018

Russia ‘deeply disappointed’ at Trump’s withdrawal from Iran deal - Times of Israel, May 9 2018

Trump to NATO allies: Raise military spending to 4 percent of GDP - AlJazeerah, Jul 12 2018

Trump says U.S. ties to NATO ‘very strong’ - Politico, Jul 12 2018

U.S. to sanction Turkey for receiving S-400 missiles - Ahval, Jul 27 2018

Trump administration to hit Russia with new sanctions for Skripal poisoning - NBC News Aug 8 2018

Space Force Is Trump’s Answer to New Russian and Chinese Weapons - FP, Aug 10 2018

US Sanctions Chinese Entity Over Purchase of Russian Fighters, S-400s – Treasury - Sputnik, Sep 20 2018

Trump hints at punitive action against India for buying S-400 from Russia - India Today, Oct 11 2018

Trump Agrees to Boost Pentagon's Budget to $750 Bln in 2019 - Reports - Sputnik, Oct 12 2018

Trump says US will withdraw from nuclear arms treaty with Russia - Guardian, Oct 21 2018

Haley Condemns ‘Outrageous’ Russian Firing on Ukrainian Ships - Bloomberg, Nov 26 2018

2 Trump Moves Cost This Russian-American CEO $2.3B - Forbes, Jan 14 2019

https://www.moonofalabama.org/2019/01/putin-asks-and-trump-delivers-here-is-a-list-of-all-the-good-things-trump-did-for-russia.html

[Spurs Homer]

I don't know and don't care. It doesn't matter if he publicly denounces Russia, his actions against Russia speaks volumes. You'll ignore this like you always do.

2018

Nov 26
Statements –
In response to dangerous escalation in the Kerch Strait

Secretary of State Mike Pompeo and U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations Nikki Haley condemned Russia’s decision to intercept, fire on, and seize three Ukrainian navy vessels in the Black Sea.
Oct 19
Indictments –
In response to attempted interference in U.S. political system

A Russian woman was charged for her alleged role in a conspiracy to interfere in the U.S. political system, including the 2018 midterm election.
Oct 4
Indictments –
In response to malicious cyber-related activities

7 officers of the Russian military intelligence service (GRU) were charged for their involvement in hacking Olympic athletes, anti-doping organizations, and chemical weapons monitors.
Sep 20
Sanctions –
In response to malicious activities

33 Russian individuals and entities were sanctioned for their role in U.S. election interference and their involvement in supporting military operations in Syria and Ukraine. A Chinese entity and its director were also sanctioned for purchasing jet fighters and missiles from Russia.
Sep 12
Executive Order –
Imposing sanctions for election interference

President Trump signed an executive order imposing sanctions on any nation or individual who authorizes, directs, or sponsors meddling operations in U.S. elections. The order would allow for the freezing of assets and the limiting of foreign access to U.S. financial institutions, as well as a cutoff of U.S. investment in sanctioned companies.
Sep 6
Statement –
In response to Salisbury attack

The United States issued a joint statement with France, Germany, Canada, and the United Kingdom, reiterating its outrage at the use of a chemical nerve agent in Salisbury and expressing full confidence in the British assessment that the suspects were officers of the Russian military intelligence service (GRU).
Aug 21
Sanctions –
In response to malicious cyber-related activities

2 Russian individuals, a Russian company, and a Slovakian company were sanctioned for helping another Russian company avoid sanctions over the country’s malicious cyber-related activities.
Aug 21
Testimony –
Assistant Secretary of State A. Wess Mitchell before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee
Aug 8
Sanctions –
In response to Salisbury attack

The U.S. administration announced it would restrict remaining sources of foreign assistance and arms sales to Russia, and deny U.S. credit to Russia, including through the Export-Import Bank. Restrictions would also prohibit the export of security-sensitive goods and technology.
Jul 25
Testimony –
Secretary of State Mike Pompeo before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee
Jul 25
Declaration –
Secretary of State Mike Pompeo issues Crimea Declaration

Secretary of State Mike Pompeo announced a formal policy reaffirming the U.S. rejection of Russia’s annexation of Crimea. The announcement was released an hour before his scheduled testimony to the Senate Foreign Relations Committee.
Jul 16
Meeting –
Trump-Putin Summit in Helsinki, Finland
Jul 13
Indictments –
In response to malicious cyber-related activities

12 Russian intelligence officers were sanctioned for their involvement in hacking the Democratic National Committee and the Clinton presidential campaign.
Jul 11-12
Meeting –
NATO Summit in Brussels, Belgium
Jun 11
Sanctions –
In response to malicious cyber-related activities

5 Russian entities and 3 individuals – all closely linked to Russia’s Federal Security Service (FSB) – were sanctioned.
Apr 6
Sanctions –
In response to worldwide malign activity

7 Russian oligarchs and the companies they own or control, 17 senior Russian government officials, and a state-owned Russian weapons trading company (and a bank it owns) were sanctioned for their roles in advancing Russia’s malign activities – including the continued occupation of Crimea, engaging in cyberattacks, and supporting Assad’s regime.
Mar 26
Expulsions –
Russian intelligence officers in Washington and Seattle

48 Russian intelligence officers from the Russian embassy in Washington were expelled, and the Russian consulate in Seattle was ordered to close, in response to the Skripal poisoning in the United Kingdom.
Mar 25
Expulsions –
Russian intelligence officers in New York

12 Russian intelligence officers from the Russian Mission to the United Nations in New York were expelled for actions deemed to be abuses of their privilege of residence.
Mar 15
Sanctions –
In response to election meddling and cyberattacks

5 Russian entities and 19 individuals were sanctioned for conducting a series of cyberattacks and interfering in the 2016 U.S. elections.
Mar 15
Alert –
In response to Russian government cyber activity

The Department of Homeland Security and FBI issued a joint Technical Alert on Russian government actions targeting U.S. government entities, as well as organizations in the energy, nuclear, commercial facilities, water, aviation, and critical manufacturing sectors.
Mar 15
Statement –
In response to Salisbury attack

The United States issued a joint statement with France, Germany, and the United Kingdom strongly condemning the Salisbury nerve agent attack and suggesting Russia was responsible for it.
Mar 14
Statement –
In response to Salisbury attack

The U.S. administration issued a statement expressing its solidarity to the United Kingdom over the nerve agent attack in Salisbury, and sharing its assessment that Russia was responsible for it.
Mar 4
Statement –
In response to Russian and Syrian regime attacks on Eastern Gouta, Syria

The U.S. administration condemned the military offensive that the Assad regime, backed by Russia and Iran, had been conducting in Syria’s Eastern Ghouta region.
Mar 4
Poisoning –
Sergei and Yulia Skripal in Salisbury, England
Feb 16
Indictments –
In response to election meddling and cyberattacks

3 Russian entities and 13 individuals were indicted for conducting information operations to influence the 2016 U.S. elections.
Feb 15
Statement –
In response to “NotPetya”

The U.S. administration condemned the Russian military for launching a destructive cyberattack in June 2017, also known as “NotPetya.”
Feb 13
Statement –
Proposing sanctions on Latvian bank involved in illicit Russian-related activity

The Department of the Treasury’s Financial Crimes Enforcement Network proposed a new rule to ban ABLV Bank AS, Latvia’s third-biggest bank, for its involvement in illicit Russia-related activity.
Feb 7
Military Action –
In response to attack on U.S.-held base in Deir Ezzor, Syria

U.S. troops killed hundreds of Syrian forces backed by Russian mercenaries (as well as Russian private military contractors). The American bombing was launched in response to a surprise attack on a U.S.-held base in the oil-rich Deir Ezzor region in Syria.
Jan 29
Release –
Russian ‘Oligarch list’

The Department of the Treasury released a list of the most significant senior foreign political figures and oligarchs in the Russian Federation that could potentially be at risk of sanctions (114 senior political figures close to Russian President Putin and 96 oligarchs with a net worth of $1 billion or more).
Jan 26
Sanctions –
In response to Ukraine conflict

21 individuals and 9 entities were sanctioned in connection with the conflict in Ukraine and Russia’s occupation of Crimea.
Jan 19
Release –
National Defense Strategy

The Department of Defense released its National Defense Strategy, identifying Russia and China as strategic competitors to the United States.

2017

Dec 22
Announcement –
Provision of lethal weapons to Ukraine

The U.S. administration approved a plan to provide Ukraine with enhanced defensive capabilities to help it fight off Russia-backed separatists.
Dec 20
Sanctions –
Global Magnitsky Act

52 people and entities from Russia, Ukraine, Uzbekistan, and elsewhere were sanctioned for alleged human rights violations and corruption.
Dec 19
Export restrictions –
In response to INF Treaty violation

The Department of Commerce announced new licensing and export restrictions on Russian companies Novator and Titan-Barrikady over production of a cruise missile prohibited by the Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces Treaty (INF).
Dec 18
Release –
National Security Strategy

The White House released its National Security Strategy, identifying Russia and China as adversarial to the United States.
Nov 10-11
Meeting –
APEC Economic Leaders’ Summit in Da Nang, Vietnam
Oct 27
Release –
Guidance on CAATSA Section 231(d)

The Department of State issued public guidance on the implementation of Section 231 of the Countering America’s Adversaries Through Sanctions Act of 2017 (CAATSA). The guidance specified 39 entities that the Department of State determined are part of – or are operating on behalf of – the Russian defense or intelligence sectors.
Sep 13
Ban –
Government use of Kaspersky Labs software

The U.S. administration banned the use of Kaspersky Labs software on government computers due to Kaspersky’s ties to Russian intelligence services.
Aug 2
Legislation –
President Trump signs Russia sanctions bill into law (CAATSA)

President Trump signed into law the Countering America’s Adversaries Through Sanctions act (CAATSA), enacting new sanctions on Russia, Iran, and North Korea.
Jul 7-8
Meeting –
G-20 Summit in Hamburg, Germany
May 26-27
Meeting –
G-7 Summit in Sicily, Italy
May 24-25
Meeting –
NATO Summit in Brussels, Belgium
Mar 15
Indictments –
In response to 2014 Yahoo hack

Three Russian individuals were charged for the 2014 Yahoo hack, including two officers of the Russian Federal Security Service (FSB).

https://www.brookings.edu/blog/order-from-chaos/2018/09/25/on-the-record-the-u-s-administrations-actions-on-russia/

Trump deploys TANKS to Estonia as NATO builds up HUGE army on Russian border - Express, Feb 7 2017

Trump launches attack on Syria with 59 Tomahawk missiles - CNBC, Apr 6 2017

U.S. Rejects Exxon Mobil Bid for Waiver on Russia Sanctions - NYT, Apr 21 2017

Trump to promote U.S. natgas exports in Russia's backyard - Reuters, Jul 3 2017

Trump Urges East Europe to Loosen Russia's Grip With U.S. Gas - Bloomberg, Jul 6 2017

Trump signs bill approving new sanctions against Russia - CNN, Aug 3, 2017

Justice Dept Asks Russia's RT to Register as Foreign Agent - Newsmax, Sep 13 2017

US 'to restrict Russian military flights over America' - Independent, Sep 26 2017

Trump signs into law U.S. government ban on Kaspersky Lab software - Reuters, Dec 12 2017

Trump gives green light to selling lethal arms to Ukraine - The Hill, Dec 20 2017

U.S. Punishes Chechen Leader in New Sanctions Against Russians - NYT, Dec 20 2017

Sputnik Partner 'Required To Register' Under U.S. Foreign-Agent Law - RFERL, Jan 10 2018

Trump says Russia is helping North Korea avoid sanctions - CBSNews, Jan 17 2018

Trump's 'energy dominance' strategy is undercutting Russia's influence and business in Europe - Reuters, Feb 9 2018

Trump looks to deter Russia, China with $686B ask for Pentagon - The Hill, Feb 12 2018

American General In Syria Confirms US Forces Killed Hundreds Of Russians In Massive Battle - The Drive, Mar 16 2018

Trump orders expulsion of 60 Russian diplomats, closure of Seattle consulate - CBS, Mar 26 2018

Trump vows periodical dispatch of US troops to Baltic states, step up air defense - Lithuania Tribune, Apr 3 2018

Trump opposes Nord Stream II, questions Germany - AA, Apr 4 2018

Trump just hit Russian oligarchs with the most aggressive sanctions yet - Vice, Apr 6 2018

Trump orders missile strike on Syria military targets - CBSNews, Apr 9 2018

Aluminum Stocks Jump As Trump Sanctions Target Putin Pal - Investors, Apr 9 2018

Russia ‘deeply disappointed’ at Trump’s withdrawal from Iran deal - Times of Israel, May 9 2018

Trump to NATO allies: Raise military spending to 4 percent of GDP - AlJazeerah, Jul 12 2018

Trump says U.S. ties to NATO ‘very strong’ - Politico, Jul 12 2018

U.S. to sanction Turkey for receiving S-400 missiles - Ahval, Jul 27 2018

Trump administration to hit Russia with new sanctions for Skripal poisoning - NBC News Aug 8 2018

Space Force Is Trump’s Answer to New Russian and Chinese Weapons - FP, Aug 10 2018

US Sanctions Chinese Entity Over Purchase of Russian Fighters, S-400s – Treasury - Sputnik, Sep 20 2018

Trump hints at punitive action against India for buying S-400 from Russia - India Today, Oct 11 2018

Trump Agrees to Boost Pentagon's Budget to $750 Bln in 2019 - Reports - Sputnik, Oct 12 2018

Trump says US will withdraw from nuclear arms treaty with Russia - Guardian, Oct 21 2018

Haley Condemns ‘Outrageous’ Russian Firing on Ukrainian Ships - Bloomberg, Nov 26 2018

2 Trump Moves Cost This Russian-American CEO $2.3B - Forbes, Jan 14 2019

https://www.moonofalabama.org/2019/01/putin-asks-and-trump-delivers-here-is-a-list-of-all-the-good-things-trump-did-for-russia.html


So - you are ok that Russia still owns trump and he is too compromised to


PERSONALLY

denounce them.

Thx!

[boutons_deux]

"his actions against Russia speaks volumes"

If Trash personally authorized, it was pro-forma ankle-biting.

But Trash probably would have all of it if he knew it was being done.

Why has Trash been lying and obstructing for 2 years?

why has Trash kept his chummy tete-a-tetes with Vlad hidden from his own staff?

Why did Jared try to set up an extra-governmental crypto-channel from WH to Moscow

Why did Trash lie about the hotel meeting with Russians?

why will Barr redact nearly everything about Trash, his mafiya and Russia?

[TSA]

So - you are ok that Russia still owns trump and he is too compromised to


PERSONALLY

denounce them.

Thx!

If Russia owned Trump as you claim, why has Russia taken no action against Trump and released the Kompromat you claim they have on him after all of the above actions were taken against Russia?

[Spurs Homer]

If Russia owned Trump as you claim, why has Russia taken no action against Trump and released the Kompromat you claim they have on him after all of the above actions were taken against Russia?


Why would they?

he is completing everything on putin’s wish list

why the fuck would they change anything when he is their slave?

fucking idiot

[TSA]

Why would they?

he is completing everything on putin’s wish list

why the fuck would they change anything when he is their slave?

fucking idiot

:lol List everything Trump is completing on Putin's wish list.

[Spurs Homer]

:lol List everything Trump is completing on Putin's wish list.

This isn't even EVERYTHING - and it isn't even a recent UPDATE -

FUCKING TRAITOR;


https://themoscowproject.org/reports/putins-payout-10-ways-trump-has-supported-putins-foreign-policy-agenda/

[TSA]

This isn't even EVERYTHING - and it isn't even a recent UPDATE -

FUCKING TRAITOR;


https://themoscowproject.org/reports/putins-payout-10-ways-trump-has-supported-putins-foreign-policy-agenda/

:lol the Moscow Project was founded by a bunch of David Brock minions still semen shielding for Clinton and pushing the debunked collusion conspiracy.

I had to stop reading from laughing too hard after this line "Instead, at every opportunity, Trump has embraced Putin and adopted positions that align perfectly with Russia’s foreign policy goals, often favoring the Kremlin over his own country."

[Spurs Homer]

:lol the Moscow Project was founded by a bunch of David Brock minions still semen shielding for Clinton and pushing the debunked collusion conspiracy.

I had to stop reading from laughing too hard after this line "Instead, at every opportunity, Trump has embraced Putin and adopted positions that align perfectly with Russia’s foreign policy goals, often favoring the Kremlin over his own country."

You saw the Helsinki video with your own eyes -

Question: Mr. Trump, the intelligence community unanimously concluded that russia attacked our elections (now the Mueller report confirms) - who do you believe - the USA or Russia/Putin?

Trump: "President Putin strongly and forcefully denies it - I have NO REASON to believe it would be Russia!"


Fucking idiot - you saw and heard this and it is available on video - for the world to see - and you are using that as your excuse...

hahahahaha!!!!

Just say you are a fucking russian already

[Reck]

Lol

1116004579114721282

A Trump stooge is saying what his bosses is telling him to say. Shocking!

Let's face it, sooner or later this Mueller report will get out. Now or when a Democratic president is in charge.

Matter of time only.

[TSA]

This isn't even EVERYTHING - and it isn't even a recent UPDATE -

FUCKING TRAITOR;


https://themoscowproject.org/reports/putins-payout-10-ways-trump-has-supported-putins-foreign-policy-agenda/

Even if we were to take this Clinton propaganda seriously how do you explain all of the actions taken against Russia? This list far outweighs the Moscow Project's 12 bullshit bullet points.

2018

Nov 26
Statements –
In response to dangerous escalation in the Kerch Strait

Secretary of State Mike Pompeo and U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations Nikki Haley condemned Russia’s decision to intercept, fire on, and seize three Ukrainian navy vessels in the Black Sea.
Oct 19
Indictments –
In response to attempted interference in U.S. political system

A Russian woman was charged for her alleged role in a conspiracy to interfere in the U.S. political system, including the 2018 midterm election.
Oct 4
Indictments –
In response to malicious cyber-related activities

7 officers of the Russian military intelligence service (GRU) were charged for their involvement in hacking Olympic athletes, anti-doping organizations, and chemical weapons monitors.
Sep 20
Sanctions –
In response to malicious activities

33 Russian individuals and entities were sanctioned for their role in U.S. election interference and their involvement in supporting military operations in Syria and Ukraine. A Chinese entity and its director were also sanctioned for purchasing jet fighters and missiles from Russia.
Sep 12
Executive Order –
Imposing sanctions for election interference

President Trump signed an executive order imposing sanctions on any nation or individual who authorizes, directs, or sponsors meddling operations in U.S. elections. The order would allow for the freezing of assets and the limiting of foreign access to U.S. financial institutions, as well as a cutoff of U.S. investment in sanctioned companies.
Sep 6
Statement –
In response to Salisbury attack

The United States issued a joint statement with France, Germany, Canada, and the United Kingdom, reiterating its outrage at the use of a chemical nerve agent in Salisbury and expressing full confidence in the British assessment that the suspects were officers of the Russian military intelligence service (GRU).
Aug 21
Sanctions –
In response to malicious cyber-related activities

2 Russian individuals, a Russian company, and a Slovakian company were sanctioned for helping another Russian company avoid sanctions over the country’s malicious cyber-related activities.
Aug 21
Testimony –
Assistant Secretary of State A. Wess Mitchell before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee
Aug 8
Sanctions –
In response to Salisbury attack

The U.S. administration announced it would restrict remaining sources of foreign assistance and arms sales to Russia, and deny U.S. credit to Russia, including through the Export-Import Bank. Restrictions would also prohibit the export of security-sensitive goods and technology.
Jul 25
Testimony –
Secretary of State Mike Pompeo before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee
Jul 25
Declaration –
Secretary of State Mike Pompeo issues Crimea Declaration

Secretary of State Mike Pompeo announced a formal policy reaffirming the U.S. rejection of Russia’s annexation of Crimea. The announcement was released an hour before his scheduled testimony to the Senate Foreign Relations Committee.
Jul 16
Meeting –
Trump-Putin Summit in Helsinki, Finland
Jul 13
Indictments –
In response to malicious cyber-related activities

12 Russian intelligence officers were sanctioned for their involvement in hacking the Democratic National Committee and the Clinton presidential campaign.
Jul 11-12
Meeting –
NATO Summit in Brussels, Belgium
Jun 11
Sanctions –
In response to malicious cyber-related activities

5 Russian entities and 3 individuals – all closely linked to Russia’s Federal Security Service (FSB) – were sanctioned.
Apr 6
Sanctions –
In response to worldwide malign activity

7 Russian oligarchs and the companies they own or control, 17 senior Russian government officials, and a state-owned Russian weapons trading company (and a bank it owns) were sanctioned for their roles in advancing Russia’s malign activities – including the continued occupation of Crimea, engaging in cyberattacks, and supporting Assad’s regime.
Mar 26
Expulsions –
Russian intelligence officers in Washington and Seattle

48 Russian intelligence officers from the Russian embassy in Washington were expelled, and the Russian consulate in Seattle was ordered to close, in response to the Skripal poisoning in the United Kingdom.
Mar 25
Expulsions –
Russian intelligence officers in New York

12 Russian intelligence officers from the Russian Mission to the United Nations in New York were expelled for actions deemed to be abuses of their privilege of residence.
Mar 15
Sanctions –
In response to election meddling and cyberattacks

5 Russian entities and 19 individuals were sanctioned for conducting a series of cyberattacks and interfering in the 2016 U.S. elections.
Mar 15
Alert –
In response to Russian government cyber activity

The Department of Homeland Security and FBI issued a joint Technical Alert on Russian government actions targeting U.S. government entities, as well as organizations in the energy, nuclear, commercial facilities, water, aviation, and critical manufacturing sectors.
Mar 15
Statement –
In response to Salisbury attack

The United States issued a joint statement with France, Germany, and the United Kingdom strongly condemning the Salisbury nerve agent attack and suggesting Russia was responsible for it.
Mar 14
Statement –
In response to Salisbury attack

The U.S. administration issued a statement expressing its solidarity to the United Kingdom over the nerve agent attack in Salisbury, and sharing its assessment that Russia was responsible for it.
Mar 4
Statement –
In response to Russian and Syrian regime attacks on Eastern Gouta, Syria

The U.S. administration condemned the military offensive that the Assad regime, backed by Russia and Iran, had been conducting in Syria’s Eastern Ghouta region.
Mar 4
Poisoning –
Sergei and Yulia Skripal in Salisbury, England
Feb 16
Indictments –
In response to election meddling and cyberattacks

3 Russian entities and 13 individuals were indicted for conducting information operations to influence the 2016 U.S. elections.
Feb 15
Statement –
In response to “NotPetya”

The U.S. administration condemned the Russian military for launching a destructive cyberattack in June 2017, also known as “NotPetya.”
Feb 13
Statement –
Proposing sanctions on Latvian bank involved in illicit Russian-related activity

The Department of the Treasury’s Financial Crimes Enforcement Network proposed a new rule to ban ABLV Bank AS, Latvia’s third-biggest bank, for its involvement in illicit Russia-related activity.
Feb 7
Military Action –
In response to attack on U.S.-held base in Deir Ezzor, Syria

U.S. troops killed hundreds of Syrian forces backed by Russian mercenaries (as well as Russian private military contractors). The American bombing was launched in response to a surprise attack on a U.S.-held base in the oil-rich Deir Ezzor region in Syria.
Jan 29
Release –
Russian ‘Oligarch list’

The Department of the Treasury released a list of the most significant senior foreign political figures and oligarchs in the Russian Federation that could potentially be at risk of sanctions (114 senior political figures close to Russian President Putin and 96 oligarchs with a net worth of $1 billion or more).
Jan 26
Sanctions –
In response to Ukraine conflict

21 individuals and 9 entities were sanctioned in connection with the conflict in Ukraine and Russia’s occupation of Crimea.
Jan 19
Release –
National Defense Strategy

The Department of Defense released its National Defense Strategy, identifying Russia and China as strategic competitors to the United States.

2017

Dec 22
Announcement –
Provision of lethal weapons to Ukraine

The U.S. administration approved a plan to provide Ukraine with enhanced defensive capabilities to help it fight off Russia-backed separatists.
Dec 20
Sanctions –
Global Magnitsky Act

52 people and entities from Russia, Ukraine, Uzbekistan, and elsewhere were sanctioned for alleged human rights violations and corruption.
Dec 19
Export restrictions –
In response to INF Treaty violation

The Department of Commerce announced new licensing and export restrictions on Russian companies Novator and Titan-Barrikady over production of a cruise missile prohibited by the Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces Treaty (INF).
Dec 18
Release –
National Security Strategy

The White House released its National Security Strategy, identifying Russia and China as adversarial to the United States.
Nov 10-11
Meeting –
APEC Economic Leaders’ Summit in Da Nang, Vietnam
Oct 27
Release –
Guidance on CAATSA Section 231(d)

The Department of State issued public guidance on the implementation of Section 231 of the Countering America’s Adversaries Through Sanctions Act of 2017 (CAATSA). The guidance specified 39 entities that the Department of State determined are part of – or are operating on behalf of – the Russian defense or intelligence sectors.
Sep 13
Ban –
Government use of Kaspersky Labs software

The U.S. administration banned the use of Kaspersky Labs software on government computers due to Kaspersky’s ties to Russian intelligence services.
Aug 2
Legislation –
President Trump signs Russia sanctions bill into law (CAATSA)

President Trump signed into law the Countering America’s Adversaries Through Sanctions act (CAATSA), enacting new sanctions on Russia, Iran, and North Korea.
Jul 7-8
Meeting –
G-20 Summit in Hamburg, Germany
May 26-27
Meeting –
G-7 Summit in Sicily, Italy
May 24-25
Meeting –
NATO Summit in Brussels, Belgium
Mar 15
Indictments –
In response to 2014 Yahoo hack

Three Russian individuals were charged for the 2014 Yahoo hack, including two officers of the Russian Federal Security Service (FSB).

https://www.brookings.edu/blog/order...ons-on-russia/

Trump deploys TANKS to Estonia as NATO builds up HUGE army on Russian border - Express, Feb 7 2017

Trump launches attack on Syria with 59 Tomahawk missiles - CNBC, Apr 6 2017

U.S. Rejects Exxon Mobil Bid for Waiver on Russia Sanctions - NYT, Apr 21 2017

Trump to promote U.S. natgas exports in Russia's backyard - Reuters, Jul 3 2017

Trump Urges East Europe to Loosen Russia's Grip With U.S. Gas - Bloomberg, Jul 6 2017

Trump signs bill approving new sanctions against Russia - CNN, Aug 3, 2017

Justice Dept Asks Russia's RT to Register as Foreign Agent - Newsmax, Sep 13 2017

US 'to restrict Russian military flights over America' - Independent, Sep 26 2017

Trump signs into law U.S. government ban on Kaspersky Lab software - Reuters, Dec 12 2017

Trump gives green light to selling lethal arms to Ukraine - The Hill, Dec 20 2017

U.S. Punishes Chechen Leader in New Sanctions Against Russians - NYT, Dec 20 2017

Sputnik Partner 'Required To Register' Under U.S. Foreign-Agent Law - RFERL, Jan 10 2018

Trump says Russia is helping North Korea avoid sanctions - CBSNews, Jan 17 2018

Trump's 'energy dominance' strategy is undercutting Russia's influence and business in Europe - Reuters, Feb 9 2018

Trump looks to deter Russia, China with $686B ask for Pentagon - The Hill, Feb 12 2018

American General In Syria Confirms US Forces Killed Hundreds Of Russians In Massive Battle - The Drive, Mar 16 2018

Trump orders expulsion of 60 Russian diplomats, closure of Seattle consulate - CBS, Mar 26 2018

Trump vows periodical dispatch of US troops to Baltic states, step up air defense - Lithuania Tribune, Apr 3 2018

Trump opposes Nord Stream II, questions Germany - AA, Apr 4 2018

Trump just hit Russian oligarchs with the most aggressive sanctions yet - Vice, Apr 6 2018

Trump orders missile strike on Syria military targets - CBSNews, Apr 9 2018

Aluminum Stocks Jump As Trump Sanctions Target Putin Pal - Investors, Apr 9 2018

Russia ‘deeply disappointed’ at Trump’s withdrawal from Iran deal - Times of Israel, May 9 2018

Trump to NATO allies: Raise military spending to 4 percent of GDP - AlJazeerah, Jul 12 2018

Trump says U.S. ties to NATO ‘very strong’ - Politico, Jul 12 2018

U.S. to sanction Turkey for receiving S-400 missiles - Ahval, Jul 27 2018

Trump administration to hit Russia with new sanctions for Skripal poisoning - NBC News Aug 8 2018

Space Force Is Trump’s Answer to New Russian and Chinese Weapons - FP, Aug 10 2018

US Sanctions Chinese Entity Over Purchase of Russian Fighters, S-400s – Treasury - Sputnik, Sep 20 2018

Trump hints at punitive action against India for buying S-400 from Russia - India Today, Oct 11 2018

Trump Agrees to Boost Pentagon's Budget to $750 Bln in 2019 - Reports - Sputnik, Oct 12 2018

Trump says US will withdraw from nuclear arms treaty with Russia - Guardian, Oct 21 2018

Haley Condemns ‘Outrageous’ Russian Firing on Ukrainian Ships - Bloomberg, Nov 26 2018

2 Trump Moves Cost This Russian-American CEO $2.3B - Forbes, Jan 14 2019

https://www.moonofalabama.org/2019/0...or-russia.html

[boutons_deux]

If Russia owned Trump as you claim, why has Russia taken no action against Trump and released the Kompromat you claim they have on him after all of the above actions were taken against Russia?

because Trash is performing compliantly with Vlad's plans

[TSA]

because Trash is performing compliantly with Vlad's plans

Did Vlad plan for increased contributions to NATO because of Trump?

“After years of reducing defense budgets, all allies have stopped the cuts and all allies have increased their defense spending. Before they were cutting billions, now they are adding billions,” he said.

Stoltenberg told lawmakers that European allies and Canada have spent an additional $41 billion in the last two years and that by the end of 2020, that figure will rise to $100 billion.”

Did Vlad plan for all the sanctions from Trump?

Did Vlad plan for Trump to push for Maduro to step down?

Did Vlad plan to get hundreds of his men obliterated in Syria?

[koriwhat]

So - you are ok that Russia still owns trump and he is too compromised to


PERSONALLY

denounce them.

Thx!

you conspiracy nuts are hilarious!

[Chris]

https://twitter.com/SaraCarterDC/status/1116117565678473221

[koriwhat]

https://twitter.com/SaraCarterDC/status/1116117565678473221

i can't wait til they all hang! :tu

the show is about to begin soon enough...

[spurraider21]

i can't wait til they all hang! :tu

the show is about to begin soon enough...
there it is!

its not a day on spurstalk until koriwhat wishes death on multiple people

[koriwhat]

there it is!

its not a day on spurstalk until koriwhat wishes death on multiple people

you love treasonous losers so keep on being the same unpatriotic loser that you are. :tu

[Reck]

Take your nightly dose and calm down, calf.

[koriwhat]

Take your nightly dose and calm down, calf.

i don't need hormone shots like you. sorry tranny!

[boutons_deux]

Jeffrey Toobin Shreds AG Barr For Saying There Was Spying on the Trump Campaign: ‘A Dog Whistle to Sean Hannity’

https://www.mediaite.com/tv/jeffrey-toobin-shreds-ag-barr-for-saying-there-was-spying-on-the-trump-campaign-a-dog-whistle-to-sean-hannity/ (https://www.mediaite.com/tv/jeffrey-toobin-shreds-ag-barr-for-saying-there-was-spying-on-the-trump-campaign-a-dog-whistle-to-sean-hannity/)

[boutons_deux]

Trump WON Mueller

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SzWZWEbxkQg

[boutons_deux]

Dan Abrams: I’m ‘Concerned’ if Barr Can be ‘Fair Arbiter’ After Trump Campaign Spying Claims

https://www.mediaite.com/radio/dan-abrams-im-concerned-if-barr-can-be-fair-arbiter-after-trump-campaign-spying-claims/

I rephrase the weasel words

Dan Abrams: I KNOW Barr Cannot, has not ever been, will never be ‘Fair Arbiter’ After Trump Campaign Spying Claims

[Spurs Homer]

you love treasonous losers so keep on being the same unpatriotic loser that you are. :tu


Here are two treasonous losers that you semen shield 24/7;

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-44852812

[koriwhat]

Here are two treasonous losers that you semen shield 24/7;

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-44852812

when did "semen shielding" become a saying because it's got to be the dumbest fucking thing i read here nowadays. fucking dumbass internet lingo.

ps: i'd side against an agency that is demonstratively spying on me illegally while trying to find anything they can, besides collusion, to bring a duly elected president down. you can keep your stockholm syndrome.

[Spurs Homer]

3 weeks into the Criminal Coverrr upppp!


Next week a redacted version which will cover up everything - and then a court fight -

just to see a full version.

Why cover up an "exoneration?"

[TSA]

3 weeks into the Criminal Coverrr upppp!


Next week a redacted version which will cover up everything - and then a court fight -

just to see a full version.

Why cover up an "exoneration?"

I'll ask you the same question I just asked vy....

If you think it's likely Barr is going to abuse his privileges do you also think Mueller's team and Rosenstein are in on it too?

"Mueller’s team is, however, participating in the redaction process, as are members of the intelligence community and prosecutors working on cases that could be affected by the public disclosure of certain information in the report, Barr said."

https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2019/04/barr-says-congress-wont-get-unredacted-mueller-report/586786/

1116465637688107008

Mueller and Rosenstein bad now?

[Spurs Homer]

I'll ask you the same question I just asked vy....

If you think it's likely Barr is going to abuse his privileges do you also think Mueller's team and Rosenstein are in on it too?

"Mueller’s team is, however, participating in the redaction process, as are members of the intelligence community and prosecutors working on cases that could be affected by the public disclosure of certain information in the report, Barr said."

https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2019/04/barr-says-congress-wont-get-unredacted-mueller-report/586786/

1116465637688107008

Mueller and Rosenstein bad now?

rosenstein is a piece of shit
barr is a piece of shit


i will accept muellers findings if and when

we see 100% of the mueller report

and

mueller testifies under oath with zero restrictions on his testimony
(classified info, ongoing investigations exempted )

anyone who believes anything barr says is a gullible fool

[TSA]

rosenstein is a piece of shit
barr is a piece of shit


i will accept muellers findings if and when

we see 100% of the mueller report

and

mueller testifies under oath with zero restrictions on his testimony
(classified info, ongoing investigations exempted )

anyone who believes anything barr says is a gullible fool

Rosenstein became one of your Gods after he appointed Mueller as Special Counsel, why is he no longer one of your heroes?

And Mueller has come out publicly and shot down stories that were untrue, why has Mueller said nothing about how Barr summarized Mueller's bottom line findings?

[Spurs Homer]

Rosenstein became one of your Gods after he appointed Mueller as Special Counsel, why is he no longer one of your heroes?

And Mueller has come out publicly and shot down stories that were untrue, why has Mueller said nothing about how Barr summarized Mueller's bottom line findings?

awhile ago

i posted that rosenstein was a wild card and that the jury was out on him

mccabes book made me highly doubt rosenstein and i hoped he might just be plaiying chess

but his recent actions are not the actions of a person of integrity


and mueller will answer all that when he is called to testify

[TSA]

awhile ago

i posted that rosenstein was a wild card and that the jury was out on him

mccabes book made me highly doubt rosenstein and i hoped he might just be plaiying chess

but his recent actions are not the actions of a person of integrityMcCabe is under a federal criminal investigation with an empaneled grand jury and you are taking his word and questioning Rosenstein's integrity? :lmao



and mueller will answer all that when he is called to testify

Mueller has not shied away from immediately shooting down stories that were untrue, why has Mueller said nothing about how Barr summarized Mueller's bottom line findings?

[Spurs Homer]

McCabe is under a federal criminal investigation with an empaneled grand jury and you are taking his word and questioning Rosenstein's integrity? :lmao




Mueller has not shied away from immediately shooting down stories that were untrue, why has Mueller said nothing about how Barr summarized Mueller's bottom line findings?

you’ll see

mccabe is a patriot

mueller does not need to chase barrs ridiculous rabbit holes and will testify when the time comes

[boutons_deux]

why has Mueller said nothing about how Barr summarized Mueller's bottom line findings?

what's your conspiracy theory?

[TSA]

what's your conspiracy theory?

There is no conspiracy theory chumplite. Mueller has said nothing about how Barr summarized Mueller's bottom line findings because he doesn't dispute them.

[Reck]

But somehow the people that worked for him do. :lol

It is more likely Mueller is waiting to be called up to testify or continue to wait while Barr further embarrasses himself by showing how much of a stooge and unreliable he's been shown to be.

[Spurs Homer]

But somehow the people that worked for him do. :lol

It is more likely Mueller is waiting to be called up to testify or continue to wait while Barr further embarrasses himself by showing how much of a stooge and unreliable he's been shown to be.

yup

[TSA]

mccabe is a patriot

:lmao

"The report also finds that McCabe committed a lack of candor offense in an interview under oath with INSD on May 9, 2017"

"The third instance of lack of candor identified by the report occurred in an audio-recorded interview under oath with OIG on July 28, 2017"

"The final instance of McCabe’s lacking candor occurred in his second interview under oath with OIG investigators."

[TSA]

But somehow the people that worked for him do. :lol

Name the people on Mueller's team that disputed Barr's summary of the bottom line findings.

[Spurs Homer]

:lmao

"The report also finds that McCabe committed a lack of candor offense in an interview under oath with INSD on May 9, 2017"

"The third instance of lack of candor identified by the report occurred in an audio-recorded interview under oath with OIG on July 28, 2017"

"The final instance of McCabe’s lacking candor occurred in his second interview under oath with OIG investigators."


lololol

lack of candor

while your hero has lied to your face 10000 times

”oooh mccabe disputed a media story for the public good and he was authorized to address media reports under his job title - im clutching my pearlzzz!”

lololol

[Reck]

IIRC Some, if not all of Mueller's people were upset barr characterized the report in the way he did.


EDIT:
https://www.nytimes.com/2019/04/03/us/politics/william-barr-mueller-report.html

Close enough

[TSA]

lololol

lack of candor

while your hero has lied to your face 10000 times

”oooh mccabe disputed a media story for the public good and he was authorized to address media reports under his job title - im clutching my pearlzzz!”

lololol

Your patriot is under a federal criminal investigation for lying under oath multiple times to multiple agencies.
Why do you admire such a person?

[TSA]

IIRC Some, if not all of Mueller's people were upset barr characterized the report in the way he did.


EDIT:
https://www.nytimes.com/2019/04/03/us/politics/william-barr-mueller-report.html

Close enough


No that’s not close enough, that’s not even close. I asked you to name the people on Mueller’s team. Instead of backing your claim you provide some hearsay anonymous bullshit from the NYT that isn’t even sourced to anyone on Mueller’s team but came from “government officials and others familiar with their simmering frustrations” :lol

You idiots haven’t learned a thing even after finding out that for two years the NYT’s anonymous sources were full of shit.

[Reck]

:lol NYT bad now
:lol hearsay anonymous

It's all in the article. i'm not going to decrypt it for you. Your life would be so much simpler if you accepted facts.

So long.

[Spurs Homer]

Your patriot is under a federal criminal investigation for lying under oath multiple times to multiple agencies.
Why do you admire such a person?


Unlike you -

IF he is guilty - I hope they convict him.

I do not believe he is -

He was doing his job and because of his counter-intel expertise in dealing with Russian mafia-

and Trump being a criminal with ties to Russian mafia -
Trump went after him and sicced his henchmen traitors in the GOP -

until they got the IG involved even though there wasn't shit to investigate -

all smoke and mirrors -

give me a fucking break

Texts and media leaks?

GTFO out of here with that manufactured bullshit.

Here is the truth:

Trump is a criminal and he went after mccabe because mccabe is a patriot who will expose russian crimes -
trump did what any criminal with absolute power would do -

go after the cops who will bring you down.

You mark my words.

I won't defend McCabe or anyone - if they are criminals - so if I am wrong and he is a genuinely guilty criminal like trump -

then fuck him too - I hope they get him.


Unlike you - who sees the evidence by the criminal in chief with your own eyes - and instead of accepting your own eyes -

you go to work for the criminals.

Fuck you.

[TSA]

:lol NYT bad now
:lol hearsay anonymous

It's all in the article. i'm not going to decrypt it for you. Your life would be so much simpler if you accepted facts.

So long.

There's nothing to decrypt and you didn't present any facts. The NYT's anonymous sources on Trump/Russian collusion have been dog shit for 2 years yet you keep slurping them up. Will you ever learn?

[TSA]

Unlike you -

IF he is guilty - I hope they convict him.

I do not believe he is -

He was doing his job and because of his counter-intel expertise in dealing with Russian mafia-

and Trump being a criminal with ties to Russian mafia -
Trump went after him and sicced his henchmen traitors in the GOP -

until they got the IG involved even though there wasn't shit to investigate -

all smoke and mirrors -

give me a fucking break

Texts and media leaks?

GTFO out of here with that manufactured bullshit.

Here is the truth:

Trump is a criminal and he went after mccabe because mccabe is a patriot who will expose russian crimes -
trump did what any criminal with absolute power would do -

go after the cops who will bring you down.

You mark my words.

I won't defend McCabe or anyone - if they are criminals - so if I am wrong and he is a genuinely guilty criminal like trump -

then fuck him too - I hope they get him.


Unlike you - who sees the evidence by the criminal in chief with your own eyes - and instead of accepting your own eyes -

you go to work for the criminals.

Fuck you.

I love how you preface it with "here is the truth" and then immediately get the facts wrong :rollin

Trump didn't go after McCabe and Trump didn't ask for the Inspector General to investigate McCabe.

The Inspector General was investigating because Democrats were upset and called for it for after how the FBI handled the Clinton investigation :rollin

[Spurs Homer]

I love how you preface it with "here is the truth" and then immediately get the facts wrong :rollin

Trump didn't go after McCabe and Trump didn't ask for the Inspector General to investigate McCabe.

The Inspector General was investigating because Democrats were upset and called for it for after how the FBI handled the Clinton investigation :rollin

gtfo of here with your bullshit

the ig had yet to find shit

when jordan, nunes and all those goons responded to trump suddenly out of left field began attacking mccabe and his wife

on “made up bullshit”

then those goons started crying out to sessions to ask the ig to look into texts and hrc emails
and then

ohr, strock,page, mccabe

go fuck yourself with your traitor fuckery

[Chris]

There's nothing to decrypt and you didn't present any facts. The NYT's anonymous sources on Trump/Russian collusion have been dog shit for 2 years yet you keep slurping them up. Will you ever learn?

You just gotta accept the facts!

Reck :lol

[boutons_deux]

the lie is that there was no collusion

[UnWantedTheory]

Rosenstein became one of your Gods after he appointed Mueller as Special Counsel, why is he no longer one of your heroes?

And Mueller has come out publicly and shot down stories that were untrue, why has Mueller said nothing about how Barr summarized Mueller's bottom line findings?


Hasn't his team done so already?

[Reck]

[/B][/B]
Hasn't his team done so already?

:lol TSA in denial

[Chris]

https://twitter.com/seanhannity/status/1116779283651944450

[TSA]

[/B][/B]
Hasn't his team done so already?

No, they haven’t.

[TSA]

gtfo of here with your bullshit

the ig had yet to find shit

when jordan, nunes and all those goons responded to trump suddenly out of left field began attacking mccabe and his wife

on “made up bullshit”

then those goons started crying out to sessions to ask the ig to look into texts and hrc emails
and then

ohr, strock,page, mccabe

go fuck yourself with your traitor fuckery

You’re a fucking idiot who can’t even get the basic facts straight.

:lol “here is the truth”

[Reck]

:lol TSA calling anyone an idiot when he cant even read the first line of an article. Yet the faggot expects you to read his wall of text diatribe he posts daily.

[TSA]

:lol TSA calling anyone an idiot when he cant even read the first line of an article. Yet the faggot expects you to read his wall of text diatribe he posts daily.You’re a fucking idiot as well. Mueller has had no problem going on the record to correct false stories. He did not go on the record to dispute Barr’s summary of his report.

“Some of Robert S. Mueller III’s investigators have told associates that Attorney General William P. Barr failed to adequately portray the findings of their inquiry and that they were more troubling for President Trump than Mr. Barr indicated, according to government officials and others familiar with their simmering frustrations.”

This isn’t even anonymously sourced to anyone on Mueller’s team.
:lol “facts”

[TSA]

1116793250797375488

[TSA]

https://twitter.com/seanhannity/status/1116779283651944450

Their hypocrisy knows no bounds

1116702065538019329

[vy65]

I'll ask you the same question I just asked vy....

If you think it's likely Barr is going to abuse his privileges do you also think Mueller's team and Rosenstein are in on it too?

"Mueller’s team is, however, participating in the redaction process, as are members of the intelligence community and prosecutors working on cases that could be affected by the public disclosure of certain information in the report, Barr said."

https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2019/04/barr-says-congress-wont-get-unredacted-mueller-report/586786/

1116465637688107008

Mueller and Rosenstein bad now?

Never answered my question in response. And are you sure you have the cart/horse order correct?

[vy65]

No that’s not close enough, that’s not even close. I asked you to name the people on Mueller’s team. Instead of backing your claim you provide some hearsay anonymous bullshit from the NYT that isn’t even sourced to anyone on Mueller’s team but came from “government officials and others familiar with their simmering frustrations” :lol

You idiots haven’t learned a thing even after finding out that for two years the NYT’s anonymous sources were full of shit.


Who on Mueller’s time is participating in the redactions? What is the scope of their review? Who has final approval/rejection authority. You just posted an article with anonymous reference to Mueller’s team with naming names.

Shit cuts both ways

[Pavlov]

1116793250797375488:lmao Strassel

[Reck]

:lol saying anonymous sources than confirming he didn't read the article.

:lol

[Chris]

Their hypocrisy knows no bounds

1116702065538019329

COMEY IS CONFUSED AS TO WHY THEY WOULD USE THAT WORD?! CLAPPER SAYS ITS ALL OBAMA?!

:lol

[TSA]

Who on Mueller’s time is participating in the redactions? What is the scope of their review? Who has final approval/rejection authority. You just posted an article with anonymous reference to Mueller’s team with naming names.

Shit cuts both ways


Ah how cute of you to try and help out the forum dunce. Only problem is the forum dunce claimed something as a fact and then attempted to use anonymous secondhand sources to back his claim. What did I claim as fact again?

[TSA]

Never answered my question in response. And are you sure you have the cart/horse order correct?


What’s your question?

[TSA]

:lol saying anonymous sources than confirming he didn't read the article.

:lol

Facts are easily verified. You can’t verify. Watch.

“Some, if not all of Mueller's people were upset barr characterized the report in the way he did.”

Name names. Who on Mueller’s team said this?

[Reck]

Right, and I posted an article saying they indeed disputed Barr's claims that Trump was a saint.

And I didn't say it was for a 100% fact. I said life would be easier for YOU if you accepted facts.

You're delusional TSA. I pity you.

[TSA]

Right, and I posted an article saying they indeed disputed Barr's claims that Trump was a saint.

And I didn't say it was for a 100% fact. I said life would be easier for YOU if you accepted facts.

You're delusional TSA. I pity you.

“they indeed disputed Barr’s claims”
“but it’s not 100% fact”

:lmao

You’re too stupid to pity anyone.

[vy65]

What’s your question?


Behind a pay wall, but the answer to your question depends on the scope of Mueller/Rosenstein's "participation."

[vy65]

Ah how cute of you to try and help out the forum dunce. Only problem is the forum dunce claimed something as a fact and then attempted to use anonymous secondhand sources to back his claim. What did I claim as fact again?

Wasn’t trying to defend anybody. Just found it curious that the line of argument you were using applies equally to the argument we were having earlier. If the devil is in the details, seems your claims of Mueller-Barr cooperation are, to drop the name of a really shitty band, highly suspect.

[Reck]

“they indeed disputed Barr’s claims”
“but it’s not 100% fact”

:lmao

You’re too stupid to pity anyone.

The "indeed" was an opinion. My opinion. :lol

I then found an article with some of Mueller's team disputing Barr's assertions that the report is all roses for Trump when its not.

TSA cant tell what's an opinion and what's a fact now. Jesus almighty.

[Winehole23]

1117148190917189635

[Pavlov]

1117148190917189635 President Derp

[UnWantedTheory]

“they indeed disputed Barr’s claims”
“but it’s not 100% fact”

:lmao

You’re too stupid to pity anyone.You can believe that a report stating the team disputed Barr's claims exists, without believing in, or knowing if, the actual report is true dipshit.

[Chris]

https://twitter.com/MattWolking/status/1117172062022402048

[AaronY]

https://twitter.com/MattWolking/status/1117172062022402048
boom!

[koriwhat]

I can't wait til them liberal tears start flowing here on ST and world wide. The left are crybabies already but this is going to be epic!

[Reck]

I can't wait til them liberal tears start flowing here on ST and world wide. The left are crybabies already but this is going to be epic!

What is calfilator?

[koriwhat]

What is calfilator?

Is this jeopardy? What is you'll never be the woman you wish to be reck no matter how hard you try for $500.

[Reck]

Is this jeopardy? What is you'll never be the woman you wish to be reck no matter how hard you try for $500.

What is it you're waiting for? What tears?

[koriwhat]

What is it you're waiting for? What tears?

Your tears specifically tranny.

[Reck]

What is it with conservatives and not answering straight up questions when asked.

[koriwhat]

What is it with conservatives and not answering straight up questions when asked.

Who's a conservative? I'm just not you nor your shit ideology and it bugs you weak fucks. Get over yourself tranny.

[boutons_deux]

George Conway points out ‘critical’ phrasing in Barr summary that shows Trump may not have been cleared of collusion

Conway noted the very specific phrasing used by Barr that seems to indicate the president is not in the clear when it comes to collusion with the Russians.

Responding to a tweet imploring Reuters to

“please distinguish between no ‘evidence’ and ‘not enough evidence to make a finding,'”

in a recent article, conservative attorney George Conway added his two cents by

noting what AG Barr failed to plainly and clearly state.

If Mueller had used the words ‘no evidence of a conspiracy or coordination’ (i.e., no collusion),

you can be damned sure Barr would have quoted those words.

But Mueller didn’t, and

Barr didn’t.”

https://www.rawstory.com/2019/04/george-conway-points-critical-phrasing-barr-summary-shows-trump-may-not-cleared-collusion/ (https://www.rawstory.com/2019/04/george-conway-points-critical-phrasing-barr-summary-shows-trump-may-not-cleared-collusion/)

... in the same category of Mueller finding collusion but not enough for the very high bar of absolute certainty of conviction (this ain't a murder trial)

Trash and his mafiya did collude ACTIVELY and have been "forgetting", lying, obstructing for 2 years.

btw, lady-basher The Great Levandowski LIED that that he didn't work with Carter Page.

[Spurs Homer]

George Conway points out ‘critical’ phrasing in Barr summary that shows Trump may not have been cleared of collusion

Conway noted the very specific phrasing used by Barr that seems to indicate the president is not in the clear when it comes to collusion with the Russians.

Responding to a tweet imploring Reuters to

“please distinguish between no ‘evidence’ and ‘not enough evidence to make a finding,'”

in a recent article, conservative attorney George Conway added his two cents by

noting what AG Barr failed to plainly and clearly state.

If Mueller had used the words ‘no evidence of a conspiracy or coordination’ (i.e., no collusion),

you can be damned sure Barr would have quoted those words.

But Mueller didn’t, and

Barr didn’t.”

https://www.rawstory.com/2019/04/george-conway-points-critical-phrasing-barr-summary-shows-trump-may-not-cleared-collusion/ (https://www.rawstory.com/2019/04/george-conway-points-critical-phrasing-barr-summary-shows-trump-may-not-cleared-collusion/)

... in the same category of Mueller finding collusion but not enough for the very high bar of absolute certainty of conviction (this ain't a murder trial)

Trash and his mafiya did collude ACTIVELY and have been "forgetting", lying, obstructing for 2 years.

btw, The Great Lady-baser Levandowski LIED that that he didn't work with Carter Page.




exactly the same thing i pointed out - but trump cult whined that their dear leader was exonerated

we saw the conspiracy and the obstruction with our own eyes

only difference is some of us trust our own eyes

[TSA]

Wasn’t trying to defend anybody. Just found it curious that the line of argument you were using applies equally to the argument we were having earlier. If the devil is in the details, seems your claims of Mueller-Barr cooperation are, to drop the name of a really shitty band, highly suspect.

What did I claim as fact and then use anonymous secondhand sources to back it?

[TSA]

The "indeed" was an opinion. My opinion. :lol

I then found an article with some of Mueller's team disputing Barr's assertions that the report is all roses for Trump when its not.

TSA cant tell what's an opinion and what's a fact now. Jesus almighty.


Who from Mueller’s team disputed Barr’s assertions?

[TSA]

exactly the same thing i pointed out - but trump cult whined that their dear leader was exonerated

we saw the conspiracy and the obstruction with our own eyes

only difference is some of us trust our own eyes


Mueller was blind the whole time.

[boutons_deux]

New panic at White House after briefing on Mueller report: ‘There is significant concern’ over obstruction

“They have been briefed but I’m told in broad brush strokes,” Karl explained.

“They’ve been briefed enough to know that

the White House will not invoke executive privilege to try to get further redactions.”

“But there is significant concern on the president’s team about what will be in this report,”

“There is significant concerns about what will be in here — new information — on the obstruction of justice question,

what the president was doing regarding some of the big questions.”

https://www.rawstory.com/2019/04/new-panic-white-house-officials-briefed-mueller-report-significant-concern/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+TheRawStory+%28The+Raw+Story% 29 (https://www.rawstory.com/2019/04/new-panic-white-house-officials-briefed-mueller-report-significant-concern/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+TheRawStory+%28The+Raw+Story% 29)

[TSA]

New panic at White House after briefing on Mueller report: ‘There is significant concern’ over obstruction

“They have been briefed but I’m told in broad brush strokes,” Karl explained.

“They’ve been briefed enough to know that

the White House will not invoke executive privilege to try to get further redactions.”

“But there is significant concern on the president’s team about what will be in this report,”

“There is significant concerns about what will be in here — new information — on the obstruction of justice question,

what the president was doing regarding some of the big questions.”

https://www.rawstory.com/2019/04/new-panic-white-house-officials-briefed-mueller-report-significant-concern/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+TheRawStory+%28The+Raw+Story% 29 (https://www.rawstory.com/2019/04/new-panic-white-house-officials-briefed-mueller-report-significant-concern/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+TheRawStory+%28The+Raw+Story% 29)

:lol White House so panicked they will not invoke executive privilege to try to get further redactions

[vy65]

What did I claim as fact and then use anonymous secondhand sources to back it?

So Mueller isn’t cooperating with Barr?

[Spurs Homer]

Mueller was blind the whole time.

we will see how much conspiracy mueller found

i dont believe a word from barr

[TSA]

So Mueller isn’t cooperating with Barr?

What did I claim as fact and then use anonymous secondhand sources to back it? Post my exact quote.

[TSA]

we will see how much conspiracy mueller found

i dont believe a word from barr

Of course you don’t. It blows up the conspiracy theory you push daily.

[vy65]

What did I claim as fact and then use anonymous secondhand sources to back it? Post my exact quote.

I never said you did because that was never my point. Try again.

[vy65]

And I’m still waiting on guidance as to the scope of Mueller’s participation with Barr

[Reck]

Of course you don’t. It blows up the conspiracy theory you push daily.

That's hilarious coming from you.

[TSA]

I never said you did because that was never my point. Try again.

Than what’s your point? You tried to jump in and defend Reck claiming I did the same. I didn’t.

[Spurs Homer]

Of course you don’t. It blows up the conspiracy theory you push daily.

when you see and hear something with your own eyes and ears

you believe it - if you are in touch with reality

i am guilty of that

when you do the opposite and disbelieve what you just saw and heard because criminals convinced you to believe their reality-

you are a gullible cult member

trump and his family met with russians and accepted their help
trump publicly asked russia to hack an americans server (felony)
trump lied to your eyes and ears daily
trump obstructed daily
trump never denounced an enemy foreign govt who attacked us

all this we know for a fact

but you want people to take the word of the traitors handpicked ag

no thanks

ill trust my own eyes and ears

[Chris]

I’m still waiting on guidance

We know.

[TSA]

when you see and hear something with your own eyes and ears

you believe it - if you are in touch with reality

i am guilty of that

when you do the opposite and disbelieve what you just saw and heard because criminals convinced you to believe their reality-

you are a gullible cult member

trump and his family met with russians and accepted their help
trump publicly asked russia to hack an americans server (felony)
trump lied to your eyes and ears daily
trump obstructed daily
trump never denounced an enemy foreign govt who attacked us

all this we know for a fact

but you want people to take the word of the traitors handpicked ag

no thanks

ill trust my own eyes and ears

You are guilty of swallowing whole 2 years of propaganda spewed by the MSM in an effort to take out Trump. You are also guilt of throwing Mueller under the bus and dismissing his investigation’s findings after worshiping his every move for 2 years. You will never admit either, you’re too dug in and embarrassed to do such.

[Spurs Homer]

You are guilty of swallowing whole 2 years of propaganda spewed by the MSM in an effort to take out Trump. You are also guilt of throwing Mueller under the bus and dismissing his investigation’s findings after worshiping his every move for 2 years. You will never admit either, you’re too dug in and embarrassed to do such.

so you have seen the full mueller report?

[Reck]

You are guilty of swallowing whole 2 years of propaganda spewed by the MSM in an effort to take out Trump. You are also guilt of throwing Mueller under the bus and dismissing his investigation’s findings after worshiping his every move for 2 years. You will never admit either, you’re too dug in and embarrassed to do such.

You are guilty of swallowing a 5 year witch hunt about Benghazi.

:lol Hillary gunna get indicted
:lol Susan Rice gunna get indicted
:lol Podesta runs a pedo ring

[TSA]

You are guilty of swallowing a 5 year witch hunt about Benghazi.

:lol Hillary gunna get indicted
:lol Susan Rice gunna get indicted
:lol Podesta runs a pedo ring

You can’t and won’t find a post from me about Benghazi that backs your claim.

[ElNono]

You can’t and won’t find a post from me about Benghazi that backs your claim.

Does that apply to TheSanityAnnex too? I mean, not really hard to find :lol

[TSA]

Does that apply to TheSanityAnnex too? I mean, not really hard to find :lol

You won’t find anything from my other handle swallowing a 5 year witch hunt either, and Reck trying to compare Benghazi to this was retarded to even begin with.

[Reck]

You can’t and won’t find a post from me about Benghazi that backs your claim.


http://www.politico.com/story/2015/09/clinton-emails-benghazi-213940


http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2015/09/25/state-department-hands-over-new-hillary-clinton-e-mails-to-benghazi-panel.html#


http://edition.cnn.com/2015/09/25/politics/hillary-clinton-emails-david-petraeus-benghazi/index.html

It's going to get much worse for her shortly as the links I posted detail.

Obama is going to fuck her hard. Might be his greatest accomplishment in his two terms.


Update: Boehner to form select committee to investigate Benghazi


House Speaker John Boehner is “seriously considering” appointing a select committee to investigate the attacks on the U.S. diplomatic post in Benghazi, Libya, according to a senior GOP leadership aide. The move comes after the revelation of an email from a top Obama national security official, Ben Rhodes, instructing Susan Rice to focus on an anti-Muslim internet video to explain the attacks.

“The new emails this week were the straw that broke the camel’s back,” says the aide. “The Speaker was furious to learn that the admininstration withheld relevant documents from a congressional subpoena. He’s sick and tired of this evasion and obstruction from the administration, and wants a solution to finally force accountability, get to the truth, and provide justice.”

Boehner, who has paid careful attention to the Benghazi developments since the attacks, has resisted calls to appoint a select committee, preferring to allow the various committees of jurisdiction to pursue investigations of their slices of the attacks on their own. Aides say Boehner continues to believe that the work of those committees has been valuable. “The current committees investigating the attack have done good work, using their authority, including subpoena authority, to gather facts, interview hundreds of witnesses, and conduct dozens of hearings. But this week’s events demonstrate a new level of stonewalling and obfuscation by the administration that requires a new level of investigation.”

The House Oversight and Reform Committee issued a subpoena for Benghazi-related documents in August of 2013, but the Rhodes email and a second set of talking points that originated with the White House were released to the public for the first time this week after Judicial Watch, a conservative research group, obtained them via a Freedom of Information Act request. For these reasons, according the aide, “the reasons for appointing a committee now are straightforward.” The aide continued: “For the first time we have clear and public evidence that the White House was more involved in misleading the American people than it had previous admitted. And, second, it’s now proven that the administration withheld relevant documents from a congressional subpoena request. While the existing investigatory committees in the House have full subpoena power, the administration has now demonstrated it is willing to flagrantly defy such subpoena requests, compelling the House to consider taking the strongest actions possible in an effort to ensure Americans have the truth about what happened.”

The details of the exact structure of the special committee are still under discussion, but a source tells THE WEEKLY STANDARD that Rep. Trey Gowdy, a lawmaker with a reputation for tough questioning of administration witnesses, is under consideration to chair it. Gowdy has participated in meetings of an ad hoc committee of House members from various committees of jurisdiction who have met informally to compare notes and shape strategy on the Benghazi investigations.

Separately, TWS has learned that at least two committees will begin an immediate inquiry into the odd pattern of classification that preceded the release of Benghazi documents this week. Some of the previously unclassified redacted documents released to Judicial Watch were classified by the administration in February, after the subpoena from the House Oversight Committee and the FOIA request from Judicial Watch.

Boehner has largely stayed in the background on Benghazi, but he has demonstrated a keen interested in the growing controversy behind the scenes. In private conversations with members of Congress and others, Boehner cites key dates in the long Benghazi timeline from memory. He has also shown a particular interest in the stories of US security and diplomatic personnel who were on the ground during the attacks.

A final decision on a select committee could come “very soon,” according to a Republican aide.





http://www.weeklystandard.com/blogs/leadership-aide-boehner-seriously-considering-select-committee-benghazi_789000.html


Gowdy going hard

A1jeJmeeMjs


I asked you a simple question and you failed to answer. Try again. Was lying about the cause of the attack acceptable? Or do you actually believe the attack was because of video?

:lol Challenge accepted.
:lol Cant and won't find anything from me about Benghazi
:lol Obama is going to fuck her hard
:lol Gowdy going hard


Both TSA and thesannityannex account chalk full of Benghazi shit. You're a shameless congenital liar.

Next time, dont make it so easy.

[TSA]

:lol Challenge accepted.
:lol Cant and won't find anything from me about Benghazi
:lol Obama is going to fuck her hard
:lol Gowdy going hard


Both TSA and thesannityannex account chalk full of Benghazi shit. You're a shameless congenital liar.

Next time, dont make it so easy.

What are the dates of those posts? You claimed I swallowed a 5 year witch hunt. You’ll need a five year span of posts.

[Reck]

:lol immediate goalpost moving instead of admitting defeat.

I only went into the top results and got these from the top. They're from 2014 and onward. Go ahead, you can click on your own posts, they won't give you an invalid error as yours often do. :lol

[ChumpDumper]

:lol TSA always hoping we forget his unbroken string of conspiracy mongering.

[TSA]

:lol immediate goalpost moving instead of admitting defeat.

I only went into the top results and got these from the top. They're from 2014 and onward. Go ahead, you can click on your own posts, they won't give you an invalid error as yours often do. :lol

You claimed I was in on a 5 year long Benghazi witch hunt, in order to prove that you’d need to produce posts from me discussing a Benghazi witch hunt over a 5 year period. You didn’t and you can’t. Not only did you not back your retarded claim but you tried to compare something that happened (Benghazi) to something that never existed (Trump/Russia collusion).

Congrats forum dunce you once again earned your namesake.

[vy65]

Than what’s your point? You tried to jump in and defend Reck claiming I did the same. I didn’t.

I never did any such thing. That’s why I said “I’m not defending anybody.” Stop putting words in people’s mouths.


Wasn’t trying to defend anybody. Just found it curious that the line of argument you were using applies equally to the argument we were having earlier. If the devil is in the details, seems your claims of Mueller-Barr cooperation are, to drop the name of a really shitty band, highly suspect.

This was my point. You’re avoiding an answer and trying to make me be some white knight when I’m not.

[vy65]

And for the umpteenth time, you still have t answered my question.

[vy65]

https://media0.giphy.com/media/xT5LMDVI4pYZTHMFwc/giphy.gif?cid=4bf119fc5cb3e655496d4a31320cca73

[Reck]

TSA is mentally ill.

[Bleke]

TSA is mentally ill.

[ChumpDumper]

TSA is mentally ill.He's willing to believe the worst of anyone who's on the other side of the political fence. It's understandable but you'd think he'd have learned a lesson after four or five ridiculous embarrassments tho.

[Spurtacular]

:lol Challenge accepted.
:lol Cant and won't find anything from me about Benghazi
:lol Obama is going to fuck her hard
:lol Gowdy going hard


Both TSA and thesannityannex account chalk full of Benghazi shit. You're a shameless congenital liar.

Next time, dont make it so easy.

It takes a real p.o.s. at this point to sperm shield for Hillary who neglected the Americans on the ground. It was understandable (if not honorable) in theory to be in denial when you considered it an affront to your party's presidential chances. With that out of the way you're just being an utter shithead.

[Spurtacular]

He's willing to believe the worst of someone exposed by wikileaks.

[Reck]

Derp has been sprung.

[Pavlov]

:lmao derp leaps into not naming any of her crimes mode

[TSA]

I never did any such thing. That’s why I said “I’m not defending anybody.” Stop putting words in people’s mouths.



This was my point. You’re avoiding an answer and trying to make me be some white knight when I’m not.

Where’s my claim of Mueller-Barr cooperation? I asked for this once already.

[TSA]

TSA is mentally ill.

I’ll accept your white flag.

[TSA]

He's willing to believe the worst of anyone who's on the other side of the political fence. It's understandable but you'd think he'd have learned a lesson after four or five ridiculous embarrassments tho.

Nothing is more embarrassing than falling for the largest conspiracy theory ever pushed in the history of the Untied States.
Congrats dipshit, you did. :bobo

[vy65]

Where’s my claim of Mueller-Barr cooperation? I asked for this once already.

Here’s one for starters:


I'll ask you the same question I just asked vy....

If you think it's likely Barr is going to abuse his privileges do you also think Mueller's team and Rosenstein are in on it too?

"Mueller’s team is, however, participating in the redaction process, as are members of the intelligence community and prosecutors working on cases that could be affected by the public disclosure of certain information in the report, Barr said."

https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2019/04/barr-says-congress-wont-get-unredacted-mueller-report/586786/

1116465637688107008

Mueller and Rosenstein bad now?

Unless you wanna admit this was a completely pointless post??

[Reck]

Which white flag is that? I just proved you massively wrong. That you would lie then consequently argue about such easily proven thing is Trump level of retarded.

Unlike Pav, I will do us both the favor of cutting this short. I proved my point and there is no need of further discussion until the next time you step on it.

[TSA]

Here’s one for starters:



Unless you wanna admit this was a completely pointless post??

Those are direct quotes from Barr and Rosenstein. You tried to compare that to Reck posting secondhand anonymous sources. :lol

[TSA]

Which white flag is that? I just proved you massively wrong. That you would lie then consequently argue about such easily proven thing is Trump level of retarded.

Unlike Pav, I will do us both the favor of cutting this short. I proved my point and there is no need of further discussion until the next time you step on it.

You haven’t proven shit dunce. You probably don’t even realize what you’d need to do to prove your claim so I can’t fault you for tapping out.

[ChumpDumper]

Meh, he proved that you abandon each conspiracy theory without admitting it unless you lose a bet or something.

[TSA]

Meh, he proved that you abandon each conspiracy theory without admitting it unless you lose a bet or something.

:lol throwing Reck a bone for not backing his claim

Have you admitted to abandoning the Trump/Russia collusion conspiracy theory yet?

[ChumpDumper]

:lol throwing Reck a bone for not backing his claim

Have you admitted to abandoning the Trump/Russia collusion conspiracy theory yet?Sure looks like it didn't happen.

It's not like is was completely unfounded.

Sorry.

[Reck]

TSA: Find me a post where I talked about Benghazi
Me: *Finds several posts*
TSA: :cry

[Spurs Homer]

Comrade TSA -

so many people defecate on you -

comrade - please retire!

[vy65]

Those are direct quotes from Barr and Rosenstein. You tried to compare that to Reck posting secondhand anonymous sources. :lol

Please provide link to comments made by Rosenstein regarding Mueller-Barr cooperation on redactions.

[koriwhat]

Comrade TSA -

so many people defecate on you -

comrade - please retire!

It's a strange infatuation the left has with calling people comrades. Very odd and ironic. I've noticed it quite a bit on twitter and a handful of times here on ST.

[TSA]

TSA: Find me a post where I talked about Benghazi
Me: *Finds several posts*
TSA: :cry

Your claim wasn’t me talking about Benghazi. You’re too stupid to even know what you claimed. This is a repeat of when you welshed because you were too stupid to understand the difference between “on” and “from”.

[TSA]

Please provide link to comments made by Rosenstein regarding Mueller-Barr cooperation on redactions.

No reason for me to do that as I never claimed such. Your butthurt is clouding your vision and you’re conflating everything now. If you’d read both articles it’d be clear and you wouldn’t look so foolish.

[boutons_deux]

Trump Is Freaking Over Obstruction Of Justice Info In Mueller Report

Trump and the White House are said to be very worried about what former White House Counsel Don McGahn told Mueller about obstruction of justice.

here is significant concerns about what will be in here, new information on the obstruction justice question, on what the president was doing regarding some of the big questions, was he trying to – how much – how far did he go down the line of trying to fire Mueller or talk about firing Mueller, situations surrounding the Comey firing.

And what worries them most is what Don McGahn told the Special Counsel .

Former White House Counsel Don McGahn has visibility on all of this.

It was reported earlier that he spent 30 hours before the Special Counsel.

George, I’m told that significantly more than 30 hours, and here’s the astounding thing.

After all of that time before the Special Counsel,

nobody on the president’s legal team debriefed McGahn about what he was asked by the Special Counsel or what he told the Special Counsel.

https://www.politicususa.com/2019/04/14/trump-is-freaking-over-obstruction-of-justice-info-in-mueller-report.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+politicususa%2FfJAl+%28Politi cus+USA+%29 (https://www.politicususa.com/2019/04/14/trump-is-freaking-over-obstruction-of-justice-info-in-mueller-report.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+politicususa%2FfJAl+%28Politi cus+USA+%29)

[Spurminator]

1117818624339791874

[boutons_deux]

1117818624339791874

... as he was hired to do, it will be a coverup, a whitewash

[spurraider21]

1117818624339791874
No no we need to state all definitive conclusions right now. Can’t wait for Thursday.

[boutons_deux]

This isn’t the first time William Barr tried to fool Congress and the nation with a ‘summary’ (https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2019/4/15/1850434/-This-isn-t-the-first-time-William-Barr-tried-to-fool-Congress-and-the-nation-with-a-summary)

by 1989, the U.S. government was profoundly unhappy with de facto Panamanian military dictator Manuel Noriega.

So, then head of the Justice Department’s Office of Legal Counsel William Barr was given an assignment—

come up with a legal justification for the United States to enter a sovereign country, dispose its leader, kidnap him, and bring him to America to stand trial.

Barr did just that.

As Political Wire reports (https://politicalwire.com/2019/04/15/barr-misled-congress-in-1989-summary-memo/),

Barr sent Congress a letter on Friday the 13th, 1989, the same day as a massive stock market crash, that concluded that

“the FBI could forcibly abduct people in other countries without the consent of the foreign state.”

Barr made it seem that this position was the

result of a study by the Justice Department and represented the department’s best legal opinion.

But there was a problem. Barr would only provide Congress with “a summary” of that opinion.

Members of Congress asked to see the full legal opinion.

Barr refused, but said he would provide an account that ‘summarizes the principal conclusions.’


In the end, Congress actually acted.

A subpoena was issued, and the DOJ eventually provided Congress with complete information.

What did they discover?

That Barr had “significantly misled” Congress, and that

his “summary” actually failed to fully disclose the study’s principal conclusions,

much less its full opinion on the legality of the proposed action.

https://www.dailykos.com/stories/1850434 (https://www.dailykos.com/stories/1850434)

[boutons_deux]

William Barr Supported Pardons In An Earlier D.C. 'Witch Hunt': Iran-Contra

https://media.npr.org/assets/img/2019/01/11/ap_9205040216-154028fafb37e07097cdc6a979a30cb09dedc8c1-s1500-c85.jpg


This won't be the first time that William Barr, President Trump's nominee to become attorney general (https://www.npr.org/2018/12/07/674243195/trump-says-hell-nominate-william-barr-to-return-as-attorney-general), will be involved with what's been called a "witch hunt (https://www.brown.edu/Research/Understanding_the_Iran_Contra_Affair/e-policing.php)."

Back then, the all-consuming, years-long scandal was called Iran-Contra. On Dec. 24, 1992, it ended when Bush pardoned six people (https://archive.nytimes.com/www.nytimes.com/books/97/06/29/reviews/iran-pardon.html) who had been caught up in it.

Then-Attorney General Barr supported the president's decision in the Iran-Contra case (https://www.npr.org/2018/12/06/674079779/george-h-w-bushs-mixed-legacy-in-a-reagan-era-scandal), which gave clemency to people who had been officials in the administration of President Ronald Reagan, including former Defense Secretary Caspar Weinberger.

He had been set to go on trial to face charges about lying to Congress.

To the man who led the Iran-Contra investigation, however, the pardons represented a miscarriage of justice.

"It demonstrates that powerful people with powerful allies can commit serious crimes in high office,

deliberately abusing the public trust without consequences,"

https://www.npr.org/2019/01/14/684553791/william-barr-supported-pardons-in-an-earlier-d-c-witch-hunt-iran-contra (https://www.npr.org/2019/01/14/684553791/william-barr-supported-pardons-in-an-earlier-d-c-witch-hunt-iran-contra)

Barr, Alberto Gonzalez, John Yoo, cheap whore. shit-stain Repug lawyers who deliver whatever lawyering the Repug politicians ask for.

[Spurs Homer]

I, for one, am not even waiting for this bullshit redacted "report" -

Congress - again - being the pussies they are - are STILL giving BARR the benefit of the doubt -

I already know what Thursday will be - another cover up attempt.

Congress just needs to go to court and consider BARR a hostile cover up agent - and stop fucking around with this issue.

Start impeachment proceedings now so that a court will have to decide to RELEASE the Grand Jury material for the legal reason that Congress is in the middle of a judicial proceeding (impeachment) and then Congress will have ALL of the Grand Jury criminality to show the country 24/7 in their impeachment trials.

[TSA]

I, for one, am not even waiting for this bullshit redacted "report" -

Congress - again - being the pussies they are - are STILL giving BARR the benefit of the doubt -

I already know what Thursday will be - another cover up attempt.

Congress just needs to go to court and consider BARR a hostile cover up agent - and stop fucking around with this issue.

Start impeachment proceedings now so that a court will have to decide to RELEASE the Grand Jury material for the legal reason that Congress is in the middle of a judicial proceeding (impeachment) and then Congress will have ALL of the Grand Jury criminality to show the country 24/7 in their impeachment trials.

:lmao

[boutons_deux]

experts expect Barr to "coverup" 50% - 70% of report

[Chris]

Propaganda experts?

[TSA]

experts expect Barr to "coverup" 50% - 70% of report

Are these the same experts that for two years said Trump colluded with Russia?

[Chris]

https://twitter.com/thehill/status/1117962839447298053

bwaha

[boutons_deux]

Are these the same experts that for two years said Trump colluded with Russia?

Trash and his mafiya DID collude with Russia G F Y

[boutons_deux]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PObqVwmO9pU&feature=youtu.be

[boutons_deux]

Trash/Barr trying to bury Trash's crimes over Easter weekend.

[Spurs Homer]

Trash and his mafiya DID collude with Russia G F Y

He saw it with his own eyes as did the rest of the planet.

His CULT status though - makes him deny what he saw with his own eyes.

[TSA]

Trash and his mafiya DID collude with Russia G F Y

Your GOD Mueller said otherwise.

[Reck]

Your GOD Mueller said otherwise.

Weren't you told to provide a link of him saying so and you couldn't?

Or was that another instance where you were being outclassed and shown your ass again?

[TSA]

Weren't you told to provide a link of him saying so and you couldn't?

Or was that another instance where you were being outclassed and shown your ass again?

The forum dunce doing forum dunce things :lol

The Special Counsel's investigation did not find that the Trump campaign or anyone associated with it conspired or coordinated with Russia in its efforts to influence the 2016 U.S. presidential election. As the report states: “[T]he investigation did not establish that members of the Trump Campaign conspired or coordinated with the Russian government in its election interference activities.”1

1 In assessing potential conspiracy charges, the Special Counsel also considered whether members of the Trump campaign “coordinated” with Russian election interference activities. The Special Counsel defined “coordination” as an “agreement—tacit or express—between the Trump Campaign and the Russian government on election interference.”

https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2019/03/24/us/politics/barr-letter-mueller-report.html

[Spurs Homer]

The forum dunce doing forum dunce things :lol

The Special Counsel's investigation did not find that the Trump campaign or anyone associated with it conspired or coordinated with Russia in its efforts to influence the 2016 U.S. presidential election. As the report states: “[T]he investigation did not establish that members of the Trump Campaign conspired or coordinated with the Russian government in its election interference activities.”1

1 In assessing potential conspiracy charges, the Special Counsel also considered whether members of the Trump campaign “coordinated” with Russian election interference activities. The Special Counsel defined “coordination” as an “agreement—tacit or express—between the Trump Campaign and the Russian government on election interference.”

https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2019/03/24/us/politics/barr-letter-mueller-report.html

those are barrs invention

just like he did in 1989

took two years for congress to get their hands on his cover up evidence

when they finally saw it - barr had misrepresented the evidence

idiots will fall for it again

and traitors

[boutons_deux]

Trump’s actions have White House officials ‘worried’ they’re ‘wide open’ to obstruction charges in the Mueller report

White House officials were concerned overall about the release of the Mueller report, but

were “most worried” about whether it would demonstrate President Donald Trump had obstructed justice.

“That’s the space of the investigation in which

the president’s actions and
things he said,
things he did,
things he directed aides to do,

really leaves a wide open space for a number of different potential things to come out.”

“They’re really going to aggressively go after anything that threatens him

in terms of saying that he had tried to obstruct justice or took actions that may have not been, you know, on the up and up, basically.”

https://www.rawstory.com/2019/04/trumps-actions-have-white-house-officials-worried-theyre-wide-open-to-obstruction-charges-in-the-mueller-report/ (https://www.rawstory.com/2019/04/trumps-actions-have-white-house-officials-worried-theyre-wide-open-to-obstruction-charges-in-the-mueller-report/)

[TSA]

those are barrs invention

just like he did in 1989

took two years for congress to get their hands on his cover up evidence

when they finally saw it - barr had misrepresented the evidence

idiots will fall for it again

and traitors

Those were Mueller’s words taken from Mueller’s report and if those weren’t Mueller’s words and Barr mischaracterized his words Mueller would have corrected him as he’s done before when his investigation was mischaracterized, but he didn’t.

[Reck]

TSA knows. He reads minds and knows all.

The end.

[Chris]

TSA knows. He reads minds and knows all.

The end.

That's 2+ years of MUH RUSSIA talkin'.

[Reck]

Those were Mueller’s words taken from Mueller’s report and if those weren’t Mueller’s words and Barr mischaracterized his words Mueller would have corrected him as he’s done before when his investigation was mischaracterized, but he didn’t.


“The attorney general has created an environment that has caused a significant part of the public … to be concerned about whether or not there is full transparency,” U.S. District Court Judge Reggie Walton said during a hearing Tuesday afternoon on a Freedom of Information Act suit demanding access to a report detailing the findings of special counsel Robert Mueller.

https://www.politico.com/story/2019/04/16/judge-barr-mistrust-mueller-1278030

:lol Barr semen shielding exposed already.

[Spurs Homer]

Those were Mueller’s words taken from Mueller’s report and if those weren’t Mueller’s words and Barr mischaracterized his words Mueller would have corrected him as he’s done before when his investigation was mischaracterized, but he didn’t.

how many fuckin times do you have to be schooled on barr taking

FRAGMENTS

of sentences

and twisting them to flatter trump?

this is barrs m-o

[Chris]

So if Mueller is assisting Barr in the redactions to his own report, does that make Mueller a sperm shielder too?

Asking for a friend. His name is logic.

[Reck]

So if Mueller is assisting Barr in the redactions to his own report, does that make Mueller a sperm shielder too?

Asking for a friend. His name is logic.

Link to Mueller assisting Barr with the redactions?

[Chris]

Link to Mueller assisting Barr with the redactions?

:lol Seriously?

Your beloved Natasha Bertrand even tweeted about it:

https://twitter.com/NatashaBertrand/status/1111710076425912321

[Spurs Homer]

So if Mueller is assisting Barr in the redactions to his own report, does that make Mueller a sperm shielder too?

Asking for a friend. His name is logic.

mueller : i think its ok to reveal trump jr and jared’s names in this paragraph

barr: uh no- as a matter of fact - lets redact this entire page - cos u know - nat’l security n shit
But hey - thanks for your input

[Chris]

mueller : i think its ok to reveal trump jr and jared’s names in this paragraph

barr: uh no- as a matter of fact - lets redact this entire page - cos u know - nat’l security n shit
But hey - thanks for your input

Herr Barr

[Reck]

:lol Seriously?

Your beloved Natasha Bertrand even tweeted about it:

https://twitter.com/NatashaBertrand/status/1111710076425912321

So that's Barr saying it, not Mueller or even his spokesperson saying it.

Hey at least you tried to post something in response. TSA simply refused to do it.

[Chris]

https://proxy.duckduckgo.com/iu/?u=http%3A%2F%2Feloftalmologocurioso.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2016%2F03%2Ftumblr_o26lsaOGkt1 s335jfo1_r5_540.gif&f=1

[Winehole23]

Is Chris more of a Memeshevik or more of a Blogshevik?

[Chris]

Is Chris more of a Memeshevik or more of a Blogshevik?

Do you think Barr was lying when he said Mueller was assisting with the redactions - yes or no?

[Winehole23]

Do you think Barr was lying when he said Mueller was assisting with the redactions - yes or no?Why would Wm. Barr lie?

[Chris]

Yes or no?

[Winehole23]

Is Barr lying about being in a huddle with Mueller? Probably not.

https://www.justsecurity.org/63635/barrs-playbook-he-misled-congress-when-omitting-parts-of-justice-dept-memo-in-1989/

[Nbadan]

https://2qibqm39xjt6q46gf1rwo2g1-wpengine.netdna-ssl.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/16420480_web1_190415_EDH_0416-mueller-barr-wexler_M.jpg

[boutons_deux]

Putin Almost Done Redacting Mueller Report

https://media.newyorker.com/photos/5cb73b73aaf4e60f45f6acd1/master/w_1626,c_limit/Borowitz-PutinRedactingMuellerReport.jpg

MOSCOW —After putting in what one associate called a “hellish all-nighter,” the Russian President, Vladimir Putin, is almost finished redacting Robert Mueller’s report in time for its release, on Thursday.


Earlier in the week, the U.S. Attorney General,

William Barr, submitted the approximately four-hundred-page document to Putin for his approval,

but the Russian President was reportedly

“in a state of disbelief” over how much Barr had failed to redact.

Quickly assembling a crisis team at the Kremlin to implement further redactions,

Putin told his associates, “Put some coffee on, boys—it’s going to be a long night.”

Although Putin is said to be satisfied that his redactions have rendered the Mueller report meaningless,

he resents that the important task of obliterating damning evidence fell to him.

“I have to do everything for these people,” he reportedly said.


https://www.newyorker.com/humor/borowitz-report/putin-almost-done-redacting-mueller-report (https://www.newyorker.com/humor/borowitz-report/putin-almost-done-redacting-mueller-report)

[boutons_deux]

Awaiting Mueller Report, GOP Senators Focus On ‘Her Emails’ :lol

Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC) is reportedly recruiting other Republican senators help with a separate endeavor.

As MSNBC reports, “a trio of top Republican senators” are demanding the Justice Department “hand over information on the handling of the probe into Hillary Clinton’s private email server.”

Graham, along with Sen. Ron Johnson (R-WI) and Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-IA) sent a letter to Barr

The document request comes despite federal investigators clearing Clinton of criminal wrongdoing, :lol

and a separate Justice Department inspector general examination that reviewed the department’s probe. :lol

Graham has likewise pledged to investigate whether the DOJ and FBI attempted to influence the 2016 to stop Donald Trump from becoming president. :lol

https://www.nationalmemo.com/awaiting-mueller-report-gop-senators-focus-on-her-emails/ (https://www.nationalmemo.com/awaiting-mueller-report-gop-senators-focus-on-her-emails/)

[TSA]

So that's Barr saying it, not Mueller or even his spokesperson saying it.

Hey at least you tried to post something in response. TSA simply refused to do it.

I quoted you with a response you were just too busy duncing to see it.

[Chucho]

God, I hope tomorrow is epic. This thread has not delivered thus far.

[TSA]

God, I hope tomorrow is epic. This thread has not delivered thus far.

Don’t get your hopes up. Most of the collusion hoax pushers have either stopped posting about it or are pretending they never pushed it in the first place. The only one who will melt down tomorrow will be Spurs Homer.

[Spurs Homer]

Don’t get your hopes up. Most of the collusion hoax pushers have either stopped posting about it or are pretending they never pushed it in the first place. The only one who will melt down tomorrow will be Spurs Homer.

people who are stupid enough to believe that barr will leave the mueller report transparent and readable
will be let down

i already said this is all a criminal cover up - why would i expect criminals to voluntarily stop committing crimes?
they wont

they will do what criminals do: continue committing crimes until caught/exposed

history repeats itself

the full mueller report wont be seen for months or years

by then americans will be back on sleep mode

tomorrow will be just another sham and barr will keep covering crimes

[Mikeanaro]

Wow, Russia must really hate mexicans.

[boutons_deux]

Preet Bharara on Barr’s Obstruction Decision: It Was Made For ‘An Audience of One’

“My view on it was the reason you have a special counsel is so the attorney general does not have to make that kind of determination.

And I’m confident that we’re going to see in the Mueller report that Mueller did not punt to Barr,” Abrams said.

“It does seem kind of wrong.”


“They should have left it alone,” Bharara said of the obstruction clarification.

“It sounds more like there was a political need and an audience of one need to do that because

there may have been hell to pay if the question was left open as Mueller did appear to leave it open on obstruction, for weeks and weeks and weeks.”

“[Barr] got in there and grabbed the ball and ran with it but I also think his view is of no consequence really because

once Mueller decided that he couldn’t make an ultimate declaration of the commission of a crime of obstruction,

that meant the president wasn’t going to be prosecuted,”

https://www.mediaite.com/radio/preet-bharara-on-barrs-obstruction-decision-it-was-made-for-an-audience-of-one/ (https://www.mediaite.com/radio/preet-bharara-on-barrs-obstruction-decision-it-was-made-for-an-audience-of-one/)

[Reck]

Huh?

https://twitter.com/CNBCnow/status/1118612148526223362

Why the need of a press consference when the report will have the same effect? Someone's worried and wants to undermind the release of the report..

[Pavlov]

Huh?

https://twitter.com/CNBCnow/status/1118612148526223362

Why the need of a press consference when the report will have the same effect? Someone's worried and wants to undermind the release of the report..Why have a press conference before anyone has a chance to read the report?

[boutons_deux]

Why have a press conference before anyone has a chance to read the report?

So Barr can have head start covering up Trash's crimes, collusion, obstruction.

Barr will blow his opportunity to restore faith in a totally politicized DoJ, by playing coverup politics rather than upholding the law.

America is fucked and unfuckable, irretrievably.

[TSA]

Preet Bharara on Barr’s Obstruction Decision: It Was Made For ‘An Audience of One’

“My view on it was the reason you have a special counsel is so the attorney general does not have to make that kind of determination.

And I’m confident that we’re going to see in the Mueller report that Mueller did not punt to Barr,” Abrams said.

“It does seem kind of wrong.”


“They should have left it alone,” Bharara said of the obstruction clarification.

“It sounds more like there was a political need and an audience of one need to do that because

there may have been hell to pay if the question was left open as Mueller did appear to leave it open on obstruction, for weeks and weeks and weeks.”

“ got in there and grabbed the ball and ran with it [b]but I also think his view is of no consequence really because

once Mueller decided that he couldn’t make an ultimate declaration of the commission of a crime of obstruction,

that meant the president wasn’t going to be prosecuted,”

https://www.mediaite.com/radio/preet-bharara-on-barrs-obstruction-decision-it-was-made-for-an-audience-of-one/ (https://www.mediaite.com/radio/preet-bharara-on-barrs-obstruction-decision-it-was-made-for-an-audience-of-one/)




You should read the articles before you spam them :lol

[Peter Strzok]

Tomorrow's press conference is just another notch in Putin's belt.

[TSA]

Huh?

https://twitter.com/CNBCnow/status/1118612148526223362

Why the need of a press consference when the report will have the same effect? Someone's worried and wants to undermind the release of the report..

You can unbind your panties sweety

1118613225074044928

[TSA]

So Barr can have head start covering up Trash's crimes, collusion, obstruction.

Barr will blow his opportunity to restore faith in a totally politicized DoJ, by playing coverup politics rather than upholding the law.

America is fucked and unfuckable, irretrievably.

The people from Obama's politicized DOJ and FBI have already been fired or removed.

[ducks]

Rosenstein wants the bs on barr to stop

[Reck]

You can unbind your panties sweety

1118613225074044928

And as I said, why hold a conference when the report itself will do?

Get your head out of your ass, TSA.

[boutons_deux]

You should read the articles before you spam them :lol

I read it

G F Y Trash fellator

[Chris]

Huh?

https://twitter.com/CNBCnow/status/1118612148526223362

Why the need of a press consference when the report will have the same effect? Someone's worried and wants to undermind the release of the report..

I don't know if I believe Barr when he says it's going to be tomorrow. What do you think?

[spurraider21]

I don't know if I believe Barr when he says it's going to be tomorrow. What do you think?
:lol

[Chris]

And as I said, why hold a conference when the report itself will do?

Get your head out of your ass, TSA.

Press conference. To notify the press. This is simple stuff simple Reck.

Do you think Barr is lying when he said he will release it tomorrow? I'm still on the fence on that one.

[Spurminator]

And as I said, why hold a conference when the report itself will do?

Get your head out of your ass, TSA.

:lol

They've already been at work preparing a "rebuttal."

1118628806418477057

muh exoneration

[Reck]

Press conference. To notify the press. This is simple stuff simple Reck.

Do you think Barr is lying when he said he will release it tomorrow? I'm still on the fence on that one.

It's not simple stuff. They would usually just release it.

Did Barr held a press conference when he released his 4 page memo? Yes or no?

Hint: Dont try to do math on this one.

[Reck]

Press conference. To notify the press. This is simple stuff simple Reck.

Do you think Barr is lying when he said he will release it tomorrow? I'm still on the fence on that one.

Also to notfy the press :lol

They've known it for days that the report would release Thursday. :lol Chris

[boutons_deux]

Trash and his henchmen legal whores think they need to rebut Mueller?

100s of pages of rebuttal? :lol

[Reck]

:lol

They've already been at work preparing a "rebuttal."

1118628806418477057

muh exoneration

LOL and still bungling it by holding a phony presser that accomplishes nothing but making it look even worse for Trump.

If your people have been meeting with DOJ officials to make for a soft landing, why the fuck do you also need to announce a press conference? Morons

[Spurminator]

1118628806418477057

Wonder if any of these discussions were on a tarmac?

[Spurs Homer]

Barr will do a tap-dance and juggle and backflip routine - to amuse Trump -

and will offer all kinds of "legal" reasons why so much of the report is redacted.

Blah blah - national security

Blah blah - sensitive investigative details -

Blah blah - sources and methods -

All to kowtow to the criminal traitor.

Rosenstein will hold his hand to make it look official and correct.
But both of these traitors have already perverted justice and are a stain on this country and have chosen to protect the traitor.

Nothing will ever change that - and in a couple of years - or a few months at best - the crimes will finally be exposed.

Criminals do what criminals do - commit crimes.

[Chris]

Maggie is concerned.

https://twitter.com/maggieNYT/status/1118616173640286208

[Reck]

Press conference. To notify the press. This is simple stuff simple Reck.

Do you think Barr is lying when he said he will release it tomorrow? I'm still on the fence on that one.


Also to notfy the press :lol

They've known it for days that the report would release Thursday. :lol Chris

:lol Chris hit and run.

[spurraider21]

Maggie is concerned.

https://twitter.com/maggieNYT/status/1118616173640286208
maggie is correct

ideally the report will already have been out so people can ask the right questions...

[Chris]

:lol Chris hit and run.

What are you confused about this time? Do you understand what a press conference is?

[Chris]

maggie is correct

ideally the report will already have been out so people can ask the right questions...

Too bad we don't have someone in the DoJ to leak it like in the good old days. Then the press could have created a narrative ahead of time. Maggie will just have to wait like the rest of us.

[Pavlov]

Too bad we don't have someone in the DoJ to leak it like in the good old days. Then the press could have created a narrative ahead of time. Maggie will just have to wait like the rest of us.Which leak of a DoJ report are you talking about, Qhris?

[Reck]

It's not simple stuff. They would usually just release it.

Did Barr held a press conference when he released his 4 page memo? Yes or no?

Hint: Dont try to do math on this one.


What are you confused about this time? Do you understand what a press conference is?

[Chris]

"Did Barr held a press conference when he released his 4 page memo?"

Why don't you go look it up faggot. I'm not going to do your homework assignments you nitwit.


"It's not simple stuff. They would usually just release it."

Link?

[Reck]

Press conference. To notify the press. This is simple stuff simple Reck.

:cry ITS TO NOTIFY THE PRESS BUT DONT ASK ME TO BACK MY CLAIM, DO IT YOURSELF FAGGOT! :madrun

:lmao

[TSA]

:cry muh press conference :cry

[TSA]

What’s the final answer from collusion hoax pushers, is Rosenstein good or bad now?

[Chris]

It's not simple stuff. They would usually just release it.

Link?

[Chris]

https://twitter.com/JackPosobiec/status/1118655464282234880

:corn:

[Chris]

https://twitter.com/OfficeOfMike/status/1118635882997792769

Another press conference! Reck I wonder what they're up to?

[Chris]

https://twitter.com/RepJeffries/status/1118641336960344064

Wow.

[CitizenDwayne]

https://twitter.com/JackPosobiec/status/1118655464282234880

:corn:
Very interesting.

Horrendous source to use, but interesting if true

[spurraider21]

https://twitter.com/RepJeffries/status/1118641336960344064

Wow.
Herr Jeffries

[Chris]

Herr Jeffries

:lol

[TSA]

Very interesting.

Horrendous source to use, but interesting if true

He definitely met with Barr, not sure where Jack heard the fallout part from.

[spurraider21]

:lol
:bobo

[Chris]

https://twitter.com/RepJerryNadler/status/1118639594692644864

Nadler is pissed! :lol

[Spurs Homer]

Criminals commit crimes.
water is wet

[Spurs Homer]

Mueller team tells politico

they will NOT

be at the “traitor press conference”
tomorrow

mueller wants no part of treason shit show

[boutons_deux]

Pelosi Shreds Barr Ahead of Mueller Report Presser: He Threw Out His Credibility to ‘Protect’ Trump


https://www.mediaite.com/trump/pelosi-shreds-barr-ahead-of-mueller-report-presser-he-threw-out-his-credibility-to-protect-trump/ (https://www.mediaite.com/trump/pelosi-shreds-barr-ahead-of-mueller-report-presser-he-threw-out-his-credibility-to-protect-trump/)

[boutons_deux]

Chuck Todd Goes Off on Report About DOJ Briefing WH Lawyers: ‘This Is Actual Collusion!’


https://www.mediaite.com/tv/chuck-todd-goes-off-on-report-about-doj-briefing-wh-lawyers-this-is-actual-collusion/

[boutons_deux]

Rep. Steve Cohen on AG Barr’s Handling of Mueller Report: ‘Opposite of a Saturday Night Massacre’
https://www.mediaite.com/donald-trump/rep-steve-cohen-on-ag-barrs-handling-of-mueller-report-opposite-of-a-saturday-night-massacre/

... is how far the Repugs have degraded themselves since Tricky Dick's time.

[TSA]

Mueller team tells politico

they will NOT

be at the “traitor press conference”
tomorrow

mueller wants no part of treason shit show

The Mueller spokesman will be there. If there was a treason shit show Mueller would have actually indicted and charged people with treason, he didn’t. You’re a hopless dipshit. :lol

[TSA]

https://twitter.com/RepJerryNadler/status/1118639594692644864

Nadler is pissed! :lol

1118646297668608000

dat gif :lol

[Chris]

1118646297668608000

dat gif :lol

:lol

[Spurs Homer]

The Mueller spokesman will be there. If there was a treason shit show Mueller would have actually indicted and charged people with treason, he didn’t. You’re a hopless dipshit. :lol

wrong traitor

the person who will be there has a new job in the doj - but is not associated with the mueller team

mueller felt he had to put out a notice and confirm that NO ONE
from his team will co-sign to the traitors shit show

remember when repukes lost their shit when obama said the emails were a nothing burger?

this week the traitor ag actually briefed the traitor in chiefs legal team on the mueller report

while refusing to give congress the full report

100 times more corrupt than anything obama ever did

russia is proud of you - you piece of shit

[boutons_deux]

impeachability has a lower Barr than treason.

brazen repeated LYING, immorality, unethicality, trashing 17 IC reports of Russian meddling as hoax AND believing Pootin, secret meetings with Pootin, dictating the adoptions LIE letter for the DJT/Russian meeting, etc, etc.

There's a long list that adds up to impeachability, but I doubt Pelosi will do it, as the Dems once again cave and enable Repugs fucking up, degrading America.

Pelosi says she would rather defeat Trash in the election than impeach him.

Dem's huge problem is the Bernie's base is probably MORE motivated, and biggier, having learned how the DNC/Hillary screwed Bernie in 2016.

If DNC screws Bernie again, and I'm sure Bernie will report it, then Bernie's base may simply refuse to vote, increasing Trash's chance of reelection.

[boutons_deux]

Maxing It Out for Trump

we’ve basically already known or should have known:

the fix is in.

The goal here is to max out every avenue to protect the President from the contents of the Report.

Bill Barr and his friends at the White House clearly do not care what anyone outside of Trump world thinks at this point.

They are not even bothering to keep up appearances at the margins.

A good and increasingly relevant question for Bill Barr at this point would be

at what point the statutory powers of the Attorney General can amount to obstruction of justice if exercised with corrupt intent.

Barr and his lieutenants have been briefing the White House about the contents of the Report and

discussing its contents while the process of redaction is underway.

it’s basically impossible for one conversation not to infect or influence the other.

This is a bedrock assumption in every regulation or administrative guideline addressed to conflicts of interest.

He is on record as arguing that both components of the probe – the 2016 election and obstruction of justice – were essentially baseless and illegitimate.

He has no reasonable basis to be the person who describes the findings of the Report.

Very clearly, he’s there to spin the report in the President’s favor.

Barr justified that letter by telling Chairman Nadler that he did “not believe it would be in the public’s interest for me to attempt to summarize the full report.”

Now he’s decided it actually would be in the public’s interest to summarize the report. Things change.



As I said, there’s little attempt here even to keep up appearances.

https://talkingpointsmemo.com/edblog/maxing-it-out-for-trump?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+tpm-news+%28TPMNews%29 (https://talkingpointsmemo.com/edblog/maxing-it-out-for-trump?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+tpm-news+%28TPMNews%29)

The Corruption Will Be UnPresidented

[Reck]

https://twitter.com/OfficeOfMike/status/1118635882997792769

Another press conference! Reck (https://www.spurstalk.com/forums/member.php?u=14412) I wonder what they're up to?

Barr's conference is going down so well that Trump is doubling down. Cool

[Pavlov]

Barr's conference is going down so well that Trump is doubling down. CoolEVEN MOAR COMPLETE AND TOTAL EXONERATION.

[Reck]

The Mueller spokesman will be there. If there was a treason shit show Mueller would have actually indicted and charged people with treason, he didn’t. You’re a hopless dipshit. :lol

They already said why he'll be there. :lol

He's an employee of the DOJ, he's not Mueller's pet.

[TSA]

wrong traitor

the person who will be there has a new job in the doj - but is not associated with the mueller team

mueller felt he had to put out a notice and confirm that NO ONE
from his team will co-sign to the traitors shit show

remember when repukes lost their shit when obama said the emails were a nothing burger?

this week the traitor ag actually briefed the traitor in chiefs legal team on the mueller report

while refusing to give congress the full report

100 times more corrupt than anything obama ever did

russia is proud of you - you piece of shit

Mueller had his chance to indict and charge for collusion. He didn’t. Why do you think that is?

[TSA]

They already said why he'll be there. :lol

He's an employee of the DOJ, he's not Mueller's pet.
Mueller doesn’t have any pets anymore. His investigation is over.

[TSA]

impeachability has a lower Barr than treason.

brazen repeated LYING, immorality, unethicality, trashing 17 IC reports of Russian meddling as hoax AND believing Pootin, secret meetings with Pootin, dictating the adoptions LIE letter for the DJT/Russian meeting, etc, etc.

There's a long list that adds up to impeachability, but I doubt Pelosi will do it, as the Dems once again cave and enable Repugs fucking up, degrading America.

Pelosi says she would rather defeat Trash in the election than impeach him.

Dem's huge problem is the Bernie's base is probably MORE motivated, and biggier, having learned how the DNC/Hillary screwed Bernie in 2016.

If DNC screws Bernie again, and I'm sure Bernie will report it, then Bernie's base may simply refuse to vote, increasing Trash's chance of reelection.

Capitalizing LYING and then lying about 17 IC agencies in the same sentence :lol