Church of Trump

[Splits]

http://www.politico.com/story/2016/05/rnc-trump-bernie-sanders-debate-223610


RNC official: A Trump-Sanders debate would be 'phenomenal'

By NOLAN D. MCCASKILL (http://www.politico.com/staff/nolan-d-mccaskill)
05/26/16 12:14 PM EDT

If a proposed debate between Bernie Sanders and Donald Trump were to take place, it would be “phenomenal,” Republican National Committee chief strategist and communications director Sean Spicer said Thursday.

“I think it would be a phenomenal debate if it happened,” Spicer told CNN.

The Vermont senator and Republican presidential nominee — by The Associated Press’ official delegate count — apparently agreed in principle by early Thursday to debate.

Trump told late-night host Jimmy Kimmel (http://www.politico.com/story/2016/05/trump-sanders-kimmel-debate-223594) on Wednesday evening that he would be willing to debate Sanders if he agrees to allow proceeds from the event to go to charity.
“Game on,” Sanders tweeted minutes later. “I look forward to debating Donald Trump in California before the June 7 primary.”

Spicer said the debate “would be a huge contrast” in which direction the country could go.

“The only thing that Bernie Sanders offers is another flavor of Ben and Jerry's ice cream,” Spicer said (Ben & Jerry’s founder Ben Cohen unveiled the “Bernie’s Yearning” (http://www.politico.com/story/2016/01/bernie-sanders-ben-and-jerrys-bernies-yearning-218185) ice cream flavor in January). “It's a far-left socialist agenda, what he’s got, whether it's foreign policy — the way he wants to partner not with Israel, the destruction he would have with that relationship — our foreign policy, our domestic policy. I think it would be a massive contrast in the direction that this country could choose.”

Spicer also knocked Hillary Clinton for refusing to agree to a Fox News debate with Sanders in California ahead of the state’s primary.

“The other thing that's odd, by the way, is that Hillary Clinton refuses to fulfill her promise to debate Bernie Sanders,” he said. “So there is a void because Hillary Clinton refuses to actually keep her word and do what she said and debate in California against Bernie Sanders.”

Sanders spokesman Michael Briggs told POLITICO (http://www.politico.com/story/2016/05/bernie-sanders-trump-debate-223602) on Thursday that the campaign wants the Sanders-Trump debate to happen.


:lol Mitch (http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/member.php?u=36270) you are so fucking stupid. Your fascist is a pussy for backing out of the debate

[Mitch]

Splits having a meltdown and can't comprehend the RNC-DNC rules


OK, but I dont know what she has to do with Bernie v Trump debate though.

Dont say you would debate a guy for charity and walk out on that. That's a shitty thing to do.

She said if you run for office you should be willing to debate "any time and anywhere." You can't really defend her for that when the reason she won't debate is because she doesn't want to somehow screw up and give Bernie the 85% he needs in California, which is pretty damn impossible.

Trump isn't a great person, but he has no real reason to debate Bernie. He's probably wanted a conservative or central network to pony up for it, not a tech company or bob arum :lol

[boutons_deux]

bogus "strong man" macho, blatant BIGOT, XENOPHOBE, trying to intimidate the judiciary

Trump Goes On Insane Racist Rant Against American Born Trump U Case Judge

Republican nominee Donald Trump erupted for a racist rant against the American-born judge in the Trump University case and destroyed any chance that the GOP had of passing him off as anything less than a deranged, self-serving, racist.


Trump said:

I have a judge who is a hater of Donald Trump, a hater. He’s a hater. His name is Gonzalo Curiel.

He is not doing the right thing. And I figure, what the hell? Why not talk about it for two minutes?…

We’re in front of a very hostile judge.

The judge was appointed by Barack Obama, federal judge.

Frankly, he should recuse himself because he’s given us ruling after ruling after ruling, negative, negative, negative.…

What happens is the judge, who happens to be, we believe, Mexican, which is great. I think that’s fine.…

I think Judge Curiel should be ashamed of himself.

I’m telling you, this court system, judges in this court system, federal court;

they ought to look into Judge Curiel.

Because what Judge Curiel is doing is a total disgrace, OK?

But we’ll come back in November.

Wouldn’t that be wild if I’m president and I come back to do a civil case?

Where everybody likes it.

OK.

This is called life, folks.

The judge was born in Indiana, not Mexico. (http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/2016/05/27/trump-attacks-federal-judge-in-trump-u-case/)

Consider for a moment that Republicans want voters to believe that this man, who seems to base judicial competence on whether not rulings are issued that favor him, is the person who the Republican Party wants voters to believe has the judgment needed to appoint Supreme Court justices.

http://www.politicususa.com/2016/05/28/trump-insane-racist-tirade-american-born-trump-case-judge.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+politicususa%2FfJAl+%28Politi cus+USA+%29

[boutons_deux]

Republicans Stunned After Trump Reveals That His Presidential Campaign Is Broke

When Donald Trump told Republicans that his campaign had money, it was a lie. In meeting with Senate Republicans, Trump's campaign privately admitted that they have no money and will not be able to run television ads until after the GOP convention in July

When Donald Trump told Republicans that his campaign had money, it was a lie.

In meeting with Senate Republicans, Trump’s campaign privately admitted that they have no money and will not be able to run television ads until after the GOP convention in July.The Washington Examiner reported: (http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/trump-camp-concedes-its-low-on-money/article/2592501)

Donald Trump’s campaign has alerted Senate Republicans that he won’t have much money to spend fending off attacks from Hillary Clinton over the next couple months.

The notice came when Paul Manafort, Trump’s senior advisor, met with a group of Senate Republican chiefs of staff for lunch last week, sources familiar with the meeting told the Washington Examiner.

The admission suggests that Trump will be far more dependent on the GOP brass for money than he has led voters to believe, but it’s consistent with his reliance on the Republican National Committee to provide a ground game in battleground states.

“They know that they’re not going to have enough money to be on TV in June and probably most of July, until they actually accept the nomination and get RNC funds, so they plan to just use earned media to compete on the airwaves,” one GOP source familiar with Manafort’s comments told the Examiner.

Trump is also refusing to use his own money to fund his campaign.

In other words, what Donald Trump is telling the voters is completely different from what is happening behind closed doors.

When Republicans nominated Trump, they thought that they were getting a billionaire who could help the party raise money while throwing his own cash into the pot for his White House bid.

What the GOP is stuck with is a deadbeat who talks a good game that they are going to have to fund in the general election because he is either unwilling or unable to pull his own weight.

Donald Trump’s wealth appears to be a myth, and it is obvious that Trump is using the Republican Party to build his cult of personality. Donald Trump has no intention of giving anything back Republicans.

http://www.politicususa.com/2016/05/28/republicans-stunned-trump-reveals-presidential-campaign-broke.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+politicususa%2FfJAl+%28Politi cus+USA+%29

Donny Trash is trolling, shaking down Repugs! :lol

"I'm the Repug nominee, bitches. You want me to win? PAY THE FUCK UP!" :lol

[Reck]

She said if you run for office you should be willing to debate "any time and anywhere." You can't really defend her for that when the reason she won't debate is because she doesn't want to somehow screw up and give Bernie the 85% he needs in California, which is pretty damn impossible.

Trump isn't a great person, but he has no real reason to debate Bernie. He's probably wanted a conservative or central network to pony up for it, not a tech company or bob arum :lol

What you're saying doesn't make sense.

You plan accordingly with debates. Had this being a close race then she would debate him. But she's like 300 pledge delegates ahead so the outcome of California won't matter either way.

I still think she should have done the debate but the reasoning isn't ilogical imo.

As for Trump, Fox also would have pony up the money.


Sources with knowledge of the situation told Variety that CBS News and Fox News have been in contact with the campaigns about a possible debate. A Fox News spokesperson confirmed that the network has been involved in talks. Meanwhile, a spokesperson for ABC News told Variety, “I can tell you we’re always interested in more opportunities to hear from the candidates.”


Fox News originally floated the idea of a Trump-sanders debate in March. The New York Times reported at the time that the cable network had nearly drawn the two candidates together for what ended up being a town-hall event with Sanders and Clinton moderated by Bret Baier.

If what he was looking for was a heavy right leaning network than it doesn't get more conservative than Fox. :lol

Just admit it big guy. Trump was scared shitless of facing big dick Bernie. :lol

[Mitch]

What you're saying doesn't make sense.

You plan accordingly with debates. Had this being a close race then she would debate him. But she's like 300 pledge delegates ahead so the outcome of California won't matter either way.

I still think she should have done the debate but the reasoning isn't ilogical imo.

As for Trump, Fox also would have pony up the money.





If what he was looking for was a heavy right leaning network than it doesn't get more conservative than Fox. :lol

Just admit it big guy. Trump was scared shitless of facing big dick Bernie. :lol

The thing is, Neither are winning without Super Delegates so it will be a contested convention. If Bernie comes out ahead in California then the first ballot might not be as clear cut as it seems. So why won't Hillary follow her own advice and do a debate?

Also I don't think Fox was going to pony up 10-15m that Trump wanted. When Trump said he'll do the debate, he said it would have to be for at least 10m. Got any sources confirming a network willing to fork over the cash for charity?

[Reck]

The thing is, Neither are winning without Super Delegates so it will be a contested convention. If Bernie comes out ahead in California then the first ballot might not be as clear cut as it seems. So why won't Hillary follow her own advice and do a debate?

Also I don't think Fox was going to pony up 10-15m that Trump wanted. When Trump said he'll do the debate, he said it would have to be for at least 10m. Got any sources confirming a network willing to fork over the cash for charity?

I'm sure if Trump would have really been serious, these networks would have done it. Trump found every excuse in the book to back out.

This thing is as good as done on the dem side. She only needs like 80 regular delegates to push her through with the superdelegates. There won't be a contested convention when a candidate has the popular vote, the most pledge delegates and the most superdelegates. Just won't happen.


Sanders can cry and whine all he wants but he's not getting the nomination. It's pretty asinine to go against the people. For as bad as Hillary is, she has gotten way more votes than him.

[Mitch]

I'm sure if Trump would have really been serious, these networks would have done it. Trump found every excuse in the book to back out.

This thing is as good as done on the dem side. She only needs like 80 regular delegates to push her through with the superdelegates. There won't be a contested convention when a candidate has the popular vote, the most pledge delegates and the most superdelegates. Just won't happen.


Sanders can cry and whine all he wants but he's not getting the nomination. It's pretty asinine to go against the people. For as bad as Hillary is, she has gotten way more votes than him.

I really don't think they'd fork over 10m for the debate, Trump has demanded the networks to give some to charity often since they make so much cash off of his antics.

There will be a contested convention, but probably not a brokered convention. Contested means nobody has the pledged delegates, supers can vote wherever they want.

Anyways, going to be something else watching the dumpster fire of the democrat convention. There's already an occupy movement by the bernie people :lol

[boutons_deux]

...

[Reck]

I really don't think they'd fork over 10m for the debate, Trump has demanded the networks to give some to charity often since they make so much cash off of his antics.

There will be a contested convention, but probably not a brokered convention. Contested means nobody has the pledged delegates, supers can vote wherever they want.

Anyways, going to be something else watching the dumpster fire of the democrat convention. There's already an occupy movement by the bernie people :lol

The dems have already given to way too many Bernie demands. And now he is telling Hillary who she should pick for VP. That's adorable.

Old man had a nice run. But time to say goodbye.

[Mitch]

The dems have already given to way too many Bernie demands. And now he is telling Hillary who she should pick for VP. That's adorable.

Old man had a nice run. But time to say goodbye.

You ready to hop on the train, Reck? :lol

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hgM2xN5TPgw

[boutons_deux]

Dilbert creator: ‘Crazy clown’ Trump has fooled voters into thinking he’s qualified to be president

Explaining that he is a trained hypnotist, Adams said he noticed Trump using persuasive techniques on audiences last summer before adding, “I thought, ‘Oh my god, he’s not a crazy clown.’

Everything he’s doing — including his ignoring of the facts — is persuasion perfection.”

“I called him to be the landslide winner in the general election last year, because the tools he’s using — essentially he’s taking a flamethrower to a stick fight — there’s nobody using the same tools he’s using,” Adams explained.

“So his complete destroying of facts is part of the persuasion because he doesn’t give you targets, he doesn’t give you details of his policies usually. So he’s reducing the number of targets while making you feel good and focus on the things he wants.”

The host and guest went on to discuss how Trump has “branded” rivals with nicknames such as “Liar Ted Cruz” and “Corrupt Hillary Clinton,” simplifying his message for audiences more interested in insults instead of facts or details.

http://www.rawstory.com/2016/05/dilbert-creator-crazy-clown-trump-has-fooled-voters-into-thinking-hes-qualified-to-be-president/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+TheRawStory+%28The+Raw+Story% 29

all y'all Trash-fellators are nothing but marks for Trash's con job.

[Reck]

You ready to hop on the train, Reck? :lol

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hgM2xN5TPgw

I would let that train roll me over tbh.

[Mitch]

I would let that train roll me over tbh.

:lol


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IMkwTcD6hsU

[Reck]

Mitch tell me the truth, this is you right?

http://cdn20.patch.com/users/22423906/20160528/020448/styles/T800x600/public/article_images/trump_protest_arrests_san_diego_police_2.jpg

:lol

[Mitch]

Mitch (http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/member.php?u=36270) tell me the truth, this is you right?

http://cdn20.patch.com/users/22423906/20160528/020448/styles/T800x600/public/article_images/trump_protest_arrests_san_diego_police_2.jpg

:lol

Only if you tell me the truth, is this you? :lol


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oaJgRrkcbfo

[Reck]

Only if you tell me the truth, is this you? :lol


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oaJgRrkcbfo

Damn, Mitch so defensive all of a sudden.

Yes, that's me but I got paid to be a background guy.

[Splits]

Splits (http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/member.php?u=24583) having a meltdown and can't comprehend the RNC-DNC rules


I'd expect nothing less from a Trumpette, lie after being battered by facts and play the "meltdown" card after I just obliterated you.

[Mitch]

Damn, Mitch so defensive all of a sudden.

Yes, that's me but I got paid to be a background guy.

:lol I'm just returning the bants, fuck if I care if you vote Hillary. At least you're not being a retard like w-2 splits

[boutons_deux]

Sarah Palin Invents Bizarre Nickname for Trump

Apparently she means it as a compliment.


http://www.alternet.org/files/styles/story_image/public/story_images/palin_trump_0.png


Where does one begin when a major party nominee comes out and tells Californians that the drought they have been experiencing for several years does not exist? One place is with the woman who, if she did not start the march toward our current idiocracy (http://www.alternet.org/media/idiocracy-realized-how-our-current-situation-worse-film-predicted), greatly accelerated it and continues to pour gasoline on its tinder pile. Sarah Palin was making the rounds for Trump this week, warming up the crowds, spewing what can only be described as some of the most moronic batsh*t the world has ever heard, with the possible exception of words uttered by the man himself.

Here are five absurdly evil moments from the rightward flank this week.

1. Sarah Palin says a series of insane things, so vote for her boy Trump!

Sarah Palin showed up in San Diego to give a series of bizarre and borderline incoherent speeches on behalf of Donald Trump.

In these speeches, she dubbed Trump the “golden wrecking ball,” which she apparently thinks is a good thing.

Tossing a word salad as only she can, Palin said Trump is now “we the people’s nominee.”
Yee hah!

To drive her point home, she added, “Suck it up, cupcake!”—whoever cupcake might be.

More spoken word poetry from Palin:

“Trump came roaring in through this primary, and he blew the lid off the corrupted and corroded machine. (sez the grifter par excellance)

He was like a golden wrecking ball.

He wrecked what needed to be wrecked in order to shine light on the shenanigans, in order to allow us to rebuild because, see, Trump builds things.

He builds big things.

And with optimism. And with common sense. He solves problems!”


The speech led the folks on Morning Joe to wonder if Palin had taken “some bad acid.”

Proving once again that she is not merely laughable but deeply disgusting, in another speech in San Diego warming up for Trump, Palin criticized President Obama for going to Hiroshima this week, calling his visit an “apology lap.”

“You mess with our freedom,” Palin bellowed, “we’ll put a boot in your ass. It’s the American way.”

The crowd lapped it up, chanting, “USA! USA! USA!”

http://www.alternet.org/right-wing/5-insane-right-wing-moments-week-sarah-palin-invents-bizarre-nickname-trump

[boutons_deux]

Trump Ramps Up Racist Attacks On Judge In Trump University Fraud Case


"There is no place in this process for racial demagoguery directed at respected members of the judiciary."

http://www.politicususa.com/2016/05/31/trump-ramps-racist-attacks-judge-trump-university-fraud-case.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+politicususa%2FfJAl+%28Politi cus+USA+%29

[Fabbs]

So back to the Veterans charity, now today (months later) Trump spouts the figure has mysteriously grown to his previously promised 6 million? :rollin

[boutons_deux]

Sessions claims credibility on Hispanic, African-American voters

http://www.msnbc.com/sites/msnbc/files/styles/ratio--3-2--1_5x-1245x830/public/2013/06/ap343531458238.jpg?itok=93ReCS6d



Sessions] is predicting presumptive Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump will attract black and Hispanic voters in the general election.

“Donald Trump is going to do better with Hispanics and African Americans, I am convinced, because he’s talking about things that will really make their wages go up,” Sessions said during a recent interview in his Capitol Hill office with The Daily Caller.


The senator didn’t specify what “better” might entail – he presumably meant stronger support than Mitt Romney received in 2012 – but it almost certainly doesn’t matter. By basing so much of his campaign on racial animus, Trump has gone to extraordinary lengths to alienate voters from minority communities.

Romney won 27% of the Latino vote four years ago and 6% of the African-American vote. There is very little evidence to suggest Trump will “do better” than this performance in the fall.

But what struck me as especially interesting about this wasn’t just the message, but also the messenger.


As we discussed (http://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show/why-donald-trumps-first-senate-supporter-matters) earlier in the year, the New Republic published a piece (https://newrepublic.com/article/61363/closed-sessions) in 2002 on Sessions’ background, which included a stint as a U.S. Attorney, when his most notable prosecution targeted three civil rights workers, including a former aide to Martin Luther King Jr., on trumped up charges of voter fraud.

The piece added (https://newrepublic.com/article/61363/closed-sessions) that Sessions, during his career in Alabama, called the NAACP “un-American” because, among other groups, it “forced civil rights down the throats of people.”

A former career Justice Department official who worked with Sessions recalled an instance in which he referred to a white attorney as a “disgrace to his race” for litigating voting rights cases on behalf of African Americans. Sessions later acknowledged having made many of the controversial remarks attributed to him, but he claimed to have been joking.

What’s more, Thomas Figures, a former assistant U.S. Attorney in Alabama and an African American, later explained that during a 1981 murder investigation involving the Ku Klux Klan, Sessions was heard by several colleagues commenting that he “used to think they [the Klan] were OK” until he found out some of them were “pot smokers.”

Sessions once again acknowledged making the remark, but once again claimed to have been kidding. Figures also remembered having heard Sessions call him “boy,” and once warned him to “be careful what you say to white folks.”

When the Reagan administration nominated Sessions for the federal bench in 1986, the Senate rejected him because of his controversial record on race.

But in 2016, Jeff Sessions is so “convinced” he has his finger on the pulse of the electorate that he’s willing to predict increased Hispanic and African-American support for the controversial Republican nominee. :lol

http://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show/sessions-claims-credibility-hispanic-african-american-voters?cid=sm_fb_maddow

In other news, Latinos, aka Trash's "rapists", are apparently signing up in droves to vote AGAINST Trash.

=============================

Trump’s Wall Backfires: Hispanic Voter Registration Skyrockets In The Face Of GOP Threat
http://www.politicususa.com/2016/04/27/trumps-wall-backfires-hispanic-voter-registration-skyrockets-face-gop-threat.html

[DMX7]

Why on Earth is Bill Kristol still being put on TV? The guy has been wrong on just about EVERYTHING.

[Mitch]

Why on Earth is Bill Kristol still being put on TV? The guy has been wrong on just about EVERYTHING.

He'll overstep his bounds eventually, Beck was just kicked off radio for explaining that he has a fantasy of Trump being assassinated :lol

[boutons_deux]

Why on Earth is Bill Kristol still being put on TV? The guy has been wrong on just about EVERYTHING.

He's wealthy, he's conservative extremist, so he gets around still, even though he's NEVER right about anything.

[DMX7]

He'll overstep his bounds eventually, Beck was just kicked off radio for explaining that he has a fantasy of Trump being assassinated :lol

No, don't worry says Glenn Beck. It was only "hypothetical". :lol

[Mitch]

No, don't worry says Glenn Beck. It was only "hypothetical". :lol

He's hoping one of his hardcore bible thumpers takes the hint and try to pull off a JFK, I think cheeto face needs a few years in the loony bin tbh.

[DMX7]

He's hoping one of his hardcore bible thumpers takes the hint and try to pull off a JFK, I think cheeto face needs a few years in the loony bin tbh.

Remember when he said Obama was a racist?

[Mitch]

Remember when he said Obama was a racist?

Never listened to Glenn Beck until recently :lol

Only conservative talk show / radio I listened to was Hannity and O'Reilly because they're entertaining. Otherwise I just tuned into BBC and WSJ

[Dirk Oneanddoneski]

Wait a minute Reck = white pants?

http://i.imgur.com/tU6Vu9m.jpg

[boutons_deux]

James Robison: Donald Trump Could Save America From Hell

http://www.rightwingwatch.org/sites/default/files/images/a_story_images/trumpheil.jpg?1454447825

Televangelist James Robinson on Friday urged conservatives to rally behind Donald Trump, explaining that the presumptive GOP nominee is ripe for an evangelical conversion and could stave off demonic attacks against the country.

Robinson said in an interview with the (http://streamer1.afa.net/afr-aod/SandyRios/sr_20160527.mp3)American Family Association’s Sandy Rios (http://streamer1.afa.net/afr-aod/SandyRios/sr_20160527.mp3) that if Trump loses to a Democrat, America will be given over to Satan:

http://www.rightwingwatch.org/content/james-robison-donald-trump-could-save-america-hell

[DMX7]

Mr. Trump handled the veteran fund raising distribution poorly but he is a hero none-the-less for making his contribution. Thank you, Mr. Trump!

[spurraider21]

bogus "strong man" macho, blatant BIGOT, XENOPHOBE, trying to intimidate the judiciary

Trump Goes On Insane Racist Rant Against American Born Trump U Case Judge

Republican nominee Donald Trump erupted for a racist rant against the American-born judge in the Trump University case and destroyed any chance that the GOP had of passing him off as anything less than a deranged, self-serving, racist.


Trump said:

I have a judge who is a hater of Donald Trump, a hater. He’s a hater. His name is Gonzalo Curiel.

He is not doing the right thing. And I figure, what the hell? Why not talk about it for two minutes?…

We’re in front of a very hostile judge.

The judge was appointed by Barack Obama, federal judge.

Frankly, he should recuse himself because he’s given us ruling after ruling after ruling, negative, negative, negative.…

What happens is the judge, who happens to be, we believe, Mexican, which is great. I think that’s fine.…

I think Judge Curiel should be ashamed of himself.

I’m telling you, this court system, judges in this court system, federal court;

they ought to look into Judge Curiel.

Because what Judge Curiel is doing is a total disgrace, OK?

But we’ll come back in November.

Wouldn’t that be wild if I’m president and I come back to do a civil case?

Where everybody likes it.

OK.

This is called life, folks.

The judge was born in Indiana, not Mexico. (http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/2016/05/27/trump-attacks-federal-judge-in-trump-u-case/)

Consider for a moment that Republicans want voters to believe that this man, who seems to base judicial competence on whether not rulings are issued that favor him, is the person who the Republican Party wants voters to believe has the judgment needed to appoint Supreme Court justices.

http://www.politicususa.com/2016/05/28/trump-insane-racist-tirade-american-born-trump-case-judge.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+politicususa%2FfJAl+%28Politi cus+USA+%29



How the fuck is that a racist rant?

[boutons_deux]

How the fuck is that a racist rant?

racist, bigoted, whatever.

Trash clearly meant to slander the Hispanic-American as a Mexican, Mexican being a 4-letter word in Trash's mouth, pandering to the xenophobes and bigots.

[CosmicCowboy]

Fuck. I thought Gonzalo was Swedish.

[Reck]

Wait a minute Reck = white pants?

http://i.imgur.com/tU6Vu9m.jpg

Holy fail.

[boutons_deux]

Trump takes the wrong message to the wrong crowd in the wrong way


Republican Donald Trump told a motorcycle rally on Sunday that people in the U.S. illegally often are cared for better than the nation’s military veterans, without backing up his allegation.

“Thousands of people are dying waiting in line to see a doctor. That is not going to happen anymore,” Trump told veterans gathered in front of the Lincoln Memorial as part of the annual Rolling Thunder event, which brings thousands of motorcyclists to Washington each Memorial Day weekend.



The assertion that veterans often receive worse care than undocumented immigrants is demonstrably ridiculous (http://www.theatlantic.com/notes/all/2016/05/the-daily-trump/484064/#note-484817), though that’s never stopped Trump before.

The presumptive Republican nominee was also apparently disappointed with the crowd size – organizers estimated about 5,000 people were in attendance – arguing that there were 600,000 people who wanted to hear his speech but weren’t allowed in.

Trump complained, “I thought this would be like Dr. Martin Luther King, where the people would be lined up from here all the way to the Washington monument, right? Unfortunately, they don’t allow ‘em to come in,” without explaining who “they” are or where these 600,000 people were hiding.

http://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show/trump-takes-the-wrong-message-the-wrong-crowd-the-wrong-way?cid=sm_fb_maddow

==========================

Trump Time Capsule #8: Illegal Immigrants Are Treated Better Than Veterans (http://www.theatlantic.com/notes/all/2016/05/the-daily-trump/484064/#note-484817)

This is not true, and no one who has thought about it for more than one second could imagine otherwise.



A wide range of preferences and programs are designed to favor military veterans, as an incentive to ongoing recruitment and as recognition of past service. For instance: nearly 30% of the total federal workforce, and as many as half (http://www.economist.com/news/united-states/21635478-nearly-half-new-federal-employees-are-military-veterans-what-next) of new federal employees, are veterans. By definition, the proportion of known illegal immigrants in the federal workforce would approach zero.
Well over a million veterans (http://www.ncsl.org/research/education/veterans-and-college.aspx) and their families have attended college with GI Bill-type benefits enacted since 9/11. For most scholarship or aid programs of any kind, proof of citizenship or legal residency is required.
The VA hospital system has had numerous, serious, well-publicized problems. On the other hand it exists (unlike some notional Illegal Immigrants Hospital System), and before the recent scandals it was often studied and cited (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2690309/) as a model of progressive medical practices. Many millions of veterans receive medical care through the VA. Illegal immigrants are not eligible for Medicaid, Medicare, treatment under Obamacare exchanges, or most private insurance coverage and generally rely on emergency rooms or cash-up-front treatment centers.
Veterans can go to their congressional representatives or the press for redress of grievances. Illegal immigrants by definition have a very limited range of rights, and few ways to assert them.


I would go on, but it’s kind of an insult to public intelligence to treat this as a serious claim. (“Donald Trump said yesterday that two was a larger number than five. Let’s examine why this is not true….”)

It was a pure statement of grievance, fitting Trump’s skillful-but-dangerous pattern of expertly reading, and then pandering to, the audience in his immediate range and in position to cheer in response.

http://www.theatlantic.com/notes/all/2016/05/the-daily-trump/484064/#note-484817

[spurraider21]

racist, bigoted, whatever.

Trash clearly meant to slander the Hispanic-American as a Mexican, Mexican being a 4-letter word in Trash's mouth, pandering to the xenophobes and bigots.
how did he imply that his supposed being hispanic or mexican made him less qualified? or less of a human being?

just because you mention an ethnicity that doesn't make you racist :lol... silly boots

[boutons_deux]

how did he imply that his supposed being hispanic or mexican made him less qualified? or less of a human being?

just because you mention an ethnicity that doesn't make you racist :lol... silly boots

Why did he mention the judge was Mexican, if not to slander him, and pander to you bigots?

[spurraider21]

Why did he mention the judge was Mexican, if not to slander him, and pander to you bigots?
you still haven't explained how it's racist

[boutons_deux]

you still haven't explained how it's racist

Wanna get technical? Mexicans are Native Americans, are racially East Asians, so are a different race (yellow).

Above all, Mexicans are not Americans, so Trash panders to white supremacist, bigoted nationalists.

[spurraider21]

Wanna get technical? Mexicans are Native Americans, are racially East Asians, so are a different race (yellow).

Above all, Mexicans are not Americans, so Trash panders to white supremacist, bigoted nationalists.
how is calling a man mexican being racist? do you know what racist means?

if you are implying that calling somebody mexican is an insult, then maybe you're the racist one putting down the messicans

[boutons_deux]

how did he imply that his supposed being hispanic or mexican made him less qualified? or less of a human being?


Euro-white supremacists and jingoist nationalists depend on treating The Other (like blacks, Mexicans, etc) as inferior human beings.

Euro-whites are superiors, non Euro-whites are inferiors.

aka, Euro-white (male) identity politics is the Repug base: low-education, low-info, low-wage losers need to emphasize that others are below them, gotta have somebody to blame for the Euro-whites being losers, while the kids are shooting up heroin, addicted to opiods, etc, etc.

It seems that a lot of that demographic has realized such "superiority" bullshit isn't really helping them, takes them nowhere, so they are killing themselves in historical numbers with alcohol, guns, drugs, shocking the demographers with their declining longevity, the only such decline among all industrial countries.

btw, Trash won't help these Euro-white losers, either. He won't "bring back the jobs" or "deport all the illegals", or etc, etc, etc. It's a lies and con job, suckering the suckers.

[spurraider21]

And how did calling him Mexican imply that he was an inferior human being?

[Dirk Oneanddoneski]

Wanna get technical? Mexicans are Native Americans, are racially East Asians, so are a different race (yellow).

Above all, Mexicans are not Americans, so Trash panders to white supremacist, bigoted nationalists.

They have a little Mayate blood too

http://i.imgur.com/h8UpOyE.jpg

[CosmicCowboy]

Wanna get technical? Mexicans are Native Americans, are racially East Asians, so are a different race (yellow).

Above all, Mexicans are not Americans, so Trash panders to white supremacist, bigoted nationalists.

:lmao

Boo, Mexico is clearly part of the Americas, you freaking racist.

[boutons_deux]

:lmao

Boo, Mexico is clearly part of the Americas, you freaking racist.

CosmicParasite, "Americans" in USA refers to USA, not Canada, Mexico, or south of the border. Do Mexicans or Nicaraguans refer commonly to themselves as Americans?

[boutons_deux]

Trump’s veterans controversy goes from bad to worse

It no doubt seemed like a good idea at the time. In January, Donald Trump was in the middle of a spat with Fox News, so the Republican presidential hopeful boycotted a debate ahead of the Iowa caucuses, instead holding a fundraiser in the Hawkeye State for veterans. The GOP candidate boasted (http://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show/donald-trumps-shady-support-veterans)that he’d raised $6 million for vets, and he’d contributed $1 million out of his own pocket.

The trouble, however, started two weeks ago, when the Washington Post started asking (https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/trump-said-he-raised-6-million-for-vets-now-his-campaign-says-it-was-less/2016/05/20/871127a8-1d1f-11e6-b6e0-c53b7ef63b45_story.html) what happened to the money. The newspaper found that

Trump did not raise $6 million as he’d claimed,

and making matters worse, though his campaign said

Trump had already made a $1 million contribution, that turned out not to be true (http://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show/caught-fibbing-trump-scrambles-address-veterans-controversy), either.

Yesterday, the presumptive Republican nominee held a press conference to set the record straight, though as the Washington Post reported (https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/media-scrutiny-over-charitable-donations-to-veterans-riles-up-trump/2016/05/31/cbb1fecc-272f-11e6-b989-4e5479715b54_story.html), it didn’t go well.

Donald Trump announced Tuesday that he had given away all the money he had raised four months earlier for veterans – and at the same time bitterly attacked the news media for pressing him to explain what he had done with the money.

“Instead of being like, ‘Thank you very much, Mr. Trump,’ or ‘Trump did a good job,’ everyone’s saying, ‘Who got it, who got it, who got it?‘ “Trump said during a news conference here at Trump Tower. “And you make me look very bad. I have never received such bad publicity for doing such a good job.”


Yes, it appears that in Trump’s mind, journalists are supposed to thank Donald Trump when he thinks he’s done something worthwhile.

But even putting that aside, whether the Republican presidential hopeful realizes it or not, yesterday’s explanation for the controversy arguably made matters worse, not better.

The AP reported (http://bigstory.ap.org/article/44c48343f6244ea58768180a94d09429/trump-detail-fundraising-veterans-charities) yesterday, for example, “Phone calls to all 41 of the groups by The Associated Press brought more than two-dozen responses Tuesday.

About half reported checks from Trump within the past week, typically dated May 24, the day The Washington Post published a story questioning whether he had distributed all of the money.”
In other words, four months after his big fundraiser, where Trump touted a tally that turned out to be untrue,

Trump only started cutting checks (http://www.msnbc.com/msnbc/trump-gave-millions-vets-groups-after-media-report-about-donations) to a variety of groups after the Washington Post published a story that made the candidate look awful.

At another point yesterday, Trump insisted, “I didn’t want to have credit” for the charitable donations, except we know that’s not true, either: he obviously did want credit, which is why he held a televised fundraiser in which he boasted about his self-proclaimed leadership on raising money for veterans. There’s also the matter of Trump not actually deserving credit for the $1 million his campaign was caught fibbing about.

Adding insult to injury, Trump insisted yesterday, “When you send checks for hundreds of thousands of dollars to people and to companies and to groups that you’ve never heard of, charitable organizations, you have to vet it.” He even demanded tax materials from the organizations before they became eligible for the money.

Even if we put aside the irony (https://americanbridgepac.org/more-tax-return-hypocrisy-from-donald-trump/) of Trump demanding tax materials from groups while he insists on keeping his own tax returns hidden from the public,

and even if we overlook the fact that his operation doesn’t appear to have done an especially good job (https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/post-politics/wp/2016/05/31/one-group-trump-donated-to-benefits-fundraisers-not-veterans/) in vetting, there’s also the inconvenient fact that, according to the Trump campaign, the groups were chosen in advance in January (http://www.motherjones.com/kevin-drum/2016/05/donald-trump-melts-down-epic-whinefest) – suggesting the vetting he had heard of the organizations and that they’d already been vetted.

So where does that leave us?

Trump said he’d raised $6 million for veterans, but that wasn’t true.

He later claimed he never used the $6 million figure, but that wasn’t true (https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/donald-trump-a-one-man-lloyds-of-london/2016/05/31/1b1c6e42-276d-11e6-ae4a-3cdd5fe74204_story.html).

His campaign insisted Trump had contributed $1 million himself, but that wasn’t true.

Trump said he “didn’t want to have credit” for the fundraising efforts, but that wasn’t true.

He said he and his team were vetting groups they’d never heard of four months after the fact, but that wasn’t true.

And as of yesterday, all of this, the Republican candidate insisted, is the media’s fault. Indeed, Trump thinks journalists should be “ashamed (http://www.msnbc.com/msnbc/trump-gave-millions-vets-groups-after-media-report-about-donations)” of themselves for scrutinizing his claims that turned out to be wrong.

http://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show/trumps-veterans-controversy-goes-bad-worse?cid=sm_fb_maddow

=========================

One group Trump donated to benefits fundraisers, not veterans

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/post-politics/wp/2016/05/31/one-group-trump-donated-to-benefits-fundraisers-not-veterans/

You Trash supporters. :lol :lol :lol :lol

[CosmicCowboy]

Maddog has blown whatever credibility she had when she started. She has become a lying, distorting tool of the far left.

Asking for 401C paperwork clarification before donating money is as standard as it comes. It's not "asking for tax returns". Using the phrase "tax documents" (Bookaki's black highlight) only fools idiots like Bookaki.

[hitmanyr2k]

Trump cares about the vets as much as he cares about Mormons :lol

You have to give him credit for applying his "Art of the Deal" tactics on braindead Americans.

[DMX7]

Trump cares about the vets as much as he cares about Mormons :lol

You have to give him credit for applying his "Art of the Deal" tactics on braindead Americans.

I'm not saying you're wrong, but describe specifically what "art of the deal tactics" are.

I get the "sometimes it pays to be a little wild" part.

[CosmicCowboy]

CosmicParasite, "Americans" in USA refers to USA, not Canada, Mexico, or south of the border. Do Mexicans or Nicaraguans refer commonly to themselves as Americans?

Get out of your mothers trailer much, Boo??

Yes, they consider themselves part of the Americas and they consider people like you in the USA arrogant for assuming they are the only "Americans".

[boutons_deux]

Get out of your mothers trailer much, Boo??

Yes, they consider themselves part of the Americas and they consider people like you in the USA arrogant for assuming they are the only "Americans".

of course they are part of the "Americas", but how many Mexicans, Costa Ricans, Bolivians, etc go around calling themselves as "Americans".

"Are you an American?" "No, I'm Costa Rican" etc, etc.

[CosmicCowboy]

of course they are part of the "Americas", but how many Mexicans, Costa Ricans, Bolivians, etc go around calling themselves as "Americans".

"Are you an American?" "No, I'm Costa Rican" etc, etc.

I will be going to Costa Rica fishing again in October and trust me, If they ask you where you are from and you say "American" they will quickly remind you that they are Americans too. They think it's cool as shit if you tell them you are a Texan though...:lol

[DMX7]

:lmao

Boo, Mexico is clearly part of the Americas, you freaking racist.

Go to England or Germany or France or just about anywhere and if you reference America they will think USA, not Mexico, not Canada, etc.

[CosmicCowboy]

Go to England or Germany or France or just about anywhere and if you reference America they will think USA, not Mexico, not Canada, etc.

You realize that Americo Vespucios, for which the "Americas" were named didn't land in your America, Right?

[DMX7]

You realize that Americo Vespucios, for which the "Americas" were named didn't land in your America, Right?


Go to England or Germany or France or just about anywhere and if you reference America they will think USA, not Mexico, not Canada, etc.

And this doesn't even address the validity of my comment.

[hitmanyr2k]

I'm not saying you're wrong, but describe specifically what "art of the deal tactics" are.

I get the "sometimes it pays to be a little wild" part.

Art of the deal is basically using hardcore salesman tactics to frame the narrative. It all starts with repetition. Trump says "I love the vets" or "I raised this much money for the vets" 100 times and eventually people will believe it, at least the dullards will of which there are aplenty in America. Trump does that with everything and that's really the only way he knows how to speak. Exaggerate for effect. He'll be the "greatest" and fix whatever subject he's talking about. He doesn't give a shit about delivering on whatever he's selling and he doesn't care about the people he's selling to. Just use repetition with plenty of positive reinforcement, sprinkle in some confidence and swagger, plant the seed and close the fuckin deal. He's a used car salesman except in this case he's the lemon and he's trying to convince the American people to drive him off the lot :lol

[CosmicCowboy]

And this doesn't even address the validity of my comment.

Doesn't really matter what random people in Europe think if you are going to defend Boo. The simple fact is the rest of the residents of North, Central, and South America think it's arrogant and ignorant for the USA to claim exclusive use of "America".

[Ghazi]

Trump > Clinton IMO, although that's not saying much at all.

[DMX7]

Doesn't really matter what random people in Europe think if you are going to defend Boo. The simple fact is the rest of the residents of North, Central, and South America think it's arrogant and ignorant for the USA to claim exclusive use of "America".

So we should refer to Manu Ginobili as an American? I think even he would disagree, he is an Argentine.

[Reck]

Trump University might as well be Hillary's emails. Both just dont want to go away. :lol

The latest:

http://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2016-election/trump-university-staffers-describe-fraudulent-scheme-new-court-documents-n584071
Mitch :lol

[Reck]

So we should refer to Manu Ginobili as an American? I think even he would disagree, he is an Argentine.

It is if he has a dual citinzenship.

[DMX7]

It is if he has a dual citinzenship.

He does, with Argentina and Italy.

[TheSanityAnnex]

Trump’s veterans controversy goes from bad to worse

It no doubt seemed like a good idea at the time. In January, Donald Trump was in the middle of a spat with Fox News, so the Republican presidential hopeful boycotted a debate ahead of the Iowa caucuses, instead holding a fundraiser in the Hawkeye State for veterans. The GOP candidate boasted (http://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show/donald-trumps-shady-support-veterans)that he’d raised $6 million for vets, and he’d contributed $1 million out of his own pocket.

The trouble, however, started two weeks ago, when the Washington Post started asking (https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/trump-said-he-raised-6-million-for-vets-now-his-campaign-says-it-was-less/2016/05/20/871127a8-1d1f-11e6-b6e0-c53b7ef63b45_story.html) what happened to the money. The newspaper found that

Trump did not raise $6 million as he’d claimed,

and making matters worse, though his campaign said

Trump had already made a $1 million contribution, that turned out not to be true (http://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show/caught-fibbing-trump-scrambles-address-veterans-controversy), either.

Yesterday, the presumptive Republican nominee held a press conference to set the record straight, though as the Washington Post reported (https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/media-scrutiny-over-charitable-donations-to-veterans-riles-up-trump/2016/05/31/cbb1fecc-272f-11e6-b989-4e5479715b54_story.html), it didn’t go well.

Donald Trump announced Tuesday that he had given away all the money he had raised four months earlier for veterans – and at the same time bitterly attacked the news media for pressing him to explain what he had done with the money.

“Instead of being like, ‘Thank you very much, Mr. Trump,’ or ‘Trump did a good job,’ everyone’s saying, ‘Who got it, who got it, who got it?‘ “Trump said during a news conference here at Trump Tower. “And you make me look very bad. I have never received such bad publicity for doing such a good job.”


Yes, it appears that in Trump’s mind, journalists are supposed to thank Donald Trump when he thinks he’s done something worthwhile.

But even putting that aside, whether the Republican presidential hopeful realizes it or not, yesterday’s explanation for the controversy arguably made matters worse, not better.

The AP reported (http://bigstory.ap.org/article/44c48343f6244ea58768180a94d09429/trump-detail-fundraising-veterans-charities) yesterday, for example, “Phone calls to all 41 of the groups by The Associated Press brought more than two-dozen responses Tuesday.

About half reported checks from Trump within the past week, typically dated May 24, the day The Washington Post published a story questioning whether he had distributed all of the money.”
In other words, four months after his big fundraiser, where Trump touted a tally that turned out to be untrue,

Trump only started cutting checks (http://www.msnbc.com/msnbc/trump-gave-millions-vets-groups-after-media-report-about-donations) to a variety of groups after the Washington Post published a story that made the candidate look awful.

At another point yesterday, Trump insisted, “I didn’t want to have credit” for the charitable donations, except we know that’s not true, either: he obviously did want credit, which is why he held a televised fundraiser in which he boasted about his self-proclaimed leadership on raising money for veterans. There’s also the matter of Trump not actually deserving credit for the $1 million his campaign was caught fibbing about.

Adding insult to injury, Trump insisted yesterday, “When you send checks for hundreds of thousands of dollars to people and to companies and to groups that you’ve never heard of, charitable organizations, you have to vet it.” He even demanded tax materials from the organizations before they became eligible for the money.

Even if we put aside the irony (https://americanbridgepac.org/more-tax-return-hypocrisy-from-donald-trump/) of Trump demanding tax materials from groups while he insists on keeping his own tax returns hidden from the public,

and even if we overlook the fact that his operation doesn’t appear to have done an especially good job (https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/post-politics/wp/2016/05/31/one-group-trump-donated-to-benefits-fundraisers-not-veterans/) in vetting, there’s also the inconvenient fact that, according to the Trump campaign, the groups were chosen in advance in January (http://www.motherjones.com/kevin-drum/2016/05/donald-trump-melts-down-epic-whinefest) – suggesting the vetting he had heard of the organizations and that they’d already been vetted.

So where does that leave us?

Trump said he’d raised $6 million for veterans, but that wasn’t true.

He later claimed he never used the $6 million figure, but that wasn’t true (https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/donald-trump-a-one-man-lloyds-of-london/2016/05/31/1b1c6e42-276d-11e6-ae4a-3cdd5fe74204_story.html).

His campaign insisted Trump had contributed $1 million himself, but that wasn’t true.

Trump said he “didn’t want to have credit” for the fundraising efforts, but that wasn’t true.

He said he and his team were vetting groups they’d never heard of four months after the fact, but that wasn’t true.

And as of yesterday, all of this, the Republican candidate insisted, is the media’s fault. Indeed, Trump thinks journalists should be “ashamed (http://www.msnbc.com/msnbc/trump-gave-millions-vets-groups-after-media-report-about-donations)” of themselves for scrutinizing his claims that turned out to be wrong.

http://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show/trumps-veterans-controversy-goes-bad-worse?cid=sm_fb_maddow

=========================

One group Trump donated to benefits fundraisers, not veterans

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/post-politics/wp/2016/05/31/one-group-trump-donated-to-benefits-fundraisers-not-veterans/

You Trash supporters. :lol :lol :lol :lol



http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2016/05/31/list-veterans-groups-receiving-trump-fundraiser-donations.html?intcmp=hpbt1

5.6 million.
And he definitely did vet them first as I see he didn't donate to that scam project wounded warriors.

[rmt]

The irony of it - golf tourney at Trump's Doral moved to Mexico - they couldn't find another country to move to?

“It is a sad day for Miami, the United States and the game of golf, to have the PGA Tour consider moving the World Golf Championships, which has been hosted in Miami for the last 55 years, to Mexico,” Trump said in a statement. “No different than Nabisco, Carrier and so many other American companies, the PGA Tour has put profit ahead of thousands of American jobs, millions of dollars in revenue for local communities and charities and the enjoyment of hundreds of thousands of fans who make the tournament an annual tradition. This decision only further embodies the very reason I am running for President of the United States.”

http://www.usatoday.com/story/sports/golf/pga/2016/06/01/pga-tour-leaving-doral-donald-trump-mexico/85238620/

[Mitch]

Surely this will be the end of his campaign :lol

Wanna bet Hillary emails will have a far more destructive effect than the Trump University case which is being handled by a judge who donated to Hillarys campaign?


Trump University might as well be Hillary's emails. Both just dont want to go away. :lol

The latest:

http://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2016-election/trump-university-staffers-describe-fraudulent-scheme-new-court-documents-n584071
Mitch (http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/member.php?u=36270) :lol

[Reck]

Surely this will be the end of his campaign :lol

Wanna bet Hillary emails will have a far more destructive effect than the Trump University case which is being handled by a judge who donated to Hillarys campaign?

He has to testify in this case one way or the other. Can you imagine winning the presidency and the first thing you have to do is go to court because of fraudulent acts? :lol

The difference here is that we should know fairly soon what will happen with the Hillary thing. This university scam is going all the way till november when the first of the lawsuit will take place.

[da_suns_fan]

I wonder if there is ANYTHING that would make Trump supporters abandon him. What could he possibly say to lose their support?

This "Trump University" stuff isnt going to matter. They dont care. So he put his name on a phony university. He still wants to kick out the illegal immigrants and kill the families of terrorists. They dont care about much of anything else.

[Nbadan]

PoliticusUSA: Republicans Stunned After Trump Reveals That His Presidential Campaign Is Broke


When Donald Trump told Republicans that his campaign had money, it was a lie. In meeting with Senate Republicans, Trump's campaign privately admitted that they have no money and will not be able to run television ads until after the GOP convention in July.


http://www.politicususa.com/2016/05/28/republicans-stunned-trump-reveals-presidential-campaign-broke.html

[Reck]

Mitch, time to donate to poor Donald. :lmao

[Mitch]

Mitch (http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/member.php?u=36270), time to donate to poor Donald. :lmao

So if I dig up some stuff from breitbart on Clinton, you'll take it serious Reck? :lol

Call me when your comment has a networked news source attached to it, not one that features an unsourced article titled "Koch Block It" :lmao

[Reck]

So if I dig up some stuff from breitbart on Clinton, you'll take it serious Reck? :lol

Call me when your comment has a networked news source attached to it, not one that features an unsourced article titled "Koch Block It" :lmao

What are you talking about?

[Mitch]

What are you talking about?

Bro you just read titles, not click links or look at what news sources report huh? :lol

Click his link

[Reck]

Bro you just read titles, not click links or look at what news sources report huh? :lol

Click his link

So are you saying this story from Politicusa is fake?

OK, let's try other sources..

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3615240/So-self-funded-campaign-Billionaire-Donald-Trump-not-money-support-presidential-run-summer-without-RNC-help-new-report-claims.html

http://www.businessinsider.com/donald-trump-campaign-needs-rnc-money-to-fight-hillary-clinton-2016-5

https://heatst.com/politics/deadbeat-donald-trump-manafort-admits-trump-campaign-out-of-cash/

http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2016/05/report-trump-campaign-low-on-funds.html

That enough? I could probably find a couple more.

:lmao

[Mitch]

So are you saying this story from Politicusa is fake?

OK, let's try other sources..

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3615240/So-self-funded-campaign-Billionaire-Donald-Trump-not-money-support-presidential-run-summer-without-RNC-help-new-report-claims.html

http://www.businessinsider.com/donald-trump-campaign-needs-rnc-money-to-fight-hillary-clinton-2016-5

https://heatst.com/politics/deadbeat-donald-trump-manafort-admits-trump-campaign-out-of-cash/

http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2016/05/report-trump-campaign-low-on-funds.html

That enough? I could probably find a couple more.

:lmao

First two are fine, but I don't see the problem tbh :lol'

Man can just write a check if he needed to.

[MultiTroll]

Trump only started cutting checks (http://www.msnbc.com/msnbc/trump-gave-millions-vets-groups-after-media-report-about-donations) to a variety of groups after the Washington Post published a story that made the candidate look awful.
Does this even register with Trump clones?

Has the media been able to ask Trump specifically about this? Oh I know he will dodge dip and weave, but has he been asked?

[TheSanityAnnex]

Does this even register with Trump clones?

Has the media been able to ask Trump specifically about this? Oh I know he will dodge dip and weave, but has he been asked?

Does it really matter when he cut the checks? So far Trump has donated $5.6 million to vets, compared to what, Hillary's $75,000?

[boutons_deux]

yes, it matters.

I assume, given his history of bad deals and lies, and that he has been asking for campaign funds (iow, he was lying that he was "independent" of donors he's now seeking), that he was going to keep the funds to himself, but a REAL journalist exposed his scheme.

[CosmicCowboy]

yes, it matters.

I assume, given his history of bad deals and lies, and that he has been asking for campaign funds (iow, he was lying that he was "independent" of donors he's now seeking), that he was going to keep the funds to himself, but a REAL journalist exposed his scheme.

:lmao

Damn you are funny sometimes, Bookaki!

[boutons_deux]

:lmao

Damn you are funny sometimes, Bookaki!

CosmicParasite is competing with Darrin, TB :lol for content-free posts.

[CosmicCowboy]

CosmicParasite is competing with Darrin, TB :lol for content-free posts.

:lol better than your hallucination posts.

[boutons_deux]

:lol better than your hallucination posts.

Trash's recent, even long-time, record is the best predictor of what he's done recently and will do. no hallucinations, at all.

[boutons_deux]

New From The Repug Fantasy World, as related by a Trash-sucker

Mitch McConnell sees Republican Party ‘at an all-time high’


for all the talk of the GOP’s upheaval, the Kentucky Republican says he doesn’t think a Trump nomination will redefine the Republican Party in any substantial way. The party is now at “an all-time high,” he said.


That’s not a paraphrase, by the way. McConnell specifically told NPR, “I think the Republican Party is at an all-time high.”

By some metrics, this isn’t completely crazy. Democrats may have taken some solace in the clownish, at times cringe-worthy, race for the Republican presidential nomination, but the “GOP is dead” rhetoric is wishful thinking belied by some raw numbers.

Republicans currently hold most of the nation’s gubernatorial offices, most of the nation’s state legislatures, a majority in the U.S. House, and a majority in the U.S. Senate. The GOP hasn’t seen numbers like these since the 1920s.

It’s really not that surprising that Mitch McConnell is feeling pretty good.

The trouble, of course, is that the Senate Majority Leader’s analysis overlooks some of the more alarming details that suggest the Republican Party’s “all-time high” is a peak from which to fall, not the start of a bold far-right era.


The Pew Research Center published a striking report (http://www.people-press.org/2016/04/28/gops-favorability-rating-edges-lower/) in April, for example, that found the GOP’s public support reaching its lowest point in a quarter-century.

As we talked about (http://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show/republican-partys-popularity-drops-24-year-low) at the time, Republicans have lost ground with women and men; whites, blacks, and Latinos; Americans of every age group; and voters of every level of education.

This year, Republicans are likely to lose another presidential race.

As things stand, the odds also suggest their U.S. Senate majority is in jeopardy, and there are even rumblings about control of the U.S. House.

Republicans have struggled for years to come up with some kind of policy agenda, but on most of the major issues of the day, the American mainstream prefers Democratic solutions.

In a country that’s growing more diverse and tolerant, the contemporary GOP is increasingly dependent on an older, white voting base.

The most popular politician in America is President Obama – whose public support is roughly triple that of the GOP-led Congress – despite years of robust Republican efforts to destroy him.

And against this backdrop Republican voters completely ignored party leaders and handed the GOP’s presidential nomination to a demagogic reality-show personality who’s never served a day in public office.

For all the speculation about Donald Trump’s ability to win over his party’s base, the fact remains that a healthy, vibrant political party in a global superpower would never have rallied behind such a candidate in the first place.

http://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show/mitch-mcconnell-sees-republican-party-all-time-high?cid=sm_fb_maddow

[Reck]

Hillary went ham on this guy.

http://www.vox.com/2016/6/2/11843550/hillary-clinton-trump-risk

[CosmicCowboy]

:lol @ Hillary trying to claim Trump would be responsible for a nuclear war when she laid the groundwork for making sure Iran and the batshit crazy ayatollah's got nukes. What a joke

[Th'Pusher]

:lol @ Hillary trying to claim Trump would be responsible for a nuclear war when she laid the groundwork for making sure Iran and the batshit crazy ayatollah's got nukes. What a joke

Iran has nukes?

[CosmicCowboy]

Iran has nukes?

Reading is fundamental

[Th'Pusher]

Reading is fundamental

"...ayatollah got nukes". You understand the word got implies they currently have nukes. Writing is fundamental.

[CosmicCowboy]

Learn to read dumbass.
Too stupid to understand "laid the groundwork" ?

[Reck]

Learn to read dumbass.
Too stupid to understand "laid the groundwork" ?

Trump is the one making commments about letting other countries have nukes so they can fight amongs each other.

[Dirk Oneanddoneski]

Shit going down in san Jose black and Hispanic Hillary supporters mob beating female Trump supporters

pXbuP19AWDM

[Dirk Oneanddoneski]

How do you embed tweets on here?

[Dirk Oneanddoneski]

Helicopter feed

JE3TYNAR7w0

[Dirk Oneanddoneski]

9ejD0FhuaU8

EmBXNE8gZvI

[Th'Pusher]

Learn to read dumbass.
Too stupid to understand "laid the groundwork" ?

What is the extent of Iran's nuclear capability today, and what role did Hillary Clinton play in getting them there?

[boutons_deux]

What is the extent of Iran's nuclear capability today, and what role did Hillary Clinton play in getting them there?

This must be what CosmicParasite is babbling about

http://www.wsj.com/articles/hillary-clinton-backed-key-u-s-shift-toward-iran-nuclear-deal-1441753099

She doesn't seem to be friendly with Iran

http://www.wsj.com/articles/hillary-clinton-backed-key-u-s-shift-toward-iran-nuclear-deal-1441753099

[CosmicCowboy]

What is the extent of Iran's nuclear capability today, and what role did Hillary Clinton play in getting them there?

Seriously? Do you not follow any current events?

[Th'Pusher]

Seriously? Do you not follow any current events?

Let's take this in pieces since you don't appear to be capable putting together a coherent thought.

What is the extent of Iran's nuclear capability today?

[Th'Pusher]

This must be what CosmicParasite is babbling about

http://www.wsj.com/articles/hillary-clinton-backed-key-u-s-shift-toward-iran-nuclear-deal-1441753099

She doesn't seem to be friendly with Iran

http://www.wsj.com/articles/hillary-clinton-backed-key-u-s-shift-toward-iran-nuclear-deal-1441753099

As is always the case, CC is emotional and has an irrational fear of Iran and their nuclear ambitions.

[Th'Pusher]

WH put it nicely in another thread


a flawed deal, but maybe the best possible under the circumstances. not doing the deal would've left us with less leverage, and Iran with far less accountability and more incentive to pursue nukes.

If HRC laid the groundwork for that, I'm ok with that.

[CosmicCowboy]

[QUOTE=Th'Pusher;8612752]As is always the case, CC is emotional and has an irrational fear of Iran and their nuclear ambitions.[/QUOT

the 8 year olds cocksucker was trying to molest must have escaped, he's pretty upset. It's made him even more stupid than usual.

Enjoying your summer break, Bonnerific? You need to. When you move into high school the big boys will be kicking your pussy ass and stealing your lunch money.

[boutons_deux]

Paul Ryan finds an odd time to endorse Donald Trump

Three months ago, the Speaker proudly declared (http://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show/paul-ryan-gets-stuck-the-republican-partys-dilemma),

“Today I want to be very clear about something: if a person wants to be the nominee of the Republican Party,

there can be no evasion and no games,

they must reject any group or cause that is built on bigotry.

This party does not prey on people’s prejudices.” HOLY SHIT! :lol :lol

And then Donald Trump preyed on people’s prejudices anyway.

http://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show/paul-ryan-finds-odd-time-endorse-donald-trump?cid=sm_fb_maddow

Repugs are SUCH shitbags, their voters, too.

[CosmicCowboy]

Does not liking people attacking other people at opposing party political events, Burning the US flag and waving Mexican flags and signs saying "make California Mexico" makes one prejudiced?

Thats not free speech, thats anarchist fascism.

[boutons_deux]

Does not liking people attacking other people at opposing party political events, Burning the US flag and waving Mexican flags and signs saying "make California Mexico" makes one prejudiced?

Thats not free speech, thats anarchist fascism.

The victims of Manifest Destiny have long memories.

[Quetzal-X]

:lol Tough Shit :lol

[angrydude]

The victims of Manifest Destiny have long memories.

It's called the right of conquest. It's a thing.

Maybe if the Indians and Mexico had protected their borders a little better they wouldn't be so upset now.

[Trill Clinton]

9ejD0FhuaU8

EmBXNE8gZvI

Chickens coming home to roost. I'd like to see the extended version of those vids. We know how trump supporters get down. They started this violence shit.

[CosmicCowboy]

Chickens coming home to roost. I'd like to see the extended version of those vids. We know how trump supporters get down. They started this violence shit.

Trill going full dumb again.

[Mitch]

She has to go to jail, Reck :lol


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ONHhSF9UJSc

[Trill Clinton]

Trill going full dumb again.

Don't qoutes me unless u want to meet up and fight in real life.

[CosmicCowboy]

Don't qoutes me unless u want to meet up and fight in real life.

OOOH WEE. iNTERNET BADASS ALERT!!!!!

:lmao

[TeyshaBlue]

Don't qoutes me unless u want to meet up and fight in real life.

Bring it on, shorty.:lol

[Trill Clinton]

OOOH WEE. iNTERNET BADASS ALERT!!!!!

:lmao

U started it. Remember when u and John Smith threatened me. I'm just standing up to my end. Shoot me a fair one.


Bring it on, shorty.:lol
Lol

[boutons_deux]

‘This is how authoritarianism starts’

Given how little Donald Trump knows about government, policy, the public sector, and public institutions, it’s difficult to say exactly how he’d govern if elected president. But the New York Timesreports (http://www.nytimes.com/2016/06/04/us/politics/donald-trump-constitution-power.html) today that legal experts from across the spectrum believe the presumptive Republican nominee has sketched out “a constitutional worldview that shows contempt for the First Amendment, the separation of powers and the rule of law.”

Indeed, the article quoted a variety of conservative and libertarian legal scholars who fear a Trump presidency could create “a constitutional crisis” if/when the political amateur took steps to implement some of his stated goals: banning Muslims from entering the country, “loosening” libel laws to encourage lawsuits against news organizations, and even using federal regulators to punish his detractors.

David Post, a retired law professor who now writes for the Washington Post’s Volokh Conspiracy, said in reference to Trump’s attacks on a judge he doesn’t like, “This is how authoritarianism starts.” UC Berkely’s John Yoo, best known as the author of the Bush/Cheney Torture Memos, called Trump’s perspective “disturbing.”

And when John Yoo thinks your views on government abuses are excessive, it’s probably time to re-think your life choices.

But perhaps most interesting was the response from congressional Republicans to these kinds of concerns. From the Times’ report (http://www.nytimes.com/2016/06/04/us/politics/donald-trump-constitution-power.html):

Republican leaders say they are confident that Mr. Trump would respect the rule of law if elected. “He’ll have a White House counsel,” :lol

( Maybe dubya's counsel torture-loving Woo can come back, along with psychologists who advised how to torture! )

Senator Mitch McConnell of Kentucky, the majority leader, told Hugh Hewitt, the radio host, on Monday. “There will be others who point out there’s certain things you can do and you can’t do.” :lol

Senator John McCain, Republican of Arizona, who has become a reluctant supporter of Mr. Trump, said he did not believe that the nation would be in danger under his presidency.

“I still believe we have the institutions of government that would restrain someone who seeks to exceed their constitutional obligations,” Mr. McCain said. “We have a Congress. We have the Supreme Court. We’re not Romania.”

“Our institutions, including the press, are still strong enough to prevent” unconstitutional acts, he said.

( yep, just like they prevented the Iraq war, dubya's team destroying Ms of WH emails, etc, etc.

SCOTUS? the "money-is-speech, the BigCorps-are-people, the "racism-is-over" SCOTUS? :lol )


Oh, good, we’ve apparently reached a new point in our discourse. Leading Republican members of Congress are reassuring the public that their party’s presidential nominee probably won’t be a Constitution-ignoring authoritarian – and if he is, there are probably institutions in place to stop him.

Putting aside whether their optimism is warranted, since when does the United States even have to ask questions like these?

The Atlantic published a piece (http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2016/05/the-seven-broken-guardrails-of-democracy/484829/) from David Frum the other day about democracy’s “guardrails” and the degree to which Trump “snapped through” them while undermining traditional American norms. The response from GOP lawmakers like McConnell and McCain seems to be that, if elected, there’s another set of structural constraints that would prevent a President Trump from doing catastrophic damage to our system of government.

Their sanguine posturing is probably meant to be reassuring, but the broader question remains the same:

why would the country elect someone who intends to deliberately put unprecedented strains on those guardrails?

http://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show/how-authoritarianism-starts?cid=sm_fb_maddow

iow, America is fucked and unfuckable, when 10Ms of Americans are suckered, conned by a piece of Trash.

[TheSanityAnnex]

‘This is how authoritarianism starts’

Given how little Donald Trump knows about government, policy, the public sector, and public institutions, it’s difficult to say exactly how he’d govern if elected president. But the New York Timesreports (http://www.nytimes.com/2016/06/04/us/politics/donald-trump-constitution-power.html) today that legal experts from across the spectrum believe the presumptive Republican nominee has sketched out “a constitutional worldview that shows contempt for the First Amendment, the separation of powers and the rule of law.”

Indeed, the article quoted a variety of conservative and libertarian legal scholars who fear a Trump presidency could create “a constitutional crisis” if/when the political amateur took steps to implement some of his stated goals: banning Muslims from entering the country, “loosening” libel laws to encourage lawsuits against news organizations, and even using federal regulators to punish his detractors.

David Post, a retired law professor who now writes for the Washington Post’s Volokh Conspiracy, said in reference to Trump’s attacks on a judge he doesn’t like, “This is how authoritarianism starts.” UC Berkely’s John Yoo, best known as the author of the Bush/Cheney Torture Memos, called Trump’s perspective “disturbing.”

And when John Yoo thinks your views on government abuses are excessive, it’s probably time to re-think your life choices.

But perhaps most interesting was the response from congressional Republicans to these kinds of concerns. From the Times’ report (http://www.nytimes.com/2016/06/04/us/politics/donald-trump-constitution-power.html):

Republican leaders say they are confident that Mr. Trump would respect the rule of law if elected. “He’ll have a White House counsel,” :lol

( Maybe dubya's counsel torture-loving Woo can come back, along with psychologists who advised how to torture! )

Senator Mitch McConnell of Kentucky, the majority leader, told Hugh Hewitt, the radio host, on Monday. “There will be others who point out there’s certain things you can do and you can’t do.” :lol

Senator John McCain, Republican of Arizona, who has become a reluctant supporter of Mr. Trump, said he did not believe that the nation would be in danger under his presidency.

“I still believe we have the institutions of government that would restrain someone who seeks to exceed their constitutional obligations,” Mr. McCain said. “We have a Congress. We have the Supreme Court. We’re not Romania.”

“Our institutions, including the press, are still strong enough to prevent” unconstitutional acts, he said.

( yep, just like they prevented the Iraq war, dubya's team destroying Ms of WH emails, etc, etc.

SCOTUS? the "money-is-speech, the BigCorps-are-people, the "racism-is-over" SCOTUS? :lol )


Oh, good, we’ve apparently reached a new point in our discourse. Leading Republican members of Congress are reassuring the public that their party’s presidential nominee probably won’t be a Constitution-ignoring authoritarian – and if he is, there are probably institutions in place to stop him.

Putting aside whether their optimism is warranted, since when does the United States even have to ask questions like these?

The Atlantic published a piece (http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2016/05/the-seven-broken-guardrails-of-democracy/484829/) from David Frum the other day about democracy’s “guardrails” and the degree to which Trump “snapped through” them while undermining traditional American norms. The response from GOP lawmakers like McConnell and McCain seems to be that, if elected, there’s another set of structural constraints that would prevent a President Trump from doing catastrophic damage to our system of government.

Their sanguine posturing is probably meant to be reassuring, but the broader question remains the same:

why would the country elect someone who intends to deliberately put unprecedented strains on those guardrails?

http://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show/how-authoritarianism-starts?cid=sm_fb_maddow

iow, America is fucked and unfuckable, when 10Ms of Americans are suckered, conned by a piece of Trash.






A bigger sign of America being fucked and unfuckable is the 71% of Democrats who still think Hillary should run if indicted.

[boutons_deux]

A bigger sign of America being fucked and unfuckable is the 71% of Democrats who still think Hillary should run if indicted.

Little Boy Repug has been "crying wolf" on the Clintons for 25 years. Dems and independents KNOW that the Repugs are behind all the anti-Hillary witch hunting.

I'll LMFAO if Hillary doesn't get indicted.

How is she MORE GUILTY than the dubya/dickhead/PNAC assholes whose treason of lies and war crimes got 1000s of US military killed, $Ts of taxpayer dollars wasted?

emails? r u fucking kidding us? :lol

[TheSanityAnnex]

Little Boy Repug has been "crying wolf" on the Clintons for 25 years. Dems and independents KNOW that the Repugs are behind all the anti-Hillary witch hunting

Not all Dems are as ignorant as you.

http://www.salon.com/2016/06/03/the_...rent_to_blame/ (http://www.salon.com/2016/06/03/the_clintons_arrogance_might_be_their_undoing_hill ary_has_a_serious_image_problem_and_blood_thirsty_ republicans_arent_to_blame/)

[boutons_deux]

Not all Dems are as ignorant as you.

http://www.salon.com/2016/06/03/the_...rent_to_blame/ (http://www.salon.com/2016/06/03/the_clintons_arrogance_might_be_their_undoing_hill ary_has_a_serious_image_problem_and_blood_thirsty_ republicans_arent_to_blame/)

Her "image" problem is the same as Obama's image problem: Repugs have been lying about, slandering both of them forever. The truth is lost, the lies get repeated until dumbfucks believe them as Bible truth.

Trump has a horrible image problem, disliked even more than Hillary.

[Reck]

She has to go to jail, Reck (http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/member.php?u=14412) :lol


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ONHhSF9UJSc

Your guy got shreaded last night.

And now he's saying racist shit about that judge and his own party is revolting. :lmao

You got quite the prize. :lol

[Reck]

Mitch (http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/member.php?u=36270) why is your boy so inept putting a simple sentence together without bundling it? :lol

Skip to 0:42

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=37-M_AzPxmM

[Mitch]

Your guy got shreaded last night.

And now he's saying racist shit about that judge and his own party is revolting. :lmao

You got quite the prize. :lol

Yeah, shredded. Hillary says she's going to make a foreign policy speech, just talkes about Trump - mentioned him ~60 times (fact) :lol

[Mitch]

Mitch (http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/member.php?u=36270) why is your boy so inept putting a simple sentence together without bundling it? :lol

Skip to 0:42

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=37-M_AzPxmM

No teleprompter, just gives speeches from post-it notes and people love it :tu

[Reck]

Yeah, shredded. Hillary says she's going to make a foreign policy speech, just talkes about Trump - mentioned him ~60 times (fact) :lol

15 for Trump and 16 for foreign policy. Did you watched the whole shit? :lol

[Reck]

No teleprompter, just gives speeches from post-it notes and people love it :tu

LOL dat spin.

[Mitch]

LOL dat spin.

It's not a spin... 10k+ people watch his rallies via youtube streaming on multiple streams, he gets 20k+ attendence at each rally. It's a fact, people love his rallies.

[Mitch]

15 for Trump and 16 for foreign policy. Did you watched the whole shit? :lol

Yeah, why is she talking about Trump so much in a foreign policy speech? Remember Trump's foreign policy speech, IIRC he only talked about foreign policy :lmao

Your girl is suffering from that rent-free thingy

[Trill Clinton]

Mitch (http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/member.php?u=36270) why is your boy so inept putting a simple sentence together without bundling it? :lol

Skip to 0:42

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=37-M_AzPxmM

What. The. Fuck?

[Reck]

It's not a spin... 10k+ people watch his rallies via youtube streaming on multiple streams, he gets 20k+ attendence at each rally. It's a fact, people love his rallies.

Does every Trump people suffer from stockholm symdrome or what? Anything he does his supporters try to spin like its nothing. :lmao



Yeah, why is she talking about Trump so much in a foreign policy speech? Remember Trump's foreign policy speech, IIRC he only talked about foreign policy :lmao

Your girl is suffering from that rent-free thingy

She gave him a taste of his own medicine, 2011 Obama style. Trump sits still trying to recover from it.

[Mitch]

Does every Trump people suffer from stockholm symdrome or what? Anything he does his supporters try to spin like its nothing. :lmao




She gave him a taste of his own medicine, 2011 Obama style. Trump sits still trying to recover from it.

Kind of hypocritical don't you think, Reck? You're trying to spin Hillary spending abnormal amounts of time on attack trump in what was supposed to be a purely policy speech, and I'm just saying Trump's unscripted speeches are loved by thousands. I'm not making any spin, simply the facts. He's been doing this for months and nobody seems to give a shit when he says controversial stuff :lol

You have to remember these two aren't playing on the same field, Trump can get away with whatever okie doke (:lol) he wants, Hillary talks and she loses ground to Bernie. she may lock this up (99.9% chance) but she probably will look bad losing california at this point

[CosmicCowboy]

:lol old, imagined and stale pedo fantasy from the boner.

[TheSanityAnnex]

Mitch (http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/member.php?u=36270) why is your boy so inept putting a simple sentence together without bundling it? :lol

Skip to 0:42
mSxo9-Z5Ki0Put the correct video in for you :tu

[Reck]

Put the correct video in for you :tu

Trump has all of his supporters spinning shit left and right these past few days. Damage control. :lol

[TheSanityAnnex]

Trump has all of his supporters spinning shit left and right these past few days. Damage control. :lol
I'm not a Trump supporter I'm mainly just anti-Hillary. I just found it funny you called out Trump for not being able to put together a coherent sentence when your boy Obama just iii iiii iiiii iiiiiif iififffiiiiifff iiiii iiiif iiiifwe iiii iififffiiiiifff iiiifwe if we fall for

[TheSanityAnnex]

Trump has all of his supporters spinning shit left and right these past few days. Damage control. :lol
Funny too watching you call out damage control when it's just you and Brian Fallon left defending Hillary.

[Reck]

I'm not a Trump supporter I'm mainly just anti-Hillary. I just found it funny you called out Trump for not being able to put together a coherent sentence when your boy Obama just iii iiii iiiii iiiiiif iififffiiiiifff iiiii iiiif iiiifwe iiii iififffiiiiifff iiiifwe if we fall for

Never once have I come here defending Obama. He does well all by himself.

You may not be a Trump supporter for all I know but you are most definitely attempting a spin by bringing something unrelated to the conversation. I'm unconcerned by what Obama is doing these days.

[rmt]

It's not a spin... 10k+ people watch his rallies via youtube streaming on multiple streams, he gets 20k+ attendence at each rally. It's a fact, people love his rallies.

I'll confirm this - went to his rally at Trump Doral. He really is a great communicator, lots of energy and buzz and they had this TRUMPeter walking around entertaining the crowds while we lined up to get in. I guess this one (huge ballroom) is different since it was at his posh hotel - swanky napkins in the bathroom, fancy cups/water.

[Mitch]

Trump has all of his supporters spinning shit left and right these past few days. Damage control. :lol

Says the guy who spins any word against Trump as some sort of monumental evisceration :lol

[Reck]

Says the guy who spins any word against Trump as some sort of monumental evisceration :lol

Trump is an easy guy to eviscerate. Have you not seen the stupid shit that he's said that has backfired within hours? The man gives ample material to mock and make fun of. He cant get out of his own way.

[Mitch]

Trump is an easy guy to eviscerate. Have you not seen the stupid shit that he's said that has backfired within hours? The man gives ample material to mock and make fun of. He cant get out of his own way.

Trump is bullet proof, none of the insults and negative rhetoric are sticking to him. He can say he is a black man on live TV and still his popularity will rise.

So when you say somebody had a successful attack on him, like you said when Romney had his little anti-Trump speech, I have to ask you if you really believe what you're pushing :lol

edit: also this is what I was talking about earlier and you called it a spin :lmao
http://www.11alive.com/news/local/african-american-singled-out-by-trump-says-no-offense/230792795?aa

[Reck]

Trump is bullet proof, none of the insults and negative rhetoric are sticking to him. He can say he is a black man on live TV and still his popularity will rise.

So when you say somebody had a successful attack on him, like you said when Romney had his little anti-Trump speech, I have to ask you if you really believe what you're pushing :lol

edit: also this is what I was talking about earlier and you called it a spin :lmao
http://www.11alive.com/news/local/african-american-singled-out-by-trump-says-no-offense/230792795?aa

Yes, bullet proof. Like the University scam not going away. Or how he's getting his feet held to the fire now that he's no longer playing in his little primaries.

Trust me, things are sticking to him.

He has peaked. I know you're having difficulty grasping the reality but it gets worst from here.

[Mitch]

Yes, bullet proof. Like the University scam not going away. Or how he's getting his feet held to the fire now that he's no longer playing in his little primaries.

Trust me, things are sticking to him.

He has peaked. I know you're having difficulty grasping the reality but it gets worst from here.

University - nobody cares, probably will be going away since the damn judge wants the documents sealed again (wtf? :lol)

You seem a little concerned about Trump wading trough the media's cow pies with ease, but your girl is waiting for the fallout for all the skeletons in her closet.

Also, one more thing... she's been tweeting about Trump for the last 12 or so hours non-stop

Rent. Fucking. Free
738897355710291968

[Reck]

University - nobody cares, probably will be going away since the damn judge wants the documents sealed again (wtf? :lol)

You seem a little concerned about Trump wading trough the media's cow pies with ease, but your girl is waiting for the fallout for all the skeletons in her closet.

Also, one more thing... she's been tweeting about Trump for the last 12 or so hours non-stop

Rent. Fucking. Free
738897355710291968

You sound like one of those Trump retards these days. I hear he's hiring people now. You should go work for him.

[Mitch]

You sound like one of those Trump retards these days. I hear he's hiring people now. You should go work for him.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PGNiXGX2nLU

[Reck]

Trump is bullet proof, none of the insults and negative rhetoric are sticking to him. He can say he is a black man on live TV and still his popularity will rise.

So when you say somebody had a successful attack on him, like you said when Romney had his little anti-Trump speech, I have to ask you if you really believe what you're pushing :lol

edit: also this is what I was talking about earlier and you called it a spin :lmao
http://www.11alive.com/news/local/african-american-singled-out-by-trump-says-no-offense/230792795?aa

Mitch you know you're my boy but this bullet proof bullshit is just that. Bullshit.

Now I know poll numbers aren't anything yet but this is just to prove a point about the bullet proof statement.


Democratic presidential contender Hillary Clinton has opened up a double-digit lead over Republican rival Donald Trump, regaining ground after the New York billionaire briefly tied her last month, according to a Reuters/Ipsos poll released on Friday.


The shift in support comes as Clinton steps up her attacks on the real estate mogul's policy positions, and as Trump fends off criticisms of his eponymous university and the pace at which he doled out money that he raised for U.S. veterans.


Clinton's polling surge comes as Trump is been harangued by criticisms over his Trump University, the target of a trio of lawsuits that claim it misled thousands of people who paid up to $35,000 for seminars to learn about Trump's investment strategies. Trump has defended the school and said he will relaunch it once the litigation ends.

http://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-election-poll-idUSKCN0YP2EX

And this is just the start. The scathing presser she did was not even taken into consideration and this is also after the State Deepartment came out with their own scathing 80 page assault on Clinton.

Like I said, man. This Trump University thing is not going away in the least. Just like the emails aren't going away anytime soon for Hillary either.

[Mitch]

Mitch you know you're my boy but this bullet proof bullshit is just that. Bullshit.

Now I know poll numbers aren't anything yet but this is just to prove a point about the bullet proof statement.







http://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-election-poll-idUSKCN0YP2EX

And this is just the start. The scathing presser she did was not even taken into consideration and this is also after the State Deepartment came out with their own scathing 80 page assault on Clinton.

Like I said, man. This Trump University thing is not going away in the least. Just like the emails aren't going away anytime soon for Hillary either.

See, Reck, two issues

1. Online poll that isn't based on registered or likely voters
2. It's double digits IF you give her margin of error.

Here's the big picture, I don't see a trend that might correlate to Trump university and also you should address why the judge wanted to re-seal the documents.
http://polling.reuters.com/#!poll/TM651Y15_13/type/smallest/dates/20160524-20160604/collapsed/true/spotlight/1

I'll give you this - She is ahead in the latest polls by 1-3% instead of down like the Rasmussen polling showed. Still, if she's not ahead by a lot at this point... I don't see her getting the usual convention boost.

[Reck]

See, Reck, two issues

1. Online poll that isn't based on registered or likely voters
2. It's double digits IF you give her margin of error.

Here's the big picture, I don't see a trend that might correlate to Trump university and also you should address why the judge wanted to re-seal the documents.
http://polling.reuters.com/#!poll/TM651Y15_13/type/smallest/dates/20160524-20160604/collapsed/true/spotlight/1

I'll give you this - She is ahead in the latest polls by 1-3% instead of down like the Rasmussen polling showed. Still, if she's not ahead by a lot at this point... I don't see her getting the usual convention boost.

Online poll?

This was done via phone with over 1400 registered voters. :lol

Enough spin. C'mon bro.


This latest Reuters poll, surveying 1,421 likely voters, was conducted May 30-June 3. The race has changed dramatically since its last survey in mid-May. It will likely change again, several times, before November. The general election campaign hasn’t even officially begun. It is likely to be a roller-coaster.

[Mitch]

Online poll?

This was done via phone with over 1400 registered voters. :lol

Enough spin. C'mon bro.

Ah, I mixed up the LV and respondants. At any rate, it's not done via phone Reck

Go to their about page

Unlike almost all mainstream polls, the data is entirely collected via online surveys. Online surveys allow us to collect far more data and to be more flexible and fast-moving than phone research, and online is also where the future of polling lies.

I don't think RCP includes them for this reason. Most voters don't use the internet very much (top voting block is seniors IIRC)

[angrydude]

The emails hurt crooked Shrillary 1000X more than the Trump university case. It's not even in the same galaxy.

Ironically, we have a choice between a warmonger and an isolationist. The irony is Hillary supporters are too stupid to tell which one is which.

[boutons_deux]

Establish Repugs, even nasty rightwingnut/Ayn-Rand assholes like Ryan, are so fucked by Trash

Ryan: Trump’s racially charged rhetoric came ‘out of left field’ :lol

“Look, the comment about the judge the other day just was out of left field for my mind. It’s reasoning I don’t relate to. I completely disagree with the thinking behind that.”

But therein lies the point: the House Speaker is apparently surprised by Trump’s racially charged comments, and it’s hard to imagine why.

If Ryan believes the ugly attacks were “out of left field,” perhaps the Speaker hasn’t been paying close enough attention to the man he intends to help elect president.

http://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show/ryan-trumps-racially-charged-rhetoric-came-out-left-field?cid=sm_fb_maddow

Ryan surprised by Trash's bigotry? :lol

[Trill Clinton]

Establish Repugs, even nasty rightwingnut/Ayn-Rand assholes like Ryan, are so fucked by Trash

Ryan: Trump’s racially charged rhetoric came ‘out of left field’ :lol

“Look, the comment about the judge the other day just was out of left field for my mind. It’s reasoning I don’t relate to. I completely disagree with the thinking behind that.”

But therein lies the point: the House Speaker is apparently surprised by Trump’s racially charged comments, and it’s hard to imagine why.

If Ryan believes the ugly attacks were “out of left field,” perhaps the Speaker hasn’t been paying close enough attention to the man he intends to help elect president.

http://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show/ryan-trumps-racially-charged-rhetoric-came-out-left-field?cid=sm_fb_maddow

Ryan surprised by Trash's bigotry? :lol

trump supporter- "whats racist about what he said?"http://i68.tinypic.com/1jt7hx.png

[boutons_deux]

Trash, and his supporters like the KKK, etc, not racist? :lol

Trump Pauses Rant To Point Out Fan: ‘Look At My African-American’

At a Redding, California rally on Friday, Donald Trump interrupted a tirade against the protesters who disrupt his campaign events to call out a black supporter in the crowd.

“Look at my African-American over here,” Trump said, pointing to a fan out of view of cameras. “Are you the greatest? You know what I’m talking about? Okay.”

The presumptive GOP nominee then segued into a story about a black U.S airman who punched a Trump protester (http://talkingpointsmemo.com/livewire/donald-trump-tucson-rally-tony-pettway-airman) in the face at a March rally in Tucson, Arizona. According to Trump, the airman, Tony Pettway, was provoked by protesters dressed in Ku Klux Klan outfits.

“This African-American gets up, and man, he slugged these guys. He slugged them,” Trump said to cheers from the audience.

“He slugged this guy wearing the Ku Klux Klan outfit, but by the time he got up to the top, you couldn’t see it was a Ku Klux Klan outfit.

So when the African-American cold-cocked this guy, this guy never know what happened, everybody thought the African-American was against me, and it was the opposite,” :lol

“He was this great guy, military guy. We have tremendous African-American support. :lol

The reason is I'm going to bring jobs back to our country.”

http://talkingpointsmemo.com/livewire/trump-protesters-look-at-my-african-american

Blacks supporting Trash is more proof that Trash supporters are stupid, ignorant, deluded, conned fucktards.

[TheSanityAnnex]

Trash, and his supporters like the KKK, etc, not racist? :lol

Trump Pauses Rant To Point Out Fan: ‘Look At My African-American’

At a Redding, California rally on Friday, Donald Trump interrupted a tirade against the protesters who disrupt his campaign events to call out a black supporter in the crowd.

“Look at my African-American over here,” Trump said, pointing to a fan out of view of cameras. “Are you the greatest? You know what I’m talking about? Okay.”

The presumptive GOP nominee then segued into a story about a black U.S airman who punched a Trump protester (http://talkingpointsmemo.com/livewire/donald-trump-tucson-rally-tony-pettway-airman) in the face at a March rally in Tucson, Arizona. According to Trump, the airman, Tony Pettway, was provoked by protesters dressed in Ku Klux Klan outfits.

“This African-American gets up, and man, he slugged these guys. He slugged them,” Trump said to cheers from the audience.

“He slugged this guy wearing the Ku Klux Klan outfit, but by the time he got up to the top, you couldn’t see it was a Ku Klux Klan outfit.

So when the African-American cold-cocked this guy, this guy never know what happened, everybody thought the African-American was against me, and it was the opposite,” :lol

“He was this great guy, military guy. We have tremendous African-American support. :lol

The reason is I'm going to bring jobs back to our country.”

http://talkingpointsmemo.com/livewire/trump-protesters-look-at-my-african-american

Blacks supporting Trash is more proof that Trash supporters are stupid, ignorant, deluded, conned fucktards.



:lol Blacks in prison are still feeling the fucking over the Clinton's gave them and any blacks now supporting Hillary is stupid, ignorant, deluded, conned fucktards.

[spurraider21]

Learn to read dumbass.
Too stupid to understand "laid the groundwork" ?
you said she laid the groundwork to make sure they got nukes. perhaps what you meant is she laid the groundwork to make sure they get nukes

when you say "got" in past tense, it implies they have nukes. just because you say "laid the groundwork" doesn't absolve that...

[DMX7]

:lol Blacks in prison are still feeling the fucking over the Clinton's gave them and any blacks now supporting Hillary is stupid, ignorant, deluded, conned fucktards.

Mr. Trump said it best... Some people just can't be helped. Bou2 is just not going to make it in the world of success... He can't be helped.

[boutons_deux]

"Some people just can't be helped"

where do you think Trash would be now if he were born a poor knitter, no father, in a hood/thug urban area, his schools badly under financed, nothing but stress and horrible examples from contemporaries and adults all around...

INSTEAD OF

growing up wealthy, privileged, private schooling, and handed $1M from this father, and given control of a $40M company?

[TheSanityAnnex]

Blacks supporting Trash is more proof that Trash supporters are stupid, ignorant, deluded, conned fucktards.



The number of prisoners grew nearly 60 percent between the end of 1992 and the end of 2000, the duration of Bill Clinton’s presidency, according to figures from the Bureau of Justice Statistics.

Read more: http://www.politico.com/story/2015/0...#ixzz4Aek1EsiJ (http://www.politico.com/story/2015/04/hillary-clintons-criminal-justice-plan-reverse-bills-policies-117488#ixzz4Aek1EsiJ)
Follow us: @politico on Twitter (http://ec.tynt.com/b/rw?id=bKDyiUp9mr3OhNab7jrHcU&u=politico) | Politico on Facebook (http://ec.tynt.com/b/rf?id=bKDyiUp9mr3OhNab7jrHcU&u=Politico)

[Trill Clinton]

The number of prisoners grew nearly 60 percent between the end of 1992 and the end of 2000, the duration of Bill Clinton’s presidency, according to figures from the Bureau of Justice Statistics.

Read more: http://www.politico.com/story/2015/0...#ixzz4Aek1EsiJ (http://www.politico.com/story/2015/04/hillary-clintons-criminal-justice-plan-reverse-bills-policies-117488#ixzz4Aek1EsiJ)
Follow us: @politico on Twitter (http://ec.tynt.com/b/rw?id=bKDyiUp9mr3OhNab7jrHcU&u=politico) | Politico on Facebook (http://ec.tynt.com/b/rf?id=bKDyiUp9mr3OhNab7jrHcU&u=Politico)

weren't you the same poster implying blacks are inherently more violent than other races? wouldn't it make sense for them to have higher prison numbers during a violent time period?http://i64.tinypic.com/97oaxt.png

[boutons_deux]

The number of prisoners grew nearly 60 percent between the end of 1992 and the end of 2000, the duration of Bill Clinton’s presidency, according to figures from the Bureau of Justice Statistics.


yep, the Repugs' "hard on (knitter) crime" shit Clinton swallowed (Clinton also allowed the military to dump $Bs of war equipment on local police, sheriffs) which resulted in huge increase (black) incarceration rate, plus "ending welfare as we know it" SHOULD be enough now for blacks to vote Bernie, but

"Blacks supporting Trash (or Hillary) is more proof that Trash supporters are stupid, ignorant, deluded, conned fucktards."

[boutons_deux]

Trump, Self-Proclaimed Outsider, Was New Jersey Political Insider

Everybody in New Jersey politics has a Trump story. That's because for more than a quarter-century, Trump, a self-proclaimed political outsider, played the ultimate insider's game in New Jersey, where political deals require relationships and cash. With the state's presidential primary on June 7, New Jersey voters will get their first opportunity to vote for a man who has long played an outsize role in state politics.

Trump golfed and broke bread with nearly every major political power broker in the state.

He used sweet talk, like he did with Kean, but he also deployed attack ads, like with former Gov. Christine Todd Whitman.

He spent millions on New Jersey lobbyists, lawyers, spokesmen and political operatives, many of whom then contributed money to important politicians.

This is how he survived business failures in state — and how he caught a lot of breaks.

http://www.npr.org/2016/06/04/480460947/trump-self-proclaimed-outsider-was-new-jersey-political-insider?utm_source=facebook.com&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=npr&utm_term=nprnews&utm_content=20160604

outsider? :lol

If ever in the WH, he'd sign every piece of Repug garbage, and wouldn't do shit for you deluded losers supporting him.

[boutons_deux]

Donald Trump uses Alex Jones as an actual news source

That crazy story Trump peddled about how there's no California drought? You can trace it to an InfoWars conspiracy


http://media.salon.com/2016/06/jones_trump2-620x412.jpg

http://www.salon.com/2016/06/04/donald_trump_uses_alex_jones_as_an_actual_news_sou rce/

===================

California Braces for Unending Drought

With California entering its fifth year of a statewide drought, Gov. Jerry Brown (http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/people/b/jerry_brown/index.html?inline=nyt-per&version=meter+at+3&module=meter-Links&pgtype=article&contentId=&mediaId=&referrer=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com%2F&priority=true&action=click&contentCollection=meter-links-click) moved on Monday to impose permanent water conservation measures and called on water suppliers to prepare for a future made drier by climate change.

Under the governor’s executive order, emergency drought regulations, like bans on hosing down driveways or watering lawns within 48 hours of a rainstorm, will remain indefinitely. Urban water suppliers will be required to report their water use to the state each month and develop plans to get through long-term periods of drought.

Despite winter rains that replenished reservoirs and eased dry conditions in parts of Northern California, Mr. Brown suggested that the drought may never entirely end, and that the state needed to adapt to life with less water.

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/05/10/us/california-drought-water-restrictions-permanent.html

[boutons_deux]

Trump Denies Muhammad Ali Slammed Him Over Muslim Attacks: ‘Who Knows Who Released That’

"I have a feeling he wouldn’t have said that to me and I don’t know that it was directed at me."

http://www.alternet.org/election-2016/trump-denies-muhammad-ali-slammed-him-over-muslim-attacks-who-knows-who-released

feeling? :lol Sound like a Christian Taliban "feeling" one knows the mind of God, and hearing God's words. :lol

Trash supporters! :lol

[boutons_deux]

58 Donald Trump Conspiracy Theories (And Counting!): The Definitive Trump Conspiracy Guide

Topics:


President Obama (http://www.rightwingwatch.org/content/58-donald-trump-conspiracy-theories-and-counting-definitive-trump-conspiracy-guide#obama)

Assasinations (http://www.rightwingwatch.org/content/58-donald-trump-conspiracy-theories-and-counting-definitive-trump-conspiracy-guide#assasinations)

Muslims and Terrorism (http://www.rightwingwatch.org/content/58-donald-trump-conspiracy-theories-and-counting-definitive-trump-conspiracy-guide#muslims)

Syrian Refugees (http://www.rightwingwatch.org/content/58-donald-trump-conspiracy-theories-and-counting-definitive-trump-conspiracy-guide#refugees)

Christian Persecution (http://www.rightwingwatch.org/content/58-donald-trump-conspiracy-theories-and-counting-definitive-trump-conspiracy-guide#christianpersecution)

Guns and Crime (http://www.rightwingwatch.org/content/58-donald-trump-conspiracy-theories-and-counting-definitive-trump-conspiracy-guide#guns)

Immigration (http://www.rightwingwatch.org/content/58-donald-trump-conspiracy-theories-and-counting-definitive-trump-conspiracy-guide#immigration)

Science (http://www.rightwingwatch.org/content/58-donald-trump-conspiracy-theories-and-counting-definitive-trump-conspiracy-guide#science)

The Media (http://www.rightwingwatch.org/content/58-donald-trump-conspiracy-theories-and-counting-definitive-trump-conspiracy-guide#media)

Miscellaneous (http://www.rightwingwatch.org/content/58-donald-trump-conspiracy-theories-and-counting-definitive-trump-conspiracy-guide#other)
http://www.rightwingwatch.org/content/58-donald-trump-conspiracy-theories-and-counting-definitive-trump-conspiracy-guide

[boutons_deux]

While Trump Touts His Properties as a Measure of Success, His Property Tax Filings Tell a Different Story

The oh-so-successful businessman claims his properties are practically worthless. Wonder why.

But while Trump publicly touts the valuation of his empire, his property tax documents claim his buildings are worth significantly less than the frontrunner would have you believe.

David Cay Johnston (http://www.investopedia.com/articles/insights/052416/donald-trumps-real-estate-math-tricks.asp) analyzed several of Trump’s buildings, finding that

in Trump’s presidential disclosure he valued the Trump National Golf Club in Westchester, New York at $50 million

, and indicated he earned $10.3 million on the course in 2015 and 2016.

In tax documents, Trump listed the value at a mere $1.35 million—a 97 percent discrepancy.
Trump International Hotel & Tower Chicago,

originally valued at $75 million, was reduced to a $49 million assessment

after it was revealed—as one lawyer who worked to secure low tax valuations for the building wrote—

“the entire retail space of the building is unleasable.”

Trump has a history of making dishonest financial filings, varying the values of his properties based on who the Republican presidential frontrunner is trying to appeal to, with swings of significantly more than 75 percent. As Johnston points out, while some range in real estate property valuations is to be expected,

the range most assessors expect hovers in the single digits, “not 97.3 percent or even 82 percent.”

The discrepancies between Trump’s boasts about his financial success and what he reports for tax purposes are not just a measure of his propensity to bend the truth, they also have implications for other property owners, as Johnston notes.

Trump recognized that

“the system is easily manipulated to shift the tax burden off grand properties and onto those whose estates are not so well endowed.”

http://www.alternet.org/election-2016/while-trump-touts-his-properties-measure-success-his-property-tax-filings-tell

You Trash supporters :lol are going to get badly fucked by Class Warrior Trash. He won't do shit for you.

But you "feel" like supporting Trash! :lol

[boutons_deux]

Donald Trump’s overt racism takes 2016 race in a new direction

Consider the number of constituencies the GOP candidate has offended and deliberately antagonized over the last couple of days.

Latino voters

Trump continues to wage a rhetorical war against U.S. District Judge Gonzalo Curiel, and the intensity of his jeremiad seems to be intensifying. In an interview with CNN’s Jake Tapper aired yesterday, the Republican candidate was reduced to overt racism, arguing that Curiel couldn’t be objective overseeing a “Trump University” case because of the judge’s ethnicity.

“If you are saying he can’t do his job because of his race, is that not the definition of racism?” Tapper asked. “No, I don’t think so at all,” Trump replied (http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/1606/05/sotu.01.html).

In case that wasn’t direct enough, Tapper also started to ask, “If you invoke [Curiel’s] race as a reason why he can’t do his job…” when Trump interrupted. “I think that’s why he’s doing it,” the candidate added.

African-American voters

Sounding very much like Stephen Colbert’s old comedic bit about his “one black friend,” Trump appeared at a rally in California on Friday and pointed to someone in the audience who caught his attention. “Look at my African American over here,” the presidential hopeful said (http://www.msnbc.com/msnbc/trump-nods-my-african-american-supporter-rally).

Even if someone were inclined to give him the benefit of the doubt – perhaps Trump meant to say something like, “Look at my African-American supporter over here” – it doesn’t explain why he would feel the need to single out one person of color who attended one of his events.

It also doesn’t explain why Trump used his Twitter account to promote a picture of a black family that’s purportedly on the “Trump Train,” but which actually doesn’t support Trump at all (https://www.buzzfeed.com/davidmack/trump-fake-photo?utm_term=.iyRK4XDOvJ#.kqGqgzr5kx).

And just to complete the Trump Trifecta…

Muslim voters

If Trump doesn’t believe American judges of Mexican heritage can be trusted to oversee his cases, it stands to reason the Republican candidate would be equally quick to reject a Muslim-American judge, right? CBS’s John Dickerson asked Trump about this yesterday, and the GOP candidate said (http://www.cbsnews.com/news/face-the-nation-transcripts-june-5-2016-trump/) it “would be possible, absolutely” that a Muslim couldn’t be trusted to be fair in a case in which Trump is a party.

The host asked, “Isn’t there sort of a tradition, though, in America that we don’t judge people by who their parents were and where they came from?” Trump replied, “I’m not talking about tradition, I’m talking about common sense, OK?”

Well, no. Actually, decency suggests it’s not OK at all. Trump hasn’t literally said he only wants white, wealthy, Christian, straight men to adjudicate his cases, but the candidate seems to be headed in that direction.
Trump is going out of his way to antagonize American constituencies and minority groups, not as a part of some kind of electoral chess game, but apparently out of pure instinct. The presumptive Republican nominee is simply speaking his mind, and these are his attitudes in the raw.

What’s more, no one should find any of this surprising in the slightest. Trump reached this point in the 2016 race by emphasizing exactly this kind of message for the last 12 months. His is a campaign built not on conservatism, but on some kind of twisted ethno-nationalism – and the rhetoric from the last few days fits comfortably into the year-long pattern.

The challenge for every Trump supporter, donor, endorser, and voter in the Republican Party is coming to terms with who – and what – they’re tying themselves to. History will not be kind.

http://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show/donald-trumps-overt-racism-takes-2016-race-new-direction?cid=sm_fb_maddow

... and then there's Trash's long, well-documented history of misogyny.

Let's see: Trash in the general elections gets destroyed by losing women, blacks, Latinos, LGBT, 18 - 35, independents.

[ducks]

Rachel is bitch

[CosmicCowboy]

Maddog is the liberal version of Hannity.

[Th'Pusher]

Maddog is the liberal version of Hannity.

Except for the fact that she's educated and intelligent. Rachel went Stanford, Oxford, was a Rhodes scholar etc.

Hannity dropped out of NYU.

[CosmicCowboy]

So she went to college. Big deal. Still a partisan hack like Hannity. They both like pussy too :lol

[boutons_deux]

So she went to college. Big deal. Still a partisan hack like Hannity. They both like pussy too :lol

False equivalence, typical rightwingnut bullshit of "can't defend our right wing assholes, so let's pull down the non-rightwingers"

[Th'Pusher]

So she went to college. Big deal. Still a partisan hack like Hannity. They both like pussy too :lol

While she is a partisan, I wouldn't consider her work to be dull or unoriginal.

Sean Hannity is just a moron.

And :lol at went to college. It is a big deal to be a Rhodes scholar. Stanford and Oxford are top tier schools in the world.

[boutons_deux]

Senate Republican Leader prioritizes winning over principles

TODD: I want to read you something that Erick Erickson, a conservative commentator, wrote for The Resurgent. He wrote it yesterday. “The attacks are racist. To claim someone is unable to objectively and professionally perform his job because of his race is racism. And damn the GOP for its unwillingness to speak up on this…. [T]he Party of Lincoln intends to circle the wagons around a racist. Damn them for that.” What do you say to Mr. Erickson?

MCCONNELL: I think the Party of Lincoln wants to win the White House. And the right-of-center world needs to respect the fact that the primary voters have spoken.

http://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show/senate-republican-leader-prioritizes-winning-over-principles?cid=sm_fb_maddow

Party of Lincoln! :lol

Holy shit, Bitch McConnell typifies the entire Repug Congress, just a fucking, lying asshole, All Politics All The Time.

Does Todd really think Trash's bigotry, racism is something new in the Repug party?

It goes back nearly 60 years to Goldwater, and has been ramped up since then.

[boutons_deux]

Donald Trump claims not to “know enough” about the KKK to distance himself from David Duke endorsement

Jake Tapper stared at the GOP front-runner incredulously as he professed, repeatedly, his ignorance of the KKK

http://www.salon.com/2016/06/06/watch_donald_trump_claims_not_to_know_enough_about _the_kkk_to_distance_himself_from_david_duke_endor sement/

Trash? :lol

Trash supporters? :lol

[CosmicCowboy]

And you fantasize about touching little boys because you were repulsive even as a child that your pedo coaches would not touch you.

I know hannity thinks for you which is why you're a fucking mongoloid piece of shit.

Dude your juvenile made up shtick is old and stale.

The only one fantasizing about pedos is you.

Get over it.

[spurraider21]

Trump whining about not getting a fair shake in court because of race is easily his most liberal position so far

[CosmicCowboy]

The truth about how disgusting you are is definitely not juvinile. And judging you by the very language you have used is not made up.

It's totally fabricated in your disgusting mind and a tired shtick. And it's spelled Juvenile, junior.

[Quetzal-X]

Did that knee ever stop festering?

[CosmicCowboy]

Did that knee ever stop festering?

Yes and no. Still infected but just controlling with antibiotics. Looks like a cure is not going to happen.

[Reck]

I think this guy is finding any and all excuses to bail out of this huge responsibity he finds himself in.

I'm thinking he chew more than he could handle.

[Reck]

http://www.bloomberg.com/politics/articles/2016-06-06/trump-orders-surrogates-to-intensify-criticism-of-judge-and-journalists

Ordering? :lol Mitch, your thoughts?

Pretty incredible imo.

[Mitch]

http://www.bloomberg.com/politics/articles/2016-06-06/trump-orders-surrogates-to-intensify-criticism-of-judge-and-journalists

Ordering? :lol Mitch (http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/member.php?u=36270), your thoughts?

Pretty incredible imo.

Incredible that he told his staff to keep talking about the lawsuit instead of downplay it like Clinton does with her emails? Seems on par to Trump's usual way of doing stuff, tbh.

[Reck]

Incredible that he told his staff to keep talking about the lawsuit instead of downplay it like Clinton does with her emails? Seems on par to Trump's usual way of doing stuff, tbh.

Ordering his supporters like they're drones. You dont order people around like they're pieces on a board bro. C'mon now.

[Mitch]

Ordering his supporters like they're drones. You dont order people around like they're pieces on a board bro. C'mon now.

I wouldn't criticize how a billionaire with fairly consistent positive feedback from his employees runs things, Reck. Rather, we can talk about how your girl treats the secret service who protects her life if you want :lol

[Reck]

I wouldn't criticize how a billionaire with fairly consistent positive feedback from his employees runs things, Reck. Rather, we can talk about how your girl treats the secret service who protects her life if you want :lol

:lol

Didn't that get debunked like a year ago? The repugs are recycling old shit because Trump campaign is dry on money to run against her.

http://www.businessinsider.com/donald-trump-campaign-needs-rnc-money-to-fight-hillary-clinton-2016-5

http://www.snopes.com/politics/clintons/secretservice.asp

:lmao

[spurraider21]

http://www.bloomberg.com/politics/articles/2016-06-06/trump-orders-surrogates-to-intensify-criticism-of-judge-and-journalists

Ordering? :lol Mitch (http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/member.php?u=36270), your thoughts?

Pretty incredible imo.
Shitty article title and it seems like you didn't read the article anyway (I don't blame you). Trump didn't order his supporters

[Reck]

Shitty article title and it seems like you didn't read the article anyway (I don't blame you). Trump didn't order his supporters

That's the way every article/media is pushing it.

https://www.google.com/search?site=&source=hp&q=trump+ordering+his+supporters+to+attack+judge&oq=trump+ordering+his+supporters+to+attack+judge&gs_l=hp.3..33i21.2399.17969.0.18198.46.45.0.1.1.0. 118.3866.38j7.45.0....0...1c.1.64.hp..0.18.1503.0. .0j5j0i131j0i3.nIeq4l_yJBA

[spurraider21]

That's the way every article/media is pushing it.

https://www.google.com/search?site=&source=hp&q=trump+ordering+his+supporters+to+attack+judge&oq=trump+ordering+his+supporters+to+attack+judge&gs_l=hp.3..33i21.2399.17969.0.18198.46.45.0.1.1.0. 118.3866.38j7.45.0....0...1c.1.64.hp..0.18.1503.0. .0j5j0i131j0i3.nIeq4l_yJBA
But did you actually read the article you posted? I think it was pretty clear he didn't actually push any "order"

[boutons_deux]

GOP Rats Flee The Sinking Ship As Top Republicans Are Already Running Away From Trump

Trump's refusal of Republican pleas for him to stop making racist statements has resulted in top Republicans

Trump’s refusal of Republican pleas for him to stop making racist statements has resulted in top Republicans already running away from their own presidential nominee.NBC News reported: (http://www.msnbc.com/msnbc/donald-trump-does-not-have-campaign)

The absence of a response to the Trump U story left the candidate to fill the vacuum with a torrent of demagoguery against the federal judge overseeing the case, Gonzalo Curiel, who Trump said was biased by his “Mexican heritage” despite his Indiana birthplace.

Trump’s comments against the judge horrified many supporters, but the real estate mogul rebuffed efforts by campaign staff, donors, and party officials to back off the incendiary claim this weekend, per sources, telling them he was unwilling to look like he had caved to pressure.

“These are things that will defeat [us],” a second source within the campaign lamented.

The Curiel story made Trump’s already difficult task of lining up surrogates even harder, as supporters like former House Speaker Newt Gingrich, Tennessee Sen. Bob Corker and Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell distanced themselves from Trump’s remarks over the weekend.

http://www.politicususa.com/2016/06/06/gop-rats-flee-sinking-ship-top-republicans-running-trump.htmlalready running away from their own presidential nominee

:lol

Trash! :lol

Trash supporers! :lol

[Reck]

But did you actually read the article you posted? I think it was pretty clear he didn't actually push any "order"

The quotes.

They're pretty close to what's insinuated.

"Take that order and throw it the hell out," Trump said, according to Bloomberg, which is based on the account of two supporters on the conference call.

Hard to know for sure though since this was a "leaked source" that wasn't authorize to speak openly so take it with a grain of salt.

[boutons_deux]

Trump the bungler: A chaotic, disorganized campaign undercuts his key message

One of Trump's core selling points is competence, and the dysfunction of his campaign team badly undermines it

http://www.salon.com/2016/06/06/trump_the_bungler_a_chaotic_disorganized_campaign_ undercuts_his_key_message/

iow, Trash, his wealth, his business competenece: all con jobs, bullshit, lies.

[Mitch]

:lol

Didn't that get debunked like a year ago? The repugs are recycling old shit because Trump campaign is dry on money to run against her.

http://www.businessinsider.com/donald-trump-campaign-needs-rnc-money-to-fight-hillary-clinton-2016-5

http://www.snopes.com/politics/clintons/secretservice.asp

:lmao

Now you're talking like Botox Deuce saying "repug" :lol

The problem with your snopes link is this

1. It assumes secret service agents didn't tell the book author their experiences because it's a breach of ethics
2. It assumes the rumors were pure propaganda from the RNC because they did make up stories about hillary to influence the '96 election

So how can they say it's false? :lol Considering how shitty of a person Hillary is, and Kessler having access to retired SS personnel, I don't think your snopes article holds water here.

[Reck]

Now you're talking like Botox Deuce saying "repug" :lol

The problem with your snopes link is this

1. It assumes secret service agents didn't tell the book author their experiences because it's a breach of ethics
2. It assumes the rumors were pure propaganda from the RNC because they did make up stories about hillary to influence the '96 election

So how can they say it's false? :lol Considering how shitty of a person Hillary is, and Kessler having access to retired SS personnel, I don't think your snopes article holds water here.

How can students say Trump is a fraud? They are going to court to find out.

You can say whatever you want but just because you do doesn't mean its true. If this was true then why is it only one guy saying these things?

Why isn't this book a collaboration between the ex secret services? This is just a money grab.

And if this was a breach of ethics, why is the book even being published in the first place?

[Mitch]

How can students say Trump is a fraud? They are going to court to find out.

You can say whatever you want but just because you do doesn't mean its true. If this was true then why is it only one guy saying these things?

Why isn't this book a collaboration between the ex secret services? This is just a money grab.

And if this was a breach of ethics, why is the book even being published in the first place?

Kessler makes a lot of non-fiction regarding the government, kind of a niche thing so it's not really surprising he's the only one who bothered to write a book on it. Pretty sure the SS agents can't sell their stories publicly and if they got cash, it was under the table or for something else. It can be put on a book because it's free speech, Kessler isn't legally bound to not write about what an SS agent might not be allowed to speak of. I didn't read the book, but I figure the agents were anonymous.

[spurraider21]

The quotes.

They're pretty close to what's insinuated.

"Take that order and throw it the hell out," Trump said, according to Bloomberg, which is based on the account of two supporters on the conference call.

Hard to know for sure though since this was a "leaked source" that wasn't authorize to speak openly so take it with a grain of salt.
thats him "throwing out" an order from his staff, quite different than giving one

[rmt]

Yes and no. Still infected but just controlling with antibiotics. Looks like a cure is not going to happen.

CC, if you want to try something natural - take 3-4 drops (depends how big you are) of oil of oregano 3 times a day (in a little water chased down by more water - it's very strong). If not an open wound (that would burn too much), I'd put some on topically too (dilute with olive/coconut oil). This usually clears up any mouth sores, bumps, even helps with respiratory/asthma/colds.

http://www.iherb.com/product-reviews/North-American-Herb-Spice-Co-Oreganol-P73-45-fl-oz-13-5-ml/7704/?p=1

[DMX7]

Trump the bungler: A chaotic, disorganized campaign undercuts his key message

One of Trump's core selling points is competence, and the dysfunction of his campaign team badly undermines it

http://www.salon.com/2016/06/06/trump_the_bungler_a_chaotic_disorganized_campaign_ undercuts_his_key_message/

iow, Trash, his wealth, his business competenece: all con jobs, bullshit, lies.




Ultimately, Mr. Trump won the GOP primary with his lean campaign. This will all be forgotten soon. Just a blip.

[boutons_deux]

GOP To Voters: Don't Worry! We'll Stop An Authoritarian President Trump (http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/tpm-news/~3/u4eMlBCe5NE/gop-promises-to-stop-an-authoritarian-trump)

If Donald Trump turns out to be an autocratic president, running the country with pen and phone irregardless of the Constitution, Congress and the courts will step in to stop him.

That's the latest and perhaps most flummoxing rationale Republicans are offering these days as the party seeks to justify its support for its nominee

http://talkingpointsmemo.com/dc/gop-promises-to-stop-an-authoritarian-trump?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+tpm-news+%28TPMNews%29

[boutons_deux]

Ultimately, Mr. Trump won the GOP primary with his lean campaign. This will all be forgotten soon. Just a blip.

Trash won against a hilariously weak Repug Klown Kar, and by appealing to you racists, bigots, KKK, white nationalists, goons and loser, rural white men in red, slave states, basically by "stealing" Repugs' 60 years of dog-whistling racist hate and polarization, and making it all loudly explicit.

Trash's subversion of the dysfunctional Repug establishment is historic, will not be forgotten soon.

And his campaign is a real MESS, because Trash is an incompetent mess of a human being.

[rmt]

boutons, he won the nomination against all odds/pundits, and he did it efficiently while spending very little money/staff and making the most of social media. Of course he's made mistakes - he is a newbie after all - running mostly on gut instinct. This really has never been done before.

[boutons_deux]

"he won the nomination against all odds/pundits"

he was running against LOSERS, not "all odds", because he was so freaky, and always ready to spew shit, the media gave him $B of free advertizing.

publishers refuse to re-publish a book on him where he's wife claimed, under oath, that he raped her (for Repugs, there is no such thing as marital rape)

Your blind defense of Trash, who has conned you and won't do shit for you, indicts yourself as a naive, ignorant fuckoff, at best.

[Capt Bringdown]

Ad running in the Sacramento, CA Craigslist for anti-Trump protesters (http://turcopolier.typepad.com/sic_semper_tyrannis/2016/06/httpendingthefedcomcraigslist-ad-recruiting-anti-trump-protestershtml.html)
14.50/hour, natch.

[rmt]

"he won the nomination against all odds/pundits"

he was running against LOSERS, not "all odds", because he was so freaky, and always ready to spew shit, the media gave him $B of free advertizing.

publishers refuse to re-publish a book on him where he's wife claimed, under oath, that he raped her (for Repugs, there is no such thing as marital rape)

Your blind defense of Trash, who has conned you and won't do shit for you, indicts yourself as a naive, ignorant fuckoff, at best.



His opponents were all current or former governors/senators/congressmen - hardly losers. Give him credit for manipulating the media and getting those free billions of dollars of advertising. And my eyes are wide open when it comes to Trump - can't believe I'm gonna vote for someone so against my values but it's all about the jobs and shaking up the corrupt system in DC. For all his faults, I still believe he's the only one that can or in the case of Hillary - is willing to do it - she'll just be more of the same old, corrupt system.

[DMX7]

Trash won against a hilariously weak Repug Klown Kar, and by appealing to you racists, bigots, KKK, white nationalists, goons and loser, rural white men in red, slave states, basically by "stealing" Repugs' 60 years of dog-whistling racist hate and polarization, and making it all loudly explicit.

Trash's subversion of the dysfunctional Repug establishment is historic, will not be forgotten soon.

And his campaign is a real MESS, because Trash is an incompetent mess of a human being.

The GOP Primary, as many in the GOP have said, was an embarrassment of riches (no pun) as far as GOP candidates go.

[DMX7]

Ad running in the Sacramento, CA Craigslist for anti-Trump protesters (http://turcopolier.typepad.com/sic_semper_tyrannis/2016/06/httpendingthefedcomcraigslist-ad-recruiting-anti-trump-protestershtml.html)
14.50/hour, natch.

Oh, the irony... won't go to $15 on principle!

[Th'Pusher]

His opponents were all current or former governors/senators/congressmen - hardly losers. Give him credit for manipulating the media and getting those free billions of dollars of advertising. And my eyes are wide open when it comes to Trump - can't believe I'm gonna vote for someone so against my values but it's all about the jobs and shaking up the corrupt system in DC. For all his faults, I still believe he's the only one that can or in the case of Hillary - is willing to do it - she'll just be more of the same old, corrupt system.

:lol hope and change

[DMX7]

Mr. Trump's comments on the judge are horrible, but I think I know why he is making them. He is going to lose the fraud case and he rather be labeled a racist than a loser & fraudster. As long as he maintains his stance that the judge cheated him because he is Hispanic, then that will be his excuse and it will worked with some and mostly preserve his image with some....

[rmt]

Mr. Trump's comments on the judge are horrible, but I think I know why he is making them. He is going to lose the fraud case and he rather be labeled a racist than a loser & fraudster. As long as he maintains his stance that the judge cheated him because he is Hispanic, then that will be his excuse and it will worked with some and mostly preserve his image with some....

Interesting theory. Then he should have settled before he went to court but I guess he didn't expect the judge to let the original plaintiff off? Maybe most of Trump's defense (video, statements) was from her? I haven't been following so closely since he became presumptive nominee.

[rmt]

:lol hope and change

How'd that work out for those who voted for Obama? Trump's slogan is "Make America Great Again" as in deals and policies that benefit Americans - not the donors and the rest of the world.

[Th'Pusher]

How'd that work out for those who voted for Obama? Trump's slogan is "Make America Great Again" as in deals and policies that benefit Americans - not the donors and the rest of the world.

You're going to be very disappointed in the unlikely event that trump wins the presidency.

[hater]

:lmao Paul Ryan Just signed his political death certificate by calling Trump a racist. Nigga gonna be shining shoes at the nearest airport next year :lmao

[boutons_deux]

"deals and policies that benefit Americans - not the donors and the rest of the world."

:lol blather from Trash con man gullible mark.

His tax policies make HIM vastly more wealthy, not you.

[boutons_deux]

Hillary is "crooked"?

‘Trump U’ scandal gets worse for Florida’s AG


The Orlando Sentinel’s Scott Maxwell noted (http://www.orlandosentinel.com/opinion/os-pam-bondi-donald-trump-scott-maxwell-20160604-column.html) over the weekend that it’s “wildly unethical” for a prosecutor to “take money from a potential target.” And as it turns out, new details from the Associated Press make the controversy appear even worse (https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/florida-ag-asked-trump-for-donation-before-nixing-fraud-case/2016/06/06/46d898c4-2c47-11e6-b9d5-3c3063f8332c_story.html).


Florida’s attorney general personally solicited a political contribution from Donald Trump around the same time her office deliberated joining an investigation of alleged fraud at Trump University and its affiliates. […]

The money came from a Trump family foundation in apparent violation of rules surrounding political activities by charities.

A political group backing Bondi’s re-election, called And Justice for All, reported receiving the check Sept. 17, 2013 – four days after Bondi’s office publicly announced she was considering joining a New York state probe of Trump University’s activities, according to a 2013 report in the Orlando Sentinel.



http://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show/trump-u-scandal-gets-worse-floridas-ag?cid=sm_fb_maddow?

Trash admitted months ago when people ask him for money, he gives and then

[rmt]

You're going to be very disappointed in the unlikely event that trump wins the presidency.

I'll be way more disappointed in the likely event that Hillary wins. Obamacare will continue, more regulations - strangling business. Did I mention that the SEC wants to get rid of leveraged funds - they think that I'm too dumb to know what risks I'm taking with MY money - why don't they just get out of my way and collect the taxes from what I make on these leveraged funds?

[rmt]

CC, if you're taking a lot of antibiotics, it might be a good idea to take some probiotics. The theory is that antibiotics wipe out the bacteria - good and bad - so it might be beneficial (to the stomach) to replace the good bacteria. If you wanna try (or eat a lot of fermented food like yogurt, kim chee, saukeraut), here's a high count one that my family takes when taking antibiotics. Don't take within 2 hrs of the antibiotics.

http://www.customprobiotics.com/custom-probiotics-adult-formula-cp-1.htm

[rmt]

"deals and policies that benefit Americans - not the donors and the rest of the world."

:lol blather from Trash con man gullible mark.

His tax policies make HIM vastly more wealthy, no you.



I suspect that part of the reason he's doing this is because of the estate tax. I'm sure he would like to pass on what he's worked hard for to his kids (as I do) and because his business is real estate, it will be very difficult to continue the business without liquidating to pay the estate taxes. I'm willing to take that chance in hopes of his turning the country around economically. Obama might try to make things sound great but it ain't. From the latest jobs report:

Employers added 38,000 jobs in May, the weakest performance since September 2010, the Labor Department said Friday. The unemployment rate, obtained from a separate survey of households, fell to 4.7% from 5% in April largely due to a steep decline in labor-force participation.

Revisions to previous payroll data showed employers added a combined 59,000 fewer jobs in April and March than previously reported. That brought average monthly job growth in the past three months to 116,000, a sharp slowdown from the average growth of 219,000 over the prior 12 months.

Nearly half a million people dropped out of the workforce last month, dragging down the share of Americans participating in the labor force by 0.2 percentage point to 62.6%. The labor-force participation rate has declined by 0.4 percentage point over the past two months, offsetting gains in the first quarter.

Bit coin is $150 above what it usually is, and China wants to move toward a gold-back yuan - not good signs for the US. Now Obama (and probably Hillary) wants to increase SS benefits and pay with what? Don't they see the big white elephant of $19+ trillion dollars in the room? We should be slowly raising SS age to 70 so that it can remain solvent instead of promising more benefits and hastening insolvency.

[boutons_deux]

On the show last night, Hillary Clinton told (http://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow/watch/clinton-trump-judge-smear-dangerous-nonsense-700286531849) Rachel, “I imagine he’ll move on to women judges because he’s been insulting women so regularly.”

Clinton was speaking hypothetically, but as it turns out, right around the time the Democratic candidate made the observation, Trump’s spokesperson told a national television audience that it might also be acceptable to accuse a woman on the bench of bias on the basis of her gender. The Huffington Postreported (http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/donald-trump-judge-attacks_us_57560111e4b0b60682deb6e3?ncid=tweetlnku shpmg00000016&section=politics) last night:


“Well, it would depend on her past and decisions she made as a judge,” Trump’s national spokeswoman Katrina Pierson said.

Noting that Trump’s sister is also a federal judge, CNN’s Wolf Blitzer asked Pierson if it would be “awful” to accuse her of bias “in regard to some case because she’s a woman.”

But Pierson would not rule it out, adding that “there is no question that there are activist judges in this country.”


http://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show/clintons-warning-about-trump-and-women-proves-prescient?cid=sm_fb_maddow

[Reck]

Trump is a shitty speaker when he's reading from a teleprompter.

[spurraider21]

i was actually listening to the speech while driving home from the ballot... i think he's a raging maniac but it was one of his better put together speeches imo

[Th'Pusher]

i was actually listening to the speech while driving home from the ballot... i think he's a raging maniac but it was one of his better put together speeches imo
That's due to the fact that he didn't write it

[spurraider21]

That's due to the fact that he didn't write it
i'd agree. he's shown to be nothing more than a blowhard like christie when he's improvising

[Splits]

:lol

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CkYvKYsVAAAYSYQ.jpg

[Splits]

No teleprompter, just gives speeches from post-it notes and people love it :tu

That all changed last night after his party neutered him :lol

He backed down real quick, what a pussy.

[Mitch]

That all changed last night after his party neutered him :lol

He backed down real quick, what a pussy.

He doubled down when his party criticized him, I don't think you're following the news tbh. He gives teleprompter speeches on special occasions, not the first time - I was talking about rallies.

[Splits]

He doubled down when his party criticized him, I don't think you're following the news tbh. He gives teleprompter speeches on special occasions, not the first time - I was talking about rallies.He'd only done 4 teleprompter speeches in a year and they were all "policy" speeches, not victory speeches.But you Trumpettes will buy anything :lol NEUTERED

[Mitch]

He'd only done 4 teleprompter speeches in a year and they were all "policy" speeches, not victory speeches.But you Trumpettes will buy anything :lol NEUTERED

Again with the straw man, Splits? I said special occasions, not victory speeches - winning the final set of primaries is a special occasion as is his AIPAC, foreign policy and energy speeches. You're starting to sound like Botox Deuce, tbh :lol

[spankadelphia]

Dems/lefties/progressives are determined to argue in bad faith with you because they're just waiting for the demographics to shift so they can have their Bolshevik revolution. Until then they're perfectly content to lie to your face about their intentions.

It's time to stop arguing with them and start building the gallows.

[hater]

Trump just fixed everything with one press call today. :lol

Nobody is going to be talking about the judge case after today :lol. Pimp

[Reck]

Trump just fixed everything with one press call today. :lol

Nobody is going to be talking about the judge case after today :lol. Pimp

That would be a miracle seem as how the case got moved till after the elections are over. :lol

[Mitch]

That would be a miracle seem as how the case got moved till after the elections are over. :lol

You see the new poll, bro? PA is in play :tu
http://www.publicpolicypolling.com/pdf/2015/PPP_Release_PA_60816.pdf

[Reck]

You see the new poll, bro? PA is in play :tu
http://www.publicpolicypolling.com/pdf/2015/PPP_Release_PA_60816.pdf

Because of Santorum? Muahahahaha

It's going to take more than picking that midget for VP to flip a state that hasn't gone red since the 80s.

[Mitch]

Because of Santorum? Muahahahaha

It's going to take more than picking that midget for VP to flip a state that hasn't gone red since the 80s.

Wut? Just read the raw polling, not the hypothetical, they already said this


Picking Rick Santorum as his running mate wouldn't do Trump any favors inPennsylvania


Also PA has been a battleground state for some time, it might go blue since Bush but it's been within 5% Since clinton vs dole with the exception of 08

[djohn2oo8]

Still following polling after Sanders and Clinton were supposed to be neck and neck in California? :lol

[djohn2oo8]

Trump just fixed everything with one press call today. :lol

Nobody is going to be talking about the judge case after today :lol. Pimp
Again, what minority group is he winning in the general?

[Reck]

Still following polling after Sanders and Clinton were supposed to be neck and neck in California? :lol
Mitch is desperate to find some hope in Trump.

None of the blue states will go red because of Trump. Never gonna happen.

[djohn2oo8]

Mitch (http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/member.php?u=36270) is desperate to find some hope in Trump.

None of the blue states will go red because of Trump. Never gonna happen.
Trump is going to get smashed. You already have GOP senators and backers regretting their endorsements and retracting them. He has had a month head start on Hillary, and managed to fuck up quite considerably even by his own standards. All of this while Obama hasn't even campaigned for Hillary yet :lol

[Mitch]

Mitch (http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/member.php?u=36270) is desperate to find some hope in Trump.

None of the blue states will go red because of Trump. Never gonna happen.

Where's the desperation? I was just reporting a poll tbh :lol

Remember, Reck, you did come to me with polls a few times as well. We're in the same field, reaping what we sow.

[djohn2oo8]

Christ, even Newt Gingrich praising Hillary's speech last night.

[Reck]

Where's the desperation? I was just reporting a poll tbh :lol

Remember, Reck, you did come to me with polls a few times as well. We're in the same field, reaping what we sow.

I used them as a reference point, not a bragging one. :lol

Besides that was for the general elections.

I swear I saw a poll the other day where Hillary was leading in Georgia. We both know that ain't gonna happen.

[hater]

Again, what minority group is he winning in the general?

The white minority tbh

[hater]

Christ, even Newt Gingrich praising Hillary's speech last night.

That's actually good for Trump campaign tbqh :lol

[hater]

That would be a miracle seem as how the case got moved till after the elections are over. :lol

Yes. Trump won even that battle. He got no distractions now :lol

[Reck]

Christ, even Newt Gingrich praising Hillary's speech last night.

He's already getting unendorsed notices. :lol

http://chicago.suntimes.com/news/sen-mark-kirk-withdraws-support-for-trump/

:lmao

[hater]

Trump will also win the Asian minority imo

No way in hell an Asian going to vote for a woman :lmao and their women will do as they're told :lol

[djohn2oo8]

The white minority tbh
Whites aren't a minority. What minority group is he going to win? Women? Nope. Blacks? Nope. Mexicans? Hell no :lol

[Mitch]

I used them as a reference point, not a bragging one. :lol

Besides that was for the general elections.

I swear I saw a poll the other day where Hillary was leading in Georgia. We both know that ain't gonna happen.

Oh come on, Reck. Your reuters poll wasn't any sort of reference, you just wanted to banter over it. Let's be adults here and call a spade a spade.

[djohn2oo8]

He's already getting unendorsed notices. :lol

http://chicago.suntimes.com/news/sen-mark-kirk-withdraws-support-for-trump/

:lmao
Oh there will be more coming. Or those senators can kiss their seats goodbye.

[Mitch]

Oh there will be more coming. Or those senators can kiss their seats goodbye.

That'll make a whole lot of difference, not like Trump ousted two heavily endorsed candidates already (Cruz and Rubio) with just Sessions and fatass christie in tow.

[Reck]

Oh come on, Reck. Your reuters poll wasn't any sort of reference, you just wanted to banter over it. Let's be adults here and call a spade a spade.

No. You know damn well I was trying to make the point that things do stick to Trump.

The reuters poll analysis talked about Trump U and even the recent Hillary speech. That directly effected why the poll numbers went up for Hillary.

[Mitch]

No. You know damn well I was trying to make the point that things do stick to Trump.

The reuters poll analysis talked about Trump U and even the recent Hillary speech. That directly effected why the poll numbers went up for Hillary.

Reminds me you never responded when i showed you it was an online poll, tbh