trump impeachment watch thread [Archive] - Page 16

Chris

10-31-2019, 05:01 PM

good read

Myth: President Trump was trying to force Ukraine to reopen a probe into Burisma Holdings and its founder Mykola Zlochevsky when he talked to Ukraine’s new president, Volodymyr Zelensky, in July of this year.

The Facts: Trump could not have forced the Ukrainians into opening a new Burisma investigation in July because the Ukrainian Prosecutor General’s office had already done so on March 28, 2019, or three months before the call.

https://johnsolomonreports.com/debunking-some-of-the-ukraine-scandal-myths-about-biden-and-election-interference/

spurraider21

10-31-2019, 05:02 PM

good read

https://johnsolomonreports.com/debunking-some-of-the-ukraine-scandal-myths-about-biden-and-election-interference/
wow trump must have been really stupid to demand something to be done that was already being done

no wonder tillerson called him a fucking moron

ChumpDumper

10-31-2019, 05:03 PM

good read

https://johnsolomonreports.com/debunking-some-of-the-ukraine-scandal-myths-about-biden-and-election-interference/So Trump was lying when he said that was the reason he was withholding the aid? :lol OK.

ChumpDumper

10-31-2019, 05:03 PM

https://dynaimage.cdn.cnn.com/cnn/digital-images/org/4e842bbe-9305-4b2a-8721-b66e2055ad50.png

incoming "say what"Good read.

Chris

10-31-2019, 05:06 PM

wow trump must have been really stupid to demand something to be done that was already being done

no wonder tillerson called him a fucking moron

"no pressure" no quid pro quo solly cholly!

ChumpDumper

10-31-2019, 05:08 PM

"no pressure" no quid pro quo solly cholly!Then why did he withhold the aid at all? Explain.

Chris

10-31-2019, 05:17 PM

good read

Trump's Ukraine call transcript: Read the document

The Trump administration has released an unclassified transcript of President Trump's July phone call with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/trumps-ukraine-call-transcript-read-the-document

spurraider21

10-31-2019, 05:27 PM

good read
thanks for the link.

lets read the transcript they claim to have posted!

https://i.gyazo.com/5765f793b8ea7d7817b9347ad95482e4.png

spurraider21

10-31-2019, 05:28 PM

good read

but wait, what did it say at the bottom there again?

https://i.gyazo.com/6b93b267f61b22b8d4df7bdee28a2a2e.png

oh, so it wasn't a transcript. darn!

Chris

10-31-2019, 05:35 PM

ChumpDumper

10-31-2019, 05:38 PM

rough transcript =/ verbatim transcript

anywho... the transcript was released several weeks ago so you're just spinning your wheels over semantics. It's probably all you have left at this point, so I don't blame you.So you agree it isn't anything close to a full transcript. Good. Stop lying about it.

Chris

10-31-2019, 05:41 PM

So you agree it isn't anything close to a full transcript. Good. Stop lying about it.

"no pressure"

transcript was declassified and released

whistleblower's integrity is nil

Schiff is coaching witnesses

Doesn't look good for team blue balls

Chris

10-31-2019, 05:44 PM

https://twitter.com/Barnes_Law/status/1190025661253083137?s=19

ChumpDumper

10-31-2019, 05:46 PM

"no pressure"

transcript was declassified and released

whistleblower's integrity is nil

Schiff is coaching witnesses

Doesn't look good for team blue ballsDennison confessed publicly. Doesn't look good for him.

ChumpDumper

10-31-2019, 05:46 PM

https://twitter.com/Barnes_Law/status/1190025661253083137?s=19:lmao dude just shit on himself

koriwhat

10-31-2019, 06:44 PM

https://twitter.com/Barnes_Law/status/1190025661253083137?s=19

barnes ain't wrong on all accounts.

Chris

10-31-2019, 06:54 PM

Deep state? You must have shit for brains if you believe that fairy tale. :lol

https://twitter.com/RealSaavedra/status/1190047301026209792?s=19

Chris

10-31-2019, 07:09 PM

https://twitter.com/dcexaminer/status/1190039279680020480?s=19

:lol

ChumpDumper

10-31-2019, 07:24 PM

https://twitter.com/dcexaminer/status/1190039279680020480?s=19

:lol
What do you need to hear from him that the other witnesses and Dennison haven't already said?

spurraider21

10-31-2019, 07:37 PM

rough transcript =/ verbatim transcript

anywho... the transcript was released several weeks ago so you're just spinning your wheels over semantics. It's probably all you have left at this point, so I don't blame you.
:lmao no.

it's not a transcript. its notes from people in the room. entirely different things

Chris

10-31-2019, 07:45 PM

:lmao no.

:lmao yes.

Reck

10-31-2019, 07:45 PM

https://twitter.com/WhiteHouse/status/1189972958279880709?s=19

Is she reffering to the "transcript" that even says "this is not a verbatin memorandum"? in a footnote?

:lmao Qchris

Chris

10-31-2019, 07:49 PM

Is she reffering to the "transcript" that even says "this is not a verbatin memorandum"? in a footnote?

:lmao Qchris

Simple Reck oblivious to the last 2 pages of discussion. Just watch Jimmy Kimmel he will fill you in on everything you need to know buddy.

Reck

10-31-2019, 08:15 PM

Simple Reck oblivious to the last 2 pages of discussion. Just watch Jimmy Kimmel he will fill you in on everything you need to know buddy.

Would you rather had me piggyback off other people's responses like you do? Or perhaps should've responded with a tweet like you also like to do.

:lol

Chris

10-31-2019, 08:24 PM

Would you rather had me piggyback off other people's responses like you do? Or perhaps should've responded with a tweet like you also like to do.

:lol

triggered by tweets :lol

Spurminator

10-31-2019, 08:28 PM

Pretending not to know what a transcript is to trigger the libs.

Reck

10-31-2019, 08:32 PM

triggered by tweets :lol

Umm you're still shook.

You took a tweet to defend your shitty (And wrong) take and you got taken to task for it. But yeah sure triggered..

Chris

10-31-2019, 08:54 PM

Pretending not to know what a transcript is to trigger the libs.

rough transcript =/ verbatim transcript

anywho... the transcript was released several weeks ago so you're just spinning your wheels over semantics. It's probably all you have left at this point, so I don't blame you.

Sorry if this went over your head Lambert.

Chris

10-31-2019, 08:55 PM

shook

taken to task

no :lol

Reck

10-31-2019, 09:02 PM

no :lol

Is that why you're going back to muh transcript after spending 3 pages backtracking? :lol shook

Chris

10-31-2019, 09:11 PM

Is that why you're going back to muh transcript after spending 3 pages backtracking? :lol shook

Some things have to be said twice for Mongoloids. No backtracking, just elaboration. Do you know what elaboration means Simple Reck?

Blake

10-31-2019, 09:17 PM

Some things have to be said twice for Mongoloids. No backtracking, just elaboration. Do you know what elaboration means Simple Reck?

Yeah everyone else are the mongoloids here, not you

Chris

10-31-2019, 09:27 PM

Yeah everyone else are the mongoloids here, not you

You can refer to me as astute scholar if you like. My pronouns are he/him.

DarrinS

10-31-2019, 09:32 PM

Reck

10-31-2019, 09:56 PM

Some things have to be said twice for Mongoloids. No backtracking, just elaboration. Do you know what elaboration means Simple Reck?

Highly Christian of you. :tu

Chris

10-31-2019, 10:05 PM

Highly Christian of you. :tu

I'll just add faith shaming to your repertoire.

ducks

10-31-2019, 10:14 PM

The Congressional Leadership Fund said in a statement that it had targeted 29 vulnerable Democrats with ads that will appear when constituents search for impeachment-related terms online. Those ads will redirect to a website with a petition titled: "Tell your member of Congress: Stop Impeachment Now!"

"The Democrats are so blinded by their personal hatred of President Trump that they’re willing to sacrifice all work on the issues voters care about, just to have one last shot at removing him from office to avenge their 2016 loss,” said CLF President Dan Conston. “Now that they’ve cast their votes in favor of marching headfirst into impeachment, vulnerable Democrats have shown voters there is zero difference whatsoever between them and the radical leftists fighting tooth and nail to impeach this president."

Chris

10-31-2019, 11:51 PM

https://twitter.com/gatewaypundit/status/1190101058233786368?s=19

:lmao:lmao:lmao:lmao:lmao

DMX7

11-01-2019, 12:01 AM

Chris

11-01-2019, 12:10 AM

transcripto el firesido que paso mi amigos? :lol

benefactor

11-01-2019, 12:28 AM

Wasn't the call recorded? How about we just play it out loud by the fire?

ElNono

11-01-2019, 12:29 AM

This isn't really about impeachment, imho, it's all about driving public opinion for 2020 election.

They're on sketchy ground with this quid pro quo bs, given that we have video of Obama and Biden doing the same.

Which political opponent Joe or Barry solicited a foreign country to investigate? McCain, Romney, both?

I actually have a much bigger concern with this whole process, and it’s the fact that alleged educated people like you are starting to question our system of democracy. If this is indeed a baseless charade, nobody will benefit more than the POTUS here. The mere mention of the word ‘coup’ by no less than elected representatives when this entire process has taken place directly on constitutional grounds (and don’t even get me started on the rebuked doctrine that the executive advanced where the POTUS is literally a king), makes one wonder if respect for the laws or constitution are simply optional, based on the party colors or the rhetoric of the day.

I’m not even positing that the POTUS is guilty of anything here, nor that Democrats are not trying to advance a political narrative as part of the process (and whether that’s morally correct or not, certainly deserves its own discussion), but the falsehood that Congress lacks the ability to investigate or impeach is a complete affront to our system of government.

I mean, I understand that the credibility of Congress, both parties similarly here, is rock bottom. If on top of that we deny that they have the capability to conduct their Constitutionally allowed job, then we just might as well scrap the Constitution and start over.

What’s even more brazen here is the fact that, as some people already said, all Trump had to do is shut the fuck up for a while, especially after being put on notice by the Mueller investigation, but instead doubled down on stupid. There’s no Democrat you can blame for that. That’s entirely on him.

ElNono

11-01-2019, 12:30 AM

Wasn't the call recorded? How about we just play it out loud by the fire?

Yup, he can just declassify it. Let the world hear this nothingburger.

clambake

11-01-2019, 12:32 AM

Which political opponent Joe or Barry solicited a foreign country to investigate? McCain, Romney, both?

I actually have a much bigger concern with this whole process, and it’s the fact that alleged educated people like you are starting to question our system of democracy. If this is indeed a baseless charade, nobody will benefit more than the POTUS here. The mere mention of the word ‘coup’ by no less than elected representatives when this entire process has taken place directly on constitutional grounds (and don’t even get me started on the rebuked doctrine that the executive advanced where the POTUS is literally a king), makes one wonder if respect for the laws or constitution are simply optional, based on the party colors or the rhetoric of the day.

I’m not even positing that the POTUS is guilty of anything here, nor that Democrats are not trying to advance a political narrative as part of the process (and whether that’s morally correct or not, certainly deserves its own discussion), but the falsehood that Congress lacks the ability to investigate or impeach is a complete affront to our system of government.

I mean, I understand that the credibility of Congress, both parties similarly here, is rock bottom. It if on top of that we deny that they have the capability to conduct their Constitutionally allowed job, then we just might as well scrap the Constitution and start over.

What’s even more brazen here is the fact that, as some people already said, all Trump had to do is shut the fuck up for a while, especially after being put on notice by the Mueller investigation, but instead doubled down on stupid. There’s no Democrat you can blame for that. That’s entirely on him.

yes

in darrins humble opinion, lol

try and imagine a humble opinion by darrin

DarrinS

11-01-2019, 01:15 AM

yes

in darrins humble opinion, lol

try and imagine a humble opinion by darrin

How sweet.

I guess the GOP can immediately proceed with articles of impeachment against Biden, if he becomes potus in 2020.

Only difference is that Biden withheld loan guarantee until AFTER he got his desired outcome.

DarrinS

11-01-2019, 01:17 AM

"Well, son of a bitch. He got fired."

DarrinS

11-01-2019, 01:23 AM

Which political opponent Joe or Barry solicited a foreign country to investigate? McCain, Romney, both?

I actually have a much bigger concern with this whole process, and it’s the fact that alleged educated people like you are starting to question our system of democracy. If this is indeed a baseless charade, nobody will benefit more than the POTUS here. The mere mention of the word ‘coup’ by no less than elected representatives when this entire process has taken place directly on constitutional grounds (and don’t even get me started on the rebuked doctrine that the executive advanced where the POTUS is literally a king), makes one wonder if respect for the laws or constitution are simply optional, based on the party colors or the rhetoric of the day.

I’m not even positing that the POTUS is guilty of anything here, nor that Democrats are not trying to advance a political narrative as part of the process (and whether that’s morally correct or not, certainly deserves its own discussion), but the falsehood that Congress lacks the ability to investigate or impeach is a complete affront to our system of government.

I mean, I understand that the credibility of Congress, both parties similarly here, is rock bottom. If on top of that we deny that they have the capability to conduct their Constitutionally allowed job, then we just might as well scrap the Constitution and start over.

What’s even more brazen here is the fact that, as some people already said, all Trump had to do is shut the fuck up for a while, especially after being put on notice by the Mueller investigation, but instead doubled down on stupid. There’s no Democrat you can blame for that. That’s entirely on him.

Many good points made here. I'll wait until Horowitz and Durham investigations are completed to respond.

hater

11-01-2019, 06:54 AM

hater

11-01-2019, 07:03 AM

https://twitter.com/rafirebreak/status/1190226313233281024?s=21

“whistleblower” identity revealed?

ChumpDumper

11-01-2019, 07:21 AM

How sweet.

I guess the GOP can immediately proceed with articles of impeachment against Biden, if he becomes potus in 2020.Sorry Darrin, you'll have to explain how Biden's actions benefited his own reelection campaign. You said it's the same thing. Prove it.

Only difference is that Biden withheld loan guarantee until AFTER he got his desired outcome.You believe attempted murder is not a crime. You've said this over and over.

baseline bum

11-01-2019, 07:23 AM

ChumpDumper

11-01-2019, 07:24 AM

Many good points made here. I'll wait until Horowitz and Durham investigations are completed to respond.But you've already exonerated Dennison. Why are you waiting for him to guide you through the other "investigations"? Somehow your purported independence of thought disappears when you can't come up with a workable conspiracy theory. Don't worry -- they can't either.

hater

11-01-2019, 08:34 AM

CIA agent whistleblower was kicked out of the white house for being anti trump leaker

if that is proven tru in public this is gonna blow up in pelosi face :lmao

:lmao

ChumpDumper

11-01-2019, 08:42 AM

CIA agent whistleblower was kicked out of the white house for being anti trump leaker

if that is proven tru in public this is gonna blow up in pelosi face :lmao

:lmaoHow does that change anything in his report that Dennison confirmed on national television?

hater

11-01-2019, 08:46 AM

How does that change anything in his report that Dennison confirmed on national television?

what was confirmed?

pgardn

11-01-2019, 08:52 AM

CIA agent whistleblower was kicked out of the white house for being anti trump leaker

if that is proven tru in public this is gonna blow up in pelosi face :lmao

:lmao

Its way past the whistleblower you dolt. It’s past Pelosi.
Trump outed himself. Ultimately this is what the red team will have to come to terms with.

Red team has gotta find a way to ignore the fact that the president of the US asked a foreign government for dirt on a political opponent in a presidential election, overtly. This will have to become a new norm in the way our government conducts foreign affairs and elections. Some red team members have come out and said it’s ok, most avoid it and gripe about how their own rules are used in the larger investigation and impeachment.
If Trump and the red team are not punished for this, we have a new method in place for screwing our elections. Gerrymandering, voter registration rules... now a candidate can directly use foreign governments for help.

Cool for you because Russia can put up their own candidate in the US. Or maybe the E.U. puts up a candidate, they have much more money.

ChumpDumper

11-01-2019, 08:57 AM

what was confirmed?Have you even read the report, hater?

Yes or no.

Spurs Homer

11-01-2019, 09:00 AM

Its way past the whistleblower you dolt. It’s past Pelosi.
Trump outed himself. Ultimately this is what the red team will have to come to terms with.

Red team has gotta find a way to ignore the fact that the president of the US asked a foreign government for dirt on a political opponent in a presidential election, overtly. This will have to become a new norm in the way our government conducts foreign affairs and elections. Some red team members have come out and said it’s ok, most avoid it and gripe about how their own rules are used in the larger investigation and impeachment.
If Trump and the red team are not punished for this, we have a new method in place for screwing our elections. Gerrymandering, voter registration rules... now a candidate can directly use foreign governments for help.

Cool for you because Russia can put up their own candidate in the US. Or maybe the E.U. puts up a candidate, they have much more money.

this ^

also

trump confirmed that everything he was accused of doing with russia - was accurate -
starting from “russia- if you are listening” to the trump tower mtg to helsinki

trump has always been the guy who was owned by russia and was openly colluding with foreign governments

this is just what he does and republicans only defense will eventually be:

”we choose trump over the constitution- over its citizens- over the rule of law”

if that is NOT a

CULT

then nothing is.

hater

11-01-2019, 09:03 AM

Have you even read the report, hater?

Yes or no.

thought so. nothing

boutons_deux

11-01-2019, 09:06 AM

"Trump outed himself"

... and people with who heard Trash commit his US Code crime have confirmed and reported the crime at the time.

And now they will repeat their testimony on TV

Winehole23

11-01-2019, 09:11 AM

CIA agent whistleblower was kicked out of the white house for being anti trump leaker

if that is proven tru in public this is gonna blow up in pelosi face :lmao

:lmaoDoesn't it kind of blow up in Trump's face that whatever the disgruntled ex-staffer alleged has been corroborated by half a dozen other people?

pgardn

11-01-2019, 09:20 AM

this ^

also

trump confirmed that everything he was accused of doing with russia - was accurate -
starting from “russia- if you are listening” to the trump tower mtg to helsinki

trump has always been the guy who was owned by russia and was openly colluding with foreign governments

this is just what he does and republicans only defense will eventually be:

”we choose trump over the constitution- over its citizens- over the rule of law”

if that is NOT a

CULT

then nothing is.

We do not have evidence for the underlined. Did Trump say he had a talk with Putin about how they could sway Minnesota red? (If Trump did have this call it did not work, red team lost Minnesota by a hair in 2016.)

What we know about is the call with Ukraine. I prefer to stick with that for impeachment. Once our legitimate politicians who care more about our democracy than their party get to his financial dealings and other transgressions, more illegal dealings may come to light. If the blue team wants to start laying down clutter...

Mueller said the evidence did not point to collusion. He left it up to the people in politics to deal with multiple transgressions in other areas and the blue team could not get most of it to gain any traction with a large majority of Americans because it is more complex imo.

ChumpDumper

11-01-2019, 09:21 AM

thought so. nothing:lmao you didn't even read the report! :lmao

:lmao you have no idea what's in it. Why are you even trying to say one word about it?

hater

11-01-2019, 09:22 AM

Doesn't it kind of blow up in Trump's face that whatever the disgruntled ex-staffer alleged has been corroborated by half a dozen other people?

what was corroborated?

LkrFan

11-01-2019, 09:22 AM

You make this shit up if you TRIED:
https://twitter.com/DavidJollyFL/status/1190270140027457540?s=19
To all you Trumpettes:
https://media.tenor.com/images/9925afa8e5e821699ebf7a370086bd42/tenor.gif

:rollin :lmao :rollin

hater

11-01-2019, 09:23 AM

:lmao you didn't even read the report! :lmao

:lmao you have no idea what's in it. Why are you even trying to say one word about it?

neither did you

cant even name a single thing thats was proven :lol

ChumpDumper

11-01-2019, 09:23 AM

what was corroborated?:rollin you know absolutely nothing about it.

Called it.

lol hater

:lmao

ChumpDumper

11-01-2019, 09:24 AM

neither did you:lmao of course I did. It's only like eight pages. Even you could do it with some help.

Called it. :lol

hater

11-01-2019, 09:27 AM

:lmao of course I did. It's only like eight pages. Even you could do it with some help.

Called it. :lol

nope u didnt

cant even name one thing proven :lol

hater

11-01-2019, 09:28 AM

what was confirmed?

still waiting chump :lol

ChumpDumper

11-01-2019, 09:28 AM

nope u didntOf course I did.

cant even name one thing proven :lolOf course I can. I've been talking about it ever since it came out. All of us have. You've been fapping to dictators this whole time.:lol

Why do you want to be so ignorant, hater?

hater

11-01-2019, 09:30 AM

what was confirmed?

still

waiting

chump

:lol

ChumpDumper

11-01-2019, 09:31 AM

Here you go hater. I challenge you to read this:

https://intelligence.house.gov/uploadedfiles/20190812_-_whistleblower_complaint_unclass.pdf

ChumpDumper

11-01-2019, 09:31 AM

still

waiting

chump

:lolRead the report. I'll wait. Only takes an intelligent person a few minutes.

https://intelligence.house.gov/uploadedfiles/20190812_-_whistleblower_complaint_unclass.pdf

hater

11-01-2019, 09:37 AM

nope u claimed this

How does that change anything in his report that Dennison confirmed on national television?

what according to you was confirmed to on national television chump?

waiting.....

Winehole23

11-01-2019, 09:40 AM

if the complaint is accurate, Rudy Giuliani and the US AG Bob Barr were essentially running a shadow Ukraine portfolio for Trump.

ChumpDumper

11-01-2019, 09:40 AM

nopeThat's you in a nutshell, hater.

You don't read shit. You're ignorant. You have horrible takes. You don't call anything because you call everything every possible way so you can say you called it.

If you refuse to know even the basics of the impeachment case by reading eight pages, why are you even in this thread?

Spurs Homer

11-01-2019, 09:43 AM

We do not have evidence for the underlined. Did Trump say he had a talk with Putin about how they could sway Minnesota red? (If Trump did have this call it did not work, red team lost Minnesota by a hair in 2016.)

What we know about is the call with Ukraine. I prefer to stick with that for impeachment. Once our legitimate politicians who care more about our democracy than their party get to his financial dealings and other transgressions, more illegal dealings may come to light. If the blue team wants to start laying down clutter...

Mueller said the evidence did not point to collusion. He left it up to the people in politics to deal with multiple transgressions in other areas and the blue team could not get most of it to gain any traction with a large majority of Americans because it is more complex imo.

jeezus

misinformation ^

mueller did not say that - there was collusion in your face - in public

mueller said;
1) russia attacked the usa in a comprehensive campaign to sway the election in favor of trump and agaist hrc
2) trump team welcomed russias attack
3) #1 & #2. - above did not/could not rise to the level of a “chargeable” conspiracy to defraud the usa for several reasons
A) all trump team lied about their contacts and barr/rosenstein made sure mueller could NOT compel trumps criminal spawn to be held accountable - it is in the report that mueller had a list of who he could prosecute (manafort/gates/flynn/cohen) - and jr and jared and ivanka could not be touched
B) trump team hid/lost/destroyed/ memos, emails, texts, etc
C) the OLC policy that a sitting prez cannot be charged - but investigative findings CAN be used after trump leaves ofc
4) trump refused to testify, lied on his written testimony and barr would not allow mueller to compel testimony

i didnt say or opine that the mueller stuff be included in impeachment as it only allows the criminals in the wh andthe GOP to muddy the waters- again

but this bullshit of “mueller found no collusion” is straight out of the trump/russia talking point manual

hater

11-01-2019, 09:49 AM

That's you in a nutshell, hater.

You don't read shit. You're ignorant. You have horrible takes. You don't call anything because you call everything every possible way so you can say you called it.

If you refuse to know even the basics of the impeachment case by reading eight pages, why are you even in this thread?

nope u claimed this

How does that change anything in his report that Dennison confirmed on national television?

what according to you was confirmed to on national television chump?

waiting.....

still waitin chump :lmao

cant even name 1 single thing you claimed was confirmed :lmao

ChumpDumper

11-01-2019, 09:51 AM

nope u claimed this

what according to you was confirmed to on national television chump?

waiting.....

still waitin chump :lmao

cant even name 1 single thing you claimed was confirmed :lmaoDo you even know what the whistleblower claims are, hater?

Sum them up for me real quick.

hater

11-01-2019, 09:52 AM

cant even name 1 single thing he says was confirmed on national television :lol

lol chump

clambake

11-01-2019, 09:53 AM

You've been fapping to dictators this whole time.:lol

lol pretty spot on

ChumpDumper

11-01-2019, 09:54 AM

cant even name 1 single thing he says was confirmed on national television :lol

lol chumpSure I can.

Trump admitted he asked Zelensky to investigate the Bidens and Crowdstrike.

Didn't you know that?

Winehole23

11-01-2019, 09:55 AM

having an AG who is both toady and fixer is kinda creepy.

ChumpDumper

11-01-2019, 09:56 AM

lol pretty spot onHe reads the shit out of their quotes. It's basically all he reads besides unverified twitter accounts that back up one conspiracy theory or another.

hater

11-01-2019, 09:58 AM

Sure I can.

Trump admitted he asked Zelensky to investigate the Bidens and Crowdstrike.

Didn't you know that?

not a crime

next

ChumpDumper

11-01-2019, 10:00 AM

not a crime

next:lmao hater moves the goalposts and redasses his ignorance of the entire impeachment issue.

You got showed up. It was so easy. :lol

Next.

vy65

11-01-2019, 10:02 AM

boutons_deux

11-01-2019, 10:03 AM

Federal judge calls BS on White House trying to censor staffers in hearings
, a federal judge in Washington, D.C. today, refuted the White House’s efforts to control what officials and former officials say when subpoenaed.

“We don’t live in a world where your status as a former executive branch official somehow shields you or prevents you from giving information,” the judge told the Trump administration.

https://www.spurstalk.com/forums/showthread.php?t=281688&p=9961502#post9961502 (https://www.spurstalk.com/forums/showthread.php?t=281688&p=9961502#post9961502)

Of course, the shitbag incompetent Federal Repug-hacks-in-robes being rammed through by MoscoMitch would always support a criminal Repug President

DarrinS

11-01-2019, 10:03 AM

having an AG who is both toady and fixer is kinda creepy.

https://media1.tenor.com/images/2879f1e9d35ef57244dc708f439403e7/tenor.gif

ChumpDumper

11-01-2019, 10:03 AM

Darrin, of course, loves it.

Winehole23

11-01-2019, 10:04 AM

not a crime

nextit's not a requirement that a crime have been committed, to impeach and remove. maladministration is impeachable, intemperance is impeachable, why not corruption as well?

as Gerry Ford once said,

an impeachable offense is whatever a majority of the House of Representatives considers it to be.

boutons_deux

11-01-2019, 10:07 AM

Degrading themselves beyond Redemption ...

Christian leaders laid hands on and prayed for Donald Trump ahead of impeachment vote

https://www.rawstory.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/Christian-Leaders-Lay-Hands-and-Pray-over-Trump.jpg
:lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol

https://www.rawstory.com/2019/11/christian-leaders-laid-hands-on-and-prayed-for-donald-trump-ahead-of-impeachment-vote/?utm_source=&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=2861

Evangelicals wonder why their flock is decreasing? wonder why more people are not affiliated with their venal snake oil shows?

Winehole23

11-01-2019, 10:10 AM

https://media1.tenor.com/images/2879f1e9d35ef57244dc708f439403e7/tenor.gif

“Everything is gauged by politics,” he continued. “And, as I said, that’s antithetical to how the department runs, and any attorney general in this period is going to end up losing a lot of political capital, and I realize that and that’s one of the reasons that I was ultimately persuaded, that maybe I should take it on because I think that [at] my stage in life it really doesn’t make any difference.”

"I am at the end of my career," Barr, 69, said.

"Everyone dies, and I am not, you know, I don't believe in the Homeric idea that, you know, immortality comes by, you know, having odes sung about you over the centuries, you know?" he added.

boutons_deux

11-01-2019, 10:13 AM

GOP’s ‘pathetic and laughable’ excuses for Trump torn to pieces by conservative Matt Lewis

Lewis starts out by laughing off the notion that impeachment — which is a process outlined in the Constitution — is some kind of extrajudicial Soviet-style “coup” against the president.

He then goes on to tackle what he describes as the more “insidious” of the anti-impeachment arguments in which

Trump is treated as too immature or unintelligent to knowingly commit crimes.

“In this paradigm, Trump is just a big kid who means well and can be forgiven for not really knowing what he’s playing with,” he writes.

“Talk about the soft bigotry of low expectations!…

Donald Trump has been president for almost three years.

To suggest that he is still ‘inexperienced in foreign affairs’ is, itself, an assertion arguably more disqualifying than corruption.”

even more disturbing: Republicans who think Trump is guilty of shaking down Ukraine to investigate his political rivals but who just don’t care.

when the topic of impeachment came up, he dismissed it with a yawn. Sure, he conceded, Trump is guilty, but ‘so what?’ All politicians are corrupt, and besides, it’s not like we were expecting Trump to be a paragon of ethics.”

will only embolden Trump to commit worse offenses in the future and

will set a future precedent in which it’s acceptable for presidents to extort foreign countries to investigate their rivals.

https://www.rawstory.com/2019/11/gops-pathetic-and-laughable-excuses-for-trump-torn-to-pieces-by-conservative-matt-lewis/?utm_source=&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=2861

=================

The Excuses for Trump Just Keep Getting More Pathetic and Laughable Every Day

https://www.thedailybeast.com/the-excuses-for-trump-just-keep-getting-more-pathetic-and-laughable-every-day?source=politics&via=rss

We Serious People not that Spurstalking Trash fellators echo the risible bullshit that is dictated to them by the Repugs / right wing hate media.

RandomGuy

11-01-2019, 10:21 AM

Trump’s First Impeachment Win
The House’s resolution should have been the easiest for Republicans to go along with. None of them did.

https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2019/10/impeachment-house-trump/601213/

:lmao

His first impeachment "win" was that they finalized the procedures for his impeachment?

Or was it that the Republicans could make an easy "no" vote?

pgardn

11-01-2019, 10:35 AM

jeezus

misinformation ^

mueller did not say that - there was collusion in your face - in public

mueller said;
1) russia attacked the usa in a comprehensive campaign to sway the election in favor of trump and agaist hrc
2) trump team welcomed russias attack
3) #1 & #2. - above did not/could not rise to the level of a “chargeable” conspiracy to defraud the usa for several reasons
A) all trump team lied about their contacts and barr/rosenstein made sure mueller could NOT compel trumps criminal spawn to be held accountable - it is in the report that mueller had a list of who he could prosecute (manafort/gates/flynn/cohen) - and jr and jared and ivanka could not be touched
B) trump team hid/lost/destroyed/ memos, emails, texts, etc
C) the OLC policy that a sitting prez cannot be charged - but investigative findings CAN be used after trump leaves ofc
4) trump refused to testify, lied on his written testimony and barr would not allow mueller to compel testimony

i didnt say or opine that the mueller stuff be included in impeachment as it only allows the criminals in the wh andthe GOP to muddy the waters- again

but this bullshit of “mueller found no collusion” is straight out of the trump/russia talking point manual

He did not have the evidence to say Trump colluded with the Russian government.
End of story. Don’t lie.

Do you really think Trump had a sit down with Russian officials on how and where to plant people at rally’s and how and where to put the Facebook shit? You really believe this? He may not have minded, but he certainly did not plan with them, there is no evidence of this type of planning other than his silly rants to crowds.

Trump team welcomed Russian attacks... Because he said read Hillary’s email or find the emails? BS exaggerating
What Trump did NOT do enough of, or vacillated on, was condemning the interference. He actually did condemn it, then he would not when asked to. Not surprising as he is stubborn as hell.

Just as Winehole has pointed out, just like boots, your partisan shit does not go over well. And yet you claim your team is more honest. Act that way. You are exactly why the blue team loses.

boutons_deux

11-01-2019, 10:44 AM

"He did not have the evidence"

not ENOUGH evidence. Mueller said there was something Russia there, but HE couldn't find it using a prosecutors very high standards for criminality.

The Russian "circumstances" and Trash and his mafiya forgetting, lying, obstructing are conclusive of their guilt

Spurs Homer

11-01-2019, 11:05 AM

He did not have the evidence to say Trump colluded with the Russian government.
End of story. Don’t lie.

Do you really think Trump had a sit down with Russian officials on how and where to plant people at rally’s and how and where to put the Facebook shit? You really believe this? He may not have minded, but he certainly did not plan with them, there is no evidence of this type of planning other than his silly rants to crowds.

Trump team welcomed Russian attacks... Because he said read Hillary’s email or find the emails? BS exaggerating
What Trump did NOT do enough of, or vacillated on, was condemning the interference. He actually did condemn it, then he would not when asked to. Not surprising as he is stubborn as hell.

Just as Winehole has pointed out, just like boots, your partisan shit does not go over well. And yet you claim your team is more honest. Act that way. You are exactly why the blue team loses.

so much wrong here- such dishonesty

”evidence” or “not enough evidence” NEVER was stated by MUeller or his report

the REpublican narrative says “not enough evidence”

mueller was not ALLOWED to charge a president- so boy scout mueller - did not even want to allege that there was conspiracy

so after tying muellers hands- mueller was left with
“did not rise to the level of conspiracy”

that is NOT equivalent to “lack of evidence” because the reason it “did not rise”was not because of a lack of evidence but because mueller was forbidden from using the evidence to charge a president

trump team welcoming the attack = collusion - that is the fucking definition of collusion

i never said that trump planned every russian tactic- but those tactics ALL - CONTRIBUTED- to the election...

facebook ads, false propaganda against hrc, propaganda aimed at blacks, propagandA about hrc crimes, hrc diseases, hrcs emails, etc

whenever trump faced an obstacle like “grab em by the pussy”
russia/wikileaks responded within 30 fucking minutes to release hacked/emails to change the narrative to save trumps ass

with the amount of misinformed uneducated americans that have been exposed as “the cult”

you bet your ass that russia helping trump swayed a lot of uneducated morons into either
voting for trump
not voting at all

add to all this - the blatant COVER UP of the mueller report which dems are still stuck trying to pry through the courts

and it just destroys all the bullshit you posted above

you act as if you are informed and “non-partisan” but you are ill-informed on the facts and end up basically spouting republican talking points while posing as a non-partisan or a democrat

LkrFan

11-01-2019, 11:13 AM

https://twitter.com/kurtbardella/status/1190243250252189696?s=19
https://twitter.com/tedlieu/status/1190297736500760576?s=19

boutons_deux

11-01-2019, 11:17 AM

Impeachment probe looking into Mulvaney involvement with Ukraine before Trump phone call

Democrats are asking questions about acting White House Chief of Staff Mick Mulvaney’s curious decision to hold up a weapons shipment to Ukraine before Donald Trump’s phone call with President Zelensky.

The report notes that Mulvaney,

in his other job as head of the Office of Management and Budget (OMB),

held up the sale of Javelin anti-tank missiles to Ukraine even after the Trump administration had approved the sale.

“The unusual move didn’t just foreshadow the huge fight that has President Donald Trump now facing impeachment.

It also caught the eye of congressional investigators in the impeachment inquiry.

This summer, OMB delayed the provision of a second shipment of military aid to Ukraine.

An Intelligence Community whistleblower pointed to the Trump administration’s decision to temporarily hold up the aid as a source of concern about alleged efforts to extort Ukraine.

Democrats responded by opening an impeachment inquiry.”

https://www.rawstory.com/2019/11/impeachment-probe-looking-into-mulvaney-involvement-with-ukraine-before-trump-phone-call-report/

ChumpDumper

11-01-2019, 11:36 AM

:lmao

1189970650045263873

LkrFan

11-01-2019, 11:55 AM

https://twitter.com/minhtngo/status/1190117181922525186?s=19

#OrangeRussianAsset

pgardn

11-01-2019, 12:01 PM

so much wrong here- such dishonesty

”evidence” or “not enough evidence” NEVER was stated by MUeller or his report

the REpublican narrative says “not enough evidence”

mueller was not ALLOWED to charge a president- so boy scout mueller - did not even want to allege that there was conspiracy

so after tying muellers hands- mueller was left with
“did not rise to the level of conspiracy”

that is NOT equivalent to “lack of evidence” because the reason it “did not rise”was not because of a lack of evidence but because mueller was forbidden from using the evidence to charge a president

trump team welcoming the attack = collusion - that is the fucking definition of collusion

i never said that trump planned every russian tactic- but those tactics ALL - CONTRIBUTED- to the election...

facebook ads, false propaganda against hrc, propaganda aimed at blacks, propagandA about hrc crimes, hrc diseases, hrcs emails, etc

whenever trump faced an obstacle like “grab em by the pussy”
russia/wikileaks responded within 30 fucking minutes to release hacked/emails to change the narrative to save trumps ass

with the amount of misinformed uneducated americans that have been exposed as “the cult”

you bet your ass that russia helping trump swayed a lot of uneducated morons into either
voting for trump
not voting at all

add to all this - the blatant COVER UP of the mueller report which dems are still stuck trying to pry through the courts

and it just destroys all the bullshit you posted above

you act as if you are informed and “non-partisan” but you are ill-informed on the facts and end up basically spouting republican talking points while posing as a non-partisan or a democrat

you are blatantly disingenuous

show me the links that quantify the interference and how it gave trump the victory.
bottom line is the election was close and you can’t handle it
I don’t like it but he won the presidency

you go ahead and try to mix this in with him being a horrible president and you’ll see why you get all the backlash and why people like you on the blue team can still lose this thing in 2020

You would make a great member of the red team

pgardn

11-01-2019, 12:03 PM

I got lots more on your bullshit but I got to work

ChumpDumper

11-01-2019, 12:13 PM

https://twitter.com/minhtngo/status/1190117181922525186?s=19

#OrangeRussianAssetThat looks like another disaster in the making and lol letting Israel push us around, but at least it's a legitimate quid pro quo.

boutons_deux

11-01-2019, 12:22 PM

That looks like another disaster in the making and lol letting Israel push us around, but at least it's a legitimate quid pro quo.

... Trash doing whatever Pootin dictates.

Russia's puppet/ally Syria has influenced, if not controlled, Lebanon for decades. Weakening Lebanon means strengthening Syria/Russia in Lebanon.

Will Pootin quid pro quo Trash that Trash International Hotel in Moscow?

baseline bum

11-01-2019, 12:28 PM

Its way past the whistleblower you dolt. It’s past Pelosi.
Trump outed himself. Ultimately this is what the red team will have to come to terms with.

Red team has gotta find a way to ignore the fact that the president of the US asked a foreign government for dirt on a political opponent in a presidential election, overtly. This will have to become a new norm in the way our government conducts foreign affairs and elections. Some red team members have come out and said it’s ok, most avoid it and gripe about how their own rules are used in the larger investigation and impeachment.
If Trump and the red team are not punished for this, we have a new method in place for screwing our elections. Gerrymandering, voter registration rules... now a candidate can directly use foreign governments for help.

Cool for you because Russia can put up their own candidate in the US. Or maybe the E.U. puts up a candidate, they have much more money.

Red team will ignore it the same way they ignored the Kavanaugh allegation and complain about the Democrats and 2016.

ElNono

11-01-2019, 12:32 PM

How sweet.

I guess the GOP can immediately proceed with articles of impeachment against Biden, if he becomes potus in 2020.

Only difference is that Biden withheld loan guarantee until AFTER he got his desired outcome.

Of course they can. Whether it ends up a politically savvy move is a different story altogether, but there should be no question about their authority to check on the executive as delineated on the Constitution.

Spurs Homer

11-01-2019, 12:35 PM

you are blatantly disingenuous

show me the links that quantify the interference and how it gave trump the victory.
bottom line is the election was close and you can’t handle it
I don’t like it but he won the presidency

you go ahead and try to mix this in with him being a horrible president and you’ll see why you get all the backlash and why people like you on the blue team can still lose this thing in 2020

You would make a great member of the red team

lol

show me the links where 70000 total vote margin of victory was proven to have zero to do with russian interference and trump team collusion

show me the entire unredacted mueller report
and all the underlyng evidence

show me how the intelligence unanimous conclusion that russia attacked

then explain how trump denouncing the usa intel and siding with russia

makes him a legit duly elected president

ypu cannot square that circle of fuckery

boutons_deux

11-01-2019, 01:06 PM

Justice Department Tells Judge That Courts Are Powerless Over Trump (https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2019/11/1/1896559/-Justice-Department-Tells-Judge-That-Courts-Are-Powerless-Over-Trump)

the Justice Department lawyer asserted that

there were NO circumstances under which the judicial branch could EVER intervene in a dispute between the legislative and executive branches.

In other words,

the Justice Department claims that Trump can defy Congress at will and

nobody can do anything about it.

https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2019/11/1/1896559/-Justice-Department-Tells-Judge-That-Courts-Are-Powerless-Over-Trump?utm_campaign=trending (https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2019/11/1/1896559/-Justice-Department-Tells-Judge-That-Courts-Are-Powerless-Over-Trump?utm_campaign=trending)

The autocracy, authoritarianism is installing, who or what will stop it?

The Repugs, hired by the oligarchy, have every intention of killing democracy, with the objective of a anti-democratic Federal judiciary, and eventually a one-party-forever autocracy.

boutons_deux

11-01-2019, 01:16 PM

Bush II ethics lawyer: Trump's offer of campaign cash to senators is tantamount to felony bribery (https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2019/10/31/1896482/-Bush-II-ethics-lawyer-Trump-s-offer-of-campaign-cash-to-senators-is-tantamount-to-felony-bribery)

Politico ran a story headlined “Trump lures GOP senators on impeachment with cold cash”

On Wednesday, the Trump reelection campaign sent afundraising appeal (https://secure.winred.com/tmagac/trump-for-2020-winning?amount=42)to its massive email list

urging donors to provide a contribution that would be divided between
the president and
Colorado Sen. Cory Gardner,
Iowa Sen. Joni Ernst, and
North Carolina Sen. Thom Tillis.

Each of the senators are supporting the anti-impeachment resolution despite being endangered in 2020.

Richard W. Painter@RWPUSA (https://twitter.com/RWPUSA)
(https://twitter.com/RWPUSA)Oct 31, 2019 (https://twitter.com/RWPUSA/status/1189875106165723138)

This is a bribe.

Any other American who offered cash to the jury before a trial would go to prison for felony bribery.

But he can get away with it?

Criminal.

Trump lures GOP senators on impeachment with cold cash

https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2019/10/31/1896482/-Bush-II-ethics-lawyer-Trump-s-offer-of-campaign-cash-to-senators-is-tantamount-to-felony-bribery?detail=emaildkre (https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2019/10/31/1896482/-Bush-II-ethics-lawyer-Trump-s-offer-of-campaign-cash-to-senators-is-tantamount-to-felony-bribery?detail=emaildkre)

vy65

11-01-2019, 01:47 PM

That looks like another disaster in the making and lol letting Israel push us around, but at least it's a legitimate quid pro quo.

Last time Israel got involved in Lebanon was a roaring success too ...

hater

11-01-2019, 01:59 PM

wait so because Israel demanded we withhold funds and we do, somehow that means we are Putins puppets??

:lmao snowflake logic

spurraider21

11-01-2019, 02:17 PM

rough transcript =/ verbatim transcript

anywho... the transcript was released several weeks ago so you're just spinning your wheels over semantics. It's probably all you have left at this point, so I don't blame you.
its either a transcript or its not. not a quasi transcript or "rough" transcript

Chris

11-01-2019, 02:43 PM

https://media3.giphy.com/media/KrTzeQI0mq4P6/giphy.gif

benefactor

11-01-2019, 02:51 PM

^The troll thing tbh

Chris

11-01-2019, 02:54 PM

I don't do the troll thing or the creepy doxxer thing. Alcohol free too :tu

LkrFan

11-01-2019, 03:02 PM

https://twitter.com/IslandOdilia03/status/1190353731709091841?s=19

America's Mayor :lol

ducks

11-01-2019, 03:07 PM

America's First Black Billionaire Gives Trump an 'A+,' Says Dems Are Moving 'Too Far Left

Chris

11-01-2019, 03:40 PM

https://twitter.com/HeyTammyBruce/status/1190252342014357505?s=19

Tammy hits a grand slam here.

LkrFan

11-01-2019, 03:49 PM

https://twitter.com/thehill/status/1190369451004383232?s=19

LkrFan

11-01-2019, 04:30 PM

https://twitter.com/AOC/status/1189902834092908545?s=19

:lol

FuzzyLumpkins

11-01-2019, 04:43 PM

TSA

11-01-2019, 06:00 PM

The synopsis Trump put out excluded him talking about Biden and an investigation into his son. Don't worry though that is going to get out eventually. Just like the Nixon tapes.

The clock is ticking.

“There's a lot of talk about Biden's son, that Biden stopped the prosecution and a lot of people want to find out about that so whatever you can do with the Attorney General would be great. Biden went around bragging that he stopped the prosecution so if you can look into it... It sounds horrible to me.”

:lol don’t worry I’m sure it’s going to get out

ChumpDumper

11-01-2019, 07:12 PM

“There's a lot of talk about Biden's son, that Biden stopped the prosecution and a lot of people want to find out about that so whatever you can do with the Attorney General would be great. Biden went around bragging that he stopped the prosecution so if you can look into it... It sounds horrible to me.”

:lol don’t worry I’m sure it’s going to get outHey, did you ever work out a narrative for all your conspiracy theories? Dennison hasn't.

Chris

11-01-2019, 07:12 PM

^someone got their talking points from Fredo and Sciff :lol

https://twitter.com/CNN/status/1190088350151192578?s=19

ChumpDumper

11-01-2019, 07:16 PM

^someone got their talking points from Fredo and Sciff :lol

https://twitter.com/CNN/status/1190088350151192578?s=19:lol you watch CNN.

FuzzyLumpkins

11-01-2019, 07:26 PM

TSA more like the actual transcript and what was cut out to be replaced by ellipses will come out.

Why Biden wanted the prosecutor fired is well documented as are multiple NATO/EU allies that were on record wanting the same thing before Biden even said anything.

pgardn

11-01-2019, 07:29 PM

lol

show me the links where 70000 total vote margin of victory was proven to have zero to do with russian interference and trump team collusion

show me the entire unredacted mueller report
and all the underlyng evidence

show me how the intelligence unanimous conclusion that russia attacked

then explain how trump denouncing the usa intel and siding with russia

makes him a legit duly elected president

ypu cannot square that circle of fuckery

Trump is a paranoid, narcissist, of course he is gonna blame someone else for not getting a win with the popular vote.
If the blue team is just baiting him with this, fine, but the fact is he was a legitimate force with the American people during 2016.
And where the fck did I say anything about Russian NOT interfering? Of course they interfered. My contention is that did NOT win him the election. Not only that, we also know from our intelligence community that Russia also screwed with Trump, especially after the Trump win. Their purpose is to create chaos, but they have no desire for an unpredictable loon to run our foreign affairs. They have made this abundantly clear. The Russians are not stupid. They realize how perilous a guy like this can be with military power.

You show me where their interference would have turned the electoral college. Give me ONE sound study that says that Russian interference gave Trump the election. Give it up, link. Trump won the electoral college. You prove Russia changed that, you are basically implying it did

TSA

11-01-2019, 07:41 PM

The synopsis Trump put out excluded him talking about Biden and an investigation into his son. Don't worry though that is going to get out eventually.

There's a lot of talk about Biden's son, that Biden stopped the prosecution and a lot of people want to find out about that so whatever you can do with the Attorney General would be great. Biden went around bragging that he stopped the prosecution so if you can look into it... It sounds horrible to me.

TSA more like the actual transcript and what was cut out to be replaced by ellipses will come out.

:rollin

FuzzyLumpkins

11-01-2019, 08:13 PM

Lt. Col. Alexander S. Vindman, the top Ukraine expert on the National Security Council, told House impeachment investigators on Tuesday that the White House transcript of a July call between President Trump and Ukraine’s president omitted crucial words and phrases, and that his attempts to include them failed, according to three people familiar with the testimony.

The omissions, Colonel Vindman said, included Mr. Trump’s assertion that there were recordings of former Vice President Joseph R. Biden Jr. discussing Ukraine corruption, and an explicit mention by Ukraine’s president, Volodymyr Zelensky, of Burisma Holdings, the energy company whose board employed Mr. Biden’s son Hunter.

https://www.nytimes.com/2019/10/29/us/politics/alexander-vindman-trump-ukraine.html

Blake

11-01-2019, 08:16 PM

I don't do the troll thing or the creepy doxxer thing. Alcohol free too :tu

:lmao good one

ducks

11-01-2019, 08:34 PM

President Donald Trump’s job approval rating remained steady in October, bolstered by national security and economic news even as the House impeachment inquiry escalated.

In the Harvard CAPS/Harris survey for The Hill released Friday, 46% of respondents said they approve of Trump’s job in office, compared with 54% who disapprove. Those numbers were unchanged from the pollster’s survey in September.

FuzzyLumpkins

11-01-2019, 09:34 PM

dumbass ducks still cherry picking polls.

yougov has him at 39% https://d25d2506sfb94s.cloudfront.net/cumulus_uploads/document/w0970skexv/tabs_Trump_Tweets_20191029.pdf
Investor's Business Daily does too https://www.investors.com/news/trump-impeachment-inquiry-6-in-10-americans-back-trump-impeachment-ibd-tipp/
ABC/WaPo has him at 38% https://www.washingtonpost.com/context/context-card/eea087b6-ca22-4cd9-a254-6bdd49d000a4/

ducks

11-01-2019, 09:39 PM

That poll was today dumbass

boutons_deux

11-02-2019, 12:53 PM

Trump And Barr Ask UK Officials To Attack The US Intelligence Community

British government officials were described as stunned by the request from Trump and Barr for them to do a hatchet job on the US intelligence community.

Trump and Barr have also been asking other foreign governments for help in investigating the FBI, CIA and Mueller investigators.

The US president has called on the Australian prime minister Scott Morrison for assistance, while the attorney general has been on similar missions to the UK and Italy.

And the information being requested has left allies astonished.

One British official with knowledge of Barr’s wish list presented to London commented that “it is like nothing we have come across before,

they are basically asking, in quite robust terms, for help in doing a hatchet job on their own intelligence services”.

Trump and Barr are going around the world and asking foreign governments to attack the United States intelligence community for them. Trump and his attorney general are

looking for dirt that they can use to discredit the Russia investigation, and

also validate the far-right conspiracy that Ukraine was behind the 2016 election attack.
It all ties back to Ukraine.

If Trump can find some way to boost the discredited Ukraine conspiracy theory,

he not only would get his pal Putin off the hook,

but it would give him another tactic to use to try to get the Ukrainians to investigate Joe Biden.

Trump is trying to discredit the intelligence community of his own country.

The president appears to be trying to make sure that he can’t be investigated for any 2020 election crimes.

William Barr is making a solid case for being named the most corrupt attorney general in US history,

and here is hoping that for the good of democracy, US allies tell Trump and Barr to go kick sand.

https://www.politicususa.com/2019/11/01/trump-barr-uk-intel-community.html (https://www.politicususa.com/2019/11/01/trump-barr-uk-intel-community.html)

boutons_deux

11-02-2019, 12:58 PM

William Barr Should Be Disbarred for His Misconduct as Attorney General

A petition (https://www.change.org/p/district-of-columbia-american-bar-association-disbar-attorney-general-william-p-barr-4abc4f8b-6ff6-46d3-97d4-d540507f65e5) is circulating to disbar U.S. Attorney General William P. Barr from practicing law in New York and the District of Columbia, where he is licensed.

The petition alleges that Barr should be disbarred for conduct largely pursued in his present capacity as attorney general.

There is, in fact,

substantial evidence to back up the charge that Barr satisfies the legal criteria for disbarment pursuant to the American Bar Association’s (ABA) Model Rules of Professional Conduct (https://www.americanbar.org/groups/professional_responsibility/publications/model_rules_of_professional_conduct/rule_1_7_conflict_of_interest_current_clients/);

Barr’s attempt to block a recent intelligence community whistleblower’s complaint (https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2019/09/26/us/politics/whistle-blower-complaint.html) that mentioned Barr himself

as complicit in President Trump’s alleged attempt to solicit interference from Ukraine in the 2020 U.S. election.

Instead of complying with this law,

Barr refused (https://www.nytimes.com/2019/09/25/us/politics/william-barr-trump-ukraine.html) to allow the complaint that implicated him to be sent to Congress,

telling the director of national intelligence that the Justice Department would handle the criminal referral against Trump.

About four weeks later, Barr’s Justice Department concluded that Trump had not violated any campaign finance laws.

Clearly, Barr violated the Whistleblower Protection Act in blocking a complaint that involved him, and

clearly had a conflict of interest in settling the criminality of allegations implicating him without recusing himself.

https://truthout.org/articles/william-barr-should-be-disbarred-for-his-misconduct-as-attorney-general/ (https://truthout.org/articles/william-barr-should-be-disbarred-for-his-misconduct-as-attorney-general/)

boutons_deux

11-02-2019, 02:02 PM

GOP Senators admit reality: Quid pro Quo is real, Trump committed extortion (https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2019/11/1/1896684/-GOP-Senators-admit-reality-Quid-pro-Quo-is-real-Trump-committed-extortion)

A growing number of Senate Republicans are ready to acknowledge that

President Trump used U.S. military aid as leverage to force Ukraine to investigate former vice president Joe Biden and his familyas the president repeatedly denies a quid pro quo.

In this shift in strategy to defend Trump,

these Republicans are insisting that the president’s action was not illegal :lol

and does not rise to the level of an impeachable offense :lol

as the Democratic-led House moves forward with the open phase of its probe.

an increasing number of Republicans wonder how long they can continue to argue that no quid pro quo was at play in the matter.

it all turns on intent, motive. ... Did the president have a culpable state of mind? … Based on the evidence that I see, that I’ve been allowed to see,

the president does not have a culpable state of mind.” :lol

at least three different people who complained about what Trump told Zelensky

on the call to NSC lawyer John Eisenberg,

who then told them not to tell anyone else about it and

then place the call information on a classified server where it couldn't be seen by anyone else,

but no sure — he didn't have a consciences of guilt or a culpable state of mind. :lol

https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2019/11/1/1896684/-GOP-Senators-admit-reality-Quid-pro-Quo-is-real-Trump-committed-extortion?detail=emaildkre

FuzzyLumpkins

11-02-2019, 02:07 PM

That poll was today dumbass

So were the polls I posted. You didn't even look at them apparently. That is the critical mind of a duck.

boutons_deux

11-02-2019, 02:48 PM

The Ukraine scandal proves Trump is exactly who we warned you he was

his more intellectually inclined defenders head toward consensus on a key fact:

The White House did, indeed, propose a quid pro quo with Ukraine,

leveraging military aid in exchange for investigations of the president’s political opponents.

Andrew McCarthy, one of Trump’s breathless propagandists ... “Stop Claiming ‘No Quid Pro Quo (https://www.nationalreview.com/2019/10/stop-claiming-no-quid-pro-quo/).’”

Rich Lowry ... “no quid pro quo” has become steadily less plausible

Ben Shapiro ... “The White House should stop saying there was no quid pro quo. There was a quid pro quo.”

despite the fact that there was, undeniably, a quid pro quo, it wasn’t impeachable. :lol

https://www.rawstory.com/2019/11/the-ukraine-scandal-proves-trump-is-exactly-who-we-warned-you-he-was/?utm_source=&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=2869 (https://www.rawstory.com/2019/11/the-ukraine-scandal-proves-trump-is-exactly-who-we-warned-you-he-was/?utm_source=&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=2869)

Chris

11-02-2019, 03:15 PM

https://twitter.com/gatewaypundit/status/1190688855474802691?s=19

ChumpDumper

11-02-2019, 03:17 PM

:lol none of you read the complaint and don't know that it's been corroborated by actual witnesses.

Chris

11-02-2019, 03:28 PM

"nobody knows what's really going on but me!"
-Chump

ChumpDumper

11-02-2019, 03:46 PM

"nobody knows what's really going on but me!"
-ChumpDid you read the complaint?

Yes or no.

Blake

11-02-2019, 03:49 PM

"nobody knows what's really going on but me!"
-Chump

Muh gatewaypundit knows what's going on

-Chris

Chris

11-02-2019, 04:06 PM

https://twitter.com/Millie__Weaver/status/1190735699676409856?s=19

Spurs Homer

11-02-2019, 04:06 PM

"nobody knows what's really going on but me!"
-Chump

trump confessed

called his crime “beautiful” and “perfect”

for once i agree

his impeachable call was perfect

and him releasing the transcript to allow the dems to have documented proof of his confession

was actually

beeeyoooteeeeful!!!

:elephant

SnakeBoy

11-02-2019, 04:08 PM

trump confessed

called his crime “beautiful” and “perfect”

for once i agree

his impeachable call was perfect

and him releasing the transcript to allow the dems to have documented proof of his confession

was actually

beeeyoooteeeeful!!!

:elephant

It wasn't a transcript. Stay on message fool :lol

Spurs Homer

11-02-2019, 04:11 PM

It wasn't a transcript. Stay on message fool :lol

it was a partial transcript that is STILL impeachable

the FULL transcript -if ever exposed - is worse for trump

LkrFan

11-02-2019, 09:47 PM

https://twitter.com/CheriJacobus/status/1190821383011475458?s=19

If this checks out, I got jokes. The pussy grabber outsmarted by another woman? Hillary, Stormy, Nancy, and now Cheri?

He's so dumb I bet the same "nothing but the best people" who helped hack her emails, also hacked the DNC. And what's the common denominator? David Dennison :lmao

ElNono

11-02-2019, 09:55 PM

Calm down Reynaldo :lol

TSA

11-02-2019, 10:24 PM

https://mobile.twitter.com/KellyO/status/1190772289559826439

:corn:

ElNono

11-02-2019, 10:29 PM

:lol what does that even mean? Way to dodge answering...

ChumpDumper

11-02-2019, 10:46 PM

https://mobile.twitter.com/KellyO/status/1190772289559826439

:corn::lol TSA falls for it every time.

Spurs Homer

11-03-2019, 02:18 PM

Watching the GOP cult stand bold-faced and deny reality

one is reminded of the quote from James Comey about trump “eating your soul.”

In our lifetime we are privileged/cursed to see Americans on display - as their souls slowly rot. All for one man - Trump.

Watch them put themselves in front of a camera and proceed to utter the words they know are false and brazenly double-down and defend those false words.

Our country is attacked with the help of the fraud president and this fraud defends the attackers - in public no less.

THe fraud then confesses to repeating this crime in 2019 -after getting away with it in 2016 - and his confession is released as a partial transcript which confirms this crime - yet the GOP runs in defense of this crime and stares at the camera and boldly state that the crime confessed to is not actually a crime because - dear leader.

The GOP died on the hill called Trump, had their soul eaten.THe GOP betrayed their oath, the country, the constitution and they cannot even muster enough backbone to save themselves after witnessing the crimes Trump commits and keeps committing.

Sit back, pay attention, watch this phenomenon unfold over the next year and watch the GOP in real time resemble treasonous zombies as the country goes up in flames.

boutons_deux

11-03-2019, 02:55 PM

Fox pays her $3M / year for this shit.

‘Get over it’:

Fox’s Jeanine Pirro says what President Trump does is

‘none of your damn business’

https://www.rawstory.com/2019/11/get-over-it-foxs-jeanine-pirro-says-what-president-trump-does-is-none-of-your-damn-business/?utm_source=&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=2878 (https://www.rawstory.com/2019/11/get-over-it-foxs-jeanine-pirro-says-what-president-trump-does-is-none-of-your-damn-business/?utm_source=&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=2878)

LkrFan

11-03-2019, 03:22 PM

Calm down Reynaldo :lol

:lol

ducks

11-03-2019, 03:46 PM

https://scontent-lax3-1.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/fr/cp0/e15/q65/74242373_2582226288492899_2875626289962680320_n.jp g?_nc_cat=1&efg=eyJpIjoidCJ9&_nc_oc=AQmfj_ZrtSDnsRnfsh7_lr58GPbclJn0XzitrhF-SkvV1isFqVssV8aTSl6DPzHBCSA&_nc_ht=scontent-lax3-1.xx&oh=18b576999fb66f4a441e32134abe0e2f&oe=5E49C274

ducks

11-03-2019, 07:08 PM

'Meet the Press' asked voters in early primary states about impeachment, saw little support

boutons_deux

11-03-2019, 11:09 PM

Repugs are gearing up to expose (to death threats) and destroy the whistleblower

CNN’s Jeffrey Toobin Slams Trump Attacking Whistleblower:

‘So Contrary to All Modern Law’

“the way he’s talking about this whistleblower is so contrary to all modern law.”

“If Donald Trump were the head of a Fortune 500 company :lol

and he was doing what he’s doing about this whistleblower, denouncing him, asking him to be unmasked,

he would be fired by the board of the company,” Toobin said.

“The way he’s talking about this whistleblower is so contrary to all modern law about whistleblowing,

it’s just a deeply appalling thing.”

https://www.mediaite.com/tv/cnns-jeffrey-toobin-slams-trump-attacking-whistleblower-so-contrary-to-all-modern-law/ (https://www.mediaite.com/tv/cnns-jeffrey-toobin-slams-trump-attacking-whistleblower-so-contrary-to-all-modern-law/)

ducks

11-04-2019, 12:04 AM

Yang also pointed out that it could also do the party harm in an additional way, because impeachment could take five Democratic presidential candidates who are senators away from the campaign trail at a critical time if they need to become jurors in a Senate trial

ducks

11-04-2019, 12:07 AM

Rep. Steve Scalise, R-La., says there’s “no guarantee” President Donald Trump will be treated fairly once the impeachment inquiry goes before the House Judiciary Committee.

In an interview aired Sunday on ABC News’ “This Week,” the House Minority Whip pointed out that “both sides” were allowed to call witnesses during impeachment proceedings against President Bill Clinton.

But, he insisted, “there’s no guarantee” that Trump’s lawyers will be allowed to ask questions when the matter goes before the judiciary panel.

"The resolution they just passed, in a very partisan way, gives the chairman the full discretion to kick the president's legal counsel out of the room and to veto any witnesses that we would call," Scalise said.

“They didn’t accept any Republican amendments. They didn't negotiate with the White House on that resolution. They don’t want fair rules, they just want to hurt President Trump's chances to win reelection. It’s all about reversing the results of the 2016 election.

"There are no high crimes and misdemeanors," he declared.

Scalise also batted back accusations that Trump was asking Ukraine to investigate his political opponent, Joe Biden, saying "That's not what was happening on the phone call."

“The law requires… when they’re sending foreign aid to ensure that country is … taking steps to root out corruption,” Scalise said. “It wasn’t about a political opponent, it was about corruption.”

ducks

11-04-2019, 12:07 AM

Bad nancy bad

ducks

11-04-2019, 12:15 AM

House Minority Leader Rep. Kevin McCarthy, R-Calif., on Sunday said the the chamber’s impeachment inquiry vote was “not due process.”

In an interview on CBS News’ “Face The Nation,” McCarthy blasted the process, and Intelligence Committee head Rep. Adam Schiff, D-Calif.

“The people deserve to know the facts, the truth and the accountability,” he said, adding: “What we voted on Thursday is not due process. There’s no transparency. … four days later the dems are right back at it… more depositions that people can’t see… they made Adam Schiff the judge, the jury and the prosecutor.”

McCarthy also blasted the whistleblower whose concerns about the July 25 phone call between President Donald Trump and the Ukraine president kicked off the impeachment inquiry.

“I think that democracy is too precious to think that somebody who’s not on a phone call, that cannot stand before the American public and answer the question, that somehow we would change the course of that,” McCarthy said.

“I think that the whistleblower should come forward in an open hearing … he can come down to the basement, but he needs to answer the questions," he added.

Asked by Brennan which witnesses Republicans would like to call, he replied: “I would bring in Adam Schiff and his staff.”:elephant

“The removal of the president of the United States, this should not be taken lightly. We deserve to know all the facts… we need accountability,” he said.

ChumpDumper

11-04-2019, 12:22 AM

ducks is shook

boutons_deux

11-04-2019, 09:21 AM

shutdown to block impeachment would be what is called the "autocratic breakthrough"

Trump won’t rule out shutting down the federal government if Democrats refuse to end impeachment inquiry

refused to rule out shutting down the Federal government if Democrats don’t end the impeachment inquiry.

The president took time to erroneously frame the impeachment inquiry,

falsely claiming it is over just his July 25 phone call during which he attempted to extort the president of Ukraine.

Asked if he would “commit to no government shutdown,” President Trump refused.

“It depends on the negotiation — I wouldn’t commit to anything,”

https://www.rawstory.com/2019/11/watch-trump-wont-rule-out-shutting-down-the-federal-government-if-
democrats-refuse-to-end-impeachment-inquiry/?utm_source=&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=2879 (https://www.rawstory.com/2019/11/watch-trump-wont-rule-out-shutting-down-the-federal-government-if-democrats-refuse-to-end-impeachment-inquiry/?utm_source=&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=2879)

"negotiation "?

The Fart of the Deal thinks impeachment is amenable to negotiation?

Spurs Homer

11-04-2019, 09:54 AM

DarrinS

11-04-2019, 10:55 AM

1190975335246028800

djohn2oo8

11-04-2019, 10:58 AM

1191380842771296256

:lmao :lmao :lmao

Trill Clinton

11-04-2019, 11:29 AM

Why is he so hellbent on not turning in his tax returns?

boutons_deux

11-04-2019, 12:16 PM

Trump Accuses Whistle-Blower of Working for United States

https://media.newyorker.com/photos/5dc04a4d88f60300083e3028/master/w_2560%2Cc_limit/Borowitz-TrumpWhistleblower.jpg

WASHINGTON —Escalating his war of words against the person who sparked the impeachment inquiry, Donald J. Trump on Monday accused the whistle-blower of working for the United States of America.

Speaking to reporters at the White House, Trump said that

he had evidence “directly linking” the whistle-blower to the United States government.

“This is the biggest witch hunt in the history of witches or hunts, and

it was all started by someone who was in the pay of the United States,” Trump said. “It’s a disgrace.”

Expanding his attack, Trump accused his principal congressional nemeses,

Representative Adam Schiff and Representative Nancy Pelosi, of being “card-carrying employees of the United States.”

“Follow the money,” he said. “Shifty Adam Schiff is cashing United States government checks every single week.”

Trump said that he was confident that his supporters would “see the impeachment inquiry for what it is:

a conspiracy by people working on behalf of a country.”

“What it comes down to is,

who are you going to trust,

somebody who is working for the United States,

or me?” he asked.

https://www.newyorker.com/humor/borowitz-report/trump-accuses-whistle-blower-of-working-for-united-states?verso=true (https://www.newyorker.com/humor/borowitz-report/trump-accuses-whistle-blower-of-working-for-united-states?verso=true)

FuzzyLumpkins

11-04-2019, 12:18 PM

1190975335246028800

The Clinton Impeachment was strictly partisan. Who won that next election.

Regurgitating someone else's unsubstantiated assertions is still your go-to I see, Darrin.

djohn2oo8

11-04-2019, 12:37 PM

1191404492337664001

djohn2oo8

11-04-2019, 12:38 PM

1191406997318619140

djohn2oo8

11-04-2019, 12:41 PM

1191409257301852161

djohn2oo8

11-04-2019, 12:49 PM

1191410419656724482

djohn2oo8

11-04-2019, 01:06 PM

1191405711311413250

boutons_deux

11-04-2019, 01:18 PM

"your security" ??? :lol :lol :lol :lol

That was about getting her out of Ukraine and out of Trash/Pompeo/Julie Annie's path to doing a corrupt deal with Z

boutons_deux

11-04-2019, 01:20 PM

So Pompeo was involved along with Trash and Julie Annie

impeach his Kansas ass, too.

boutons_deux

11-04-2019, 01:29 PM

‘No reason to call witnesses’:

Trump has a Monday meltdown over impeachment —

insists ‘there is no whistleblower’ :lol

https://www.rawstory.com/2019/11/no-reason-to-call-witnesses-trump-has-a-monday-meltdown-over-impeachment-insists-there-is-no-whistleblower/?utm_source=&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=2883

Chris

11-04-2019, 01:43 PM

:sleep

boutons_deux

11-04-2019, 01:47 PM

So Repugs can't WHINE and BITCH about "secret" testimony. :lol

djohn2oo8

11-04-2019, 01:51 PM

1191425964799975424

Chris

11-04-2019, 01:53 PM

Sean Hannity? :lmao

ChumpDumper

11-04-2019, 01:55 PM

Sean Hannity? :lmaoThat's our line, Qhris.

dabom6

11-04-2019, 01:57 PM

That's our line, Qhris.

:lol

benefactor

11-04-2019, 02:24 PM

Sean Hannity? :lmao
Exactly:lol

Chris

11-04-2019, 02:37 PM

That's our line, Qhris.

lol "our"

Hive mind

ChumpDumper

11-04-2019, 02:38 PM

lol "our"

Hive mind:lmao you can't even breathe without getting the OK from anonymous twitter.

djohn2oo8

11-04-2019, 02:48 PM

1191441438640410626

djohn2oo8

11-04-2019, 02:50 PM

1191441821479718914

Chris

11-04-2019, 04:35 PM

https://twitter.com/gatewaypundit/status/1191449528219648002?s=19

get rekt :lol

LkrFan

11-04-2019, 04:45 PM

'Meet the Press' asked voters in early primary states about impeachment, saw little support

O--NuA-ISdY

Chris

11-04-2019, 04:54 PM

https://twitter.com/seanhannity/status/1191463083199344640?s=19

So much for the Hannity thing :lol

Spurs Homer

11-04-2019, 04:57 PM

https://twitter.com/seanhannity/status/1191463083199344640?s=19

So much for the Hannity thing :lol

Ivanovich never said Pompeo-

she said - "on the seventh floor - pompeo's office - I was told pompeo or someone close to him made the call and then I was told the call was made - and then things seemed to simmer down for a little while" (the bullshit hannity was whining about regarding her simmered down)

LkrFan

11-04-2019, 05:03 PM

https://twitter.com/tomiahonen/status/1191451072310710274?s=19

When "the Enemy of the People" start airing open hearings headed up by the "Do Nothing Dems" >>>>>> :lmao

djohn2oo8

11-04-2019, 05:14 PM

1191476365087924227

:lmao Rudy

boutons_deux

11-04-2019, 05:19 PM

Giuliani associate now willing to comply with Trump impeachment inquiry

Lev Parnas, an indicted Ukrainian-American businessman who has ties to President Donald Trump’s personal lawyer, Rudy Giuliani,

is now prepared to comply with requests for records and testimony from congressional impeachment investigators,

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-trump-impeachment-parnas-exclusiv/exclusive-giuliani-associate-now-willing-to-comply-with-trump-impeachment-inquiry-lawyer-idUSKBN1XE297?feedType=RSS&feedName=topNews&utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+reuters%2FtopNews+%28News+%2F +US+%2F+Top+News%29 (https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-trump-impeachment-parnas-exclusiv/exclusive-giuliani-associate-now-willing-to-comply-with-trump-impeachment-inquiry-lawyer-idUSKBN1XE297?feedType=RSS&feedName=topNews&utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+reuters%2FtopNews+%28News+%2F +US+%2F+Top+News%29)

:lol

djohn2oo8

11-04-2019, 05:30 PM

1191480972526661634

djohn2oo8

11-04-2019, 07:03 PM

1191504025725886465

:lmao

TSA

11-04-2019, 07:23 PM

https://mobile.twitter.com/jsolomonReports/status/1191471811562790912

djohn2oo8

11-04-2019, 07:26 PM

1191510462027960320

ChumpDumper

11-04-2019, 07:34 PM

https://mobile.twitter.com/jsolomonReports/status/1191471811562790912"Ukraine prosecutors have said they do not believe the Bidens did anything wrong under Ukraine law."

I'll take Solomon's word on that....

djohn2oo8

11-04-2019, 08:16 PM

1191523031019077632

ElNono

11-04-2019, 09:18 PM

https://mobile.twitter.com/jsolomonReports/status/1191471811562790912

Not even sure what they’re trying to figure out here?

Chris

11-04-2019, 09:36 PM

https://twitter.com/RandPaul/status/1191522866573037568?s=19

Go get em Rand :tu

Chris

11-04-2019, 09:38 PM

House Republicans are considering moving Jim Jordan to the House Intelligence Committee tasked with impeachment

ChumpDumper

11-04-2019, 09:42 PM

https://twitter.com/RandPaul/status/1191522866573037568?s=19

Go get em Rand :tuUh, Rand is in Congress.

He's definitely not even trying to get 'em.

:lol Gym

Chris

11-04-2019, 09:46 PM

<strawman>

Yawn.

ChumpDumper

11-04-2019, 09:49 PM

:lol that's not a straw man.

The Republican senate could call up Biden at any time.

Chris

11-04-2019, 09:52 PM

An intentionally misrepresented proposition.

It's a strawman.*

*yawn

ChumpDumper

11-04-2019, 09:54 PM

An intentionally misrepresented proposition.

It's a strawman.*

*yawnNope. He's in Congress. He's on a committee that can subpoena people as can the other Republican senators.

All he's doing is tweeting.

Yawn at him. He's feeding you a line.

Chris

11-04-2019, 11:26 PM

https://twitter.com/seanmdav/status/1191558155790094336?s=19

ChumpDumper

11-04-2019, 11:28 PM

https://twitter.com/seanmdav/status/1191558155790094336?s=19
Did Rand Paul name him in public tonight?

Chris

11-04-2019, 11:34 PM

Did Rand Paul name him in public tonight?

do what?

ChumpDumper

11-04-2019, 11:36 PM

do what?Try to keep up with your own tweet reposts.

Did Trump name the whistleblower tonight?

Did Rand?

They say they know his name.

Chris

11-04-2019, 11:50 PM

Try to keep up with your own tweet reposts.

Did Trump name the whistleblower tonight?

Did Rand?

They say they know his name.

We're talking about journalists tho

ChumpDumper

11-04-2019, 11:55 PM

We're talking about journalists thoWe're all talking about the whistleblower.

Did Trump name him?

Did Rand name him?

Yes or no.

These are simple questions.

spurraider21

11-04-2019, 11:58 PM

Not even sure what they’re trying to figure out here?
something something BIDEN something something UKRAINE something something OBAMA STATE DEPARTMENT

Spurminator

11-05-2019, 12:00 AM

So libertarian Rand Paul wants whistleblowers to be outed now.

benefactor

11-05-2019, 12:05 AM

So libertarian Rand Paul wants whistleblowers to be outed now.
Yep...figure that one out.

DarrinS

11-05-2019, 12:06 AM

So libertarian Rand Paul wants whistleblowers to be outed now.

It's a leaker with whistleblower status.

What did Obama administration do with whistleblowers?

ChumpDumper

11-05-2019, 12:07 AM

It's a leaker with whistleblower status.

What did Obama administration do with whistleblowers?Did those whistleblowers follow the provisions of the Whistleblower Protection Act, Darrin?

Yes or no.

DarrinS

11-05-2019, 12:08 AM

Did those whistleblowers follow the provisions of the Whistleblower Protection Act, Darrin?

Yes or no.

Whatever provisions Schiff and staff guided him through.

ChumpDumper

11-05-2019, 12:15 AM

Whatever provisions Schiff and staff guided him through.You didn't answer the question, Darrin.

Did those whistleblowers follow the provisions of the Whistleblower Protection Act, Darrin?

Yes or no.

Or you can say you have no idea what that is. I'll believe that.

Spurminator

11-05-2019, 12:16 AM

Whatever provisions Schiff and staff guided him through.

(Translated: he doesn't know, but :cheer Trump :cheer)

DarrinS

11-05-2019, 12:24 AM

You didn't answer the question, Darrin.

Did those whistleblowers follow the provisions of the Whistleblower Protection Act, Darrin?

Yes or no.

Or you can say you have no idea what that is. I'll believe that.

Schiff and staff probably wrote the complaint, so it probably does follow those provisions.

ChumpDumper

11-05-2019, 12:26 AM

Schiff and staff probably wrote the complaint, so it probably does follow those provisions.What written complaints?

:lol Get your whistleblowers straight, Darrin.

pgardn

11-05-2019, 12:28 AM

It's a leaker with whistleblower status.

What did Obama administration do with whistleblowers?

In the bigger picture exactly what did this whistleblower leak of importance that the president has not admitted himself?

The biggest problem is the president of the US has himself admitted he asked a foreign country to look for dirt on a political opponent. The red team can say the president was merely looking for corruption but it DOES NOT MATTER as he asked for corruption SPECIFICALLY ON BIDEN.

We don’t really even need to go any further, it’s done.

The blue team has decorated this cake with quid pro quo, Giuliani, our Secretary of State and possibly others, but the real damage was done by the orange loon himself.

I await the red red team to flail about crying about pseudo mystical procedures, etc... But in the end they are going to have to live with the fact that president can now ask foreign spy agencies to look up info on ANYONE and use it for political purposes. And NO, this is not normal. The US has a huge aversion to letting foreign countries pick and choose our political candidates.

Chris

11-05-2019, 12:30 AM

DarrinS

11-05-2019, 12:30 AM

What written complaints?

:lol Get your whistleblowers straight, Darrin.

https://intelligence.house.gov/uploadedfiles/20190812_-_whistleblower_complaint_unclass.pdf

FuzzyLumpkins

11-05-2019, 12:32 AM

What difference does it make who the whistleblower is? I mean if it is Hillary Clinton and AOC tagteaming a hack to get the info that does not excuse what Trump did.

What Trump did meets the standard of like half a dozen felonies.

ChumpDumper

11-05-2019, 12:34 AM

https://intelligence.house.gov/uploadedfiles/20190812_-_whistleblower_complaint_unclass.pdf:lmao That's not who you were talking about Darrin.

Get your whistleblowers straight.

pgardn

11-05-2019, 12:35 AM

We found out who one of the whistleblowers was and it didn't help their credibility. Smart of them to do it underground with selective leaks to friendly Media, and let the other so-called whistleblower fade into black. Anytime they go off script (ie:Mueller fumbling and bumbling under direct questioning) it just goes to hell in a hand basket.

https://intelligence.house.gov/uploadedfiles/20190812_-_whistleblower_complaint_unclass.pdf

So what?

The President shot himself in the face.
He outed himself.
Done.

DarrinS

11-05-2019, 12:38 AM

In the bigger picture exactly what did this whistleblower leak of importance that the president has not admitted himself?

The biggest problem is the president of the US has himself admitted he asked a foreign country to look for dirt on a political opponent. The red team can say the president was merely looking for corruption but it DOES NOT MATTER as he asked for corruption SPECIFICALLY ON BIDEN.

So?

From what's in the public domain, it does look pretty damn corrupt. You don't get a free pass, just because you're running for office.

Also, it seems that he was far more interested in interference in 2016, than he was Biden, who is almost senile these days.

ChumpDumper

11-05-2019, 12:41 AM

We found out who one of the whistleblowers was and it didn't help their credibilityWhat did the whistleblower say that isn't credible?

Be specific. Darrin linked his complaint.

ChumpDumper

11-05-2019, 12:43 AM

FuzzyLumpkins

11-05-2019, 12:44 AM

The tape of the call, the complete transcript, and all the witnesses to the call and its coverup stand on their own merit and depend naught on who or what the whistleblower is.

This is a stupid red herring cooked up by the RWEC.

Spurtacular

11-05-2019, 12:44 AM

:lmao you bought the server story

Damn you are gullible.

Sounds like you got a conspiracy theory going. Tell us about it.

pgardn

11-05-2019, 12:47 AM

So?

From what's in the public domain, it does look pretty damn corrupt. You don't get a free pass, just because you're running for office.

Also, it seems that he was far more interested in interference in 2016, than he was Biden, who is almost senile these days.

Great.

Go get him.
That is an entirely separate issue (even though it looks like red team has nada)
And wtf does it matter that he asked about 2016?

This is 2019 and our president has asked a foreign country to dig up dirt on a political opponent for the 2020 election.

What is perplexing you about this?
Its Done.
So now the red team basically will say this is ok, foreign spy agencies can have a say in our elections.
This is now normal operating procedure.
Now exactly which party claims they are against globalization?

The contradictions are embarrassing.
But not for the red team apparently.

DarrinS

11-05-2019, 12:47 AM

ducks

11-05-2019, 12:49 AM

5 more years of trump then jr will run and 8 years of him

FuzzyLumpkins

11-05-2019, 12:51 AM

RWEC

:lmao

Of course you ignore the argument against your position to defend your shitty sources.

Still disingenuous as ever.

pgardn

11-05-2019, 12:53 AM

5 more years of trump/foreign spy agencies then jr will run and 8 years of him asking foreign countries to help him get Ivanka elected

Good deal ducks, good deal.
The best deals with the best talks with the bestest people.

DarrinS

11-05-2019, 12:53 AM

Great.

Go get him.
That is an entirely separate issue (even though it looks like red team has nada)
And wtf does it matter that he asked about 2016?

This is 2019 and our president has asked a foreign country to dig up dirt on a political opponent for the 2020 election.

What is perplexing you about this?
Its Done.
So now the red team basically will say this is ok, foreign spy agencies can have a say in our elections.
This is now normal operating procedure.
Now exactly which party claims they are against globalization?

The contradictions are embarrassing.
But not for the red team apparently.

Lol "dig up dirt".

It's "make up dirt". Didn't you read Schiff's reenactment?