PDA

View Full Version : The Official Trump is Doing Awesome Thread



Pages : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 [26] 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203

spurraider21
12-27-2017, 12:54 PM
Who should I believe. Pew Research Center or the guy that can't spell potato?
:lol underrated post

hater
12-27-2017, 03:35 PM
Trumps tweets are usually an omen of things to come

He is a few steps ahead in terms of knowledge of events to come. Now that the Russiagate hoax is crumbling as we spak there must be some new info soon to come out that will basically put a fork in it.

dabom
12-27-2017, 04:05 PM
:lol underrated post

:lol

Blake
12-27-2017, 04:21 PM
Trumps tweets are usually an omen of things to come

He is a few steps ahead in terms of knowledge of events to come. Now that the Russiagate hoax is crumbling as we spak there must be some new info soon to come out that will basically put a fork in it.

But he lies on twitter. This is something we know.

boutons_deux
12-27-2017, 05:30 PM
Obama Beats Trump As America's Most-Admired Man

President Donald Trump is the second-most admired man in the world among Americans. He joins a small group of incumbent presidents who failed to win Gallup’s top distinction while in office.

Trump’s predecessor,

former President Barack Obama,

and vanquished general election opponent,

Hillary Clinton

, retain their titles as the man and woman Americans most admire,

Obama edged out Trump, 17 percent to 14 percent, to win his 10th most-admired title.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/news/obama-beats-trump-as-americas-most-admired-man/vi-BBHpTB8

14%? holy shit, 10Ms of Americans prove once again they are dumb, stupid, ignorant as shit :lol

boutons_deux
12-27-2017, 07:38 PM
After CNN took a video of Trump golfing, his staff went next level ridiculous on the next golf trip (https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2017/12/27/1727970/-After-CNN-took-a-video-of-Trump-golfing-his-staff-went-next-level-ridiculous-on-the-next-golf-trip)

The most ridiculous, thin-skinned, unqualified, incompetent person in the history of this country is currently occupying the White House.

Lack of qualifications aside, he’s easily the laziest president in modern history, having racked up the most vacation time of anyone to hold the office in recent administrations and it isn’t even close.

Here’s a graphic to help you visualize just how much vacation he has taken and please note, Democratic presidents work their tails off for you.

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DSBe7lrUEAAWH0u.jpg

spoon fed his gullible voters this line of malarkey on the campaign trail: (https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2017/3/27/1647639/-Watch-2016-con-artist-Trump-tell-a-crowd-he-d-never-play-golf-never-leave-the-White-House)

“I have the greatest stuff and you know what? I love golf.

But if I were in the White House, I don’t think I’d ever see Turnberry again.

I don’t think I’d ever see Doral again. I own Doral in Miami.

I don’t think I’d ever see many of the places I have.

I don’t think I’d ever see anything,

I just want to stay in the White House and work my ass off and make great deals, right?

Who’s gonna leave?”


https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2017/12/27/1727970/-After-CNN-took-a-video-of-Trump-golfing-his-staff-went-next-level-ridiculous-on-the-next-golf-trip

Chris
12-27-2017, 08:25 PM
WATCH: Box Truck Arrives At Golf Course To Block CNN From Stalking Trump, CNN Loses It


CNN got upset on Wednesday when a box truck arrived at President Donald Trump’s golf course that CNN claimed, without proof, was there to block them from watching Trump.

CNN’s Dan Merica joined “CNN Newsroom” fill-in host Don Lemon where he reported that after successfully monitoring the president through a small gap in the surrounding vegetation for the last couple of days they were blocked by a box truck on Wednesday, NewsBusters reported.

“Over the last few days, we've gotten video of the President golfing at his nearby golf club here in West Palm Beach,” Merica said. “There is a break in the hedges, really. The President doesn't really and his staff doesn't tell us when he is golfing. And we have taken to going outside the golf course and filming him as he golfs through the break in hedges near the club.”

CNN’s obsession with wanting to monitor and surveil the president on a near-constant basis mimics the actions of a would-be stalker.

“Today, a big white box truck parked in front trying to obscure our shot of President Trump golfing,” Merica continued. “Now it may seem trivial, but it is important to give video as the President does these things on a daily basis. And goes to something that is larger, the President and the White House have tried to obscure the fact that President Trump golfs on a regular basis.”

This is CNN.

WATCH:

946143904612605952

www.dailywire.com/news/25148/watch-box-truck-arrives-golf-course-block-cnn-ryan-saavedra

Pavlov
12-27-2017, 08:35 PM
WATCH: Box Truck Arrives At Golf Course To Block CNN From Stalking Trump, CNN Loses ItGolfing good now.

spurraider21
12-27-2017, 08:53 PM
LOL. I remember how outraged libs were about Bush's vacations and playing golf. I think Obama is on page to out-do Bush, but I don't want to be like the libtards and express any phony outrage.

well at least darrin is above petty golf stories


Holy shit!

How does our Golfer-in-Chief get to the golf course on MEMORIAL DAY?


My side? Mark Halperin is a liberal.

Obama just has an asshole-ish personality. He's extremely arrogant and, at the same time, very thin skinned.

Ironically, he's played so much golf that he forgot his own daughter's age in that press conference. :lmao

spurraider21
12-27-2017, 08:54 PM
also :lol at obama being arrogant and thin skinned compared to the guy we have today

Pavlov
12-27-2017, 08:58 PM
:lol Darrin kept calling the black president a narcissist.

Chris
12-27-2017, 10:57 PM
945970444007591936

Chris
12-27-2017, 10:58 PM
946201376652169220

Pavlov
12-27-2017, 10:59 PM
946201376652169220:lmao

Chris
12-27-2017, 11:02 PM
946210723528572930

Chris
12-27-2017, 11:37 PM
946222746157142016

Chris
12-27-2017, 11:41 PM
946184027203080194

https://media1.giphy.com/media/prVVzTBArbJvO/giphy.gif

Pavlov
12-27-2017, 11:43 PM
946184027203080194

https://media1.giphy.com/media/prVVzTBArbJvO/giphy.gifRNC really helped Roy Moore win in Alabama. :lol

Chris
12-27-2017, 11:45 PM
RNC really helped Roy Moore win in Alabama. :lol

Destroying the ballots :lol

Chris
12-27-2017, 11:46 PM
946048090750029824

Chris
12-27-2017, 11:47 PM
946140500620468224

Pavlov
12-27-2017, 11:48 PM
Destroying the ballots :lolThose are Republicans doing that. :lmao

Chris
12-27-2017, 11:49 PM
https://scontent-dft4-2.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t31.0-8/26060038_2005398276399187_4096745436484853807_o.jp g?oh=b2b6fab888f300a1c0aa1f1f6498205e&oe=5AFB8E31

Pavlov
12-27-2017, 11:52 PM
Damn, Chris really has to convince himself Trump is doing well.

Chris
12-27-2017, 11:53 PM
Damn, Chris really has to convince himself Trump is doing well.

How bout those tax cuts and jobs?

Pavlov
12-27-2017, 11:57 PM
How bout those tax cuts and jobs?He hired no one and it's pretty pathetic this is the only legislation that was passed. The bill itself is shit -- increases the debt and the reforms disappear for the non-rich after a few years. That is not reform.

Chris
12-28-2017, 12:00 AM
He hired no one and it's pretty pathetic this is the only legislation that was passed. The bill itself is shit -- increases the debt and the reforms disappear for the non-rich after a few years. That is not reform.

No one has been able to explain to me this catastrophic event that is supposed to happen "after a few years". Can you explain or point me in the right direction.

Pavlov
12-28-2017, 12:02 AM
No one has been able to explain to me this catastrophic event that is supposed to happen "after a few years". Can you explain or point me in the right direction.Hey, Chris is ignorant about another political issue!

Stop the presses!

Chris
12-28-2017, 12:06 AM
Hey, Chris is ignorant about another political issue!

Stop the presses!

I'm not the one refusing to qualify my opinion. That tells me you are ignorant of the subject. Who was he supposed to hire Pavlov?

Pavlov
12-28-2017, 12:07 AM
Who was he supposed to hire Pavlov?You tell me. You brought up jobs.

Chris
12-28-2017, 12:28 AM
DNC in Disarray and Is Struggling to Raise Money Ahead of 2018 Elections


Top Democratic Party donors have been reluctant to open their wallets, and it has given the Republican Party a sixfold cash advantage ahead of the 2018 midterms.

“[Democratic National Committee] leaders say they are struggling against reputational hits from the 2016 election, including accusations by former party chairwoman Donna Brazile that the DNC was biased toward Hillary Clinton during the presidential primary,” according to The Wall Street Journal.

Brazile, the former interim chairwoman of the DNC, outlined a scenario in which the Clinton campaign controlled the DNC's fledgling finances under the leadership of Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz (D-FL).

946006707888586753

“I mean, it was bankrupt. It was on the verge of insolvency. Its data was mediocre to poor, nonexistent, wrong," Clinton said about the DNC during a technology conference this spring, according to the Journal.

Barack Obama set the DNC back during his eight years in office by giving them very little of his attention as he built his own fundraising and data operation apart from the DNC.

946009983199727616

“But there is a new wrinkle: Some top [Democratic] donors have lost faith in the party hierarchy,” reports the Journal.

The DNC had only $6.3 million in the bank on Dec. 1 paling in comparison to the $40 million in the Republican National Committee's coffers. In November, the DNC had its worst fundraising month in 10 years.

“At this point, there’s not really anyone at the DNC who I would trust with my money,” said John Morgan, a Democrat from Florida who has given the DNC large contributions to help Obama in the past.

Morgan is considering a run for governor in Florida but may not run as a Democrat despite holding fundraisers for both Obama and Clinton at his home.

“Why would I write big checks to them when I can do my own thing?" he said.

https://ijr.com/the-declaration/2017/12/1040660-dnc-disarray-struggling-raise-money-ahead-2018-elections/

Pavlov
12-28-2017, 12:30 AM
DNC in Disarray and Is Struggling to Raise Money Ahead of 2018 Elections:lol Alabama

Quadzilla99
12-28-2017, 12:35 AM
945884833611440128

Chris
12-28-2017, 01:19 AM
:lmao:lmao:lmao

946141896082165761

:lmao:lmao:lmao

Chris
12-28-2017, 01:24 AM
946195103613194241

Chris
12-28-2017, 01:27 AM
946193962980737030

boutons_deux
12-28-2017, 04:19 AM
Trump Is Only First-Year President To Ever Lose Most Admired Man Poll
http://www.nationalmemo.com/trump-first-year-president-ever-lose-admired-man-poll/

so much awesome winning! :lol

Chris
12-28-2017, 04:22 AM
:cry muh polls :cry

boutons_deux
12-28-2017, 04:28 AM
Most Americans say Trump’s Twitter use is inappropriate

Just 26 percent (http://d25d2506sfb94s.cloudfront.net/cumulus_uploads/document/h41dwa7h84/econTabReport.pdf) of 1,500 Americans polled said that Trump's use of Twitter was appropriate,

By the end of his first year in office, Trump had spent about 40 hours (http://www.newsweek.com/donald-trump-40-hours-tweeting-becoming-president-759285) tweeting about 2,600 times,

A staggering 59 percent of those polled said they disapproved of the president's near-daily tweets to his 45.2 million followers.

55 percent of people said that Trump does not have the temperament to be president, and

only 32 percent believed the president was honest and trustworthy.

https://www.rawstory.com/2017/12/most-americans-say-trumps-twitter-use-is-inappropriate/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+TheRawStory+%28The+Raw+Story% 29

Spurtacular
12-28-2017, 07:06 AM
fine. Stop your whining and present me with an accurate figure/citation. Are there 25 million? 40 million? 80 million? Spit it outTotal red herring. If it is exaggerated, then they aren’t facts and my criticism is valid. The rest of that is just a lot of *ding*

if it’s so obvious that illegals are taking a shit on our economy then you wouldn’t have to fabricate “facts” to make that point

Sorry for the delay, but I messaged someone who pays more attention to this than I do, and I had to wait for the reply. Here it is:


There are between 50 million and 80 million illegal aliens living in this country.




3. James H. Walsh, formerly an Associate General Counsel of the Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS) in the United States Department of Justice, writes


"... the U.S. Census Bureau routinely undercounts and then adjusts upward total census numbers of Hispanics and other foreign nationals residing in the United States––counting only, of course, those willing to be counted. For the year 2000, the Census Bureau reported a total U.S. population count of “about 275 million” men, women, and children.


When the states and local governments challenged that number as an undercount, the total was corrected upward to 281.4 million, with no clear count of illegal aliens. The Hispanic 2000 census count was 32.8 million, but on re-count the Census Bureau adjusted this number upward to 35.3 million, a 13 percent increase."

How many illegal aliens reside in the United States? | CAIRCO - Colorado Alliance for Immigration Reform | issues legislation projects research (http://www.cairco.org/issues/how-many-illegal-aliens-reside-united-states)


Increased the totals by 13%!!!

Now....hold on tight....this is gonna involve mathematics, so I may lose you here:


Soooo....if we apply that same 'adjustment' to the fabled 11 million....over a decade of so....we have almost 40 million.





But wait!!!

There's more!


4. Another way to arrive at the numbers of illegals in the country is to base it on the number of apprehensions and escapes.


"The average number of recorded apprehensions of illegal aliens in the United States now hovers at 1.2 million a year . A DHS report, Border Apprehensions: 2005, documented 1.3 million apprehensions in 2005. For the 10-year period (1996–2005), the highest number of apprehensions, 1.8 million, occurred in 2000, and the lowest, 1 million, in 2003. These DHS statistics contradict persistent statements by other government agencies that only 400,000 to 500,000 illegal aliens enter the country each year.



Journeymen Border Patrol agents (on the job five years or more) estimate that a minimum of five illegal aliens enter the United States for each apprehension, and more likely seven. That informed estimate would raise the total number of illegal aliens entering the United States in 2003 to 8 million men, women, and children.


He concludes that:


My estimate of 38 million illegal aliens residing in the United States is calculated, however, using a conservative annual rate of entry (allowing for deaths and returns to their homelands) of three illegal aliens entering the United States for each one apprehended. My estimate includes apprehensions at the Southern Border (by far, the majority), at the Northern Border, along the Pacific, Atlantic, and Gulf of Mexico coasts, and at seaports and airports.





5. Taking the DHS average of 1.2 million apprehensions per year and multiplying it by 3 comes to 3.6 million illegal entries per year; then multiplying that number by 10 for the 1996–2005 period, my calculations come to 36 million illegal entries into the United States. Add to this the approximately 2 million visa overstays during the same period, and the total is 38 million illegal aliens currently in the United States."

How many illegal aliens reside in the United States? | CAIRCO - Colorado Alliance for Immigration Reform | issues legislation projects research (http://www.cairco.org/issues/how-many-illegal-aliens-reside-united-states)


....and that number is over a decade old!!!!!!


6. But other Border Patrol agents estimate that a minimum of five illegal aliens enter the United States for each apprehension, and more likely seven......which would give a total of nearly 80 million illegals occupying our country.


[I]The number of illegals would be at least.....at least.....60-80 million at this time.....permanently residing right here is this country.

As you can see, the static 11 million number that we see year after year is just more systematic bull shit.

hater
12-28-2017, 07:19 AM
:lmao at Obomba or Orangefreak taking credit for defat of ISIS

When we all know it was Putin who blasted the terrorist bastards out of the face of the planet.

Vlad started by turning ISIS never nding column of tankers into ashes. Something Obomba couldnt even touch

“Dont touch thise guys they ar just making a living sellingsyrian oil” :cry

Thank you motha russia :tu

hater
12-28-2017, 07:21 AM
First taking credit for defating Hitler and now taking credit for defeating ISIs :lmao

These american bastards are pathetic :lmao

boutons_deux
12-28-2017, 11:15 AM
The internet mocks ‘short-fingered Vulgarian’ Trump for continuing Twitter feud with Vanity Fair

https://www.rawstory.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/Donald-Trump-pointing-his-finger.jpg

President Donald Trump gloated over Vanity Fairtaking heat (https://www.rawstory.com/2017/12/the-internet-hammers-vanity-fair-for-bad-video-urging-hillary-clinton-trade-politics-for-knitting/)for a sexist joke at Hillary Clinton’s expense.

The president has long feuded (https://www.vanityfair.com/magazine/2015/07/donald-ivana-trump-divorce-prenup-marie-brenner) with the magazine published by Condé Nast, and he took a shot Thursday morning at the company’s artistic director.

“Vanity Fair, which looks like it is on its last legs, is bending over backwards in apologizing for the minor hit they took at Crooked H,” Trump tweeted.

“Anna Wintour, who was all set to be Amb to Court of St James’s & a big fundraiser for CH, is beside herself in grief & begging for forgiveness!”


J.R. McGrail ?@JRMcGrail (https://twitter.com/JRMcGrail)

Trump pissed Vanity Fair never apologized for "Short-fingered Vulgarian" https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/946401576381505536 … (https://t.co/72VLd1UHig)

Jane Coaston (https://twitter.com/cjane87)
✔@cjane87 (https://twitter.com/cjane87)

Donald Trump is really speaking to the multitudes who make up the intersection of “white working class voters in Rust Belt America” and “people who follow Vanity Fair on Twitter.

RHF@RachelFeinstien (https://twitter.com/RachelFeinstien)

Replying to BARbaraAKelley realDonaldTrump (https://twitter.com/_/status/946402451497811968)

Anna Wintour isn’t even the editor of Vanity Fair. Weird that Trump would lie about this.

LCD Loundsystem@VinceOstrowski (https://twitter.com/VinceOstrowski)

Trump was thankful to be able to tweet about Vanity Fair because one of the only things he legitimately knows anything about is magazine-related gossip

Don Moynihan (https://twitter.com/donmoyn)
(https://twitter.com/donmoyn)✔@donmoyn (https://twitter.com/donmoyn)

Trump so anxious to show off his inside knowledge of the Court of St. James that he did not bother to verify that Anna Wintour is the editor of Vanity Fair (she's not) pic.twitter.com/WrhdCuHvV1 (https://t.co/WrhdCuHvV1)

https://www.rawstory.com/2017/12/the-internet-mocks-short-fingered-vulgarian-trump-for-continuing-twitter-feud-with-vanity-fair/

rmt
12-28-2017, 11:53 AM
945884833611440128

Strong Democrat ............................... 23
Not very strong Democrat ................. 9
Independent/lean Democrat .............. 11
Strictly Independent........................... 15
Independent/lean Republican ............ 8
Not very strong Republican ............... 7
Strong Republican ............................. 18
Other (VOL) ..................................... 6
Not sure ........................................... 3

27.8% more Strong Democrat than Strong Republican
28.6% more Not very strong Democrat than Not very strong Republican
37.5% more Independent/lean Democrat than Independent/lean Republican

boutons_deux
12-28-2017, 01:55 PM
A mall in China is ringing in the year of the dog with a Trump-inspired dog statue


https://qzprod.files.wordpress.com/2017/12/trump-dog-2018-weibo-e1514358096474.jpg?quality=80&strip=all&w=1600


A mall in China is ringing in the Year of the Rooster with a Trump-like rooster statue

https://qzprod.files.wordpress.com/2016/12/trump-rooster-statue-e1483268231127.jpg?quality=80&strip=all&w=1600
https://qz.com/874243/a-mall-in-china-is-ringing-in-the-year-of-the-rooster-with-a-trump-like-rooster-statue/


https://qz.com/1166112/for-chinese-new-year-a-mall-erects-a-trump-dog-statue-to-celebrate-year-of-the-dog/?mc_cid=93cc35f1b5&mc_eid=47e367557b

boutons_deux
12-28-2017, 02:31 PM
Sassy Gay Republican SAS (http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/member.php?u=1455)sygayrepub:

“I don’t think liberals understand that when they trash talk Trump, they’re also trash talking the millions of people who voted for him.”

Christine Teigen #chrissyteigen:

“Uhhhhh. Yeah. We know.”

https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2017/12/27/1728050/-Model-and-Twitter-darling-Chrissy-Teigen-comepletely-quips-a-Trump-supporter-with-just-four-words

Will Hunting
12-28-2017, 02:58 PM
DNC in Disarray and Is Struggling to Raise Money Ahead of 2018 Elections
I’m not understanding how the party you think is run by the ultra rich elite globalists can’t raise any money.

spurraider21
12-28-2017, 03:04 PM
I’m not understanding how the party you think is run by the ultra rich elite globalists can’t raise any money.
https://imgflip.com/i/21surjhttps://imgflip.com/i/21surjhttps://i.imgflip.com/21sut3.jpg

DMC
12-28-2017, 03:23 PM
CNN: GOP in disarray
Fox: DNC in disarray


Sounds like status quo

Splits
12-28-2017, 03:51 PM
Strong Democrat ............................... 23
Not very strong Democrat ................. 9
Independent/lean Democrat .............. 11
Strictly Independent........................... 15
Independent/lean Republican ............ 8
Not very strong Republican ............... 7
Strong Republican ............................. 18
Other (VOL) ..................................... 6
Not sure ........................................... 3

27.8% more Strong Democrat than Strong Republican
28.6% more Not very strong Democrat than Not very strong Republican
37.5% more Independent/lean Democrat than Independent/lean Republican

whats your point? Is this another one of your idiotic "biased sampling" conspiracies ? How'd Alabama work out for you?

rmt
12-28-2017, 04:09 PM
Alabama was certainly a special case.

I just wanted to point out the breakdown. People can make their own decision as to whether there are that many more Dem-leaning than Rep-leaning and whether they then believe this poll.

Splits
12-28-2017, 04:17 PM
Alabama was certainly a special case.

I just wanted to point out the breakdown. People can make their own decision as to whether there are that many more Dem-leaning than Rep-leaning and whether they then believe this poll.

i just want to point out you're a fucking dumbass who doesn't know how math works. People can make their own decisions if you're an intentional idiot or you just don't know how fucking stupid you are

Pavlov
12-28-2017, 04:22 PM
whats your point? Is this another one of your idiotic "biased sampling" conspiracies ? How'd Alabama work out for you?In this random sampling to determine the political affiliation of people, the pollsters didn't seek out enough people of a predetermined political affiliation to make it valid.

I guess.

Chris
12-28-2017, 04:30 PM
In this random sampling to determine the political affiliation of people, the pollsters didn't seek out enough people of a predetermined political affiliation to make it valid.

I guess.

Yeah that's the ticket!

Pavlov
12-28-2017, 04:31 PM
Yeah that's the ticket!OK, what's your theory, Chris?

spurraider21
12-28-2017, 04:39 PM
OK, what's your theory, Chris?
globalists*







































* undefined

Chris
12-28-2017, 04:45 PM
I9ZgGT9V2vE

boutons_deux
12-28-2017, 06:08 PM
Sassy Gay Republican SAS (http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/member.php?u=1455)sygayrepub:

“I don’t think liberals understand that when they trash talk Trump, they’re also trash talking the millions of people who voted for him.”

Christine Teigen #chrissyteigen:

“Uhhhhh. Yeah. We know.”

https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2017/12/27/1728050/-Model-and-Twitter-darling-Chrissy-Teigen-comepletely-quips-a-Trump-supporter-with-just-four-words

Chris
12-28-2017, 06:30 PM
https://scontent-dft4-2.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t31.0-8/26023875_2006019346337080_550813665867461935_o.jpg ?oh=5fbe341ae8ab41a5dda80a5faa3056e1&oe=5AF55034

Chris
12-28-2017, 06:34 PM
Since you guys like polls

https://scontent-dft4-2.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/26114202_10160361832535725_8081822995707619721_n.j pg?oh=5e6f172bd2e2b44bf3e2b6db00300b18&oe=5AC149F4

Chris
12-28-2017, 06:36 PM
https://scontent-dft4-2.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/26166036_1907540805940064_6518734925494001923_n.jp g?oh=68031636b036ac66ebc538112a47886f&oe=5AC83B48

Chris
12-28-2017, 06:38 PM
https://scontent-dft4-2.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t31.0-8/26170238_10160360480420725_69108726815282753_o.jpg ?oh=bea4fcad0a8c685230d7449e6ae483e0&oe=5AF9AC37

Chris
12-28-2017, 06:41 PM
946460939578167296

Bill lying his ass off.

Pavlov
12-28-2017, 06:41 PM
:lol still obsessed with *ding*

Chris
12-28-2017, 06:43 PM
:lol still obsessed with *ding*

That's right go find your binky.

Chris
12-28-2017, 10:26 PM
Fact is we know that the daily flow across the border to the USA is substantial; and yet the establishment loves to cite 11 million illegals like it's a never-changing number.


946556868180267008

Chris
12-28-2017, 10:31 PM
946475963101138947

Spurtacular
12-28-2017, 10:41 PM
946475963101138947

Reminds me of that one Malcolm In The Middle episode.

Reck
12-28-2017, 10:43 PM
https://scontent-dft4-2.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/26166036_1907540805940064_6518734925494001923_n.jp g?oh=68031636b036ac66ebc538112a47886f&oe=5AC83B48

Rasmussen...a less obvious republican rag than say...The Daily Caller and such shit sites.

Chris
12-28-2017, 10:52 PM
Rasmussen...a less obvious republican rag than say...The Daily Caller and such shit sites.

What's a reputable news source in your eyes?

AaronY
12-28-2017, 11:14 PM
Sassy Gay Republican SAS (http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/member.php?u=1455)sygayrepub:

“I don’t think liberals understand that when they trash talk Trump, they’re also trash talking the millions of people who voted for him.”

Christine Teigen #chrissyteigen:

“Uhhhhh. Yeah. We know.”

https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2017/12/27/1728050/-Model-and-Twitter-darling-Chrissy-Teigen-comepletely-quips-a-Trump-supporter-with-just-four-words
Wow thats cool SI swimsuit models chiming in..thanks for that boo

Spurtacular
12-29-2017, 01:44 AM
946462597792092160

Spurminator
12-29-2017, 11:40 AM
Totally normal person.

946724075157651457

Pavlov
12-29-2017, 03:13 PM
"Old man watches basic cable."

boutons_deux
12-29-2017, 03:26 PM
Totally normal person.

946724075157651457

... "same" by repugs' in-house pollster, Rasmussen :lol

Chris
12-29-2017, 05:00 PM
https://scontent-dft4-2.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/26055993_1804733936492416_2536449471268517389_n.jp g?oh=055cecdfdd9c1d4711d259836b7a8562&oe=5AC8E960

spurraider21
12-29-2017, 05:00 PM
lol red scare

Pavlov
12-29-2017, 05:01 PM
lol red scareANTIFA COUP!

Chris
12-29-2017, 05:37 PM
TESTIFY!


946710455132835840

Chris
12-29-2017, 05:38 PM
Jesus...


946654483739578368

Chris
12-29-2017, 05:40 PM
946728546633953285

Boycotting Amazon tbh

Pavlov
12-29-2017, 05:42 PM
946728546633953285

Boycotting Amazon tbhDid you ever use it before?

Chris
12-29-2017, 05:44 PM
Did you ever use it before?

Yes.

spurraider21
12-29-2017, 06:21 PM
Jesus...


946654483739578368
skid row

- totally representative of the entire state of california
- was full of rainbows and bunnies before jerry brown

spurraider21
12-29-2017, 06:21 PM
946728546633953285

Boycotting Amazon tbh
why are you boycotting amazon. what did they do?

Blake
12-29-2017, 07:00 PM
946728546633953285

Boycotting Amazon tbh

:lol he's not really taking a shot at Amazon, genius.

And how stupid do you have to be to equate amazon with the USPS?

Chris
12-29-2017, 07:28 PM
946584848382267394

spurraider21
12-29-2017, 07:32 PM
946584848382267394
http://www.cleveland.com/opinion/index.ssf/2017/12/christina_hagans_candidacy_wil.html

where does this question her intelligence for believing in god or make any sexist attack??

Blake
12-29-2017, 07:34 PM
Lol Chris deflecting from his amazon whiff

Blake
12-29-2017, 07:35 PM
946584848382267394

:lol :lol :lol

Chris
12-29-2017, 07:47 PM
http://www.cleveland.com/opinion/index.ssf/2017/12/christina_hagans_candidacy_wil.html

where does this question her intelligence for believing in god or make any sexist attack??


She's a resident of the party's lunatic fringe, firmly aligned with the Steve Bannon wing of President Donald Trump's version of the Republican Party.

That's the same Trump-Bannon alliance that enthusiastically embraced failed Alabama Senate candidate Roy Moore, a homophobic slavery apologist brought down by credible allegations that he made numerous sexual advances to under-aged girls.

Hagan proudly boasts of her unwavering support for Trump, Bannon, and Jesus Christ, not necessarily in that order. Her campaign website solemnly proclaims, "Christina believes when we fix our hearts and attention on Jesus, the founder, the author of our faith, things begin to change."

How all that "attention on Jesus" fits in with a president accused of predatory behavior by a dozen women is unexplained in Hagan's spiritual biography. It's all part of the blind spot those on the religious right have with people like Trump and Roy Moore. And it's at the core of a hypocrisy that seems to constitute the essence of their very being.

Clearly not a hit piece.

DMC
12-29-2017, 07:56 PM
http://www.cleveland.com/opinion/index.ssf/2017/12/christina_hagans_candidacy_wil.html

where does this question her intelligence for believing in god or make any sexist attack??

"She's a resident of the party's lunatic fringe"

"Hagan proudly boasts of her unwavering support for Trump, Bannon, and Jesus Christ"

"How all that "attention on Jesus" fits in with a president accused of predatory behavior by a dozen women is unexplained in Hagan's spiritual biography. It's all part of the blind spot those on the religious right have with people like Trump and Roy Moore. And it's at the core of a hypocrisy that seems to constitute the essence of their very being."

I don't see anything sexist, except that she's a she and the writer could have gone for a male instead. If she was black and said "racist" I don't think many here would take issue with it, considering she was singled out while the men in the party were said to be much better choices. He stated basically that Gonzales would be a better choice because of his non-American ancestry

" Gonzalez is a thoughtful conservative. He's young, bright and genuinely cares about issues related to all Americans - not just some. His Cuban ancestry and star-quality potential represent everything the Republican Party should embrace."

So if you were to contrast that (as implied) to Hagan, she's not bright, not young? and not thoughtful. He basically calls her a crazy hypocrite.

Sorry if it wasn't clearly spelled out, counsel.

spurraider21
12-29-2017, 08:11 PM
"She's a resident of the party's lunatic fringe"
nothing to do with religion or sex


"Hagan proudly boasts of her unwavering support for Trump, Bannon, and Jesus Christ"
yes. none of that questions her intelligence for believing in god. none of that is sexist


"How all that "attention on Jesus" fits in with a president accused of predatory behavior by a dozen women is unexplained in Hagan's spiritual biography. It's all part of the blind spot those on the religious right have with people like Trump and Roy Moore. And it's at the core of a hypocrisy that seems to constitute the essence of their very being."
yes. there is an inherent hypocrisy in acting pious while turning a blind eye to abusive behavior. none of that questions her intelligence due to her belief in god. it questions her integrity


I don't see anything sexist,
agreed wholeheartedly


except that she's a she and the writer could have gone for a male instead.
lol. she's running for office.


If she was black and said "racist" I don't think many here would take issue with it, considering she was singled out while the men in the party were said to be much better choices. He stated basically that Gonzales would be a better choice because of his non-American ancestry
but that isn't the claim im addressing (racism). her claim was that the piece was sexist and questioned her intelligence due to a belief in god

Gonzalez is a thoughtful conservative. He's young, bright and genuinely cares about issues related to all Americans - not just some. His Cuban ancestry and star-quality potential represent everything the Republican Party should embrace."

So if you were to contrast that (as implied) to Hagan, she's not bright, not young? and not thoughtful. He basically calls her a crazy hypocrite.
honestly i dont know much about her. if its true that she turned a blind eye to moore/trump accusations, and that she is deeply religious, then i'd agree she's a hypocrite on that front


Sorry if it wasn't clearly spelled out, counsel.
it was very clear that the piece wasn't sexist nor did it question her intelligence for believing in god

spurraider21
12-29-2017, 08:12 PM
Clearly not a hit piece.
i dont doubt that it was a hit piece.

but it wasn't sexist in any way, nor was it anti-christian or question her intelligence due to a belief in god

she's just a snowflake that gets offended too easily imo. probably an SJW and antifa apologist tbh

DMC
12-29-2017, 08:31 PM
nothing to do with religion or sex

Sex no, but certainly the right is characterized by their religious beliefs and the writer goes to great length to mention hers repeatedly.


yes. none of that questions her intelligence for believing in god. none of that is sexist

Yet she's a lunatic. Pretty sure had she been Muslim, it would have been more clear to you and others.


yes. there is an inherent hypocrisy in acting pious while turning a blind eye to abusive behavior. none of that questions her intelligence due to her belief in god

Why is he judging her belief in god without mentioning his or her opponent's beliefs? How does her belief in god have anything to do with what Trump is "accused" of? The bible doesn't hold one person accountable for the transgressions of another, and both parties are rife with sinners.


agreed wholeheartedly

lol. she's running for office.

So is Gonzales. The owner of the Cleveland news is also the owner if Vanity Fair.

It stands to reason they support a liberal approach.


but that isn't the claim im addressing (racism). her claim was that the piece was sexist and questioned her intelligence due to a belief in god
No, you're looking for a cut and dry "because she's a female..." but you'd not need the cut and dry "because she's black".. That's my point. Let's not get caught up in low hanging fruit.


" Gonzalez is a thoughtful conservative. He's young, bright and genuinely cares about issues related to all Americans - not just some. His Cuban ancestry and star-quality potential represent everything the Republican Party should embrace."


honestly i dont know much about her. if its true that she turned a blind eye to moore/trump accusatinos, and that she is deeply religious, then i'd agree she's a hypocrite on that front

Are you religious? If not, how can you judge? If you are religious, why would you judge?


it was very clear that the piece wasn't sexist nor did it question her intelligence for believing in god
Sure it did. It's clear you won't tie the two together "lunatic" and "unwavering support for Jesus" (then says "not in that order" even though the writer had complete control over which order he wrote it).

If you wish to argue merely by assertion, fine. You can have it.

spurraider21
12-29-2017, 08:34 PM
Sex no, but certainly the right is characterized by their religious beliefs and the writer goes to great length to mention hers repeatedly.

Yet she's a lunatic. Pretty sure had she been Muslim, it would have been more clear to you and others.

Why is he judging her belief in god without mentioning his or her opponent's beliefs? How does her belief in god have anything to do with what Trump is "accused" of? The bible doesn't hold one person accountable for the transgressions of another, and both parties are rife with sinners.

So is Gonzales. The owner of the Cleveland news is also the owner if Vanity Fair.

It stands to reason they support a liberal approach.
No, you're looking for a cut and dry "because she's a female..." but you'd not need the cut and dry "because she's black".. That's my point. Let's not get caught up in low hanging fruit.

Are you religious? If not, how can you judge? If you are religious, why would you judge?

Sure it did. It's clear you won't tie the two together "lunatic" and "unwavering support for Jesus" (then says "not in that order" even though the writer had complete control over which order he wrote it).

If you wish to argue merely by assertion, fine. You can have it.
i think trump is a lunatic and on the right wing fringe, but he's not religious. the two aren't mutually exclusive

DMC
12-29-2017, 08:37 PM
i think trump is a lunatic and on the right wing fringe, but he's not religious. the two aren't mutually exclusive

If you said "trump is a lunatic, he believes in jesus"

That's a relationship you just built with your statement.

This isn't rocket science. Calling someone a lunatic just before pointing out their religious beliefs would doom many a political candidate. The opinion writers get no free pass, since they'd be the ones stoking the fires.

spurraider21
12-29-2017, 08:39 PM
If you said "trump is a lunatic, he believes in jesus"

That's a relationship you just built with your statement.

This isn't rocket science.
i would criticize anybody who governs primarily with religion in mind. like a judge that says "in my courtroom, the bible comes before the constitution." thats not questioning his intelligence for his belief in god. that is questioning his judgment when his religious tendencies override reason

DMC
12-29-2017, 08:46 PM
i would criticize anybody who governs primarily with religion in mind.

As would I. I would also criticize anyone who professed a belief in a supernatural being and then professed that they could govern without regard to it. One shows a mental illness, the other shows a character flaw. Unfortunately a professed atheist couldn't get a seat on a city council, much less the ticket of either party.


like a judge that says "in my courtroom, the bible comes before the constitution." thats not questioning his intelligence for his belief in god. that is questioning his judgment when his religious tendencies override reason
Judicial decisions are based on law. The executive branch has more leeway to make decisions and more leeway to hide the underlying reasons. You'll never read a 10 page case law of why Obama used executive power to force legislation or why Trump fired Comey. You'll only see the opinions of those who were aware of it.

spurraider21
12-29-2017, 08:48 PM
As would I. I would also criticize anyone who professed a belief in a supernatural being and then professed that they could govern without regard to it. One shows a mental illness, the other shows a character flaw. Unfortunately a professed atheist couldn't get a seat on a city council, much less the ticket of either party.
yeah, and the jab the article took was doing just that. again, nothing there called her intelligence into question due to a belief in god


Judicial decisions are based on law. The executive branch has more leeway to make decisions and more leeway to hide the underlying reasons. You'll never read a 10 page case law of why Obama used executive power to force legislation or why Trump fired Comey. You'll only see the opinions of those who were aware of it.
true. i still see a religious executive who governs with that in mind as someone forcing his religion down the populace's throat. that is different than calling his intelligence into question (though i might do that anyway)

DMC
12-29-2017, 09:54 PM
yeah, and the jab the article took was doing just that. again, nothing there called her intelligence into question due to a belief in god

Except I am not a columnist for the paper that is owned by the group that owns Vanity Fair. I would expect someone to come back at me if I criticized it, as attacking their religion.


true. i still see a religious executive who governs with that in mind as someone forcing his religion down the populace's throat. that is different than calling his intelligence into question (though i might do that anyway)
People in power force their beliefs upon others. That's how power works. If those beliefs are religious by virtue of definition (face it, many beliefs aren't based in science) then it seems especially egregious however to think anyone in a position of authority where discrimination is concerned (no clear outlines on which decision to make) is going to rely on their beliefs, like it or not. Some might weigh whether or not their decisions conflict with the constitution, which is a fairly clear outline (and part of the judicial branch to decide) however eventually it's their core beliefs that they act on, and why we elect them. If we don't want religious nuts (anyone who believes an invisible man in the sky commands the universe and watches our moves to decide if we're worthy of the fantasy world isn't playing with a full deck) governing, we need to be more adamant about promoting atheists. The problem is many atheists have an anti-religion agenda and that also conflicts with the Bill of Rights.

AaronY
12-29-2017, 10:16 PM
Jesus...


946654483739578368
Is he going to drive down Rodeo Drive next and show that?

koriwhat
12-29-2017, 10:54 PM
Is he going to drive down Rodeo Drive next and show that?

california is a hell hole represented by losers like moonbeam, waters, and the like...

Chucho
12-29-2017, 11:20 PM
Is he going to drive down Rodeo Drive next and show that?

No, but as someone who moved to " the worst economic climate" per Time and CNN in 2009, and have traveled all across this state and have witnessed Moonbeams reign of terror, the vast majority of all metropolitan areas of California look more like that than the posh parts the elitists and tech giants populate.

Living here and seeing the bat shit lunacy of an alt-Left goverrnment and seeing how it could make a shitty situation (Governator's reign) even worse and have complete disregard for the people of the state and give them no voice in very important votes really opened my eyes. Jerry Brown is Alt Left Trump, just a bigger thief.

AaronY
12-29-2017, 11:47 PM
No, but as someone who moved to " the worst economic climate" per Time and CNN in 2009, and have traveled all across this state and have witnessed Moonbeams reign of terror, the vast majority of all metropolitan areas of California look more like that than the posh parts the elitists and tech giants populate.

Living here and seeing the bat shit lunacy of an alt-Left goverrnment and seeing how it could make a shitty situation (Governator's reign) even worse and have complete disregard for the people of the state and give them no voice in very important votes really opened my eyes. Jerry Brown is Alt Left Trump, just a bigger thief.
Oh, all of the government published economic numbers are fake then. That's good to knoe

AaronY
12-29-2017, 11:48 PM
california is a hell hole represented by losers like moonbeam, waters, and the like...
This is based on huge amounts of personal research or what?

koriwhat
12-30-2017, 12:00 AM
This is based on huge amounts of personal research or what?

don't have to go down the rabbit hole to see that their reps suck and don't give a fuck about their constituents.

Chris
12-30-2017, 12:28 AM
946924936051994631

Chris
12-30-2017, 12:36 AM
Lol Chris deflecting from his amazon whiff


Report: Amazon, Microsoft workers caught hiring sex workers using company email

http://www.kiro7.com/news/local/report-amazon-microsoft-workers-caught-hiring-sex-workers-using-company-email/669779121

Deflect that.

Chris
12-30-2017, 12:40 AM
GLOBALISTS FEAR 2018 THE YEAR OF “FULL TRUMP”

Trump growing more comfortable and experienced at being president


The globalists fear 2018 will mark the return of the hardcore Donald Trump his voters knew on the campaign trail as he grows more comfortable – and experienced – at being president.
Trump has even told his staff to expect “full Trump,” which isn’t surprising given his ramp-up of 101-proof tweets recently, including the one where he blasted “global warming” advocates as Arctic winds blast the US:

946531657229701120

His tweets sound like vintage Infowars articles like this one.
“Most of those in his current decision-making circle — even if they’re not mainstream Republicans — are defending mainstream Republican principles like free trade and an internationalist view of foreign policy,” reported Axios. “But top officials paint a different portrait of Trump when it comes to what he really wants on trade, immigration and North Korea — but has been tamped down by skeptical staff and Cabinet officials.”
In other words, there’s going to be a sharp contrast between first-year Trump and 2018 Trump. He’s going on the offensive, especially as he completes the transition from being a real estate developer to an accomplished president.
Trump is also aided by the fact that Special Counsel Robert Mueller can no longer hide the fact his probe is entirely political.
This means the globalists might get desperate enough to do anything they can to stop the president’s “America First” agenda, especially as the 2018 mid-term elections loom over the horizon.
It could be as simple as fueling an economic collapse they can blame on Trump, a likely scenario given that the central banks are staffed by financiers adept at overriding the economy with a few bad policies Trump has no control over.
So far, the nation’s economic success under Trump is due to the president simply unshackling the artificial restrains former President Obama placed on the economy.
“If the deep state is successful in taking Trump down, the entire political movement around Trump will be wiped out and our constitutional republic may never recover,” warns political commentator Michael Snyder. “Trump is our last, best chance to dethrone the progressive globalist establishment, and that is why they hate him so much.”
https://www.infowars.com/globalists-fear-2018-the-year-of-full-trump/

Chris
12-30-2017, 12:57 AM
944804265662574592

Pavlov
12-30-2017, 03:37 AM
GLOBALISTS FEAR 2018 THE YEAR OF “FULL TRUMP”

Trump growing more comfortable and experienced at being presidentWhat's your definition of a globalist, Chris?

Reck
12-30-2017, 03:47 AM
GLOBALISTS FEAR 2018 THE YEAR OF “FULL TRUMP”

Trump growing more comfortable and experienced at being president

Yeah I can see GOP candidates begging for a president who's in the 30s, ha lost every single special election races he's endorsed and someone who just passed a tax bill that no one likes but the ultra rich.

But yeah, fear MAGA baby!

Isitjustme?
12-30-2017, 04:24 AM
944804265662574592

Please tell me this is you, Chris?

Please Dear God. Please.

Isitjustme?
12-30-2017, 04:25 AM
I mean wtf is this thing?


944804265662574592

Chucho
12-30-2017, 10:38 AM
Oh, all of the government published economic numbers are fake then. That's good to knoe

By your logic, you're fine with Trumps economy as is. The published economic numbers are fake.:rolleyes

I didn't say anything about economic numbers. The wage and class gap is bigger here than basically anywhere in the country. If you like your state government voting on annual raises you have no say in, absurd annual $15+ billion tax increases annually for pet projects, sacrificing the water supply of the farmland to sell to municipalities for profit and to appease extremist ecologists and other policies that force SMBs to close at record rates and that are driving one of worst population decreases in state history, California is the state for you.

California is what everyone claims the Right is doing to Murica- catering to the rich and widening the wage gap while ignoring the poor and being brazen with their self-interest governing.

boutons_deux
12-30-2017, 10:49 AM
White House reportedly frustrated by President Trump’s impromptu interview

President Donald Trump sat down for an impromptu interview with a New York Times reporter (https://www.nytimes.com/2017/12/28/us/politics/trump-interview-mueller-russia-china-north-korea.html?mtrref=www.google.com&gwh=DCD70D25B0EA5201DA5C16537F3D1264&gwt=pay) Thursday and some White House aides and officials weren’t happy about his decision (http://thehill.com/homenews/administration/366841-white-house-surprised-frustrated-by-trump-nyt-interview-report).

Trump ended up giving Schmidt a 30-minute, on-the-record interview in which he discussed multiple topics, (https://www.nytimes.com/2017/12/28/us/politics/trump-interview-mueller-russia-china-north-korea.html?mtrref=www.google.com&gwh=DCD70D25B0EA5201DA5C16537F3D1264&gwt=pay) including his tumultuous relationship with the media and special counsel Robert Mueller’s Russia investigation.

According to The Washington Post (https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/time-at-mar-a-lago-is-a-respite-for-trump--and-a-headache-for-his-staff/2017/12/29/c1c3764a-ecb1-11e7-b698-91d4e35920a3_story.html?utm_term=.02fa9df4b088), no aides were present during the interview, but White House communications director

Hope Hicks monitored the interview from “afar,”

even going so far as to have Trump’s personal aide interrupt the interview and hand the president a cell phone with her on the other end. :lol

One White House official didn’t even know the interview had happened until after it was finished, and when asked about it, replied, “What interview? Today?”

Another aide called the interview “embarrassing.”

The president’s former campaign adviser, Roger Stone :lol, said that Mar-a-Lago “allows Trump to be Trump.” :lol

some interesting quotes that have gotten a lot of coverage, such as

Trump’s assertion that there was no collusion with Russia, but if there had been, it was not a crime (https://www.nytimes.com/2017/12/28/us/politics/trump-interview-mueller-russia-china-north-korea.html?mtrref=www.google.com&gwh=DCD70D25B0EA5201DA5C16537F3D1264&gwt=pay).

https://www.rawstory.com/2017/12/white-house-reportedly-frustrated-by-president-trumps-impromptu-interview/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+TheRawStory+%28The+Raw+Story% 29

"collusion not a crime" getting a lot of play as talking point leading up to

Mueuller proving there was

LIED-ABOUT, "FORGOTTEN"-ABOUT, COVERED-UP collusion.

boutons_deux
12-30-2017, 10:53 AM
Mike Pence’s Aspen vacation neighbors taunt him with ‘Make America Gay Again’ banner


https://www.rawstory.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/Mike-Pence-Make-America-Gay-Again.jpg

Vice President Mike Pence’s Christmas vacation in Aspen was protested by the neighbors next to the private home in which he was staying.

A rainbow flag with the words “Make America Gay Again” was posted at the end of the driveway to both houses, the Aspen Times reports (https://www.aspentimes.com/news/vp-mike-pence-gets-message-from-aspen-neighbors-make-america-gay-again/).

The banner was hung by the daughters of the homeowners — and one of their girlfriends.

https://www.rawstory.com/2017/12/mike-pences-aspen-vacation-neighbors-taunt-him-with-make-america-gay-again-banner/

... but Pence's Christian supremacy bubble is impenetrable.

boutons_deux
12-30-2017, 11:16 AM
White House reportedly frustrated by President Trump’s impromptu interview



https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/740361916883730432/B44FKZvz_normal.jpgRob Reiner
✔@robreiner (https://twitter.com/robreiner)


Just read NYT interview with DT.

We have a sick ignoramus running this country.

The fact that intelligent citizens have to live with his moronic pathologically lying behavior is completely unacceptable.

We must do all we can to protect Democracy and rid the US of this fool.

9:41 PM - Dec 28, 2017 (https://twitter.com/robreiner/status/946586970804822016)...

just another wealthy, "liberal Hollywood Jew" speaking truth to a that PIECE OF SHIT Trash

Only the Congressional ans WH cabhinet Repugs can do anything about Trash, but they has proven that they accept Trash as Useful Idiot, even if distracting idiot, who'll sign all their shitty bills.

boutons_deux
12-30-2017, 11:51 AM
Trash has NO REDEEMING qualities

In a 30-minute interview, PVL so-called President Trash made 24 false or misleading claims

“What I’ve done is, I have absolute right to do what I want to do with the Justice Department.” :lol

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/fact-checker/wp/2017/12/29/in-a-30-minute-interview-president-trump-made-24-false-or-misleading-claims/?undefined=&utm_term=.d6331a116a2a&wpisrc=nl_most&wpmm=1

boutons_deux
12-30-2017, 01:29 PM
The photo of a regretful Trump supporter is going viral on Donald's own playground—Twitter (https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2017/3/17/1644618/-The-photo-of-a-regretful-Trump-supporter-is-going-viral-on-Twitter-on-Donald-s-own-playing-field)

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/C6_mcpfWkAEyIYn.jpg

https://twitter.com/SmithInAmerica/status/842145037421027328/photo/1?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.dailykos.com%2Fstory%2F2 017%2F3%2F17%2F1644618%2F-The-photo-of-a-regretful-Trump-supporter-is-going-viral-on-Twitter-on-Donald-s-own-playing-field

Blake
12-30-2017, 02:22 PM
Report: Amazon, Microsoft workers caught hiring sex workers using company email

http://www.kiro7.com/news/local/report-amazon-microsoft-workers-caught-hiring-sex-workers-using-company-email/669779121

Deflect that.

You gonna boycott Microsoft too?

boutons_deux
12-30-2017, 02:23 PM
Here are 5 of the worst Fox News lies and errors repeated by Trash


https://www.rawstory.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/Fox-and-Friends-Apology-800x430.jpg

1. When he tweeted Fox News’ lies about his campaign manager’s crimes.

Fox & Friends quickly got to work spreading the lie that Manafort’s wrongdoing had occurred “many years before he joined Trump.”

2. When he repeated Fox News’ false reporting about James Comey.

Fox & Friends segment and subsequent tweet claimed Comey had leaked “top secret information” to a friend (https://twitter.com/foxandfriends/status/884359746639220736), a declaration with no relationship to the truth.

3. When he was confused by Fox News about the Swedish terror attack that never was.

Fox News put its spotlight on a documentary linking the increase in violent crime in Sweden (https://www.theguardian.com/world/datablog/2017/feb/24/trump-fox-news-and-the-truth-about-in-sweden-in-data) with the arrival of brown migrants. (On a not-so-side note, the Guardian cites a Swedish Migration Agency report (https://www.theguardian.com/world/datablog/2017/feb/24/trump-fox-news-and-the-truth-about-in-sweden-in-data) showing that is totally made-up Islamophobic garbage.)

4. When he tweeted falsehoods about President Obama because he misunderstood a Fox News report.

“122 vicious prisoners, released by the Obama Administration from Gitmo, have returned to the battlefield,” Trump wrote in the Twitter missive. “Just another terrible decision (https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/839084268991229952?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.washingtonpost.com%2Fnew s%2Fpost-politics%2Fwp%2F2017%2F03%2F07%2Ftrumps-split-screen-a-two-hour-virtual-conversation-between-the-president-and-fox-and-friends%2F)!”

President Bush released 532 detainees from Guantanamo Bay, and 113 of those former detainees returned to “the battlefield.”

Meanwhile, Obama released 161 detainees, with just nine returning to the battlefield. So, no, Obama didn’t release 122 “vicious prisoners”

5. When he even retweeted a Fox spelling error of his own words.

Trump declared that “the West was saved with the blood of patriots.”

Fox News aired the speech, but instead of Trump’s actual words, the chyron offered a misquote that read,

“POTUS: WEST SAVED BY THE BLOOD OF PATRIARCHS.”

Trump tweeted the Fox News clip featuring (https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/883012994145280000?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fcrooksandliars.com%2F2017%2F 07%2Fconfused-old-man-tweets-fox-news-misquote) the typo, despite the fact that it contained a total misstatement of his own words.

https://www.rawstory.com/2017/12/here-are-5-of-the-worst-fox-news-lies-and-errors-repeated-by-donald-trump/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+TheRawStory+%28The+Raw+Story% 29

Chris
12-30-2017, 06:44 PM
947235015343202304

Chris
12-30-2017, 06:56 PM
https://scontent-dft4-2.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/26047515_1805136113118865_2265878287057306207_n.pn g?oh=b84a840b75d7db189cc9f7b49e3b1c9b&oe=5ABE926B

Blake
12-30-2017, 08:09 PM
947235015343202304

Lol what a pussy

boutons_deux
12-30-2017, 08:46 PM
Lol what a pussy

if Trash were only a pussy, rather than what he is.

Chris
12-30-2017, 09:44 PM
947287128584568832

Chris
12-30-2017, 09:46 PM
947204099627417600

DMC
12-30-2017, 09:56 PM
Lol what a pussy

Incredibly ironic coming from you.

Blake
12-30-2017, 11:35 PM
947287128584568832

Lol at what Woods likes to look at

Chris
12-31-2017, 12:58 AM
Lol at what Woods likes to look at

I'm guessing you prefer naked men?

Chris
12-31-2017, 12:59 AM
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DSVwIl6UQAIutIH.jpg:large

Blake
12-31-2017, 01:33 PM
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DSVwIl6UQAIutIH.jpg:large

I think that's a stupid meme.

Pavlov
12-31-2017, 02:15 PM
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DSVwIl6UQAIutIH.jpg:largelol

You idiots would be calling Reagan a RINO were he around today.

boutons_deux
12-31-2017, 02:32 PM
St Ronnie Alzheimer's increased severely while in office. At the end of 2nd term, he was not functioning as an adult, let alone President.

Chris
12-31-2017, 05:56 PM
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DSYePs5XcAMGdXx.jpg:large

Chris
12-31-2017, 06:18 PM
https://scontent-dft4-2.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/26167077_1044342475706462_4797192007473128244_n.jp g?oh=cc588f99c8237f6796e4baed9b96d554&oe=5AC3DF42

Splits
12-31-2017, 06:31 PM
https://i.imgur.com/wWYlgoF.png

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DSaS2SHX4AAU6hH.jpg:large

Chris
12-31-2017, 06:57 PM
Devastating Report Reveals the Insane Amount of Crime Committed by Illegals


Fox News Tucker Carlson is know much more for his piercing words than crunching numbers, but on a recent installment of “Tucker Carlson Tonight,” he unveiled some numbers that every American needs to be aware of:

Relying on data from the U.S. Sentencing Commission, Carlson reported that the illegal alien population in the United States — about 7 percent of the general population — accounts for a shocking percentage of criminal activity committed in the country.

“Non-citizens account for 22 percent, more than a fifth of all federal murder convictions,” Carlson said.

Non-citizens account for 18 percent of fraud convictions and 33 percent of money laundering convictions, he said.

But the disturbing statistics don’t stop there.

TRENDING: Trump Pledges to Help Free 25,000,000 Slaves Worldwide

Non-American residents make up 29 percent of drug trafficking convictions and an astounding 72 percent of convictions for drug possession.

“Meanwhile, the non-citizen percentage of the American people? About 7 percent,” Carlson explained.

Check it out here:

VzLwz714ylM

According to Fox News Insider, Carlson was joined by conservative author and commentator Mark Steyn to discuss the report, which found that 21 percent of the federal prison population are illegal immigrants.

That’s 37,557 illegal immigrants who are in federal prisons around the country.

According to USA Today, there were 11.3 million illegal immigrants living in the United States in 2016.

But that number has slowed down thanks to President Donald Trump’s “America First” policy.

RELATED: Trump Pledges to Help Free 25,000,000 Slaves Worldwide

Trump’s controversial border wall between the United States and Mexico could solve the issue of illegal immigrants entering the United States to commit crimes. GOP.com reported that President Trump has already made the southern border harder to cross than ever before.

In fact, illegal immigration is down 24 percent in 2017 compared to 2016.

With another three years left in his presidency, Americans can only expect Trump to take even greater strides to keep Americans safe from criminal aliens.

As Carlson’s numbers showed, the country needs it.

https://conservativetribune.com/report-crime-by-illegals/

spurraider21
12-31-2017, 07:02 PM
so apparently non-citizen = illegal alien?

:lol

boutons_deux
12-31-2017, 09:31 PM
https://img.wonkette.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/best-prostate-e1487289341377.jpg

Chris
01-01-2018, 04:32 PM
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DSe7qNZX0AAufkC.jpg:large

Chris
01-01-2018, 04:46 PM
Must read.


THE OBAMA YEARS: A LEGACY OF SCANDAL AND DECEPTION


On December 13, former vice president, Joe Biden, appeared on CBS with the hosts of “This Morning” where he peddled his new book and showered his former boss with praise. During the course of the interview, he was asked about his relationship with Obama and responded with the following; “I’ve served with eight presidents and I’ve gotten to know four of them very well. I’ve never met any president that has more character, more integrity, and more backbone than this guy does.” Then he went completely off the rails when he absurdly added; “And eight years, not a hint — not a hint — of a scandal.”

What was perhaps even more outrageous than the statement itself was the fact that none of This Morning’s hosts challenged the veracity of that statement and allowed it to pass without a scintilla of scrutiny, exposing yet again an extreme bias existing within elements of the establishment media. In fact, the Obama administration was among the most corrupt and scandal-ridden in recent memory. Biden’s comment merits further examination so let’s buckle up and take a stroll down memory lane.

Solyndra Scandal – The Obama administration provided this failing solar company with a $535 million stimulus-funded loan, courtesy of the American taxpayer. Taxpayer money kept pouring in despite the fact that the Office of Management and Budget warned that Solyndra was not a profitable or viable company. But it gets worse. The family foundation of billionaire George Kaiser, an Obama fundraiser, was one of Solyndra's main investors. Can you say quid pro quo?

Veterans Affairs Scandal - Over 40 veterans needlessly died while waiting to be seen by doctors at a Phoenix VA facility. Another 1,700 veterans were forced to wait for months before being seen by medical personnel. An audit of the VA confirmed that VA officials systematically altered records and appointment schedules in a deliberate and methodical VA scheme to manipulate data to meet fabricated goals.

Operation Chokepoint Scandal – The Obama DOJ utilized the power of big government to pressure banks to cease doing business with industries with which the administration had ideological differences. Gun manufacturers and gun stores were prime targets even though they had not violated any laws. Eventually, the FDIC admitted to misconduct, bowed to pressure and significantly curtailed the discriminatory regulations after affected businesses threatened legal action.

Gibson Guitar Scandal – Armed federal agents executed four search warrants on Gibson Guitar Corp. facilities in Nashville and Memphis, Tenn., seizing guitars, electronic files and other inventory including wood that was purchased in India and Madagascar. The DOJ alleged that Gibson’s had violated an obscure law known as the Lacey Act which made it a crime to violate the environmental laws of another country. Gibson produced an affidavit from government officials in Madagascar stating that Gibson had violated none of that nation’s laws. Gibson also alleged that the DOJ was misinterpreting Indian law. Gibson’s CEO was a major donor to the GOP but his competitors, who purchased the same materials and were not GOP donors, were untouched by Obama’s DOJ. As part of a settlement to drop criminal charges, Gibson was required to pay a $250,000 fine and was required to donate $50,000 to an environmental group. Gibson was eventually able to retrieve its inventory from the clutches of the DOJ.

Fast & Furious Scandal – A scheme concocted by the Obama administration that went horribly wrong. The administration lost track of some 1,400 guns that made their way into the stream of criminal enterprises including those of the Mexican drug cartels. Two of the guns were found at the scene of the shooting of Border Patrol Agent Brian Terry. Attorney General Eric Holder was cited for contempt of Congress for failing to turn over documents relating to the scandal. It was the first time Congress had taken such an action against a sitting Cabinet official. Seventeen Democrats joined Republicans in voting in favor of the criminal contempt resolution.

DOJ-James Rosen Scandal – FOX News journalist, James Rosen became the target of Obama’s DOJ in yet another example of extreme government overreaching. Believing that Rosen was responsible for a leak concerning a policy decision on North Korea, AG Eric Holder sought a subpoena for Rosen’s emails claiming that Rosen had broken the law “at the very least, either as an aider, abettor and/or co-conspirator.” The government’s affidavit also accused Rosen of possibly violating the Espionage Act. It appeared that the DOJ was acting like the East German Stasi in chasing fictitious enemies of the state. In a rare instance of bipartisanship, Holder was roundly criticized from all sides of the political spectrum and Holder himself was later forced to acknowledge that he regretted the episode.

Gruber-Obamacare Scandal – To establish Obamacare’s validity, Obama hired economist and academic Jonathan Gruber to give the plan his seal of approval. Gruber was later caught on video and audio making several disparaging remarks about Americans, stating that Obamacare’s passage rested on the “stupidity of the American voter.” Democrats later tried to distance themselves from him and tried to minimize his role in formulating Obamacare but there was no debating that he was one of Obamacare’s chief architects and was paid nearly $400,000 for his services. Gruber confirmed what most of us already knew; that Obamacare passed as a result of a concerted effort by the administration to deceive the American people.

Skolkovo Scandal – While serving as secretary of state, Clinton oversaw a program meant to “reset” relations with Moscow and improve ties. The program centered around the Russian city of Skolkovo near Moscow with the stated aim of “identifying areas of cooperation and pursuing joint projects and actions that strengthen strategic stability, international security, economic well-being, and the development of ties between the American and Russian people.” The program transformed Skolkovo into a technology hub akin to a Silicon Valley. Sensitive American technology was transferred to the Russians, substantially enhancing their military and cyber capabilities. The US Army and the FBI concluded that Russia had exploited the program for military applications. The FBI warned American technology companies doing business in Skolkovo that the Skolkovo project was a means by which the Russians would acquire dual use technologies and apply them for military ends. According to investigative author Peter Schweizer, Russian and American companies and individuals involved in the Skolkovo fiasco “had major financial ties to the Clintons.” Moreover, during the Russian reset period, those entities provided the Clintons with “tens of millions of dollars” in the form of “contributions to the Clinton Foundation, paid for speeches by Bill Clinton, or investments in small start-up companies with deep Clinton ties.”

Benghazi Scandal - U.S. Ambassador to Libya, Chris Stevens and three other Americans were killed during an attack on the American consulate office. The Obama administration initially denied that the attack was terror related and instead peddled the now false and discredited narrative that it was triggered by a reaction to an anti-Muslim film. However, emails later confirmed that administration officials were well aware that it was a well-orchestrated, premeditated attack planned by Islamist terrorists and had nothing to do with an internet film. In addition, a congressional committee found that the delay in deploying military assets to the theater, which it attributed to needless bureaucratic bungling, almost certainly cost those men their lives.

IRS Exemption Scandal – IRS officials, taking their cues from the White House delayed, ignored or rejected nonprofit status applications from groups deemed to be right-wing or pro-Israel. Eventually, Former IRS senior executive Lois Lerner, one of the key actors in the scandal was held to be in contempt of Congress, though Holder’s DOJ refused to prosecute.

Iran Ransom Scandal – In deal to secure the release of four Americans held hostage by Iran, the Obama administration gave the Iranian government $1.7 billion in unmarked, untraceable cash, stacked in pallets. The money promptly went to finance Iran’s terrorist activities. Attorney General Loretta Lynch was required to sign off on the ransom deal but no paper bearing her signature was ever produced despite congressional calls compelling her to do so.

Bergdahl-Guantanamo Scandal – Obama released 5 hardened Taliban terrorists for convicted deserter Bowe Bergdahl. The release of the terrorists was in violation of the National Defense Authorization Act. Obama was required to provide Congress with 30-days’ notice prior to releasing the Guantanamo detainees but he only provided notice on the actual day of the exchange. Consequently, the chief counsel for the Government Accountability Office determined that the Pentagon had illegally spent the money used to facilitate the prisoner exchange. In addition, like Benghazi, the administration tried to spin the story and portrayed Bergdahl as a soldier who “served with honor and distinction.” Lastly, at least 3 of the 5 detainees released for Bergdahl have reverted to their terrorist habits placing America and its allies at risk.

Dossier Scandal – Elements within the FBI and DOJ who were hostile to Trump and friendly to Clinton obtained a salacious and unverified dossier on Trump which was compiled by a British foreign agent from Russian sources. In addition to being unverified, unreliable and based exclusively on Russian sources, the dossier amounted to opposition research because it was obtained by agents and operatives working directly and indirectly for the Clinton campaign. Despite this knowledge, the FBI dressed up the dossier to appear as if it was a legitimate intelligence document and then used it to obtain a FISA warrant to spy on American citizens.

Clinton Email Server Scandal – Secretary of State Hillary Clinton used an unsecured bathroom server to send and receive classified information. It is a virtual certainty that many of Clinton’s emails were compromised by foreign, hostile governments. Over 33,000 emails belonging to the State Department were deleted and some of Clinton’s state department emails ended up on a registered sex offender’s laptop. Clinton was criminally exonerated by the FBI and Loretta Lynch’s DOJ blindly accepted the FBI’s findings and recommendations without conducting an examination of its own. FBI agent Peter Strzok, who maintained a visceral hatred toward Trump and was deeply involved in the email investigation, later changed the wording of a memo exonerating Clinton to “extremely careless” from “grossly negligent.” The change was significant because the latter language tracked the wording of the criminal statute. FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe, who was also involved in investigating Clinton, failed to disclose that his wife had accepted $500,000 for her state senate campaign from long-time Clinton ally, Terry McAuliffe.

Uranium 1 Scandal – While serving as secretary of state, Hillary Clinton signed off on a deal that allowed Russia to acquire 20 percent of America’s uranium mining capacity. While other members of the Obama cabinet were also required to sign off for approval of the deal, Clinton was the only cabinet figure to obtain direct pecuniary benefit, to the tune of millions of dollars, from entities with vested interests in seeing the acquisition completed. She never disclosed this conflict of interest when giving her authorization. Once in Russian hands, some of the uranium, the foundational material for nuclear bombs, was exported abroad.

Loretta Lynch-Bill Clinton Tarmac Scandal – While Hillary Clinton was being criminally investigated by the FBI, Loretta Lynch, the nation’s top law enforcement official met with Bill Clinton for 30 minutes at a Phoenix tarmac where she says they discussed “grandchildren” and “golf.” Later, it was revealed that she instructed FBI Director James Comey to refer to the investigation as a “matter” rather than an investigation, tracking the Clinton campaign’s talking points. Finally, Comey testified in a closed session before the Intelligence Committee, that he confronted Lynch with a sensitive document in which it was suggested that Lynch was going to use her authority and power of her office to thwart prosecution of Clinton irrespective of the FBI’s findings. Lynch reportedly stared at the document and then “looked up with a steely silence that lasted for some time, then asked him if he had any other business with her and if not that he should leave her office.”

Project Cassandra Scandal – In an effort to curry favor with the Islamic Republic of Iran, the Obama administration delayed, obstructed and ultimately shut down a DEA initiative aimed at thwarting Hezbollah arms trafficking, drug trafficking and money laundering schemes. As a result, Hezbollah continued to import drugs into the United States, continued to supply anti-American insurgents with deadly Explosively Formed Projectiles and continued to engage in massive money laundering schemes.

The level of corruption and scandal witnessed during Obama’s tenure rivals, and perhaps even surpasses that of the Nixon years. The administration’s legacy leaves a long and wide trail of lies, deception and government overreaching. Biden’s comment on This Morning would be laughable if it wasn’t so sad. Lastly, whether one opposes or favors Trump, all can acknowledge that but for Trump’s victory, many of these scandals would have never come to light because the Clinton administration would have happily swept all the filth under the rug.

https://www.frontpagemag.com/fpm/268842/obama-years-legacy-scandal-and-deception-ari-lieberman#.WkRBJQ-IMYk.twitter

Pavlov
01-01-2018, 05:16 PM
Must *ding*:lol

spurraider21
01-02-2018, 01:56 PM
schrodinger's president: simultaneously has DACA cancelled while blaming his opponents for not making DACA happen

948211438472089600

Killakobe81
01-02-2018, 03:21 PM
Must read.


THE OBAMA YEARS: A LEGACY OF SCANDAL AND DECEPTION

in less than a year ...Trumps mistakes already has surpassed the many you have listed here ...well done.
Make America Great Again , my ass.

Chris
01-02-2018, 08:45 PM
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DSg2a_NW4AAYkYG.jpg:large

Chris
01-02-2018, 08:47 PM
948201230685360128

Pavlov
01-02-2018, 11:35 PM
948201230685360128

States' rights bad now.

Spurtacular
01-02-2018, 11:46 PM
https://i.imgur.com/wWYlgoF.png



No way Obama would pass a reading test on those books.

ducks
01-02-2018, 11:58 PM
https://scontent-lax3-1.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/fr/cp0/e15/q65/26166143_1591302797585258_6692878456844650043_n.jp g?efg=eyJpIjoidCJ9&oh=e1e2a1e47196c80daa6fafde1dd451c7&oe=5AF12810

DMX7
01-03-2018, 12:03 AM
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DSaS2SHX4AAU6hH.jpg:large

LOL, he nailed it but he forgot to throw in a "that, I can tell you" or "if you want to know the truth".

DMX7
01-03-2018, 12:08 AM
No way Obama would pass a reading test on those books.

why?

Spurtacular
01-03-2018, 12:09 AM
why?

Cos he didn't read them.

DMX7
01-03-2018, 12:10 AM
Cos he didn't read them.

How would you know?

Spurtacular
01-03-2018, 12:20 AM
How would you know?

Does that stuttering megalomaniac strike you as an avid reader?

DMX7
01-03-2018, 12:34 AM
Does that stuttering megalomaniac strike you as an avid reader?

What seems much more likely is that you're not an avid reader and that you're just projecting your insecurity about that on to Obama. I don't doubt he's read every one of those books.

Spurtacular
01-03-2018, 12:38 AM
What seems much more likely is that you're not an avid reader and that you're just projecting your insecurity about that on to Obama. I don't doubt he's read every one of those books.

It's quite the opposite. I read much more than I ever did; but this isn't about me.

ducks
01-03-2018, 12:45 AM
States' rights bad now.

States have rights as long as the do not go against the consitition
Cal has

Pavlov
01-03-2018, 12:49 AM
Does that stuttering megalomaniac strike you as an avid reader?
Reads more than you.

Spurtacular
01-03-2018, 12:51 AM
Reads more than you.

Obama's ego wouldn't allow for it, tbh. He has plenty of minions to do whatever he wants, including putting together book lists.

DMX7
01-03-2018, 01:21 AM
It's quite the opposite. I read much more than I ever did; but this isn't about me.


Then read better books. Your posts reek of provincialism. You don't reason well and you don't even know how to use a semicolon properly.

You just make shit up. So is your ridiculous perception of Obama as a "stuttering megalomaniac" supposed to convince anyone other than a dolt like yourself that Obama doesn't read the books he says he reads? Give me a break.

boutons_deux
01-03-2018, 01:22 AM
Trash tweets saying go watch Hannity, then deletes tweet.

Fox is running the WH, Trash is spokesjerk

DMX7
01-03-2018, 01:33 AM
Trash tweets saying go watch Hannity, then deletes tweet.

Fox is running the WH, Trash is spokesjerk

Hannity may as well be on the WH payroll.

Spurtacular
01-03-2018, 01:33 AM
Then read better books. Your posts reek of provincialism. You don't reason well and you don't even know how to use a semicolon properly.

You just make shit up. So is your ridiculous perception of Obama as a "stuttering megalomaniac" supposed to convince anyone other than a dolt like yourself that Obama doesn't read the books he says he reads? Give me a break.

Besides the fact that grammar nazi'ing makes you look obtuse, you shouldn't be giving these types of tips if you're going to be so blatantly off and utterly pedantic; really, this speaks to you being triggered, though. Indeed, Obama is a stuttering megalomaniac. This isn't an absurd notion; but to you, I'm sure it is an affront to your hero worship. Surely, you will not be giving an inch on this as a result. But take this chestnut for safekeeping: Watch and see how many times Obama ever references any of these books in casual interactions (non-speechifying) (or even in speeches for that matter, quite possibly, tbh).

Chris
01-03-2018, 02:12 AM
States' rights bad now.

Illegal is illegal.

Pavlov
01-03-2018, 04:13 AM
Obama's ego wouldn't allow for it, tbh. He has plenty of minions to do whatever he wants, including putting together book lists.You're an idiot, dude. Obama is more well read than you.

Pavlov
01-03-2018, 04:14 AM
Illegal is illegal.Not when you thought it wasn't.

Pavlov
01-03-2018, 04:14 AM
Besides the fact that grammar nazi'ing makes you look obtuse, you shouldn't be giving these types of tips if you're going to be so blatantly off and utterly pedantic; really, this speaks to you being triggered, though. Indeed, Obama is a stuttering megalomaniac. This isn't an absurd notion; but to you, I'm sure it is an affront to your hero worship. Surely, you will not be giving an inch on this as a result. But take this chestnut for safekeeping: Watch and see how many times Obama ever references any of these books in casual interactions (non-speechifying) (or even in speeches for that matter, quite possibly, tbh).You've never mentioned a book ever.

Spurtacular
01-03-2018, 05:05 AM
You're an idiot, dude. Obama is more well read than you.

That's why he needed Bill Ayers to ghost write his autobiography.

Spurtacular
01-03-2018, 05:08 AM
You've never mentioned a book ever.

Thanks for that random observation.

Chris
01-03-2018, 03:19 PM
Not when you thought it wasn't.

Illegal is illegal.

Pavlov
01-03-2018, 03:24 PM
That's why he needed Bill Ayers to ghost write his autobiography.:lmao another conspiracy!

Pavlov
01-03-2018, 03:24 PM
Illegal is illegal.Like secession.

Chris
01-03-2018, 04:05 PM
948435024361205760

Chris
01-03-2018, 04:08 PM
948611350196039681

Pavlov
01-03-2018, 04:11 PM
:lol hopes

Chris
01-03-2018, 04:20 PM
948592484304801792

spurraider21
01-03-2018, 04:44 PM
948611350196039681
thats a lot of people who wait in line, filed their paperwork, and came here legally

why do we need ICE to protect us from legal immigrants?

Chris
01-03-2018, 05:15 PM
948664435496939520

spurraider21
01-03-2018, 05:18 PM
:lol freaking out about N Korea. those dipshits just dropped a missile over their own city

Pavlov
01-03-2018, 05:18 PM
948664435496939520They've threatened the US over and over and over again and still are. :lol

Spurtacular
01-03-2018, 05:20 PM
:lmao another conspiracy!

Oh, you never heard that one? Don't worry; I'm sure snopes will tell you it's not true.

Pavlov
01-03-2018, 05:21 PM
Oh, you never heard that one.Of course I have. You're stupid enough to believe it.

Spurtacular
01-03-2018, 05:26 PM
:cry Terrorists don't write muh heroes books! :cry

:lmao

Pavlov
01-03-2018, 05:29 PM
:cryPweese beweeve muh conspiwacee!:cry

Chris
01-03-2018, 05:30 PM
:lol freaking out about N Korea. those dipshits just dropped a missile over their own city


They've threatened the US over and over and over again and still are. :lol

Nuclear war funny to 21 and Pavlov.

Pavlov
01-03-2018, 05:32 PM
Nuclear war funny to 21 and Pavlov.Are you afraid of North Korea, Chris?

Yes or no.

spurraider21
01-03-2018, 05:32 PM
Nuclear war funny to 21 and Pavlov.
nuclear war is not funny. the notion that we are facing imminent nuclear war is funny

Chris
01-03-2018, 05:38 PM
nuclear war is not funny. the notion that we are facing imminent nuclear war is funny

Why is it funny?

spurraider21
01-03-2018, 05:56 PM
Why is it funny?
because it's unfounded. N Korea has zero incentive to launch nukes on anybody. their nuclear program/development is a means for the regime to maintain credibility among their people

Chris
01-03-2018, 05:58 PM
because it's unfounded. N Korea has zero incentive to launch nukes on anybody. their nuclear program/development is a means for the regime to maintain credibility among their people

So if you were the President you would just ignore them since it's unfounded?

spurraider21
01-03-2018, 05:59 PM
So if you were the President you would just ignore them since it's unfounded?
nah, i would definitely continue to impose economic sanctions

Chris
01-03-2018, 06:00 PM
nah, i would definitely continue to impose economic sanctions

Why did you edit/add more to the post after I quoted you?

Chris
01-03-2018, 06:02 PM
https://scontent-dft4-2.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/26168389_1427482650711894_4085580643480570263_n.pn g?oh=25765c2868767d468f149c5e25f15170&oe=5AB2F606

spurraider21
01-03-2018, 06:03 PM
Why did you edit/add more to the post after I quoted you?
i dno. i edit posts all the time to tidy them up. which post are you referring to?

Pavlov
01-03-2018, 06:04 PM
:lol Chris thinks Trump made Kim contact the RoK.

Chris
01-03-2018, 06:05 PM
i dno. i edit posts all the time to tidy them up. which post are you referring to?


because it's unfounded.


because it's unfounded. N Korea has zero incentive to launch nukes on anybody. their nuclear program/development is a means for the regime to maintain credibility among their people

Pavlov
01-03-2018, 06:06 PM
Still unfounded. What's the problem?

spurraider21
01-03-2018, 06:07 PM
yeah, i made my answer more thorough. still, you appear to have quoted the full response, so its not like i went back and edited it after you quoted me. dont see the problem here tbh

Chris
01-03-2018, 06:08 PM
yeah, i made my answer more thorough. still, you appear to have quoted the full response, so its not like i went back and edited it after you quoted me. dont see the problem here tbh

It automatically changes the quote. I just thought it was weird. Moving on.

Chris
01-03-2018, 06:09 PM
So direct threats from Crazy Kim = unfounded? OK - cool story I guess...

spurraider21
01-03-2018, 06:09 PM
It automatically changes the quote. I just thought it was weird. Moving on.
it doesnt change it.

unless you clicked "respond to post" at some point after i completed my edit

Pavlov
01-03-2018, 06:10 PM
So direct threats from Crazy Kim = unfounded? OK - cool story I guess...Are you afraid of North Korea, Chris?

Yes or no.

spurraider21
01-03-2018, 06:11 PM
So direct threats from Crazy Kim = unfounded? OK - cool story I guess...
im not worried he's going to launch nukes at the US. its questionable they even have that capability, and even if they did, there is no incentive for doing so. his threats are propaganda to sell his people on the fact that he alone can defend them from the big bad US

Chris
01-03-2018, 06:13 PM
Are you afraid of North Korea, Chris?

Yes or no.

I'm talking to 21 you churl. You always have to make everything personal and about emotions. Why don't you go fap in the Bannon thread?

Pavlov
01-03-2018, 06:15 PM
I'm talking to 21 you churl. You always have to make everything personal and about emotions. Why don't you go fap in the Bannon thread?I'm asking you if you are afraid of North Korea.

The answer for me is no.

See how easy that is?

Chris
01-03-2018, 06:16 PM
im not worried he's going to launch nukes at the US. its questionable they even have that capability, and even if they did, there is no incentive for doing so. his threats are propaganda to sell his people on the fact that he alone can defend them from the big bad US

Which is why Pence is suggesting a peaceful disarmament. The capability is certainly not in question. The motive always is.

Pavlov
01-03-2018, 06:17 PM
Which is why Pence is suggesting a peaceful disarmament.In exchange for what?

Chris
01-03-2018, 06:18 PM
In exchange for what?

Until Kim steps up to the negotiating table we don't know do we?

Chris
01-03-2018, 06:21 PM
Oh Billy


https://hw.infowars.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/uOcJsQV.jpg

Pavlov
01-03-2018, 06:24 PM
Until Kim steps up to the negotiating table we don't know do we?So no real reason for him to step up at this point.

OK.

Chris
01-03-2018, 06:31 PM
So no real reason for him to step up at this point.

OK.

I don't speak for or pretend to understand Crazy Kim. Since it's unfounded, there's really no point in wondering right?

Pavlov
01-03-2018, 06:31 PM
Qusay, feeling a little left out, starts his own conspiracy theory:
948378088899072000

Pavlov
01-03-2018, 06:33 PM
I don't speak for or pretend to understand Crazy Kim. Since it's unfounded, there's really no point in wondering right?You should really find out the meaning of the words other people use before you use them yourself.

Chris
01-03-2018, 06:35 PM
You should really find out the meaning of the words other people use before you use them yourself.

Tapping out early tonight I see. It's easy to refute your nonsense.

spurraider21
01-03-2018, 06:35 PM
Qusay, feeling a little left out, starts his own conspiracy theory:
948378088899072000
ellen is deep state now

Chris
01-03-2018, 06:36 PM
Qusay, feeling a little left out, starts his own conspiracy theory:
948378088899072000

It's no conspiracy that social media platforms censor and demonetize Conservative platforms. Only one wearing a tin foil hat is you.

Pavlov
01-03-2018, 06:38 PM
Tapping out early tonight I see. It's easy to refute your nonsense.No, your post simply made no sense.

Pavlov
01-03-2018, 06:39 PM
It's no conspiracy that social media platforms censor and demonetize Conservative platforms. Only one wearing a tin foil hat is you.If Qusay thinks Twitter is deep state, why does he use it?

Chris
01-03-2018, 06:40 PM
No, your post simply made no sense.

I will use layman's terms next time. All you have to do is ask.

Chris
01-03-2018, 06:41 PM
If Qusay thinks Twitter is deep state, why does he use it?

You should send him a tweet about it. Maybe Q will give you some attention.

Pavlov
01-03-2018, 06:42 PM
I will use layman's terms next time. All you have to do is ask.Repeat that post using layman's terms.

Thanks.

Pavlov
01-03-2018, 06:43 PM
You should send him a tweet about it. Maybe Q will give you some attention.I do not mean Q when I say Qusay. :lol

Chris
01-03-2018, 06:43 PM
Repeat that post using layman's terms.

Thanks.


I will use layman's terms next time. All you have to do is ask.

You're welcome.

Blake
01-03-2018, 06:45 PM
https://scontent-dft4-2.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/26168389_1427482650711894_4085580643480570263_n.pn g?oh=25765c2868767d468f149c5e25f15170&oe=5AB2F606

Is Trump planning on nuking NK first?

Pavlov
01-03-2018, 06:46 PM
You're welcome.Tapping out early tonight I see. It's easy to refute your nonsense.

Chris
01-03-2018, 06:49 PM
Is Trump planning on nuking NK first?

Go ask Steve Bannon.

spurraider21
01-03-2018, 06:50 PM
Go ask Steve Bannen.

Blake
01-03-2018, 06:51 PM
Go ask Steve Bannon.

It's your meme, dummy.

Pavlov
01-03-2018, 07:25 PM
:lmao

948703754743885825

Quite a day tbh.

Chris
01-03-2018, 07:27 PM
Chelsea loves her some Church of Satan

948300041143357440

Pavlov
01-03-2018, 07:29 PM
Chelsea loves her some Church of Satan

948300041143357440How does that *ding* indicate she loves the Church of Satan?

Chris
01-03-2018, 07:31 PM
How does that *ding* indicate she loves the Church of Satan?

948305271495053314

Pavlov
01-03-2018, 07:38 PM
948305271495053314:lol So has it been a year since they were included on the same line?

Chris
01-03-2018, 07:58 PM
:lol So has it been a year since they were included on the same line?

Clintons love them some Satan. Pavlov voted for Satan. :tu

spurraider21
01-03-2018, 07:59 PM
Clintons love them some Satan. Pavlov voted for Satan. :tu
you dont know what the church of satan is

Pavlov
01-03-2018, 07:59 PM
Clintons love them some Satan. Pavlov voted for Satan. :tu:lol Chris and his Satan

Pavlov
01-03-2018, 08:00 PM
you dont know what the church of satan isIt's totes Satan!

Chris
01-03-2018, 08:01 PM
you dont know what the church of satan is

Tell me more about the Church of Satan Mr. Atheist Lawyer guy. Chop f'in chop.

Chris
01-03-2018, 08:02 PM
https://i.ytimg.com/vi/eM3gir0gFHU/maxresdefault.jpg

spurraider21
01-03-2018, 08:02 PM
Tell me more about the Church of Satan Mr. Atheist Lawyer guy. Chop f'in chop.
well, the first thing you should probably know is that the Church of Satan doesn't believe in satan

Chris
01-03-2018, 08:02 PM
well, the first thing you should probably know is that the Church of Satan doesn't believe in satan

Is that it?

spurraider21
01-03-2018, 08:04 PM
Is that it?
i said that's the first thing you should know.

kind of a big one

Chris
01-03-2018, 08:06 PM
i said that's the first thing you should know.

kind of a big one

I already knew that. So is that it, or did you have a point or something?

spurraider21
01-03-2018, 08:09 PM
I already knew that. So is that it, or did you have a point or something?
yeah, the point is your posts about loving satan because of church of satan tweets is really really stupid.

church of satan doesnt believe in satan, doesnt believe in demons, possession, or souls.

AaronY
01-03-2018, 08:23 PM
Trump disbanded that voting rights commission so thats good news. Telling Bannon to fuck off is also good.

Spurminator
01-03-2018, 08:23 PM
Trump disbanded that voting rights commission so thats good news.

Predictably, he found nothing and blamed others.

Chris
01-03-2018, 08:26 PM
yeah, the point is your posts about loving satan because of church of satan tweets is really really stupid.

You finally got your opinion out there.


church of satan doesnt believe in satan, doesnt believe in demons, possession, or souls.

Great. I'm sure the Church of Satan loves you speaking on behalf of their collective beliefs. I'm anxious to see a link to back up your claims.