Brett Kavanaugh now under FBI investigation

[hater]

:lmao 59 pages of hot air

[Reck]

1044310315578642433

Safe spaces.

Desperation starting to seep in. He's doing himself a major diservice by begging on friendly TV Networks. What kind of supreme court judge nominee makes TV appearances to whine? He's losing the plot.

[Winehole23]

you know who the real victims are?

men accused of sexual assault.

[DarrinS]

you know who the real victims are?

men accused of sexual assault.


Only when falsely accused, e.g. Duke lacrosse.

[Winehole23]

I wonder, was the liberal lie machine in hibernation during the Gorsuch nomination?

He went to Georgetown Prep at the same time as Kavanaugh, but somehow, never got accused of anything sexually untoward.

[Winehole23]

Only when falsely accused, e.g. Duke lacrosse.well, whether it's true or false is far from clear in this case

[Winehole23]

also, it's a job interview, not a trial at law.

if someone's rep is trash, that's a legit reason not to hire or promote.

[Pavlov]

Kavanaugh should be excluded simply for his bonkers behavior in det abortion case, but that was what got him the nomination.

[Winehole23]

the allegations of sexual assault will tend to solidify his support. may even increase it.

there are reasons Kavanaugh got picked. putting him on the Supreme Court would own the libs massively.

I expect it to happen for that reason, among others.

[Winehole23]

Kavanaugh should be excluded simply for his bonkers behavior in det abortion case, but that was what got him the nomination.for me it's credibility. a man who can't lie convincingly shouldn't be a judge in the highest place.

[Kim Jong-il]

To the contrary, you raise them with proper love and attention and they develop good self esteem so as to weed out the assaultive types on their own.

So your point here is that women bring sexual assault upon themselves?

[Kim Jong-il]

Only when falsely accused, e.g. Duke lacrosse.
Or Brian Banks, but I understand why a bunch of affluent white guys came immediately to mind for you.

[boutons_deux]

putting him on the Supreme Court would own the libs massively.

secondary

Primary goal is that for 40 years the oligarchy haswaited for this chance, moderate/centrists/squishies all gone, now oligarchy will get 5 hard-core whores to do their tricks.

that progress and progressives get screwed is distant secondary, since oligarchy amasses no Capital by screwing progressives politically.

It's all about screwing everybody to amass Capital

[Reck]

https://twitter.com/MichaelAvenatti/status/1044233074609811456
DarrinS getting Avenattied again. :lol

[Winehole23]

It's all about screwing everybody to amass Capitalsure, why not.

sexual impunity is the micro level, protecting economic privilege is the macro screw over.

same preppy white boy entitlement.

[Cry Havoc]

yo CH, this is by no means a jab at you man... did your ex cheat on you or leave you high and dry? i ask because i feel like i remember you claiming something of the sort or maybe you said she just wasn't the one. i could be sorely mistaken and sorry if i am.

It's cool. It became a really toxic relationship, so I walked. I recently found out she passed away late last year, but I don't have any details.


anyhow, what i am getting at is the fact that women, just like men, are capable of being evil sob's who will lie their asses off if given the chance. i don't trust anyone these days because most are liars and will do so to your face. known too many in my lifetime from women to men. i've known a few women who have accused friends in the past of such assault only to be found out to be nothing but fabrication.

there's def truth tellers out there too but i think they're few and far between tbh.

i'd rather just see due process gain a strong hold in this nation again and not this public judge/jury bs we got going on lately.

as for all these accusers... they all just happened to wait till now to come forward and some with ties to far left movements/org's and ties to a certain billionaire too. just so damn fishy.

Of course lots of people lie. What's baffling is that you seem to find Kavanaugh beyond reproach -- what makes you think he isn't a gigantic liar as well? At BEST he obfuscated like crazy while in front of Congress. Why are you not holding lava over his head based on his conduct thus far? Why single out and go after this woman so doggedly instead of holding everyone's feet to the fire? You have to realize how discontinuous your responses are to this situation, at least on some level.

[Kim Jong-il]

https://twitter.com/MichaelAvenatti/status/1044233074609811456
DarrinS (https://www.spurstalk.com/forums/member.php?u=2042) getting Avenattied again. :lol
Kinda doubt she exists tbh. Avenatti is trying to be Liberal Trump, I wouldn’t put it past him to throw out complete bullshit that he knows nobody will hold him accountable for.

[Chris]

Kavanaugh should be excluded simply for his bonkers behavior in det abortion case, but that was what got him the nomination.

Fascist Pavlov wants to exclude people.

[Pavlov]

Fascist Pavlov wants to exclude people.You have no idea what I'm talking about.

[Kim Jong-il]

Fascist Pavlov wants to exclude people.
How inclusive are you, Chris?

[Spurminator]

Only when falsely accused, e.g. Duke lacrosse.

The Duke Lacrosse rape story from 2006 is Darrin's go-to in discussions of sexual assault allegations he doesn't want to believe. Or, for any other reason.


Rolling Stone -- UVA. That went well.

And don't forget about those horrible Duke lacrosse players.


There's enough dirt on Trump. No need to go full Duke lacrosse.


People must feel pretty stupid for rushing to judgement on this one.

I wonder how the Duke Lacrosse team is doing these days?


When all the information has come forward and if it appears that Mr. Gates is at fault, don't you think he has done a serious misservice to minorities who have legitimate cases against the police?

Kinda like the whole Duke lacrosse fiasco?


The Duke Lacrosse team was nat'l news and it was a crime that never even happened.

[Nbadan]

ames Roche was roommates with Kavanaugh at the time of the alleged incident and is now the C.E.O. of a software company in San Francisco. “Debbie and I became close friends shortly after we both arrived at Yale,” he said. “She stood out as being exceptionally honest and gentle. I cannot imagine her making this up.” He said that he never witnessed Kavanaugh engage in any sexual misconduct, but did recall him being “frequently, incoherently drunk.” He described Ramirez as a vulnerable outsider. “Is it believable that she was alone with a wolfy group of guys who thought it was funny to sexually torment a girl like Debbie? Yeah, definitely. Is it believable that Kavanaugh was one of them? Yes.”

[Nbadan]

This story was updated with comments from two former classmates of Kavanaugh, Louisa Garry and Dino Ewing, who initially signed a statement of support for Kavanaugh provided by his attorneys. They approached The New Yorker after this story was published and asked that their names be removed from the statement, saying that they did not wish to dispute Ramirez’s claims.

There are some who are saying that Kavanaugh won't survive Thursday...

[Cry Havoc]

https://thinkprogress.org/brett-kavanaugh-spreads-conspiracy-theory-letter-ford-ramirez-5cd397f04187/

“The coordinated effort to destroy my good name will not drive me out,” Kavanaugh alleges.

Wow. What a pathetic response from someone who wants to be a supreme court justice.

[Nbadan]

https://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/newpix/2018/09/17/20/502C7A7B00000578-0-image-m-23_1537211543667.jpg

Brett Kavanaugh and Mark Judge

[pgardn]

It's hilarious how you've gone full trumpie on this case. Kind of liek you got accused once and haven't live that moment down since.

Sexual assaulters look out for each other's backs I hear. :lol

You really have no clue as to what I have been saying.
Go back and reread my posts you clueless piece of shit.
Another corroborated instant in which another person present tells stories/answers to questions that are too similar, yet asked independently, is why the 2nd acuusser’s claims must be given merit you dumb piece of fecal material.

And your other bizarre assessment of MY intentions get shot down just like this.
You just don’t like to admit when you are a dead wrong fuckwit.

[Reck]

https://twitter.com/grynbaum/status/1044342064450859009

This is some new type of self pity grovelling. Holy shit.

No wonder Darrin, Chris and those 50 year old virgins like this guy so much. :cry he's pure

[Pavlov]

https://twitter.com/grynbaum/status/1044342064450859009

This is some new type of self pity grovelling. Holy shit.

No wonder Darrin, Chris and those 50 year old virgins like this guy so much. :cry he's pure:lmao another incel

[Chris]

Mitch goes in


scGaddAR4VU

[boutons_deux]

Over 900 Yale alumnae sign open letter in support of Deborah Ramirez (https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2018/9/24/1798349/-Over-900-female-Yale-alumnae-sign-open-letter-in-support-of-Deborah-Ramirez)


https://images.dailykos.com/images/592480/story_image/GettyImages-1043782818.jpg?1537816127https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2018/9/24/1798349/-Over-900-female-Yale-alumnae-sign-open-letter-in-support-of-Deborah-Ramirez?detail=emaildkre

[Pavlov]

:lol Cocaine Mitch is upset!

[pgardn]

Avenatti claims to have a group of K victims lined up

Trash's base don't care.

Even boots gets it...
His response above to my same post.
There are probably a number of people waiting in the line with worthwhile AND absolutel fiction. It takes time to ferret them out when the ball gets rolling when you might have a guy who had/has? no respect for women.

[boutons_deux]

Kavanaugh went to Yale.

There he joined the fraternity Delta Kappa Epsilon, or DKE, which was, according to The Yale Daily News (https://yaledailynews.com/blog/2018/09/20/a-flag-of-underwear-photo-from-kavanaughs-time-shows-dke-hijinks/),

“notorious for disrespecting women.”

(Long after Kavanaugh graduated, the fraternity,

once headed by George W. Bush,

was banned from campus after video emerged of pledges chanting (https://www.reuters.com/article/us-sexual-harassment-yale/yale-punishes-fraternity-for-sexist-chanting-idUSTRE74H06W20110518),

“No Means Yes! Yes Means Anal!”)

Kavanaugh was also a member of an all-male secret society (https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/mollyhensleyclancy/the-yale-secret-society-brett-kavanaugh-joined-was-mostly) called Truth and Courage, which had an obscene nickname affirming its dedication to womanizing.

Kavanaugh went on to become a protégé of appeals court judge Alex Kozinski, for whom he clerked in the early 1990s.

Last year, Kozinski resigned after multiple accusations of sexual harassment by former female clerks and junior staffers;

two said he showed them porn in his office.

The judge’s lewd behavior was, by many accounts, an open secret.

“All the clerks and former clerks in Kozinski’s ambit knew and understood that you assumed the risk and accepted the responsibilities of secrecy,”

His story shows, in lurid microcosm,

how a certain class of men guard and perpetuate their privileges.

Women who struggle ceaselessly to be smart enough,

attractive enough,

ambitious enough and

likable enough

have been playing a rigged game.

As they realize that, their incandescent fury is remaking our politics.

We’ll know things have changed when palling around with sexual abusers carries more stigma than being abused does.

https://www.nytimes.com/2018/09/24/opinion/columnists/kavanaugh-georgetown-supreme-court.html?partner=rss&emc=rss

[Cry Havoc]

https://twitter.com/grynbaum/status/1044342064450859009

This is some new type of self pity grovelling. Holy shit.

No wonder Darrin, Chris and those 50 year old virgins like this guy so much. :cry he's pure

Ah yes, while those 100 keg parties were happening he was shuttered in his room reading The Bible and Atlas Shrugged like a good Christian boy.

[Winehole23]

Have you boofed yet?

[Winehole23]

FFFFFFourth of July

[Cry Havoc]

No one's answered Winehole's query about Gorsuch, oddly enough.

[boutons_deux]

No one's answered Winehole's query about Gorsuch, oddly enough.

which query?

[DarrinS]

The Duke Lacrosse rape story from 2006 is Darrin's go-to in discussions of sexual assault allegations he doesn't want to believe. Or, for any other reason.


It’s a good example because so many people rushed to assume they were guilty. Because fraternity jocks

[baseline bum]

which query?

About where all the sexual assault accusers were for Gorsuch if this was just the Democrats making shit up to stop a supreme court nomination.

[koriwhat]

It's cool. It became a really toxic relationship, so I walked. I recently found out she passed away late last year, but I don't have any details.

Of course lots of people lie. What's baffling is that you seem to find Kavanaugh beyond reproach -- what makes you think he isn't a gigantic liar as well? At BEST he obfuscated like crazy while in front of Congress. Why are you not holding lava over his head based on his conduct thus far? Why single out and go after this woman so doggedly instead of holding everyone's feet to the fire? You have to realize how discontinuous your responses are to this situation, at least on some level.

you got me wrong CH. i am not against her and for him at all. i am merely against the masses being judge&jury without due process like our judicial system allows. that's basically it.

however, i do think ford and the rest are political pawns and their accusations seem ridiculous with little to no info to corroborate. what gets me is the fact these women are coming forward now and not when SpecialK was climbing the ladder up to SC. it all just seems fishy especially when you follow the money and those who are speaking for these "victims".

ps: sorry about that ex. we've all dealt with one or a few of the same. at least you walked away and didn't let the toxicity bring you down too. :tu

[boutons_deux]

About where all the sexual assault accusers were for Gorsuch if this was just the Democrats making shit up to stop a supreme court nomination.

I guess Gorsuch wasn't a sexual asshole/predator.

K has a sorrowful trail of mistreated, unhappy ladies that Gorsuch doesn't.

[Spurminator]

It’s a good example because so many people rushed to assume they were guilty. Because fraternity jocks

Yes, that one instance 12 years ago is an example of men who were unfairly convicted by the court of public opinion. It's kind of weird, though, that you have to go back to an incident 12 years ago every time the topic comes up. Doesn't that tell you it's probably not a widespread problem?

[cd98]

About where all the sexual assault accusers were for Gorsuch if this was just the Democrats making shit up to stop a supreme court nomination.

Gorsuch was not a painful change for the left. He was replacing Scalia, and so that kept status quo. But Kavanaugh is another matter to them because he is replacing Kennedy, the swing vote of the group. Not only is there more urgency to stop him, but there is more urgency to de-legitimize him if he gets on the bench. Moreover, their base demands that they get in the mud and do whatever is necessary to stop this nomination from happening. If the Dems don't, they will hear it from their base.

That's why the Dems are scouring Yale and asking for people to come forward. That's also why they are helping people remember important facts that they forgot, like that Kavanaugh did it and not someone else.

[cd98]

Also, if for some reason Kavanaugh is not confirmed and Dems retake the Senate, don't think for a second that the Dems will confirm any Trump nomination until after the 2020 election. They will stall for two years (unless he nominates Garland).

[Trainwreck2100]

About where all the sexual assault accusers were for Gorsuch if this was just the Democrats making shit up to stop a supreme court nomination.

gorsuch was pre :cry me too

[Spurminator]

Gorsuch was not a painful change for the left. He was replacing Scalia, and so that kept status quo. But Kavanaugh is another matter to them because he is replacing Kennedy, the swing vote of the group. Not only is there more urgency to stop him, but there is more urgency to de-legitimize him if he gets on the bench. Moreover, their base demands that they get in the mud and do whatever is necessary to stop this nomination from happening. If the Dems don't, they will hear it from their base.

That's why the Dems are scouring Yale and asking for people to come forward. That's also why they are helping people remember important facts that they forgot, like that Kavanaugh did it and not someone else.

Gorsuch was replacing Merrick Garland, really. If we're talking about Democrats inventing a narrative out of thin air, there's no reason to believe they wouldn't have targeted Gorsuch as retaliation. Yet several Democrats voted to confirm him.

[DarrinS]

Lol, this attention whore.

Drinking game - drink for every mention of Mark Judge


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LMpAAvVi4d8



Won’t name his mystery accuser. Seems like now might be a good time.

[boutons_deux]

Kavanaugh allies ask to have signatures removed from statement supporting him (http://theweek.com/speedreads/797943/kavanaugh-allies-ask-have-signatures-removed-from-statement-supporting)

http://theweek.com/speedreads/797943/kavanaugh-allies-ask-have-signatures-removed-from-statement-supporting

:lol

[Spurminator]

Also, if for some reason Kavanaugh is not confirmed and Dems retake the Senate, don't think for a second that the Dems will confirm any Trump nomination until after the 2020 election. They will stall for two years (unless he nominates Garland).

I think they'll go along with a candidate similar to Garland even if it's not Garland. They'll approve a moderate. Trump may have to find a nominee somewhere outside of the Heritage/Federalist Society litmus. That's not a bad thing.

Honestly the whole President-nominates-Senate-approves process needs to be re-examined.

[cd98]

gorsuch was pre :cry me too

What's amazing is that the Me Too started with Republicans like Charlie Rose, Weinstein, Russell Simmons, Tavis Smiley, and Matt Lauer.

[baseline bum]

Gorsuch was not a painful change for the left. He was replacing Scalia, and so that kept status quo. But Kavanaugh is another matter to them because he is replacing Kennedy, the swing vote of the group. Not only is there more urgency to stop him, but there is more urgency to de-legitimize him if he gets on the bench. Moreover, their base demands that they get in the mud and do whatever is necessary to stop this nomination from happening. If the Dems don't, they will hear it from their base.

That's why the Dems are scouring Yale and asking for people to come forward. That's also why they are helping people remember important facts that they forgot, like that Kavanaugh did it and not someone else.

You're such a fucking partisan hack. The Gorsuch nomination was the one stolen from the Democrats that would have given them a 5-4 advantage in the Supreme Court if McConnell and the GOP didn't all of a sudden pretend the president didn't have any authority to nominate people to the Supreme Court. A Kavanaugh nomination just moves the Supreme Court from pretty hard right to very hard right.

[clambake]

this guy about to cry on fox? jesus, what a milk toast snowflake.

[cd98]

Gorsuch was replacing Merrick Garland, really. If we're talking about Democrats inventing a narrative out of thin air, there's no reason to believe they wouldn't have targeted Gorsuch as retaliation. Yet several Democrats voted to confirm him.

They also took heat for not fighting more. But the balance of the court didn't shift when Gorsuch was confirmed.

[boutons_deux]

Yet several Democrats voted to confirm him.

... is why Dems are so fucking weak, get bullied around by Repugs

[baseline bum]

Also, if for some reason Kavanaugh is not confirmed and Dems retake the Senate, don't think for a second that the Dems will confirm any Trump nomination until after the 2020 election. They will stall for two years (unless he nominates Garland).

Why should they?

[baseline bum]

I think they'll go along with a candidate similar to Garland even if it's not Garland. They'll approve a moderate. Trump may have to find a nominee somewhere outside of the Heritage/Federalist Society litmus. That's not a bad thing.

Honestly the whole President-nominates-Senate-approves process needs to be re-examined.

I hope not. Republicans can't just decide to have a functioning government only when their guy has the presidency.

[cd98]

You're such a fucking partisan hack. The Gorsuch nomination was the one stolen from the Democrats that would have given them a 5-4 advantage in the Supreme Court if McConnell and the GOP didn't all of a sudden pretend the president didn't have any authority to nominate people to the Supreme Court. A Kavanaugh nomination just moves the Supreme Court from pretty hard right to very hard right.

Partisan hack? I'm glad that you can see straight and that you have no partisan bias. And it wasn't stolen from them. You want to control the confirmation process, don't blow the Senate, like the Dems did. I do remember Harry Reid changing the rules to his favor when it suited him. Maybe you guys could be filibustering right now instead of trying to find people to make false accusations to stop the nomination.

[cd98]

Why should they?

I thought it was wrong to do, in your opinion. But maybe it's only wrong when it happens to your guys.

[Reck]

Partisan hack? I'm glad that you can see straight and that you have no partisan bias. And it wasn't stolen from them. You want to control the confirmation process, don't blow the Senate, like the Dems did. I do remember Harry Reid changing the rules to his favor when it suited him. Maybe you guys could be filibustering right now instead of trying to find people to make false accusations to stop the nomination.

Harry Reid was forced to do that because republicans struck or oposed every single thing obama tried to do in there. It's sad that you cannot admit your bias since it's just so obvious. Have some self awareness.

That seatw as 100% certifiably stolen. Guy didn't even get a single meeting really? you're bordering on stupid now.

Oh and nice, you support a would-be rapist. Cherry on top.

[cd98]

Harry Reid was forced to do that because republicans struck or oposed every single thing obama tried to do in there. It's sad that you cannot admit your bias since it's just so obvious. Have some self awareness.

That seatw as 100% certifiably stolen. Guy didn't even get a single meeting really? you're bordering on stupid now.

Oh and nice, you support a would-be rapist. Cherry on top.

Both sides have used the filibuster. It's pretty stupid to think that only one party used it. Using the filibuster means you have to compromise. But Harry Reid didn't want to compromise, so he got rid of the filibuster, despite being warned of the consequences.

[cd98]

Harry Reid was forced to do that because republicans struck or oposed every single thing obama tried to do in there. It's sad that you cannot admit your bias since it's just so obvious. Have some self awareness.

That seatw as 100% certifiably stolen. Guy didn't even get a single meeting really? you're bordering on stupid now.

Oh and nice, you support a would-be rapist. Cherry on top.

Says a guy that is lock stop with the Clinton/Kennedy people. Your issue isn't with rape, it's with the political party.

[cd98]

Harry Reid was forced to do that because republicans struck or oposed every single thing obama tried to do in there. It's sad that you cannot admit your bias since it's just so obvious. Have some self awareness.

That seatw as 100% certifiably stolen. Guy didn't even get a single meeting really? you're bordering on stupid now.

Oh and nice, you support a would-be rapist. Cherry on top.

Don't forget that the Me Too movement started with party toting Democrats (Weinstein et al). Those are the rapists. The ones that were funding Hillary's presidential campaign.

[boutons_deux]

I thought it was wrong to do, in your opinion. But maybe it's only wrong when it happens to your guys.

when have the Dems ever pulled a Gorsuch trick on the Dems?

After obstructing Obama/Dems for 8 years, Bitch McC then broke every rule, protocol, agreement in the Senate book to spite their hated knitter, deny him his rightful SCOTUS appointment, and reserve Scalia's seat for another hard right extremist like Gorsuch and K.

Obama had the power to appoint an interim judge to serve until 20 Jan 18, but he wimped out. That's the problem with the Dems, fucking wimps, and as corrupt as the Repugs.

[cd98]

when have the Dems ever pulled a Gorsuch trick on the Dems?

Bitch McC broke every rule, protocol in the Senate book to spite their hated knitter, deny him his rightful SCOTUS appointment, and reserve Scalia's seat for another hard right extremist like Gorsuch and K.

Obama had the power to appoint an interim judge until 20 Jan 18, but he wimped out. That's the problem with the Dems, fucking wimps, and as corrupt as the Repugs.

What the Party of Harry Reid doesn’t like changing the Senate rules?

[ElNono]

Mitch goes in

scGaddAR4VU

:lmao damn, I've never seen Mitch so fucking butthurt... of course the whole indignant play is all a show, he's one of the most cut throat politicians in DC

[Fabbs]

:lmao damn, I've never seen Mitch so fucking butthurt... of course the whole indignant play is all a show, he's one of the most cut throat politicians in DC
Bitch McConnell had been out of the news, but if he is going to resurface this reminded me to add him to the Most Punchable Faces list. :lol

[boutons_deux]

Both sides have used the filibuster. It's pretty stupid to think that only one party used it. Using the filibuster means you have to compromise. But Harry Reid didn't want to compromise, so he got rid of the filibuster, despite being warned of the consequences.

Bitch McC and the Repugs didn't actually filibuster.

Repugs just told the Dems were going filibuster every damn thing Dems wanted, and the Dems folded. 100% obstruction.

THAT's why Reid dropped the filibuster, but only in a limited fashion.

False Equivalence that Dems are just as bad as Repugs. G F Y

[GB20]

Mitch goes in


scGaddAR4VU
they did the same shit to Obama.

[Reck]

cd98 is seething mad because it has been pointed out that he's just ducks with better english.

I have no problem admitting I'm a democrat and most of the time I'll side with them but I'm also not a blind follower. I call a square a square no matter the politics.

Dont blame me for your shortcomings, guy. I get that republicans are more deviant and depraved so you are often hesitant to call them your own but you are them and you own them, pal.

[cd98]

Bitch McC and the Repugs didn't actually filibuster.

Repugs just told the Dems were going filibuster every damn thing Dems wanted, and the Dems folded. 100% obstruction.

THAT's why Reid dropped the filibuster, but only in a limited fashion.

False Equivalence that Dems are just as bad as Repugs. G F Y

But there was no rule for the timing of the confirmation of Garland. So Mitch didn’t break a rule, he just didn’t follow the norm. Harry Reid changed an actual rule. Point is you are ok with it, if done by Dems. Your stance isn’t on principle, it’s on party.

[LGBTQIAPK & G-D]

cd96 is seething mad because it has been pointed out that he's just ducks with better english.

I have no problem admitting I'm a democrat and most of the time I'll side with them but I'm also not a blind follower. I call a square a square no matter the politics.

Dont blame me for your shortcomings, guy. I get that republicans are more deviant and depraved so you are often hesitant to call them you're own but you are them and you own them, pal.

He's a seether, not a pleaser.

I have no problem admitting that I'm a democrat either and I'll side with them but I'm a seeing follower. I pound that square peg into the round hole too, man.

I blame people for their shortcomings, too. Fucking republicans are so fucking evil and worthless. If they had their way, guys like us couldn't pretend to be girly, pal.

[Pavlov]

GODDAMMIT WE'RE GOING TO PUSH THIS NOMINATION THROUGH EVEN IF HE IS AN ABUSIVE INCEL PERV.

ESPECIALLY IF HE'S AN ABUSIVE INCEL PERV!

[cd98]

cd98 is seething mad because it has been pointed out that he's just ducks with better english.

I have no problem admitting I'm a democrat and most of the time I'll side with them but I'm also not a blind follower. I call a square a square no matter the politics.

Dont blame me for your shortcomings, guy. I get that republicans are more deviant and depraved so you are often hesitant to call them your own but you are them and you own them, pal.

You think you aren’t biased. But bc I disagree with the smears I’m somehow defending the Republican Party on everything? I don’t even post in the other political threads. I only post on this one bc it’s interesting to me from a legal perspective. Every once in a while I get tired of the blind partisanship here and I throw a few punches just to show some hypocrisy that I see in the posts.

[GB20]

Mitch goes in


scGaddAR4VU
they did the same shit to Obama.

[baseline bum]

Partisan hack? I'm glad that you can see straight and that you have no partisan bias. And it wasn't stolen from them. You want to control the confirmation process, don't blow the Senate, like the Dems did. I do remember Harry Reid changing the rules to his favor when it suited him. Maybe you guys could be filibustering right now instead of trying to find people to make false accusations to stop the nomination.

The Democrats never decided the president doesn't have the authority to nominate judges to the Supreme Court. Fuck off with your crap justifications for McConnell's obstructionism.

[Reck]

Lol, this attention whore.

Drinking game - drink for every mention of Mark Judge


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LMpAAvVi4d8



Won’t name his mystery accuser. Seems like now might be a good time.

https://twitter.com/MichaelAvenatti/status/1044380512091951104

Avenatti bullying in the paint. :lol Darrin

[baseline bum]

when have the Dems ever pulled a Gorsuch trick on the Dems?


They never did. cd98 is such a typical Republican, hates both parties supposedly but always come semen shielding for the GOP.

[baseline bum]

cd98 is seething mad because it has been pointed out that he's just ducks with better english.

He's more like koriwhat without the anger issues.

[cd98]

The Democrats never decided the president doesn't have the authority to nominate judges to the Supreme Court. Fuck off with your crap justifications for McConnell's obstructionism.

You are so partisan you can’t acknowledge that when Dems have a majority in the House/Senate they ignore the rules and traditions when it suits them. You need to stop whining about Gorsuch, it’s gotten pathetic.

[baseline bum]

You are so partisan you can’t acknowledge that when Dems have a majority in the House they ignore the rules and traditions when it suits them. You need to stop whining about Gorsuch, it’s gotten pathetic.

What's pathetic is you with your typical both sides rationalizations for McConnell's and the GOP's theft of a seat on the court.

[cd98]

What's pathetic is you with your typical both sides rationalizations for McConnell's and the GOP's theft of a seat on the court.

Aw. That’s just not fair.

[cd98]

What's pathetic is you with your typical both sides rationalizations for McConnell's and the GOP's theft of a seat on the court.

So Harry Reid changes the filibuster rules so he can get the judges he wants confirmed with no compromise bc it benefits the Democrats and it’s ok, but it’s so unfair when Republicans use their time in power to their advantage bc it hurts Democrats. Ok. You are very principled.

[Pavlov]

So Harry Reid changes the filibuster rules so he can get the judges he wants confirmed with no compromise bc it benefits the Democrats and it’s ok, but it’s so unfair when Republicans use their time in power to their advantage bc it hurts Democrats. Ok. You are very principled.What was the compromise offered by Republicans?

[baseline bum]

So Harry Reid changes the filibuster rules so he can get the judges he wants confirmed with no compromise bc it benefits the Democrats, but it’s so unfair when Republicans use their time in power to their advantage bc it hurts Democrats. Ok. You are very principled.

It's really funny seeing you on your high horse whining about the Democrats after eight years of your boy McConnell's unprecedented obstructionism. McConnell decided presidents don't have the authority to nominate Supreme Court justices out of thin air and you have the nerve to whine that the Democrats wouldn't confirm one of Trump's picks if they win the senate. No shit they wouldn't after seeing Garland's seat stolen.

[Reck]

This guy has to be a troll of one of the more hardcore conservatives on here. Delusional.

[pgardn]

Mitch goes in


scGaddAR4VU

Crying like someone accused him of being born in the wrong country.
Turtle Tears...

[baseline bum]

What was the compromise offered by Republicans?

It's funny, Garland was the compromise offered by Obama (Orrin Hatch said he'd easily get confirmed back in the filibuster days) but cd98 wants to pretend Obama nominated Al Sharpton.

[boutons_deux]

Trevor just great, funny, and with the goods

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zuudCxw1GdQ&feature=em-uploademail

[Winehole23]

It's really funny seeing you on your high horse whining about the Democrats after eight years of your boy McConnell's unprecedented obstructionism. McConnell decided presidents don't have the authority to nominate Supreme Court justices out of thin air and you have the nerve to whine that the Democrats wouldn't confirm one of Trump's picks if they win the senate. No shit they wouldn't after seeing Garland's seat stolen.yep

[Winehole23]

with barely a peep and even a few votes for Gorsuch

[cd98]

It's funny, Garland was the compromise offered by Obama (Orrin Hatch said he'd easily get confirmed back in the filibuster days) but cd98 (https://www.spurstalk.com/forums/member.php?u=16113) wants to pretend Obama nominated Al Sharpton.

See, I actually have posted and said good things about Garland. He did get a raw deal. But Harry Reid set the precedence of using the majority power when you have it to steamroll the minority party, so it’s partially his party’s fault. But I can at least say something good about a Democrat judge. You are such a blind partisan that you call a foul when the Dems commit a foul.

[cd98]

If Harry Reid hadn’t overturned two centuries of precedence on the filibuster, the Dems could have been filibustering instead of pushing hit pieces and getting people to bring false accusations to stop the Kavanaugh confirmation.

[baseline bum]

See, I actually have posted and said good things about Garland. He did get a raw deal. But Harry Reid set the precedence of using the majority power when you have it to steamroll the minority party, so it’s partially his party’s fault. But I can at least say something good about a Democrat judge. You are such a blind partisan that you call a foul when the Dems commit a foul.

Boy you ran away from Pavlov's compromise question real quickly.

[baseline bum]

If Harry Reid hadn’t overturned two centuries of precedence on the filibuster, the Dems could have been filibustering instead of pushing hit pieces and getting people to bring false accusations to stop the Kavanaugh confirmation.

Now they're false accusations? Because Kavanaugh has the Magic R?

[Nathan89]

vOZp8dGD8G4

[Th'Pusher]

If Harry Reid hadn’t overturned two centuries of precedence on the filibuster, the Dems could have been filibustering instead of pushing hit pieces and getting people to bring false accusations to stop the Kavanaugh confirmation.

So now you’re all in? All the accusations are false now? Just the other day you wanted to let the accusers filll in the gaps. You could have at least waited till Thursday to declare the accusations false.

[Winehole23]

Stealing a Supreme Court justice is a definite foul. Harry Reid 86ing the filibuster wasn't the equivalent because the equvalent foul wasn't committed.

If the Dems block Kavanaugh they won't have done the equivalent unless the Dems win the Senate, which is long long odds.

[Winehole23]

so that would be a highly speculative equivalence

[Winehole23]

but I can see you take it just the same

[Winehole23]

high price to pay for hurt feelings, but ain't it always the way

[Spurs Homer]

Did anyone see Kavanaugh's "virginity defense" on Faux news?

He is lying. He must have repeated his FOX news talking point 50 times. He refused to answer if he would support an FBI investigation to clear his name. He is worse than the other sex offender on the Supreme Court.

[cd98]

So now you’re all in? All the accusations are false now? Just the other day you wanted to let the accusers filll in the gaps. You could have at least waited till Thursday to declare the accusations false.

Nah. I think Ford’s story is credible, but not necessarily true, at least as to Kavanaugh and I’ve given the flaws of her story on other posts. I think the Yale accusations are false and ginned up by lefty political groups.

[cd98]

Did anyone see Kavanaugh's "virginity defense" on Faux news?

He is lying. He must have repeated his FOX news talking point 50 times. He refused to answer if he would support an FBI investigation to clear his name. He is worse than the other sex offender on the Supreme Court.

Hes obviously lying bc he’s a Republican.

[DMC]

Did anyone see Kavanaugh's "virginity defense" on Faux news?

He is lying. He must have repeated his FOX news talking point 50 times. He refused to answer if he would support an FBI investigation to clear his name. He is worse than the other sex offender on the Supreme Court.

You raped someone. I know it. Will you support an FBI investigation to clear your name now? I mean, your name needs to be cleared since I accused you, you stand accused. You're guilty I just know it.

[Winehole23]

Nah. I think Ford’s story is credible, but not necessarily true, at least as to Kavanaugh and I’ve given the flaws of her story on other posts. I think the Yale accusations are false and ginned up by lefty political groups.wonder where the damn lefties were when Gorsuch gave the Republicans a Supreme Court majority. a few of them even voted for Gorsuch.

[cd98]

Stealing a Supreme Court justice is a definite foul. Harry Reid 86ing the filibuster wasn't the equivalent because the equvalent foul wasn't committed.

If the Dems block Kavanaugh they won't have done the equivalent unless the Dems win the Senate, which is long long odds.

You probably don’t know this, but the DC Circuit is not your average appellate court. It’s a big deal. Big enough that Harry changed a 200 year rule. You can’t have it both ways. If you think bending the rules is ok for Harry, then it’s ok for Mitch.

[cd98]

wonder where the damn lefties were when Gorsuch gave the Republicans a Supreme Court majority

I can tell you their base was pissed. They didn’t go in the gutter like they did with those Yale allegations. But heads would roll if they sat quietly a month before the mid term elections.

[Winehole23]

some of them even voted for the other sideyou can't say the the same for your side, cd98

[baseline bum]

Eight years of unprecedented obstructionism by McConnell against the anti-war government nig and all cd98 wants to remember is Harry Reid.

[Spurs Homer]

You raped someone. I know it. Will you support an FBI investigation to clear your name now? I mean, your name needs to be cleared since I accused you, you stand accused. You're guilty I just know it.

If I was up for a lifetime position on the SC - absolutely - let's do this yesterday. I have nothing to fear nothing to hide. If the allegation proves false - I want the FBI to prosecute the false accuser.

See how easy it is.

[Fusternino]

I read Avenatti's email and nearly threw up.

Kavanaugh should just quit before Wednesday to save his family from learning even more about him.

[boutons_deux]

What does Michael Avenatti have on Brett Kavanaugh? What we know so far.

Avenatti claims to have more information on Kavanaugh and his friend, Mark Judge.

https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2018/9/24/17896136/michael-avenatti-email-brett-kavanaugh-devils-triangle

[Winehole23]

Eight years of unprecedented obstructionism by McConnell against the anti-war government nig and all cd98 (https://www.spurstalk.com/forums/member.php?u=16113) wants to remember is Harry Reid.like the Republicans are going to restore minority rule in the Senate now that they have the majority because, principle and tradition.

my ass.

[Kim Jong-il]

vOZp8dGD8G4
HOLY FUCKING SHIT, A YOUTUBE VIDEO.

CANCEL THE FUCKING HEARING, WE HAVE A YOUTUBE VIDEO THAT PROVES EVERYTHING!

[baseline bum]

McConnell saw how much hatred there was of the black man in the oval office from his base, and from there knew he was good to be a historic obstructionist. But Harry Reid broke the senate. :lol

[Fabbs]

I know I know it's Bill Oreily.
Calm down Trump Haters and listen to what he says about Christine Fords attorney. Seems like very valid points.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M4NuUdBapV0

That she is hard core Dem and demeaned Paula Jones allegations (vs Billy C) and also supported Al Franken (dissing his accuser). Political much?

[Nathan89]

HOLY FUCKING SHIT, A YOUTUBE VIDEO.

CANCEL THE FUCKING HEARING, WE HAVE A YOUTUBE VIDEO THAT PROVES EVERYTHING!

Platform doesn't matter tbh. He's a pretty accomplished journalist.

From his wiki:


Pool's coverage has been carried and syndicated by multiple mainstream outlets including NBC (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NBC), Reuters (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reuters), Al Jazeera (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Al_Jazeera), and Time (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Time_(magazine)).[7] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tim_Pool#cite_note-wired1-7)[8] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tim_Pool#cite_note-8) He was covered by Fast Company (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fast_Company_(magazine)) and Wired (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wired_(magazine)).[7] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tim_Pool#cite_note-wired1-7)[9] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tim_Pool#cite_note-9)[10] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tim_Pool#cite_note-10) In 2013, Pool joined Vice Media (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vice_Media) producing and hosting content as well as developing new methods of reporting.[11] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tim_Pool#cite_note-dredge-11) In 2014, he joined Fusion TV (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fusion_(TV_channel)) as Director of Media innovation and Senior Correspondent.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tim_Pool

[leemajors]

FALSE ACQUISTIONS!!

[Cry Havoc]

Washington (CNN)A woman who signed a letter supporting Brett Kavanaugh after he was accused of sexual assault earlier this month called revelations from his high school yearbook that showed he and his friends reportedly boasted about their supposed conquests with her "hurtful," The New York Times reported Monday.

Renate Schroeder Dolphin joined 64 other women this month who signed a letter to the Senate Judiciary Committee saying they knew the Supreme Court nominee during their high school years and that "he has behaved honorably and treated women with respect."
However, Kavanaugh included "Renate Alumnius" as an entry in his high school yearbook page, and two of Kavanaugh's classmates told the Times the mentions of "Renate" were part of the high school football players' unsubstantiated boasting about their conquests.

Sounds like a winner to me.

[leemajors]

Platform doesn't matter tbh. He's a pretty accomplished journalist.

From his wiki:



https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tim_Pool

Is he a Proud Boy? Just curious.

[InRareForm]

vOZp8dGD8G4

I'm not watching that lol

[DarrinS]

HOLY FUCKING SHIT, A YOUTUBE VIDEO.

CANCEL THE FUCKING HEARING, WE HAVE A YOUTUBE VIDEO THAT PROVES EVERYTHING!


All caps rage. Lol

[LGBTQIAPK & G-D]

GODDAMMIT WE'RE GOING TO PUSH THIS NOMINATION THROUGH EVEN IF HE IS AN ABUSIVE INCEL PERV.

ESPECIALLY IF HE'S AN ABUSIVE INCEL PERV!

Incel pervs are not a part of my coalition. We discriminate like that.

[DarrinS]

I read Avenatti's email and nearly threw up.

Kavanaugh should just quit before Wednesday to save his family from learning even more about him.


I’m still waiting for the tapes he promised.

[TSA]

Is he a Proud Boy? Just curious.

Quite the opposite. Pool is a soy boy.

[LGBTQIAPK & G-D]

vOZp8dGD8G4

Journalists need to be certified. This bum off the street is a danger to society.

[Nathan89]

Is he a Proud Boy? Just curious.

Center-Lefty and says he would never vote right. He's one of my favorite journalists though tbh.

[Nathan89]

I'm not watching that lol

I don't care. Next time don't comment either.

[Spurminator]

All caps rage. Lol

Are you talking about the title of the video?

[DarrinS]

Is he a Proud Boy? Just curious.


Straight up Nazi, obviously

[DarrinS]

Are you talking about the title of the video?

Shouldn’t you be searching my post history for burns?

[Spurtacular]

Boy you ran away from Pavlov (https://www.spurstalk.com/forums/member.php?u=7343)'s compromise question real quickly.

Obama's compromise.

:lol Chump (pavlov) and compromise are two terms that'll never go together.

[Nathan89]

Journalists need to be certified. This bum off the street is a danger to society.

:rollin

Nobody gives a shit about that. As evidence by his career so far. I don't know his credentials though.

[ducks]

Brett is not guilty if anything yet
So far the people making accusations look like idiots that have lots of gaps in stories.
Nothing disqualify yet

[DarrinS]

I’m still curious whether Avenatti is going to produce his accuser. There needs to be a more credible accusation than Dr. Ford and blurry cock chick.

[Nathan89]

1044408830564683776

Leftist cult chants "we believe survivors" at Ted Cruz. I'd hate have these morons on a jury tbh.

[DMC]

If I was up for a lifetime position on the SC - absolutely - let's do this yesterday. I have nothing to fear nothing to hide. If the allegation proves false - I want the FBI to prosecute the false accuser.

See how easy it is.

So you want to be questioned about everything under the sun, under oath, in front of the world and the Senate? lol

[ducks]

I’m still curious whether Avenatti is going to produce his accuser. There needs to be a more credible accusation than Dr. Ford and blurry cock chick.

Stormy Daniels

[Nathan89]

Brett is not guilty if anything yet
So far the people making accusations look like idiots that have lots of gaps in stories.
Nothing disqualify yet

One accusation was revealing itself to be shit so they layered another shit accusation on top of it. Of course the radicals think both are legit because "we believe survivors" is the ethos. Details are irrelevant.

[Spurs Homer]

So you want to be questioned about everything under the sun, under oath, in front of the world and the Senate? lol

Absolutely. Why not? If he can push for clinton to be forced to answer questions regarding the cigar being inserted in dark places - i guess it’s just his time in the barrel - amirite?

[Reck]

All caps rage. Lol

He was mocking him...

[DarrinS]

He was mocking him...

Mocking who?

[Kim Jong-il]

The Dad humor is so thick it’s making me bald prematurely.

[ducks]

https://scontent-lax3-1.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/fr/cp0/e15/q65/42439869_1926184557430412_4958755256100978688_n.jp g?_nc_cat=1&efg=eyJpIjoidCJ9&oh=7c2e41728724299ec92638407fe1955b&oe=5C5AB3BB

[DarrinS]

The Dad humor is so thick it’s making me bald prematurely.

Makes no sense

[ducks]

https://scontent-lax3-1.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/fr/cp0/e15/q65/42510358_1926189337429934_4824409031269416960_n.jp g?_nc_cat=1&efg=eyJpIjoidCJ9&oh=2f6f222834de960b0aacf8eac4355fc4&oe=5C57CB4F

[Winehole23]

McConnell saw how much hatred there was of the black man in the oval office from his base, and from there knew he was good to be a historic obstructionist. But Harry Reid broke the senate. :lol2009 thread would've jumped all over this.

now?

radio silence.

[Winehole23]

I’m not a party hack. How often do you see me here taking up for any party?
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DdR4C9FV0AAUdW-.jpg:large (https://twitter.com/super70ssports/status/996553416641007618)


Don't sell yourself short, judge, you're a tremendous hack.

[ducks]

https://twitter.com/AnnCoulter/status/1044450996464668673?s=20

[Winehole23]

still applies:

265985287908368384

[ducks]

No proof of rape

[Winehole23]

No proof of rapegood thing it wasn't aimed at your head. you didn't duck

[ElNono]

This is the problem with politics these days, tbh, we went from rapist to self-admitted 30 year old incel SAWM... what's even more sad it's the former is probably more believable than the later...

[ElNono]

I'm actually way more concerned about the nomination now if this guy truly went to college and didn't get any pussy until he was 30+...

[ElNono]

where's the middle ground these days? where did all the guys that "touched some boobies in high school and smoked some pot in college" go? It's either saint or the devil? really?

[boutons_deux]

where's the middle ground these days? where did all the guys that "touched some boobies in high school and smoked some pot in college" go? It's either saint or the devil? really?

consent is the arbiter

[ElNono]

try laughing one of these days, boutons... it's good for you

[boutons_deux]

Senate Democrats Investigate a New Allegation of Sexual Misconduct, from Brett Kavanaugh’s College Years
The claim dates to the 1983-84 academic school year, when Kavanaugh was a freshman at Yale University.

The offices of at least four Democratic senators have received information about the allegation,

and at least two have begun investigating it.

(Ramirez identified the two male onlookers, but, at her request, The New Yorker is not naming them.)

A third male student then exposed himself to her. “I remember a penis being in front of my face,” she said.

https://www.newyorker.com/news/news-desk/senate-democrats-investigate-a-new-allegation-of-sexual-misconduct-from-the-supreme-court-nominee-brett-kavanaughs-college-years-deborah-ramirez

[boutons_deux]

New Yorker reporters fact-check Brett Kavanaugh’s ‘false’ Fox News interview about sexual assault allegations

Kavanaugh said of the incident, which he denies, “If such a thing had happened, it would have been the talk of the campus.”

at least one witness suggests that the event was talked about on campus in the days afterward.

“And so it was – a classmate who heard about it at the time told me he has thought of it every time he’s heard Kavanaugh’s name – for the last 35 years!” said Mayer (https://twitter.com/JaneMayerNYer/status/1044370396949164032).

“Worth considering [regarding] Kavanaugh’s assertion that all men & women he knew in college consider this ‘inconceivable’: his roommate at the time is on the record saying Ramirez’s claim is credible and consistent with Kavanaugh’s behavior he witnessed,”

The interviewer did, in fact, note that Kavanaugh’s roommate found Ramirez’s allegations credible with. Kavanaugh had no explanation for why his roommate would say this.

https://www.rawstory.com/2018/09/new-yorker-reporters-fact-check-brett-kavanaughs-false-fox-news-interview-sexual-assault-allegations/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+TheRawStory+%28The+Raw+Story% 29

Shit! There's more evidence about K's sexual shenanagans, even rape,

than there was, after EIGHT FUCKING REPUG COMMITTEES and $10M, (what)about "Ben Ghazi!"

"Her Emails!"

"Uranium One"

:lol

But Repugs want NO investigation, no "advise and consent" of K by FBI or Senators, let's hurry and vote before MORE K truth(s) are discovered, confirmed.

[boutons_deux]

K is NOT a happy drunk

Kavanaugh's Yale freshman roommate says when he drank heavily, he got 'aggressive and belligerent'
(http://theweek.com/speedreads/797971/kavanaughs-yale-freshman-roommate-says-when-drank-heavily-got-aggressive-belligerent)
http://theweek.com/speedreads/797971/kavanaughs-yale-freshman-roommate-says-when-drank-heavily-got-aggressive-belligerent

[Bill_Brasky]

Both sides have used the filibuster. It's pretty stupid to think that only one party used it. Using the filibuster means you have to compromise. But Harry Reid didn't want to compromise, so he got rid of the filibuster, despite being warned of the consequences.

Lol "both sides". Shut the fuck up.

[pgardn]

It’s difficult to believe red team would think blue team would play nice after Mitch McConnel’s Obama proclaimation and Garland.

[Kim Jong-il]

Makes no sense
ok

[101A]

I think Dems playing this wrong. If all it takes is an FBI investigation to nail this guy to the wall, then go ahead and let him confirmed. He's guilty, right? If you beat him now, Trump just puts another conservative judge up there. IF you put K on the bench, you need only wait a couple of years, get your own president up there - THEN do your FBI investigation. He's guilty, so impeach him - AND replace him with a solid liberal justice. FOR LIFE!

[Spurs Homer]

I'm actually way more concerned about the nomination now if this guy truly went to college and didn't get any pussy until he was 30+...

Yeah - this is what stuck out to me too. Prime Yale/Harvard pussy and this guy had to resort to sexual assault?
lol

[Spurs Homer]

Kavanaugh did not allow his wife to answer the question asked to her directly (on Faux news) - if she supported an FBI investigation to clear her husbands name- Kavanaugh interrupted and repeated his "fair process" mantra and then said he would do what the Senate recommended.

In other words - FBI investigation "over my dead body"

Why are they terrified of an FBI investigation - while the accusers are asking for an FBI investigation?

[boutons_deux]

I think Dems playing this wrong. If all it takes is an FBI investigation to nail this guy to the wall, then go ahead and let him confirmed. He's guilty, right? If you beat him now, Trump just puts another conservative judge up there. IF you put K on the bench, you need only wait a couple of years, get your own president up there - THEN do your FBI investigation. He's guilty, so impeach him - AND replace him with a solid liberal justice. FOR LIFE!

Interesting, but too long of a shot.

Too much can go wrong

I don't think the Dems will have 2/3 of the Senate for many years need to convict an impeached judge.

I posted an article that suggested why the Repugs are sticking with this asshole when they could withdraw him and replace with a baggage-less asshole.

Federalist Soc has many hard right extremist activists ready to go.

[boutons_deux]

Republican Party Declares Moral Bankruptcy

https://media.newyorker.com/photos/5ba94e17f27f652d85899a79/master/w_1298,c_limit/Borowitz-Republican-Party-Declares-Moral-Bankruptcy.jpg

WASHINGTON —The Republican Party officially filed for moral bankruptcy on Tuesday morning,

a move that many in the nation considered long overdue.

In filing for moral bankruptcy,

the Republicans will formally attest that they have no morals, standards, or ethics on their balance sheet, and

will agree to cease all activity as a political party in exchange for indemnity from any and all legal actions.

Harland Dorrinson, a Washington attorney who specializes in moral bankruptcies, said that, by making its moral vacuum official,

the G.O.P. could theoretically break itself up and sell off the parts, but, he warned, “There are no buyers.”

“From Lindsey Graham to Ted Cruz to Mitch McConnell to Chuck Grassley,

all of the Republican Party’s assets could only be described as toxic,” he said.

“Their breakup value is zero.”

Further complicating such a sale, Dorrinson said, is the fact that

the lion’s share of the Republican Party is already owned by the National Rifle Association, Koch Industries, and the Russian government.

“All of those entities are going to take a major loss on their investment,” he warned.

“The Kochs have been trying to sell Paul Ryan for months, and they can’t give him away.”

While bemoaning the demise of a once legitimate political party, Dorrinson did see one silver lining.

“The bankruptcy of the Republican Party will be presided over by Donald Trump, and no one has more experience in this area,”

he said.


https://www.newyorker.com/humor/borowitz-report/republican-party-declares-moral-bankruptcy (https://www.newyorker.com/humor/borowitz-report/republican-party-declares-moral-bankruptcy)

[Spurminator]

LOL hilarious satire by the king of satire! Just nonstop laughs! He's saying what we're all thinking, and that's what makes it so funny.

[Spurs Homer]

Republican Party Declares Moral Bankruptcy

https://media.newyorker.com/photos/5ba94e17f27f652d85899a79/master/w_1298,c_limit/Borowitz-Republican-Party-Declares-Moral-Bankruptcy.jpg

WASHINGTON —The Republican Party officially filed for moral bankruptcy on Tuesday morning,

a move that many in the nation considered long overdue.

In filing for moral bankruptcy,

the Republicans will formally attest that they have no morals, standards, or ethics on their balance sheet, and

will agree to cease all activity as a political party in exchange for indemnity from any and all legal actions.

Harland Dorrinson, a Washington attorney who specializes in moral bankruptcies, said that, by making its moral vacuum official,

the G.O.P. could theoretically break itself up and sell off the parts, but, he warned, “There are no buyers.”

“From Lindsey Graham to Ted Cruz to Mitch McConnell to Chuck Grassley,

all of the Republican Party’s assets could only be described as toxic,” he said.

“Their breakup value is zero.”

Further complicating such a sale, Dorrinson said, is the fact that

the lion’s share of the Republican Party is already owned by the National Rifle Association, Koch Industries, and the Russian government.

“All of those entities are going to take a major loss on their investment,” he warned.

“The Kochs have been trying to sell Paul Ryan for months, and they can’t give him away.”

While bemoaning the demise of a once legitimate political party, Dorrinson did see one silver lining.

“The bankruptcy of the Republican Party will be presided over by Donald Trump, and no one has more experience in this area,”

he said.


https://www.newyorker.com/humor/borowitz-report/republican-party-declares-moral-bankruptcy (https://www.newyorker.com/humor/borowitz-report/republican-party-declares-moral-bankruptcy)





Another one of those, "this would almost be funny- if it weren't so goddamn true" - smh.

[Nathan89]

This is the problem with politics these days, tbh, we went from rapist to self-admitted 30 year old incel SAWM... what's even more sad it's the former is probably more believable than the later...

It would have been really stupid of him to claim he was a virgin if he wasn't.

[DarrinS]

He should’ve nominated Diane Sykes and been done with it. I couldn’t see Dems going dirty on a female candidate.

[Fabbs]

Why are they terrified of an FBI investigation - while the accusers are asking for an FBI investigation?
You need to be woke, son.
that bastion of integrity the FBI. :rolleyes
https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcTXhKbt8Gx643TJ86h7g2yr69NOtJGRS e0GsQR0QW8r9L5_h_AG

[boutons_deux]

Christian supremacists DROOLING over 5 hard right SCOTUS whores who will overturn Roe, Obergefell, etc

Justice Brett Kavanaugh would represent an immediate threat to LGBT rights

Major anti-LGBT group is ready, with at least four cases on established rights heading for the Supreme Court

https://www.salon.com/2018/09/25/justice-brett-kavanaugh-would-represent-an-immediate-threat-to-lgbt-rights/

[Reck]

1044408830564683776

Leftist cult chants "we believe survivors" at Ted Cruz. I'd hate have these morons on a jury tbh.

Like the Trumpie in that manafort trial that almost derailed it? :lol

[Spurminator]

It would have been really stupid of him to claim he was a virgin if he wasn't.

Happens all the time in churches across the country. Consider the audience.

[boutons_deux]

You need to be woke, son.
that bastion of integrity the FBI. :rolleyes
https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcTXhKbt8Gx643TJ86h7g2yr69NOtJGRS e0GsQR0QW8r9L5_h_AG

FBI under tranny J E Hoover was more corrupt.

Trash plus his Repug dickless sycophants hate the FBI, slander it as corrupt, only when it comes after them.

[Nathan89]

Happens all the time in churches across the country. Consider the audience.

This is different. If he's lying and a bunch of women come forward saying "he slept with me" then that would be bad. In fact I think it's stupid to say even if it's true. He becomes an easier target as a result tbh.

[Spurminator]

This is different. If he's lying and a bunch of women come forward saying "he slept with me" then that would be bad.

How? Do you think the people who already don't believe his accusers would pivot and believe women who came forward to contradict this claim?

Unless they've been holding on to his semen samples, I don't see how it would change anything. People have made up their minds.

[Cry Havoc]

How? Do you think the people who already don't believe his accusers would pivot and believe women who came forward to contradict this claim?

Unless they've been holding on to his semen samples, I don't see how it would change anything. People have made up their minds.

Avenatti should produce a few women who have calendars that say, "Slept with Brett Kavanaugh" circa 1983. :lol

[Cry Havoc]

This is different. If he's lying and a bunch of women come forward saying "he slept with me" then that would be bad. In fact I think it's stupid to say even if it's true. He becomes an easier target as a result tbh.

Ah yes, lest we forget how Biblical and Holy and studious one must be when they are getting blackout drunk in high school (which is illegal, for the record). Definitely a good Christian man who would never have sex before marriage. :lol

[RandomGuy]

So you are going to ignore the evidence that says humans can tell the truth about something and not remember all the details?


Studies consistently prove that memories are some of the worst evidence to rely on because people commonly mis-remember. Unfortunately, the whole case Ford has involves her memory and no verifiable facts. So that's fine if you want to hid behind her memory, but if she can't point to something verifiable like when and where it happened, then how can you expect people to believe the account? I'm sorry, but just claiming that she is a woman or that it happened is not enough in the real world. In an imaginary liberal world, maybe it's enough to convict and put in prison, but not in the real world.

um... she is a woman. This is what is known in the real world as a "fact", i.e. an objective, verifiable feature of reality. Unlike imaginary conservative world.

Man, for a lawyer, you suck at this.

So, are you going to ignore the evidence that says humans can tell the truth about something and not remember all the details?

[RandomGuy]

The claim can't be proven or refuted with little or no detail after 35 years and is a classic he said she said. There is no risk to her.

Other than the death threats you mean. Right?

The risk of death at the hands of some deranged nutjob, acting on the posted address and pictures of her house. because "god" told him to do it.

As a horrible human being, you don't care about that. At this point, I wouldn't put it past you secretly wishing something would happen to her, to shut her up.
.

[Nathan89]

How? Do you think the people who already don't believe his accusers would pivot and believe women who came forward to contradict this claim?

Unless they've been holding on to his semen samples, I don't see how it would change anything. People have made up their minds.

Both the accusations thus far are terrible when you look at the details. This lower bar simply opens him up to more attack imo. It's easier to say we had sex than he raped me. It only makes sense to say it if it's true. Even then though it's debatable. To needlessly lie about it to defend against two crumbling accusations would be moronic.

[RandomGuy]

I think Dems playing this wrong. If all it takes is an FBI investigation to nail this guy to the wall, then go ahead and let him confirmed. He's guilty, right? If you beat him now, Trump just puts another conservative judge up there. IF you put K on the bench, you need only wait a couple of years, get your own president up there - THEN do your FBI investigation. He's guilty, so impeach him - AND replace him with a solid liberal justice. FOR LIFE!

Why not let the FBI look into it now?

(hint: rhymes with shmidterms)

[CitizenDwayne]

He should’ve nominated Diane Sykes and been done with it. I couldn’t see Dems going dirty on a female candidate.
Very true. Even if K is innocent, he’s put Republicans in a very awkward spot. Best course of action is get him to withdraw and try to rush someone else through

[boutons_deux]

"get him to withdraw"

Repugs don't want that defeat in the weeks before the election, with Dems gloating over the defeated Repugs.

As has been pointed out, K, symbolically, represents white male privilege (women a semen receptacles), moneyed privilege, and the white male powers that groomed him and exercise that white male power over USA.

[boutons_deux]

Brett Kavanaugh’s first year roommate—James Roche—has released a statement about the character of the two parties involved.

In it he provides yet another account of

Kavanaugh’s excessive drinking that was noticeable “even by the standards of the time.”

Roche says he became friends with Debbie, who felt out of place amongst the wealthy types like Kavanaugh,

but tried hard to be friendly and get along with everyone.

And while Roche says he was not present during the incident that Ramirez has told the press,

he does not doubt it.

Based on my time with Debbie, I believe her to be unusually honest and straightforward and I cannot imagine her making this up.
Based on my time with Brett, I believe that he and his social circle were capable of the actions that Debbie described.


He says he has nothing more to add and will not be doing interviews, but he makes one thing very clear.


I have shared this information with a small number of reporters who reached out to me directly because Debbie has a right to be heard and I believe her.


https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2018/9/24/1798432/-Kavanaugh-s-freshman-roommate-drops-a-bomb-Debbie-has-a-right-to-be-heard-and-I-believe-her?detail=emaildkre

[ducks]

Other than the death threats you mean. Right?

The risk of death at the hands of some deranged nutjob, acting on the posted address and pictures of her house. because "god" told him to do it.

As a horrible human being, you don't care about that. At this point, I wouldn't put it past you secretly wishing something would happen to her, to shut her up.
.
What about death threats against Brett and his wife?

[Nathan89]

"White male privilege" is leftist drivel.

[clambake]

What about death threats against Brett and his wife?

you doxxed her yourself, dickhead.

[RandomGuy]

You're a lawyer?
You see nothing wrong with how Kavanaugh's alleged victim is being treated? You keep repeating that the FBI has zero to investigate? Seriously?

Ok- just humor us;

(a) You are the alleged sexual assault victims attorney - the defense is telling you - no witnesses, no fbi investigation, no delay -gotta take the stand in 3 days, the jury has made comments regarding your client being "mixed-up" - and have pretty much stated that the accused suspect is pretty much gonna walk. They refused an investigation and said - "it was too long ago - nothing to find there" - there was another WITNESS - but he told the prosecutor "I don't want to testify under oath" and the prosecutor said "ok-sure"
-- Are you happy with this for your victim/client? -- Are the scales of justice evenly applied here?


(b) You are Kavanaughs attorney - the prosecutor is telling you - "he will walk" - the jury has been holding "war room sessions" all week and coaching him on how to answer questions, the prosecutor has disallowed any independent investigation even though the standard practice has always been to allow an fbi background to be completed or re-opened whenever new allegations surface but they winked at you and said "don't worry - the president believes your client and will back you 100%
-- Are you happy being the attorney in this situation?

A or B seems legally fair to you?

Since you are a lawyer.




If I was her attorney (and I'm not a criminal attorney), I would tell her to file a complaint with the Maryland police department. There is no statute of limitations on a rape allegation. I would tell her to have them investigate. Before I went public with the allegation, I would make sure that she could clearly articulate where she was, when it happened, who was there, who's house it was, how she got there, and where she went after. I also wouldn't go to the media and politicize. I would have handled it privately and quietly and if the Maryland police decided there was a case, then it would become public.

But that's not anything close to what happened here because it has been treated like a political hit job. Unfortunately. That's why I tend to think it is a hoax. Answer the questions above, and then I'd see if I change my mind about the allegation.


I noticed you didn't answer the question.

I will ask it again, for Spurs Homer, since you saw fit to ignore a fair question.

A or B seems legally fair to you?


Gorsuch was not a painful change for the left...[answers other post].

A or B seems legally fair to you?

[Cry Havoc]

What about death threats against Brett and his wife?

Man, you are a giant piece of shit.

You doxx a woman and then claim this? You had an active hand in perpetuating violence against someone else.

[CitizenDwayne]

"get him to withdraw"

Repugs don't want that defeat in the weeks before the election, with Dems gloating over the defeated Repugs.

As has been pointed out, K, symbolically, represents white male privilege (women a semen receptacles), moneyed privilege, and the white male powers that groomed him and exercise that white male power over USA.
He was a flawed pick. They need to move on. They may lose the battle over K, but the war (tipping the SC in their favor for decades) is more important than some petty gender squabble

[RandomGuy]

He was a flawed pick. They need to move on. They may lose the battle over K, but the war (tipping the SC in their favor for decades) is more important than some petty gender squabble

He was a flawed pick.

Problem is that the executive branch mechanism that normally funnels people that might pass muster is broken. "chaotic" is the word that best suits the current executive branch, so I don't see it happening before the midterms.

[Cry Havoc]

He was a flawed pick. They need to move on. They may lose the battle over K, but the war (tipping the SC in their favor for decades) is more important than some petty gender squabble

Sure, but it's not that simple. By lining up behind him and putting the weight of the president and Congress and double-downing on his character, they're now tied to him.

If they abandon him, it cuts them off at the knees in the primaries. Even losing 1 extra senate seat at this point could be disastrous. They could actually lose the house and senate, which would be have huge ramifications for the foreseeable future.

This is why the current administration is so incompetent. They make a mistake and rather than owning up to it (which would be, you know, the adult thing to do), they muster all their strength, jam their fingers in their ears, and insist that they meant to do the thing that is an idiotic thing to do.

[101A]

Brett Kavanaugh’s first year roommate—James Roche—has released a statement about the character of the two parties involved.


And while Roche says he was not present during the incident that Ramirez has told the press,




Seriously. How can you not recognize that that is the ONLY bit of information in that post that has any relevance?

[RandomGuy]

What about death threats against Brett and his wife?

UN laughing at Donald Trump. That was painful to watch.

[101A]

He was a flawed pick.

Problem is that the executive branch mechanism that normally funnels people that might pass muster is broken. "chaotic" is the word that best suits the current executive branch, so I don't see it happening before the midterms.

How is this pick flawed? Guys been through 6 FBI background checks, and EVERY charge against him has been leveled, for the first time, AFTER the nomination (one in the past week). I suspect ANY nominee will be "flawed" between the time they are nominated, and before they come to a vote. If an admitted 20 something (or later) year old virgin can be labelled a rapist, can you imagine what will happen to a guy with actual game?

[DarrinS]

Even CNN shitting on Avenatti :lmao


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hYBbzISYUYo

[benefactor]

What about death threats against Brett and his wife?
You should get back to work. Your boss is going to be pissed if he finds you hiding in the mop closet on your phone.

[101A]

Why not let the FBI look into it now?

(hint: rhymes with shmidterms)

Because there isn't enough evidence to justify an FBI investigation. Waste of time. This behavior should not be encouraged. Again, if he did this, AND the FBI can uncover it, and you are SO sure of that, then just wait, he's not going anywhere. Lifetime appointment. The mileage the democrats could get over Senators putting an actual rapist on the court, despite their protests, would rival Watergate repercussions. I, as a conservative, am willing to take the risk. I am convinced, based on the utter lack of evidence or corroboration, that the charges are baseless.

[boutons_deux]

Kavanaugh classmate throws cold water on his claims of virginity: ‘He claimed otherwise during freshman year’

https://www.rawstory.com/2018/09/kavanaugh-classmate-throws-cold-water-claims-virginity-claimed-otherwise-freshman-year/

[RandomGuy]

Three new allegations against President Trump’s Supreme Court nominee show the dangers of a hasty process.

The one overriding theme of Brett Kavanaugh’s nomination to the Supreme Court has been haste, and the three new allegations of sexual misconduct against him that surfaced in the past day—bringing the total to four—suggest a motivation for Republican hurry, as well as demonstrate its dangers.

Sunday evening, The New Yorker reported on allegations by Deborah Ramirez, a woman who attended Yale with Kavanaugh, that he had “exposed himself at a drunken dormitory party, thrust his penis in her face, and caused her to touch it without her consent as she pushed him away.” Later in the evening, Michael Avenatti, the lawyer who represents Stormy Daniels, posted an email laying out allegations that Kavanaugh might have been present at gang rapes in high school organized by a friend. Monday morning, a local paper in Montgomery County, Maryland, reported that police there are examining another allegation from the 1980s.
https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2018/09/kavanaugh-deborah-ramirez-michael-avenatti/571090

At this rate he should stop trying for SCOTUS and seek the Republican nomination for president.

[RandomGuy]

Because there isn't enough evidence to justify an FBI investigation. Waste of time. This behavior should not be encouraged. Again, if he did this, AND the FBI can uncover it, and you are SO sure of that, then just wait, he's not going anywhere. Lifetime appointment. The mileage the democrats could get over Senators putting an actual rapist on the court, despite their protests, would rival Watergate repercussions. I, as a conservative, am willing to take the risk. I am convinced, based on the utter lack of evidence or corroboration, that the charges are baseless.

"not enough evidence".

for the Federal Bureau of Investigation to re-open their background investigation.

How can we know about any corroboration without an investigation by the federal agency with that word in it's name?

[RandomGuy]

How is this pick flawed? Guys been through 6 FBI background checks, and EVERY charge against him has been leveled, for the first time, AFTER the nomination (one in the past week). I suspect ANY nominee will be "flawed" between the time they are nominated, and before they come to a vote. If an admitted 20 something (or later) year old virgin can be labelled a rapist, can you imagine what will happen to a guy with actual game?

Dude had a list of 65 women ready to go within 15 minutes of the first charges surfacing. No one innocent has that. No one.

[DarrinS]

Each new allegation more flimsy than the last. That New Yorker piece needs to go in the journalistic dustbin of history. And Avenatti‘s imaginary friend needs to appear soon. Avenatti Twitter on lockdown at the moment. :lol

[DarrinS]

Dude had a list of 65 women ready to go within 15 minutes of the first charges surfacing. No one innocent has that. No one.

Wrong

https://apnews.com/1f7e47de5ce340f7b4cab8e92ef91cf0


But, I won’t accuse you of lying.

[baseline bum]

How is this pick flawed? Guys been through 6 FBI background checks, and EVERY charge against him has been leveled, for the first time, AFTER the nomination (one in the past week). I suspect ANY nominee will be "flawed" between the time they are nominated, and before they come to a vote. If an admitted 20 something (or later) year old virgin can be labelled a rapist, can you imagine what will happen to a guy with actual game?

He's flawed because he's a partisan scumbag who claims presidents shouldn't be under investigation even though he was part of Ken Starr's team that went after Clinton. I have no idea if the sexual assault allegations are true or not but they wouldn't surprise me given his lack of character. I hope they completely derail his confirmation and force our Dear Leader to move on to someone else.

[RandomGuy]

Each new allegation more flimsy than the last. That New Yorker piece needs to go in the journalistic dustbin of history. And Avenatti‘s imaginary friend needs to appear soon. Avenatti Twitter on lockdown at the moment. :lol

Amazing how flimsy these allegations always seem to be when it is against Republicans, you dumbass fuckstick.

https://2qibqm39xjt6q46gf1rwo2g1-wpengine.netdna-ssl.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/web1_L-Trump-Women-EDH-161009-1200x594.jpg

Seems to me like the only metric for how believable you find a woman's claim is whether the person who did the raping or assault was a Republican.

Then it's just fine with you, because Republicans never do that, and all the claims are always made up. Case closed. You should be on the fucking FBI's payroll. What a genius.

[RandomGuy]

Wrong

https://apnews.com/1f7e47de5ce340f7b4cab8e92ef91cf0


But, I won’t accuse you of lying.

Fair enough . A matter of hours.

A mistake in facts, easily rectified by posting something relevant.

[Cry Havoc]

Fair enough you scumbaggy piece of shit. A matter of hours.

A mistake in facts, easily rectified by posting something relevant.

Most people are smart enough to realize that when you said "15 minutes" you meant it colloquially.

Of course, most people don't have to split hairs in a sad attempt to prove someone isn't a sexual predator.

[Pavlov]

He's flawed because he's a partisan scumbag who claims presidents shouldn't be under investigation even though he was part of Ken Starr's team that went after Clinton. I have no idea if the sexual assault allegations are true or not but they wouldn't surprise me given his lack of character. I hope they completely derail his confirmation and force our Dear Leader to move on to someone else.As I said before his tortured, Kafkaesque rulings on det abortion case should make him lose his current job much less get him promoted.

[Cry Havoc]

HAHAHA YOU SAID 15 MINUTES IT WAS ACTUALLY 3 HOURS SO HES INNOCENT

#nothowthisworks

[Reck]

Even CNN shitting on Avenatti :lmao


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hYBbzISYUYo

He said the person will come forward in 48 hours.

:lol Darrin mad about grandstanding, something Trump does on a daily basis. :lol

[RandomGuy]

Detective DarrinS is on the case.

(door swings open, a tearful woman enters, sits down at Detective Darrin's desk)

Woman: (sniffs) I had a man attack me...

Detective Darrin (sits up in chair): That certainly sounds horrible. Tell me was your attacker wearing anything showing party affiliation?

Woman: (confused), he was wearing a red hat with the words "make America" something.

Detective Darrin: AHA, LAIR, you must be making it up, those people never do anything of the sort. I am calling the police to report your crime now! CASE CLOSED!

(fade to red)

:rolleyes

[RandomGuy]

As I said before his tortured, Kafkaesque rulings on det abortion case should make him lose his current job much less get him promoted.

Can't produce 90+% of his relevant legal papers, but somehow can find a calendar from 1982. :rollin

[baseline bum]

As I said before his tortured, Kafkaesque rulings on det abortion case should make him lose his current job much less get him promoted.

Agreed, what a piece of shit Kavanaugh is.

[RandomGuy]

"His conversations were very vivid," "He spoke about acts that he had seen in pornographic films involving such matters as women having sex with animals and films showing group sex or rape scenes. [...] On several occasions [he] told me graphically of his own sexual prowess."

https://www.newsweek.com/clarence-thomas-impeachment-perjury-sexual-harassment-812953

[RandomGuy]

Agreed, what a piece of shit Kavanaugh is.

“At the age of 24, I found out I’d be attending a dinner at my boss’s house with Justice Clarence Thomas,” Moira Smith posted from her since-deactivated Facebook account. “I was so incredibly excited to meet him, rough confirmation hearings notwithstanding. He was charming in many ways—giant, booming laugh, charismatic, approachable.”

“But to my complete shock, he groped me while I was setting the table, suggesting I should sit ‘right next to him,’” she said. “When I feebly explained that I’d been assigned to the other table, he groped again…’are you *sure*??’ I said I was and proceeded to keep my distance.”

https://www.newsweek.com/clarence-thomas-impeachment-perjury-sexual-harassment-812953

Seems like Thomas is a creepy groper.

[RandomGuy]

But hey, I'm sure that since Thomas is a Republican, he didn't do it. Right?

[baseline bum]

2009 thread would've jumped all over this.

now?

radio silence.

In 2009 Republicans had plausible deniability that they weren't a nationalist party and were instead a conservative party. After they elected Trump by a landslide over conservatives like Cruz and Kasich it's plain as day though. They elected a guy whose entire early campaign was about scary anti-war government nig's birth certificate and whose later campaign was about Mexicans being rapists and all other kinds of openly racist shit. The Republicans in congress may not be a nationalist bloc yet but the voters sure are so the representatives are going to start following suit as long as Trump is wildly popular with the GOP base.

[101A]

Kavanaugh classmate throws cold water on his claims of virginity: ‘He claimed otherwise during freshman year’

https://www.rawstory.com/2018/09/kavanaugh-classmate-throws-cold-water-claims-virginity-claimed-otherwise-freshman-year/
.
So did I.

Next

[RandomGuy]

Follows a familiar pattern of conservatives figuring out who is credible, and who is not.


"A liberal Democrat has accused Thomas of groping her at a dinner party in the ’90s. The story is in no way credible."
https://www.newsweek.com/clarence-thomas-impeachment-perjury-sexual-harassment-812953

Problem is... Thomas denied all of it, under oath, which is perjury if he knowing stated something false.
https://www.newsweek.com/clarence-thomas-impeachment-perjury-sexual-harassment-812953



What was Bill Clinton impeached for again?

[RandomGuy]

I guess perjury is bad for Democrats, but ok for Republicans.

Republicans accused of sexual assault or other creepy shit automatically didn't do it, and all the women are making it up.

Moore, Thomas, Trump, Kavanaugh. So many women just "making things up".

Let's see what the board conservatives had to say about the women accusing Fraken. My bet is that the hypocritical bullshit will be a tad thick.

[101A]

He's flawed because he's a partisan scumbag who claims presidents shouldn't be under investigation even though he was part of Ken Starr's team that went after Clinton. I have no idea if the sexual assault allegations are true or not but they wouldn't surprise me given his lack of character. I hope they completely derail his confirmation and force our Dear Leader to move on to someone else.

Are you sure that's what he thinks? I'm not.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/fact-checker/wp/2018/07/11/does-brett-kavanaugh-think-the-president-is-immune-from-criminal-charges/?utm_term=.f4e0738e8f14

[RandomGuy]

"Seriously? Now you're bothered by a Democrat's behavior?" -- Juanita Broaddrick

https://www.laurieayers.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/juanita-broaddrick.jpg

Seems like this woman wasn't making it up when she accused a Democrat, for this Republican. Metric holds true so far.

[101A]

I guess perjury is bad for Democrats, but ok for Republicans.

Republicans accused of sexual assault or other creepy shit automatically didn't do it, and all the women are making it up.

Moore, Thomas, Trump, Kavanaugh. So many women just "making things up".


Let's see what the board conservatives had to say about the women accusing Fraken. My bet is that the hypocritical bullshit will be a tad thick.

I thought Franken shouldn't have resigned. The thing he did with the pics was stupid for a grown man, but didn't rise to the level of any harassment. Trump's a fucking cad, a bully, an asshole, a creep and allegedly not good in the sack. But we all knew all of this when he got elected, so the court of public opinion weighs in with a "we don't give a shit - we are buring the flipped apple cart." Moore is one of the creepiest sons of bitches I've read about recently, and the Republicans dodged a bullet with him not getting elected. Him being in Washington would have been gleeful target for Democrats. I watch Hill's testimony on Thomas, and I believe her. I watch Thomas's testimony defending himself, and I believe him. Without more evidence, in my mind, tie goes to the accused.

How about you, RG? Any comment on Ellison?

[baseline bum]

Are you sure that's what he thinks? I'm not.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/fact-checker/wp/2018/07/11/does-brett-kavanaugh-think-the-president-is-immune-from-criminal-charges/?utm_term=.f4e0738e8f14

Then you should probably read the article you linked.

[RandomGuy]

Yet liberals are crying that we don't embrace the Islamic culture.

You think women get treated poorly in the US, at least Moore didn't throw acid in her face and mutilate her genitalia, or maybe even have all his brothers rape her and have her imprisoned and shot for being a whore.

Oh here's a goody.

"she should be grateful it was just attempted rape, and not burning acid".

[101A]

Then you should probably read the article you linked.


Kavanaugh’s position in this article is different from saying the president can’t be indicted under existing law. If he thinks the law already bars an indictment of the sitting president, as some Democrats claim he does, why would he call on Congress to pass a law that shields the president from criminal charges?

[ElNono]

It would have been really stupid of him to claim he was a virgin if he wasn't.

His wife was right next to him... smart move in a 4D chess match.

[RandomGuy]

I thought Franken shouldn't have resigned. The thing he did with the pics was stupid for a grown man, but didn't rise to the level of any harassment. Trump's a fucking cad, a bully, an asshole, a creep and allegedly not good in the sack. But we all knew all of this when he got elected, so the court of public opinion weighs in with a "we don't give a shit - we are buring the flipped apple cart." Moore is one of the creepiest sons of bitches I've read about recently, and the Republicans dodged a bullet with him not getting elected. Him being in Washington would have been gleeful target for Democrats. I watch Hill's testimony on Thomas, and I believe her. I watch Thomas's testimony defending himself, and I believe him. Without more evidence, in my mind, tie goes to the accused.

How about you, RG? Any comment on Ellison?

My general take on Franken mirrored your own.

As for any given woman, I am mindful most don't make shit up. That was what makes the metoo movement so powerful, IMO. They have found their voice, and rightfully so.

[baseline bum]

I wasn't talking about indicting, I was talking about investigations into a sitting president, which he seems to disagree with in your article. His change of heart is awful convenient after the Clinton investigation he was part of turned out to be the most complete nothingburger imaginable.

[RandomGuy]

Trash remains, Moore is supported for the Senate, but Dems have to resign?


Solly Cholly! You picked the wrong team :lol


Wow. Even morons like Chris understand the underlying subtext of when women are to be believed, and the politician should resign. Talk about oblivious.

holee shite

[101A]

I wasn't talking about indicting, I was talking about investigations into a sitting president, which he seems to disagree with in your article. His change of heart is awful convenient after the Clinton investigation he was part of turned out to be the most complete nothingburger imaginable.

He addresses the change of heart in the article. Basically he argues that if Clinton hadn't been worried about Paula Fucking Jones, he might have been able to focus on Osama Bin Laden. Also, this opinion/piece was written when Obama was early in his presidency (2009). It might very well be a dog whistle for Trump in choosing Kavanaugh - but it no way condemns Kavanaugh for baiting Trump into it. Just a political argument written by an legal scholar. You can disagree with it, but there is no ulterior motive involved.

[RandomGuy]

Losing two Dems in a week. And for sexual harassment. That’s unfortunate.

Detective Darrin on the case. No doubts about the women accusing Democrats here. Unfortunate that any politician might lose their job being held accountable for their actions, though.

Super easy to decide who to believe for Darrin.

[101A]

My general take on Franken mirrored your own.

As for any given woman, I am mindful most don't make shit up. That was what makes the metoo movement so powerful, IMO. They have found their voice, and rightfully so.

The political actors involved don't need "most". They, literally, only need 1 (or 2). With the thousands whohave had interactions with or been in reasonable geographic proximity of Kavanaugh in the past 4 decades, not that tough a hurdle to leap. Also, I've noted both these women have "psychology" in their professional resumes and/or educational background. I have a strong bias against psych majors. They're all nuts. (have believed, and espoused that view, for over 30 years). I just need to be honest about my bigotry in this.

[TSA]

Even CNN shitting on Avenatti :lmao


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hYBbzISYUYo

1044654371030650880

[RandomGuy]

The political actors involved don't need "most". They, literally, only need 1 (or 2). With the thousands whohave had interactions with or been in reasonable geographic proximity of Kavanaugh in the past 4 decades, not that tough a hurdle to leap. Also, I've noted both these women have "psychology" in their professional resumes and/or educational background. I have a strong bias against psych majors. They're all nuts. (have believed, and espoused that view, for over 30 years). I just need to be honest about my bigotry in this.

Women who are willing to tell the truth don't because they are afraid of the consequences of having their lives destroyed or not being believed. That is what the evidence shows.

They often never report, or wait decades. That is what women telling the truth do.

They often can't remember everything outside of the single traumatic event. That is what women telling the truth do.

If the vast majority of women don't make it up, it is more than reasonable to generally accept any given account as likely true, barring some solid evidence that paints the woman as either solidly delusional or the kind of person who would.

Ford is credible on that basis, and has little motivation to lie.

Kavanaugh has at least as much motivation to lie as she does, more so, because it involves a felony, and he is up for a lifetime appointment to the pinnacle of the legal profession.

Who has more motivation to lie in this case?

[Pavlov]

1044654371030650880:lol TSA goes full TSA

[Spurs Homer]

You need to be woke, son.
that bastion of integrity the FBI. :rolleyes
https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcTXhKbt8Gx643TJ86h7g2yr69NOtJGRS e0GsQR0QW8r9L5_h_AG

You went full Trumptard!

[101A]

Women who are willing to tell the truth don't because they are afraid of the consequences of having their lives destroyed or not being believed. That is what the evidence shows.

They often never report, or wait decades. That is what women telling the truth do.

They often can't remember everything outside of the single traumatic event. That is what women telling the truth do.

If the vast majority of women don't make it up, it is more than reasonable to generally accept any given account as likely true, barring some solid evidence that paints the woman as either solidly delusional or the kind of person who would.

Ford is credible on that basis, and has little motivation to lie.

Kavanaugh has at least as much motivation to lie as she does, more so, because it involves a felony, and he is up for a lifetime appointment to the pinnacle of the legal profession.

Who has more motivation to lie in this case?

Since when is "who has the most to gain by lying" been any type of metric? And who am I to judge motive?

As I've said before, the Left (present company possibly included I'm afraid) are hysterical about this nomination. "Coat Hanger Abortions" hang in the balance. The hyperbole has been extreme, and believed absolutely. I run in academic circles - they have swallowed the kool-aid. This woman (Ford) is now a hero to these people. What does she have to gain? I'm thinking a book, a speaking tour, and I'd be willing to bet a nice slot at the next presidential convention (bookmark this post). She is going to be an icon of the left for years. She lives in fucking San Francisco! What does she have to lose? Not a damn thing. Have some perspective. Regardless, even if she was going to wear the scarlet letter for the rest of her life, and this was going to ruin her, the fact that there is absolutely NO EVIDENCE AND NO CORROBORATION cannot be ignored! It isn't even a he said/she said. It is a he and he and she said,/she said (30 years later, then changed her story 6 years after that.) Please.

[101A]

Also, a woman with a PhD in Psychology would certainly know how to frame a story to make it the most believable. She reads the literature.

[Pavlov]

Also, a woman with a PhD in Psychology would certainly know how to frame a story to make it the most believable. She reads the literature.Yep, she's doing it all for the death threats and security costs and general shittiness of all Trump supporters.

You cracked the code!

[Mikeanaro]

I think there could be a whole stadium full of women abused by Kavanaugh in a couple of days...

[boutons_deux]

Also, a woman with a PhD in Psychology would certainly know how to frame a story to make it the most believable. She reads the literature.

yep, white male asshole criminalizing the white male's victim as masochisitic, self-hurting.

[CosmicCowboy]

Since when is "who has the most to gain by lying" been any type of metric? And who am I to judge motive?

As I've said before, the Left (present company possibly included I'm afraid) are hysterical about this nomination. "Coat Hanger Abortions" hang in the balance. The hyperbole has been extreme, and believed absolutely. I run in academic circles - they have swallowed the kool-aid. This woman (Ford) is now a hero to these people. What does she have to gain? I'm thinking a book, a speaking tour, and I'd be willing to bet a nice slot at the next presidential convention (bookmark this post). She is going to be an icon of the left for years. She lives in fucking San Francisco! What does she have to lose? Not a damn thing. Have some perspective. Regardless, even if she was going to wear the scarlet letter for the rest of her life, and this was going to ruin her, the fact that there is absolutely NO EVIDENCE AND NO CORROBORATION cannot be ignored! It isn't even a he said/she said. It is a he and he and she said,/she said (30 years later, then changed her story 6 years after that.) Please.

You might as well give up trying to reason with RG.

He is all in.

Because academic papers say 9 out of 10 accusations have seeds of truth she couldn't possibly be the 10/10.

[DarrinS]

Detective Darrin on the case. No doubts about the women accusing Democrats here. Unfortunate that any politician might lose their job being held accountable for their actions, though.

Super easy to decide who to believe for Darrin.


Well, there was phographic evidence, so...