Church of Trump

[Splits]

Nate Silver needs to retire and let TSA, rmt and ducks take over as poll statisticians. Squirrel-head is acting mentally unstable and driving away longtime Republicans, and you people think it's the pollsters' and media's fault?

:lol

They and Karl Rove have the "real math".

[boutons_deux]

Donald Trump's Campaign Website Won't Let Some Cancel Recurring Donations

As the screenshots below demonstrate, there is no clear option on Trump's website (https://secure.donaldjtrump.com/donate/) to cancel monthly contributions or remove your credit card information: The site layout makes it appear that once you've set up a donation, you may only switch from one valid credit card to another.

There is, actually, a way to cancel — but only if you register your account by setting a password and navigate through a labyrinthine process.

This design flaw first came to light Wednesday, when CNN reporterJeremy Diamond tweeted (https://twitter.com/JDiamond1/status/761015802459856896/photo/1?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw) a screenshot of an email from a disenchanted Trumpdonor who alleged that the campaign has not returned voice message requests to cancel contributions.

https://mic.com/articles/150640/donald-trump-donations-how-to-stop-recurring-payments-credit-cards#.scJmQHCcX

Totally superfluous evidence that Trash is a classic Repug grifter.

[TheSanityAnnex]

Nate Silver needs to retire and let TSA, rmt and ducks take over as poll statisticians. Squirrel-head is acting mentally unstable and driving away longtime Republicans, and you people think it's the pollsters' and media's fault?
Some of us are aware that polls are intentionally skewed to show Clinton favorably. At least Reuters is admitting it

[boutons_deux]

Republicans hope that triaging Trump will save them downballot. (http://www.dailykos.com/stories/2016/8/7/1557727/-Republicans-hope-that-triaging-Trump-will-save-them-downballot-Good-luck-with-that)

In the world of Republican “super PACs,” strategists are going even farther: discussing advertisements that would

treat Mr. Trump’s defeat as a given

and urge voters to send Republicans to Congress as a check on a Hillary Clinton White House.

The discussions were described by officials familiar with the deliberations, several of whom spoke on the condition of anonymity about confidential planning.

Republicans might tell themselves this approach will save them, but hard-nosed operatives know it won’t, because

few voters today split their tickets. That’s why the GOP is considering abandoning Trump entirely—their nuclear option.

But all weapons of mass destruction are tremendously dangerous, and one Republican politico lays out exactly why kicking Trump to the curb might be as risky as bear-hugging him (http://www.nytimes.com/2016/08/07/us/politics/donald-trump-gop.html):

“Do we run the risk of depressing our base by repudiating the guy, or do we run the risk of being tarred and feathered by independents for not repudiating him?” asked Glen Bolger, a Republican pollster working on many of this year’s races.

“We’re damned if we do and damned if we don’t.”


Exactly.

And the fears are so acute that Republicans aren’t merely worrying about the Senate, where they hold just a four-seat majority,

but even the House, where Democrats would need to win 30 seats to retake control.

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2016/08/07/1557727/-Republicans-hope-that-triaging-Trump-will-save-them-downballot-Good-luck-with-that?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+dailykos%2Findex+%28Daily+Kos %29

[Splits]

“They not only changed their formula, to put Hillary ahead. They went back and changed the results, for a week of results where Trump was ahead, and then they turned those into Hillary leads,” said Caddell. “They also erased all the former polling off the site. They didn’t tweak their procedure – they cooked it.”

“Never in my life have I seen a news organization, and a supposedly reputable poll, do something so dishonest,” Caddell continued. “What they have done is, they decided the people who said, ‘oh, I’m never for someone’ – oh, those must be Hillary votes. They used to be Trump voters.”


Why Reuters is changing it poll
http://mobile.reuters.com/article/idUSKCN10910T

Linking to the Reuters article, pretending the "Caddell analysis" is from that link when, in fact, it is from fucking breitbart and you didn't post the link :lmao

Fucking dishonest piece of shit.

[TheSanityAnnex]

Linking to the Reuters article, pretending the "Caddell analysis" is from that link when, in fact, it is from fucking breitbart and you didn't post the link :lmao

Fucking dishonest piece of shit.

Why would I "pretend" his analysis trashing their tweaks is from from Reuters, and then bold and provide the actual Reuters article?

You try too hard sometimes. Put that some of that effort into discussing whether or not their tweaks to the polls are ethical, which you failed to do the first time. What you are doing now is no different than trying to shift focus from the contents of the hacked DNC emails to who hacked them.

[TheSanityAnnex]

rmt was correct in you having both a math and reading comprehension problem.

[Dirk Oneanddoneski]

Nate Silver needs to retire

You're right

http://i.imgur.com/PYzsTc8.jpg

[DMX7]

Mr. Trump doesn't need this. He gives and he gives and he gives. And all he asks in return is to be made President of the United States.

[ducks]

http://offtrade.info/cnmnews/tag/polls-rigged-by-media/

[Reck]

Citing 2015 Gallup is cherrypicking useless information. The chart above is "poll of polls" the past 8 years. The smallest spread was +5D in May 2011.

Last 2 Presidential election cycles were +6D and +7D. So +10D in a single poll after Trump has had the worst two weeks in his entire campaign and the party is split on a drastic fault line, is completely reasonable and/or within the margin of error. It isn't some grand conspiracy.

Yes, I dont get where the 2015 poll came from.

That other retard TSA is even worse though.

He passes links from breitbart and those far right sites as legit on here.

I read into the reuters supposed skewed results and to a point, he's right. They lean democrat pretty good but they got to 8 points because they made the voters pick either Trump or Hillary. No other third party, no undecided, no sitting this one out.

Imo they did their job. Unlike Rasmussen who goes to great lenght to not push leaners. :lol

But either way, you take Reuters poll away and even this new ABC/Washington Post poll and she still holds a 5-7 point lead.

http://i68.tinypic.com/2rrwjuo.jpg

You cannot spin this. It's inescapable fact.

Leave it to dumbfucks like TSA and ducks to come up with wierd conspiracy theories that explains why Hillary is winning.

[TheSanityAnnex]

Yes, I dont get where the 2015 poll came from.

That other retard TSA is even worse though.

He passes links from breitbart and those far right sites as legit on here.

I read into the reuters supposed skewed results and to a point, he's right. They lean democrat pretty good but they got to 8 points because they made the voters pick either Trump or Hillary. No other third party, no undecided, no sitting this one out.

Imo they did their job. Unlike Rasmussen who goes to great lenght to not push leaners. :lol

But either way, you take Reuters poll away and even this new ABC/Washington Post poll and she still holds a 5-7 point lead.

http://i68.tinypic.com/2rrwjuo.jpg

You cannot spin this. It's inescapable fact.

Leave it to dumbfucks like TSA and ducks to come up with wierd conspiracy theories that explains why Hillary is winning.
:lol "Reuters supposed skewed results" :lol

for fucks sake Reuters clearly admitted to skewing results, they even showed the changes and scraped previous polls

[TheSanityAnnex]

Reck who figured out rmt's math was right first Splits or you?

[Reck]

:lol "Reuters supposed skewed results" :lol

for fucks sake Reuters clearly admitted to skewing results, they even showed the changes and scraped previous polls

Like I said, I will throw away not only the Reuters poll but the Washington Post as well.

Explain the others. More specially, explain why Fox has her up 10. Fucking Fox. :lol

[boutons_deux]

SALMA HAYEK OFFERS TO LEND DONALD TRUMP HER COPY OF 'U.S. HISTORY FOR DUMMIES'


https://scontent-atl3-1.xx.fbcdn.net/t31.0-8/13925802_636466316524694_6105158012845248117_o.jpg

http://www.latina.com/entertainment/celebrity/salma-hayek-offers-trump-copy-us-history-dummies

:lol

Trash and Trash supporters are fucking ridiculous fools. :lol

[Splits]

Why would I "pretend" his analysis trashing their tweaks is from from Reuters, and then bold and provide the actual Reuters article?

The better question is: why didn't you link the breitb:lolrt "analysis" that you copypasted?

Maybe you could post some WND, NewsMax, and DC "articles" to backup this brilliant "analysis".

[Reck]

Because you are a scared worthless cocksucker that has no original thoughts of your own. You realize that you're a piece of shit, and lie like the pieces of shit that think for you

retard is the stupidest person alive, and a disgusting racist but is at least just a piece of shit, fucking mongoloid stupid, but not a dishonest piece of shit

You got your shit pushed in yet again. Now go call your thinkers so they can tell you how to weasel out of this with some bullshit semantic argument....actually just kill yourself.

You may be on to something.

After my last post where I gave him a couple of caveats and challenged him to explain why Hillary is still ahead by 10 points on a Fox News poll and he still hasn't responded.

:lol cuck

[Splits]

rmt was correct in you having both a math and reading comprehension problem.

Other than the fact that I responded to her :cry they're over-sampling Dems by 43.4% :cry simpleton take with a comprehensive, numbers-based smackdown, to which neither you nor her chose to respond.

[Splits]

Some of us are aware that polls are intentionally skewed to show Clinton favorably. At least Reuters is admitting it

:lmao based on what evidence?

:cry so much red +R last cycle the media must be compensating this cycle :cry

https://static01.nyt.com/images/2012/11/10/us/politics/fivethirtyeight-1110-accuracy2012-2/fivethirtyeight-1110-accuracy2012-2-blog480.png

CONSPIRACY!

[ducks]

George P. Bush, a Trump Holdout, Urges Support For Nominee
https://www.texastribune.org/2016/08/07/george-p-bush-trump-holdout-urges-support-him/

[Splits]

George P. Bush, a Trump Holdout, Urges Support For Nominee
https://www.texastribune.org/2016/08/07/george-p-bush-trump-holdout-urges-support-him/

Oh noes, an endorsement from the establishment!

[rmt]

Other than the fact that I responded to her :cry they're over-sampling Dems by 43.4% :cry simpleton take with a comprehensive, numbers-based smackdown, to which neither you nor her chose to respond.

The WP/ABC poll didn't over-sample Dems by 43.4%. They over-sampled Dems by 43.4% - 11.5% (from the 2015 Gallup I picked up) = 31.9%. I used a January 11, 2016 Gallup poll with over 12k adults with "This elevated percentage of political independents leaves Democratic (29%) and Republican (26%) identification at or near recent low points, with the modest Democratic advantage roughly where it has been over the past five years." Meaning the difference between 29 and 26 is 3 (3 divided by 26 is 11.5) so for approximately the past 5 years there are about 11.5% more people identifying as Democrats than as Republicans. So for this WP/ABC, they over-sampled Dems by 31.9% which is quite significant.

Using your poll of polls and latest numbers, 35.8 - 28.7 = 7.1 7.1/28.7 = 24.7 43.4 - 24.7 = 18.7% Democrats over-sampled (which is still significant).

I was only clearing up the math for ducks and Reck. You chose to ignore my comment about it being too early to be obsessing about polls, insult my homeschooling (math) and bring my kids into this.

[Splits]

Yes, I dont get where the 2015 poll came from.

That other retard TSA is even worse though.

He passes links from breitbart and those far right sites as legit on here.

I read into the reuters supposed skewed results and to a point, he's right. They lean democrat pretty good but they got to 8 points because they made the voters pick either Trump or Hillary. No other third party, no undecided, no sitting this one out.

Imo they did their job. Unlike Rasmussen who goes to great lenght to not push leaners. :lol

But either way, you take Reuters poll away and even this new ABC/Washington Post poll and she still holds a 5-7 point lead.

http://i68.tinypic.com/2rrwjuo.jpg

You cannot spin this. It's inescapable fact.

Leave it to dumbfucks like TSA and ducks to come up with wierd conspiracy theories that explains why Hillary is winning.

Facts:

1) Any poll which poses Trump v. Clinton without the 3rd party candidates is not as credible as those which provide Lib and Green alternatives since Lib/Green will be on the ballot in all 50 states

2) The polls which have both h2h and all 4 parties on the ballot trend towards Trump losing by 1-2 points less when all 4 are on the ballot. The 3rd party voters take away from both R&D, but slightly a bit more from D.

3) No single poll before Labor day is meaningful in and of itself. The trends are somewhat meaningful, but you can't conclude anything this far out

4) Given 1-3, Shillary is clearly ahead right now, has a clear path to the presidency through the electoral college, and it isn't really disputable considering Republican leaders are scrambling to find ways to salvage their asses from the writing on the wall that they see for themselves

If I had to predict RIGHT NOW, I'd say

1) Trump's ceiling is 39% and will get beat by 11 points with 3rd parties taking up another 11 points.
2) Dems take 8 senate seats
3) Repubs hold the house by 8-12 seats

[Reck]

Oh noes, an endorsement from the establishment!

Jeb's son.

Jeb is such a failure as a man he cant even get sympathy from his own son. I mean, think about it. The son is voting for Trump after Trump took Jeb's manhood from him. How the fuck does that happen?

Beta family. :lol

[Splits]

The WP/ABC poll didn't over-sample Dems by 43.4%. They over-sampled Dems by 43.4% - 11.5% (from the 2015 Gallup I picked up) = 31.9%. I used a January 11, 2016 Gallup poll with over 12k adults with "This elevated percentage of political independents leaves Democratic (29%) and Republican (26%) identification at or near recent low points, with the modest Democratic advantage roughly where it has been over the past five years." Meaning the difference between 29 and 26 is 3 (3 divided by 26 is 11.5) so for approximately the past 5 years there are about 11.5% more people identifying as Democrats than as Republicans. So for this WP/ABC, they over-sampled Dems by 31.9% which is quite significant.

Using your poll of polls and latest numbers, 35.8 - 28.7 = 7.1 7.1/28.7 = 24.7 43.4 - 24.7 = 18.7% Democrats over-sampled (which is still significant).

I was only clearing up the math for ducks and Reck. You chose to ignore my comment about it being too early to be obsessing about polls, insult my homeschooling (math) and bring my kids into this.

Ok, genius. I'll insult your homeschooling because you think it's inappropriate for teachers to mention the term "climate change" in chemistry class.

Now, on to your numbers...

First of all, the Gallup numbers you keep quoting are absolutely meaningless, I don't know why you keep inserting them into this conversation. Especially when Gallup was +R7 in 2012. The numbers from the 8-year chart I posted are not "my" numbers, they are "the" numbers. It isn't an individual pollster or someone sticking their finger in the air and measuring the partisan temperature on any given day. Those are the aggregate numbers from all pollsters and actual elections over an 8 year time period. They have vacillated from +D10.5 to +D5 over the last 8 years. They currently stand at +D7.1.

Furthermore, let's pretend that the +D2.9 (10-7.1) is "bias" in this particular poll, which I would normally object to since there is demonstrable evidence that Trump attacking the Khans and his own party leadership will have a negative staying power, but let's just pretend for your little mind game that the accurate party affiliation is +D7.1.

So we have a difference of +D2.9 but with only 56% (33-23) of voters identifying with R or D and the other 44% identifying as independent/other. The poll you have such great consternation with is +D10 and shows Shill 50 Trump 42.

Using your incredible mathematical deduction skills, tell me what the poll results should be.

[Spurminator]

Guys, polls don't matter...

762497721831874561

[rmt]

Guys, polls don't matter...

762497721831874561

The polls might not be correct but my math is (no offense to you).

[boutons_deux]

The polls might not be correct but my math is (no offense to you).

math is the least of your problems. You, and others, supporting Trash is your hilarious problem.

[boutons_deux]

https://scontent-dft4-2.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/13938586_10153664703567595_3865291749739130821_n.j pg?oh=3fd3843f730e880d84b7fd239710f0a5&oe=585862E9

[hater]

Agree this is just another case of poll manipulation to control a society folks. Good news is this almost never works. Didn't work on the brexit vote.

It wont work this time.

[RandomGuy]

Facts:

1) Any poll which poses Trump v. Clinton without the 3rd party candidates is not as credible as those which provide Lib and Green alternatives since Lib/Green will be on the ballot in all 50 states

2) The polls which have both h2h and all 4 parties on the ballot trend towards Trump losing by 1-2 points less when all 4 are on the ballot. The 3rd party voters take away from both R&D, but slightly a bit more from D.

3) No single poll before Labor day is meaningful in and of itself. The trends are somewhat meaningful, but you can't conclude anything this far out

4) Given 1-3, Shillary is clearly ahead right now, has a clear path to the presidency through the electoral college, and it isn't really disputable considering Republican leaders are scrambling to find ways to salvage their asses from the writing on the wall that they see for themselves

If I had to predict RIGHT NOW, I'd say

1) Trump's ceiling is 39% and will get beat by 11 points with 3rd parties taking up another 11 points.
2) Dems take 8 senate seats
3) Repubs hold the house by 8-12 seats

http://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/2016-election-forecast/?ex_cid=rrpromo

The post convention bump hit Trump pretty hard. 82% chance of clinton win at the moment.

[RandomGuy]

The WP/ABC poll didn't over-sample Dems by 43.4%. They over-sampled Dems by 43.4% - 11.5% (from the 2015 Gallup I picked up) = 31.9%. I used a January 11, 2016 Gallup poll with over 12k adults with "This elevated percentage of political independents leaves Democratic (29%) and Republican (26%) identification at or near recent low points, with the modest Democratic advantage roughly where it has been over the past five years." Meaning the difference between 29 and 26 is 3 (3 divided by 26 is 11.5) so for approximately the past 5 years there are about 11.5% more people identifying as Democrats than as Republicans. So for this WP/ABC, they over-sampled Dems by 31.9% which is quite significant.

Using your poll of polls and latest numbers, 35.8 - 28.7 = 7.1 7.1/28.7 = 24.7 43.4 - 24.7 = 18.7% Democrats over-sampled (which is still significant).

I was only clearing up the math for ducks and Reck. You chose to ignore my comment about it being too early to be obsessing about polls, insult my homeschooling (math) and bring my kids into this.

It is too early. We have weeks and weeks for Trump to keep saying morally bankrupt things and have each one of those hammered home.


“He’s not a war hero,” said Trump. “He was a war hero because he was captured. I like people who weren’t captured.”

Personally implying that a guy who was tortured for years isn't a war hero, pretty much disqualifies you from being a commander.

[RandomGuy]

Or maybe there is the fact that Trump is now being used as a propaganda tool:
http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2016/may/20/hillary-clinton/donald-trump-now-being-used-terrorist-propaganda-v/


I have said it before, and I will repeat:

You can't discredit the idea you are evil, by doing evil, and Trump actively advocates war crimes. Something else to consider when giving him command of our armed forces.

http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2015/dec/17/rand-paul/rand-pauls-right-geneva-conventions-bar-donald-tru/

[boutons_deux]

George W. Bush administration official announces support for Clinton over Trump

Lezlee Westine, a former aide to President George W. Bush, will support Hillary Clinton for president.

Westine, who served as the Bush administration's White House director of public liaison and deputy assistant to the president, is one of several Republican figures to publicly announce their support for Clinton in recent weeks.

“Our nation faces a unique set of challenges that require steady and experienced leadership," Westine said in a statement. "That is why today I am personally supporting Hillary Clinton.

"She has the expertise and commitment to American values to grow the economy, create jobs and protect America at home and abroad," she said.

She joins a growing list of conservatives in the business, foreign policy and political spheres who have come out in support of Clinton.

On Sunday, the political director in the Reagan administration — Frank Lavin — wrote in a commentary for CNN that he could not support Republican nominee Donald Trump and would vote for Clinton instead.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/post-politics/wp/2016/08/08/george-w-bush-administration-official-announces-support-for-clinton-over-trump/?wpisrc=nl_most-draw7&wpmm=1

Interesting, but their handful of votes for Clinton don't offset the 10Ms of assholes who support Trash NO MATTER WHAT!

[RandomGuy]

Agree this is just another case of poll manipulation to control a society folks.

No, actually it isn't.

Revealing statement though. Confirmation bias and appeals to ignorance fallacy in action.

[RandomGuy]

Ok, genius. I'll insult your homeschooling because you think it's inappropriate for teachers to mention the term "climate change" in chemistry class.


Which is weird, because climate change is changing the ph of the oceans.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ocean_acidification

Seems like chemistry to me.

[RandomGuy]

The WP/ABC poll didn't over-sample Dems by 43.4%. They over-sampled Dems by 43.4% - 11.5% (from the 2015 Gallup I picked up) = 31.9%. I used a January 11, 2016 Gallup poll with over 12k adults with "This elevated percentage of political independents leaves Democratic (29%) and Republican (26%) identification at or near recent low points, with the modest Democratic advantage roughly where it has been over the past five years." Meaning the difference between 29 and 26 is 3 (3 divided by 26 is 11.5) so for approximately the past 5 years there are about 11.5% more people identifying as Democrats than as Republicans. So for this WP/ABC, they over-sampled Dems by 31.9% which is quite significant.

Using your poll of polls and latest numbers, 35.8 - 28.7 = 7.1 7.1/28.7 = 24.7 43.4 - 24.7 = 18.7% Democrats over-sampled (which is still significant).

I was only clearing up the math for ducks and Reck. You chose to ignore my comment about it being too early to be obsessing about polls, insult my homeschooling (math) and bring my kids into this.


People just don’t seem to report their past vote very accurately. Answers tend to wind up biased toward the winner; often, people who vote for the loser say they “can’t remember” or say they voted for someone else.

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/08/09/upshot/a-favorable-poll-for-donald-trump-has-a-major-problem.html?_r=0

Your calculation assumes the self-reporting is accurate. It isn't.

[RandomGuy]

math is the least of your problems. You, and others, supporting Trash is your hilarious problem.

"hilarious" isn't the word I would use.

Terrifying would be closer. Trump is the most singularly unqualified and unstable person to be President that I can remember.

[boutons_deux]

"hilarious" isn't the word I would use.

Terrifying would be closer. Trump is the most singularly unqualified and unstable person to be President that I can remember.

what's hilarious is that Trash's conned, lied-to supporters thinking that Trash GAF about them and their problems.

[ducks]

Clinton lies to everyone
takes her money from all countries that hate women

[boutons_deux]

TRUMP ECONOMIC PLAN CALLS FOR EVERY AMERICAN TO INHERIT MILLIONS FROM FATHER

DETROIT — At a speech in Detroit on Monday, the Republican Presidential nominee, Donald J. Trump, spelled out the details of his economic plan, which calls for every American to inherit millions of dollars from his or her father.

“There are people at my rallies, desperate people, desperate because they want jobs,” he told his luncheon audience at the Detroit Economic Club. “Once they inherit millions from their father, they will never want a job again.”

Using an anecdote to show how his economic plan would work, Trump explained, “A man with zero dollars who inherited forty million dollars from his father would become forty million dollars wealthier.”

“We are going to make America rich again,” he said.

Tearing into “the failed economic policies of the Obama Administration,” he argued that children in China are inheriting money from their fathers at a much higher rate than American children are.

“We don’t win at anything anymore,” he said. “We don’t win at inheriting.”

Trump’s plan for wealth creation drew strong praise from his team of economic advisers, including Ivanka, Eric, Tiffany, Barron, and Donald Trump, Jr.

http://www.newyorker.com/humor/borowitz-report/trump-economic-plan-calls-for-every-american-to-inherit-millions-from-father?mbid=nl_080816%20Borowitz%20Newsletter%20(1 )&CNDID=43758549&spMailingID=9321970&spUserID=MTQzNTk4MTA2MDYxS0&spJobID=980629916&spReportId=OTgwNjI5OTE2S0 (http://www.newyorker.com/humor/borowitz-report/trump-economic-plan-calls-for-every-american-to-inherit-millions-from-father?mbid=nl_080816%20Borowitz%20Newsletter%20(1 )&CNDID=43758549&spMailingID=9321970&spUserID=MTQzNTk4MTA2MDYxS0&spJobID=980629916&spReportId=OTgwNjI5OTE2S0)

[ducks]

another white link means not worth reading

[DMX7]

Mr. Trump is currently giving an major economic address. It's on CNN. I swear, is half the crowd protesters?

[DMX7]

another white link means not worth reading

Co-signed.

[hater]

I called there would be a major smear campaign from libtards, neocons and Wall Street/ MIC against Mr Trump.

I called this months ago. And once again I was right.

They are all going all in vs Mr Trump now. Too bad they wont be there when he tears ShillaHitler to shreds in the debates :lol

[clambake]

can't believe some people care enough about this to make up words like "shillahitler"

[DMX7]

Mr. Trump just concluded his major economic address. It was a great speech!

[clambake]

Mr. Trump just concluded his major economic address. It was a great speech!

a short summary please.

oh, but you can't include words like america great, or great again.

[boutons_deux]

Donald Trump, Hoping to Change Subjects, Says He Will Bring Prosperity


http://www.nytimes.com/2016/08/09/us/politics/donald-trump-economy-speech.html

... iow, Trash is, as always, lying to his conned supporters. The power to spend money is in the REPUG House, not the White House.

The REPUG House is strict obstructionism, strict "austerian", so no money for the Real Economy, nor for the 99%, like $Ts needed for infrastructure.

[Reck]

Mr. Trump just concluded his major economic address. It was a great speech!

Too bad it was all bullshit.

:lol cutting tax from 35 to 15.

Not even his momma believes that.

[DMX7]

a short summary please.

oh, but you can't include words like america great, or great again.

He will do stuff and other stuff and make America great again. God bless you and your family.

[DMX7]

Too bad it was all bullshit.

:lol cutting tax from 35 to 15.

Not even his momma believes that.

He's eliminating loopholes that benefit fat cats and introducing loopholes that benefit the regular Joe.

[Reck]

He's eliminating loopholes that benefit fat cats and introducing loopholes that benefit the regular Joe.

Not really. He's cutting taxes for everyone.

Good luck with that. Rich, middle class and poor. :lol

[boutons_deux]

He's eliminating loopholes that benefit fat cats and introducing loopholes that benefit the regular Joe.

bullshit. He won't get a single item through the Repug House that hurts the income of BigCorp/1%.

Reports show that he has used tons of loopholes to avoid paying taxes. He won't hurt himself.

iow, Trash is lying.

[Reck]

Fact checkers already finding all kind of holes on Trump's economic plans. Will mostly benefit the wealthy.

Shocker. :lol

[DMX7]

Fact checkers already finding all kind of holes on Trump's economic plans. Will mostly benefit the wealthy.

Shocker. :lol

Liberal media

[spurraider21]

another white link means not worth reading
When ducks (of all people) takes a shit on you, it's probably time to stop posting

[DMX7]

Mr. Trump received an endorsement from Jeb Bush's son.

[Splits]

a short summary please.

oh, but you can't include words like america great, or great again.


He will do stuff and other stuff and make America great again. God bless you and your family.

:lol

[Warlord23]

So he wants to reduce income taxes, reduce corporate taxes, repeal the estate tax, spend a boatload on infrastructure and the military, all the while magically paying down the debt at the same time. He will pull out of existing trade deals and make great new ones. American factories and mines will magically become more competitive than those in the developing world, and employ tens of thousands of workers with no automation whatsoever. And while Hillary is the one owned by Wall Street, Comrade Combover is the one who will repeal Dodd-Frank and put a moratorium on regulations.

He could probably promise a free Rolls-Royce for every American and his supporters would still believe him.

[boutons_deux]

Former GOP national security officials: Trump would be ‘most reckless’ American president in history

A group of 50 former national security officials, all of whom have served Republican presidents from Richard M. Nixon to George W. Bush, have signed an open letter calling Donald Trump unqualified to be president and warning that, if elected,

“he would be the most reckless President in American history.”

The letter offers a withering critique of the GOP nominee, saying he

“lacks the character, values and experience” to be president.

The signatories declare their conviction that

he would be dangerous “and would put at risk our country’s national security and well-being.”

They state flatly that none of them intend to vote for Trump in November. Some have decided to vote for Hillary Clinton, while others intend to sit out the election or write in another name,

https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/group-of-50-former-gop-national-security-officials-trump-would-be-most-reckless-president-in-american-history/2016/08/08/6715042c-5d9f-11e6-af8e-54aa2e849447_story.html?tid=sm_fb

[ducks]

it is amazing congress has a approval ratting of 14% and the media think people care what the establishement says

[boutons_deux]

Trump’s Speech on Fossil Fuels Was Riddled With Lies and Inaccuracies

In classic Trump form, not a single policy was ever named during the address, but the sentiment was self-evident: more drilling means more jobs.

However, point by point, Trump’s promises and allegations about an energy revolution were riddled with inaccuracies and bunk data.

What he calls (https://www.donaldjtrump.com/press-releases/an-america-first-energy-plan) an

“America first energy plan” is no more than a strawman propped up by xenophobia, limited government, and the idealization of a dying coal industry.

In his speech, Trump proclaimed the following: “The Obama-Clinton war on coal has cost Michigan over 50,000 jobs. Hillary Clinton says her plan will ‘put a lot of coal companies and coal miners out of business.’ We will put our coal miners and steel workers back to work.”

Several falsehoods in these accusations were brought to light by fact-checkers at theWashington Post (https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2016/08/08/donald-trumps-economic-speech-annotated/#annotations:10213092) and NPR (http://www.npr.org/2016/08/08/488816816/donald-trump-looks-to-turn-the-page-on-bad-week-with-economic-speech). According to a study published last year in Energy Policy,approximately 50,000 coal industry jobs were lost nationwide (http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301421515001123) between 2008 and 2012. Trump’s data point appears to have been excerpted from a 2011 report issued by the Sierra Club that estimated the hypothetical number of jobs (http://nma.dev2.networkats.com/newsroom/press_release_detail.asp?idVar=380) that would have been created in Michigan if a series of coal power plants had not been blocked by environmental regulations.

In regard to putting coal miners “back to work,” the job destruction that Trump attributed to the Obama administration was more likely a symptom of cheap natural gas supplanting coal.

This year, the Energy Information Association published data that showed between 2014 and 2015, coal-generated power dropped by 226,000 gigawatt-hours in the US (http://www.forbes.com/sites/rrapier/2016/03/18/whats-killing-the-coal-industry/#4cb09cb05281). In its place, natural gas rose by 208,000 gigawatt-hours. And, as Philip Bump pointed out at the Washington Post (https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2016/08/08/donald-trumps-economic-speech-annotated/#annotations:10213092), more mining jobs were eliminated during the Reagan and Bush administrations than during Obama’s two terms.

It’s also worth noting that almost all of the “facts” that Trump cited during his address were credited to the Heritage Foundation, a right-wing stink tank whose benefactors include Charles and David Koch.

According to SourceWatch, the institute received more than $6 million in funding (http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php/Heritage_Foundation#Ties_to_the_Koch_Brothers) from the Koch-owned Claude R. Lambe Foundation, and more than $700,000 from oil company ExxonMobil.

The Heritage Foundation, with whom Trump is not shy about his affiliation (https://www.buzzfeed.com/andrewkaczynski/heritage-foundation-president-trump-has-shown-an-openness-to?utm_term=.brG7K3rRA#.pdn6gVBMR), has been flagged by climate experts as one of the organizations most committed to spreading doubt about climate science. According to the Union of Concerned Scientists, the foundation once said in a report (http://www.ucsusa.org/global_warming/solutions/fight-misinformation/global-warming-skeptic.html#.V6j2ZDkrK2w): “The only consensus over the threat of climate change that seems to exist these days is that there is no consensus.”

On the fossil fuel industry’s ability to stimulate job creation and economic growth, Trump had this to say:

According to the Institute for Energy Research, lifting the restrictions on all sources of American energy will:

Increase GDP by more than $100 billion dollars annually, add over 500,000 new jobs annually, and increase annual wages by more than $30 billion dollars over the next 7 years;

Increase federal, state, and local tax revenues by almost $6 trillion dollars over 4 decades;

Increase total economic activity by more than $20 trillion dollars over the next 40 years.

What he omitted from these figures (which were attributed to another Koch-funded, anti-climate science organization (http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php/Institute_for_Energy_Research)), however, was the fact that this year, for the first time ever in the US (http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2016-05-25/clean-energy-jobs-surpass-oil-drilling-for-first-time-in-u-s),

solar energy jobs surpassed those created by the oil and gas industry. There are now more jobs related to solar power than oil, gas, and coal extraction,

according to the International Renewable Energy Agency.

Another report, published by the Global Green Growth Institute and the United Nations Industrial Development Organization in 2015, found that investments in renewable energy sources yield more jobs per dollar (http://cleantechnica.com/2015/06/23/investment-renewable-energy-yields-jobs-fossil-fuel-sector/) than equal amounts contributed to the fossil fuel industry.

Today, Trump turned a blind eye to truth that while renewables continue to find their footing, the nation’s declining coal sector (http://cleantechnica.com/2015/06/23/investment-renewable-energy-yields-jobs-fossil-fuel-sector/) is drawing its last breaths. As more homeowners adopt clean energy alternatives, such as installing solar panels on their roofs, the shift away from fossil fuels is palpable. And now, with policy adviser Rep. Kevin Cramer at his side (http://motherboard.vice.com/read/trumps-energy-adviser-is-dangerously-anti-environment-kevin-cramer), it’s evident that

Trump’s energy plan is just pandering to corporate interests.
So while Trump has sworn to rebuild the nation using “American energy—mined from American sources,” what

he’s really pledged is to construct is a shaky platform on a dying industry.

http://motherboard.vice.com/read/trumps-speech-on-fossil-fuels-was-riddled-with-lies-and-inaccuracies

:lol

Trash and his LIES! :lol

Trash supporters! :lol

Heritage STINK tank, Demint! :lol

[boutons_deux]

GOP Senator Susan Collins Won’t Vote for Trump: He’s ‘Unworthy of Being Our President’


http://www.mediaite.com/online/gop-senator-susan-collins-wont-vote-for-trump-hes-unworthy-of-being-our-president/

the anti-Trash shitball is picking up bulk and speed. :lol

[boutons_deux]

Military widow on Trump U: ‘This was a scam’

A military widow, who attended Trump University, Cheryl Lankford, comments on her experience with Trump University and explains why she is encouraging others to not vote for him.

http://www.msnbc.com/politicsnation/watch/military-widow-on-trump-u-this-was-a-scam-739636803718?cid=sm_fb_msnbc

[ElNono]

it is amazing congress has a approval ratting of 14% and the media think people care what the establishement says

Actually Congress' approval rating was fairly higher when it was establishment only... once you added the teabaggers and pseudo-martyrs like Cruz, it's been going down ever since. And why not? You send people there to try to find solutions, not to do nothing at all.

[Spurminator]

Actually Congress' approval rating was fairly higher when it was establishment only... once you added the teabaggers and pseudo-martyrs like Cruz, it's been going down ever since. And why not? You send people there to try to find solutions, not to do nothing at all.

:tu

[boutons_deux]

Trump’s economic plan shifted from ‘lunacy’ to regular Republican ‘nonsense’

While Trump promised that his plan — which involved cutting the estate tax, among other proposals — would “those who have the very least,” Reich argued that it actually followed through on the conservative tradition of hiding benefits for the rich inside ostensibly populist rhetoric.

“Like the benefit for child care: it looks good on the surface, until you actually look at the details, and it’s a big giveaway for the rich,” he argued.

Reich’s fellow economist, Daily Beast columnist David Cay Johnston, explained that Trump’s promise to deliver “unlimited deductions” for child care expenses also stood to benefit the rich more than the middle class.

“If you’re rich enough to have three nannies for your kids, when you fly them around on your private jet, you get a tax break,”

http://www.rawstory.com/2016/08/robert-reich-trumps-economic-plan-shifted-from-lunacy-to-regular-republican-nonsense/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+TheRawStory+%28The+Raw+Story% 29

[boutons_deux]

Darrell Issa: Congressman, R-Calif., Reportedly Loses Popularity Due to Support for Donald Trump


“There are growing signs that veteran Rep. Darrell Issa, R-Vista, could be headed for an election dogfight...The polling and Applegate’s strong June fundraising convinced the DCCC to put Applegate on a watch list of 10 ‘emerging’ Republican districts that could be moved to their tally of targeted GOP seats.”


https://www.facebook.com/topic/Darrell-Issa/108134099207738?source=whrt&position=4&trqid=6316681838081638796

[boutons_deux]

TWITTER HILARIOUSLY MOCKS TRUMP FOR ALL THE TIMES HE CITED ‘MANY PEOPLE ARE SAYING’ AS SOURCE
http://latest.com/2016/08/twitter-hilariously-mocks-trump-for-all-the-times-he-cited-many-people-are-saying-as-source/

http://48iee3d13d13g5duyqt39y17.wpengine.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/trump-chimp.jpg

https://twitter.com/NYTnickc/status/762798078575382528/photo/1?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw

[boutons_deux]

Florida Republican Party: Chief Spokesman Wadi Gaitan Says He Is Quitting Because of Donald Trump

Gaitan, who is Hispanic, said in a statement Monday he is joining the LIBRE Initiative, a conservative organization backed by the Koch brothers, and "avoiding efforts that support Donald Trump."

https://www.facebook.com/topic/Florida-Republican-Party/112596422089493?source=wtfrt&position=7&trqid=6316687984157362080

[z0sa]

TWITTER HILARIOUSLY MOCKS TRUMP FOR ALL THE TIMES HE CITED ‘MANY PEOPLE ARE SAYING’ AS SOURCE
http://latest.com/2016/08/twitter-hilariously-mocks-trump-for-all-the-times-he-cited-many-people-are-saying-as-source/

http://48iee3d13d13g5duyqt39y17.wpengine.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/trump-chimp.jpg

https://twitter.com/NYTnickc/status/762798078575382528/photo/1?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw

that's a racist picture.

[boutons_deux]

that's a racist picture.

my apologies to the orangutan.

[boutons_deux]

Will Delegitimizing A Clinton Presidency Outlast Trump's Campaign?

Trump's insistence on delegitimizing a Clinton presidency in a generic sense is in some respects a continuation of the GOP congressional strategy of the Obama era.

“There was an effort not just to vote against everything that Obama and Democrats were for, but to delegitimize the process and and then take advantage of the anger that would result.

And it worked like a charm in the midterms of 2010 and 2014,” Norman Ornstein, a congressional scholar at the American Enterprise Institute, told TPM.

“A lot of this anger that is being churned up against Clinton is going to be used in the same way.”

But it's undeniable that Trump goes beyond the dog-whistle intimations of past politicians by specifically suggesting that Clinton could only be elected thanks to a "dishonest machine (http://www.bloomberg.com/politics/articles/2016-08-08/trump-sees-wide-ranging-clinton-machine-conspiracy-to-steal-election)," or that she should have been ineligible to run in the first place because of what he and his supporters see as her criminal use of a private email server.

Chants of “lock her up” (http://talkingpointsmemo.com/dc/lock-her-up-hillary-clinton)became the unofficial refrain of the Republican National Convention, with more than a few current or former elected GOP officials egging on attendees in their speeches.

More recently, Trump has floated the idea that if he loses, it’s because the election is “rigged.” (http://talkingpointsmemo.com/dc/trump-rigged-election-voter)

Now, Trump is also touting the idea that (http://talkingpointsmemo.com/dc/washingtonpost) Clinton could have mental health problems and may not be “all there.”

“It’s definitely going to set the groundwork, if Hillary wins, for an ongoing, sort of at least simmering question about how she won, whether she should have been in the race,” said John W. Patty, a professor of political science at the University of Chicago.

“That’s part of the narrative among some of the people chanting ‘lock her up’—it's that they really believe that she got away with a crime."

http://talkingpointsmemo.com/dc/trump-clinton-legitimacy-campaign?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+tpm-news+%28TPMNews%29

Just like the Christian Taliban, the Repugs refuse to recognize any non-Repugs. If you're non-Repug, your legitimacy is denied.

And it's all emotional appeal, based on anti-science, anti-rationality, anti-education, anti-elite, all pure, primitive emotion, with hate and anger being the primary emotions.

In fact, Trash is the ideal Repug candidate in his lying, bullshit attacks, slander, innuendo, "many people are saying ..." .

[rmt]

my apologies to the orangutan.

Trump is an attractive guy (for his age).

[hitmanyr2k]

Trump is an attractive guy (for his age).

http://imageshack.com/a/img922/3796/HB8sFy.gif

[Reck]

Trump is an attractive guy (for his age).

Women are into toasty looking orange guys?

You're the first I hear calling such men attractive. Extreme tanning doesn't look good on anybody imo.

[rmt]

Women are into toasty looking orange guys?

You're the first I hear calling such men attractive. Extreme tanning doesn't look good on anybody imo.

Compared to which other 70 year old - Biden? Bill? Bush? His features are attractive - who cares about tanning. He has good genes - his entire family is attractive - Baron looks just like Trump's younger version.

[boutons_deux]

Trump is an attractive guy (for his age).

yep, all that (over-stated, lied about) money! Dyed hair, fake hair, sprayed on tan, pot belly, 40+ inch waist, yep, women love it all.

[boutons_deux]

Larry Wilmore ridicules Trump’s doomed surrogates: ‘It’s like having to defend Jeffrey Dahmer’

“His media surrogates have a lot to explain, but they always manage to avoid actually explaining anything,” Wilmore said.

He showed a video montage of Trump’s surrogates trying, one after the other, to change the subject from the candidate’s latest outrageously misinformed statements.

“See how they did that?” Wilmore said.

“This is what happens when you drink the Trump Kool-Aid. It’s like if you’re in the position of having to defend Jeffrey Dahmer.

It’s like, did Jeffrey Dahmer eat those people?

You’re asking me if it’s fair to judge people based on an eating disorder?

I don’t think you want me to answer that.”

http://www.rawstory.com/2016/08/larry-wilmore-ridicules-trumps-doomed-surrogates-its-like-having-to-defend-jeffrey-dahmer/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+TheRawStory+%28The+Raw+Story% 29

Trash, indefensible object of hilarious ridicule.

[rmt]

yep, all that (over-stated, lied about) money! Dyed hair, fake hair, sprayed on tan, pot belly, 40+ inch waist, yep, women love it all.

Well, at least he's in pretty good shape compared to Hillary, who has to be helped up stairs.

https://twitter.com/Always_Trump/status/762347632240898048/photo/1?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw

[ducks]

http://nypost.com/2016/08/08/trumps-revolution-should-be-embraced-by-both-parties/

[Fabbs]

“His media surrogates have a lot to explain, but they always manage to avoid actually explaining anything,” Wilmore said....He showed a video montage of [B]Trump’s surrogates trying, one after the other, to change the subject from the candidate’s latest outrageously misinformed statements.
:lol and, Trump was not lying when he told prospective students about how he "hand picked every instructor" blah blah etc
But but but rather:
"Trump University’s sales pitches “are classic examples of sales puffery common to advertising everywhere,” his lawyers said in court documents filed...

It's not lying, it's "sales puffery". :lmao
GTFO

[Reck]

Well, at least he's in pretty good shape compared to Hillary, who has to be helped up stairs.

https://twitter.com/Always_Trump/status/762347632240898048/photo/1?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw

How do you know on what shape Trump is?

This is pretty low tactic. Oh my god, Hillary was helped up a couple of stairs. She's unfit!!

You truely are a trumpie.

BTW...Trump got himself trapped in an elevator. Inept!

[Warlord23]

Well, at least he's in pretty good shape compared to Hillary, who has to be helped up stairs.

https://twitter.com/Always_Trump/status/762347632240898048/photo/1?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw

You might want to come out of the right-wing bubble/echo-chamber every now and then to know which conspiracy theories have been debunked in the real world

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/post-politics/wp/2016/08/08/armed-with-junk-science-and-old-photos-critics-question-hillaryshealth/
http://money.cnn.com/2016/08/08/media/drudge-report-hillary-clinton-fall/

[mrsmaalox]

Trump is an attractive guy (for his age).

I don't know what to do first---:vomit: or :lmao

[Reck]

I don't know what to do first---:vomit: or :lmao

Long time no talk maalox, what's up?

[rmt]

How do you know on what shape Trump is?

This is pretty low tactic. Oh my god, Hillary was helped up a couple of stairs. She's unfit!!

You truely are a trumpie.

BTW...Trump got himself trapped in an elevator. Inept!

You are the one who brought up Trump's pot belly and 40 inch waist like most 70 years old don't have pot bellies and 40 inch waists. Don't you think someone being helped up stairs (even if it was 6 months ago - still in the primaries) is more indicative of health than a pot belly - these days even 40+ and 50+ year olds have pot bellies. I know that Trump doesn't drink and has seemingly boundless energy (up late tweeting) and isn't prone to coughing spells.

[spurraider21]

that's a racist picture.
its not racism if you insult white people. haven't you heard?

[Reck]

You are the one who brought up Trump's pot belly and 40 inch waist like most 70 years old don't have pot bellies and 40 inch waists. Don't you think someone being helped up stairs (even if it was 6 months ago - still in the primaries) is more indicative of health than a pot belly - these days even 40+ and 50+ year olds have pot bellies. I know that Trump doesn't drink and has seemingly boundless energy (up late tweeting) and isn't prone to coughing spells.

What are you talking about? I never mentioned Trump's age or fatness.

You're confusing me.

As far as Hillary being helped up, she slipped and was caught from falling. Have you never tripped or slipped on something? How's this different? These are things that happen to everyone. We are lucky they dont take pictures of her taking a dump in the bathroom.

Price you pay for being famous. The pictures were taken out of context and that really should be the end of it. There is no hidden story here that Hillary cant even walk.

And for Trump, I won't even especulate on his health. I haven't the slightest clue, so the fact you seem certain that he isn't prone to coughing spells is a little odd seem as you're not with the man 24/7.

[rmt]

What are you talking about? I never mentioned Trump's age or fatness.

You're confusing me.

As far as Hillary being helped up, she slipped and was caught from falling. Have you never tripped or slipped on something? How's this different? These are things that happen to everyone. We are lucky they dont take pictures of her taking a dump in the bathroom.

Price you pay for being famous. The pictures were taken out of context and that really should be the end of it. There is no hidden story here that Hillary cant even walk.

And for Trump, I won't even especulate on his health. I haven't the slightest clue, so the fact you seem certain that he isn't prone to coughing spells is a little odd seem as you're not with the man 24/7.

Sorry that was boutons' post. My apologies.

[CosmicCowboy]

Sorry that was boutons' post. My apologies.

They are easy to confuse...:lol

[Axl Rose]

I don't know what to do first---:vomit: or :lmao
So you hate trump just because you're Mexican and he's a big meanie? Low info voter

[TheSanityAnnex]

You might want to come out of the right-wing bubble/echo-chamber every now and then to know which conspiracy theories have been debunked in the real world

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/post-politics/wp/2016/08/08/armed-with-junk-science-and-old-photos-critics-question-hillaryshealth/
http://money.cnn.com/2016/08/08/media/drudge-report-hillary-clinton-fall/ here is a nice breakdown :lol


Hillary Clinton has Parkinson's Disease.


Here is her trained body man seen carrying a diazepam auto-injector after her DNC speech:


https://i.sli.mg/9cSYuQ.jpg


Here she is exhibiting involuntary facial movements, tremor, and rigidity, when interrupted by hecklers. Notice how her body man (not a SS agent) gets to her immediately, and tells her to "keep talking" and she immediately snaps out her trance and says "I'm going to keep talking".


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t5Sty0Bqzjs


Here she is experiencing diskinesia when startled by a sudden question.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2gYplpPmbXI


She plays it off as a joke, but her body keeps moving. People are wrongly calling this a "seizure". This is not a seizure. This is diskinesia. It is a symptom of levodopa treatment for Parkinson's disease. The diazepam auto-injector her body man carries is a rapid but temporary treatment for the diskinesia if it happens in public. The side-effects of the diazepam treatment are fatigue, muscle weakness, confusion, and difficulty walking.


http://www.wnd.com/2016/08/unstable-hillary-gets-help-climbing-stairs/


Were you wondering why hecklers at a rally are a major security concern? It's because anything startling can trigger her episodes. That's why her handlers immediately rushed on stage when they saw her freeze up and start making involuntary mouth movements.


Hillary has forbidden press from taking video or photos of her getting on or off her plane. This rule has been in effect for years, even going back to when she was heading the state department. The reason? She often needs to be assisted or even carried up and down the stairs. This has been stated by numerous whistle-blowers, including former SS agents.


If you're wondering why there aren't more examples, I will point out that Hillary has held only one press conference (one!) in the last 260 days -- unheard of for a presidential candidate. She has made no public appearance that was not under 30 minutes, and entirely scripted, down to the questions asked, since her last debate with Bernie Sanders -- during which she took an unscheduled 45 minute "bathroom" break in the middle.


Hillary Clinton is a very sick woman, and is likely dying. She has at least one degenerative disease, and is receiving regular treatments that affect mood, personality, energy level, and the ability to think and reason clearly. She is taking levodopa, valium, and possibly other drugs as well in order to appear normal in public. She is also concealing all of this from the public.


She may in fact be taking so much valium to offset the levodopa treatment that she is experiencing periodic withdrawals, which would explain her horrible temper and the episodes of rage which have been described by former staffers, SS agents, and assistants. (http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3626031/A-Secret-Service-agent-protected-Hillary-Clinton-set-publish-tell-book.html, http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2653420/Get-f-away-Hillary-Clinton-shouted-minder-refused-carry-bag-She-treated-Secret-Service-like-hired-help-Bill-softie-hard-manage-says-former-agent-bombshell-expose.html, http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-06-28/people-need-know-real-hillary-clinton-and-how-dangerous-she)


Anyways, here's Martin Shkreli, former CEO of Turing Pharmaceuticals, speaking to the point.


https://twitter.com/1080p/status/762430843520360448


Some people have commented on her "coughing fits" and that she might have cancer or something else.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5o7FIsd8XGw


Personally, I think this is also involuntary movement. That crater in her mouth isn't a chancre caused by stage 2 syphilis, as some have suggested. It's a lozenge. She has coughing fits. Specifically, involuntary upper respiratory spasm, difficulty swallowing, and inefficacy of normal coughing. These symptoms are consistent with Parkinson's disease.


http://www.parkinsons.org.uk/forum/thread/54544


http://www.parkinsons.org.uk/forum/thread/54544


http://www.parkinsons.org.uk/forum/thread/54381


http://journal.publications.chestnet.org/data/Journals/CHEST/21998/1009.pdf


Hillary Clinton has Parkinson's Disease, has had it for a while, is undergoing treatment for it that involves the use of mood-altering drugs, and she is concealing all of this from the public.

[Warlord23]

So I chanced upon this earlier today, and I was hoping one of the resident Trumpkins could translate this for me (we know he has the best words, don't we folks?)


Look, having nuclear—my uncle was a great professor and scientist and engineer, Dr. John Trump at MIT; good genes, very good genes, OK, very smart, the Wharton School of Finance, very good, very smart—you know, if you’re a conservative Republican, if I were a liberal, if, like, OK, if I ran as a liberal Democrat, they would say I'm one of the smartest people anywhere in the world—it’s true!—but when you're a conservative Republican they try—oh, do they do a number—that’s why I always start off: Went to Wharton, was a good student, went there, went there, did this, built a fortune—you know I have to give my like credentials all the time, because we’re a little disadvantaged ...

But you look at the nuclear deal, the thing that really bothers me—it would have been so easy, and it’s not as important as these lives are (nuclear is powerful; my uncle explained that to me many, many years ago, the power and that was 35 years ago; he would explain the power of what's going to happen and he was right—who would have thought?), but when you look at what's going on with the four prisoners—now it used to be three, now it’s four—but when it was three and even now, I would have said it's all in the messenger; fellas, and it is fellas because, you know, they don't, they haven’t figured that the women are smarter right now than the men, so, you know, it’s gonna take them about another 150 years—but the Persians are great negotiators, the Iranians are great negotiators, so, and they, they just killed, they just killed us.

[boutons_deux]

No Pivot Here: Trump Asks, Why Would I Tone It Down When I'm 'Winning?'

After months ago promising he would tone down his rhetoric as part of a more "presidential" general election pivot, Donald Trump on Tuesday said that it doesn't make any sense for him to change his strategy now that he's "winning."

"I think that you know my temperament has gotten me here. I've always had a good temperament and it's gotten me here," Trump said in an interview with Fox Business, according to a transcript (https://twitter.com/SopanDeb/status/762983234405793792) of the appearance.

"I certainly don't think it is appropriate to start changing all of a sudden when you have been winning."

http://talkingpointsmemo.com/livewire/donald-trump-temperament-why-change-winning?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+tpm-news+%28TPMNews%29

"Winning" with the ignorant, deluded, conned Repug base isn't enough, asshole. :lol

[boutons_deux]

Trump Suggests Shooting Clinton, Her Supreme Court Picks, Or Both

Donald Trump on Tuesday warned his supporters that if Hillary Clinton were elected president and appointed members to the Supreme Court, there was nothing anyone could do about it – but then added that, given the Second Amendment, maybe there was.

“If she gets to pick her judges ― nothing you can do, folks,” Trump said (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EcxkkrNSv-4) at a Wilmington, N.C., rally with a shrug.

“Although: the Second Amendment, people, maybe there is. I don’t know.”

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/trump-clinton-shoot_us_57aa2f6de4b0ba7ed23dd652?utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Donald%20Trump%20Suggests%20Shooting% 20Hillary%20Clinton%20Her%20Supreme%20Court%20Pick s%20Or%20Both&utm_content=Donald%20Trump%20Suggests%20Shooting%2 0Hillary%20Clinton%20Her%20Supreme%20Court%20Picks %20Or%20Both+CID_4e53d5925e907180e9debfe088216697&utm_source=Email%20marketing%20software&utm_term=Read%20More

[hitmanyr2k]

How many of you got your Trump Executive membership card? I'm sure it's worth just as much as a Trump University degree :lol

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CpbtZrYXEAAtn9f.jpg

[boutons_deux]

Trump Wigs Out And Blames “Dishonest Media” for His Death Threat Against Hillary Clinton

You have to see this to believe it. Donald Trump put out a statement blaming the "dishonest media" for his blatant "second amendment" solution to Hillary Clinton getting to pick Supreme Court judges.

Someone needs to tell Donald Trump he’s not Teflon Trump anymore. The Secret Service has already spoken to a Trump adviser about his threats to have Hillary Clinton executed (http://www.politicususa.com/2016/08/09/time-weeks-trump-campaign-threatened-kill-hillary-clinton.html)just three weeks ago, so no, this isn’t the mean media’s fault.

The words that come out of Donald Trump’s mouth are not the fault of the media.

Rep. Eric Swalwell (D-CA) isn’t buying it either, he tweeted, “Donald Trump suggested someone kill Sec. Clinton. We must take people at their word. @SecretService must investigate #TrumpThreat.”

http://www.politicususa.com/2016/08/09/donald-trump-blames-the-dishonest-media-death-threat-hillary-clinton.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+politicususa%2FfJAl+%28Politi cus+USA+%29

[boutons_deux]

Ex-CIA Head on Trump Guns Remark: Anyone Else Who Said That Would Be in a Police Wagon Now


http://www.mediaite.com/tv/ex-cia-head-on-trump-2nd-amendment-comment-anyone-else-who-said-that-would-be-in-a-police-wagon-now/

[boutons_deux]

Presidential Nominees Release Their Tax Returns (Except One)


“Of the past 20 presidential nominees, 19 made their tax returns public. Nearly all of them did it about 200 days before the election.”

http://ritholtz.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/tax-returns-1024x347.png

http://ritholtz.com/2016/08/nominees-tax-return/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+TheBigPicture+%28The+Big+Pict ure%29

of course, Bishop Gekko limited his returns to 3 years, avoiding the years where he got caught in tax evasion, got no-penalty amnesty.

[boutons_deux]

Repugs are the Job Creators, the Job Protectors

At The Height Of The Great Recession, Mike Pence Wanted The Fed To Stop Focusing On Unemployment

The unemployment rate in November, 2010 was 9.8 percent, (http://data.bls.gov/pdq/SurveyOutputServlet?request_action=wh&graph_name=LN_cpsbref3) near its peak level.

However, joblessness was not Pence’s concern at the time.

That month he went to the floor of Congress and called on the Federal Reserve to stop focusing job growth and proposed legislation to enshrine this change into law. In a speech titled “End The Dual Mandate At The Fed,” he called on Congress to alter the bank’s role in the economy.

“It is time, once again, to demand that the Federal Reserve focus exclusively on price stability and protecting the dollar,” he said (https://www.congress.gov/congressional-record/2010/11/17/house-section/article/h7502-1?q=%7B%22search%22%3A%5B%22%5C%22mike+pence%5C%22 %22%5D%7D&resultIndex=1195).

Pence made similar statements in a speech to the Detroit Economic Club (http://www.econclub.org/Multimedia/Transcripts/Congressman%20Mike%20Pence%20Speech%2012910.pdf) later that month.

http://www.rightwingwatch.org/content/height-great-recession-mike-pence-wanted-fed-stop-focusing-unemployment

[boutons_deux]

Desperate Donald: He’s plummeting in the polls, so he’s turning up the trash talk

Trump's campaign is tanking, and his only recourse is to unleash insane and unhinged attacks on Hillary

http://www.salon.com/2016/08/09/desperate-donald-hes-plummeting-in-the-polls-so-hes-turning-up-the-trash-talk/

[benefactor]

Christ almighty Trump is an idiot

[baseline bum]

Just go shoot Clinton if you don't get your way on supreme court nominations? :lol

Trump's going to be such a disaster for the Republican party. Why did they ever nominate that piece of shit?

[z0sa]

here is a nice breakdown :lol


Hillary Clinton has Parkinson's Disease.


Here is her trained body man seen carrying a diazepam auto-injector after her DNC speech:


https://i.sli.mg/9cSYuQ.jpg


Here she is exhibiting involuntary facial movements, tremor, and rigidity, when interrupted by hecklers. Notice how her body man (not a SS agent) gets to her immediately, and tells her to "keep talking" and she immediately snaps out her trance and says "I'm going to keep talking".


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t5Sty0Bqzjs


Here she is experiencing diskinesia when startled by a sudden question.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2gYplpPmbXI


She plays it off as a joke, but her body keeps moving. People are wrongly calling this a "seizure". This is not a seizure. This is diskinesia. It is a symptom of levodopa treatment for Parkinson's disease. The diazepam auto-injector her body man carries is a rapid but temporary treatment for the diskinesia if it happens in public. The side-effects of the diazepam treatment are fatigue, muscle weakness, confusion, and difficulty walking.


http://www.wnd.com/2016/08/unstable-hillary-gets-help-climbing-stairs/


Were you wondering why hecklers at a rally are a major security concern? It's because anything startling can trigger her episodes. That's why her handlers immediately rushed on stage when they saw her freeze up and start making involuntary mouth movements.


Hillary has forbidden press from taking video or photos of her getting on or off her plane. This rule has been in effect for years, even going back to when she was heading the state department. The reason? She often needs to be assisted or even carried up and down the stairs. This has been stated by numerous whistle-blowers, including former SS agents.


If you're wondering why there aren't more examples, I will point out that Hillary has held only one press conference (one!) in the last 260 days -- unheard of for a presidential candidate. She has made no public appearance that was not under 30 minutes, and entirely scripted, down to the questions asked, since her last debate with Bernie Sanders -- during which she took an unscheduled 45 minute "bathroom" break in the middle.


Hillary Clinton is a very sick woman, and is likely dying. She has at least one degenerative disease, and is receiving regular treatments that affect mood, personality, energy level, and the ability to think and reason clearly. She is taking levodopa, valium, and possibly other drugs as well in order to appear normal in public. She is also concealing all of this from the public.


She may in fact be taking so much valium to offset the levodopa treatment that she is experiencing periodic withdrawals, which would explain her horrible temper and the episodes of rage which have been described by former staffers, SS agents, and assistants. (http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3626031/A-Secret-Service-agent-protected-Hillary-Clinton-set-publish-tell-book.html, http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2653420/Get-f-away-Hillary-Clinton-shouted-minder-refused-carry-bag-She-treated-Secret-Service-like-hired-help-Bill-softie-hard-manage-says-former-agent-bombshell-expose.html, http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-06-28/people-need-know-real-hillary-clinton-and-how-dangerous-she)


Anyways, here's Martin Shkreli, former CEO of Turing Pharmaceuticals, speaking to the point.


https://twitter.com/1080p/status/762430843520360448


Some people have commented on her "coughing fits" and that she might have cancer or something else.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5o7FIsd8XGw


Personally, I think this is also involuntary movement. That crater in her mouth isn't a chancre caused by stage 2 syphilis, as some have suggested. It's a lozenge. She has coughing fits. Specifically, involuntary upper respiratory spasm, difficulty swallowing, and inefficacy of normal coughing. These symptoms are consistent with Parkinson's disease.


http://www.parkinsons.org.uk/forum/thread/54544


http://www.parkinsons.org.uk/forum/thread/54544


http://www.parkinsons.org.uk/forum/thread/54381


http://journal.publications.chestnet.org/data/Journals/CHEST/21998/1009.pdf


Hillary Clinton has Parkinson's Disease, has had it for a while, is undergoing treatment for it that involves the use of mood-altering drugs, and she is concealing all of this from the public.

Wow

[boutons_deux]

Elizabeth Warren (https://twitter.com/elizabethforma)
(https://twitter.com/elizabethforma)✔@elizabethforma (https://twitter.com/elizabethforma)

.@realDonaldTrump (https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump) makes death threats because he's a pathetic coward who can’t handle the fact that he’s losing to a girl.
4:51 PM - 9 Aug 2016 (https://twitter.com/elizabethforma/status/763130669606309892)




Elizabeth Warren (https://twitter.com/elizabethforma)
(https://twitter.com/elizabethforma)✔@elizabethforma (https://twitter.com/elizabethforma)

Your reckless comments sound like a two-bit dictator,@realDonaldTrump (https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump). Not a man who wants to lead the greatest democracy on the planet.
4:53 PM - 9 Aug 2016 (https://twitter.com/elizabethforma/status/763131045411688448)



Which dickless Repugs want to fuck with Liz Warren! :lol

[DMX7]

Warren's attacks seem juvenile at this point. Not that I disagree with her, but the point has already been made about Trump. Enough with the tweeting.

[baseline bum]

Trumps just sounds more and more like Hitler every time he opens his fat mouth.

[DMX7]

Trumps just sounds more and more like Hitler every time he opens his fat mouth.

It's like Eric Cartman is running for president.

[baseline bum]

It's like Eric Cartman is running for president.

:lmao

[hater]

2nd amendment people have strong political power. Trump is right about ths.

:lmao dummyrats crying foul :lmao

ShillaHitler followers are so pathetic

[baseline bum]

2nd amendment people have strong political power. Trump is right about ths.

:lmao dummyrats crying foul :lmao

ShillaHitler followers are so pathetic

You're becoming like Koolaid nigga

[baseline bum]

Trump calling on someone to shoot Clinton is even more pathetic than when Santorum called Obama an anti-war government ######.

[djohn2oo8]

Trump calling on someone to shoot Clinton is even more pathetic than when Santorum called Obama a ######.
There is no way Clinton and Trump aren't in this together to throw the race for her...He cannot be that stupid with some of the shit he says.

[baseline bum]

There is no way Clinton and Trump aren't in this together to throw the race for her...He cannot be that stupid with some of the shit he says.

Pretty sure Hillary doesn't want some rightwing nut to come shoot her.

[TheSanityAnnex]

Trump calling on someone to shoot Clinton is even more pathetic than when Santorum called Obama an anti-war government ######.
If you watch the entire speech and not just the 10 second clip it's obvious he is talking about the voting power of gun activist groups, 2nd amendment supporters, and NRA members. Just more media spin.

[baseline bum]

If you watch the entire interview and not just the 10 second clip it's obvious he is talking about the voting power of gun activist groups, 2nd amendment supporters, and NRA members. Just more media spin.

:lmao

[TheSanityAnnex]

:lmao
Seriously. Did you watch the whole thing or just the 10 second clip?

It could have been ambiguous trolling though, and if so seems to be working.

[baseline bum]

:cry It's the fault of the media :cry
:cry The same media that made Trump in the primaries with all their coverage of him :cry

[boutons_deux]

If you watch the entire speech and not just the 10 second clip it's obvious he is talking about the voting power of gun activist groups, 2nd amendment supporters, and NRA members. Just more media spin.

:lol holy shit, you Trash fellators! :lol

[ducks]

Answer the damm question
Did u watch the whole speech ?

[djohn2oo8]

If you watch the entire speech and not just the 10 second clip it's obvious he is talking about the voting power of gun activist groups, 2nd amendment supporters, and NRA members. Just more media spin.
"If she wins, we have no way to stop her. Other than 2nd amendment people, aka gun people, aka go shoot her"

[TheSanityAnnex]

Answer the damm question
Did u watch the whole speech ?
None of them have.

[ducks]

3 people died and the media is not talking about that

[baseline bum]

Answer the damm question
Did u watch the whole speech ?

Why would I watch the whole speech from that faggot?


If she gets to pick her judges, nothing you can do, folks. Although the Second Amendment people, maybe there is. I don't know.

After she gets to pick her judges somehow the second ammendment people are going to stop her? How do they stop her after she already got to pick her judges?

[ducks]

Just like trump threw the baby out Not

[ducks]

They could write the congressman duh

[djohn2oo8]

They could write the congressman duh
Gun nuts going to write their congressmen...:lmao

[ducks]

Dad of killer in Orlando cheering Clinton on and no media cover of that

[ducks]

I email them !!!

[baseline bum]

Dad of killer in Orlando cheering Clinton on and no media cover of that

You sound like Michael Moore with all the shit he was throwing on the wall about the bin Laden family and Bush in Fahrenheit 9/11.

[TheSanityAnnex]

Why would I watch the whole speech from that faggot?

To understand his quote in context with the rest of the speech. Either way he meant it, the media meltdown has been pretty epic. His ambiguous comments are masterful trolling that provide endless comical headlines.

[TheSanityAnnex]

You sound like Michael Moore with all the shit he was throwing on the wall about the bin Laden family and Bush in Fahrenheit 9/11.
He was there. HuffPo far enough right for you?
http://m.huffpost.com/us/entry/us_57aa2b1ee4b0ba7ed23dc7e6

[djohn2oo8]

To understand his quote in context with the rest of the speech. Either way he meant it, the media meltdown has been pretty epic. His ambiguous comments are masterful trolling that provide endless comical headlines.
They weren't ambiguous. And it's why the Secret Service will be investigating him .

[baseline bum]

He was there. HuffPo far enough right for you?
http://m.huffpost.com/us/entry/us_57aa2b1ee4b0ba7ed23dc7e6

I don't give a shit about Huffington Post. :lol

[TheSanityAnnex]

They weren't ambiguous. And it's why the Secret Service will be investigating him .
:lol link please.

Dont bother, it doesn't exist. The secret service has not said they WILL be investigating.

[TheSanityAnnex]

I don't give a shit about Huffington Post. :lol

Having the Orlando shooters dad there was worse than Mike Brown's mom at the convention.

[baseline bum]

Having the Orlando shooters dad there was worse than Mike Brown's mom at the convention.

What does that matter? Did Clinton know he was going to be there or court his support? This is exactly the same kind of stupid guilt by association shit that everyone on the right (rightfully) bitches about when Michael Moore puts it in one of his movies.

[hater]

You're becoming like Koolaid nigga


If you truly believe Trump was calling for the assassination of Clinton you have koolaid in your veins and bones tbqh

[TheSanityAnnex]

What does that matter? Did Clinton know he was going to be there or court his support? This is exactly the same kind of stupid guilt by association shit that everyone on the right (rightfully) bitches about when Michael Moore puts it in one of his movies.
Don't know if she asked to be there. I take back what I said earlier, having Mike Brown's mom on stage at the convention was worse. But having Seddique "my son shouldn't have targeted gays because God would take care of them himself" Mateen there wasn't good for optics.

[TheSanityAnnex]

Where's that secret service link djohn?

[djohn2oo8]

:lol link please.

Dont bother, it doesn't exist. The secret service has not said they WILL be investigating.
You do know they never come out and say "Hey, we will be investigating you."

763142627202048000

[ducks]

Place was packed
https://scontent-lax3-1.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/fr/cp0/e15/q65/13872949_10157466610875725_2285373877808649900_n.j pg?efg=eyJpIjoidCJ9&oh=7a76286ec18e0e22f3064bf6f7a41203&oe=581C0179

[TheSanityAnnex]

You do know they never come out and say "Hey, we will be investigating you."

763142627202048000
You said they will be investigating him and this is your proof? lol gtfo

[Splits]

Doesn't matter what he meant, matters what people hear. I'm pretty sure the Bubba gun fellators aren't analyzing speech transcripts figuring out the context

[Splits]

763116726435323905

[baseline bum]

Don't know if she asked to be there. I take back what I said earlier, having Mike Brown's mom on stage at the convention was worse. But having Seddique "my son shouldn't have targeted gays because God would take care of them himself" Mateen there wasn't good for optics.

What does him being there have to do with anything? You're just throwing shit against the wall.

[TheSanityAnnex]

Doesn't matter what he meant, matters what people hear. I'm pretty sure the Bubba gun fellators aren't analyzing speech transcripts figuring out the context

We learned with Hillary intent has everything to do with it. He can just play that card. Genius move tbh, rile up the bubbas and fuck with the liberal media at the same time.

[baseline bum]

If you truly believe Trump was calling for the assassination of Clinton you have koolaid in your veins and bones tbqh

He was making an assassination joke. It's what he does, say some stupid troll shit to always keep his face on TV.

[baseline bum]

We learned with Hillary intent has everything to do with it. He can just play that card. Genius move tbh, rile up the bubbas and fuck with the liberal media at the same time.

Liberal media? When were they trying to get Sanders elected?

[Splits]

If you watch the entire interview and not just the 10 second clip it's obvious he is talking about the voting power of gun activist groups, 2nd amendment supporters, and NRA members. Just more media spin.

You must not have watched it either considering the bolded

[djohn2oo8]

You said they will be investigating him and this is your proof? lol gtfo
Will the SECRET service come out and tell the world they will be investigating? :lmao you are dumb

[TheSanityAnnex]

You must not have watched it either considering the bolded
I changed it a few seconds after posting. See edit. You literally just quoted and edited my edited post faggot lol

[TheSanityAnnex]

763116726435323905
You seem to be tossing account ban bets around frequently.

I'll put my account up if Trump's speech in NC turns out less than Hillary's in Omaha.

http://i1311.photobucket.com/albums/s679/thefuzzylumpkins/Mobile%20Uploads/image_zpsvxil70jn.jpeg

you in?

[TheSanityAnnex]

Will the SECRET service come out and tell the world they will be investigating? :lmao you are dumb
So then we'll never know. Your claim that they WILL is dumb.

[TheSanityAnnex]

He was making an assassination joke. It's what he does, say some stupid troll shit to always keep his face on TV.
If you really want to go that route I don't even think you aren't even interpreting what he said correctly. Sounded more like he was alluding to the fact that the 2nd amendment is for standing up to a tyrannical government taking rights away, which he was implying would happen if Clinton became President. Even looking at it that way I still don't see it as a call to assassinate Clinton.

[Reck]

TheSanityAnnex, holy shit man. I know you dont like Hillary (With good reason) but you have gone into a tailspin on this thread alone. You might want some of that diazepam yourself. :lol

[djohn2oo8]

So then we'll never know. Your claim that they WILL is dumb.
They will never say it publicly, you idiot. But they will be investigating...They already investigated his adviser once.

[TheSanityAnnex]

They will never say it publicly, you idiot. But they will be investigating...They already investigated his adviser once.
Okie dokie Mr Secret Service. Be sure to let us all know when the investigation is complete and what the findings were.

[TheSanityAnnex]

You seem to be tossing account ban bets around frequently.

I'll put my account up if Trump's speech in NC turns out less than Hillary's in Omaha.

http://i1311.photobucket.com/albums/s679/thefuzzylumpkins/Mobile%20Uploads/image_zpsvxil70jn.jpeg

you in?
Splits will you take the bet if hater includes his account? Don't be a pussy if we make it 2 for 1

[TheSanityAnnex]

TheSanityAnnex (http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/member.php?u=4389), holy shit man. I know you dont like Hillary (With good reason) but you have gone into a tailspin on this thread alone. You might want some of that diazepam yourself. :lol
I like to be entertained.

[hater]

He was making an assassination joke. It's what he does, say some stupid troll shit to always keep his face on TV.

Doesn't seem like hypocrite Liberal/neocon media is calling it a joke. Seems to me they have an agenda against the man. If what u say is true then why doesn't the media stop hyping everything that comes from his mouth??

Agenda

[hater]

It was an amazing crowd tonight fellas.

[hater]

Donald Trump talks straight fellas. Doesn't mince words and puts America first. We need that man in the white house

[boutons_deux]

If you really want to go that route I don't even think you aren't even interpreting what he said correctly. Sounded more like he was alluding to the fact that the 2nd amendment is for standing up to a tyrannical government taking rights away, which he was implying would happen if Clinton became President. Even looking at it that way I still don't see it as a call to assassinate Clinton.

:lol holy shit! There's NO QUESTION what Trash's meaning was.


Dana Perino: If Clinton Made That ‘Second Amendment’ Remark About Trump, We Would Freak Out

Geraldo Rivera was mortified by what Trump said, declaring, “This is a federal crime if he means waht he says.”
“Imagine,”

Dana Perino said, “if [Clinton] had said, or somebody had said, that about Donald Trump––like carelessly say ‘Oh, maybe someone will assassinate him’––we would all be going crazy.”

Greg Gutfeld got a little snarky after he said this kind of thing puts pressure on Trump’s strongest defenders.

As Eric Bolling started to speak, Gutfeld said, “Speaking of whom…”

http://www.mediaite.com/tv/fox-host-if-clinton-made-that-second-amendment-remark-about-trump-we-would-freak-out/

:lol

[Reck]

Doesn't seem like hypocrite Liberal/neocon media is calling it a joke. Seems to me they have an agenda against the man. If what u say is true then why doesn't the media stop hyping everything that comes from his mouth??

Agenda

Trump is officially trying to lose this on purpose. Joking about killing an elected official can put you under the scrutiny of the secret service. Joke or not, they are probably investigating Trump.

It's something that they have to do joke or not. This will also boost Hillary in the poll.

I give Trump a month before he drops out..

[boutons_deux]

Donald Trump says he will debate ... so long as he gets to change rules, moderators, and dates (http://www.dailykos.com/stories/2016/8/9/1558356/-Donald-Trump-says-he-will-debate-so-long-as-he-gets-to-change-rules-moderators-and-dates)


“I renegotiated the debates in the primaries, remember? They were making a fortune on them and they had us in for three and a half hours and I said that’s ridiculous,” Trump said. “I’m sure they’ll be open to any suggestions I have, because I think they’ll be very fair suggestions. But I haven’t [seen the conditions] yet. They’re actually presented to me tonight.”



Trump hasn’t seen the conditions. Because, you know, he hasn't bothered to look (http://www.debates.org/index.php?page=2016debates) at the rules and explanations that the CPD has provided for months.

And the CPD isn’t making a fortune, because it’s a nonprofit organization.

And since Donald Trump has already had experience with a moderator being mean to him (http://www.politicususa.com/2016/03/03/megyn-kelly-destroys-donald-trump-words-fox-news-debate.html), he also wants to ditch the choices of the commission and pick his own buddies.

Trump said he reserved the right to object to the commission’s choice of moderators, which have not yet been announced.


Trump has, of course, already complained about the dates, including lying about exchanging letters with the NFL (http://www.dailykos.com/story/2016/8/1/1555363/-Donald-Trump-already-preparing-his-excuses-for-dodging-the-presidential-debates).

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2016/08/09/1558356/-Donald-Trump-says-he-will-debate-so-long-as-he-gets-to-change-rules-moderators-and-dates?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+dailykos%2Findex+%28Daily+Kos %29

[benefactor]

This whole thing is just getting ridiculous. If Trump says in he will lose in a landslide. He solidifies it every time he opens his mouth.

[hater]

Trump is officially trying to lose this on purpose. Joking about killing an elected official can put you under the scrutiny of the secret service. Joke or not, they are probably investigating Trump.

It's something that they have to do joke or not. This will also boost Hillary in the poll.

I give Trump a month before he drops out..

Please provide the quote where he asks for someone to assassinate Shitler

[Reck]

Please provide the quote where he asks for someone to assassinate Shitler

What is the 2nd ammendment about?

Dont be an idiot.

[Splits]

You seem to be tossing account ban bets around frequently.

I'll put my account up if Trump's speech in NC turns out less than Hillary's in Omaha.

http://i1311.photobucket.com/albums/s679/thefuzzylumpkins/Mobile%20Uploads/image_zpsvxil70jn.jpeg

you in?

non-verifiable, so no.

[Axl Rose]

This whole thing is just getting ridiculous. If Trump says in he will lose in a landslide. He solidifies it every time he opens his mouth.
Cmon dude you're smarter than that. Stop taking your viewpoints from cnn.

[TheSanityAnnex]

non-verifiable, so no.

Dont be a pussy, isn't that what you been telling hater the last few days?

We can easily verify attendance at each event. Sack up pussy. Take the bet.

[TheSanityAnnex]

What is the 2nd ammendment about?

Dont be an idiot.
According to most liberals it has absolutely nothing to do with the people defending themselves against a tyrannical government. You guys can't have it both ways.

[Splits]

Dont be a pussy, isn't that what you been telling hater the last few days?

We can easily verify attendance at each event. Sack up pussy. Take the bet.

Ive been calling hater a pussy for months, not days. And my bets are directly related to his predictions, because he shitposts daily about Trump poll or election victories yet refuses to back it up with anything but emojis. I've made plenty of predictions about objective data points, feel free to take up any of them.

[spurraider21]

Don't know if she asked to be there. I take back what I said earlier, having Mike Brown's mom on stage at the convention was worse. But having Seddique "my son shouldn't have targeted gays because God would take care of them himself" Mateen there wasn't good for optics.
Whining about optics then defending a guy who alluded to Clinton getting assassinated to stop her AFTER she's elected

[spurraider21]

According to most liberals it has absolutely nothing to do with the people defending themselves against a tyrannical government. You guys can't have it both ways.
So please explain how this concept would be used to prevent Hillary or SCOTUS from acting? I would imagine it involves using a gun, somehow. Please enlighten me

[TheSanityAnnex]

Ive been calling hater a pussy for months, not days. And my bets are directly related to his predictions, because he shitposts daily about Trump poll or election victories yet refuses to back it up with anything but emojis. I've made plenty of predictions about objective data points, feel free to take up any of them.
And my bet is directly related to you mocking the attendance at a Trump rally that hadn't even started. Am I wrong to assume after your post you think Hillary gets better turnouts?

The bet still stands. Or do you think Hillary gets far less turnout at her rally's?

[TheSanityAnnex]

Whining about optics then defending a guy who alluded to Clinton getting assassinated to stop her AFTER she's elected
Meh, I don't take anything he says at face value. Anyone paying attention already knows not to.

[spurraider21]

Meh, I don't take anything he says at face value. Anyone paying attention already knows not to.
That was my thought process when he announced he was running for president, tbh

[Spurminator]

I would think gun rights proponents would be falling all over themselves to denounce Trump's comments instead of defending the comments. A Presidential candidate implied, joking or not, that they would be willing and capable of assassinating his opponent.

Where are all of the good guys with guns telling us how wrong he is?

[InRareForm]

Trump is +300 odds

It was +180 two weeks ago.

It was a 4 point game at halftime, now Hillary has a 15 point lead in the 3rd quarter

[ducks]

Former Dem Sen. Joe Lieberman Could Endorse Trump

[TheSanityAnnex]

I would think gun rights proponents would be falling all over themselves to denounce Trump's comments instead of defending the comments. A Presidential candidate implied, joking or not, that they would be willing and capable of assassinating his opponent.

Where are all of the good guys with guns telling us how wrong he is?
I took it as a call for 100 million gun owners to get out and vote to stop Clinton. Others took it as a call to rise against a tyrannical government trying to take away their guns. If you watch the entire speech, and know how shitty Trump puts his thoughts to spoken words I think it's the former.

[ducks]

http://www.kvnonews.com/2016/08/senator-deb-fischer-support-trump/

[Spurminator]

I took it as a call for 100 million gun owners to get out and vote to stop Clinton. Others took it as a call to rise against a tyrannical government trying to take away their guns. If you watch the entire speech, and know how shitty Trump puts his thoughts to spoken words I think it's the former.

A Presidential candidate's speech shouldn't have to require such detailed parsing.

I didn't read it because I don't really care, it has absolutely no impact on my vote.

[TheSanityAnnex]

So please explain how this concept would be used to prevent Hillary or SCOTUS from acting? I would imagine it involves using a gun, somehow. Please enlighten me
If you truly believe he was calling for someone to kill her sure, of course it would involve a gun.

[Splits]

And my bet is directly related to you mocking the attendance at a Trump rally that hadn't even started. Am I wrong to assume after your post you think Hillary gets better turnouts?

The bet still stands. Or do you think Hillary gets far less turnout at her rally's?

Rally attendance is subjective. I've also never claimed that Shill turns out more than Trump.

hater, on the other hand, has predicted Trump will win the election, will be ahead in the polls after the first debate, will "take the gloves off and she'll never recover" etc etc. When PA was tied, I offered him Trump +5 in the GA and he still wouldn't take it. Every crap prediction he makes, I offer a bet. But he won't take any of them because he's a pussy and/or doesn't believe his own shitposting.

He makes ridiculous predictions to try to get a rise, I call him out to put his money where his mouth is, he backs down. Rinse repeat.

Feel free to make an objective prediction, and I'll decide whether or not I agree with you.

Here, I'll start: Shill will beat Trump by over 100 electoral college votes. Loser can't post in the political forum until 2017.

[Spurminator]

Next time you guys post an article about the tweets of random protestors, ask yourselves if you're holding them to a higher standard than the leading GOP candidate for President of the United States, and then ask yourself why that would be.

[Splits]

Meh, I don't take anything he says at face value. Anyone paying attention already knows not to.

But everyone needs to watch the entire "interview" to understand the context?

Pick a lane.

[TheSanityAnnex]

A Presidential candidate's speech shouldn't have to require such detailed parsing.

I didn't read it because I don't really care, it has absolutely no impact on my vote.
Why ask what gun owners think if you won't read it in its entirety and don't care?

[TheSanityAnnex]

But everyone needs to watch the entire "interview" to understand the context?

Pick a lane.
Take a bet pussy. Attendance numbers are easily verifiable.

[Spurminator]

Why ask what gun owners think if you won't read it in its entirety and don't care?

I'm just surprised gun owners, knowing that most people will read the comment supposedly taken out of context, and knowing how sensitive the discussion of gun rights is in the current political climate, aren't more concerned about the comment itself than about whether everybody is considering the full context and best possible interpretation of the comment.

[TheSanityAnnex]

Rally attendance is subjective. I've also never claimed that Shill turns out more than Trump.

hater, on the other hand, has predicted Trump will win the election, will be ahead in the polls after the first debate, will "take the gloves off and she'll never recover" etc etc. When PA was tied, I offered him Trump +5 in the GA and he still wouldn't take it. Every crap prediction he makes, I offer a bet. But he won't take any of them because he's a pussy and/or doesn't believe his own shitposting.

He makes ridiculous predictions to try to get a rise, I call him out to put his money where his mouth is, he backs down. Rinse repeat.

Feel free to make an objective prediction, and I'll decide whether or not I agree with you.

Here, I'll start: Shill will beat Trump by over 100 electoral college votes. Loser can't post in the political forum until 2017.
I don't make the same claims hater does and have never predicted a Trump victory. I decline your bet.

Explain in to me why you posted the picture of the pre-Trump rally if not to mock his turnout?

[TheSanityAnnex]

I'm just surprised gun owners, knowing that most people will read the comment supposedly taken out of context, and knowing how sensitive the discussion of gun rights is in the current political climate, aren't more concerned about the comment itself than about whether everybody is considering the full context and best possible interpretation of the comment.

Maybe I'm not most gun owners and at this point just really don't give a shit. As a Californian I have my gun rights trampled yearly, I'm used to it now and am firmly in the will not comply camp.

[Splits]

I don't make the same claims hater does and have never predicted a Trump victory. I decline your bet.

Explain in to me why you posted the picture of the pre-Trump rally if not to mock his turnout?

I posted it to mock his turnout.

It is one of his main rallying cries. In recent weeks he has booked venues he knows are too small, then goes off on the fire marshall that people aren't allowed in.

Shill does no such thing. If she did, I would :lol at her as well.

[TheSanityAnnex]

Gotta run. Splits take my bet, we'll just make until next Monday.

Peace.

[Splits]

Take a bet pussy. Attendance numbers are easily verifiable.

How many were at that Shill rally?

[Spurminator]

Maybe I'm not most gun owners and at this point just really don't give a shit. As a Californian I have my gun rights trampled yearly, I'm used to it now and am firmly in the will not comply camp.

Oh I'm not pinning all of this on you. I'm wondering when we're going to hear from the NRA or anyone else of influence in the Gun Rights community with the same hysteria that follows any comment on guns by the current President. Not even Obama has suggested that 2nd Amendment advocates are POTUS assassins.

[Reck]

According to most liberals it has absolutely nothing to do with the people defending themselves against a tyrannical government. You guys can't have it both ways.

What about Hillary looks tyrannical to you? There is literally no shread of evidence that Hillary wants to be a Putin like figure or Kim Yong Un type.

If you ask me, Trump has by far displayed a more isolationist and dictator like president.

Imo, there is no way you can spin what he said into what you're trying to fit his narrative in. First of, the people wouldn't even have to revolt if a US president tries to consolidate power and rule as dictator. That's something the military would squash in two seconds.

You can probably say Trump wasn't serious when he said it but he implied Hillary should perhaps be dealt with by the people by force. And since he used the second ammendment as a reference, what other way of dealing with someone you dont like can we assume he meant?

I truly believe he has tossed in the white towel and its just finding a way to get out of it while at the same time making the excuse that the election was rigged.

[hater]

What is the 2nd ammendment about?

Dont be an idiot.

Is it about assassinating people?

Don't be a moron

[Reck]

Is it about assassinating people?

Don't be a moron

Ah yes, I forgot.

Guns dont actually fire bullets..

[spurraider21]

If you truly believe he was calling for someone to kill her sure, of course it would involve a gun.
what do you think he was calling for? how else would "second amendment people" stop hillary from appointing a SCOTUS justice after her election? spell it out for me

[Splits]

what do you think he was calling for? how else would "second amendment people" stop hillary from appointing a SCOTUS justice after her election? spell it out for me

Writing letters to their Senators?

[spurraider21]

its amazing that after years of shitting on obummer for using the teleprompter, trump literally takes a shit on himself every time he tries speaking without one :lol

[hitmanyr2k]

You seem to be tossing account ban bets around frequently.

I'll put my account up if Trump's speech in NC turns out less than Hillary's in Omaha.

http://i1311.photobucket.com/albums/s679/thefuzzylumpkins/Mobile%20Uploads/image_zpsvxil70jn.jpeg

you in?

Honestly man, why do you make yourself look dumb over and over and over? Why do you believe the right wing echo chamber when they manipulate idiots like you time and time again? You can see in those pictures in that tweet that Hillary isn't even on stage yet. Doesn't that give some kind of clue that it's early and the speech hasn't even started yet? How about showing an actual picture when she's on stage? Like these mental midget.

http://imageshack.com/a/img924/1375/cxy5Pw.jpg

http://imageshack.com/a/img922/2985/m0EbMB.jpg

[benefactor]

^ethered tbh

[Reck]

Honestly man, why do you make yourself look dumb over and over and over? Why do you believe the right wing echo chamber when they manipulate idiots like you time and time again? You can see in those pictures in that tweet that Hillary isn't even on stage yet. Doesn't that give some kind of clue that it's early and the speech hasn't even started yet? How about showing an actual picture when she's on stage? Like these mental midget.

http://imageshack.com/a/img924/1375/cxy5Pw.jpg

http://imageshack.com/a/img922/2985/m0EbMB.jpg

Damnnnn

I dont usually give two fucks about rallies and what people attend but the righties make such a big deal with Trump rallies. They always try to make Hillary's rallie seem cheap like its some kind of achievement.

I'm going to vote for Hillary and I would never attend one of her shitty rallies. Too old for pep rallies. :lol

[TheGreatYacht]

hitmanyr2k :wow

[hater]

Ah yes, I forgot.

Guns dont actually fire bullets..

Is it about assassinating people????

[Pelicans78]

Is it about assassinating people????

You at it again? Didn't you learn your lesson in the Coup of Turkey thread?

It's obvious he was implying an assassination, and even if he wasn't he should have made himself more clear.

[boutons_deux]

Former Dem Sen. Joe Lieberman Could Endorse Trump

Lieberman has been independent, not Dem, for many years. He's was one of the Senators who killed medicare-for-all at the discussion stage because his state of CT is loaded with BigInsurance. iow, he's a whore to Big$$$ like all of them are.

[boutons_deux]

Trump On Second Amendment Backlash: ‘I Think It’s A Good Thing For Me’

Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump (http://www.huffingtonpost.com/news/donald-trump/) said Tuesday night he’s benefitting from the controversy he created earlier in the day by suggesting “the Second Amendment people” might forcefully stop Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton from appointing Supreme Court justices.

After an outcry (http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/trump-clinton-shoot_us_57aa2f6de4b0ba7ed23dd652) from Democrats and gun-control advocates over remarks that appeared to obliquely encourage violence, Trump said he didn’t mean to suggest any harm. The real villains, he said on Fox News (http://insider.foxnews.com/2016/08/09/trump-uproar-over-2nd-amendment-remark-give-me-break), were the media.

“I have to say, in terms of politics, there is few things, and I happen to think that if [the media] did even bring this up, I think it’s a good thing for me,” Trump told Sean Hannity.

“Because it’s going to tell people more about me with respect to the Second Amendment ... because Hillary Clinton wants to essentially abolish the Second Amendment.” :lol

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/trump-second-amendment-backlash_us_57aaa702e4b0ba7ed23e2bf8?uc7rf5cxim251 m7vi&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=The%20Morning%20Email%20081016&utm_content=The%20Morning%20Email%20081016+CID_4c6 4d6116f20ae429607e46edae8e0bb&utm_source=Email%20marketing%20software&utm_term=Christina%20Wilkie%20HuffPost

You "Second Amendment people" here, locked and loaded for Hillary! :lol

[CosmicCowboy]

if Hillary really does go after guns in a big way I guarantee she will be a one term President.

Personally I think she is just patronizing the anti-gun nuts for the election and doesn't have the balls to really go after them.

[boutons_deux]

For you gun fellators and NRA/BigGun shills, background checks means "abolishing the God-given inalienable rights in 2nd Amendment"

[hater]

You at it again? Didn't you learn your lesson in the Coup of Turkey thread?

It's obvious he was implying an assassination, and even if he wasn't he should have made himself more clear.

Saying the words 2nd amendment implies assassination??In what fantasy land do you live at, Pikachu?

[Reck]

Saying the words 2nd amendment implies assassination??In what fantasy land do you live at, Pikachu?

Boy, are you stupid!

[mrsmaalox]

So you hate trump just because you're Mexican and he's a big meanie? Low info voter

I'm not Mexican and I don't hate Trump. So you love Trump because his mindless bloviating gives you the courage to hurl a racist insult at me just because I don't find him as attractive as you do?

Just stick around, Im sure one of the TrumptyDumptys would love to describe to you his round pink cherubic belly and how the fiberglass insulation on his head looks like a gilded halo in the sunlight, so you can resume touching yourself :jack

[mrsmaalox]

Long time no talk maalox, what's up?

Not much, can't come around here much anymore, my eyerolling muscles get too strained.

[DarrinS]

I'm not Mexican and I don't hate Trump. So you love Trump because his mindless bloviating gives you the courage to hurl a racist insult at me just because I don't find him as attractive as you do?

Just stick around, Im sure one of the TrumptyDumptys would love to describe to you his round pink cherubic belly and how the fiberglass insulation on his head looks like a gilded halo in the sunlight, so you can resume touching yourself :jack

:lol

[hater]

Boy, are you stupid!

Yup that really explains why u think 2nd ammendement means assassination :lmao

You really got me there :lol

[hater]

I'm not Mexican and I don't hate Trump. So you love Trump because his mindless bloviating gives you the courage to hurl a racist insult at me just because I don't find him as attractive as you do?

Just stick around, Im sure one of the TrumptyDumptys would love to describe to you his round pink cherubic belly and how the fiberglass insulation on his head looks like a gilded halo in the sunlight, so you can resume touching yourself :jack

Nice. That still doesn't make Shillary any prettier. She's still worse than Trump in foreign policy (birthed ISIS, wanted to shoot Russian planes,etc), economic policy (she is Wall Streets Hooker) and social (she anti-Bernie)

Pathetic

[Reck]

Not much, can't come around here much anymore, my eyerolling muscles get too strained.

:lol Dont blame you there.

[Axl Rose]

I'm not Mexican and I don't hate Trump. So you love Trump because his mindless bloviating gives you the courage to hurl a racist insult at me just because I don't find him as attractive as you do?

Just stick around, Im sure one of the TrumptyDumptys would love to describe to you his round pink cherubic belly and how the fiberglass insulation on his head looks like a gilded halo in the sunlight, so you can resume touching yourself :jack

you're Mexican, maybe not by citizenship but it's in your blood. You do hate trump because you took the time out of your day to throw dirt on his name and write up that silly narrative to me for pointing it out. Can you logically explain why you hate trump without using mindless buzzwords like "racist" and all the other "ist" words?

[boutons_deux]

Trash going full knitter hater

https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/1980294624/DJT_Headshot_V2_bigger.jpgDonald J. Trump
✔@realDonaldTrump (https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump)

.@dbongino (https://twitter.com/dbongino) You were fantastic in defending both the Second Amendment and me last night on @CNN (https://twitter.com/CNN). Don Lemon is a lightweight - dumb as a rock

Trash supporters, what they hear:

Hillary is unstable (women are genetically unstable, emotional)

Lemon is dumb as a rock (it's knitter genetics)

[boutons_deux]

Trash getting mortal payback for banning WaPo reporters

TRUMP: A TRUE STORY

https://www.washingtonpost.com/graphics/politics/2016-election/trump-lies/


... not that Trash supporters GAF about facts about Trash, any more than they GAF about AGW facts.

[TheSanityAnnex]

^ethered tbh
http://i1311.photobucket.com/albums/s679/thefuzzylumpkins/lead_960_zpscxaznaxg.jpg

[ducks]

The Washington Post.

The Post said that the opinion of Democrats and analysts that Trump had hinted for violence against Clinton was not the feeling of those at the event and that, aside from Democrats trying to score political points, the criticism from most others was relative mild, according to the paper.


https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/post-politics/wp/2016/08/09/from-audience-to-nra-trump-weathers-2nd-amendment-storm/

[boutons_deux]

"A key part of Trump's polling problems is that college-educated white women (who voted more for Romney in 2012) are dumping Trump in droves."

https://www.facebook.com/therachelmaddowshow/videos/10153827227814067/

[boutons_deux]

Trump’s threat is nothing new — Republicans have called for ‘Second Amendment remedies’ for years

http://2d0yaz2jiom3c6vy7e7e5svk.wpengine.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/palingun-800x430.jpg

But his comments are part of a

widespread belief that the Second Amendment covers the right of gun-owning Americans to use violence to settle political disagreements their First Amendment rights can’t solve.


That belief is promoted on the T-shirt rack at any gun shop or Army surplus store, and it’s broadcast on bumper stickers parked outside gun ranges and other places where “Second Amendment people” gather.

The notion of constitutionally protected political violence is also promoted by Republican lawmakers and candidates, as well as influential lobbyists and anti-government activists.

NRA chief Wayne LaPierre has offered many variations (http://mediamatters.org/research/2016/08/09/trump-s-violent-claim-about-second-amendment-and-hillary-clinton-echoes-what-nra-has-said-years/212279) of that interpretation of the Second Amendment, which he claims could be used to fight perceived tyranny and overturn voting results. “Our Founding Fathers understood that the guys with the guns make the rules,” he said in 2009, at the Conservative Political Action Conference.

GOP House candidate Robert Lowry held a campaign event at a Florida gun range in October 2009, where he fired gunshots (http://talkingpointsmemo.com/dc/gop-candidate-shoots-at-target-with-wasserman-schultz-s-initials) at a silhouette that had his opponent Rep. Debbie Wasserman-Schultz’s printed on it.

Nevada Senate candidate Sharron Angle, who nearly defeated then-Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, suggested gun violence in January 2010 to settle political disagreements. “You know, if this Congress keeps going the way it is, people are really looking toward those Second Amendment remedies,” Angle said (http://voices.washingtonpost.com/plum-line/2010/06/sharron_angle_floated_possibil.html).

Brad Goehring, who ran for the California statehouse, referred to “liberal hunting permits” that are sold as novelties at gun shops in a May 2010 Facebook post. “If I could issue hunting permits, I would officially declare today opening day for liberals,”Goerhing said (https://thinkprogress.org/california-gop-candidate-wants-to-issue-hunting-permits-for-conservatives-to-thin-the-liberal-herd-fb714b62d4d3). “The season would extend through November 2 and have no limits on how many taken as we desperately need to ‘thin’ the herd.”

Jesse Kelly, who ran against Giffords before she was shot, held a campaign event in June 2010 at a local gun shop. “Get on Target for Victory in November. Help remove Gabrielle Giffords from office,” read an advertisement for the event (http://talkingpointsmemo.com/dc/flashback-giffords-opponent-had-m16-shooting-event-help-remove-gabrielle-giffords-from-office). “Shoot a fully automatic M16 With Jesse Kelly.”

Sarah Palin circulated a map (http://gawker.com/5728545/shot-congresswoman-was-in-sarah-palins-crosshairs) placing crosshairs over lawmakers who supported President Barack Obama’s health care reform law — including Rep. Gabrielle Giffords, who was shot and seriously wounded by a deranged gunman in 2011. “Don’t retreat, instead- RELOAD!” urged Palin, the former half-term governor and failed vice presidential candidate.

Oklahoma Republican John Sullivan told a town hall audience (http://www.care2.com/causes/gop-rep-says-killing-a-couple-of-democrats-only-way-to-pass-ryan-budget.html#comment-3262561) in February 2012 that the only way Rep. Paul Ryan’s budget proposal would pass is if some Democratic lawmakers were shot. “I live with some Senators, I yell at them all the time, I grabbed one of them the other day and shook him and I’d love to get them to vote for it — boy I’d love that,” Sullivan said. “You know but other than me going over there with a gun and holding it to their head and maybe killing a couple of them, I don’t think they’re going to listen unless they get beat.”

Sen. Joni Ernst said in August 2012, when she was running for office (http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/10/22/joni-ernst-guns_n_6032164.html), that she would use her gun to protect herself from the government.

“I do believe in the right to carry, and I believe in the right to defend myself and my family — whether it’s from an intruder, or whether it’s from the government, should they decide that my rights are no longer important,” Ernst said.

Mike Vanderboegh, founder of the III Percent gun militia and an influential speaker in the right-wing patriot movement, told open carry advocates (http://www.rawstory.com/2014/07/open-carry-advocate-when-our-arguments-fail-we-must-vote-with-our-guns/) that the Second Amendment and the Bible called for them to use gun violence against their political enemies. “Failing all other appeals to peaceful means, that the founders’ solution to such tyranny is still available, still potent, and still waiting, for when democracy turns to tyranny, the armed citizenry still gets to vote,” Vanderboegh said, as the crowd cheered wildly.

Larry Pratt, the executive director emeritus of Gun Owners of America and former Virginia lawmaker, made remarks strongly similar to Trump’s in May 2016, when he warned that Second Amendment rights could be threatened if liberals gain a majority on the high court. “Their decisions, unlike the Roe v. Wade usurpation, don’t extend to the whole of society, they’re not supposed to, and we may have to reassert that proper constitutional balance, and it may not be pretty,” Pratt said (http://www.rawstory.com/2016/06/right-wing-gun-nut-warns-conservatives-will-use-bullet-box-if-they-cant-win-at-ballot-box/). “So I’d much rather have an election where we solve this matter at the ballot box than have to resort to the bullet box.”

http://www.rawstory.com/2016/08/trumps-threat-is-nothing-new-republicans-have-called-for-second-amendment-remedies-for-years/

Trash KNEW EXACTLY what his “Second Amendment people” meant

[hater]

The Washington Post.

The Post said that the opinion of Democrats and analysts that Trump had hinted for violence against Clinton was not the feeling of those at the event and that, aside from Democrats trying to score political points, the criticism from most others was relative mild, according to the paper.


https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/post-politics/wp/2016/08/09/from-audience-to-nra-trump-weathers-2nd-amendment-storm/


Agree.

It's actually 1000x the scandal that Shitler had the Orlando shooters dad as her guest of honor. Where is the media outrage on that???

[DMX7]

Agree.

It's actually 1000x the scandal that Shitler had the Orlando shooters dad as her guest of honor. Where is the media outrage on that???

Just imagine if he were at Trump's rally... Can you imagine the outrage???

I can't! That, I can tell you.

[boutons_deux]

Senator Elizabeth Warren took her turn publicly musing about the incident yesterday when she tweeted (http://www.mediaite.com/online/warren-coward-trump-makes-death-threats-because-hes-angry-hes-losing-to-a-girl/) about Trump not being happy “losing to a girl,” and

that really set Melissa Francis off.

Seriously, even though Warren has been really vocal through this entire election, it was these two little tweets that made Francis furious.

She repeatedly asked why Warren was allowed to tweet something like that, ( :lol maybe allowed by 1st Amendment? :lol )

http://www.mediaite.com/online/why-is-foxs-melissa-francis-freaking-out-over-why-warren-is-allowed-to-tweet-about-trump/

[rmt]

So, does anyone remember any media outrage at Hillary's assassination comment:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E0QAewVrR28

[Spurminator]

763075178926596096

[Spurminator]

So, does anyone remember any media outrage at Hillary's assassination comment:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E0QAewVrR28

Yes, there was outrage. But she apologized shortly after, which usually diffuses bad press, instead of blaming the media for blowing it out of proportion, which usually has the opposite effect.

Public Relations 101.

[Reck]

So, does anyone remember any media outrage at Hillary's assassination comment:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E0QAewVrR28

Did she implied that or tell anyone to go kill Obama? All she did was say someone got killed in june.

Dumb comment to make but dont try to equate that to what Trump said. It doesn't even come close.

[spurraider21]

Senator Elizabeth Warren took her turn publicly musing about the incident yesterday when she tweeted (http://www.mediaite.com/online/warren-coward-trump-makes-death-threats-because-hes-angry-hes-losing-to-a-girl/) about Trump not being happy “losing to a girl,” and

that really set Melissa Francis off.

Seriously, even though Warren has been really vocal through this entire election, it was these two little tweets that made Francis furious.

She repeatedly asked why Warren was allowed to tweet something like that, ( :lol maybe allowed by 1st Amendment? :lol )

http://www.mediaite.com/online/why-is-foxs-melissa-francis-freaking-out-over-why-warren-is-allowed-to-tweet-about-trump/




They are referring to media reactiom/outrage/response, not the actual legality of the statement, you dipshit

[boutons_deux]

They are referring to media reactiom/outrage/response, not the actual legality of the statement, you dipshit

"She repeatedly asked why Warren was allowed to tweet something like that"

... just as transparently clear as Trash's "2nd Amendment People", herr spinmeister.

[boutons_deux]

Donald Trump’s problem, in a nutshell: More than half the country says they’d never vote for him

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2016/08/10/donald-trumps-problem-in-a-nutshell-more-than-half-the-country-says-theyd-never-vote-for-him/?tid=pm_politics_pop_b

[Splits]

A US Secret Service official confirms to CNN that the USSS has spoken to the Trump campaign regarding his Second Amendment comments.

"There has been more than one conversation" on the topic, the official told CNN.

http://www.cnn.com/2016/08/10/politics/trump-second-amendment/

[ducks]

did the sis speak to Clinton for actually saying someone could kill obAMA

[DMX7]

did the sis speak to Clinton for actually saying someone could kill obAMA

The SIS? You mean the USSS?

[clambake]

did the sis speak to Clinton for actually saying someone could kill obAMA

thats different

obama is black

[hater]

:lmao Man climbing Trump tower in NYC like in Superman The MOvie :lmao

fucking Trump is amazing. turning 2016 into a superman movie :lol

http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-eDVW2NIz8FI/VBRqQ69JDYI/AAAAAAAA67k/G3L1YaU0InE/s1600/superman10confessionisgoodforthesoul.jpg

[djohn2oo8]

A US Secret Service official confirms to CNN that the USSS has spoken to the Trump campaign regarding his Second Amendment comments.

"There has been more than one conversation" on the topic, the official told CNN.

http://www.cnn.com/2016/08/10/politics/trump-second-amendment/



:lmao TSA

[TheSanityAnnex]

:lmao TSA
"We're tired of responding to tweets, Trump to knock it off"

nice investigation djohn.

[Splits]

763498735821287424

[ducks]

feds deny talking to trump cnn is lying