trump impeachment watch thread

[Winehole23]

Because it's neither wrong or impeachable.

It is in the public interest to know if Biden is corrupt.

/threadwish in one hand and shit in the other, see which one fills up faster

[DarrinS]

wish in one hand and shit in the other, see which one fills up faster

Sounds like you have personal experience with this.

[Winehole23]

Sounds like you have personal experience with this.Ha.

Figurative language about the futility of wishing.

[ElNono]

:lol can you imagine the fake outrage from team red in here if Obama made that call? This is why you can't take them seriously, tbh...

[Winehole23]

:lol can you imagine the fake outrage from team red in here if Obama made that call? This is why you can't take them seriously, tbh...Did you see the news about the impending indictment of Giuliani in NY?

Fruman/Parnas/Ukraine related. Reportedly, Parnas has flipped, and Rudy's is joking about having "good insurance that will pay all his hospital bills"

That's gotta mean he's got the dope on Trump or assurance he'll be pardoned.

Bad look for DJT either way.

[TSA]

:lol can you imagine the fake outrage from team red in here if Obama made that call? This is why you can't take them seriously, tbh...

:lol admitting it’s fake outrage from team blue

[Chris]

Obama

*ding

[Winehole23]

:lol can you imagine the fake outrage from team red in here if Obama made that call? This is why you can't take them seriously, tbh...no need to imagine, consider the real outrage and the insistent howling over investigations of the Trump campaign and Rick Gates.

[Winehole23]

moving goal posts


Attempted bribery isn't in the Constitution

[ChumpDumper]

:lol admitting it’s fake outrage from team blueHey, TSA.

You're super great at making up narratives.

Make one up for Dennison here.

What was he actually doing with his shadow foreign policy that bypassed all the normal channels?

His personal lawyer and a couple of Ukrainian money donors?

What were they actually doing for the United States of America?

[ElNono]

:lol admitting it’s fake outrage from team blue

I'm far from defending team blue, tbh... let the chips fall where they may.

That said, it's all fake with you guys... the alleged seriousness and outrage, all fake.

[ElNono]

no need to imagine, consider the real outrage and the insistent howling over investigations of the Trump campaign and Rick Gates.

It's not serious. I'm far from saying team blue doesn't do it (see RG, boutox)... but two wrongs doesn't make a right...

[Chris]

https://twitter.com/Thomas1774Paine/status/1195174633823178753?s=19

Color me suprised... :wakeup

[Quadzilla99]

1195128673000710144

Lol at this Trump fluffer. Yeah, lets kill this as fast as possible. If we drag it on and on we might find out more and more impeachable offenses we don't even know about yet

[Quadzilla99]

The group that dragged Benghazi on for like 600 years wants to ignore actual crimes as quickly as possible

[LkrFan]

https://twitter.com/DearAuntCrabby/status/1195311448706207745?s=19

Yep yep

[LkrFan]

https://twitter.com/RepSwalwell/status/1195171703091073025?s=19

Truth bombs

[pgardn]

https://twitter.com/Thomas1774Paine/status/1195174633823178753?s=19

Color me suprised... :wakeup

Has zero to do with Trump making that call.
This is bigger than any of the players.
Its about using foreign powers to interfere in our elections.

And the hypocrisy of the red team trying to find 2 million illegal votes from unregistered voters while this bomb is sitting on their head. “I can’t see it, where is it?” Trump is the president, he won the election. This is about using foreign players to have the ability to decide OUR elections. “But, But unregistered voters!” 2 million that voted for Hillary that don’t even exist.

The skunk has sprayed you, pretend not to smell it.

[Blake]

https://twitter.com/Thomas1774Paine/status/1195174633823178753?s=19

Color me suprised... :wakeup

Ancient Egyptian garb?!? Why isn't fake stream media all over that??!!

[pgardn]

Ancient Egyptian garb?!? Why isn't fake stream media all over that??!!

Just imagine what he has done on Halloween.
Therefore, this is a witch hunt.

[Spurs Homer]

Nunes pulls up a chair and “reads Hannity” to America...

[Winehole23]

Bringing up Hannity is a weird tactic, he's part of the narrative.

[Spurs Homer]

Breaking news!

GOP new talking point: “the guy that attempted bribery and extortion - once had a cordial respectful conversation before he committed bribery and extortion”

*edited partial new transcript

[pgardn]

WH releases first call with Zelensky.

Okay, so what.
Timing is interesting and shows such incredibly feeble attempts to somehow change the call in question?

Teacher: Donald I already have your homework. What are these balls of wadded paper?
Donald: Ok. My friends have decided to throw my doodling paper at you.

wtf is wrong with this group of advisers defending him...

[CosmicCowboy]

https://twitter.com/DearAuntCrabby/status/1195311448706207745?s=19

Yep yep

tax returns didn't even exist when the constitution was written.

[pgardn]

tax returns didn't even exist when the constitution was written.

twitter sources are so reliable...

[Spurs Homer]

Another impressive patriot witness


these “deep state never-trumpers” nowhere near fitting the bogus label

[MultiTroll]

tax returns didn't even exist when the constitution was written.
:lol

[Winehole23]

tax returns didn't even exist when the constitution was written.What is the 16th Amendment?

[benefactor]

https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/470609-white-house-releases-call-of-early-trump-call-to-ukraine-president

:lol...what the fuck does this have to do with anything? It feels like more of "hey look over here at this thing that doesn't matter instead of what does" that has been Trump and his ball washers whole modus operandi throughout the entire process.

[CosmicCowboy]

What is the 16th Amendment?

Can you show me where in the 16th amendment it says this?


As those on the left understand, the Constitution actually states that the president must turn over his tax returns when asked.

[Winehole23]

https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/470609-white-house-releases-call-of-early-trump-call-to-ukraine-president

:lol...what the fuck does this have to do with anything? It feels like more of "hey look over here at this thing that doesn't matter instead of what does" that has been Trump and his ball washers whole modus operandi throughout the entire process.Red team getting desperate.

Impeachment is a big deal. The recent criminal indictment of more Trump cronies and the criminal investigation his personal lawyer Rudy Giuliani for stuff related to impeachment makes it even worse for Trump.

[Winehole23]

Can you show me where in the 16th amendment it says this?Article VI, Section 2.

Statutes are law of the land, all US officers take an oath to uphold them, DJT took an oath to faithfully execute US laws.


All Debts contracted and Engagements entered into, before the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be as valid against the United States under this Constitution, as under the Confederation.

This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding.

The Senators and Representatives before mentioned, and the Members of the several State Legislatures, and all executive and judicial Officers, both of the United States and of the several States, shall be bound by Oath or Affirmation, to support this Constitution; but no religious Test shall ever be required as a Qualification to any Office or public Trust under the United States.[1] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Article_Six_of_the_United_States_Constitution#cite _note-1)

[CosmicCowboy]

Article VI, Section 2.

Statutes are law of the land, haven you read your Constitution?

and what law says he has to turn over his tax return? Historically it has been tradition but not required by law.

[Winehole23]

So then, it is no exaggeration to say the US law requiring the IRS to furnish tax returns to Congress is part of the US Constitution.

[Winehole23]

and what law says he has to turn over his tax return? Historically it has been tradition but not required by law.There's a law requiring the IRS to provide it.

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/6103

[MultiTroll]

Article VI, Section 2.

Statutes are law of the land, all US officers take an oath to uphold them, DJT took an oath to faithfully execute US laws.
Upskirt pictures are protected by the 1st Amendment.
You're good with that eh Perv?

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/texas-court-throws-out-anti-upskirt-photography-law-9745800.html

[Winehole23]

and what law says he has to turn over his tax return? Historically it has been tradition but not required by law.You're mistaken about the question before the court.

It's ok to be upset about your mistaken understanding of the case.

[Winehole23]

Upskirt pictures are protected by the 1st Amendment.
You're good with that eh Perv?

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/texas-court-throws-out-anti-upskirt-photography-law-9745800.htmlWild deflection.

The desperation shows.

[CosmicCowboy]

BTW, I think the tax returns would have been a big nothingburger that would have blown over by now if he had just turned them over in 2016. Now he is just being stubborn but it makes it look like he is hiding something.

[Winehole23]

Upskirt pictures are protected by the 1st Amendment.
You're good with that eh Perv?

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/texas-court-throws-out-anti-upskirt-photography-law-9745800.htmlThat was a Texas court upholding upskirt photography.

That ruling isn't to my liking, I wish it had been different. Maybe the Texas lege will fix it next time around.

[Winehole23]

BTW, I think the tax returns would have been a big nothingburger that would have blown over by now if he had just turned them over in 2016. Now he is just being stubborn but it makes it look like he is hiding something.Backflips to excuse DJT's lack of transparency based purely on your own Spidey-sense.

Strong!

[LkrFan]

tax returns didn't even exist when the constitution was written.

Don't be obtuse son. The Constitution has been amended several times over throughout the years.

You think when your forefathers wrote it, it was a finished product? If so, :lmao

[MultiTroll]

Wild deflection.

The desperation shows.
You were soapboxing about the Constitution. Acting all *righteous*, saying it is the basis upon which Trump must show.

You desperation to divert shows. Don't run off.

[Winehole23]

You were soapboxing about the Constitution. Acting all *righteous*, saying it is the basis upon which Trump must show.

You desperation to divert shows. Don't run off.Merely speaking to the facts being discussed.

Sure does seem to piss you off.

[Winehole23]

Back on topic, DJT is live-tweeting insults of Yovanovitch while she testifies. State TV is taking up cudgels for DJT too.

[MultiTroll]

Merely speaking to the facts being discussed.

Sure does seem to piss you off.
And your "Constitution" which you try to self righteously win your "e" argument with.....
Also protects the upskirt photos.

Shuts you and those who try to use it up nicely.

LOL Rumphumper Lite.

[RandomGuy]

and what law says he has to turn over his tax return? Historically it has been tradition but not required by law.


(f)Disclosure to Committees of Congress
(1)Committee on Ways and Means, Committee on Finance, and Joint Committee on Taxation
Upon written request from the chairman of the Committee on Ways and Means of the House of Representatives, the chairman of the Committee on Finance of the Senate, or the chairman of the Joint Committee on Taxation,
the Secretary shall furnish such committee with any return
or return information specified in such request

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/6103

[Spurs Homer]

Lolololololol

infant in chief in a panic just gave the dems another win...

[RandomGuy]

BTW, I think the tax returns would have been a big nothingburger that would have blown over by now if he had just turned them over in 2016. Now he is just being stubborn but it makes it look like he is hiding something.

He didn't turn them over because they would be a roadmap to investigative journalists, auditors, and prosecutors that wanted to look into what is almost certainly money laundering, and outright fraud, both tax and banking.

Overstating assets on loan applications would be the least of the things they would find.

[Spurs Homer]

Witness intimidation in front of the world by the traitor criminal -


another FELONY


yawn....

[RandomGuy]

upskirt photos.


You desperation to divert shows. Don't run off.

Your desperation to divert from Trumps extortion of a bribe from one of our allies shows.

[Winehole23]

Back on topic, DJT is live-tweeting insults of Yovanovitch while she testifies. State TV is taking up cudgels for DJT too.OTOH, Bret Baier suggested DJT just added an article of impeachment in real time:

1195364536326541313

[Winehole23]

You were soapboxing about the Constitution. Acting all *righteous*, saying it is the basis upon which Trump must show.Article VI, Section 2 is real. US laws are law of the land -- part of the US Consitution. Your tantrum does nothing to change that.


You desperation to divert shows. Don't run off.Not sure what you mean I answered your question. Texas screwed up with the upskirt ruling, maybe the Texas lege can write a law that will pass Constitutional muster in deep Red Texas next time around.

[ChumpDumper]

Upskirt pictures are protected by the 1st Amendment.
You're good with that eh Perv?

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/texas-court-throws-out-anti-upskirt-photography-law-9745800.html:lmao you had this bookmarked

[ChumpDumper]

OTOH, Bret Baier suggested DJT just added an article of impeachment in real time:

1195364536326541313That's exactly what he did.

There might be a blow up with the White House counsel too.

[MultiTroll]

:lmao you had this bookmarked
Oh oh it's log in/log out.

No Ms. Fabrication, I didn't have it bookmarked.
Continue photographing.
It's the law.

[ChumpDumper]

https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/470609-white-house-releases-call-of-early-trump-call-to-ukraine-president

:lol...what the fuck does this have to do with anything? It feels like more of "hey look over here at this thing that doesn't matter instead of what does" that has been Trump and his ball washers whole modus operandi throughout the entire process.Worse, the administration lied about the content of the call.

1195350782411001856

These people are stupid. So many own goals.

[MultiTroll]

Can't wait to see you phaggots when Don gets reelected.

Clutching your Hillary dolls. :rollin

[ChumpDumper]

Oh oh it's log in/log out.

No Ms. Fabrication, I didn't have it bookmarked.
Continue photographing.
It's the law.How did you look it up?

[TSA]

OTOH, Bret Baier suggested DJT just added an article of impeachment in real time:

1195364536326541313

:lol the only possible witness tampering that occurred came from Schiff sharing the tweet in real time.
Day 2 is going as bad if not worse than when Mueller testified.

[ChumpDumper]

:lol the only possible witness tampering that occurred came from Schiff sharing the tweet in real time. How does that fit the statute, counselor?

I'm going to say it doesn't and you're full of shit.

lol TSA

[Spurs Homer]

:lol the only possible witness tampering that occurred came from Schiff sharing the tweet in real time.
Day 2 is going as bad if not worse than when Mueller testified.


translation: “there isn’t a crime that Trump commits that I will not defend- defending criminals - its what I do!”

[pgardn]

D
WH releases first call with Zelensky.

Okay, so what.
Timing is interesting and shows such incredibly feeble attempts to somehow change the call in question?

Teacher: Donald I already have your homework. What are these balls of wadded paper?
Donald: Ok. My friends have decided to throw my doodling paper at you.

wtf is wrong with this group of advisers defending him...


https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/470609-white-house-releases-call-of-early-trump-call-to-ukraine-president

:lol...what the fuck does this have to do with anything? It feels like more of "hey look over here at this thing that doesn't matter instead of what does" that has been Trump and his ball washers whole modus operandi throughout the entire process.

....

[Winehole23]

That's exactly what he did.

There might be a blow up with the White House counsel too.What about the WH counsel?

[Quadzilla99]

BTW, I think the tax returns would have been a big nothingburger that would have blown over by now if he had just turned them over in 2016. Now he is just being stubborn but it makes it look like he is hiding something.

If its a nothingburger then it just means he didn't want his tax returns released as he's not really a billionaire so hes embarrassed about it since he's such a braggart about his wealth and success don't you think?

Not a professional Trump ballwasher like Chris and Fabbs so I legitimately can't think of another innocuous reason he wouldn't just release them at this point

[ChumpDumper]

What about the WH counsel?Seems to be some back-and-forth between them and the communications staff.

Trumpistas really need to think about this:

1195389248523952128

[benefactor]

:lol rage tweeting yourself into another article of impeachment

[Chris]

"Where does it say that in the Constitution?"

"Law of the land..."

:lmao

[ChumpDumper]

1195404094778859520

Lordy!

[TSA]

Not able to watch today....has she cried like last time?

[FuzzyLumpkins]

:lol rage tweeting yourself into another article of impeachment

Apparently everyone is telling him to act nonchalant and in control as it is the image that will benefit him best. He couldn't last 24 hours.

[ChumpDumper]

Not able to watch today....has she cried like last time?Stefanik?

Definitely, along with Nunes.

[boutons_deux]

Hey, TSA.

You're super great at making up narratives.

Make one up for Dennison here.

What was he actually doing with his shadow foreign policy that bypassed all the normal channels?

His personal lawyer and a couple of Ukrainian money donors?

What were they actually doing for the United States of America?

Was shitbag, greasebag Trash upholding his Oath of Office?

[Chris]

Not able to watch today....has she cried like last time?

https://twitter.com/EddieZipperer/status/1195407083824398337?s=19

no crying, but this is short and incredibly informative

[ChumpDumper]

https://twitter.com/EddieZipperer/status/1195407083824398337?s=19

no crying, but this is short and incredibly informativeMaybe you can give a shot at this.

What was Dennison doing?

What was he actually doing with his shadow foreign policy that bypassed all the normal channels?

His personal lawyer and a couple of Ukrainian money donors?

What were they actually doing for the United States of America?

[Chris]

Maybe you can give a shot at this.

What was Dennison doing?

What was he actually doing with his shadow foreign policy that bypassed all the normal channels?

His personal lawyer and a couple of Ukrainian money donors?

What were they actually doing for the United States of America?

Sorry, you have questions pending from yesterday.

[RandomGuy]

Sorry, you have questions pending from yesterday.

When given the opportunity to be honest... you never are.

Chickenshit dodge noted.

[pgardn]

https://twitter.com/EddieZipperer/status/1195407083824398337?s=19

no crying, but this is short and incredibly informative

Yes incredibly informative.
Obama asked the question because he was sure to face Biden in the upcoming election in 2016:spin
Obama asked the question within our government. Good. Make sure there is no conflict of interest.

So Trump comes along and a few years later and does not raise a question within our government, HE ASKS THE LEADER OF A FOREIGN COUNTRY to dig up information on Biden, a political opponent. One done in house and it was a question, the other done via a foreign government and Trump ASKS THE LEADER OF A FOREIGN to find information on Biden.

Exactly the same... you are hilarious.

This is what happens when you gather tweets from people who cant think.
Or likely know you, little Christian, cant think.

[RandomGuy]

:lol the only possible witness tampering that occurred came from Schiff sharing the tweet in real time.
Day 2 is going as bad if not worse than when Mueller testified.


(b)Whoever knowingly uses intimidation,... or engages in misleading conduct toward another person, with intent to—
(1)influence, delay, or prevent the testimony of any person in an official proceeding;

https://smurk.files.wordpress.com/2012/05/steppingonarake.jpg

So your argument here is that Schiff is using Trumps hostile intimidating tweet to intimidate the witness?

Is that it?

:rollin

[ChumpDumper]

Sorry, you have questions pending from yesterday.What questions did you ask me?

[RandomGuy]

:lol the only possible witness tampering that occurred came from Schiff sharing the tweet in real time.
Day 2 is going as bad if not worse than when Mueller testified.

'He essentially added an article of impeachment in real-time': Trump criticised by Fox News and Ken Starr for attacking Yovanovitch during hearing
https://news.yahoo.com/essentially-added-article-impeachment-real-165214680.html


Donald Trump’s tweets attacking Marie Yovanovitch during her powerful testimony before the House impeachment inquiry has turned into a lightning rod of the hearings — and even some prominent conservative sources have slammed the president’s comments.

The [Trump] tweet was highlighted by House Intelligence Committee chairman Adam Schiff, who asked Ms Yovanovitch what she thought of him saying that “everywhere Marie Yovanovitch went turned bad”, before attacking her decades of experience.

“Very intimidating,” Ms Yovanovitch said of the tweet.


(b)Whoever knowingly uses intimidation,... or engages in misleading conduct toward another person, with intent to—
(1)influence, delay, or prevent the testimony of any person in an official proceeding;

Seems like Trump's tweet has had the effect that Trump was shooting for, i.e. witness tampering, exactly as defined in the law.

Committing a crime right in front of you.

Make another excuse you stupid piece of shit. its right fucking there.

[koriwhat]

Far righty getting his ears boxed in.
Its tough when you actually have to read stuff and have command of what is going on instead of mimicking other far right nut jobs with literally zero substance.

actually i left after my last reply but i see you stayed behind to scream at the sky.

yall are all the same tbh... always pointing the finger at trump supporters and those who are in the middle and want nothing to do with yall's commie agenda yet when we prod and poke yall cry foul.

either way, we'll all get to witness how this sham impeachment goes. idc to have a back and forth with you any longer seeing how you've dived off the deep end and refuse to answer simple questions but demand answers from me. :tu

[koriwhat]

Can't wait to see you phaggots when Don gets reelected.

Clutching your Hillary dolls. :rollin

anyone but the left and that fucking cunt hillary! trump would be icing on the cake though because 4 more yrs of watching a bunch of pussies cry is music to my ears. :tu

[Chris]

What questions did you ask me?

Sorry, you have questions pending from yesterday.

[ChumpDumper]

Sorry, you have questions pending from yesterday.Ask your questions here.

I will answer them.

[MultiTroll]

anyone but the left and that fucking cunt hillary! trump would be icing on the cake though because 4 more yrs of watching a bunch of pussies cry is music to my ears. :tu
Anyone with minute intelligence knows that blocking Trumps reelection is all this phony impeachment inquiry crap is all about.

Snowflake #1: He violated section 2 article 4 on of the...
STFU!

[TSA]

'He essentially added an article of impeachment in real-time': Trump criticised by Fox News and Ken Starr for attacking Yovanovitch during hearing
https://news.yahoo.com/essentially-added-article-impeachment-real-165214680.html





Seems like Trump's tweet has had the effect that Trump was shooting for, i.e. witness tampering, exactly as defined in the law.

Committing a crime right in front of you.

Make another excuse you stupid piece of shit. its right fucking there.

Are you arguing Trump knew Adam Schiff was going to share his tweet? :rollin

These hearings have been a clown show so far but this tops it for sure.

[Reck]

Did this faggot really committed another article of impeachment to the list?

:lmao

[LkrFan]

Down goes another Trump associate. More to follow I'm sure https://twitter.com/michelleinbklyn/status/1195384803119554560?s=19

[boutons_deux]

Bret Baier: Impeachment Hearing ‘Turns On A Dime’ As

Trump Draws Charges Of Witness Intimidation


https://www.forbes.com/sites/markjoyella/2019/11/15/brett-baier-impeachment-hearing-turns-on-a-dime-as-trump-draws-charges-of-witness-intimidation/#6a0936d72e8a

[ChumpDumper]

Are you arguing Trump knew Adam Schiff was going to share his tweet? :rollin

These hearings have been a clown show so far but this tops it for sure.Gee you didn't think word would get to her during a break or that other witnesses would see it?

Are you acting this stupid or are you really this stupid?

[ChumpDumper]

Did this faggot really committed another article of impeachment to the list?

:lmaoYes he did.

[Reck]

Gee you didn't think word would get to her during a break or that other witnesses would see it?

Are you acting this stupid or are you really this stupid?

Poor TSA.

Like its such a reach that something the PRESIDENT tweets won't get noticed and picked up. This isn't even a new thing.

Trump has done this in the past during the Mueller hearings. He would watch and tweet some retarded shit and minutes later it would be part of the hearing.

Trump supporters are in reaching mode today because today was brutal and undefendable.

[boutons_deux]

I'll be pissed if Pelosi blocks Mueller's 9 obstructions by Trash from A of I. She sniffs they are "nothing".

Pile Trash's shit up high, there's tons of it.

[RandomGuy]

Seems like Trump's tweet has had the effect that Trump was shooting for, i.e. witness tampering, exactly as defined in the law.

Committing a crime right in front of you.

Make another excuse you stupid piece of shit. its right fucking there.


Are you arguing Trump knew Adam Schiff was going to share his tweet? :rollin

These hearings have been a clown show so far but this tops it for sure.

smh

You stupid piece of shit.

To be able to make that claim, i.e. that Schiff was the one doing the intimidating USING TRUMPS TWEET, you have to admit Trumps tweet was intimidating.

Are you saying Trumps tweet was intimidating?

[RandomGuy]

Did this faggot really committed another article of impeachment to the list?

:lmao

Yes he did.

Be funny to see the Republican faces in the room as Trumps tweet was read. Most of them aren't as fucking stupid as TSA or Gym Jordan.

[ChumpDumper]

Poor TSA.

Like its such a reach that something the PRESIDENT tweets won't get noticed and picked up. This isn't even a new thing.

Trump has done this in the past during the Mueller hearings. He would watch and tweet some retarded shit and minutes later it would be part of the hearing.

Trump supporters are in reaching mode today because today was brutal and undefendable.It's ridiculous.

They can't give any reasonable, lawful explanation for what happened so they do everything possible to avoid talking about the facts of the case.

[benefactor]

It was dumb period, but he doubled down on the stupid by doing it while they were still live. At least wait until it's over so they can't skewer you live on TV. Hilarious.

[Winehole23]

actually i left after my last reply but i see you stayed behind to scream at the sky.

yall are all the same tbh... always pointing the finger at trump supporters and those who are in the middle and want nothing to do with yall's commie agenda yet when we prod and poke yall cry foul.

either way, we'll all get to witness how this sham impeachment goes. idc to have a back and forth with you any longer seeing how you've dived off the deep end and refuse to answer simple questions but demand answers from me. :tukw, whining about mean liberals, picks up his marbles and walks away.










He'll be back.

[koriwhat]

kw, whining about mean liberals, picks up his marbles and walks away.

He'll be back.

i haven't left... i just won't be having a back and forth with that loon. now go clutch reck's marbles which we all know you love to do.

[TSA]

smh

You stupid piece of shit.

To be able to make that claim, i.e. that Schiff was the one doing the intimidating USING TRUMPS TWEET, you have to admit Trumps tweet was intimidating.

Are you saying Trumps tweet was intimidating?

I didn't claim Schiff was the one doing the intimidating, I said the only possible tampering could have come from him since he introduced the tweet into the official proceeding. And I don't think Schiff tampered I was using it as an example to show how stupid your Trump witness tampering claim was.

"Everywhere Marie Yovanovitch went turned bad. She started off in Somalia, how did that go? Then fast forward to Ukraine, where the new Ukrainian President spoke unfavorably about her in my second phone call with him. It is a US President's absolute right to appoint ambassadors. They call it 'serving at the pleasure of the President.' "

That is not intimidating.

[Reck]

i haven't left... i just won't be having a back and forth with that loon. now go clutch reck's marbles which we all know you love to do.

:lol KW ding words. You gay

[ChumpDumper]

:lol TSA wants to die on witness tampering hill.

Dennison is so fucking stupid he blew up the Republicans' fake ass attempt at showing Schiff as being a meanie bobeanie to women.

Smooth move, David.

[koriwhat]

:lol KW ding words. You gay

you wish tbh.

[Chris]

https://twitter.com/DevinNunes/status/1195446957994627074?s=19

Nunes went HAM :lol

[Chris]

https://twitter.com/RepMarkMeadows/status/1195416159492943873?s=19

https://media0.giphy.com/media/3ofSBs4Q1f8Q4aRFkc/giphy.gif

[ChumpDumper]

:lol poor Qhris

https://www.kanopy.com/sites/default/files/imagecache/vp_thumbnail_extremly_large/video-assets/4993899_landscape.jpg

[Reck]

https://twitter.com/RepMarkMeadows/status/1195416159492943873?s=19

https://media0.giphy.com/media/3ofSBs4Q1f8Q4aRFkc/giphy.gif

She's not a prosecutor nor is it her job to investigate anyone. :lol Chris spinning hard

[ChumpDumper]

She's not a prosecutor nor is it her job to investigate anyone. :lol Chris spinning hardTrump was doing the bribing.

:lmao dumbasses

[RandomGuy]

I didn't claim Schiff was the one doing the intimidating, I said the only possible tampering could have come from him since he introduced the tweet into the official proceeding. And I don't think Schiff tampered I was using it as an example to show how stupid your Trump witness tampering claim was.

"Everywhere Marie Yovanovitch went turned bad. She started off in Somalia, how did that go? Then fast forward to Ukraine, where the new Ukrainian President spoke unfavorably about her in my second phone call with him. It is a US President's absolute right to appoint ambassadors. They call it 'serving at the pleasure of the President.' "

That is not intimidating.

She said it was intimidating.

Under oath.

In front of the entire country.

smh

[Chris]

"Were you intimidated by Trump's tweet?"

What tweet?"

"OK I'm gonna read the tweet lol"

"ARTICLES OF IMPEEEESHMENT"!!!

[Chris]

https://twitter.com/CarpeDonktum/status/1195424352692510721?s=19


lhttps://media1.tenor.com/images/090e4e1a887679072148ac379d6dd8fa/tenor.gif?itemid=7212093

[ChumpDumper]

:lmao Trumpistas angry.

All your god had to do was shut the fuck up for five hours.

[RandomGuy]

I said the only possible tampering could have come from him since he introduced the tweet into the official proceeding.

You really don't understand the statute. smh

Statute doesn't hinge on how the intimidation is delivered. Whether she found out about it from Schiff, or simply checked her own twitter feed for the intimidation from the President of the United states.

Feel free to show exactly what part of the statute you are attempting to refer to. :lol

[ChumpDumper]

8687673342-D chess!

1195444330674229248

[ChumpDumper]

You really don't understand the statute. smh

Statute doesn't hinge on how the intimidation is delivered. Whether she found out about it from Schiff, or simply checked her own twitter feed for the intimidation from the President of the United states.

Feel free to show exactly what part of the statute you are attempting to refer to. :lolApparently he's trying to say Schiff conspired with Trump to intimidate a witness.

Or something.

He's pretty much shut the fuck up about it.

[Chris]

He was doing an interview with Bongino poor Maggie lol

[ChumpDumper]

:lmao Boingo

[Chris]

https://twitter.com/TCPigott/status/1195417528492810245?s=19


RUH ROH RAGGY! :lmao

[Chris]

:lmao Boingo

get rekt :lol

[TSA]

You really don't understand the statute. smh

Statute doesn't hinge on how the intimidation is delivered. Whether she found out about it from Schiff, or simply checked her own twitter feed for the intimidation from the President of the United states.

Feel free to show exactly what part of the statute you are attempting to refer to. :lol

He said she was bad at her job, that's not intimidating.

What part of what he said is intimidating?

[ChumpDumper]

get rekt :lolYou just called Trump a liar.

[RandomGuy]

Apparently he's trying to say Schiff conspired with Trump to intimidate a witness.

Or something.

He's pretty much shut the fuck up about it.


)Whoever knowingly uses intimidation,... or engages in misleading conduct toward another person, with intent to—
(1)influence, delay, or prevent the testimony of any person in an official proceeding;

My guess He is flailing here, attempting to interpret the last two words here to fit Schiff's behavior. "Schiff in an official hearing intimidated the witness USING TRUMPS INTIMIDATING TWEET".

That, though isn't the way the statute is generally applied, AFAIK. If it were, then only attempts in court to intimidate a witness could count as witness tampering, which is dumb.

It really is that dumb. Just guessing.

[RandomGuy]

He said she was bad at her job, that's not intimidating.

What part of what he said is intimidating?

She said it was intimidating.

Under oath.

In front of the entire country.

smh

[Winehole23]

He said she was bad at her job, that's not intimidating.

What part of what he said is intimidating?Chilling to current US officials who are considering giving testimony, death threats and stochastic violence from from MAGAs to whomever Trump points at, tbh.

[Chris]

https://twitter.com/oliverdarcy/status/1195423962496479232?s=19

This is the guy who got Alex Jones deplatformed

[ChumpDumper]

My guess He is flailing here, attempting to interpret the last two words here to fit Schiff's behavior. "Schiff in an official hearing intimidated the witness USING TRUMPS INTIMIDATING TWEET".

That, though isn't the way the statute is generally applied, AFAIK. If it were, then only attempts in court to intimidate a witness could count as witness tampering, which is dumb.

It really is that dumb. Just guessing.I can't believe this clown is trying to defend this.

[ChumpDumper]

https://twitter.com/oliverdarcy/status/1195423962496479232?s=19

This is the guy who got Alex Jones deplatformedThat's awesome.

Why was she fired, btw?

[RandomGuy]

Chilling to current US officials who are considering giving testimony, death threats and stochastic violence from from MAGAs to whomever Trump points at, tbh.

Thanks. You beat me to it.

Trump commits a crime, in front of TSA, and TSA makes excuses for it. I guess we know how far he will go.

[ChumpDumper]

Genius of Schiff to read the tweet tbh. Completely derailed the Republicans strategy to assassinate her character. Stefanik reduced to reading news clips. :lol

[DarrinS]

https://media.tenor.co/images/24b504860d2aa0e127221215188c31ea/tenor.gif

[ChumpDumper]

Yes, Darrin is boring as shit.

[TSA]

She said it was intimidating.

Under oath.

In front of the entire country.

smh
Who fucking cares we all read the same tweet, it wasn't intimidating.

In your opinion, what part of what he said was intimidating? And with what intent to influence? He already canned her ass.

[ChumpDumper]

Who fucking cares we all read the same tweet, it wasn't intimidating.

In your opinion, what part of what he said was intimidating? And with what intent to influence? He already canned her ass.She still works for the federal government, genius.

[Reck]

https://twitter.com/TCPigott/status/1195417528492810245?s=19


RUH ROH RAGGY! :lmao

Oh it seems. Oohhhhhhh

[TSA]

Chilling to current US officials who are considering giving testimony, death threats and stochastic violence from from MAGAs to whomever Trump points at, tbh.

These current officials obviously weren't bad at their jobs as they are still employed.

[ChumpDumper]

These current officials obviously weren't bad at their jobs as they are still employed.What are you saying Yovanovitch did badly?

[Chris]

https://twitter.com/bennyjohnson/status/1195443182743539713?s=19


Weird right?

[ChumpDumper]

https://twitter.com/bennyjohnson/status/1195443182743539713?s=19


Weird right?Has anything the whistleblower reported been refuted?

I mean I know you want him to be murdered, but what about the actual facts?

[Chris]

Has anything the whistleblower reported been refuted?

I mean I know you want him to be murdered, but what about the actual facts?

Sorry, you have questions pending from yesterday.

[Chris]

https://twitter.com/RepRatcliffe/status/1195459661111201795?s=19

[TSA]

Thanks. You beat me to it.

Trump commits a crime, in front of TSA, and TSA makes excuses for it. I guess we know how far he will go.

Trump: she was bad at her job and I had every right to fire her as she served at my leisure

team blue fake outrage: INTIMIDATION! A CRIME WAS COMMITTED! IMPEACH AGAIN!

You look like fucking maniacs to normal people

[ChumpDumper]

Sorry, you have questions pending from yesterday.Ask them.

I will answer them.

You, however, will never answer any question.

Because you can't.

lol Qhris.

[ChumpDumper]

Trump: she was bad at her jobHow was she bad at her job?

[Chris]

https://twitter.com/drawandstrike/status/1195417863080820737?s=19

Weird right?

[ChumpDumper]

https://twitter.com/drawandstrike/status/1195417863080820737?s=19

Weird right?:lmao StealthJeff

[ChumpDumper]

Some meta shit right here:

1195434597707898880

[spurraider21]

Nunes went HAM :lol
i think you mean beef

[djohn2oo8]

1195467455969157120


:lmao that call was on speakerphone

[djohn2oo8]

TSA. Why do you think she was bad at her job?

[djohn2oo8]

1195464222509060097

[djohn2oo8]

1195466916376301573

[djohn2oo8]

1195466006526861312

[djohn2oo8]

1195467515146715138

[ChumpDumper]

1195467515146715138:lmao all these people had to do was not be complete idiots.

Dennison is a fucking moron.:rollin

[djohn2oo8]

1195468703804133381

[djohn2oo8]

1195471839981690880


:lmao Jesus

[GB20]

1195471839981690880


:lmao Jesus

Wow!! :lmao

[Nathan89]

Believing the same biased people that leave out part of Trump's statement to make it sound like he's a Nazi lover. That makes sense.

[djohn2oo8]

Jesus Christ....Holmes’s opening statement :wow

[Nathan89]

https://youtu.be/QX7MQl2jtCo

[ChumpDumper]

Believing the same biased people that leave out part of Trump's statement to make it sound like he's a Nazi lover. That makes sense.You believed Bernie.

What happened?

[ChumpDumper]

https://youtu.be/QX7MQl2jtCoWhat purpose would calling up the whistleblower serve?

Explain.

[Nathan89]

You have Dem politicians that have openly stated they wanted to impeach Trump out of fear of him being re-elected tbh. Show me the proof. So far there is nothing.

[RandomGuy]

Who fucking cares we all read the same tweet, it wasn't intimidating.

In your opinion, what part of what he said was intimidating? And with what intent to influence? He already canned her ass.

She said it was intimidating.

Under oath.

In front of the entire country.

smh

[RandomGuy]

You have Dem politicians that have openly stated they wanted to impeach Trump out of fear of him being re-elected tbh. Show me the proof. So far there is nothing.

What purpose would calling up the whistleblower serve?

Do tell.

[ChumpDumper]

You have Dem politicians that have openly stated they wanted to impeach Trump out of fear of him being re-elected tbh. Show me the proof. So far there is nothing.Proof of what?

The bribery and extortion?

Plenty of proof of that.

What other possible explanation could there be?

Let's see your narrative of events in Ukraine.

[RandomGuy]

Believing the same biased people that leave out part of Trump's statement to make it sound like he's a Nazi lover. That makes sense.

He essentially added an article of impeachment in real-time': Trump criticised by Fox News and Ken Starr for attacking Yovanovitch during hearing
https://news.yahoo.com/essentially-added-article-impeachment-real-165214680.html


Donald Trump’s tweets attacking Marie Yovanovitch during her powerful testimony before the House impeachment inquiry has turned into a lightning rod of the hearings — and even some prominent conservative sources have slammed the president’s comments.

The [Trump] tweet was highlighted by House Intelligence Committee chairman Adam Schiff, who asked Ms Yovanovitch what she thought of him saying that “everywhere Marie Yovanovitch went turned bad”, before attacking her decades of experience.

“Very intimidating,” Ms Yovanovitch said of the tweet.


(b)Whoever knowingly uses intimidation,... or engages in misleading conduct toward another person, with intent to—
(1)influence, delay, or prevent the testimony of any person in an official proceeding;

Seems like Trump's tweet has had the effect that Trump was shooting for, i.e. witness tampering, exactly as defined in the law.

Committing a crime right in front of you.

Make another excuse you stupid piece of shit. its right fucking there.

[Chris]

You have Dem politicians that have openly stated they wanted to impeach Trump out of fear of him being re-elected tbh. Show me the proof. So far there is nothing.

Werent you listening yesterday? Hearsay is better than actual proof.

[Winehole23]

These current officials obviously weren't bad at their jobs as they are still employed.It's one thing to pink slip someone, quite another to reach out directly to millions of followers calling her a bad person. Surely you're alive to the difference.

[Chris]

Also some animals are more equal than others.

[ChumpDumper]

Qhris will never try to explain the events in Ukraine because there is no explanation that is good for Dennison.

[RandomGuy]

You have Dem politicians that have openly stated they wanted to impeach Trump out of fear of him being re-elected tbh. Show me the proof. So far there is nothing.


FIRST FELONY
E. Efforts to fire Mueller
Obstructive act (p. 87): Former White House Counsel Don McGahn is a “credible witness” in providing evidence that Trump indeed attempted to fire Mueller. This “would qualify as an obstructive act” if the firing “would naturally obstruct the investigation and any grand jury proceedings that might flow from the inquiry.”
Nexus (p. 89): “Substantial evidence” indicates that, at this point, Trump was aware that “his conduct was under investigation by a federal prosecutor who could present any evidence of federal crimes to a grand jury.”
Intent (p. 89): “Substantial evidence indicates that the President’s attempts to remove the Special Counsel were linked to the Special Counsel’s oversight of investigations that involved the President’s conduct[.]”

SECOND FELONY
F. Efforts to curtail Mueller
Obstructive act (p. 97): Trump’s effort to force Sessions to confine the investigation to only investigating future election interference “would qualify as an obstructive act if it would naturally obstruct the investigation and any grand jury proceedings that might flow from the inquiry.” “Taken together, the President’s directives indicate that Sessions was being instructed to tell the Special Counsel to end the existing investigation into the President and his campaign[.]”
Nexus (p. 97): At the relevant point, “the existence of a grand jury investigation supervised by the Special Counsel was public knowledge.”
Intent (p. 97): “Substantial evidence” indicates that Trump’s efforts were “intended to prevent further investigative scrutiny of the President’s and his campaign’s conduct.”

THIRD FELONY
I. Order to McGahn to deny Trump’s order to fire Mueller
Obstructive act (p. 118): This effort “would qualify as an obstructive act if it had the natural tendency to constrain McGahn from testifying truthfully or to undermine his credibility as a potential witness[.]” There is “some evidence” that Trump genuinely believed press reports that he had ordered McGahn to fire Mueller were wrong. However, “[o]ther evidence cuts against that understanding of the president’s conduct”—and the special counsel lists a great deal more evidence on this latter point.
Nexus (p. 119): At this point “the Special Counsel’s use of a grand jury had been further confirmed by the return of several indictments.” Mueller’s office had indicated to Trump’s lawyers that it was investigating obstruction, and Trump knew that McGahn had already been interviewed by Mueller on the topic. “That evidence indicates the President’s awareness” that his efforts to fire Mueller were relevant to official proceedings. Trump “likely contemplated the ongoing investigation and any proceedings arising from it” in directing McGahn to create a false record of the earlier interaction.
Intent (p. 120): “Substantial evidence indicates that … the President acted for the purpose of influencing McGahn’s account in order to deflect or prevent further scrutiny” of Trump.

FOURTH FELONY
J. Conduct toward... Manafort
Obstructive act (p. 131): “The President’s actions toward witnesses … would qualify as obstructive if they had the natural tendency to prevent particular witnesses from testifying truthfully, or otherwise would have the probable effect of influencing, delaying, or preventing their testimony to law enforcement.” ...Regarding Manafort, “there is evidence that the President’s actions had the potential” to influence Manafort’s thinking on cooperation, and his public statements “had the potential to influence the trial jury.”
Nexus (p. 132): Trump’s actions toward [Manafort and others] “appear to have been connected to pending or anticipated official proceedings involving each individual.”
Intent (p. 132): “[e]vidence … indicates that the President intended to encourage Manafort not to cooperate with the government”.


Nothing my ass. Keep ignoring the felonies.

They are piling up, the statute of limitations will not be up by the time he is out of office.

[djohn2oo8]

1195474173541462016

[Winehole23]

Werent you listening yesterday? Hearsay is better than actual proof.Criminal rules of evidence and procedure don't apply to impeachment, but fwiw there are twenty or so exceptions to the hearsay rule. One of them is conversations in furtherance of a criminal scheme.

[djohn2oo8]

1195475685697044485

[RandomGuy]

Werent you listening yesterday? Hearsay is better than actual proof.

Trump has prevented people with first hand knowledge from testifying and withheld documents relevant to the inquiry.

The subpoenas for a couple of them were recently dropped so they wouldn't have to go to court.

My guess is that that denial of the executive of the legislative power itself will be another article of impeachment, and that the subpoenas were dropped so that they could be added.

[pgardn]

https://twitter.com/RepMarkMeadows/status/1195416159492943873?s=19

https://media0.giphy.com/media/3ofSBs4Q1f8Q4aRFkc/giphy.gif


Are Rep Meadows and Stewart really this stupid or are they just playing to ignorant partisans like Chrissy?

[Reck]

Also some animals are more equal than others.

Chris, its time to make your peace. Despite our differences, you're ST family.

:lol

[TSA]

TSA. Why do you think she was bad at her job?

I never said she was bad at her job. Trump could remove her if he thought she was good at her job, she serves at the leisure of the President.

[ChumpDumper]

I never said she was bad at her job. Trump could remove her if he thought she was good at her job, she serves at the leisure of the President.What did she do to get recalled?

I mean she spent two full terms as ambassador in different countries under Republican and Democratic presidents.

So what did she do to get canned before her term was up in Ukraine?

[RandomGuy]

I never said she was bad at her job. Trump could remove her if he thought she was good at her job, she serves at the leisure of the President.

She serves at the liesure[sic] of whatever crook is shoving money in Rudy Guliani's hands.

[Reck]

1195475685697044485

Next week is gonna be lit.

I want to hear from this guy Sondland. That should be it for Trump when he confirms it.

[LkrFan]

https://twitter.com/maggieNYT/status/1195479042344079360?s=19

[TSA]

Trump has prevented people with first hand knowledge from testifying and withheld documents relevant to the inquiry.

The subpoenas for a couple of them were recently dropped so they wouldn't have to go to court.

My guess is that that denial of the executive of the legislative power itself will be another article of impeachment, and that the subpoenas were dropped so that they could be added.Your guess is wrong.

Schiff dropped them so the House wouldn’t have to go to court. Judge Leon said nope see ya in court.

https://www.wsj.com/articles/schiffs-obstruction-theory-11573776120?redirect=amp#click=https://t.co/mascSl8cSD

[TSA]

She said it was intimidating.

Under oath.

In front of the entire country.

smh

In your opinion, what part of what he said was intimidating? And with what intent to influence? He already canned her ass.

[RandomGuy]

Your guess is wrong.

Schiff dropped them so the House wouldn’t have to go to court. Judge Leon said nope see ya in court.

https://www.wsj.com/articles/schiffs-obstruction-theory-11573776120?redirect=amp#click=https://t.co/mascSl8cSD

not interested in what op-ed is behind the paywall.

[LkrFan]

https://twitter.com/ryanstruyk/status/1195479453641715712?s=19

[ChumpDumper]

In your opinion, what part of what he said was intimidating? And with what intent to influence? He already canned her ass.She is still a federal employee, genius.

Why was she recalled?

[RandomGuy]

In your opinion, what part of what he said was intimidating? And with what intent to influence? He already canned her ass.


She said it was intimidating.

Under oath.

In front of the entire country.

smh

[RandomGuy]

In your opinion, what part of what he said was intimidating? And with what intent to influence? He already canned her ass.


FIRST FELONY
E. Efforts to fire Mueller
Obstructive act (p. 87): Former White House Counsel Don McGahn is a “credible witness” in providing evidence that Trump indeed attempted to fire Mueller. This “would qualify as an obstructive act” if the firing “would naturally obstruct the investigation and any grand jury proceedings that might flow from the inquiry.”
Nexus (p. 89): “Substantial evidence” indicates that, at this point, Trump was aware that “his conduct was under investigation by a federal prosecutor who could present any evidence of federal crimes to a grand jury.”
Intent (p. 89): “Substantial evidence indicates that the President’s attempts to remove the Special Counsel were linked to the Special Counsel’s oversight of investigations that involved the President’s conduct[.]”

SECOND FELONY
F. Efforts to curtail Mueller
Obstructive act (p. 97): Trump’s effort to force Sessions to confine the investigation to only investigating future election interference “would qualify as an obstructive act if it would naturally obstruct the investigation and any grand jury proceedings that might flow from the inquiry.” “Taken together, the President’s directives indicate that Sessions was being instructed to tell the Special Counsel to end the existing investigation into the President and his campaign[.]”
Nexus (p. 97): At the relevant point, “the existence of a grand jury investigation supervised by the Special Counsel was public knowledge.”
Intent (p. 97): “Substantial evidence” indicates that Trump’s efforts were “intended to prevent further investigative scrutiny of the President’s and his campaign’s conduct.”
THIRD FELONY
I. Order to McGahn to deny Trump’s order to fire Mueller
Obstructive act (p. 118): This effort “would qualify as an obstructive act if it had the natural tendency to constrain McGahn from testifying truthfully or to undermine his credibility as a potential witness[.]” There is “some evidence” that Trump genuinely believed press reports that he had ordered McGahn to fire Mueller were wrong. However, “[o]ther evidence cuts against that understanding of the president’s conduct”—and the special counsel lists a great deal more evidence on this latter point.
Nexus (p. 119): At this point “the Special Counsel’s use of a grand jury had been further confirmed by the return of several indictments.” Mueller’s office had indicated to Trump’s lawyers that it was investigating obstruction, and Trump knew that McGahn had already been interviewed by Mueller on the topic. “That evidence indicates the President’s awareness” that his efforts to fire Mueller were relevant to official proceedings. Trump “likely contemplated the ongoing investigation and any proceedings arising from it” in directing McGahn to create a false record of the earlier interaction.
Intent (p. 120): “Substantial evidence indicates that … the President acted for the purpose of influencing McGahn’s account in order to deflect or prevent further scrutiny” of Trump.

FOURTH FELONY
J. Conduct toward... Manafort
Obstructive act (p. 131): “The President’s actions toward witnesses … would qualify as obstructive if they had the natural tendency to prevent particular witnesses from testifying truthfully, or otherwise would have the probable effect of influencing, delaying, or preventing their testimony to law enforcement.” ...Regarding Manafort, “there is evidence that the President’s actions had the potential” to influence Manafort’s thinking on cooperation, and his public statements “had the potential to influence the trial jury.”
Nexus (p. 132): Trump’s actions toward [Manafort and others] “appear to have been connected to pending or anticipated official proceedings involving each individual.”
Intent (p. 132): “[e]vidence … indicates that the President intended to encourage Manafort not to cooperate with the government”.


What you have here, is another item in a well-established pattern of criminal obstruction of justice and witness tampering.

He can't help himself, just like you can't help but make excuses even when he does it right in front of you, you dishonest piece of shit.

[DarrinS]

Longest HR exit interview, ever

[TSA]

Next week is gonna be lit.

I want to hear from this guy Sondland. That should be it for Trump when he confirms it.

Sondland already said Trump never told him the military aid wasn’t dependent on investigations and that he just presumed it was. Next week you’ll hear him say the same...so lit!

[pgardn]

actually i left after my last reply but i see you stayed behind to scream at the sky.

yall are all the same tbh... always pointing the finger at trump supporters and those who are in the middle and want nothing to do with yall's commie agenda yet when we prod and poke yall cry foul.

either way, we'll all get to witness how this sham impeachment goes. idc to have a back and forth with you any longer seeing how you've dived off the deep end and refuse to answer simple questions but demand answers from me. :tu

you,

are a liar

You ask for a link, I gave it to you.
I ask you for a link on your lie concerning Obama, you have nothing.

Damn right you dont want to actually confront facts.
You have no idea what is going on.
I asked you some of the simplest questions imaginable about this ordeal and you had no answer. You dont have a clue what is going on.

[TSA]

What you have here, is another item in a well-established pattern of criminal obstruction of justice and witness tampering.

He can't help himself, just like you can't help but make excuses even when he does it right in front of you, you dishonest piece of shit.

I can copy and paste too! Except only one of us is avoiding direct questions.

In your opinion, what part of what he said was intimidating? And with what intent to influence? He already canned her ass.

[RandomGuy]

https://twitter.com/ryanstruyk/status/1195479453641715712?s=19

That would be a first hand statement of what Trump was saying about all this.

"I heard the president say X".

There goes the "muh hearsay" defense. Stupid Qhris.

[ChumpDumper]

Longest HR exit interview, everWhat did she do to get recalled, Darrin?

[Reck]

Sondland already said Trump never told him the military aid wasn’t dependent on investigations and that he just presumed it was. Next week you’ll hear him say the same...so lit!

Cool. Let's hear him say it publicly under oath and go against 2 people who overheard the same conversation.

[ChumpDumper]

Sondland already said Trump never told him the military aid wasn’t dependent on investigations and that he just presumed it was. Next week you’ll hear him say the same...so lit!
What was the aid dependent on then?

[RandomGuy]

I can copy and paste too! Except only one of us is avoiding direct questions.

In your opinion, what part of what he said was intimidating? And with what intent to influence? He already canned her ass.

Ah, TSA has what he thinks is another gotcha for me.

I think I will avoid your question roughly the same number of times you dodged answering the question "was Ukrainian aid ever held up, and who was holding it up"

You never did cop to it, just posted a bullshit link, pussy.

(edit)

Which, by my count was roughly two dozen times. Get cracking. You are only on ask number 4.

[djohn2oo8]

1195479909159854080

[pgardn]

What did she do to get recalled, Darrin?

Everywhere she went things went bad.
She went to Somalia, it went bad...

-Donald

[djohn2oo8]

1195481017655726083

[ChumpDumper]

Everywhere she went things went bad.
She went to Somalia, it went bad...

-Donald:lol Trumpistas shut the fuck up so quickly when asked about any of this.

There are no innocent explanations for any of these actions.

[djohn2oo8]

1195483401719099400

[RandomGuy]

What was the aid dependent on then?

TSA doesn't know. He just KNOWS it isn't what Trump or Mulvaney said it was, which was investigations into Democrats. Get over it. :lol

[TSA]

Cool. Let's hear him say it publicly under oath and go against 2 people who overheard the same conversation.

He’s already testified he said that under oath. :lol

[ChumpDumper]

TSA doesn't know. He just KNOWS it isn't what Trump or Mulvaney said it was, which was investigations into Democrats. Get over it. :lolHe's scouring twitter looking for an explanation.

He won't find one. The Republican committee members would've used it already.

All they have are their little performance pieces that Trump ruins when he goes full Toonces on them.

[Reck]

1195479909159854080
TSA I'd like to see Sondland refute this under oath. :lol

[Reck]

He’s already testified he said that under oath. :lol

No he hasn't. These are new accounts from 2 different aides.

[DarrinS]

What did she do to get recalled, Darrin?

We just had a director at our company let go. He didn't do anything wrong. A new VP was hired and he wanted his own team. Go figure.

[ChumpDumper]

We just had a director at our company let go. He didn't do anything wrong. A new VP was hired and he wanted his own team. Go figure.You didn't answer the question, Darrin.

Dennison said she was bad.

What did she do to get recalled?

[TSA]

Ah, TSA has what he thinks is another gotcha for me.

I think I will avoid your question roughly the same number of times you dodged answering the question "was Ukrainian aid ever held up, and who was holding it up"

You never did cop to it, just posted a bullshit link, pussy.

(edit)

Which, by my count was roughly two dozen times. Get cracking. You are only on ask number 4.2 dozen times get a grip my dude :lmao

I drug you along to see how many times you’d copy and paste all that bullshit. The best part was each time you did it I’d laugh at how long it must have taken adding something new each time and then you’d have to go back and edit because the formatting was all fucked up :lmao

The only reason you’re avoiding this simple question is because you know you’d have to admit there wasn’t anything intimidating about his statement.

[DarrinS]

You didn't answer the question, Darrin.

Dennison said she was bad.

What did she do to get recalled?


I don't know. Maybe he wanted someone else. Who cares?

[djohn2oo8]

1195484539029606400

[Chris]

He’s already testified he said that under oath. :lol

:lol

[TSA]

https://mobile.twitter.com/GlennKesslerWP/status/1195400248656629760

womp womp

[djohn2oo8]

1195481329627992065

[ChumpDumper]

I don't know. Maybe he wanted someone else. Who cares?So she didn't actually do anything to get recalled or to deserve the smear campaign by Trump's personal lawyer and by his son?

This is what you're saying?

[TSA]

1195481329627992065

:lol no shit it came from Trump he said it himself back in like June

[ChumpDumper]

https://mobile.twitter.com/GlennKesslerWP/status/1195400248656629760

womp wompHas the Senate called her to testify?


Any Grassley letters?

[Reck]

A second official at the U.S. Embassy in Ukraine overheard U.S. Ambassador to the European Union Gordon Sondland (https://thehill.com/people/gordon-sondland)'s call with President Trump (https://thehill.com/people/donald-trump) about the need for an investigation by Ukraine, The Associated Press reported Thursday, citing an unidentified source.



Kyiv-based foreign service officer Suriya Jayanti also overheard the call (https://apnews.com/6d318542e50b45dc9e1d4d829ad36c96?utm_campaign=Soci alFlow&utm_medium=AP_Politics&utm_source=Twitter), the wire service reported, citing a person briefed on what Jayanti overheard.

https://thehill.com/policy/international/470478-second-person-heard-call-suggesting-trump-cared-more-about

:lol TSA

[ChumpDumper]

https://thehill.com/policy/international/470478-second-person-heard-call-suggesting-trump-cared-more-about

:lol TSAOh boy! Maybe they'll be able to be mean to this lady.

[TSA]

https://thehill.com/policy/international/470478-second-person-heard-call-suggesting-trump-cared-more-about

:lol TSA

Trump released the “transcript” of the call you dipshit none of this is new

[RandomGuy]

He's scouring twitter looking for an explanation.

He won't find one. The Republican committee members would've used it already.

All they have are their little performance pieces that Trump ruins when he goes full Toonces on them.

https://4.bp.blogspot.com/-jo06hj-jr7A/VvQ3zlA7OEI/AAAAAAADB20/0RQORwvxgxofXJ1u3EY8UigT5ZVIawakA/s1600/toonces%2Bdriving%2Bcat.gif

[RandomGuy]

Trump released the “transcript” of the call you dipshit none of this is new

Not a transcript.

[djohn2oo8]

1195487583444307969

[koriwhat]

you,

are a liar

You ask for a link, I gave it to you.
I ask you for a link on your lie concerning Obama, you have nothing.

Damn right you dont want to actually confront facts.
You have no idea what is going on.
I asked you some of the simplest questions imaginable about this ordeal and you had no answer. You dont have a clue what is going on.

:lmao spygate started on his watch :tu

mic drop... done with you.

[RandomGuy]

2 dozen times get a grip my dude :lmao

I drug you along to see how many times you’d copy and paste all that bullshit. The best part was each time you did it I’d laugh at how long it must have taken adding something new each time and then you’d have to go back and edit because the formatting was all fucked up :lmao

The only reason you’re avoiding this simple question is because you know you’d have to admit there wasn’t anything intimidating about his statement.

She said there was.

Under oath.

In front of the country.

You didn't dodge the question to string me along, dumb shit.

You dodged the question because you knew that Trump used the aid to extort Ukraine into getting a bribe for his campaign in the form of investigations into Democrats.

Answering the question, i.e. "Trump was the one holding up the aid to Ukraine this year", meant having to admit that he had something to extort them with, i.e. the quid that you so desperately want to admit didn't happen for the quo of investigations.

[TSA]

uh oh someone might have perjured themselves :lol

https://mobile.twitter.com/TheLastRefuge2/status/1195485293702459392

https://mobile.twitter.com/TrumpWarRoom/status/1195446982988455938

How did her lawyers let that go in her opening statement? :rollin

Why did she lie? What is she hiding?

[LkrFan]

https://twitter.com/jeremyherb/status/1195481892285538304?s=19

[Reck]

Trump released the “transcript” of the call you dipshit none of this is new

You mean the memo that clearly states it wasn't a verbatin memorandum.

:lol release the KRAKEN

[TSA]

She said there was.

Under oath.

In front of the country.

You didn't dodge the question to string me along, dumb shit.

You dodged the question because you knew that Trump used the aid to extort Ukraine into getting a bribe for his campaign in the form of investigations into Democrats.

Not only can you read my mind you’ve already figured out why the aid was held up even though no one has yet testified that they knew :rollin

Hate to break it you but I strung you along. It’s what I do.

[ChumpDumper]

uh oh someone might have perjured themselves :lol

https://mobile.twitter.com/TheLastRefuge2/status/1195485293702459392

https://mobile.twitter.com/TrumpWarRoom/status/1195446982988455938

How did her lawyers let that go in her opening statement? :rollin

Why did she lie? What is she hiding?Probably nothing.

Why does Trump lie? What is Trump hiding? Why is he stonewalling?

[TSA]

You mean the memo that clearly states it wasn't a verbatin memorandum.

:lol release the KRAKEN

Only the forum dunce would miss the meaning of me using “transcript”.

[ChumpDumper]

Not only can you read my mind you’ve already figured out why the aid was held up even though no one has yet testified that they knew :rollin

Hate to break it you but I strung you along. It’s what I do.Why was the aid held up?

[RandomGuy]

Not only can you read my mind you’ve already figured out why the aid was held up even though no one has yet testified that they knew :rollin

Hate to break it you but I strung you along. It’s what I do.

I can feel the butthurt from here.

Let it flow through you.

[LkrFan]

https://twitter.com/TheBeatWithAri/status/1195488609522126848?s=19

[Reck]

Only the forum dunce would miss the meaning of me using “transcript”.

:lol you calling anyone dunce when you've been getting dunked on for half a day for thinking Schiff was the one intimidating a witness.

It is always a treat watching you panic looking for twitter to save you. BUT BUT SHE LIED NOW!

:lmao

[RandomGuy]

Not only can you read my mind you’ve already figured out why the aid was held up even though no one has yet testified that they knew :rollin

Hate to break it you but I strung you along. It’s what I do.

soph•ist (ˈsɒf ɪst)

2. a person who reasons adroitly and speciously.

[LkrFan]

https://twitter.com/robreiner/status/1195487233018433537?s=19

[TSA]

:lol you calling anyone dunce when you've been getting dunked on for half a day for thinking Schiff was the one intimidating a witness.

It is always a treat watching you panic looking for twitter to save you. BUT BUT SHE LIED NOW!

:lmao

Only the forum dunce would think I said Schiff was intimidating the witness.

[TSA]

I can feel the butthurt from here.

Let it flow through you.

Of course you can feel the butthurt you’ve had no problem putting it on full display here for the last 3+ years.

[Chris]

When you got nothing, just accuse the other side of getting "dunked on".

[TSA]

uh oh someone might have perjured themselves :lol

https://mobile.twitter.com/TheLastRefuge2/status/1195485293702459392

https://mobile.twitter.com/TrumpWarRoom/status/1195446982988455938

How did her lawyers let that go in her opening statement? :rollin

Why did she lie? What is she hiding?

1E79reHArJU

I almost feel bad for her getting drug into this. She perjured herself and had nothing to add as witness for the Dems.

“Do you have any information regarding the President of the United States accepting any bribes?” Republican Congressman Chris Stewart of Utah asked point blank.

“No,” Yovanovitch said.

“Do you have any information regarding any criminal activity that the President of the United States has been involved with at all?”

“No.”

[LkrFan]

https://twitter.com/briantylercohen/status/1195444589290610688?s=19

Adam Schiff won't be welcome at the White House picnic :lol

[TSA]

When you got nothing, just accuse the other side of getting "dunked on".

Nothing wrong with accusing someone of getting dunked on but the poor fella just doesn’t have the smarts to understand when and how someone gets dunked on.

[djohn2oo8]

Does TSA even know what the hell is going on?

[Reck]

Only the forum dunce would think I said Schiff was intimidating the witness.

You already went two pages about this very same thing with RG. :lol