Brett Kavanaugh now under FBI investigation

[boutons_deux]

Dozens of 'serious' conduct complaints against Justice Brett Kavanaugh are dismissed because he was confirmed to the Supreme Court



Federal judges reviewing complaints lodged against Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh said Tuesday that

the allegations against the former federal appeals court judge are "serious."



But they ruled that it must dismiss them without determining their merits because of Kavanaugh's October confirmation by the U.S. Senate.
Judge Timothy Tymkovich wrote that "the complaints must be dismissed because an intervening event — Justice Kavanaugh's confirmation to the Supreme Court — has made the complaints no longer appropriate for consideration under the [Judicial Conduct and Disability Act]."


https://i.amz.mshcdn.com/Vnj-WYf4f9a_tj_VnUNO7OGHhjo=/950x534/filters:quality(90)/https%3A%2F%2Fblueprint-api-production.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fuploads%2Fcard%2Fima ge%2F853904%2Ffb4cf226-6daa-42b7-b177-be7dbeabee93.jpg


most of the complaints include allegations of

false statements under oath during Kavanaugh's D.C. Circuit confirmation hearings in 2004 and 2006 as well as during his Supreme Court confirmation hearings earlier this year.

Kavanaugh, President Donald Trump's second nominee to the top court, was accused of sexual misconduct before he was confirmed.

Kavanaugh "falsely testified about his personal conduct, behavior, and recollection of events" prior to joining the federal judiciary and thar

he "displayed partisan bias and lack of judicial temperament."

he castigated Democrats for holding up his nomination because they were "fueled with apparent pent-up anger about President Trump and the 2016 election" and seeking "revenge on behalf of the Clintons."

"he did not display the impartiality and judicial temperament requisite to sit on the highest court of our land."

Tymkovich, a George W. Bush appointee, declined to recuse himself from the probe into Kavanaugh after a complaint was filed requesting that he do so.

https://www.cnbc.com/2018/12/18/dozens-of-complaints-against-brett-kavanaugh-dismissed.html

So this binge-drinking, pussy-grabbing, incorrigible SERIOUS-LIAR-UNDER-FEDERAL-OATH PIECE CATHOLIC REPUG SHIT is now a crapifying hard-right-asshole in SCOTUS robes.

And remember that equally POS Roberts sat on these complaints until after K was ramrodded onto SCOTUS

[CosmicCowboy]

:lmao @ Boo's butthurt whining about Kavanaugh still. Fucking hilarious.

[Winehole23]

You've been whining about Hillary since the mid 1990s.

[CosmicCowboy]

You've been whining about Hillary since the mid 1990s.

LOL. Hillary is just a pathetic footnote in history. She just hasn't realized it yet.

[spurraider21]

LOL. Hillary is just a pathetic footnote in history. She just hasn't realized it yet.
neither have any conservatives in government, the media, or on this board

[Pavlov]

neither have any conservatives in government, the media, or on this board:lol She'll be their go-to *DING* for decades to come.

[boutons_deux]

I filed one of the 83 dismissed misconduct complaints against Brett Kavanaugh. Here’s why.

Larry Behrendt practiced law for more than 30 years in New York and California.

dismissed 83 judicial misconduct complaints filed against Brett M. Kavanaugh (https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/legal-issues/judiciary-dismisses-serious-misconduct-complaints-against-brett-m-kavanaugh/2018/12/18/f55416b0-0301-11e9-b6a9-0aa5c2fcc9e4_story.html?utm_term=.fa6088e35620) in connection with his nomination to the Supreme Court.

The identities of the complainers have been kept secret, but nothing prevents them from coming forward.

I am coming forward. I’m one of those 83 complainers.

Kavanaugh alleged (without factual basis) that

he was the victim of a vast, secret, left-wing cabal,

masterminded by senators such as Dianne Feinstein (https://www.mcclatchydc.com/news/politics-government/justice/supreme-court/article219064835.html) (D-Calif.)

and

motivated by “revenge on behalf of the Clintons (https://thehill.com/homenews/senate/408821-kavanaugh-says-hes-victim-of-revenge-on-behalf-of-the-clintons).”

I was shocked to hear a Supreme Court nominee carry on like a crazed conspiracy theorist.

Turns out, there’s a rule against federal judges behaving like this.

Congress passed the Judicial Conduct and Disability Act in 1980, and the rules under that act state that

it’s misconduct (http://www.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/guide-vol02e-ch03.pdf) for a federal judge to make “inappropriately partisan statements.”

I may be retired, but I think I know an inappropriately partisan statement when I hear one.

dismissal (http://www.uscourts.gov/courts/ca10/10-18-90038-et-al.O.pdf) of the 83 complaints on Dec. 18, explaining its decision roughly as follows:

(1) The 1980 act applies to circuit judges but not Supreme Court justices,

(2) Kavanaugh was a D.C. Circuit Court judge during his confirmation hearings and when I filed my complaint, but

(3) he’s a Supreme Court justice now.

Evidently a circuit judge nominated to the Supreme Court can be held responsible for his partisan misconduct before the Senate,

so long as the Senate fails to confirm the nominee.

But if the nominee wins the approval of a partisan Senate, then his inappropriate partisanship is excused.

This reasoning doesn’t make sense to me. It’s like saying we can prosecute a safecracker only if the safe proved to be empty.

the Judicial Council skipped around relevant commentary stating that (http://www.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/guide-vol02e-ch03.pdf)

“as long as the subject of a complaint performs judicial duties, a complaint alleging judicial conduct must be addressed.”

The 1980 act assigned to the courts a responsibility to address judges who engage in misconduct, and the 10th Circuit Judicial Council read the act looking for a way out.

It appears that federal judges can indeed make inappropriately partisan statements,

so long as they are important judges with powerful partisan friends.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/i-filed-one-of-the-83-dismissed-misconduct-complaints-against-brett-kavanaugh-heres-why/2018/12/30/a1ecf1da-0a19-11e9-88e3-989a3e456820_story.html?utm_term=.7697eb7df9bd&wpisrc=nl_most&wpmm=1

So in fact, Man IS above the law,

if wealthy enough,

and/or connected enough and/or

in a profession that protects its worst, even criminal members

I expect that Roberts, who had alread sat on the complaints, colluded with the 10th Circuit (making sure Repug-appointed judges included) to excuse shitbag K from his judicial misconduct on the Federal bench

[DarrinS]

^

https://www.bingeclock.com/memes/seinfeld___good_luck_with_all_that.jpg

[boutons_deux]

"It hit me like a ton of bricks

when I saw this week that Susan Collins received $1.8 million in donations

after voting to confirm Brett Kavanaugh to the Supreme Court—

by far the most she's ever raised in a quarter."

... from Robert Reich/MoveOn email

and remember how Paul Ryan or his PAC received $500K after passing the Oligarchy's Tax Cut?

[boutons_deux]

Brett Kavanaugh Shows How Eager He Is to Tear Down the Wall Between Church and State

in 2017, the U.S. Supreme Court

flipped the First Amendment on its head (https://www.scotusblog.com/2017/06/symposium-crumbling-wall-separating-church-state/) by ruling, for the first time ever, that

the Constitution sometimes requires the government to provide public funds directly to a church.

Its decision (https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/16pdf/15-577_khlp.pdf) in Trinity Lutheran v. Comer blew a chunk (https://www.scotusblog.com/2017/06/symposium-bad-news-trinity-lutheran-two-justices-support-establishment-clause/) out of the wall between church and state.

And on Monday, Justice Brett

Kavanaugh announced (https://www.supremecourt.gov/orders/courtorders/030419zor_d1pf.pdf) his intention to demolish the remainder of that wall by invalidating laws that bar government subsidization of religion.

On Monday, Kavanaugh vindicated Sotomayor’s fears by seizing upon a case called

Morris County Board of Chosen Freeholders v. Freedom From Religion Foundation.

In Morris County, 12 churches sought to help restore their facilities with historic preservation funds provided by the county.

But the New Jersey Constitution, like the Missouri Constitution, bars direct aid to religion, and a taxpayer, represented by FFRF, sued to enforce this provision.

“the public funds awarded in this case” would go toward “religious uses.”

Indeed,

the funds in question would help the church “conduct worship services” and

“repair religious imagery.”

New Jersey taxpayers, the court held, cannot possibly be obligated to subsidize the literal exercise of religion.

Kavanaugh wrote separately to condemn New Jersey’s “pure discrimination against religion.” :lol

In his view,

“prohibiting historic preservation grants to religious organizations simply because the organizations are religious would raise serious questions under this Court’s precedents and the Constitution’s fundamental guarantee of equality.”

Eventually, Kavanaugh wrote,

the court should affirm the “bedrock principle of religious equality” ":lol

by striking down laws that restrict states’ ability to preserve houses of worship with taxpayer dollars. Justices Samuel Alito and Neil Gorsuch joined his opinion.

https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2019/03/kavanaugh-separation-church-state-morris-county.html

America is CLEARLY not now, or ever was, a democracy, is tending towards authoritarianism and Christian theocracy.

[boutons_deux]

The oligarchy buys whatever it wants, and America is for sale, has been for decades, and is extremely cheap with a unimaginable ROI.

$22 Million In Dark Money Behind Kavanaugh Nomination

the Judicial Crisis Network, a conservative secretive dark money group received $22 million from anonymous donors (https://www.opensecrets.org/news/2019/05/dark-money-group-funded-by-17million-mystery-donor-before-kavanaugh/#utm_source=twitter&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=twitt_dark-money-17m-kavanaugh-051719) in the year leading up to the Tump administration and conservatives’ push to place Brett Kavanaugh on the U.S. Supreme Court.

A full $17 million of that $22 million came from one anonymous donor.

“The Judicial Crisis Network (JCN), a Washington, D.C.-based nonprofit, pledged to spend (https://www.apnews.com/91c58df540884d698ceb35a529c34b08) as much as $10 million to ensure Kavanaugh’s confirmation — the same amount that it spent (https://web.archive.org/web/20170705003230/https://judicialnetwork.com/judicial-crisis-network-launches-10-million-campaign-preserve-justice-scalias-legacy-support-president-elect-trump-nominee/) to help confirm Justice Neil Gorsuch in 2017,”

“JCN has close ties (https://www.thedailybeast.com/the-secrets-of-leonard-leo-the-man-behind-trumps-supreme-court-pick?ref=scroll) to Trump’s judicial adviser Leonard Leo, a longtime executive at the Federalist Society, the influential conservative and libertarian lawyers network based in Washington, D.C.”

“Wellspring has continued to send massive annual endowments (https://www.opensecrets.org/news/2017/03/wellsprings-dark-money-crucial-to-trump-orbit/) to JCN since the group launched (https://www.opensecrets.org/news/2018/09/kavanaugh-confirmation-dark-money/) in 2005.

JCN, in turn, has continued to pour tens of millions of dollars (https://www.opensecrets.org/news/2018/10/only-a-fraction-of-dark-money-spending-on-kavanaugh-disclosed/) into every subsequent Supreme Court nomination fight and working to reshape the judiciary.

Wellspring reported donating almost $15 million (https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/5299936-Wellspring-Committee-2017-990.html) to JCN in 2017, on top of $23.5 million (https://maplight.org/story/tax-returns-identify-dark-money-organization-as-source-of-gop-supreme-court-attacks/) in 2016.

Neither organization discloses the sources of its funds.”

https://www.nationalmemo.com/report-22-million-in-dark-money-behind-kavanaugh-nomination/ (https://www.nationalmemo.com/report-22-million-in-dark-money-behind-kavanaugh-nomination/)

[boutons_deux]

House Democrats seek Supreme Court Justice Kavanaugh's records

Two Democrats on the U.S. House Judiciary Committee, including the panel’s chairman, asked the National Archives on Tuesday for records from Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh’s service in the White House under former President George W. Bush.

they were seeking records from 2001 to 2006 that include

documents unavailable during Kavanaugh’s 2018 Senate confirmation,

which was dominated by allegations of sexual misconduct.

Nadler and Johnson said the Senate Judiciary Committee voted to recommend Kavanaugh’s confirmation to the full Senate after reviewing only a fraction of his White House records.

Nadler and Johnson said they wanted records from Kavanaugh’s service in the White House counsel’s office from 2001 to 2003 and as White House staff secretary from 2003 to 2006. The list includes Kavanaugh’s emails and office file textual records from his stint as staff secretary.

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-court-kavanaugh/house-democrats-seek-supreme-court-justice-kavanaughs-records-idUSKCN1UW2E5?feedType=RSS&feedName=politicsNews&utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+Reuters%2FPoliticsNews+%28Reu ters+Politics+News%29 (https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-court-kavanaugh/house-democrats-seek-supreme-court-justice-kavanaughs-records-idUSKCN1UW2E5?feedType=RSS&feedName=politicsNews&utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+Reuters%2FPoliticsNews+%28Reu ters+Politics+News%29)

House Dems should impeach K and then vote to find him guilty, eg, of lying to Congress during confirmation to his earlier Federal judgeship. They may even find that he lied to the Senate for his SCOTUS confirmation.

Wimpy, creepy little privileged fuckoff loser

[DMC]

House Democrats seek Supreme Court Justice Kavanaugh's records

Two Democrats on the U.S. House Judiciary Committee, including the panel’s chairman, asked the National Archives on Tuesday for records from Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh’s service in the White House under former President George W. Bush.

they were seeking records from 2001 to 2006 that include

documents unavailable during Kavanaugh’s 2018 Senate confirmation,

which was dominated by allegations of sexual misconduct.

Nadler and Johnson said the Senate Judiciary Committee voted to recommend Kavanaugh’s confirmation to the full Senate after reviewing only a fraction of his White House records.

Nadler and Johnson said they wanted records from Kavanaugh’s service in the White House counsel’s office from 2001 to 2003 and as White House staff secretary from 2003 to 2006. The list includes Kavanaugh’s emails and office file textual records from his stint as staff secretary.

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-court-kavanaugh/house-democrats-seek-supreme-court-justice-kavanaughs-records-idUSKCN1UW2E5?feedType=RSS&feedName=politicsNews&utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+Reuters%2FPoliticsNews+%28Reu ters+Politics+News%29 (https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-court-kavanaugh/house-democrats-seek-supreme-court-justice-kavanaughs-records-idUSKCN1UW2E5?feedType=RSS&feedName=politicsNews&utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+Reuters%2FPoliticsNews+%28Reu ters+Politics+News%29)

House Dems should impeach K and then vote to find him guilty, eg, of lying to Congress during confirmation to his earlier Federal judgeship. They may even find that he lied to the Senate for his SCOTUS confirmation.

Wimpy, creepy little privileged fuckoff loser








You need to be investigated you fucking idiot.

[Chris]

another djohn special :lol

[Winehole23]

neither have any conservatives in government, the media, or on this boardBoard conservatives ostensibly still thirsty for HRC. Does not cease from their mouths years after she became a political dead duck.

[Winehole23]

Her folklorical significance has survived her political career, for better and for worse.

[Chris]

Those crazy Conservatives still want justice 3 years later. What a fiasco.

[Thread]

House Democrats seek Supreme Court Justice Kavanaugh's records

Two Democrats on the U.S. House Judiciary Committee, including the panel’s chairman, asked the National Archives on Tuesday for records from Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh’s service in the White House under former President George W. Bush.

they were seeking records from 2001 to 2006 that include

documents unavailable during Kavanaugh’s 2018 Senate confirmation,

which was dominated by allegations of sexual misconduct.

Nadler and Johnson said the Senate Judiciary Committee voted to recommend Kavanaugh’s confirmation to the full Senate after reviewing only a fraction of his White House records.

Nadler and Johnson said they wanted records from Kavanaugh’s service in the White House counsel’s office from 2001 to 2003 and as White House staff secretary from 2003 to 2006. The list includes Kavanaugh’s emails and office file textual records from his stint as staff secretary.

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-court-kavanaugh/house-democrats-seek-supreme-court-justice-kavanaughs-records-idUSKCN1UW2E5?feedType=RSS&feedName=politicsNews&utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+Reuters%2FPoliticsNews+%28Reu ters+Politics+News%29 (https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-court-kavanaugh/house-democrats-seek-supreme-court-justice-kavanaughs-records-idUSKCN1UW2E5?feedType=RSS&feedName=politicsNews&utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+Reuters%2FPoliticsNews+%28Reu ters+Politics+News%29)

House Dems should impeach K and then vote to find him guilty, eg, of lying to Congress during confirmation to his earlier Federal judgeship. They may even find that he lied to the Senate for his SCOTUS confirmation.

Wimpy, creepy little privileged fuckoff loser








Is Kavanaugh the Merritt Garland Justice, or, is Such the Merritt Garland Justice?

LMFAO! & people say, I say, people say we don't do wet work. tee, hee.

[Winehole23]

Those crazy Conservatives still want justice 3 years later. What a fiasco.Justice for what/whom?

Isn't it enough to have hastened her retirement from politics?

[boutons_deux]

Why House Democrats Are Demanding Brett Kavanaugh’s Records

What do we expect to get from these documents? First and foremost, Kavanaugh’s full views on abortion, which remain hidden as long as his records do.

these are not normal times.
So instead of allowing for, or insisting upon, a thorough vetting of Kavanaugh prior to his confirmation (https://rewire.news/article/2018/10/06/brett-kavanaugh-confirmed-by-senate-creating-conservative-supreme-court-majority/),

Senate Republicans conducted a sham process that deprived the American people of 92 percent of Kavanaugh’s records

—and of answers to still-burning

questions about whether he is ultimately fit to serve on the U.S. Supreme Court.

a mere fraction of Kavanaugh’s records (https://www.huffpost.com/entry/brett-kavanaugh-investigation_n_5d49d56ce4b01ae816c9c6a4)—just 415,084 (https://www.judiciary.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/2018-08-31%20Burck%20to%20Grassley%20-%20Accounting%20of%20Kavanaugh%20WHCO%20Records.pd f)of the estimated 3.85 million total pages (https://www.archives.gov/news/topics/kavanaugh-records) of documents—from the George W. Bush administration.

The documents it was able to review were

provided by Bush’s personal lawyer

instead of by the nonpartisan professionals at the National Archives and Records Administration.


As a result, the only records seen by the Senate Judiciary Committee were

hand-picked and screened by the same lawyer who represents the likes of Don McGahn, Reince Priebus, and Steve Bannon (https://www.vox.com/2018/9/4/17819062/bill-burck-kavanaugh-explained)

—and only a subset of that limited, partisan production was made available to the public.

The National Archives itself did not provide a single page of records from Kavanaugh’s service in the White House.

a majority of the American public is still acutely skeptical of Kavanaugh and is eager for such review.

A recent poll found that 58 percent of respondents (https://www.thedailybeast.com/progressive-group-goes-after-jerry-nadler-but-not-impeachment) think the National Archives should release the hidden Kavanaugh documents.

President Trump repeatedly promised (https://www.cnbc.com/2016/10/19/trump-ill-appoint-supreme-court-justices-to-overturn-roe-v-wade-abortion-case.html) on the campaign trail that Roe would be overturned “automatically” once he had his choice of justices on the Court.

The public’s faith in the independence of the judiciary depends on the impartiality of judges and justices.

the public deserves an opportunity to review Kavanaugh’s full record to determine when his impartiality should be questioned and

when he should be expected to recuse himself.

to get answers about whether

Kavanaugh lied under oath when he testified before the Senate Judiciary Committee in 2004, 2006, and 2018.

During all three hearings, Kavanaugh seemed to lie about issues large and small (https://medium.com/@demandjustice/kavanaugh-29-lies-and-counting-69ab6dee833d),

from whether he was involved in the confirmation of controversial judges (https://www.vox.com/2018/9/6/17828378/brett-kavanaugh-confirmation-perjury-pryor)

to whether he knew he was using documents that had been stolen from a Democratic staffer’s computer (https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/leahy-says-kavanaugh-was-not-truthful-about-democratic-documents/2018/09/07/babfb4aa-b2d9-11e8-a20b-5f4f84429666_story.html).

The complete set of records from his time in the George W. Bush White House should shed light on these issues and settle, once and for all,

whether the most junior justice of the United States Supreme Court perjured himself in the process of achieving that position.

There is no way to fully undo the damage that has been done to the legitimacy of the Supreme Court,

but House Democrats have an opportunity to expose the true Kavanaugh to the U.S. public.

It’s a great first step, and we’re glad they’re taking it.

https://rewire.news/article/2019/08/12/why-house-dems-demanding-kavanaughs-records/

[boutons_deux]

‘Barr politicizes everything’: Ex prosecutors rip Trump’s AG for honoring Brett Kavanaugh lawyers

Attorney General William Barr was blasted by former DOJ prosecutors after announcing a controversial choice of recipients of the Department of Justice’s distinguished service award.

“The Justice Department will present one of its

most prestigious awards to the lawyers who worked on the highly contentious Supreme Court nomination process of Judge Brett M. Kavanaugh,”

“Next month, Attorney General William P. Barr will present the Attorney General’s Award for Distinguished Service to those who worked ‘to support the nomination’ of the judge,

Typically, the distinguished service honor, the department’s second-highest,

is given to employees who worked on significant prosecutions, rather than on judicial nomination processes,”

“This prestigious award typically goes to prosecutors who
make the biggest cases against
terrorists,
corrupt politicians,
drug cartels,
organized crime enterprises, etc.”

“And now AG Barr is using it to honor… Team Kavanaugh.”

https://www.rawstory.com/2019/09/barr-politicizes-everything-ex-prosecutors-rip-trumps-ag-for-honoring-brett-kavanaugh-lawyers/ (https://www.rawstory.com/2019/09/barr-politicizes-everything-ex-prosecutors-rip-trumps-ag-for-honoring-brett-kavanaugh-lawyers/)

[TSA]

'I’m glad Brett was confirmed': Blasey Ford's father supported Kavanaugh confirmation

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/im-glad-brett-was-confirmed-blasey-fords-father-supported-kavanaugh-confirmation

:lmao

[boutons_deux]

Brett Kavanaugh Fit In With the Privileged Kids. She Did Not.

she says, a freshman named Brett Kavanaugh pulled down his pants and thrust his penis at her, prompting her to swat it away and inadvertently touch it.

It was the nadir of her first year, when she often felt insufficiently rich, experienced or savvy to mingle with her more privileged classmates.

https://static01.nyt.com/images/2019/09/15/opinion/15pogrebinkelly2/15pogrebinkelly2-articleLarge.jpg?quality=75&auto=webp&disable=upscale

“I had gone through high school, I’m the good girl, and now, in one evening, it was all ripped away,”

By preying upon her in this way, she added, Mr. Kavanaugh and his friends “make it clear I’m not smart.”

Ms. Ramirez’s story could be more fully corroborated. During his Senate testimony,

Mr. Kavanaugh said that if the incident Ms. Ramirez described had occurred, it would have been “the talk of campus.”

Our reporting suggests that it was.

At least seven people, including Ms. Ramirez’s mother, heard about the Yale incident long before Mr. Kavanaugh was a federal judge.

Two of those people were classmates who learned of it just days after the party occurred,

suggesting that it was discussed among students at the time.

We also uncovered a previously unreported story about Mr. Kavanaugh in his freshman year that echoes Ms. Ramirez’s allegation.

A classmate, Max Stier, saw Mr. Kavanaugh with his pants down at a different drunken dorm party, where friends pushed his penis into the hand of a female student.

Mr. Stier, who runs a nonprofit organization in Washington, notified senators and the F.B.I. about this account, but

the F.B.I. did not investigate and Mr. Stier has declined to discuss it publicly.

(We corroborated the story with two officials who have communicated with Mr. Stier.)

Mr. Kavanaugh did not speak to us because we could not agree on terms for an interview. But he has denied Dr. Ford’s and Ms. Ramirez’s allegations, and declined to answer our questions about Mr. Stier’s account.

People called her Debbie Cheerleader or Debbie Dining Hall or would start to say

“Debbie does … ” playing on the 1978 porn movie “Debbie Does Dallas.” But Ms. Ramirez didn’t understand the reference.

It wasn’t until she got a call from a reporter and saw her account of Mr. Kavanaugh described as “sexual misconduct” in The New Yorker that Ms. Ramirez understood it as anything more than one of many painful encounters at Yale.

Ms. Ramirez’s legal team gave the F.B.I. a list of at least 25 individuals who may have had corroborating evidence.

But the bureau — in its supplemental background investigation —

interviewed none of them,

though we learned many of these potential witnesses tried in vain to reach the F.B.I. on their own.

Two F.B.I. agents interviewed Ms. Ramirez, telling her that they found her “credible.” But the

Republican-controlled Senate had imposed strict limits on the investigation. “‘We have to wait to get authorization to do anything else,’”

“I would view the Ramirez allegations as not having been even remotely investigated.” Other Democrats agreed.

Senator Charles E. Grassley (https://www.grassley.senate.gov/news/news-releases/supplemental-fbi-investigation-executive-summary), :lol Republican of Iowa :lol and chairman of the Judiciary Committee,

concluded, “There is no corroboration of the allegations made by Dr. Ford or Ms. Ramirez.”

Ms. Ramirez came to feel supported by the very Yale community from which she had once felt so alienated.

More than 3,000 Yale women signed an open letter (https://medium.com/@yalewomenforwomen/open-letter-from-women-of-yale-in-support-of-deborah-ramirez-685bf4bb84f0) commending her “courage in coming forward.”

More than 1,500 Yale men issued a similar letter two days later.

https://www.nytimes.com/2019/09/14/sunday-review/brett-kavanaugh-deborah-ramirez-yale.html?fbclid=IwAR141nXDIb2C9CLR_XSgQ1iAQM_M4tv 5Jfdk9mow0EBjr05UKyLJrnldLGM#click=https://t.co/k6L6j4Qd1c (https://www.nytimes.com/2019/09/14/sunday-review/brett-kavanaugh-deborah-ramirez-yale.html?fbclid=IwAR141nXDIb2C9CLR_XSgQ1iAQM_M4tv 5Jfdk9mow0EBjr05UKyLJrnldLGM#click=https://t.co/k6L6j4Qd1c)

Then add in K has been caught LYING to Congress in the earlier Federal judge nomination.

Repugs CRAPIFYING Congress and SCOTUS and USA, ANYTHING for power and money. aka, FUCK AMERICA

[spurraider21]

'I’m glad Brett was confirmed': Blasey Ford's father supported Kavanaugh confirmation

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/im-glad-brett-was-confirmed-blasey-fords-father-supported-kavanaugh-confirmation

:lmao
yeah hilarious.

you're a father.

imagine little TSA claims to have been sexually assaulted/raped but you go cheering on the accused's career advancement in public :lmao

[TSA]

yeah hilarious.

you're a father.

imagine little TSA claims to have been sexually assaulted/raped but you go cheering on the accused's career advancement in public :lmao

I am a father, and a father knows better than anyone if their child is a lying cunt.

[spurraider21]

I am a father, and a father knows better than anyone if their child is a lying cunt.
Yup. Go on publicly applauding the career advancement of the person she claims raped her :tu

[ducks]

People claim things that are not true
FBI who hates republicans found nothing

[ducks]

Biden claimed during the debate he was Vice President
Does not make him Mike Pence is!

[TSA]

Yup. Go on publicly applauding the career advancement of the person she claims raped her :tu

He knows his daughter is full of shit. Good for him.

[spurraider21]

He knows his daughter is full of shit. Good for him.
did ford's dad say his daughter was a lying cunt and full of shit?

yeah and i'm sure you'll put yourself down as a job reference for hamzeh when your daughter tells you she was raped by a muslim

[TSA]

did ford's dad say his daughter was a lying cunt and full of shit?

yeah and i'm sure you'll put yourself down as a job reference for hamzeh when your daughter tells you she was raped by a muslim

He didn’t need to say it, his actions tell all.

[ElNono]

did ford's dad say his daughter was a lying cunt and full of shit?

yeah and i'm sure you'll put yourself down as a job reference for hamzeh when your daughter tells you she was raped by a muslim

you're not connecting dem dots, tbh

[Spurminator]

Sounds like a really close father daughter relationship, I'm sure she confided everything to him.

[boutons_deux]

Imagine TSA's kids will be a as fucked up as he is, extremist right wing, misogynist, brain-washed conspiracists

otoh, I do know people who saw the sickness of their parent(s) and in reaction went wonderfully in the other direction, to their and everyone's benefit

[Pavlov]

Sounds like a really close father daughter relationship, I'm sure she confided everything to him.The only time fathers are ever assholes to their daughters is when the daughters are lying hussies.

That's just science.

[boutons_deux]

Internet hilariously piles on Trump for botched ‘suing for liable’ Kavanaugh defense: ‘It’s libel, Mr. Stable Genius’

https://www.rawstory.com/2019/09/internet-hilariously-piles-on-trump-for-botched-suing-for-liable-kavanaugh-defense-its-libel-mr-stable-genius/?utm_source=&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=1457

Trash is functionally illiterate

[boutons_deux]

Kamala Harris blisters Kavanaugh for lying to her during his hearings and calls for him to be impeached

“I sat through those hearings. Brett Kavanaugh lied to the U.S. Senate and most importantly to the American people.

He was put on the Court through a sham process

and his place on the Court is an insult to the pursuit of truth and justice. He must be impeached,” she tweeted.

https://www.rawstory.com/2019/09/kamala-harris-blisters-kavanaugh-for-lying-to-her-during-his-hearings-and-calls-for-him-to-be-impeached/?utm_source=&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=1457

K also LIED in his confirmation statements to the Senate

Will the eternally feckless Dems vote to impeach K and Barr for blatant and serious lying?

[TSA]

Sounds like a really close father daughter relationship, I'm sure she confided everything to him.

He’d only need to watch a few minutes of her testimony to know she was lying.

It’s truly amazing to know that people still believe her story after watching her publicly testify. None of her immediate family even supported her after that.

[boutons_deux]

Republicans accused of stifling sexual misconduct claim against Brett Kavanaugh during confirmation
https://www.rawstory.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/graham.jpg

Republicans created a process which would stifle her account so that Kavanaugh could be confirmed.

https://www.rawstory.com/2019/09/republicans-accused-of-stifling-sexual-misconduct-claim-against-brett-kavanaugh-during-confirmation/ (https://www.rawstory.com/2019/09/republicans-accused-of-stifling-sexual-misconduct-claim-against-brett-kavanaugh-during-confirmation/)

Repug DoJ also blocked FBI from pursuing leads

[boutons_deux]

Did Brett Kavanaugh perjure himself during his confirmation hearing?

New allegations are raising questions about whether he met the very high bar for perjury.

Here are five other instances where discrepancies in Kavanaugh’s testimonies have been raised.

1) Kavanaugh’s drinking: The Supreme Court nominee has been adamant that while he enjoys beer and perhaps at time drank “too many,” it was never to the point of passing out, blacking out, or even causing slight lapses in memory.

His characterization of drinking has been refuted by multiple friends and past roommates, as Vox’s Emily Stewart explained (https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2018/10/2/17927660/brett-kavanaugh-ub40-chris-dudley-bar-fight). He grew “belligerent and aggressive” as a drunk, according to Chad Ludington, one of Kavanaugh’s former classmates.

Liz Swisher, another former Yale classmate, recounted to CNN (https://www.cnn.com/videos/politics/2018/09/29/liz-swisher-yale-classmate-sloppy-drunk-bts-cuomo-vpx.cnn) of Kavanaugh’s drinking: “There’s no problem with drinking beer in college. The problem is lying about it.”

2) His yearbook: During the testimony about the sexual allegations, Democrats asked Kavanaugh to define several lines in his yearbook, which appeared to reference sexual activities. As Vox’s Alex Abad-Santos explained (https://www.vox.com/2018/9/27/17911728/brett-kavanaugh-boof-definition-supreme-court), the word “boof (https://www.vox.com/culture/2018/9/27/17905818/brett-kavanaughs-yearbook-boof),” a slang term that many have defined to mean anal sex, Kavanaugh defined as “flatulence.”

While he and other classmates admitted the yearbook was full of exaggerations, those definitions Kavanaugh provided under oath didn’t hold up with classmates at Georgetown Prep, as the New York Times’s David Enrich reported:


https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/1109608186556960768/dkhXpmd7_bigger.jpg (https://twitter.com/davidenrich)David Enrich
(https://twitter.com/davidenrich)✔@davidenrich
(https://twitter.com/davidenrich)
Based on extensive interviews by me and @katekelly (https://twitter.com/katekelly) with Kavanaugh's former Georgetown Prep classmates,

what he just said about the meanings of "boofed" and "Devil's Triangle" is not true.

3:56 PM - Sep 27, 2018 (https://twitter.com/davidenrich/status/1045416955522535425)



3) Kavanaugh’s involvement in the nomination of a controversial anti-Roe v. Wade judge: In 2004, Kavanaugh said he did not “personally” handle the nomination of Judge William Pryor, who currently sits on the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals (which covers Alabama, Georgia, and Florida) and is somewhat of a liberal bogeyman, famously calling Roe v. Wade and the legal right to abortion”the worst abomination in the history of constitutional law.” (http://www.nationalreview.com/article/207215/nominee-who-wont-back-down-byron-york)

Kavanaugh, who worked in Bush’s White House counsel office in the early 2000s, distanced himself from Pryor’s nomination in 2004, saying during his own confirmation hearing,

“No, I was not involved in handling his nomination.” LIE

But as the Washington Post’s Seung Min Kim first reported (https://www.washingtonpost.com/powerpost/kavanaugh-hearing-trumps-supreme-court-nominee-faces-second-day-of-questioning/2018/09/06/3529677a-b147-11e8-aed9-001309990777_story.html?utm_term=.99cc7dd49783), between 2002 and 2003,

Kavanaugh is included in several emails referencing the Pryor nomination.

In one exchange between Kavanaugh and White House aide Kyle Sampson, Kavanaugh is asked: “How did the Pryor interview go?” He responded, “Call me.”

In another email chain, Kavanaugh is included in a conversation about a conference call to “coordinate plans and efforts” around Pryor.

4) There’s also the case of the improperly obtained (https://www.nytimes.com/2004/03/05/us/report-finds-republican-aides-spied-on-democrats.html) Democratic files, detailing strategies for opposing Bush’s judicial nominees in the 2000s, which a Republican Senate aide circulated with White House staff.

In 2004, Kavanaugh claimed that he had never seen “any documents that appeared ... to have been drafted or prepared by Democratic staff members of the Senate Judiciary Committee.”

But as Vox’s Dylan Matthews explained (https://www.vox.com/2018/9/7/17829320/brett-kavanaugh-supreme-court-hearing-perjury), an email between the Republican staffer and Kavanaugh showed him receiving some of the documents.

5) Democrats have also tried to interrogate Kavanaugh’s possible involvement in the Bush administration torture policy. As Vox’s Li Zhou explained (https://www.vox.com/2018/9/5/17819660/supreme-court-brett-kavanaugh-hearing), in 2006

Kavanaugh said, “I was not involved and am not involved in the questions about the rules governing detention of combatants … and so I do not have the involvement with that.”

However, Sen. Dick Durbin (D-IL) cited two news reports that said

Kavanaugh was present at a meeting on whether US enemy combatants should be given lawyers while they are being detained.
There’s a high legal bar for perjury

... proving that someone “willfully lied under oath.”

To claim perjury, the prosecutor would also have to prove that the lies had direct relevance to the testimony.

But when it comes to his testimonies about alleged sexual misconduct,

Kavanaugh was directly asked about drinking in high school and his behavior in college, which are related to the allegations of assault.

If he deliberately misled a senator, that could qualify as perjury (https://www.rawstory.com/2018/10/msnbc-legal-analyst-explains-exactly-brett-kavanaugh-perjured-oath/).

For example, Sen. John Kennedy (R-LA) asked Kavanaugh directly: “Are Ramirez’s allegations about you true?”

Kavanaugh responded, “None of the witnesses in the room support that. If that had happened,

that would have been the talk of campus our freshman dorm.”

The New York Times is now reporting that it was.

And as a result, some, including Democratic presidential candidate Julián Castro (https://twitter.com/JulianCastro/status/1173075279687929856?s=20), are

calling for an investigation into whether the justice did in fact meet the bar for perjury, and

whether he should be impeached.

https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2019/9/15/20866829/brett-kavanaugh-perjury-confirmation-hearing-deborah-ramirez-new-allegations (https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2019/9/15/20866829/brett-kavanaugh-perjury-confirmation-hearing-deborah-ramirez-new-allegations)

[UZER]

RBG must be close to saying goodbye.

[TSA]

RBG must be close to saying goodbye.

indelible to the hippocampus, the laughter

[Spurtacular]

Another Nothing Burger. NYT reaching new heights in sanctimony.

[ducks]

The New York Times Anti-Kavanaugh Bombshell Is Actually a Dud

https://www.nationalreview.com/2019/09/the-new-york-times-anti-kavanaugh-bombshell-is-actually-a-dud/

[Spurminator]

He’d only need to watch a few minutes of her testimony to know she was lying.

It’s truly amazing to know that people still believe her story after watching her publicly testify. None of her immediate family even supported her after that.

Okay so you're backing off him knowing she lied because he's her father and reverting back to the standard "She lied because obviously she lied" position.

[koriwhat]

did ford's dad say his daughter was a lying cunt and full of shit?

yeah and i'm sure you'll put yourself down as a job reference for hamzeh when your daughter tells you she was raped by a muslim

"i don't fly because i'm scared...oh i fly for vacation all the time though."

"i had to have a 2nd door because i have ptsd...oh i have a 2nd door because i'm running an airBnB."

[koriwhat]

those backing ford are just big fucking pussies plain & simple. male feminists which are the bottom of the bottom of scumbags.

[Chris]

https://twitter.com/kathygriffin/status/1173308630281490432?s=20

Kathy Griffin hits the bottom of the barrel.

[spurraider21]

and yet chris still pays attention to her twitter for some reason :lol

[Chris]

21 doesn't understand how retweets work on twitter :lol

[Reck]

21 doesn't understand how retweets work on twitter :lol

You took the time to read/paste and embed and comment on her tweet here. lol Qchris

[Pavlov]

21 doesn't understand how retweets work on twitter :lolHe understands how you read it and decided to post it here with comment like you do many of her and other celebrities' tweets.

[Chris]

You took the time to read/paste and embed and comment on her tweet here. lol Qchris

Simple Reck doesn't understand what's being discussed :lol

[Pavlov]

Simple Reck doesn't understand what's being discussed :lolKathy Griffin was not being discussed until you wanted to discuss her.

[Reck]

Simple Reck doesn't understand what's being discussed :lol

White flag Qchris busting out his 5th grade insults. lol you

[ElNono]

:lol 21 and Reck don't understand how bots work....

[ducks]

BREAKING: New York Times Adds Correction To Kavanaugh Smear Article

https://www.dailywire.com/news/51805/breaking-new-york-times-adds-correction-kavanaugh-ryan-saavedra?utm_source=facebook&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=dwbrand

[ducks]

NY Times Updates Kavanaugh Story: Woman 'Does Not Recall' Incident

[SnakeBoy]

NY Times Updates Kavanaugh Story: Woman 'Does Not Recall' Incident

Should have updated it to say "We aren't real news anymore"

[boutons_deux]

Kavanaugh is stupid mofo frat rat, sexual predator and a criminal liar benefitting from Repug Senate and Repug DoJ ramming him through, while blocking his complete record from the Judiciary committe, and restricting FBI research.

impeach the mofo Repug shitbag privileged prick FAILING upward, and impeach Barr for lying, too.

[SnakeBoy]

Kavanaugh is stupid mofo frat rat, sexual predator and a criminal liar benefitting from Repug Senate and Repug DoJ ramming him through.

impeach the mofo Repug shitbag privileged prick FAILING upward, and impeach Barr for lying, too.

:lol one of your better ones

[CosmicCowboy]

Kavanaugh is stupid mofo frat rat, sexual predator and a criminal liar benefitting from Repug Senate and Repug DoJ ramming him through.

impeach the mofo Repug shitbag privileged prick FAILING upward, and impeach Barr for lying, too.

I sure hope this shithead doesn't own an assault rifle.

[spurraider21]

I sure hope this shithead doesn't own an assault rifle.
DEFINE ASSAULT RIFLE

[boutons_deux]

oh yeah, he's fucking Catholic, too :lol

[koriwhat]

oh yeah, he's fucking Catholic, too :lol

You're such a fucking weak retarded dipshit bouts

[Yonivore]

Wow, the Notorious RBG must be really sick...

[TSA]

NY Times Updates Kavanaugh Story: Woman 'Does Not Recall' Incident
https://mobile.twitter.com/JerylBier/status/1173594181782126593

[boutons_deux]

Ben Shapiro Demands Kavanaugh Accusers Describe His Junk (https://splinternews.com/ben-shapiro-demands-kavanaugh-accusers-describe-his-jun-1838150315)


https://splinternews.com/ben-shapiro-demands-kavanaugh-accusers-describe-his-jun-1838150315?utm_source=splinter_newsletter&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=2019-09-16

[ducks]

oh yeah, he's fucking Catholic, too :lol

Yes because only Catholics are bad no one else
Rolleyes

[monosylab1k]

DEFINE ASSAULT RIFLE

:lol

[TSA]

https://mobile.twitter.com/JanCBS/status/1173781504767483905

https://mobile.twitter.com/ChuckRossDC/status/1173938877297504256

https://mobile.twitter.com/VinceCoglianese/status/1173936783782006784

:rollin

[Chris]

https://mobile.twitter.com/VinceCoglianese/status/1173936783782006784

Hate it when that happens.

[boutons_deux]

All The Lies Brett Kavanaugh Told

The Supreme Court nominee fibbed throughout his entire confirmation hearing.

https://img.huffingtonpost.com/asset/5bb2623b260000360081ce8a.jpeg?ops=scalefit_720_nou pscale

https://www.huffpost.com/entry/brett-kavanaugh-lies_n_5bb26190e4b027da00d61fcd (https://www.huffpost.com/entry/brett-kavanaugh-lies_n_5bb26190e4b027da00d61fcd)

[boutons_deux]

NY Times Reporters Say Kavanaugh Asked Them To Lie In Exchange For An Interview

Reporters Robin Pogrebin and Kate Kelly said that Justice Brett Kavanaugh agreed to speak to them as long as they publicly said he declined the interview.

https://www.huffpost.com/entry/new-york-times-reporters-kavanaugh-lie-interview_n_5d82da62e4b0849d47233e56?ncid=newsltus hpmgnews__TheMorningEmail__091919&guccounter=1 (https://www.huffpost.com/entry/new-york-times-reporters-kavanaugh-lie-interview_n_5d82da62e4b0849d47233e56?ncid=newsltus hpmgnews__TheMorningEmail__091919&guccounter=1)

[DarrinS]

NY Times Reporters Say Kavanaugh Asked Them To Lie In Exchange For An Interview

Reporters Robin Pogrebin and Kate Kelly said that Justice Brett Kavanaugh agreed to speak to them as long as they publicly said he declined the interview.

https://www.huffpost.com/entry/new-york-times-reporters-kavanaugh-lie-interview_n_5d82da62e4b0849d47233e56?ncid=newsltus hpmgnews__TheMorningEmail__091919&guccounter=1 (https://www.huffpost.com/entry/new-york-times-reporters-kavanaugh-lie-interview_n_5d82da62e4b0849d47233e56?ncid=newsltus hpmgnews__TheMorningEmail__091919&guccounter=1)


Also known as "off the record"

[boutons_deux]

Also known as "off the record"

bullshit

K is liar with tons to hide.

Dems should put together a case, then impeach him after 21 Jan 2021, replace him with Obama

[DarrinS]

bullshit

K is liar with tons to hide.

Dems should put together a case, then impeach him after 21 Jan 2021, replace him with Obama


:lmao

[boutons_deux]

K had an emotional breakdown in his "job interview", and still got hired. No business would hire him, but Repugs did.

Fucking ridiculous, a scam, proving how the Repugs totally want to fuck up govt, and have a fully prejudiced, politicized judiciary

[TSA]

K had an emotional breakdown in his "job interview", and still got hired. No business would hire him, but Repugs did.

Fucking ridiculous, a scam, proving how the Repugs totally want to fuck up govt, and have a fully prejudiced, politicized judiciary

The only scam run was done by Blasey-Ford and her handlers.

[boutons_deux]

The only scam run was done by Blasey-Ford and her handlers.

You Lie.

K is as unfit, unqualified for SCOTUS as Trash is for the WH.

[boutons_deux]

Dem senator accuses the FBI of a carrying out a ‘cover-up’ for Brett Kavanaugh — and calls for an investigation

Sheldon Whitehouse of Rhode Island, in a USA Today op-ed (https://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/2019/09/20/fbi-kavanaugh-investigation-red-flags-shoddy-work-product-column/2366590001/) published on Friday, argued that Kavanaugh wasn’t adequately vetted as he should have been.

“people reached out to my office to find out where to go in the FBI with information relevant to the allegations against Kavanaugh.”

But according to Whitehouse, the FBI wasn’t helpful.


“We were given the runaround by the FBI,” Whitehouse recalls.

“No one was designated to receive information related to Kavanaugh;

people trying to help were referred to an FBI ‘tip line.’”

allegations against Kavanaugh were “unusual” because

in most cases, “FBI agents want to talk with people who claim to have information and to take statements,

often referred to as 302s. A witness interview allows agents to pursue lines of questioning and to evaluate credibility.

another “flag” came when “FBI Director Christopher

Wray began to disavow responsibility for the investigation” and

“pointed out very publicly that the Kavanaugh investigation was not being run under FBI investigative protocols,

but following directions from the White House.”

https://www.rawstory.com/2019/09/dem-senator-accuses-the-fbi-of-a-carrying-out-a-cover-up-for-brett-kavanaugh-and-calls-for-an-investigation/?utm_source=&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=1518 (https://www.rawstory.com/2019/09/dem-senator-accuses-the-fbi-of-a-carrying-out-a-cover-up-for-brett-kavanaugh-and-calls-for-an-investigation/?utm_source=&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=1518)

[boutons_deux]

More reasons to remove K from SCOTUS

You rightwingnutjob assholes voted for this, right?

[boutons_deux]

Sen. Kamala Harris calls for a House impeachment inquiry into Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh (https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2019/9/27/1888322/-Sen-Kamala-Harris-calls-for-a-House-impeachment-inquiry-into-Supreme-Court-Justice-Brett-Kavanaugh)

Sen. Kamala Harris is calling on the House Judiciary Committee to launch a formal impeachment inquiry into Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh,

citing a need to determine the truth about the allegations against him after a farcical investigation last year.

Sen. Harris noted the FBI investigation was “not serious.” Indeed, the agency did not interview multiple witnesses and/or corroborators, something they said was inexplicably outside the scope of their extremely narrow investigation directives.

The system failed women and she made the case to revisit the Kavanaugh allegations through an impeachment inquiry.

If we want to live in a country where women are believed and given access to the justice they deserve, we must roll up our sleeves and get to work holding our leaders accountable—especially those who serve on the highest court in our land.

We need to get to the truth about Kavanaugh. And I believe the best path to truth and accountability is through a formal impeachment process.


And for those who say this will go nowhere in the Senate, she has a message for you too:

it’s about restoring faith in our justice system.

restoring faith in our justice system requires meaningful accountability and transparency.

This should have been given to the American people before Kavanaugh was confirmed to a lifetime seat on our highest court.

It didn’t, and it was a national travesty.

But, it is within the power of the United States Congress to do it now.

https://www.dailykos.com/stories/1888322 (https://www.dailykos.com/stories/1888322)
(https://www.dailykos.com/stories/1888322)
she doesn't mention that K LIED in his earlier confirmation hearing?

[boutons_deux]

Repug DoJ protecting Repug K

DOJ court filing reveals FBI’s reason for withholding information on Kavanaugh background check

During the confirmation process for Kavanaugh in 2018, the FBI conducted a superficial background check

Kalmbacher, discussing Leopold’s lawsuit, explains, “at first, it seemed as if the FBI was keen to wash their hands of the Kavanaugh imbroglio;

the agency uncharacteristically acknowledged the request and assigned it for expedited processing on the same day the Kavanaugh document request was filed.

Then came the stonewall.

A month passed, and the FBI produced zero responsive documents.”

After that, Kalmbacher notes, “nearly one year of legal wrangling followed.” And on Friday, according to Kalmbacher,

“the FBI moved to have the case dismissed by arguing that they’ve already released enough information and

that what they haven’t yet released is covered by one of the several statutory exceptions to FOIA.”

information that is “unquestionably private” and “could subject Judge Kavanaugh and others to harassment or embarrassment in their private lives.”


“Much of the information requested by plaintiffs — both in the supplemental background investigation file and the tip records —

relates to Judge Kavanaugh’s alleged conduct as a teenager and young adult — :lol

decades before his distinguished career in public service began — :lol

and does not concern the performance of his public duties.” :lol

In 2018, Kavanaugh’s critics argued that given how disturbing the allegations being made against him were,

the FBI should have conducted a much more thorough and comprehensive investigation of him.

https://www.salon.com/2019/10/29/doj-court-filing-explains-fbis-reason-for-withholding-information-on-kavanaugh-background-check_partner/ (https://www.salon.com/2019/10/29/doj-court-filing-explains-fbis-reason-for-withholding-information-on-kavanaugh-background-check_partner/)

:lol Repug DoJ? no problem

but Dem whistleblower outing Trash as criminal? illegit! :lol

[Nathan89]

Let the record reflect nearly all the Dem senators attacked a good man based on political motivations.

[ChumpDumper]

Let the record reflect nearly all the Dem senators attacked a good man based on political motivations.How do you know he's good?

[DMC]

How do you know he's good?

Prompt for non-value added shit post avalanche..

Chumpy must be lonely again.

[ChumpDumper]

Prompt for non-value added shit post avalanche..

Chumpy must be lonely again.How can I be lonely with you attached to my ankle, Karen?

[boutons_deux]

Brett Kavanaugh was a secret source to Bob Woodward while working as a lawyer in Ken Starr’s 1999 investigation

https://www.rawstory.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/Grabien-Ali_Velshi-468651a-2.jpg




https://media.gettyimages.com/photos/brett-kavanaugh-speaks-at-the-senate-judiciary-committee-hearing-on-picture-id1041953998?s=612x612


https://www.sltrib.com/resizer/Ca6tJEX4EEyEp1D7iZtTpOE7lrM=/0x600/smart/filters:quality(86)/arc-anglerfish-arc2-prod-sltrib.s3.amazonaws.com/public/TJCBTLRWKVGGPEVXRNFEXILIN4.jpg

“And at the height of the furor over Brett Kavanaugh’s nomination to the Supreme Court in 2018, some who did saw a shocking article awaiting publication,”

Bob Woodward, the Post legend who protected the identity of his Watergate source, Deep Throat, for 30 years, was going to unmask one of his own confidential sources.

He was, in particular, going to disclose that Judge

Kavanaugh had been an anonymous source in his 1999 book Shadow: Five Presidents and the Legacy of Watergate,”

, Kavanaugh gave Woodward juicy details about Ken Starr’s investigation behind the scenes while serving as a lawyer on Starr’s team.

It was executive editor Martin Baron who stopped it, insisting that Woodward uphold his agreement.

“The article, described by two Post journalists who read it, would have been explosive, arriving as the nominee battled a decades-old sexual assault allegation and was fighting to prove his integrity,”

https://www.rawstory.com/2020/06/brett-kavanaugh-was-a-secret-source-to-bob-woodward-while-working-as-a-lawyer-in-ken-starrs-1999-investigation-report/

It was obvious that K as huge piece of slimy shit who had emotional breakdown in his job interview.

Repugs hired him anyway, more evidence that Repugs are no longer a political party but cheap whores to oligarchy who have tried for decades to put 5 hard conservatives on the Supreme Court. K was #5

[boutons_deux]

Kavanaugh makes Collins his fool, breaking his supposed promises on abortion case

https://images.dailykos.com/images/583685/story_image/AP_18233549043859.jpg?1535741444

Sen. Susan Collins is 0-3 with her guy Brett Kavanaugh's votes on the Supreme Court so far this session.

Kavanaugh, who is on the Supreme Court because of Collins,

has voted to kick Dreamers out of the country,

let employers fire LGBTQ people solely on the basis of their sexual orientation, and

now to take abortion rights away from Louisiana women.

It's that last one that must really sting for Collins, since

she premised her entire support for the guy on the fact that he would respect precedent, especially when it came to abortion.

Kavanaugh told her, she said (https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2018/10/susan-collins-brett-kavanaugh-roe-v-wade/572344/) that he believed

"decisions become part of our legal framework with the passage of time, and

that honoring precedent is essential to maintaining public confidence."

She also said he was the first nominee she had spoken with

"to express the view that precedent is not merely a practice and tradition,

but rooted in Article III of our Constitution itself."

Boy, does she look stupid now.

https://www.dailykos.com/stories/1956881 (https://www.dailykos.com/stories/1956881)

[boutons_deux]

Brett Kavanaugh’s Confirmation Got a Big Boost From a Mysterious Individual Donation of $15.9 Million

When Brett Kavanaugh's nomination to the Supreme Court was under fire,

a dark money group called Judicial Crisis Network came to his aid.

According to recently obtained documents,

more than half of JCN's funding came from one mysterious, unnamed donor who gave $15.9 million towards the effort.

received nearly $16 million from a single mystery donor,

The documents show that the

(JCN) received a total of nearly $30 million of donations in between July 2018 and June 2019

— the period that covered Kavanaugh’s tumultuous confirmation.

https://jacobinmag.com/2020/07/brett-kavanaugh-dark-money?utm_source=Jacobin&utm_campaign=d6e570b75d-EMAIL_CAMPAIGN_2019_10_01_07_50_COPY_01&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_be8b1b2846-d6e570b75d-85395805&mc_cid=d6e570b75d&mc_eid=33263fe77b (https://jacobinmag.com/2020/07/brett-kavanaugh-dark-money?utm_source=Jacobin&utm_campaign=d6e570b75d-EMAIL_CAMPAIGN_2019_10_01_07_50_COPY_01&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_be8b1b2846-d6e570b75d-85395805&mc_cid=d6e570b75d&mc_eid=33263fe77b)

The corrupt oligarchy secretly buying a corrupt judiciary, including SCOTUS

$20M was spent for the campaign for Gorsuch.

America is fucked and unfuckable.

[SnakeBoy]

Brett Kavanaugh is about to get a lot more powerful
https://bangordailynews.com/2020/11/03/opinion/contributors/brett-kavanaugh-is-about-to-get-a-lot-more-powerful/

tldr Brett is the new swing vote on the SC


To be clear, a court on which Kavanaugh is the swing voter is an extraordinarily conservative court.

[spurraider21]

Brett Kavanaugh is about to get a lot more powerful
https://bangordailynews.com/2020/11/03/opinion/contributors/brett-kavanaugh-is-about-to-get-a-lot-more-powerful/

tldr Brett is the new swing vote on the SC
damn, maybe we'll see if second amendment people will do something about it

[boutons_deux]

Dems should impeach K for lying to Senate in both confirmation hearings.

Remember thar DoJ shut down FBI's vetting of Kavanaugh,

since then a lot more witnesses have come forward to prove K lied.

swing voter in a 6 - 3 SCOTUS? :lol

[Isitjustme?]

Dems should impeach K for lying to Senate in both confirmation hearings.

Remember thar DoJ shut down FBI's vetting of Kavanaugh,

since then a lot more witnesses have come forward to prove K lied.

swing voter in a 6 - 3 SCOTUS? :lol





I guess he counts Roberts as a lib so should Roberts vote with us etc.

[Will Hunting]

He’s not wrong, on this court the combination of Gorsuch/Kav are the swing vote. There are some issues where Gorsuch will be more likely to flip and others where it’ll be Kavanaugh. ACB will be another Uncle Thomas/wop Alito.

[Winehole23]

Sen. Whitehouse requests an investigation of the investigation.

It's doubtful anything but more noise will be the result.


“This was unique behavior in my experience, as the Bureau is usually amenable to information and evidence; but in this matter the shutters were closed, the drawbridge drawn up, and there was no point of entry by which members of the public or Congress could provide information to the FBI,” Whitehouse said.


He added that, once the FBI decided to create a “tip line”, senators were not given any information on how or whether new allegations were processed and evaluated. While senators’ brief review of the allegations gathered by the tip line showed a “stack” of information had come in, there was no further explanation on the steps that had been taken to review the information, Whitehouse said.


“This ‘tip line’ appears to have operated more like a garbage chute, with everything that came down the chute consigned without review to the figurative dumpster,” he said.
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2021/mar/16/fbi-brett-kavanaugh-background-check-fake

[hater]

:lmao djohn

[boutons_deux]

I guess he counts Roberts as a lib so should Roberts vote with us etc.

Roberts knows he can vote with libs to polish his historical reputation, knowing that his conservative buddies will still win 5-4 on issues that Roberts, if swinger, would vote against.

[Isitjustme?]

Roberts knows he can vote with libs to polish his historical reputation, knowing that his conservative buddies will still win 5-4 on issues that Roberts, if swinger, would vote against.

Yeah, I know. I was guessing what he thought there. Roberts has had some good votes for a conservative justice.

[pgardn]

:lmao djohn

Says the guy who has never experienced a thread blow up on contact.
You are too worried about Tarot card readings.

[Winehole23]

1385362881596821507

[RandomGuy]

Brett Kavanaugh is about to get a lot more powerful
https://bangordailynews.com/2020/11/03/opinion/contributors/brett-kavanaugh-is-about-to-get-a-lot-more-powerful/

tldr Brett is the new swing vote on the SC

:lol Fellow justices dragging his ass over the coals for setting aside precedent in his SC rulings using quotes from his previous rulings saying that setting aside precedents was bad.

The hurr dee durr wing you support is pretty hurr dee durr.

:cry judicial activism is bad :cry

Why are you hurr dee durr's so hypocritical?

[SnakeBoy]

Fellow justices

https://media1.tenor.com/images/cf138d632c36bdd61310e44a8a99b27a/tenor.gif

[RandomGuy]

https://media1.tenor.com/images/cf138d632c36bdd61310e44a8a99b27a/tenor.gif

Why does your party pick such incompetent, and corrupt people as a matter of course? It seems strange to me.

[boutons_deux]

Why does your party pick such incompetent, and corrupt people as a matter of course? It seems strange to me.

Not strange, sexual drunken predator impeachable LIAR Kavanaugh worked to impeach Clinton, worked for dubya DOJ, known as reliably, politically corrupted hard right tool. (and a Catholic). Many $Ms were spent to buy him his lifetime seat as corrupt SCOTUS so-called judge.

recent opinion: "underage criminals to be imprisoned for life without chance of parole"

[Winehole23]

Trump wipes his shoe on Justice Kavanaugh

1414920040521023489

[boutons_deux]

https://2vwlfu3ynqxb3npfhm3m8lde-wpengine.netdna-ssl.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/2018-10-03T052247Z_1_LYNXNPEE9209C_RTROPTP_4_USA-COURT-KAVANAUGH-1-2000x1200.jpg

The FBI Admits That Its Investigation Into Brett Kavanaugh Was A Scam

The June 30, 2021 letter from the FBI Office of Congressional Affairs revealed new information on the Kavanaugh investigation:

that Justice Kavanaugh’s nomination “was the first time that the FBI set-up a tip line for a nominee undergoing Senate confirmation,” and

that tip line received “over 4,500 tips, including phone calls and electronic submissions.”

The FBI apparently pursued none of these tips.

Instead, by the FBI’s own account,

it merely “provided all relevant tips” to Trump’s Office of White House Counsel,

the very office that had constrained and directed the limited investigation.”

they turned them over to the White House, where the tips were buried and never investigated.


The Brett Kavanaugh Investigation Was A Cover-Up

was fake.

It was an investigation in name only where the outcome was predetermined.

The fact that the FBI went along with this betrayal of the American people suggests

a level of corruption that has led to lingering mistrust of the Bureau that continues through today.

The reality is that a seated Supreme Court Justice

might be a sex criminal, and the FBI, Trump administration, and the Republican Party put him there.

https://www.politicususa.com/2021/07/22/the-fbi-admits-that-its-investigation-into-brett-kavanaugh-was-a-scam.html

Govt is corrupted by Capitalists, SCOTUS is corrupt, LE is corrupt, ALL are not fixable.

America is fucked and unfuckable

America is a failed state descending unstoppably into Capitalist/Christian fascism.

[koriwhat]

Trump wipes his shoe on Justice Kavanaugh

He ain't lying though after that smear job against Kavanaugh.

[pgardn]

Trump wipes his shoe on Justice Kavanaugh

1414920040521023489

Little boy with the giant fat orange thing with his bullfrog throat petting him...

I would rip his larynx out of his bloated toad throat and shove it in his eye socket.
(I think this is violent enough)

[Winehole23]

weird investigation, the FBI referred leads from the fake tip line to the White House

1418251301343879168

[Winehole23]

one Yalie covering for another

[boutons_deux]

Sen. Whitehouse says allegations against Kavanaugh were ‘swept under the rug’ by FBI

Whitehouse used the investigation of former USA Gymnastics team doctor and convicted pedophile Nassar to question the legitimacy of the FBI’s 2018 background check into Brett Kavanaugh, wondering if that investigation might have been “just as flawed.”

the last time a woman came forward in this committee to testify to her allegations of sexual assault in her childhood, the witness was Christine Blasey Ford,” Whitehouse said.

“It is very possible that the FBI investigation of her allegations was just as flawed, just as constrained, just as inappropriate, as the investigation in this case.”

called out FBI Director Christopher Wray over the bureau’s investigation of Ford’s allegation that Kavanaugh sexually assaulted her when they were teenagers.

Whitehouse noted that he repeatedly requested more information about the FBI’s investigation into Ford’s allegations

but had been ignored for two years before finally receiving a response yesterday.

“Not coincidentally, I suspect, on the eve of your appearance today,” Whitehouse said to Wray.

“Let’s just make sure there’s wasn’t also a botched handling of another allegation in this committee with regard to Dr. Ford,” Whitehouse said after questioning the legitimacy of investigations in the case.

Other lawmakers also questioned Wray over the bureau’s handling of the Kavanaugh probe,

including the claim that the FBI lacked the authority to conduct a deeper background investigation into the then-nominee.

the bureau claimed that a 2010 Memorandum of Understanding prevented it from performing a deeper investigation into allegations of misconduct.

“In its years-late response to our questions, the FBI leaned hard on the notion that this MOU limited its authority to be the FBI and investigate wrongdoing.

Now that we have the MOU, it’s even harder to understand the Bureau’s excuses for ignoring credible information it received. Director Wray ought to be ready to answer my questions about this episode – I won’t stop asking until he does.”
https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2021/9/15/2052470/-After-failed-Larry-Nassar-investigation-Sen-Whitehouse-questions-FBI-probe-of-Kavanaugh

I remember reading that the FBI received 100s of comments against K, but ignored them.

Who wrote the MOU? Trash / Barr / McConnell?

[boutons_deux]

FBI Director Wray faces 'new scrutiny' over Kavanaugh investigation

"The FBI director, Chris Wray, is facing new scrutiny of the Bureau's handling of its 2018 background investigation of Brett Kavanaugh,

including its claim that the FBI lacked the authority to conduct a further investigation into the then-Supreme Court nominee.

At the heart of the new questions that Wray will face later this week, when he testifies before the Senate Judiciary Committee, is a

2010 memorandum of understanding that the FBI has recently said constrained the agency's ability to conduct any further investigations of allegations of misconduct."

"The FBI closed its extended background check of Kavanaugh after four days :lol

and did not interview either Blasey Ford or Kavanaugh," Kirchgaessner notes.

"The FBI also disclosed to the Senate this June — two years after questions were initially asked — that

it had received 4500 tips from the public during the background check and

that it had shared all 'relevant tips' with the White House counsel at that time. :lol

It is not clear whether those tips were ever investigated." :lol

"an examination by The Guardian of the

2010 MOU, which was signed by the then-Attorney General Eric Holder and then-White House Counsel Robert Bauer,

does not make explicitly clear that the FBI was restricted in terms of how it would conduct its investigation."

the FBI leaned hard on the notion that this MOU limited its authority to be the FBI and investigate wrongdoing.

Now that we have the MOU,

it's even harder to understand the Bureau's excuses for ignoring credible information it received.

https://www.rawstory.com/brett-kavanaugh-investigation

Understand? Trash/Barr/McConnell "understood" to Wray to do no investigation

[Winehole23]

Integrity-free

https://cdn.cnn.com/cnnnext/dam/assets/180927163350-14-kavanaugh-senate-hearing-0927-large-169.jpg

1439588839320956934

[boutons_deux]

Andy Borowitz (https://www.facebook.com/andyborowitz?__cft__[0]=AZVExDWQe1nAoEqX3xaQ-lWdIr5OkRSzt_ffDbveQDXIVAc3iQYU9ZUEux-dCi1F2VOZHL9ulEEuquzL6qo4muTCppO8vLpsBQC40MjS4IWIk x1HxRysdofhUuhn1ttOZy4ufJk1RgQMLeM_rP0G6kPAtUL01Xm n9M4XIrO4N9dH4nACza--nhEtazu5LKGUfXA&__tn__=-UC%2CP-R)

New Evidence Indicates Alcohol Offers No Protection Against Covid

https://i.insider.com/5bae0cf49c5d673e1e8b4568?width=1000&format=jpeg&auto=webp

[Thread]

Andy Borowitz (https://www.facebook.com/andyborowitz?__cft__[0]=AZVExDWQe1nAoEqX3xaQ-lWdIr5OkRSzt_ffDbveQDXIVAc3iQYU9ZUEux-dCi1F2VOZHL9ulEEuquzL6qo4muTCppO8vLpsBQC40MjS4IWIk x1HxRysdofhUuhn1ttOZy4ufJk1RgQMLeM_rP0G6kPAtUL01Xm n9M4XIrO4N9dH4nACza--nhEtazu5LKGUfXA&__tn__=-UC%2CP-R)

New Evidence Indicates Alcohol Offers No Protection Against Covid

https://i.insider.com/5bae0cf49c5d673e1e8b4568?width=1000&format=jpeg&auto=webp




How did this happen?

Simple...

Trump President.
Not Clinton.

[RandomGuy]

Integrity-free

https://cdn.cnn.com/cnnnext/dam/assets/180927163350-14-kavanaugh-senate-hearing-0927-large-169.jpg

1439588839320956934

The basis of modern conservatism is dishonesty, and violence.

Any lie that gets you what you want is fine.

If that means lying under oath, while putting your name in the hat for the Supreme Court, who cares, amaright?

smh

[Thread]

The basis of modern conservatism is dishonesty, and violence.

Any lie that gets you what you want is fine.

If that means lying under oath, while putting your name in the hat for the Supreme Court, who cares, amaright?

smh

Your side does the same damn thing, RG. You've nary room, son.

You just don't want anyone doing it to you. You only want to do it to them.

Don't fret, it's American.

[DMC]

Repetitive autistic screeching that I think makes me sound wise

The bottom line is you lost in 2016. The next 4 years you pretended you were robbed. Now the tables have turned and you're still acting the victim. Are you always the victim and if so, why would anyone trust you to lead (figuratively speaking, with "you" being the left)

[Thread]

The bottom line is you lost in 2016. The next 4 years you pretended you were robbed. Now the tables have turned and you're still acting the victim. Are you always the victim and if so, why would anyone trust you to lead (figuratively speaking, with "you" being the left)

You goddamn right, D.

D M C

[spurraider21]

How did this happen?

Simple...

Trump President.
Not Clinton.


The bottom line is you lost in 2016. The next 4 years you pretended you were robbed. Now the tables have turned and you're still acting the victim. Are you always the victim and if so, why would anyone trust you to lead (figuratively speaking, with "you" being the left)
now you’re just Thread with a little window dressing

DaleMC

[RandomGuy]

The bottom line is you lost in 2016. The next 4 years you pretended you were robbed. Now the tables have turned and you're still acting the victim. Are you always the victim and if so, why would anyone trust you to lead (figuratively speaking, with "you" being the left)

I keep forgetting you have a learning/reading disability. Seriously: sorry. You genuinely can't string the syllogism together to be able to correctly identify a logical fallacy.

Whatever we are, we are vastly more honest, and vastly less violent.

[RandomGuy]

The bottom line is you lost in 2016. The next 4 years you pretended you were robbed. Now the tables have turned and you're still acting the victim. Are you always the victim and if so, why would anyone trust you to lead (figuratively speaking, with "you" being the left)

Kavennaough, who should have been the acme of integrity lied under oath, repeatedly, to get his supreme court seat. A seat for which the people who put them there lied about their motives for putting him there.

and you either believe the lies, because you can't do the critical thinking, or you don't care.

Why would anyone trust YOU?

[Isitjustme?]

1385362881596821507

lmao thats pretty fucked up

[boutons_deux]

Capitalist/Christian fascism is America's unavoidable future.

SCOTUS not only won't stop it, SCOTUS has been enabling it for 20 years.

Fuck you, Founding Fathers and your deeply flawed US Constitution.

[Thread]

I keep forgetting you have a learning/reading disability. Seriously: sorry. You genuinely can't string the syllogism together to be able to correctly identify a logical fallacy.

Whatever we are, we are vastly more honest, and vastly less violent.

Where's that (plan), that mother fucker, that cocksucker, that mother fucker swore he had, RG?

It's too late for the 300k the motherfucker has already killed because he won't divulge that (plan), but it could save the next 300k if that monster motherfucker squattin' in the White House would just tell us.

C'mon, RG, come ta Pappy.

Signed,

- Pappy

[Thread]

Capitalist/Christian fascism is America's unavoidable future.

SCOTUS not only won't stop, SCOTUS has been enabling it for 20 years.

Fuck you, Founding Fathers and your deeply flawed US Constitution.

"The worst form of government, except every other."

[Thread]

Kavennaough, who should have been the acme of integrity lied under oath, repeatedly, to get his supreme court seat. A seat for which the people who put them there lied about their motives for putting him there.

and you either believe the lies, because you can't do the critical thinking, or you don't care.

Why would anyone trust YOU?

Same thing with (the plan), RG.

[DMC]

now you’re just Thread with a little window dressing

DaleMC

You're just Chump with less ignore function - same buttinski

[Winehole23]

there's no buttinski on a public forum, just crankypants wimps like you who try to police a non-existent decorum.

you should go private if you want to have a private convo, tbh.

[DMC]

I keep forgetting you have a learning/reading disability. Seriously: sorry. You genuinely can't string the syllogism together to be able to correctly identify a logical fallacy.

Whatever we are, we are vastly more honest, and vastly less violent.

https://content.fortune.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/bWwnd-how-often-u-s-adults-say-violence-can-be-justified-in-order-to-advance-political-goals.png

I wouldn't say "vastly" but then you're in denial and have been since 2016.

[DMC]

there's no buttinski on a public forum, just crankypants wimps like you who try to police a non-existent decorum.

you should go private if you want to have a private convo, tbh.

Buttinski #2

Outside of tweet spamming the forum, you don't have anything to offer. Run along and find someone with an interesting opinion you can share.

[Winehole23]

:cry go away, stop bothering me! :cry

[ChumpDumper]

You're just Chump with less ignore function - same buttinski
You know you're kind of a pussy, don't you?

You need to cry more, try to insult people and declare victory now.

[Winehole23]

Buttinski #2

Outside of tweet spamming the forum, you don't have anything to offer. Run along and find someone with an interesting opinion you can share.

https://64.media.tumblr.com/8c3afff4ab290e29860d60351db45a96/c3eca336f6720b09-eb/s250x400/c383a2a614e69f82e2e9eea27f6c968d65d2da17.gifv

[DMC]

Winehole several bottles into this day - going on a necro posting tear, living the dream.

[Winehole23]

Winehole several bottles into this day - going on a necro posting tear, living the dream.pure coffee so far, I'll be going to work in a bit.

btw, posting contemporaneous stories related to old threads isn't necro posting, it's follow up and continuity.

[DMC]

pure coffee so far, I'll be going to work in a bit.

btw, posting contemporaneous stories related to old threads isn't necro posting, it's follow up and continuity.

https://i.imgur.com/8Y4dBHM.jpg

When you bump this you're just self fellating. Don't pretend anyone else gives a shit about it. You have entire pages of nothing but your own posts. Who are you updating?

[Winehole23]

https://i.imgur.com/8Y4dBHM.jpg

When you bump this you're just self fellating. Don't pretend anyone else gives a shit about it.Speak for yourself, I didn't write the stories but putting them all in one place helps me keep track. And many other posters did comment multiple times, as you have attested. That's hardly consistent with no one but me caring.

Your cowardly silence on this and so many other things stands out, tbh

[daboom1]

https://i.imgur.com/8Y4dBHM.jpg

When you bump this you're just self fellating. Don't pretend anyone else gives a shit about it. You have entire pages of nothing but your own posts. Who are you updating?

:wow

[ChumpDumper]

Who are you updating?You, obviously.

You're the one keeping track of him. He is your topic.

[DMC]

Speak for yourself, I didn't write the stories but putting them all in one place helps me keep track. And many other posters did comment multiple times, as you have attested. That's hardly consistent with no one but me caring.

Your cowardly silence on this and so many other things stands out, tbh

So you don't have the ability on your PC to keep the exact same shit you mass post here? :lol You and Boots need to compare notes, two peas in a pod.

And :lol at the ignored dingleberry that shows up after every post I make, the actual expert on mass posting shit no one reads.

[DMC]

:wow

:lol TeyshaBlue and Wild Cobra who haven't posted here in years.. coming in strong at 3 and 4 with < 5% of the posts Whinehold has. Gotta get det information out there! People need to know this shit!

[Winehole23]

emojis of desperation

[SnakeBoy]

:lol TeyshaBlue and Wild Cobra who haven't posted here in years.. coming in strong at 3 and 4 with < 5% of the posts Whinehold has. Gotta get det information out there! People need to know this shit!

:lol

[DarrinS]

https://i.imgur.com/8Y4dBHM.jpg

When you bump this you're just self fellating. Don't pretend anyone else gives a shit about it. You have entire pages of nothing but your own posts. Who are you updating?

:lol

[Winehole23]

Newspapers ran a story about it yesterday, y’all’s lack of interest proves nothing, let alone that no one is interested.

What’s posted to bulletin boards isn’t for everyone, that’s life.

*shrugs*

[Winehole23]

:lol


:lol

https://www.spurstalk.com/forums/blob:https://www.spurstalk.com/daaf38af-6860-45c2-8f05-03dd233804f0


https://www.spurstalk.com/forums/blob:https://www.spurstalk.com/5a2538db-c209-4caa-898f-ed68ee1636d4

[Winehole23]

Fellow Yalie Chris Wray confirms the Potemkin investigation. Tips were forwarded to Kavanaugh's handlers, who decided which people would be interviewed, then they shitcanned the tips.

1555271566447071233

[Spurs Homer]

Fellow Yalie Chris Wray confirms the Potemkin investigation. Tips were forwarded to Kavanaugh's handlers, who decided which people would be interviewed, then they shitcanned the tips.

1555271566447071233


like we said all along…

the rapist kavanaugh cases/tips/assaults were covered up by the trump white house in collusion with the GOP and the FBI

no surprise at all

[Thread]

like we said all along…

the rapist kavanaugh cases/tips/assaults were covered up by the trump white house in collusion with the GOP and the FBI

no surprise at all

Wray good now.

tee, hee.

[daboom1]

Wray good now.

tee, hee.

[boutons_deux]

Sundance documentary exposes Kavanaugh as never before. Stay tuned...

https://images.dailykos.com/images/882897/story_image/Kavanaugh-sniffing-10-4-18-1068x771.jpg?1605307473

“Takeaways from Sundance’s secret Brett Kavanaugh documentary.

Director Doug Liman announced his new documentary at the festival.

Then new tips began pouring in.”

“At another point, Liman uses text message exchanges from Kavanaugh’s fellow Yale classmates to suggest that

Kavanaugh was worried that sexual assault allegations against him,

including Ramirez’s account, might resurface months before Farrow’s article came out and the confirmation hearing.

That in itself offers

proof that Kavanaugh perjured himself

when he claimed to have found out about Ramirez’s accusation only after reading about it in The New Yorker.

All it (the film) does in its current form is remind us that

everything we knew about the White House-enabled cover-up of Kavanaugh’s crimes is true.”

The text messages would be additional proof of perjury and

the possibility that Kavanaugh’s Republican handlers at the time had knowledge of the accusations.

This would implicate them in the Kavanaugh lie before Congress and suggest that

the accusations at least should have sparked a Republican vetting prior to the hearings.

https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2023/1/21/2148450/-Sundance-documentary-exposes-Kavanaugh-as-never-before-Stay-tuned

[Winehole23]

Bannon and Epstein discussed Kavanaugh confirmation strategy



https://cdn.bsky.app/img/feed_thumbnail/plain/did:plc:tegh4bfkyn3wsycl4yrtjveb/bafkreifgume7pdzplbykzx52wvhvhszvhgavz4byzzssf6jh5 akw6g5osy@jpeg

[Winehole23]

^^^Epstein was a Tier 3 sex offender (https://legalclarity.org/what-does-it-mean-to-be-a-tier-3-sex-offender/) at the time

[Winehole23]

absent the personal connection with Trump, why would Bannon keep him in the fold?