trump impeachment watch thread

[TSA]

oh wow, another day where both sides claim they DESTROYED the other side, and nothing actually happens.


https://mobile.twitter.com/CarpeDonktum/status/1194639980141912067

[Blake]

You bring nothing to the table, ever.

Nothing at the table is better than a big bowl of Twitter shit

[boutons_deux]

Will Trash get low-brow fired from Fox?

Fox’s Napolitano:

GOP Wants to ‘Undermine the Witnesses

Rather Than Address the Merits’ Because

a Quid Pro Quo ‘Clearly’ Violates Bribery Laws

Napolitano expressed doubt that any minds were changed on Wednesday.

He also spelled out the Republican battle plan —

one which he believes was borne out of the GOP’s inability to excuse the president’s behavior on the merits.

“I think that the argument that

asking for a favor in return for doing a legal obligation — releasing the funds — is pretty clearly a violation of a criminal bribery laws,”

Napolitano said.

“Republicans may not want to acknowledge that,

which is why they’d rather undermine the witnesses than address the merits.”

https://www.mediaite.com/tv/foxs-napolitano-gop-wants-to-undermine-the-witnesses-rather-than-address-the-merits-because-a-quid-pro-quo-clearly-violates-bribery-laws/ (https://www.mediaite.com/tv/foxs-napolitano-gop-wants-to-undermine-the-witnesses-rather-than-address-the-merits-because-a-quid-pro-quo-clearly-violates-bribery-laws/)

[boutons_deux]

Brine That Turkey‏Verified account @carolrhartsell (https://twitter.com/carolrhartsell)
@carolrhartsell


“As I testified, Mr. Jordan…” is the classiest way I’ve ever heard someone say,

“Listen, shit burger.”

#ImpeachmentHearings (https://twitter.com/hashtag/ImpeachmentHearings?src=hash)

10:41 AM - 13 Nov 2019

https://twitter.com/carolrhartsell/status/1194686769721155585?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5 Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1194686769721155585&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Ftheoldreader.com%2Fposts%2Fa ll (https://twitter.com/carolrhartsell/status/1194686769721155585?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5 Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1194686769721155585&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Ftheoldreader.com%2Fposts%2Fa ll)

[TSA]

If_oCB_AJWA

[boutons_deux]

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EJQwzbyU4AE0_Hz?format=jpg&name=small

[RandomGuy]

You brought up this and said they were debunked and investigating them served no interest to the U.S, not me.

Both links fixed. Both links sourced. Both links prove them out.

https://www.politico.com/story/2017/01/ukraine-sabotage-trump-backfire-233446

https://www.thedailybeast.com/ukrainian-officials-meddled-in-2016-election-by-leaking-secret-manafort-ledger-court-says

Now explain why investigating Ukraine’s role in 2016 election interference is not in the interest of the U.S.


Russia’s effort was personally directed by Russian President Vladimir Putin, involved the country’s military and foreign intelligence services, according to U.S. intelligence officials. They reportedly briefed Trump last week on the possibility that Russian operatives might have compromising information on the president-elect. And at a Senate hearing last week on the hacking, Director of National Intelligence James Clapper said “I don't think we've ever encountered a more aggressive or direct campaign to interfere in our election process than we've seen in this case.”

There’s little evidence of such a top-down effort by Ukraine. Longtime observers suggest that the rampant corruption, factionalism and economic struggles plaguing the country — not to mention its ongoing strife with Russia — would render it unable to pull off an ambitious covert interference campaign in another country’s election.

Ukrainian "interference" amounted to some government officials talking smack about Trump and pointing out Trump's campaign manager had ongoing involvement with that Russian linked oligarch. :cry

The same leaks that lead to Mueller uncovering Manaforts crimes in hiding income from the IRS.

What needs investigating TSA? :lol

[RandomGuy]

You brought up this and said they were debunked and investigating them served no interest to the U.S, not me.

Both links fixed. Both links sourced. Both links prove them out.

https://www.politico.com/story/2017/01/ukraine-sabotage-trump-backfire-233446

https://www.thedailybeast.com/ukrainian-officials-meddled-in-2016-election-by-leaking-secret-manafort-ledger-court-says

Now explain why investigating Ukraine’s role in 2016 election interference is not in the interest of the U.S.

Now explain why Trump actually held up the aid. Be specific, and provide supporting evidence.

Trump held up the aid as extortion so he could get a bribe from Ukraine in the form of investigations into his political rivals.

That was what all the people who have testified understood to be the case, and why you are so desperate to change the subject, because you yourself admitted that should be impeachable.

[RandomGuy]

Perhaps Trump should cooperate with the inquiry and let witnesses be heard instead of ordering them not to testify.

An honest man has nothing to hide, right?


If video of an asshole Indian beating his drum in the face of a teenager didn't stop the media from demonizing an innocent teenager with remarkable restraint then trying to avoid a shit show seems imperative. Your "honest man" platitudes don't mean shit.

Translation:

I can't answer the question in a way that doesn't make Trump look like shit, so let me change the subject. "LOOK OVER THERE!"

:lol

[boutons_deux]

Trump Breached US Security With Unsecured Cell Phone Call In Ukraine Scheme

When Gordon Sondland called Trump from Kyiv to update him on the shakedown of Ukraine for a Biden investigation,

the Russians heard it all.

A U.S. ambassador’s cellphone call to President Trump from a restaurant in the capital of Ukraine last summer was

a stunning breach of security,

exposing the conversation to surveillance by foreign intelligence services, including Russia’s,

https://www.politicususa.com/2019/11/13/trump-breached-security-ukraine-scheme.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+politicususa%2FfJAl+%28Politi cus+USA+%29


====

Ambassador’s cellphone call to Trump from Kyiv restaurant was a stunning breach of security

https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/ambassadors-cellphone-call-to-trump-from-kyiv-restaurant-was-a-stunning-breach-of-security-former-officials-say/2019/11/13/37d75752-0641-11ea-b17d-8b867891d39d_story.html

[Reck]

If_oCB_AJWA

you've gotten so creepy with the Trump worshipping dude. I mean, just say you'd toss his salad already.

[boutons_deux]

GOP Lawmaker Promotes Impossible Barack Obama Conspiracy Theory During Impeachment Hearings

Rep. Brad Wenstrup (R-Ohio) was not about to be outdone.

“Maybe now we understand :lol no! :lol

what President [Barack] Obama meant when he told Russian President [Dmitry] Medvedev that he’d have more flexibility after his election,”

Wenstrup theorized while finishing up his time with Taylor.

“Maybe :lol NO! :lol

that flexibility was to deny lethal aide to the Ukraine–allowing Russia to march right in and kill Ukrainians.” :lol

Vox’s Aaron Rupar was taking notes:

https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/816281781011959808/aGIAz8Qe_normal.jpg (https://twitter.com/atrupar)Aaron Rupar
(https://twitter.com/atrupar)✔@atrupar
(https://twitter.com/atrupar)

@RepBradWenstrup (https://twitter.com/RepBradWenstrup) accuses

the Obama administration of colluding with Russia to .... hurt Ukraine?

As opposed to Trump, who he absurdly portrays as Ukraine's staunch ally.

It doesn't make much sense.


https://lawandcrime.com/awkward/gop-lawmaker-promotes-impossible-barack-obama-conspiracy-theory-during-impeachment-hearings/ (https://lawandcrime.com/awkward/gop-lawmaker-promotes-impossible-barack-obama-conspiracy-theory-during-impeachment-hearings/)

[koriwhat]

I mean, just say you'd toss his salad already.

the details of your lifestyle we don't care to read about...

[baseline bum]

Nothing happened except a bunch of overpaid blowhards blew really hard. Nothing will come of this, because there is nothing Trump could do that would cause his fanbase to turn on him. They could leak a video of Trump shitting on the American flag and Trumptards would defend it by claiming a deep state operate put ex-lax in his Diet Coke.

:lol

[Chris]

http://giphygifs.s3.amazonaws.com/media/cgwLj6wmsTYs0/200.gif

[Luka Doncic]

the make believe world yall lefty's live in is so hyperbolic and asinine.
And yet as a diehard Trumptard you can’t deny that you will defend him under any and all circumstances.

[koriwhat]

And yet as a diehard Trumptard you can’t deny that you will defend him under any and all circumstances.

a diehard trumptard... the bullshit yall peddle here is worse than snake oil.

“Ridicule is man’s most potent weapon.”
“If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it."

good going Saul Goebbels :tu

[pgardn]

Red team strategy exactly as predicted.

Deflect onto corruption in Ukraine (no shit!? It’s real and our orange turd is on it thank God) or defend the call as normal diplomatic relations. What else is there? I guess try to make the witnesses central instead of the call.

Why is Trump spending so much time trying to change Ukrainian corruption and stick to Russia? We can force changes in Russia without sending them money. And maybe check out his own foreign holdings as promised in his most transparent president ever statements. “You will not testify, I’m transparent. Im so transparent I’m invisible”

[koriwhat]

I guess try to make the witnesses central instead of the call.

how exactly are they witnesses when they witnessed nothing and not one of them were there in on the call? 2nd-3rd-4th hand hearsay... interesting witnesses.

[pgardn]

how exactly are they witnesses when they witnessed nothing and not one of them were there in on the call? 2nd-3rd-4th hand hearsay... interesting witnesses.

Exactly as stated.


Witnesses.... icing.

Cake, the call.

Defend the president of the US asking a foreign country (therefore foreign intelligence) to investigate a presidential opponent in an upcoming election. You want foreign intelligence services being paid for helping US political candidates? Better yet, you can let foreign countries decide which candidates we put up for election.
Do you understand history and why the writers of the constitution DID NOT want foreign interference in our elections? Koriwhat, the true globalist? Ok then.

You don’t need witnesses for the above. Just say the president did not know what the fck he was doing.

[koriwhat]

Exactly as stated.


Witnesses.... icing.

Cake, the call.

Defend the president of the US asking a foreign country (therefore foreign intelligence) to investigate a presidential opponent in an upcoming election. You want foreign intelligence services being paid for helping US political candidates? Better yet, you can let foreign countries decide which candidates we put up for election.
Do you understand history and why the writers of the constitution DID NOT want foreign interference in our elections?

You don’t need witnesses for the above. Just say the president did not know what the fck he was doing.

lol you don't want foreign interference as the DNC server lays dormant in the Ukraine which has yet to be looked at by the FBI.

those witnesses aren't witnesses at all tbh and you know it just like i do. it's a circus show with the lefty's on the hill.

as well, i would want my president to look into corruption whether or not you do. biden is on record presenting a qpq with ukraine but it's all good right?

either way, what's the transcript say?

last, "Defend the president of the US asking a foreign country (therefore foreign intelligence) to investigate a presidential opponent in an upcoming election", what do you say about obama spying on trump's campaign with the help of many foreign intel agencies?

[DarrinS]

The Dems really made a strong case today.

[pgardn]

lol you don't want foreign interference as the DNC server lays dormant in the Ukraine which has yet to be looked at by the FBI.

those witnesses aren't witnesses at all tbh and you know it just like i do. it's a circus show with the lefty's on the hill.

as well, i would want my president to look into corruption whether or not you do. biden is on record presenting a qpq with ukraine but it's all good right?

either way, what's the transcript say?

last, "Defend the president of the US asking a foreign country (therefore foreign intelligence) to investigate a presidential opponent in an upcoming election", what do you say about obama spying on trump's campaign with the help of many foreign intel agencies?

You are repeating the same BS. This aint about Obama son.
And even if it were, give me your links to the bolded.
You wont because it did not take place.
I got a number of transcripts to the phone call, have you read it?

[pgardn]

The Dems really made a strong case today.

What impressed you?
I just got the basics.

I read the call. Its more convincing as an impeachable offense than anything I have seen so far. The rest is basically ornamental to make as many red team members line up when Trump goes down in 2020.

[koriwhat]

You are repeating the same BS. This aint about Obama son.
And even if it were, give me your links to the bolded.
You wont because it did not take place.
I got a number of transcripts to the phone call, have you read it?

lol how about obama's "when i get reelected..." comment to a foreign head?

were you this mad when obama tried to interfere with foreign elections?

and many many more things that don't need to be repeated...

either way, yall lefty's want to brush the past under the carpet but that ploy is played out.

it's time we find out exactly who brought upon the whole bullshit russia hoax and more!

[DarrinS]

The Dems really made a strong case today.

I forgot to add

:lmao


Best part was Nunes shitting all over Schiff while sitting right next to him.

[koriwhat]

PG, i don't need links for any damn thing tbh. obama was in office at the time of spygate so it started and happened under his watch!

i can't wait to see all the commies burn in hell but first a bullet in their heads will suffice!

[koriwhat]

Best part was Nunes shitting all over Schiff while sitting right next to him.

:tu

[Reck]

Darrin has a strange view point on this one.

:lol Also thinking Nunes is capable of shitting on anyone.

[pgardn]

PG, i don't need links for any damn thing tbh. obama was in office at the time of spygate so it started and happened under his watch!

i can't wait to see all the commies burn in hell but first a bullet in their heads will suffice!

Of course.

[DarrinS]

What impressed you?
I just got the basics.

I read the call. Its more convincing as an impeachable offense than anything I have seen so far. The rest is basically ornamental to make as many red team members line up when Trump goes down in 2020.


Nothing impressed me. Why bring back the same dudes from their secret underground depositions? What was the point of all of this?

[pgardn]

Nothing impressed me. Why bring back the same dudes from their secret underground depositions? What was the point of all of this?

Did you read my post that you replied to?

[DarrinS]

Dems would've been better served keeping this "inquiry" in the basement. They (particularly Schiff) aren't a good look under public scrutiny.

[DarrinS]

Did you read my post that you replied to?

Yes

[koriwhat]

Of course.

of course what? you want to dismiss what i said... how exactly do you do that without blind faith in the dems tbh?

it's quite funny how you lefty's hate bringing up obama and his crimes as well as his directing of spygate/russiagate. don't live in the past right unless it's manafort and anyone else that has been apart of the trump campaign/admin.

well, it's a new age where we find the cockroaches from the past and shine a light on them for all to see. :tu

[pgardn]

of course what? you want to dismiss what i said... how exactly do you do that without blind faith in the dems tbh?

it's quite funny how you lefty's hate bringing up obama and his crimes as well as his directing of spygate/russiagate. don't live in the past right unless it's manafort and anyone else that has been apart of the trump campaign/admin.

well, it's a new age where we find the cockroaches from the past and shine a light on them for all to see. :tu

This is about the impeachment of Trump, not about something Obama did not do.
How do you defend Trump and his phone call. Have you read it?

[pgardn]

Yes

Then I answered your question.

[Blake]

This is about the impeachment of Trump, not about something Obama did not do.
How do you defend Trump and his phone call. Have you read it?

I'm sure he saw an informative alt right YouTube telling him what he needs to know

[pgardn]

I'm sure he saw an informative alt right YouTube telling him what he needs to know

Definitely what he is to avoid.
Dont discuss the phone call.

Or, everybody does this.

[koriwhat]

I'm sure he saw an informative alt right YouTube telling him what he needs to know

5 pgs of nothing... your assumption that i don't read is asinine. you think to highly of yourself and less of others and that's probably why your ex-wife cuckolded you because you assumed she wouldn't. i hope for nothing but the worst for you in life blaKKKe. :tu

[koriwhat]

Definitely what he is to avoid.
Dont discuss the phone call.

Or, everybody does this.

i read it weeks ago. there's no qpq whatsoever... in that call he specifically asks about crowdstrike, the server, and biden's corruption. he didn't push a qpq at all. point to it and show me where exactly then considering we read the same transcript.

you don't want our chief executive looking into past corruption? wtf?

better yet, you two girls can keep playing patty cake with each other instead.

[pgardn]

i read it weeks ago. there's no qpq whatsoever... in that call he specifically asks about crowdstrike, the server, and biden's corruption. he didn't push a qpq at all. point to it and show me where exactly then considering we read the same transcript.

you don't want our chief executive looking into past corruption? wtf?

better yet, you two girls can keep playing patty cake with each other instead.

It does not matter $ was used or not.
In the speech Trump asks the newly elected Ukrainian president to look into the Biden's. His political opponent in the upcoming election.
Thats all that needed to be said. And he said it 8 times. Trump can get the CIA and FBI to investigate, he and Rudy are not investigators. Or he can use the Ukrainian intelligence services which is what he did.

The rest is window dressing for the red team to get outed in 2020 along with Trump.

Do you understand why our constitution was written by people who had exactly the same problems with the French and British. Even into the early 1800s?
Do you get this, or do you want our elections to become a global election?

[spurraider21]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4-WaoNrd0lc

[DarrinS]

Dems are managing to NOT impeach Trump and kill Biden's campaign simultaneously.

:lmao


You don't think people are going to compare/contrast the "phone call" with video of Biden bragging about getting the prosecutor fired? Smh

[pgardn]

Dems are managing to NOT impeach Trump and kill Biden's campaign simultaneously.

:lmao


You don't think people are going to compare/contrast the "phone call" with video of Biden bragging about getting the prosecutor fired? Smh

Trump is our current president.
He asked a foreign country to interfere in our elections. He also apparently withheld for some time $ to get an agreement.
Please defend this.

[spurraider21]

Dems are managing to NOT impeach Trump and kill Biden's campaign simultaneously.

:lmao


You don't think people are going to compare/contrast the "phone call" with video of Biden bragging about getting the prosecutor fired? Smh
good

[DarrinS]

He asked a foreign country to interfere in our elections. He also apparently withheld for some time $ to get an agreement.
Please defend this.


I don't agree with your premise, so there's nothing to defend.

[Luka Doncic]

Still funny that Darrin ever pretended to dislike Trump :lol

[ChumpDumper]

You brought up this and said they were debunked and investigating them served no interest to the U.S, not me.

Both links fixed. Both links sourced. Both links prove them out.

https://www.politico.com/story/2017/01/ukraine-sabotage-trump-backfire-233446

https://www.thedailybeast.com/ukrainian-officials-meddled-in-2016-election-by-leaking-secret-manafort-ledger-court-says

Now explain why investigating Ukraine’s role in 2016 election interference is not in the interest of the U.S.Basically everything is known.

If the Republicans are serious about it, they can subpoena Chalupa Grande to the Senate at any time. She will be more than happy to testify.

Why haven't they done that, TSA?

Explain.

[DarrinS]

Still funny that Darrin ever pretended to dislike Trump :lol

Lol, sock puppet burner account.

[Luka Doncic]

Lol, sock puppet burner account.
ok boomer

[ChumpDumper]

Dems are managing to NOT impeach Trump and kill Biden's campaign simultaneously.

:lmao


You don't think people are going to compare/contrast the "phone call" with video of Biden bragging about getting the prosecutor fired? SmhCompare/contrast them for us, Darrin.

Tell us how you think they are exactly the same or totally different.

[Reck]

Dems are managing to NOT impeach Trump and kill Biden's campaign simultaneously.

:lmao


You don't think people are going to compare/contrast the "phone call" with video of Biden bragging about getting the prosecutor fired? Smh

Seriously what world are you living in right now?

Is Trump more or less likely to get impeached after today, yes or no?

This must be what denial looks like. Lol Darrin

[DarrinS]

Seriously what world are you living in right now?

Is Trump more or less likely to get impeached after today, yes or no?

This must be what denial looks like. Lol Darrin


No

Poor Recky

[Reck]

No

Poor Recky

Predicted response and one where I’ll enjoy bumping at a later date.

[ducks]

CNN analyst: It's a 'problem' for Dems that impeachment witnesses never met Trump
By

https://www.foxnews.com/media/cnn-jeffrey-toobin-ambassador-bill-taylor-george-kent

[ducks]

https://mobile.twitter.com/SteveGuest/status/1194735807027916805?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5 Etweetembed&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.foxnews.com%2Fmedia%2Fcn n-jeffrey-toobin-ambassador-bill-taylor-george-kent

Ouch!

[pgardn]

I don't agree with your premise, so there's nothing to defend.

So calling a foreign leader on the phone to ask for investigations into what Trump believes to be his biggest competitor in the upcoming election is not an impeachable offense. I hear you.

Open the flood gates.
Darrin is a globalist.

[Chris]

https://twitter.com/MichaelCoudrey/status/1194782001422721024?s=19

[ducks]

At one point in Wednesday's hearing, Rep. Mike Quigley, D-Ill., even appeared to embrace hearsay testimony, claiming that "hearsay can be much better evidence than direct" and that "countless people have been convicted on hearsay because the courts have routinely allowed and created, needed exceptions to hearsay." It was unclear which of those limited exceptions would apply to Wednesday's testimony.

Lol

[pgardn]

CNN analyst: It's a 'problem' for Dems that impeachment witnesses never met Trump
By

https://www.foxnews.com/media/cnn-jeffrey-toobin-ambassador-bill-taylor-george-kent

They dont need to know him or meet him to answer the questions they have been asked about this call and the planning behind it.
It may be a problem for the blue team because some people will not understand what the witnesses today were being asked.
Ignorance can rule. Red team relies on it.

[ChumpDumper]

https://twitter.com/MichaelCoudrey/status/1194782001422721024?s=19:lmao

[ducks]

They dont need to know him or meet him to answer the questions they have been asked about this call and the planning behind it.
It may be a problem for the blue team because some people will not understand what the witnesses today were being asked.
Ignorance can rule. Red team relies on it.

Says you cnn guy says they have a problem !

[ChumpDumper]

Says you cnn guy says they have a problem !And you believe CNN?

[Chris]

MY top 5 quotes from today:


5.) Jordan: "I've seen church prayer chains that are easier to understand than this back & forth."

4.) Schiff: "I do not know the identity of the whistleblower."

3.) Dem Mike Quigley: “Hearsay can be much better evidence than direct [evidence].”

2.) Jordan: You didn’t listen in on President Trump & Zelensky’s call?

Taylor: I did not.

Jordan: You’ve never talked with Chief of Staff Mulvaney?

Taylor: I never did.

Jordan: You’ve never met the President?

Taylor: That’s correct.

Jordan: And you’re their star witness.

1.) "What I can do here for you today is tell you what I heard from people"




:lmao

[Reck]

Yikes Chris is really going through it.

[Chris]

Reck again brings nothing to the table and attacks another poster because he can't understand what's going on.

Narrative posts are fun.

[TSA]

good

https://mobile.twitter.com/aaronjmate/status/1194795384540946432

[ChumpDumper]

MY top 5 quotes from today:


5.) Jordan: "I've seen church prayer chains that are easier to understand than this back & forth."

4.) Schiff: "I do not know the identity of the whistleblower."

3.) Dem Mike Quigley: “Hearsay can be much better evidence than direct [evidence].”

2.) Jordan: You didn’t listen in on President Trump & Zelensky’s call?

Taylor: I did not.

Jordan: You’ve never talked with Chief of Staff Mulvaney?

Taylor: I never did.

Jordan: You’ve never met the President?

Taylor: That’s correct.

Jordan: And you’re their star witness.

1.) "What I can do here for you today is tell you what I heard from people"




:lmao:lol "MY"

You didn't watch any of this.

[ChumpDumper]

https://mobile.twitter.com/aaronjmate/status/1194795384540946432That's a pretty strong ticket tbh.

[DarrinS]

That's a pretty strong ticket tbh.

I guess that's why Bloomberg jumped in. :lmao

[pgardn]

MY top 5 quotes from today:


5.) Jordan: "I've seen church prayer chains that are easier to understand than this back & forth."

4.) Schiff: "I do not know the identity of the whistleblower."

3.) Dem Mike Quigley: “Hearsay can be much better evidence than direct [evidence].”

2.) Jordan: You didn’t listen in on President Trump & Zelensky’s call?

Taylor: I did not.

Jordan: You’ve never talked with Chief of Staff Mulvaney?

Taylor: I never did.

Jordan: You’ve never met the President?

Taylor: That’s correct.

Jordan: And you’re their star witness.

1.) "What I can do here for you today is tell you what I heard from people"




:lmao

Omission.

Im not a star witness.

And from pgardn:
Based on what the people who testified were asked they had no need to ever meet, speak or intimately know the president to reveal what they were asked. The witnesses who know Trump and talked about the exact plan to talk and meet the Ukrainian President are not testifying by orders of the president.

You seriously think the president’s lawyer, who clearly knows and talked to Trump about the meeting and call is gonna testify? Giuliani is already lawyering up himself. There are rotten apples associated with this who of course will not testify as they will get in more trouble than merely impeached. And of course some face a presidential order not to talk.

Chris acting like the real witnesses who hatched this stupid idea that Trump ran overboard with and shouted it to the world are going to testify...

And we would not even need them if the red team followed their own principles AND did not own the Senate. The orange guy already told us what he did. He basically forced the House to start impeachment proceedings. It’s crazy the red team knows so little or claims to know so little. Stupid or disingenuous or both...

[ChumpDumper]

I guess that's why Bloomberg jumped in. :lmaoHe'd probably be fine too tbh.

So no comment on the compare/contrast?

Typical brave Darrin.

[Chris]

Omission.

Im not a star witness.

And from pgardn:
Based on what the people who testified were asked they had no need to ever meet, speak or intimately know the president to reveal what they were asked. The witnesses who know Trump and talked about the exact plan to talk and meet the Ukrainian President are not testifying by orders of the president.

You seriously think the president’s lawyer, who clearly knows and talked to Trump about the meeting and call is gonna testify? Giuliani is already lawyering up himself. There are rotten apples associated with this who of course will not testify as they will get in more trouble than merely impeached. And of course some face a presidential order not to talk.

Chris acting like the real witnesses who hatched this stupid idea that Trump ran overboard with and shouted it to the world are going to testify...

And we would not even need them if the red team followed their own principles AND did not own the Senate. The orange guy already told us what he did. He basically forced the House to start impeachment proceedings. It’s crazy the red team knows so little or claims to know so little. Stupid or disingenuous or both...

Trump released the transcript.

Trump sets foreign policy.

"no pressure"

Disagreement with foreign policy is not an impeachable offense.

toodles

[Chris]

:lol "MY"

You didn't watch any of this.

Oh look, another narrative post.

[johnsmith]

eat my shit, motherfucker

Touch a woman with her consent....incel.

[pgardn]

Trump released the transcript.

Trump sets foreign policy.

"no pressure"

Disagreement with foreign policy is not an impeachable offense.

toodles

Foreign policy is asking a foreign country for information on a presidential opponent?
So the president of the US can ask foreign countries to participate in our elections by having their intelligence services aid certain US candidates? Ok then

Chris is a thorough globalist. He wants the world to help us elect our president.
“But, but... 2 million illegal votes”

No contradictions by Chris and the red team I guess.

See I can write my own stuff Chris, I don’t have to list your silly red talking points that say, it’s ok!
Because it’s not, and the genuine folks on the red team absolutely know this.

[ChumpDumper]

Oh look, another narrative post.Did you actually watch the hearing itself.

Yes or no.

[ChumpDumper]

Trump released the transcript.
Not a transcript.


Trump sets foreign policy.
Foreign policy does not include bribery/extorsion


"no pressure"
yes pressure


Disagreement with foreign policy is not an impeachable offense.
Bribery and extortion are.

[DarrinS]

Out: quid pro quo

In: bribery/extortion


Good luck with that

:lmao

[ChumpDumper]

Out: quid pro quo

In: bribery/extortion


Good luck with that

:lmao:lol quid pro quo is part of both, Darrin.

Do you really not understand how these things work?

:lmao good luck with that

:lol

[pgardn]

Lindsey Graham using the incompetence approach:

As Sen. Lindsey O. Graham (https://apple.news/ANiGP2QvJSrKoYtCdYF269Q) (R-S.C.) put it, “What I can tell you about the Trump policy towards the Ukraine is that it was incoherent. . . . They seem to be incapable of forming a quid pro quo.”


The red team is all over the place.
They know it’s wrong and are just fumbling and stumbling trying to deflect.

“But, But,... today’s witnesses did not know Trump.”
So the fck what.

[pgardn]

Or...

”But, But,... The Ukrainians never did look into the Biden’s”

So if the new president of Ukraine had said to Orange dumpster fire, ‘We absolutely will NOT do you a favor, and I will say this for the 8th time, by looking into the Bidens. As I understand it, your founding fathers would have abhorred such an action and this would get me into serious trouble with your democracy’

Then this would have made it so much better...
Such pitiful flailing about.

[ChumpDumper]

Or...

”But, But,... The Ukrainians never did look into the Biden’s”

So if the new president of Ukraine had said to Orange dumpster fire, ‘We absolutely will NOT do you a favor, and I will say this for the 8th time, by looking into the Bidens. As I understand it, your founding fathers would have abhorred such an action and this would get me into serious trouble with your democracy’

Then this would have made it so much better...
Such pitiful flailing about.It's so stupid. Zelensky was going to knuckle under to the pressure and announce the investigations in September. Then the whistleblower complaint became known and Congress asked the administration what the fuck was going on.

Two days later, the aid magically was released.

Go figure.

[Winehole23]

Lindsey Graham using the incompetence approach:

As Sen. Lindsey O. Graham (https://apple.news/ANiGP2QvJSrKoYtCdYF269Q) (R-S.C.) put it, “What I can tell you about the Trump policy towards the Ukraine is that it was incoherent. . . . They seem to be incapable of forming a quid pro quo.”


The red team is all over the place.
They know it’s wrong and are just fumbling and stumbling trying to deflect.

“But, But,... today’s witnesses did not know Trump.”
So the fck what.Too stupid to commit a crime, is Lindsay Graham's defense of Trump. Unfortunately for Sen. Graham and the President, no crime has to be proven, as he well knows.

20 years ago Lindsay Graham said a president didn't even have to commit a crime to be impeached. Wonder what changed.

[Winehole23]

It's so stupid. Zelensky was going to knuckle under to the pressure and announce the investigations in September. Then the whistleblower complaint became known and Congress asked the administration what the fuck was going on.

Two days later, the aid magically was released.

Go figure.If the alarm goes off before the bank robbers get the money and they flee the scene, do we give them a pass?

[ChumpDumper]

If the alarm goes off before the bank robbers get the money and they flee the scene, do we give them a pass?Trumpistas do.

They don't care about the law.

They don't care about our system of government.

They don't care about the USA.

Period.

[Winehole23]

Out: quid pro quo

In: bribery/extortion


Good luck with that

:lmaoAnother DarrinS self-own.

Failure at inception is one of his specialties.

[ChumpDumper]

Another DarrinS self-own.

Failure at inception is one of his specialties.Is it really possible he's this stupid?

[Winehole23]

Is it really possible he's this stupid?Impossible to rule out.

I'm more inclined to think he admires his own glibness, mistaking it for wit.

He thought Jim Jordan did really well today.

[Winehole23]

Fox getting with the pogrom, suggests Soros has deployed Ukraine, the FBI, NGOs and US diplomats against Trump.


There is no doubt that George Soros controls a large part of the foreign service part of the State Department and the activities of FBI agents overseas who work with NGOs.

[ChumpDumper]

Rubelandia is going to eat that up

[Chris]

https://twitter.com/DanaBoos3/status/1194844036483432448?s=19

[LkrFan]

https://twitter.com/joncoopertweets/status/1194777679909851139?s=19

^ Truth Bombs

[LkrFan]

https://twitter.com/briantylercohen/status/1194829877381226496?s=19

:lol

[LkrFan]

https://twitter.com/joncoopertweets/status/1194952230786543616?s=19

[pgardn]

Another DarrinS self-own.

Failure at inception is one of his specialties.


Is it really possible he's this stupid?

This ordeal is almost impossible for the red team to take on so expectations concerning a legitimate argument concerning that call don’t appear to exist. All that remains is continuing evidence that Orange man held back money, how the plan to ask Ukraine was hatched, and who else might be involved. This was over before it started in reality and it’s just a matter of how the red team lines up once we are through with this. So note how different Senators react to this and we have the group who sees this call as perfectly legitimate. And note who stays away.

If 50% of the voters and enough EC votes see this as legit in 2020, we need yet another election amendment inviting foreign countries to “vote” in our elections.

We will need to add on to the 15th, 19th, 24th, Voting Rights act, SC decisions.

The President and any candidates wishing to run for election may solicit funds from foreign countries, in exchange for information on other candidates for the purpose of allowing foreign countries to have a monetary role in deciding.... Then eventually we give them a vote in the EC globalistic EU style. Excellent...

[boutons_deux]

alternative facts lady never fails to amuse

Kellyanne Conway denies Trump asked Ukraine to investigate Biden

right after clip shows Trump asking for Biden probe

https://www.rawstory.com/2019/11/kellyanne-conway-denies-trump-asked-ukraine-to-investigate-biden-right-after-clip-shows-trump-asking-for-biden-probe/

[Winehole23]

Baghdad Bob school of public affairs, tbh.

[boutons_deux]

America media has dumbed and numbed and jaded itself down along with all of America that all life, from the "vast wasteland", must be "fun" and "entertainment"

NBC News torched for complaint that impeachment hearings lacked ‘pizzazz’:

‘Were they expecting a wardrobe malfunction?’

https://www.rawstory.com/2019/11/nbc-news-torched-for-complaint-that-impeachment-hearings-lacked-pizzazz-were-they-expecting-a-wardrobe-malfunction/?utm_source=&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=2991

NBC worried that ratings pushing up ad revenues from BigCorp aren't high enough.

[boutons_deux]

‘Comically incompetent’ Jim Jordan and Devin Nunes crashed and burned after just one impeachment hearing

House impeachment hearings could hardly have gone worse (https://www.rawstory.com/2019/11/gops-chaotic-first-day-fighting-impeachment-revealed-theyre-overwhelmed-by-evidence-against-trump-ex-prosecutor/) for Donald Trump because his staunchest defenders —

Repps. Devin Nunes (R-CA) and Jim Jordan (R-OH)

thoroughly embarrassed themselves and the GOP with their nationally televised antics.

Wilson scorched the two lawmakers and Trump’s other “skells, sycophants, and dead-end goons on the committee” for faceplanting spectacularly on just the first day of the hearings.

. “In the face of two credible, non-partisan witnesses of unimpeachable character and service,

the Trump House Clown Caucus brought their A-game,

and instead of changing the dialogue and owning the libs

they managed to

validate the witnesses,

embarrass themselves, and

doubtlessly enrage the Audience of One.”

https://www.rawstory.com/2019/11/comically-incompetent-jim-jordan-and-devin-nunes-crashed-and-burned-after-just-one-impeachment-hearing-rick-wilson/?utm_source=&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=2991 (https://www.rawstory.com/2019/11/comically-incompetent-jim-jordan-and-devin-nunes-crashed-and-burned-after-just-one-impeachment-hearing-rick-wilson/?utm_source=&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=2991)

[boutons_deux]

Fox & Friends hosts deflated after legal analyst drops the hammer on Trump:

‘The law is not on the president’s side’

the hosts of “Fox & Friends,” who did their best to spin

Wednesday’s impeachment hearings as a win for President Donald Trump (http://rawstory.com/2019/11/trump-twitter-rages-against-impeachment-testimony-star-witnesses-unable-to-answer-the-question/). :lol

“The law is not on the president’s side,” he said. “The law says asking for a campaign favor, whether it arrives or not…”

“But it’s not a campaign favor!” Kilmeade :lol objected. :lol

“Well that depends on how you look at it,” Napolitano replied.

“Is he investigating 2016 or does he want dirt on Biden… for 2020?” :lol duh, the latter

https://www.rawstory.com/2019/11/fox-friends-hosts-deflated-after-legal-analyst-drops-the-hammer-on-trump-the-law-is-not-on-the-presidents-side/?utm_source=&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=2991

Why does Fox still employ this highly effective, truth-talking spoil-sport Napolitano?

[boutons_deux]

:lol

1194737039050231808

the ambassador agrees

More evidence that America is fucked and unfuckable when the corrupt Repugs and their ignorant cult mob are THIS FUCKING STUPID

[TSA]

Fox & Friends hosts deflated after legal analyst drops the hammer on Trump:

‘The law is not on the president’s side’

the hosts of “Fox & Friends,” who did their best to spin

Wednesday’s impeachment hearings as a win for President Donald Trump (http://rawstory.com/2019/11/trump-twitter-rages-against-impeachment-testimony-star-witnesses-unable-to-answer-the-question/). :lol

“The law is not on the president’s side,” he said. “The law says asking for a campaign favor, whether it arrives or not…”

“But it’s not a campaign favor!” Kilmeade :lol objected. :lol

“Well that depends on how you look at it,” Napolitano replied.

“Is he investigating 2016 or does he want dirt on Biden… for 2020?” :lol duh, the latter

https://www.rawstory.com/2019/11/fox-friends-hosts-deflated-after-legal-analyst-drops-the-hammer-on-trump-the-law-is-not-on-the-presidents-side/?utm_source=&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=2991

Why does Fox still employ this highly effective, truth-talking spoil-sport Napolitano?




The law is on the President’s side.


“The conversation raised concerns by a whistleblower that Trump may have broken the law by asking for foreign help in the presidential campaign. But the Justice Department concluded that based on the evidence that's available, prosecutors "did not and could not make out a criminal campaign finance violation."

Under the law, a "thing of value" under discussion has to be in some way quantifiable, and the Justice Department couldn't find that here, officials said.”

https://www.npr.org/2019/09/25/764164340/trump-asked-ukrainian-president-for-a-favor-on-biden-doj-says-no-charges

[Chucho]

Trumpistas do.

They don't care about the law.

They don't care about our system of government.

They don't care about the USA.

Period.

:lol

[boutons_deux]

The law is on the President’s side. :lol

the (corrupt Barr )Justice Department :lol is on the Presidents side

Tell us, from your close-up experience, does Trash have a dick? how big is it, fully engorged and ready for your lips?

Barr TRASHED his credibility with his LYING 4-pager on the Mueller report.

If you ever knew, impeachment is a political process not judicial

[TSA]

The law is on the President’s side. :lol

the (corrupt Barr )Justice Department :lol is on the Presidents side

Tell us, from your close-up experience, does Trash have a dick? how big is it, fully engorged and ready for your lips?

Barr TRASHED his credibility with his LYING 4-pager on the Mueller report.

If you ever knew, impeachment is a political process not judicial

You're the one that brought up the law dipshit. The law is on the President's side.

[Chucho]

You're the one that brought up the law dipshit. The law is on the President's side.


It's over, bro. It's over. No need to fight it. It's ok to admit he turned out to be a POS.

[Chucho]

Touch a woman with her consent....incel.

:lol

[boutons_deux]

You're the one that brought up the law dipshit. The law is on the President's side.

it's not a legal process, but political process.

If impeachment/conviction gets enough votes FOR WHATEVER FUCKING REASONS, any President is GONE, no appeals, no Mulligans, no do-overs

and "bribery" word is actually in the CONSTITUTION as grounds for impeachment

Repugs will shit stain themselves forever, proving that they are the oligarchy's CHEAP whores, by voting against impeachment/conviction.

And the Capitalist, anti-democratic, authoritarian oligarchy doesn't GIVE A SHIT if the President, ANY President, is a corrupt bastard,

just as long as he works to enable/protect/enrich the oligarchy.

[Blake]

:lol

1194737039050231808

the ambassador agrees

More evidence that America is fucked and unfuckable when the corrupt Repugs and their ignorant cult mob are THIS FUCKING STUPID

Ratcliffe is one annoying fucker

[djohn2oo8]

1195023685012393986

:lmao Sondland

[Spurs Homer]

Ratcliffe is one annoying fucker

and from Texas -

fucking disgrace and a really punchable face.
I thought Ted Cruz was the lowest form of scum that lived and breathed in the state of Texas -

but I was wrong.

:lol

[RandomGuy]

You're the one that brought up the law dipshit. The law is on the President's side.

who cares about the law, ammirite?

You gave up any pretense of caring about the law when you shrugged off obstruction of justice from the Mueller report.

[RandomGuy]

It's over, bro. It's over. No need to fight it. It's ok to admit he turned out to be a POS.

He can't at this point. His ego is far too invested in it.

He is one of the Q faithful, a pizzagate fanatic, who sees Clinton conspiracies everywhere.

He swore up and down that Mueller was really going to do surprise mass arrests of Democrats including Hillary, if I remember correctly. DUN DUN DUN!!!

[djohn2oo8]

1195025340386729984

[djohn2oo8]

1195027380445810688

[boutons_deux]

Ratcliffe is one annoying fucker

When these shitbags were elected, and are re-elected, what does that say about their voters?

[Spurs Homer]

X
When these shitbags were elected, and are re-elected, what does that say about their voters?

yup

2018 -election- “senate keeps their majority”

[ChumpDumper]

S:lolndland

The best part is that there is close to a 100% chance that unsecured cell phone call was heard by Ukraine and Russia among others.

[spurraider21]

https://twitter.com/DanaBoos3/status/1194844036483432448?s=19
didnt trump's friend epstein get arrested for being a pedophile?

[Spurs Homer]

School shooting...


....and we have a ....

DISTRACTION!!!


who would have called dat shit?

[ChumpDumper]

School shooting...


....and we have a ....

DISTRACTION!!!


who would have called dat shit?Um...no one.

[ducks]

https://mobile.twitter.com/parscale/status/1195015929672929281?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5 Etweetembed&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.foxbusiness.com%2Fmoney% 2Ftrump-campaign-impeachment-hearing-fundraising

[boutons_deux]

School shooting...


....and we have a ....

DISTRACTION!!!


who would have called dat shit?

It's great entertainment, Reality TV

[TSA]

He can't at this point. His ego is far too invested in it.

He is one of the Q faithful, a pizzagate fanatic, who sees Clinton conspiracies everywhere.

He swore up and down that Mueller was really going to do surprise mass arrests of Democrats including Hillary, if I remember correctly. DUN DUN DUN!!!

This coming from *checks notes* a Russiagate hoax and Kavenaugh hoax believer :lol

[TSA]

1195023685012393986

:lmao Sondland

U.S. envoy Sondland did not link Biden probe to aid: Ukraine minister

https://mobile.reuters.com/article/amp/idUSKBN1XO1HK?__twitter_impression=true

:lmao Sondland

[ChumpDumper]

Uranium One.

[ChumpDumper]

U.S. envoy Sondland did not link Biden probe to aid: Ukraine minister

https://mobile.reuters.com/article/amp/idUSKBN1XO1HK?__twitter_impression=true

:lmao Sondland"Ambassador Sondland did not tell us, and certainly did not tell me, about a connection between the assistance and the investigations. You should ask him."


Uh, they did.


:lmao TSA

[Chris]

*Drumpf whataboutery

cool story bro

[Spurs Homer]

I have a prediction for tomorrows shit-show;


There will be a humongous DISTRACTION tomorrow...


yuuuge breaking news will happen really close to the start of the show

just watch

[Spurs Homer]

Um...no one.

[Chris]

https://twitter.com/RepMattGaetz/status/1195031123090432003?s=19


that last little tidbit at the end :lol

[RandomGuy]

1. The consistency question. One measure of the president’s sincerity is whether he demands investigations of corruption everywhere it exists, or only in Ukraine. In the hearing, Republicans failed to name any other country in which Trump has applied such pressure. Rep. Raja Krishnamoorthi, an Illinois Democrat, asked one of the witnesses, acting U.S. Ambassador to Ukraine Bill Taylor, whether “irregular channels of diplomacy” like the one Trump deployed in Ukraine had been used by the administration anywhere else in the world. “I’ve not heard of any other separate channel that has this kind of influence,” said Taylor.

2. The reform gap. Taylor and George Kent, the deputy assistant secretary of state responsible for Ukraine, testified that U.S. anti-corruption policy traditionally focuses on building honest institutions: police, investigators, prosecutors, and courts. Kent described specific steps to advance this mission in Ukraine. Republicans offered no evidence that Trump ever expressed interest in these steps. Rep. Adam Schiff, the committee’s Democratic chairman, noted that Trump, in his call with Zelensky, never mentioned the principal reforms in Ukraine: “setting up an anti-corruption court or looking into corruption among oligarchs or companies in general.” Schiff pointed out that Trump instead pressed Zelensky to investigate former Vice President Joe Biden and other Democrats. Kent confirmed this account of the call.

3. The Yovanovich ouster. Kent testified that Marie Yovanovitch—the U.S. ambassador Trump removed from Kyiv after she opposed the partisan meddling of Trump’s personal attorney, Rudy Giuliani—had fought resolutely against corruption in Ukraine. Republicans didn’t even try to present a more charitable explanation for her removal. Instead, Republican Rep. John Ratcliffe of Texas argued that “all ambassadors serve at the pleasure of the president” and that it wasn’t an abuse of power “to remove an ambassador for political reasons because you don’t like what they’re doing.” This line of argument all but concedes Trump’s crooked motives.

4. The Pentagon certification. Republican Rep. Chris Stewart of Utah said the president was entitled to suspend aid to Ukraine based on the National Defense Authorization Act. “Availability of funds under assistance to the Ukraine—it has to be certified,” Stewart observed, quoting the law. “And what has to be certified? Quote, ‘For the purposes of decreasing corruption.’ ” But Kent pointed out that “the secretary of defense had already certified that that conditionality had been met.” By ignoring this certification, Trump proved his talk of corruption was insincere.

5. The “check him out” lie. Republican Rep. Jim Jordan of Ohio told a fantastic story. He claimed that when Trump blocked the aid in mid-July, the president said, “Time out. Let’s check out this new guy. Let’s see if Zelensky’s the real deal.” Jordan continued: “So for 55 days, we checked him out. President Zelensky had five interactions with senior U.S. officials in that time frame.” Jordan said that senators, former National Security Adviser John Bolton, and Vice President Mike Pence “all became convinced that Zelensky was in fact worth the risk, he was in fact legit and the real deal and a real change. And guess what? They told the president, ‘He’s a reformer. Release the money.’ And that’s exactly what President Trump did.”

By ignoring this certification, Trump proved his talk of corruption was insincere.
This story is a complete fabrication. Bolton needed no convincing; he supported the aid all along. So did the Republican senators who were advising Trump on Ukraine. We also have a video-recorded statement from Mick Mulvaney, the acting White House chief of staff, who blocked the aid on Trump’s instructions and later released it. Mulvaney said the suspension was lifted for reasons that had nothing to do with corruption.

6. The phone call. Kent detailed the history of Burisma, the Ukrainian company that hired Hunter Biden, Joe Biden’s son, to serve on its board. He said the Bidens had nothing to do with the company’s problematic past. The suspicious character, Kent explained, was Burisma’s owner, Mykola Zlochevsky, who allegedly awarded deals to his own companies when he was a Ukrainian official from 2010 to 2012. That was two years before Hunter Biden joined Burisma’s board. Based on this chronology, you can make a case for investigating Zlochevsky or Burisma, but not for investigating the Bidens.

Trump did the opposite. In an exchange with Schiff, Kent confirmed that in the July 25 call, Trump never mentioned Burisma or Zlochevsky. Instead, Trump pressed Zelensky to investigate the Bidens. Trump didn’t even mention corruption. Taylor heard the same pitch from Gordon Sondland, the U.S. ambassador to the European Union, who was relaying Trump’s demands to Ukraine. Trump told Sondland that he specifically wanted an investigation of the Bidens.

7. The Yermak invitation. Taylor testified that in August, Andriy Yermak, an aide to Zelensky, “asked that the United States submit an official request for an investigation into Burisma’s alleged violations of Ukrainian law, if that is what the United States desired.” This would have been the logical course if Trump were sincere about investigating corruption rather than smearing the Bidens. But Trump never pursued it. When Rep. Eric Swalwell, a California Democrat, asked Kent whether the Department of Justice had formally requested investigative cooperation from Ukraine, Kent said he knew of no such request.

Instead of building a case for Trump’s innocence, Republicans added to the mountain of evidence that he abused his power for personal reasons. Rep. Devin Nunes of California, the committee’s ranking Republican, complained that during the 2016 election, “the Ukrainian embassy supported the Hillary Clinton campaign,” Ukraine’s ambassador to the United States “wrote an op-ed … criticizing then-candidate Trump,” and a former Ukrainian government minister “mocked and disparaged then-candidate Trump on Facebook and Twitter.” That, said Nunes, was “what concerned” Trump about Ukraine. “It was numerous indications of Ukrainian interference in the 2016 election to oppose his campaign,” said Nunes. “Once you know that, it’s easy to understand the president’s desire to get to the bottom of this corruption and to discover exactly what happened in the 2016 election.”

Steve Castor, the committee’s Republican legal counsel, cited the testimony of multiple witnesses to support this revenge theory. “Didn’t [Trump] lament that the Ukrainians were out to get him?” Castor asked Taylor, referring to a May 23 Oval Office meeting. Castor recounted Ukraine’s alleged sins against Trump: the op-ed, the criticisms, and the “unkind things on social media.” That, said Castor, was why “President Trump was very concerned that some elements of the Ukrainian establishment … were out to get him.”

The question of whether to impeach and remove Trump boils down to motive. Even Republican senators acknowledge this. If the president pressed Ukraine to investigate corruption, that’s fine. If he pressed Ukraine to target his political opponents, that’s an abuse of power. Four layers of evidence—transcript, texts, depositions, and public testimony—have settled this question. Trump didn’t care about corruption. He betrayed his oath and his country.

https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2019/11/wednesday-impeachment-hearing-clarified-trump-motives.html

[Chris]

https://twitter.com/JohnDennisSF/status/1195025966248054785?s=19

[Chris]

Trump campaign raked in 3.1 million on first day of hearings :lol

[Chris]

https://twitter.com/BreitbartNews/status/1195050908012417024?s=19

Still pushing a debunked conspiracy theory :lol

[Chris]

https://twitter.com/GOPLeader/status/1194995882111975426?s=19

[Blake]

https://twitter.com/JohnDennisSF/status/1195025966248054785?s=19

Jeez you guys still don't understand "right to confront his accuser" is only applicable in criminal court.

Fuck you're stupid.

[LkrFan]

1195025340386729984

:corn:

[Chucho]

Trump campaign raked in 3.1 million on first day of hearings :lol

What good is that if he's getting the axe before he needs a war chest? :lol

[Chris]

https://twitter.com/JackPosobiec/status/1195030580435525632?s=19

[Winehole23]

What good is that if he's getting the axe before he needs a war chest? :lol
DJT can use it to defray legal expenses.

[Chris]

https://twitter.com/Weinsteinlaw/status/1194841411759353858?s=19

[Chris]

What good is that if he's getting the axe before he needs a war chest? :lol

Explain your axe theory.

[ChumpDumper]

https://twitter.com/RepMattGaetz/status/1195031123090432003?s=19


that last little tidbit at the end :lolBribery and extortion are impeachable offenses.

[ChumpDumper]

https://twitter.com/JackPosobiec/status/1195030580435525632?s=19Uh, everything about the Ukraine extortion plan was secret and backdoor until the whistleblower put a stop to it.

:lol the complete lack of self awareness

[LkrFan]

Rudy a thug
https://twitter.com/LincolnsBible/status/1195067502608338944?s=19
Like Cohen, he got receipts :lol

[Chucho]

Explain your axe theory.

He tried to extort a mud-digging campaign from an ally. He got caught. He's gonna get impeached.

[ChumpDumper]

He tried to extort a mud-digging campaign from an ally. He got caught. He's gonna get impeached.BUT THE SOROS PIZZA PEDOPHILES. WHAT WILL BE DONE ABOUT THE SOROS PIZZA PEDOPHILES?

[Chris]

He tried to extort a mud-digging campaign from an ally. He got caught. He's gonna get impeached.

no :lol

[Chris]

Bribery and extortion are impeachable offenses.

Good thing neither of those are on the table.

[Chris]

https://twitter.com/paulsperry_/status/1195050527148642306?s=19

[ChumpDumper]

Good thing neither of those are on the table.Bad for you that both are on the table and have been proved right off the bat by Dennison himself.

[ChumpDumper]

https://twitter.com/paulsperry_/status/1195050527148642306?s=19No, it's what he used the super secret backdoor shadow dealings for. He really abused his power.

[Chris]

Bad for you that both are on the table and have been proved right off the bat.

nah I'm good, nothing will happen just like Mueller

[ChumpDumper]

Seriously, why would there have to be some kind of back channel in Ukraine?

Guys like Kent and Taylor were all in on fighting corruption in Ukraine.

Explain why Giuliani and random campaign donors had to be the guys.

[ChumpDumper]

nah I'm goodWhich is why you're furiously retweeting Soros pedophile conspiracy theories.

:lmao Qhris

[Chris]

No, it's what he used the super secret backdoor shadow dealings for. He really abused his power.

nah I read the transcript so no super secrets

also "no pressure" which debunks your abuse of power theory

[Chris]

Which is why you're furiously retweeting Soros pedophile conspiracy theories.

:lmao Qhris

oh look another narrative post

Chump's ace in the hole.

[Blake]

Good thing neither of those are on the table.

Lol wut

[ChumpDumper]

nah I read the transcript so no super secretsNot a transcript. the actual transcript was hidden on a super secret server.


also "no pressure" which debunks your abuse of power theoryExcept there was pressure.

Lots or pressure.

Life and death pressure.

Sorry, Qhris. You can't wave this shit away with the talking points you've been issued.

[ChumpDumper]

oh look another narrative post

Chump's ace in the hole.Do you want me to point out your Soros pedophile posts, Qhris?

Just let me know.

[Chris]

"no pressure" is a direct quote

sorry

[Chris]

Do you want me to point out your Soros pedophile posts, Qhris?

Just let me know.

go ahead

[Blake]

"no pressure" is a direct quote

sorry

Lol wut

[ChumpDumper]

"no pressure" is a direct quote

sorryI can find abuse victims that claim their abusers did not abuse them.

Sorry, Qhris.

[Blake]

go ahead

You're asking to be shit on?

[ChumpDumper]

go ahead

https://twitter.com/JackPosobiec/status/1195030580435525632?s=19

https://twitter.com/DanaBoos3/status/1194844036483432448?s=19

:lol Qhris

[Chris]

I can find abuse victims that claim their abusers did not abuse them.

Sorry, Qhris.

that's nice but irrelevant unless you have some proof

I got a direct quote.

Go ahead.

[Blake]

that's nice but irrelevant unless you have some proof

I got a direct quote.

Go ahead.

Oh well then nothing more to do. Impeachment hearings over.

[Chris]

:lol Qhris

What does that have to do with your narrative posts? You're just doubling down without making a lick of sense.

[ChumpDumper]

that's nice but irrelevant unless you have some proof

I got a direct quote.

Go ahead.We do have proof.

Hundreds of pages of it.

:lol Qhris

[ChumpDumper]

What does that have to do with your narrative posts? You're just doubling down without making a lick of sense.I just pointed out what you do by reposting what you did.

Don't get pissy about it. They're your Soros pedophile posts.

[Chris]

We do have proof.

Hundreds of pages of it.

:lol Qhris

Who is we?

Show me the proof.

[ChumpDumper]

Who is we?

Show me the proof.Have you read or watched any of the actual testimony, Qhris?

Yes or no.

[Chris]

I just pointed out what you do by reposting what you did.

Don't get pissy about it. They're your Soros pedophile posts.

So you're just spinning your wheels.

Got it :tu

[ChumpDumper]

So you're just spinning your wheels.

Got it :tuActually, you are.

Soros pedophile tweets are proof you don't want to discuss any facts.

[Chris]

I got some proof.

https://twitter.com/BreitbartNews/status/1192255426286489600?s=20
https://twitter.com/PPDNews/status/1193656942260039681?s=19

[ChumpDumper]

:lmao moar Soros pedophile posts

[Chris]

Have you read or watched any of the actual testimony, Qhris?

Yes or no.

Who is we?

Show me the proof or do another narrative post. I'm betting on the latter.

[ChumpDumper]

Who is we?

Show me the proof or do another narrative post. I'm betting on the latter.Just a second.

If you haven't read or listened to any actual testimony, why are you here?

[Spurs Homer]

Serious question;

is qhris - thread?

is thread - Qhris?

[Chris]

Just a second.

If you haven't read or listened to any actual testimony, why are you here?

called that shit

[koriwhat]

Serious question;

is qhris - thread?

is thread - Qhris?

keep dreaming Avante. :tu

[ChumpDumper]

Serious question;

is qhris - thread?

is thread - Qhris?No.

Qhris stole a bunch of shtick and sayings from Dale.

It would be interesting to hear from Dale about impeachment.

[ChumpDumper]

called that shitThat isn't narrative.

It's a question.

If you haven't read or listened to any actual testimony, why are you here?

[LkrFan]

1 by 1 they are coming out from the shadows
https://twitter.com/funder/status/1195092020278243328?s=19

[LkrFan]

No.

Qhris stole a bunch of shtick and sayings from Dale.

It would be interesting to hear from Dale about impeachment.

I guarantee you he is lurking this very thread (no pun intended :lol) every day. He'll resurface sooner or later.

[ChumpDumper]

1 by 1 they are coming out from the shadows
https://twitter.com/funder/status/1195092020278243328?s=19Seriously, S:lolndland continues to ruin everything for Dennison.

[koriwhat]

1 by 1 they are coming out from the shadows
https://twitter.com/funder/status/1195092020278243328?s=19

new "witnesses"... :lmao

https://image.shutterstock.com/image-photo/image-450w-790548355.jpg

[Spurs Homer]

If sondland routinely called dear leader on his cell phone

rudy probably did too

instead of going to the local embassy and making a secure call...

that means Putin has NEW kompromat on dear leader
(bribery/extortion)

but but her emails had the GOP clutching their pearls over
”national security”

lol

[Reck]

I got some proof.

https://twitter.com/BreitbartNews/status/1192255426286489600?s=20
https://twitter.com/PPDNews/status/1193656942260039681?s=19

Talk about not bringing anything to the table. :lmao Still propping up Breitbart in 2019.

[koriwhat]

Talk about not bringing anything to the table. :lmao Still propping up Breitbart in 2019.

you're kidding though right? this isn't necessarily a breitbart thing when it comes straight out of the mouth of that child abuse advocate zaid. the dude's YT history is suspect as well... i don't know any grown man who likes nothing but disney minor girls and visits disneyland alone well into his 40's and childless as well as single.

dismiss that breitbart tweet all you'd like but zaid is a disturbing disgusting hipster looking male feminist that you all are tbh. :tu

[LkrFan]

https://twitter.com/AndyOstroy/status/1195102754865369089?s=19

...because he is still under audit :rolleyes

[LkrFan]

Seriously, S:lolndland continues to ruin everything for Dennison.

:lmao

[RandomGuy]

I got some proof.

https://images-na.ssl-images-amazon.com/images/I/31wtyWRrnIL._AC_UL160_SR128,160_.jpg
https://images-na.ssl-images-amazon.com/images/I/31wtyWRrnIL._AC_UL160_SR128,160_.jpg


We already know you are an idiot. No need to keep proving it dude.

[RandomGuy]

called that shit

How about I call this:

You will avoid any defense of anything you post, and simply post more non-sequitur tweets.

[LkrFan]

https://twitter.com/TheBeatWithAri/status/1195122658762989570?s=19
:lol

[boutons_deux]

Flipped Giuliani associate claims he discussed Ukraine with Trump, convinced him to fire ambassador

Parnas' account contradicts Trump's claim that he didn't know him, which prompted Parnas to flip in the case


he discussed Ukraine with Donald Trump as early as April 2018,

told associates he spoke with Trump for about 90 minutes at an event for big donors to the Trump PAC.

Parnas and business partner Igor Fruman, who was also indicted, snagged an invite to the event after their alleged illicit donation.

he and Fruman told Trump they thought then-ambassador to Ukraine Marie Yovanovitch was unfriendly to his interests.

Trump reacted so strongly to what they told him that Trump demanded that Yovanovitch “should be fired,”

“Thank you President Trump !!! Incredible dinner and even better conversation,”

(https://www.salon.com/2019/11/14/flipped-giuliani-associate-claims-he-discussed-ukraine-with-trump-convinced-him-to-fire-ambassador/)After the exchange with Trump, Parnas and Fruman repeatedly complained that they were “shellshocked” that Yovanovitch remained in her post for months after Trump said he wanted to fire her, an associate told The Post.

Giuliani echoed a similar complaint about how long it took to remove Yovanovitch in an interview with The Post.
“The president fired her three times and thought she was gone,” he said. “The president thought she was gone long before she was actually fired.”

(https://www.salon.com/2019/11/14/flipped-giuliani-associate-claims-he-discussed-ukraine-with-trump-convinced-him-to-fire-ambassador/)https://www.salon.com/2019/11/14/flipped-giuliani-associate-claims-he-discussed-ukraine-with-trump-convinced-him-to-fire-ambassador/

=============

At donor dinner, Giuliani associate said he discussed Ukraine with Trump

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/at-donor-dinner-giuliani-associate-said-he-discussed-ukraine-with-trump-according-to-people-familiar-with-his-account/2019/11/12/2a1f28e0-0558-11ea-b17d-8b867891d39d_story.html

[boutons_deux]

Pelosi smacks down Fox News reporter’s question — and hilariously explains to Trump what ‘exculpatory’ means

smacked down Fox News reporter Chad Pergram after

he insinuated that House Democrats seemed “excited” about the prospect of impeaching President Donald Trump.
During a press conference, Pergram asked Pelosi, “Why would the public not think that the House is dead set on a course to impeach the president when all of this milieu was going on?”

“All this milieu is a seeking of the truth,” she replied. “It’s called an inquiry.”

Pelosi at this point turned to the camera and seemed to address Trump directly.

And if the president has something that is

exculpatory — Mr. President, that means if you have anything that shows your innocence :lol B U R N ! :lol

— then he should make that known,” she said

Pelosi then went on to say that, based solely on the evidence gathered so far,

what the president has done “makes what Nixon did look almost small.”

https://www.rawstory.com/2019/11/pelosi-smacks-down-fox-news-reporters-question-and-hilariously-explains-to-trump-what-exculpatory-means/?utm_source=&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=2995 (https://www.rawstory.com/2019/11/pelosi-smacks-down-fox-news-reporters-question-and-hilariously-explains-to-trump-what-exculpatory-means/?utm_source=&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=2995)


https://media3.giphy.com/media/7A4iGSv5ncnLxUfGjZ/giphy.gif?cid=790b7611dd47b25638dc1040e8d4e9166f38 58f1e4a87a5c&rid=giphy.gif

[Winehole23]

https://twitter.com/TheBeatWithAri/status/1195122658762989570?s=19
:lolBeggars belief that Trump never met the guy who gave a million dollars to his inauguration, speaking of which: did Trumplandia ever account for all the money raised?

[MultiTroll]

Pelosi smacks down Fox News reporter’s question — and hilariously explains to Trump what ‘exculpatory’ means

smacked down Fox News reporter Chad Pergram after

​
She didn't smack down shit you Snowflake.
Stupid cunt has zero interest in making the country any better.
Politically based hunt all the way.

[Winehole23]

Multi-troll with the red ass

[boutons_deux]

‘Difficult for Sondland to get out of this’:

Second witness puts Trump’s EU ambassador in legal bind

a second “U.S. embassy staffer in Kyiv” is now known to have overheard President Trump’s phone call with ambassador to the EU Gordon Sondland, where he discussed the need for Ukraine to move forward with “investigations.”

According to experts, the call was a clear breach (https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/ambassadors-cellphone-call-to-trump-from-kyiv-restaurant-was-a-stunning-breach-of-security-former-officials-say/2019/11/13/37d75752-0641-11ea-b17d-8b867891d39d_story.html) of security.

“The security ramifications are insane — using an open cellphone to communicate with the president of the United States,”

“In a country that is so wired with Russian intelligence, you can almost take it to the bank that the Russians were listening in on the call.”

https://www.rawstory.com/2019/11/difficult-for-sondland-to-get-out-of-this-second-witness-puts-trumps-eu-ambassador-in-legal-bind/?utm_source=&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=2995 (https://www.rawstory.com/2019/11/difficult-for-sondland-to-get-out-of-this-second-witness-puts-trumps-eu-ambassador-in-legal-bind/?utm_source=&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=2995)

[RandomGuy]

Pelosi at this point turned to the camera and seemed to address Trump directly.

And if the president has something that is

exculpatory — Mr. President, that means if you have anything that shows your innocence[COLOR=#000000][FONT=&][SIZE=3][FONT=arial][COLOR=#000000] :lol B U R N ! :lol


oooh, snap.

[MultiTroll]

Multi-troll with the red ass
No, California was and is red with fires while your two girls Pelosi and Newsome sit around itching their cunts and doing media shit like this.

Gullible phuck.

[Winehole23]

Multi-troll pitching a fit over Pelosi and Newsome in Trump impeachment watch thread.

Shook.

[MultiTroll]

Passive agressive phaggot playbook.

Bravo!

[Chris]

you're kidding though right? this isn't necessarily a breitbart thing when it comes straight out of the mouth of that child abuse advocate zaid. the dude's YT history is suspect as well... i don't know any grown man who likes nothing but disney minor girls and visits disneyland alone well into his 40's and childless as well as single.

dismiss that breitbart tweet all you'd like but zaid is a disturbing disgusting hipster looking male feminist that you all are tbh. :tu

Whenever Chump gets put in his place, RandomGay and Simple Reck always show up for damage control. :lol I guess that's what Chump means by "we".

#HiveMind

[pgardn]

The law is on the President’s side.


“The conversation raised concerns by a whistleblower that Trump may have broken the law by asking for foreign help in the presidential campaign. But the Justice Department concluded that based on the evidence that's available, prosecutors "did not and could not make out a criminal campaign finance violation."

Under the law, a "thing of value" under discussion has to be in some way quantifiable, and the Justice Department couldn't find that here, officials said.”

https://www.npr.org/2019/09/25/764164340/trump-asked-ukrainian-president-for-a-favor-on-biden-doj-says-no-charges



You mean Trump's DOJ. Or a DOJ that is clearly fractured because some are merely there to serve the president. Some actually find it necessary to follow law occasionally.

And from your post:


"I would like you to do us a favor," Trump asked President Volodymyr Zelenskiy, according to the official account released on Wednesday.
Later in the conversation, according to the memo (https://www.npr.org/764052120), Trump said:
"I would like you to find out what happened with this whole situation in Ukraine ... There's a lot of talk about Biden's son, that Biden stopped the prosecution and a lot of people want to find out about that. So whatever you can do with the attorney general would be great. Biden went around bragging that he stopped the prosecution so if you can look into it ... it sounds horrible to me."


This is so incredibly wrong and impeachable I have yet to hear a solid response from the red team.
And with Trump yet again:

Some people say...
People are saying...
I have heard it said that...
When people tell me...

Then he disallows anyone under his control to testify?
This is laughable.
The most transparent president ever.
(who hides his tax returns)
This is absolutely crazy...

[ChumpDumper]

Whenever Chump gets put in his place, RandomGay and Simple Reck always show up for damage control. :lol I guess that's what Chump means by "we".

#HiveMind:lol Qhris found a conspiracy pal

[Chris]

https://twitter.com/jonvoight/status/1195099987194998784?s=19

Herr Voight

[Chris]

https://twitter.com/charliekirk11/status/1195161138779918336?s=19

[Chris]

https://twitter.com/gatewaypundit/status/1195161656667623425?s=19


ouch :lol

[DMX7]

https://twitter.com/gatewaypundit/status/1195161656667623425?s=19


ouch :lol
He already said himself there was a quid pro quo even though POTUS said no. :spin

[Chris]

https://twitter.com/paulsperry_/status/1195126283795083264?s=19

soneone ITT used all 3 today! :lol

[ChumpDumper]

https://twitter.com/paulsperry_/status/1195126283795083264?s=19

soneone ITT used all 3 today! :lolIt is all three tbh.

Which ones are you having trouble understanding?

[weebo]

Another school shooting? Yawn...zzzz...

[koriwhat]

You mean Trump's DOJ. Or a DOJ that is clearly fractured because some are merely there to serve the president. Some actually find it necessary to follow law occasionally.

now tell us what you think about obama's fbi? hahahaha

[Reck]

https://twitter.com/jonvoight/status/1195099987194998784?s=19

Herr Voight

lol who's the simple one now?

:lol Qchris likes to be told what to do and think.

[koriwhat]

She didn't smack down shit you Snowflake.
Stupid cunt has zero interest in making the country any better.
Politically based hunt all the way.

the lefty's here are stupid authoritarian losers who want nothing but the worst for our country sadly enough. it's funny how they stick with pelosi the crook even though her own district is starting to resemble a 3rd world country while she sits pretty in 1 of her mansions tucked behind walls the peasants can't get into.

pocket protector wearing spineless lefty's the lot of them!

[pgardn]

now tell us what you think about obama's fbi? hahahaha

Not much.

But Attorney General, Eric Holder, was pitiful.

ha

ha

Im supposed to laugh now...

So why is the most transparent president ever not telling us who says what and not letting witnesses testify?

[ChumpDumper]

the lefty's here are stupid authoritarian losers who want nothing but the worst for our country sadly enough. it's funny how they stick with pelosi the crook even though her own district is starting to resemble a 3rd world country while she sits pretty in 1 of her mansions tucked behind walls the peasants can't get into.

pocket protector wearing spineless lefty's the lot of them!klass warfare kori

[pgardn]

the lefty's here are stupid authoritarian losers who want nothing but the worst for our country sadly enough. it's funny how they stick with pelosi the crook even though her own district is starting to resemble a 3rd world country while she sits pretty in 1 of her mansions tucked behind walls the peasants can't get into.

pocket protector wearing spineless lefty's the lot of them!

Rightwing nut job.
Pocket protectors. NASA stuff. Good deal.

[Blake]

https://twitter.com/jonvoight/status/1195099987194998784?s=19

Herr Voight

Chris reporting with your Hollywood Minute

[Chris]

Chris reporting with your Hollywood Minute

not Disney related I know, but maybe you can understand what he's talking about?

[Chris]

lol who's the simple one now?

:lol Qchris likes to be told what to do and think.

Oh look, another narrative post.

[koriwhat]

Not much.

But Attorney General, Eric Holder, was pitiful.

ha

ha

Im supposed to laugh now...

So why is the most transparent president ever not telling us who says what and not letting witnesses testify?

it's funny how you literally won't speak against obama being in office while spygate was kicking off under his watch. we already knew eric holder was a piece of shit but you won't dare speak about obama's corrupt legacy.

as for trump, i haven't heard about him withholding witnesses from testifying at a sham impeachment hearing held by commies. inform me with a link...

either way, you dodged my question i posed earlier. :lmao


Rightwing nut job.
Pocket protectors. NASA stuff. Good deal.

leftwing nutjob. the left are spineless nerds.

[koriwhat]

not Disney related I know, but maybe you can understand what he's talking about?

how dare you post tweets while the lefty's here suck off kyle griffen retweets whenever given the chance.

[pgardn]

it's funny how you literally won't speak against obama being in office while spygate was kicking off under his watch. we already knew eric holder was a piece of shit but you won't dare speak about obama's corrupt legacy.

as for trump, i haven't heard about him withholding witnesses from testifying at a sham impeachment hearing held by commies. inform me with a link...

either way, you dodged my question i posed earlier. :lmao



leftwing nutjob. the left are spineless nerds.

You are clearly a far right nut job.
Why do you think Eric Holder was a POS since WE already knew this?

[koriwhat]

You are clearly a far right nut job.
Why do you think Eric Holder was a POS since WE already knew this?

you want to keep asking me questions and demand answers but you keep dodging my very straight forward question to you. you first fringe weirdo far left nut job.

[pgardn]

koriwhat thinks its a sham that

Foreign policy is asking a foreign country for information on a presidential opponent?
So the president of the US can ask foreign countries to participate in our elections by having their intelligence services aid certain US candidates? Ok then

Koriwhat is a thorough globalist. He wants the world to help us elect our president.
“But, but... 2 million illegal votes”

sure a sham

idiot...

[pgardn]

you want to keep asking me questions and demand answers but you keep dodging my very straight forward question to you. you first fringe weirdo far left nut job.

But WE already knew. What did we know? Im not dodging anything. Obama picked a horrible Attorney General and Rahm Emanuel. That makes him culpable for their practices. I could go on. But this is about our current president far righty. Im being nice by even entertaining it. Your lack of substance is substantial though. Keep going.

[koriwhat]

koriwhat thinks its a sham that

Foreign policy is asking a foreign country for information on a presidential opponent?
So the president of the US can ask foreign countries to participate in our elections by having their intelligence services aid certain US candidates? Ok then

Koriwhat is a thorough globalist. He wants the world to help us elect our president.
“But, but... 2 million illegal votes”

sure a sham

idiot...

dodge #3 you fringe weirdo far left nut job :tu

[koriwhat]

Foreign policy is asking a foreign country for information on a presidential opponent?

like obama did?

[pgardn]

dodge #3 you fringe weirdo far left nut job :tu

I told you what you think is a sham.
Defend yourself.
Give me substance. I have told you what Trump has done. Defend it.

Foreign policy is asking a foreign country for information on a presidential opponent?
So the president of the US can ask foreign countries to participate in our elections by having their intelligence services aid certain US candidates? Ok then

Koriwhat is a thorough globalist. He wants the world to help us elect our president.

[pgardn]

like obama did?

Link?

This is a lie.
Do you want me to link Trump's phone call again?

[koriwhat]

So the president of the US can ask foreign countries to participate in our elections by having their intelligence services aid certain US candidates? Ok then


like obama did?

[koriwhat]

Link?

This is a lie.
Do you want me to link Trump's phone call again?

link that transcript if you'd like and while doing so show me where trump said "this for that"... :tu

come on already you far left nut job.

[pgardn]

^cant supply a link.

Here ya go again.
Read it and refute it:

"I would like you to do us a favor," Trump asked President Volodymyr Zelenskiy, according to the official account released on Wednesday.
Later in the conversation, according to the memo (https://www.npr.org/764052120), Trump said:
"I would like you to find out what happened with this whole situation in Ukraine ... There's a lot of talk about Biden's son, that Biden stopped the prosecution and a lot of people want to find out about that. So whatever you can do with the attorney general would be great. Biden went around bragging that he stopped the prosecution so if you can look into it ... it sounds horrible to me."


This is so incredibly wrong and impeachable I have yet to hear a solid response from the red team.
And with Trump yet again:

Some people say...
People are saying...
I have heard it said that...
When people tell me...

Then he disallows anyone under his control to testify?
This is laughable.
The most transparent president ever.
(who hides his tax returns)
This is absolutely crazy...

[koriwhat]

Link?

This is a lie.
Do you want me to link Trump's phone call again?

so then obama lied about russia's interference then, right? logic would say so and so did mueller's report too. :lol

[koriwhat]

^cant supply a link.

Here ya go again.
Read it and refute it:

"I would like you to do us a favor," Trump asked President Volodymyr Zelenskiy, according to the official account released on Wednesday.
Later in the conversation, according to the memo (https://www.npr.org/764052120), Trump said:
"I would like you to find out what happened with this whole situation in Ukraine ... There's a lot of talk about Biden's son, that Biden stopped the prosecution and a lot of people want to find out about that. So whatever you can do with the attorney general would be great. Biden went around bragging that he stopped the prosecution so if you can look into it ... it sounds horrible to me."


This is so incredibly wrong and impeachable I have yet to hear a solid response from the red team.
And with Trump yet again:

Some people say...
People are saying...
I have heard it said that...
When people tell me...

Then he disallows anyone under his control to testify?
This is laughable.
The most transparent president ever.
(who hides his tax returns)
This is absolutely crazy...

and in all that there's still no quid pro quo... so what if people are discussing biden's corruption, even biden, on film, discussed his own corruption. now show me the quid pro quo you can't point to but keep speculating on because you're a fringe far left nut job weirdo.

[pgardn]

so then obama lied about russia's interference then, right? logic would say so and so did mueller's report too. :lol

Incorrect.
Both Obama AND Trump were told about Russia's interference directly after Trump won.
Trump is on record saying he does believe Russia interfered. He is also on record saying its a deep state lie. Trump has vacillated between these two directly opposing statements.

Here is the link:
https://apps.npr.org/documents/document.html?id=6429015-Trump-Ukraine-Transcript

You have nothing.
Just like Chris.

[pgardn]

and in all that there's still no quid pro quo... so what if people are discussing biden's corruption, even biden, on film, discussed his own corruption. now show me the quid pro quo you can't point to but keep speculating on because you're a fringe far left nut job weirdo.

Does not matter the phone call itself is an impeachable offense. And Sonland has said it is quid pro quo, so there you go.

Here ya go again.
Read it and refute it:

"I would like you to do us a favor," Trump asked President Volodymyr Zelenskiy, according to the official account released on Wednesday.
Later in the conversation, according to the memo (https://www.npr.org/764052120), Trump said:
"I would like you to find out what happened with this whole situation in Ukraine ... There's a lot of talk about Biden's son, that Biden stopped the prosecution and a lot of people want to find out about that. So whatever you can do with the attorney general would be great. Biden went around bragging that he stopped the prosecution so if you can look into it ... it sounds horrible to me."


This is so incredibly wrong and impeachable I have yet to hear a solid response from the red team.
And with Trump yet again:

Some people say...
People are saying...
I have heard it said that...
When people tell me...

Then he disallows anyone under his control to testify?
This is laughable.
The most transparent president ever.
(who hides his tax returns)
This is absolutely crazy...

This above IS Impeachable in itself.

[pgardn]

Far righty getting his ears boxed in.
Its tough when you actually have to read stuff and have command of what is going on instead of mimicking other far right nut jobs with literally zero substance.

[angrydude]

Does not matter the phone call itself is an impeachable offense. And Sonland has said it is quid pro quo, so there you go.

Here ya go again.
Read it and refute it:

"I would like you to do us a favor," Trump asked President Volodymyr Zelenskiy, according to the official account released on Wednesday.
Later in the conversation, according to the memo (https://www.npr.org/764052120), Trump said:
"I would like you to find out what happened with this whole situation in Ukraine ... There's a lot of talk about Biden's son, that Biden stopped the prosecution and a lot of people want to find out about that. So whatever you can do with the attorney general would be great. Biden went around bragging that he stopped the prosecution so if you can look into it ... it sounds horrible to me."


This is so incredibly wrong and impeachable I have yet to hear a solid response from the red team.
And with Trump yet again:

Some people say...
People are saying...
I have heard it said that...
When people tell me...

Then he disallows anyone under his control to testify?
This is laughable.
The most transparent president ever.
(who hides his tax returns)
This is absolutely crazy...

This above IS Impeachable in itself.

Because it's neither wrong or impeachable.

It is in the public interest to know if Biden is corrupt.

/thread

[pgardn]

Because it's neither wrong or impeachable.

It is in the public interest to know if Biden is corrupt.

/thread

Its not the president’s job to find alleged corruption in political opponents in the upcoming election. In fact this is arguably the worst way to go about actually finding anything for the public because it is a political opponent AND the president is asking a foreign country and their intelligence service to interfere. Absolutely impeachable.
Its is most certainly wrong and impeachable.

End of story.

[Blake]

not Disney related I know, but maybe you can understand what he's talking about?

No because I don't give a shit either way about his Hollywood political opinion. That's your deal

[Blake]

Because it's neither wrong or impeachable.

It is in the public interest to know if Biden is corrupt.

/thread

:lol