Flynn in major trouble for speaking to Russia about sanctions

[Chris]

Alcohol is a gateway for demons. Sorry to be a Debbie Downer.

[djohn2oo8]

Alcohol is a gateway for demons. Sorry to be a Debbie Downer.
So is prison. Anybody seen Manafort lately?

[Spurs Homer]

So is prison. Anybody seen Manafort lately?


remember when tsa was breathlessly awaiting the "nunes memo?"


:lol:lol:lol

[djohn2oo8]

remember when tsa was breathlessly awaiting the "nunes memo?"


:lol:lol:lol
He is still waiting on part 2. Don’t worry it’s coming.

[boutons_deux]

IA asshole hasn't done his homework and/or is just fucking stupid

TRUMP’S D.O.J. CHIEF APPEARS CONFUSED ABOUT THE MUELLER PROBE

“What is he even talking about?”
==

...met with deserved skepticism.

An opponent of the probe (https://www.cnn.com/2017/08/06/opinions/rosenstein-should-curb-mueller-whittaker-opinion/index.html) who had previously encouraged (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-8Bke7g0r6A&feature=youtu.be&t=387) the administration to rein Mueller in,

Whitaker’s motives in making such a statement were unclear.

Whitaker told the media he had been “fully briefed” on the matter,

yet the extent to which Trump’s acting attorney general is up to date on Mueller’s timeline is foggy.

The uncertainty surrounding Whitaker’s comments raised alarm bells for prominent observers of the probe, including Neal Katyal (https://twitter.com/neal_katyal/status/1090100023889747969), a former acting solicitor general under Barack Obama, who cautioned that

“everything [Whitaker] says should be doubted,”

and CNN chief legal analyst Jeffrey Toobin (https://twitter.com/CNNSitRoom/status/1090033019577163776), who blasted

the acting attorney general as “utterly unqualified.”

https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2019/01/matthew-whitaker-trump-doj-chief-appears-confused-about-mueller-probe?mbid=nl_th_5c50de6aa358ac6e49189151&utm_source=nl&utm_medium=email&utm_brand=vf&utm_mailing=vyf_hive_news_20190130%20(1)&bxid=MzI5MjgzNzg1MjQ4S0&hasha=992d608214b505003aa04bf10a595031&hashb=542eb31d958e85ddd5a4c3ccf3faae18526a77bd&spMailingID=15041456&spUserID=MzI5MjgzNzg1MjQ4S0&spJobID=1562417641&spReportId=MTU2MjQxNzY0MQS2

[boutons_deux]

Bush, Clinton and Obama ethics officials warn Trump’s AG pick has a major Mueller problem

ethics officials have warned that attorney general nominee William Barr may “undermine all government ethics” (https://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/2019/01/29/attorney-general-nominee-william-barr-wrong-mueller-recusal-trump-column/2702636002/) with his review of the Russia investigation report.

“We were stunned to hear attorney general nominee William Barr (https://www.rawstory.com/2019/01/ag-nominee-william-barr-says-trump-never-discussed-mueller-investigation/) testify in his Senate confirmation hearing (https://www.rawstory.com/2019/01/10-disturbing-moments-trumps-attorney-general-nominee-hearings/) that he is not required to follow recusal advice from the Justice Department’s career ethics officials,”

the nominee “is wrong on the ethics law,”

“His approach to recusal, if pursued, may cause irreparable damage not only to the Justice Department’s ethics program but single-handedly undermine ethics programs governmentwide,”

The nominee’s potential conflicts of interest in special counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation are based on

his bizarre decision to submit an unsolicited 19-page memo to Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein arguing that the probe should have its scope limited.

He went on to circulate that memo to Solicitor General Noel Francisco and the Trump White House’s legal team and

“inexplicably provided or discussed the memo with Jared Kushner’s personal attorney and Trump’s personal attorney,”

https://www.rawstory.com/2019/01/bush-clinton-obama-ethics-officials-warn-trumps-ag-pick-major-mueller-problem/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+TheRawStory+%28The+Raw+Story% 29

Barr's memo was his "career move" fishing for AG spot by sucking up to Trash. Trash rewarded him.

[Trill Clinton]

https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1090608298343190528

https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1090609577006112769

https://twitter.com/BradMossEsq/status/1090610404311617538

[Spurs Homer]

If Obama had done this - cuckservatives would have scalped and then lynched Obama.

On FOX tv!

[Trill Clinton]

If Obama had done this - cuckservatives would have scalped and then lynched Obama.

On FOX tv!

thats a fact

[TSA]

Stone’s indictment shook him up.

The indictment having nothing to do with colluding with Russia or Wikileaks? Yeah I’m shook :rollin

[Brazil]

"There economy is now crashing, which is the only thing holding them back. Be careful of Iran. Perhaps Intelligence should go back to school!"

is it for real ?

:lmao

[boutons_deux]

34 guilty pleas, 2 companies guilty

... but Trash is innocent

[Spurs Homer]

Trump again - in full public view -

going against his own intelligence agencies - facts and intelligence.
In full public view - he is letting the world know -

that his first priority - is NOT the interests of the USA - but his and Putin's interests that are his priority.

No other way to say it - but that this is TREASONOUS behavior - again in FULL PUBLIC VIEW.

Other countries can now observe and determine this:

"Whatever USA intelligence is saying to us - it is NOT what Trump stands for - we can use this knowledge for our own means and we can further compromise Trump because the door is open to us to probe, attack, make offers, SAY that we made offers, use propaganda/lies/deceit/ to continue to compromise USA intel or the USA president himself"

Disgusting. Disgraceful. Dangerous. Treasonous.

[djohn2oo8]

The indictment having nothing to do with colluding with Russia or Wikileaks? Yeah I’m shook :rollin
You said he wouldn’t be charged period. Again, dumb sack of shit wrong again.

[Chris]

https://twitter.com/DailyCaller/status/1090718452057325569

ruh roh

[Pavlov]

https://twitter.com/DailyCaller/status/1090718452057325569

ruh rohWhy should we be afraid of the information Buzzfeed used to win its case against the Russian dude, Chris?

Explain.

[Chris]

https://twitter.com/RealJamesWoods/status/1090655079906983936

[Pavlov]

https://twitter.com/RealJamesWoods/status/1090655079906983936Trump supporters hate Trump's Justice Department.:lol

[Chris]

Ohr shit

https://twitter.com/gatewaypundit/status/1090728735555440642

[Spurminator]

That's funny, I woke up this very morning hoping to see James Woods' take on a Sean Hannity column about Roger Stone.

[Pavlov]

Ohr shit

https://twitter.com/gatewaypundit/status/1090728735555440642
:lol gateway pundit

[TSA]

You said he wouldn’t be charged period. Again, dumb sack of shit wrong again.

Explain to me how an indictment that has nothing to do with colluding with Russia or Wikileaks would have me shook.

Do you really want me to list all the shit you've been wrong about in this thread? So wrong and embarrassed that you went into hiding each time. If you want I'll list all of them and the amount of time you hid like a little bitch, just say when.

[TSA]

:lol gateway pundit

Does the source matter when it's her actual testimony and she admits it? Would it be better if he posted the same testimony from McClatchy?

[Spurminator]

She admitted to spying? Where?

Yes, the source matters. This is why.

[TSA]

That's funny, I woke up this very morning hoping to see James Woods' take on a Sean Hannity column about Roger Stone.

Woods is right though. Why hasn't Glenn Simpson been indicted by Mueller?

https://dailycaller.com/2019/01/30/nellie-ohr-ivanka-trump-fusion-gps/

Bruce Ohr met with Steele and Fusion GPS founder Glenn Simpson prior to the 2016 election. That conflicts with testimony given by Simpson as well as a memo released by Democrats on the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence.

Simpson testified to the Intelligence committee on Nov. 14, 2017 that he did not meet with anyone from the Justice Department or FBI until after the election. But Ohr testified that he met Simpson on Aug. 22, 2016.

Democrats on House Intelligence also claimed in a memo released last year that Ohr did not pass information he gleaned from Fusion GPS or Steele until after the election. But Ohr testified that he contacted top FBI officials almost immediately after his July 30, 2016 meeting with Steele.

[Pavlov]

Does the source matter when it's her actual testimony and she admits it? Would it be better if he posted the same testimony from McClatchy?This is your white flag.

[Pavlov]

Woods is right though. Why hasn't Glenn Simpson been indicted by Mueller?

https://dailycaller.com/2019/01/30/nellie-ohr-ivanka-trump-fusion-gps/

Bruce Ohr met with Steele and Fusion GPS founder Glenn Simpson prior to the 2016 election. That conflicts with testimony given by Simpson as well as a memo released by Democrats on the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence.

Simpson testified to the Intelligence committee on Nov. 14, 2017 that he did not meet with anyone from the Justice Department or FBI until after the election. But Ohr testified that he met Simpson on Aug. 22, 2016.

Democrats on House Intelligence also claimed in a memo released last year that Ohr did not pass information he gleaned from Fusion GPS or Steele until after the election. But Ohr testified that he contacted top FBI officials almost immediately after his July 30, 2016 meeting with Steele.Why hasn't Simpson been indicted by Whittaker?

Trump supporters hate Trump's justice department.

[Spurminator]

:lol Suddenly the guys who celebrated the pardons of Joe Arpaio and Dinesh D'Souza are concerned about partisan optics with regard to the application of laws.

[Chris]

Special Counsel Robert Mueller, an independent prosecutor, is akin to "Trump's justice department" even though then AG Jeff Sessions recused himself. This is all Trump guys :tu

[Pavlov]

Special Counsel Robert Mueller, an independent prosecutor, is akin to "Trump's justice department" even though then AG Jeff Sessions recused himself. This is all Trump guys :tuMueller is Trump's justice department.

He's not an independent prosecutor. He's a special counsel.

[Chris]

https://twitter.com/DailyCaller/status/1090736815278039040

[spurraider21]

Special Counsel Robert Mueller, an independent prosecutor, is akin to "Trump's justice department" even though then AG Jeff Sessions recused himself. This is all Trump guys :tu
which led to rod rosentein's supervision.

guess who nominated rod rosenstein, chris?

[Chris]

which led to rod rosentein's supervision.

guess who nominated rod rosenstein, chris?

He was hired by Jeff Sessions. Direct quote from Trump ; )

[Pavlov]

He was hired by Jeff Sessions. Direct quote from Trump ; )Can I see that direct quote, Chris?

Also Sessions can't hire the deputy.

[spurraider21]

He was hired by Jeff Sessions. Direct quote from Trump ; )
so trump didn't nominate rod rosenstein to be deputy AG?

[Chris]

Can I see that direct quote, Chris?

Also Sessions can't hire the deputy.

He was hired by Jeff Sessions," Trump told Geraldo Rivera in an interview with "The Geraldo Show" on WTAM radio, according to Fox News.

"I was not involved in that process because, you know, they go out and get their own deputies and the people that work in the department," Trump added.

[Chris]

so trump didn't nominate rod rosenstein to be deputy AG?

See above quote ^

[Pavlov]

He was hired by Jeff Sessions," Trump told Geraldo Rivera in an interview with "The Geraldo Show" on WTAM radio, according to Fox News.

"I was not involved in that process because, you know, they go out and get their own deputies and the people that work in the department," Trump added.And who hired Sessions?

[Chris]

https://proxy.duckduckgo.com/iu/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fmedia1.tenor.com%2Fimages%2Fc924b 622b71a51d0c4aa21760c69b9f3%2Ftenor.gif%3Fitemid%3 D9264828&f=1

[Pavlov]

Who approved the hire?

I don't understand how you think Trump has nothing to do with Trump's justice department.

Explain.

[spurraider21]

See above quote ^
yes i read what he said in september 2018

did donald trump not nominate rod rosentein to be deputy AG in February 2017?

did jeff sessions, as attorney general, have the authority to nominate somebody to be the deputy AG?

[Chris]

I don't understand

I know.

[Pavlov]

I know.I know you can't explain the nomination process.:tu

[djohn2oo8]

To save us all time on the fact Chris is wrong

https://www.google.com/amp/s/mobile.reuters.com/article/amp/idUSKBN15G2ZS

[Chris]

https://twitter.com/LindseyGrahamSC/status/1090733779226951685
https://twitter.com/LindseyGrahamSC/status/1090734210250346500
https://twitter.com/LindseyGrahamSC/status/1090734468883800065
https://twitter.com/LindseyGrahamSC/status/1090734899320029184
https://twitter.com/LindseyGrahamSC/status/1090735342322372608

[Pavlov]

https://twitter.com/LindseyGrahamSC/status/1090733779226951685
https://twitter.com/LindseyGrahamSC/status/1090734210250346500
https://twitter.com/LindseyGrahamSC/status/1090734468883800065
https://twitter.com/LindseyGrahamSC/status/1090734899320029184
https://twitter.com/LindseyGrahamSC/status/1090735342322372608I firmly support law enforcement taking into account threats to officer safety, flight risk, and the need to ensure evidence is preserved

Answered his own questions tbh.

[Chris]

I firmly support law enforcement taking into account threats to officer safety, flight risk, and the need to ensure evidence is preserved

Answered his own questions tbh.

Roger Stone was not a "flight risk", a non-offender, and publicly compliant.

[djohn2oo8]

Roger Stone was not a "flight risk", a non-offender, and publicly compliant.
Actually Hillary is a non offender. Manafort and Stone on the other hand...

[Chris]

Actually Hillary is a non offender.

lol 'HQ Special'

[Pavlov]

Roger Stone was not a "flight risk", a non-offender, and publicly compliant.How could an arrest warrant be issued for a non-offender?

He had enough money to flee.

He took a video of himself hamfisting a fully automatic rifle with Alex Jones saying he would defend himself and his family.

[Pavlov]

lol 'HQ Special'That Trump is still giving her.

[Chris]

a fully automatic rifle

Scary!

[Chris]

That Trump is still giving her.

Huber/Horowitz

[Pavlov]

Scary!Better safe than dead.

Why are you against the FBI volunteers' taking precautions?

[Pavlov]

Huber/HorowitzWhat about them?

Explain.

[spurraider21]

Huber/Horowitz


What about them?

Explain.
https://www.phrases.org.uk/images/security-blanket-linus.gif

[Chris]

What about them?

Explain.

She's under investigation.

[Pavlov]

https://www.phrases.org.uk/images/security-blanket-linus.gif:lol TSA was bragging that Huber was keeping all his indictments sooper dooper secret because reasons.

Wouldn't it look exactly the same if he has no indictments on file at all?

[Chris]

:lmao

"dabom2" has no idea what is being discussed here.

[Pavlov]

She's under investigation.Actually no. The investigation is under review.

For a year and a half.

And Huber refused to update Congress about it.

lol

[Pavlov]

"dabom2" has no idea what is being discussed here.No, that's warranted laughter tbh.

[Chris]

lol "predict the future! (oh you can't? lol you got shutdown!)"

lol "dabom2"

Huber is investigating the Clinton Foundation.

Horowitz is investigating the 'HQ Special' and already outlined the corruption there with his first report. FBI raided a whistleblower a few months ago...https://dailycaller.com/2018/11/29/fbi-whistleblower-clinton-uranium/

(you're welcome)

[Chris]

https://twitter.com/esaagar/status/1090781884928479233

He has nothing to fear :tu

[Pavlov]

https://twitter.com/esaagar/status/1090781884928479233

He has nothing to fear :tu:lol

[TSA]

Why hasn't Simpson been indicted by Whittaker?

Trump supporters hate Trump's justice department.

Quoting me and then dodging my question by posing one of your own lol

Why hasn’t Glenn Simpson been indicted by Mueller? It falls under his mandate.

[TSA]

To save us all time on the fact Chris is wrong

https://www.google.com/amp/s/mobile.reuters.com/article/amp/idUSKBN15G2ZS

Speaking of being wrong.

Do you really want me to list all the shit you've been wrong about in this thread? So wrong and embarrassed that you went into hiding each time. If you want I'll list all of them and the amount of time you hid like a little bitch, just say when.

[TSA]

1090746476064636931

[TSA]

I see you Raul, I mean djohn

[Pavlov]

Quoting me and then dodging my question by posing one of your own lol

Why hasn’t Glenn Simpson been indicted by Mueller? It falls under his mandate.Because he hasn't committed a crime probably.

[TSA]

Because he hasn't committed a crime probably.

“Simpson testified to the Intelligence committee on Nov. 14, 2017 that he did not meet with anyone from the Justice Department or FBI until after the election. But Ohr testified that he met Simpson on Aug. 22, 2016.”

Explain how Stone lying to the Intelligence committee is a crime but Glenn Simpson lying to Intelligence committee is not a crime.

[Pavlov]

“Simpson testified to the Intelligence committee on Nov. 14, 2017 that he did not meet with anyone from the Justice Department or FBI until after the election. But Ohr testified that he met Simpson on Aug. 22, 2016.”

Explain how Stone lying to the Intelligence committee is a crime but Glenn Simpson lying to Intelligence committee is not a crime.Did he amend his testimony?

Was he under oath?

Also was it material?

Also why can't Whittaker bring charges via the local AUSA?

I don't know the answers to any of these.

Explain your understanding of each.

[Spurs Homer]

“Simpson testified to the Intelligence committee on Nov. 14, 2017 that he did not meet with anyone from the Justice Department or FBI until after the election. But Ohr testified that he met Simpson on Aug. 22, 2016.”

Explain how Stone lying to the Intelligence committee is a crime but Glenn Simpson lying to Intelligence committee is not a crime.

Because - all he has to do is go in - JUST LIKE JEFF SESSIONS DID -

and say he thought it was after the election but "my bad - I guess if you say it was in August - then so be it"

and there goes your stupid traitor conspiracy to attack the good guys and defend the traitors.

Simpson/Ohr/Comey/Strock et al were simply doing their jobs and commenting on what a piece of shit trump is - just the same as 67% of all other americans -
yet your cult and you destroyed their lives -

trump and his criminal enterprise - sold out their country, stole the election, betrayed their oaths, laundered billions, etc -

and all you can do is defend their crimes.

You are a piece of shit. I would fuck you up if I ever ran into you.
Fuck you.

[TSA]

Because - all he has to do is go in - JUST LIKE JEFF SESSIONS DID -

and say he thought it was after the election but "my bad - I guess if you say it was in August - then so be it"

and there goes your stupid traitor conspiracy to attack the good guys and defend the traitors.

Simpson/Ohr/Comey/Strock et al were simply doing their jobs and commenting on what a piece of shit trump is - just the same as 67% of all other americans -
yet your cult and you destroyed their lives -

trump and his criminal enterprise - sold out their country, stole the election, betrayed their oaths, laundered billions, etc -

and all you can do is defend their crimes.

You are a piece of shit. I would fuck you up if I ever ran into you.
Fuck you.

:lmao meltdown harder

[Spurs Homer]

:lmao meltdown harder

No meltdown - just factual.

Trump sides with the enemy who attacked the USA -
you support the traitor.
You are a traitor.

You would deserve it.

[TSA]

Did he amend his testimony?

Was he under oath?

Also was it material?

Also why can't Whittaker bring charges via the local AUSA?

I don't know the answers to any of these.

Explain your understanding of each.


No he didn’t amend his testimony. Yes he was under oath. Yes it was material. Whitaker could, but that’s not what we are discussing.

Explain how Stone lying to the Intelligence committee is a crime but Glenn Simpson lying to Intelligence committee is not a crime.

[TSA]

No meltdown - just factual.

Trump sides with the enemy who attacked the USA -
you support the traitor.
You are a traitor.

You would deserve it.

No, that was a meltdown. That’s factual.

[Spurs Homer]

No he didn’t amend his testimony. Yes he was under oath. Yes it was material. Whitaker could, but that’s what we are discussing.

Explain how Stone lying to the Intelligence committee is a crime but Glenn Simpson lying to Intelligence committee is not a crime.

I explained it you moron.
Jeff Sessions lied.

He was allowed to come in and - even though he lied again - and said - "i don't recall" 500 times -
as long as he restated his position - to clear his lies - it is a non-issue.

Stone - is the subject-target of an investigation and he lied repeatedly and Mueller has evidence.

Stone will have his day in court.

Simpson is a patriot who should be rewarded - not harassed by criminals and traitors like you.

[Pavlov]

No he didn’t amend his testimony.Link?


Yes he was under oath. Yes it was materialLink?


Whitaker could, but that’s what we are discussing.

Explain how Stone lying to the Intelligence committee is a crime but Glenn Simpson lying to Intelligence committee is not a crime.Don't know. Looks like there is some difference you are missing since Trump's DOJ isn't doing what you want them to do.

I'd ask Whittaker at this point. He's the acting AG and more qualified to answer.

[Winehole23]

https://twitter.com/DailyCaller/status/1090736815278039040WORSE THAN BENGHAZI

[boutons_deux]

NRA desperately backpedaling from Russia as investigators look closer (https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2019/1/29/1830509/-NRA-desperately-backpedaling-from-Russia-as-investigators-look-closer)

For years,

the NRA has been snuggly with Russia,

pushing policy that supports the easy export of weapons and supporting “gun-rights groups” within Russia that NRA officials were well aware had no existence outside of propaganda.

And there was money.

The NRA has admitted to receiving small amounts of cash in the form of dues from Russian members.

It hasn’t illuminated the sudden influx of

untagged funds that almost, just by coincidence,

exactly matched the record $30 million that the group plowed into Donald Trump’s campaign in 2016.

Not only did NRA representatives make multiple pilgrimages to the authoritarian homeland,

and frequently snap publicity shots with oligarchs, Russian soldiers, and Kremlin insiders,

but the organization also pushed a kind of “brutalist cool,”

reflecting a presentation that valued a robust use of violence rather than wimpy old democratic debate.

It’s railed against bills that would have restricted imports of semiautomatic weapons made in Russia. federal investigators really seem to mean it when it comes to looking at connections between the NRA and its Russian pals …

Moscow has suddenly become off limits for the NRA.the NRA is now claiming it never supported the Russia trips to begin with

The NRA has “turned over thousands of pages” in response to requests from Senate committees.

those pages don’t include the ones the Senate wants: the list of donors behind the slug of cash injected into the NRA’s 2016 campaign.

The NRA could be standing in front of money that reached its coffers through some form of money-laundering scheme,

or they may be simply hiding a check straight from the Kremlin.

the NRA is crouching behind its status as a supposedly nonprofit organization to avoid reporting where it got the money to be the single largest outside contributor to the 2016 election.

https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2019/1/29/1830509/-NRA-desperately-backpedaling-from-Russia-as-investigators-look-closer?detail=emaildkre

[boutons_deux]

NRA sought private access to Putin during a trip to Moscow

emails from the National Rifle Association (https://www.thedailybeast.com/nra-heavyweight-wanted-access-to-putin-leaked-email?ref=scroll) that showed a former NRA president sought to have private access to Russia’s President Vladimir Putin.

The email was sent in 2015 right on the brink of when Russia meddling started.

The email was released from Republican operative Paul Erickson.

At the time, Erickson said the trip could have “enormous diplomatic consequences.”

https://www.rawstory.com/2019/01/nra-sought-private-access-putin-trip-moscow-report/

gun-fellating BigGun whores uncovered as money-launderers for America's adversary that is actively waging war against USA.

iow, NRA is a traitorous organization.

[djohn2oo8]

Speaking of being wrong.

Do you really want me to list all the shit you've been wrong about in this thread? So wrong and embarrassed that you went into hiding each time. If you want I'll list all of them and the amount of time you hid like a little bitch, just say when.
TSA’s wrong count:

”Trump not under FBI investigation”
”Hillary eats Dead Babies”
”Hillary runs a child sex ring out of a pizza shop”
”Hillary had Seth Rich murdered”
”Obama Wiretapped Trump”
”There aren’t or weren’t any FISA warrants”
”The FBI didn’t notify the court of the bias of the dossier”
”The FBI investigation started with the dossier”
“Game over Guccifer2.0 is Seth Rich”
”Roger Stone will not be indicted”
”Paul Manafort will not be indicted”
”The only one indicted will be Susan Rice”
“Roger Stone did not reach out to Wikileaks”
”Jr’s meeting with the Russians was about adoptions”
”Comey Committed a crime but I don’t know what it is”
“Wray is a Trump guy” (whatever the hell that meant)
”Nunes memo will end the Mueller investigation”
”Just wait guys Nunes has another memo coming”
”The IG report will be damning for Comey”
”Comey will be charged”
”The book of Q guys!”
”Kim dot com is the real deal”
“Seeing stolen information isn’t a crime”
“Hillary is going to jail”
”Cohen won’t be charged”
“Mueller is done and no more indictments coming”
”Nothing to do with collusion even though Roger Stone’s indictment mentions lying about ties to Wikileaks”
”Flynn not in trouble”
”Flynn will withdraw his guilty plea”
”Flynn and Mueller working together to combat the deep state”

[djohn2oo8]

“Mueller’s prosecutors are corrupt”
”The DOJ is corrupt”
”The FBI has gone rogue and is corrupt”

[djohn2oo8]

“Rod Rosenstein is evil”

[djohn2oo8]

“Manafort has nothing to do with the Trump campaign”
Quickly learns Manafort committed crimes while on the Trump campaign :lol

[djohn2oo8]

“Manafort’s judge is the deep state”

[djohn2oo8]

That’s about 36 things off the top of my head that you were wrong about

[djohn2oo8]

Oh yeah.

”Trump did not ask Comey to let the investigation of Flynn go”
”Trump did not fire Comey because of Russia even though he went on TV and told Lester Holt that’s exactly why he did it”

number up to 38 now

[Spurs Homer]

TSA’s wrong count:

”Trump not under FBI investigation”
”Hillary eats Dead Babies”
”Hillary runs a child sex ring out of a pizza shop”
”Hillary had Seth Rich murdered”
”Obama Wiretapped Trump”
”There aren’t or weren’t any FISA warrants”
”The FBI didn’t notify the court of the bias of the dossier”
”The FBI investigation started with the dossier”
“Game over Guccifer2.0 is Seth Rich”
”Roger Stone will not be indicted”
”Paul Manafort will not be indicted”
”The only one indicted will be Susan Rice”
“Roger Stone did not reach out to Wikileaks”
”Jr’s meeting with the Russians was about adoptions”
”Comey Committed a crime but I don’t know what it is”
“Wray is a Trump guy” (whatever the hell that meant)
”Nunes memo will end the Mueller investigation”
”Just wait guys Nunes has another memo coming”
”The IG report will be damning for Comey”
”Comey will be charged”
”The book of Q guys!”
”Kim dot com is the real deal”
“Seeing stolen information isn’t a crime”
“Hillary is going to jail”
”Cohen won’t be charged”
“Mueller is done and no more indictments coming”
”Nothing to do with collusion even though Roger Stone’s indictment mentions lying about ties to Wikileaks”
”Flynn not in trouble”
”Flynn will withdraw his guilty plea”
”Flynn and Mueller working together to combat the deep state”


Holy fuck.

For all the shit he talks - you'd think he'd be right once in a while!

:lol:lol

[Blake]

https://twitter.com/esaagar/status/1090781884928479233

He has nothing to fear :tu

:lmao :lmao

[djohn2oo8]

When Mueller’s report comes out, that will be the equivalent to infinity war where Mueller snaps his finger and Chris, Darrin and TSA all shout how they don’t feel good before they disintegrate

[djohn2oo8]

Btw gotta love the Trump crew all upset about The way Stone was arrested even though he was going around threatening to kill witnesses.

[boutons_deux]

Russia pretended to hack its own court documents, and altered them, and Mueller caught them (https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2019/1/30/1830996/-Russia-purposely-didn-t-just-leak-court-documents-from-Robert-Mueller-they-altered-them)

Concord Management and Consulting, the indicted Russian “company” that provided funding for the Russian effort to weaponize social media,

leaked information from non-public court documents to undercut the case being made by the special counsel’s office.

To release the information,

the Russian company created yet another fake company, Redstone Hacking,

which claimed to have “hacked Russian server with info from the Russian troll case,”

but in fact Concord was just releasing its own copy of court documents—

but with making a few changes.

On Wednesday, the special counsel’s office made a new court filing (http://cdn.cnn.com/cnn/2019/images/01/30/2019-1-30concord.2.pdf)

opposing the publication of some documents related to the Concord case.

the filing reveals that Concord Management has already been busy conducting its own document release—against court orders.

And the Russians have been making changes to the documents they release.

The new filing states that

"Certain non-sensitive discovery materials in the defense's possession

appear to have been altered and

disseminated as part of a disinformation campaign

aimed (apparently) at discrediting ongoing investigations into Russian interference in the U.S. political system.”

https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2019/1/30/1830996/-Russia-purposely-didn-t-just-leak-court-documents-from-Robert-Mueller-they-altered-them

[Spurs Homer]

Russia pretended to hack its own court documents, and altered them, and Mueller caught them (https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2019/1/30/1830996/-Russia-purposely-didn-t-just-leak-court-documents-from-Robert-Mueller-they-altered-them)

Concord Management and Consulting, the indicted Russian “company” that provided funding for the Russian effort to weaponize social media,

leaked information from non-public court documents to undercut the case being made by the special counsel’s office.

To release the information,

the Russian company created yet another fake company, Redstone Hacking,

which claimed to have “hacked Russian server with info from the Russian troll case,”

but in fact Concord was just releasing its own copy of court documents—

but with making a few changes.

On Wednesday, the special counsel’s office made a new court filing (http://cdn.cnn.com/cnn/2019/images/01/30/2019-1-30concord.2.pdf)

opposing the publication of some documents related to the Concord case.

the filing reveals that Concord Management has already been busy conducting its own document release—against court orders.

And the Russians have been making changes to the documents they release.

The new filing states that

"Certain non-sensitive discovery materials in the defense's possession

appear to have been altered and

disseminated as part of a disinformation campaign

aimed (apparently) at discrediting ongoing investigations into Russian interference in the U.S. political system.”

https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2019/1/30/1830996/-Russia-purposely-didn-t-just-leak-court-documents-from-Robert-Mueller-they-altered-them




And -

any other president would have immediately laid down the law against Russia -

except for this traitor piece of shit criminal.

Trump and Putin have the same end game: To trash Mueller and the USA case against Russia.

[Spurs Homer]

oh and lol

about TSA disappearing again under the heat after all his shit-talking

:lol:lol


What's the count up to on how many times he has shit the bed?

38?

40?


:lol:lol

[boutons_deux]

YET ANOTHER Trash cabinet member connected to Russia


Pootin and his mafiya have been conducting a well-financed All Court Press on Repugs, NRA, Trash for decades

Newly emerged photo shows Ben Carson with key employee of sanctioned Russian oligarch

A photo emerges showing the HUD secretary with Alexey Komov, the main link between U.S. Christian fundamentalists and sanctioned Russians.

https://i2.wp.com/thinkprogress.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/Screenshot-2108.png?w=1920&ssl=1

(https://thinkprogress.org/why-was-ben-carson-hanging-out-with-the-employee-of-this-sanctioned-russian-oligarch-konstantin-malofeev-alexey-komov-bdb4cd383eaa/)https://thinkprogress.org/why-was-ben-carson-hanging-out-with-the-employee-of-this-sanctioned-russian-oligarch-konstantin-malofeev-alexey-komov-bdb4cd383eaa/

Did Pootin dictate to Trash to put Russian-groomed "I Can See Clearly Now" Carson as HUD head?

[djohn2oo8]

I was on the record saying they already investigated Flynn and said no wrong doing or illicit ties. The FBI came out and made that statement in the middle of an investigation.

The only desperate one's here are you and the tweet brigade that jizz their pants every time Garland says Boom.

The whole Dem narrative has been about Trump/Russia collusion, why would I not ask if any collusion has been found?

What new information came out from Comey today?
Damn. No wrong doing or illicit ties? Now we are up to 40 wrong things

[djohn2oo8]

Hannity's a blowhard I usually ignore, but these recent tweets got my attention. If Media Matters/David Brock are trying to silence him, he's on to something they don't want getting out.

867126424691515394

867143093459570688
All in on the Seth Rich conspiracy

[djohn2oo8]

I think she'll be indicted in March on the server issue and indicted again over the summer on her foundation issue.

41

[djohn2oo8]

CROFL he predicted TWO indictments. Wrong twice in one post :rollin

Make that 42

[Spurs Homer]

CROFL he predicted TWO indictments. Wrong twice in one post :rollin

Make that 42


:lol:lol

in before he does REAL homework -

and comes back with REAL conspiracy theories!

[Spurs Homer]

42



:lol:lol

[TSA]

Hi Rauljohn2oo8. Why are you hiding behind an alt just to browse the thread?

[djohn2oo8]

42

[TSA]

That's a nice list you made. I have no problem admitting when I'm wrong, but half of that shit you just made up and another quarter of has not been determined. There is a big difference between the two of us though, you get embarrassed when you are wrong and run and hide like a little bitch. You'll prove it for me too, watch.

[djohn2oo8]

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/b/b4/Jackie_Robinson%27s_retired_number_42.svg/1024px-Jackie_Robinson%27s_retired_number_42.svg.png

[djohn2oo8]

2/14/2017


posted by TheSannityAnnex
America's spies anonymously took down Michael Flynn. That is deeply worrying.


:rollin

and we have #43

[djohn2oo8]

posted by TheSannityAnnex
I did not have a problem with Wikileaks as it wasn't the US intelligence community committing felonies and supplying them information.


ewww.

1. Any comment on the multiple felonies the Trump campaign committed?
2. Wikileaks is Russian Intel

[djohn2oo8]

I've never made definitive claims about pizzagate.
Ladies and gentlemen we have #44

[djohn2oo8]

The 3 investigations are about Russia hacking the election, not Flynn. You'd know this if you'd read beyond a tweet.
#45

[Spurs Homer]

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/b/b4/Jackie_Robinson%27s_retired_number_42.svg/1024px-Jackie_Robinson%27s_retired_number_42.svg.png



:lol:lol

[djohn2oo8]

Wikileaks verifies information and produces the actual documents.
#46

[djohn2oo8]

Journalists name sources every day.
#47

[djohn2oo8]

If true, what are your thoughts on Obama having British intelligence spy on the Trump team as a workaround of spying on a US citizen?
#48

[djohn2oo8]

Did you even read Nunes statement? This isn't going the way you hoped it would, I tried to warn you.
#49

[djohn2oo8]

Obama had world leaders and allies under surveillance, it would be more shocking if he didn't have Trump under surveillance.
#50

[TSA]

Let's just go with the most recent example of you being embarrassed and running and hiding like a little bitch. Remember when you were spamming the Michael Cohen is doing awesome thread with the Buzzfeed story claiming that Mueller had proof Trump directed Cohen to lie to congress? You couldn't contain your glee and pushed that thread 5 pages in a day.

https://www.spurstalk.com/forums/showthread.php?t=273725&page=52

Then this happened

https://www.spurstalk.com/forums/showthread.php?t=273725&page=56

And you disappeared never to be seen again in your own thread. Like the bitch you are you went into hiding for a week. Even your buddy Spurs Homer noticed your disappearance and was concerned.


Where in da fuck is djohn?

banned?

dmc doxxed him?

wtf? :lol :lol


Djohn sighting

wtf? Djohn

You hid like a little bitch for a week browsing the political forum with your Raul Manafort alt, too embarrassed to log in and take your lumps for once again pushing fake news and having it immediately blow up in your face.

Luckily you got a break and Kyle Griffin gave fed you some false hope and you came back to the forum like nothing ever happened

1088794970226593792

My question for you is why do you run and hide so often when shit blows up in your face? Why can't you just man up and take your lumps?

[TSA]

:rollin djohn melting down hard right now just grabbing random quotes and numbering them

[Spurs Homer]

:rollin djohn melting down hard right now just grabbing random quotes and numbering them


48

[Spurs Homer]

Oh nvm

50

lol

[TSA]

This was a fun one. Remember your Kavanaugh is under FBI investigation thread? :rollin

It went 211 pages and you bailed your own thread on page 177 with an amazingly ironic last post


They are stalling now.

https://www.spurstalk.com/forums/showthread.php?t=275669&page=177&p=9551949&highlight=kavanaugh#post9551949

How long did you run and hide from the political forum after that one blew up in your face? A week? Two weeks?

[TSA]

Again djohn...my question for you is why do you run and hide so often when shit blows up in your face? Why can't you just man up and take your lumps?

[Raul Manafort]

Look who's wrong again. I'm not djohn.

[TSA]

Look who's wrong again. I'm not djohn.

Lyle Griffin

[djohn2oo8]

The DNC never let the FBI run forensics on the actual server, did anyone ask Comey how they came to that conclusion? Did anyone ask Comey why the FBI had to rely on the Clinton funded Crowdstrike findings instead of doing their own investigation?

The Crowdstrike findings were torn apart by the private security sector.
Lol #51

[TSA]

There is a big difference between the two of us though, you get embarrassed when you are wrong and run and hide like a little bitch. You'll prove it for me too, watch.

Well that didn't take very long :lol

[djohn2oo8]

Lyle Griffin
#52

[djohn2oo8]

The DNC never let the FBI run forensics on the actual server, did anyone ask Comey how they came to that conclusion? Did anyone ask Comey why the FBI had to rely on the Clinton funded Crowdstrike findings instead of doing their own investigation?

The Crowdstrike findings were torn apart by the private security sector.
Lol #51

[TSA]

#52

My question for you is why do you run and hide so often when shit blows up in your face? Why can't you just man up and take your lumps?

[djohn2oo8]

From everything I have read, no. DNC wouldn't allow them to. FBI went off the Crowdstrike report.
#53

[TSA]

When Mueller’s report comes out, that will be the equivalent to infinity war where Mueller snaps his finger and Chris, Darrin and TSA all shout how they don’t feel good before they disintegrate

Everyone here knows when Mueller's report comes out and it doesn't go your way you'll just run and hide like a little bitch per par.

[TSA]

#53

:rollin so shook and melting down so hard he's posting statements proven true

[Spurs Homer]

Damn

53

[djohn2oo8]

I still think NSA head Mike Rogers tipped off Trump to this back in November.
#54

[TSA]

#54

:rollin so shook and melting down so hard he's posting statements proven true

[TSA]

Keep melting down djohn. Slow day at the office for me and this is entertaining. Watching you melt down is more fun than when you run and hide.

[Raul Manafort]

pizza pizza

[djohn2oo8]

I still think NSA head Mike Rogers tipped off Trump to this back in November.
#54

[Spurs Homer]

Keep melting down djohn. Slow day at the office for me and this is entertaining. Watching you melt down is more fun than when you run and hide.


You gotta be tired of taking L’s

and shitting the bed

smh

[djohn2oo8]

They did clear him on wrong doing and said no illicit ties.

And you keep forgetting how the conversation started yesterday
#55

[djohn2oo8]

55. That boy the Michael Jordan of being wrong

[TSA]

Where in da fuck is djohn?

banned?

dmc doxxed him?

wtf? :lol :lol

[djohn2oo8]

Hillary actually broke laws, what laws has Trump broken? Name one and offer proof.
Christ. #56

[djohn2oo8]

lol what was the trap?

lol who set the trap?

lol get the fuck out of here. Someone is about to get fucked and it isn't Trump or anyone on his team.
#57 is a real doozie

[TSA]

Christ he's still melting down :lol

[TSA]

I didn't know a simple question would cause so much damage.

trigger warning

djohn why do you run and hide so often when shit blows up in your face? Why can't you just man up and take your lumps?

[Raul Manafort]

Crazy Bread

[djohn2oo8]

We are about to witness Spurstalk's all time greatest meltdown. Prepare your anus djohn, the NSA is about to go in raw.

Potential 'smoking gun' showing Obama administration spied on Trump team, source says

Republican congressional investigators expect a potential “smoking gun” establishing that the Obama administration spied on the Trump transition team, and possibly the president-elect himself, will be produced to the House Intelligence Committee this week, a source told Fox News.

Classified intelligence showing incidental collection of Trump team communications, purportedly seen by committee Chairman Devin Nunes, R-Calif., and described by him in vague terms at a bombshell Wednesday afternoon news conference, came from multiple sources, Capitol Hill sources told Fox News. The intelligence corroborated information about surveillance of the Trump team that was known to Nunes, sources said, even before President Trump accused his predecessor of having wiretappedhim in a series of now-infamous tweets posted on March 4.

The intelligence is said to leave no doubt the Obama administration, in its closing days, was using the cover of legitimate surveillance on foreign targets to spy on President-elect Trump, according to sources.

The key to that conclusion is the unmasking of selected U.S. persons whose names appeared in the intelligence, the sources said, adding that the paper trail leaves no other plausible purpose for the unmasking other than to damage the incoming Trump administration.

The FBI hasn’t been responsive to the House Intelligence Committee’s request for documents, but the National Security Agency is expected to produce documents to the committee by Friday. The NSA document production is expected to produce more intelligence than Nunes has so far seen or described – including what one source described as a potential “smoking gun” establishing the spying.

Some time will be needed to properly assess the materials, with the likely result being that congressional investigators and attorneys won’t have a solid handle on the contents of the documents – and their implications – until next week.

Because Nunes’s intelligence came from multiple sources during a span of several weeks, and he has not shared the actual materials with his committee colleagues, he will be the only member of the panel in a position to know whether the NSA has turned over some or all of the intelligence he is citing. However, Fox News was told Intelligence Committee Ranking Member Rep. Adam Schiff, D-Calif., had been briefed on the basic contents of the intelligence described by Nunes.

CIA Director Mike Pompeo is also sympathetic to the effort to determine, with documentary evidence, the extent of any alleged Obama administration spying on the Trump team, sources said.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/03/23/potential-smoking-gun-showing-obama-administration-spied-on-trump-team-source-says.html
Did they go in raw?

#58

[djohn2oo8]

Hillary and her team had many connections with the Russians and probably more financial interests than Trump as well.
Lawdy. #59

[TSA]

epic meltdown :rollin

[TSA]

I broke djohn :rollin

[djohn2oo8]

Hillary and her team had many connections with the Russians and probably more financial interests than Trump as well.
Lawdy. #59

[djohn2oo8]

You've months to make your shit sandwich and no one's had to eat anything. 86 pages and not a single person charged with a crime.
Lol #60

[Raul Manafort]

Papa dJohn's!

[djohn2oo8]

I never claimed Podesta/Clinton/Alefantis would be charged with anything nor did I accuse them of doing anything, unlike djohn2008. I find it ridiculous that even needed to be pointed out to you.
Lol you said Clinton would be indicted twice

#61

[TSA]

Lol #60

1441 pages and still not a single person charged with a crime concerning Trump/Russia election collusion :lmao

[TSA]

djohn why do you run and hide so often when shit blows up in your face? Why can't you just man up and take your lumps?


https://media.giphy.com/media/ZEVc9uplCUJFu/giphy.gif

[Brazil]

Brah. :lol

:lol tbh...

[Spurs Homer]

61

Anyone can read the last few pages and re-confirm just how wrong traitor boy is.

SMH.

[Blake]

epic meltdown :rollin

How is him showing your failures a meltdown?

[Chris]

more womp womp :lol

https://twitter.com/CNN/status/1091086487683301376

[Pavlov]

more womp womp :lol

https://twitter.com/CNN/status/1091086487683301376:lol why would it take two and a half years for Uday to say whom he called, Chris?

[Spurs Homer]

more womp womp :lol

https://twitter.com/CNN/status/1091086487683301376

If those were Republicans who said this - I highly doubt it -

if they were Dems - maybe.

Still would not absolve Jr. or Sr. - of crimes.

[boutons_deux]

"Trump has one tool to deal with problems, a hammer.

When you only got a hammer, everything is a nail: “You’re fired!”****

Robert Mueller knows this.

Thus, he is smart enough to position himself to retort calmly;

“Yes, and you sir, are finished as president,”

all while he reaches across the table to fold up his computer, gather his coat, all with a sly smile across his face:

“I am done here, anyway.”

No one in the media can say it, because it’s speculative, and it pretty-well states straight up:

“Your president is a child, and cannot deal with the truth.”

We can.

I can.

Take absolutely nothing from the fact that no one has been charged with conspiracy.

Shit, Don Jr. lied his ass off to the Congress, and he’s not indicted yet, for the exact same reason.

Mueller will get one shot, and one shot only.

Until he has everything ready to go, office boxed up and a four-day weekend planned with his wife in Barbados, he holds on that shot.

He has prepared all his life for that moment. Let’s trust him.
****

He is a prosecutor with a funny little twist to his job.

The better he does his job,

the more professional,

thorough,

ethical,

conscientious,

all that together by the pound,

the more likely his reward will be termination.

Look at the crimes charged and note how

he put guys on the hot seat with real felonies and jail, but doesn’t implicate the big baby.

That’s not an accident.

And neither is the fact that

everyone around Trump has committed a felony lying about Russia.

At this level, there are no coincidences. Every word is planned, every move, everything matters.

They lie about Russia because the truth is more dangerous.

Mueller has not charged the real conspiracy yet, because he knows what logically follows if he does his job.

The better he does the last job he’ll ever hold,

the more likely it ends with the first termination of his life.

I’ll say it.

He’s got this.

Take that away from it all."

https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2019/1/29/1830764/-The-Media-Cannot-Talk-About-One-Fundamental-Truth-Regarding-Mueller-s-Investigation?utm_campaign=trending

[TSA]

1091101004836278272

I’m thoroughly enjoying watching the whole narrative collapse week by week

[boutons_deux]

DJTJr didn't / can't talk face to face with Fadder?

Nothing's collapsed, They are all going down, for collusion, lying to Congress, money laundering, etc, etc.

[Spurs Homer]

1091101004836278272

I’m thoroughly enjoying watching the whole narrative collapse week by week


Hahahaha!

How hilarious when

HOPE

rises again!

:lol:lol

[Chris]

https://twitter.com/gatewaypundit/status/1091179538342727680

This includes Hillary/Comey/Brennan/McCabe FBI swat teams GO! :lol

[djohn2oo8]

Hahahaha!

How hilarious when

HOPE

rises again!

:lol:lol
I will take his failures past 100

[djohn2oo8]

Tomorrow should be fun if the memo is released as expected. The spin from the left is going to be all time.
:lol

#62

[djohn2oo8]

You're a fool to pretend there is only a four page memo, even your boy Schiff isn't trying to sell that bullshit story.
#63

[djohn2oo8]

I think the memo is being used as a primer for the public so that when the OIG report is released they aren't completely shocked at the amount of corruption that was going on in the Obama administration. Did you read every page of the Church Committee reports?
#64

[djohn2oo8]

:lol nervous laughter from mono

The public now knows the FBI purposely hid information from the FISC when applying for the FISA warrant. The public is now prepped for the OIG investigation findings.


a) Neither the initial application in October 2016, nor any of the renewals, disclose or reference the role of the DNC, Clinton campaign, or any party/campaign in funding Steele’s efforts, even though the political origins of the Steele dossier were then known to senior and FBI officials.

b) The initial FISA application notes Steele was working for a named U.S. person, but does not name Fusion GPS and principal Glenn Simpson, who was paid by a U.S. Law firm (Perkins Coie) representing the DNC (even though it was known by DOJ at the time that political actors were involved with the Steele dossier). The application does not mention Steele was ultimately working on behalf of -- and paid by -- the DNC and Clinton campaign, or that the FBI had separately authorized payment to Steele for the same information.
#65

[djohn2oo8]

And you said Flynn was in major trouble for talking to the Russians about sanctions, he wasn’t. He never was. He never will be. I’m willing to bet he’ll be cleared of the bullshit non-factor process crime as well.

List the 2 process crimes and the 2 that have absolutely nothing to do with Trump or his campaign. Add the 3rd Gates crime that has zero to do with Trump as well. Let’s have some fun.
Has he been cleared yet?

#66

[djohn2oo8]

Not only did Flynn not commit treason but there is also a chance he gets cleared. First time I've heard Judge Sullivan filed an order directing Mueller to provide Flynn with any evidence in the special counsel’s possession that is favorable to Flynn.

New developments in Flynn's case raise questions about the circumstances under which he pled guilty to lying to the FBI.

Back in early December, Trump fans started throwing stuff at me for suggesting that we await more information about FBI agent Peter Strzok before demanding that he be drawn and quartered. Yes, it was clear that Strzok engaged in serious misconduct: The married G-man’s reported extramarital affair with his married FBI colleague Lisa Page was scandalous not only for the obvious reasons but as potential blackmail material against counterintelligence agents. Plus, Strzok appears to have been the main investigator in the Hillary Clinton emails case that the FBI and Justice Department bent over backwards not to prosecute; and there is reason to believe his rabidly anti-Trump text messages with his paramour crossed the line from arrogant political banter to unprofessional investigative decision-making. But there were dissonant notes, too, cutting against the neat ditty about a high-ranking government agent acting on a corrupt partisan agenda. For one thing, I was hearing from people with good national-security credentials that Strzok was a highly effective counterintelligence agent. And then there was Mike Flynn. The first revelations about Strzok’s texts came only days after General Flynn, who had fleetingly served as President Trump’s first national-security adviser, pled guilty in the Mueller investigation to a charge of lying to FBI investigators. Strzok had conducted the interview with Flynn. Combine that with the fact that he had been a principal in all the important FBI interviews in the Clinton caper, and the presumption crystalized: Political hack Strzok went kid-gloves on the Hillary Gang and scorched-earth on Trump World.

That’s not reality, though. Here’s how I recounted what actually happened in the December column: Strzok did not decide on his own to interview Flynn. We know the matter was being monitored at the highest level of the Justice Department, by then–acting attorney general Sally Yates and then–FBI director James Comey. Strzok and a colleague were assigned to interview Flynn. More importantly, Strzok apparently reported that he believed Flynn had been truthful. Shortly after the interview occurred, it was reported that the FBI had decided no action would be taken against Flynn. On March 2, Comey testified to a closed session of the House Intelligence Committee that, while Flynn may have had some honest failures of recollection during the interview, the agents who questioned him concluded that he did not lie. Far from setting Flynn up, it seems that Strzok would exculpate him. Flynn was prosecuted not because Strzok is an anti-Trump zealot, but apparently because Strzok’s finding that Flynn was truthful was negated by Mueller’s very aggressive prosecutors. Did they decide they knew better than the experienced investigators who were in the room observing Flynn’s demeanor as he answered their questions?

Of course, the point is moot now because Flynn has admitted his guilt. Still, I wonder whether Mueller’s team informed Flynn and his counsel, prior to Flynn’s guilty plea to lying to the FBI, that the interviewing agents believed he had not lied to the FBI. I still wonder what Mueller’s team told Flynn before the guilty plea. There are good reasons to do so. Flynn’s case is back in the news thanks to Byron York’s important Washington Examiner report yesterday. He retraces the history: Because Flynn was a Trump transition official and incoming national-security adviser, there was nothing at all inappropriate about his discussing Obama-imposed sanctions against Russia with Russian ambassador Sergey Kislyak.

Nevertheless, then–acting attorney general and Obama partisan Sally Yates seriously considered prosecuting Flynn under the absurd, never-invoked Logan Act. This misconception that Flynn had done something wrong led Yates and Comey to have Flynn interviewed as if he were a criminal suspect. Apparently unconcerned, Flynn agreed to be interviewed without counsel. Strzok came away from the session believing that Flynn had told the truth. Comey, Byron York reports, “told lawmakers that the FBI agents who interviewed Flynn did not believe that Flynn had lied to them, or that any inaccuracies in his answers were intentional.” Yet, ten months later, with Yates, Comey, and Strzok now out of the picture, Mueller decided to charge Flynn with lying to the FBI anyway. And Flynn decided to plead guilty — perhaps because he was guilty . . . or perhaps because he lacked the resources to sustain the legal fight . . . or perhaps because he feared Mueller’s team would otherwise prosecute his son. There are a few other oddities about the case.

After Flynn pled guilty, I argued that this showed Mueller did not have a collusion case. If he did, he would have forced Flynn to plead guilty to some kind of criminal conspiracy involving the Trump campaign and Russia, and had Flynn implicate his Trump World coconspirators in the course of allocuting in court. Instead, Flynn pled out to a mere process crime, giving Mueller a scalp but not much else. The judge who accepted Flynn’s guilty plea was Rudolph Contreras. Mysteriously, just days after taking Flynn’s plea, Judge Contreras recused himself from the case. The press has been remarkably uncurious about this development. No rationale for the recusal has been offered, no explanation for why, if Judge Contreras had some sort of conflict, the recusal came after the guilty plea, not before. We can note that Contreras is one of the eleven federal district judges assigned to the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court. We do not know if Judge Contreras signed one or more of the FISA warrants the Justice Department sought for Trump campaign figures Carter Page and Paul Manafort (or even if signing a FISA warrant would constitute grounds for a conflict in Flynn’s case). We can note, however, that Contreras is one of just three FISA court judges who sits in the District of Columbia, where it is likely the Trump-Russia FISA warrants were sought.

When Judge Contreras pulled out, Flynn’s case was reassigned to Judge Emmet G. Sullivan. We now know that one of Judge Sullivan’s first actions on the case was to file an order directing Mueller to provide Flynn with any evidence in the special counsel’s possession that is favorable to Flynn, whether on the issue of guilt or of sentencing. Significantly, the order stresses that if Mueller has such evidence but believes it is not “material” and therefore that Flynn is not entitled to disclosure of it, Mueller must show the evidence to the court so that Judge Sullivan may decide whether to mandate its disclosure.

Now, it could be that this is just Judge Sullivan’s standard order on exculpatory information, filed in every case over which he presides. But it is noteworthy that Flynn had already pled guilty, and in the course of doing so had agreed to Mueller’s demand that he waive “the right to any further discovery or disclosures of information not already provided” — in addition to forfeiting many other trial and appellate rights. (See plea agreement, pages 6–7.) It certainly appears that Sullivan’s order supersedes the plea agreement and imposes on the special counsel the obligation to reveal any and all evidence suggesting that Flynn is innocent of the charge to which he has admitted guilt. Could this provide General Flynn with factual grounds of which he was previously unaware to seek to have his plea vacated? Would he have a viable legal basis to undo the plea agreement that he and his lawyer signed on November 30? We do not know at this point. All we can say is that Flynn’s sentencing has just been postponed until May.

Read more at: http://www.nationalreview.com/article/456379/michael-flynn-guilty-plea-questions-raised-about-fbi-robert-mueller-investigation
#67

[djohn2oo8]

I'm of a differing opinion. I think Mueller has been in on it from the start and I think Trump and Mueller planned on loading the team up with Clinton stooges when they met the night before Mueller was appointed to Special Counsel. Give them the rope and let Horowitz hang them.
:lmao :lmao :lmao oh my gawd

#68

Im putting that one in my sig

[djohn2oo8]

Great, multiple sources say he didn't recuse himself. It doesn't really matter so no point going back and forth. What matters is he was recused after accepting Flynn's plea meaning there was already a conflict of interest when he accepted Flynn's plea.
#69

[djohn2oo8]

Strzok could have lied on the 302's on Flynn. No attorney was present and it wasn't recorded. Flynn's legal team will now have access to the 302's.
It was recorded and now this is #70.

[djohn2oo8]

Hillary isn't cleared by a long shot. Did you forget what Sessions announced recently?
#71

[djohn2oo8]

Not in the clear yet but looks to be getting closer day by day.

==============

General Flynn Should WITHDRAW His Guilty Plea. His New Judge Is A Government Misconduct Expert


Extraordinary manipulation by powerful people led to the creation of Robert Mueller’s continuing investigation and prosecution of General Michael Flynn. Notably, the recent postponement of General Flynn’s sentencing provides an opportunity for more evidence to be revealed that will provide massive ammunition for a motion to withdraw Flynn’s guilty plea and dismiss the charges against him.

It was Judge Rudolph Contreras who accepted General Flynn’s guilty plea, but he suddenly was recused from the case. The likely reason is that Judge Contreras served on the special court that allowed the Federal Bureau of Investigation to surveil the Trump campaign based on the dubious FISA application. Judge Contreras may have approved one of those four warrants.

The judge assigned to Flynn’s case now is Emmet G. Sullivan. Judge Sullivan immediately issued what is called a “Brady” order requiring Mueller to provide Flynn all information that is favorable to the defense whether with respect to guilt or punishment. Just today, Mueller’s team filed an agreed motion to provide discovery to General Flynn under a protective order so that it can be reviewed by counsel but not disclosed otherwise.

This development is huge. Prosecutors almost never provide this kind of information to a defendant before he enters a plea — much less after he has done so. This is one of myriad problems in our justice system. As Judge Jed Rakoff wrote several years ago, people who are innocent enter guilty pleas every day. They simply can no longer withstand the unimaginable stress of a criminal investigation. They and their families suffer sheer exhaustion in every form — financial, physical, mental, and emotional. Add in a little prosecutorial duress — like the threat of indicting your son — and, presto, there’s a guilty plea.

Judge Sullivan is the perfect judge to decide General Flynn’s motion. The judicial hero of my book, Emmet Sullivan held federal prosecutors in contempt for failing to disclose evidence, dismissed the corrupted prosecution of Alaska Senator Ted Stevens and appointed a special prosecutor to investigate the Department of Justice.

That independent counsel, Henry Schuelke, issued a scathing report finding systematic, intentional and pervasive misconduct in the Department of (In)Justice. He identified the prosecution’s deliberate concealment of evidence favorable to the defense. That is why Judge Sullivan both issues such Brady orders in each of his cases and encourages every other judge in the country to do the same.

Emmet G. Sullivan is one judge who is ready, willing and able to hold Mr. Mueller accountable to the law and who has the wherewithal to dismiss the case against General Flynn — for egregious government misconduct — if Mueller doesn’t move to dismiss it himself.

Judge Sullivan’s experience can only help General Flynn as more evidence appears every day to reveal that Flynn should not have been prosecuted. James Comey testified to Congress that the agents who interviewed Flynn — including the hopelessly compromised Peter Strzok — thought Flynn was telling the truth. The entire FISA warrant application becomes more problematic by the day.

Within the next six weeks, we will probably have the bombshell report of Michael Horowitz, the Inspector General for the Department of Justice. He is the one who discovered the Strzok-Page emails, and he has been investigating the FBI and DOJ in their Clinton cover-up for the last year.

Since Flynn entered his guilty plea, we’ve learned that information Mr. Comey leaked deliberately to “trigger” Robert Mueller’s entire investigation was classified. Also, FBI agents Peter Strzok, Lisa Page and Deputy Director Andrew McCabe were working on an “insurance policy” to protect the country against a Trump presidency. It seems plausible that this “insurance policy” included the appointment of a special prosecutor.

Indeed, the bases for throwing out everything Robert Mueller has touched grow exponentially as more truth finds sunlight.

Watching guilty pleas evaporate is nothing new for Mr. Mueller’s favored lieutenant Andrew Weissmann. Along with his Enron Task Force comrade Leslie Caldwell, Weissmann terrorized Arthur Andersen partner David Duncan into pleading guilty.

Weissmann and Caldwell made Duncan testify at length against Arthur Andersen when they destroyed the company and 85,000 jobs only to be reversed by a unanimous Supreme Court three years later. Turns out, the “crime” they “convinced” Mr. Duncan to plead guilty to was not a crime at all. The court allowed Duncan to withdraw his plea. And, that was not the only Weissmann-induced plea to be withdrawn either. Just ask Christopher Calger.

Judge Sullivan is the country’s premiere jurist experienced in the abuses of our Department of Justice. He knows a cover-up when he sees one. Until the Department is cleaned out with Clorox and firehoses, along with its “friends” at the FBI, Judge Sullivan is the best person to confront the egregious government misconduct that has led to and been perpetrated by the Mueller-Weissmann “investigation” and to right the injustices that have arisen from it. Stay tuned for the fireworks.
====================

Sidney Powell, former federal prosecutor and veteran of 500 federal appeals, is the author of LICENSED TO LIE: Exposing Corruption in the Department of Justice. She is a Senior Fellow of the London Center for Policy Research and Senior Policy Advisor for America First.

http://dailycaller.com/2018/02/16/general-flynn-should-withdraw-his-guilty-plea-his-new-judge-is-a-government-misconduct-expert/


#72. My nigga TSA with these BARRY BONDS home runs of being wrong

[djohn2oo8]

Grassley and Graham assert that the Steele dossier formed the “bulk” of the FISA application, and as important, that the application “appears to contain no additional information corroborating the dossier allegations against Mr. Page,” and that the FBI “relied more heavily on Steele's credibility than on any independent verification or corroboration for his claims.”
#73

[djohn2oo8]

Sure, and it can still be dismissed.
#74

[djohn2oo8]

You have some catching up to do. Mueller agreed to have the court provide all evidence used against him. His previous plea with the judge who was recused May now be void.
:lmao
#75

[Spurs Homer]

72727272727272


lolololololololol

[djohn2oo8]

And if McCabe changed the 302’s of Mike Flynn’s interview Flynn will walk free.
Lol

[djohn2oo8]

76

[djohn2oo8]

Sorry Pavlov but you can't do the same thing. Gates committed those crimes when he was connected to the Clintons, not Trump.
77

[djohn2oo8]

The special counsel investigation will most likely cost more than the what was laundered and obtained illegally by Manafort/Gates. Seem worth it to you? Expensive political charade you and I are paying for.
78

The investigation has actually paid for itself

[Spurs Homer]

Comrade TSA

78

[djohn2oo8]

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/4/4c/NY-78.svg/600px-NY-78.svg.png

[djohn2oo8]

Floodgates wide open now. John Solomon articles are just a hint of what’s to come. This shit is getting blown wide open right before the mid-terms. Shocked Trump was this patient with what he knows was a fraud of an investigation.
79

[djohn2oo8]

Like I said earlier...Trump has the DOJ slow rolling the release of documents heading to the midterms. I’m curious when he’s going to open the floodgates. He’s had EVERYTHING since he took office.

1030467140439048192
80

[djohn2oo8]

:lol thinking it will get worse after those in the FBI/DOJ are exposed for trying to frame candidate/president elect/president Trump.
Anybody been exposed yet ya little cumrag?

#81

[djohn2oo8]

I know each instance of potential “collusion” was instigated by government informants aka frame job.
82

[djohn2oo8]

I’m actually starting to feel bad for Mueller, this investigation will be a stain on his career.
#83

[Trill Clinton]

Just now seeing that people were whining about the amount of police and agents at stones arrest lol smh.

[djohn2oo8]

That’s exactly what happened with count #8 for Cohen. He plead guilty to a crime that is not a crime. He did so for leniency on the actual crimes he committed.

“There appear to be two payments involved in this unusual plea - Cohen pleaded guilty to a campaign finance violation for having "coordinated" the American Media Inc. payment to Karen McDougal for her story, not for actually making the payment. So he is pleading guilty over a corporate contribution he did not make.

Now, when it comes to Stormy Daniels, Cohen made a payment a few days before the election that Trump attorney Rudy Giuliani says was reimbursed. First, given that this payment was on Oct. 27, it would never have been reported before the election campaign and so, for all intents and purposes, was immaterial as it relates to any effect on the campaign. What's clear in this plea deal is that, in exchange for overall leniency on his massive tax evasion, Cohen is pleading guilty to these other charges as an attempt to give prosecutors what they want - a Trump connection.

The usual procedures here would be for the FEC to investigate complaints and sort through these murky laws to determine if these kinds of payments are personal in nature or more properly classified as campaign expenditures. And, on the Daniels payment that was made and reimbursed by Trump, it is again a question of whether that was made for personal reasons (especially since they have been trying since 2011 to obtain agreement). Just because it would be helpful to the campaign does not convert it to a campaign expenditure. Think of a candidate with bad teeth who had dental work done to look better for the campaign; his campaign still could not pay for it because it's a personal expenditure.“

http://thehill.com/opinion/white-house/402959-cohens-plea-deal-is-prosecutors-attempt-to-set-up-trump?amp&__twitter_impression=true
Pled guilty to a crime that’s not a crime lol

#84

[djohn2oo8]

Just now seeing that people were whining about the amount of police and agents at stones arrest lol smh.
And it wasn’t even excessive force lol

[djohn2oo8]

None of that was disclosed to the FISC. And Ohr’s testimony also revealed Wood’s procedures were not followed.
#85

[Winehole23]

low hoop dunking, tbh.

drumbeats of doom ( aka wishcasting) is something you two share in common.

[djohn2oo8]

The wheels are falling off. I expect the “Russian” set up to be exposed before the midterms. Horowitz FISA abuse report rumored to come out end of by October.

Agents Tried to Flip Russian Oligarchs. The Fallout Spread to Trump.

https://www.nytimes.com/2018/09/01/us/politics/deripaska-ohr-steele-fbi.html#click=https://t.co/jT0xnQpz54
Setup exposed before the midterms? :lol

#86

[djohn2oo8]

low hoop dunking, tbh.

drumbeats of doom ( aka wishcasting) is something you two share in common.
Saying the same boring shit over and over again is something unique to you. Not wishcasting when people I predict to be indicted are following in that pattern. Now go eat a bowl of dicks.

[Winehole23]

Damn, who pissed in your bowl of dicks this morning?

You're awfully thin skinned for someone who dishes so much.

[Winehole23]

Lol you complaining about repetitive posting.

[Spurs Homer]

Setup exposed before the midterms? :lol

#86

Well - 86 -

wait - where is TSA?

OH YEAH - HIDING


like a little bitch!


:lol:lol

[djohn2oo8]

Damn, who pissed in your bowl of dicks this morning?

You're awfully thin skinned for someone who dishes so much.
Something that never made sense is to complain about something and keep coming back to view it. That’s what you do. And not one time do you offer any opinion really. Even when you have facts in front of you.

[Winehole23]

Something that never made sense is to complain about something and keep coming back to view it.

Not sure what you mean.


And not one time do you offer any opinion really.I'm happy to give my opinion anytime it's requested and often give it unbidden. Maybe that's the burr in your saddle.

[TSA]

:lmao holy shit the meltdown continues :lmao

I know how to keep it going
djohn2oo8 why do you run and hide so often when shit blows up in your face?

1091058160872419330

How long did you go into hiding after you pushed the story that Manafort somehow secretly snuck into the most watched embassy in the world multiple times to meet with Assange? 1 week in hiding? 2 weeks in hiding? :rollin

[TSA]

Well - 86 -

wait - where is TSA?

OH YEAH - HIDING


like a little bitch!


:lol:lol

I don't go into hiding. The only one who does that is your boy djohn. Fact.


Where in da fuck is djohn?

banned?

dmc doxxed him?

wtf? :lol :lol

:cry where is my djohn :cry

[Spurs Homer]

Comrade TSA

working hard for mother russia!

[TSA]

Mar 28 2018

Office of the Inspector General (OIG) will initiate a review that will examine the Justice Department’s and the Federal Bureau of Investigation’s (FBI) compliance with legal requirements, and with applicable DOJ and FBI policies and procedures, in applications filed with the U.S. Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISC) relating to a certain U.S. person. As part of this examination, the OIG also will review information that was known to the DOJ and the FBI at the time the applications were filed from or about an alleged FBI confidential source. Additionally, the OIG will review the DOJ’s and FBI’s relationship and communications with the alleged source as they relate to the FISC applications.

If circumstances warrant, the OIG will consider including other issues that may arise during the course of the review.

https://oig.justice.gov/press/2018/2018-03-28b.pdf


Jan 29 2019

The Department of Justice (DOJ) Office of the Inspector General (OIG) initiated this investigation upon the receipt of information from the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) concerning multiple allegations involving an FBI contractor and three FBI officials.

The OIG found that as a result of conduct by two current senior FBI officials, and one retired FBI official, the FBI contractor engaged in certain inherent governmental activities (The direction and control of intelligence and counterintelligence operations) in contravention of Federal Acquisition Regulations (FAR). Additionally, the OIG found that these three FBI officials did not adhere to Office of Management and Budget policy while managing the contractor. Further, the OIG found that the FBI contractor failed to adhere to personal conflict of interest rules under the FAR.

The OIG has completed its investigation and provided its report to the FBI for appropriate action.

https://oig.justice.gov/reports/2019/f190129.pdf

Sounds like a description of Fusion GPS and Nellie Ohr. I wonder who the FBI officials were.

[Winehole23]

is breaking agency rules more of a legal matter, or an internal disciplinary one?

cf., McCabe

[pgardn]

Every Caucasian red team Republican was born into poverty, worked hard, and is now making six figures a year.
This board is an example of the American Dream.

[TSA]

is breaking agency rules more of a legal matter, or an internal disciplinary one?

cf., McCabe

Guess it would depend on the violation. Federal prosecutors had/have a grand jury for McCabe.

[TSA]

:lmao holy shit the meltdown continues :lmao

I know how to keep it going
djohn2oo8 why do you run and hide so often when shit blows up in your face?

1091058160872419330

How long did you go into hiding after you pushed the story that Manafort somehow secretly snuck into the most watched embassy in the world multiple times to meet with Assange? 1 week in hiding? 2 weeks in hiding? :rollin


Where in da fuck is djohn?

banned?

dmc doxxed him?

wtf? :lol :lol

[TSA]

Hi Raul

[Spurs Homer]

Comrade trump = over 8,000 confirmed lies

comrade TSA = 86 confirmed propaganda pieces

working hard for mother russia!

[TSA]

Comrade trump = over 8,000 confirmed lies

comrade TSA = 86 confirmed propaganda pieces

working hard for mother russia!

now do djohn

[TSA]

1091339642933334018

worst Russian puppet ever

[TSA]

1091337905358888960

[Winehole23]

1091339642933334018

worst Russian puppet everit doesn't seem commonsensical to me that walking away from the INF treaty is an anti-Russia move.

can you walk us through that interpretation?

[TSA]

it doesn't seem commonsensical to me that walking away from the INF treaty is an anti-Russia move.

can you walk us through that interpretation?

The US will no longer be constrained by the terms of the treaty. You think that Russia is happy about that?

1091329320478486536

[Spurminator]

Yes, I'm sure Russia is super pissed off that the US will no longer adhere to a treaty that they themselves have ignored for 5 years. They'll probably be so mad, they'll continue to advance their weapons programs.

:lol

[TSA]

Yes, I'm sure Russia is super pissed off that the US will no longer adhere to a treaty that they themselves have ignored for 5 years. They'll probably be so mad, they'll continue to advance their weapons programs.

:lol

How about these then for worst Russian puppet

supporting overthrow of Maduro
bombing Syria and killing hundreds of Russians
pushing Germany to open up to US gas imports
sanctions
arming Ukraine

[TSA]

Yes, I'm sure Russia is super pissed off that the US will no longer adhere to a treaty that they themselves have ignored for 5 years. They'll probably be so mad, they'll continue to advance their weapons programs.

:lol

or these

Trump deploys TANKS to Estonia as NATO builds up HUGE army on Russian border - Express, Feb 7 2017

Trump launches attack on Syria with 59 Tomahawk missiles - CNBC, Apr 6 2017

U.S. Rejects Exxon Mobil Bid for Waiver on Russia Sanctions - NYT, Apr 21 2017

Trump to promote U.S. natgas exports in Russia's backyard - Reuters, Jul 3 2017

Trump Urges East Europe to Loosen Russia's Grip With U.S. Gas - Bloomberg, Jul 6 2017

Trump signs bill approving new sanctions against Russia - CNN, Aug 3, 2017

Justice Dept Asks Russia's RT to Register as Foreign Agent - Newsmax, Sep 13 2017

US 'to restrict Russian military flights over America' - Independent, Sep 26 2017

Trump signs into law U.S. government ban on Kaspersky Lab software - Reuters, Dec 12 2017

Trump gives green light to selling lethal arms to Ukraine - The Hill, Dec 20 2017

U.S. Punishes Chechen Leader in New Sanctions Against Russians - NYT, Dec 20 2017

Sputnik Partner 'Required To Register' Under U.S. Foreign-Agent Law - RFERL, Jan 10 2018

Trump says Russia is helping North Korea avoid sanctions - CBSNews, Jan 17 2018

Trump's 'energy dominance' strategy is undercutting Russia's influence and business in Europe - Reuters, Feb 9 2018

Trump looks to deter Russia, China with $686B ask for Pentagon - The Hill, Feb 12 2018

American General In Syria Confirms US Forces Killed Hundreds Of Russians In Massive Battle - The Drive, Mar 16 2018

Trump orders expulsion of 60 Russian diplomats, closure of Seattle consulate - CBS, Mar 26 2018

Trump vows periodical dispatch of US troops to Baltic states, step up air defense - Lithuania Tribune, Apr 3 2018

Trump opposes Nord Stream II, questions Germany - AA, Apr 4 2018

Trump just hit Russian oligarchs with the most aggressive sanctions yet - Vice, Apr 6 2018

Trump orders missile strike on Syria military targets - CBSNews, Apr 9 2018

Aluminum Stocks Jump As Trump Sanctions Target Putin Pal - Investors, Apr 9 2018

Russia ‘deeply disappointed’ at Trump’s withdrawal from Iran deal - Times of Israel, May 9 2018

Trump to NATO allies: Raise military spending to 4 percent of GDP - AlJazeerah, Jul 12 2018

Trump says U.S. ties to NATO ‘very strong’ - Politico, Jul 12 2018

U.S. to sanction Turkey for receiving S-400 missiles - Ahval, Jul 27 2018

Trump administration to hit Russia with new sanctions for Skripal poisoning - NBC News Aug 8 2018

Space Force Is Trump’s Answer to New Russian and Chinese Weapons - FP, Aug 10 2018

US Sanctions Chinese Entity Over Purchase of Russian Fighters, S-400s – Treasury - Sputnik, Sep 20 2018

Trump hints at punitive action against India for buying S-400 from Russia - India Today, Oct 11 2018

Trump Agrees to Boost Pentagon's Budget to $750 Bln in 2019 - Reports - Sputnik, Oct 12 2018

Trump says US will withdraw from nuclear arms treaty with Russia - Guardian, Oct 21 2018

Haley Condemns ‘Outrageous’ Russian Firing on Ukrainian Ships - Bloomberg, Nov 26 2018

2 Trump Moves Cost This Russian-American CEO $2.3B - Forbes, Jan 14 2019

https://www.moonofalabama.org/2019/01/putin-asks-and-trump-delivers-here-is-a-list-of-all-the-good-things-trump-did-for-russia.html

[boutons_deux]

Why is Trash and every one of his mafiya, and the NRA, etc, LYING about their contacts with Russia?

Why are so many people, now or have been, in Trash's Exec connected to Russia?

Why is Trash obstructing the Russian investigation?

[Spurminator]

How about these then for worst Russian puppet

I'm not reading copypasta from your bullshit links, nor am I getting into a pissing match over whether he's a "puppet." I'm simply laughing at the idea that Russia is mad about the US exiting a treaty that they ignored. You obviously have no response specific to that, so you've changed the subject.

[boutons_deux]

A Little More About Those Blocked Number Phone Calls Don Made Before Trump Tower Meeting... (https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2019/2/1/1831395/-A-Little-More-About-Those-Blocked-Number-Phone-Calls-Don-Made-Before-Trump-Tower-Meeting)

https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2019/2/1/1831395/-A-Little-More-About-Those-Blocked-Number-Phone-Calls-Don-Made-Before-Trump-Tower-Meeting?detail=emaildkre

[TSA]

I'm not reading copypasta from your bullshit links, nor am I getting into a pissing match over whether he's a "puppet." I'm simply laughing at the idea that Russia is mad about the US exiting a treaty that they ignored. You obviously have no response specific to that, so you've changed the subject.

I'm sorry you don't want to talk about the subject of Trump being a Russian puppet. Is there anything else you'd like to discuss? The recent OIG release? Trump Jr's phone calls? djohn's disappearing acts?

[boutons_deux]

"Trump Jr's phone calls?"

how to call blocked phones with no numbers visible? They weren't block for DJTJr

He called long-time business associate Lorber and the CEO of Nascar.

The meeting was all about Trash lifting sanctions so real estate, banking deals could advance, and maybe quid pro quo Russians giving Trash dirt on Hillary.

In ANY case, while all the lying, obfuscation, obstruction by Trash and his mafiya? sure makes them look 100% innocent.

[Spurminator]

I'm sorry you don't want to talk about the subject of Trump being a Russian puppet. Is there anything else you'd like to discuss? The recent OIG release? Trump Jr's phone calls? djohn's disappearing acts?

You brought up the INF treaty. I figured you wanted to talk about that.

You posted about it twice.

[TSA]

You brought up the INF treaty. I figured you wanted to talk about that.

You posted about it twice.

And we don't feel the same about it, there isn't much more to discuss. Would you like to discuss something else related to this thread?

[Spurminator]

And we don't feel the same about it, there isn't much more to discuss. Would you like to discuss something else related to this thread?

I'd be somewhat curious as to why, specifically, you believe Russia is not happy that the US is exiting a treaty that they have ignored for 5 years. You posted twice about it and gave up pretty quickly when presented with something resembling a challenge to your read on it. Seems a little early for "agree to disagree." IMO

But if that's not what you want to talk about, like I said before, I'm good. Do you need my input on something else?

[Spurs Homer]

1091339642933334018

worst Russian puppet ever

Of course - a guy with 86 propaganda lies on this thread alone -

would BELIEVE the guy with over 8,000 confirmed lies to the American people.


Makes perfect sense.

[Spurs Homer]

And we don't feel the same about it, there isn't much more to discuss. Would you like to discuss something else related to this thread?

No one has the time

or


the CRAYONS

to explain the truth to a cult member.


:lol:lol

[Winehole23]

TSA so glib. Repeating what others say without giving it a moment's though most likely.

[TSA]

I'd be somewhat curious as to why, specifically, you believe Russia is not happy that the US is exiting a treaty that they have ignored for 5 years. You posted twice about it and gave up pretty quickly when presented with something resembling a challenge to your read on it. Seems a little early for "agree to disagree." IMO

But if that's not what you want to talk about, like I said before, I'm good. Do you need my input on something else?Because the US had honored the treaty and the US will no longer be constrained by said treaty.

"We will move forward with developing our military response options and will work with NATO and our other allies and partners to deny Russia any military advantage from its unlawful conduct"

I don't believe Russia will be happy with the US working with NATO and other allies to eliminate any advantage Russia thought they had gained by ignoring the treaty.

[TSA]

No one has the time

or


the CRAYONS

to explain the truth to a cult member.


:lol:lol
Do you have the time to go through this thread and post all the lies, fake news, and propaganda your boy djohn has been spreading for over two years?

[Pavlov]

lol TSA ramping up his Googles.

Defensive

[TSA]

:lmao holy shit the meltdown continues :lmao

I know how to keep it going
djohn2oo8 why do you run and hide so often when shit blows up in your face?

1091058160872419330

How long did you go into hiding after you pushed the story that Manafort somehow secretly snuck into the most watched embassy in the world multiple times to meet with Assange? 1 week in hiding? 2 weeks in hiding? :rollin

lol little bitch djohn ran away again. Like the Guardian, djohn will never address this lie he peddled.

[TSA]

Hi Rauljohn

[boutons_deux]

Why is TRASH LYING? What crimes is Trash HIDING?

Documents show Trump is still lying about Trump Tower Moscow

Donald Trump told the New York Times that his business deal to build a Trump Tower in Moscow (https://www.rawstory.com/2019/02/trump-insists-trump-tower-moscow-business-deal-not-business-deal-bonkers-nyt-interview/) wasn’t a business deal

because it hadn’t advanced very far, even though he signed a letter of intent to build it while he was running for president.

“I don’t think they had a location,” Trump said in dismissing the deal’s significance.

“I’m not even sure if they had a location.”

However, documents obtained by BuzzFeed about the Trump Tower Moscow project show once again that the president isn’t telling the truth.

“In fact,

hundreds of pages of business documents, emails, text messages, and architectural plans

obtained by BuzzFeed News show

that the Trump Organization was scoping at least one prime location for the luxury glass skyscraper,”

writes reporter Emma Loop.

“The signed letter of intent includes a proposal to build the tower in Moscow City,

a former industrial complex near the edge of the Moscow River

that has since been converted into an ambitious commercial district clustered with several of the tallest skyscrapers in Europe.”

Looper also notes that

Trump repeated false claims first made by attorney Rudy Giuliani

that there were no concrete plans when it came to the construction of the tower.

This too, Looper says, is false.

“BuzzFeed News last week published (https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/azeenghorayshi/here-are-the-trump-moscow-plans?bfsource=relatedmanual) detailed plans revealing that

the tower was in fact a richly imagined vision of upscale splendor on the banks of the river,

expected to yield profits in excess of $300 million,” she explains.

https://www.rawstory.com/2019/02/busted-documents-show-trump-still-lying-trump-tower-moscow/

[Raul Manafort]

I'm not djohn.

[djohn2oo8]

The US will no longer be constrained by the terms of the treaty. You think that Russia is happy about that?

1091329320478486536
You are a stupid motherfucker. Literally.

This makes #87

Learn what the treaty is and the history before you open your cockflappers.

[djohn2oo8]

Hi Rauljohn
#88.

You would think the odds would say this asshole would be right once in his life

[koriwhat]

Learn what the treaty is and the history before you open your cockflappers.

explain it genius!

[djohn2oo8]

explain it genius!
For Putin to expand his nuclear arsenal, does this move help him do that or stop him?

[djohn2oo8]

It also abandons our EU allies as they don’t have the leverage to contain Russia.

[koriwhat]

For Putin to expand his nuclear arsenal, does this move help him do that or stop him?


It also abandons our EU allies as they don’t have the leverage to contain Russia.

keep trying... poor attempt.

[Winehole23]

explain it genius!I thought this was a prettty good synopsis:

https://nationalinterest.org/feature/leaving-inf-treaty-gift-russia-34152