PDA

View Full Version : Flynn in major trouble for speaking to Russia about sanctions



Pages : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 [73] 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210

Chris
01-04-2018, 08:09 PM
:lol politicians investigating politicians :lol

Does anyone have a guestimate how long til this dog n pony show ends?
Costs to taxpayers?

Mueller investigation closing in on 1 BILLION :tu

TSA
01-04-2018, 08:11 PM
So lock them up?

Or release good now?

Lock them up for responding to a FOIA and heavily redacting the release?

spurraider21
01-04-2018, 08:12 PM
Have Hillary testify under oath, record her testimony, don’t allow a subject of the investigation to also act as her lawyer, let the field office run the investigation like they always do, don’t give out immunity deals like candy, don’t reward someone with immunity after lying under oath, actually charge someone who lied under oath, don’t ask for evidence subpoena it, don’t destroy evidence for subject of investigation, don’t add intent as a requirement for criminality when the law says nothing of intent.
im asking what the precise difference is between an investigation and a matter, as FBI terminology goes


Hillary broke the law multiple times, no one should be above the law. As a lawyer I’m shocked you would even ask this question.
agreed on principle, but she already was investigated and cleared

spurraider21
01-04-2018, 08:15 PM
Read this and objectively tell why me there's no reason for a re-hash.
republican congressmen were upset with the clinton investigation? no shit :lol

if you want an internal investigation of the FBI, have at it. you're just dragging out the corpse of hillary so you can have a partisan punching bag

TSA
01-04-2018, 08:16 PM
im asking what the precise difference is between an investigation and a matter, as FBI terminology goes


agreed on principle, but she already was investigated and cleared

That wasn’t a proper investigation as you will soon see when we start hearing what the OIG investigation uncovered.

vy65
01-04-2018, 08:18 PM
Mueller investigation closing in on 1 BILLION :tu

https://www.washingtonpost.com/amphtml/world/national-security/mueller-investigation-cost-justice-department-67-million-within-first-five-months/2017/12/05/0fed9436-d9cf-11e7-b1a8-62589434a581_story.html

Only $993.3 million more to go :tu

spurraider21
01-04-2018, 08:19 PM
That wasn’t a proper investigation as you will soon see when we start hearing what the OIG investigation uncovered.
so please break down what a matter is and what an investigation is, according to the FBI. what is done different, procedurally?

spurraider21
01-04-2018, 08:25 PM
That wasn’t a proper investigation as you will soon see when we start hearing what the OIG investigation uncovered.
if the FBI and DOJ could have been politicized to protect shillary what makes you think the OIG cant be politicized to engage in a witch hunt?

clambake
01-04-2018, 08:45 PM
https://www.washingtonpost.com/amphtml/world/national-security/mueller-investigation-cost-justice-department-67-million-within-first-five-months/2017/12/05/0fed9436-d9cf-11e7-b1a8-62589434a581_story.html

Only $993.3 million more to go :tu
lol

Chris
01-04-2018, 08:46 PM
https://www.washingtonpost.com/amphtml/world/national-security/mueller-investigation-cost-justice-department-67-million-within-first-five-months/2017/12/05/0fed9436-d9cf-11e7-b1a8-62589434a581_story.html

Only $993.3 million more to go :tu


947134233465774082

That's One Billion with a B.

:tu :tu :tu

Green Man
01-04-2018, 08:47 PM
https://www.washingtonpost.com/amphtml/world/national-security/mueller-investigation-cost-justice-department-67-million-within-first-five-months/2017/12/05/0fed9436-d9cf-11e7-b1a8-62589434a581_story.html

Only $993.3 million more to go :tu
:lmao

vy65
01-04-2018, 08:49 PM
At the current rate, only 62 more years to go Chris.

spurraider21
01-04-2018, 08:50 PM
:tu :tu :tu
so according to Clarke (who predictably points to no source), "when all is said & done" it "will approach" 1 billion

and you translate that to mean: Mueller investigation closing in on 1 Billion

:lol

Chris
01-04-2018, 08:52 PM
so according to Clarke (who predictably points to no source), "when all is said & done" it "will approach" 1 billion

and you translate that to mean: Mueller investigation closing in on 1 Billion

:lol

I'll take Sheriff Clarke vs. "vy65" for $500 Alex.

vy65
01-04-2018, 08:56 PM
I’ll take DOJ budgetary reports and simple math vs. Chris’ twitter feed of rastlin and Sherrif Clarke for $1000 Alex

Pavlov
01-04-2018, 08:56 PM
BILLION

dabom
01-04-2018, 09:00 PM
BILLION

What is it with these repugs? 1 Billion? :lmao

spurraider21
01-04-2018, 09:01 PM
I'll take Sheriff Clarke vs. "vy65" for $500 Alex.
well, its not vy's figure. he's citing to the DOJ's budget report :lol. clarke is making his up out of thin air

so i'll translate your post:

"I'll take thin air over the DOJ's budget report for $500 Alex"

vy65
01-04-2018, 09:02 PM
Chris getting shat on worse than Hulk Hogan at Wrestlemania XVII ....

Chris
01-04-2018, 09:03 PM
Top House Conservatives Just Called on Attorney General Jeff Sessions to Resign


Rep. Jim Jordan (R-OH) and Rep. Mark Meadows (R-NC) are calling out Attorney General Jeff Sessions.

Both Jordan and Meadows aren't pleased with Sessions at the U.S. Department of Justice. They are so concerned with how Sessions has performed as attorney general that they are asking for him to step down.

In an editorial for the Washington Examiner, Jordan and Meadows argue that “there is no evidence of collusion between the Trump campaign and the Russians.” Further, the two congressmen point out that it's not because a lack of “examination,” as six investigations have taken place regarding the Russian probe.

Jordan and Meadows follow up with a series of questions that they want to be answered.

“If George Papadopoulos was central to the FBI’s investigation of the Trump campaign, why did the FBI wait more than 6 months to interview him in late January and again in February? And even if they were trying to keep the probe quiet during the 2016 election, why wait more than 2 months after Election Day?” the congressmen write.

Among other questions asked by Jordan and Meadows are about former FBI Director James Comey, Fusion GPS, and Christopher Steele, the author of the Trump dossier.

Then comes a joint call from the congressmen for Sessions to resign:

It’s apparent that Comey has never had a problem sharing information with reporters, and he allowed his team to “follow the leader” in that regard — but it is time for this practice to come to an immediate end.

Attorney General Jeff Sessions has recused himself from the Russia investigation, but it would appear he has no control at all of the premier law enforcement agency in the world. It is time for Sessions to start managing in a spirit of transparency to bring all of this improper behavior to light and stop further violations. If Sessions can't address this issue immediately, then we have one final question needing an answer: When is it time for a new attorney general?

Sadly, it seems the answer is now.

At this time, it's unclear if other conservatives in the House feel the same as Jordan and Meadows.

https://ijr.com/the-declaration/2018/01/1044114-top-house-conservatives-just-called-attorney-general-jeff-sessions-resign/

spurraider21
01-04-2018, 09:03 PM
I'm legit sorry Chris. I know it must be annoying that we expect sources for claims. Really makes it harder to make points, huh?

spurraider21
01-04-2018, 09:04 PM
Top House Conservatives Just Called on Attorney General Jeff Sessions to Resign
Sessions bad now

Chris
01-04-2018, 09:39 PM
Huma’s Cousin, Who Partnered With ‘Russian Donald Trump,’ Convicted of Fraud, Tampered With Case By Deleting Emails




https://media3.giphy.com/media/HPA8CiJuvcVW0/giphy.gif
https://media0.giphy.com/media/2I4dGMb36Y8ZW/giphy.gif

949071044714774529

https://media3.giphy.com/media/S3Ot3hZ5bcy8o/giphy.gif

boutons_deux
01-04-2018, 09:48 PM
948962500460077056
lolwut

:lol Trash's vocab FAIL :lol

boutons_deux
01-04-2018, 09:49 PM
Sessions re-opening investigation into Hillary email, to satisfy Trash's DEMANDS that Sessions lockup political opponents

spurraider21
01-04-2018, 09:57 PM
Chris with the massive *ding* in a thread about Russia

Chris
01-04-2018, 10:39 PM
Witness: DNC Runs Deep in Mueller Investigation, Trump Won’t Get a “Fair Shake”


There’s a reason that courthouse statues of Lady Justice depict her wearing a blindfold: the law is supposed to be enforced impartially and fairly, with no bias given to either side… no matter how famous or unpopular the person on trial.

The impartiality of special counsel Robert Mueller’s Russia probe has already been called into question, after top agents involved in the investigation were exposed for having a clear anti-Trump bias.

Despite those concerns, however, the Deputy Attorney General and others assured Congress that they could stay impartial as the case unfolds. Now, a disturbing new report suggests that the deck is once again stacked against the Trump administration.

“The federal grand jury handing down indictments for special counsel Robert Mueller doesn’t appear to include any supporters of President Donald Trump, according to one witness who recently testified before the panel,” wrote journalist Richard Johnson for the New York Post’s Page Six.

“The grand jury room looks like a Bernie Sanders rally,” Johnson’s inside source allegedly told him.

“Maybe they found these jurors in central casting, or at a Black Lives Matter rally in Berkeley [Calif.],” Johnson wrote, quoting a source who apparently had been inside the hearing chamber.

“Of the 20 jurors, 11 are African-Americans and two were wearing ‘peace T-shirts,'” the reporter continued, still referencing his unnamed witness. “There was only one white male in the room, and he was a prosecutor.”

In other words, it sounds suspiciously like the grand jury may have been handpicked to be biased against Donald Trump and his administration.

That was certainly the conclusion that the witness allegedly came to after testifying for the panel. “That room isn’t a room where POTUS gets a fair shake,” the source admitted, according to Richard Johnson of the Post.

The grand jury has already indicted Paul Manafort, a member of Donald Trump’s campaign before the now-president fired him. That same panel is now looking into whether or not there were improper connections between Trump’s team and Russia, a claim that has been called into question numerous times.

There are major concerns about how involved the Obama-era Justice Department was in the infamous “Trump dossier” that was largely fictitious and clearly meant to smear the GOP candidate.

Many of the officials involved in the current probe are holdovers from that Democrat administration, as was Mueller’s personal friend, former FBI director James Comey.

More serious red flags about the bias of Robert Mueller and his investigation were recently raised when FBI Special Agent Peter Strzok, who was involved in both the Hillary Clinton email investigation and the Russia probe, was caught sending incredibly anti-Trump messages to his mistress, another FBI employee.

“So this agent in the middle of almost everything related to Secretary Clinton and President Trump, sent pro-Clinton texts, anti-Trump texts,” summarized Republican Congressman Trey Gowdy during a fiery exchange last month.

“This ‘conflict of interest free’ senior agent at the FBI can’t think of a single solitary American who would vote for Donald Trump. Not a single solitary American he can imagine would vote for Donald Trump,” Gowdy said at the time.

Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein weakly insisted that he and his team would be unbiased, but Gowdy didn’t seem convinced.

If the New York Post’s Page Six report is accurate, he may have had good reason to be skeptical. Lady Justice seems to have lifted her impartial blindfold… and she may have replaced it with an agenda.

H/T PJ Media

https://conservativetribune.com/witness-mueller-panel-anti-trump/

Spurminator
01-04-2018, 10:53 PM
At the current rate, only 62 more years to go Chris.

Hell it would take 6 more years just to catch up to Trump's golf expenditures. And that's if he quit playing golf today.

djohn2oo8
01-04-2018, 10:53 PM
949119519246766080

Reck
01-04-2018, 10:58 PM
Why do you lie so much?

:lol

You're retarded. Basically you can say all of your posts are predictions because when you get called out on your bullshit you got nowhere to hide so you say it was just a prediction or made in jest as a copout.

You're a loser.

Reck
01-04-2018, 11:08 PM
949043908096544770

Some facts about where this potentially goes.

948942015269687296

948942849772531714

948944261113942016

DOJ not even trying to lie this is politically motivated. :lol

Case will be throw out like it was a hot potatoe. :lol

djohn2oo8
01-04-2018, 11:31 PM
949126530839572481
sloppy steve lol triggered

djohn2oo8
01-04-2018, 11:35 PM
949128361451798529

:lol

Reck
01-04-2018, 11:37 PM
949128361451798529

:lol

Did he reallly?

It would be out already if Trump had talked to him and was on tape.

djohn2oo8
01-04-2018, 11:41 PM
Did he reallly?

It would be out already if Trump had talked to him and was on tape.

Yes really and not yet. The book comes out tomorrow. Give it some time.

TSA
01-04-2018, 11:56 PM
I was wondering why this Bannon story was being pushed so hard. Now I know.

DOJ prepares new probe of Clinton’s email server

https://nypost.com/2018/01/04/doj-prepares-new-probe-of-clintons-email-server/

Now I really know why :wow

FBI launches new Clinton Foundation investigation

http://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/367541-fbi-launches-new-clinton-foundation-investigation?amp&__twitter_impression=true

djohn2oo8
01-04-2018, 11:58 PM
Btw, Bannon does not do the book without Mueller's consent.

DarrinS
01-05-2018, 12:05 AM
Btw, Bannon does not do the book without Mueller's consent.

Wut?

Green Man
01-05-2018, 12:21 AM
947134233465774082

That's One Billion with a B.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1z-AxgueBRk

Chris
01-05-2018, 12:26 AM
Some facts about where this potentially goes.

*Follows up immediately with an opinion. :lol

948942015269687296

9Jz1TjCphXE

Reck :lol

Reck
01-05-2018, 12:37 AM
*Follows up immediately with an opinion. :lol

948942015269687296

9Jz1TjCphXE

Reck (http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/member.php?u=14412) :lol

So this is not political at all and won't face an upheel battle just to proof she's not being targeted on the behest of Trump?

That person whom I just posted tweets from is ex FBI. Let's see who's more right. Her or David Clarke. :lol

TSA
01-05-2018, 01:00 AM
"I believe"

Jesus, they haven't provided anything yet. :rollin

949072079449595905

:rollin

The Unraveling

Chris
01-05-2018, 01:05 AM
So this is not political at all and won't face an upheel battle just to proof she's not being targeted on the behest of Trump?

That person whom I just posted tweets from is ex FBI. Let's see who's more right. Her or David Clarke. :lol

'upheel' 'proof' :lol sorry to be a grammar nazi, but cmon man! :lol

Chris
01-05-2018, 01:11 AM
949129724806254592

Chris
01-05-2018, 01:18 AM
Fusion’s Russia Fog

The Steele dossier hit men now claim to be political victims.


Let’s see. The Clinton campaign hires Fusion GPS, an opposition research firm, to investigate the Trump campaign. Fusion hires a former British spy, Christopher Steele, who produces a dossier based on Russian sources full of rumor, hearsay and an occasional fact to allege collusion between the Kremlin and Trump campaign. The dossier gets to the FBI, which uses it to justify opening a counterintelligence probe of the Trump campaign, perhaps including a judicial warrant to spy on Trump officials. Then Fusion has Mr. Steele privately brief select media reporters, ensuring that the dossier’s contents become public before the election.

And now Fusion GPS complains about being a victim? Only in Washington, folks.

***
That’s the sob story spun by Fusion GPS founders Glenn Simpson and Peter Fritsch Wednesday in a New York Times op-ed that matches the Steele dossier for disinformation. The Fusion duo portray themselves as valiantly working to “highlight Mr. Trump’s Russia ties” by providing the FBI with “intelligence reports” that corroborated “credible allegations of collusion between the Trump camp and Russia.”

For exercising their “right under the First Amendment,” Fusion laments that it has been subject to Congressional harassment and a “succession of mendacious conspiracy theories,” including by us. Oh my.

https://si.wsj.net/public/resources/images/BN-WV490_3inJ7_JV_20180103175929.jpg?width=620&height=928
Glenn R. Simpson, co-founder of the research firm Fusion GPS, arrives for a scheduled appearance before a closed House Intelligence Committee hearing on Capitol Hill, Nov. 14, 2017. PHOTO: PABLO MARTINEZ MONSIVAIS/ASSOCIATED PRESS


Fusion is talented at producing dirt for hire, including for Russians to smear human-rights activist Bill Browder. The problem is the veracity of its work, and the cofounders don’t name a single example in their op-ed of something that proves the dossier’s claim of collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia. Eighteen months after the dossier hit Washington, the FBI, special counsel Robert Mueller and Congress have also offered no public validation of its collusion allegations.

The Fusion boys pat themselves on the back for “having handed over our relevant bank records,” but the firm stonewalled Congressional committees for most of 2017, refusing to divulge the names of its clients (the Clinton campaign and the Democratic National Committee) and even suing to prevent access to its bank records. In court documents, Fusion has also admitted to paying journalists during the election, though it refuses to disclose the names, amounts or purposes of the payments.

As Mr. Browder notes on Twitter , the Fusion op-ed also “conveniently omits” that it “worked for Russian gov’t interests trying to repeal Magnitsky Act [sanctions] at the same time [it] was working on the dossier.” Mr. Simpson met with his Russian client, Kremlin-connected lawyer Natalia Veselnitskaya, before and after she sat with Donald Trump Jr. in Trump Tower in June 2016.

Mr. Simpson continues to claim he knew nothing about her Trump meeting and that she knew nothing of his Steele dossier work—though you’ll have to take his word for the coincidence. As for Fusion’s deep concern about “an attack on our country by a hostile foreign power,” the firm’s concern about Russia—and its human-rights abuses, for which the Magnitsky sanctions were imposed—would seem to stop at its bank account.

Far from being victimized, Fusion has been protected by a Beltway press corps stocked with allies who rely on the firm for scoops. Fusion also has friends in the FBI and Justice Department who have a mutual interest in blocking Congress from discovering how the dossier was used to investigate the Trump campaign.

Toward that end, the New York Times reported on the weekend that the real Rosetta Stone of the Trump-Russia probe was a drunken conversation in May of 2016 by junior Trump staffer George Papadopoulos. This narrative would have us believe that the FBI hinged its probe on a man it didn’t bother to interview until 2017, and about whom it didn’t brief Congress until months after the election.

By the way, the FBI or Justice Department sources who leaked this story almost surely broke the law in disclosing classified information about details collected by intelligence agencies about the meetings and conversations of Mr. Papadopoulos, a private citizen. Yet the FBI and Justice still refuse to tell Congress how they used the Steele dossier.

***
Fusion now says it wants Congress to release transcripts of Mr. Simpson’s interviews with committees, a change from his refusal last year to appear in public session before the Senate Judiciary Committee. By all means, disclose it all, along with FBI agent-source reports on the Steele dossier and the surveillance warrant applications that Justice refuses to release.

Americans deserve to know what really happened last year—not merely accept the obfuscation of Fusion’s political hit men.

https://www.wsj.com/articles/fusions-russia-fog-1515024911

TSA
01-05-2018, 01:30 AM
Run? They went over Nunes head yesterday and you said fuck all about it. :lmao

“House Intelligence Committee Chairman Devin Nunes, R-CA, and Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein spoke at length Wednesday night, just hours before Nunes’ imposed midnight deadline on the Justice Department passed.”

“Rosenstein not only agreed to provide all the documents requested, which include unreacted FBI interviews with witnesses, as well as, access to eight key FBI and DOJ witnesses but information on Andrew Weissmann, whose now a senior member of the special counsel.”

949142201212092416

https://saraacarter.com/2018/01/05/special-counsel-attorney-andrew-weissman-under-scrutiny-as-rosenstein-agrees-to-turn-over-documents-to-nunes/amp/?__twitter_impression=true

Chris
01-05-2018, 01:34 AM
Federal Judge Deals HUGE Blow To Fusion GPS In Bank Records Battle


A federal judge has ruled against Fusion GPS in the Trump dossier firm’s quest to block the release of its bank records to the House Intelligence Committee.

Judge Richard Leon shot down all four of Fusion’s arguments against the release of 70 records of transactions involving some of its clients as well as journalists and researchers it has paid since Sept. 2015.

Fusion sued its bank, TD Bank, in October, to prevent it from complying with a subpoena issued by the House Intelligence Committee, which has been looking into Fusion’s role in putting together the dossier.

That subpoena, issued by committee chairman Devin Nunes on Oct. 5, prompted Perkins Coie, the law firm that represented the Clinton campaign and DNC, to reveal that it had hired Fusion GPS in April 2016 to investigate Trump.

Fusion, which was founded by three former Wall Street Journal reporters, later hired Christopher Steele, a former British spy with experience in Moscow.

Fusion argued that the court should quash the committee’s subpoena on four separate grounds.

The company argued that the subpoena for bank records lacked a valid legislative purpose, that it was too broad and the records being sought were not relevant to the committee’s Russia probe, that it violated Fusion’s First Amendment rights, and that it violated statutes prohibiting the release of bank records to government authorities. (RELATED: UNSEALED: Fusion GPS Bank Records Show Russia-Related Payments)

Leon shot down all of the arguments, including Fusion’s assertion that Nunes had no grounds to issue a subpoena because he had recused himself back in April from the Russia probe.

“Unfortunately for plaintiff, the record contradicts its claims,” wrote Leon, a George W. Bush appointee.

Leon rebutted the claim — pushed by Fusion and Democrats alike — that Nunes had actually recused himself from the investigation.

He pointed to Nunes’ oft-cited press release in which he ceded control of the committee’s day-to-day operations to Texas Rep. Conaway. But “nowhere in this press release did Chairman Nunes ‘recuse’ himself from the Russia investigation,” Leon notes.

“He retained the power to issue the Subpoena at issue in this case.”

Leon also said that the committee’s subpoena is not overly broad. He noted that it has already been revealed that Fusion ordered Steele to brief several news outlets on the dossier. Therefore, the subpoena may reveal “relevant information” about payments to reporters.

The Intelligence committee has stated in past court filings that Fusion’s bank records shows that it has made nine separate payments to three unidentified journalists who wrote about or commented on Russia-related issues during the presidential campaign and into 2017.

Fusion also did work for a Russian businessman with links to the Kremlin. The oppo firm was paid by the businessman’s law firm, BakerHostetler.

Leon also dismissed the idea that the bank subpoena violates Fusion’s First Amendment right to free association.

“Plaintiff points to no authority to support its theory that the freedom of association protects financial records,” says Leon.

Leon did not set a date for when TD Bank must release the Fusion bank records.

http://dailycaller.com/2018/01/04/federal-judge-deals-huge-blow-to-fusion-gps-in-bank-records-battle/

TSA
01-05-2018, 01:42 AM
Leon shot down all of the arguments, including Fusion’s assertion that Nunes had no grounds to issue a subpoena because he had recused himself back in April from the Russia probe.

“Unfortunately for plaintiff, the record contradicts its claims,” wrote Leon, a George W. Bush appointee.

Leon rebutted the claim — pushed by Fusion and Democrats alike — that Nunes had actually recused himself from the investigation.

He pointed to Nunes’ oft-cited press release in which he ceded control of the committee’s day-to-day operations to Texas Rep. Conaway. But “nowhere in this press release did Chairman Nunes ‘recuse’ himself from the Russia investigation,” Leon notes.

“He retained the power to issue the Subpoena at issue in this case.”
djohn2oo8 get in here and post the Fusion GPS op-ed for the 10th time :rollin

djohn2oo8
01-05-2018, 01:50 AM
All these articles and neither Chris nor TSA can name one thing Hillary should be charged with.

djohn2oo8
01-05-2018, 01:51 AM
Btw, has Trump been cleared yet? :lol

Chris
01-05-2018, 01:53 AM
All these articles and neither Chris nor TSA can name one thing Hillary should be charged with.

She destroyed evidence that was under subpoena. She broke the law. Everyone knows it.

djohn2oo8
01-05-2018, 01:54 AM
She destroyed evidence that was under subpoena. She broke the law. Everyone knows it.

What law? What should the charge be?

Chris
01-05-2018, 01:56 AM
What law? What should the charge be?

Guess we will find out after the investigation won't we? :lol Your girl Hillary is in deep shit :lol

TSA
01-05-2018, 01:57 AM
948706905756766209
:lol big ass grin

:lol big ass grin about to give Nunes everything he asked for

Rough week djohn can it get any worse for you? Hopefully you at least get to relax next week, the week of the 15th must be terrifying for you.

djohn2oo8
01-05-2018, 01:57 AM
Guess we will find out after the investigation won't we? :lol Your girl Hillary is in deep shit :lol

What law? You said she broke the law. Which law Chris?

djohn2oo8
01-05-2018, 01:58 AM
:lol big ass grin about to give Nunes everything he asked for

Rough week djohn can it get any worse for you? Hopefully you at least get to relax next week, the week of the 15th must be terrifying for you.

What did he give Nunes?

Chris
01-05-2018, 01:59 AM
What law? You said she broke the law. Which law Chris?

Typical Pavlovian response. Doesn't like the answer so circle those wagons! YEE-HAW!

djohn2oo8
01-05-2018, 02:00 AM
Typical Pavlovian response. Doesn't like the answer so circle those wagons! YEE-HAW!

How can she be guilty of something you don't even know the charge for? You haven't provided an answer btw.

TSA
01-05-2018, 02:03 AM
All these articles and neither Chris nor TSA can name one thing Hillary should be charged with.

Unauthorized removal and retention of classified documents or materials under 18 USC §1924

Chris
01-05-2018, 02:03 AM
Lawdy!


COMEY BUSTED! FBI Chief FOIA Officer Confirms ALL OF COMEY’S Memos Were Classified at Time They Were Written

http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/wp-content/uploads/james-comey-sad-450x270-1-600x361.jpg


udicial Watch Director of Investigations Chris Farrell went on with Lou Dobbs on Thursday to discuss former fired FBI Director James Comey’s criminal activity regarding the private memos he leaked to the liberal media.

Farrell told Lou Dobbs that the acting FBI Chief FOIA Officer confirmed that ALL of James Comey’s memos were classified at the time they were written and are still classified today.
James Comey leaked the classified documents to a liberal reporter and friend to publish which is a federal crime.

Chris Farrell: We have a sworn declaration from David Hardy who is the Chief FOIA Officer of the FBI that we obtained just in the last few days. And in that sworn declaration Mr. Hardy says that all of Comey’s memos, all of them, were classified at the time they were written and they remain classified.

It looks like Boy Scout Comey could be heading to prison!

Via Lou Dobbs Tonight:
2UrlETHovrA

http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2018/01/comey-busted-fbi-chief-foia-officer-confirms-comeys-memos-classified-time-written/

djohn2oo8
01-05-2018, 02:03 AM
Unauthorized removal and retention of classified documents or materials under 18 USC §1924

And you have proof of this? Or no?

djohn2oo8
01-05-2018, 02:04 AM
Lawdy!


COMEY BUSTED! FBI Chief FOIA Officer Confirms ALL OF COMEY’S Memos Were Classified at Time They Were Written

http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/wp-content/uploads/james-comey-sad-450x270-1-600x361.jpg

So you don't know what her charge should be. Lordy!

Chris
01-05-2018, 02:05 AM
Lawdy Lawd!

949128539147853824

djohn2oo8
01-05-2018, 02:06 AM
Poor Chris. Can't even quote a verified account :lol

TSA
01-05-2018, 02:06 AM
What did he give Nunes?

949072079449595905

Chris
01-05-2018, 02:07 AM
And you have proof of this? Or no?

That's what investigations are for. :tu

Chris
01-05-2018, 02:07 AM
:cry muh verified Twitter accounts :cry

TSA
01-05-2018, 02:08 AM
And you have proof of this? Or no?

Comey testified to it.

djohn2oo8
01-05-2018, 02:09 AM
949072079449595905

According to the tweet Rosenstein has not yet give Nunes any documents. Ill ask again. What did Rosenstein gove Nunes?

TSA
01-05-2018, 02:09 AM
Lawdy!


COMEY BUSTED! FBI Chief FOIA Officer Confirms ALL OF COMEY’S Memos Were Classified at Time They Were Written

http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/wp-content/uploads/james-comey-sad-450x270-1-600x361.jpg

:lol shit is hitting the fan at a furious pace

djohn2oo8
01-05-2018, 02:09 AM
Comey testified to it.

To what?

Chris
01-05-2018, 02:10 AM
Comey and Clinton in major trouble not Flynn :lol

TSA
01-05-2018, 02:12 AM
According to the tweet Rosenstein has not yet give Nunes any documents. Ill ask again. What did Rosenstein gove Nunes?

:cry nothing was handed over in 24 hours fake news :cry

djohn2oo8
01-05-2018, 02:13 AM
:cry nothing was handed over in 24 hours fake news :cry

You didn't answer the question. What did Rosenstein hand over?

djohn2oo8
01-05-2018, 02:14 AM
Comey and Clinton in major trouble not Flynn :lol

What are their charges? We know Flynn's :lol

Chris
01-05-2018, 02:15 AM
Maxine begging Mueller :lol

948632843919478784

djohn2oo8
01-05-2018, 02:16 AM
What are their charges? We know Flynn's :lol

Answer the question, Chris.

TSA
01-05-2018, 02:16 AM
Comey and Clinton in major trouble not Flynn :lol

I need to go to sleep but djohns meltdown is too entertaining

djohn2oo8
01-05-2018, 02:18 AM
I need to go to sleep but djohns meltdown is too entertaining

What did Rosenstein hand over to Nunes, it's a simple question. Something? or Nothing?

Chris
01-05-2018, 02:19 AM
I need to go to sleep but djohns meltdown is too entertaining

:lmao

djohn2oo8
01-05-2018, 02:20 AM
Guess Hillary won't be charged since Chris can't think of one.

TSA
01-05-2018, 02:21 AM
You didn't answer the question. What did Rosenstein hand over?

No one said he handed over anything except you. If you would stop melting down and read Nunes letter you’d see Rosenstein agreed to all of his requests.

TSA
01-05-2018, 02:23 AM
Guess Hillary won't be charged since Chris can't think of one.

While Chris was busy laughing at your ass I gave you one :lol

boutons_deux
01-05-2018, 02:23 AM
Handwritten Notes Taken By Reince Priebus Confirm That Trump Pressured James Comey Over Russia

Once Trump's right-hand man in the White House, Reince Priebus just added another piece to the ever-growing obstruction of justice puzzle being constructed by special counsel Robert Mueller

http://www.politicususa.com/2018/01/04/handwritten-notes-reince-priebus-confirm-trump-pressured-james-comey-russia.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+politicususa%2FfJAl+%28Politi cus+USA+%29

Trash gotta get hit with obstruction, corrupt foreign practices, money laundering

djohn2oo8
01-05-2018, 02:23 AM
No one said he handed over anything except you. If you would stop melting down and read Nunes letter you’d see Rosenstein agreed to all of his requests.
So at the end of it all, Rosenstein handed over nothing. Nada. Zilch. Glad we agree.

djohn2oo8
01-05-2018, 02:24 AM
While Chris was busy laughing at your ass I gave you one :lol

And you couldn't say what Comey testified to regarding this.

Reck
01-05-2018, 02:46 AM
Some people are just hopeless.

We just have to laugh at shitstains like TSA and Chris. Keep the status Quo around here since they're holding their end of the bargain by being complete naive morons. :tu

TSA
01-05-2018, 03:01 AM
So at the end of it all, Rosenstein handed over nothing. Nada. Zilch. Glad we agree. :rollin

“House Intelligence Committee Chairman Devin Nunes, R-CA, and Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein spoke at length Wednesday night, just hours before Nunes’ imposed midnight deadline on the Justice Department passed.”

“Rosenstein not only agreed to provide all the documents requested, which include unreacted FBI interviews with witnesses, as well as, access to eight key FBI and DOJ witnesses but information on Andrew Weissmann, whose now a senior member of the special counsel.”

TSA
01-05-2018, 03:22 AM
:rollin Pavlov lurking in the background sucking down Mountain Dew prepping his next barrage of 20 questions

Big Dog
01-05-2018, 03:27 AM
And you couldn't say what Comey testified to regarding this.
You go through phases of your life where being right is highly valued. It manifests on a site called Spurstalk. Your bleeding soft liberal heart is so heavily damaged when a Republican lands nomination of the highest office. You get sucked like a sycophant into the media narrative that Mr. Orange man is the worse human being ever, going on to question so far as to why his trashbags are one color over the other.

Your weekly highlight is feeling 5-6 weekly euphoric highs where the media or some shitbag twitterer tweets something that incriminates Trump/Trump's corner.

You live your life doing this for months going on years to prove a point. It amounts to nothing.

This is your life.

AaronY
01-05-2018, 03:36 AM
You go through phases of your life where being right is highly valued. It manifests on a site called Spurstalk. Your bleeding soft liberal heart is so heavily damaged when a Republican lands nomination of the highest office. You get sucked like a sycophant into the media narrative that Mr. Orange man is the worse human being ever, going on to question so far as to why his trashbags are one color over the other.

Your weekly highlight is feeling 5-6 weekly euphoric highs where the media or some shitbag twitterer tweets something that incriminates Trump/Trump's corner.

You live your life doing this for months going on years to prove a point. It amounts to nothing.

This is your life.
You sound like a real edgy badass man. should have thrown in a suicide recommendation if you really wanted to go hard and be extra edgy. missed opportunity tbh

TSA
01-05-2018, 03:39 AM
You sound like a real edgy badass man. should have thrown in a suicide recommendation if you really wanted to go hard and be extra edgy. missed opportunity tbh

suicide recommendation, recommendation. Extra spicy.

Big Dog
01-05-2018, 03:40 AM
^ you missed an opportunity to be an even more intuitive outside bystander 4chan style. That take sure hit home for you too. :lol

AaronY
01-05-2018, 03:46 AM
That take gave us all something to think about tbh

djohn2oo8
01-05-2018, 08:50 AM
949246600601366528

djohn2oo8
01-05-2018, 08:51 AM
:rollin

“House Intelligence Committee Chairman Devin Nunes, R-CA, and Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein spoke at length Wednesday night, just hours before Nunes’ imposed midnight deadline on the Justice Department passed.”

“Rosenstein not only agreed to provide all the documents requested, which include unreacted FBI interviews with witnesses, as well as, access to eight key FBI and DOJ witnesses but information on Andrew Weissmann, whose now a senior member of the special counsel.”

You already agreed that Rosenstein has yet to provide anything. Can't back out now.

djohn2oo8
01-05-2018, 08:53 AM
949263103916683264

djohn2oo8
01-05-2018, 08:54 AM
949275556893347842

djohn2oo8
01-05-2018, 09:08 AM
949278739380277248

djohn2oo8
01-05-2018, 09:10 AM
949133249430745089
:lol

dabom
01-05-2018, 09:14 AM
949133249430745089
:lol

"But they lied on purpose" :cry

djohn2oo8
01-05-2018, 10:51 AM
949302151930695680 Reck

Reck
01-05-2018, 10:54 AM
949302151930695680 Reck (http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/member.php?u=14412)

As much as I dislike Mr. Ears, he showed some integrity in this respect.

He's still a massive pussy, however.

djohn2oo8
01-05-2018, 10:56 AM
As much as I dislike Mr. Ears, he showed some integrity in this respect.

He's still a massive pussy, however.

He's a cooperating witness too ;)

djohn2oo8
01-05-2018, 11:08 AM
949298544355299328
:lmao Bannon's got the juice.

djohn2oo8
01-05-2018, 11:10 AM
949312040270794752

Reck
01-05-2018, 11:13 AM
949298544355299328
:lmao Bannon's got the juice.

Makes perfect sense.

Bannon was Trump main dick slurper. The only way he ditches you is if you are fucked and fuckable to use boots phrase. :lol

djohn2oo8
01-05-2018, 11:14 AM
949287018160361473

Pavlov
01-05-2018, 11:16 AM
949287018160361473

Obviously classified and illegal.

LOCK HIM UP

Reck
01-05-2018, 11:16 AM
949287018160361473

:lol Chris
:lol TSA

But...he broke the law! :cry

djohn2oo8
01-05-2018, 11:19 AM
Obviously classified and illegal.

LOCK HIM UP

:lol

djohn2oo8
01-05-2018, 11:20 AM
:lol Chris
:lol TSA

But...he broke the law! :cry

:lol

AaronY
01-05-2018, 11:22 AM
Today's thread forecast: cloudy with a chance of BOOMs

djohn2oo8
01-05-2018, 11:24 AM
http://www.gifbin.com/bin/122013/1387404342_yogi_aint_afraid_of_no_train.gif


lol Look at TSA tryna stop the Mueller train

AaronY
01-05-2018, 11:31 AM
Let's take a live lookin at TSA city

https://i.imgur.com/uKy7jTK.gif

And then DJohnville

https://i.imgur.com/zBrlCFv.gif

The forecast calls for booms throughout the whole day only letting up around 7 p.m. when Dijon drinks his Daily Mountain Dew and gets a lil sleepy and TSA has to go fuck his pregnant wife or whatever

monosylab1k
01-05-2018, 11:31 AM
You go through phases of your life where being right is highly valued. It manifests on a site called Spurstalk. Your bleeding soft liberal heart is so heavily damaged when a Republican lands nomination of the highest office. You get sucked like a sycophant into the media narrative that Mr. Orange man is the worse human being ever, going on to question so far as to why his trashbags are one color over the other.

Your weekly highlight is feeling 5-6 weekly euphoric highs where the media or some shitbag twitterer tweets something that incriminates Trump/Trump's corner.

You live your life doing this for months going on years to prove a point. It amounts to nothing.

This is your life.
Are there still guys out there who take Fight Club seriously and not realize it’s a parody/satire?

AaronY
01-05-2018, 11:33 AM
Are there still guys out there who take Fight Club seriously and not realize it’s a parody/satire?
The things you buy own yooo man you don't own them

djohn2oo8
01-05-2018, 11:33 AM
Are there still guys out there who take Fight Club seriously and not realize it’s a parody/satire?

:lol

Reck
01-05-2018, 11:45 AM
http://www.gifbin.com/bin/122013/1387404342_yogi_aint_afraid_of_no_train.gif


lol Look at TSA tryna stop the Mueller train

This guy just won 10 rupees.

AaronY
01-05-2018, 11:48 AM
Teddy Duchamp would love that fucking train dodge tbh

boutons_deux
01-05-2018, 12:10 PM
Why Trump and Sessions are now in a heap of legal trouble

https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/right-turn/wp/2018/01/05/a-heap-of-legal-trouble-for-trump-and-sessions/?undefined=&utm_term=.6abe1a40c728&wpisrc=nl_most&wpmm=1

djohn2oo8
01-05-2018, 12:54 PM
949309735391649792
Moron. Just threw them all under the bus :lol

djohn2oo8
01-05-2018, 01:14 PM
949334394455642114

djohn2oo8
01-05-2018, 01:20 PM
949334394455642114

949342291952578560

https://media.giphy.com/media/3o6ZtihIv0pJqdp3H2/200.gif

djohn2oo8
01-05-2018, 02:07 PM
949354826961510400
flipped lol

djohn2oo8
01-05-2018, 03:43 PM
949336584574439424
keep tweeting out accomplices

TSA
01-05-2018, 04:44 PM
GOP senators request criminal investigation of Trump dossier author

http://thehill.com/blogs/floor-action/senate/367631-gop-senators-request-criminal-investigation-of-trump-dossier-author

Pavlov
01-05-2018, 04:51 PM
GOP senators request criminal investigation of Trump dossier author

http://thehill.com/blogs/floor-action/senate/367631-gop-senators-request-criminal-investigation-of-trump-dossier-author:lol Trump and Grassley trying to politicize the DOJ.

Chris
01-05-2018, 05:42 PM
Jay Chay

949288941395628032

Chris
01-05-2018, 05:44 PM
SAD!

949287555660500992

Splits
01-05-2018, 05:46 PM
SCARED!

949287555660500992

fify

Chris
01-05-2018, 06:06 PM
949396852734087170

Pavlov
01-05-2018, 06:08 PM
949396852734087170:lol "Please investigate the stuff you already investigated a year ago."

Chris
01-05-2018, 06:55 PM
Lawdy!

949346510159994881

Splits
01-05-2018, 06:56 PM
949396852734087170

https://i.imgur.com/Ry68kSy.png
https://i.imgur.com/meMpgCw.png
(https://twitter.com/renato_mariotti/status/949359565035982848)

Chris
01-05-2018, 06:58 PM
https://i.imgur.com/Ry68kSy.png
https://i.imgur.com/meMpgCw.png
(https://twitter.com/renato_mariotti/status/949359565035982848)

Check it out - this is my Pavlov impression.

"Mariotti :lol"

djohn2oo8
01-05-2018, 07:00 PM
Why is Chris laughing at a prosecutor?

Splits
01-05-2018, 07:01 PM
Check it out - this is my Pavlov impression.

"Mariotti :lol"

Yes, a formal federal prosecutor running for IL State AG. Not some random twitter handle like your "sources".

https://i.imgur.com/aymkgoV.png

lol burn

djohn2oo8
01-05-2018, 07:03 PM
Yes, a formal federal prosecutor running for IL State AG. Not some random twitter handle like your "sources".

https://i.imgur.com/aymkgoV.png

lol burn

Chris laughs at anybody with more knowledge than him. So basically everybody.

Chris
01-05-2018, 07:03 PM
:cry muh verified Twitter accounts :cry

:cry muh verified Twitter accounts :cry

djohn2oo8
01-05-2018, 07:04 PM
Imagine Chris growing up during his years, taking tests and answering questions with doodles.

Splits
01-05-2018, 07:04 PM
lol Chris taking another L

Your surrender is duly noted

Splits
01-05-2018, 07:05 PM
Imagine Chris growing up during his years, taking tests and answering questions with doodles.

You're implying he's grown up. Whatever his age, he has the intellect of a middle school dropout

djohn2oo8
01-05-2018, 07:07 PM
You're implying he's grown up. Whatever his age, he has the intellect of a middle school dropout

:lol

spurraider21
01-05-2018, 07:09 PM
You're implying he's grown up. Whatever his age, he has the intellect of a middle school dropout
i think he's just uninformed, caught in an information bubble, and incredibly stubborn/dishonest

spurtacular on the other hand, legitimately has some learning disability. it truly boggles my mind that he functions on a daily basis when you read the shit he posts :lol

Splits
01-05-2018, 07:11 PM
i think he's just uninformed, caught in an information bubble, and incredibly stubborn/dishonest

spurtacular on the other hand, legitimately has some learning disability. it truly boggles my mind that he functions on a daily basis when you read the shit he posts :lol

Put the two of them in a ring, least drool wins

djohn2oo8
01-05-2018, 07:12 PM
Put the two of them in a ring, least drool wins

lol

spurraider21
01-05-2018, 07:12 PM
Put the two of them in a ring, least drool wins
chris in a landslide imo

Splits
01-05-2018, 07:15 PM
chris in a landslide imo

It's tough to judge, I don't think I've ever seen Chris put his own opinion into words. At least with Jimmerboy you can take what he says to Vegas, bet the opposite, and win 90% of the time.

spurraider21
01-05-2018, 07:26 PM
It's tough to judge, I don't think I've ever seen Chris put his own opinion into words. At least with Jimmerboy you can take what he says to Vegas, bet the opposite, and win 90% of the time.
the thing is, its not that jimmer boy just lacks intelligence. he has negative intelligence

Green Man
01-05-2018, 07:29 PM
Imagine Chris growing up during his years, taking tests and answering questions with doodles.
“But Daddehhhhhhhhhhhhh my globalist cuck teacher failed me because instead of writing an essay I just printed out a bunch of kickass memes! That’s ain’t FAIR, Daddeh! Whatever happened to muh freedom of speech! :cry”

Pavlov
01-05-2018, 07:50 PM
lol Chris

boutons_deux
01-05-2018, 08:04 PM
:lol Trump and Grassley trying to politicize the DOJ.

Repugs shitting themselves in pure panic

Chris
01-05-2018, 09:10 PM
949131515912372225

spurraider21
01-05-2018, 09:12 PM
:wow Q is going down

that explains his wrong predictions! Sessions fed him false intel and he leaked it

Chris
01-05-2018, 09:14 PM
949080887479754755

Chris
01-05-2018, 09:17 PM
:wow Q is going down

that explains his wrong predictions! Sessions fed him false intel and he leaked it


What should the charges against Q be? Can you name one?

djohn2oo8
01-06-2018, 02:41 AM
Lordy. What's a Trumptard to do when they find out Trump follows Louise Mensch too?

djohn2oo8
01-06-2018, 12:22 PM
Mueller now investigating Ivanka's involvement in the Russian meeting.

DarrinS
01-06-2018, 12:27 PM
Mueller now investigating Ivanka's involvement in the Russian meeting.

I hear Barron is in on it too. Real talk. :tu

Pavlov
01-06-2018, 12:31 PM
Why would Ivanka not be involved at all, Darrin? Real talk.

FlAVaK
01-06-2018, 12:34 PM
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DS3uW9DXUAIargz?format=jpg

FlAVaK
01-06-2018, 12:37 PM
949669064690970624

djohn2oo8
01-06-2018, 12:38 PM
Why would Ivanka not be involved at all, Darrin? Real talk.


https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DS3uW9DXUAIargz?format=jpg

:lmao Darrin.

TSA
01-06-2018, 04:14 PM
“SCIF” – a Sensitive Compartmented Information Facility. To understand the larger FISA 702(16)(17) issues in 2016 it is important to focus on the word “compartmented”.

Intelligence information is housed by compartments within the larger intelligence community network. Each intelligence unit holds intelligence unique to that compartment and task. The FBI Counterintelligence unit would hold the intelligence information specific to their task or assignment; the DOJ National Security Division would hold their own compartmented intelligence; again, specific to their task and objectives. So too would the DOJ, DoD (Pentagon), State Dept., or CIA.

This compartmented structure is what led to the creation of the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, ODNI. The 911 commission recommended the office to serve as a hub able to ensure intelligence sharing; that is – to ensure intelligence was not intentionally withheld from other compartments when needed.

In 2016 the ODNI for President Obama was James Clapper.

It is doubtful the 911 commission ever gave thought to what might happen when intelligence is weaponized as a political tool. The DNI is a political appointment, a cabinet member, of the President. If the executive branch, the President, wanted to weaponize intelligence as a political tool, he/she would have control over such weaponization as an outcome of their political appointees within the: FBI (Comey, McCabe), DOJ (Lynch/Yates), CIA (Brennan), DNI (Clapper), or DoD (Ash Carter), etc.
The civilian (representative) oversight into the compartmented intelligence falls to a very select group known as the Intelligence Gang of Eight.

Four Democrats and Four Republicans (four minority party and four majority party political leaders) for a total of eight. Four from the House and Four from the Senate. –Understand the Gang of Eight Here– The Gang-of-Eight can, if they choose, interact with the intelligence product with the same level of security clearance as the compartment being reviewed.

Only these eight members can interact with the intelligence product in this way. This ensures their ability to conduct oversight.

It is critical to understand the difference between the House Intelligence Committee, the Senate Intelligence Committee and the Gang of Eight. Only two members from the House Intelligence Committee (chair and minority), and two members of the Senate Intelligence Committee (chair and vice-chair) are participants. The other four are Speaker of the House, minority leader of House, Leader of Senate and Minority leader of Senate. The latter four are not part of any other intel committee.

On March 20th 2017 congressional testimony, James Comey was asked why the FBI Director did not inform congressional oversight about the counterintelligence operation that began in July 2016.

FBI Director Comey said he did not tell congressional oversight he was investigating presidential candidate Donald Trump because the Director of Counterintelligence suggested he not do so. *Very important detail.*

I cannot emphasize this enough. *VERY* important detail. Again, notice how Comey doesn’t use FBI Counterintelligence Director WH “Bill” Priestap’s actual name, but refers to his position and title. Again, watch the first three minutes:

FBI Director James Comey was caught entirely off guard by that first three minutes of that questioning. He simply didn’t anticipate it.

Oversight protocol requires the FBI Director to tell the congressional intelligence “Gang of Eight” of any counterintelligence operations. The Go8 has oversight into these ops at the highest level of classification. In July 2016 the time the operation began, oversight was the responsibility of this group, the Gang of Eight:

Obviously, based on what we have learned since March 2017, and what has surfaced recently, we can all see why the FBI would want to keep it hidden that they were running a counterintelligence operation against a presidential candidate. After all, as FBI Agent Peter Strzok said it in his text messages, it was an “insurance policy”.

REMINDER – FBI Agent Strzok to FBI Attorney Page:
“I want to believe the path you threw out for consideration in Andy’s office that there’s no way he gets elected – but I’m afraid we can’t take that risk. It’s like an insurance policy in the unlikely event you die before you’re 40.”

FBI Director James Comey told congress on March 20th, 2017, the reason he didn’t inform the statutory oversight “Gang of Eight” was because Bill Priestap (Director of Counterintelligence) recommended he didn’t do it.

The originating intelligence agency agency, in these examples the DOJ National Security Division and/or FBI Counterintelligence Division, holds the proprietary intelligence they create in their SCIF. They may also receive intelligence products created for them, which they will also host in their unique SCIF. Thus, intelligence is compartmentalized.

In 2015 Sally Yates blocked any inspector general oversight of the DOJ National Security Division (SEE Pdf HERE). The Office of Inspector General. Michael Horowitz, requested oversight over the DOJ National Security Division and it was Sally Yates who responded with a lengthy 58-page legal explanation saying, essentially, ‘nope – not allowed.’ (PDF HERE) All of the DOJ is subject to oversight, except the NSD.

The White House -the executive branch- is also a host of intelligence information and consequently the White House has their own SCIF which holds intelligence products they would create (very little), or intelligence products created for them (the vast majority).

An example of a product created for the executive branch would be the President’s Daily Briefing (PDB).

The PDB as a whole product would only exist in the White House SCIF. Parts of the PDB would be hosted by the originating participant, ex. NSA, FBI, DOJ, DoD, CIA State Dept. etc., but only the White House would have the fully assembled product. After all, it’s assembled for the President.

Putting the “Oversight” structure together with the “Compartmented” intelligence security you will note that only a few people ‘could’ traditionally access the full PDB. However, under President Obama the President’s Daily Brief went to almost everyone at top levels in his administration. Regarding the Obama PDB:

[…] But while through most of its history the document has been marked “For the President’s Eyes Only,” the PDB has never gone to the president alone. The most restricted dissemination was in the early 1970s, when the book went only to President Richard Nixon and Henry Kissinger, who was dual-hatted as national security adviser and secretary of state.

In other administrations, the circle of readers has also included the vice president, the secretary of defense and the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, along with additional White House staffers.

By 2013, Obama’s PDB was making its way to more than 30 recipients, including the president’s top strategic communications aide and speechwriter, and deputy secretaries of national security departments. (link)

Pay attention to that last part. According to the Washington Post outline Obama’s PDB’s were going to more than 30 recipients including: “Deputy Secretaries of national security departments”.

During an MSNBC interview about her unmasking U.S. citizens within intelligence reports, in April 2017, President Obama’s National Security Adviser, Susan Rice, defined the Obama national security departments to include: “State” – “Defense” (Pentagon includes NSA) and “CIA”….

So under President Obama’s watch Deputy Asst. Secretaries of Defense had daily access to the PDB. An example of an Obama Deputy Asst. Secretary of Defense, Evelyn Farkas.

With dozens of people having access to President Obama’s PDB, Rice’s unmasking of names within the intelligence product gave dozens of people direct access to unmasked intelligence – including Obama officials who could, likely did, use the PDB for specific and intentional political purposes. This political outcome was essentially confirmed by Evelyn Farkas who was one of the downstream recipients of the unmasked intelligence.

If the House Intelligence Committee, or Senate Intelligence Committee, as a whole – wanted to see the President’s Daily Briefing, they would have to request the individual components from the individual intelligence agencies because the PDB product was not created for them; it was created for the Office of The President.

Only the Chairman and Minority leader from each Intel committee could go to the White House to see the PDB end product. [Remember, they alone are four of the Gang-of-Eight.]

This is why Devin Nunes, who is a Go8 member, has to request the intelligence from each department (NSA, DOJ, FBI etc.) in order to share it with the oversight committee. Nunes can review the ‘executive SCIF product’ but cannot export or import intelligence product he did not create.

The Congressional SCIF would then hold the compartmented information after delivery for the committee members to review under very tight controls. The intelligence is removed/deleted after review. No systems are connected.

Our research indicates that in February and March 2017 Chairman Devin Nunes, a gang of eight member, reviewed intelligence reports (most likely PDB’s) that were assembled exclusively for the office of the former President (Obama). That is why he went to the Eisenhower Executive Office Building (EEOB) Information Facility to review.

The intelligence product would be delivered to that SCIF system for his review, most likely by the ODNI (Dan Coats) or NSA (Mike Rogers). It would be removed from that SCIF system after Nunes review, (no systems are connected). It is important to note here that President Trump nominated Senator Dan Coats as ODNI on January 5th, 2017 – however, Democrats held up that nomination until March 16th, 2017.

It is not coincidental that immediately following DNI Dan Coat’s ability to provide that information Chairman Devin Nunes first reported his concerns. After Devin Nunes review the information March 22nd 2017, Nunes stated the intelligence product he reviewed was “not related to Russia, or the FBI Russian counter-intelligence investigation”.

House Intelligence Committee Chairman, Devin Nunes, then held a brief press conference and stated he has been provided intelligence reports brought to him by unnamed sources that include ‘significant information’ about President-Elect Trump and his transition team.
1.) …”On numerous occasions the [Obama] intelligence community incidentally collected information about U.S. citizens involved in the Trump transition.”
2.) “Details about U.S. persons associated with the incoming administration; details with little or no apparent foreign intelligence value were widely disseminated in intelligence community reporting.”
3.) “Third, I have confirmed that additional names of Trump transition members were unmasked.”
4.) “Fourth and finally, I want to be clear; none of this surveillance was related to Russia, or the investigation of Russian activities.

“The House Intelligence Committee will thoroughly investigate surveillance and its subsequent dissemination, to determine a few things here that I want to read off:”

•“Who was aware of it?”
•“Why it was not disclosed to congress?”
•“Who requested and authorized the additional unmasking?”
•“Whether anyone directed the intelligence community to focus on Trump associates?”
•“And whether any laws, regulations or procedures were violated?”

“I have asked the Directors of the FBI, NSA and CIA to expeditiously comply with my March 15th (2017) letter -that you all received a couple of weeks ago- and to provide a full account of these surveillance activities.”

Again, this is why the intelligence reports seem likely to have been political opposition research -that was part of Obama’s PDB– unless it was a separate intelligence product, apart from the PDB, which was created for the Office of the President. [I view the latter as highly doubtful because it would be too risky for the President to be asking for specific ‘stand alone’ intelligence against political adversaries, ie candidate Donald Trump.]

…Here’s where all the dots connect

Fast forward to 2018 – Aside from the larger Russian conspiracy narrative, up to now the controversial media story has been around the origin of the 2016 FISA warrant(s).

As previously stated by all reporting there was a June 2016 FISA application that was denied, and an October 2016 application that was approved. The current line of congressional inquiry surrounds the underlying content of the requested FISA warrant, and whether it was built upon fraud and manipulated content (the ‘Steele Dossier’) presented to the FISA Court (FISC).

Recently the media have been working frantically, against an entire year of prior support for the Steele Dossier, to distance the origin of the FBI counterintelligence operation from the dossier. The reason why reveals the bigger underlying story.

When Intelligence Chairman Devin Nunes explained his concern in March 2017 about what he saw from a review of 2016 intelligence gathering, reporting and subsequent unmasking, the issue behind his concern was clouded in mystery. Indeed the larger headlines at the time were about demanding a special prosecutor and driving the Russia conspiracy narrative.

In hindsight, and with information from our assembled timelines of 2016 though today, we can now revisit that concern expressed by Chairman Nunes with a great deal more perspective and information. Understanding the latest information will help us all understand the totality of Nunes original frame of reference.

As many of you are aware, immediately following the 2016 presidential election NSA Director Admiral Mike Rogers traveled to Trump Tower to meet with president-elect Donald Trump. The day AFTER the Rogers visit, President-elect Trump moved his transition team out of Trump Tower to Bedminister New Jersey.
We always suspected NSA Director Rogers gave President-elect Trump a head’s up of sorts.

Later, during the December 2016 and Jan, Feb, March, April 2017 Russian Conspiracy frenzy, when the entire intelligence community seemed to be collectively leaking against Trump’s interests, those suspicions gained even greater likelihood. However, what we learned in 2017 about the activity in 2016 almost guarantees that was exactly what happened. That back-story also ties into both the FISA issue and the Devin Nunes concern.

Admiral Mike Rogers became NSA director in April 2014.

Sometime in early 2016 Admiral Rogers became aware of “ongoing” and “intentional” violations of Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA), Section 702 surveillance. Specifically item #17 which includes the unauthorized upstream data collection of U.S. individuals within NSA surveillance.

Section 702 – Item #17 “About Queries” is specifically the collection of emails, and phone call surveillance of U.S. persons.

The public doesn’t discover this issue, and NSA Director Rogers action, until May 2017 when we learn that Rogers told the FISA court he became aware of unlawful surveillance and collection of U.S. persons. Put into context, with the full back-story, it appears that 2016 surveillance was the political surveillance now in the headlines; the stuff Chairman Nunes is currently questioning.

The dates here are important as they tell a story.

As a result of Rogers suspecting [FISA 702 (#17 – email and phone calls)] surveillance activity was being used for reasons he deemed unlawful, in mid 2016 Rogers ordered the NSA compliance officer to run a full audit on 702 NSA compliance.

Again, 702 is basically spying on Americans; the actual “spying” part is 702. Item 17 is “About Queries“, which allows queries or searches of content of email and phone conversations based on any subject matter put into the search field.

The NSA compliance officer identified several strange 702 “About Queries” that were being conducted. These were violations of the fourth amendment (search and seizure), ie. unlawful surveillance and gathering. Admiral Rogers was briefed by the compliance officer on October 20th, 2016.

Admiral Mike Rogers ordered the “About Query” activity to stop, reported the activity to the DOJ, and then went to the FISA court.

On October 26th, 2016, full FISC assembly, NSA Director Rogers personally informed the court of the 702(17) violations. Additionally, Rogers also stopped “About Query” permanently.

[Things to note: ♦Note the sequencing; ♦note that Rogers a career military person, followed the chain of command; ♦note the dates as they align with the Trump FISA application from the FBI and DOJ-NSD, (ie. early October 2016); ♦and note amid this sequence/time-line the head of DOJ-National Security Divsion, John P Carlin resigns.]

The DOJ National Security Division set Admiral Mike Rogers up to take the fall for their unlawful conduct. They preempted Rogers by filing a notification with the FISA Court on 26th September 2016 (look at the pdf). DOJ-NSD head John P Carlin was setting up Rogers as the scapegoat while knowing the NSA FISA compliance officer was still reviewing their conduct. Carlin wouldn’t notify the court unless he was trying to cover something. Carlin then announced his resignation. The NSA compliance officer did not brief Admiral Rogers until 20th Oct 2016. Admiral Rogers notified the FISC on 26th Oct 2016.

October 2016 is a very important month:

♦DOJ Deputy Attorney Bruce Ohr was “demoted” in the summer of 2017 after the Inspector General discovered unreported 2016 contacts between Ohr and Russian Dossier author Christopher Steele, as well as contact with Fusion GPS founder Glenn Simpson, in October 2016.

♦Also in October 2016 the DOJ lawyers formatted the FBI information (Steele Dossier etc.) for the Trump FISA application; the head of the NSD, Asst. Attorney General John P Carlin, left his job. It would have specifically been John Carlin’s responsibility to ensure a valid legal basis for the FISA application submitted to the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISC).

♦In October 2016 the NSA compliance officer completes a review and briefs Rogers of FISA(17) violations, email collection and phone surveillance. Rogers informs FISC – [FISA Court Ruling Link]

Now Look At This – October 2016: On Friday November 18th, 2016, The Washington Post reported on a recommendation in “October” that Mike Rogers be removed from his NSA position:

The heads of the Pentagon and the nation’s intelligence community have recommended to President Obama that the director of the National Security Agency, Adm. Michael S. Rogers, be removed.

The recommendation, delivered to the White House last month, was made by Defense Secretary Ashton B. Carter and Director of National Intelligence James R. Clapper Jr., according to several U.S. officials familiar with the matter.

[…] In a move apparently unprecedented for a military officer, Rogers, without notifying superiors, traveled to New York to meet with Trump on Thursday at Trump Tower. That caused consternation at senior levels of the administration, according to the officials, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss internal personnel matters. (link)

Important reminder. Remember, in 2015 Sally Yates blocked any inspector general oversight of the DOJ National Security Division (SEE Pdf HERE). The OIG, Michael Horowitz, requested oversight and it was Sally Yates who responded with a lengthy 58-page legal explanation saying, essentially, ‘nope – not allowed.’ (PDF HERE) All of the DOJ is subject to oversight, except the NSD.

There’s a pretty clear picture here.

Obama’s political operatives within the DOJ-NSD were using FISA 702(17) surveillance “about inquiries” that would deliver email and phone communication for U.S. people (Trump campaign). The NSD unit was working in coordination with the FBI Counterintelligence Unit (Peter Strzok etc.). In an effort to stop the activity NSA Director Mike Rogers initiated a full 702 compliance review. However, before the review was complete the DOJ-NSD had enough information for their unlawful FISA warrant which worked retroactively to make the prior FBI surveillance (began in July ’16 per James Comey) lawful. Rogers stopped the process on October 26th 2016. As a result of his not going along, Rogers became a risk; Clapper demanded he be fired.

Ten days after the election, November 17th 2016, Admiral Rogers travels to Trump Tower without telling ODNI James Clapper. Rogers likely informs President-elect Trump of the prior activity by the FBI and DOJ, including the probability that all of Trump Tower’s email and phone communication was being collected.

♦ On November 17th, 2016, NSA Director Admiral Mike Rogers went to see President-Elect Donald Trump in Trump Tower, New York. –SEE HERE– Director Rogers never told his boss DNI, James Clapper.
♦ On November 18th, 2016, the Trump Transition Team announced they were moving all transition activity to Trump National Golf Club in Bedminster, New Jersey. –SEE HERE– Where they interviewed and discussed the most sensitive positions to fill. Defense, State, CIA, ODNI.

The transition team was set up in Trump Tower. The very next day, November 18th 2016, Trump moves the entire transition team to Bedminister New Jersey?

Does this make more sense now?

https://theconservativetreehouse.files.wordpress.com/2017/03/trump-tweet-wire-tapping.jpg

TSA
01-06-2018, 04:15 PM
It would appear Obama’s Director of National Intelligence, James Clapper, is up to his eyeballs in this; though he denies participating. The FBI counterintelligence unit was monitoring Trump through FISA 702(17) upstream surveillance collected by a DOJ National Security Division that had no oversight.

The information the FBI collected, and the stuff Fusion GPS was creating via Christopher Steele, was used to create the Russian Narrative and also to manipulate the FISC into giving them a FISA warrant. ie. “The Insurance Policy”.

Ultimately, the people within all of these intercepts is what Devin Nunes discovered when he looked at the “unmasking requests” which were a result of those FISA 702(17) collections on Team Trump. That’s why Devin Nunes was so stunned at what he saw in February and March 2017.

This is why Chairman Devin Nunes is currently gathering evidence.

https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2018/01/05/operation-condor-how-nsa-director-mike-rogers-saved-the-u-s-from-a-massive-constitutional-crisis/

Pavlov
01-06-2018, 04:23 PM
lol sundance

Reck
01-06-2018, 04:26 PM
lol sundance

Do you or any other person here actually read TSA's walls of text? The guy is wasting his time everytime he does it.

TSA
01-06-2018, 04:27 PM
https://i.imgur.com/Ry68kSy.png
https://i.imgur.com/meMpgCw.png
(https://twitter.com/renato_mariotti/status/949359565035982848)

Flynn lying to FBI bad, Steele lying to FBI good

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/byron-york-what-the-trump-dossier-criminal-referral-means/article/2645184

Pavlov
01-06-2018, 04:28 PM
Do you or any other person here actually read TSA's walls of text? The guy is wasting his time everytime he does it.I doubt even he does after seeing the pizzagate shit he threw against the wall.

TSA
01-06-2018, 04:28 PM
lol sundance

lol attacking the source yet tucks tail when asked to attack the content

Pavlov
01-06-2018, 04:29 PM
Flynn lying to FBI bad, Steele lying to FBI good

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/byron-york-what-the-trump-dossier-criminal-referral-means/article/2645184What are you saying Steele lied about, TSA?

Pavlov
01-06-2018, 04:30 PM
lol attacking the source yet tucks tail when asked to attack the contentI can make fun of both. It's full of probablys and likelys that you will now take as gospel.

TSA
01-06-2018, 04:30 PM
Do you or any other person here actually read TSA's walls of text? The guy is wasting his time everytime he does it.

You should read it. It’s well thought out and puts together a lot of dates providing a good timeline.

Pavlov
01-06-2018, 04:33 PM
Operation Condor :lmao

TSA
01-06-2018, 04:34 PM
What are you saying Steele lied about, TSA?

I’m still waiting on my security clearances to have access to the classified documents Grassley is referring to.

TSA
01-06-2018, 04:38 PM
I can make fun of both. It's full of probablys and likelys that you will now take as gospel.

You claiming it’s full of probablys and likelys just shows you didn’t read it.

Pavlov
01-06-2018, 04:42 PM
I’m still waiting on my security clearances to have access to the classified documents Grassley is referring to.This referral does not pertain to the veracity of claims contained in the dossier. The referral is for further investigation only, and is not intended to be an allegation of a crime.

:lol

Pavlov
01-06-2018, 04:44 PM
You claiming it’s full of probablys and likelys just shows you didn’t read it.Six likelys tbh.

:lol

djohn2oo8
01-06-2018, 04:45 PM
This referral does not pertain to the veracity of claims contained in the dossier. The referral is for further investigation only, and is not intended to be an allegation of a crime.

:lol

:lmao Lordy!

Pavlov
01-06-2018, 04:53 PM
Still trying to figure out how this is just like Three Days of the Condor like "sundance" says. Maybe dude just really, really likes Robert Redford.

TSA
01-06-2018, 04:53 PM
This referral does not pertain to the veracity of claims contained in the dossier. The referral is for further investigation only, and is not intended to be an allegation of a crime.

:lol

Not sure why you find that funny or why you think Steele didn’t lie to the FBI about something other than the dossier.

"I don't take lightly making a referral for criminal investigation," Grassley said in a statement Friday. "But, as I would with any credible evidence of a crime unearthed in the course of our investigations, I feel obliged to pass that information along to the Justice Department for appropriate review. Everyone needs to follow the law and be truthful in their interactions with the FBI."

"Maybe there is some innocent explanation for the inconsistencies we have seen," Grassley continued, "but it seems unlikely."

TSA
01-06-2018, 04:56 PM
Six likelys tbh.

:lol

Did you finally read it tbh?

Pavlov
01-06-2018, 04:56 PM
Not sure why you find that funny or why you think Steele didn’t lie to the FBI about something other than the dossier.

"I don't take lightly making a referral for criminal investigation," Grassley said in a statement Friday. "But, as I would with any credible evidence of a crime unearthed in the course of our investigations, I feel obliged to pass that information along to the Justice Department for appropriate review. Everyone needs to follow the law and be truthful in their interactions with the FBI."

"Maybe there is some innocent explanation for the inconsistencies we have seen," Grassley continued, "but it seems unlikely."I think it has to do with the dossier because Grassley says it has to do with the dossier.

Attached please find a classified memorandum related to certain communications between Christopher Steele and multiple U.S. news outlets regarding the so-called “Trump dossier” that Mr. Steele compiled on behalf of Fusion GPS for the Clinton Campaign and the Democratic National Committee and also provided to the FBI.

This is why I think it's likely you don't actually read anything.

Pavlov
01-06-2018, 04:57 PM
Did you finally read it tbh?It's full of likelys tbh.

DarrinS
01-06-2018, 04:58 PM
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DS3uW9DXUAIargz?format=jpg

Exchanged pleasantries? Holy shite! Mueller gonna tear her ass up.

TSA
01-06-2018, 05:05 PM
I think it has to do with the dossier because Grassley says it has to do with the dossier.

Attached please find a classified memorandum related to certain communications between Christopher Steele and multiple U.S. news outlets regarding the so-called “Trump dossier” that Mr. Steele compiled on behalf of Fusion GPS for the Clinton Campaign and the Democratic National Committee and also provided to the FBI.

This is why I think it's likely you don't actually read anything.

I think Steele lied to the FBI about his contacts with the media or being directed by Fusion GPS to contact the media.

TSA
01-06-2018, 05:05 PM
It's full of likelys tbh.

Please list them.

TSA
01-06-2018, 05:07 PM
I think it has to do with the dossier because Grassley says it has to do with the dossier.

Attached please find a classified memorandum related to certain communications between Christopher Steele and multiple U.S. news outlets regarding the so-called “Trump dossier” that Mr. Steele compiled on behalf of Fusion GPS for the Clinton Campaign and the Democratic National Committee and also provided to the FBI.
If Steele lied to the FBI should he be charged yes or no?
This is why I think it's likely you don't actually read anything.

Pavlov
01-06-2018, 05:08 PM
I think Steele lied to the FBI about his contacts with the media or being directed by Fusion GPS to contact the media.So that does have to do with the dossier and what does that change?


Please list them.:lmao You didn't read it! Busted!

TSA
01-06-2018, 05:10 PM
So that does have to do with the dossier and what does that change?

:lmao You didn't read it! Busted!

I did read it. That’s why I was able to call bullshit on your claim of it being full of probablys and likelys.

List all the likelys you claim the article is full of.

Pavlov
01-06-2018, 05:12 PM
I did read it. That’s why I was able to call bullshit on your claim of it being full of probablys and likelys.

List all the likelys you claim the article is full of.There are six likelys. If you free to count and list them yourself.

TSA
01-06-2018, 05:13 PM
So that does have to do with the dossier and what does that change?It doesn’t change anything. The issue is whether or not Steele lied to the FBI about anything.

If Steele lied to the FBI should he be charged yes or no?

Would seeking charges if he did lie be politicizing the DOJ yes or no?

Pavlov
01-06-2018, 05:15 PM
It doesn’t change anything.I'm glad we agree. One has to wonder why you jump all over these stories.

TSA
01-06-2018, 05:15 PM
There are six likelys. If you free to count and list them yourself.

Would six likelys in an article of that size be an article full of likelys yes or no?

Pavlov
01-06-2018, 05:16 PM
Would six likelys in an article of that size be an article full of likelys yes or no?Yes.

Damn, that was easy.

TSA
01-06-2018, 05:16 PM
I'm glad we agree. One has to wonder why you jump all over these stories.

Dodge #1

The issue is whether or not Steele lied to the FBI about anything.

If Steele lied to the FBI should he be charged yes or no?

Would seeking charges if he did lie be politicizing the DOJ yes or no?

TSA
01-06-2018, 05:16 PM
Yes.

Damn, that was easy.

Lying is easy for you.

Pavlov
01-06-2018, 05:20 PM
Dodge #1Sorry, I've already said investigate everything -- as opposed to you.

If you want Steele to go to jail because he impugned your Dear Leader, just say so. Your thirst for justice only applies to opponents of your Dear Leader. That isn't' justice at all.

Pavlov
01-06-2018, 05:21 PM
Lying is easy for you.It's full of likelys, sundance. You can't change that.

Chucho
01-06-2018, 05:24 PM
Sorry, I've already said investigate everything -- as opposed to you.

If you want Steele to go to jail because he impugned your Dear Leader, just say so. Your thirst for justice only applies to opponents of your Dear Leader. That isn't' justice at all.

On the flip side of the coin, you only show support of anti-Trump investigation. You are the same as TSA, except hinging you're "W" on something you have said, but don't show. Your partisanship is as strong and blatant as his.

TSA
01-06-2018, 05:26 PM
Sorry, I've already said investigate everything -- as opposed to you.

If you want Steele to go to jail because he impugned your Dear Leader, just say so. Your thirst for justice only applies to opponents of your Dear Leader. That isn't' justice at all.

Another lie and another dodge. I’ve repeatedly said investigate everything and everyone. But my questions did not ask whether you thought Steele should be investigated.

If Steele lied to the FBI should he be charged yes or no?

Would seeking charges if he did lie be politicizing the DOJ yes or no?

Don’t be a coward this time.

Pavlov
01-06-2018, 05:37 PM
On the flip side of the coin, you only show support of anti-Trump investigation. You are the same as TSA, except hinging you're "W" on something you have said, but don't show. Your partisanship is as strong and blatant as his.Sorry, I said investigate everything.

I don't give a shit who goes to prison.

Pavlov
01-06-2018, 05:40 PM
Another lie and another dodge. I’ve repeatedly said investigate everything and everyone. But my questions did not ask whether you thought Steele should be investigated.

If Steele lied to the FBI should he be charged yes or no?

Would seeking charges if he did lie be politicizing the DOJ yes or no?

Don’t be a coward this time.If crimes were committed, then prosecute them. I don't care if it's Steele or Clinton or Rice or Obama. I mock you because you think convictions are a slam dunk every time you read a post of text from some anonymous douche on the internet.

Everything Trump and Grassey is doing is now is politicizing the DOJ and there's not a thing you can do about it.

Reck
01-06-2018, 05:55 PM
It doesn’t change anything. The issue is whether or not Steele lied to the FBI about anything.

If Steele lied to the FBI should he be charged yes or no?

Would seeking charges if he did lie be politicizing the DOJ yes or no?

Interesting.

I dont know much about Steele but what I do know is that he's a well respected guy within the intel community here and in his country of origin and one who was also a top official of MI6.

So given all that I would assume he knows the consequences of lying to the FBI and all that would entail.

One thing I dont get is why people like you think people like him and Comey are yokels who would do silly shit like not covering their asses or know the law they themselves enforced.

Ultimately to answer your question, if he lied to the FBI that's a felony and he should be charged with perjury.

Splits
01-06-2018, 06:10 PM
Would six likelys in an article of that size be an article full of likelys yes or no?

lol the hysterics of some anonymous right wing conspiritard are now being referred to as an "article"

djohn2oo8
01-06-2018, 06:25 PM
TSA "Flynn lying to the FBI means he only gets a slap on the wrist, But Steele lied even though I have no proof, Jail him!!!!"

djohn2oo8
01-06-2018, 06:25 PM
949668129046605824
Publicity stunt like yall were saying

Reck
01-06-2018, 06:27 PM
TSA "Flynn lying to the FBI means he only gets a slap on the wrist, But Steele lied even though I have no proof, Jail him!!!!"

What's that he said a while back about Papadapilous? 0 to 6 months with a 2000 dollars paid vacation. :lol

If they do find Steele lied, the likelihood of him recieving a jail sentence is nearly zero percent.

djohn2oo8
01-06-2018, 06:29 PM
What's that he said a while back about Papadapilous? 0 to 6 months with a 2000 dollars paid vacation. :lol

If they do find Steele lied, the likelyhood of him recieving a jail sentence is nearly zero percent.

It's funny because the FBI has already verified parts of the dossier. Alot of it actually. He won't be charged. Grassley and Graham either playing a brilliant game of chess to play Trump, or playing partisan politics.

Chucho
01-06-2018, 09:17 PM
Sorry, I said investigate everything.

I don't give a shit who goes to prison.

But cheerlead hard for one side. Got it.

Reck
01-06-2018, 09:23 PM
But cheerlead hard for one side. Got it.

Trump is hopeless so you have to cut your losses.

People who are waiting for Trump to "turn" the corner are just lying to themselves at this point.

Chucho
01-06-2018, 09:30 PM
Trump is hopeless so you have to cut your losses.

People who are waiting for Trump to "turn" the corner are just lying to themselves at this point.

Agreed. just calling him out for calling someone out for doing the same thing.

Pavlov
01-06-2018, 10:34 PM
But cheerlead hard for one side. Got it.Better than never having a political opinion in the political forum at all tbh.

Pavlov
01-06-2018, 10:35 PM
Agreed. just calling him out for calling someone out for doing the same thing.Sorry, I've never gone full retard like TSA did with pizzagate.

UZER
01-06-2018, 11:32 PM
Political forum in a nutshell:

WasRS2XclpY

Chucho
01-07-2018, 12:05 AM
Better than never having a political opinion in the political forum at all tbh.

That's what you call tired-Schtick, never ending back and forths with TSA, Spurt and Chris? Got it.

Chucho
01-07-2018, 12:06 AM
Sorry, I've never gone full retard like TSA did with pizzagate.

But 99% of your posts are carrying on with him, Chris and Spurt. Speaks volumes of you.

Pavlov
01-07-2018, 12:07 AM
That's what you call tired-Schtick, never ending back and forths with TSA, Spurt and Chris? Got it.Your shtick is just as tired, which is pretty notable considering your tenure here.

Chucho
01-07-2018, 12:08 AM
Your shtick is just as tired, which is pretty notable considering your tenure here.

LOL, you hate when people make observations about you. No need to be so upset. You are who you are.

Pavlov
01-07-2018, 12:08 AM
LOL, you hate when people make observations about you. No need to be so upset. You are who you are.Same for you. lol

Chucho
01-07-2018, 12:09 AM
LOL, "your tenure here".

Chucho
01-07-2018, 12:09 AM
Same for you. lol

Stick to your Chrises and Spurtseses.

Pavlov
01-07-2018, 12:09 AM
LOL, "your tenure here".lol upset over my word choice.

Pavlov
01-07-2018, 12:10 AM
Stick to your Chrises and Spurtseses.LOL you really don't like people making observations about you.

Chucho
01-07-2018, 12:10 AM
lol upset over my word choice.

LOL, your rage over an observation.

Pavlov
01-07-2018, 12:11 AM
LOL, your rage over an observation.LOL your observations

Chucho
01-07-2018, 12:11 AM
:depressed Muh Spurstalk rep. :depressed

Pavlov
01-07-2018, 12:11 AM
[QUOTE=Pavlov;9241313]:depressed Muh Spurstalk rep. :depressed/QUOTE]LOL your rep
LOL blown quote

Chucho
01-07-2018, 12:12 AM
LOL your observations

Don't be so obvious and tiring with your schtick. Chris or Spurts will engage you, try to refrain.

Pavlov
01-07-2018, 12:13 AM
Don't be so obvious and tiring with your schtick.LOL same to you
Chris or Spurts will engage you, try to refrain.LOL forum coach

Chucho
01-07-2018, 12:16 AM
LOL same to youLOL forum coach

Djohn can do the math to correct me, but you're a stud with those 29 ppd.

Pavlov
01-07-2018, 12:17 AM
Djohn can do the math to correct me, but you're a stud with those 29 ppd.LOL tired shtick

Chucho
01-07-2018, 12:20 AM
LOL, my psyche is being challenged.

At least you don't lash out in full blown rage and retreat to your closet full of alts. +1.

Pavlov
01-07-2018, 12:21 AM
At least you don't lash out in full blown rage and retreat to your closet full of alts. +1.LOL tired changed quote shtick

dabom
01-07-2018, 03:25 AM
Lol

Th'Pusher
01-07-2018, 09:48 AM
LOL, "your tenure here".
It did take you a while to build up the confidence to post in the political forum, tbh. After lurking for the better part of a decade, the straw that broke the camel's back was discussion about Obama's legacy. :lol

benefactor
01-07-2018, 10:31 AM
Political forum in a nutshell:

WasRS2XclpY
Basically, but it's still the best thing ST has going right now tbh

Chucho
01-07-2018, 11:53 AM
It did take you a while to build up the confidence to post in the political forum, tbh. After lurking for the better part of a decade, the straw that broke the camel's back was discussion about Obama's legacy. :lol

Yeah, I lurked here everyday for ten years.:rolleyes

pgardn
01-07-2018, 12:13 PM
Political forum in a nutshell:

WasRS2XclpY

Nailed.
Its an easy vortex to fall into.

Th'Pusher
01-07-2018, 12:39 PM
Yeah, I lurked here everyday for ten years.:rolleyes

That’s not what I said. So tell us about that first post. Were you nervous about what people would think about your emotionally charged opinion of Obama’s legacy?

djohn2oo8
01-07-2018, 01:25 PM
950043691175038976
TSA getting played hard.

Chucho
01-07-2018, 09:09 PM
That’s not what I said. So tell us about that first post. Were you nervous about what people would think about your emotionally charged opinion of Obama’s legacy?

Hey man, to be fair, I had 300 posts before I started posting regularly.

Splits
01-08-2018, 08:17 AM
950349740402757632

burn the evidence!
just like *ding*!

djohn2oo8
01-08-2018, 09:39 AM
950344330086178817

Reck
01-08-2018, 09:43 AM
950344330086178817

LOL written responses.

Trump is deadly afraid of Mueller so he doesn't want to meet him face to face. :lol

He should get the Bill Clinton treatment and get deposed on camera under oath. I'd pay to see that.

Isitjustme?
01-08-2018, 10:13 AM
Basically, but it's still the best thing ST has going right now tbh

NBA forum is like Elvis during the Vegas years levels of shelves of its former self

boutons_deux
01-08-2018, 10:57 AM
950344330086178817

His so-called c-team lawyers want to provide only an affidavit saying "no collusion" and "I'm innocent" :lol that's some great lawyering :lol

Reck
01-08-2018, 11:04 AM
NBA forum is like Elvis during the Vegas years levels of shelves of its former self

What even goes on there anymore? I self perma banned from there. Last post I made there was probably back in 2014 when Spurs won their 5th.

djohn2oo8
01-08-2018, 11:28 AM
LOL written responses.

Trump is deadly afraid of Mueller so he doesn't want to meet him face to face. :lol

He should get the Bill Clinton treatment and get deposed on camera under oath. I'd pay to see that.

950401198204571649