Flynn in major trouble for speaking to Russia about sanctions

[Winehole23]

thanks for having an own take in your own words.

the implied DEEP STATE/Russian plot against Trump is hilarious. can wait for the updates on that.

the attempt to give credit to the HPSCI and Liu is petty, but procedurally correct. Mueller referred, Liu prosecuted.

[Cuck Ross]

1035901294265782272

[TSA]

The wheels are falling off. I expect the “Russian” set up to be exposed before the midterms. Horowitz FISA abuse report rumored to come out end of by October.

Agents Tried to Flip Russian Oligarchs. The Fallout Spread to Trump.

https://www.nytimes.com/2018/09/01/us/politics/deripaska-ohr-steele-fbi.html#click=https://t.co/jT0xnQpz54

[Pavlov]

The wheels are falling off. I expect the “Russian” set up to be exposed before the midterms. Horowitz FISA abuse report rumored to come out end of by October.

Agents Tried to Flip Russian Oligarchs. The Fallout Spread to Trump.

https://www.nytimes.com/2018/09/01/us/politics/deripaska-ohr-steele-fbi.html#click=https://t.co/jT0xnQpz54What is your conspiracy theory now after reading that?

[boutons_deux]

Why has Trash repeatedly obstructed Russian investigation?

Why has JeBo recused himself?

Why has Trash hired so many people with Russian connections?

Trash is compromised, blackmailed.

Trash and his mafiya colluded with Russians.

and that's just the shit we know, not what else Mueller has

It really is GAMEOVER for Trash, after just a few more months of evidence and flippers falling in Mueller's lap.

TSA, etc will look as silly, stupid, ignorant, dishonest, willfully duped again as they were with Pizzagate.

[Reck]

The wheels are falling off. I expect the “Russian” set up to be exposed before the midterms. Horowitz FISA abuse report rumored to come out end of by October.

Agents Tried to Flip Russian Oligarchs. The Fallout Spread to Trump.

https://www.nytimes.com/2018/09/01/us/politics/deripaska-ohr-steele-fbi.html#click=https://t.co/jT0xnQpz54

That article is mostly about them wanting info on Manafort....Manafort is already in jail waiting a hefty jail sentence while he also waits for another trial where he will be found of having committed additional crimes. :lol

[boutons_deux]

yep, they were going after Manafort, not after Trash.

Of course Trash is LYING that therefore Mueller's takedown of Trash is illegit. :)

You People are hilariously desperate, grasping at any conspiracy that protects Trash! :lol

We see now that they "got" Manafort anyway w/o Russians' help, and will get him more in the next trial.

[Pavlov]

TSA's conspiracy theory gets more vast and vague every day. The number of people involved is reaching triple digits and would've been exposed at any time by a single email or background interview.

No wonder he never says what he thinks really happened.

[boutons_deux]

Trash has ONLY his sick self to blame, since his firing Comey, which he admitted was to obstruct the Russian investigation, lit the Special Council fuse.

[koriwhat]

Trash has ONLY his sick self to blame, since his firing Comey, which he admitted was to obstruct the Russian investigation, lit the Special Council fuse.

funny how he "admitted" nothing of the sort and you leave out the fact that rosenstein submitted a memo stating comey wasn't up to par for the position he held and should be relieved of said position. as well, how about the fact that it isn't illegal for the president of the united states to relieve his head fbi director of his position as he sees fit.

you're just a bitter bitch who is so emotionally up in arms over nothing whatsoever but that's the ideology you subscribe to and i'd expect nothing less from you and those with your same weak ass mentality.

[Reck]

funny how he "admitted" nothing

He's on video saying it specifically....

[koriwhat]

He's on video saying it specifically....

i'll go look for it but in the mean time post it if you don't mind. i really would love to see it.

[Ennis Del Mar]

i'll go look for it but in the mean time post it if you don't mind. i really would love to see it.
Here it is
http://sunny95.com/wp-content/blogs.dir/16/files/2013/04/brokeback.gif

[koriwhat]

He's on video saying it specifically....

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2017/may/11/donald-trump-james-comey-firing-russia-investigation

is this it??? if so, what? lmao

[Ennis Del Mar]

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2017/may/11/donald-trump-james-comey-firing-russia-investigation

is this it??? if so, what? lmao
https://i.pinimg.com/736x/bc/1f/09/bc1f09ccb1f746698c22b31e81fcfa02--heath-ledger-films-animated-gif.jpg

[koriwhat]

poor weak lame trolls... move along loser.

[TSA]

The wheels are falling off. I expect the “Russian” set up to be exposed before the midterms. Horowitz FISA abuse report rumored to come out end of by October.

Agents Tried to Flip Russian Oligarchs. The Fallout Spread to Trump.

https://www.nytimes.com/2018/09/01/us/politics/deripaska-ohr-steele-fbi.html#click=https://t.co/jT0xnQpz54

1036045954439434240

[Spurs Homer]

1036045954439434240

Actually, that is what is called- investigating. Of course the FBI is going to interview suspects, witnesses, Russians close to Putin, etc. Why wouldn't they? This is how you conduct investigations. Obviously, it gave them all the info they needed to secure Manaforts convictions and evidence to try him on even more counts - unless he gives up the traitor in chief before the next trial.

[Winehole23]

the fallout spread to Trump because he'd been schmoozing them for more than a decade. he had to get money from somewhere once every bank but Deutsche Bank stopped lending to him.

why was it he didn't disclose his tax returns?

[Chris]

1036040594055778304

[Chris]

1036068045989371909

[Pavlov]

1036068045989371909Great. Trump can have them arrested.

I bet he won't.

[Chris]

Great. Trump can have them arrested.

I bet he won't.

If Trump had them arrested he would "literally be Hitler" though?

[Winehole23]

presumably it's within the ambit of the DOJ to prosecute crimes.

it's unseemly for the president to sic Justice on his enemies, but there's nothing wrong with DOJ taking the hint if it thinks laws have been broken by US officers.

[Winehole23]

If Trump had them arrested he would "literally be Hitler" though?if Obama had ordered the DOJ to arrest his enemies, he would have been Hitler, right?

is that what you think is happening here?

[Pavlov]

If Trump had them arrested he would "literally be Hitler" though?Change that subject just as fast as you can, Chris.

[Chris]

if Obama had ordered the DOJ to arrest his enemies, he would have been Hitler, right?

is that what you think is happening here?

I was entertaining a hypothetical.

[Chris]

Change that subject just as fast as you can, Chris.

You clammed up fast on det one.

[Pavlov]

You clammed up fast on det one.Actually you clammed up and changed the subject.

They won't be arrested for anything Rudy says.

Now try to change the subject again.

[Winehole23]

I was entertaining a hypothetical.We're about halfway there. Trump has already given marching orders, repeatedly. For some reason, DOJ hesitates to do what he says.

[Winehole23]

I was entertaining a hypothetical.What do you think is happening here?

[boutons_deux]

the fallout spread to Trump because he'd been schmoozing them for more than a decade. he had to get money from somewhere once every bank but Deutsche Bank stopped lending to him.

why was it he didn't disclose his tax returns?

and my guess is that DB's loan was Russian $100Ms, DB as money launderer

[Winehole23]

makes sense for DB to have acted as a middle man, DJT burned a lot of banks and a lot of investors in his time. what I don't get is why DB would allow DJT's alleged money laundering to be discovered under any circumstances.

[boutons_deux]

makes sense for DB to have acted as a middle man, DJT burned a lot of banks and a lot of investors in his time. what I don't get is why DB would allow DJT's alleged money laundering to be discovered under any circumstances.

I don't know when mighty DB's serious troubles started, but pocketing $50M or $100 for a Pootin-to-Trash passthru laundering fee might have looked like easy money.

Although DB got bailed out by US Treasury during the Banksters Great Depression, DB also got fined for laundering Russian money

Deutsche Bank fined for $10 billion Russian money-laundering scheme

https://money.cnn.com/2017/01/31/investing/deutsche-bank-us-fine-russia-money-laundering/index.html (https://money.cnn.com/2017/01/31/investing/deutsche-bank-us-fine-russia-money-laundering/index.html)

[Chris]

What do you think is happening here?

Investigations into the leakers especially within the DOj/FBI. Congress would probably be on the chopping block as well. Don't forget about Huber, and Sessions doesn't leak anything. We wouldn't even know about Huber if Sessions didn't throw us a bone.

[Chris]

I will add Trump is manipulating the media with his negative tweets about Sessions. These guys are working lockstep.

[Chris]

Actually you clammed up and changed the subject.

They won't be arrested for anything Rudy says.

Now try to change the subject again.

Will they be arrested for things Rudy didn't say, or are you calling nothingburger on Ohr shit?

[Pavlov]

Will they be arrested for things Rudy didn't say, or are you calling nothingburger on Ohr shit?Rudy said they committed crimes.

They won't be arrested for any crime Rudy said they committed.

Do you understand yet, Chris?

Yes or no.

[Chris]

Rudy said they committed crimes.

They won't be arrested for any crime Rudy said they committed.

Do you understand yet, Chris?

Yes or no.

I was just asking for some clarification with your usual innuendo.

[boutons_deux]

Here's Why The FBI And Mueller Are Investigating "Suspicious" Transactions By Russian Diplomats

The former Russian ambassador received a salary payment twice as large as past years, and bankers blocked a $150,000 withdrawal.

When BuzzFeed News reported (https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/jasonleopold/newly-uncovered-russian-payments-are-a-focus-of-election) earlier this year on dozens of suspicious financial transactions by Russian diplomats living in Washington, Kremlin officials objected with ferocity. A Russian foreign ministry spokesperson denounced the news organization as a “tool of the American intelligence services (https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/anthonycormier/russian-foreign-ministry-calls-for-crackdown-on-us-leaks)” and insisted the transactions were purely run of the mill.

But new documents show that American bank examiners delved deeper into the embassy's financial activity than was previously known — and reveal why

they flagged two of the transactions as suspicious.

The first,

made just 10 days after the US presidential election in 2016, was a $120,000 lump-sum check to then-ambassador Sergey Kislyak that was twice as large as any payment he’d received in the previous two years.

The second,

just five days after President Donald Trump’s inauguration, was a blocked attempt to withdraw $150,000 in cash that a bank official feared was meant for Russians the US had just expelled from the country.

In their investigations into 2016 election interference, special counsel Robert Mueller and the FBI are scrutinizing the financial activity by the Russian embassy, according to three federal law enforcement sources with direct knowledge of the matter.

Last November, BuzzFeed News began revealing suspicious embassy transactions, including a

$29,000 wire transfer (https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/jasonleopold/secret-finding-60-russian-payments-to-finance-election) to the embassy's US bank account to “finance election campaign of 2016”;

$325,000 in payments to the Russian Cultural Centre in Washington (https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/jasonleopold/newly-uncovered-russian-payments-are-a-focus-of-election); and

$2.4 million paid to small home-improvement companies controlled by a Russian immigrant living in Virginia.

But former ambassador Kislyak looms over the Trump-Russia investigation.

After failing to disclose during his confirmation hearings a meeting with Kislyak, Attorney General Jeff Sessions recused himself (https://www.washingtonpost.com/powerpost/top-gop-lawmaker-calls-on-sessions-to-recuse-himself-from-russia-investigation/2017/03/02/148c07ac-ff46-11e6-8ebe-6e0dbe4f2bca_story.html?utm_term=.d240a1461311) from the Russia investigation.

Jared Kushner, the president’s son-in-law, discussed (https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/russian-ambassador-told-moscow-that-kushner-wanted-secret-communications-channel-with-kremlin/2017/05/26/520a14b4-422d-11e7-9869-bac8b446820a_story.html?utm_term=.a38a08c940a3) with Kislyak setting up a line of communication at the Russian Embassy.

And Michael Flynn, the former national security adviser, pleaded guilty (https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/zoetillman/michael-flynn-charged) last year to lying to the FBI about multiple calls to Kislyak during the transition.

In mid-2017, as US law enforcement stepped up its investigation of Russian interference, agents turned for help to Citibank, where the embassy was a customer. As bankers trawled through the embassy’s account and those of its diplomats, they hit upon a payment to Kislyak they found suspicious.

Ten days after the election, the embassy cut a check to the former ambassador for $120,000.

The check was marked “payroll.” Kislyak deposited the money in his Citibank checking account,

then wired the funds to his account in Russia in two $60,000 installments.

...

https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/jasonleopold/suspicious-payments-kislyak-russia-embassy-mueller

[Winehole23]

Investigations into the leakers especially within the DOj/FBI. Congress would probably be on the chopping block as well.what leakers? what got leaked?


Don't forget about Huber, and Sessions doesn't leak anything. We wouldn't even know about Huber if Sessions didn't throw us a bone.Huber is a mini-Mueller. He'll write a report and make recommendations.

If you don't like what he says in the report, you can always say he was an Obama holdover, and line up the can for another kick.

[TSA]

what leakers? what got leaked?
https://money.cnn.com/2017/11/14/media/leak-investigations-jeff-sessions/index.html


Huber is a mini-Mueller. He'll write a report and make recommendations.

If you don't like what he says in the report, you can always say he was an Obama holdover, and line up the can for another kick.
Unlike Mueller Huber can prosecute. He doesn’t need to write a report and make recommendations.

[spurraider21]

I was just asking for some clarification with your usual innuendo.
:lmao innuendo. he says it outright


Actually you clammed up and changed the subject.

They won't be arrested for anything Rudy says.

Now try to change the subject again.

[boutons_deux]

The Butina/CPAC/NRA Oil Deal Is True To Form

“During her time in the United States, she surrounded herself not only with high-profile American conservatives but also with dubious characters who seemed bent on making a fast buck — and it was not always easy to tell one from the other.

Simple point: there’s no bright line.

They’re often the same people.

That’s why the Russians targeted them in the first place.

Across the board, in their efforts to infiltrate American politics by way of the conservative movement and the GOP, Russian efforts were based on a simple insight:

contemporary conservative politics is notoriously corrupt.

It is no accident that

President Trump now embodies the GOP and what now counts as conservatism.

His corruption, his addiction to the grift, does embody it.

I mean the often legal ways that contemporary conservative politics is dominated by efforts to sell extremism and victimology to conservative political consumers for huge financial returns.

It’s

why they focused so much attention on the NRA in the first place:

openness to corruption is always an indicator for openness to subversion.

The NRA, whatever its role in promoting gun extremism, is also a huge grifting operation.

The Russians knew and know just who they were dealing with.

https://talkingpointsmemo.com/edblog/the-butina-cpac-nra-oil-deal-is-true-to-form?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+tpm-news+%28TPMNews%29

[Pavlov]

https://money.cnn.com/2017/11/14/media/leak-investigations-jeff-sessions/index.html


Unlike Mueller Huber can prosecute. He doesn’t need to write a report and make recommendations.Sorry, Huber is part of the cover up.

Uranium One BOOM lawyer said so on the Grecian Formula infomercial.

tmCIMNnw7io

When's the last time you screeched about Uranium One, TSA?

[Winehole23]

Unlike Mueller Huber can prosecute. He doesn’t need to write a report and make recommendations.that's not clear:


I am confident that Mr. Huber’s review will include a full, complete, and objective evaluation of these matters in a manner that is consistent with the law and the facts,” Sessions wrote. “I receive regular updates from Mr. Huber and upon the conclusion of his review, will receive his recommendations as to whether any matters not currently under investigation require further resources, or whether any merit the appointment of a Special Counsel.”https://www.ajc.com/news/national/who-john-huber-the-man-appointed-investigate-gop-concerns-about-fbi-justice-department/

[Pavlov]

At best, it's an investigation to determine whether to actually investigate things that Fox News/Trump complained about.

[Winehole23]

TSA always overeggs the custard

[Chris]

1036446165984845824
1036447327500820480
1036448066042298368
1036449455212515329
1036451490183831553
1036452874765647872
1036454592182149122
1036460354971357185
1036461029205716993
1036461608627662848
1036462529591922689
1036463501286559745
1036464291979976704
1036465468901650432
1036466210743967744
1036467059553693696
1036468174093529094
1036468902463713280
1036469156474970112

[Pavlov]

1036446165984845824
1036447327500820480
1036448066042298368
1036449455212515329
1036451490183831553
1036452874765647872
1036454592182149122
1036460354971357185
1036461029205716993
1036461608627662848
1036462529591922689
1036463501286559745
1036464291979976704
1036465468901650432
1036466210743967744
1036467059553693696
1036468174093529094
1036468902463713280
1036469156474970112
tldr: whataboutism

[boutons_deux]

Carter Page Takes to Twitter to Weigh in on FISA Warrants in the Most Bizarre Way Possible

Carter Page, Ph.D. :lol :lol @carterwpage
(https://twitter.com/carterwpage)
Nice, @AshaRangappa_ (https://twitter.com/AshaRangappa_)

Now your police state logic basically argues that Brown v. Board of Ed (1954) is officially dead:

"deprived of the equal protection of the laws guaranteed by the 14th Amendment"

Care to stick a fork in the whole US Constitution too?https://twitter.com/AshaRangappa_/status/1036608085048090624 … (https://t.co/bfN7DKiNfK)

=============

Asha Rangappa
✔@AshaRangappa_

Replying to @Gutdaddy @carterwpage

Because (for the millionth time)

FISAs are about gathering intelligence,

not evidence of crime.

FISAs rarely result in criminal charges, bruh.

(https://twitter.com/AshaRangappa_/status/1036608085048090624)9:11 AM - Sep 3, 2018 (https://twitter.com/carterwpage/status/1036617693217083392)

https://lawandcrime.com/high-profile/carter-page-takes-to-twitter-to-weigh-in-on-fisa-warrants-in-the-most-bizarre-way-possible/

[boutons_deux]

Giuliani: Team Trump Will Likely Try To Block Mueller Report’s Release


Giuliani claims that President Donald

Trump’s original legal team—which has undergone many mutations since—cut a deal with Mueller

that that the White House can object to public dissemination of information from the probe on the grounds of executive privilege.

When asked if the White House is likely to invoke this clause,

Giuliani was frank: “I’m sure we will.”

https://talkingpointsmemo.com/news/giuliani-says-team-trump-will-likely-try-to-block-mueller-report-release?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+tpm-news+%28TPMNews%29 (http://forums.talkingpointsmemo.com/t/discussion-giuliani-team-trump-will-likely-try-to-block-mueller-reports-release/76834)

[Pavlov]

Giuliani: Team Trump Will Likely Try To Block Mueller Report’s Release


Giuliani claims that President Donald

Trump’s original legal team—which has undergone many mutations since—cut a deal with Mueller

that that the White House can object to public dissemination of information from the probe on the grounds of executive privilege.

When asked if the White House is likely to invoke this clause,

Giuliani was frank: “I’m sure we will.”

https://talkingpointsmemo.com/news/giuliani-says-team-trump-will-likely-try-to-block-mueller-report-release?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+tpm-news+%28TPMNews%29 (http://forums.talkingpointsmemo.com/t/discussion-giuliani-team-trump-will-likely-try-to-block-mueller-reports-release/76834)

That's the opposite of cutting a deal.

[boutons_deux]

Ex-FBI agent on CNN: Mueller has a new line of inquiry that could result in even more indictments for Trump’s associates

https://www.rawstory.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/asha.jpg

Former FBI special agent and CNN analyst Asha Rangappa on Monday said that special counsel Robert Mueller appeared to have opened a “new line” of inquiry in his investigation of Russian meddling and possible collusion with the Trump campaign.

Sam Patten, a lobbyist and associate of Trump’s former campaign manager Paul Manafort,

pleaded guilty last week (https://www.rawstory.com/2018/08/manafort-associated-samuel-patten-charged-foreign-lobbying-violation/) to running an

illegal foreign lobbying campaign and funneling a Ukrainian oligarch’s money to Trump’s inauguration committee.

The charges were referred to the U.S. Attorney in the District of Columbia by Mueller.

“When we talk about

active measures by Russia in the campaign, we’re talking about a number of different fronts on which Russia was operating,”

she explained.

“One is disinformation campaign

and we know that Mueller has already indicted several individuals and the Internet Research Agency [for] its Facebook and social media activities.”

“Then we have the hacking and intrusion into emails and voting machines.

We already have an indictment on that against 12 GRU Russian intelligence officers.”

“I think there’s going to be another series of indictments concerning illegal campaign contributions, and this Patten plea being the first of them but

where Russia may have been using straw donors, illegal donors,

to funnel money into places that they would otherwise not be able to directly,” Rangappa said.

https://www.rawstory.com/2018/09/ex-fbi-agent-cnn-mueller-new-line-inquiry-result-even-indictments-trumps-associates/

hyper-Patriot NRA! :lol

[dabom]

Ex-FBI agent on CNN: Mueller has a new line of inquiry that could result in even more indictments for Trump’s associates

https://www.rawstory.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/asha.jpg

Former FBI special agent and CNN analyst Asha Rangappa on Monday said that special counsel Robert Mueller appeared to have opened a “new line” of inquiry in his investigation of Russian meddling and possible collusion with the Trump campaign.

Sam Patten, a lobbyist and associate of Trump’s former campaign manager Paul Manafort,

pleaded guilty last week (https://www.rawstory.com/2018/08/manafort-associated-samuel-patten-charged-foreign-lobbying-violation/) to running an

illegal foreign lobbying campaign and funneling a Ukrainian oligarch’s money to Trump’s inauguration committee.

The charges were referred to the U.S. Attorney in the District of Columbia by Mueller.

“When we talk about

active measures by Russia in the campaign, we’re talking about a number of different fronts on which Russia was operating,”

she explained.

“One is disinformation campaign

and we know that Mueller has already indicted several individuals and the Internet Research Agency [for] its Facebook and social media activities.”

“Then we have the hacking and intrusion into emails and voting machines.

We already have an indictment on that against 12 GRU Russian intelligence officers.”

“I think there’s going to be another series of indictments concerning illegal campaign contributions, and this Patten plea being the first of them but

where Russia may have been using straw donors, illegal donors,

to funnel money into places that they would otherwise not be able to directly,” Rangappa said.

https://www.rawstory.com/2018/09/ex-fbi-agent-cnn-mueller-new-line-inquiry-result-even-indictments-trumps-associates/

hyper-Patriot NRA! :lol




True American Patriot. :hatsoff:

[boutons_deux]

Trump attacks Jeff Sessions for not forcing the Justice Department to ignore Republican crimes

“Two long running, Obama era, investigations of two very popular Republican Congressmen

were brought to a well publicized charge,

just ahead of the Mid-Terms,

by the Jeff Sessions Justice Department. :lol

Two easy wins now in doubt because there is not enough time.

Good job Jeff…” :lol Trump tweeted.

The president was apparently referring to Congressmen Duncan Hunter (R-CA) and Chris Collins (R-NY).

Hunter was charged with illegally using campaign funds to pay personal expenses while Collins was charged with taking part in an insider trading scheme.

“….The Democrats, none of whom voted for Jeff Sessions, must love him now. :lol

Same thing with Lyin’ James Comey. :lol

The Dems all hated him, wanted him out, thought he was disgusting – UNTIL I FIRED HIM! :lol

Immediately he became a wonderful man, a saint like figure in fact. Really sick!” Trump added in another tweet.

https://www.rawstory.com/2018/09/trump-attacks-jeff-sessions-not-forcing-justice-department-ignore-republican-crimes/ (https://www.rawstory.com/2018/09/trump-attacks-jeff-sessions-not-forcing-justice-department-ignore-republican-crimes/)

[boutons_deux]

Judge Pirro Blasts AG Sessions: 'Resign Immediately' or 'Be a Real Attorney General'

'You don't even know you're nothing but a shill.'

Judge Jeanine Pirro directly addressed Jeff Sessions,

blasting him for the job he's done as attorney general.

She asked if Sessions had any self-respect and

why he'd remain in a position where he knows he isn't wanted.

http://insider.foxnews.com/2018/09/02/judge-jeanine-pirro-opening-statement-blasts-jeff-sessions-resign-or-be-real-attorney

[Spurs Homer]

Judge Pirro Blasts AG Sessions: 'Resign Immediately' or 'Be a Real Attorney General'

'You don't even know you're nothing but a shill.'

Judge Jeanine Pirro directly addressed Jeff Sessions,

blasting him for the job he's done as attorney general.

She asked if Sessions had any self-respect and

why he'd remain in a position where he knows he isn't wanted.

http://insider.foxnews.com/2018/09/02/judge-jeanine-pirro-opening-statement-blasts-jeff-sessions-resign-or-be-real-attorney




The Criminal in chief probably already promised her the gig!
Criminal president defending other criminals in government!

[Winehole23]

And you’d be fine with it as long as it’s your side, you’re nothing but a simple trumper party over country lie.I think DJT is an obvious crook and a historically bad president. I hope he gets soundly beaten in 2020 and his party horsewhipped into the minority. The GOP deserves it for nominating him.

A bunch of DJT's political flunkies will end up in prison -- good riddance to smelly garbage..

If ongoing investigations implicate HRC or executive branch employees in crimes, those should be prosecuted too if DOJ thinks it has winnable cases. Let the chips fall where they may.

So yeah, you have no idea what side I'm on.

It sure ain't yours.

[Chris]

1036876808074022912

[Winehole23]

I know you’re not on my side. My side is America.How grandiose.


And you thinking the DOJ hasn’t already exhaustively investigates the clintons queued by a bullshit tweet from a known corrupted liar is even more ridiculous. As far either of us know, investigations into HRC's emails and foundation shenanigans are ongoing. It's not for either one of us to declare the status/non-status of these, but the FBI. If you asked me to pull a judgment from thin air, I'd say criminal referrals aren't likely.


Which unicorn state do you identify with?The USA.


I’ll bet you call you call yourself a libertarian, don’t you? Or when you really want your republican talking points to sound deep, a classical liberal.Neither. It's adorable, you just keep whiffing.

Since when was it Republican talking points to say DJT is a crook and historically bad, and that and I hope the GOP gets horsewhipped in 2020? :lol

[Winehole23]

it matters very little to me what label you wish to apply.

not everyone fits into the R/D pigeonholes, nor is everyone politically doctrinal.

[Winehole23]

but go ahead, kick everyone who merely disagrees with you into the same rhetorical ditch.

[Reck]

1036876808074022912

Chris going back to that dried up well.

[Winehole23]

if the anonymous sauce has first hand knowledge or evidence, it should be no problem to get an investigation rolling, but it's dubious that's the point.

the point is to smear Mueller.

[Cuck Ross]

1036990093850861570

[djohn2oo8]

1036995944687063040

:lmao :lmao

[djohn2oo8]

1036996709048496128

:lol

[RandomGuy]

Not if the Coyote gives the boulder enough kinetic energy to begin with.
From the initial speed it appears he did not. But we need data damnit.

Well played. :D

[RandomGuy]

Giuliani: Team Trump Will Likely Try To Block Mueller Report’s Release


Giuliani claims that President Donald

Trump’s original legal team—which has undergone many mutations since—cut a deal with Mueller

that that the White House can object to public dissemination of information from the probe on the grounds of executive privilege.

When asked if the White House is likely to invoke this clause,

Giuliani was frank: “I’m sure we will.”

https://talkingpointsmemo.com/news/giuliani-says-team-trump-will-likely-try-to-block-mueller-report-release?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+tpm-news+%28TPMNews%29 (http://forums.talkingpointsmemo.com/t/discussion-giuliani-team-trump-will-likely-try-to-block-mueller-reports-release/76834)



They will try, and it will be hilarious and a total failure. Trump party will look like they are trying to cover up, and Democrats will use that to beat them over the head for years.

[djohn2oo8]

1036997358079410177

[RandomGuy]

[tweet
[tweet
[tweet
[tweet
[tweet
[tweet
[tweet
[tweet
[tweet
[tweet



Did you see a puddy tat? :lol

[RandomGuy]

“I think there’s going to be another series of indictments concerning illegal campaign contributions, and this Patten plea being the first of them but

where Russia may have been using straw donors, illegal donors,

to funnel money into places that they would otherwise not be able to directly,” Rangappa said.

https://www.rawstory.com/2018/09/ex-fbi-agent-cnn-mueller-new-line-inquiry-result-even-indictments-trumps-associates/

hyper-Patriot NRA! :lol


... and that will be where collusion will be proven, and the real criminal activity happens. If any Trump campaign staff knew about it, that will be the smoking gun.

[boutons_deux]

from woodward's book

Kelly said of Trump: “He’s an idiot. It’s pointless to try to convince him of anything. He’s gone off the rails. We’re in Crazytown. I don’t even know why any of us are here. This is the worst job I’ve ever had.”

Priebus dubbed the presidential bedroom, where Trump obsessively watched cable news and tweeted, “the devil’s workshop,” and said early mornings and Sunday evenings, when the president often set off tweetstorms, were “the witching hour.”

Priebus was “‘like a little rat. He just scurries around.’”

“Mattis was particularly exasperated and alarmed, telling close associates that the president acted like — and had the understanding of — ‘a fifth- or sixth-grader.’ ”

Trump told Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross, a wealthy investor eight years his senior: “I don’t trust you. I don’t want you doing any more negotiations. … You’re past your prime.

Trump told Porter that Sessions was a “traitor” for recusing himself from overseeing the Russia investigation,

Trump added, “This guy is mentally retarded. He’s this dumb Southerner. … He couldn’t even be a one-person country lawyer down in Alabama.”

Trump lashed out at a vocal critic, Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.). He falsely suggested that the former Navy pilot had been a coward for taking early release from a prisoner-of-war camp in Vietnam because of his father’s military rank and leaving others behind.

an alliance among Trump’s traditionalists — including Mattis and Gary Cohn, the president’s former top economic adviser — to stymie what they considered dangerous acts.

“It felt like we were walking along the edge of the cliff perpetually,” Porter is quoted as saying. “Other times, we would fall over the edge, and an action would be taken.”

After Syrian leader Bashar al-Assad launched a chemical attack on civilians in April 2017, Trump called Mattis and said he wanted to assassinate the dictator. “Let’s fucking kill him! Let’s go in. Let’s kill the fucking lot of them,” Trump said

Cohn “stole a letter off Trump’s desk” that the president was intending to sign to formally withdraw the United States from a trade agreement with South Korea. Cohn later told an associate that he removed the letter to protect national security and that Trump did not notice that it was missing.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/bob-woodwards-new-book-reveals-a-nervous-breakdown-of-trumps-presidency/2018/09/04/b27a389e-ac60-11e8-a8d7-0f63ab8b1370_story.html?noredirect=on&utm_term=.a3c268eb6580

holy shit! What a shit hole WH under shitbag Trash! :lol

[RandomGuy]

I stick to my word unlike some people around here.

Props for that.

[djohn2oo8]

Props for that.
Lol sticks to his word

[djohn2oo8]

1037006052003389441

:lmao

[djohn2oo8]

1037007395829035009

[Spurminator]

:lol That phone call audio

[Chucho]

Did you see a puddy tat? :lol

Dets funny.

[Chucho]

People shouldn’t fit into pigeon holes. But yet, here you are


ROFL. King Pigeonholer showing his complete lack of self-awareness. :rollin

[Reck]

:lol That phone call audio

There's a phonecall audio? Of whom and about what?

[baseline bum]

1036995944687063040

:lmao :lmao

God that article is one of the most disturbing things I have ever read. But he'll stay in power because he has correctly identified the GOP voters as a white nationalist bloc and he is the candidate they have apparently always wanted.

[boutons_deux]

exactly, slavery of 400 years ago is America's Original Sin, today racism is the foundation of America, is why we cant have nice things like a democratic socialist country, because white people hate that black people would also benefit

[Chucho]

This may be above you lil spurt, but the easiest way to avoid being pigeonholed, is not to pigeonhole yourself


You're the one who perceives everyone in pigeonholes, lil Boots.

See, when you go around telling everyone there this and that based on your perception, which is completely black and white, you pigeonhole everyone. That's how you work. Get a new schtick.

[Spurs Homer]

"but-but -her emails!"

[Chucho]

I know that you have never really been held accountable for your thinking before, so you have no concept of your idiocy.


:rollin The pigeonholer trying to pigeonhole.

[Spurminator]

There's a phonecall audio? Of whom and about what?

Between Woodward and Trump (with special appearance by KelleyAnne). It's the video at the top of the page on the Post article.

[Pavlov]

lol President Derp.

[Reck]

Between Woodward and Trump (with special appearance by KelleyAnne). It's the video at the top of the page on the Post article.

Thanks. listened to it just now.

Amazing how Trump lies to himself. He actually believes all of what he says. The man is in mental decline for certain.

[djohn2oo8]

1037073698275184645
Pavlov

remember when TSA that Wray was a Trump guy?

[boutons_deux]

To Senate Republicans, rushing Kavanaugh through is the only remaining way to block Russia probe (https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2018/9/4/1793200/-To-Senate-Republicans-rushing-Kavanaugh-through-is-the-only-remaining-way-to-block-Russia-probe)

In his role in the Bush White House, Kavanaugh would have been in the midst of discussions on torture and indefinite detention;

the involvement of the next Supreme Court Justice in international war crimes would be a bad look.

Brett Kavanaugh is unique among the potential Supreme Court nominees in that

he transformed from a partisan investigator serving in the Ken Starr probe of anything and everything related to Bill Clinton

to a new George W. Bush-convenient belief that sitting presidents ought not be investigated for crimes at all.

If appointed to the court, it is logical to presume that he will bring this new, innovative premise to the Supreme Court itself.

And that, perhaps,

explains why the Republican Party is rushing pell-mell to confirm Kavanaugh with a sense of seemingly frantic urgency rather than slowing the process by even a few more weeks.

https://www.dailykos.com/stories/1793200

[djohn2oo8]

1037086546279714816

[Chris]

Bob Woodward's new book is totally going to expose Trump - he's finished!

[Pavlov]

Bob Woodward's new book is totally going to expose Trump - he's finished!lol Chris is shook

[Pavlov]

BTW, you can follow me on Twitter @Stealth25thAmendment

[boutons_deux]

Trump can expect tax, conflict probes if Democrats take House: Hoyer

Trash can expect congressional investigations of his tax returns and possible conflicts of interest if Democrats take control of the U.S. House of Representatives in November’s elections,

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-election-democrats/trump-can-expect-tax-conflict-probes-if-democrats-take-house-hoyer-idUSKCN1LK2OZ?feedType=RSS&feedName=politicsNews&utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+Reuters%2FPoliticsNews+%28Reu ters+Politics+News%29




https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-election-democrats/trump-can-expect-tax-conflict-probes-if-democrats-take-house-hoyer-idUSKCN1LK2OZ?feedType=RSS&feedName=politicsNews&utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+Reuters%2FPoliticsNews+%28Reu ters+Politics+News%29

[Chris]

1037133561990656001

The Buckling

[Reck]

1037133561990656001

The Buckling

Wrong.

he'll accept some written answer on Russia, but not on obstruction. He still wants an interview.

lol Chris.

[pgardn]

1037007395829035009

God.

What a prepubescent imbecile.
Thank goodness he is so easy to distract.

[Chris]

This book is going to be filled with facts like Fire & Fury. Trump is finished.

[Pavlov]

1037133561990656001

The Buckling
link?

[djohn2oo8]

Poor Chris. That’s coming from Trumps team. Mueller’s office doesn’t leak.

[pgardn]

This book is going to be filled with facts like Fire & Fury. Trump is finished.

No Trump is fine.
There are still a solid portion of idiots like you to back him.

Aside: That recorded conversation shows how confused the basic structure of this WH is...

”Who did you talk to Bob to try and get ahold of me?”

”Well you directly Mr. President and about your entire staff!”

”Well did you talk to my...”

wtf....?
What a fcktard.

[Pavlov]

This book is going to be filled with facts like Fire & Fury. Trump is finished.
lol still shook

[Chris]

link?

https://www.nytimes.com/2018/09/04/us/politics/mueller-trump-russia-investigation.html

[Chris]

No Trump is fine.
There are still a solid portion of idiots like you to back him.

Aside: That recorded conversation shows how confused the basic structure of this WH is...

”Who did you talk to Bob to try and get ahold of me?”

”Well you directly and about your entire staff!”

”Well did you talk to my...”

wtf....?
What a fcktard.

Congratulations on not picking up on obvious sarcasm.

Aside: You have Trump Derangement Syndrome. Seek help.

[boutons_deux]

just because Mueller accepts written answers (which will probably be ghost written), doesn't mean Mueller won't later demand in person questioning, and/or subpoena to appear under oath, like Clinton and approved by SCOTUS, before a grand jury

[Chris]

Poor Chris. That’s coming from Trumps team. Mueller’s office doesn’t leak.

lol Ashy Raggamuffin (Asha Rangappa) was/is an obvious leaker. Sessions doesn't leak. Quit stealing my shit.

[Reck]

lol Ashy Raggamuffin (Asha Rangappa) was/is an obvious leaker. Sessions doesn't leak. Quit stealing my shit.

What is an ex FBI agent supposed to be leaking, Chris?

[pgardn]

Congratulations on not picking up on obvious sarcasm.

Aside: You have Trump Derangement Syndrome. Seek help.

You don’t do sarcasm/troll.
Remember how you characterize yourself, stay in character.

Did you listen to the conversation Chris?
What did you think of K. Conway’s response to Trump when she said she followed protocol?
The board is interested in your lack of thought.

[Chris]

What is an ex FBI agent supposed to be leaking, Chris?

Sorry if you aren't up to date on that.

It was covered thoroughly ITT.

You are like a child who walks in during the middle of a movie asking questions. Go do your homework.

[Chris]

You don’t do sarcasm/troll.

I do lots of sarcasm. Troll and sarcasm aren't mutually exclusive.



Remember how you characterize yourself, stay in character.

I don't do the troll thing. I'm an open book.


Did you listen to the conversation Chris?
What did you think of K. Conway’s response to Trump when she said she followed protocol?
The board is interested in your lack of thought.

I doubt the board appreciates your crazy ass speaking for them. Go soak your head.

[ElNono]

You are like a child

sounds like the POTUS, tbh... why do you do his homework?

[pgardn]

I do lots of sarcasm. Troll and sarcasm aren't mutually exclusive.




I don't do the troll thing. I'm an open book.



I doubt the board appreciates your crazy ass speaking for them. Go soak your head.

Reading, listening and learning are difficult.
I understand.

[Pavlov]

lol Ashy Raggamuffin (Asha Rangappa) was/is an obvious leaker. Sessions doesn't leak. Quit stealing my shit.
lol racist Chris

[Pavlov]

just because Mueller accepts written answers (which will probably be ghost written), doesn't mean Mueller won't later demand in person questioning, and/or subpoena to appear under oath, like Clinton and approved by SCOTUS, before a grand juryTrue if Mueller had enough evidence to contradict Trump's take home exam, it won't help him.

If you think Trump won't try to lie on paper you haven't been paying attention the last fifty years.

[Reck]

Sorry if you aren't up to date on that.

It was covered thoroughly ITT.

You are like a child who walks in during the middle of a movie asking questions. Go do your homework.

Is this your lazy way of saying you got nothing?

well, noted.

Asha Rangappa is a, retired and b, has absolutely nothing to do with this ongoing investigation. C as a bonus, she doesn’t get any intelligence on current and ongoing investigation.

I would say you are one dumb motherfucker but I’m going to spare you that.

[djohn2oo8]

1037437803175596033

[Spurs Homer]

Ny times
anonymous op ed

lol

[Cuck Ross]

1037378607545384961

[Cuck Ross Bot]

1037386651474059264

[boutons_deux]

Trump: I Have 100 Pics Of Robert Mueller And James Comey ‘Hugging And Kissing’

The president says the special counsel and former FBI director are “best friends.”

President Donald Trump (https://www.huffingtonpost.com/topic/donald-trump) has complained that special counsel Robert Mueller (https://www.huffingtonpost.com/topic/robert-mueller) is too close to former FBI Director James Comey (https://www.huffingtonpost.com/topic/james-comey) to conduct a fair investigation. And now, he claims he has the pics to prove it.

″[Mueller’s] Comey’s best friend,” Trump told the Daily Caller. “And I could give you 100 pictures of him and Comey hugging and kissing (https://dailycaller.com/2018/09/05/full-transcript-trump-daily-caller-interview/) each other.”

Vox examined wire service photos and found no such images (https://www.vox.com/2018/9/5/17823824/trump-claims-he-has-100-photos-of-comey-and-mueller-kissing-we-tried-to-find-some). A non-exhaustive HuffPost survey of images from Reuters and Getty also revealed no hugging and kissing.

The pair has enjoyed a close professional relationship, which dates back to 2003 when Comey was deputy attorney general under President George W. Bush (https://www.huffingtonpost.com/topic/george-w-bush) and Mueller was the director of the FBI.

Both threatened to resign (https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2017/live-updates/trump-white-house/trump-comey-and-russia-how-key-washington-players-are-reacting/brothers-in-arms-the-long-friendship-between-mueller-and-comey/?noredirect=on&utm_term=.912ffefa3856) in opposition to a domestic surveillance program which was modified as a result,

https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/donald-trump-robert-mueller-james-comey-kiss_us_5b90a668e4b0162f4729bd87?utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=__TheMorningEmail__090618&utm_content=__TheMorningEmail__090618+CID_c0c3b76b 7a336a1c8991c2010d8a1860&utm_source=Email%20marketing%20software&utm_term=hugging%20and%20kissing&ncid=newsltushpmgnews__TheMorningEmail__090618

======================

Trump Appears To Blow A Kiss At FBI Director James Comey

“He’s become more famous than me.”

https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/donald-trump-james-comey-air-kiss_us_58857527e4b096b4a232b942

[pgardn]

Ny times
anonymous op ed

lol

Trump is not in an lol mood.
He appears to be taking it seriously.

Easy:

Anonoymous source... there is no anonymous source, and the Times should be ridiculed for this ploy.

Instead:

Who the hell is it? Treason?

Stop after easy. The paranoid orange dazed cannot.

[pgardn]

Woodward opened up the WH branch to control the president.
Im relieved it exists.

[boutons_deux]

Woodward opened up the WH branch to control the president.
Im relieved it exists.

the best news to come out of WH since 20 Jan 17, but the Exec branch is doing nearly all the damage, not Trash, damage that would continue w/o Trash

[Winehole23]

WH staffers ignoring POTUS, removing papers from his desk and generally going rogue is not good news.

However much one would wish DJT reined in, his underlings substituting their judgment for his is improper and dangerous in its own right.

[TSA]

have already been 2 reports. one for mccabe, one for handling of clinton matter.

so far zero charges. you're all in on the FISA report, though, until you kick the can further along whenever that one is released

Prosecutors use grand jury as investigation of Andrew McCabe intensifies

“Federal prosecutors have for months been using a grand jury to investigate former FBI deputy director Andrew McCabe”

https://www.washingtonpost.com/amphtml/world/national-security/prosecutors-use-grand-jury-as-investigation-of-andrew-mccabe-intensifies/2018/09/06/aa922b2e-b137-11e8-9a6a-565d92a3585d_story.html?__twitter_impression=true

[Pavlov]

Prosecutors use grand jury as investigation of Andrew McCabe intensifies

“Federal prosecutors have for months been using a grand jury to investigate former FBI deputy director Andrew McCabe”

https://www.washingtonpost.com/amphtml/world/national-security/prosecutors-use-grand-jury-as-investigation-of-andrew-mccabe-intensifies/2018/09/06/aa922b2e-b137-11e8-9a6a-565d92a3585d_story.html?__twitter_impression=true: lol TSA kicks the can as predicted.

[TSA]

:lol TSA kicks the can as predicted.

spurraider21 said no charges have been brought per OIG investigation. I post an article showing federal prosecutors are using a grand jury and still investigating McCabe hence no charges because it’s ongoing and that is somehow kicking the can?

[spurraider21]

spurraider21 said no charges have been brought per OIG investigation. I post an article showing federal prosecutors are using a grand jury and still investigating McCabe hence no charges because it’s ongoing and that is somehow kicking the can?
i said there have been no charges and you posted an article confirming there have been no charges

[TSA]

i said there have been no charges and you posted an article confirming there have been no charges

What an astute observation counselor. Were you aware a grand jury had been convened concerning McCabe?

[Pavlov]

spurraider21 said no charges have been brought per OIG investigation. I post an article showing federal prosecutors are using a grand jury and still investigating McCabe hence no charges because it’s ongoing and that is somehow kicking the can?So it's at the exact same point you mock the Mueller investigation for being RE: Russia, except your investigation is actually behind the Mueller investigation.

OK.

lol TSA

[TSA]

So it's at the exact same point you mock the Mueller investigation for being RE: Russia, except your investigation is actually behind the Mueller investigation.

OK.

lol TSA

Actually no, it’s not at the exact same point. Mueller has no grand jury convened for Trump/Russia election collusion.

[spurraider21]

What an astute observation counselor. Were you aware a grand jury had been convened concerning McCabe?
Considering CIA mouthpiece fake news WaPo has reported that there is a grand jury, it must be false, right?

[TSA]

The set up is already breaking down. The conspirators are already contradicting each other in sworn testimony. McCabe, Strzok, Page, Ohr etc. It’s cover your ass time and they are throwing each other under the bus.


1037855978203623424

Sit back and enjoy watching it all crumble.

[Spurs Homer]

1037855978203623424

Sit back and enjoy watching it all crumble.

Yup. That white house is imploding from within. Rats turning on each other. The mentally unstable cult leader even more paranoid now.

[TSA]

1037855978203623424

Sit back and enjoy watching it all crumble.

1037863445562122241

1037865693386035201

1037866757036408833

[Pavlov]

Actually no, it’s not at the exact same point. Mueller has no grand jury convened for Trump/Russia election collusion.How would you know?

[Pavlov]

1037863445562122241

1037865693386035201

1037866757036408833
:lmao the faith you put in anonymous Twitter.

Pizza.

[TSA]

I took some time to read the Woods procedures as laid out in a memo to field offices from Woods himself. It's really nothing like TSA would want it to be.

“Former FBI officials and agents with experience in FISA warrants say the affidavits for Page appear to be “material misrepresentations” and failed to properly follow so-called Woods Procedures requiring accuracy of facts by the sworn declarants. Those procedures were strengthened in 2003 by then-FBI director Robert Mueller, now the special counsel pursuing the Trump-Russia affair.

Withholding material and exculpatory evidence from the FISA applications may also have violated Page’s Fourth Amendment protections against omissions of material facts that would undermine or negate probable cause to search.

“It is illegal,” said veteran FBI agent Michael Biasello. “The affiant" -- the person swearing to the affidavit -- "cannot cherry-pick only information favorable to the case.”

https://www.realclearinvestigations.com/articles/2018/09/05/fbi_kept_from_fisa_court_russian_view_of_page_as_i diot.html

[TSA]

:lmao the faith you put in anonymous Twitter.

Pizza.

Excellent rebuttal of a factual summary of the Hill article 10/10

[Pavlov]

“Former FBI officials and agents with experience in FISA warrants say the affidavits for Page appear to be “material misrepresentations” and failed to properly follow so-called Woods Procedures requiring accuracy of facts by the sworn declarants. Those procedures were strengthened in 2003 by then-FBI director Robert Mueller, now the special counsel pursuing the Trump-Russia affair.

Withholding material and exculpatory evidence from the FISA applications may also have violated Page’s Fourth Amendment protections against omissions of material facts that would undermine or negate probable cause to search.

“It is illegal,” said veteran FBI agent Michael Biasello. “The affiant" -- the person swearing to the affidavit -- "cannot cherry-pick only information favorable to the case.”

https://www.realclearinvestigations.com/articles/2018/09/05/fbi_kept_from_fisa_court_russian_view_of_page_as_i diot.htmlIol how many echo chamber sites do you visit a day, TSA?

It's a warrant.

[Pavlov]

Did you actually read the Woods procedures?

Yes or no.

[TSA]

Iol how many echo chamber sites do you visit a day, TSA?

It's a warrant.

Another excellent rebuttal. On fire today 10/10.

[Pavlov]

Another excellent rebuttal. On fire today 10/10.

Have you read the Woods procedures, TSA?

Yes or no.

[TSA]

Have you read the Woods procedures, TSA?

Yes or no.

No I didn’t read the link you provided been in Hong Kong all week, but I’m glad you took the time to read them. Are you Pavlov, a person with zero experience obtaining a FISA, disagreeing with these FBI officials and agents? Are you claiming Woods procedures were followed yes or no?

““Former FBI officials and agents with experience in FISA warrants say the affidavits for Page appear to be “material misrepresentations” and failed to properly follow so-called Woods Procedures requiring accuracy of facts by the sworn declarants. Those procedures were strengthened in 2003 by then-FBI director Robert Mueller, now the special counsel pursuing the Trump-Russia affair.

Withholding material and exculpatory evidence from the FISA applications may also have violated Page’s Fourth Amendment protections against omissions of material facts that would undermine or negate probable cause to search.

“It is illegal,” said veteran FBI agent Michael Biasello. “The affiant" -- the person swearing to the affidavit -- "cannot cherry-pick only information favorable to the case.”

[Pavlov]

No I didn’t read the link you provided been in Hong Kong all week, but I’m glad you took the time to read them. Are you Pavlov, a person with zero experience obtaining a FISA, disagreeing with these FBI officials and agents? Are you claiming Woods procedures were followed yes or no?

““Former FBI officials and agents with experience in FISA warrants say the affidavits for Page appear to be “material misrepresentations” and failed to properly follow so-called Woods Procedures requiring accuracy of facts by the sworn declarants. Those procedures were strengthened in 2003 by then-FBI director Robert Mueller, now the special counsel pursuing the Trump-Russia affair.

Withholding material and exculpatory evidence from the FISA applications may also have violated Page’s Fourth Amendment protections against omissions of material facts that would undermine or negate probable cause to search.

“It is illegal,” said veteran FBI agent Michael Biasello. “The affiant" -- the person swearing to the affidavit -- "cannot cherry-pick only information favorable to the case.”
"appear"

You fall for it every time.

:lmao you couldn't read a few pages on a trans Pacific flight.

So you'll never read them?

[TSA]

"appear"

You fall for it every time.

:lmao you couldn't read a few pages on a trans Pacific flight.

So you'll never read them?

I do millions of business a year in Asia and had to prep for meetings and sleep so no, didn’t have time on my flight over. I fly back tonight so maybe I’ll get around to it. You have read them so I’m not sure why you dodged my questions.

Are you Pavlov, a person with zero experience obtaining a FISA, disagreeing with these FBI officials and agents? Are you claiming Woods procedures were followed yes or no?

[Pavlov]

I do millions of business a year in Asia and had to prep for meetings and sleep so no, didn’t have time on my flight over. I fly back tonight so maybe I’ll get around to it. You have read them so I’m not sure why you dodged my questions.

Are you Pavlov, a person with zero experience obtaining a FISA, disagreeing with these FBI officials and agents? Are you claiming Woods procedures were followed yes or no?
Yes, I am.

You know fuck all about them. Trying to big time your ignorance is hilarious though.

Keep it up. You're too important to know what you're talking about.

:lol

[TSA]

Yes, I am.

You know fuck all about them. Trying to big time your ignorance is hilarious though.

Keep it up. You're too important to know what you're talking about.

:lol

How does a person with zero FISA experience feel confident saying they know more about Woods procedures than FBI officials and agents who have actual FISA experience?

[ElNono]

WH staffers ignoring POTUS, removing papers from his desk and generally going rogue is not good news.

However much one would wish DJT reined in, his underlings substituting their judgment for his is improper and dangerous in its own right.

True. However, even an impeachment process would take a while, and somebody has to man the wheel while the child is tweeting in the back room.

[TSA]

Yes, I am.

You know fuck all about them. Trying to big time your ignorance is hilarious though.

Keep it up. You're too important to know what you're talking about.

:lol

Also, how can you say Woods procedures were followed when you have not seen the unredacted Page FISA application?

[Pavlov]

How does a person with zero FISA experience feel confident saying they know more about Woods procedures than FBI officials and agents who have actual FISA experience?
I read them.

And your quote is actually pretty ambiguous.

You've gone on about Woods procedures for a solid year and didn't even think to look them up.

lol

[Pavlov]

Also, how can you say Woods procedures were followed when you have not seen the unredacted Page FISA application?
How can you say they weren't followed?

The renewals tell me all I need to know

[TSA]

I read them.


And the unredacted Page FISA application?

[TSA]

How can you say they weren't followed?

The renewals tell me all I need to know

I’m putting faith in the people who have read the unredacted applications that said the Woods procedures weren’t followed.

Are you putting faith that the people who filed the applications didn’t lie or omit relevant information? The same people who were fired/demoted/removed and are currently under investigation?

[Pavlov]

And the unredacted Page FISA application?

Your blogs didn't read them.

[Pavlov]

I’m putting faith in the people who have read the unredacted applications that said the Woods procedures weren’t followed.

Are you putting faith that the people who filed the applications didn’t lie or omit relevant information? The same people who were fired/demoted/removed and are currently under investigation?Rosenstein was fired?

News to me.

Link?

[TSA]

Rosenstein was fired?

News to me.

Link?

Rosentein didn’t file the application. Try again.

Are you putting faith that the people who filed the applications didn’t lie or omit relevant information? The same people who were fired/demoted/removed and are currently under investigation?

[ElNono]

How does a person with zero FISA experience feel confident saying they know more about Woods procedures than FBI officials and agents who have actual FISA experience?

Biasello is far from a unbiased source, tbh...
http://www.thompsontimeline.com/tag/michael-biasello/

But let's pretend that he's indeed right. What makes you think this would somehow stop the collusion investigation? For example, it clearly didn't had much, if anything, to do with the indictment of Russian agents.

At most, it would make certain items inadmissible in a potential criminal trial (which has been dubious since the get go, but certainly the worst case scenario for POTUS).

[Pavlov]

Rosentein didn’t file the application. Try again.

Are you putting faith that the people who filed the applications didn’t lie or omit relevant information? The same people who were fired/demoted/removed and are currently under investigation?
The renewals, TSA. Three of them.

Explain.

[TSA]

Your blogs didn't read them.these guys did.

Vtg67Exxd-g

[TSA]

The renewals, TSA. Three of them.

Explain.

The questions, Pavlov. Two of them.

Are you putting faith that the people who filed the applications didn’t lie or omit relevant information? The same people who were fired/demoted/removed and are currently under investigation?

Explain.

[Pavlov]

these guys did.

Vtg67Exxd-g
And?

You don't even know what Woods procedures are.

:lmao

[TSA]

Biasello is far from a unbiased source, tbh...
http://www.thompsontimeline.com/tag/michael-biasello/

But let's pretend that he's indeed right. What makes you think this would somehow stop the collusion investigation? For example, it clearly didn't had much, if anything, to do with the indictment of Russian agents.

At most, it would make certain items inadmissible in a potential criminal trial (which has been dubious since the get go, but certainly the worst case scenario for POTUS).

I never said the collusion investigation should be shut down not sure what you are talking about. And what do the indictments of the Russian agents have to do with Trump and collusion?

[Pavlov]

The questions, Pavlov. Two of them.

Are you putting faith that the people who filed the applications didn’t lie or omit relevant information? The same people who were fired/demoted/removed and are currently under investigation?

Explain.
Renewed three times.

During the Trump administration.

That's all I need tbh.

If you knew anything about this subject you wouldn't be whining so much.

Your ignorance is your only weapon at this point.

[TSA]

And?

You don't even know what Woods procedures are.

:lmao

I’m putting faith in the people who have read the unredacted applications that said the Woods procedures weren’t followed.

[Pavlov]

I’m putting faith in the people who have read the unredacted applications that said the Woods procedures weren’t followed.
Partisan hacks?

That has worked so well for you in the past.

Pizza.

[TSA]

Renewed three times.

During the Trump administration.

That's all I need tbh.

If you knew anything about this subject you wouldn't be whining so much.

Your ignorance is your only weapon at this point.

How many dodges is that in a row? Try again. We’ll go yes or no to make it simpler for your pussy ass.

Are you putting faith that the people who filed the applications didn’t lie or omit relevant information yes or no?

The same people who were fired/demoted/removed and are currently under investigation yes or no?

[Pavlov]

How many dodges is that in a row? Try again. We’ll go yes or no to make it simpler for your pussy ass.

Are you putting faith that the people who filed the applications didn’t lie or omit relevant information yes or no?

The same people who were fired/demoted/removed and are currently under investigation yes or no?
I'm putting my faith in the renewals that ran well into the Trump administration.

Pretty simple.

It's an Intel warrant.

You don't understand because you choose to be ignorant and let others tell you what to believe.

You're easily influenced. Plain and simple.

Pizza.

Q.

Cat Stevens.

See a pattern, TSA?

Yes or no.

[ElNono]

I never said the collusion investigation should be shut down not sure what you are talking about. And what do the indictments of the Russian agents have to do with Trump and collusion?

You've been saying we should "watch for this whole thing to crumble" for months... what are you talking about?

And indictments of Russian agents obviously do have everything to do with a collusion investigation:

1) You can't have collusion to affect an election if there was no election tampering (or attempts)

2) You can't claim he colluded with Russia if you don't demonstrate there was a Russian side to this.

[TSA]

I'm putting my faith in the renewals that ran well into the Trump administration.


The same people filed the renewals.

Are you putting your faith in the people who filed the applications/renewals that they didn’t lie or omit relevant information yes or no?

The same people who were fired/demoted/removed and are currently under investigation yes or no?

[Pavlov]

The same people filed the renewals.Rosenstien was not there for the first application.

He was appointed by Donald J. Trump.

Try again TSA.

[TSA]

You've been saying we should "watch for this whole thing to crumble" for months... what are you talking about?The “Russia collusion” set up is being exposed.


And indictments of Russian agents obviously do have everything to do with a collusion investigation:

1) You can't have collusion to affect an election if there was no election tampering (or attempts)

2) You can't claim he colluded with Russia if you don't demonstrate there was a Russian side to this.

Where in the indictments of the Russian agents is anyone from Trump’s campaign mentioned? Where in the indictments is any collusion even mentioned?

[TSA]

Rosenstien was not there for the first application.

He was appointed by Donald J. Trump.

Try again TSA.
Rosenstein doesn’t file the application nor file the renewal, he signs off on them. Try again.

Are you putting your faith in the people who filed the applications/renewals that they didn’t lie or omit relevant information yes or no?

The same people who were fired/demoted/removed and are currently under investigation yes or no?

[Pavlov]

Rosenstein doesn’t file the application nor file the renewal, he signs off on them. Try again.

Are you putting your faith in the people who filed the applications/renewals that they didn’t lie or omit relevant information yes or no?

The same people who were fired/demoted/removed and are currently under investigation yes or no?Again, the renewals tell me all I need to know.

I put my faith in the renewals.

Tell me, TSA -- what are the criteria for renewing a FISA warrant?

Please answer this time. You have dodged this question every time you have been asked.

[TSA]

Again, the renewals tell me all I need to know.

I put my faith in the renewals.

Tell me, TSA -- what it the criteria for renewing a FISA warrant?

Please answer this time. You have dodged this question every time you have been asked.

No I’ve linked you to the steps for a renewal and ignored you every time you’ve asked since. The only one dodging here is you. Yes or no answers. You are acting like a total pussy.

Are you putting your faith in the people who filed the applications/renewals that they didn’t lie or omit relevant information yes or no?

The same people who were fired/demoted/removed and are currently under investigation yes or no?

[Pavlov]

No I’ve linked you to the steps for a renewal and ignored you every time you’ve asked since. The only one dodging here is you. Yes or no answers. You are acting like a total pussy.

Are you putting your faith in the people who filed the applications/renewals that they didn’t lie or omit relevant information yes or no?

The same people who were fired/demoted/removed and are currently under investigation yes or no?I have faith in the Carter Page FISA warrant process from start to finish.

Period.

What are the criteria for renewing a FISA warrant, TSA?

Please answer this time. You're coming off as terrified to answer this simple question that you have dodged so many times before.

Don't panic.

Don't get pissy.

Just answer.

What are the criteria for renewing a FISA warrant?

[ElNono]

The “Russia collusion” set up is being exposed.

That's what the investigation is about. Ergo, the claim you're making is that there was no such a thing, thus no investigation needs to continue.

I'm not convinced the whole investigation hinges on a FISA warrant. At most, it would preclude certain evidence from coming up in a potential trial.


Where in the indictments of the Russian agents is anyone from Trump’s campaign mentioned? Where in the indictments is any collusion even mentioned?

Nowhere, but that misses the point. Let's flip it around: Trump's campaign people get indicted for collusion with Russia to tamper the elections.

What does the prosecutor needs to prove?
- That there was an attempt to tamper with the election (if there was no attempt to tamper, then there was no conspiracy)
- That Russia was one of the co-conspirators attempting to tamper with the election
- That there's a nexus between the person and the Russian side that's directly related to the conspiracy.

The Russian indictments cover the first two, that's why they're important in a collusion case. It's actually 2/3 of the case.

[TSA]

I have faith in the Carter Page FISA warrant process from start to finish.

Period.

What are the criteria for renewing a FISA warrant, TSA?

Please answer this time. You're coming off as terrified to answer this simple question that you have dodged so many times before.

Don't panic.

Don't get pissy.

Just answer.

What are the criteria for renewing a FISA warrant?

Thank you for dropping the pussy act and finally answering the questions. Your question about the FISA renewal was already answered.

In light of all of the top FBI/DOJ officials involved in the Carter Page FISA warrant process being fired/demoted/removed from positions and also currently under investigation for said decisions relating to the Carter Page FISA warrant how do you continue to have faith in the whole Carter Page FISA warrant process from start to finish?

[Pavlov]

Thank you for dropping the pussy act and finally answering the questions. Your question about the FISA renewal was already answered.

In light of all of the top FBI/DOJ officials involved in the Carter Page FISA warrant process being fired/demoted/removed from positions and also currently under investigation for said decisions relating to the Carter Page FISA warrant how do you continue to have faith in the whole Carter Page FISA warrant process from start to finish?Sorry, question pending.

What are the criteria for renewing a FISA warrant?

Please quit stalling and answer this after so many months of pretending it was never asked.

[TSA]

That's what the investigation is about. Ergo, the claim you're making is that there was no such a thing, thus no investigation needs to continue.

I'm not convinced the whole investigation hinges on a FISA warrant. At most, it would preclude certain evidence from coming up in a potential trial.



Nowhere, but that misses the point. Let's flip it around: Trump's campaign people get indicted for collusion with Russia to tamper the elections.

What does the prosecutor needs to prove?
- That there was an attempt to tamper with the election (if there was no attempt to tamper, then there was no conspiracy)
- That Russia was one of the co-conspirators attempting to tamper with the election
- That there's a nexus between the person and the Russian side that's directly related to the conspiracy.

The Russian indictments cover the first two, that's why they're important in a collusion case. It's actually 2/3 of the case.

That’s great. There is no other 1/3 of the case. They tried to manufacture the 1/3 and it’s now being exposed as a set up.

[TSA]

Sorry, question pending.

What are the criteria for renewing a FISA warrant?

Please quit stalling and answer this after so many months of pretending it was never asked.

Your question about FISA renewal has already been answered. Your just flailing and stalling now. I’m sitting in the Cathay Pacific lounge with 2 hours to go before a 14 hour flight. You won’t outlast me.

In light of all of the top FBI/DOJ officials involved in the Carter Page FISA warrant process being fired/demoted/removed from positions and also currently under investigation for said decisions relating to the Carter Page FISA warrant how do you continue to have faith in the whole Carter Page FISA warrant process from start to finish?

[Pavlov]

Your question about FISA renewal has already been answered.No.

It has not.

What are the criteria for renewing a FISA warrant?

Question pending.

Please answer for once.

My faith in the FISA process will not change no matter how many times you ask or big time lounge brag.

[TSA]

No.

It has not.

What are the criteria for renewing a FISA warrant?

Question pending.

Please answer for once.

Yes, it’s already been answered in this very thread. Article was by your girl Asha. Moving on.

In light of all of the top FBI/DOJ officials involved in the Carter Page FISA warrant process being fired/demoted/removed from positions and also currently under investigation for said decisions relating to the Carter Page FISA warrant how do you continue to have faith in the whole Carter Page FISA warrant process from start to finish?

[TSA]

No.

It has not.

What are the criteria for renewing a FISA warrant?

Question pending.

Please answer for once.

My faith in the FISA process will not change no matter how many times you ask or big time lounge brag.

:lol editing to try and say sitting in a lounge for an international flight is big timing.

[Pavlov]

Yes, it’s already been answered in this very thread.No.



In light of all of the top FBI/DOJ officials involved in the Carter Page FISA warrant process being fired/demoted/removed from positions and also currently under investigation for said decisions relating to the Carter Page FISA warrant how do you continue to have faith in the whole Carter Page FISA warrant process from start to finish?Because it was approved and renewed by judges. The criteria for renewal by judges are critical to this.

What are the criteria for renewing a FISA warrant?

Please answer for once. Your stalling is pathetic.

[TSA]

No.yes. In this very thread. Any more begging of an already answered question will be ignored.



Because it was approved and renewed by judges. The criteria for renewal by judges are critical to this.
Interesting. Do the FISC judges personally vet the evidence presented to them before approving or do they rely on the NSD lawyers and FBI acting in good faith when presenting an application?

[Pavlov]

yes. In this very thread. Any more begging of an already answered question will be ignored. I'm not begging. You've proved you're the biggest pussy here by running away from this simple question time and time again.



Interesting. Do the FISC judges personally vet the evidence presented to them before approving or do they rely on the NSD lawyers and FBI acting in good faith when presenting an application?I'll have to ask you again, TSA since it's crucial to your understanding anything related to your questions: What are the criteria for renewing a FISA warrant?

Please answer for once in your life to prove you actually understand what the criteria actually are.

[TSA]

Knowing that you’ll probably dodge the next question let me toss you a softball. What time is it where you are at? 4 AM?

[TSA]

Knowing that you’ll probably dodge the next question let me toss you a softball. What time is it where you are at? 4 AM?

Called that dodge.

[Pavlov]

Knowing that you’ll probably dodge the next question let me toss you a softball. What time is it where you are at? 4 AM?Sorry, TSA -- question pending.

What are the criteria for renewing a FISA warrant?

Please answer to prove you have any knowledge of this subject whatsoever.

Attempts to make it personal will be welcomed as your giving up again.

[TSA]

Because it was approved and renewed by judges. The criteria for renewal by judges are critical to this.



Do the FISC judges personally vet the evidence presented to them before approving or do they rely on the NSD lawyers and FBI acting in good faith when presenting an application?

[Pavlov]

Do the FISC judges personally vet the evidence presented to them before approving or do they rely on the NSD lawyers and FBI acting in good faith when presenting an application?Sorry, TSA -- question pending.

What are the criteria for renewing a FISA warrant?

Please answer to prove you have any knowledge of this subject whatsoever.

[TSA]

I’ll accept your white flag Pavlov, all the way from Hong Kong. <<< big timing white flag acceptance :lol

[Pavlov]

I’ll accept your white flag Pavlov, all the way from Hong Kong. <<< big timing white flag acceptance :lolYou're going back to the Woods procedures of which you know nothing.

You've already waved that white flag.

You could have read them ten times over in the time you've been whining about them.

What is stopping you? :lol

Question pending: What are the criteria for renewing a FISA warrant?

Please answer to prove you have any knowledge of this subject whatsoever.

[TSA]

Staying up to the wee hours of the morning to beg for answers to already answered questions after already being told the same already answered questions would be ignored :rollin

:lol your life

[Pavlov]

Staying up to the wee hours of the morning to beg for answers to already answered questions after already being told the same already answered questions would be ignored :rollin

:lol your life


Attempts to make it personal will be welcomed as your giving up again.

:lol TSA. Why don't you just read the Woods procedures you've been whining about but avoiding for a full year?

Please answer a simple question for once.

[TSA]

Staying up to the wee hours of the morning to beg for answers to already answered questions after already being told the same already answered questions would be ignored :rollin

:lol your life

[TSA]

:lol begging until the sun rises
:lol your life

[Pavlov]

lol meltdown.

Sorry, TSA.

You could've read the Woods procedures 30 times over by now.

You never will. Don't ever bring them up again.

[TSA]

Just log off dude and get some sleep dude this is getting sad.

[TSA]

lol meltdown.

Says the guy glued to his computer at 4:30 in the morning :lmao

[Pavlov]

Staying up to the wee hours of the morning to beg for answers to already answered questions after already being told the same already answered questions would be ignored :rollin

:lol your life


I’ll accept your white flag Pavlov, all the way from Hong Kong. <<< big timing white flag acceptance :lol


:lol begging until the sun rises
:lol your life


Just log off dude and get some sleep dude this is getting sad.


Says the guy glued to his computer at 4:30 in the morning :lmaolol

[TSA]

lol meltdown.

Sorry, TSA.

You could've read the Woods procedures 30 times over by now.

You never will. Don't ever bring them up again.

I don’t need to read them you have read them and claim to understand them better than actual FBI agents. I consider you the ST Woods procedure expert and will direct all relevant questions your way.

Do the FISC judges personally vet the evidence presented to them before approving or do they rely on the NSD lawyers and FBI acting in good faith when presenting an application?

[TSA]

lol

It’s a good sign you can laugh at yourself.

[Pavlov]

I don’t need to read them you have read them and claim to understand them better than actual FBI agents. I consider you the ST Woods procedure expert and will direct all relevant questions your way.

Do the FISC judges personally vet the evidence presented to them before approving or do they rely on the NSD lawyers and FBI acting in good faith when presenting an application?Nope. They don't have to.

The Woods procedures were followed.

You'd know that if you read them.

You simply don't want to read them.

The Woods procedures were followed. The warrant was approved. The warrant was renewed three times.

All that tells me everything I need to know.

Your FISA rants are just another in a long line of nothingburgers that you have passed on from the people who tell you what to think.

[Pavlov]

It’s a good sign you can laugh at yourself.You, on the other hand, are extremely pissy right now.

That's a bad sign.

[TSA]

You, on the other hand, are extremely pissy right now.

That's a bad sign.

dude...just relax and take a breath before you hit post reply. Every time I quote to respond you’ve edited.

I’m not pissy at all. I’ve been big timing at the lounge bar trying to get drunk enough to pass out for a good chunk of my upcoming flight. I keep chuckling with your every response. I’m sitting at a bar 5:42 Hong Kong time while you’re sitting in Texas arguing on the internet while the sun comes up :rollin

[Pavlov]

dude...just relax and take a breath before you hit post reply. Every time I quote to respond you’ve edited.

I’m not pissy at all. I’ve been big timing at the lounge bar trying to get drunk enough to pass out for a good chunk of my upcoming flight. I keep chuckling with your every response. I’m sitting at a bar 5:42 Hong Kong time while you’re sitting in Texas arguing on the internet while the sun comes up :rollinSee, that's being incredibly pissy.

It's not my fault I read a few pages of a memo and you still can't.

And you never will. You need that bubble.

[TSA]

The Woods procedures were followed. The warrant was approved. The warrant was renewed three times.

Interesting claim. How would an FISC judge know for a fact that the Woods procedures were followed and everything presented in the application as fact had been verified to be factual?

[TSA]

See, that's being incredibly pissy.

It's not my fault I read a few pages of a memo and you still can't.

And you never will. You need that bubble.

Again I’m not pissy at all tbh. You have been my entertainment for the last few hours.

Are you pissy that you are still stuck awake responding to me? When do you plan on sleeping?

[Pavlov]

Interesting claim. How would an FISC judge know for a fact that the Woods procedures were followed and everything presented in the application as fact had been verified to be factual?Who said the judge does that?

Please answer the question for once.

[Pavlov]

Again I’m not pissy at all tbh. You have been my entertainment for the last few hours.

Are you pissy that you are still stuck awake responding to me? When do you plan on sleeping?I get plenty of sleep. I'm not stuck in any way.

lol so curious about me.

Of course you're being pissy -- you can't stop making it personal, TSA.

[TSA]

I’ve got to board Pavs....first class. Didn’t even feel like flying business on the way back

9iCd6UHR-3I

Get some sleep freak.

[Pavlov]

I’ve got to board Pavs....first class. Didn’t even feel like flying business on the way back

9iCd6UHR-3I

Get some sleep freak.lol so pissy and personal

Read the Woods procedures memo.

You'll be incredibly disappointed.

Pizza.

[TSA]

lol so pissy and personal

Read the Woods procedures memo.

You'll be incredibly disappointed.

Pizza.

InGtiEXQyF0

Straight from det first class big timing WiFi stream

[ElNono]

That’s great. There is no other 1/3 of the case. They tried to manufacture the 1/3 and it’s now being exposed as a set up.

You don't know that. Neither do I, tbh...

There's no point in being emotionally invested when there's an investigation ongoing...

[spurraider21]

love how trump basically tells everyone that he cant stop himself from committing perjury if he's in a room with mueller

[boutons_deux]

George Papadopoulos, Trump Campaign Adviser, Is Sentenced to 14 Days in Jail

Mr. Papadopoulos was also fined $9,500 and

ordered to complete 200 hours of community service and

one year of probation after he serves his sentence.

Federal District Judge Randolph D. Moss cited “the gravity of the investigation” and the need to send a message to the public as the reason for the imprisonment.

Prosecutors argued that Mr. Papadopoulos’s repeated lies during a January 2017 interview with federal investigators impeded the inquiry at a critical moment.

In part because Mr. Papadopoulos misled authorities, they said in court papers (https://www.nytimes.com/2018/08/17/us/politics/trump-mueller-papadopoulos-russia.html), they failed to arrest a London-based professor — suspected of being a Russian operative — before he left the United States in February 2017, never to return.

“I wanted to distance myself as much as possible — and Trump himself and the campaign — from what was probably an illegal action or dangerous information,” he said.

https://www.nytimes.com/2018/09/07/us/politics/george-papadopoulos-sentencing-special-counsel-investigation.html?partner=rss&emc=rss

[Winehole23]

love how trump basically tells everyone that he cant stop himself from committing perjury if he's in a room with muellera man's gotta know his limitations

[DarrinS]

a man's gotta know his limitations


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_VrFV5r8cs0

[djohn2oo8]

1038187667542953984

[Winehole23]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_VrFV5r8cs0yep, that's the one

[djohn2oo8]

1038182081837322240

[boutons_deux]

pleading guilty to avoid Manafort's legal costs, but what does the govt get in return?

[boutons_deux]

Key Republican Senators Lay Groundwork for Trump to Fire Sessions — But Here's the Catch

He could have just received his long-awaited green light.

One crucial go-ahead came from Senator Lindsey Graham of South Carolina, who wavers between

criticizing many of the president's policies (https://www.salon.com/2018/06/15/lindsey-graham-on-being-called-a-hypocrite-for-cozying-up-to-trump-i-do-not-give-a-sht/) to

cozying up to a commander-in-chief who occasionally invites him to golf outings at a Trump-branded resort (https://www.cbsnews.com/news/trump-talks-tax-cuts-and-budget-on-golf-course-with-graham/).

Graham formerly affirmed the following: "If Jeff Sessions is fired, there will be holy hell to pay (https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/congress/lindsey-graham-reveals-mccain-s-last-words-him-tearful-interview-n904361)." But a lot has happened between July 2017 and last week.

"The president's entitled to an attorney general he has faith in –

somebody that's qualified for the job," :lol

Graham told reporters last week, according to CNN (https://www.cnn.com/2018/08/23/politics/lindsey-graham-jeff-sessions-replace/index.html).

"And I think there will come a time – sooner rather than later – where it will be time to have a new face and a fresh voice

at the Department of Justice."

"That's an important office in the country," Graham added. "And, after the election, I think there will be some serious discussions about a new attorney general."

Continuing his media blitz in support of Trump's ability to remove Sessions from office, Graham further declared Tuesday morning on NBC's Today Show that

the pair's "relationship is beyond repair."

In another reversal, Senator Chuck Grassley of Iowa, ...

"I do have time for hearings on nominees that the president might send up here that I didn't have last year," the senator said in an interview with Bloomberg.

"Clearly, Attorney General Sessions doesn’t have the confidence of the president," Grassley added.

Both senators' comments came after a Fox News interview in which

Trump repeatedly insulted Sessions (https://www.salon.com/2018/08/23/trump-argues-michael-cohens-hush-money-payments-werent-crimes-and-flipping-should-be-outlawed/) and criticized his attorney general's decision to recuse himself from overseeing the Russia investigation,

alleging that he had never taken control of the Department of Justice.

https://www.alternet.org/news-amp-po...ns-heres-catch (https://www.alternet.org/news-amp-politics/key-republican-senators-lay-groundwork-trump-fire-sessions-heres-catch)

[djohn2oo8]

1038201026321571840

lol he a target

[Spurs Homer]

pleading guilty to avoid Manafort's legal costs, but what does the govt get in return?

Good news: It gets them Trump

Bad news: Kavanaugh deciding SC vote to give Trump ultimate power.

[DarrinS]

Good news: It gets them Trump

Bad news: Kavanaugh deciding SC vote to give Trump ultimate power.

:lmao

[Spurs Homer]

:lmao

Of course this makes you happy. Have a mentally unfit white supremacist ruling our country.
Who is the joke on? smh

[Isitjustme?]

Of course this makes you happy. Have a mentally unfit white supremacist ruling our country.
Who is the joke on? smh

Darrin's a neutral party. He doesnt support Trump nor make arguments for him so I dont know who youre talking to

[DarrinS]

Of course this makes you happy. Have a mentally unfit white supremacist ruling our country.
Who is the joke on? smh

there it is


Oh, can you explain how Kavanaugh will unilaterally give Drumpf ultimate power?

[Reck]

Of course this makes you happy. Have a mentally unfit white supremacist ruling our country.
Who is the joke on? smh

Darrin laughs because he's pretty much on his way out. We're the ones who have to bare the brunt and deal with Trump's and the GOP aftermath.

[DarrinS]

Darrin laughs because he's pretty much on his way out. We're the ones who have to bare the brunt and deal with Trump's and the GOP aftermath.


I’m dealing with this shitty economy and my tax cuts. The horrors.

[boutons_deux]

Papa Dop sez, to NYTimes, that he doesn't remember, over gin and tonic(s), telling Downer about Russians having dirt on Hillary :lol

[Reck]

I’m dealing with this shitty economy and my tax cuts. The horrors.

An economy that Obama kickstarted and handed on a platter, you mean? :lol You hypocrite faggot.

But yes of course. Enjoy your 10 dollar tax increase by all means necessary.

[DarrinS]

An economy that Obama kickstarted and handed on a platter, you mean? :lol You hypocrite faggot.

But yes of course. Enjoy your 10 dollar tax increase by all means necessary.

Had this tax cut been in affect in 2017, I’d have saved 27K. Lol, 10 bucks

[TSA]

George Papadopoulos, Trump Campaign Adviser, Is Sentenced to 14 Days in Jail

Mr. Papadopoulos was also fined $9,500 and

ordered to complete 200 hours of community service and

one year of probation after he serves his sentence.

Federal District Judge Randolph D. Moss cited “the gravity of the investigation” and the need to send a message to the public as the reason for the imprisonment.

Prosecutors argued that Mr. Papadopoulos’s repeated lies during a January 2017 interview with federal investigators impeded the inquiry at a critical moment.

In part because Mr. Papadopoulos misled authorities, they said in court papers (https://www.nytimes.com/2018/08/17/us/politics/trump-mueller-papadopoulos-russia.html), they failed to arrest a London-based professor — suspected of being a Russian operative — before he left the United States in February 2017, never to return.

“I wanted to distance myself as much as possible — and Trump himself and the campaign — from what was probably an illegal action or dangerous information,” he said.

https://www.nytimes.com/2018/09/07/us/politics/george-papadopoulos-sentencing-special-counsel-investigation.html?partner=rss&emc=rss

960170465674321920

14 days :rollin

[Chris]

TSA


1038237893817495552

Bongino called it months ago on his podcast.

[boutons_deux]

Once-loyal Alabama delegation gives Sessions the cold shoulder

The attorney general could once count on his fellow Alabamians to publicly defend him. That seems no longer the case.

https://www.politico.com/story/2018/...support-797865 (https://www.politico.com/story/2018/08/27/alabama-delegation-jeff-sessions-support-797865)

[TSA]

https://vault.fbi.gov/records-between-fbi-and-christopher-steele/records-between-fbi-and-christopher-steele-part-02-of-02/view

Medium confidence
Minimally corroborated

:lol RandomGuy

[Spurs Homer]

there it is


Oh, can you explain how Kavanaugh will unilaterally give Drumpf ultimate power?

His vote will assure that Mueller cannot indict Trump. Cannot subpoena Trump. Cannot make Trump testify before a grand jury.

Why else would Trump nominate this guy - who wasn't even on the first TWO lists of SC nominees that Trump promised to go by?

[Reck]

960170465674321920

14 days :rollin

TSA so desperate he’ll settle this as a win. :lol

the agreed plea deal was 0 to 6 months. He cooperated, he got a super light sentence. The end. Felon in the end.


Roughly 60 percent of defendants in such cases receive probation, the judge said, and sentencing guidelines suggested a punishment from probation to six months in prison.

While Mr. Papadopoulos deserved a harsher punishment than probation, the judge said, he also deserved credit for trying to cooperate and for his apparent contrition.

https://www.nytimes.com/2018/09/07/us/politics/george-papadopoulos-sentencing-special-counsel-investigation.html

Nevermind. Not a win for you after all. :lol

[ducks]

Robby Starbuck
Robby Starbuck
Robbystarbuck
·
9h
It’s not inexplicable at all. Two FBI agents working the case didn’t think Flynn lied. This was in the House Intelligence Committee Russia Report. Andrew McCabe testified to them that two FBI agents who interviewed Michael Flynn “didn’t think he was lying.”
Quote Tweet
Josh Dawsey
@jdawsey1
Trump told pool that he'd seen George Papadopoulos get nailed for lying to the FBI and Michael Flynn get nailed for lying to the FBI. He inexplicably said Mueller thought Flynn lied but that the FBI did not. Said he is leery they will try to ensnare him for perjury.

[Pavlov]

TSA


1038237893817495552

Bongino called it months ago on his podcast.So he's not presumed dead at all.

lol panic lying

[ElNono]

Actually, Flynn plead guilty, and admission that he indeed lied to the FBI...

[Chris]

Flynn was guilty of trusting the FBI and not bringing a lawyer. Perjury traps are common in our corrupt system.

[Pavlov]

Flynn was guilty of trusting the FBI and not bringing a lawyer. Perjury traps are common in our corrupt system.How common, Chris?

Let's see your perjury trap statistics for 2017.