Flynn in major trouble for speaking to Russia about sanctions

[TSA]

So you're waving the white flag on your Rice and Mueller theories.

lol

OK, I'll try asking you the first question you dodged again -- what is my Trump/Russia collusion false narrative?

Be specific or wave your white flag again.I’m shutting down your deflection attempt.

Narrative: Trump colluded with Russia to sway the election. You pushed it, to claim you didn’t is laughable. If you think I’m mistaken after reading your posts ITT for over a year state what your theory is.

[TSA]

Watch him as he’ll now try and claim he never thought there was collusion to begin with :lol3....2....1....

[Chris]

Pavlov :lol

[Pavlov]

I’m shutting down your deflection attempt.

Narrative: Trump colluded with Russia to sway the election. You pushed it, to claim you didn’t is laughable. If you think I’m mistaken after reading your posts ITT for over a year state what your theory is.I never thought Trump was smart enough to collude with Russia himself.

He certainly surrounded himself with people who would be smart enough and willing. Trump's crimes, if there are any, will probably have to do with money laundering, obstructing justice and/or being blackmailed.

[TSA]

I never thought Trump was smart enough to collude with Russia.

State your theory.

[Pavlov]

State your theory.You have it.

Now, what is your Rice theory this week?

What is your Mueller theory this week?

[clambake]

my theory is that he's going to choke on all his dirty money.

obstruction is nice, too.

[TSA]

I never thought Trump was smart enough to collude with Russia himself.

He certainly surrounded himself with people who would be smart enough and willing. Trump's crimes, if there are any, will probably have to do with money laundering, obstructing justice and/or being blackmailed.

Instead of hitting reply so fast why don’t you just take time and put all your thoughts in the post the first time instead of constantly going back and editing.

Don’t play dumb either, you know when I say Trump/Russia that means Trump and his campaign.

State your theory on Trump/Trump campaign/Russia election collusion.

[Chris]

982621352287928320

[Pavlov]

Instead of hitting reply so fast why don’t you just take time and put all your thoughts in the post the first time instead of constantly going back and editing. :lol mad


Don’t play dumb either, you know when I say Trump/Russia that means Trump and his campaign.No, it doesn't. Trump is an old, cable watching idiot.


State your theory on Trump/Trump campaign/Russia election collusion.You have it. After Trump's son, son-in-law and campaign manager met with Russians who promised dirt on Clinton, every single investigation is justified. You'll just have to let it play out.

Now, what is your Rice theory this week?

What is your Mueller theory this week?

[TSA]

:lol mad

No, it doesn't. Trump is an old, cable watching idiot.

You have it. After Trump's son, son-in-law and campaign manager met with Russians who promised dirt on Clinton, every single investigation is justified. You'll just have to let it play out.

Now, what is your Rice theory this week?

What is your Mueller theory this week?

I didn’t ask if you thought the investigation was justified I asked what your theory was on Trump/Trump campaign/Russia election collusion and you’ve failed to state it. What is your theory?

[TSA]

Since your having difficulties I’ll go first. My theory on Trump/Trump campaign/Russia election collusion is that the entire thing is a farce built on bullshit concocted by the DNC and pushed through the intelligence community.

[Chris]

982715190172160000

[Pavlov]

I didn’t ask if you thought the investigation was justified I asked what your theory was on Trump/Trump campaign/Russia election collusion and you’ve failed to state it. What is your theory?You have it.

Sorry I didn't commit whole hog to any moonbat conspiracy theories like you did. I'm just better than you in that respect. All I know is there is enough smoke and lying about Russia to justify any and all investigations.

[Pavlov]

Since your having difficulties I’ll go first. My theory on Trump/Trump campaign/Russia election collusion is that the entire thing is a farce built on bullshit concocted by the DNC and pushed through the intelligence community.Yeah, why?

Did they force Trump's son, son-in-law and campaign manager to meet with Russians who claimed they had dirt on Clinton?

What is your Susan Rice theory this week?

What is your Robert Mueller theory this week?

Why did Trump hire Manafort and Gates?

[TSA]

You have it.

Sorry I didn't commit whole hog to any moonbat conspiracy theories like you did. I'm just better than you in that respect. All I know is there is enough smoke and lying about Russia to justify any and all investigations.

You stated your theory on what crimes Trump could be charged with and avoided election collusion. State your theory on Trump/Trump campaign/Russian election collusion.

[Chris]

Hoax? A presidential candidate's son, son-in-law and campaign manager met with agents of the Russian government with the express purpose of colluding with them to influence the 2016 election. If you're inclined to look at it in terms of Ws and Ls, there is no way our "side" can lose now.

[Pavlov]

You stated your theory on what crimes Trump could be charged with and avoided election collusion. State your theory on Trump/Trump campaign/Russian election collusion.Dunno for sure, but it sure looks like they were trying since Trump's son, son-in-law and campaign manager met with Russians who claimed they had dirt on Clinton.

Do you agree it looks like they were definitely trying to collude with Russians?

Yes or no.

[Pavlov]

Yes, Chris -- that's what I said back then and what I say now.

You can answer the question too:

Do you agree it looks like they were definitely trying to collude with Russians?

Yes or no.

[TSA]

Dunno for sure, but it sure looks like they were trying since Trump's son, son-in-law and campaign manager met with Russians who claimed they had dirt on Clinton.

Do you agree it looks like they were definitely trying to collude with Russians?

Yes or no.

No, that’s just opposition research according to you.

Do you agree it looks like the DNC was definitely trying to collude with Ukraine, Australia, and the UK?

[Pavlov]

No:lol OK

You're delusional.

Good to know.

[Chris]

Yes, Chris -- that's what I said back then and what I say now.

You can answer the question too:

Do you agree it looks like they were definitely trying to collude with Russians?

Yes or no.

No.

[Pavlov]

No.:lol That's two.

[TSA]

:lol OK

You're delusional.

Good to know.


Do you agree it looks like the DNC was definitely trying to collude with Ukraine, Australia, and the UK?

[Pavlov]

Do you agree it looks like the DNC was definitely trying to collude with Ukraine, Australia, and the UK?I'll need more information from you to determine whether they're all the same.

Describe each in enough detail to show they are all the same.

[TSA]

I'll need more information from you to determine whether they're all the same.

Describe each in enough detail to show they are all the same.


DNC paying Christopher Steele for opposition research. If you think Don Jr arranging a meeting with a Russian for opposition research reaches collusion than surely the DNC paying a Brit for it must reach that same level of collusion if not more.

Collusion or not collusion?

[Pavlov]

DNC paying Christopher Steele for opposition research. If you think Don Jr arranging a meeting with a Russian for opposition research reaches collusion than surely the DNC paying a Brit for it must reach that same level of collusion if not more.

Collusion or not collusion?When did the DNC pay Steele?

Be specific.

[TSA]

When did the DNC pay Steele?

Be specific.

April 2016-October 2016 through Perkins Coie to Fusion GPS.

Explain how paying a foreigner for opposition research is not collusion but meeting a foreigner and not receiving opposition research is collusion.

[Pavlov]

April 2016-October 2016 through Perkins Coie to Fusion GPS.Your timeline is off.


Did the person writing the checks even know Steele was employed?

[koriwhat]

April 2016-October 2016 through Perkins Coie to Fusion GPS.

Explain how paying a foreigner for opposition research is not collusion but meeting a foreigner and not receiving opposition research is collusion.

it's never been about what crime djt has or hasn't commited; it's about obama/hrc not being deemed dictator for life. the loons on the left run on pure hatred masked with legality to make their stance look redeemable.

[TSA]

Your timeline is off.


Did the person writing the checks even know Steele was employed?

Timeline is fine.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/clinton-campaign-dnc-paid-for-research-that-led-to-russia-dossier/2017/10/24/226fabf0-b8e4-11e7-a908-a3470754bbb9_story.html?utm_term=.12cb88b2a641

:lol at trying to use ignorance of payments as a defense. You are so disingenuous it’s sad.

You planted your flag with the Dems and their narrative, you chose to stand on that hill with djohn, you’ll join him on the tree of woe.

[Pavlov]

Timeline is fine.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/clinton-campaign-dnc-paid-for-research-that-led-to-russia-dossier/2017/10/24/226fabf0-b8e4-11e7-a908-a3470754bbb9_story.html?utm_term=.12cb88b2a641

Sorry, it's off. It's a fundamental mistake.

Get back to me when you actually know when Steele was paid.

I'll wait.

[TSA]

Sorry, it's off. It's a fundamental mistake.

Get back to me when you actually know when Steele was paid.

I'll wait.
It’s irrelevant. The DNC/Clinton campaign paid a foreigner to conduct opposition research. Is that collusion yes or no?

You’ll continue to try and squirm out of answering by asking more questions and in doing so will show the forum your white flag.

[Pavlov]

It’s irrelevant.It's indicative of your understanding of the situation.

So far you're completely wrong. Stupidly wrong. Fatally wrong.

[spurraider21]

49uMF9XX27M
rosenstein's wife, is a top obama/clinton lawyer

her husband, rosenstein, is a top trump lawyer.

you think that somehow makes rod rosenstein compromised... but maybe his wife was compromised and working for republicans under pressure from her republican husband...

[TSA]

It's indicative of your understanding of the situation.

So far you're completely wrong. Stupidly wrong. Fatally wrong.

:lol so predictable

Squirm #1

The DNC/Clinton campaign paid a foreigner to conduct opposition research. Is that collusion yes or no?

[spurraider21]

:lol so predictable

Squirm #1

The DNC/Clinton campaign paid a foreigner to conduct opposition research. Is that collusion yes or no?
were the brits trying to influence the US election in a state-sanctioned manner, and did they commit crimes in furtherance of that cause?

[Pavlov]

:lol so predictable

Squirm #1

The DNC/Clinton campaign paid a foreigner to conduct opposition research. Is that collusion yes or no?They paid a law firm.

Fix your timeline. It's wrong.

[Pavlov]

were the brits trying to influence the US election in a state-sanctioned manner, and did they commit crimes in furtherance of that cause?Steele is a "crown prosecutor" :lol.

[Spurminator]

It’s irrelevant. The DNC/Clinton campaign paid a foreigner to conduct opposition research. Is that collusion yes or no?

No.

Why is this so difficult for you?

[TSA]

were the brits trying to influence the US election in a state-sanctioned manner, and did they commit crimes in furtherance of that cause?

Irrelevant. We are discussing collusion from the US campaigns.

If Don Jr meeting with a foreigner for to get opposition research is collusion than the DNC paying a foreigner for opposition research is collusion.

[Pavlov]

Irrelevant.Yeah, it's relevant.

Why do you want to ignore facts?

[TSA]

No.

Why is this so difficult for you?

But meeting with a foreigner for opposition research and not getting it is collusion? :lol

[spurraider21]

Irrelevant. We are discussing collusion from the US campaigns.

If Don Jr meeting with a foreigner for to get opposition research is collusion than the DNC paying a foreigner for opposition research is collusion.
it's not irrelevant.

otherwise, did the RNC collude with trump to get him elected over hillary?
did george soros collude with hillary to help her in the election?
did trump collude with trump jr?

collusion is only relevant here because of the crimes committed by a foreign power

edit: im going to go ahead and correct/clarify myself that there would have to be underlying illegal behavior for it to be considered collusion

[TSA]

Yeah, it's relevant.

Why do you want to ignore facts?

Please explain how it’s relevant. I’m looking forward to how you will try and distance the DNC/Clinton campaign from Christopher Steele.

[Spurminator]

But meeting with a foreigner for opposition research and not getting it is collusion? :lol

Not in and of itself, no. Who has said it is?

[Pavlov]

Please explain how it’s relevant. I’m looking forward to how you will try and distance the DNC/Clinton campaign from Christopher Steele.The distance is already there. That's how they work. That's how it's different.

They're not stupid. Stupid is having your son, son-in-law and campaign manager meet with Russians in an attempt to get dirt on Clinton.

[TSA]

it's not irrelevant.

otherwise, did the RNC collude with trump to get him elected over hillary?
did george soros collude with hillary to help her in the election?
did trump collude with trump jr?

collusion is only relevant here because of the crimes committed by a foreign power

What crime did Veselnitskaya commit when she met with Don Jr?

[spurraider21]

What crime did Veselnitskaya commit when she met with Don Jr?
see edits above

[TSA]

The distance is already there. That's how they work. That's how it's different.

They're not stupid. Stupid is having your son, son-in-law and campaign manager meet with Russians in an attempt to get dirt on Clinton.

So it’s not collusion if you hide the payments to foreigners gathering opposition research?

[Chris]

see edits above

:lol

[Pavlov]

So it’s not collusion if you hide the payments to foreigners gathering opposition research?Hide?

No.

Your theory is that Hillary knew all about Steele and was waiting with baited breath for every memo that came from him.

It's just wrong.

And there's definitely the data theft crime underlying all the Trump/Russia connections.

What's the underlying Steele crime?

[TSA]

Hide?

No.

Your theory is that Hillary knew all about Steele and was waiting with baited breath for every memo that came from him.

It's just wrong.

And there's definitely the data theft crime underlying all the Trump/Russia connections.

What's the underlying Steele crime?

Only a person as naive as yourself would believe Hillary had no idea what Fusion GPS and Christopher Steele were doing.

I never said there was an underlying Steele crime, what’s the underlying Veselnitskaya crime?

[Pavlov]

Only a person as naive as yourself would believe Hillary had no idea what Fusion GPS and Christopher Steele were doing.What is your proof she did, TSA?

Give all your evidence. Don't be shy.


I never said there was an underlying Steele crime, what’s the underlying Veselnitskaya crime?Already stated. No one said she stole the data herself.

[Spurminator]

Proof is necessary for TSA until it isn't. Then you're just stupid for not buying in to the theory.

[TSA]

What is your proof she did, TSA?

Give all your evidence. Don't be shy.I’m not naive. State right here you think Hillary had no clue about what Fusion GPS was doing, do it.


Already stated. No one said she stole the data herself.what stolen data are you claiming she had?

[TSA]

Proof is necessary for TSA until it isn't. Then you're just stupid for not buying in to the theory.

The irony of you posting this in this thread :lol

[Spurminator]

The irony of you posting this in this thread :lol

Are you content to be the pro-Trump version of djohn? Is that why you spend so much time in this thread? Self-loathing?

Both of you tend to lean towards hyperbolic speculation, but at least some of his updates are newsworthy (whether they personally implicate Donald Trump in Russian collusion or not.) And the Flynn/Manafort/Papadopoulos stuff is a lot more than you ever got out of Pizzagate, Seth Rich, Spirit Cooking, Deep State conspiracies, or whatever monumentally retarded bullshit you're spending so much time on.

I don't subscribe to the idea that the whole Trump family is going to prison or anything but you're the last person who should be criticizing people for buying into wild speculation.

[Chris]

Are you content to be the pro-Trump version of djohn? Is that why you spend so much time in this thread? Self-loathing?

Both of you tend to lean towards hyperbolic speculation, but at least some of his updates are newsworthy (whether they personally implicate Donald Trump in Russian collusion or not.) And the Flynn/Manafort/Papadopoulos stuff is a lot more than you ever got out of Pizzagate, Seth Rich, Spirit Cooking, Deep State conspiracies, or whatever monumentally retarded bullshit you're spending so much time on.

I don't subscribe to the idea that the whole Trump family is going to prison or anything but you're the last person who should be criticizing people for buying into wild speculation.

Another fence sniper.
Expert

[Pavlov]

I’m not naive.What is your evidence?

List all your evidence Clinton knew all about Steele.

Do it now.

[koriwhat]

What is your evidence?

List all your evidence Clinton knew all about Steele.

Do it now.

you're such a bitch pav

[Pavlov]

you're such a bitch pavYou're free to present your evidence as well.

[koriwhat]

You're free to present your evidence as well.

my evidence is that you're a fool playing a fool's game and you think by doing so it puts you on top of some pedestal high above us all.

[TSA]

Are you content to be the pro-Trump version of djohn? Is that why you spend so much time in this thread? Self-loathing?

Both of you tend to lean towards hyperbolic speculation, but at least some of his updates are newsworthy (whether they personally implicate Donald Trump in Russian collusion or not.) And the Flynn/Manafort/Papadopoulos stuff is a lot more than you ever got out of Pizzagate, Seth Rich, Spirit Cooking, Deep State conspiracies, or whatever monumentally retarded bullshit you're spending so much time on.

I don't subscribe to the idea that the whole Trump family is going to prison or anything but you're the last person who should be criticizing people for buying into wild speculation.

I’m content to call out all the bullshit djohn posts on a daily basis since none of you will do it. The Flynn/Manafort/Papadopoulos indictments have nothing to do with Trump/Russia election collusion. You are aware of that right?

[Pavlov]

I’m content to call out all the bullshit djohn posts on a daily basis since none of you will do it. The Flynn/Manafort/Papadopoulos indictments have nothing to do with Trump/Russia election collusion. You are aware of that right?I accept your white flag RE: evidence Clinton knew about Steele.

Also for your critical timeline error.

[clambake]

so, he wants to talk, huh?


mueller: "hello mr. president"

trump: "hello mr. mueller"

mueller: "no no, call me bob"

[Spurminator]

Another fence sniper.
Expert (http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/member.php?u=36625)

:lol calling in reserves

[TSA]

What is your evidence?

List all your evidence Clinton knew all about Steele.

Do it now.

You are really on a roll today editing quotes to avoid answering questions. I don’t have evidence of Hillary saying she knew about Steele but it’s a logical conclusion she did because her campaign and the DNC funded it.

State right here you think Hillary had no clue about what Fusion GPS was doing, do it.

Also you never said what stolen data you claimed the Russian lawyer had. What stolen data were you talking about?

[Spurminator]

I’m content to call out all the bullshit djohn posts on a daily basis since none of you will do it. The Flynn/Manafort/Papadopoulos indictments have nothing to do with Trump/Russia election collusion. You are aware of that right?

What difference does that make to whether they are newsworthy or not? You're setting arbitrary goalposts.

Fact is, those are real indictments that happened to real people close to the President. If their names were Podesta you would have started a thread for every single one of them.

[TSA]

What difference does that make to whether they are newsworthy or not? You're setting arbitrary goalposts.

Fact is, those are real indictments that happened to real people close to the President. If their names were Podesta you would have started a thread for every single one of them.
The fact is those are real indictments that happened to real people that have nothing to do with the President or how he won the election.

[TSA]

I get that you’ve all dug your holes and are now embarrassed but I thought at least one of you would have had the balls to step up and say you were wrong all along.

[Spurminator]

The fact is those are real indictments that happened to real people that have nothing to do with the President or how he won the election.

Yes, we know this is your goalpost, you've reminded us dozens of times.

If they were Podestas, it wouldn't be your goalpost.

You are a hypocrite.

[TSA]

Yes, we know this is your goalpost, you've reminded us dozens of times.

If they were Podestas, it wouldn't be your goalpost.

You are a hypocrite.
Since you keep bringing up the Podestas...who is actually linked to the crimes Manafort/Gates were indicted for, Donald Trump or Tony Podesta?

[Pavlov]

You are really on a roll today editing quotes to avoid answering questions. I don’t have evidence of Hillary saying she knew about Steele but it’s a logical conclusion she did because her campaign and the DNC funded it.So no evidence whatsoever.

Zero.

None.

Just your rabid dislike of a person.


State right here you think Hillary had no clue about what Fusion GPS was doing, do it.Already have. You must've been changing your Susan Rice theory at the time and missed it.


Also you never said what stolen data you claimed the Russian lawyer had. What stolen data were you talking about?I never said she had it. You're really on a roll today making shit up.

The underlying crime is the data theft by the Russians.

[Pavlov]

I get that you’ve all dug your holes and are now embarrassed but I thought at least one of you would have had the balls to step up and say you were wrong all along.I'm content to wait until the Mueller report comes in -- or whatever we call it after he's fired by Trump and you cheer it because you were told to.

[Spurminator]

Since you keep bringing up the Podestas...who is actually linked to the crimes Manafort/Gates were indicted for, Donald Trump or Tony Podesta?

What does that have to do with Hillary Clinton?

[TSA]

So no evidence whatsoever.

Zero.

None.

Just your rabid dislike of a person.You said yourself Hillary isn’t stupid and now try to claim she was oblivious. Only naive people believe she didn’t know what her campaign and the DNC were doing with Fusion GPS, and you’re admitting to being one of them. Sad.




I never said she had it. You're really on a roll today making shit up.

The underlying crime is the data theft by the Russians.What stolen data were you talking about?

[Chris]

I'm content to wait until the Mueller report comes in -- or whatever we call it after he's fired by Trump and you cheer it because you were told to.

Why are you so confident in Mueller? After all he's a Republican as you've stated probably well over 20 times. I bet you just want to see Trump suffer no matter who holds the noose.

[TSA]

What does that have to do with Hillary Clinton?

You and I weren’t discussing Hillary Clinton, we were discussing the indictments that have come from the Trump/Russia investigation. I’ll ask you again, who is actually linked to the crimes Manafort/Gates were indicted for, Donald Trump or Tony Podesta?

[TSA]

I'm content to wait until the Mueller report comes in -- or whatever we call it after he's fired by Trump and you cheer it because you were told to.

:lol this false narrative will go as well as when you tried the I want Rosenstein fired false narrative.

And you aren’t content you’re scared shitless. Your entire posting style has changed, you’ve always tried to get false narratives to stick but now you are also frequently caught lying. It’s pathetic.

[Spurminator]

You and I weren’t discussing Hillary Clinton, we were discussing the indictments that have come from the Trump/Russia investigation. I’ll ask you again, who is actually linked to the crimes Manafort/Gates were indicted for, Donald Trump or Tony Podesta?

Your goalpost is Trump's personal accountability in these indictments, mine is Hillary Clinton. So what does Manafort/Gates have to do with any current investigation related to Hillary Clinton?

:lol You're making my point for me and don't even realize it.

[TSA]

Your goalpost is Trump's personal accountability in these indictments, mine is Hillary Clinton. So what does Manafort/Gates have to do with any current investigation related to Hillary Clinton?

:lol You're making my point for me and don't even realize it.

I’d expect you to ask me the same question about the Podestas if the roles were reversed, but they aren’t, and we aren’t discussing hypotheticals. You brought up the Podestas and now you don’t want to talk about them.

I’ll ask you again, who is actually linked to the crimes Manafort/Gates were indicted for, Donald Trump or Tony Podesta?

[FuzzyLumpkins]

You mean like accusing someone of killing their brother, who had a heart attack? That level of personal?

You're doing it again. And you're missing the point of the over and over and over and over and over again.

[Spurminator]

I’d expect you to ask me the same question about the Podestas if the roles were reversed, but they aren’t, and we aren’t discussing hypotheticals. You brought up the Podestas and now you don’t want to talk about them.

I’ll ask you again, who is actually linked to the crimes Manafort/Gates were indicted for, Donald Trump or Tony Podesta?

You: Manafort/Flynn are irrelevant because their indictments have nothing to do with Trump
Me: You wouldn't be saying that if their names were Podesta.
You: SPEAKING OF PODESTA, HERE'S WHY HE'S RELEVANT!!!

[TSA]

You: Manafort/Flynn are irrelevant because their indictments have nothing to do with Trump
Me: You wouldn't be saying that if their names were Podesta.
You: SPEAKING OF PODESTA, HERE'S WHY HE'S RELEVANT!!!


Who is actually linked to the crimes Manafort/Gates were indicted for, Donald Trump or Tony Podesta?

[TSA]

982379925112934401
Someone wants their story before Comey’s book :lol

[Expert]

You're doing it again. And you're missing the point of the over and over and over and over and over again.
Pointing out your hypocrisy is "personal"? If you say so, dipshit.

[FuzzyLumpkins]

Pointing out your hypocrisy is "personal"? If you say so, dipshit.

EVery time you lose an argument you always make it personal. I don't do that. You to that every day, fatboy.

And you are talking about me in trying to do so. The two notions are not mutually exclusive. Now go eat a cheeseburger.

[Expert]

EVery time you lose an argument you always make it personal. I don't do that. You to that every day, fatboy.
Argument by repetition. How unpredictable.

[FuzzyLumpkins]

Argument by repetition. How unpredictable.

That is because you are too dumb to understand the difference between doing it to deflect repeatedly verses just doing it.

[Chris]

You: Manafort/Flynn are irrelevant because their indictments have nothing to do with Trump
Me: You wouldn't be saying that if their names were Podesta.
You: SPEAKING OF PODESTA, HERE'S WHY HE'S RELEVANT!!!

Why can't you answer a simple question? Instead you crawl away, belly draggin'.

[Chris]

EVery time you lose an argument you always make it personal. I don't do that. You to that every day, fatboy.

And you are talking about me in trying to do so. The two notions are not mutually exclusive. Now go eat a cheeseburger.

Way to contradict yourself in the same post dummy :lol

[Spurminator]

Who is actually linked to the crimes Manafort/Gates were indicted for, Donald Trump or Tony Podesta?

I'll give you the benefit of the doubt and say Podesta. So what does that mean? What does Podesta's linkage mean?

[Spurminator]

You: Manafort/Flynn are irrelevant because their indictments have nothing to do with Trump
Me: You wouldn't be saying that if their names were Podesta.
You: SPEAKING OF PODESTA, HERE'S WHY HE'S RELEVANT!!!

Confirmed. Intellectually dishonest hypocrite.

[Expert]

That is because you are too dumb to understand the difference between doing it to deflect repeatedly verses just doing it.
Which are you doing now? I'm too dumb to guess.

[Pavlov]

You said yourself Hillary isn’t stupid and now try to claim she was oblivious. Only naive people believe she didn’t know what her campaign and the DNC were doing with Fusion GPS, and you’re admitting to being one of them. Sad.It's smart to separate oneself from the kind of work that was being done on the campaign's behalf. Trump wasn't smart in that respect.


What stolen data were you talking about?Playing even more stupid than you actually are is your white flag.

[Pavlov]

:lol this false narrative will go as well as when you tried the I want Rosenstein fired false narrative.The narrative there is you will want Rosenstein fired when you are told to want Rosenstein fired.


And you aren’t content you’re scared shitless. Your entire posting style has changed, you’ve always tried to get false narratives to stick but now you are also frequently caught lying. It’s pathetic.You really haven't defined any false narratives from me at all here.

Your failure is your white flag.

[Chris]

Why are you so confident in Mueller? After all he's a Republican as you've stated probably well over 20 times. I bet you just want to see Trump suffer no matter who holds the noose.

[Pavlov]

Why are you so confident in Mueller? After all he's a Republican as you've stated probably well over 20 times. I bet you just want to see Trump suffer no matter who holds the noose.Everything I know about Mueller points to his doing the job he was charged with effectively. He's a patriot. I believe Trump is a piece of shit, but if Mueller finds nothing on him, I'll accept it.

Why are you so anti-Mueller?

Because someone told you to be anti-Mueller.

[Chris]

Everything I know about Mueller points to his doing the job he was charged with effectively. He's a patriot. I believe Trump is a piece of shit, but if Mueller finds nothing on him, I'll accept it.

Why are you so anti-Mueller?

Because someone told you to be anti-Mueller.


Mueller is a war mongerer who lied about weapons of mass destruction. I thought you were paying attention.

[Pavlov]

Mueller is a war mongerer who lied about weapons of mass destruction. I thought you were paying attention.Oh, tell us all about his warmongering and lying about WMDs.

And your vehement opposition to the Iraq invasion, while you're at it.

[djohn2oo8]

Oh, tell us all about his warmongering and lying about WMDs.

And your vehement opposition to the Iraq invasion, while you're at it.

:lol

[Reck]

Mueller is a war mongerer who lied about weapons of mass destruction. I thought you were paying attention.

Chris, I thought we already went through this?

Are you just lashing out and making things up because you're in that mood or do you actually believe this? The latter requires proof.

[FuzzyLumpkins]

Which are you doing now? I'm too dumb to guess.

I agree. Now would you care to discuss the ongoing Russia investigation?

[Expert]

I agree. Now would you care to discuss the ongoing Russia investigation?
Should I go find some tweets to post?

[Chris]

I found a tweet to post.

982992165973430273

https://media1.tenor.com/images/a6c0d89f503a5d4796c890a770311093/tenor.gif?itemid=6233544

[Pavlov]

I found a tweet to post.

982992165973430273

https://media1.tenor.com/images/a6c0d89f503a5d4796c890a770311093/tenor.gif?itemid=6233544:lol good luck with that

[Chris]

:lol good luck with that

Putting all your faith in Rosenstein and Mueller :lol good luck with that

[Pavlov]

Putting all your faith in Rosenstein and Mueller :lol good luck with thatWhomever Trump tries to replace them with will probably be just as terrifying to you tbh.

[Chris]

Do I really need to dig up all the stories and videos of Robert Mueller lying about weapons of mass destruction (again)?!

Are you all really that inept? :lmao

[Pavlov]

Do I really need to dig up all the stories and videos of Robert Mueller lying about weapons of mass destruction (again)?!

Are you all really that inept? :lmaoYeah, go right ahead and tell us where he got his information.

Also tell us how opposed to the Iraq War you were.

[Chris]

Are you all really that inept? :lmao


Yeah

gotheem! :lmao

[Pavlov]

gotheem! :lmaoTruncating two quotes is your white flag.

I accept your surrender.

[djohn2oo8]

Not even Gowdy supports Chris anymore. Sad!

[Chris]

mAv0eJLq_ws

[Pavlov]

mAv0eJLq_wsHow long do you think it takes to review a million pages to review for release, Chris?

[Brazil]

Do I really need to dig up all the stories and videos of Robert Mueller lying about weapons of mass destruction (again)?!

Are you all really that inept? :lmao

What is inept is thinking 2/90 = 14%

:lmao

[Reck]

I found a tweet to post.

982992165973430273

https://media1.tenor.com/images/a6c0d89f503a5d4796c890a770311093/tenor.gif?itemid=6233544

By a few of us, he means up to 5 others. :lol

[djohn2oo8]

mAv0eJLq_ws

981511769075142656

[Chris]

981511769075142656

Digging up old news :lol poor fella

[djohn2oo8]

Digging up old news :lol poor fella

https://i.makeagif.com/media/5-05-2015/4jO6oq.gif

[Chris]

983140510998114306

Lawdy!

[Chris]

983170132984958976

[djohn2oo8]

983140510998114306

Lawdy!


983170132984958976
Chris lookin shaky

[Chris]

983155104114249729

[Chris]

Time to kick the doors down

983415036524879872

[Pavlov]

Time to kick the doors down

983415036524879872When was the last time doors were kicked down over a FOIA request, Chris?

[djohn2oo8]

983155104114249729


Time to kick the doors down

983415036524879872
https://media1.tenor.com/images/1afa851d9ae7e412a04f3d2e553d9269/tenor.gif?itemid=4583000

[Splits]

983434003352047616

[boutons_deux]

983434003352047616

amazing.

I wonder which drugs Trash takes to sleep, a little bit, at night?

[RandomGuy]

When was the last time doors were kicked down over a FOIA request, Chris?

I wonder if Mueller kicked Cohen's door down?

https://www.nytimes.com/2018/04/09/us/politics/fbi-raids-office-of-trumps-longtime-lawyer-michael-cohen.html


I'm sure it was too have a seekrit meeting so a to ask him how to get Podest and Clinton. :lol

[RandomGuy]

Attorney client priveledge doesn't protect against conspiracy to commit crimes.

R'oh raggy.... rumps rucked...

[Pavlov]

Will there be a Monday night massacre?

[boutons_deux]

Will there be a Monday night massacre?

Although Repugs say Trash firing Mueller would be "unacceptable", House MAY impeach, but not convict.

Conviction will come only if the Dems control Congress enough in 2019. Silver says it's not unthinkable, anymore.

[Chris]

983449805132369921

[Pavlov]

983449805132369921The only thing Mueller had to do with today's raid was pass along the information to Rosenstein who passed it on to Berman IIRC.

:lol KimDotcom

No deals.

[Reck]

983155104114249729


Time to kick the doors down

983415036524879872

Not your day, eh Chris?

Duck.

[Chris]

Not your day, eh Chris?

Duck.

It's a great day. Mueller overplayed his hand and the wheels for his termination have been set in motion.

[Pavlov]

It's a great day. Mueller overplayed his hand and the wheels for his termination have been set in motion.:lol Mueller didn't ask for any of these warrants.

[Reck]

It's a great day. Mueller overplayed his hand and the wheels for his termination have been set in motion.

Vy guy explained it to you.

Here in New York we have big balls. It was a judge that had nothing to do with Mueller or the Russia investigation.

[Pavlov]

Vy guy explained it to you.

Here in New York we have big balls. It was a judge that had nothing to do with Mueller or the Russia investigation.And the SNDY attorney seeking the warrant.

[djohn2oo8]

It's a great day. Mueller overplayed his hand and the wheels for his termination have been set in motion.

983486133597364228

[djohn2oo8]

983437672042516480
:lmao

[spurraider21]

983437672042516480
:lmao
:lol that one's funny

[djohn2oo8]

983492805678063616
:rollin

[djohn2oo8]

983480871276744704

[Trill Clinton]

983492805678063616
:rollin

wow

[Chris]

Dan

983496477547868160

[boutons_deux]

After Trump says 'we'll see' about firing Mueller, Democrats hit back (http://theweek.com/speedreads/766301/after-trump-says-well-about-firing-mueller-democrats-hit-back)

After President Trump was finished lashing out at

Special Counsel Robert Mueller, (https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2018-04-09/fbi-raids-office-of-trump-lawyer-michael-cohen-in-mueller-probe)

Attorney General Jeff Sessions,

Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein,

the FBI, and

Hillary Clinton's emails on Monday evening,

he fielded a question from an unnamed reporter: "Why don't you just fire Robert Mueller?"

"Well, I think it's a disgrace what's going on," Trump responded.

"We'll see what happens.

I think it's really a sad situation when you see what happened.

Many people have said you should fire him."

http://theweek.com/speedreads/766301/after-trump-says-well-about-firing-mueller-democrats-hit-back

So Trash sees his way forward by firing Mueller because "many people" (on Fox News? :lol ) said he should.

Holy shit, what fucked up shit hole country.

[boutons_deux]

Fox Business’ Lou Dobbs Trashes Mueller: ‘I Would Fire the SOB in Three Seconds’
https://www.mediaite.com/tv/fox-business-lou-dobbs-trashes-mueller-i-would-fire-the-sob-in-three-seconds/

... you can't because your obese self can only manage being shitbag on shithole Fox

[Chris]

Dan

983496477547868160

[Chris]

When Trump says "we will see" it means you're fucked :lol

[clambake]

When Trump says "we will see" it means you're fucked :lol

cmon dale, tell your leader to do it!

[Spurminator]

When Trump says "we will see" it means you're fucked :lol

Wherein a former Nader voter celebrates potential obstruction of justice by a Republican President.

:cry Trump gave me hope :cry

[Chris]

Wherein a former Nader voter celebrates potential obstruction of justice by a Republican President.

:cry Trump gave me hope :cry

lmobsessedao!!!

[Spurminator]

lmobsessedao!!!

Reply smack.

This is your force field.

Loser.

[Pavlov]

Dan

983496477547868160This isn't Mueller.

It's Berman.

You have a whole new Trump appointee you have to hate, so get to it.

[Chris]

983511547828895745

[Reck]

The return of Chuck Woolery.

Chris is completely shook. :lol

[Pavlov]

983511547828895745
https://cdn3.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_asset/file/2400374/tumblr_muixf6K4Ky1raidyco7_500.0.gifDid the FBI raid her home and office?

[Spurminator]

"Chuck Woolery gave me hope."

[Chris]

983491722264096768

[Pavlov]

983491722264096768This isn't Mueller.

It's Berman.

"Lou's hair dye gave me hope."

[Chris]

Did the FBI raid her home and office?

Of course not they know the players who butter their bread. IG report should be a real eye opener.

[Pavlov]

Of course not they know the players who butter their bread. IG report should be a real eye opener.Who are the players who butter their bread?

List them.

[Chris]

This isn't Mueller.

It's Berman.

"Lou gave me hope."

It's almost like you keep saying that to convince yourself. Mueller is in deep shit whether you like it or not.

[Chris]

Who are the players who butter their bread?

List them.

DNC/Soros/Globalists duh

[Spurminator]

It's almost like you keep saying that to convince yourself.

It's objectively true. It's fact. There's no convincing needed.

[Pavlov]

It's almost like you keep saying that to convince yourself. Mueller is in deep shit whether you like it or not.Did the FBI raid his office and home?

Firing Mueller will only make things worse for Trump tbh.

[Pavlov]

DNC/Soros/Globalists duhWait.

Whose bread are they buttering?

[Chris]

Did the FBI raid his office and home?

Firing Mueller will only make things worse for Trump tbh.

What's going to happen?

[Pavlov]

What's going to happen?If he fires Mueller?

He'd have to fire Rosenstein first and find someone to take his place. That might be a challenge in itself. The political fallout would be immediate and severe.

Worst of all, the Special Counsel investigation would continue and any state investigations in, say, New York would probably become known.

It's a bad idea.

Especially since Dennison did nothing wrong -- correct?

[Chris]

If he fires Mueller?

He'd have to fire Rosenstein first and find someone to take his place. That might be a challenge in itself. The political fallout would be immediate and severe.

Worst of all, the Special Counsel investigation would continue and any state investigations in, say, New York would probably become known.

It's a bad idea.

Especially since Dennison did nothing wrong -- correct?

I wasn't asking about the process. You said it would be bad for Trump. What's going to happen specifically to Trump if Mueller gets shitcanned?

[Pavlov]

I wasn't asking about the process. You said it would be bad for Trump. What's going to happen specifically to Trump if Mueller gets shitcanned?I just told you. Politically he'll be paralyzed. Democrats will be given a huge gift for the midterms and might even get control of both houses.

It's a bad idea.

[Chris]

I just told you. Politically he'll be paralyzed. Democrats will be given a huge gift for the midterms and might even get control of both houses.

It's a bad idea.

So Trump not winning in 2020 and Dems get control of both houses if Mueller gets fired. Got it :tu

[Pavlov]

So Trump not winning in 2020 and Dems get control of both houses if Mueller gets fired. Got it :tuWhat part of "might" did you not understand?

Oh right, you boycotted the dictionary.:tu

[Spurminator]

Plus there's the consideration that the President of the United States is getting rid of his enemies like some third world dictator. But that's really only a concern for people who care about the country.

[Reck]

So Trump not winning in 2020 and Dems get control of both houses if Mueller gets fired. Got it :tu

LOL Trump wouldn't make it to 2020 if he fires Rosenstein and Mueller with midterms being held at the end of this year.

Couldn't ask for a better birthday present. :lol

[Chris]

What part of "might" did you not understand?

Oh right, you boycotted the dictionary.:tu

Always adding qualifiers lest you make a mistake. SAD!

[Pavlov]

Plus there's the consideration that the President of the United States is getting rid of his enemies like some third world dictator. But that's really only a concern for people who care about the country.Not Chris.

Not TSA.

[Pavlov]

Always adding qualifiers lest you make a mistake. SAD!It wasn't added.

It was always there.

Why do you lie?

SAD

[Chris]

LOL Trump wouldn't make it to 2020 if he fires Rosenstein and Mueller with midterms being held at the end of this year.

Couldn't ask for a better birthday present. :lol

The turnip truck just called. They were concerned for your safety after you fell off with Maxine Waters.

[Spurminator]

983491722264096768


This isn't Mueller.

It's Berman.


It's almost like you keep saying that to convince yourself.

983484369217073152

:lmao

[djohn2oo8]

983502509980332033
Lordy it's only Monday!

[djohn2oo8]

983504946896166912

[djohn2oo8]

983515018686640128

[Chris]

The Daily Beast (official reader of court documents) :tu

[Pavlov]

The Daily Beast (official reader of court documents) :tuAre you disputing any of their reporting, Chris?

Yes or no.

[Chris]

Are you disputing any of their reporting, Chris?

Yes or no.

I'm waiting for the IG report not ruminations from the Daily Beast.

[Pavlov]

I'm waiting for the IG report not ruminations from the Daily Beast.You didn't answer the question, Chris. The IG has nothing to do with Manafort.

Are you disputing any of their reporting, Chris?

Yes or no.

[djohn2oo8]

678410436774141956
Life comes at you fast.

[Chris]

You didn't answer the question, Chris. The IG has nothing to do with Manafort.

Are you disputing any of their reporting, Chris?

Yes or no.

I wouldn't dignify that trash heap with a click. What do you think about the Daily Beast?

[djohn2oo8]

678410436774141956
Life comes at you fast.

[DMX7]

983491722264096768

Does Lou Dobbs know who appointed the FBI Director, the AG and the Deputy AG? Does he know Mueller is a Republican? Deep State!!!! :lol

[Chris]

678410436774141956
Life comes at you fast.

How many years will Cohen get in the slammer?

[Pavlov]

I wouldn't dignify that trash heap with a click. What do you think about the Daily Beast?I think that story looks accurate.

Not hiding behind a dead poet name helps her credibility tbh.

[Pavlov]

How many years will Cohen get in the slammer?:lol Chris demanding predictions.

[DMX7]

How many years will Cohen get in the slammer?

He could very well be headed there.

[Chris]

983551739100971008

[Pavlov]

983551739100971008Donald Trump’s charity?

What is that, Chris?

[Chris]

983553759878918144

[Chris]

Donald Trump’s charity?

What is that, Chris?

???

[DMX7]

They hate so badly that Robert Mueller is a lifelong Republican.

[Pavlov]

983553759878918144Lawyers good now, Chris?

[Chris]

They hate so badly that Robert Mueller is a lifelong Republican.

Lifelong war mongering Globalist swamp monster.

[Pavlov]

???What is the charity the donation was made to, Chris?

[DMX7]

Lifelong war mongering Globalist swamp monster.

...AND Republican. :lol

[Chris]

What is the charity the donation was made to, Chris?

It did not say in the article Pavlov.

[boutons_deux]

Mueller reportedly investigating $150,000 payment from Ukrainian billionaire to Trump Foundation
(http://theweek.com/speedreads/766304/mueller-reportedly-investigating-150000-payment-from-ukrainian-billionaire-trump-foundation)

http://theweek.com/speedreads/766304/mueller-reportedly-investigating-150000-payment-from-ukrainian-billionaire-trump-foundation

[Pavlov]

It did not say in the article Pavlov.Solid reporting by the Caller.

Pulitzer incoming.

[Chris]

Lawyers good now, Chris?

Do you dispute any of those conflicts of interest?

[Pavlov]

Do you dispute any of those conflicts of interest?Yeah, I do actually.

None of these are a real conflict of interest under DOJ guidelines. Only idiots think these things weren't checked out.

[Chris]

Solid reporting by the Caller.

Pulitzer incoming.

The Donald Trump Association. Definitely dirty dailycaller trying to cover that up :lol

[Pavlov]

The Donald Trump Association. Definitely dirty dailycaller trying to cover that up :lol:lmao

You still can't get it right after being spoon fed a link.

[Chris]

Yeah, I do actually.

None of these are a real conflict of interest under DOJ guidelines. Only idiots think these things weren't checked out.

Who's in charge of checking it out and debunking these conflicts of interest?

[Chris]

983553190380486657

Reck :lmao

[Pavlov]

Who's in charge of checking it out and debunking these conflicts of interest?The DOJ has an actual office dedicated to such things.

[spurraider21]

983553759878918144
864998445244743684

[djohn2oo8]

How many years will Cohen get in the slammer?

More than Hillary.

[djohn2oo8]

983450101959004166
Chris. Get used to it.

[djohn2oo8]

983545641291804673

[djohn2oo8]

983484547114422272

[djohn2oo8]

983445749223567360
Even Luigi

[Pavlov]

983445749223567360
Even LuigiTrigger alert for Chris: Gerald is also a lawyer.

[Chris]

983484547114422272

Except for Mueller's team of sharks :lol

Also lol at rubber stamps

[DMX7]

Christopher A. Wray is a Republican too!

[spurraider21]

Christopher A. Wray is a Republican too!
where does it end?

[Pavlov]

Except for Mueller's team of sharks :lol

Also lol at rubber stamps:lol Chris has such a childish view of government.

[boutons_deux]

983545641291804673

Go back 45 years

In the aftermath of Richard Nixon’s resignation, Watergate continued to claim victims.

The final toll included:



one presidential resignation
one vice-presidential resignation – although Agnew’s crimes were unrelated to Watergate
40 government officials indicted or jailed
H.R. Haldeman and John Erlichman (White House staff), resigned 30 April 1973, subsequently jailed
John Dean (White House legal counsel), sacked 30 April 1973, subsequently jailed
John Mitchell, Attorney-General and Chairman of the Committee to Re-elect the President (CREEP), jailed
Howard Hunt and G. Gordon Liddy (ex-White House staff), planned the Watergate break-in, both jailed
Charles Colson, special counsel to the President, jailed
James McCord (Security Director of CREEP), jailed


http://watergate.info/analysis/casualties-and-convictions (http://watergate.info/analysis/casualties-and-convictions)

[DMX7]

Except for Mueller's team of sharks :lol

Also lol at rubber stamps

If they're so bias and liberal than why isn't lifelong Republican Mueller replacing the whole team???

[Chris]

"Democrat! Republican! Water gooood. Fire BAD!" -DMX,21,dodgerjohn,Pooplov

[Reck]

983553190380486657

Reck (http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/member.php?u=14412) :lmao

All they need is like 25 seats to do it which is doable and in the realm of possibility. :lol Chris.

https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2018/03/26/us/elections/house-races-midterms.html

:lmao

[djohn2oo8]

"Democrat! Republican! Water gooood. Fire BAD!" -DMX,21,dodgerjohn,Pooplov

The meltdown is real.

[Pavlov]

"Democrat! Republican! Water gooood. Fire BAD!" -DMX,21,dodgerjohn,PooplovRepublicans aren't necessarily bad just because they're Republicans, Chris.

Same with Democrats.

:lol childish white Chris

[AaronY]

It's really happening this time!

RonPaul.gif

[boutons_deux]

All Repugs are bad, including their electors, until they are proven good with evidence of good governance, of passing laws, regs that advance the common good.

Can you rightwingnutjob assholes, aka Repug voters who elect Repug assholes, provide any examples of Repug good governance, of laws, regs that advance the common good?

[pgardn]

All Repugs are bad, including their electors, until they are proven good with evidence of good governance, of passing laws, regs that advance the common good.

Can you rightwingnutjob assholes, aka Repug voters who elect Repug assholes, provide any examples of Repug good governane, of laws, regs that advance the common good?


So give us your list of good Republicans.
Avante can assign them a lane.

[djohn2oo8]

983678808401342465

[Reck]

983678808401342465

Jesus fuck. These guys cant get out of their own way. So cartoonish.

[djohn2oo8]

Feels like a pretty good morning. Anybody seen TSA?

https://media.giphy.com/media/l378dER0czgSiyqfC/giphy.webp

[Reck]

983693171183046656

Dude's panicked.

[djohn2oo8]

983693171183046656

Dude's panicked.

Yup.

[Reck]

983702510769668096

TTTTT PAINNNN

:lol Chris

[TSA]

Feels like a pretty good morning. Anybody seen TSA?

https://media.giphy.com/media/l378dER0czgSiyqfC/giphy.webp

sitting here laughing at the two of you circle jerking over a possible campaign finance law violation that wouldn't be ruled on until after the 2020 election :rollin

[clambake]

tick tock

[djohn2oo8]

983482270299369472

[djohn2oo8]

sitting here laughing at the two of you circle jerking over a possible campaign finance law violation that wouldn't be ruled on until after the 2020 election :rollin

https://media.giphy.com/media/63LWHEPuXxgn5xkdNE/200w.webp

[djohn2oo8]

983717504236351489

[djohn2oo8]

983718890520956928
LOL Subpoena time!

[djohn2oo8]

983722538114207744
Schumer goin in