trump impeachment watch thread

[Winehole23]

GOP pizza flash mob falls to impress

[Chris]

Is Gaetz trying to position himself for an eventual presidential run? Feels like it. Taking the Trump lite angle so Dear Leader will pass the torch to him along with his followers

Herr Gaetz

[Pavlov]

lol mindless Qhris

[Chris]

ORANGE MAN BAD!

[ElNono]

Qhris avoids the topic he himself starts, per par.

And no, I would disagree. As far as I'm concerned, it's not Orange Man Bad. It's Orange Man Stupid.

[Chris]

Qhris avoids the topic he himself starts, per par.

And no, I would disagree. As far as I'm concerned, it's not Orange Man Bad. It's Orange Man Stupid.

Blaming Orange man for "losing the House" seems pretty stupid, but whatever floats your boat.

[Pavlov]

:lol Dennison was definitely the reason Republicans lost the house. What other reason could there have been?

[ElNono]

Blaming Orange man for "losing the House" seems pretty stupid, but whatever floats your boat.

He ran the government for 2 years, best in class, according to you... what am I missing here? Illegals stuffing ballots? some Freemason conspiratard? Do tell.

[Winehole23]

Herrenvolk democracy

[ducks]

Poll: Most Wisconsin Voters Do Not Support Impeaching Trump

[dabom7]

You don't need to hype my name brah. :lol

The real dabom stands up!

[FuzzyLumpkins]

Negative campaigning works extraordinarily well for the Republicans. When the Democrats do it it just kills turnout.

The DNC took a big wet shit on Palin portraying her as a buffoon and that worked out pretty well.

[baseline bum]

The DNC took a big wet shit on Palin portraying her as a buffoon and that worked out pretty well.

Obama 2008 ran a campaign largely about healthcare and Iraq. It was a far cry from say Willy Horton or Butter Emails.

[Spurminator]

Is Gaetz trying to position himself for an eventual presidential run? Feels like it. Taking the Trump lite angle so Dear Leader will pass the torch to him along with his followers

Nah, he's going for an executive position in the Trump Organization when they both get voted out of office.

[boutons_deux]

Here’s the exact law that may end Trump’s presidency

Philip Zelikow, a history professor at the University of Virginia, has written an article on Lawfare (https://www.lawfareblog.com/self-dealing-ukraine-core-impeachment-inquiry) outlining exactly why the president is in both political and legal jeopardy.


Specifically, Zelikow cites

18 U.S.C. § 201(b) (https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/201), which states that

any public official who

“corruptly demands,
seeks,
receives,
accepts, or
agrees to receive or accept
anything of value personally or
for any other person or entity,
in return for… being influenced in the performance of any official act”

is breaking the law.

Zelikow goes on to break down all the ways that Trump’s actions in the Ukraine affair seem to fit the bill for breaking this law.

Among other things, he shows how Ukraine publicly announcing that it was investigating former Vice President Joe Biden undoubtedly counts as a thing of value to the president.

“There is no doubt that these demands were things of great value to Trump,” he writes.

“Federal bribery law does not require that the value be in money.

As the Department of Justice Criminal Resource Manual points out,

such things include ‘intangible as well as tangible things’ and

‘have been broadly construed to focus on the worth attached to the bribe by the defendant, rather than its commercial value.'”

https://www.rawstory.com/2019/10/heres-the-exact-law-that-may-end-trumps-presidency/?utm_source=&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=2786 (https://www.rawstory.com/2019/10/heres-the-exact-law-that-may-end-trumps-presidency/?utm_source=&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=2786)

https://www.lawfareblog.com/self-dealing-ukraine-core-impeachment-inquiry (https://www.lawfareblog.com/self-dealing-ukraine-core-impeachment-inquiry)

[Spurs Homer]

Poll: Most Wisconsin Voters Do Not Support Impeaching Trump

must be the CHEESE!

[DarrinS]

1187371069700788225


1187373241310044163

[Pavlov]

1187371069700788225


1187373241310044163Amazingly, none of that matters.

In fact, word of the aid freeze had gotten to high-level Ukrainian officials by the first week in August, according to interviews and documents obtained by The New York Times.

The problem was not bureaucratic, the Ukrainians were told. To address it, they were advised, they should reach out to Mick Mulvaney, the acting White House chief of staff, according to the interviews and records.

https://www.nytimes.com/2019/10/23/us/politics/ukraine-aid-freeze-impeachment.html

[Winehole23]

lol desperate Darrin

[boutons_deux]

Senate Republicans coming to grips with the fact that defending Trump is a fool's errand (https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2019/10/23/1894574/-Senate-Republicans-coming-to-grips-with-the-fact-that-defending-Trump-is-a-fool-s-errand)

A Republican source close to Majority Leader Mitch McConnell told a reporter (https://twitter.com/HotlineJosh/status/1187042958790533121) of impeachment Wednesday, "This is shaping up to be a very dark moment for the Trump White House."

signs are definitely emerging that Republicans realize Donald Trump is in a heap of trouble and is growing less defensible by the day.

South Dakota Sen. John Thune said (https://twitter.com/burgessev/status/1187017238626406405),

“The picture coming out based on the reporting we’ve seen is not a good one.

But I would say until we have a process that allows to see this with full transparency, :lol

it’s pretty hard to come to hard and fast conclusions.” :lol

McConnell's show of seriousness comes at a time when the reelection campaigns of some of the most vulnerable members of his caucus are sucking wind.

Four Republican senators (https://www.nationaljournal.com/s/682314?unlock=1EAZFXDRKO5HMK81) in tough reelection bids presently have approval ratings that are underwater and were simultaneously outraised by their Democratic opponents in third-quarter fundraising:

Sens. Susan Collins of Maine,

Joni Ernst of Iowa,

Martha McSally of Arizona, and

Thom Tillis of North Carolina.

https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2019/10/23/1894574/-Senate-Republicans-coming-to-grips-with-the-fact-that-defending-Trump-is-a-fool-s-errand?detail=emaildkre (https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2019/10/23/1894574/-Senate-Republicans-coming-to-grips-with-the-fact-that-defending-Trump-is-a-fool-s-errand?detail=emaildkre)

Hey, weasal words Thune, Trash and Mulvaney ADMITTING quid-pro-quo corruption on TeeVee isn't "transparent" enough? :lol

[boutons_deux]

Steve Bannon's rogue impeachment defense shows just how stupid he thinks Trump is (https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2019/10/24/1894757/-Steve-Bannon-s-rogue-impeachment-defense-shows-just-how-stupid-he-thinks-Trump-is)

Steve Bannon

still strongly supports Donald Trump,

wants him in the White House …

and very clearly believes he’s an fucking idiot.

Former Breitbart editor Raheem Kassam, one of Bannon’s co-hosts, says,

“There’s a very serious failure to take this whole process seriously from the Republican side.”

Their War Room show is about telling Republicans to take it very seriously, starting with the name:

Trump has refused to have an impeachment defense war room in the White House.You can basically go down the list of Trump fall-back positions on defense, and

Bannon thinks they’re a bad idea.

Don’t say it’s a “witch hunt.”

Don’t call the pro-impeachment polls “fake news.”

Don’t try to slam everyone who testifies against Trump.

And FFS, “We can’t do the Rudy thing anymore.”

in their view. “Here’s our fundamental problem:

We don’t have an elevator pitch to easily describe this to the right,”

says Bannon’s other co-host, 2016 Trump campaign communications director Jason Miller.

a more fundamental problem:

Trump is guilty of massive abuses of power,

obstruction of justice,

and more.

https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2019/10/24/1894757/-Steve-Bannon-s-rogue-impeachment-defense-shows-just-how-stupid-he-thinks-Trump-is?detail=emaildkre

[Chris]

https://twitter.com/seanmdav/status/1187415893560692739?s=19

[Pavlov]

https://twitter.com/seanmdav/status/1187415893560692739?s=19You didn't bitch about the exact same process during the Benghazi hearings, so do us a favor and stop pretending you're acting on anything resembling principle.

[boutons_deux]

Mueller wasn't a "debacle"

it documented 9? times Trash obstructed, and had strong sniffs of Trash + Pootin

[Chris]

You didn't bitch about the exact same process during the Benghazi hearings, so do us a favor and stop pretending you're acting on anything resembling principle.

I wasn't posting here during Benghazi :lol want to try again?

[Reck]

want to try again?

My name ain't Pav but..

https://twitter.com/politvidchannel/status/1187359261367496704

:lol you

[Chris]

My name ain't Pav but..

https://twitter.com/politvidchannel/status/1187359261367496704

:lol you

This may come as a surprise to someone who only sees black and white with no nuance, but I don't have blanket support for Republicans.

:lol Simple Reck

[Chris]

https://twitter.com/RepMattGaetz/status/1187434921603809286?s=19

[ducks]

Mueller wasn't a "debacle"

it documented 9? times Trash obstructed, and had strong sniffs of Trash + Pootin

Says the great buttons who hates America and everything it does

[Chris]

https://twitter.com/gatewaypundit/status/1187428497435906054?s=19

[Reck]

This may come as a surprise to someone who only sees black and white with no nuance, but I don't have blanket support for Republicans.

:lol Simple Reck

But you do. :lol

How many republicans have you turned against because your orange man crush told you to do so? I'll wait..

[Chris]

But you do. :lol

How many republicans have you turned against because your orange man crush told you to do so? I'll wait..

lol "i'll wait" Simple Reck sounds like your typical Libtard on twitter :lol

[vy65]

This may come as a surprise to someone who only sees black and white with no nuance, but I don't have blanket support for Republicans.

:lol Simple Reck


:lmao You’d offer your mouth up as dear leader’s bidet if he asked you.

[Reck]

lol "i'll wait" Simple Reck sounds like your typical Libtard on twitter :lol

dat quick change of subject tho. :lol

[FuzzyLumpkins]

Obama 2008 ran a campaign largely about healthcare and Iraq. It was a far cry from say Willy Horton or Butter Emails.

Sure but my point is that the Dems have done it too in their campaigns.

[boutons_deux]

Sure but my point is that the Dems have done it too in their campaigns.

examples?

[baseline bum]

Sure but my point is that the Dems have done it too in their campaigns.

I just don't want the Democrats thinking they can win with a campaign centered on how unfit for office Trump is, how much of a criminal he is, how unable he is to control his emotions, etc. Which is what I fear a Biden campaign will be about, just like the Clinton one was, which will lead to low turnout. If it's another low turnout election like 2016 we're going to end up with four more years of orange Nazi.

[TSA]

I just don't want the Democrats thinking they can win with a campaign centered on how unfit for office Trump is, how much of a criminal he is, how unable he is to control his emotions, etc. Which is what I fear a Biden campaign will be about, just like the Clinton one was, which will lead to low turnout. If it's another low turnout election like 2016 we're going to end up with four more years of orange Nazi.

https://twitter.com/JoeBiden/status/1186989582182694922

[Reck]

I just don't want the Democrats thinking they can win with a campaign centered on how unfit for office Trump is, how much of a criminal he is, how unable he is to control his emotions, etc. Which is what I fear a Biden campaign will be about, just like the Clinton one was, which will lead to low turnout. If it's another low turnout election like 2016 we're going to end up with four more years of orange Nazi.

You dont need to even say it. Most people with common sense know Trump is basically a criminal who has gotten away with it.

[TSA]

I just don't want the Democrats thinking they can win with a campaign centered on how unfit for office Trump is, how much of a criminal he is, how unable he is to control his emotions, etc. Which is what I fear a Biden campaign will be about, just like the Clinton one was, which will lead to low turnout. If it's another low turnout election like 2016 we're going to end up with four more years of orange Nazi.

https://twitter.com/JoeBiden/status/1187104405637779462

https://www.todosconbiden.com/

https://twitter.com/todosconbiden

https://www.facebook.com/todosconbiden

:rollin

[boutons_deux]

‘We’re getting crushed’:

White House staff panicking as Trump’s inner circle battles over impeachment defense

close aides to the president are looking at the long game and

lamenting they have no one capable of mounting a public defense of Trump.

some staffers are worried they are losing the public relations battle. :lol gonna lose the impeachment batttle, too!

Giuliani has been asked to curtail his TV appearances, :lol

the lack of a consistent response has been hampered by infighting at the highest levels, with no one able to agree on a plan to fight back.

“White House aides have complained that White House counsel Pat Cipollone has not shared information with others in the West Wing.

Mulvaney and Cipollone have butted heads during the process,

showing 55 percent of voters now supporting the impeachment inquiry.

https://www.rawstory.com/2019/10/were-getting-crushed-white-house-staff-panicking-as-trumps-inner-circle-battles-over-impeachment-defense/?utm_source=&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=2797&recip_id=298460&list_id=1 (https://www.rawstory.com/2019/10/were-getting-crushed-white-house-staff-panicking-as-trumps-inner-circle-battles-over-impeachment-defense/?utm_source=&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=2797&recip_id=298460&list_id=1)

[Chris]

Jose Biden :lol

[djohn2oo8]

1187464670757773312

:lmao Dayummm

[djohn2oo8]

Bolton strikes back

[djohn2oo8]

1187467583160815617

[Reck]

Jose Biden :lol

https://twitter.com/realdonaldtrump/status/728297587418247168?lang=en

:lol Hispanics

[boutons_deux]

Of course, deeply indebted Trash, dreaming of his Moscow Trash Tower International, would love to be responsible for Pootin and his "little green men" invading the rest of Ukraine.

[Spurminator]

https://twitter.com/JoeBiden/status/1187104405637779462

https://www.todosconbiden.com/

https://twitter.com/todosconbiden

https://www.facebook.com/todosconbiden

:rollin

Obviously better to campaign on exposing Democrats' underground pedophilia rings.

[TSA]

Obviously better to campaign on exposing Democrats' underground pedophilia rings.

click the links Lambert

[benefactor]

This may come as a surprise to someone who only sees black and white with no nuance, but I don't have blanket support for Republicans.

:lol:lol:lol

[Spurminator]

click the links Lambert

First you were LOL-amused by an advertising campaign, now it's a few dummy social media accounts that have you tickled.

You should get Netflix.

[Spurs Homer]

You didn't bitch about the exact same process during the Benghazi hearings, so do us a favor and stop pretending you're acting on anything resembling principle.

wasnt just benghazi;

you want cherry-picked selective leaking?
(strock/page texts slamming trump released- strock/page texts slamming hrc, obama - not released)

bunch of other examples in both the mueller and kavanaugh debacles of how justice was obstructed by repugs when holding the majority

[TSA]

First you were LOL-amused by an advertising campaign, now it's a few dummy social media accounts that have you tickled.

You should get Netflix.

Sorry that your girl ran a less terrible campaign than your boy is currently running.

[TSA]

https://mobile.twitter.com/KenDilanianNBC/status/1187446826749845505

Nothing to see here move along. Investigating possible corruption of a candidate bad now.

[Reck]

Sorry that your girl ran a less terrible campaign than your boy is currently running.

But Hillary'd.

You really need new material after you got nuked.

[TSA]

But Hillary'd.

You really need new material after you got nuked.

Trump President not Clinton. You just got nuked.

[Chris]

https://twitter.com/realdonaldtrump/status/728297587418247168?lang=en

:lol Hispanics

pretty sure todosconbiden > i like taco bowls

[Chris]

mi llamo Joe :lol

[DarrinS]

https://twitter.com/JoeBiden/status/1186989582182694922

Desperado :lol

[boutons_deux]

https://mobile.twitter.com/KenDilanianNBC/status/1187446826749845505

Nothing to see here move along. Investigating possible corruption of a candidate bad now.

yep, if you want to go after Hunter, start another thread. Your shit is just whataboutism.

btw, in your Hunter thread, also whatabout the Trash spawn doing business on the Trash name?

And Trash's revenue is nearly $150M since he took office.

We still don't know how many $100Ms he owes.

[boutons_deux]

From a NYTImes email (the NYTimes totally destroyed by Trash cancelling the WH subscription)



What really scares the White House about the impeachment investigation right now?





At a Senate Republican lunch last week,

Lindsey Graham :lol tried to propose a letter to Nancy Pelosi saying that

the House was wasting its time because the Senate wouldn’t convict the president,

and there was pushback from Republicans. :lol

To many people around Mr. Trump, that was scary.

It signaled that people who haven’t been asked —

retiring senators such as Richard Shelby or others —

could actually break with him.

Republican support might be softer than they think it should be.

[Quadzilla99]

1187524133065838593

[DarrinS]

1187524133065838593



1187384537199841280

[Reck]

Back to Trump's greatest hits, I guess. 2016.

Pretty much all he has. I beat Hillary by a landslide! MAGA!

[Quadzilla99]

1187384537199841280

lol Mollie Hemingway. Could you have chosen a more partisan hack? Was Sean Davis's twitter unavailable?

[ElNono]

This may come as a surprise to someone who only sees black and white with no nuance, but I don't have blanket support for Republicans.

https://thumbs.gfycat.com/LoathsomeMerryKoi-size_restricted.gif

[boutons_deux]

Judge Napolitano Schools ‘Fox & Friends’ on Impeachment:

Schiff Just ‘Following the Rules’ Written by GOP

“And as frustrating as it may be to have these hearings going on behind closed doors—

the hearings over which Congressman Schiff is presiding—they are consistent with the rules.”

“Well, they can’t change the rules, they follow the rules.”

He went to explain that those rules were

last written in January 2015 when Republicans held the majority and the Speaker of the House was John Boehner. :lol

“The rules say that this level of inquiry, this initial level of inquiry, can be done in secret,” Napolitano said,

effectively dismantling the primary talking point of both Fox News and the Trump White House.

“Secret evidence doesn’t work in this world,

so eventually there will be a public presentation of this,” he added,

“at which lawyers for the president can cross-examine these people and challenge them.”

“I know this is going to sound weird, these are not the impeachment hearings.

The impeachment hearings have to be held in public by the House Judiciary Committee.

This is the initial interview of witnesses to see what they have to say,

to determine whether or not they are even worthy of presenting evidence of impeachment.”

https://www.thedailybeast.com/judge-napolitano-schools-fox-and-friends-on-impeachment-adam-schiff-just-following-the-rules-written-by-gop

[boutons_deux]

https://img.thedailybeast.com/image/upload/c_crop,d_placeholder_euli9k,h_1687,w_3000,x_0,y_0/dpr_1.5/c_limit,w_1044/fl_lossy,q_auto/v1571932289/191024-wilson-trump-clown-possee-tease_vukz9s

[spurraider21]

:lmao

13 Republicans involved in impeachment protest already have access to hearings (https://www.axios.com/house-republicans-scif-impeachment-inquiry-67cf94d5-b2be-4420-ab4c-0582eb1369ef.html)

[boutons_deux]

:lmao

13 Republicans involved in impeachment protest already have access to hearings (https://www.axios.com/house-republicans-scif-impeachment-inquiry-67cf94d5-b2be-4420-ab4c-0582eb1369ef.html)



I read it was 40, and they all can question the witnesses

[Winehole23]

I read it was 40, and they all can question the witnesses13 who participated in the sit in had the right to be there and question the witness, but chose to disrupt the meeting instead.

Then they ordered pizza.

Then Matt Gaetz compared it to Thermopylae.

[ducks]

You want them to Order escorts?

[boutons_deux]

it's 47, and 12 can question

[benefactor]

You want them to Order escorts?
Do you ever get tired of being dumb?

[boutons_deux]

13 who participated in the sit in had the right to be there and question the witness, but chose to disrupt the meeting instead.

Then they ordered pizza.

Then Matt Gaetz compared it to Thermopylae.

yep, said they were the "300" :lol Florida Man

[Winehole23]

You want them to Order escorts?Perhaps that counts as civil disobedience as well, but like ordering pizza, it doesn't send a coherent message about what you're protesting.

Weak tactics.

[ducks]

Escorts can be dumb but they better looking then you !

[boutons_deux]

https://images.dailykos.com/images/731196/story_image/GettyImages-1177775883.jpg?1571921719

[Winehole23]

Escorts can be dumb but they better looking then you !Cuteness counts for sure.

Good talk, ducks.

[Winehole23]

https://images.dailykos.com/images/731196/story_image/GettyImages-1177775883.jpg?1571921719THERMOPYLAE!

[FuzzyLumpkins]

I just don't want the Democrats thinking they can win with a campaign centered on how unfit for office Trump is, how much of a criminal he is, how unable he is to control his emotions, etc. Which is what I fear a Biden campaign will be about, just like the Clinton one was, which will lead to low turnout. If it's another low turnout election like 2016 we're going to end up with four more years of orange Nazi.

I hear you. Clinton did nothing more than make a website about policy and made her campaign mostly that glass ceiling and I'm not the orange turd bullshit. She also ignored the constant barrage of corruption and email narrative. Throw in the scandal involving the DNC and Bernie Sanders and she was fucked. Even still it was close.

[boutons_deux]

"the constant barrage of corruption and email narrative"

both fabricated bullshit, lies, slander from Fox, Repugs, right wing hate media.

[Pavlov]

1187384537199841280So it's a criminal investigation into Mueller?

He already reached and published his conclusion about Mifsud.

Guess you were too busy worshiping Dennison to notice.

[djohn2oo8]

1187718522430001155



LAWDYYYYYY!!!!

[LkrFan]

https://twitter.com/gregolear/status/1187544376475561989?s=19

[Spurs Homer]

You want them to Order escorts?


does DC have enough boy escorts to satisfy all those pedos?

[LkrFan]

https://twitter.com/TeaPainUSA/status/1187726237042692101?s=19

:wow

[benefactor]

Would be hilarious if Bolton went through with it tbh

[LkrFan]

https://twitter.com/thehill/status/1187786667438022661?s=19
https://media.giphy.com/media/JmsG1PY1K94hyOa1v9/giphy.gif

:lol

[Chris]

Bolton good now.

[benefactor]

Bolton good now.
Nah, just bad for Trump now. He's still a POS

[Chris]

https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn%3AANd9GcSyXOaIhXZI_GuiIs0qClYXf8yNw8E qMGsd4itnT8tDfkl2Fd3W

[djohn2oo8]

1187803527629938689


:lmao :lmao

[djohn2oo8]

1187804835976011778

[TSA]

1187803527629938689


:lmao :lmao

You post a lot of non-stories but this might be the stupidest shit you’ve ever posted.


Why have you abandoned your baby?

https://www.spurstalk.com/forums/showthread.php?t=266387&page=1914&

[koriwhat]

You post a lot of non-stories but this might be the stupidest shit you’ve ever posted.


Why have you abandoned your baby?

https://www.spurstalk.com/forums/showthread.php?t=266387&page=1914&

djohn loves him some feminine kyle griffin...

[spurraider21]

1187803527629938689


:lmao :lmao
:lmao and this guy was trumps cybersecurity advisor

[LkrFan]

https://twitter.com/MaddowBlog/status/1187812112824963075?s=19

[LkrFan]

1187803527629938689


:lmao :lmao

:rollin :lmao :rollin

[LkrFan]

https://twitter.com/TeaPainUSA/status/1187747236479950848?s=19

:lol

[koriwhat]

funny how the left applauds ussr tactics like a fake impeachment inquiry without a vote and behind closed doors. it's quite comical how the boogie man is russia while the left uses nothing but ussr tactics to try and squash their opposition.

[Chris]

Imagine going to CNN to get your news :lol

[spurraider21]

funny how the left applauds ussr tactics like a fake impeachment inquiry without a vote and behind closed doors. it's quite comical how the boogie man is russia while the left uses nothing but ussr tactics to try and squash their opposition.
when was the last time there was a behind closed doors impeachment hearing in the ussr?

[koriwhat]

when was the last time there was a behind closed doors impeachment hearing in the ussr?

funny how you want to act like i am speaking merely of impeachment and not of closed door testimony where the right can't know who is testifying, can't hear them testify, can't read transcripts, etc... yet here you are being petty over nothing while slurping up your false idols ussr tactics.

[djohn2oo8]

1187815017632206849

[koriwhat]

1187815017632206849

you and your tweets are so fucking lame... kgriffin2oo8

[clambake]

there are republicans in the room.

[djohn2oo8]

1187811327223521283

[djohn2oo8]

1187813108217253888

[djohn2oo8]

1187814691566948354

[djohn2oo8]

1187817577696808963

[TSA]

:lol djohn throwing his God Mueller under the bus

[djohn2oo8]

1187818354230337537

[djohn2oo8]

:lol djohn throwing his God Mueller under the bus
??? Dumbass. They get all of his materials that are now before grand juries.


:lmao TSA

[djohn2oo8]

1187815404711878656


:lmao Hot dayummmmmm

[djohn2oo8]

Btw, at least 12 pending cases those materials relate to

[vy65]

:lol djohn throwing his God Mueller under the bus

How is releasing the full report throwing Mueller under the bus?

[djohn2oo8]

1187814605206294528

LkrFan get in here and holla at ya boy

[TSA]

How is releasing the full report throwing Mueller under the bus?

Mueller and his team had more investigative resources and power than these committees could ever dream of and these stupid fucks are going to try the Russia angle again and fail again.

[TSA]

1187815404711878656


:lmao Hot dayummmmmm

:lmao going back to the debunked Manafort secretly met with Assange well

[djohn2oo8]

1187830978540113920

[djohn2oo8]

http://giphygifs.s3.amazonaws.com/media/jNdw5Qmy5MOpq/giphy.gif


Judge Howell!

[TSA]

http://giphygifs.s3.amazonaws.com/media/jNdw5Qmy5MOpq/giphy.gif


Judge Howell!

It will be appealed and Howell will get slapped down and you'll go back into hiding like you always do.

http://giphygifs.s3.amazonaws.com/media/jNdw5Qmy5MOpq/giphy.gif

[djohn2oo8]

It will be appealed and Howell will get slapped down and you'll go back into hiding like you always do.

http://giphygifs.s3.amazonaws.com/media/jNdw5Qmy5MOpq/giphy.gif

Any idea where the FISA abuse report is?


:lmao

[djohn2oo8]

Don’t make me resurrect Pizzagate

[djohn2oo8]

Or when the book of Q told you Hillary ate dead babies

[LkrFan]

1187814605206294528

LkrFan get in here and holla at ya boy

John Clawd Van Dammmmn!! :rollin :lmao :rollin

[LkrFan]

https://twitter.com/Tom_Winter/status/1187814726211903489?s=19

:corn:

[TSA]

Any idea where the FISA abuse report is?


:lmao

Yeah it should be released some time in November, and the findings led to Durham opening a criminal inquiry.

[TSA]

Don’t make me resurrect Pizzagate

:lol don't make me resurrect

Remember the thread where you bet me $2000 that Mueller was going to put Trump, Trump Jr, Kushner, and Ivanka in prison? :lol
Remember the thread where you lost that bet and welched because you were too broke to pay up and you begged me to drop it via PM? :lol
I remember that thread https://www.spurstalk.com/forums/showthread.php?t=266387

Remember the thread where you were all excited to join the Spurstalk fantasy football league? :lol
Remember when you told the league you were going to pay tomorrow and then I said I'd contact the commissioner and take any money you won to pay off your debt and then you never joined the league? :lol
I remember that thread https://www.spurstalk.com/forums/showthread.php?t=279589&page=6

[djohn2oo8]

TSA thought Pelosi was ditching Impeachment :lmao

[djohn2oo8]

Thought Seth Rich was Guccifer 2.0

[djohn2oo8]

Anybody seen Susan Rice’s indictment?

[TSA]

TSA thought Pelosi was ditching Impeachment :lmao


:lol don't make me resurrect

Remember the thread where you bet me $2000 that Mueller was going to put Trump, Trump Jr, Kushner, and Ivanka in prison? :lol
Remember the thread where you lost that bet and welched because you were too broke to pay up and you begged me to drop it via PM? :lol
I remember that thread https://www.spurstalk.com/forums/showthread.php?t=266387

Remember the thread where you were all excited to join the Spurstalk fantasy football league? :lol
Remember when you told the league you were going to pay tomorrow and then I said I'd contact the commissioner and take any money you won to pay off your debt and then you never joined the league? :lol
I remember that thread https://www.spurstalk.com/forums/showthread.php?t=279589&page=6

[TSA]

Thought Seth Rich was Guccifer 2.0


:lol don't make me resurrect

Remember the thread where you bet me $2000 that Mueller was going to put Trump, Trump Jr, Kushner, and Ivanka in prison? :lol
Remember the thread where you lost that bet and welched because you were too broke to pay up and you begged me to drop it via PM? :lol
I remember that thread https://www.spurstalk.com/forums/showthread.php?t=266387

Remember the thread where you were all excited to join the Spurstalk fantasy football league? :lol
Remember when you told the league you were going to pay tomorrow and then I said I'd contact the commissioner and take any money you won to pay off your debt and then you never joined the league? :lol
I remember that thread https://www.spurstalk.com/forums/showthread.php?t=279589&page=6

[TSA]

Anybody seen Susan Rice’s indictment?


:lol don't make me resurrect

Remember the thread where you bet me $2000 that Mueller was going to put Trump, Trump Jr, Kushner, and Ivanka in prison? :lol
Remember the thread where you lost that bet and welched because you were too broke to pay up and you begged me to drop it via PM? :lol
I remember that thread https://www.spurstalk.com/forums/showthread.php?t=266387

Remember the thread where you were all excited to join the Spurstalk fantasy football league? :lol
Remember when you told the league you were going to pay tomorrow and then I said I'd contact the commissioner and take any money you won to pay off your debt and then you never joined the league? :lol
I remember that thread https://www.spurstalk.com/forums/showthread.php?t=279589&page=6

[TSA]

You can keep reminding the board your a welcher I've got no problem with it.

[djohn2oo8]

https://media.giphy.com/media/TT7JW4Qm7uaNW/giphy.gif


Smells like impeachment

[djohn2oo8]

https://media.giphy.com/media/TT7JW4Qm7uaNW/giphy.gif



Smells like impeachment
LkrFan what ya say my nig?

[TSA]

1187814605206294528

LkrFan get in here and holla at ya boy

https://mobile.twitter.com/gabrielmalor/status/1187831202142707712

https://mobile.twitter.com/benjaminwittes/status/1187817474143731712


LkrFan what ya say my nig? :lmao

[djohn2oo8]

TSA. If Trump is truly innocent, then why shouldn’t the house see the same material that is currently in front of an active grand jury? Explain

[djohn2oo8]

And btw, that decision isn’t getting overturned. They will appeal and lose.

[djohn2oo8]

1187881206844669952

[djohn2oo8]

1187882224877735936

[LkrFan]

LkrFan what ya say my nig?

I can smell that shiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiit!! :lmao

[LkrFan]

TSA. If Trump is truly innocent, then why shouldn’t the house see the same material that is currently in front of an active grand jury? Explain

Exactly. TSA is full of shit :lol

[LkrFan]

1187882224877735936

Hey TSA what do you think about this shiiiiiiiiiiiiit? :lmao

[ducks]

https://www-m.cnn.com/2019/10/26/politics/impeachment-unpopular-swing-states-wisconsin/index.html?r=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.cnn.com%2F

[ElNono]

Mueller and his team had more investigative resources and power than these committees could ever dream of and these stupid fucks are going to try the Russia angle again and fail again.

Even if we take you at face value, what kind of mental gymnastics did you have to go through to turn that into ‘throwing Mueller under the bus’?

[boutons_deux]

One of Murdoch's toilet papers exonerates Trash

Wall Street Journal editorial board:

Trump is too 'inept' and 'incompetent' to do crimes (https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2019/10/24/1894828/-Wall-Street-Journal-editorial-board-Trump-is-too-inept-and-incompetent-to-do-crimes)

Most of the op-ed is cribbed directly from Republican talking points, mewling that Taylor "testified in secret" (his opening statement was publicly released) and that, Actually, maybe it will turn out when all transcripts are out that there is nothing to see here.

But then it devolves into a more novel argument: Dear Leader, the Angry Hatepumpkin, is too stupid and incompetent to have successfully committed crimes.

Intriguingly, Mr. Taylor says in his statement that many people in the Administration opposed the Giuliani effort, including some in senior positions at the White House.

This matters because it may turn out that while Mr. Trump wanted a quid-pro-quo policy ultimatum toward Ukraine, he was too inept to execute it.

Impeachment for incompetence would disqualify most of the government, and most Presidents at some point or another in office.



This is the editorial board of The Wall Street Journal making this case, to be clear.

It is important that they be given boldfaced credit for their stance; we would not want to deprive them. Wall. Street. Journal. The newspaper.

https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2019/10/24/1894828/-Wall-Street-Journal-editorial-board-Trump-is-too-inept-and-incompetent-to-do-crimes?detail=emaildksp

Trash is kind of a idiot savant, widely deeply ignorant and stupid, mentally deficient in all areas

EXCEPT

that Trash is highly intelligent, motivated, skilled, defensive (paranoid) when pursuing corruption and violence for his self-aggrandizement and self-enrichment.

[boutons_deux]

The Common Misconception About ‘High Crimes and Misdemeanors’

The constitutional standard for impeachment is different from what’s at play in a regular criminal trial.

“High crimes and misdemeanors” is not, and has never been, limited to indictable criminality.

Nonetheless, despite centuries of learning on the point, there the phrase sits, begging to be taken at its delusory face value.

There are two strong arguments against the idea that the phrase requires criminal behavior:

a historical one and a practical one.

The history of the phrase “high crimes and misdemeanors” and of how it entered our Constitution establishes beyond serious dispute that it extends far beyond mere criminal conduct.

The practical reasoning is in some ways more important:

A standard that permitted the removal of presidents only for indictable crimes would leave the nation defenseless against the most dangerous kinds of presidential behavior.

, the founders, both during the ratification period and afterward, identified multiple noncriminal acts they believed to be impeachable.

Madison even argued (https://founders.archives.gov/documents/Madison/01-12-02-0143) that presidents could be impeached for “wanton removal of meritorious officers.”

Alexander Hamilton made the larger point that impeachment is directed at “political” offenses that “proceed from … the abuse or violation of some public trust.”

impeachable conduct is often “purely political,” and that “no previous statute is necessary to authorize an impeachment for any official misconduct.”

“high Crimes and Misdemeanors” was not restricted to indictable crimes. Their understanding has been ratified by two centuries of American practice.

Multiple judges have been impeached, and some removed, for noncriminal abuses or dereliction of office.

the House Judiciary Committee approved three articles of impeachment against Richard Nixon:

the first for obstruction of justice,

the second for abuse of power, and

the third for defying House subpoenas during its impeachment investigation.

the best argument against the claim that impeachment requires criminality is

not the overwhelming weight of contrary history and precedent,

but the sheer dangerous absurdity of the proposition.

Impeachment is not an antique legalism, but an essential tool for securing the safety of the American constitutional order against those who would corrupt or destroy it.

An Englishman once said (https://books.google.com/books?id=UT0_MCzwRW4C&pg=PA93&lpg=PA93&dq=goliath%27s+sword+impeachment&source=bl&ots=hk0WaIQfdh&sig=ACfU3U1gJ7i0p5-9Nh_X7ZOd03FXQ2c-TA&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwjz39G6-57lAhVHmK0KHf-pDhUQ6AEwAnoECAUQAQ#v=onepage&q=goliath's%20sword%20impeachment&f=false),

“Impeachment ought to be, like Goliath’s sword, kept in the temple, and not used but on great occasions.”

This aphorism is often cited as a caution against the frivolous unsheathing of impeachment’s blade, but

it is also a reminder of the breadth and power of the weapon in times of need.

This is such a time.

https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2019/10/what-does-high-crimes-and-misdemeanors-actually-mean/600343/?utm_campaign=the-atlantic&utm_content=5db451974c15b8000148e4d0_ta&utm_medium=social&utm_source=facebook&fbclid=IwAR3bWtKQ3oZSsL5ppl2FRktH9fZhXAzTbuIOG_AfE 5zmlAIZtKsWbRWWNH8

[Spurs Homer]

The Common Misconception About ‘High Crimes and Misdemeanors’

The constitutional standard for impeachment is different from what’s at play in a regular criminal trial.

“High crimes and misdemeanors” is not, and has never been, limited to indictable criminality.

Nonetheless, despite centuries of learning on the point, there the phrase sits, begging to be taken at its delusory face value.

There are two strong arguments against the idea that the phrase requires criminal behavior:

a historical one and a practical one.

The history of the phrase “high crimes and misdemeanors” and of how it entered our Constitution establishes beyond serious dispute that it extends far beyond mere criminal conduct.

The practical reasoning is in some ways more important:

A standard that permitted the removal of presidents only for indictable crimes would leave the nation defenseless against the most dangerous kinds of presidential behavior.

, the founders, both during the ratification period and afterward, identified multiple noncriminal acts they believed to be impeachable.

Madison even argued (https://founders.archives.gov/documents/Madison/01-12-02-0143) that presidents could be impeached for “wanton removal of meritorious officers.”

Alexander Hamilton made the larger point that impeachment is directed at “political” offenses that “proceed from … the abuse or violation of some public trust.”

impeachable conduct is often “purely political,” and that “no previous statute is necessary to authorize an impeachment for any official misconduct.”

“high Crimes and Misdemeanors” was not restricted to indictable crimes. Their understanding has been ratified by two centuries of American practice.

Multiple judges have been impeached, and some removed, for noncriminal abuses or dereliction of office.

the House Judiciary Committee approved three articles of impeachment against Richard Nixon:

the first for obstruction of justice,

the second for abuse of power, and

the third for defying House subpoenas during its impeachment investigation.

the best argument against the claim that impeachment requires criminality is not the overwhelming weight of contrary history and precedent, but the sheer dangerous absurdity of the proposition.

Impeachment is not an antique legalism, but an essential tool for securing the safety of the American constitutional order against those who would corrupt or destroy it.

An Englishman once said (https://books.google.com/books?id=UT0_MCzwRW4C&pg=PA93&lpg=PA93&dq=goliath%27s+sword+impeachment&source=bl&ots=hk0WaIQfdh&sig=ACfU3U1gJ7i0p5-9Nh_X7ZOd03FXQ2c-TA&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwjz39G6-57lAhVHmK0KHf-pDhUQ6AEwAnoECAUQAQ#v=onepage&q=goliath's%20sword%20impeachment&f=false),

“Impeachment ought to be, like Goliath’s sword, kept in the temple, and not used but on great occasions.”

This aphorism is often cited as a caution against the frivolous unsheathing of impeachment’s blade, but

it is also a reminder of the breadth and power of the weapon in times of need. This is such a time.

https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2019/10/what-does-high-crimes-and-misdemeanors-actually-mean/600343/?utm_campaign=the-atlantic&utm_content=5db451974c15b8000148e4d0_ta&utm_medium=social&utm_source=facebook&fbclid=IwAR3bWtKQ3oZSsL5ppl2FRktH9fZhXAzTbuIOG_AfE 5zmlAIZtKsWbRWWNH8


If Mueller had balls we would not be in this predicament - with a lunatic criminal taking orders from russia to pull our troops out of syria and allowing Russia to assume control of that area.

Mueller pussied out instead of challenging that bogus OLC memo - and had he instead adhered to the Constitution and showed some spine and compelled the traitors to ALL testify under oath -


at WORST- we would have had a number of trump team indicted for perjury -
at BEST -

we would have rid this cancer by showing ALL of the evidence and shown trump selling out the country to help Russia in their attack on the USA elections/democracy.

[boutons_deux]

If Mueller had balls we would not be in this predicament

He delivered 9? instances of Trash obstruction, each of which is impeachable, and certainly the sum is.

Mulller played the Good Obedient Soldier role and obeyed the totally BULLSHIT rule about not indicting a President, which of course was written by the self-serving President's own bootlicking employees.

[Chris]

O6t8_mEZZgo

destroys Schiff :lol

[LkrFan]

https://twitter.com/chelsea_janes/status/1188623404188012544?s=19

:rollin :lmao :rollin

[LkrFan]

https://twitter.com/albamonica/status/1188623950743588866?s=19

:rollin :lmao :rollin

[LkrFan]

https://twitter.com/arlenparsa/status/1188627056323633154?s=19

:lol

[Spurs Homer]

:lmao:lmao:lmao:lmao

[djohn2oo8]

https://twitter.com/albamonica/status/1188623950743588866?s=19

:rollin :lmao :rollin
:lmao

[djohn2oo8]

1188867748182528002

[djohn2oo8]

1188875600959852551

[SnakeBoy]

https://twitter.com/albamonica/status/1188623950743588866?s=19

:rollin :lmao :rollin

lol Full On

Literally everyone in the video is just sitting there waiting for them to shut up

[Chris]

lol Full On

Literally everyone in the video is just sitting there waiting for them to shut up

:lol

[spurraider21]

https://twitter.com/albamonica/status/1188623950743588866?s=19

:rollin :lmao :rollin
at home, Dennison?

[SnakeBoy]

at home, Dennison?

Just look at all those MAGA hats

[spurraider21]

Just look at all those MAGA hats
where does david dennison currently reside?

[Chris]

https://twitter.com/bennyjohnson/status/1188807646012465153?s=19


:lol

[Chris]

https://twitter.com/RepLeeZeldin/status/1188890411462467584?s=19

[RandomGuy]

Just look at all those MAGA hats

https://fanatics.frgimages.com/FFImage/thumb.aspx?i=/productimages/_257000/altimages/FF_257619ALT1_full.jpg&w=900



Sure... look at the hats... :rollin

Maybe they are all worn by white millenials leaving the Democratic party. :lmao

[ChumpDumper]

https://twitter.com/RepLeeZeldin/status/1188890411462467584?s=19False.

[LkrFan]

at home, Dennison?

:lmao

[djohn2oo8]

1188899448606339074

[boutons_deux]

It's Happening!

Once impeachment investigation is formally approved, Trash/Tom Hagen will have less ability to block Congress

[TSA]

1188899448606339074

:lol Pelosi caved

[djohn2oo8]

1188904125221744643

[djohn2oo8]

1188908314383523842

[ChumpDumper]

:lol Pelosi caved
lol no

Happy Qanon day though!

[spurraider21]

1188908314383523842
makes sense. a continued refusal to comply with those requests would only add further grounds

[Chris]

https://twitter.com/RepMattGaetz/status/1188895732457234432?s=19

[Spurs Homer]

Repukes took the bait

pelosi let them bitch and moan about “process” and “secret hearings” and “unfair” and “dennison deserves due process”

then when the entire planet agreed that all that was holding impeachment back was the dems agreeing to

“fair rules”

pelosi said - “ok- be careful what you wish for”

lololol


how will repukes move those goalposts now that they will be asked about content/evidence/trump defense


instead of process?

[Chris]

https://twitter.com/benshapiro/status/1188906983170007040?s=19

[spurraider21]

https://twitter.com/benshapiro/status/1188906983170007040?s=19
quid pro quo in the benefit of the country is fine. thats just striking a deal.

quid pro quo to benefit an individual in his bid to get re-elected? bad.

[Chris]

https://twitter.com/GOPLeader/status/1188888032600055814?s=19


oh snap :wow

[ChumpDumper]

https://twitter.com/RepMattGaetz/status/1188895732457234432?s=19:lmao Republicans bitching about their own procedures

[Chris]

quid pro quo to benefit an individual in his bid to get re-elected? bad.

Interesting conspiracy theory you have there, let's see how it plays out.

[spurraider21]

Interesting conspiracy theory you have there, let's see how it plays out.
it's already been admitted to

[Chris]

it's already been admitted to

nah

[Chris]

https://twitter.com/GOPoversight/status/1188873561580232705?s=19

[ChumpDumper]

https://twitter.com/GOPoversight/status/1188873561580232705?s=19Then why did they keep bragging about a quid pro quo like they were fancy geniuses?

[LkrFan]

https://twitter.com/blakesmustache/status/1188904456819269632?s=19

[Chris]

uncle blazer and aunt crabby :lol

[djohn2oo8]

1188982545200885761

[djohn2oo8]

1188985094381416449

[Chris]

Pelosi was asked by NBC News reporter Alex Moe to comment on the impeachment resolution, and the Speaker replied, “It’s not an impeachment resolution.”


:lol

[djohn2oo8]

1188987523885871104

[Spurtacular]

:lol 128 pages in 4 weeks
:lol desperate chumpettes

[djohn2oo8]

1188987023710920705

[Spurtacular]

https://twitter.com/blakesmustache/status/1188904456819269632?s=19

:lol :cry Muh guess
:lol Lock that in your hope chest, LF

[djohn2oo8]

1188988896094380035

[dabom6]

Boom faggot. Chrissy

[djohn2oo8]

1188991151195545600

[Spurtacular]

1188988896094380035

Oh, the humanity!

[djohn2oo8]

1188992224295559168

[djohn2oo8]

1188992612688117760

[Chris]

:sleep

[ElNono]

1188992224295559168

Reminds me of McCain... Nation over party. True patriot.

[djohn2oo8]

1188986103933669376

[djohn2oo8]

Also says Pence knew

[djohn2oo8]

1188994510816190464


gotdayummmmmm LkrFan

[dabom6]

1188994510816190464


gotdayummmmmm LkrFan

Receipts. :lol

[Spurtacular]

Receipts. :lol

Has Chump accepted you yet?

[vy65]

Tweet crew silent af

[Spurminator]

Tweet crew silent af

Here you go:

TSA: :lol (posts rebuttal by @comfortablysmug)
Chris: (Posts Trump tweet calling Vindman a liar and also someone he's never met)
Darrin: "Meh"
ducks: (starts four unrelated threads)
Derp: (something about Blake)

[vy65]

Here you go:

TSA: :lol (posts rebuttal by @comfortablysmug)
Chris: (Posts Trump tweet calling Vindman a liar and also someone he's never met)
Darrin: "Meh"
ducks: (starts four unrelated threads)
Derp: (something about Blake)

And now they’ll quote this in a desperate attempt to deflect instead of responding to what the Army dude is gonna say

[Winehole23]

Active duty officer testifying against the CINC. Brave.

[vy65]

“I did not think it was proper to demand that a foreign government investigate a U.S. citizen, and I was worried about the implications for the U.S. government’s support of Ukraine,” Colonel Vindman said in his statement. “I realized that if Ukraine pursued an investigation into the Bidens and Burisma it would likely be interpreted as a partisan play which would undoubtedly result in Ukraine losing the bipartisan support it has thus far maintained.”

Burisma Holdings is an energy company on whose board Mr. Biden’s son served while his father was vice president.
“This would all undermine U.S. national security,” Colonel Vindman added, referring to Mr. Trump’s comments in the call.

Chirp chirp

[pgardn]

Here you go:

TSA: :lol (posts rebuttal by @comfortablysmug)
Chris: (Posts Trump tweet calling Vindman a liar and also someone he's never met)
Darrin: "Meh"
ducks: (starts four unrelated threads)
Derp: (something about Blake)

These are the big hitters for the red team on this site.
Pitiful...

The posters above do not think that a president asking a foreign country for dirt on a political opponent is an impeachable offense. So stop the discussion right here. The posters above don’t get why there is a big problem with the aforementioned. Why are worrying about this America? They seriously don’t get it. Or don’t want to get it, since after all it came from their orange god.

[baseline bum]

These are the big hitters for the red team on this site.
Pitiful...

The posters above do not think that a president asking a foreign country for dirt on a political opponent is an impeachable offense. So stop the discussion right here. The posters above don’t get why there is a big problem with the aforementioned. Why are worrying about this America? They seriously don’t get it. Or don’t want to get it, since after all it came from their orange god.

Well it doesn't rise to the level of getting a blowjob from someone not your wife I guess?

[pgardn]

Well it doesn't rise to the level of getting a blowjob from someone not your wife I guess?

Well Stormy noted orange guy has a toadstool for a penis, so there’s that....

[vy65]

The meeting proceeded well until the Ukrainians broached the subject of a meeting between the two presidents. The Ukrainians saw this meeting as critically important in order to solidify the support of their most important international partner. Amb. Sondland started to speak about Ukraine delivering specific investigations in order to secure the meeting with the President, at which time Ambassador Bolton cut the meeting short.

Following this meeting, there was a scheduled debriefing during which Amb. Sondland emphasized the importance that Ukraine deliver the investigations into the 2016 election, the Bidens, and Burisma. I stated to Amb. Sondland that his statements were inappropriate, that the request to investigate Biden and his son had nothing to do with national security, and that such investigations were not something the NSC was going to get involved in or push. Dr. Hill then entered the room and asserted to Amb. Sondland that his statements were inappropriate.

[Chris]

Democrats leaking closed door testimony to damage Trump. The latest NYT story is just another shrimp on the barbie. (hence::sleep)

[ElNono]

Yeah, the problem is the leak, not the testimony :sleep

[Chris]

Selective leaking without due process is concerning. The Colonel is entitled to his opinion about the phone call, but we got the transcripts a long time ago. This is nothing more than mental masturbation for NPCs.

[ElNono]

Closed door testimony good now?

[ElNono]

Selective leaking without due process is concerning. The Colonel is entitled to his opinion about the phone call, but we got the transcripts a long time ago. This is nothing more than mental masturbation for NPCs.

We didn’t get the transcript. What was released, however, does support the Coronel’s contention.

This is not a judicial process, thus your claims of due process are moot. Also don’t forget Republicans are also in the room with ability to question the witness.

[vy65]

Yeah, the problem is the leak, not the testimony :sleep

Nono with the targeted bunker buster truth nuke

[pgardn]

Democrats leaking closed door testimony to damage Trump. The latest NYT story is just another shrimp on the barbie. (hence::sleep)

Did you read what Trump himself released concerning his call to Ukraine you fool?

[vy65]

Little birds shouldn’t be talking about things they don’t know about ...

[Chris]

https://twitter.com/GOPoversight/status/1188945667185692672?s=19

[ChumpDumper]

Democrats leaking closed door testimony to damage Trump. The latest NYT story is just another shrimp on the barbie. (hence::sleep)Hey, they're going to vote to make it all public so you're super happy about that, right?

Or are you sad that Nancy is taking away your pet (and only) talking point?

:lol Qhris

[ElNono]

https://twitter.com/GOPoversight/status/1188945667185692672?s=19

What are Republicans trying to say here? That the Republicans in the Intelligence Committee are stupid or ill suited to participate in the investigation?

[Chris]

It's not an impeachable offense for a President to make military aid contingent on that government launching a corruption investigation.

[ElNono]

It's not an impeachable offense for a President to make military aid contingent on that government launching a corruption investigation.

I thought you said there was no quid pro quo. Why the sudden change of heart?

[ChumpDumper]

It's not an impeachable offense for a President to make military aid contingent on that government launching a corruption investigation.What specific crimes did they demand the Ukrainians investigate?

[ChumpDumper]

I thought you said there was no quid pro quo. Why the sudden change of heart?Get over it incoming.

[vy65]

It’s not an impeachable offense for dear leader to make military aid to a key ally dependent on launching a (already completed) criminal investigation into a political opponent, potentially jeopardizing US foreign policy on political whims because I don’t like team blue. Cmon guize

[vy65]

Memba when the talking point was quintiple hearsay? How far we’ve come ...

[boutons_deux]

Pelosi is now convinced that the evidence of corruption with Ukraine, and no doubt the 9 times of Trash obstructing the Russian investigation are overwhelming.

She's gonna shut up the Repugs about the investigation being ilegit. Fuck the Repugs to hell

[pgardn]

It's not an impeachable offense for a President to make military aid contingent on that government launching a corruption investigation.

Who was the target of that investigation?
And who was suppose to carry out the investigation? (You don’t truly think a government that has just been threatened with denial of aide is going to investigate this problem, you know, the corrupt government itself?)

God this is so laughably stupid.
Sounds like Chris is a presidential advisor.

[ChumpDumper]

Memba when the talking point was quintiple hearsay? How far we’ve come ...WHERE IS THE WHISTLEBLOWER WHO REPORTED EVERYTHING I PUBLICLY ADMITTED TO DOING???

[boutons_deux]

a (already completed) criminal investigation into a political opponent

what?

[vy65]

First it was hearsay within hearsay within hearsay within hearsay. Then it was :cry perfect call :cry and no quid pro quo. Then it was muh republicans have to order pizza outside the hearing that other republicans are sitting in on. Now, it’s dear leader can do whatever he wants/leave him alone.

Little birds be chirpin I guess. Has Hair Getz said anything yet?

[baseline bum]

Pelosi is now convinced that the evidence of corruption with Ukraine, and no doubt the 9 times of Trash obstructing the Russian investigation are overwhelming.

She's gonna shut up the Repugs about the investigation being ilegit. Fuck the Repugs to hell

The Republicans don't care about Trump's corruption. It would be suicide for them to because their voters don't care about corruption from politicians with the Magic R next to their names on the ballot. Because Democrats are worse than Putin and worse than Kim Jong Un.

[vy65]

what?

Meant the investigation into Burisma was already completed

[Chris]

It was/is Trump's Presidential and Constitutional duty to investigate corruption and meddling in the 2016 election. To not have requested Ukraines aid in that effort would have amounted to dereliction of duty.

Quid pro quo is a red herring.

[Chris]

https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1189026689860489216?s=19

[vy65]

The president using us foreign policy and his personal lawyer to investigate a political rival is not a constitutional prerogative. Feel free to support your position with any authority you can find (you can’t and you won’t).

Red Herring? This army guy has team red scrambling hard

[DarrinS]

So, Ukraine got their aid and there's no Biden investigation?

[ChumpDumper]

It was/is Trump's Presidential and Constitutional duty to investigate corruption and meddling in the 2016 election. To not have requested Ukraines aid in that effort would have amounted to dereliction of duty.

Quid pro quo is a red herring.What crimes are you saying needed to be investigated, Qhris?

[ChumpDumper]

So, Ukraine got their aid and there's no Biden investigation?ATTEMPTED MURDER IS NOT A CRIME