trump impeachment watch thread

[pgardn]

lol Dennison verified everything the whistleblower reported himself.

This is what I dont get.

Has the red team not understood what took place on the phone?
Trump let parts of it out himself that were absolutely impeachment worthy.

[Spurminator]

micropenis :lol

Keep trying this, it'll stick someday for sure.

[pgardn]

micropenis :lol

Hilarious Chris the Christian.

[Chris]

lol Dennison verified everything the whistleblower reported himself.

Are we sure that's the preferred pronoun for the whistleblower?

[Chris]

Keep trying this, it'll stick someday for sure.

It's stuck on you forever Lambert :lol

[ChumpDumper]

Are we sure that's the preferred pronoun for the whistleblower?
Qhris desperately trying the change his subject.

[Spurminator]

Are we sure that's the preferred pronoun for the whistleblower?

That pronoun is referring to Trump, dumbass.

You just called your Dear Leader a tranny.

I can't imagine how you must feel about that.

[baseline bum]

Then I thought, we will see if this guy is as bad as I thought he might be. I thought he might be guided by people who understood how to get things done.

Well that was a gigantic mistake. I had no idea that a president would actually make problems on purpose, purposely create chaos to divide people. Actually want to please a portion of the public purely for some sort of revenge against a black man, I had no idea.


Was it really that hard to see coming when Trump's mentor was Roy Cohn? I saw this shitshow 100 miles away and Trump has been everything I knew he would be.

[Chris]

This is what I dont get.

Has the red team not understood what took place on the phone?
Trump let parts of it out himself that were absolutely impeachment worthy.

Trump released the transcripts. No quid, no pressure - verified by Ukraine. You're just spinning your wheels.

[ChumpDumper]

That pronoun is referring to Trump, dumbass.

You just called your Dear Leader a tranny.

I can't imagine how you must feel about that.
:lol

[ChumpDumper]

Trump released the transcripts. No quid, no pressure - verified by Ukraine. You're just spinning your wheels.
That wasn't a transcript.

Why did you always have to lie?

[baseline bum]

This is what I dont get.

Has the red team not understood what took place on the phone?
Trump let parts of it out himself that were absolutely impeachment worthy.

What's there not to get? Red team doesn't care.

[TSA]

Your post. Reread it.

The Obama administration asked intelligence agencies in Australia, UK, and Italy to dig for dirt on Trump and his campaign. Western intelligence spies were sent to dig dirt on Trump and his campaign. The FBI, CIA, and DOJ we’re deployed to dig for dirt on Trump and his campaign. FISA warrants were sought to dig dirt on Trump and his campaign. You didn’t give a shit when any of this happened.

links

What are you saying is a false claim?

[Chris]

That pronoun is referring to Trump, dumbass.

You just called your Dear Leader a tranny.

I can't imagine how you must feel about that.

the "himself" is redundant unless it's referring to the "whistleblower"

Would read:

lol Dennison verified everything the whistleblower reported

It's easy to infer Chump was referring to the whistleblower and even accused me of changing the subject.

Only a chickenshit would walk it back with an emoji, but no surprise there.

[pgardn]

Was it really that hard to see coming when Trump's mentor was Roy Cohn? I saw this shitshow 100 miles away and Trump has been everything I knew he would be.

I just thought he was an idiot.
Not a person who would actually try to create problems.

Hes both.

I also thought he would actually listen to people but he just fired them instead.
This I should have known as well.

I seriously thought Trump would realize he was actually the president of the most powerful nation on Earth and change his ways.
Next thing I know he thinks he is friends with a despot from NK. A dude who starves his own people... "Maybe being friends and making deals will work...?"Good Lord.

[Chris]

What's there not to get? Red team doesn't care.

Why should we care about another nothingburger from la resistance?

[ducks]

Emerson Poll: Trump Tied With Biden, Warren in Ariz


Trump holds a slim lead over Sen. Bernie Sanders, 51-49%.

[pgardn]

What are you saying is a false claim?

Your paragraph.
Read it.

Links...

[Spurs Homer]

You failed to answer the question.

The Obama administration asked intelligence agencies in Australia, UK, and Italy to dig for dirt on Trump and his campaign. Western intelligence spies were sent to dig dirt on Trump and his campaign. The FBI, CIA, and DOJ we’re deployed to dig for dirt on Trump and his campaign. FISA warrants were sought to dig dirt on Trump and his campaign. You didn’t give a shit when any of this happened.

What changed?

cocksucking piece of shit liar


russian tactics

[spurraider21]

Just plead the 5th like the Demonrats :tu
:lmao oh yeah they're the only ones who have plead the 5th during this administration :lmao

[TSA]

Your paragraph.
Read it.

Links...

You took issue with my paragraph. Speak the fuck up. What are you saying is a false claim?

[pgardn]

What's there not to get? Red team doesn't care.

I believe they shit themselves.
They are going have to defend what Trump already admitted.
How do you do that?

Deflecting, starting their own investigations, blah, blah... its not gonna work if the blue team makes it very straightforward what this clown has done.
And its VERY straightforward.

I seriously believe in private the majority had to shit in their pants.
They are on the high diving board and cant come down now.

Has anyone heard a peep from Ted Cruz? I dont believe either Texas senators have made do or die statements like some others falling on their swords.

[Chris]

Your paragraph.
Read it.

Links...

What's your dispute? Links please.

[spurraider21]

Trump released the transcripts. No quid, no pressure - verified by Ukraine. You're just spinning your wheels.
nope. chris willfully spreading lies per par

[pgardn]

You took issue with my paragraph. Speak the fuck up. What are you saying is a false claim?

Your paragraph taken in total.
STFU and get the links.
Now.

[pgardn]

What's your dispute? Links please.

I dont believe his assertions in his paragraph.
This is the link.

https://www.spurstalk.com/forums/showthread.php?t=281255&page=141&p=9959031#post9959031

[Chris]

https://twitter.com/seanmdav/status/1189353182473998337?s=19
https://media.giphy.com/media/l0ErLeqamV3UOARsA/giphy.gif

[Chris]

:yield

Got it :tu

[pgardn]

https://twitter.com/seanmdav/status/1189353182473998337?s=19
https://media.giphy.com/media/l0ErLeqamV3UOARsA/giphy.gif

The times article given says no such thing.
Why does Chris the Christian lie?

[pgardn]

:deadhorse:deadhorse

Yes you guys do indeed lie over and over again.
Just like your orange master.

[Chris]

https://twitter.com/BreitbartNews/status/1189375590064906240?s=19

[ChumpDumper]

the "himself" is redundant unless it's referring to the "whistleblower"

Would read:

lol Dennison verified everything the whistleblower reported

It's easy to infer Chump was referring to the whistleblower and even accused me of changing the subject.

Only a chickenshit would walk it back with an emoji, but no surprise there. It's completely clear himself was referring to Dennison.

[pgardn]

Breitbart:

Birth Control Makes Women Crazy

Give us more....

[Chris]

https://twitter.com/nypost/status/1189375630489595904?s=19

yup liar

[pgardn]

https://twitter.com/nypost/status/1189375630489595904?s=19

yup liar

Best Tabloid rag on the east coast.
Hurrah.

[vy65]

https://twitter.com/BreitbartNews/status/1189375590064906240?s=19

Thoroughly debunked. Stop spreading lies.

Chirp chirp

[boutons_deux]

"biden" removed from transcript

coverup crime

[boutons_deux]

Nunes-outed whistleblower now in mortal danger, just like Christine Ford, or anybody with the balls to oppose the Repugs

[ChumpDumper]

The times article given says no such thing.
Why does Chris the Christian lie?
:lol multiple people approached the whistleblower about multiple issues

[Chris]

https://twitter.com/BreitbartNews/status/1189386272089001985?s=19

[Chris]

https://twitter.com/DailyCaller/status/1189383953339375616?s=19

[Winehole23]

right wing lit crit twists the defeat into a victory of regal woundedness.

THEY DONE HIM WRONG!




(following the rules established by the previous Republican majority four years ago)

[Chris]

right wing lit crit twists the defeat into a victory of regal woundedness.

THEY DONE HIM WRONG!




(following the rules established by the previous Republican majority four years ago)

https://media.tenor.com/images/0d30d71992d213a93d0f074452cdcad3/tenor.gif

[Chris]

https://twitter.com/gatewaypundit/status/1189394148538933250?s=19

Credibilty shot :lol

[ChumpDumper]

https://twitter.com/DailyCaller/status/1189383953339375616?s=19Why do you keep whining about he process the Republicans set up?

[ChumpDumper]

https://twitter.com/gatewaypundit/status/1189394148538933250?s=19

Credibilty shot :lolThis guy is totally making you shit yourself.

Why did Dennison Sharpie out the words he was afraid to release?

[Chris]

This guy is totally making you shit yourself.

Adam and Nancy shit the bed and you can't wait to catch a whiff.

[ChumpDumper]

Adam and Nancy shit the bed and you can't wait to catch a whiff.How would someone's credibility be shot if he was trying to include words that Dennison actually said and wanted to Sharpie out of the memo?

Explain.

[LkrFan]

https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1189505265151991809?s=19
The "Do Nothing Dems" are being infair to the Rupublicans :lmao

[vy65]

Barely literate moron with middle school bully level insults at the opposition. You have to be at absolute zero retarded to like this stupid ape.

[pgardn]

Adam and Nancy shit the bed and you can't wait to catch a whiff.

The President shit the bed on his own.
They merely woke him up to the fact he asked a foreign government to investigate a presidential opponent in the next election. Orange guy had no clue that was bad. No idea how the constitution by the founding fathers was written to avoid this kind of shit as the British and French constantly tried to stick their noses in a fledgling democracy’s business and we wanted elections free of this type of interference. This was and is hugely important but Chrissy does not get it.

Well now you do. So try to claim there is nothing wrong with it because orange guy himself directly vomited the goods. Who thought 2020 would lead into a guy faceplanting himself. “Oh I was on my own intelligence mission...” So what? You went and ran over a sacred idea for a democracy to function by the people in the US, not foreign intelligence agencies.

”please do me a favor and investigate Biden” 8 times on the same call. And now as the icing is applied by the blue team Chrissy still does not get the central idea.

[djohn2oo8]

1189496568212328449

[djohn2oo8]

1189515107493187584

[djohn2oo8]

1189535361430675456

[djohn2oo8]

1189539686584389633

[ducks]

https://files.constantcontact.com/9c83fb30501/8a4546bf-0543-4621-ab40-3101ba7370b6.pdf
Battleground states against impeachment

[boutons_deux]

How can GOP senators serve as impeachment jurors when they’re implicated in Trump’s misdeeds?

a Ukrainian diplomat who claimed to have met with Sen. Ron Johnson, R-Wis., this summer to discuss the baseless conspiracy theory promoted by President Trump

Political action committees for Republican

Sens. Mitch McConnell, Marco Rubio and Lindsey Graham reportedly accepted $7.35 million in contributions from a Ukrainian-born oligarch

with close ties to Russian President Vladimir Putin during the 2016 election.

the president recently hosted several GOP senators at the White House, including top Johnson, Graham, John Thune of South Dakota and John Kennedy of Louisiana, last week.

A day earlier, Thune and Kennedy, had

blocked a Democratic bill to provide funding for states to shore up election security.

The next day, Sen. Marsha Blackburn, R-Tenn., quietly blocked three election-security bills for the second time (https://www.salon.com/2019/06/14/sen-marsha-blackburn-takes-one-for-trump-defends-flow-of-russian-money/) this year.

https://www.rawstory.com/2019/10/how-can-gop-senators-serve-as-impeachment-jurors-when-theyre-implicated-in-trumps-misdeeds/

[boutons_deux]

https://files.constantcontact.com/9c83fb30501/8a4546bf-0543-4621-ab40-3101ba7370b6.pdf
Battleground states against impeachment

Of course, they are sicko shithole red states populated with Trash's sicko cult mob.

[Spurs Homer]

How can GOP senators serve as impeachment jurors when they’re implicated in Trump’s misdeeds?

https://www.rawstory.com/2019/10/how-can-gop-senators-serve-as-impeachment-jurors-when-theyre-implicated-in-trumps-misdeeds/

this


ive been saying that the media needs to ask republicans:

”how much money did you accept from russia funneled through the NRA?”


they will immediately STFU

[Winehole23]

:lol multiple people approached the whistleblower about multiple issuesRed team cutting itself to ribbons sprinting past Occam's Razor.

[djohn2oo8]

1189558533072785409

[djohn2oo8]

1189559165259304960

[boutons_deux]

Growing criminal investigations into Rudy Giuliani

The FBI,

the Southern District of New York, and

Justice Department :lol Tom Hagen's DoJ? :lol

are all investigating Rudy Giuliani over his work in Ukraine.

https://www.msnbc.com/11th-hour/watch/growing-criminal-investigations-into-rudy-giuliani-72077381858

[boutons_deux]

Russia ambassador nominee confirms in open hearing

Giuliani ran smear campaign against impeachment witness

https://www.rawstory.com/2019/10/russia-ambassador-nominee-confirms-in-open-hearing-giuliani-ran-smear-campaign-against-impeachment-witness/ (https://www.rawstory.com/2019/10/russia-ambassador-nominee-confirms-in-open-hearing-giuliani-ran-smear-campaign-against-impeachment-witness/)

Another campaign LIE and broken promise: Trash claimed he hired The Best People

[djohn2oo8]

1189572152724525058

[boutons_deux]

Ball-busting AOC kicking the Trash-defending Repugs in the balls

https://www.facebook.com/washingtondcpress/videos/535366283694571/

[djohn2oo8]

1189589660328177664

[boutons_deux]

Vindman reveals how notorious Devin Nunes aide tricked the president over and over again on Ukraine

Lt. Col. Alexander Vindman was sidelined from debriefing President Donald Trump about Ukraine’s future because

an associate of Rep. Devin Nunes (R-CA) had already claimed the role of White House expert on the foreign ally, which he actually knew very little about.

Vindman testified before the House impeachment inquiry that

longtime Nunes staffer Kashyap Patel had “misrepresented” himself to the president to become more deeply involved in Ukraine policy,

Vindman had attended the inauguration of Ukrainian president Volodymyr Zelensky and was looking forward to explaining the newly elected leader’s vision for his country, but was instructed “at the last second” not to attend the debriefing.

Trump’s advisers were worried his presence might confuse the president, :lol

who had been led to believe that Patel was the National Security Council expert on Ukraine

Patel, who had no discernible expertise on Ukraine, was “improperly” feeding information the president about the European ally.

he and other NSC officials, including Hill and former national security adviser John Bolton, were

frustrated by having to correct misinformation delivered to the president about Ukraine by Patel.

https://www.rawstory.com/2019/10/vindman-reveals-how-notorious-devin-nunes-aid-tricked-the-president-over-and-over-again-on-ukraine/

What did Nunes obtain by planting Patel next to Trash? Trying to get Trash to shift blame for 2016 meddling from Pootin to Ukraine?

[djohn2oo8]

1189608769141071873

[djohn2oo8]

1189631975151276032

[LkrFan]

https://twitter.com/tedlieu/status/1189625638954684416?s=19

[LkrFan]

Yep yep
https://twitter.com/TeaPainUSA/status/1189632428131995648?s=19

[Chris]

Rudy gonna flip. Bolton gonna clip. They got him now guys super cereal!

[LkrFan]

CNN off the top rope
https://twitter.com/CNN/status/1189636905098502144?s=19

[ChumpDumper]

Rudy gonna flip. Bolton gonna clip. They got him now guys super cereal!Bolton isn't in any trouble. He wouldn't be flipping.

How would Rudy flip from under the bus he's being thrown under?

[boutons_deux]

Rudy ain't gonna flip and one, or more, of the several investigations will nail him.

[LkrFan]

https://twitter.com/TomJChicago/status/1189632918471299078?s=19
https://twitter.com/LACaldwellDC/status/1189608769141071873?s=19

[Chris]

CNN tweets and Aunt Crabby woe is me

[Chris]

Bolton isn't in any trouble. He wouldn't be flipping.

How would Rudy flip from under the bus he's being thrown under?

Didnt you see the triple exclamation point? Bolton is coming.

[LkrFan]

https://twitter.com/MarkSZaidEsq/status/1189641829240717313?s=19
https://twitter.com/nytimes/status/1189640639862001664?s=19

[ChumpDumper]

Didnt you see the triple exclamation point? Bolton is coming.Triggered you hard, hipster Qhris.

[LkrFan]

https://twitter.com/SethAbramson/status/1189651203044474885?s=19

[djohn2oo8]

1189651407508516864

[LkrFan]

https://twitter.com/nprpolitics/status/1189649951808262145?s=19

:corn:

[Chris]

https://twitter.com/RepMattGaetz/status/1189593220763865093?s=19

[Chris]

https://twitter.com/TrumpWarRoom/status/1189655716635828224?s=19

[spurraider21]

https://twitter.com/TrumpWarRoom/status/1189655716635828224?s=19
no transcript

chris still lying lol

[Chris]

no transcript

chris still lying lol

go read it for yourself :tu

[Chris]

https://twitter.com/SaraCarterDC/status/1189501417410707458?s=19

[Chris]

https://twitter.com/mitchellvii/status/1189659482864988163?s=19

[vy65]

:lmao Matt "Let me speak to your manager" Getz

slurping on a Karen's cock and calling it winning ...

[vy65]

I will write the strongest worded letter and even call the customer complaint hotline if I have to!!

[benefactor]

Gaetz's ball washing of Trump is reaching embarrassing levels. He'd probably let Trump go full Ted Cruz on him and he'd just laugh with everyone who is laughing at him

[spurraider21]

go read it for yourself :tu
read what? the document that explicitly states that it is not a transcript?

[boutons_deux]

https://www.facebook.com/washingtondcpress/videos/973185263050711/

[TSA]

Here’s your whistleblower :lol


https://www.realclearinvestigations.com/articles/2019/10/30/whistleblower_exposed_close_to_biden_brennan_dnc_o ppo_researcher_120996.html

[TSA]

Here’s your whistleblower :lol


https://www.realclearinvestigations.com/articles/2019/10/30/whistleblower_exposed_close_to_biden_brennan_dnc_o ppo_researcher_120996.html

:lol Brennan
:lol Biden
:lol Chalupa
:lol Schiff

[TSA]

Here’s your whistleblower :lol


https://www.realclearinvestigations.com/articles/2019/10/30/whistleblower_exposed_close_to_biden_brennan_dnc_o ppo_researcher_120996.html

https://mobile.twitter.com/FOOL_NELSON/status/1183072792906010625

[boutons_deux]

the whistleblower is now irrelevant :lol

Trash admitted his corruption and many others have confirmed, that's why Trash edited the "perfect" transcript and hid the original in top secret WH machine.

[pgardn]

Don’t matter now.

Trump dumped on himself.

[spurraider21]

trump and people from his staff have already confirmed what the whistleblower said :lol

[TSA]

trump and people from his staff have already confirmed what the whistleblower said :lol

What did Trump and his staff confirm the whistleblower said?
Be specific.

[boutons_deux]

the whistleblower is a Dem, with partisan objectives?

Like biological evolution, that just a theory

[Chris]

Don’t matter now.

:lmao

[Chris]

https://twitter.com/dbongino/status/1189709490578501632?s=19
9Jz1TjCphXE

[boutons_deux]

Jason Chaffetz: How can Congress read eight-page impeachment resolution in just two days?

https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2019/10/30/1896138/-Jason-Chaffetz-How-can-Congress-read-eight-page-impeachment-resolution-in-just-two-days?utm_campaign=trending

[Chris]

https://twitter.com/gatewaypundit/status/1189703159993831424?s=19


:lmao

[Chris]

https://twitter.com/cvpayne/status/1189693327345684482?s=19

[boutons_deux]

Fox News pundit withers under questioning from CNN’s Cuomo — and admits Trump tried to extort Ukraine for Biden dirt

former Bush Administration lawyer John Yoo :lol

appeared to walk all of it back under questioning from CNN’s Chris Cuomo — and

admitted that the transcript of President Donald Trump’s Ukraine call shows he tried to extort Biden dirt out of their leadership. :lol

https://www.rawstory.com/2019/10/john-yoo-withers-under-questioning-from-cnns-cuomo-and-admits-trump-tried-to-extort-ukraine-for-biden-dirt/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+TheRawStory+%28The+Raw+Story% 29 (https://www.rawstory.com/2019/10/john-yoo-withers-under-questioning-from-cnns-cuomo-and-admits-trump-tried-to-extort-ukraine-for-biden-dirt/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+TheRawStory+%28The+Raw+Story% 29)

:lol

[Chris]

https://twitter.com/RudyGiuliani/status/1189721173145329666?s=19

[Chris]

—Worked directly under James Clapper

—Worked & travelled with Joe Biden

—Served in the Obama administration

—Worked with John Brennan

—Is a registered Democrat

[boutons_deux]

—Worked directly under James Clapper

—Worked & travelled with Joe Biden

—Served in the Obama administration

—Worked with John Brennan

—Is a registered Democrat

interesting, but just a theory

[ChumpDumper]

Here’s your whistleblower :lol


https://www.realclearinvestigations.com/articles/2019/10/30/whistleblower_exposed_close_to_biden_brennan_dnc_o ppo_researcher_120996.html"RealClearInvestigations is disclosing the name because of the public’s interest in learning details of an effort to remove a sitting president from office."

Sure....that's the ticket....be a shame if anything happened to him....

Anyhoo, buttouns is right. Dude is moot since Dennison admitted to his abuse of power.

[ChumpDumper]

What did Trump and his staff confirm the whistleblower said?
Be specific.The memo he and you and Chris keep lying about.

[boutons_deux]

IC denies to confirm the outed guy is the whistleblower

[ChumpDumper]

IC denies to confirm the outed guy is the whistleblowerOf course they're going to GLOMAR that. Everyone knows Nunes and his staff has been blabbing his name all over the capitol.

[benefactor]

So much stupid:lol

The call happened...who gives a fuck who outed it or who he worked for or what the fuck ever? Trump isn't even denying it happened. All that matters now is what was actually discussed and the motivations. That's why the interviews are happening.

[ChumpDumper]

So much stupid:lol

The call happened...who gives a fuck who outed it or who he worked for or what the fuck ever? Trump isn't even denying it happened. All that matters now is what was actually discussed and the motivations. That's why the interviews are happening.:lol no shit

Trump's own appointees and State and NSA officials are telling Congress what the whistleblower relayed to the IG (IG bad now!). All TSA is doing is celebrating the death warrant that's been put out on this dude who actually did the right thing.

[pgardn]

:lmao

Chris giving the usual in depth analysis.
Surrender to the embarrassment and chuckle.
Good Chrissy.

[DMX7]

If it wasn't this whistle blower it probably would have been someone else. It seems like there were a ton of people who had information on this -- even Bolton was calling it a "drug deal".

[Chris]

"DON'T MATTER WHO IT WAS ORANGE MAN BAD!!!"

:lol

[SnakeBoy]

:lmao

:lol

They'll try to press forward as if it doesn't matter

https://img.buzzfeed.com/buzzfeed-static/static/2014-11/3/16/enhanced/webdr10/anigif_enhanced-2628-1415049405-27.gif

[Chris]

interesting, but just a theory

:lol

[ChumpDumper]

"DON'T MATTER WHO IT WAS ORANGE MAN BAD!!!"

:lolActually it doesn't matter who it was because Dennison confessed.

[Chris]

:lol

They'll try to press forward as if it doesn't matter

https://img.buzzfeed.com/buzzfeed-static/static/2014-11/3/16/enhanced/webdr10/anigif_enhanced-2628-1415049405-27.gif

:lmao

[ChumpDumper]

:lol

They'll try to press forward as if it doesn't matterWhy does it matter?

Explain.

[benefactor]

Yeah I really want to hear why it matters when Trump confirmed it happened after it was outed. Answer this...did Trump feel like the call was ok? Yes or no.

[ChumpDumper]

I mean if the truth is on his side why is he lying about basically everything?

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EIJe16xX0AIEwx6.jpg

Same reason all his supporters here have to lie about basically everything, I suppose.

[benefactor]

“When you look at the information, it’s a joke. Impeachment for that? When you have a wonderful meeting or a wonderful phone conversation.”

-Donald Trump

So some guy blowing the whistle on a wonderful phone conversation is bad now?

[TSA]

So much stupid:lol

The call happened...who gives a fuck who outed it or who he worked for or what the fuck ever? Trump isn't even denying it happened. All that matters now is what was actually discussed and the motivations. That's why the interviews are happening.

The interviews are nothing more than opinions and feelings from unelected officials who disagree with Trump’s foreign policy.

[boutons_deux]

Seth Meyers:

‘It turns out Donald Trump’s mouth was the smoking gun this whole time’

[TSA]

https://mobile.twitter.com/CarrollQuigley1/status/1187263545676877824

https://mobile.twitter.com/CarrollQuigley1/status/1187266637214281728

[ChumpDumper]

The interviews are nothing more than opinions and feelings from unelected officials who disagree with Trump’s foreign policy.:lol no

They disagree with blackmailing Ukraine into publicly announcing investigations into Biden and one of your stupid conspiracy theories.

[weebo]

https://twitter.com/dbongino/status/1189709490578501632?s=19
9Jz1TjCphXE

Deep state? You must have shit for brains if you believe that fairy tale. :lol

[benefactor]

The interviews are nothing more than opinions and feelings from unelected officials who disagree with Trump’s foreign policy.


So much stupid:lol

[FuzzyLumpkins]

Why does it matter?

Explain.

Because he is a democrat. Of course that means that they cannot trust anything he says or does.

[FuzzyLumpkins]

:lol TSA still doesn't understand the difference between fact and opinion.

[ducks]

Nancy Pelosi targeted in ethics complaint filed by 40 conservative groups
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/pelosi-targeted-in-ethics-complaint-filed-by-40-conservative-groups

[ChumpDumper]

Nancy Pelosi targeted in ethics complaint filed by 40 conservative groups
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/pelosi-targeted-in-ethics-complaint-filed-by-40-conservative-groupsSounds totally nonpartisan and super effective!

[ducks]

Donald Trump Jr: I Wish I Was Like Hunter Biden So I Could ‘Make Millions Off of My Father’s Presidency’

[ducks]

How many people listened to the call
They are a lot of liars

[ChumpDumper]

Donald Trump Jr: I Wish I Was Like Hunter Biden So I Could ‘Make Millions Off of My Father’s Presidency’:lmao I can totally believe you are too dense to see the irony in that sentence.

[ChumpDumper]

How many people listened to the callSeveral.

They are a lot of liarsThen Dennison can just release the actual transcript and prove them all wrong.

[Chris]

"Whistleblower" was fired from the National Security Council in 2017 for leaks, and returned to the CIA. :lol

[ChumpDumper]

"Whistleblower" was fired from the National Security Council in 2017 for leaks, and returned to the CIA. :lol
How does that change Dennison's confession?

[boutons_deux]

a repeat

TRUMP INSISTS HE’S SMART ENOUGH TO COMMIT CRIMES

“If I wanted to do quid pro quo,

I would’ve done the damn quid pro quo.”

https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2019/10/donald-trump-quid-pro-quo-defense?utm_source=nl&utm_brand=vf&utm_mailing=VF_Hive_103119_1&utm_medium=email&bxid=5bd6795524c17c1048022fcc&cndid=43758549&hasha=992d608214b505003aa04bf10a595031&hashb=542eb31d958e85ddd5a4c3ccf3faae18526a77bd&hashc=54b3612ab970ce13a64a16665b1987080ca5b72e2ee7 62b722fbba6ab378f2f5&esrc=bounceX&utm_campaign=VF_Hive_103119_1&utm_term=VYF_Hive

Somebody ask highly educated, cultured Trash what is the language of quid pro quo.

Trash was smart enough to commit an impeachable U.S. Code crime with several people listening :lol

Proving Trash and his cult mob are a bunch of incompetent, stupid, ignorant motherfuckers.

[boutons_deux]

“HE CAN THROW RUDY OVERBOARD NOW”:

INSIDE THE FEUD BETWEEN GIULIANI AND ATTORNEY GENERAL WILLIAM BARR

Giuliani made a mess of an investigation Barr was going to do on his own, and it may lead to the president’s impeachment.

But cutting him loose could be dangerous.

“He knows Trump’s world really well,” says a former SDNY official.

Rudy Giuliani had met with Assistant Attorney General Brian Benczkowski and other DOJ officials to discuss a foreign bribery case involving one of Giuliani’s clients, Carr’s words delivered a blunt, distancing message:

“When Mr. Benczkowski and fraud section lawyers met with Mr. Giuliani, they were not aware of any investigation of Mr. Giuliani’s associates in the Southern District of New York and would not have met with him had they known.”

It sure sounded like the annoyance of Attorney General William Barr coursing between the lines of that statement.

Whatever legal jeopardy Giuliani may be in from an ongoing SDNY investigation of his dealings in Ukraine,

he has probably put himself at even greater risk by getting crossways with Barr.

Barr can’t be happy that

Giuliani has muddied the attorney general’s own globe-trotting effort to reinvestigate the investigation of Russian meddling in the election,

this time from a decidedly pro-Trump perspective.

“Giuliani was out there very clumsily doing part of what Barr was going to do on his own, launching this very political investigation,” says Matthew Miller, a senior DOJ official in the Obama administration.

“And Rudy has done it in a way that could get the president impeached.”

https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2019/10/inside-the-feud-between-giuliani-and-william-barr?utm_source=nl&utm_brand=vf&utm_mailing=VF_Hive_103119_1&utm_medium=email&bxid=5bd6795524c17c1048022fcc&cndid=43758549&hasha=992d608214b505003aa04bf10a595031&hashb=542eb31d958e85ddd5a4c3ccf3faae18526a77bd&hashc=54b3612ab970ce13a64a16665b1987080ca5b72e2ee7 62b722fbba6ab378f2f5&esrc=bounceX&utm_campaign=VF_Hive_103119_1&utm_term=VYF_Hive (https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2019/10/inside-the-feud-between-giuliani-and-william-barr?utm_source=nl&utm_brand=vf&utm_mailing=VF_Hive_103119_1&utm_medium=email&bxid=5bd6795524c17c1048022fcc&cndid=43758549&hasha=992d608214b505003aa04bf10a595031&hashb=542eb31d958e85ddd5a4c3ccf3faae18526a77bd&hashc=54b3612ab970ce13a64a16665b1987080ca5b72e2ee7 62b722fbba6ab378f2f5&esrc=bounceX&utm_campaign=VF_Hive_103119_1&utm_term=VYF_Hive)

[CosmicCowboy]

Trumps a fucking idiot. It defies logic that he got to be a fucking billionaire and score all that grade a pussy.

[ChumpDumper]

Start out a millionaire, have your multimillionaire daddeh bail you out continuously until you can learn how to have bankruptcy laws, tv networks, thirsty banks and folks who need to launder money bail you out continuously.

[boutons_deux]

Who said, who knows whether Trash is a net worth billionaire?

Trash is a repeat business failure, lost all his inheritance, stealing from suppliers, scamming investors, defrauding Trash U students.

[boutons_deux]

House Democrats unveil new rules to end Republican shenanigans in impeachment hearings

a new and different way of holding public hearings that appears guaranteed to end Republican grandstanding and games.

will end the universally despised 5-minute per member format for questions and

a provision that will slap the handcuffs on minority Republicans looking to cause trouble by forcing them

to submit witnesses in advance so they can be screened for relevance to the witness or investigation.

It will also give House Intel Chairman Adam Schiff (D-CA) the ability to direct the first 90-minutes of each public hearing and use staff attorneys to question witnesses if he chooses.


https://washingtonpress.com/2019/10/30/house-democrats-unveil-new-rules-to-end-republican-shenanigans-in-impeachment-hearings/?fbclid=IwAR1vUFMVWnXk-7Yp8uQKxsQmSN7GnTqiZ9y7Mdc47UBfRmyu8XOU-KX6NVc

[pgardn]

The interviews are nothing more than opinions and feelings from unelected officials who disagree with Trump’s foreign policy.

His foreign policy is to ask foreign governments to dig up dirt on political opponents for an upcoming US election.
That foreign policy is an impeachable offense. Too bad neither you or your orange god get that.

[boutons_deux]

Trump attempt to kill NSC adviser’s subpoena could blow up in the faces of multiple White House officials

explain the legal ramifications of National Security Adviser Charles Kupperman’s lawsuit seeking a ruling on whether he must comply with a congressional subpoena and what it would mean if he is ordered to do so.

“Ultimately, if this judge said, as I think he should

this is not an optional invite,” he continued.

“The whole reason a subpoena is more than a piece of paper

it’s that it is mandatory.

And so, if a judge says,

Kupperman, ‘you need to get in there and testify,’

I don’t see any way for Bolton and the others to dodge subpoenas either.”

https://www.rawstory.com/2019/10/trump-attempt-to-kill-nsc-advisers-subpoena-could-blow-up-in-the-faces-of-multiple-white-house-officials-cnn/?utm_source=&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=2844 (https://www.rawstory.com/2019/10/trump-attempt-to-kill-nsc-advisers-subpoena-could-blow-up-in-the-faces-of-multiple-white-house-officials-cnn/?utm_source=&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=2844)

[boutons_deux]

Limbaugh wrongly claims Republicans are being shut out of impeachment hearings

wrong that the hearings have excluded House Republicans, 47 of whom sit on the three committees that have been leading the investigation.

There are nine Republicans on the House Intelligence Committee (https://intelligence.house.gov/about/hpsci-minority-members.htm), 17 are on the House Oversight Committee (https://oversight.house.gov/members), and 21 are on the House Foreign Affairs Committee (https://foreignaffairs.house.gov/members).

All 47 of those Republicans have been able to participate and ask questions in the interviews and depositions held to this point,

There is no constitutional provision that says a president or his allies must be allowed to cross-examine witnesses during a House impeachment inquiry.

"Nothing in either the Constitution or House rules requires public hearings and/or cross-examination at this stage,"

"The House impeachment inquiry is equivalent to a grand jury investigation in a criminal case," said Suzanna Sherry, professor of law at Vanderbilt University.

"And there is no opportunity for cross-examination when evidence is presented to the grand jury."

https://www.politifact.com/punditfact/statements/2019/oct/29/rush-limbaugh/limbaugh-wrongly-claims-republicans-are-being-shut/ (https://www.politifact.com/punditfact/statements/2019/oct/29/rush-limbaugh/limbaugh-wrongly-claims-republicans-are-being-shut/)

As always, Repugs, right wing hate media and Spurstalkers, are totally full of shit.

[vy65]

So much stupid:lol

The call happened...who gives a fuck who outed it or who he worked for or what the fuck ever? Trump isn't even denying it happened. All that matters now is what was actually discussed and the motivations. That's why the interviews are happening.

Because Trumpista's need a talking point and can't actually defend against what was actually said or all the officials shitting on Trump?

[vy65]

The interviews are nothing more than opinions and feelings from unelected officials who disagree with Trump’s foreign policy.

Taylor and Vindman offered eye witness testimony. What are you talking about?

[boutons_deux]

Trump Boasts That His Impeachment Will Get Higher TV Ratings Than All Other Impeachments

WASHINGTON —In an interview with NBC’s Lester Holt, Donald Trump boasted that, if he is impeached, the television ratings will be higher than those of any other impeachment in history.

“Everywhere I go, people tell me that if I am impeached, they’re going to watch it,” he said.

“The ratings are going to be through the roof.”

He said that he expected his impeachment ratings to be “many, many times” the size of the audience for Bill Clinton’s impeachment, in 1998.

“It’s not even going to be close,” Trump said. “The ratings for Bill Clinton’s impeachment were a joke.”

Asked about the recent impeachment of the former South Korean President Park Geun-hye, Trump said, “Did anyone even watch that one? That was Korea. Nobody cares.”

As for the impeachment of Brazilian President Dilma Rousseff, he said, “I didn’t hear about that one.

I don’t follow Brazil.
I like Argentina.
I saw ‘Evita’ many, many times.
Andrew Lloyd Webber did a great job.
Millions and millions of people loved it.
But that was a Broadway show, not an impeachment.”

Even though he anticipates “just terrific” ratings for his impeachment,

Trump said that he did not expect the media to provide an honest accounting of his audience size.

“They’re going to lie and say that a lot of people who watched my impeachment didn’t watch,

and that’s going to be very bad and unfair,

but it’s not going to change the fact that

my impeachment will be a great impeachment, a really beautiful impeachment,” he said.

https://www.newyorker.com/humor/borowitz-report/trump-boasts-that-his-impeachment-will-get-higher-tv-ratings-than-all-other-impeachments?source=EDT_NYR_EDIT_NEWSLETTER_0_imag enewsletter_Borowitz_ZZ&utm_campaign=aud-dev&utm_source=nl&utm_brand=tny&utm_mailing=TNY_Borowitz_103119&utm_medium=email&bxid=5bd6795524c17c1048022fcc&cndid=43758549&esrc=bounceX&mbid=&utm_term=TNY_Borowitz (https://www.newyorker.com/humor/borowitz-report/trump-boasts-that-his-impeachment-will-get-higher-tv-ratings-than-all-other-impeachments?source=EDT_NYR_EDIT_NEWSLETTER_0_imag enewsletter_Borowitz_ZZ&utm_campaign=aud-dev&utm_source=nl&utm_brand=tny&utm_mailing=TNY_Borowitz_103119&utm_medium=email&bxid=5bd6795524c17c1048022fcc&cndid=43758549&esrc=bounceX&mbid=&utm_term=TNY_Borowitz)

[ducks]

Minnesota Rep. Collin Peterson was one of just two House Democrats to vote no on ground rules for an impeachment inquiry of President Donald Trump.

Peterson and New Jersey Rep. Jeff Van Drew were the only Democrats to vote against the rules package, which the House approved on a 232-196 vote Thursday.

[ducks]

Report: Treasurer For Biden Super PAC Also A Registered Agent For Foreign Country

[TSA]

Taylor and Vindman offered eye witness testimony. What are you talking about?

"Vindman learned after their meeting that Trump still refused to allow the security assistance funds to go to Ukraine, which made Vindman think the President was still waiting for the "deliverable," as Bill Taylor, the top American diplomat in Ukraine, referred to it in his own deposition -- the announcement of an investigation into the Bidens that Ukrainian officials needed to deliver in order to get the money they wanted."

https://www.cnn.com/2019/10/30/politics/vindman-ukraine-aid-trump-investigations/index.html

"Taylor says he was told by a National Security Council official that Trump told Sondland he had insisted Zelensky "go to a microphone and say he is opening investigations of Biden and 2016 interference."
"Ambassador Sondland said that he had talked to President Zelensky and Mr. Yermak and told them that, although this was not a quid pro quo, if President Zelensky did not 'clear things up' in public, we could be at a 'stalemate.' I understood 'stalemate to mean that Ukraine would not receive the much-needed military assistance," Taylor testified."

https://www.cnn.com/2019/10/22/politics/bill-taylor-deposition-text-messages/index.html

[vy65]

"Vindman learned after their meeting that Trump still refused to allow the security assistance funds to go to Ukraine, which made Vindman think the President was still waiting for the "deliverable," as Bill Taylor, the top American diplomat in Ukraine, referred to it in his own deposition -- the announcement of an investigation into the Bidens that Ukrainian officials needed to deliver in order to get the money they wanted."

https://www.cnn.com/2019/10/30/politics/vindman-ukraine-aid-trump-investigations/index.html

"Taylor says he was told by a National Security Council official that Trump told Sondland he had insisted Zelensky "go to a microphone and say he is opening investigations of Biden and 2016 interference."
"Ambassador Sondland said that he had talked to President Zelensky and Mr. Yermak and told them that, although this was not a quid pro quo, if President Zelensky did not 'clear things up' in public, we could be at a 'stalemate.' I understood 'stalemate to mean that Ukraine would not receive the much-needed military assistance," Taylor testified."

https://www.cnn.com/2019/10/22/politics/bill-taylor-deposition-text-messages/index.html

Do you think all their testimony was hearsay? That they were not eyewitnesses to anything? Or are you selectively and disingenuously calling out quotes?

[TSA]

Do you think all their testimony was hearsay? That they were not eyewitnesses to anything? Or are you selectively and disingenuously calling out quotes?

Vindman listened in on the call and gave his opinion on it. Taylor was pretty much all hearsay.

What damaging facts do you think they were eyewitness to?

[vy65]

Vindman listened in on the call and gave his opinion on it. Taylor was pretty much all hearsay.

What damaging facts do you think they were eyewitness to?

Vindman
The July 25 call

Taylor
i.
I sensed something odd when Ambassador Sondland told me on June 28 that he did not wish to include most of the regular interagency participants in a call planned with President Zelenskyy later that day. Ambassador Sondland, Ambassador Volker, Secretary Perry, and I were on this call, dialing in from different locations. However, Ambassador Sondland said that he wanted to make sure no one was transcribing or monitoring as they added President Zelenskyy to the call. Also, before President Zelenskyy joined the call, Ambassador Volker separately told the U.S. participants that he, Ambassador Volker, planned to be explicit with President Zelenskyy in a one-on-one meeting in Toronto on July 2
about what President Zelenskyy should do to get the White House meeting. Again, it was not clear to me on that call what this meant, but Ambassador Volker noted that he would relay that President Trump wanted to see rule of law, transparency, but also, specifically, cooperation on investigations to “get to the bottom of things.” Once President Zelenskyy joined the call, the conversation was focused on energy policy and the Stanytsia-Luhanska bridge. President Zelenskyy also said he looked forward to the White House visit President Trump had offered in his May 29 letter.

ii.
On July 10 in Kyiv, I met with President Zelenskyy’s chief of staff, Andrei Bohdan, and then-foreign policy advisor to the president and now Foreign Minister Vadym Prystaiko, who told me that they had heard from Mr. Giuliani that the phone call between the two presidents was unlikely to happen and that they were alarmed and disappointed.


In a regular NSC secure video-conference call on July 18, I heard a staff person from the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) say that there was a hold on security assistance to Ukraine but could not say why. Toward the end of an otherwise normal meeting, a voice on the call—the person was off-screen—said that she was from OMB and that her boss had instructed her not to approve any additional spending of security assistance for Ukraine until further notice. I and others sat in astonishment


iii.
Very concerned, on that same day I sent Ambassador Sondland a text message asking if “we [are] now saying that security assistance and [a] WH meeting are conditioned on investigations?” Ambassador Sondland responded asking me to call him, which I did. During that phone call, Ambassador Sondland told me that President Trump had told him that he wants President Zelenskyy to state publicly that Ukraine will investigate Burisma and alleged Ukrainian interference in the 2016 U.S. election.

Ambassador Sondland also told me that he now recognized that he had made a mistake by earlier telling the Ukrainian officials to whom he spoke that a White House meeting with President Zelenskyy was dependent on a public announcement of investigations—in fact, Ambassador Sondland said, “everything” was dependent on such an announcement, including security assistance.

[vy65]

Vindman listened in on the call and gave his opinion on it. Taylor was pretty much all hearsay.

What damaging facts do you think they were eyewitness to?

The transcript is doctored. Vindman listened to the call and was concerned by it and thought it inappropriate.

How are you more qualified than he to opine on the propriety of the call?

[hater]

called it since page 1 ma nigs

nothing chesseburger :tu

the only voice I listen to is Dear Sen Kennedy. he is a dear clean soul and his words matter more than any shennanigans of losers in the media or in this thread :lol

listen to Kennedy and weep ma nigs

SIx5MwI6feU

"Democrats are putting a fresh coat of paint on rotten wood" :lmao

love you Sen Kennedy

[hater]

"this freak show... circus without a tent. maybe I'm being harsh, let's just call it play acting"

:lmao

ma niga Kennedy going shaved balls deep

[TSA]

Vindman
The July 25 call

Taylor
i.
I sensed something odd when Ambassador Sondland told me on June 28 that he did not wish to include most of the regular interagency participants in a call planned with President Zelenskyy later that day. Ambassador Sondland, Ambassador Volker, Secretary Perry, and I were on this call, dialing in from different locations. However, Ambassador Sondland said that he wanted to make sure no one was transcribing or monitoring as they added President Zelenskyy to the call. Also, before President Zelenskyy joined the call, Ambassador Volker separately told the U.S. participants that he, Ambassador Volker, planned to be explicit with President Zelenskyy in a one-on-one meeting in Toronto on July 2
about what President Zelenskyy should do to get the White House meeting. Again, it was not clear to me on that call what this meant, but Ambassador Volker noted that he would relay that President Trump wanted to see rule of law, transparency, but also, specifically, cooperation on investigations to “get to the bottom of things.” Once President Zelenskyy joined the call, the conversation was focused on energy policy and the Stanytsia-Luhanska bridge. President Zelenskyy also said he looked forward to the White House visit President Trump had offered in his May 29 letter.

ii.
On July 10 in Kyiv, I met with President Zelenskyy’s chief of staff, Andrei Bohdan, and then-foreign policy advisor to the president and now Foreign Minister Vadym Prystaiko, who told me that they had heard from Mr. Giuliani that the phone call between the two presidents was unlikely to happen and that they were alarmed and disappointed.


In a regular NSC secure video-conference call on July 18, I heard a staff person from the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) say that there was a hold on security assistance to Ukraine but could not say why. Toward the end of an otherwise normal meeting, a voice on the call—the person was off-screen—said that she was from OMB and that her boss had instructed her not to approve any additional spending of security assistance for Ukraine until further notice. I and others sat in astonishment


iii.
Very concerned, on that same day I sent Ambassador Sondland a text message asking if “we [are] now saying that security assistance and [a] WH meeting are conditioned on investigations?” Ambassador Sondland responded asking me to call him, which I did. During that phone call, Ambassador Sondland told me that President Trump had told him that he wants President Zelenskyy to state publicly that Ukraine will investigate Burisma and alleged Ukrainian interference in the 2016 U.S. election.

Ambassador Sondland also told me that he now recognized that he had made a mistake by earlier telling the Ukrainian officials to whom he spoke that a White House meeting with President Zelenskyy was dependent on a public announcement of investigations—in fact, Ambassador Sondland said, “everything” was dependent on such an announcement, including security assistance.

hearsay

[TSA]

The transcript is doctored. Vindman listened to the call and was concerned by it and thought it inappropriate.

How are you more qualified than he to opine on the propriety of the call?

"Vindman testified that the White House's rough transcript was mostly accurate in describing the contents of the July 25 phone call between Trump and Zelensky aside from the edits he wanted to make."

muh feelings

[hater]

"speaker pelotudosi is gonna hurt Congress' 10% approval rating"

:lmao

Ma nig JohnKenn

[hater]

:lmao Pelosi

https://twitter.com/swsog/status/1189958945529425920

[ChumpDumper]

So now they don't want transparency?

I believe that.

[Spurminator]

Uneducated partisan retards arguing with a lawyer. You love to see it.

[boutons_deux]

If Trash/Tom Hagen think the transcript vindicates Trash, why hide the full transcript in a top secret natsec machine?

Echoes of the Russian investigation: forgetting, lying, obstructing, acting guilty, as accurately suspected.

TSA and other deplorables fall for it, defend it, every time.

[TSA]

Uneducated partisan retards arguing with a lawyer. You love to see it.

It doesn't take a lawyer to know that none of the witnesses called have provided any proof of a quid pro quo.

[ChumpDumper]

I really want to hear the Trumpista narratives for these three things:

1) Trump's entire process withholding aid from Ukraine.

2) The origins of the Russia investigation.

3) The Crowdstrike server whatever the hell thing that's supposed to be.

No copypasta, please.

Any takers?

[ChumpDumper]

It doesn't take a lawyer to know that none of the witnesses called have provided any proof of a quid pro quo.Yeah, Dennison did that himself.:tu

[TSA]

If Trash/Tom Hagen think the transcript vindicates Trash, why hide the full transcript in a top secret natsec machine?

Echoes of the Russian investigation: forgetting, lying, obstructing, acting guilty, as accurately suspected.

TSA and other deplorables fall for it, defend it, every time.

The changes came months after entire transcripts of Trump’s calls with the leaders of Australia and Mexico were leaked to The Washington Post, setting off a furious internal search for the source of the unauthorized disclosures and widening the mistrust between the president and his staff.

Before the upgrade, the White House began restricting the distribution of the transcripts of the president’s calls with foreign leaders to a narrower group of officials. Before that, the transcripts had been put on a shared drive that all NSC staffers had access to, which made it easier for leaks to happen, according to a former Trump White House official.

https://www.politico.com/news/2019/10/01/white-house-trump-leaks-code-015194

"Vindman testified that the White House's rough transcript was mostly accurate in describing the contents of the July 25 phone call between Trump and Zelensky aside from the edits he wanted to make."

"Sources from both parties told CNN that the changes were not seen as significant."

https://www.cnn.com/2019/10/30/politics/alexander-vindman-testimony-white-house-transcript/index.html

[Spurminator]

It doesn't take a lawyer to know that none of the witnesses called have provided any proof of a quid pro quo.

Regardless of your selective standards of proof, this is why they are impeachment proceedings.

[ChumpDumper]

The changes came months after entire transcripts of Trump’s calls with the leaders of Australia and Mexico were leaked to The Washington Post, setting off a furious internal search for the source of the unauthorized disclosures and widening the mistrust between the president and his staff.

Before the upgrade, the White House began restricting the distribution of the transcripts of the president’s calls with foreign leaders to a narrower group of officials. Before that, the transcripts had been put on a shared drive that all NSC staffers had access to, which made it easier for leaks to happen, according to a former Trump White House official.

https://www.politico.com/news/2019/10/01/white-house-trump-leaks-code-015194

"Vindman testified that the White House's rough transcript was mostly accurate in describing the contents of the July 25 phone call between Trump and Zelensky aside from the edits he wanted to make."

"Sources from both parties told CNN that the changes were not seen as significant."

https://www.cnn.com/2019/10/30/politics/alexander-vindman-testimony-white-house-transcript/index.htmlTrump could, you know, take the actual transcript off his top secret server and let us all read it.

Why not?

Why do he and you and all the other Trumpistas have to lie about the memo?

[LkrFan]

https://twitter.com/thehill/status/1189964767303274497?s=19

[LkrFan]

Senate Republicans are taking the House impeachment proceedings against President Trump more seriously as damaging revelations against the president mount and the possibility of a quick dismissal of the charges shrinks.

Earlier this year, GOP senators pledged to quickly quash any articles of impeachment passed by the House. But as the Democrats compile more evidence that Trump withheld military assistance from Ukraine to pressure Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky to investigate former Vice President Joe Biden, they are adopting a more sober tone.

While no Senate Republican has said the charges against Trump rise to the level of being an impeachable offense, many have expressed concern over the drip-drip of damaging revelations.

Vote for impeachment, Trump snitches on all the Rs that are paid off by Russian Oligarchs via the NRA.

Vote no on impeachment, then the Senate turns Blue in 2020.

Times of the essence for them to make a decision.

Tick tock R MFers :lol

[LkrFan]

https://twitter.com/minhtngo/status/1189967939602018304?s=19

[ChumpDumper]

https://twitter.com/minhtngo/status/1189967939602018304?s=19That shit was ridiculous. Forced out because of revenge porn.

[ChumpDumper]

Trump could, you know, take the actual transcript off his top secret server and let us all read it.

Why not?

Why do he and you and all the other Trumpistas have to lie about the memo?Case in point:

1189897137984876545

[SnakeBoy]

That shit was ridiculous. Forced out because of revenge porn.

Those pockmarks tho.

[ChumpDumper]

Those pockmarks tho.I didn't say anything about her looks. Do you want to discuss her looks?

Yes or no.

[hater]

Vote for impeachment, Trump snitches on all the Rs that are paid off by Russian Oligarchs via the NRA.

Vote no on impeachment, then the Senate turns Blue in 2020.

Times of the essence for them to make a decision.

Tick tock R MFers :lol

:lmao thinking anything besides this thing getting a quick death in the senate :lmao :lmao

boy are you in for a dissapointment :lmao

[vy65]

"Vindman testified that the White House's rough transcript was mostly accurate in describing the contents of the July 25 phone call between Trump and Zelensky aside from the edits he wanted to make."

muh feelings

You didn't answer the question. Vindman was concerned and thought what was said inappropriate. Don't deflect; how are you more qualified than he to opine on the proprietary of the call?

[vy65]

hearsay

Quickly moving goal posts. Eyewitness to a call and the statements being hearsay are not mutually exclusive.

If this were a trial, think you could keep any of what I posted out of evidence?

[djohn2oo8]

1189971903018098689

[Chris]

Uneducated partisan retards arguing with a lawyer. You love to see it.

Go suck some lawyer micropenis

[ChumpDumper]

Go suck some lawyer micropenis

^gutter tier

[djohn2oo8]

1189974074879033349

[vy65]

Chirp chirp bitches

[hater]

im pretty sure many lawyers thought Mueller investigation was a slam dunk :lmao :lmao :lmao

[RandomGuy]

You failed to answer the question.

The Obama administration asked intelligence agencies in Australia, UK, and Italy to dig for dirt on Trump and his campaign. Western intelligence spies were sent to dig dirt on Trump and his campaign. The FBI, CIA, and DOJ we’re deployed to dig for dirt on Trump and his campaign. FISA warrants were sought to dig dirt on Trump and his campaign. You didn’t give a shit when any of this happened.

What changed?


=5th time
Should Trump be impeached if he starts threatening countries for dirt on his political opponents, TSA? Simple yes or no question.

Sure [denial that denial that a threat was made for dirt]

Well, we have a standard we can both agree on [threatening another country for dirt on a political rival is an impeachable offense]. A step forward.
Is Ukraine dependent on US security guarantees and military aid to protect itself from Russia? yes or no.

The US contributes a lot to the protection of Ukraine. [denial that a threat was made for dirt]

Another yes.
We are indeed getting somewhere. 1st time
Was this aid suspended at any time? If so, when?
You might find this link helpful:
https://www.apnews.com/94fdeaddc6b34c02b97278674b87541e

[repeats denial that denial that a threat was made for dirt]

Not really an answer. We are attempting to establish facts concerning what you yourself admit should be impeachable. Hard to do when you fail to offer any.
The question remains.
Ukraine is dependent on the US for military and economic support. 2nd time
Was this aid suspended at any time? If so, when?

[repeats denial that denial that a threat was made for dirt]

Not really an answer.
We are attempting to establish facts concerning what you yourself admit should be impeachable.
Hard to do when you fail to offer any.
The question remains.
Ukraine is dependent on the US for military and economic support. 3rd time
Was this aid suspended at any time? If so, when?

[repeats denial that a threat was made for dirt]

Not really an answer.
We are attempting to establish facts concerning what you yourself admit should be impeachable.
Hard to do when you fail to offer any.
The question remains.
Ukraine is dependent on the US for military and economic support. 4th time
Was this aid suspended at any time? If so, when?

[ignores question, posts tweets]

Not really an answer.
We are attempting to establish facts concerning what you yourself admit should be impeachable.
Hard to do when you fail to offer any.
The question remains.
Ukraine is dependent on the US for military and economic support. 5th time
Was this aid suspended at any time? If so, when?

[ignores question, posts tweets deflecting from central question of impeachment]

Not really an answer to my question.
We are attempting to establish facts concerning what you yourself admit should be impeachable. Hard to do when you fail to offer any.
The question remains.
Ukraine is dependent on the US for military and economic support. [6th time
Was this aid suspended at any time? If so, when?

[ignores question, answers other posts]



People who cannot answer honest, fair questions are dishonest sophists.

TSA cannot answer answer honest, fair questions.

TSA is a dishonest sophist.
QED


sophist[ sof-ist ]SHOW IPA
EXAMPLES|WORD ORIGINSEE MORE SYNONYMS FOR sophist ON THESAURUS.COM
noun
(often initial capital letter) Greek History.
any of a class of professional teachers in ancient Greece who gave instruction in various fields, as in general culture, rhetoric, politics, or disputation.
a person belonging to this class at a later period who, while professing to teach skill in reasoning, concerned himself with ingenuity and specious effectiveness rather than soundness of argument.
a person who reasons adroitly and speciously rather than soundly.
The early manifestation of Dunning-Kruger.

Why are you dishonest here?


I already told you I’m not interested in playing your game of hypotheticals just to circle back to your original false claim.

I haven't made any claims yet in the course of this back and forth, dishonest sophist.

I have merely agreed with you:
Trump [should] be impeached if he starts threatening countries for dirt on his political opponents and Ukraine is dependent on the US for aid and support.

I am attempting to determine if that happened based on the facts we can both agree on.

You have not answered any questions that might establish facts relevant to that statement, because you are dishonest.

I am merely curious as to why you are dishonest here. Repeating your refusal to answer questions doesn't really tell me why you are dishonest.

Why are you dishonest here?

[vy65]

im pretty sure many lawyers thought Mueller investigation was a slam dunk :lmao :lmao :lmao

Just like you were sure WW3 was gonna happen

[RandomGuy]

The changes came months after entire transcripts of Trump’s calls with the leaders of Australia and Mexico were leaked to The Washington Post, setting off a furious internal search for the source of the unauthorized disclosures and widening the mistrust between the president and his staff.

Before the upgrade, the White House began restricting the distribution of the transcripts of the president’s calls with foreign leaders to a narrower group of officials. Before that, the transcripts had been put on a shared drive that all NSC staffers had access to, which made it easier for leaks to happen, according to a former Trump White House official.

https://www.politico.com/news/2019/10/01/white-house-trump-leaks-code-015194

"Vindman testified that the White House's rough transcript was mostly accurate in describing the contents of the July 25 phone call between Trump and Zelensky aside from the edits he wanted to make."

"Sources from both parties told CNN that the changes were not seen as significant."

https://www.cnn.com/2019/10/30/politics/alexander-vindman-testimony-white-house-transcript/index.html

Why did Trump withhold the aid to Ukraine? Do tell.

[hater]

Just like you were sure WW3 was gonna happen

being a “lawyer” and being in totally wrong are not mutually exclusive :lmao

same thing being a “lawyer” and being a total fucking clown(see michael avenatti). :lol

[CosmicCowboy]

Yeah, Dennison did that himself.:tu

So what is the status of the Biden Investigation in Ukraine? I haven't heard anything about it.

[RandomGuy]

So what is the status of the Biden Investigation in Ukraine? I haven't heard anything about it.

Nothing to investigate. They are "reviewing" the case, in a sop to the idiot in the oval office, so they can get the aid he was holding up.

Bidens son was hired in the years after a corruption scandal as part of an attempt to placate the US government and buy some credibility.

He was overpaid for what he did, which was essentially provide a vaneer.

Sorry, it isn't a new Benghazi. :cry
(edit)

It was, essentially, a half-baked conspiracy theory from some book, and never panned out as an actual scandal. On par for what passes for "fact" in modern conservative circles these days.

[vy65]

being a “lawyer” and being in totally wrong are not mutually exclusive :lmao

same thing being a “lawyer” and being a total fucking clown(see michael avenatti). :lol

Yes, "lawyers" and even lawyers are wrong about things from time to time. Fascinating observation that has nothing to do with Taylor or Vinland or anything else in this thread

[hater]

Yes, "lawyers" and even lawyers are wrong about things from time to time. Fascinating observation that has nothing to do with Taylor or Vinland or anything else in this thread

well do you disagree that this will have a quick death in the senate thus its a nothing burger?

if you do disagree you are one “lawyer” that is wrong :lol

[ChumpDumper]

So what is the status of the Biden Investigation in Ukraine? I haven't heard anything about it.Uh, didn't you say you were for impeachment, CC?

Have you changed your mind?

Do tell.

[Chris]

https://twitter.com/JackPosobiec/status/1189989299887980544?s=19

transcipt you say? :lol (lol 21 and chumpstreet) :lol

welp :lol

[CosmicCowboy]

Nothing to investigate. They are "reviewing" the case, in a sop to the idiot in the oval office, so they can get the aid he was holding up.

Bidens son was hired in the years after a corruption scandal as part of an attempt to placate the US government and buy some credibility.

He was overpaid for what he did, which was essentially provide a vaneer.

Sorry, it isn't a new Benghazi. :cry
(edit)

It was, essentially, a half-baked conspiracy theory from some book, and never panned out as an actual scandal. On par for what passes for "fact" in modern conservative circles these days.

They were paid a long time ago. What? There is no investigation? no something for something?

[ChumpDumper]

https://twitter.com/JackPosobiec/status/1189989299887980544?s=19



welp :lolWhy would anyone worry about the perfect call's being leaked?

Why not release the transcript now?

It just sitting there on that secret server in a basement or something....

[CosmicCowboy]

Uh, didn't you say you were for impeachment, CC?

Have you changed your mind?

Do tell.

I think he guy is an idiot and should have never pulled that bullshit. They can certainly justify impeachment. I just don't think they ultimately can prove quid quo pro since they got their money without an investigation.

[ChumpDumper]

I think he guy is an idiot and should have never pulled that bullshit. They can certainly justify impeachment. I just don't think they ultimately can prove quid quo pro.Are you for impeachment and removal?

Yes or no.

[CosmicCowboy]

Are you for impeachment and removal?

Yes or no.

i would be fine with him being removed but i'm saying I don't think they can get him removed.

[ChumpDumper]

i would be fine with him being removed but i'm saying I don't think they ca get him removed.Your answer is no. You are not for impeachment and removal.

[CosmicCowboy]

So your answer is no. You are not for impeachment and removal.

It's not what I said. I said YES to impeachment. That is the process. I said YES I'm OK with him being removed because he is an embarrasing dumbshit.

I'm also saying they won't actually be able to remove him.

[ChumpDumper]

It's not what I said. I said YES to impeachment. That is the process. I said YES I'm OK with him being removed because he is an embarrasing dumbshit.

I'm also saying they won't actually be able to remove him.So just say this: "I am for impeachment and removal."

[Chris]

https://twitter.com/JackPosobiec/status/1189989299887980544?s=19

transcipt you say? :lol (lol 21 and chumpstreet) :lol

welp :lol
spurraider21

[ChumpDumper]

spurraider21:lol Jack had to lie about it too. Why do you all have to lie about the memo, Qhris?

[spurraider21]

spurraider21 (https://www.spurstalk.com/forums/member.php?u=31905)
:lmao posobiec

find the word transcript in that article chris

[CosmicCowboy]

So just say this: "I am for impeachment and removal."

I would have removed him months ago if I had that power so that other candidates could get their programs going. Removing Trump just to get Pence is not that appetizing to me.

[baseline bum]

Vote for impeachment, Trump snitches on all the Rs that are paid off by Russian Oligarchs via the NRA.

Vote no on impeachment, then the Senate turns Blue in 2020.

Times of the essence for them to make a decision.

Tick tock R MFers :lol

If they vote yes on impeachment the senate turns supermajority blue in 2020.

[ChumpDumper]

I would have removed him months ago if I had that power so that other candidates could get their programs going. Removing Trump just to get Pence is not that appetizing to me.So just say this: "I am for impeachment and removal."

[vy65]

well do you disagree that this will have a quick death in the senate thus its a nothing burger?

if you do disagree you are one “lawyer” that is wrong :lol

I don't know that it will have a quick death in the senate - or - that it will be a nothing burger. But you sure seem as certain as this as you were of WW3

[CosmicCowboy]

So just say this: "I am for impeachment and removal."

fuck off Chump. I explained my position fully. I'm not playing your fucking game.

[Chris]

:lmao posobiec

find the word transcript in that article chris

https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1189897137984876545?s=19

[vy65]

Not surprised tweet crew doesn't know what a transcript is

[Chris]

https://twitter.com/WhiteHouse/status/1189972958279880709?s=19

[ChumpDumper]

https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1189897137984876545?s=19


https://twitter.com/WhiteHouse/status/1189972958279880709?s=19Yeah, we've already established you've all been lying about the memo and continue to do so.

Our question is why?

[hater]

I don't know that it will have a quick death in the senate - or - that it will be a nothing burger. But you sure seem as certain as this as you were of WW3

if US keeps igniting fire ls all over the world there will be WW3 so that prediction was never wrong

thanks for admitying you are not sure about this being a nothing burger or not

regarding not dying in the senate. how do you see it happening once it gets to the senate? what could possibly happen that GOP senators will not laugh this to death? :lol (see my Senator Kenedy post)

[ChumpDumper]

fuck off Chump. I explained my position fully. I'm not playing your fucking game.You are not for impeachment and removal.

[ChumpDumper]

if US keeps igniting fire ls all over the world there will be WW3 so that prediction was never wrongActually you're always wrong about that.

[hater]

Actually you're always wrong about that.

nope not wrong. i always said that and im 100% correct

you on the other and predicted a hillary win :lmao

[ChumpDumper]

nope not wrong. i always said that and im 100% correctAre we in WW3 right now?

Yes or no.


you on the other and predicted a hillary win :lmaoActually you predicted that. You were completely wrong:lmao


lol hater

[vy65]

if US keeps igniting fire ls all over the world there will be WW3 so that prediction was never wrong

thanks for admitying you are not sure about this being a nothing burger or not

regarding not dying in the senate. how do you see it happening once it gets to the senate? what could possibly happen that GOP senators will not laugh this to death? :lol (see my Senator Kenedy post)

So WW3 hasn't happened yet? Your prognostications are definitely on point.

I never said this wasn't a nothing burger. On the contrary, I think this is hella concerning. You sure seem to be fine with it though.

How do I see what happening once the articles get to the senate? The process? The trial? A path to conviction?

[hater]

So WW3 hasn't happened yet? Your prognostications are definitely on point.

I never said this wasn't a nothing burger. On the contrary, I think this is hella concerning. You sure seem to be fine with it though.

How do I see what happening once the articles get to the senate? The process? The trial? A path to conviction?

it will go pretty much as Dear Senator Keneddy says. see my post above

[Chris]

I never said this wasn't a nothing burger.

lol wut

[djohn2oo8]

1190000776904663046

[Chris]

https://twitter.com/bennyjohnson/status/1189919356236509189?s=19

MUST WATCH :lmao

[ChumpDumper]

https://twitter.com/bennyjohnson/status/1189919356236509189?s=19

MUST WATCH :lmao
So, two people. One that was already there.

[vy65]

lol wut

typo

good to see you're reading my posts and running from them

chirp chirp

[spurraider21]

https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1189897137984876545?s=19


https://twitter.com/WhiteHouse/status/1189972958279880709?s=19
sorry chris... "BUT ORANGE MAN SAID!" isn't a defense. post what you think the transcript is here, and lets look at the bottom of page 1 together.

i predict it will specifically say that it is not a transcript

[Chris]

typo

good to see you're reading my posts and running from them

chirp chirp

lol wut

[Chris]

sorry chris... "BUT ORANGE MAN SAID!" isn't a defense. post what you think the transcript is here, and lets look at the bottom of page 1 together.

i predict it will specifically say that it is not a transcript

The transcript was posted weeks ago. Sorry for your loss tbh

[spurraider21]

The transcript was posted weeks ago. Sorry for your loss tbh
link to the transcript?

[ChumpDumper]

The transcript was posted weeks ago. Sorry for your loss tbhQhris folds.

[vy65]

Quickly moving goal posts. Eyewitness to a call and the statements being hearsay are not mutually exclusive.

If this were a trial, think you could keep any of what I posted out of evidence?


You didn't answer the question. Vindman was concerned and thought what was said inappropriate. Don't deflect; how are you more qualified than he to opine on the proprietary of the call?

TSA?

[Chris]

https://twitter.com/RealSaavedra/status/1190017100934336513?s=19

[Blake]

https://twitter.com/RealSaavedra/status/1190017100934336513?s=19

Jeez you're such a pussy. Why do you keep running away

[Chris]

Jeez you're such a pussy. Why do you keep running away

do what? :lol

[Chris]

https://twitter.com/JackPosobiec/status/1190020730005667841?s=19

[spurraider21]

chris quoting jack posobiec quoting rush limbaugh

wow

[SnakeBoy]

The transcript was posted weeks ago. Sorry for your loss tbh

Then...the transcript proves guilt stupid Trump

Now...it's not a transcript

:lol

[spurraider21]

Then...the transcript proves guilt stupid Trump

Now...it's not a transcript

:lol
the memo of the call released by the white house proves what the whistleblower said

we still have not seen the transcript. if you disagree, feel free to post the transcript here, or a link to it