View Full Version : Brett Kavanaugh now under FBI investigation
Chris
10-01-2018, 05:56 PM
Interesting gloss over RapeK's multiple perjuries. I bet he won't be working on that. :lol
Look @ the eyes :21 seconds in...Mitch is not fucking around. :tu
Chris
10-01-2018, 05:59 PM
1046885665718206465
ducks
10-01-2018, 06:01 PM
1046867053968314368
and he is not in jail wow
Chris
10-01-2018, 06:02 PM
1046538947772469249
ducks
10-01-2018, 06:03 PM
(facepalm)
It's linked in the second paragraph.
https://morningconsult.com/2018/09/26/republican-women-lose-faith-kavanaugh-trump-after-week-accusations/
The optics haven't improved since then. Her tearful bravery against his snide distain.
the prosecutor says she would not press charges
says ford story is full of shit
ShotThroughTheHeart
10-01-2018, 06:05 PM
1046885665718206465
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J9swDIB-d1w
monosylab1k
10-01-2018, 06:06 PM
http://i68.tinypic.com/4t5a8m.jpg
monosylab1k
10-01-2018, 06:07 PM
1046538947772469249
That didn’t disqualify Gorsuch. Keep whining tho.
You know where this is going when the narrative is shifting from Kavanaugh the attempted rapist to he perjured himself because he said he never drank so much he blacked out and half of his college buddies agree and half of his college buddies disagree and what did the terms he used in his yearbook mean. It's getting desperate, which means its time to have a vote.
Splits
10-01-2018, 06:08 PM
1046878513012314112
:cry muh due process :cry
monosylab1k
10-01-2018, 06:10 PM
You know where this is going when the narrative is shifting from Kavanaugh the attempted rapist to he perjured himself because he said he never drank so much he blacked out and half of his college buddies agree and half of his college buddies disagree and what did the terms he used in his yearbook mean. It's getting desperate, which means its time to have a vote.
Yeah get that vote in quick before the FBI uncovers even more perjury :tu
Chris
10-01-2018, 06:11 PM
1046878513012314112
:cry muh due process :cry
lol "HQ Special"
That didn’t disqualify Gorsuch. Keep whining tho.
Gorsuch wasn't replacing Kennedy, he was replacing Scalia. It's a big deal for Kavanaugh to replace Kennedy, so there is a much bigger fight. Also, Dems couldn't stop Gorsuch because the Republicans controlled the Senate and Trump had plenty of time to get Gorsuch through (Dems did try to filibuster to no avail on Gorsuch).
But Kavanaugh's nomination is months from the midterms. So it makes sense for Dems to pull out all stops on him because if they can somehow take the Senate, they will block any nomination until 2020. Then, there plan is to let Pres. Avenatti pick the next supreme court justice.
Yeah get that vote in quick before the FBI uncovers even more perjury :tu
Yes, because America really cares about what the yearbook words mean. Good luck with that narrative.
boutons_deux
10-01-2018, 06:12 PM
time to have a vote.
Bitch McC sez the vote is this week, iow, before the FBI fake investigation is done.
I bet Repugs are scared the even the FBI restricted work will come up with bad shit on K.
monosylab1k
10-01-2018, 06:13 PM
Gorsuch wasn't replacing Kennedy, he was replacing Scalia. It's a big deal for Kavanaugh to replace Kennedy, so there is a much bigger fight. Also, Dems couldn't stop Gorsuch because the Republicans controlled the Senate and Trump had plenty of time to get Gorsuch through (Dems did try to filibuster to no avail on Gorsuch).
But Kavanaugh's nomination is months from the midterms. So it makes sense for Dems to pull out all stops on him because if they can somehow take the Senate, they will block any nomination until 2020. Then, there plan is to let Pres. Avenatti pick the next supreme court justice.
^low iq post.
monosylab1k
10-01-2018, 06:13 PM
Yes, because America really cares about what the yearbook words mean. Good luck with that narrative.
^even worse. smh.
Bitch McC sez the vote is this week, iow, before the FBI fake investigation is done.
I bet Repugs are scared the even the FBI restricted work will come up with bad shit on K.
If it's a fake investigation, then all the more reason to just have a vote.
I'm glad you really believe there is anything to investigate in a story with no verifiable facts. Keep carrying that mantra.
baseline bum
10-01-2018, 06:18 PM
Bye RapeK.
You think that's going to flip any Republican votes? :lol
Not a chance. These are the assholes who cover for Trump's barrage of lies, they could give two shits about Kavanuagh being caught in one.
baseline bum
10-01-2018, 06:23 PM
^low iq post.
No, this is a low iq post:
Of course he’s guilty, he’s a Republican. And I’m sure you voted for Hillary even though she went after and tried to destroy all those women that accused Bill of sexual assault with more verifiable facts than Ford presented.
Im not blaming the hit job on Hillary, but I am saying the Clintons cast a wide shadow over the democrats and I’m sure there are people that worked with Hillary that love seeing this guy get taken down.
i don’t know what happened 30 years ago. Did Ford misremember how many beers she had or if it was Ford or someone else, or did it happen? I don’t know. There’s no way to prove it. Did Kavenaugh lie about attempted rape or was he too drunk to know? Again, I don’t know. But I do know there is no evidence and it was 35 years ago. No one has credibly alleged anything like that for the rest of his life. He’s not a rapist. He’s not a sexual assaulter. Dem Senators know that, and they know the evidence on this is non existent. Half of them are former prosecutors. This was the only way to take him down, so they did it consequences be damned.
Spurminator
10-01-2018, 06:23 PM
Gorsuch wasn't replacing Kennedy, he was replacing Scalia. It's a big deal for Kavanaugh to replace Kennedy, so there is a much bigger fight
Republicans don't care about upsetting the ideological balance of the SCOTUS, what makes you think that's what Democrats care about?
I don't have any doubt a credible and similar accusation against Gorsuch would have been used if they had it.
No, this is a low iq post:
I don't know if he attempted rape (because no one can know), but based on the evidence, he's not a sexual assaulter and he's not a rapist.
djohn2oo8
10-01-2018, 06:25 PM
You think that's going to flip any Republican votes? :lol
Not a chance. These are the assholes who cover for Trump's barrage of lies, they could give two shits about Kavanuagh being caught in one.
Seems like the WH is trying to save face after the whole limits and constraints to the investigation to now saying they can investigate anything. FBI told that ass to pound sand.lets see what they find
Republicans don't care about upsetting the ideological balance of the SCOTUS, what makes you think that's what Democrats care about?
I don't have any doubt a credible and similar accusation against Gorsuch would have been used if they had it.
I'm sure they would have used the accusation if it had been available, but I think both sides care a lot about the next appointment. It's a major shift in how the constitution is interpreted and it will be that way for a long time.
baseline bum
10-01-2018, 06:26 PM
I don't know if he attempted rape (because no one can know), but based on the evidence, he's not a sexual assaulter and he's not a rapist.
You didn't know but you know. Impressive with only three sentences separation between your two contradictory statements. Do you do that shit in court too?
ducks
10-01-2018, 06:27 PM
The FBI has reportedly spoken to four witnesses in its probe of sexual assault misconduct allegations against Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh — including one high school pal who said he provided no corroboration of Christine Blasey Ford's accusation that Kavanaugh groped her during a party when both were teens.
baseline bum
10-01-2018, 06:28 PM
Seems like the WH is trying to save face after the whole limits and constraints to the investigation to now saying they can investigate anything. FBI told that ass to pound sand.lets see what they find
Does it matter what they find? Every Republican senator other than Graham who spoke at the hearing treated Ford like a credible witness but still wanted to push the nomination through to pwn the libs.
You didn't know but you know. Impressive with only three sentences separation between your two contradictory statements. Do you do that shit in court too?
I can only rely on what the evidence says, which is that he is not a rapist or a sexual assaulter.
baseline bum
10-01-2018, 06:31 PM
I can only rely on what the evidence says, which is that he is not a rapist or a sexual assaulter.
What a load. First you didn't know then you knew now you're trying to backtrack something clear as day. Weren't you the poster trying to tell me how great Dinesh D'Souza's films were too?
djohn2oo8
10-01-2018, 06:32 PM
Does it matter what they find? Every Republican senator other than Graham who spoke at the hearing treated Ford like a credible witness but still wanted to push the nomination through to pwn the libs.
Yes it does. McConnell needs the vote done quick. Odds are he will be caught in more lies, the WH will distance themselves and leave McConnell to fix it. It’s gonna be messy.
boutons_deux
10-01-2018, 06:32 PM
I can only rely on what the evidence says
what evidence?
whatever it may be, is that all the evidence?
baseline bum
10-01-2018, 06:32 PM
I'm sure they would have used the accusation if it had been available, but I think both sides care a lot about the next appointment. It's a major shift in how the constitution is interpreted and it will be that way for a long time.
LOL not a partisan shill. Why wouldn't it have been available if they Dems are just making shit up like you seem to believe?
ducks
10-01-2018, 06:33 PM
Does it matter what they find? Every Republican senator other than Graham who spoke at the hearing treated Ford like a credible witness but still wanted to push the nomination through to pwn the libs.
they wanted to make it sound like she was credible to help with the politically me to movement
they did not want to bash ford
baseline bum
10-01-2018, 06:33 PM
Yes it does. McConnell needs the vote done quick. Odds are he will be caught in more lies, the WH will distance themselves and leave McConnell to fix it. It’s gonna be messy.
Trump's not going to distance himself. This is a proxy war for all his credible sexual assault allegations.
ducks
10-01-2018, 06:35 PM
what evidence?
whatever it may be, is that all the evidence?
lets see he washed his hand that might have touched her tit
she took a shower since then
we do not know what year or what house
to look for evidence
we know people vacuumed their houses since 25-35 years ago
did anyone take a pic of the party with a cell phone
did mark take pic and post it online
no it would have already came out
what evidence?
whatever it may be, is that all the evidence?
The lack of any evidence to support any of Ford's claims and the named witnesses denying that such an event occurred.
LOL not a partisan shill. Why wouldn't it have been available if they Dems are just making shit up like you seem to believe?
I have a hard time telling which party you are from.
You think that's going to flip any Republican votes? :lol
Not a chance. These are the assholes who cover for Trump's barrage of lies, they could give two shits about Kavanuagh being caught in one.
You're blankenting the entire senate which is wrong to do. Flake is already on the fence. Get the two bitches to agree he lied under oath and the rest really doesn't matter.
I mean, here he's in a picture with the woman he claimed he didn't know until the news broke. It's just blatant lying at this point.
https://twitter.com/bpolitics/status/1046902641106726917
:lol Chris Dudley being dragged into this mess.
https://twitter.com/bpolitics/status/1046902641106726917
:lol Chris Dudley being dragged into this mess.
Chris Dudley was the only guy in the NBA willing to throw a basketball at the back of Shaq's head after being dunked on. That may be his only NBA highlight though.
hater
10-01-2018, 07:03 PM
Posted by snowflake: “but but he was at a barfight :cry :cry”
:lmao pathetic
baseline bum
10-01-2018, 07:17 PM
You're blankenting the entire senate which is wrong to do. Flake is already on the fence. Get the two bitches to agree he lied under oath and the rest really doesn't matter.
I mean, here he's in a picture with the woman he claimed he didn't know until the news broke. It's just blatant lying at this point.
Flake's an attention whore. What are the odds you think he actually votes no? I'd put them at <5%.
SnakeBoy
10-01-2018, 07:20 PM
An allegation standing alone is not necessarily sufficient to conclude that conduct occurred
Spurtacular
10-01-2018, 07:23 PM
Flake's an attention whore. What are the odds you think he actually votes no? I'd put them at <5%.
Flake's for sale, son. Doubt the Dems will want to pay, tbh. A Kavanaugh nomination is the best thing that could happen for them at this point.
spurraider21
10-01-2018, 07:33 PM
kavanaughondudley.gif
ducks
10-01-2018, 07:43 PM
Don't forget, the Democrats are the same people that want to allow men in the ladies' room
ducks
10-01-2018, 07:45 PM
Flake want to ever run as a presidential canadiate as a Republican he vote yes unless something major comes up in fbi probe
lefty
10-01-2018, 07:47 PM
:lol
https://twitter.com/babyitsmb/status/1045726408000049152?s=19
Pavlov
10-01-2018, 07:54 PM
Don't forget, the Democrats are the same people that want to allow men in the ladies' roomIf an assault ever took place there, you wouldn't believe the victim anyway.
You'd doxx her you piece of shit.
hater
10-01-2018, 07:59 PM
:lmao James Comey
What a fucking tool. Worst FBI chief in history. Hes basically Chief Wiggum :lmao
https://twitter.com/AriMelber/status/1046496364656562177?s=20
hater
10-01-2018, 08:00 PM
:lol J:lolmes C:lolmey
https://twitter.com/CharlesHurt/status/1046579170552291338?s=20
hater
10-01-2018, 08:01 PM
:lmao Comey getting obliterated :lmao
https://twitter.com/ByronYork/status/1046495600240472065?s=20
hater
10-01-2018, 08:02 PM
https://twitter.com/JerryDunleavy/status/1046545581055848450?s=20
hater
10-01-2018, 08:03 PM
https://twitter.com/TomFitton/status/1046543528627777536?s=20
hater
10-01-2018, 08:04 PM
J:lolmes C:lolmey
https://twitter.com/DineshDSouza/status/1046764205561565186?s=20
hater
10-01-2018, 08:05 PM
https://twitter.com/AshleyThomas100/status/1046778251719380993?s=20
spurraider21
10-01-2018, 08:06 PM
Don't forget, the Democrats are the same people that want to allow men in the ladies' room
yeah and force them to share stalls too!
benefactor
10-01-2018, 08:15 PM
Don't forget, the Democrats are the same people that want to allow men in the ladies' room
Says the fuck puddle that pees on 13 yr olds
yeah and force them to share stalls too!
For efficiency, if she spreads her legs you can pee just fine.
https://twitter.com/bpolitics/status/1046902641106726917
:lol Chris Dudley being dragged into this mess.
OMG Brett had BEERS on the WEEKENDs!
I could understand a cosmo or appletini but beer? Gross.
hitmanyr2k
10-01-2018, 09:41 PM
J:lolmes C:lolmey
https://twitter.com/DineshDSouza/status/1046764205561565186?s=20
Isn't D'Souza a felon? :lol
ducks
10-01-2018, 10:16 PM
Harvard Poll: Trump's Approval Steady at 46 Percent
Spurminator
10-01-2018, 10:26 PM
Harvard Poll: Trump's Approval Steady at 46 Percent
:cheer Steady
:cheer 46%
ducks
10-01-2018, 10:30 PM
:lmao Comey getting obliterated :lmao
https://twitter.com/ByronYork/status/1046495600240472065?s=20
Flynn did not lie
:cheer Steady
:cheer 46%
Obama's average approval rating was just 46.7%
GWB had the highest ever at 90% just after the 9/11 attacks. It's amazing how many liberals jumped behind the leg of the other side when the shit hits the fan :lol
"NO MORE GUNS!"
"STOP FUNDING WAR!"
BOOM!!!
"FUCK THIS SHIT GO WAR GO, DEAD OR ALIVE, FUCK THESE FAGGOTS!"
https://content.gallup.com/origin/gallupinc/GallupSpaces/Production/Cms/POLL/1rgktrfxgkc1y6lhk2lm2g.png
:lol:lol
pgardn
10-01-2018, 11:34 PM
K lied about the issues that have nothing to do with the real issue.
Sounds just like Orange Haze. Just vote and get it over with. Orange guy can find another gold spoon fed frat boy liar quite easily. The red team has the ball. Let them play. No tears about the backlash.
Spurminator
10-01-2018, 11:35 PM
Obama's average approval rating was just 46.7%
Sounds right. Betcha can't find a post or tweet from any Obama cheerleader celebrating that result.
SnakeBoy
10-01-2018, 11:41 PM
https://content.gallup.com/origin/gallupinc/GallupSpaces/Production/Cms/POLL/1rgktrfxgkc1y6lhk2lm2g.png
:lol:lol
Damn I thought Dubya was already in the 30's in '04. Even I was ready to vote for Hillary then (no joke) but the dumb bitch didn't run and Kerry was a bridge too far.
Spurtacular
10-01-2018, 11:42 PM
Damn I thought Dubya was already in the 30's in '04. Even I was ready to vote for Hillary then (no joke) but the dumb bitch didn't run and Kerry was a bridge too far.
I don't know how you're seeing Kerry as worse than Hillary, tbh.
SnakeBoy
10-01-2018, 11:44 PM
I don't know how you're seeing Kerry as worse than Hillary, tbh.
You gotta go back in time.
ducks
10-01-2018, 11:44 PM
Ex-Boyfriend says Kavanaugh accuser Julie Swetnick threatened to kill his unborn child, 'was exaggerating everything
pgardn
10-01-2018, 11:47 PM
Ex-Boyfriend says Kavanaugh accuser Julie Swetnick threatened to kill his unborn child, 'was exaggerating everything
Unborn child threatened to kill Swetnick with excessively large head.
Spurtacular
10-01-2018, 11:53 PM
You gotta go back in time.
I'm sure you have your reasons, but Hillary is pure evil, a psychopath. Kerry may not have a strong moral compass, but I don't think he's on Hillary's level.
Want to deny some more science on this Darrin?
What's your conspiracy? Did the big bad woman make it up so she can have the pleasure of fleeing her home from death threats?
1046945241608151040
1046957522433859588
Damn I thought Dubya was already in the 30's in '04. Even I was ready to vote for Hillary then (no joke) but the dumb bitch didn't run and Kerry was a bridge too far.
Just an illustration to show how fickle and unreliable "approval rating" is in terms of historically great leaders. Country doing good, bash the fuck out of leaders, why not? Country under attack? Rally behind them because it could be real this time.
Spurtacular
10-02-2018, 12:28 AM
1046945241608151040
1046957522433859588
Didn't take long for the corporate gestapo to delete the video.
1046945241608151040
1046957522433859588
This kind of bullshit gets air time and any real victims get diluted by these fucking parasites. A grease fire is too good for her.
Nbadan
10-02-2018, 12:55 AM
29 lies and counting...
LIE 1
In 2004, Kavanaugh claimed that the nomination of anti-abortion, anti-LGBTQ judge William Pryor was “not one that I worked on personally.”
TRUTH
Newly released emails showed Kavanaugh was involved in selecting Pryor, interviewing him, and working to confirm him.
LIE 2
In 2006, Kavanaugh denied he “primarily handl[ed]” the nomination of Judge Charles Pickering, who had pushed to reduce the sentence of a man convicted of burning a cross in front of an interracial couple’s house.
TRUTH
Emails released this year show that Kavanaugh prepared documents on Pickering and worked on a draft op-ed in support of the nominee.
LIE 3
In 2006, Kavanaugh denied that he “handled” the nomination of William Haynes.
TRUTH
Recent emails revealed that Kavanaugh played a large role in Haynes nomination, including determining that Haynes “would be an across-the-board judicial conservative”.
Etc.....
https://medium.com/@demandjustice/kavanaugh-29-lies-and-counting-69ab6dee833d
Nbadan
10-02-2018, 01:16 AM
https://twitter.com/nycsouthpaw/status/1046906911516446721
spurraider21
10-02-2018, 02:10 AM
Flynn did not lie
of course he did. he pled guilty to lying
Chris
10-02-2018, 02:20 AM
Perjury traps are common. The FBI and Comey didn't think Flynn lied, but Mueller's goons found some t's that weren't crossed.
spurraider21
10-02-2018, 02:26 AM
Perjury traps are common.
that isn't a thing
The FBI and Comey didn't think Flynn lied, but Mueller's goons found some t's that weren't crossed.
:cry
here's everything he lied about
https://www.justice.gov/file/1015126/download
:lmao "t's that were't crossed"
This kind of bullshit gets air time and any real victims get diluted by these fucking parasites. A grease fire is too good for her.
These interviews are so pathetic and desperate now it almost seems like they’re straight trolling
1046889074051747842
Chris
10-02-2018, 03:31 AM
Perjury trap is actually a thing, sorry.
Anywho, it's the main reason Trump won't talk to Mueller.
Isitjustme?
10-02-2018, 03:59 AM
Perjury trap is actually a thing, sorry.
Anywho, it's the main reason Trump won't talk to Mueller.
Sup bruh...you ever figure out how women go to the bathroom?
boutons_deux
10-02-2018, 06:38 AM
New Reports Add To Muddled View Of Brett Kavanaugh’s Character At YaleNew text messages suggest the Supreme Court nominee and his lawyers contacted old classmates in an effort to discredit Deborah Ramirez
Multiple reports on Monday evening shed light on Supreme Court nominee Brett
Kavanaugh (https://www.huffingtonpost.com/topic/brett-kavanaugh)’s recent efforts to rein in his friends’ comments about his behavior as a student at Yale University.
Kavanaugh and his legal team had been texting with the judge’s college friends to undercut classmate Deborah Ramirez’s allegations of sexual misconduct before she went public in The New Yorker (https://www.newyorker.com/news/news-desk/senate-democrats-investigate-a-new-allegation-of-sexual-misconduct-from-the-supreme-court-nominee-brett-kavanaughs-college-years-deborah-ramirez).
Kavanaugh’s relationship to Ramirez was closer than he let on and that
she was uncomfortable around him when they were both at a wedding 10 years after they graduated.
Kavanaugh was known during his Yale days as a heavy drinker (https://www.nytimes.com/2018/09/26/us/politics/kavanaugh-drinking-yale-high-school.html).
Kavanaugh after a bar fight (https://www.nytimes.com/2018/10/01/us/politics/kavanaugh-bar-fight.html) while he was a junior at Yale. Kavanaugh was accused of throwing ice at a patron at the bar, and one of his friends, Chris Dudley, was accused of hitting the man with a glass on the side of the head.
another Yale classmate who said he was at the bar that night issued a statement (https://www.nytimes.com/2018/09/30/us/politics/chad-ludington-statement-brett-kavanaugh.html) providing other details of the encounter.
“I believe that he lied, distorted and dissembled to the Senate Judiciary Committee,” Ludington said of the judge.
“He never acknowledged that he got to the point that he might not actually remember something.
And I find that very hard to believe, actually. I find that impossible to believe, actually.”
While Ludington said he doesn’t think there’s anything inappropriate about drinking in college, he noted that he thought it was “fundamentally wrong” to lie to lawmakers.
https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/brett-kavanaugh-texts-deborah-ramirez_us_5bb2a89fe4b0d1ebe0e40388?utm_medium=ema il&utm_campaign=__TheMorningEmail__100218&utm_content=__TheMorningEmail__100218+CID_4c071c62 89e514eae1759d7137c71023&utm_source=Email%20marketing%20software&utm_term=HuffPost&ncid=newsltushpmgnews__TheMorningEmail__100218
Blatantly, inarguably clear that K is serial liar, and a liar to Congress.
Perfect oligarchy candidate for SCOTUS, and echoes the deplorable, lying rot from the head of the Exec branch
hater
10-02-2018, 06:41 AM
I'm sure you have your reasons, but Hillary is pure evil, a psychopath. Kerry may not have a strong moral compass, but I don't think he's on Hillary's level.
Agreed 100%.
But to be fair Shitlery really fucked up her career while at Sec of State
If she had not been a sec of state (our historys shittiest) she probably would have been elected
Thanks Obama :lol
baseline bum
10-02-2018, 06:42 AM
New Reports Add To Muddled View Of Brett Kavanaugh’s Character At Yale[FONT=ProximaNova][SIZE=3][FONT=arial][COLOR=#000000]New text messages suggest the Supreme Court nominee and his lawyers contacted old classmates in an effort to discredit Deborah Ramirez
Multiple reports on Monday evening shed light on Supreme Court nominee Brett
Kavanaugh (https://www.huffingtonpost.com/topic/brett-kavanaugh)’s recent efforts to rein in his friends’ comments about his behavior as a student at Yale University.
Kavanaugh and his legal team had been texting with the judge’s college friends to undercut classmate Deborah Ramirez’s allegations of sexual misconduct before she went public in The New Yorker (https://www.newyorker.com/news/news-desk/senate-democrats-investigate-a-new-allegation-of-sexual-misconduct-from-the-supreme-court-nominee-brett-kavanaughs-college-years-deborah-ramirez)[COLOR=#000000].
Well, that should end the nomination right there. If it was a Democrat nomination it surely would have.
boutons_deux
10-02-2018, 06:54 AM
Kavanaugh: 29 Lies and Counting
Jeff Flake told 60 Minutes that Kavanaugh would not be confirmed if the FBI probe showed that he lied to the Senate Judiciary Committee.
We already know that Kavanaugh has lied. Repeatedly.
From Brett Kavanaugh’s first confirmation hearing for the D.C. Circuit Court to his most recent hearing with Dr. Christine Blasey Ford, he has lied.
It didn’t matter how small or big the issue.
It didn’t matter that he was under oath.
Integrity matters, Kavanaugh’s character matters, and
he has clearly shown that he is not fit for a lifetime appointment on the Supreme Court.
Here are 29 times that Kavanaugh has lied.
LIE 1
In 2004, Kavanaugh claimed that the nomination of anti-abortion, anti-LGBTQ judge William Pryor was “not one that I worked on personally.”
TRUTH
Newly released emails showed Kavanaugh was involved in selecting Pryor, interviewing him, and working to confirm him.
LIE 2
In 2006, Kavanaugh denied he “primarily handl[ed” the nomination of Judge Charles Pickering, who had pushed to reduce the sentence of a man convicted of burning a cross in front of an interracial couple’s house.
TRUTH
Emails released this year show that Kavanaugh prepared documents on Pickering and worked on a draft op-ed in support of the nominee.
LIE 3
In 2006, Kavanaugh denied that he “handled” the nomination of William Haynes.
TRUTH
Recent emails revealed that Kavanaugh played a large role in Haynes nomination, including determining that Haynes “would be an across-the-board judicial conservative”.
LIE 4
In 2004, Kavanaugh denied knowing that he had received documents stolen from Democratic senators during the Bush administration, claiming that he was “not aware of that matter ever until I learned of it in the media late last year.”
TRUTH
Emails showed that Kavanaugh received stolen information about Senator Leahy and was told to hold it in the “strictest confidence” and to keep it confidential — Kavanaugh should have known that it was improperly obtained.
Kavanaugh’s claims otherwise were deemed by one fact checker to “defy logic”.
LIE 5
In a 2004 written questionnaire, Kavanaugh wrote “These meetings, calls, and emails were typical of how judicial confirmations have been handled in past
TRUTH
As Glenn Kessler noted in the Washington Post, Kavanaugh’s claims that his interactions with Miranda were “typical” of past administrations is “not accurate”.
LIE 6
In 2006, Kavanaugh again denied knowing that he had received the stolen documents saying that he “Did not know about it, did not suspect it.”
TRUTH
Emails showed that Kavanaugh received stolen information about Senator Leahy and was told to hold it in the “strictest confidence” and to keep it confidential — Kavanaugh should have known that it was improperly obtained.
LIE 7
In 2018, Kavanaugh denied knowing that he had received documents that were stolen from Democratic senators during the Bush administration, claiming that his interactions with Miranda were “the usual kinds of discussions that would happen.”
TRUTH
Kavanaugh’s description that his interactions were “usual” has been categorized as “not accurate”.
LIE 8
During his confirmation hearing in 2006, Kavanaugh said, “I was not involved and am not involved in the questions about the rules governing detention of combatants.”
TRUTH
One year later, it was reported that Kavanaugh had in fact counseled a group of White House lawyers regarding the administration’s decision to deny lawyers to enemy combatants. There are now at least three recorded examples of Kavanaugh participating in discussions of Bush administration detainee policy.
LIE 9
During Kavanaugh’s 2006 confirmation hearing, he lied under oath about his work on warrantless wiretapping. Kavanaugh denied involvement in a controversial Bush-era surveillance program and said that he didn’t know about it until the program was revealed by the New York Times.
TRUTH
A newly released email shows that Kavanaugh asked the Justice Department about the constitutionality of “random/constant surveillance of phone and email conversations of non-citizens who are in the United States when the purpose of the surveillance is to prevent terrorist/criminal violence.
LIE 10
Kavanaugh claimed that his previous testimony about his work in the Bush White House was “100 percent accurate.”
TRUTH
As Leahy detailed, “There is evidence that Mr. Miranda provided you with materials that were stolen from me,” Mr. Leahy said at the hearing. “And that would contradict your prior testimony. It is also clear from public emails — and I’m refraining from going into nonpublic ones — that you had reason to believe materials were obtained inappropriately at the time.
LIE 11
During his 2006 confirmation hearing for his D.C. Circuit Court nomination, Kavanaugh assured members of the Senate Judiciary Committee that he would “follow Roe v. Wade faithfully and fully.
TRUTH
A decade later, and just one year after the Supreme Court once again reaffirmed Roe v. Wade in Whole Woman’s Health v. Hellerstedt, Kavanaugh ruled to deny a woman the right to get an abortion without obstruction by the federal government.
LIE 12
“When this allegation first arose, I welcomed any kind of investigation. Senate, FBI or otherwise. The committee has now conducted a thorough investigation, and I cooperated fully. I know that any investigation … will clear me.”
TRUTH
NBC News: “Kavanaugh did not publicly welcome an investigation in two public statements denying the allegations and an in-depth interview with Fox News. It is unclear if he did so privately.
LIE 13
Kavanaugh claimed in his opening statement on September 27, “I spent most of my time in high school focused on academics, sports, church, and service.”
TRUTH
As Kavanaugh’s own calendar indicated, there were a lot of parties and gatherings noted, as the Washington Post noted, “But it does have one interesting entry: “Go to Timmy’s for Ski’s.” That’s a slang term for “brewskis” = beer, and he includes other friends who Ford alleges were at the party — or in the room, in the case of Mark Judge — when the incident occurred.
LIE 14
Kavanaugh stated, categorically, that he “never attended a gathering like the one Dr. Ford describes in her allegation.”
TRUTH
Kavanaugh himself admitted that his calendars “show a few weekday gatherings at friends’ houses after a workout or just to meet up and have some beers.
LIE 15
Kavanaugh argued that “none of those gatherings included the group of people that Dr. Ford has identified.”
TRUTH
A July 1 calendar entry included the exact group of people that Dr. Blasey Ford said attended the gathering.
LIE 16
Kavanaugh testified, “When my friends and I spent time together at parties on weekends, it was usually with friends from nearby Catholic all-girls high schools — Stone Ridge, Holy Child, Visitation, Immaculata, Holy Cross. Dr. Blasey did not attend one of those schools. She attended an independent private school named Holton-Arms, and she was a year behind me.”
TRUTH
New York Times: “Judge Kavanaugh’s implication is that students at Holton-Arms, an all-girls school, didn’t mingle much those who attended Georgetown Prep. Two of Judge Kavanaugh’s former schoolmates said on Friday that this was not true and that Holton-Arms students were routinely present at parties with Georgetown Prep boys.
‘Holton-Arms was definitely part of our social scene,’ Mr. Barbot said. Another Georgetown Prep alumnus who was in Judge Kavanaugh’s class said, ‘Holton was as much a sister school as the others.’
LIE 17
According to Slate, “Nine times during Thursday’s hearing, Kavanaugh claimed that four of the teenagers, including himself, made statements affirming that Ford’s version of events didn’t happen.
For example, Kavanaugh claimed that “[all four witnesses who are alleged to be at the event said it didn’t happen.
“I just want to reemphasize: All four witnesses who were allegedly at the event have said it didn’t happen, including Dr. Ford’s longtime friend, Ms.
Keyser.
“It’s been investigated and all four witnesses say it didn’t happen.”
TRUTH
This is untrue. Dr. Blasey Ford claimed that Kavanaugh, Mark Judge, a boy named P.J., and one other boy whose name she could not recall were present at the party. She also said her friend Leland was present. Though P.J and Leland have both said they could not recall the event, neither have said that it did not happen and Leland said she believed Ford.
LIE 18
Kavanaugh claimed in his opening statement on September 27, “Dr. Ford’s allegations are not merely uncorroborated, it’s refuted by the very people she says were there.”
TRUTH
Associated Press: “THE FACTS: The statements in question do not corroborate Ford’s allegations, but they also do not exonerate Kavanaugh. They leave open the possibility that people at the small gathering forgot about it or were not in position to witness the assault.
LIE 19
Kavanaugh claimed to be simply a social drinker.
“I — passed out would be — no, but I’ve gone to sleep, but — but I’ve never blacked out. That’s the — that’s the — the allegation, and that — that — that’s wrong.”
TRUTH
Many of Kavanaugh’s high school and collegeclassmates contest this, claiming that Kavanaugh was a heavy drinker who was often incoherent and even belligerent.
Even Trump himself admitted at a recent press conference, “He did have difficulty as a young man with drink[ing.
LIE 20
“We have heard your college roommate say that you did drink frequently…,” Klobuchar said. “Another classmate said it’s not credible for you to say you didn’t have memory lapses.”
“I don’t think I, I actually don’t think that’s, the second quote’s correct,” Kavanaugh replied.
TRUTH
Washington Post: “It is [correct. The classmate was Liz Swisher, who knew him in college. She told The Post that he was a ‘sloppy drunk,’ adding: ‘There’s no medical way I can say that he was blacked out. . . . But it’s not credible for him to say that he has had no memory lapses in the nights that he drank to excess.’
LIE 21
When asked about his high school year book’s reference to him being “Beach Week Ralph Club — Biggest Contributor,” Kavanaugh claimed that it was a reference to his weak stomach.
TRUTH
Again, according to manypeople who knew him in high school and college, this explanation lacks any credulity.
LIE 22
When Sen. Whitehouse asked Kavanaugh how do you pronounce “boofed,”Kavanaugh stated that it referred “to flatulence. We were 16.”
TRUTH
As the New York Times reported, “‘Boofed’ in the 1980s was a term that often referred to anal sex, and that is how Judge Kavanaugh’s classmates said they interpreted his comment. They said they had never heard it used to refer to flatulence.
LIE 23
When asked about “Devil’s Triangle” and what it was, Kavanaugh said it was a “Drinking game.”
TRUTH
As the New York Times reported “the phrase was regularly used to describe sex between two men and a woman.” As a classmate at Georgetown Prep, Bill Barbot said “the spin that Brett was putting on [the yearbook was a complete overstatement of the innocence with which they were intended.’
LIE 24
In Kavanaugh’s yearbook, some of the football players, including Kavanaugh, used the cryptic phrase “Renate Alumni.
Kavanaugh testified that it was because “she was a great friend of ours” and attacked Democrats and the media for bringing her name into it.
TRUTH
Two ex-Georgetown Prep classmates told the New York Times that boys were bragging (truthfully or not, probably not) about sex with Renate.
Sean Hagan said that Kavanaugh and his teammates “were very disrespectful, at least verbally, with Renate.
Renate said, I can’t begin to comprehend what goes through the minds of 17-year-old boys who write such things, but the insinuation is horrible, hurtful and simply untrue. I pray their daughters are never treated this way.
LIE 25
With respect to Kavanaugh’s yearbook reference of being a “Renate Alumnius,” Kavanaugh claimed it was to show “affection” because she was a friend.
TRUTH
Kavanaugh’s own lawyer told the New York Times, “Judge Kavanaugh and Ms. Dolphin attended one high school event together and shared a brief kiss good night following that event.
LIE 26
Kavanaugh claimed to have ““no connections” to Yale, explaining that “I got there by busting my tail.”
TRUTH
In fact, Kavanaugh’s grandfather attended the school and Kavanaugh would be classified as a legacy student.
LIE 27
Kavanaugh told Sens. Feinstein and Whitehouse that he never broke grand jury secrecy laws.
TRUTH
As Feinstein has detailed, “According to a memo from the National Archives, Brett Kavanaugh instructed Hickman Ewing, a colleague and deputy independent counsel in the Starr investigation, to ‘call [Chris Ruddy’ about matters before a grand jury, which would be illegal to disclose.
LIE 28
Kavanaugh said that polygraph tests are “not reliable.”
TRUTH
In a 2006 opinion, Kavanaugh wrote that polygraph examinations “serve law enforcement purposes.
LIE 29
Sen. Kamala Harris asked Kavanaugh if he had watched Ford’s testimony and Kavanaugh responded, “I did not. I plan to, I plan to, but I did not, I was preparing mine.”
TRUTH
A committee aide told The Wall Street Journal that Kavanaugh was watching Ford testify from a monitor in another room in the Dirksen Senate Building.
https://medium.com/@demandjustice/kavanaugh-29-lies-and-counting-69ab6dee833d
DarrinS
10-02-2018, 09:01 AM
1046881156518596608
There was another New Yorker article on Sept 14 where Ramirez wasn’t named. In BOTH articles, Kavanaugh is quoted, so they obviously reached out to him for a statement. So, he technically knew about the allegation before it was published, but understood it would be published by the New Yorker.
Spurs Homer
10-02-2018, 09:03 AM
New Reports Add To Muddled View Of Brett Kavanaugh’s Character At Yale
New text messages suggest the Supreme Court nominee and his lawyers contacted old classmates in an effort to discredit Deborah Ramirez
Multiple reports on Monday evening shed light on Supreme Court nominee Brett
Kavanaugh (https://www.huffingtonpost.com/topic/brett-kavanaugh)’s recent efforts to rein in his friends’ comments about his behavior as a student at Yale University.
Kavanaugh and his legal team had been texting with the judge’s college friends to undercut classmate Deborah Ramirez’s allegations of sexual misconduct before she went public in The New Yorker (https://www.newyorker.com/news/news-desk/senate-democrats-investigate-a-new-allegation-of-sexual-misconduct-from-the-supreme-court-nominee-brett-kavanaughs-college-years-deborah-ramirez).
Kavanaugh’s relationship to Ramirez was closer than he let on and that
she was uncomfortable around him when they were both at a wedding 10 years after they graduated.
Kavanaugh was known during his Yale days as a heavy drinker (https://www.nytimes.com/2018/09/26/us/politics/kavanaugh-drinking-yale-high-school.html).
Kavanaugh after a bar fight (https://www.nytimes.com/2018/10/01/us/politics/kavanaugh-bar-fight.html) while he was a junior at Yale. Kavanaugh was accused of throwing ice at a patron at the bar, and one of his friends, Chris Dudley, was accused of hitting the man with a glass on the side of the head.
another Yale classmate who said he was at the bar that night issued a statement (https://www.nytimes.com/2018/09/30/us/politics/chad-ludington-statement-brett-kavanaugh.html) providing other details of the encounter.
“I believe that he lied, distorted and dissembled to the Senate Judiciary Committee,” Ludington said of the judge.
“He never acknowledged that he got to the point that he might not actually remember something.
And I find that very hard to believe, actually. I find that impossible to believe, actually.”
While Ludington said he doesn’t think there’s anything inappropriate about drinking in college, he noted that he thought it was “fundamentally wrong” to lie to lawmakers.
https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/brett-kavanaugh-texts-deborah-ramirez_us_5bb2a89fe4b0d1ebe0e40388?utm_medium=ema il&utm_campaign=__TheMorningEmail__100218&utm_content=__TheMorningEmail__100218+CID_4c071c62 89e514eae1759d7137c71023&utm_source=Email%20marketing%20software&utm_term=HuffPost&ncid=newsltushpmgnews__TheMorningEmail__100218
Blatantly, inarguably clear that K is serial liar, and a liar to Congress.
Perfect oligarchy candidate for SCOTUS, and echoes the deplorable, lying rot from the head of the Exec branch
What I've been saying all along - that from the beginning this has been an elaborate cover-up.
The GOP knew going in that because Trump wanted this guy - and this guy at all costs - because this guy placed the (R) President above the law -
they knew they needed to
a) rush through as fast as possible
b) conceal hundreds of thousands of public documents
c) attack possible witnesses to any fuckery that Kavanaugh had engaged in
d) attack the Dems and accuse THEM of wrongdoing
e) if all of those fail - turn this entire thing into a he said/she said and accuse the Dems of turning it into a circus
Kavanaugh - under oath - testified that he found out about the Ramirez allegation after the New Yorker article was made public. Confirmed lie. Again.
boutons_deux
10-02-2018, 09:08 AM
Trump Jr. Says Kavanaugh Climate Makes Him Fear For His Sons
“I’ve got boys, and I’ve got girls. And when I see what’s going on right now, it’s scary,’ he said
When asked which of his children he fears for more, he said “I mean, right now, I’d say my sons.”
https://talkingpointsmemo.com/news/trump-jr-kavanaugh-climate-sons?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+tpm-news+%28TPMNews%29 (https://talkingpointsmemo.com/news/trump-jr-kavanaugh-climate-sons?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+tpm-news+%28TPMNews%29)
How dare abused women get all UPPITY and fight back.
White males supremacy contains both racism and misogyny.
DarrinS
10-02-2018, 09:09 AM
Kavanaugh - under oath - testified that he found out about the Ramirez allegation after the New Yorker article was made public. Confirmed lie. Again.
New Yorker authors contacted Kavanaugh for statements before publishing.
spurraider21
10-02-2018, 09:10 AM
Perjury trap is actually a thing, sorry.
Anywho, it's the main reason Trump won't talk to Mueller.
Nah, they aren’t. Basically the cow-tipping of law. Sorry your boy uses it as an excuse.
Spurs Homer
10-02-2018, 09:12 AM
New Yorker authors contacted Kavanaugh for statements before publishing.
By then Kavanaugh and his "team" had already tried to influence the witnesses and Kavanaugh himself asked a witness to DENY that Ramirez was credible.
CitizenDwayne
10-02-2018, 09:13 AM
Perjury traps are a big problem...for people who lie constantly (see Trump, Kavanaugh).
What I've been saying all along - that from the beginning this has been an elaborate cover-up.
The GOP knew going in that because Trump wanted this guy - and this guy at all costs - because this guy placed the (R) President above the law -
they knew they needed to
a) rush through as fast as possible
b) conceal hundreds of thousands of public documents
c) attack possible witnesses to any fuckery that Kavanaugh had engaged in
d) attack the Dems and accuse THEM of wrongdoing
e) if all of those fail - turn this entire thing into a he said/she said and accuse the Dems of turning it into a circus
Kavanaugh - under oath - testified that he found out about the Ramirez allegation after the New Yorker article was made public. Confirmed lie. Again.
When he wrote his papers about indicting sitting presidents, Obama was in office - and he wrote that because he feared that maybe the distraction caused by Lewinsky encouraged Clinton to take his eye off of OBL in the late '90's.
Kavanaugh's document trove is larger than the last FIVE nominees - COMBINED.
I haven't seen Ford attacked. Slightly questioned only in a couple of instances.
Pelosi held the letter for at least 45 days - do you have an explanation for that? Wrongdoing? Or through your blue goggles are you blind to that, Homer?
ducks
10-02-2018, 09:16 AM
Unborn child threatened to kill Swetnick with excessively large head.
Forgot democracts are for killing babies
boutons_deux
10-02-2018, 09:16 AM
Manchin and Heitkamp Getting Are Pressure to Vote for Kavanaugh
The ultra-conservative Judicial Crisis Network (JCN) is spending big money to pressure (https://www.politico.com/story/2018/10/02/kavanaugh-confirmation-ads-manchin-heitkamp-857849) red-state Democrats Joe Manchin (https://www.politicususa.com/vocabulary/joe-manchin) (D-W.Va.) and Heidi Heitkamp (https://www.politicususa.com/vocabulary/heidi-heitkamp) (D-N.D.) to confirm Brett Kavanaugh (https://www.politicususa.com/2018/10/01/kavanaugh-bar-fight-police-report.html).
JCN announced on Monday they will spend $400,000 this week on pushing Manchin and Heitkamp to support Kavanaugh.
They are the only undecided Democrats, and both are up for reelection next month.
By all accounts Kavanaugh remains short of the 50 votes needed to confirm him.
Three Republicans — Jeff Flake of Arizona, Lisa Murkowski of Alaska, and Susan Collins of Maine — have not said for sure
they would support Kavanaugh when it comes to a vote on the floor of the Senate.
https://www.politicususa.com/2018/10/02/manchin-and-heitkamp-getting-are-pressure-to-vote-for-kavanaugh.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+politicususa%2FfJAl+%28Politi cus+USA+%29
ducks
10-02-2018, 09:21 AM
Wow if true
https://scontent-lax3-1.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/fr/cp0/e15/q65/43056155_1833668530094486_3954566171147108352_n.jp g?_nc_cat=1&efg=eyJpIjoidCJ9&oh=a9f3309317d05cc7db8611d23249a6a6&oe=5C60C5EC
ducks
10-02-2018, 09:24 AM
Oh she rembers she only had one beer but can not rember when the party was
Spurs Homer
10-02-2018, 09:34 AM
When he wrote his papers about indicting sitting presidents, Obama was in office - and he wrote that because he feared that maybe the distraction caused by Lewinsky encouraged Clinton to take his eye off of OBL in the late '90's.
Kavanaugh's document trove is larger than the last FIVE nominees - COMBINED.
I haven't seen Ford attacked. Slightly questioned only in a couple of instances.
Pelosi held the letter for at least 45 days - do you have an explanation for that? Wrongdoing? Or through your blue goggles are you blind to that, Homer?
He would never answer ANY question regarding his views on Presidential power in THIS hearing- claiming that a judge cannot weigh in on "political" issues.
His Right Wing conspiracy theory laced rant blew that lie out of the water - he most definitely weighed in on a political opinion - his own political biased opinion.
Ford is being attacked - but the hypocrites are using the Dems to attack her - saying they put her up to this - when she was the one that went to the Washington Post - on her own - before any Dem had a say.
You mean Feinstein - not Pelosi - has already rightfully defended her decision -
Her #1 concern was keeping the anonymity of the victim - but - as stated above - the victim herself reached out to the Washington post - when she saw that the repukes were going to ignore any allegation and speed-rush confirm Rapey Brett.
Everything refuted - but you won't see the truth in front of your face.
Spurs Homer
10-02-2018, 09:36 AM
Forgot democracts are for killing babies
What's the difference between ^ that and you taking away their healthcare and putting them in cages and separating them from their parents?
Seems like killing them saves them the torture you would rather inflict. Neither way is virtuous.
hater
10-02-2018, 09:44 AM
Perjury traps are a big problem...for people who lie constantly (see Trump, Kavanaugh).
Hillary, Obama, Jr, Sr, Billy, Reagan, Carter, etc, etc
Ding
MultiTroll
10-02-2018, 10:04 AM
Wow if true
https://scontent-lax3-1.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/fr/cp0/e15/q65/43056155_1833668530094486_3954566171147108352_n.jp g?_nc_cat=1&efg=eyJpIjoidCJ9&oh=a9f3309317d05cc7db8611d23249a6a6&oe=5C60C5EC
ducks lets see if this can be proven.
If so, what a huge cup of STFU for the snowflakes.
boutons_deux
10-02-2018, 10:12 AM
ducks lets see if this can be proven.
If so, what a huge cup of STFU for the snowflakes.
Ford is irrelevant, now. Even if she is totally discredited, it doesn't matter.
K's lying to Congress and lying about everything, his extreme partisanship ratfucking career, plus his nervous breakdown last Thu are his failings, his unfitness for SCOTUS
Rightwing hate media is after Ford to slime her as a hysterical woman, and because she's attacking a man whom they see their proxy for themselves as racist, misogynist shitbags.
RandomGuy
10-02-2018, 10:14 AM
Wow if true
https://scontent-lax3-1.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/fr/cp0/e15/q65/43056155_1833668530094486_3954566171147108352_n.jp g?_nc_cat=1&efg=eyJpIjoidCJ9&oh=a9f3309317d05cc7db8611d23249a6a6&oe=5C60C5EC
smh.
You will fall for anything.
You are seriously the most gullible person I have ever had to read text from, outside of mouse.
spurraider21
10-02-2018, 10:14 AM
Wow if true
https://scontent-lax3-1.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/fr/cp0/e15/q65/43056155_1833668530094486_3954566171147108352_n.jp g?_nc_cat=1&efg=eyJpIjoidCJ9&oh=a9f3309317d05cc7db8611d23249a6a6&oe=5C60C5EC
i dont even need to click on that to say it's probably not true
RandomGuy
10-02-2018, 10:16 AM
Pelosi held the letter for at least 45 days - do you have an explanation for that? Wrongdoing? Or through your blue goggles are you blind to that, Homer?
Because Dr. Ford requested that her name be kept out of it. She requested that.
Or through your red goggles are you blind to that, 101a?
DarrinS
10-02-2018, 10:20 AM
Because Dr. Ford requested that her name be kept out of it. She requested that.
Or through your red goggles are you blind to that, 101a?
She could still have anonymity, if not for Feinstein and the legal team she recommended.
baseline bum
10-02-2018, 10:28 AM
he wrote that because he feared that maybe the distraction caused by Lewinsky encouraged Clinton to take his eye off of OBL in the late '90's.
What a load. Judge Bluto is still a Clinton conspiracy theorist twenty years later, as evidenced by his crying opening statement at the hearing.
MultiTroll
10-02-2018, 10:29 AM
Ford is irrelevant, now. Even if she is totally discredited, it doesn't matter.
:rollin
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mN7LW0Y00kE
He would never answer ANY question regarding his views on Presidential power in THIS hearing- claiming that a judge cannot weigh in on "political" issues.
His Right Wing conspiracy theory laced rant blew that lie out of the water - he most definitely weighed in on a political opinion - his own political biased opinion.
What Kavanaugh actually said about political power was this: “I don’t think we want judges commenting on the latest political controversy because that would ultimately leave people to doubt whether we are independent,”
What he said about whether a president can be subpoenaed is this: Can a sitting president be required to respond to a subpoena? “I can’t give you an answer on that hypothetical question,”
You've successfully morphed two answers into one to fit your narrative.
Ford is being attacked - but the hypocrites are using the Dems to attack her - saying they put her up to this - when she was the one that went to the Washington Post - on her own - before any Dem had a say.
Ford is not being attacked, but the Democrats have certainly exploited her - including her own attorneys. SHE testified that she would rather have met in private in California, but unless she perjured herself, somehow she didn't know that was on the table. Feinstein wanted anything but for her to remain anonymous. She wanted the (36 year old, uncorroborated allegation without evidence to get AS MUCH TRACTION AND ATTENTION as possible - that is done by behaving exactly as she did.
You mean Feinstein - not Pelosi - has already rightfully defended her decision -
Her #1 concern was keeping the anonymity of the victim - but - as stated above - the victim herself reached out to the Washington post - when she saw that the repukes were going to ignore any allegation and speed-rush confirm Rapey Brett.
The Republicans found out about the letter pretty much at the same time as everyone else - when the story was published. How could they rush the nomination before the allegation, when they didn't know it was out there? Once Feinstein got Katz involved, the objective wasn't protecting Ford's anonymity, it was hyper-publicizing her. Again, can you explain how Ford didn't know this could happen without her getting on a scary airplane and in front of the klieg lights?
Everything refuted - but you won't see the truth in front of your face.
Just seeing if you can read this.
What a load. Judge Bluto is still a Clinton conspiracy theorist twenty years later, as evidenced by his crying opening statement at the hearing.
So you haven't read the article he wrote in 2009, huh?
New Reports Add To Muddled View Of Brett Kavanaugh’s Character At YaleNew text messages suggest the Supreme Court nominee and his lawyers contacted old classmates in an effort to discredit Deborah Ramirez
Multiple reports on Monday evening shed light on Supreme Court nominee Brett
Kavanaugh (https://www.huffingtonpost.com/topic/brett-kavanaugh)’s recent efforts to rein in his friends’ comments about his behavior as a student at Yale University.
Kavanaugh and his legal team had been texting with the judge’s college friends to undercut classmate Deborah Ramirez’s allegations of sexual misconduct before she went public in The New Yorker (https://www.newyorker.com/news/news-desk/senate-democrats-investigate-a-new-allegation-of-sexual-misconduct-from-the-supreme-court-nominee-brett-kavanaughs-college-years-deborah-ramirez).
Kavanaugh’s relationship to Ramirez was closer than he let on and that
she was uncomfortable around him when they were both at a wedding 10 years after they graduated.
Kavanaugh was known during his Yale days as a heavy drinker (https://www.nytimes.com/2018/09/26/us/politics/kavanaugh-drinking-yale-high-school.html).
Kavanaugh after a bar fight (https://www.nytimes.com/2018/10/01/us/politics/kavanaugh-bar-fight.html) while he was a junior at Yale. Kavanaugh was accused of throwing ice at a patron at the bar, and one of his friends, Chris Dudley, was accused of hitting the man with a glass on the side of the head.
another Yale classmate who said he was at the bar that night issued a statement (https://www.nytimes.com/2018/09/30/us/politics/chad-ludington-statement-brett-kavanaugh.html) providing other details of the encounter.
“I believe that he lied, distorted and dissembled to the Senate Judiciary Committee,” Ludington said of the judge.
“He never acknowledged that he got to the point that he might not actually remember something.
And I find that very hard to believe, actually. I find that impossible to believe, actually.”
While Ludington said he doesn’t think there’s anything inappropriate about drinking in college, he noted that he thought it was “fundamentally wrong” to lie to lawmakers.
https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/brett-kavanaugh-texts-deborah-ramirez_us_5bb2a89fe4b0d1ebe0e40388?utm_medium=ema il&utm_campaign=__TheMorningEmail__100218&utm_content=__TheMorningEmail__100218+CID_4c071c62 89e514eae1759d7137c71023&utm_source=Email%20marketing%20software&utm_term=HuffPost&ncid=newsltushpmgnews__TheMorningEmail__100218
Blatantly, inarguably clear that K is serial liar, and a liar to Congress.
Perfect oligarchy candidate for SCOTUS, and echoes the deplorable, lying rot from the head of the Exec branch
[tweet]1046889074051747842
:lol Fraud Ludington
What a load. Judge Bluto is still a Clinton conspiracy theorist twenty years later, as evidenced by his crying opening statement at the hearing.
Here you go:
http://www.minnesotalawreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/Kavanaugh_MLR.pdf
Mikeanaro
10-02-2018, 10:44 AM
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Dog0atiV4AAkxbe.jpg:large
Here you go:
http://www.minnesotalawreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/Kavanaugh_MLR.pdf
I'm actually impressed by the paper - Kavanaugh admits he has possibly changed his position - something 99.9% of this board NEVER do.
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Dog0atiV4AAkxbe.jpg:large
Wow. Fuck the "artist" and everyone who thinks that is funny or at all appropriate.
1046945241608151040
1046957522433859588
RandomGuy what are your thoughts on Swetnick? I’ve been told women don’t lie about these things.
ducks
10-02-2018, 10:51 AM
ducks lets see if this can be proven.
If so, what a huge cup of STFU for the snowflakes.
what are they afraid of hiding her medical records
boutons_deux
10-02-2018, 10:53 AM
Poor little paranoid, sniffy, sniffling K, wimmen beatin up on him
Republicans have a strategy to save Kavanaugh. It exposes Trumpism at its worst.
the South Carolina Republican showcased (https://twitter.com/FoxNews/status/1047067416776327169) what is emerging in some quarters as the last-ditch strategy to save Brett Kavanaugh’s Supreme Court nomination — a strategy that exposes Trumpism at its ugliest.
“This good man should not be destroyed,” :lol
if two GOP senators end up opposing him —
it will “end up legitimizing” the “destruction of a good person” by a “horrible process.”
if Kavanaugh goes down, President Trump should renominate him, and
push for another vote by barnstorming in states that Trump won. In other words,
Trump should whip his voters into a rage over the profound injustice of such an outcome.
Graham’s basic claim is also at the core of a big new campaign to rescue Kavanaugh.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/plum-line/wp/2018/10/02/republicans-have-a-strategy-to-save-kavanaugh-it-exposes-trumpism-at-its-worst/?utm_term=.5486c47ac5d7&wpisrc=nl_most&wpmm=1
“This good man should not be destroyed,” :lol
It's a fucking job interview for an lying shitbag who already lied his way into, already has a Federal lifetime job,
Destroy? :lol Old Lesbian, GFY
spurraider21
10-02-2018, 11:32 AM
RandomGuy (https://www.spurstalk.com/forums/member.php?u=1813) what are your thoughts on Swetnick? I’ve been told women don’t lie about these things.
oh well is jason beale of the federalist says so...
boutons_deux
10-02-2018, 11:35 AM
Kavanaugh in 2015:
A Judge Must Keep “Emotions in Check” and Not Be a “Political Partisan”
And, the Supreme Court nominee said, “don’t be a jerk.”
https://www.motherjones.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/brett-kavanaugh-10012018.jpg?w=990
Kavanaugh’s performance at the hearing
immediately raised questions (https://www.motherjones.com/politics/2018/09/a-bruising-hearing-casts-doubt-on-kavanaughs-judicial-temperament/) about his judicial temperament. :lol he has one? :lol
During his first set of confirmation hearings,
Kavanaugh had declared (https://www.seattletimes.com/nation-world/perspective-kavanaughs-fury-has-legal-experts-questioning-his-judicial-neutrality/), “The Supreme Court must never, never be viewed as a partisan institution.” :lol
Yet here he was now, hurling politicized vitriol.
Judith Resnik, a law professor at Yale, told (https://www.seattletimes.com/nation-world/perspective-kavanaughs-fury-has-legal-experts-questioning-his-judicial-neutrality/) the New York Times
his remarks were “partisan and not judicious.”
“Judicial temperament,
at its best, is a form of restraint that appears as an even-handedness of vision,
a thorough-going fairness that eschews anger in favor of reason and
clings to respect of all parties as an essential ingredient for the operation of justice.”
Certainly, Kavanaugh’s testimony did not meet those standards.
Kavanaugh explained the importance of judicial temperament.
He described the attributes required for a “good judge”:
to have the “proper demeanor,” :lol
to keep “our emotions in check,” :lol
to be “calm amidst the storm,” :lol
and to “demonstrate civility.” :lol
And, Kavanaugh added, “Don’t be a jerk.” :lol
https://www.motherjones.com/politics/2018/10/kavanaugh-in-2015-a-judge-must-keep-emotions-in-check-and-not-be-a-political-partisan/
K's cheap talk, high-falutin' legal speech totally belied and destroyed by his total breakdown last Thursday, to the Senate and with 10Ms watching.
boutons_deux
10-02-2018, 11:40 AM
Merrick Garland's yearbook entry is a stark contrast to Kavanaugh's, and a route out of this mess. (https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2018/10/1/1800584/-Merrick-Garland-s-yearbook-entry-is-a-stark-contrast-to-Kavanaugh-s-offer-a-route-out-of-this-mess)
This is Merrick Garland’s yearbook:
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DoYXzPSXgAAOfoF.jpg
As you can see, it has none of crude, misogynist madness that is in Kavanaugh’s.
It illustrates
the stark contrast between a nomination from Obama, and one from Trump.
It’s neat, but
each nominee seems to be a reflection of the president who nominated him.
Kavanaugh’s nomination has already damaged the Supreme Court.
If the allegations against him are substantiated, which I believe they are, it will cause further damage.
https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2018/10/1/1800584/-Merrick-Garland-s-yearbook-entry-is-a-stark-contrast-to-Kavanaugh-s-offer-a-route-out-of-this-mess?detail=emaildkre
If the FBI so-called, multi-day :lol investigation confirms K as a shitbag,
then you'll hear Trash et al whining, screaming "deep state"
oh well is jason beale of the federalist says so...
“retired U.S. Army interrogator and strategic debriefer with 30 years experience in military and intelligence interrogation and human intelligence collection operations”
His opinion carries a bit more weight than others. Since you decided to chime in how about sharing your opinion on Swetnick. Do you think she is lying? Yes or no.
spurraider21
10-02-2018, 11:50 AM
“retired U.S. Army interrogator and strategic debriefer with 30 years experience in military and intelligence interrogation and human intelligence collection operations”
His opinion carries a bit more weight than others. Since you decided to chime in how about sharing your opinion on Swetnick. Do you think she is lying? Yes or no.
and yet he's still politically driven, based on everything i've read from him. you can float credentials all you want. i can point to comey and mueller having a long illustrious history in law enforcement and you'd still be telling me they were duped and/or coordinated to engineer a witch hunt
i haven't heard her statement tbh. im not going to pretend to know one way or another. but if jason beale says so then you must be right. case closed
CitizenDwayne
10-02-2018, 11:52 AM
“retired U.S. Army interrogator and strategic debriefer with 30 years experience in military and intelligence interrogation and human intelligence collection operations”
His opinion carries a bit more weight than others. Since you decided to chime in how about sharing your opinion on Swetnick. Do you think she is lying? Yes or no.
It was in The Federalist. Did you even need to read it to know what his opinion would be?
boutons_deux
10-02-2018, 11:53 AM
Federalist soc is an oligarchy stink tank, where rotten eggs like K are incubated then hatched toxically into govt, etc.
Pavlov
10-02-2018, 11:55 AM
lol gentry Breitbart
Spurs Homer
10-02-2018, 12:13 PM
What Kavanaugh actually said about political power was this: “I don’t think we want judges commenting on the latest political controversy because that would ultimately leave people to doubt whether we are independent,”
What he said about whether a president can be subpoenaed is this: Can a sitting president be required to respond to a subpoena? “I can’t give you an answer on that hypothetical question,”
You've successfully morphed two answers into one to fit your narrative.
Ford is not being attacked, but the Democrats have certainly exploited her - including her own attorneys. SHE testified that she would rather have met in private in California, but unless she perjured herself, somehow she didn't know that was on the table. Feinstein wanted anything but for her to remain anonymous. She wanted the (36 year old, uncorroborated allegation without evidence to get AS MUCH TRACTION AND ATTENTION as possible - that is done by behaving exactly as she did.
The Republicans found out about the letter pretty much at the same time as everyone else - when the story was published. How could they rush the nomination before the allegation, when they didn't know it was out there? Once Feinstein got Katz involved, the objective wasn't protecting Ford's anonymity, it was hyper-publicizing her. Again, can you explain how Ford didn't know this could happen without her getting on a scary airplane and in front of the klieg lights?
Just seeing if you can read this.
1) So when he came out with his Trump 2016 election/revenge for Hillary rant - he pretty much made a political statement - meaning he just wanted to dissemble and avoid being truthful when he answered those questions under oath. He is a liar - under oath. When Bill Clinton was dragged through the mud - Kavanaugh sure thought a (D) President could be subpoenaed, amirite? So a liar and a right wing hypocrite.
2) Ford is being attacked - because Republicans are saying through the left side of their mouth that "she is credible" "she suffered" - and through the right side of their mouth - "there is no corroboration" "we believe Kavanaugh" "dems put her up to this" - It is simple - if she is credible - if you believe her - then the other cannot be accurate. So they don't have the balls to attack her directly - but instead they are attacking her credibility with their false claims that the Dems had some master plan. Worse - it was a GOP cover-up from the start so they are choking on their hypocrisy - as are you.
3) Oh we are finding out that they did not find out about the allegations the way they are saying - the 2nd allegation was being challenged by "Brett's team" before the story was revealed. I am willing to bet they also knew about Ford - but we have yet to see that surface - stay tuned. They were hiding documents because they knew there was dirt on Kavanaugh and they hoped they could rush-confirm him BEFORE these allegations surfaced.
4) Ford already knew this would be a shit show - this is why she tried staying out of the limelight. She said she weighed how much she needed to stay hidden vs. how bad it would be to have a sexual assaulter on the SC. She went AGAINST her fear of flying - her aversion to the spotlight - this is called courage - to be scared of flying but still do it when necessary. She admitted that but your red glasses could not see that.
and yet he's still politically driven, based on everything i've read from him. you can float credentials all you want. i can point to comey and mueller having a long illustrious history in law enforcement and you'd still be telling me they were duped and/or coordinated to engineer a witch hunt
i haven't heard her statement tbh. im not going to pretend to know one way or another. but if jason beale says so then you must be right. case closed
You’ve been provided the clip of her interview. Will you listen to it and give your opinion on whether or not you think she’s lying?
lol gentry Breitbart
lol almost NEVER
Pavlov
10-02-2018, 12:37 PM
lol almost NEVERlol you're permanently butthurt
lol you're permanently butthurt
lol projecting
Pavlov
10-02-2018, 12:41 PM
lol projectinglol denial
spurraider21
10-02-2018, 12:47 PM
You’ve been provided the clip of her interview. Will you listen to it and give your opinion on whether or not you think she’s lying?
probably not from work.
i could probably read a transcript or check it out later.
spurraider21
10-02-2018, 12:47 PM
what are they afraid of hiding her medical records
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CpWu98MW8AAfMci.jpg
ElNono (https://www.spurstalk.com/forums/member.php?u=8054)
lol denial
You’ll show me denial right now.
After watching the Swetnick interview do you think she is lying? Yes or no.
probably not from work.
i could probably read a transcript or check it out later.
transcript will do you no good. Check it out later as it needs to watched.
Pavlov
10-02-2018, 12:50 PM
You’ll show me denial right now.
After watching the Swetnick interview do you think she is lying? Yes or no.Didn't watch.
Don't care.
Kavanaugh will be confirmed just like I said.
spurraider21
10-02-2018, 12:51 PM
transcript will do you no good. Check it out later as it needs to watched.
i dont have 30 years experience as an interrogator and strategic debriefer
will i be able to draw any meaningful conclusions, TSA?
Pavlov
10-02-2018, 12:53 PM
i dont have 30 years experience as an interrogator and strategic debriefer
will i be able to draw any meaningful conclusions, TSA?YES OR NO
Didn't watch.
Don't care.
Kavanaugh will be confirmed just like I said.
lol white flag
Pavlov
10-02-2018, 12:55 PM
lol white flaglol MAGA conspiretard
i dont have 30 years experience as an interrogator and strategic debriefer
will i be able to draw any meaningful conclusions, TSA?
None of that is needed to form your own opinion and answer whether or not you think she is lying.
Pavlov
10-02-2018, 12:57 PM
None of that is needed to form your own opinion and answer whether or not you think she is lying.Opinions only matter if you have 30 years' interrogation experience according to you.
clambake
10-02-2018, 01:00 PM
i wonder why trump wants this guy so bad. what could the reason be?
Pavlov
10-02-2018, 01:02 PM
You’ll show me denial right now.
After watching the Swetnick interview do you think she is lying? Yes or no.The larger and actually relevant question is do you think Kavanaugh was being completely truthful during his testimony?
Yes or no.
lol MAGA conspiretard
>women almost NEVER lie about rape allegations
>>I think I found a woman lying about rape allegations what do you think?
>I won’t watch I don’t care
:rollin
Pavlov
10-02-2018, 01:03 PM
>women almost NEVER lie about rape allegations
>>I think I found a woman lying about rape allegations what do you think?
>I won’t watch I don’t care
:rollinAlmost never <> never
The larger and actually relevant question is do you think Kavanaugh was being completely truthful during his testimony?
Yes or no.
CitizenDwayne
10-02-2018, 01:05 PM
i wonder why trump wants this guy so bad. what could the reason be?
Good question. Perhaps his defenders could help spell that out
Almost never <> never
The larger and actually relevant question is do you think Kavanaugh was being completely truthful during his testimony?
Yes or no.
Didn’t watch.
Don’t care.
Kavanaugh will be confirmed just like you said.
Pavlov
10-02-2018, 01:10 PM
Didn’t watch.
Don't care.:lol now you're lying.
It always ends with your flat out lying.
It's just your way.
Unless you truly don't care about a SCOTUS nominee's lying under oath -- which I will also believe since you're a MAGA consrpiretard who actively supports lying and liars.
boutons_deux
10-02-2018, 01:22 PM
Good question. Perhaps his defenders could help spell that out
what I've seen is that their nightmare is Dems gloating over blocking K, as Dem payback for Repugs blocking Gardner.
Head of Federalist Soc says there's nothing special about K and he has dozens of others who could replace him and vote hard right just like K will for the oligarchy for decades.
Trash chose K over the preferences of the Repugs.
now the Repugs are using K
to say FUCK YOU to Dems
to say FUCK YOU to libtards
to say FUCK YOU to #MeToo, femiNazis, all women
clambake
10-02-2018, 01:25 PM
what I've seen is that their nightmare is Dems gloating over blocking K, as Dem payback for Repugs blocking Gardner.
Head of Federalist Soc says there's nothing special about K and he has dozens of others who could replace him and vote hard right just like K will for the oligarchy for decades.
Trash chose K over the preferences of the Repugs.
now the Repugs are using K
to say FUCK YOU to Dems
to say FUCK YOU to libtards
to say FUCK YOU to #MeToo, femiNazis, all women
sure, but there must be something else we're missing.
RandomGuy
10-02-2018, 01:25 PM
what are they afraid of hiding her medical records
What are they afraid of hiding his tax records?
RandomGuy
10-02-2018, 01:26 PM
Didn’t watch.
Don’t care.
Kavanaugh will be confirmed just like you said.
Don't care about the truth. Sounds about right.
RandomGuy
10-02-2018, 01:28 PM
RandomGuy what are your thoughts on Swetnick? I’ve been told women don’t lie about these things.
My understanding:
Democrats overstated what her actual claims were.
She corrected them.
Rapey McKavanaugh probably did something that, if it were known, would easily constitute a felony, but will probably get away with never being charged.
in2deep
10-02-2018, 01:33 PM
Judge Bluto Blutarsky :lol
its a done deal guys
he is such a horrible pick for a judge it gives me nausea thinking about it
but its a done deal. Time to love on. Life will go on
Mikeanaro
10-02-2018, 01:35 PM
sure, but there must be something else we're missing.
He is his new sexual consigliere?
boutons_deux
10-02-2018, 01:37 PM
Judge Bluto Blutarsky :lol
its a done deal guys
he is such a horrible pick for a judge it gives me nausea thinking about it
but its a done deal. Time to love on. Life will go on
Nope, still 3 or 4 Senators in play.
and Flake may still give a retiring "fuck you" to Trash for all the shit Trash has thrown at him, like McCain did with ACA and his funeral.
for the election:
Married Women May Be Moving Away From The GOP
https://www.npr.org/2018/10/02/651439266/married-women-may-be-moving-away-from-the-gop?sc=tw
in2deep
10-02-2018, 01:44 PM
Nope, still 3 or 4 Senators in play.
and Flake may still give a retiring "fuck you" to Trash for all the shit Trash has thrown at him, like McCain did with ACA and his funeral.
for the election:
Married Women May Be Moving Away From The GOP
https://www.npr.org/2018/10/02/651439266/married-women-may-be-moving-away-from-the-gop?sc=tw
They said unless FBI uncovers something big they are all voting yes.
FBI only has 3 days left. Media would immediately know if they found something
My understanding:
Democrats overstated what her actual claims were.
She corrected them.
Rapey McKavanaugh probably did something that, if it were known, would easily constitute a felony, but will probably get away with never being charged.
These are her own claims I’m asking you about. Her claims in the interview I posted. Do you think Swetnick is lying in the interview?
1047171789787467776
What is she afraid of?
ducks
10-02-2018, 02:13 PM
The FBI should investigate the way Google scrubbed all information on Christine Blasey Ford from the internet. That is blatant election meddling
spurraider21
10-02-2018, 02:15 PM
The FBI should investigate the way Google scrubbed all information on Christine Blasey Ford from the internet. That is blatant election meddling
:lmao
ducks
10-02-2018, 02:15 PM
What are they afraid of hiding his tax records?
tax records are not required by law to show
he instead should millions of pages of $ paper more then any one ever in office
boutons_deux
10-02-2018, 02:16 PM
Feinstein is a huge reason Dems can't do shit. Schumer, too.
The report needs to be public, and for those people who want anonymity then their names can be hidden.
ducks
10-02-2018, 02:16 PM
this fight is all about wade vs roe
however 9 would vote not just him
ducks
10-02-2018, 02:17 PM
Fienstein is a huge reason Dems can't do shit. Schumer, too.
The report needs to be public, and for those people who want anonymity then their names can be hidden.
why do you not want the fbi to investigate them
her hiring a chinese dude for 20 years is ?????????
ducks
10-02-2018, 02:18 PM
Fienstein is a huge reason Dems can't do shit. Schumer, too.
The report needs to be public, and for those people who want anonymity then their names can be hidden.
be great if it is it would create a nice red wave
hater
10-02-2018, 02:18 PM
The FBI should investigate the way Google scrubbed all information on Christine Blasey Ford from the internet. That is blatant election meddling
“And if all others accepted the lie which the Party imposed
–if all records told the same tale–then the lie passed into
history and became truth. “Who controls the past,” ran the
Party slogan, “controls the future: who controls the present
controls the past.”…George Orwell, “1984″
ducks
10-02-2018, 02:19 PM
Fienstein is a huge reason Dems can't do shit. Schumer, too.
The report needs to be public, and for those people who want anonymity then their names can be hidden.
I am sure your sanders fellow that spreads the wealth would be much better in charge right????????????????????????????
Imagine Dr Ford was under the perjury trap scenario. She can simply mis-remember things and cross things out as she goes, and change her story to fit the developing narrative.
Odd that it's not a trial but somehow perjury is being discussed.
ElNono
10-02-2018, 02:25 PM
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CpWu98MW8AAfMci.jpg
ElNono (https://www.spurstalk.com/forums/member.php?u=8054)
It's well known Shillary was a zombie kept alive by drugs, young children's blood and controlled by da deep state... Ask Seth Rich what happened when he wanted to let the world know...
These are the things we know, tbh...
boutons_deux
10-02-2018, 02:33 PM
"What happened to me is probably the most horrendous, awful thing that could happen to a human being. My body was violated; my soul was broken [...] I felt like somebody took me and basically said, 'You're worthless. You are nothing to us. You are disposable."
Swetnick also notes that she reported the rape to police;
NBC's Snow says the police department may take up to a month to retrieve a report from 1982.
Swetnick also clarified she doesn't remember whether Kavanaugh or Judge were among those who raped her, but she did say they had been in the same general area of the house: "[Before] this happened to me, at that party, I saw Brett Kavanaugh there."
And about those Quaaludes:
Funny thing!
It turns out a whole bunch of Kavanaugh's buds in high school included hilarious jokes about "Killer Qs" (https://medium.com/@climatebrad/brett-kavanaughs-georgetown-prep-yearbook-explained-1bfea9bc047c) in their yearbook --
one even mentioned the "Killer Q's Club"
right after a line about "Revolving Rooms (Beach Week '82)."
And wouldn't you believe it, those pals were among those Kavanaugh mentioned in his
"what happens at Georgetown Prep stays at Georgetown Prep" speech.
https://www.wonkette.com/nbc-julie-swetnick-interview
hater
10-02-2018, 02:37 PM
1046902559124918272
:lol
:lmao
:lol Avenatti
Hes Trumps strongest weapon tbqh :lmao
hitmanyr2k
10-02-2018, 02:41 PM
Very long read so I know most people on this board who have the attention span of a goldfish won't read it but there's no one else that has written it better.
https://www.currentaffairs.org/2018/09/how-we-know-kavanaugh-is-lying
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CpWu98MW8AAfMci.jpg
ElNono (https://www.spurstalk.com/forums/member.php?u=8054)
#Strongertogether (Hillary and Guy with Diazepam)
hater
10-02-2018, 02:49 PM
This went from assault to excessive drinking and ice throwing real quick :lmao
baseline bum
10-02-2018, 02:56 PM
They said unless FBI uncovers something big they are all voting yes.
That's my expectation, but do you have a source on that?
boutons_deux
10-02-2018, 02:57 PM
Kavanaugh claims he had a sterling reputation at Yale, is immediately shot down by ex-roommate
Life comes at you fast.
his former Yale roommate, James Roche, told the Bay Area ABC affiliate (https://abc7news.com/politics/brett-kavanaughs-yale-roommate-says-he-believes-second-accuser/4330055/) that he believes Ramirez.
“I concluded that although Brett was normally reserved,
he was a notably heavy drinker, even by the standards of the time,
and that he became aggressive and belligerent when he was very drunk,”
Roche told ABC 7.
“I did not observe the specific incident in question, but I do remember
Brett frequently drinking excessively and becoming incoherently drunk.”
Roche said it was
“believable” to him that Kavanaugh was part of a group of men who thought it was fun to torment women.
“I have shared this information with a small number of reporters who reached out to me directly because Debbie has a right to be heard and I believe her.”
https://thinkprogress.org/kavanaugh-fox-news-interview-yale-reputation-ramirez-james-roche-assault-allegation-party-e17377f2f203/
Spurs Homer
10-02-2018, 03:00 PM
Does anyone have a copy of that “magic list” of all those famous guys that were brought down by those lying wicked women with all those false allegations?
Trump says it is a very dangerous time for poor innocent males?
boutons_deux
10-02-2018, 03:03 PM
How is K's
lying to Congress about everything and
his nervous breakdown last Thurs,
not already "big".
If FBI doesn't find a crime, then approve K? :lol
America is fucked and unfuckable
RandomGuy
10-02-2018, 03:04 PM
These are her own claims I’m asking you about. Her claims in the interview I posted. Do you think Swetnick is lying in the interview?
Haven't seen it, so I dont' really have a comment.
easy enough.
boutons_deux
10-02-2018, 03:14 PM
Trump says it 'would not be acceptable' if Kavanaugh lied to Congress
(http://theweek.com/speedreads/799534/trump-says-not-acceptable-kavanaugh-lied-congress)
President Trump seems to have drawn a red line on Brett Kavanaugh.
While speaking to reporters Tuesday afternoon,
Trump reiterated his support for his embattled Supreme Court pick,
saying Kavanaugh's nomination is going "very well." :lol LIE! :lol
But Trump made one thing clear:
If Kavanaugh lied to Congress during his Senate hearing, this "would not be acceptable,"
Trump also said that "I don't think you should lie to Congress"
he hopes it will be a "positive" vote,
what happens will be "dependent on what comes back from the FBI."
http://theweek.com/speedreads/799534/trump-says-not-acceptable-kavanaugh-lied-congress
CitizenDwayne
10-02-2018, 03:27 PM
Very long read so I know most people on this board who have the attention span of a goldfish won't read it but there's no one else that has written it better.
https://www.currentaffairs.org/2018/09/how-we-know-kavanaugh-is-lying
Thanks for sharing, that was a good read
DarrinS
10-02-2018, 03:39 PM
1047208068210155520
SnakeBoy
10-02-2018, 03:41 PM
Very long read so I know most people on this board who have the attention span of a goldfish won't read it but there's no one else that has written it better.
https://www.currentaffairs.org/2018/09/how-we-know-kavanaugh-is-lying
Dayum, he cracked the case!
Dun Dun
LkrFan
10-02-2018, 03:45 PM
1047215210900148227
Pavlov
10-02-2018, 03:50 PM
1047208068210155520"Clearly, there were business purposes [for it], not just ones related to her anxieties."
DEVASTATING
1047171789787467776
What is she afraid of?
What is McConnel afraid of?
https://twitter.com/joncoopertweets/status/1047206718613151745
CosmicCowboy
10-02-2018, 03:53 PM
What is McConnel afraid of?
https://twitter.com/joncoopertweets/status/1047206718613151745
:Lmao
The very thought that some Senators woudn't leak it is ludicrous.
boutons_deux
10-02-2018, 04:01 PM
I figure the FBI report goes to Grassley, who will probably edit the report to get K approved, and Grassley will give his version to the Senators.
K is already proven UNfit, even Trash says so, for lying to Congress now and when up for judge, and for his hilariously pathetic nervous breakdown last Thursday.
LkrFan
10-02-2018, 04:03 PM
1046894898614587397
SnakeBoy
10-02-2018, 04:11 PM
1047215210900148227
Just trying to get his followers back
https://twitchy.com/gregp-3534/2018/09/09/boomerang-resistance-fave-benjamin-wittes-quits-twitter-as-libs-pounce-on-his-pro-kavanaugh-tweets/
ducks
10-02-2018, 04:15 PM
https://scontent-lax3-1.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/fr/cp0/e15/q65/42949776_1936068796441988_9034043719463993344_n.jp g?_nc_cat=1&efg=eyJpIjoidCJ9&oh=be5180187bae5c0c8d6d8b302881fe63&oe=5C256148
ducks
10-02-2018, 04:16 PM
Just trying to get his followers back
https://twitchy.com/gregp-3534/2018/09/09/boomerang-resistance-fave-benjamin-wittes-quits-twitter-as-libs-pounce-on-his-pro-kavanaugh-tweets/did they say how big his bank account grew?
LkrFan
10-02-2018, 04:22 PM
1047228894200389633
:lol
AaronY
10-02-2018, 04:23 PM
Just trying to get his followers back
https://twitchy.com/gregp-3534/2018/09/09/boomerang-resistance-fave-benjamin-wittes-quits-twitter-as-libs-pounce-on-his-pro-kavanaugh-tweets/
Yeah I love twitchy too bro
1040331957907927040
although probably not for the same reasons you do obviously
1047228894200389633
:lol
Ford had a few names as well, none of them recalled anything. Maybe they all had blackouts.
boutons_deux
10-02-2018, 04:26 PM
The ghost of Lindsey Graham makes the case for voting 'no' on perjury-prone Brett Kavanaugh (https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2018/10/2/1800840/-The-ghost-of-Lindsey-Graham-makes-the-case-for-voting-no-on-perjury-prone-Brett-Kavanaugh)
https://images.dailykos.com/images/595500/story_image/graham.png?1538499539
Lindsey Graham, a man who once defended the integrity of our courts over all else, is working his hardest to shove Brett Kavanaugh onto the Supreme Court, despite clear evidence that he has perjured himself over issues large and small.
Lying used to be a disqualifying characteristic for public office according to then Congressman Lindsey Graham.
Here he is making the case to impeach Bill Clinton based on a perjury charge.
‘I have argued to you that when you found that a judge was a perjurer, you couldn’t in good conscience send him back in a courtroom because everybody that came in that courtroom thereafter would have a real serious doubt’— @LindseyGrahamSC (https://twitter.com/LindseyGrahamSC) (January 1999)
https://twitter.com/RetroNewsNow/status/1045702133088178179
LkrFan
10-02-2018, 04:26 PM
Senator Blumenthal, yall:
1047235798570086400
LkrFan
10-02-2018, 04:27 PM
Ford had a few names as well, none of them recalled anything. Maybe they all had blackouts.
:lol
https://scontent-lax3-1.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/fr/cp0/e15/q65/42949776_1936068796441988_9034043719463993344_n.jp g?_nc_cat=1&efg=eyJpIjoidCJ9&oh=be5180187bae5c0c8d6d8b302881fe63&oe=5C256148
br549-exlax3-burpyt-09.wutdafuk/v/dildomuffin-vagina/?
1047208068210155520
Cue the lying under oath arguments.
Senator Blumenthal, yall:
1047235798570086400
Because the Dems weren't communicating behind the scenes to make an accusation.. that's for sure.
Mikeanaro
10-02-2018, 04:36 PM
Because the Dems weren't communicating behind the scenes to make an accusation.. that's for sure.
100% apolitical, I swear on Julie´s life.
Haven't seen it, so I dont' really have a comment.
easy enough.
Are you going to watch it or do you no longer want to discuss false rape allegations?
Because the Dems weren't communicating behind the scenes to make an accusation.. that's for sure.
This was corrected in a later article. He knew that Ramirez was circulating a text or email about him, but he didn't know what the allegation would be. That would make his answer consistent.
That said, you'll be hearing that he is a perjurer and a rapist for the rest of his existence if he is on the court, even if it is completely untrue.
Senator Blumenthal, yall:
1047235798570086400
Jake Tapper, yall:
1047136264162566151
Ford had a few names as well, none of them recalled anything. Maybe they all had blackouts.
Fattie really working over time for rapey over here. I bet you wanna be bent over for some skis, right DMC?
hater
10-02-2018, 05:04 PM
Jake Tapper, yall:
1047136264162566151
Lkrfan everybody :lmao
I dont think you two dummies get his tweet.
He's saying he lied under oath because he clearly knew about her prior to the new Yorker story breaking. :lol
RapeyK said he didn't. That's a lie...under oath.
CosmicCowboy
10-02-2018, 05:13 PM
I dont think you two dummies get his tweet.
He's saying he lied under oath because he clearly knew about her prior to the new Yorker story breaking. :lol
RapeyK said he didn't. That's a lie...under oath.
uhhh ..it was already "broke" if they asked him for comment. Typical Reck to get a hard on over the semantics of whether the story was public or published.
uhhh ..it was already "broke" if they asked him for comment. Typical Reck to get a hard on over the semantics of whether the story was public or published.
Except phone texts show otherwise. :lol weeks before the actual story broke.
Also :lol Blaming the victim for "reaching out."
Why do you people project so much?
FBI Investigation could end as soon as tonight. :lmao
SnakeBoy
10-02-2018, 05:25 PM
Senator Blumenthal, yall:
1047235798570086400
My mother makes $77 hourly at the laptop . She has been laid off for 5 months yet multi month quicker her test become$18713 on a to a wonderful degree key stage coping with the pc for a few hours. try this sit down
HERE☛ w*w*w.j*o*b*s*8*4.c*o*m™
please don't copy "(™)" in url thanks
boutons_deux
10-02-2018, 05:25 PM
Judiciary GOPers Blast Out Claims About Kavanaugh Accuser’s ‘Sexual Preferences’
released a bizarre letter Tuesday from a former TV weatherman in DC recounting his recollections about the “sexual preferences” of a woman who has accused Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh of sexual misconduct.
emphasized excerpts from the letter focused on accuser Julie Swetnick’s alleged past sexual practices and provided a link to the full letter.
The Twitter account (https://twitter.com/senorrinhatch/status/1047225465881202689) for the office of Judiciary Republican Orrin Hatch (UT) also tweeted out the letter, explaining that the sender, now based in Utah, first reached out to Hatch’s office about the “information” last week.
the Judiciary Committee seems to be putting in play the prior sexual activities of self-identified sexual assault victims.
he recalled a conversation with her about her sexual activities in high school.
Swetnick told Ketterer, according to the letter, that she “first tried sex with multiple guys while in high school and still liked it from time-to-time.”
“Julie never said anything about being sexually assaulted, raped, gang-raped or having sex against her will,”
the letter said.
“She never mentioned Brett Kavanaugh in any capacity.”
Ketterer concludes the letter by writing,
“based on my direct experience with Julie, I do not believe her allegations against Mr. Kavanaugh.”
https://talkingpointsmemo.com/dc/judiciary-gopers-blast-out-claims-about-kavanaugh-accusers-sexual-preferences?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A%20tpm-news%20%28TPMNews%29
Repugs are this absolutely sure this MALE is telling the truth, but all the FEMALES are lying.
https://twitter.com/kylegriffin1/status/1047251162997710849
Legit 2 days long investigation. :tu
SnakeBoy
10-02-2018, 05:30 PM
https://twitter.com/kylegriffin1/status/1047251162997710849
Legit 2 days long investigation. :tu
FBI bad now
ducks
10-02-2018, 05:32 PM
Have 5000 agents
Also nothing there no need to do more
FBI bad now
Never said they were either.
I dont blame them honestly. giving them a week to conduct an investigation that surely would have produced more leads and witnesses was always doom for failure.
I mean, they won't even interview the two key people in this. :lol
ElNono
10-02-2018, 05:36 PM
Can't wait to hear if FBI good or bad now, tbh...
hater
10-02-2018, 05:41 PM
:cry but but he threw ice in a bar :cry
hater
10-02-2018, 05:43 PM
CNN already moved on back to Trumps taxes :lmao :lol
CNN already moved on back to Trumps taxes :lmao :lol
Tax fraud good now?
:cry but but he threw ice in a bar :cry
Correction: He may have thrown ice.
Tax fraud good now?
Usually it's not good to make assumptions without evidence, but with Trump, it's usually pretty safe to assume things like his tax records show all kinds of stuff.
Fattie really working over time for rapey over here. I bet you wanna be bent over for some skis, right DMC?
At least if I bend over, Mr Winky doesn't come plopping out of my tuck zone like it does with you.
Can't wait to hear if FBI good or bad now, tbh...
For half the country it will vindicate Kavanaugh. For the other half, it will be a worthless report because (1) Trump limited scope; (2) not enough time; and (3) didn't talk to every witness (people will come out and say "I have info on Kavanaugh, but they never interviewed me"). End of the day, if you are GOP, you say it's good so you can have your vote and if DEM, then any "valid" report must conclude Kavanaugh is a rapist drug gang banger.
This was corrected in a later article. He knew that Ramirez was circulating a text or email about him, but he didn't know what the allegation would be. That would make his answer consistent.
That said, you'll be hearing that he is a perjurer and a rapist for the rest of his existence if he is on the court, even if it is completely untrue.
My give a fuck has diminished with the rise of the snowflake. I just laugh at them. When Matt Damon or anyone on SNL parodies them, when CNN and other liberal sources pretend Armageddon is upon us, I know we're doing something right.
Spurs Homer
10-02-2018, 05:57 PM
CNN showing a letter that Kavanaugh wrote in 1983 - self describing his crew as obnoxious drunks...
Kavanaugh signed the letter as..."bart"
:lol:lol
he also (under oath) lied about being referred to as Bart O Kavanaugh
Pavlov
10-02-2018, 05:58 PM
My give a fuck has diminished with the rise of the snowflake. I just laugh at them. When Matt Damon or anyone on SNL parodies them, when CNN and other liberal sources pretend Armageddon is upon us, I know we're doing something right.:lol "we"
Mikeanaro
10-02-2018, 06:01 PM
Bart O Kavanaugh
https://i.ytimg.com/vi/zUrGAguaNqk/hqdefault.jpg
Spurs Homer
10-02-2018, 06:01 PM
My give a fuck has diminished with the rise of the snowflake. I just laugh at them. When Matt Damon or anyone on SNL parodies them, when CNN and other liberal sources pretend Armageddon is upon us, I know we're doing something right.
Except that the biggest snowflakes are Trump and his angry white men.
Being born in the USA on third base - makes it really hard to live and every brown or black or gay or tranny or immigrant person just has so many advantages over your snowflake sissy asses :lol:lol
At least if I bend over, Mr Winky doesn't come plopping out of my tuck zone like it does with you.
Weird thing to think about from you. Weird and obssesive imagery.
Wouldn't surprised me one bit if you did some burlesque draggy queen homo stuff behind closed doors. You seem to know a lot about it.
https://twitter.com/kylegriffin1/status/1047251162997710849
Legit 2 days long investigation. :tu
It takes minimal time for the witnesses to repeat to the FBI that they can’t corroborate Ford’s account
Spurs Homer
10-02-2018, 06:02 PM
Wierd thing to think about from you. Wierd and obssesive imagery.
Wouldn't surprised me one bit if you did some burlesque draggy queen homo stuff behind closed doors. You seem to know a lot about it.
You think someone would hire someone with yellow obese hands? :lol:lol
AaronY
10-02-2018, 06:03 PM
FBI bad now
And for you guys: FBI good now
AaronY
10-02-2018, 06:04 PM
Hurr durr dis a funnest game
You think someone would hire someone with yellow obese hands? :lol:lol
Everyone has a fetish I guess. No knuckles, yellow obese having hands qualifies as one I suppose.
Spurminator
10-02-2018, 06:06 PM
When Matt Damon or anyone on SNL parodies them, when CNN and other liberal sources pretend Armageddon is upon us, I know we're doing something right.
Big Sarah Palin fan?
DarrinS
10-02-2018, 06:06 PM
It takes minimal time for the witnesses to repeat to the FBI that they can’t corroborate Ford’s account
SnakeBoy
10-02-2018, 06:08 PM
The New York Times Preparing Hit Piece On Brett Kavanaugh For Party Planning
https://thefederalist.com/2018/10/02/new-york-times-preparing-hit-piece-on-brett-kavanaugh-for-party-planning/
Spurs Homer
10-02-2018, 06:10 PM
Everyone has a fetish I guess. No knuckles, yellow obese having hands qualifies as one I suppose.
:lol:lol
I'll skip dinner now - thanks for the visual!
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.5 Copyright © 2026 vBulletin Solutions Inc. All rights reserved.