Brett Kavanaugh now under FBI investigation

[DarrinS]

rape comedians and rape philosophers seem to be a thing in the GOP

really?

[boutons_deux]

what's funny about that, boots?

Schumer, Pelosi, DiFi are moribund placeholders, ain't gonna re-invent shit about the Dems.

Dems are quite content to fuck around, compliant in their silence when screaming outrage is fully justifiied, and let the Repugs fuck up govt, fuck up the country, run a brutal racial ethnic cleansing campaign

they ain't gonna do shit

Where were they when Hillary was running a shitty campaign?

re-invention? G M A F B

[Nbadan]

Give the Dems some credit, they didn't have the numbers to win this fight but then again the GOP didn't have the proof against Hillary's email scandal nor Bengazi, but they just kept repeating the lie and their base bought in...


The top Democrat on the House Judiciary Committee says he will investigate alleged perjury and sexual misconduct by Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh, and slammed a "whitewash" probe completed by the FBI earlier this week.

The New York Times reported that Rep. Jerrold Nadler (D-NY), who will head the Judiciary Committee if Democrats take over the House after November's elections, said that the legitimacy of the Supreme Court is at stake, as the Senate prepared Saturday to confirm Kavanaugh's nomination to the Supreme Court.

https://thinkprogress.org/leading-democrat-vows-congressional-probe-after-fbi-whitewash-of-kavanaugh-30bac4383e9d/

Trump will be busy defending himself from the Mueller investigation and his little tax problem.....should be interesting times after the election....

[Winehole23]

really?just lie back and enjoy it.

[Winehole23]

there's rape and there's legitimate rape

[Winehole23]

the latter kind doesn't cause pregnancy

[ElNono]

Schumer, Pelosi, DiFi are moribund placeholders, ain't gonna re-invent shit about the Dems.

Dems are quite content to fuck around, compliant in their silence when screaming outrage is fully justifiied, and let the Repugs fuck up govt, fuck up the country, run a brutal racial ethnic cleansing campaign

they ain't gonna do shit

Where were they when Hillary was running a shitty campaign?

re-invention? G M A F B

The question is how many more elections are they going to lose to figure it out, or if they find a catalyst. But it's happening one way or another.

It's easy to dramatize now, but it was only 6 years ago Obama was winning re-election fairly comfortably.

The GOP was in the same conundrum pre-Trump. Everybody and their mother thought Mitch was a sellout, and there was no way forward. Then they dropped the social conservative charade and pushed through.

[Winehole23]

Now, I’m of the understanding that in many cases of rape it does not involve any pregnancy because of the trauma of the incident...that may be true with incest a little bit

[Winehole23]

Being a father of five girls, I’ve explored this a lot

[ElNono]

Unfortunately, ignorance knows no bounds.

[Winehole23]

http://goprapeadvisorychart.com/

[Winehole23]

http://goprapeadvisorychart.com/sites/default/files/images/chart1.gif

[spurraider21]

there's rape and there's legitimate rape
oh man, that was some shit

[Winehole23]

http://goprapeadvisorychart.com/sites/default/files/images/chart2.gif

[baseline bum]

Then they dropped the social conservative charade and pushed through.

When was that? Trump's list of judges he'd appoint to attack Roe vs Wade was a huge part of him getting elected.

[boutons_deux]

oh man, that was some shit

don't forget "they can flush it out", don't get pregnant from rape if they don't want to

[ElNono]

When was that? Trump's list of judges he'd appoint to attack Roe vs Wade was a huge part of him getting elected.

For the election, they gladly overlooked the "grab em by the pussy", the fact that he's married and re-married 26327638234 times...

Heck, one would argue that even after the election, Dear Leader pretty much admitted to be an adulterer and fuck multiple porn actresses, and obviously, nary a peep from the congregation.

They did the math and that was the equation. Now that they're in power, you're going to get a mixed bag. But for all intents and purposes, the game is getting to power, and possibly, staying there.

I mean, they bitched and moaned so much about an outsider because politicos are career liars, and I don't think I'm stretching reality much at all stating this guy is the worst liar I can think if in the WH since I was born (which is quite a feat).

[baseline bum]

For the election, they gladly overlooked the "grab em by the pussy", the fact that he's married and re-married 26327638234 times...

Heck, one would argue that even after the election, Dear Leader pretty much admitted to be an adulterer and fuck multiple porn actresses, and obviously, nary a peep from the congregation.


What does that have to do with dropping social conservatism? Dismantling Roe Vs Wade is peak social conservatism. So is cracking down on illegals because they're rapists who claim MS-13. Trump's executive order allowing churches to be overtly political and remain tax exempt isn't social conservative? I don't understand this point you keep making that social conservatism is dead just because Trump is a hypocrite. The evangelicals just spin it as forgiving him for being a flawed man because only jeebus is without sin.

[Winehole23]

What does that have to do with dropping social conservatism? Dismantling Roe Vs Wade is peak social conservatism. So is cracking down on illegals because they're rapists who claim MS-13. Trump's executive order allowing churches to be overtly political and remain tax exempt isn't social conservative? I don't understand this point you keep making that social conservatism is dead just because Trump is a hypocrite. The evangelicals just spin it as forgiving him for being a flawed man because only jeebus is without sin.It's partly because Donald Trump has no political or religious convictions whatsoever that he can go so much further to the right than his subordinates, and I think he's doing that. After a long long walk in the political wilderness, footsore religious pilgrims (and other kooky conservatives who somehow managed to hang on long enough) begin to see their just reward.

Donald Trump is about to give them the goodies. Think of Trump as being a kind of Moses for white people in particular and sadistic people in general.

A Supreme Court justice isn't nothing. Of course he'll be forgiven for his humanizing and pathetic human frailties, how is that even a question?

[ducks]

Did we hear that when Obama ran for president some facebook executives and white house executives traded places so that Obama would get the full cooperation of facebook and lists of facebook subscribers who leaned Democrat? Not on Yahoo

[Winehole23]

yeah, let's talk about Obama now.

[Nathan89]

https://twitter.com/ByronYork/status/1049402151951376385?s=20

[ElNono]

What does that have to do with dropping social conservatism? Dismantling Roe Vs Wade is peak social conservatism. So is cracking down on illegals because they're rapists who claim MS-13. Trump's executive order allowing churches to be overtly political and remain tax exempt isn't social conservative? I don't understand this point you keep making that social conservatism is dead just because Trump is a hypocrite. The evangelicals just spin it as forgiving him for being a flawed man because only jeebus is without sin.

The point is that he's actually not a social conservative, nor he lives his life as a social conservative, he's made that readily public and available. He just says and does because that's convenient for him, and that's the conduit to power.

Remember before the elections the whole 'moral litmus test' for social conservatism? How Teddy was the moral compass for conservatism? Let's go further back, remember that Romney didn't win the election because he wasn't conservative enough? The whole thing is a big charade.

Trump is way, way less socially conservative than either (we could make the argument he's just as conservative on economics as both). The notion that people will largely look at your social conservative creds to elect you was proven to be a complete fallacy.

Obviously, the man now wants to please his crowd, and having a Congress ready and willing, he's going to pass every conservative dream that's been waiting in the wings forever, including the southern socially awkward agenda (which will eventually be overturned in time, wherever possible).

That said, now the cat is out of the bag, and he's not really any less of a flat out liar than your average politico, so the question is how people will eventually react to that, vis a vis, whoever the Democrats put in front of him.

[baseline bum]

The point is that he's actually not a social conservative, nor he lives his life as a social conservative, he's made that readily public and available. He just says and does because that's convenient for him, and that's the conduit to power.

Remember before the elections the whole 'moral litmus test' for social conservatism? How Teddy was the moral compass for conservatism? Let's go further back, remember that Romney didn't win the election because he wasn't conservative enough? The whole thing is a big charade.

Trump is way, way less socially conservative than either (we could make the argument he's just as conservative on economics as both). The notion that people will largely look at your social conservative creds to elect you was proven to be a complete fallacy.

Obviously, the man now wants to please his crowd, and having a Congress ready and willing, he's going to pass every conservative dream that's been waiting in the wings forever, including the southern socially awkward agenda (which will eventually be overturned in time, wherever possible).

That said, now the cat is out of the bag, and he's not really any less of a flat out liar than your average politico, so the question is how people will eventually react to that, vis a vis, whoever the Democrats put in front of him.

His social conservative cards are pretty strong based on how he has governed.

[Nathan89]

https://twitter.com/washingtonpost/status/1049476397729767424?s=20

:lol

[ElNono]

His social conservative cards are pretty strong based on how he has governed.

That's all Congress. The only thing he really wanted from Congress, which was the wall, he didn't get (yet).

[baseline bum]

That's all Congress. The only thing he really wanted from Congress, which was the wall, he didn't get (yet).

His judicial nominations and executive orders give him strong social conservative standing.

[Winehole23]

That's all Congress. The only thing he really wanted from Congress, which was the wall, he didn't get (yet).MacGuffin?

White whale?

[Winehole23]

https://twitter.com/ByronYork/status/1049402151951376385?s=20find another preppy New Englander to defend Kavanaugh. great plan.

[Winehole23]

perfect, in a way

[SnakeBoy]

That said, now the cat is out of the bag, and he's not really any less of a flat out liar than your average politico, so the question is how people will eventually react to that, vis a vis, whoever the Democrats put in front of him.

People are going to want the truth. They will pay more attention to Gil next time imho


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gazOeC8B3oA

[ElNono]

MacGuffin?

White whale?

Pretty much. He's clearly ensnared in his own narcissism (a criticism you could levy to some other politicos too). I forgot to mention tariffs as his own initiative that doesn't require Congress, yet to be seen to what degree of success/failure.

[ElNono]

His judicial nominations and executive orders give him strong social conservative standing.

Are their his though? I could definitely say tariffs, that's the kind of thing he would do. Immigration is probably another order that you could attribute to him.

[ElNono]

People are going to want the truth. They will pay more attention to Gil next time imho


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gazOeC8B3oA

:lol

You know what I mean. He ain't pulling the manufacturing jobs are coming back to 'Murica again.

(you would hope people aren't that dumb. again.)

[SnakeBoy]

:lol

You know what I mean. He ain't pulling the manufacturing jobs are coming back to 'Murica again.

(you would hope people aren't that dumb. again.)

Hope springs eternal

[boutons_deux]

Trevor Noah on Trash tactic of weaponizing male victimhood

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4LZ3P1sv9jE&t=340s

What is DARVO?

https://dynamic.uoregon.edu/jjf/defineDARVO.html

[Cuppycake Gumdrop]

Some of the responses in this thread truly astound me. How would any of you guys (or our husbands, fathers, brothers, sons) feel if you were alleged to attempted rape on so flimsy evidence and memories? This is purely political - 3 and a half decades later - it's preposterous. And I don't hear any sympathy for the hundreds of thousands of REAL evidence/rape kits sitting on shelves awaiting testing for lack of funding.

http://www.wbur.org/onpoint/2018/08/16/rape-kits-untested-backlog
Sooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo fucking concerned about :cry all the untested rape kits :cry but as soon as Kavanaugh is rammed through, nary a peep about it:lmao

[Pavlov]

Sooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo fucking concerned about :cry all the untested rape kits :cry but as soon as Kavanaugh is rammed through, nary a peep about it:lmao:lol That crusade ended pretty quickly tbh.

[ducks]

Five Teenage ‘Mean Girls’ Falsely Accused A Boy Of Sexual Assault. They Weren’t Punished.
https://www.dailywire.com/news/36917/five-teenage-mean-girls-falsely-accused-boy-sexual-ashe-schow?utm_source=facebook&utm_medium=social&utm_content=062316-news&utm_campaign=dwbrand

[Pavlov]

Five Teenage ‘Mean Girls’ Falsely Accused A Boy Of Sexual Assault. They Weren’t Punished.
https://www.dailywire.com/news/36917/five-teenage-mean-girls-falsely-accused-boy-sexual-ashe-schow?utm_source=facebook&utm_medium=social&utm_content=062316-news&utm_campaign=dwbrandThe new crusade against women and girls begins.

[rmt]

When is pointing out the hypocrisy of so many of you whining about listening to/believing Ford while hundreds of thousands of rape kits (STILL) sit on shelves awaiting testing a crusade? You don't see me even COMMENT on (much less celebrate) Kavanaugh getting onto the SC.

[Spurminator]

When is pointing out the hypocrisy of so many of you whining about listening to/believing Ford while hundreds of thousands of rape kits (STILL) sit on shelves awaiting testing a crusade? You don't see me even COMMENT on (much less celebrate) Kavanaugh getting onto the SC.

Are you saying liberals need to focus on systematic failures in law enforcement?

Maybe you guys could cover this one.

[rmt]

Are you saying liberals need to focus on systematic failures in law enforcement?

Maybe you guys could cover this one.

I am saying that this entire debacle was political. And only, bou, out of all of you liberals would admit it. The feigned concern for Ford's vague memories of attempted rape is hypocritical compared to rape kits with real DNA evidence sitting on shelves.

[rmt]

Spurminator, my previous post was not specifically aimed at you. I should resist the baiting by others who don't want to move on.

[Spurminator]

I am saying that this entire debacle was political. And only, bou, out of all of you liberals would admit it. The feigned concern for Ford's vague memories of attempted rape is hypocritical compared to rape kits with real DNA evidence sitting on shelves.

Well yeah it was political but I don't think the concern was feigned. And I certainly don't think you're required to fix the rape kit issue before you can express concern for (alleged) assault victims.

This conservative sleight of hand where you question the sincerity of someone's concern by pointing to a different issue altogether really isn't very convincing, and it's way overplayed at this point. Try to mix in a few other fallacies to be less predictable.

[Pavlov]

Well yeah it was political but I don't think the concern was feigned. And I certainly don't think you're required to fix the rape kit issue before you can express concern for (alleged) assault victims.

This conservative sleight of hand where you question the sincerity of someone's concern by pointing to a different issue altogether really isn't very convincing, and it's way overplayed at this point. Try to mix in a few other fallacies to be less predictable.WHATABOUTCHICAGO?????

[Cuppycake Gumdrop]

WHATABOUTCHICAGO?????
CHICAGO DIDN’T WORK????? SOMEONE PULL THE MS-13 LEVER NOW!

[boutons_deux]

CHICAGO DIDN’T WORK????? SOMEONE PULL THE MS-13 LEVER NOW!

done

richies in the Hamptons are all scrambling to install panic rooms in their mansions.

https://nypost.com/2018/10/06/hamptons-millionaires-build-luxe-panic-rooms-to-hide-from-ms-13/

[CosmicCowboy]

Y'all don't have panic rooms?

[boutons_deux]

Trevor attacks, has a HILARIOUS artist's rendering of K at the bench

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E4V0Y6SzXzE&feature=em-uploademail

[boutons_deux]

Fox News segment says the MeToo movement ‘has gone too far’

because pioneer women were ‘tougher’ about rape

https://www.rawstory.com/2018/10/fox-news-segment-says-metoo-movement-gone-far-pioneer-women-tougher-rape/

iow, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nfWlot6h_JM

[boutons_deux]

Kavanaugh Disappointed to Discover Supreme Court Has No Happy Hour

https://media.newyorker.com/photos/5bbcbdd4742f932cbcb7a8dc/master/w_1298,c_limit/Borowitz-Kavanaugh-Setback.jpg

WASHINGTON —In a setback for the newest Associate Justice on his first day at work, Brett Kavanaugh said on Tuesday that he was “very disappointed” to learn that the Supreme Court does not have a happy hour.

Kavanaugh told reporters that he made the horrifying discovery as

the clock ticked down to 5 p.m. and “everyone was still in their offices working and stuff.”

“I mean, I couldn’t believe it,” Kavanaugh said.

“I had been busting my tail for six hours, and I needed to blow off some steam.”

Ruth Bader Ginsburg was the member of the Court who delivered the bad news to Kavanaugh.

“When she told me, I guess I started crying a bit, which I now regret,” he said.

“She just kind of closed her office door and went back to work or whatever.”

Kavanaugh’s unpleasant discovery that the Supreme Court has “absolutely no drink specials” has

left him wondering if his bruising confirmation battle “was even worth it.”

“This place blows,” he said.

https://www.newyorker.com/humor/borowitz-report/kavanaugh-disappointed-to-discover-supreme-court-has-no-happy-hour (https://www.newyorker.com/humor/borowitz-report/kavanaugh-disappointed-to-discover-supreme-court-has-no-happy-hour)

[ducks]

fake news

[boutons_deux]

One more for the road. Kavanaugh allegedly vandalized truck in drunken rage (https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2018/10/9/1803056/-Can-you-stand-one-more-overlooked-accusation-Kavanaugh-allegedly-vandalized-truck-in-drunken-rage)

According to the Wall Street Journal, when senators went into their super-secret cone of silence with their special Mitch McConnell decoder rings last week, they saw a stack of documents with thousands of tips about Brett Kavanaugh that had been sent to the FBI tipline. And they basically ignored them all.

From the Wall Street Journal: (https://www.wsj.com/livecoverage/kavanaugh/card/1538782969)

One document likely in the stack would be a notarized statement submitted to the FBI Tuesday by a truck owner,

who allegedly confronted an inebriated college student who was “smashing the black cargo box” in the bed of his parked Ford Courier on a New Haven, Conn., street in the fall of 1986.

“I yelled again at the person, and realized it was Brett Kavanaugh,” reads the statement, which goes on to allege that the future Supreme Court nominee, “uncontrollably, incoherently drunk,”

later refused to pay for the damage when confronted over the incident at meeting of Truth and Courage, the secret society both Yale undergraduates belonged to.

Judge Kavanaugh, through his attorney, denies the incident took place.

The former truck owner, whose redacted statement was reviewed by The Wall Street Journal, says that Truth and Courage members met twice weekly through senior year to hang out and drink.

When “heavily drunk,” Mr. Kavanaugh, could turn “belligerent, offensive and even possibly criminal,” the statement says.

The judge has denied such allegations about his alcohol habits in testimony before the Senate.


Gee, that almost sounds like “wilding.”

Oh, and in case you’re not pissed off enough yet,

here’s a quote about the myriad accusations, from a Republican senator:

Sen. John Kennedy (R., La.) said:

“It’s pretty thick—the whole report, you could stand on it and paint the ceiling.”


Yes, Sen. Kennedy.

Or maybe you could write on the ceiling.

Might I suggest, “Fuck you, America”?

https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2018/10/9/1803056/-Can-you-stand-one-more-overlooked-accusation-Kavanaugh-allegedly-vandalized-truck-in-drunken-rage?detail=emaildkre

[AaronY]

Y'all don't have panic rooms?
You have a panic room?

[boutons_deux]

How a Kavanaugh Court Will Take Us Back to the Dark Ages

1. The Muslim Ban.

2. Gay Marriage.

3. Torture.

Trump has pledged to torture people, and to torture them with great brutality.

4. A Woman’s Right to Choose

5. Big Money Dominating Politics.

6. Workers Rights.

Social scientists have found that the rapid march of the United States toward being a highly unequal society and a plutocracy has been enabled in part by the corporations’ gutting of the union movement.

https://www.truthdig.com/articles/how-a-kavanaugh-court-will-take-us-back-to-the-dark-ages/

I would not be surprised if the BigGun / Repugs brought a case / passed a law that forbade ANY and ALL gun regs at state and local level

[Fabbs]

Boots have you stated do you live in the U.S.A.?

[boutons_deux]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ov4epAJRPMw

International Man of Mystery, and rightwingnutjob kickass BITCH SLAPPER par excellence

[boutons_deux]

5 Interesting Supreme Court Cases Kavanaugh Could Decide This Term

The new justice could be a deciding vote on upcoming cases concerning immigrant detention laws and prison sentencing rules.

Protecting people from being tried for the same crime twice

Gamble v. United States, one of the first cases the Supreme Court has agreed to hear, centers on the constitutionality of the “separate sovereignty exception” to the Fifth Amendment’s double jeopardy clause.

In simpler terms, that’s a controversial loophole in the rule that a person cannot be tried for the same crime twice. The exception under question holds that because the federal and state government are “separate sovereigns,” the double jeopardy clause does not apply.

Limiting who can be charged under the Armed Career Criminal Act

In another case with implications for lengths of prison sentences (http://www.scotusblog.com/2018/10/argument-preview-do-slight-force-robberies-count-for-enhancing-armed-career-criminal-act-sentences/), the Supreme Court has agreed to hear a case dealing with which state robbery crimes should be considered violent felonies under the Armed Career Criminal Act, a statute that set a minimum sentence of 15 years for crimes involving firearms if the offender already has three serious or violent felony convictions on their record.

Detaining immigrants during deportation proceedings

The Supreme Court has also agreed to decide in Nielsen v. Preap, a case that will determine whether thousands of longtime U.S. residents face indefinite detention without a bond hearing.

Applying civil rights protections in LGBT discrimination cases

One case that may be added to the Supreme Court’s docket this term would determine whether the federal civil rights law that bans workplace sex discrimination also applies to sexual orientation.

In Zarda v. Altitude Express, Inc., a skydiving company asked the Supreme Court to hear an appeal in the case it lost in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 2nd Circuit earlier this year. That decision found that the company violated Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 when it fired him for being gay.

Allowing religious symbols on public property

Another issue that could be added to the Supreme Court’s docket concerns a set of rulings that barred the display of large crosses on public property.

In two lawsuits out of Maryland (https://constitutioncenter.org/blog/a-tale-of-two-crosses-at-the-supreme-court) likely to be considered as one case if they’re granted an appeal before the Supreme Court, and a similar one (https://s3.amazonaws.com/becketnewsite/Becket-Pensacola-Cert-Petition-FINAL.pdf) out of Florida whose parties are hoping to bypass lower courts so that it may be considered with the Maryland cases, the Supreme Court may consider how far the government may go in preventing religious symbols on public property.

https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/supreme-court-cases-decisions-brett-kavanaugh_us_5bbba129e4b028e1fe402b92?utm_medium=e mail&utm_campaign=__TheMorningEmail__101018&utm_content=__TheMorningEmail__101018+CID_3130f4ad b9073d700a782eba9c9c4da5&utm_source=Email%20marketing%20software&utm_term=five%20Supreme%20Court%20cases&ncid=newsltushpmgnews__TheMorningEmail__101018

here's how the rulings will go

LGBT: no civil rights federal protection, so-called Catholic judges pander to Christian hate, implement Christian sharia

religious shit on taxpayer property: judges pander to Christian supremacy

double jeopardy: since most people tried are poor, fuck the poor, try them twice, punish them twice.

immigrant detention w/o bond: they aren't Americans, so fuck 'em, damage them with detention for political objectives, aka torture.

I, human being, disagree with all of those rulings.

[ducks]

trump was very transparent he had a list of 25 judges he would select so far he selected 2 of them
people voted for him
he got more then what was needed 270

[Spurs Homer]

trump was very transparent he had a list of 25 judges he would select so far he selected 2 of them
people voted for him
he got more then what was needed 270


You work pretty hard at swallowing semen from a white supremacist traitor.

Doesn't say much about you.

[koriwhat]

You work pretty hard at swallowing semen from a white supremacist traitor.

Doesn't say much about you.

you have no clue what a white supremacist is tbh. you're just a good little zombie who has been taught to step in line and spew the dems talking points ad nauseam as if it's fact. you're a simpleton.

[ducks]

Not one president has ever gave a list of judges he would try to get to the Supreme Court

People wanted those judges

[ducks]

WATCH: Don Lemon Yells 'Shut Up' At Panelist, Insists Leftists Targeting GOP Senators Are Just 'People Who Are Upset


https://www.dailywire.com/news/36965/watch-don-lemon-yells-shut-panelist-insists-hank-berrien?utm_source=facebook&utm_medium=social&utm_content=062316-news&utm_campaign=dwbrand

[boutons_deux]

'Welcome to the Future': SCOTUS Ruling on North Dakota's Voter ID Law Underscores Nationwide GOP Attack on Voting Rights

"This is why the Supreme Court matters...It's about the very nature of American democracy. And, oh yeah, about racism too."

As the U.S. Supreme Court this week upheld a North Dakota voter ID requirement, it likely disenfranchised tens of thousands of the state's residents—particularly Democratic-leaning (https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2018/10/heidi-heitkamp-north-dakota-senate-voter-id.html) Native American voters—and made clear that

the highest court in the land will do little to protect Americans from the Republican Party's rampant attacks on voting rights.

The court ruled in favor of the Eighth Circuit Court's decision that allowed the state to require all voters to have a residential street address and an accepted form of ID which includes that address.

The requirement, (https://splinternews.com/the-supreme-court-just-upheld-a-terrible-voter-id-law-i-1829641431)introduced in 2017 by GOP Gov. Doug Burgum, blatantly disenfranchises indigenous voters, many of whom live on reservations and use P.O. boxes instead of street addresses.

"Access to voting should not be dependent on whether one lives in a city or on a reservation,"

In her dissent, Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg shared (https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/18pdf/18a335_l647.pdf) grave concerns that the rule could leave tens of thousands of the state's voters unable to vote in November:

The risk of disenfranchisement is large...

Seventy thousand North Dakota residents—

almost 20 percent of the turnout in a regular quadrennial election—

lack a qualifying ID;

and approximately 18,000 North Dakota residents also lack supplemental documentation sufficient to permit them to vote without a qualifying ID.


https://www.commondreams.org/news/2018/10/10/welcome-future-scotus-ruling-north-dakotas-voter-id-law-underscores-nationwide-gop?cd-origin=rss

[CosmicCowboy]

You have a panic room?

I was joking a little but mine at the SA house is more like a safe/closet but two people could actually get in there in a pinch. More than likely if I got that far though I would just come right back out with a shotgun.

[CitizenDwayne]

Not one president has ever gave a list of judges he would try to get to the Supreme Court

People wanted those judges
What people? The people that couldn’t get him the popular vote?

[Pavlov]

:lol CC has a panic room

[CosmicCowboy]

:lol CC has a panic room

Actually a walk in closet/safe. Built it long before I ever heard of "panic rooms". Not really a collector but I have a shitload of guns from 3 generations both sides of the family plus my personal shooters.

[Pavlov]

Actually a walk in closet/safe. Built it long before I ever heard of "panic rooms". Not really a collector but I have a shitload of guns from 3 generations both sides of the family plus my personal shooters.Uh, you'd lock yourself in an old safe?

Even funnier tbh.

[benefactor]

Not one president has ever gave a list of judges he would try to get to the Supreme Court

People wanted those judges
Shut up, stupid.

[CosmicCowboy]

What is so funny about having a security closet Chump? I have some expensive guns and protect them accordingly from a snatch and grab burglar as a backup to the house alarm system. Hahaha.

[baseline bum]

Not one president has ever gave a list of judges he would try to get to the Supreme Court

People wanted those judges

More people apparently didn't want those judges

[ducks]

What people? The people that couldn’t get him the popular vote?

The legal people did
The 2 million of so that voted for Clinton were the illegals in cal
They do not require driver lic

[ducks]

Shut up, stupid.

Damm truth hurt much

[CosmicCowboy]

The legal people did
The 2 million of so that voted for Clinton were the illegals in cal
They do not require driver lic

Oh, please Ducks. You are making conservatives look as unhinged as Boutons makes liberals look.

[MultiTroll]

Hey I know who we can get to counteract the image of Repubs as old white farts:
https://www.newyorker.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/150622_r26649-1196.jpg

[ducks]

Male Student Shells Out $12,000 In Legal Defense After Female Student Changes Mind About Consensual Hookup


https://www.dailywire.com/news/36964/justice-male-student-shells-out-over-12000-legal-amanda-prestigiacomo?utm_source=facebook&utm_medium=social&utm_content=062316-news&utm_campaign=dwbrand


What if that was you males ?

[boutons_deux]

FBI's Wray confirms White House limited Kavanaugh probe

FBI Director Christopher Wray told the Senate on Wednesday that the White House put limits on the re-opened investigation into Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh,

but the law enforcement chief insisted that the process used was a typical one. :lol ok! :lol

the inquiry was "very specific in scope :lol —limited in scope." :lol

https://www.politico.com/story/2018/10/10/kavanaugh-fbi-probe-limit-888667

So Senate had a huge of docs on K that was ignored,

FBI 6 b/g checks were ignored and DIDN't exonerate,

WH limited the rape stuff, while

FBI ignored all the sex and drinking lies verified by K's classmates, friends, whatever.

Trash and Repugs give America a huge FUCK ALL Y'ALL

[Isitjustme?]

I was joking a little but mine at the SA house is more like a safe/closet but two people could actually get in there in a pinch. More than likely if I got that far though I would just come right back out with a shotgun.
If you have all those guns whats the panic room for?

Also followup question..how do you shoot the guns at the invading people when you're in the panic room?

[CosmicCowboy]

We give you a big Fuck You Boo!

[AaronY]

If you have all those guns whats the panic room for?

Also followup question..how do you shoot the guns at the invading people when you're in the panic room?
The panic room has a turret i think

[CosmicCowboy]

If you have all those guns whats the panic room for?

Also followup question..how do you shoot the guns at the invading people when you're in the panic room?

It not a panic room fuckwad. It a safe/closet big enough to walk in. Give it the fuck up.

[Spurs Homer]

FBI's Wray confirms White House limited Kavanaugh probe

FBI Director Christopher Wray told the Senate on Wednesday that the White House put limits on the re-opened investigation into Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh,

but the law enforcement chief insisted that the process used was a typical one. :lol ok! :lol

the inquiry was "very specific in scope :lol —limited in scope." :lol

https://www.politico.com/story/2018/10/10/kavanaugh-fbi-probe-limit-888667

So Senate had a huge of docs on K that was ignored,

FBI 6 b/g checks were ignored and DIDN't exonerate,

WH limited the rape stuff, while

FBI ignored all the sex and drinking lies verified by K's classmates, friends, whatever.

Trash and Repugs give America a huge FUCK ALL Y'ALL




Like we have been saying:

COVERUP and a SHAM.

[boutons_deux]

D A R V O in action

Boy sues school for gender discrimination over expulsion after admitting to sexual harassment (https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2018/10/10/1803082/-Boy-sues-school-for-gender-discrimination-after-expulsion-for-admitting-to-sexual-harassment)

a high school student and his father in Virginia are trying to sue for gender discrimination after the school expelled the boy for sexually assaulting and harassing female students.

The school did an investigation and found him responsible for committing those acts, and

he was forced to transfer to an alternative school.

He even confessed to exposing his genitals

and making sexually explicit remarks, but said they were just “jokes.”

In true Betsy Devos-esque behavior,

the student punished for assault is framing himself as the true victim here.

From the Washington Post (https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/education/va-student-accused-of-sexual-misconduct-says-school-discriminated-against-him/2018/10/08/c0eb63f0-cb21-11e8-a3e6-44daa3d35ede_story.html?utm_term=.0fd29ae3e114):

The boy and his father say media reports that

“suggest the pervasive nature of sexual assault committed by male students” influenced Fairfax’s treatment of the student,

who has a 4.1 grade-point average and belonged to the crew team and drama club.

School officials, according to the lawsuit, refused to believe the student because “he is male and would have believed a female student in the same situation.”


the attorney for the plaintiff said that

getting expelled from school is worse than a criminal conviction.

The punishment, Binnall said,

could harm his client’s college and career prospects.

“These findings are just awful for anyone who wants a future,” he said.

“It’s worse than a criminal conviction, or just as bad.”



https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2018/10/10/1803082/-Boy-sues-school-for-gender-discrimination-after-expulsion-for-admitting-to-sexual-harassment?utm_campaign=trending

Lawyers will say and do anything for $$$

[Chris]

1050247800032649216

[Chris]

1050170624839053312
1050173162023923712

[Winehole23]

News flash: Kavanaugh is a conservative judge.

[AaronY]

It not a panic room fuckwad. It a safe/closet big enough to walk in. Give it the fuck up.
Was I right though? Does the panic room have a gun turret?

[AaronY]

News flash: Kavanaugh is a conservative judge.
Whoa! True if huge

[AaronY]

Chris gonna be so excited when he finds out hes a conservative

[boutons_deux]

'What Goes Around, Comes Around': Kavanaugh's Snarl Takes on New Meaning Now That He's a U.S. Supreme Court Justice

"So no matter how genteelly he forces himself to behave in the future," warns Naomi Klein, "remember that the snarl was the truth - not just about his character but about his true purpose on the bench."

author and journalist Naomi Klein posited that it is more important than ever (https://twitter.com/NaomiAKlein/status/1048618461159718913) to understand that moment and recognize the profound ramifications it will have going forward now that Justice Kavanaugh is a reality.

"The Coming Kavanaugh Court Doctrine: Democrats Are Unconstitutional (https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/brett-kavanaugh-supreme-court-legitimacy_us_5bb7757ae4b028e1fe3d25a5)"

—the threat of "what goes around comes around" could have serious implications for "cases that help Republicans and harm Democrats" in the future.

"Essentially what he did is he took his mask off and he revealed himself as a politician who wears a robe,"

Kavanaugh is being appointed not *in spite* of that snarl but precisely because of it.

he is a snarling gargoyle who can be counted on

not just to defend himself but

the whole damn frat known as the Republican Party + its billionaire backers.

Against all threats to their power + wealth.

He has shown he will do whatever it takes to protect them. That's why he was worth backing despite his copious baggage.

remember that the snarl was the truth - not just about his character but about his true purpose on the bench.

https://www.commondreams.org/news/2018/10/07/what-goes-around-comes-around-kavanaughs-snarl-takes-new-meaning-now-hes-us-supreme

[boutons_deux]

Roberts asks federal judges to handle Kavanaugh complaints (https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/whitehouse/roberts-asks-federal-judges-to-handle-kavanaugh-complaints/2018/10/10/eefe53c6-cccd-11e8-ad0a-0e01efba3cc1_story.html?utm_term=.f8aacfcd40d1)

Could this investigation have serious repercussions? Or is it a way to sweep this under the rug?


By Mark Sherman | AP

It’s possible the complaints will never be investigated if the lower-court judges determine they have no jurisdiction over a Supreme Court justice under the judiciary’s ethics rules.

The judges may be forced to conclude “that intervening events have rendered the allegations moot or make remedial action impossible,” said Arthur Hellman, an ethics professor at the University of Pittsburgh.

Another ethicist, Stephen Gillers of New York University, disagreed that the complaints are moot.

Kavanaugh remains a federal judge and the complaints “allege misconduct that occurred while Kavanaugh was on the D.C. Circuit and subject to the Code of Conduct for U.S. Judges.

Any violation of the Code does not disappear because he is now on another federal court,” Gillers said in an email.

But Gillers said the complaints “may be found not to be meritorious in the end.”



https://images.dailykos.com/images/595366/large/Kavanaugh.jpg?1538461033

https://images.dailykos.com/images/597038/large/MitchMcConnell.jpg?1538846910

https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2018/10/10/1803537/-BREAKING-Chief-Justice-Roberts-opens-a-new-investigation-of-Brett-Kavanaugh?detail=emaildkre

whitewashing imminent, handslapping at very worst

[boutons_deux]

Susan Collins Gets Six Figure Dark Money Payback For Kavanaugh"Yes" Vote. But It's Not A "Bribe". (https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2018/10/10/1803421/-Susan-Collins-Gets-6-Figure-Dark-Money-Payback-For-Kavanaugh-Yes-Vote)

Susan Collins Gets ‘Six Figure’ Payback From Dark Money Group After Voting ‘Yes’ On Kavanaugh

A “dark money” group that spent millions promoting Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh’s confirmation effort announced on Tuesday that it’s

rewarding Sen. Susan Collins (R-ME) with a new “six-figure TV and digital ad campaign” in support of her re-election after she voted for Kavanaugh’s confirmation.

The group, Judicial Crisis Network, issued a press release (https://judicialnetwork.com/in-the-news/jcn-launches-6-figure-ad-buy-in-maine-thanking-sen-susan-collins/) expressing its gratitude to Collins for her “yes” vote.

“Thank you Susan Collins for thoughtfully reviewing Judge Kavanaugh’s judicial record and weighing the evidence, and

for being a reasonable voice during this incredibly divisive time,” Carrie Severino, the group’s chief counsel and policy director, said.

Judicial Crisis Network was one of several well-funded dark money groups to support the accused sexual assaulter’s nomination.

This raises a serious question: Did Collins accept a bribe in exchange for her vote?

https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2018/10/10/1803421/-Susan-Collins-Gets-6-Figure-Dark-Money-Payback-For-Kavanaugh-Yes-Vote?detail=emaildkre

[Winehole23]

Chris gonna be so excited when he finds out hes a conservativeI was responding directly to Chris, silly

[Winehole23]

This raises a serious question: Did Collins accept a bribe in exchange for her vote?

https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2018/10/10/1803421/-Susan-Collins-Gets-6-Figure-Dark-Money-Payback-For-Kavanaugh-Yes-Vote?detail=emaildkrethat's just the way it works now. unless there's an explicit quid pro quo, it's not bribery. rewarding a politician for doing something you like post-facto isn't considered corrupt anymore.

btw, the JCN also sprung for a 1.5 million dollars in TV ads for Kavanaugh.

stakes just went up for Supreme Court confirmations.

[AaronY]

I was responding directly to Chris, silly
I know thats what makes it all so great

[boutons_deux]

There are at least 15 ethics complaints against Kavanaugh. Will he be held accountable? (https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2018/10/11/1803691/-There-are-at-least-15-complaints-against-Kavanaugh-Will-he-be-held-accountable)

Complaints against Brett Kavanaugh in the D.C. Circuit, the federal appeals court that hears appeals from D.C., have just been passed along a second time.

challenging as unethical Kavanaugh’s statements during his first Senate confirmation hearing and his response to allegations of sexual assault.

Here’s the money passage from the first complaint, filed by the Democratic Coalition:

Kavanaugh violated Canons 1 and 2 of Code of Judicial Conduct by committing crimes of dishonesty while he was a federal judge,

by obtaining confirmation of his appointment as a federal judge by false and perjurious testimony,

by concealing and covering up his criminal actions and by obstructing justice.

He is unfit to serve as a judge by reason of his corrupt, unscrupulous, dishonest and criminal conduct.


The complaint points to Kavanaugh’s claim that he didn’t use materials stolen from Democratic offices by a Republican operative, Manuel Miranda, and had no knowledge of the offense.

Enter the second complaint (https://assets.documentcloud.org/documents/4946560/Democratic-Coalition-judicial-misconduct.pdf) filed, also from the coalition;

it takes aim at Kavanaugh’s “public and partisan campaign of lies to cover-up [sic] and conceal sexual misconduct and crimes he committed in the past.”

The complaint cites his appearance on Fox News and perjury before the Senate Judiciary Committee.

As the number of complaints grew, Garland recused himself (https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/zoetillman/merrick-garland-has-recused-himself-from-the-ethics) from reviewing them, without saying more, and

the complaints went to the next-most senior judge,

Judge Karen LeCraft Henderson, a George H. W. Bush appointee.

On Oct. 6, Henderson released a statement (https://www.cadc.uscourts.gov/intranet/home.nsf/Content/Announcement+-+Statement+of+Judge+Karen+LeCraft+Henderson+Regard ing+Judicial+Misconduct+Complaints/%24FILE/PressRelease20181006.pdf) concerning the ethics complaints against Kavanaugh.

Under the Judicial Conduct and Disability Act (28 U.S.C. §§351-364) any person may file a misconduct complaint against a federal judge in the circuit in which the federal judge sits.

After the start of Judge Brett Kavanaugh’s confirmation hearings, members of the general public began filing complaints in the D.C. Circuit about statements made during those hearings.

The complaints do not pertain to any conduct in which Judge Kavanaugh engaged as a judge.

The complaints seek investigations only of the public statements he has made as a nominee to the Supreme Court of the United States.


Judge Timothy Tymkovich, a George W. Bush appointee :lol who made Trump’s SCOTUS shortlist :lol, has a mandate to review these complaints.

There’s little doubt that, should the court investigate, they’ll find Kavanaugh didn’t just violate but set fire to the judicial canon of ethics.

Under that canon, perjury matters in and of itself, regardless of content.

So too does partisanship.

When I clerked on a federal appellate court, even our gym gear and bumper stickers were policed.

Problem is, Supreme Court justices aren’t subject to the canon of ethics. Still, there’s hope. The D.C. Circuit limited its consideration of complaints against Kavanaugh to those relating to his behavior while serving as a federal appellate judge.

https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2018/10/11/1803691/-There-are-at-least-15-complaints-against-Kavanaugh-Will-he-be-held-accountable

[ducks]

The democracts like the live in the past results and try to change those outcomes instead of trying to run on what they would do if elected

[Nbadan]

The democracts like the live in the past results and try to change those outcomes instead of trying to run on what they would do if elected

The GOP does the same thing with Healthcare...didn't they vote for it too? Didn't they negotiate it in committee?

[Spurtacular]

The democracts like the live in the past results and try to change those outcomes instead of trying to run on what they would do if elected

Cos we all know what they'd do; fuck shit up. :lol

[DMX7]

Cos we all know what they'd do; fuck shit up. :lol

Obama ran a pretty competent government... about as smooth as you could ask for in this chaotic world. And he did it after inheriting a mess.

[Spurtacular]

Obama ran a pretty competent government... about as smooth as you could ask for in this chaotic world. And he did it after inheriting a mess.

Nonsense. Remember those worthless stimuluses? Obamacare was a joke. The debt doubled. He allowed Iran to keep building nukes. Etc.

[boutons_deux]

https://images.dailykos.com/images/598033/story_image/silverlining915.png?1539072290

[DMX7]

Nonsense. Remember those worthless stimuluses? Obamacare was a joke. The debt doubled. He allowed Iran to keep building nukes. Etc.

WTF? Are you living in an alternate universe?

[Spurtacular]

WTF? Are you living in an alternate universe?

You are. Median income flat-lined under Obama. No year of three percent GDP growth. Handing out trillions in empty stimuluses. Keeping the CIA's Afghanistan war going. Fucking up healthcare. Setting back racial relations decades. Just cos you have a man crush doesn't mean Obama was a good president, son.

[Pavlov]

You are. Median income flat-lined under Obama. No year of three percent GDP growth. Handing out trillions in empty stimuluses. Keeping the CIA's Afghanistan war going. Fucking up healthcare. Setting back racial relations decades. Just cos you have a man crush doesn't mean Obama was a good president, son.What has Trump done to advance race relations and end the "CIA's Afghanistan war" and reduce the debt?

[Spurtacular]

What has Trump done to advance race relations and end the "CIA's Afghanistan war" and reduce the debt?

All red marks. Never said he hadn't. :lol That you want to ignore all the good things though.

[Pavlov]

All red marks. Never said he hadn't. :lol That you want to ignore all the good things though.What good things has he done?

[Spurtacular]

What good things has he done?

How about you tell me that answer.

[Pavlov]

How about you tell me that answer.I'm asking you since you brought up "all the good things" he's done.

It's your claim. Back it up or shit yourself again.

Your choice.

[boutons_deux]

Kavanaugh proves one of the nine justices is not like the others (https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2018/10/10/1803480/-Kavanaugh-proves-one-of-the-nine-justices-is-not-like-the-others)

On his first day of arguments, during just one case (https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2018/16-1363_h315.pdf)—Nielsen v. Preap—

Kavanaugh tried to speak at the same time as other justices—

despite the tradition of new justices deferring to established justices—

and interrupted each of the lawyers twice.

Kavanaugh didn’t so much ask questions as make statements. T

he types of statements that should have come from the government’s attorney, not a justice.

When he did ask questions—well, here’s an example of a “question”:

Is that presumption based on what we think was really going through Congress's mind at the time or is it based on a constitutional overlay, because what was really going through Congress's time [sic] in 1996 was harshness on this topic. Is that not right?


Kavanaugh didn’t even pretend he possesses the independence required for a justice.

Justices often pose hypotheticals, detailed grammatical questions bearing on statutory interpretation, and comparisons to other cases and statutes.

They may nudge an attorney to explore an argument or to respond to the opposing party’s argument.

What they don’t do is argue the case for the attorneys before them. Until Kavanaugh.

https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2018/10/10/1803480/-Kavanaugh-proves-one-of-the-nine-justices-is-not-like-the-others?detail=emaildksp

K isn't a SCOTUS judge anymore than Trash is a President.

Both are unqualified, ignorant, sexual predator assholes

[boutons_deux]

Democrats didn't leak Dr. Ford's letter—it was most likely the White House (https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2018/10/14/1803379/-Democrats-didn-t-leak-Dr-Ford-s-letter-it-was-most-likely-the-White-House)

nearly all the press reports prior to and including the New Yorker report that first detailed the contents of Dr. Ford’s letter indicate that

Sen. Feinstein’s office didn’t share anything about the letter with anyone except the FBI on Sept 12.

In fact, the most likely source for the ultimate release of Dr. Ford’s name and identity was the White House itself.

All their outrage is false.

https://www.dailykos.com/stories/1803379https://www.dailykos.com/stories/1803379

[Winehole23]

[I’ve sent out contacts to Sen. Feinstein’s office asking them to confirm that they weren’t the source of the Ford letter leak, although it seems quite obvious from every source that they weren’t. I’ve also contacted the New Yorker and asked the same question, and also asked them if they could confirm that the White House wasn’t a source for the letter. It will be very interesting if they can't easily say no. So far, they have not responded.]the conclusory air of the Daily Moulitsas isn't well supported. doesn't look good for the hypothesis if the New Yorker and Sen Feinstein won't confirm.

absence of evidence may not be evidence of absence, but for damn sure it isn't evidence of evidence.

[CosmicCowboy]

Democrats didn't leak Dr. Ford's letter—it was most likely the White House (https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2018/10/14/1803379/-Democrats-didn-t-leak-Dr-Ford-s-letter-it-was-most-likely-the-White-House)

nearly all the press reports prior to and including the New Yorker report that first detailed the contents of Dr. Ford’s letter indicate that

Sen. Feinstein’s office didn’t share anything about the letter with anyone except the FBI on Sept 12.

In fact, the most likely source for the ultimate release of Dr. Ford’s name and identity was the White House itself.

All their outrage is false.

https://www.dailykos.com/stories/1803379https://www.dailykos.com/stories/1803379




Damn you are one stupid motherfucker.

[ducks]

Democrats didn't leak Dr. Ford's letter—it was most likely the White House (https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2018/10/14/1803379/-Democrats-didn-t-leak-Dr-Ford-s-letter-it-was-most-likely-the-White-House)

nearly all the press reports prior to and including the New Yorker report that first detailed the contents of Dr. Ford’s letter indicate that

Sen. Feinstein’s office didn’t share anything about the letter with anyone except the FBI on Sept 12.

In fact, the most likely source for the ultimate release of Dr. Ford’s name and identity was the White House itself.

All their outrage is false.

https://www.dailykos.com/stories/1803379https://www.dailykos.com/stories/1803379




Link does not even work

[boutons_deux]

Chief Justice Roberts :lol

stresses 'independence from the political branches' :lol

"I will not criticize the political branches," he said, but added that the judicial branch "must be very different." :lol

"I have great respect for our public officials. :lol

After all, they speak for the people, :lol

he said. "But we speak for the Constitution :lol -- our role is very clear.

We are to interpret the laws and Constitution of the United States :lol

https://edition.cnn.com/2018/10/16/politics/john-roberts-civility/index.html

Unending Orwellian doublespeak that kills people, destroys the environment, etc, etc.

[Winehole23]

rule by unelected judges good now

[boutons_deux]

rule by unelected judges good now

horrifically, for life, to keep the people down, as the FFs intended

[TSA]

djohn2oo8 pulled a Reck and :cry migrated back up stairs :cry

pussy ass bitch :rollin

[Reck]

djohn2oo8 (https://www.spurstalk.com/forums/member.php?u=14870) pulled a Reck (https://www.spurstalk.com/forums/member.php?u=14412) and :cry migrated back up stairs :cry

pussy ass bitch :rollin

Again, you want us to comment on something that has been settled? lol post padding.

[Isitjustme?]

You are. Median income flat-lined under Obama. No year of three percent GDP growth. Handing out trillions in empty stimuluses. Keeping the CIA's Afghanistan war going. Fucking up healthcare. Setting back racial relations decades. Just cos you have a man crush doesn't mean Obama was a good president, son.
How did he do this?

Be specific now

[TSA]

Again, you want us to comment on something that has been settled? lol post padding.

I didn’t want or need a comment from you. I’m just laughing at djohn bailing the political forum like a little bitch.
Little pussy is too embarrassed to stay and take his lumps.

[Reck]

I didn’t want or need a comment from you. I’m just laughing at djohn bailing the political forum like a little bitch.
Little pussy is too embarrassed to stay and take his lumps.

Ok that's fair. But next time, dont mention me if you dont want a comment.

[koriwhat]

I didn’t want or need a comment from you. I’m just laughing at djohn bailing the political forum like a little bitch.
Little pussy is too embarrassed to stay and take his lumps.

djohn is the forum's dumbest motherfucking cocksucker for sure. dude gobbles up all the loser trolls/alts/bitches every word and is their hype man. fuck that faggot djohn!

[koriwhat]

I'm asking you since you brought up "all the good things" he's done.

It's your claim. Back it up or shit yourself again.

Your choice.

you can easily look all this up and not even on google but here on ST where you have participated in said threads. you're a blowhard faggot pavTHETIC and just like pavlovian theory goes you're the dumbass dog drooling and that bell is the ideology you subscribe to where nothing but pussy men like yourself flock to.

[Pavlov]

you can easily look all this up and not even on google but here on ST where you have participated in said threads. you're a blowhard faggot pavTHETIC and just like pavlovian theory goes you're the dumbass dog drooling and that bell is the ideology you subscribe to where nothing but pussy men like yourself flock to.So you can't think of one good thing he did after trying to brag about it.

:lmao

[koriwhat]

So you can't think of one good thing he did after trying to brag about it.

:lmao

why is it my job to do your job? this is an issue with you always. as well, you didn't ask me to help hold your hand so what exactly are you going on about? you're a child!

[Nathan89]

https://twitter.com/robbysoave/status/1052606783532007424?s=20

Poor kid.

[Pavlov]

why is it my job to do your job? this is an issue with you always. as well, you didn't ask me to help hold your hand so what exactly are you going on about? you're a child!It's not my job to back up your claim.

lol kori

[Spurs Homer]

https://twitter.com/robbysoave/status/1052606783532007424?s=20

Poor kid.

This is a wonderful example of brainwashing.
Hundreds of thousands of cases where the women told the truth and were legitimately sexually assaulted.
Your cult leader - makes up a preposterous lie that this (women lying) is suddenly some great problem in our society and you swallow it whole.

A person who was not brainwashed would 99 times out of 100 conclude:
"Hmm - hundreds of thousands of cases - VS. Trump & Kavanaugh?"
Hmm - obviously - Trump & Kavanaugh are liars and sexual assaulters - especially with all the evidence presented- yup - Trump & Kavanaugh are sexual assaulters!"

A brainwashed person would conclude:

"Hmm dear leader denies it - let me go out and find ONE example where women lied!"

Brainwashing. Sad. Bigly Sad.

:cry:cry

[Spurminator]

This is a wonderful example of brainwashing.
Hundreds of thousands of cases where the women told the truth and were legitimately sexually assaulted.
Your cult leader - makes up a preposterous lie that this (women lying) is suddenly some great problem in our society and you swallow it whole.

A person who was not brainwashed would 99 times out of 100 conclude:
"Hmm - hundreds of thousands of cases - VS. Trump & Kavanaugh?"
Hmm - obviously - Trump & Kavanaugh are liars and sexual assaulters - especially with all the evidence presented- yup - Trump & Kavanaugh are sexual assaulters!"

A brainwashed person would conclude:

"Hmm dear leader denies it - let me go out and find ONE example where women lied!"

Brainwashing. Sad. Bigly Sad.

:cry:cry

The problem is too many liberals have made this an easy argument by insisting on hashtag-friendly causes like "Believe All Survivors."

For every conservative who is a kneejerk skeptic of women who come forward with claims of assault, there is a liberal who believes that women would never lie about being assaulted (an argument that comes directly to blows with many examples in the Jim Crow era of white women claiming to have been assaulted by black men.)

Women should be heard and respected, but due process is still paramount. When you set the expectation that every woman who claims to have been assaulted is telling the truth, that bar cannot be cleared by the reality of a nation with 300+ million people, and examples like this high school student (which are the exception, not the norm) become easy targets to contradict the effort.

[Spurs Homer]

The problem is too many liberals have made this an easy argument by insisting on hashtag-friendly causes like "Believe All Survivors."

For every conservative who is a kneejerk skeptic of women who come forward with claims of assault, there is a liberal who believes that women would never lie about being assaulted (an argument that comes directly to blows with many examples in the Jim Crow era of white women claiming to have been assaulted by black men.)

Women should be heard and respected, but due process is still paramount. When you set the expectation that every woman who claims to have been assaulted is telling the truth, that bar cannot be cleared by the reality of a nation with 300+ million people, and examples like this high school student (which are the exception, not the norm) become easy targets to contradict the effort.

This is false.

That is not what is being said. You can believe the allegation, respect the victim and then conduct a proper investigation where the truth and the facts can be found. If the allegations are false - then the accuser can be prosecuted.

The Kavanaugh thing was nothing but a coverup - start to finish. There was PLENTY of corroboration and circumstantial evidence to call this a credible allegation.
Every time an idiot says: "there was zero evidence"
Those were blatant lies - which other idiots parroted - and an entire brainwashed nation parroted that same idiocy.


A real investigation would have gotten very close to what happened to Dr. Ford - which is plain to see - which is Kavanaugh and his buddy attacked her in a drunken state and could not remember. His friend probably remembers it - but he was allowed to get off the hook of a real FBI interrogation.

Impeachment will be a proper thing to do and those cowardly Dems better not shrink from the job.

[Spurminator]

That is not what is being said. You can believe the allegation, respect the victim and then conduct a proper investigation where the truth and the facts can be found. If the allegations are false - then the accuser can be prosecuted.

I agree that can be done, I disagree that it's all people want. Many of the most vocal proponents, unfortunately, demand action and consequences before due process can even take place. (You may argue that losing a job is not the same as prosecution and imprisonment but it's still a consequence that is difficult to overcome, and it does happen.)

I think you're projecting your more reasonable view of the issue onto all liberals. Unfortunately, not everyone shares (or can afford to share, in the case of many businesses) your cautious approach.


The Kavanaugh thing was nothing but a coverup - start to finish. There was PLENTY of corroboration and circumstantial evidence to call this a credible allegation.
Every time an idiot says: "there was zero evidence"
Those were blatant lies - which other idiots parroted - and an entire brainwashed nation parroted that same idiocy.

A real investigation would have gotten very close to what happened to Dr. Ford - which is plain to see - which is Kavanaugh and his buddy attacked her in a drunken state and could not remember. His friend probably remembers it - but he was allowed to get off the hook of a real FBI interrogation.

Impeachment will be a proper thing to do and those cowardly Dems better not shrink from the job.

The Kavanaugh debacle was a disaster for Democrats. They would be stupid to revisit it with impeachment efforts, but I don't doubt they are stupid enough to do it. Fundamentally, most of America doesn't think we should penalize or investigate someone (particularly white men) for their actions in high school 36 years ago.

[boutons_deux]

"for their actions in high school 36 years ago."

For me, the impeachable offenses are his lying to Congress to snag both Federal judgeships, totally verified as liar.

There are plenty of witnesses that say he was a drunken party animal, not his LIE that he was serious person / altar boy.

That he is emotionally unsuitable is secondary, but hard to prosecute.

That he was a sexual predator, and childish besotted, drunken party animal 35 years ago is certainly big black mark on his character (Ms of young men did not behave either way), but too old.

K is a ratfucking Repug shitbag, but that's what the oligarchy wants on SCOTUS, which is now fully degraded to the oligarchy's benefit, and for decades.

[Spurtacular]

How did he do this?

Be specific now

If I had a son, he'd look like Trayvon.

[Isitjustme?]

If I had a son, he'd look like Trayvon.

Which is true so....??

[Pavlov]

Which is true so....??It sure made derp hate black people.

[Spurminator]

Somehow "she could've been my daughter" or "I could have been his father" doesn't inspire near the pearl-clutching when it comes from white people. What a stupid thing to still be mad about.

[TSA]

This is false.

That is not what is being said. You can believe the allegation, respect the victim and then conduct a proper investigation where the truth and the facts can be found. If the allegations are false - then the accuser can be prosecuted.

The Kavanaugh thing was nothing but a coverup - start to finish. There was PLENTY of corroboration and circumstantial evidence to call this a credible allegation.
Every time an idiot says: "there was zero evidence"
Those were blatant lies - which other idiots parroted - and an entire brainwashed nation parroted that same idiocy.


A real investigation would have gotten very close to what happened to Dr. Ford - which is plain to see - which is Kavanaugh and his buddy attacked her in a drunken state and could not remember. His friend probably remembers it - but he was allowed to get off the hook of a real FBI interrogation.

Impeachment will be a proper thing to do and those cowardly Dems better not shrink from the job.

List everything corroborated. It should be a long list since you claim PLENTY was corroborated.

[TSA]

Ok that's fair. But next time, dont mention me if you dont want a comment.

I’ll mention you whenever I want. You aren’t being forced to reply. I’ve got 2,998 unchecked notifications, exercise some self control.

Is djohn ever coming back?

[Spurtacular]

Which is true so....??

It was stoking racial tensions.

[Chucho]

I

Is djohn ever coming back?

Oh, just you wait.

[Pavlov]

It was stoking racial tensions.How?

[Spurtacular]

How?

Obama knew this issue was being sold on racial injustice in the media.

:lol Sociopath pretending to not understand.

[Pavlov]

Obama knew this issue was being sold on racial injustice in the media.No, how specifically did that statement trigger you?

[Spurtacular]

No

:lol The media wasn't trying to stoke racial flames?
:lol Today's sociopath

[Pavlov]

:lol The media wasn't trying to stoke racial flames?
:lol Today's sociopathYou can't say how?

OK. It was a pretty stupid thing for you to say in the first place.

[Winehole23]

Skip Gates, Ferguson, Trayvon.

it was unforgivably racist for Obama not to back the blue.

his comments and negative coverage of police in the media drove a wedge between blacks and whites that did not previously exist.

[Spurtacular]

You can't say how?

OK. It was a pretty stupid thing for you to say in the first place.

:lol Everything points to it; but you have your own sociopath truth at the end of the day.

[Pavlov]

:lol Everything points to itLike what? What things?

[pgardn]

8 years of a black guy brought out the plantation ownership mentality in the white serfs.

Those slaves keeping the poor white man down by working for nothing.

Classic.

[CosmicCowboy]

I’ll mention you whenever I want. You aren’t being forced to reply. I’ve got 2,998 unchecked notifications, exercise some self control.

Is djohn ever coming back?
I think spurs homer is his new alt. Equally dumb.

[TSA]

I think spurs homer is his new alt. Equally dumb.

I’ve thought the same.

[Winehole23]

doubt it.

djohn doesn't do paragraphs, em dashes or logic pretzels like SH

[Winehole23]

also, ratio of commentary to spam is way off

[Chucho]

also, ratio of commentary to spam is way off


Yeah, djohn doesn't have any of his own thoughts beyond what his masters teach him to think.

SpursHomer seems to be Bonnerific on loads of Xanax or some kinda mood elevator. He does the whole "everyone who isn't a Demo is a disgusting Republican and has no worth" schtick just like a medicated Bonnerific would.

[TSA]

doubt it.

djohn doesn't do paragraphs, em dashes or logic pretzels like SH

Alts aren’t supposed to be indentical in posting methods if you don’t want anyone to catch on

[Chucho]

Alts aren’t supposed to be indentical in posting methods if you don’t want anyone to catch on

We're talking about djohn here. You're VERY generous if you think he's capable of that.

[Winehole23]

Alts aren’t supposed to be indentical in posting methods if you don’t want anyone to catch onnever bothered you

[koriwhat]

This is false.

That is not what is being said. You can believe the allegation, respect the victim and then conduct a proper investigation where the truth and the facts can be found. If the allegations are false - then the accuser can be prosecuted.

The Kavanaugh thing was nothing but a coverup - start to finish. There was PLENTY of corroboration and circumstantial evidence to call this a credible allegation.
Every time an idiot says: "there was zero evidence"
Those were blatant lies - which other idiots parroted - and an entire brainwashed nation parroted that same idiocy.


A real investigation would have gotten very close to what happened to Dr. Ford - which is plain to see - which is Kavanaugh and his buddy attacked her in a drunken state and could not remember. His friend probably remembers it - but he was allowed to get off the hook of a real FBI interrogation.

Impeachment will be a proper thing to do and those cowardly Dems better not shrink from the job.

Ahhahahaha you're a nut!

[TSA]

never bothered you

You think I post under an alt? :lol
Please tell me who you think it is. I never hid the fact I used to post under thesanityannex and never posted differently when I did.

[TSA]

We're talking about djohn here. You're VERY generous if you think he's capable of that.

You think Spurs Homer is djohn?

[koriwhat]

It's not my job to back up your claim.

lol kori

my claim that you were indeed in threads that answered your initial question about what djt has accomplished as pres? threads you participated in? lmao you're a schmuck!

[Pavlov]

my claim that you were indeed in threads that answered your initial question about what djt has accomplished as pres? threads you participated in? lmao you're a schmuck!I asked you.

You couldn't name one thing.

You shit yourself.

lol

[koriwhat]

I asked you.

You couldn't name one thing.

You shit yourself.

lol

actually you didn't ask me initially and i really don't give a fuck what you ask of me. you're a dipshit pavTHETIC! get that straight first dipshit.

you're just mad because you weren't cool is grade school, middle school, high school, college, or now. you found a nook on the internet where your ego could blossom under the false pretense that you're worth a fuck when in reality you ain't worth shit. you're pathetic here just like you have been all your life holmes and no amount of fluffing yourself is going to change that reality.

[Pavlov]

actually you didn't ask me initially and i really don't give a fuck what you ask of me. you're a dipshit pavTHETIC! get that straight first dipshit.

you're just mad because you weren't cool is grade school, middle school, high school, college, or now. you found a nook on the internet where your ego could blossom under the false pretense that you're worth a fuck when in reality you ain't worth shit. you're pathetic here just like you have been all your life holmes and no amount of fluffing yourself is going to change that reality.lol your narrative.

I asked you straight up what good things Trump has done.

The number of good things you listed remains zero.

You continue to shit yourself.

[koriwhat]

lol your narrative.

I asked you straight up what good things Trump has done.

The number of good things you listed remains zero.

You continue to shit yourself.

i hope people are seriously seeing who and what you are through all these bs replies/etc. you're just a fucking loser and the merrygoround is just part of your loser mentality. i have accepted how big of a loser you are and just sit back and laugh at how hard you try not to be the loser you are. lol you pathetic fuck!

[Pavlov]

i hope people are seriously seeing who and what you are through all these bs replies/etc. you're just a fucking loser and the merrygoround is just part of your loser mentality. i have accepted how big of a loser you are and just sit back and laugh at how hard you try not to be the loser you are. lol you pathetic fuck!I sit back and laugh at your failure to list the good things you think Trump has done.

lol

[koriwhat]

The calf tatted cocksucker only appreciates that trump hates the same people that frighten him, which is everybody. Especially since trump has tasted a penis or two like he has, and pretends to be a man too like him

yall can claim whatever yall want about me without knowing a god damn thing. i'll just call all you sissy men Blassey-Ford's from here on out.

so mad so yall play make believe and spew bs about me when you couldn't be further from the truth. i didn't vote at all in 2016 but who'd you vote for? lmao this is going to be rich!

as well, with a handle like Bonnerific i'd say you're more likely the candidate who sucks dick.

[koriwhat]

I sit back and laugh at your failure to list the good things you think Trump has done.

lol

you think i have to do what you ask of me? seriously? it's too easy to see how much of a bitch you are through those rose colored glasses of yours.

[Pavlov]

you think i have to do what you ask of me? seriously? it's too easy to see how much of a bitch you are through those rose colored glasses of yours.lol your failure continues.:tu

Continue whining about it, sissy.

[Blake]

actually you didn't ask me initially and i really don't give a fuck what you ask of me. you're a dipshit pavTHETIC! get that straight first dipshit.

you're just mad because you weren't cool is grade school, middle school, high school, college, or now. you found a nook on the internet where your ego could blossom under the false pretense that you're worth a fuck when in reality you ain't worth shit. you're pathetic here just like you have been all your life holmes and no amount of fluffing yourself is going to change that reality.

:madrun "I'm so chill" :madrun

[Nathan89]

https://twitter.com/notlarrysabato/status/1053023848772378625?s=20:wow:lmao

[Pavlov]

I AM CHILLING AND LAUGHING RIGHT NOW YOU FUCKING SISSY BITCH NOOK FAGGOT!

[Spurs Homer]

You think Spurs Homer is djohn?

Sounds like you got it bad for djohn!


:cry:cry

[koriwhat]

lol your failure continues.:tu

Continue whining about it, sissy.


:madrun "I'm so chill" :madrun

2 dipshits who come to each others aid over their hyperbole and egos. 2 fucking clown pussy wannabe "men" in pavTHETIC and bitchMadeBlake.

[SnakeBoy]

https://twitter.com/notlarrysabato/status/1053023848772378625?s=20:wow:lmao

The blacks are finally seeing the light

[Pavlov]

2 dipshits who come to each others aid over their hyperbole and egos. 2 fucking clown pussy wannabe "men" in pavTHETIC and bitchMadeBlake.lol ur a sissy

[DMC]

https://twitter.com/notlarrysabato/status/1053023848772378625?s=20:wow:lmao

:lol that cannot be real

Must be related to Avery Johnson though

[koriwhat]

lol your failure continues.:tu

Continue whining about it, sissy.


lol ur a sissy

the best you got loser? poor sad excuse of a man pavTHEfag... tsk tsk tsk

[Chucho]

https://twitter.com/notlarrysabato/status/1053023848772378625?s=20:wow:lmao

Funny and lots of truth in there.

[Chucho]

the best you got loser? poor sad excuse of a man pavTHEfag... tsk tsk tsk

You could probably beat him up in a real-life fist fight, huh?

[Spurtacular]

https://twitter.com/notlarrysabato/status/1053023848772378625?s=20:wow:lmao

:lmao

[TSA]

I AM CHILLING AND LAUGHING RIGHT NOW YOU FUCKING SISSY BITCH NOOK FAGGOT!

I AM CHILLING AND SHITPOSTING 24/7 BECAUSE I HAVE AN ACTUAL LIFE!

[Pavlov]

the best you got loser? poor sad excuse of a man pavTHEfag... tsk tsk tsk:lmao I'm imitating you, dumbass.

[Pavlov]

I AM CHILLING AND SHITPOSTING 24/7 BECAUSE I HAVE AN ACTUAL LIFE!
TSA massively triggered by his own conspiracy theories.

Tough shit, dude.

You're an idiot.

[TSA]

TSA massively triggered by his own conspiracy theories.

Tough shit, dude.

You're an idiot.

That doesn’t even make sense. Nothing about my comment has anything to do with conspiracy theories.

Who’s really triggered?

[Pavlov]

That doesn’t even make sense. Nothing about my comment has anything to do with conspiracy theories.

Who’s really triggered?
You. You're upset because I listed your failures.

Sorry not sorry.

[Isitjustme?]

Funny and lots of truth in there.

Lmao so that's a take

[Chucho]

Lmao so that's a take

Thanks for that. This thread just wouldn't be the same without such astute comments such as this

[Isitjustme?]

Thanks for that. This thread just wouldn't be the same without such astute comments such as this

Your original comment was so deep felt i needed to stay on the same level

[Chucho]

Your original comment was so deep felt i needed to stay on the same level


It really was. Deeper than Derp getting drilled on a hot date.

[Chris]

O5bXWZ6DKsQ


D-d-d-damn son :lol

[Chris]

V-ls1zSdCO8

[spurraider21]

V-ls1zSdCO8
:lmao

[Pavlov]

:lol "Rebel" Media

[boutons_deux]

VRWC outfit Judicial Crisis Network now financing defense of their whore Collins

[Winehole23]

:lol "Rebel" Mediadid you see the episode that got Gavin McInnes kicked off Rebel?

[Pavlov]

did you see the episode that got Gavin McInnes kicked off Rebel?Teh Joooos?

[koriwhat]

You could probably beat him up in a real-life fist fight, huh?

maybe but i really don't care about all that nonsense. sad excuse of a man because the dude is a schmuck with no spine and all bark.


:lmao I'm imitating you, dumbass.

not even close... if you think that then i know you're most definitely the dumbass i have pegged you for.

[koriwhat]

I AM CHILLING AND SHITPOSTING 24/7 BECAUSE I HAVE AN ACTUAL LIFE!

lmao! :tu

[Winehole23]

Teh Joooos?https://www.reddit.com/r/beholdthemasterrace/comments/8gkcih/proud_boys_leader_gavin_mcinnes_pulls_out_penis/

[Winehole23]

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DpvPNSZVsAA2460.jpg

[Spurminator]

Not even trying to hide it.

1055589751418445825

[Chris]

1058475460483575808

[TSA]

1058475460483575808

:lol djohn
:lol Avenatti
:lol every liberal who pinned their hopes on an obvious smear campaign

[Reck]

:lol djohn
:lol Avenatti
:lol every liberal who pinned their hopes on an obvious smear campaign

What does Avenatti have to do with this? Did he represent her?

[Chris]

:lol djohn
:lol Avenatti
:lol every liberal who pinned their hopes on an obvious smear campaign

Avenatti has taken so many L's this year getting Tucked was icing on the cake :lol

[TSA]

What does Avenatti have to do with this? Did he represent her?

Fuck, you are dense. What did djohn have to do with this criminal referral?

[Nathan89]

1058475460483575808

#believeallwomen

[hater]

Dsnowflake2008 :lmao

[Reck]

Fuck, you are dense. What did djohn have to do with this criminal referral?

So you got jack shit.

:lol obssessed with Avenatti when he has nothing to do with this woman.

:lol Djohn living rent free on your already tiny head.

:lol Cant answer the question

:lol I'll have an oversized pepperoni pizza

[TSA]

So you got jack shit.

:lol obssessed with Avenatti when he has nothing to do with this woman.

:lol Djohn living rent free on your already tiny head.

:lol Cant answer the question

:lol I'll have an oversized pepperoni pizza

Asking why Avenatti is being discussed in the Kavanaugh thread djohn started and then bringing up pizzagate.

Chris you’re right it’s their new white flag :rollin

[Reck]

Asking why Avenatti is being discussed in the Kavanaugh thread djohn started and then bringing up pizzagate.

Chris (https://www.spurstalk.com/forums/member.php?u=1656) you’re right it’s their new white flag :rollin

You brought up both Avenatti and Djohn, moron.

What do they have to do with this woman making up a story? You simply couldn't keep it in your pants and had to comment on something you had no idea about per the usual with you.

But at least you got Chris to jump on the "I dont know what the fuck I'm talking about but will comment and laugh at it anyway" bandwagon.

[Chris]

Asking why Avenatti is being discussed in the Kavanaugh thread djohn started and then bringing up pizzagate.

Chris you’re right it’s their new white flag :rollin

NPC confirmed :tu

[Reck]

Avenatti has taken so many L's this year getting Tucked was icing on the cake :lol

You can be a braver man than pizza boy and answer how Avenatti is connected with this woman and how he took an L in this particular instance.

Or you know, not. :lol

[Chris]

You can be a braver man than pizza boy and answer how Avenatti is connected with this woman and how he took an L in this particular instance.

Or you know, not. :lol

Avenatti has been involved for quite some time if you have been following the thread, and represented Swetnick.

[Reck]

Avenatti has been involved for quite some time if you have been following the thread, and represented Swetnick.

You do realize this is not Julie Swetnick we're talking about? I hope you do. :lol

Talk about not reading what you post. Yikes

[Chris]

You do realize this is not Julie Swetnick we're talking about? I hope you do. :lol

Talk about not reading what you post. Yikes

Nobody alluded that this was Swetnick. You got triggered that TSA was laughing at Avenatti and now you are grasping at straws.

Yikes.

[Reck]

Nobody alluded that this was Swetnick. You got triggered that TSA was laughing at Avenatti and now you are grasping at straws.

Yikes.

You thought Avenatti had something to do with this woman otherwise you wouldn't have said anything about him "losing" so much lately. :lol own up to your mistake. There is a reason TSA didn't address my post and has since left the building.

[Chris]

You thought Avenatti had something to do with this woman otherwise you wouldn't have said anything about him "losing" so much lately. :lol own up to your mistake. There is a reason TSA didn't address my post and has since left the building.

No one made a mistake. You just got lost in translation. Again.

Own up to it :tu

[koriwhat]

No one made a mistake. You just got lost in translation. Again.

Own up to it :tu

same as always with these dipshits but more so with pavTheFag. these losers are trying to buck as if they know anything at all. bunch of echo chamber losers they are.

keep them crying chris. :tu

[TSA]

You brought up both Avenatti and Djohn, moron.

What do they have to do with this woman making up a story? You simply couldn't keep it in your pants and had to comment on something you had no idea about per the usual with you.

But at least you got Chris to jump on the "I dont know what the fuck I'm talking about but will comment and laugh at it anyway" bandwagon.

djohn made up a story about Kavanaugh and Avenatti represented someone who made up a story about Kavanaugh.

Only a legit retard would need their hand held to see the connection to this woman. You’re a retard, retard. No one steps on their own dick as much as you do.

[Chris]

same as always with these dipshits but more so with pavTheFag. these losers are trying to buck as if they know anything at all. bunch of echo chamber losers they are.

keep them crying chris. :tu

I'm still looking for just one that's not disingenuous on this board. Pavlov's rhetoric is predictable as he himself has claimed he is just "trolling for the kicks."

[koriwhat]

No one steps on their own dick as much as you do.

when it's not shoved up "ITs" ass. lol

[Reck]

djohn made up a story about Kavanaugh and Avenatti represented someone who made up a story about Kavanaugh.

Only a legit retard would need their hand held to see the connection to this woman. You’re a retard, retard. No one steps on their own dick as much as you do.

Link AND link?

Let me save you the time. There aren't any. Avenatti never represented this woman nor was there ever someone he represented that made up one either.

Pulling shit out of your ass may work at 4chan but in the real world, you need facts.

:lol calls someone retarded but buys into every retarded conspiracy there is to buy. :lol

[koriwhat]

Link AND link?

Let me save you the time. There aren't any. Avenatti never represented this woman nor was there ever someone he represented that made up one either.

Pulling shit out of your ass may work at 4chan but in the real world, you need facts.

:lol calls someone retarded but buys into every retarded conspiracy there is to buy. :lol

poor tranny is all worked up over nothing. so angry all the time tranny... maybe it's time for a hormone shot or two?

[TSA]

Link AND link?

Let me save you the time. There aren't any. Avenatti never represented this woman nor was there ever someone he represented that made up one either.

Pulling shit out of your ass may work at 4chan but in the real world, you need facts.

:lol calls someone retarded but buys into every retarded conspiracy there is to buy. :lolNo one claimed Avenatti represented the latest woman that’s up for criminal referral.

You needs links? :rollin

You are currently posting in the thread of a lie started by djohn, the OP :rollin

Avenatti and Swetnick both have criminal referrals for their lies.

Reck admitting to believing Swetnick :rollin

You are a retard’s retard. You will now be referred to as Simple Reck

[Reck]

No one claimed Avenatti represented the latest woman that’s up for criminal referral.

You needs links? :rollin

You are currently posting in the thread of a lie started by djohn, the OP :rollin

Avenatti and Swetnick both have criminal referrals for their lies.

Reck admitting to believing Swetnick :rollin

You are a retard’s retard. You will now be referred to as Simple Reck

Your originality rivals that of ducks, congrats pizzagate.

Be careful with the emoticon overload. You don’t want to let on how butthurt you are about jumping th gun here. Lol

[Chris]

:yield:yield:yield pizzagate :yield:yield:yield

[TSA]

Your originality rivals that of ducks, congrats pizzagate.

Be careful with the emoticon overload. You don’t want to let on how butthurt you are about jumping th gun here. Lol

Just because you’re too retarded to see the relevance doesn’t mean anyone jumped the gun.
Keep digging that hole Simple Reck.

[Reck]

Avenatti and Swetnick both have criminal referrals for their lies.

https://twitter.com/MichaelAvenatti/status/1058709047040339968

Another day, another TSA fantasy destroyed.

But you hadn't jumped the gun. :lol Dumb fuck

[boutons_deux]

Ford Did Not Recant Accusations Against Kavanaugh

Q: Did Christine Blasey Ford recant her accusations of sexual assault against Brett Kavanaugh?

A: No. Comments by President Trump may have left that impression. But he was referring to a little-known case that had nothing to do with Ford.

FULL QUESTION

President Trump has claimed several times that Ms. Ford now admits that she never met Judge Kavanaugh, and the sexual assault she claimed occurred in fact never happened. Is this True?

FULL ANSWER

During a rally in Missouri the night before the midterm elections, President Donald Trump said (https://www.c-span.org/video/?c4759257/trump-rally-missouri) that “the accuser of Brett Kavanaugh” has “admitted she never met him, she never saw him … it was false accusations, it was a scam, it was fake.”


Trump, Nov. 5: And you saw what happened on Friday, also. We had great jobs numbers, but we also had something else. The accuser of Brett Kavanaugh, a man who is a fine man, the accuser admitted she never met him, she never saw him, he never touched her, talked to her, he had nothing to do with her, she made up the story, it was false accusations, it was a scam, it was fake. It was all fake. And you know, when that came about, people were calling for him to immediately get out. Think of that. Think if he would have done that, and then we found out that it was all false accusations. False statements. A made-up story. And let’s look at the rest of them please. Let’s look at the rest of them. Because that man suffered.


Trump had made similar comments at a rally in Montana (https://factba.se/transcript/donald-trump-speech-maga-rally-belgrade-mt-november-3-2018) two days earlier, saying that “one of [Kavanaugh’s] accusers … just came out a little while ago and said it was all a lie; that she never met now-Justice Kavanaugh. … It was a made-up story.”

The same day, Trump tweeted a similar statement:

https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/874276197357596672/kUuht00m_bigger.jpg (https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump)Donald J. Trump
(https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump)✔@realDonaldTrump
(https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump)
(https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump)A vicious accuser of Justice Kavanaugh has just admitted that she was lying, her story was totally made up, or FAKE! Can you imagine if he didn’t become a Justice of the Supreme Court because of her disgusting False Statements. What about the others? Where are the Dems on this?

7:38 AM - Nov 3, 2018 (https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1058715144442781696)



https://www.factcheck.org/2018/11/ford-did-not-recant-accusations-against-kavanaugh/

[boutons_deux]

Christine Blasey Ford has a security detail because she still receives threats

The Palo Alto University professor hasn’t been able to go back to work since testifying that Brett Kavanaugh assaulted her.

https://www.vox.com/2018/11/8/18076154/christine-blasey-ford-threats-kavanaugh-gofundme

y'all dickless misogynist racists are real tough guys as long as you can remain anonymous

[Winehole23]

she obviously did it for the money and the fame

[Winehole23]

let's not forget the real victims: Justice Kavanaugh and his family.

CBF ruined their lives!

[SnakeBoy]

she obviously did it for the money and the fame

Kavanaugh Accuser Christine Blasey Ford Rakes in $1 Million, Several Book Offers
https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2018/10/29/kavanaugh-accuser-christine-blasey-ford-rakes-in-1-million-several-book-offers/

[Spurtacular]

she obviously did it for the money and the fame


let's not forget the real victims: Justice Kavanaugh and his family.

CBF ruined their lives!

Sarcasm isn't effective when you're pretty much hitting the nail on the head, dude.

:lol Blake level posting

[Winehole23]

Kavanaugh Accuser Christine Blasey Ford Rakes in $1 Million, Several Book Offers
https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2018/10/29/kavanaugh-accuser-christine-blasey-ford-rakes-in-1-million-several-book-offers/hopefully it'll be enough to protect her from the MAGAmob for the foreseeable future. private security isn't cheap.

[LkrFan]

1061671889469235200
:)

[boutons_deux]

Sounds like Dems are talking about voting to impeach K

I think they really should even if the Repug Senate will not vote to convict.

There's plenty of FACTUAL shit about K that needs (re) airing to stink up the place around K and the farcical SuchGore/K/McC SCOTUS.

[Spurtacular]

1061671889469235200
:)

Dems take the house and they don't have any real plans to help Americans. This is why the pendulum will swing sooner rather than later, tbh.

[Nbadan]

Dems take the house and they don't have any real plans to help Americans. This is why the pendulum will swing sooner rather than later, tbh.

Judging by the midterms, it's already swinging....

[DMC]

1061671889469235200
:)

This is the new time filler for politicians... to commit to an non-measurable goal so no one can say they didn't do anything. Imagine telling your boss "this year I am going to investigate better ways to do things" and when asked "what is your goal?" you answer "we'll have to see how it unfolds as the year progresses".

[boutons_deux]

Ford Did Not Recant Accusations Against Kavanaugh


https://www.factcheck.org/2018/11/ford-did-not-recant-accusations-against-kavanaugh/

[DMC]

Ford Did Not Recant Accusations Against Kavanaugh


https://www.factcheck.org/2018/11/ford-did-not-recant-accusations-against-kavanaugh/

This changes everything.

[LkrFan]

This is the new time filler for politicians... to commit to an non-measurable goal so no one can say they didn't do anything. Imagine telling your boss "this year I am going to investigate better ways to do things" and when asked "what is your goal?" you answer "we'll have to see how it unfolds as the year progresses".
Nice post, but you really think the "13 angry Dems" won't do anything while they have control of the House? I think it'll be a coordinated effort by Ds, Mueller, FBI, etc. to bring a lot of shit the Rs been hiding for years...to light. I'm here for it. :)

[DMC]

Nice post, but you really think the "13 angry Dems" won't do anything while they have control of the House? I think it'll be a coordinated effort by Ds, Mueller, FBI, etc. to bring a lot of shit the Rs been hiding for years...to light. I'm here for it. :)

They won't do anything for their electorate. They'll focus on assimilating to the hive in DC.

[boutons_deux]

Catholic University dean resigns after questioning Kavanaugh accuser's allegations that led to his suspension

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/catholic-university-dean-resigns-after-questioning-kavanaugh-accusers-allegations-that-led-to-his-suspension

Lots of collateral damage from oligarchy's shitty SCOTUS whores.