Brett Kavanaugh now under FBI investigation

[Reck]

For the record, I think Avenatti's allegation really does a disservice to Ford. The last two women bringing the allegations against Kavanaugh have stories that are easily shot with holes. The Avenatti one is so over the top that it blares over the other allegations. I've said that Ford's allegation, while heavily flawed, at least passes the credibility test. The Avenatti one is so off the rails that it damages Ford's allegation by association. That's why the Dems were telling him not to do what he was doing, but like Trump, he's an attention whore.

I'm not surprised you think this way. You're intensely pro Trump/GOP. You're making TSA blush.

[koriwhat]

https://twitter.com/TheDailyShow/status/1045017623774339072

stanley is that you? you're now exiled to the annex.

[cd98]

I'm not surprised you think this way. You're intensely pro Trump/GOP. You're making TSA blush.

Well you could not be more wrong. I've never been a fan of Trump. I never voted for him and specifically voted against him in the primaries and in the general election (no I didn't vote for Hillary either, I just wrote in a name).

That said, you should proudly wear your "I go with Democrats 100% of the time" shirt.

[koriwhat]

Well you could not be more wrong. I've never been a fan of Trump. I never voted for him and specifically voted against him in the primaries and in the general election (no I didn't vote for Hillary either, I just wrote in a name).

That said, you should proudly wear your "I go with Democrats 100% of the time" shirt.

funny how the pathetic bunch here always assume if you're not for satan herself or 2face bernout then you must be a trump voter. these pathetic fucks like reck are all the same caliber of fucking losers.

[cd98]

funny how the pathetic bunch here always assume if you're not for satan herself or 2face bernout then you must be a trump voter. these pathetic fucks like reck are all the same caliber of fucking losers.

Yep. People spend too much time attacking each other instead of focusing on the specific details of these accusations and whether they have legitimacy. It doesn't matter whether I voted for Trump or Hillary, that's not the question. What matters is how credible the accusations are and whether they are sufficient (because none of them have any convincing evidence to support them) to derail Kavanaugh's nomination.

[Reck]

Well you could not be more wrong. I've never been a fan of Trump. I never voted for him and specifically voted against him in the primaries and in the general election (no I didn't vote for Hillary either, I just wrote in a name).

That said, you should proudly wear your "I go with Democrats 100% of the time" shirt.

I'll equally shit on them when they get into a scandal. Republicans just do it so often it may appear it's one sided but I have no use for elected officials who think it's cute to use their position for their gain instead of working for the people that put them there.

[koriwhat]

Yep. People spend too much time attacking each other instead of focusing on the specific details of these accusations and whether they have legitimacy. It doesn't matter whether I voted for Trump or Hillary, that's not the question. What matters is how credible the accusations are and whether they are sufficient (because none of them have any convincing evidence to support them) to derail Kavanaugh's nomination.

it's all kabuki with the far left. too bad they're all shitty actors from their politicians on down.

[cd98]

I'll equally shit on them when they get into a scandal. Republicans just do it so often it may appear it's one sided but I have no use for elected officials who think it's cute to use their position for their gain instead of working for the people that put them there.

Well I do the same for either party. But in this case, the stories have holes the size of Texas, especially the last two. So if I'm calling out any party, it's the Dems for this circus show. I realize that they had no choice since they were the ones that got rid of the filibuster, so this is their only means of stopping the confirmation, but it may have destroyed this process going forward if it is successful. And either way, it creates a black eye on the high court. I'm not a big fan of what they are doing, though, like I said, they have no choice because if they let Kavanaugh roll onto the bench with no challenge, they will be toast in November.

[Reck]

Well I do the same for either party. But in this case, the stories have holes the size of Texas, especially the last two. So if I'm calling out any party, it's the Dems for this circus show. I realize that they had no choice since they were the ones that got rid of the filibuster, so this is their only means of stopping the confirmation, but it may have destroyed this process going forward if it is successful. And either way, it creates a black eye on the high court. I'm not a big fan of what they are doing, though, like I said, they have no choice because if they let Kavanaugh roll onto the bench with no challenge, they will be toast in November.

I agree with most of this.

[hater]

:lmao :lolven:lolti

Threw his client inder the bus at the 1st interview :lmao

Poor Ford. That lady seemed legit and was just hijacked by porn lawyer 2020 :lmao

https://twitter.com/curtishouck/status/1045049568189181955?s=21

[Chris]

https://twitter.com/MichaelAvenatti/status/1044985963200614400

Avenatti big dicking DarrinS TSA and Chris like it's Christmas time. :lmao

Don't @ me with your "big dick" fantasies churl.

[Nathan89]

:lmao :lolven:lolti

Threw his client inder the bus at the 1st interview :lmao

Poor Ford. That lady seemed legit and was just hijacked by porn lawyer 2020 :lmao

https://twitter.com/curtishouck/status/1045049568189181955?s=21

Perhaps he should get more information from his client. That is laughably vague.

[RandomGuy]

Most victims never come forward. Many wait decades.

Most don't because they think they won't be believed.

Provide any evidence that waiting for a long time means that the claim is less likely true.



So they won't be believed until the accused is up for the supreme court?

Your logic is astounding, fucktard.

Not really evidence. That is a doorbell ringing insult, and a poorly ordered phrased one at that.

It's almost as if you don't have any evidence that the length of time between the event and coming forward affects whether it is true or not.

If you actually had evidence, you would lead with that. Since you don't have it... jr. high level game.

Not impressed.

[DarrinS]

Uh...Wut?


1045068692382523392

[Reck]

CNN good now.

:lol right wingers

[hater]

Can you imagine a judge questioning Avenati in court??

“Judge, these are not my claims. They are my clients”. :lmao :lol :lmao

Worst “lawyer” in history lol

[rmt]

More of that Blue Wave propaganda? please
So you think Russia wanted Trump so americans can have better economy and international trades?

Russia sure wanted Trump who would pull back environmental regulations encouraging fracking, pipelines, drilling, etc so USA could take away Russia's oil business - yeah.

[RandomGuy]

So rape is only important to a woman when political gain is available? Got it.

Insults, and strawmen.

Would you like me to show how your argument was a failure of reasoning, or did you know that already and not care?

[Chris]

CP18FDxuEJg

[in2deep]

:lmao :lolven:lolti

Threw his client inder the bus at the 1st interview :lmao

Poor Ford. That lady seemed legit and was just hijacked by porn lawyer 2020 :lmao

https://twitter.com/curtishouck/status/1045049568189181955?s=21

lol what a train wreck

[RandomGuy]

Can you imagine a judge questioning Avenati in court??

“Judge, these are not my claims. They are my clients”. :lmao :lol :lmao

Worst “lawyer” in history lol

(facepalm)

That is the definition of what a lawyer does in a courtroom, provides the court their clients claims.

Wow, that is some weapons grade stupidity. Careful where you point that.

(edit)

What are you going to do for an encore?


"Can you imagine a pizza guy delivering a pizza??

“here you go sir, here is the pizza you ordered”. :lmao :lol :lmao

Worst “pizza guy” in history lol


:rollin

[rmt]

This shit is just ugly as hell and we're going to have to figure out a way to prevent this kind of divisive partisan shit-slinging in future nominations for the health of the country. I don't see how we go back from this with the current system.

First step is to remove the President's arbitrary authority to nominate SC judges. I'd rather see a bipartisan panel nominate a group of potential judges and vet through all of them for the best and most agreeable candidate across party lines.

Have you forgotten a little thing called the Constitution?

[koriwhat]

Have you forgotten a little thing called the Constitution?

they always do.

[Reck]

lol what a train wreck

Why is it a trainwreck? Is Jake Tapper a litigator and is Avenatti obligated to show his hands on live TV?

She already said she's willing to testify and go to the FBI. All under oath.

Like usual right wingers think this is somehow a win. :lol

[DarrinS]

Avenatti sees dumpster fire, douses himself with gasoline, and jumps in. :lol

[koriwhat]

Why is it a trainwreck? Is Jake Tapper a litigator and is Avenatti obligated to show his hands on live TV?

She already said she's willing to testify and go to the FBI. All under oath.

Like usual right wingers think this is somehow a win. :lol

counting chickens before they hatch...

[cd98]

CNN good now.

:lol right wingers

That is funny. But Jake Tapper is the only guy I trust in the news on any network. And yes, that includes Foxnews. He calls the shots as he sees them (I think his critiques of Trump were dead on) and he calls out both sides for their inconsistencies. Wish more news people were like him.

[RandomGuy]

You're a lawyer?
You see nothing wrong with how Kavanaugh's alleged victim is being treated? You keep repeating that the FBI has zero to investigate? Seriously?

Ok- just humor us;

(a) You are the alleged sexual assault victims attorney - the defense is telling you - no witnesses, no fbi investigation, no delay -gotta take the stand in 3 days, the jury has made comments regarding your client being "mixed-up" - and have pretty much stated that the accused suspect is pretty much gonna walk. They refused an investigation and said - "it was too long ago - nothing to find there" - there was another WITNESS - but he told the prosecutor "I don't want to testify under oath" and the prosecutor said "ok-sure"
-- Are you happy with this for your victim/client? -- Are the scales of justice evenly applied here?


(b) You are Kavanaughs attorney - the prosecutor is telling you - "he will walk" - the jury has been holding "war room sessions" all week and coaching him on how to answer questions, the prosecutor has disallowed any independent investigation even though the standard practice has always been to allow an fbi background to be completed or re-opened whenever new allegations surface but they winked at you and said "don't worry - the president believes your client and will back you 100%
-- Are you happy being the attorney in this situation?

A or B seems legally fair to you?

Since you are a lawyer.




If I was her attorney (and I'm not a criminal attorney), I would tell her to file a complaint with the Maryland police department. There is no statute of limitations on a rape allegation. I would tell her to have them investigate. Before I went public with the allegation, I would make sure that she could clearly articulate where she was, when it happened, who was there, who's house it was, how she got there, and where she went after. I also wouldn't go to the media and politicize. I would have handled it privately and quietly and if the Maryland police decided there was a case, then it would become public.

But that's not anything close to what happened here because it has been treated like a political hit job. Unfortunately. That's why I tend to think it is a hoax. Answer the questions above, and then I'd see if I change my mind about the allegation.


I noticed you didn't answer the question.

I will ask it again, for Spurs Homer, since you saw fit to ignore a fair question.

A or B seems legally fair to you?


Gorsuch was not a painful change for the left...[answers other post].

A or B seems legally fair to you?

[cd98]

Why is it a trainwreck? Is Jake Tapper a litigator and is Avenatti obligated to show his hands on live TV?

She already said she's willing to testify and go to the FBI. All under oath.

Like usual right wingers think this is somehow a win. :lol

I'm going to do you a favor. Ignore Avenatti. Sure he's excellent at trolling Trump, but the guy has the stink of attention whore all over him. He gives lawyers a bad name, and we already have a bad name. His affidavit is so lawyered to shout big, ugly things like drugging girls and gang rape without really making a real claim against Kavanaugh. It creates the impression that he was a gang rapist and drugging girls to the casual reader while having deniability if anyone ever accuses the affiant of lying about Kavanaugh doing the raping and drugging.

If you want to stop this confirmation, it's going to be Ford that does it.

[in2deep]

(facepalm)

That is the definition of what a lawyer does in a courtroom, provides the court their clients claims.

Wow, that is some weapons grade stupidity. Careful where you point that.

(edit)

What are you going to do for an encore?




:rollin

A lawyer does more than present client claims in court. They represent the client, speak on behalf of the coient and argue in favor of the client wether with judge or opposing lawyers

its fair to say Avenati did a terrible job in the Tapper interview

[RandomGuy]

[here's some youtube of Donald Trump to own the libs]

:sleep

[Trill Clinton]

https://twitter.com/calebecarma/status/1045029337316159489?s=19

Just sick but not surprising of the deplorables. Y'all don't deserve to have children with this mentality.

[hater]

A lawyer does more than present client claims in court. They represent the client, speak on behalf of the coient and argue in favor of the client wether with judge or opposing lawyers

its fair to say Avenati did a terrible job in the Tapper interview

:lmao randomguy

(Facepalm) :lol

[cd98]

A or B seems legally fair to you?

First, I don't have any obligation to answer any hypothetical. Second, I don't offer loaded hypotheticals that do not reflect the facts of the case and the other potential ways to resolve the issue. I gave you an answer and that is the right answer, which is more than I need to do. Ford has big problems with her story as far as giving it weight, I've noted those issues over and over.

You don't need to make believe that Ford hasn't had time to get her story straight. She should've had it straight before going to Sen. Feinstein and she has had months to get ready for this day. Glaring in all of this is that her side is the first one that wanted another hearing, until they were granted it, and then they wanted an investigation with the FBI.

[cd98]

A or B seems legally fair to you?

Also, your hypothetical isn't even clear. Are you talking about a court of law? If so, then your hypothetical makes no sense and has no reflection on the reality of how the process works.

[cd98]

A lawyer does more than present client claims in court. They represent the client, speak on behalf of the coient and argue in favor of the client wether with judge or opposing lawyers

its fair to say Avenati did a terrible job in the Tapper interview

Avanetti was totally dodging. If you have smoking gun evidence of gang rape, you don't lead people on. You throw it out right now and kill the confirmation in its tracks while winning the adoration of the entire left wing base. If you have nothing, you pretend to have something and string things along to delay. Jake Tapper makes it so obvious that this is a hack job.

[dabom]

When that gang rapist loses his nomination. :lmao

[djohn2oo8]

1045081111620198401


And another one

[cd98]

https://twitter.com/calebecarma/status/1045029337316159489?s=19

Just sick but not surprising of the deplorables. Y'all don't deserve to have children with this mentality.

On the flip side, this has to be one of the worst arguments in favor of Kavanaugh. You can say that what a person does as a teenager should not define him for the rest of his life. You shouldn't argue that groping people is just fine because it's done all the time.

[LkrFan]

:lmao randomguy

(Facepalm) :lol

Damn son, gonna have to call you "hate her" instead of hater. All those misogynistic posts I'm seeing from you. :lol

[Nathan89]

On the flip side, this has to be one of the worst arguments in favor of Kavanaugh. You can say that what a person does as a teenager should not define him for the rest of his life. You shouldn't argue that groping people is just fine because it's done all the time.

Tbf, that same argument was used defend drunk driving on here just the other day.:lol

[DarrinS]

Damn son, gonna have to call you "hate her" instead of hater. All those misogynistic posts I'm seeing from you. :lol

The irony

Looks at avatar

[RandomGuy]

Also, your hypothetical isn't even clear. Are you talking about a court of law? If so, then your hypothetical makes no sense and has no reflection on the reality of how the process works.

"does either seem fair" to you is pretty simple question, if one was being intellectually honest. I assume in this case the words were simple enough not to allow for much ambiguity.

I can see why it might trouble you.

[djohn2oo8]

1045083151696113664

[koriwhat]

The irony

Looks at avatar

for real right? it's the loser brigade that always thinks they're holier than thou. 2 face fuck faces they all are tbh.

[Pavlov]

1045083151696113664Let's not investigate this either, right?

Whores looking for money, right?

[Reck]

1045081111620198401


And another one

Oh so good old Kavanaugh is not all about det rape. He likes to beat them too.

[koriwhat]

1045083151696113664

way to be late but you just took the opportunity to flaunt your bf over msnbc instead. it's ok, we all know how much you love playing with kyle's butthole.

[djohn2oo8]

way to be late but you just took the opportunity to flaunt your bf over msnbc instead. it's ok, we all know how much you love playing with kyle's butthole.
Your calf tats are all in a bunch

[koriwhat]

Your calf tats are all in a bunch

:cry

you really can't come up with anything worth a fuck huh? you're amy schumer level comedy at best. both stink like a small barn yard animal.

[RandomGuy]

You're a lawyer?
You see nothing wrong with how Kavanaugh's alleged victim is being treated? You keep repeating that the FBI has zero to investigate? Seriously?

Ok- just humor us;

(a) You are the alleged sexual assault victims attorney - the defense is telling you - no witnesses, no fbi investigation, no delay -gotta take the stand in 3 days, the jury has made comments regarding your client being "mixed-up" - and have pretty much stated that the accused suspect is pretty much gonna walk. They refused an investigation and said - "it was too long ago - nothing to find there" - there was another WITNESS - but he told the prosecutor "I don't want to testify under oath" and the prosecutor said "ok-sure"
-- Are you happy with this for your victim/client? -- Are the scales of justice evenly applied here?

(b) You are Kavanaughs attorney - the prosecutor is telling you - "he will walk" - the jury has been holding "war room sessions" all week and coaching him on how to answer questions, the prosecutor has disallowed any independent investigation even though the standard practice has always been to allow an fbi background to be completed or re-opened whenever new allegations surface but they winked at you and said "don't worry - the president believes your client and will back you 100%
-- Are you happy being the attorney in this situation?

A or B seems legally fair to you?

Since you are a lawyer.




If I was her attorney (and I'm not a criminal attorney), I would tell her to file a complaint with the Maryland police department. There is no statute of limitations on a rape allegation. I would tell her to have them investigate. Before I went public with the allegation, I would make sure that she could clearly articulate where she was, when it happened, who was there, who's house it was, how she got there, and where she went after. I also wouldn't go to the media and politicize. I would have handled it privately and quietly and if the Maryland police decided there was a case, then it would become public.

But that's not anything close to what happened here because it has been treated like a political hit job. Unfortunately. That's why I tend to think it is a hoax. Answer the questions above, and then I'd see if I change my mind about the allegation.


I noticed you didn't answer the question.

I will ask it again, for Spurs Homer, since you saw fit to ignore a fair question.

A or B seems legally fair to you?


Gorsuch was not a painful change for the left...[answers other post].


A or B seems legally fair to you?


First, I don't have any obligation to answer any hypothetical. Second, I don't offer loaded hypotheticals that do not reflect the facts of the case and the other potential ways to resolve the issue. I gave you an answer and that is the right answer, which is more than I need to do. Ford has big problems with her story as far as giving it weight, I've noted those issues over and over.

You don't have to answer any given question, this is just a message board.

How intellectually honest you want to be, or not is up to you. A fair question, put to gauge what you think, is somehow not worth answering? Got it.

A description of what is, in fact, going on is somehow "loaded". Wow.

:cry reality is biased against my beliefs :cry

That is what you are going with? Really? smh

[cd98]

"does either seem fair" to you is pretty simple question, if one was being intellectually honest. I assume in this case the words were simple enough not to allow for much ambiguity.

I can see why it might trouble you.

If your fact pattern reflected the actual case, then maybe, but when it doesn't, then why am I answering loaded hypotheticals. I understand that you really want my take, but if you want it that bad, sign an engagement letter and I'll provide you a legal response to your hypothetical for payment.

[koriwhat]

If your fact pattern reflected the actual case, then maybe, but when it doesn't, then why am I answering loaded hypotheticals. I understand that you really want my take, but if you want it that bad, sign an engagement letter and I'll provide you a legal response to your hypothetical for payment.

:tu

[dabom]

1045081111620198401


And another one

That sick fucking bastard. :lmao

[djohn2oo8]

:cry

you really can't come up with anything worth a fuck huh? you're amy schumer level comedy at best. both stink like a small barn yard animal.
They look horrific

[Pavlov]

If your fact pattern reflected the actual case, then maybe, but when it doesn't, then why am I answering loaded hypotheticals. I understand that you really want my take, but if you want it that bad, sign an engagement letter and I'll provide you a legal response to your hypothetical for payment.:lol the derp gambit

[boutons_deux]

Trash is lying, 19 women made video of his pussy grabbing

Trump admits sexual assault allegations against him have affected his defense of Kavanaugh

“I’ve had a lot of false charges made against me, really false charges.”

https://www.vox.com/2018/9/26/17907398/trump-brett-kavanaugh-sexual-misconduct-allegations

[baseline bum]

Well I do the same for either party. But in this case, the stories have holes the size of Texas, especially the last two. So if I'm calling out any party, it's the Dems for this circus show. I realize that they had no choice since they were the ones that got rid of the filibuster, so this is their only means of stopping the confirmation, but it may have destroyed this process going forward if it is successful. And either way, it creates a black eye on the high court. I'm not a big fan of what they are doing, though, like I said, they have no choice because if they let Kavanaugh roll onto the bench with no challenge, they will be toast in November.

LOL blaming the Democrats for destroying the supreme court nomination process that Mitch McConnell broke two and a half years before.

[benefactor]

https://twitter.com/calebecarma/status/1045029337316159489?s=19

Just sick but not surprising of the deplorables. Y'all don't deserve to have children with this mentality.
I'm afraid ducks has already reproduced, unfortunately

[hater]

The irony

Looks at avatar

:lmao lkrfemalehater

[baseline bum]

https://twitter.com/calebecarma/status/1045029337316159489?s=19

Just sick but not surprising of the deplorables. Y'all don't deserve to have children with this mentality.

Too bad Avante is banned, he would have loved seeing this.

[LkrFan]

Fo fo fo:

1045085284638052352

Where there's smoke...

[LkrFan]

Too bad Avante is banned, he would have loved seeing this.

For real? What she do? :lol

[boutons_deux]

How Ken Starr’s Associate Brett Kavanaugh Would Question Supreme Court Nominee Brett Kavanaugh

The message seems clear:

Kavanaugh considers it improper and unseemly to undertake a searching and potentially embarrassing inquiry into his sexual history and potential abuse of alcohol.

Kavanaugh has also suggested that such an inquiry is unnecessary, particularly given that, during high school,

he was a model citizen, “focused on academics and athletics, going to church every Sunday at Little Flower, [and] working on my service projects.” :lol

Yet when he was a prosecutor on Ken Starr’s independent counsel staff,

Kavanaugh had no such reticence about asking intrusive, deeply embarrassing questions about sexual matters.

In 1998, when Starr’s team was preparing to question Bill Clinton under oath regarding his relationship with Monica Lewinsky,

Kavanaugh wrote an internal memo (https://www.washingtonpost.com/apps/g/page/politics/read-the-memo-from-brett-kavanaugh-to-judge-starr/2322/) titled “Slack for the President?” in which he said that

he was “strongly opposed to giving the President any ‘break’ in the questioning regarding the details of the Lewinsky relationship”

unless the president resigned or “confess[ed].”

I’d imagine that prosecutor Kavanaugh would ask Supreme Court nominee Kavanaugh questions including the following:

• Whether, as alleged by Christine Blasey Ford (https://www.washingtonpost.com/investigations/california-professor-writer-of-confidential-brett-kavanaugh-letter-speaks-out-about-her-allegation-of-sexual-assault/2018/09/16/46982194-b846-11e8-94eb-3bd52dfe917b_story.html?utm_term=.88f2798bf2af), during a drinking binge, Kavanaugh forced her into a room, put his hand over her mouth, tried to remove her clothes as she struggled to get away, and treated her so roughly she reasonably feared for her life;



• Whether, as alleged by Deborah Ramirez (https://www.newyorker.com/news/news-desk/senate-democrats-investigate-a-new-allegation-of-sexual-misconduct-from-the-supreme-court-nominee-brett-kavanaughs-college-years-deborah-ramirez), Kavanaugh, again while highly inebriated, pulled down his pants before Ramirez and presented his penis to her while others laughed and one onlooker taunted her to “kiss it”; and

• Whether, as alleged by Julie Swetnick (http://www.latimes.com/politics/la-na-pol-julie-swetnick-declaration-20180926-htmlstory.html), Kavanaugh, while drunk, repeatedly “ground” himself against women and attempted to fondle and grab them without their consent, as well as whether he was present while a drugged and debilitated Swetnick was gang raped.

prosecutor Kavanaugh had no patience with such considerations,

arguing to fellow members of Starr’s team that “it is our job to make [the witness’s] pattern of revolting behavior clear—piece by painful piece.”

Furthermore, while Kavanaugh has since questioned whether presidents should be subject to criminal investigations while in office,

he has not disavowed his memo nor suggested that the questioning of President Clinton was conducted improperly.

https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2018/09/brett-kavanaugh-ken-starr-clinton-supreme-court.html

[hitmanyr2k]

1045081111620198401


And another one


Even if he did that he was a 33 year old kid. Why is this coming out now?

[LkrFan]

The irony

Looks at avatar

Please. I love women. All kinds. Black, White, Hispanic, etc. Don't be a faggot. :lol

[boutons_deux]

Even if he did that he was a 33 year old kid. Why is this coming out now?

because NOW he is a nominee to SCOTUS for fucking LIFE, 30 more years of this drunken frat bro's so-called "justice"

[hater]

Please. I love women. All kinds. Black, White, Hispanic, etc. Don't be a faggot. :lol

Yeah it shows in your avatar sick fuck :lol

Change it to something non-mysoginistic and we might take you seriously

[LkrFan]

Yeah it shows in your avatar sick fuck :lol

Change it to something non-mysoginistic and we might take you seriously

N:lolpe

I see I struck a nerve witcha. My bad :lmao

[LkrFan]

:lmao lkrfemalehater

You and him are like Brett Kavanagh and Mark Judge :rollin :lmao :rollin

[boutons_deux]

https://scontent-dfw5-2.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/42478933_2322693687823672_7081837554214895616_n.jp g?_nc_cat=1&oh=21d72b49a6488ec2d3114b3ea5689d6f&oe=5C61F3FD

[Chris]

Yeah it shows in your avatar sick fuck :lol

Change it to something non-mysoginistic and we might take you seriously

Not as bad as AaronY's creepy sig imo

[LkrFan]

Your calf tats are all in a bunch

:lmao

[koriwhat]

They look horrific

some well done spurs logos? they look horrific huh? maybe if i went and got them done in a kitchen by a junkie but they look exactly how the logo looks.

you just lack creativity and latch onto the whole calf tats thing because you're simple. ah poor little simpledjohn.

[djohn2oo8]

because NOW he is a nominee to SCOTUS for fucking LIFE, 30 more years of this drunken frat bro's so-called "justice"

he was being sarcastic

[LkrFan]

Not as bad as AaronY's creepy sig imo

Look at my avatar. She's happy. Smiling. Signing. Dancing. Turning me on, etc. No drugging needed by me. Not worried here. :lol

[djohn2oo8]

some well done spurs logos? they look horrific huh? maybe if i went and got them done in a kitchen by a junkie but they look exactly how the logo looks.

you just lack creativity and latch onto the whole calf tats thing because you're simple. ah poor little simpledjohn.
Can’t leave the meth lab alone eh.

[koriwhat]

N:lolpe

I see I struck a nerve witcha. My bad :lmao

no, you probably don't understand the definition of irony is all. there's a bunch of you dumb motherfuckers here on ST.

[boutons_deux]

At the UN, Trump just went off on woman reporters who asked about Kavanaugh’s rape accusations

In a surprise turn of events, President Trump held a solo press conference this afternoon at the United Nations summit — his first in months — and

opened up with a disgraceful slew of attacks against Kavanaugh’s accusers and

accused the Democrats of orchestrating a “con job” against Kavanaugh, getting testy with reporters.

CNN’s Jim Acosta attempted to get an answer from the President about why he always sides with the accused men instead of the accusers — like accused pedophile Senate candidate Roy Moore — but instead

got some preposterous nonsense,

before getting visibly upset with him after Acosta asked him to call on female reporters.

But it was when a reporter asked him about his own sex assault allegations that he really went off the rails,

accusing them all of being paid off and

complained endlessly about the way that the “fake news media” spread the stories and refused to publish “the truth.”

He grew furious with the woman reporter and treated her with appalling rudeness, refusing to actually answer her question and even telling her to sit down.

https://washingtonpress.com/2018/09/26/at-the-un-trump-just-went-off-on-woman-reporters-who-asked-about-kavanaughs-rape-accusations/

[koriwhat]

Can’t leave the meth lab alone eh.

i wouldn't know. i don't do meth and never will.

again, the calf tat angle and now the drug angle too? lmao! i smoke bud so harp on me for that but you'll find me not doing much else besides the occasional ginseng energy pill from time to time.

you're out of your league but keep trying small fry.

[Chris]

Turning me on, etc. No drugging needed by me.

TMI lil' fella

[Reck]

Look at my avatar. She's happy. Smiling. Signing. Dancing. Turning me on, etc. No drugging needed by me. Not worried here. :lol

Nice under boobs too.

Chris the incel likes his chick flat and pale.

[koriwhat]

:cry

[Pavlov]

Nice under boobs too.

Chris the incel likes his chick flat and pale.Don't be ridiculous.

Chris doesn't like women.

[koriwhat]

Nice under boobs too.

Chris the incel likes his chick flat and pale.

and you love your dudes hipster'd out and estrogen laden. right, tranny?

[hater]

N:lolpe

I see I struck a nerve witcha. My bad :lmao

How do you think women feel when seeing your avatar Harvey Weinstein?

[Reck]

and you love your dudes hipster'd out and estrogen laden. right, tranny?

For someone who's not a faggot you sure love talking about dude's cocks and what not.

Surprisingly, that wouldn't be the most shocking thing about you, calf. You have to live with shitty tattoos for the rest of your life and have people look at you like you're some kind of retard boy or something.

[dabom]

Look at my avatar. She's happy. Smiling. Signing. Dancing. Turning me on, etc. No drugging needed by me. Not worried here. :lol

You got all the Re-Tards on your nuts. :lol































:tu

[koriwhat]

For someone who's not a faggot you sure love talking about dude's cocks and what not.

Surprisingly, that wouldn't be the most shocking thing about you, calf. You have to live with shitty tattoos for the rest of your life and have people look at you like you're some kind of retard boy or something.

this is a great copy&paste job. i feel like i've read this same response from you numerous times over but pertaining to other posters here. the icing on the cake was your second sentence because it truly shows how much you love me.

you're a faggot holmes. own it!

[LkrFan]

How do you think women feel when seeing your avatar Harvey Weinstein?

Harvey Weinstein? :lol

I think she must feel sexy and confident. :toast

[LkrFan]

You got all the Re-Tards on your nuts. :lol































:tu

:toast

[koriwhat]

btw tranny, i didn't mention anyone's cock so... who's got cock on their mind; trannywReck does!

[LkrFan]

Nice under boobs too.

Chris the incel likes his chick flat and pale.
Word. He must like em like my man Splits? :lmao

[Reck]

this is a great copy&paste job. i feel like i've read this same response from you numerous times over but pertaining to other posters here. the icing on the cake was your second sentence because it truly shows how much you love me.

you're a faggot holmes. own it!

Gay confirmed.

[LkrFan]

TMI lil' fella

Ask your moms if I'm little. I'm packing what yo daddy lacking :lmao

[LkrFan]

no, you probably don't understand the definition of irony is all. there's a bunch of you dumb motherfuckers here on ST.

Calf tats. But I'm dumb? Okay :lol

[koriwhat]

Gay confirmed.

lmao you trying to weasel yourself out of this. it's ok Reck, it's 2018 and you can be whatever you'd like little fairy.

[koriwhat]

Calf tats. But I'm dumb? Okay :lol

yeah, you definitely showed how dumb you are in this thread.

[Reck]

https://twitter.com/renato_mariotti/status/1045095767789248512

A fifth one. I'm out. :lol

[Pavlov]

https://twitter.com/renato_mariotti/status/1045095767789248512

A fifth one. I'm out. :lolWhores looking for speaking fees!

[LkrFan]

yeah, you definitely showed how dumb you are in this thread.

You insulting me is equivalent to an Avante post. Talking loud, saying nothing.

[LkrFan]

https://twitter.com/renato_mariotti/status/1045095767789248512

A fifth one. I'm out. :lol

Kavanagh gone be like:

https://pics.me.me/i-plead-the-fif-moneyballerbdog-2255447.png

:lol

[Reck]

You insulting me is equivalent to an Avante post. Talking loud, saying nothing.

:lol

Seriously. Hell Avante actually makes a case for counter arguments. Calfie over here just caps locks his way through an entire post of nothing.

[koriwhat]

You insulting me is equivalent to an Avante post. Talking loud, saying nothing.

if you can't understand how you're being ironic then you must be dumb. what's hard to understand? dodge this but in the end you're a dummy anyhow.

[dabom]

Kavanagh gone be like:

https://pics.me.me/i-plead-the-fif-moneyballerbdog-2255447.png

:lol

:lmao

[koriwhat]

:lol

Seriously. Hell Avante actually makes a case for counter arguments. Calfie over here just caps locks his way through an entire post of nothing.

oh do i? i don't capitalize much... you blind too tranny?

[LkrFan]

1045099779217391616

:lmao

[LkrFan]

if you can't understand how you're being ironic then you must be dumb. what's hard to understand? dodge this but in the end you're a dummy anyhow.

Okay :lol

[LkrFan]

:lol

Seriously. Hell Avante actually makes a case for counter arguments. Calfie over here just caps locks his way through an entire post of nothing.

:rollin :lmao :rollin

[ducks]

Surprised they have not accused him of raping a man

[Nathan89]

https://twitter.com/SaysSimonson/status/1045097793399017478?s=20

[DMC]

Not really evidence. That is a doorbell ringing insult, and a poorly ordered phrased one at that.

It's almost as if you don't have any evidence that the length of time between the event and coming forward affects whether it is true or not.

If you actually had evidence, you would lead with that. Since you don't have it... jr. high level game.

Not impressed.

You're not making any sense. I don't need any evidence. The "presumed innocent until proven guilty" automatically puts the onus of proof on the prosecution.

[ducks]

No, Kavanaugh Shouldn't Withdraw. A Serious Look At The Allegations Against Him Shows Why.

https://www.dailywire.com/news/36373/no-kavanaugh-shouldnt-withdraw-serious-look-ben-shapiro?utm_source=facebook&utm_medium=social&utm_content=062316-news&utm_campaign=dwbrand

[TSA]

Let's not investigate this either, right?

Whores looking for money, right?

1045095699862487041

Investigate what? Be specific dipshit :lol

[DMC]

Lkrfan is here now, the thread is officially as dead as the NBA Forum :lol

[Chris]

Lkrfan is here now, the thread is officially as dead as the NBA Forum :lol

The harbinger of doom :lol

[Pavlov]

1045095699862487041

Investigate what? Be specific dipshit :lolThanks for the info. Perhaps the alleged victim or witnesses will come forward -- if they exist.

Pretty random accusation to be made up tho.

[Nathan89]

https://twitter.com/PfeifferDC/status/1045096533950156801?s=20

https://twitter.com/PfeifferDC/status/1045096733926203392?s=20

5th accusation. Another reliable source.:lol

[TSA]

Thanks for the info. Perhaps the alleged victim or witnesses will come forward -- if they exist.

Pretty random accusation to be made up tho.

How would you start your investigation detective?

[Chris]

1045053616392982528

welp

[boutons_deux]

Even if they go public, Repugs and ST assholes will not believe them.

The committee vote on Friday is the next, but not final, vote.

Everybody still have time to chime in, step up, and trash K before the full Senate vote.

[DarrinS]

https://twitter.com/PfeifferDC/status/1045096533950156801?s=20

https://twitter.com/PfeifferDC/status/1045096733926203392?s=20

5th accusation. Another reliable source.:lol


:lmao :lmao :lmao

[Chris]

1045024259532156928

[ducks]

Thanks for the info. Perhaps the alleged victim or witnesses will come forward -- if they exist.

Pretty random accusation to be made up tho.
so they are to investigate the whole 1998 if brett was ever in the denver area

why can they not be more specific or what they would get in trouble if they were specific and found out they were were lying

[Pavlov]

How would you start your investigation detective?I said thanks for the info. Perhaps the alleged victim or witnesses will come forward -- if they exist.

[Nathan89]

https://twitter.com/marthamaccallum/status/1044980638951067650?s=20

[Pavlov]

so they are to investigate the whole 1998 if brett was ever in the denver area

why can they not be more specific or what they would get in trouble if they were specific and found out they were were lyingI would prefer the people actually involved come forward.

[djohn2oo8]

Lkrfan is here now, the thread is officially as dead as the NBA Forum :lol
Naw it’s gone 90 pages in a week. Sorry fatty.

[Nathan89]

1045053616392982528

welp

Because she graduated years before them and made up a story decades later. They had no reason to know her.

[boutons_deux]

Read Christine Blasey Ford's Prepared Testimony For Thursday's Senate Hearing

http://digg.com/2018/christine-blasey-ford-prepared-statement

[Chris]

1045033489068945410
1045034691194163201
1045035880723951618
1045037190152155141

[Pavlov]

:lol Stealth Jeff

[DarrinS]

boutons should call in and say he has boofed by K

[Chris]

1045101030684446720

[ducks]

Even if they go public, Repugs and ST assholes will not believe them.

The committee vote on Friday is the next, but not final, vote.

Everybody still have time to chime in, step up, and trash K before the full Senate vote. do you believe the people saying it did not happen?

[TSA]

I would prefer the people actually involved come forward.

:lol “people actually involved”

[Chris]

1045097039456063488

[Pavlov]

1045101030684446720So there was an investigation?

Good.

The FBI could've gotten this all pretty quickly without anonymous twitter.

[TSA]

Naw it’s gone 90 pages in a week. Sorry fatty.

90 pages in a week and Kavanaugh is still not under FBI investigation

:lol lyin’ john

[Pavlov]

:lol “people actually involved”Right, the alleged victim or the people who are supposed to have witnessed the incident.

Pretty simple stuff.

If they don't there isn't much to be done.

[Nathan89]

1045024259532156928

Of course not.

[ducks]

I think it is time someone mails new york police a letter saying chuck raped someone with a name no contact info and see what the left and media would do

[djohn2oo8]

90 pages in a week and Kavanaugh is still not under FBI investigation

:lol lyin’ john
As long as he ain’t confirmed :tu

[Nathan89]

boutons should call in and say he has boofed by K

And Dems will tally it up as another credible accusation.

[Pavlov]

I think it is time someone mails new york police a letter saying chuck raped someone with a name no contact info and see what the left and media would doWhy don't you find some more women to doxx?

[ducks]

Of course not.

notice they have no picture of her stomach and weight
and she has a ton of makeup on to cover herself up

[TSA]

Right, the alleged victim or the people who are supposed to have witnessed the incident.

Pretty simple stuff.

If they don't there isn't much to be done.

There was nothing to be done from the get go yet you wanted an investigation.

[ducks]

Why don't you find some more women to doxx?

they are not credible no need to

[djohn2oo8]

There was nothing to be done from the get go yet you wanted an investigation.
You mean like Horowitz? :lol

[Nathan89]

1045097039456063488

https://twitter.com/jpodhoretz/status/1045088456937025536?s=20

[boutons_deux]

90 pages in a week and Kavanaugh is still not under FBI investigation

:lol lyin’ john

lyin pussy grabbin Trash is defending K as a brother-in-pussy-grabbing. won't ask for FBI to get involved, but I bet they are "informally" investigating, ya know, deep state and all that

[Pavlov]

notice they have no picture of her stomach and weight
and she has a ton of makeup on to cover herself up:lolWTF?

[ducks]

I would prefer the people actually involved come forward.

do you think they should have came forward when he was first picked to be a judge before he was even selected to go to the highest court in the land

[Chris]

:cry muh FBI :cry

[djohn2oo8]

:lolWTF?
:lmao indeed

[Pavlov]

There was nothing to be done from the get go yet you wanted an investigation.I asked a question.

You gave me information I didn't have.

I thanked you.

Pretty simple.

[ducks]

so someone's mother says she was shoved against a wall in 1998 but said shovee was so traumatized by the shoving she wants to remain anonymous? A shoving?

[Pavlov]

do you think they should have came forward when he was first picked to be a judge before he was even selected to go to the highest court in the landSure.

If they don't, can they never come forward?

[Chris]

https://twitter.com/jpodhoretz/status/1045088456937025536?s=20

"too traumatized to speak" :lol

[ducks]

Sure.

If they don't, can they never come forward?

they should have came forward no later then 5 years after the fact

[Pavlov]

they should have came forward no later then 5 years after the factIf they don't, can they never come forward?

[djohn2oo8]

:lmao no later than 5 years

[djohn2oo8]

Does that go for the Cosby accusers too ducks?

[Pavlov]

Does that go for the Cosby accusers too ducks ks?And anyone who accuses any Democrat.

[djohn2oo8]

they should have came forward no later then 5 years after the fact
*than

[Nathan89]

https://twitter.com/elliosch/status/1044713343569858562?s=20

[Trill Clinton]

https://scontent-dfw5-2.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/42478933_2322693687823672_7081837554214895616_n.jp g?_nc_cat=1&oh=21d72b49a6488ec2d3114b3ea5689d6f&oe=5C61F3FD

Not true. There is a poster itt, I won't say his name, who in the past admitted if his daughter made an outcry of sexual abuse he would not believe her.

[Pavlov]

https://twitter.com/elliosch/status/1044713343569858562?s=20Right, the Senators make the conclusion from the evidence the FBI gathers.

It's a job interview background check.

[Reck]

Oh shit. Stealth Jeff is on the case. Game OVAH

[Chris]

Oh crap Will Smith memes. Game OVAH

[Nathan89]

https://twitter.com/McCormackJohn/status/1045106877674254338?s=20

"According to Vinneccy, Swetnick threatened him after they broke up and even after he got married to his current wife and had a child.

“Right after I broke up with her, she was threatening my family, threatening my wife and threatening to do harm to my baby at that time,” Vinneccy said in a telephone interview with POLITICO. "I know a lot about her.”

"She’s not credible at all,” he said. “Not at all.”"

Relevant to the 3rd reliable source.:lol

[Chris]

:lol

[Nathan89]

:lmao

[TSA]

https://twitter.com/PfeifferDC/status/1045096533950156801?s=20

https://twitter.com/PfeifferDC/status/1045096733926203392?s=20

5th accusation. Another reliable source.:lol

He folded :rollin

1045098674081214464

[ducks]

the slime ball idiots are the ones the democrats are hiring
crazy nancy and chuck are not that bright

[dabom]

Another 100pager OP. Man how do you do it? :lol

[Chris]

1045101750133444609
https://media2.giphy.com/media/3o7btNRptqBgLSKR2w/giphy.gif?cid=3640f6095bac29fe7452552f7774c478

[TSA]

Roughly a decade ago, Ms. Swetnick was involved in a dispute with her former employer, New York Life Insurance Co., over a sexual-harassment complaint she filed, according to people familiar with the matter. Representing her in the complaint was the firm run by Debra Katz, the lawyer currently representing Dr. Ford.

https://www.wsj.com/articles/attorney-avenatti-releases-affidavit-from-woman-describing-kavanaugh-at-parties-in-1980s-1537974634?redirect=amp#click=https://t.co/TVTI8TGxf5

This is getting beyond pathetic now

[Chris]

Another 100pager OP. Man how do you do it? :lol

lol "we was trolling all along"

[dabom]

lol "we was trolling all along"

Even stealth Jeff made an appearance.:lol

[Pavlov]

Roughly a decade ago, Ms. Swetnick was involved in a dispute with her former employer, New York Life Insurance Co., over a sexual-harassment complaint she filed, according to people familiar with the matter. Representing her in the complaint was the firm run by Debra Katz, the lawyer currently representing Dr. Ford.

https://www.wsj.com/articles/attorney-avenatti-releases-affidavit-from-woman-describing-kavanaugh-at-parties-in-1980s-1537974634?redirect=amp#click=https://t.co/TVTI8TGxf5

This is getting beyond pathetic nowAll the more reason to involve the FBI. As you well know, there are consequences for lying to them.

Remember?

[Chris]

1045074797577687040

[djohn2oo8]

Another 100pager OP. Man how do you do it? :lol
Easy. Find whatever triggers old white men and it’s off to the races.

[ducks]

Roughly a decade ago, Ms. Swetnick was involved in a dispute with her former employer, New York Life Insurance Co., over a sexual-harassment complaint she filed, according to people familiar with the matter. Representing her in the complaint was the firm run by Debra Katz, the lawyer currently representing Dr. Ford.

https://www.wsj.com/articles/attorney-avenatti-releases-affidavit-from-woman-describing-kavanaugh-at-parties-in-1980s-1537974634?redirect=amp#click=https://t.co/TVTI8TGxf5

This is getting beyond pathetic nowTHE SLIME balls should be shipped out of the usa

[Nathan89]

"We believe her. We believe her. We believe her."

:huddle:

[djohn2oo8]

Hell I could start a thread about boss David Hogg and that shit would go 100 plus

[Nathan89]

Who would've thought Dems have a deep bench of nutcases to call on at any given time to smear someone.

[TSA]

At the same time, my greatest fears have been realized – and the reality has been far worse than what I expected. My family and I have been the target of constant harassment and death threats. I have been called the most vile and hateful names imaginable. These messages, while far fewer than the expressions of support, have been terrifying to receive and have rocked me to my core. People have posted my personal information on the internet. This has resulted in additional emails, calls, and threats. My family and I were forced to move out of our home. Since September 16, my family and I have been living in various secure locales, with guards. This past Tuesday evening, my work email account was hacked and messages were sent out supposedly recanting my description of the sexual assault.

https://assets.documentcloud.org/documents/4945864/Ford-Testimony-2018-09-26.pdf

:lol Joy Reid defense.

[djohn2oo8]

"We believe her. We believe her. We believe her."

:huddle:
Yeah we get it. You piss sitting down.

[Chris]

Easy. Find whatever triggers old white men and it’s off to the races.

Racist djohn folks ^

[TSA]

Hell I could start a thread about boss David Hogg and that shit would go 100 plus

Would you lie in the thread title like this thread?

[Chris]

At the same time, my greatest fears have been realized – and the reality has been far worse than what I expected. My family and I have been the target of constant harassment and death threats. I have been called the most vile and hateful names imaginable. These messages, while far fewer than the expressions of support, have been terrifying to receive and have rocked me to my core. People have posted my personal information on the internet. This has resulted in additional emails, calls, and threats. My family and I were forced to move out of our home. Since September 16, my family and I have been living in various secure locales, with guards. This past Tuesday evening, my work email account was hacked and messages were sent out supposedly recanting my description of the sexual assault.

https://assets.documentcloud.org/documents/4945864/Ford-Testimony-2018-09-26.pdf

:lol Joy Reid defense.

Those crazy hackers, you never know what they will do next.

[djohn2oo8]

Racist djohn folks ^
And right on cue. Triggered. :lol

[Chris]

At least I'm not a racist. Yikes.

[djohn2oo8]

Would you lie in the thread title like this thread?
I might make a Susan Rice is indicted thread to get your hopes up.

[djohn2oo8]

At least I'm not a racist. Yikes.
Nobody asked. :lol

[Nathan89]

Roughly a decade ago, Ms. Swetnick was involved in a dispute with her former employer, New York Life Insurance Co., over a sexual-harassment complaint she filed, according to people familiar with the matter. Representing her in the complaint was the firm run by Debra Katz, the lawyer currently representing Dr. Ford.

https://www.wsj.com/articles/attorney-avenatti-releases-affidavit-from-woman-describing-kavanaugh-at-parties-in-1980s-1537974634?redirect=amp#click=https://t.co/TVTI8TGxf5

This is getting beyond pathetic now

Unfortunately you really have to be paying attention to realize how low the corrupt Dem party is going here.

[djohn2oo8]

Unfortunately you really have to be paying attention to realize how low the corrupt Dem party is going here.
Because sex assault allegations always come from Dems. :lol

[DarrinS]

It’s funny how Avenatti acts like he’s some kind of white knight, but always manages to make things worse. :lol

Please run in 2020

:lol

[Mikeanaro]

Hell I could start a thread about boss David Hogg and that shit would go 100 plus
Doubt it, Boss Hogg is not hot right now.

[Nathan89]

Because sex assault allegations always come from Dems. :lol

Didn't say that.

[djohn2oo8]

It’s funny how Avenatti acts like he’s some kind of white knight, but always manages to make things worse. :lol

Please run in 2020

:lol
Funny how Darrin thinks he is breaking some news.

[TSA]

I might make a Susan Rice is indicted thread to get your hopes up.

Why would anyone believe the next thread title from a confirmed and proud liar hoping for a high page count?

[Nathan89]

https://twitter.com/McCormackJohn/status/1045106877674254338?s=20

"According to Vinneccy, Swetnick threatened him after they broke up and even after he got married to his current wife and had a child.

“Right after I broke up with her, she was threatening my family, threatening my wife and threatening to do harm to my baby at that time,” Vinneccy said in a telephone interview with POLITICO. "I know a lot about her.”

"She’s not credible at all,” he said. “Not at all.”"

Relevant to the 3rd reliable source.:lol

[TSA]

Funny how Darrin thinks he is breaking some news.

Like you breaking the news of Kavanaugh being under FBI investigation when he wasn’t and still isn’t :lmao

[Fabbs]

I knew just give that ambulance chasing bitch Avenatti enough rope and he'd hang his own twat.

[djohn2oo8]

Like you breaking the news of Kavanaugh being under FBI investigation when he wasn’t and still isn’t :lmao
As long as he ain’t confirmed :tu

[Chris]

As long as he ain’t confirmed :tu

You're a confirmed liar and racist :tu

[Nathan89]

https://twitter.com/seanmdav/status/1045053894190084102?s=20

[djohn2oo8]

You're a confirmed liar and racist :tu
You like pedophiles. No room for you.

[Chris]

1045093917933412352
1045097010989322242

[hater]

https://twitter.com/McCormackJohn/status/1045106877674254338?s=20

"According to Vinneccy, Swetnick threatened him after they broke up and even after he got married to his current wife and had a child.

“Right after I broke up with her, she was threatening my family, threatening my wife and threatening to do harm to my baby at that time,” Vinneccy said in a telephone interview with POLITICO. "I know a lot about her.”

"She’s not credible at all,” he said. “Not at all.”"

Relevant to the 3rd reliable source.:lol

:lmao :lol :lol :lmao :lol

Shes probably mental

:lmao :lolven:lolti

[djohn2oo8]

The phrase “old white men” gets Chris upset :lmao

[hater]

1045101750133444609
https://media2.giphy.com/media/3o7btNRptqBgLSKR2w/giphy.gif?cid=3640f6095bac29fe7452552f7774c478

:lmao omg

Too good

[Chris]

You like pedophiles. No room for you.

Who is a pedophile?

[djohn2oo8]

Who is a pedophile?
Roy Moore

[Nathan89]

https://twitter.com/bennyjohnson/status/1045053131112042497?s=20

[Chris]

How old was Roy Moore's accuser?

[DarrinS]

Funny how Darrin thinks he is breaking some news.

Funny how you thought you won the Internet today. :lmao

[hater]

Why would anyone believe the next thread title from a confirmed and proud liar hoping for a high page count?

Dsnowflake2008. :lmao :lol

[Nathan89]

https://twitter.com/bennyjohnson/status/1045028680035110913?s=20

https://twitter.com/bennyjohnson/status/1045037660878897153?s=20

Relevant to reliable source #1.:lol

[djohn2oo8]

Funny how you thought you won the Internet today. :lmao
Triggered shitty comebacks.

[djohn2oo8]

How old was Roy Moore's accuser?
Underage.

[dabom]

Underage.

:lol

[in2deep]

Lol OP

[djohn2oo8]

Lol OP
It’s LOL old white men riled up at rape allegations.

[Chris]

Underage.

This is your white flag.

[in2deep]

https://twitter.com/keithurbahn/status/1045110612987191296?s=21

[ducks]

Underage.

Sucking on moms tits for milk

[djohn2oo8]

Sucking on moms tits for milk
You have issues :lmao

[djohn2oo8]

This is your white flag.
The white flag came when Roy Moore molested kids.

[DarrinS]

https://twitter.com/keithurbahn/status/1045110612987191296?s=21


:lmao

[Nathan89]

Time to deflect now that all the reliable sources start getting called out.

[Chris]

1044960940884709378

Worst lawyer ever :lol

[djohn2oo8]

Time to deflect now that all the reliable sources start getting called out.
Called out by who?

[djohn2oo8]

1044960940884709378

Worst lawyer ever :lol
Literally no one called him a good one. Chrisbot :lol

[Nathan89]

1044960940884709378

Worst lawyer ever :lol

That photo was all it took fo cult Dem to determine it was yet another reliable source.

[Chris]

The white flag came when Roy Moore molested kids.

You are fake news.

[Nathan89]

Called out by who?

By all the evidence that comes out after the initial accusation that's deemed reliable based on the "we believe her" ethos.

[Nathan89]

https://twitter.com/JackPosobiec/status/1045077766851514368?s=20

:tu

[hitmanyr2k]

Avenatti's trolling is hilarious. I hope the Trump family keeps challenging him :lol

1045104078580264961

[dabom]

Avenatti's trolling is hilarious. I hope the Trump family keeps challenging him :lol

1045104078580264961

O my fucking GOD! Dude is killin it. :lmao :lmao

[in2deep]

It’s LOL old white men riled up at rape allegations.

Lol im not white

[djohn2oo8]

You are fake news.
And Stealth Jeff is real news, Citizen X?

[djohn2oo8]

Lol im not white
Didn’t say you were. But niggas in here following Rosie O’Donnell have outed themselves.

[Mikeanaro]

https://twitter.com/keithurbahn/status/1045110612987191296?s=21
:rollin

[DarrinS]

Didn’t say you were. But niggas in here following Rosie O’Donnell have outed themselves.

What does this even mean?

[djohn2oo8]

What does this even mean?
That you follow Rosie O’Donnell and deserve to be laughed at

[elbamba]

If your fact pattern reflected the actual case, then maybe, but when it doesn't, then why am I answering loaded hypotheticals. I understand that you really want my take, but if you want it that bad, sign an engagement letter and I'll provide you a legal response to your hypothetical for payment.

I am just wondering what "fair" has to do with the law? He's not really asking a legal opinion at all, which in turn, makes his hypothetical pointless for you to answer in your capacity as a lawyer.

[DarrinS]

Can’t wait for tomorrow

:corn: