View Full Version : Flynn in major trouble for speaking to Russia about sanctions
Winehole23
02-28-2019, 01:29 AM
Using the inauguration as a slush fund, coddling dictators, trying to transfer nuke tech to Saudi, letting lobbyists regulate the industries they represent, conducting domestic policy and foreign relations to benefit his own family and business cronies, paying a huge bribe to the political donor class as a tax cut, screwing farmers, alienating US allies...it ain't all about the loss in 2016. The losses have piled up since.
RandomGuy
02-28-2019, 08:32 AM
You know the Cohen testimony has RG shook when he’s having to go back to posts from 2017
Translation:
"Stop pointing out the stupid things I said back then."
Dude, that is weak, even for you.
hater
02-28-2019, 08:35 AM
Using the inauguration as a slush fund, coddling dictators, trying to transfer nuke tech to Saudi, letting lobbyists regulate the industries they represent, conducting domestic policy and foreign relations to benefit his own family and business cronies, paying a huge bribe to the political donor class as a tax cut, screwing farmers, alienating US allies...it ain't all about the loss in 2016. The losses have piled up since.
Tobe fair Most of the things you listed were done by most presidents before Orange with Hair
Most are actual job requirements :lol
djohn2oo8
02-28-2019, 01:35 PM
Yeah, it’s annoying hearing you whine about college kids all that time.
The funny thing my nigga, one of the judges in Mueller’s investigation just name dropped collusion
1101179483170791425
djohn2oo8
02-28-2019, 01:36 PM
1101179883009519616
but TSA seddddddd Mueller wasn’t investigating collusion :lmao
1101179883009519616
but TSA seddddddd Mueller wasn’t investigating collusion :lmao
I never once said Mueller wasn’t investigating collusion.
I said Mueller hasn’t indicted a single person for collusion. That’s a fact.
djohn2oo8
02-28-2019, 01:41 PM
I never once said Mueller wasn’t investigating collusion.
I said Mueller hasn’t indicted a single person for collusion. That’s a fact.
Holy shit that goddamn goalpost move :lmao :lmao :lmao
djohn2oo8
02-28-2019, 01:41 PM
Mueller investigating collusion. That’s it and that’s all folks.
Spurminator
02-28-2019, 01:43 PM
Using the inauguration as a slush fund, coddling dictators, trying to transfer nuke tech to Saudi, letting lobbyists regulate the industries they represent, conducting domestic policy and foreign relations to benefit his own family and business cronies, paying a huge bribe to the political donor class as a tax cut, screwing farmers, alienating US allies...it ain't all about the loss in 2016. The losses have piled up since.
:cry "autistic screeching" :cry
spurraider21
02-28-2019, 01:45 PM
https://media1.tenor.com/images/147b4efa44e99ee8be152051c514d744/tenor.gif?itemid=7642189
Spurminator
02-28-2019, 01:48 PM
Trump: "I could shoot a man in the middle of 5th Avenue, and my supporters would call anyone who complained an autistic screecher. Sounds great, right? Autistic screecher. It's the best buzzphrase."
Holy shit that goddamn goalpost move :lmao :lmao :lmao
No amount of smilies will hide how retarded your take was. Find a single post of me saying Mueller was not investigating collusion.
djohn2oo8
02-28-2019, 02:19 PM
You said collusion theory dead multiple times and said Mueller wasn’t investigating it :lol
You said collusion theory dead multiple times and said Mueller wasn’t investigating it :lol
Again, find a single quote of me claiming Mueller was not investigating collusion, or run away like a pussy again.
RandomGuy
02-28-2019, 02:33 PM
I never once said Mueller wasn’t investigating collusion.
I said Mueller hasn’t indicted a single person for collusion. That’s a fact.
You are very careful not to go out on any limb for predictions. Wonder why.
What do you think is in all that redacted space in what we do know so far?
Is it possible that he is saving the worst for last?
Do racketeering trials generally paint pictures of individual misdeeds before the overall conspiracy charge?
The answer to both, is, yes.
Now what? No, not yet, and yes, we have a ways to go.
Care to predict whether someone will be charged? (makes chicken noises)
RandomGuy
02-28-2019, 02:38 PM
Again, find a single quote of me claiming Mueller was not investigating collusion, or run away like a pussy again.
You've had Pelosi, Feinstein, Schiff, Waters, Comey all say no collusion. TSA in 2017 "no collusion"
TSA in 2019: No one has been indicted yet.
Happy to give you that. You have never claimed Mueller wasn't investigating collusion.
If you roll with the anons theory of Trump bringing Mueller on to go after the Clinton's the team Mueller assembled makes sense.
You just were deluded by paranoia and stupidity as to whose collusion was being investigated. Or duped. Feel free to tell me which word is better, duped, or deluded.
RandomGuy
02-28-2019, 02:43 PM
RandomGuy is it Mueller time yet?
https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/mueller-now-investigating-democratic-lobbyist-tony-podesta-n812776
Mueller Now Investigating Democratic Lobbyist Tony Podesta
Sure. Manafort indicted AND convicted, not Podesta. To beat you to it: Not for Russian collusion, just for lying about meetings and ties with Russians, because that is simply what people do.
You are very careful not to go out on any limb for predictions. Wonder why.
What do you think is in all that redacted space in what we do know so far?
Is it possible that he is saving the worst for last?
Do racketeering trials generally paint pictures of individual misdeeds before the overall conspiracy charge?
The answer to both, is, yes.
Now what? No, not yet, and yes, we have a ways to go.
Care to predict whether someone will be charged? (makes chicken noises)
I’ve nevered waivered on collusion from the get go. I predict no one from Trump campaign will be charged with colluding with Russia during the election.
Sure. Manafort indicted AND convicted, not Podesta. To beat you to it: Not for Russian collusion, just for lying about meetings and ties with Russians, because that is simply what people do.
None of what Manafort was indicted for had anything to do with election collusion. The things Manafort were actually indicted for are directly tied to Podesta so I fully expect Tony Podesta and Craig Greg to be indicted as well since they were involved in the scheme. You should be calling for their indictments as well.
RandomGuy
02-28-2019, 02:57 PM
Flynn’s testimony will be devastating in ways you haven’t imagined
+++
Godspeed
:rollin
RandomGuy
02-28-2019, 02:58 PM
1. Oh, man. If I’m looking at things right, this OIG report is going to stun the nation. This is going to be MASSIVE.
:lmao
RandomGuy
02-28-2019, 02:59 PM
Rep. Peter T. King: Donald Trump Jr. interview casts doubt on any ‘collusion’
Rep. Peter T. King said Sunday it’s difficult to conclude there was any collusion between Russia and the Trump campaign based on a recent interview Donald Trump Jr. gave to congressional investigators
“Nobody listening to that interview could come out of that thinking there was any collusion at all. This is totally phony,” Mr. King, New York Republican, said on Fox News.
Mr. King is a member of the House Intelligence Committee, which recently interviewed the younger Mr. Trump as part of its investigation into ties between Russia and the Trump campaign.
Mr. King said the worst thing the president could do now would be to remove special counsel Robert Mueller, who is conducting a criminal investigation, saying such a move would give Democrats and the media an opportunity to “blow this up and come up with another phony issue.”
He said once the collusion issue is set aside, investigators can turn to matters involving former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, the president’s 2016 campaign opponent, such as a uranium deal involving Russia and the Clinton-led State Department during the Obama administration.
http://amp.washingtontimes.com/news/2017/dec/10/peter-t-king-new-york-representative-donald-trump-/?__twitter_impression=true
"no collusion"
RandomGuy
02-28-2019, 02:59 PM
You've had Pelosi, Feinstein, Schiff, Waters, Comey all say no collusion.
"no collusion"
RandomGuy
02-28-2019, 03:02 PM
I’ve nevered waivered on collusion from the get go. I predict no one from Trump campaign will be charged with colluding with Russia during the election.
Again, find a single quote of me claiming Mueller was not investigating collusion, or run away like a pussy again.
You've had Pelosi, Feinstein, Schiff, Waters, Comey all say no collusion. TSA in 2017 "no collusion"
TSA in 2019: No one has been indicted yet.
Happy to give you that. You have never claimed Mueller wasn't investigating collusion.
If you roll with the anons theory of Trump bringing Mueller on to go after the Clinton's the team Mueller assembled makes sense.
You just were deluded by paranoia and stupidity as to whose collusion was being investigated. Or duped. Feel free to tell me which word is better, duped, or deluded.
RandomGuy
02-28-2019, 03:06 PM
Sure. Manafort indicted AND convicted, not Podesta. To beat you to it: Not for Russian collusion, just for lying about meetings and ties with Russians, because that is simply what people do.
None of what Manafort was indicted for had anything to do with election collusion. The things Manafort were actually indicted for are directly tied to Podesta so I fully expect Tony Podesta and Craig Greg to be indicted as well since they were involved in the scheme. You should be calling for their indictments as well.
:lol It's like you can't help yourself.
Sure, if they did something wrong, they should be charged/indicted. Easy. For what? Don't say "things". 'n stuff.
boutons_deux
02-28-2019, 03:10 PM
"None of what Manafort was indicted for had anything to do with election collusion."
goddamn, you're fukkin stuped
Manafort Accused of Sharing Trump Polling Data With Russian Associate
https://www.nytimes.com/2019/01/08/us/politics/manafort-trump-campaign-data-kilimnik.html
Yes collusion :lol
:lol It's like you can't help yourself.
Sure, if they did something wrong, they should be charged/indicted. Easy. For what? Don't say "things". 'n stuff.
It’s not “if” they did something wrong, Mueller already established that in Manafort’s indictment. They were intimately involved with Manafort in the scheme in Ukraine.
"None of what Manafort was indicted for had anything to do with election collusion."
goddamn, you're fukkin stuped
Manafort Accused of Sharing Trump Polling Data With Russian Associate
https://www.nytimes.com/2019/01/08/us/politics/manafort-trump-campaign-data-kilimnik.html
Yes collusion :lol
Mueller didn’t charge him with any crime for that. This has gone on so long you Russiagaters don’t even remember your original conspiracy theory of Manafort and Page conspiring with Russia and Wikileaks to damage Hillary.
boutons_deux
02-28-2019, 03:24 PM
‘A Criminal Proceeding Is Not a Free for All’: Stone Judge Tells Corsi and Klayman to Take a Hike
https://am21.akamaized.net/lc/cnt/uploads/2019/01/klayman.jpg
These were Judge Amy Berman Jackson‘s words in a Thursday minute order
telling Corsi and Klayman that granting them leave to file an amicus brief
did not mean permission to “inform the Court of facts that he wished to bring to the Court’s attention on an ongoing basis.”
https://lawandcrime.com/high-profile/a-criminal-proceeding-is-not-a-free-for-all-stone-judge-tells-corsi-and-klayman-to-take-a-hike/
Pavlov
02-28-2019, 03:34 PM
‘A Criminal Proceeding Is Not a Free for All’: Stone Judge Tells Corsi and Klayman to Take a Hike
https://am21.akamaized.net/lc/cnt/uploads/2019/01/klayman.jpg
These were Judge Amy Berman Jackson‘s words in a Thursday minute order
telling Corsi and Klayman that granting them leave to file an amicus brief
did not mean permission to “inform the Court of facts that he wished to bring to the Court’s attention on an ongoing basis.”
https://lawandcrime.com/high-profile/a-criminal-proceeding-is-not-a-free-for-all-stone-judge-tells-corsi-and-klayman-to-take-a-hike/
:lol Corsi
RandomGuy
02-28-2019, 03:57 PM
Sure, if they did something wrong, they should be charged/indicted. Easy. For what? Don't say "things". 'n stuff.
It’s not “if” they did something wrong, Mueller already established that in Manafort’s indictment. They were intimately involved with Manafort in the scheme in Ukraine.
Translation:
"they did... things"
https://media.giphy.com/media/h5YJdPfkSbcRO/giphy.gif
Translation:
"they did... things"
https://media.giphy.com/media/h5YJdPfkSbcRO/giphy.gif
https://www.politico.com/f/?id=0000015f-6d73-d751-af7f-7f735cc70000
spurraider21
02-28-2019, 04:22 PM
TSA is the horowitz FISA stuff gonna lay dormant until mueller is done?
legit wondering, cause i haven't heard anything about that report in a while. could it be they dont want to release that kind of info about an active investigation?
You are very careful not to go out on any limb for predictions. Wonder why.
What do you think is in all that redacted space in what we do know so far?
Is it possible that he is saving the worst for last?
Do racketeering trials generally paint pictures of individual misdeeds before the overall conspiracy charge?
The answer to both, is, yes.
Now what? No, not yet, and yes, we have a ways to go.
Care to predict whether someone will be charged? (makes chicken noises)
Do you follow emptywheel like winehole does? You’re going down the same path she is trying to keep your narrative afloat.
1101183076342743040
TSA is the horowitz FISA stuff gonna lay dormant until mueller is done?
legit wondering, cause i haven't heard anything about that report in a while. could it be they dont want to release that kind of info about an active investigation?
Yes and yes. Huber as well.
spurraider21
02-28-2019, 04:37 PM
Yes and yes. Huber as well.
yeah... its just weird because in the FBI bias report, they talked about decision making of FBI with respect to prioritizing the russia investigation, etc
doesnt seem consistent
Pavlov
02-28-2019, 04:38 PM
What will you guys have if those turn out to be nothingburgers?
yeah... its just weird because in the FBI bias report, they talked about decision making of FBI with respect to prioritizing the russia investigation, etc
doesnt seem consistent
Not following...what doesn’t seem consistent?
What will you guys have if those turn out to be nothingburgers?
The same thing as your Russian collusion investigation.
Pavlov
02-28-2019, 05:22 PM
The same thing as your Russian collusion investigation.Nah, we'd kick the can down to SDNY and state courts.
Where will you kick the can for Hillary and Obama?
Chris
02-28-2019, 05:25 PM
yeah... its just weird because in the FBI bias report, they talked about decision making of FBI with respect to prioritizing the russia investigation, etc
doesnt seem consistent
Do what?
spurraider21
02-28-2019, 05:36 PM
Not following...what doesn’t seem consistent?
they were willing to talk about some aspects of the russia investigation in that previous report... so it wouldnt necessarily stand to reason that THIS is why they wont release the FISA one.
i dont think its a big deal or anything
Pavlov
02-28-2019, 05:38 PM
they were willing to talk about some aspects of the russia investigation in that previous report... so it wouldnt necessarily stand to reason that THIS is why they wont release the FISA one.
i dont think its a big deal or anything'Memba det Huber status update hearing?:lol
spurraider21
02-28-2019, 05:38 PM
'Memba det Huber status update hearing?:lol
i actually dont. i've basically tuned out all the huber stuff because for a while they couldnt make up their minds about whether or not they wanted/needed a second special counsel
Pavlov
02-28-2019, 05:46 PM
i actually dont. i've basically tuned out all the huber stuff because for a while they couldnt make up their minds about whether or not they wanted/needed a second special counselIt was a lame duck session last year. No one from Huber's office showed up so the Republicans had some conspiracy theorists testify about Clinton Foundation financial statements.
spurraider21
02-28-2019, 05:50 PM
It was a lame duck session last year. No one from Huber's office showed up so the Republicans had some conspiracy theorists testify about Clinton Foundation financial statements.
just looked it up and :lmao they actually brought in the judicial watch guy
Pavlov
02-28-2019, 05:56 PM
just looked it up and :lmao they actually brought in the judicial watch guy:lol I couldn't believe they went through with it.
djohn2oo8
02-28-2019, 08:36 PM
What evidence do you have that Michael Cohen committed these crimes?
A guilty plea :lol
Chris
02-28-2019, 08:42 PM
https://twitter.com/JamesOKeefeIII/status/1101287881325379584
RandomGuy
03-01-2019, 08:52 AM
Care to predict whether someone will be charged? (makes chicken noises)
Do you follow emptywheel like winehole does? You’re going down the same path she is trying to keep your narrative afloat.
1101183076342743040
BUK BUK BUK BUK!!!!
So, you don't want to commit to that. Probably wise, abeit totally chickenshit given how vociferously you are fighting this, as if your ego depends on it.
I think, as the Steele dossier said waaaay back, that there was some high level coordination of efforts, i.e. collusion, with Russian intelligence. I guessed it was data sharing, because there were and are open source reports of such. We are starting to see that, like just about everything else that can be verified, pan out.
What we will find 100% guaranteed, as Cohen's testimony confirmed, is a crooked group of people, led by a crooked conman, who would do ANYTHING to win, including selling out the country. Immoral, illegal, no matter.
Trump party will pay the price for that. Regardless of whether anyone gets charged, that collusion will extract a price at the ballot box.
I will go out on a limb here: Someone will be charged for something relating to this. My guess is his children, and quite possibly Trump himself, although he has juuuust distanced himself enough.
I give that assessment as slightly more likely than not, and with a low confidence. The needle seems to be pointing past the 50/50 mark, but is nowhere near certain.
Be happy to change my mind about that after the report is issued, and admit I was wrong in my assessment. The amount of "redacted" in what we have seen so far hints at a rather large iceberg. Dead ahead. the HMS Trump seems ill-equipped to avoid the disaster.
RandomGuy
03-01-2019, 08:56 AM
Manafort was indicted a little over 3 months after his raid.
Let's give Cohen five.
I guess your goalpost is now moved to saying a pending trial of Cohen for fraud is good news for Republicans in November.
In fact, the raid itself is good news in your opinion because somehow Clinton.
Right?
What evidence do you have that Michael Cohen committed these crimes?
oooh snap.
TSA shocked that an ongoing investigation doesn't release evidence. Now we have the evidence and Cohen's ironclad guilty plea as FACT.
RandomGuy
03-01-2019, 08:58 AM
I shouldn't need to explain that a payment to Stormy Daniels has nothing to with election collusion.
Guilty plea says it was.
RandomGuy
03-01-2019, 09:00 AM
The entire Special Counsel investigation exists because of Comey and his leaked memos. If my conspiracy theory didn’t make sense there wouldn’t be a parallel DOJ investigation of the investigators ongoing for over a year now.
We know that there was a counterintelligence investigation before that. Whoops.
RandomGuy
03-01-2019, 09:02 AM
983887167477907456
:lmao
I guess they are still waiting to be raided. :rollin
RandomGuy
03-01-2019, 09:09 AM
984026799612026882
:lol
With some of the other details we know now, "fighting back" means a lot of behind the scenes manuevering as well. Tweets like this, direct statements, will be front and center in any obstruction of justice charges.
This is looking more likely as time passes, and more evidence comes out. I would guess that Mueller has enough to charge Trump on this, which is what got Nixon and Clinton. What Trump has done, vastly exceeds what either of his predecessors did, and Trump has been doing it, like a fucking idiot, IN PUBLIC.
I will go out and say that Trump will be indicted for it. The MAGA bomber and Coast Guard Lt types are the tip of the shitberg at that point. When Trump is charged, there will be some terrorist attack by one of his supporters.
Spurs Homer
03-01-2019, 09:49 AM
With some of the other details we know now, "fighting back" means a lot of behind the scenes manuevering as well. Tweets like this, direct statements, will be front and center in any obstruction of justice charges.
This is looking more likely as time passes, and more evidence comes out. I would guess that Mueller has enough to charge Trump on this, which is what got Nixon and Clinton. What Trump has done, vastly exceeds what either of his predecessors did, and Trump has been doing it, like a fucking idiot, IN PUBLIC.
I will go out and say that Trump will be indicted for it. The MAGA bomber and Coast Guard Lt types are the tip of the shitberg at that point. When Trump is charged, there will be some terrorist attack by one of his supporters.
djohn2oo8
03-01-2019, 11:53 AM
1101523575700422656
LOL Stone
BUK BUK BUK BUK!!!!
So, you don't want to commit to that. Probably wise, abeit totally chickenshit given how vociferously you are fighting this, as if your ego depends on it.
I think, as the Steele dossier said waaaay back, that there was some high level coordination of efforts, i.e. collusion, with Russian intelligence. I guessed it was data sharing, because there were and are open source reports of such. We are starting to see that, like just about everything else that can be verified, pan out.
What we will find 100% guaranteed, as Cohen's testimony confirmed, is a crooked group of people, led by a crooked conman, who would do ANYTHING to win, including selling out the country. Immoral, illegal, no matter.
Trump party will pay the price for that. Regardless of whether anyone gets charged, that collusion will extract a price at the ballot box.
I will go out on a limb here: Someone will be charged for something relating to this. My guess is his children, and quite possibly Trump himself, although he has juuuust distanced himself enough.
I give that assessment as slightly more likely than not, and with a low confidence. The needle seems to be pointing past the 50/50 mark, but is nowhere near certain.
Be happy to change my mind about that after the report is issued, and admit I was wrong in my assessment. The amount of "redacted" in what we have seen so far hints at a rather large iceberg. Dead ahead. the HMS Trump seems ill-equipped to avoid the disaster.
I answered you yesterday dipshit
I’ve nevered waivered on collusion from the get go. I predict no one from Trump campaign will be charged with colluding with Russia during the election.
Thanks for making yourself look foolish running around typing chicken noises
djohn2oo8
03-01-2019, 01:08 PM
1101453490520580097
You called Cohen a liar. So since he is a liar do you believe him about Prague or not?
You called Cohen a liar. So since he is a liar do you believe him about Prague or not?
Mueller believed Cohen was not in Prague and that’s good enough for me. You walked yourself into a corner again.
Do you not believe Mueller?
djohn2oo8
03-01-2019, 01:23 PM
1101542664317460480
lol that’s not so subtle
djohn2oo8
03-01-2019, 01:23 PM
Mueller believed Cohen was not in Prague and that’s good enough for me. You walked yourself into a corner again.
Do you not believe Mueller?
You haven’t show me Muellers quote where he said that. Show me.
You haven’t show me Muellers quote where he said that. Show me.
It’s in the sentencing memo. Cohen was never charged with lying about being in Prague.
Do you believe Mueller? Yes or no.
djohn2oo8
03-01-2019, 01:32 PM
It’s in the sentencing memo. Cohen was never charged with lying about being in Prague.
Do you believe Mueller? Yes or no.
Show me where Mueller stayed he believed Cohen about Prague
djohn2oo8
03-01-2019, 01:33 PM
I know you aren’t asking if I believe Mueller when you said him and his team were nothing but the deep state Hillary supporters
djohn2oo8
03-01-2019, 01:40 PM
Mueller may have to recuse himself :rollin
875854393278705664
RandomGuy (https://www.spurstalk.com/forums/member.php?u=1813) you're the self proclaimed conflict of interest specialist what's your take?
Hmmm seems here TSA didn’t find Mueller credible
djohn2oo8
03-01-2019, 01:43 PM
I had no problem with the special counsel for this fabricated shit show but if these leaks are coming from Meuller or his team of Clinton donor lawyers Trump should fire Mueller optics be damned.
Hmm here he wanted Mueller fired
djohn2oo8
03-01-2019, 01:44 PM
These are anonymous sources from the NYT and WaPo of course I will put my faith in what they are reporting.
Anonymous sources good here
djohn2oo8
03-01-2019, 01:47 PM
“as soon as Mueller/the team felt his bias could affect his work on the case” :rollin
OIG found the texts. Mueller stonewalled the reason for Strzok’s demotion from Congress as long as he could.
Let’s see. Now here he says Mueller acted in bad faith
djohn2oo8
03-01-2019, 01:47 PM
I'd guess it had something to do with Mueller hiding the reason for Strzok being removed from Mueller's team from congress for four months.
Once again accusing Mueller of acting in bad faith. I guess you didn’t believe him then
djohn2oo8
03-01-2019, 01:50 PM
I'm of a differing opinion. I think Mueller has been in on it from the start and I think Trump and Mueller planned on loading the team up with Clinton stooges when they met the night before Mueller was appointed to Special Counsel. Give them the rope and let Horowitz hang them.
:lmao
djohn2oo8
03-01-2019, 01:51 PM
I’m glad Mueller is getting these guys on crimes they got away with a decade ago :bobo
Yet you said earlier in the thread Mueller wasn’t limited to the Russia angle? :lol
djohn2oo8
03-01-2019, 01:53 PM
Why would I not take the word from offices headed by an Obama and Mueller appointee?
Hmmm. Accusing Mueller again eh
spurraider21
03-01-2019, 01:55 PM
all obama appointees are suspicious except for horowitz who is going to pwn the dems
djohn2oo8
03-01-2019, 01:57 PM
:lol
Spurs Homer
03-01-2019, 02:19 PM
Comrade TSA has defecated the sleeping quarters again.
comrade please take your L gracefully
djohn melting down when asked if he trusts Mueller :rollin
djohn2oo8
03-01-2019, 02:21 PM
djohn melting down when asked if he trusts Mueller :rollin
You said he was stonewalling. So now you believe him? :lol
You said he was stonewalling. So now you believe him? :lol
I just said I believed him you dipshit. If you weren't melting down so hard you would have seen it.
You've propped up Mueller for over two years and now you can't even tell me that you believe him :rollin
djohn2oo8
03-01-2019, 02:32 PM
I just said I believed him you dipshit. If you weren't melting down so hard you would have seen it.
You've propped up Mueller for over two years and now you can't even tell me that you believe him :rollin
You said he was stonewalling and a Hillary shill. Can’t decide which side of the fence you are on depending on the day it seems lol
You said he was stonewalling and a Hillary shill. Can’t decide which side of the fence you are on depending on the day it seems lol
Apparently you can't decide what side of the fence you are on either.
Do you trust Mueller? Yes or no.
1101505690483523584
1101248095269064705
March 14th :corn:
Pavlov
03-01-2019, 03:04 PM
:lmao Undercover Huber
:lmao Stealth Jeff
1101542664317460480
lol that’s not so subtle
1101550398916186113
:lol
Chris
03-01-2019, 03:37 PM
Word on the street is the ides of March.
Pavlov
03-01-2019, 03:37 PM
:lmao "the street"
djohn2oo8
03-01-2019, 03:41 PM
1101550398916186113
:lol
I’ll trust the FBI over Undercover Uber.
I’ll trust the FBI over Undercover Uber.
Do you trust Mueller?
I’ll trust the FBI over Undercover Uber.
The FBI says it right on Page 12 of what you posted :rollin
Chris
03-01-2019, 03:52 PM
*Still waiting on confirmation from Kyle Griffin
uh oh Spurstalk Russiagater’s favorite resistance lawyer is even starting the walk back :lol
1101513006599602176
*Still waiting on confirmation from Kyle Griffin
Have Citizen X ask Kyle Griffin if he trusts Mueller so djohn can finally answer my question
djohn2oo8
03-01-2019, 06:13 PM
Do you trust Mueller?
I do. You trashed him. You pick and choose when to believe him. But naw I ain’t letting you forget you called Mueller and his team rogue.
djohn2oo8
03-01-2019, 06:13 PM
And then said he was working with Flynn to take down the deep state :lol
Pavlov
03-01-2019, 06:20 PM
And then said he was working with Flynn to take down the deep state :lol:lmao Pleading guilty to a felony and losing your house to pwn the Dems!
KING SPOOK
djohn2oo8
03-01-2019, 06:24 PM
:lmao Pleading guilty to a felony and losing your house to pwn the Dems!
KING SPOOK
:lmao
djohn2oo8
03-01-2019, 06:24 PM
Guilty plea withdrawn!!!!
Chris
03-01-2019, 06:29 PM
uh oh Spurstalk Russiagater’s favorite resistance lawyer is even starting the walk back :lol
1101513006599602176
"impossible bar"
zUyqDxa2k3w
Chris
03-01-2019, 06:29 PM
Have Citizen X ask Kyle Griffin if he trusts Mueller so djohn can finally answer my question
:lol
djohn2oo8
03-01-2019, 06:36 PM
Chris is desperate these days. Not one thing has he been right about
djohn2oo8
03-01-2019, 06:45 PM
Lawdy. Blumenthal came right out and sed they have evidence of collusion including documents and witnesses :)
spurraider21
03-01-2019, 06:48 PM
:lmao Pleading guilty to a felony and losing your house to pwn the Dems!
KING SPOOK
:lmao
I do. You trashed him. You pick and choose when to believe him. But naw I ain’t letting you forget you called Mueller and his team rogue.
If you trust Mueller than you must also believe Cohen when he denies being in Prague.
Do you believe Cohen when he said he wasn’t in Prague?
djohn2oo8
03-01-2019, 07:01 PM
If you trust Mueller than you must also believe Cohen when he denies being in Prague.
Do you believe Cohen when he said he wasn’t in Prague?
The hell kind of logic is that? I never called Mueller a liar. And you JUST said earlier that you didn’t necessarily believe Cohen but you believed Mueller about Prague :lmao
djohn2oo8
03-01-2019, 07:01 PM
You also laughed at Cohen being a star witness and now you believe him again? :lol
Chris
03-01-2019, 07:04 PM
djohn wants to believe
Chris
03-01-2019, 07:04 PM
"Mott the Hoople and the game of Life yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah
Andy Kaufman in the wrestling match yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah
Monopoly, Twenty one, checkers, and chess yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah
Mister Fred Blassie in a breakfast mess yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah
Let's play Twister, let's play Risk yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah
I'll see you in heaven if you make the list yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah
Now, Andy did you hear about this one?
Tell me, are you locked in the punch?
Andy are you goofing on Elvis? Hey, baby
Are we losing touch?
If you believed they put a man on the moon
Man on the moon
If you believe there's nothing up his sleeve
Then nothing is cool"
The hell kind of logic is that? I never called Mueller a liar. And you JUST said earlier that you didn’t necessarily believe Cohen but you believed Mueller about Prague :lmao
Mueller believed Cohen when Cohen said he wasn’t in Prague. Do you believe Cohen when he said he wasn’t in Prague?
djohn2oo8
03-01-2019, 07:07 PM
Mueller believed Cohen when Cohen said he wasn’t in Prague. Do you believe Cohen when he said he wasn’t in Prague?
Where is that quote from Mueller?
Pavlov
03-01-2019, 07:10 PM
"Mott the Hoople and the game of Life yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah
Andy Kaufman in the wrestling match yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah
Monopoly, Twenty one, checkers, and chess yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah
Mister Fred Blassie in a breakfast mess yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah
Let's play Twister, let's play Risk yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah
I'll see you in heaven if you make the list yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah
Now, Andy did you hear about this one?
Tell me, are you locked in the punch?
Andy are you goofing on Elvis? Hey, baby
Are we losing touch?
If you believed they put a man on the moon
Man on the moon
If you believe there's nothing up his sleeve
Then nothing is cool"That's trolling.
Chris
03-01-2019, 07:12 PM
That's tolling.
I'm a master toller.
Where is that quote from Mueller?
Mueller never charged Cohen for lying about being in Prague. Do you believe Cohen when he said he was never in Prague?
djohn2oo8
03-01-2019, 07:13 PM
1101629247154737153
djohn2oo8
03-01-2019, 07:14 PM
Mueller never charged Cohen for lying about being in Prague. Do you believe Cohen when he said he was never in Prague?
Manafort wasn’t charged with all of his crimes in one indictment was he? Now find me the quote from Mueller.
Manafort wasn’t charged with all of his crimes in one indictment was he? Now find me the quote from Mueller.
Manafort’s crimes were all listed in the indictment and sentencing memo.
Mueller never once mentioned Cohen lying about being in Prague in the indictment or sentencing memo
You either believe Cohen or you believe Mueller and his team are incompetent. Which is it?
djohn2oo8
03-01-2019, 07:45 PM
Manafort’s crimes were all listed in the indictment and sentencing memo.
Mueller never once mentioned Cohen lying about being in Prague in the indictment or sentencing memo
You either believe Cohen or you believe Mueller and his team are incompetent. Which is it?
Manafort was indicted on two separate occasions. Meaning all of his charges weren’t listed in the first indictment. Who is to say Cohen won’t be indicted on any new charges?Now find me the quote from Mueller.
Manafort was indicted on two separate occasions. Meaning all of his charges weren’t listed in the first indictment. Who is to say Cohen won’t be indicted on any new charges?Now find me the quote from Mueller.
poor fella doesn’t know what to do with the collapsing narrative he’s pushed for over two years
Chris
03-01-2019, 07:50 PM
Lanny says the closed door testimony is going to be a yuge bombshell.
Pavlov
03-01-2019, 07:52 PM
poor fella doesn’t know what to do with the collapsing narrative he’s pushed for over two yearsC'mon TSA -- your total of collapsed narratives is well into the double digits.
C'mon TSA -- your total of collapsed narratives is well into the double digits.
That’s great Pavlov. Now do djohn.
djohn2oo8
03-01-2019, 08:14 PM
C'mon TSA -- your total of collapsed narratives is well into the double digits.
Triple digits now
djohn2oo8
03-01-2019, 08:14 PM
poor fella doesn’t know what to do with the collapsing narrative he’s pushed for over two years
I’m sitting here laughing at you. And that exoneration letter you said was coming for Trump
I’m sitting here laughing at you. And that exoneration letter you said was coming for Trump
Coming from the guy who bet $2000 that Trump, Trump Jr, Ivanka, and Kushner are going to prison :lmao
djohn2oo8
03-01-2019, 09:21 PM
Coming from the guy who bet $2000 that Trump, Trump Jr, Ivanka, and Kushner are going to prison :lmao
And all of them are literally under investigation. With Cohen name dropping Jr as a person in his indictment
djohn2oo8
03-01-2019, 09:30 PM
Hillary out there drinking mimosas while the Felon family has to deal with The SDNY, Mueller and the NY AG
And all of them are literally under investigation. With Cohen name dropping Jr as a person in his indictment
I’ve made some bad bets clouded by emotion or booze, but I’ve never made one as terrible as yours. I honestly feel a little bad for you.
djohn2oo8
03-01-2019, 09:47 PM
Susan Rice out there indictment free.
djohn2oo8
03-01-2019, 09:47 PM
Pizzashops out there safe for kids
you throw up the white flag so quick these days :lol
djohn2oo8
03-01-2019, 09:59 PM
you throw up the white flag so quick these days :lol
Wanna know who threw up the white flag? Guccifer 2.0.
koriwhat
03-01-2019, 10:20 PM
Wanna know who threw up the white flag? Guccifer 2.0.
this fucking retard djohn who thinks he knows anything about everything is too much... what a fucking idiot.
djohn2oo8
03-01-2019, 10:24 PM
this fucking retard djohn who thinks he knows anything about everything is too much... what a fucking idiot.
Show up to a soccer field Joey and say it like you mean it
koriwhat
03-01-2019, 10:25 PM
Show up to a soccer field Joey and say it like you mean it
i showed up so where was your gay lover at you dumb fucking asian? keep defeating the odds of your own race!
djohn2oo8
03-01-2019, 10:34 PM
Somebody get him a looser pair of tube socks
koriwhat
03-01-2019, 10:36 PM
Somebody get him a looser pair of tube socks
you made them too tight with those little asian slave labor hands of yours... get back to work pak!
djohn2oo8
03-01-2019, 10:51 PM
Guess he couldn’t figure out the ignore button like he said he would.
DarrinS
03-01-2019, 10:55 PM
Bad orange man arrested yet? I hear the walls are closing in.
Pavlov
03-01-2019, 10:56 PM
Bad orange man arrested yet? I hear the walls are closing in.
You're the only one who has ever said that.
DarrinS
03-01-2019, 11:07 PM
You're the only one who has ever said that.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qjUvfZj-Fm0
AaronY
03-02-2019, 12:12 AM
You're the only one who has ever said that.
Djohn thinks it. He's said it a bunch of times
Spurs Homer
03-02-2019, 12:21 AM
Bad orange man arrested yet? I hear the walls are closing in.
Patience.
Torture should be agonizingly slow.
The walls will keep closing in slowly - and every once in a while -
a little ray of sunshine will creep through and cultards like you and TSA - will celebrate and call scoreboard -
only to have it vanish again with more revelations of criminality.
Slowly....slowly....
More hearings...by Ivanka. Trump jR, Jared....
More embarrassment for your cult leader until the disgrace and embarrassment are too much and he resigns as the shittiest worst criminal ever to have stolen any office.
:lmao:lmao
Pavlov
03-02-2019, 03:40 AM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qjUvfZj-Fm0Did you Google that one too or did a family member post it on Facebook?
https://www.cnn.com/2019/03/01/opinions/why-america-may-not-get-answers-it-seeks-from-mueller-zeldin-zelizer/index.html
CNN creating a backdoor for themselves.
djohn2oo8
03-02-2019, 11:06 AM
CNN good now :lol
CNN good now :lol
So you think that's what I am saying when I say CNN is creating a backdoor for themselves? Are you really just a troll bot now?
djohn2oo8
03-02-2019, 11:19 AM
So you think that's what I am saying when I say CNN is creating a backdoor for themselves? Are you really just a troll bot now?
You called CNN fake news yet you are now reading CNN :lol
You called CNN fake news yet you are now reading CNN :lol
Yes, this is why I highlighted how they created a backdoor for themselves.
:lol djohn premature ejaculation again
djohn2oo8
03-02-2019, 11:47 AM
Yes, this is why I highlighted how they created a backdoor for themselves.
:lol djohn premature ejaculation again
They got you scrolling CNN.com. Never thought I’d see the day or maybe I did.
RandomGuy
03-02-2019, 12:31 PM
Mueller never once mentioned Cohen lying about being in Prague in the indictment or sentencing memo
So you saw the unredacted portions? Tell me what they say specifically. I am curious myself.
https://www.cnn.com/2019/03/01/opinions/why-america-may-not-get-answers-it-seeks-from-mueller-zeldin-zelizer/index.html
CNN creating a backdoor for themselves.
NBC as well
1101826537291165696
RandomGuy
03-02-2019, 12:32 PM
I'm a master toller.
You certainly are good at baiting people.
A master baiter.
So you saw the unredacted portions? Tell me what they say specifically. I am curious myself.
Holy shit I honestly can’t believe you of all people still believe Cohen was in Prague
djohn2oo8
03-02-2019, 12:37 PM
Holy shit I honestly can’t believe you of all people still believe Cohen was in Prague
Who said he wasn’t?
djohn2oo8
03-02-2019, 12:40 PM
Mueller didn’t say it :)
Who said he wasn’t?
He did. If he lied again then he gets even more jail time. Also, then you can disregard everything else he said.
RandomGuy
03-02-2019, 12:41 PM
https://www.cnn.com/2019/03/01/opinions/why-america-may-not-get-answers-it-seeks-from-mueller-zeldin-zelizer/index.html
CNN creating a backdoor for themselves.
People have been trying tamp expectations for a while. Not the first such piece.
I think it will be vastly more damning than anything conservatives would like. Trump party will take it on the... chin... in the polls.
There is enough known to have enough to indict Trump, so that is the starting point. Anything else known will simply add to that.
djohn2oo8
03-02-2019, 12:42 PM
He did. If he lied again then he gets even more jail time. Also, then you can disregard everything else he said.
If he lied, he will get more time. And no. Those checks were very real btw.
If he lied, he will get more time. And no. Those checks were very real btw.
You have to take his word on their purpose though. You seem ok with det one.
Spurminator
03-02-2019, 12:45 PM
Bad orange man arrested yet? I hear the walls are closing in.
You're the only one who has ever said that.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qjUvfZj-Fm0
That's funny. But "arrested" is never used or implied in that video.
People have been trying tamp expectations for a while. Not the first such piece.
I think it will be vastly more damning than anything conservatives would like. Trump party will take it on the... chin... in the polls.
There is enough known to have enough to indict Trump, so that is the starting point. Anything else known will simply add to that.
Wishcasting again
Spurminator
03-02-2019, 12:46 PM
It is complete insanity to believe Donald Trump is going to be arrested at any point.
djohn2oo8
03-02-2019, 12:49 PM
You have to take his word on their purpose though. You seem ok with det one.
He obviously gave information to The SDNY and to Mueller that got him a deal. That infomation is vetted. Which is why The SDNY implicated directly Trump in their Cohen indictment. Now yes, because he told the truth, doesn’t mean he told the truth about everything. He also plead guilty to lying about the exact same things Trump did :)
djohn2oo8
03-02-2019, 12:50 PM
It is complete insanity to believe Donald Trump is going to be arrested at any point.
Well be shocked then. It’s up to you.
He obviously gave information to The SDNY and to Mueller that got him a deal. That infomation is vetted. Which is why The SDNY implicated directly Trump in their Cohen indictment. Now yes, because he told the truth, doesn’t mean he told the truth about everything. He also plead guilty to lying about the exact same things Trump did :)
So you selectively believe only that which supports your bias.
Got it
So you saw the unredacted portions? Tell me what they say specifically. I am curious myself.
Mueller must have forgotten to include the Prague lie in his sentencing memo :lol
https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/5453418-Mueller-Cohen-filing.html
djohn2oo8
03-02-2019, 01:29 PM
So you selectively believe only that which supports your bias.
Got it
Hopefully lightening doesn’t strike you down with all that irony.
djohn2oo8
03-02-2019, 01:30 PM
Mueller must have forgotten to include the Prague lie in his sentencing memo :lol
https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/5453418-Mueller-Cohen-filing.html
What if Cohen said he was there to Mueller? Therefore not lying about it?
:lol TSA
:lol walked right to the corner
Hopefully lightening doesn’t strike you down with all that irony.
I reserve judgement on it. He could be telling the truth about all of it or lying about all of it, or somewhere in the middle. He's proven he's willing to lie under oath and we don't know the repercussions he will face from telling the truth vs lying, in terms of suddenly having an "accident".
What if Cohen said he was there to Mueller? Therefore not lying about it?
:lol TSA
:lol walked right to the corner
Then he lied to congress.
djohn2oo8
03-02-2019, 01:32 PM
Then he lied to congress.
He asked for a reason Mueller didn’t charge him and I gave him a possibility
djohn2oo8
03-02-2019, 01:34 PM
Or maybe Cohen was in a suburb of Prague and not the actual city. The vicinity. Right next to it. So many possibilities ;)
djohn2oo8
03-02-2019, 01:34 PM
The technically he would just be in the area :)
What if Cohen said he was there to Mueller? Therefore not lying about it?
:lol TSA
:lol walked right to the corner
So Mueller was just picking and choosing which lies to Congress he would charge :lol ok
djohn2oo8
03-02-2019, 01:39 PM
Funny. Cohen has told Congress he had never been to Prague. He told the WSJ a different story.
He asked for a reason Mueller didn’t charge him and I gave him a possibility
It's not really a possibility as he would not have lied if he already admitted to it. He wouldn't have been asked again in fact, or it would have been something they couldn't talk about and he would have stated as much.
You think just saying something makes it true? :lol
Funny. Cohen has told Congress he had never been to Prague. He told the WSJ a different story.
I’m shocked that Mueller wasn’t aware of this after 2 years of investigating.
djohn2oo8
03-02-2019, 02:20 PM
It's not really a possibility as he would not have lied if he already admitted to it. He wouldn't have been asked again in fact, or it would have been something they couldn't talk about and he would have stated as much.
You think just saying something makes it true? :lol
It is an possibility because you can’t say that’s not what Cohen told Mueller. :)
walked into a corner you did
djohn2oo8
03-02-2019, 02:20 PM
I’m shocked that Mueller wasn’t aware of this after 2 years of investigating.
So now Cohen told Congress he had never been.
koriwhat
03-02-2019, 02:22 PM
Funny. Cohen has told Congress he had never been to Prague. He told the WSJ a different story.
what's his passport say? lmao!
It is an possibility because you can’t say that’s not what Cohen told Mueller. :)
walked into a corner you did
Not knowing doesn't create a possibility. It's nonsensical, no need to consider it.
djohn2oo8
03-02-2019, 02:24 PM
what's his passport say? lmao!
Well when he took a picture of it he took a picture of the cover and not the inside :lol
djohn2oo8
03-02-2019, 02:24 PM
Not knowing doesn't create a possibility. It's nonsensical, no need to consider it.
So you can’t say for sure. Got it.
1101505690483523584
1101248095269064705
March 14th :corn:
I don’t think the Sater testimony is going to turn out how Schiff thinks it will. Whole can of worms from the previous administration is about to be opened.
https://observer.com/2015/01/loretta-lynch-and-other-prosecutors-stand-accused-of-allowing-criminals-to-operate/amp/?__twitter_impression=true
So now Cohen told Congress he had never been.
Yes Cohen told Congress under oath he had never been. And Mueller didn’t charge him for lying under oath about that.
djohn2oo8
03-02-2019, 02:31 PM
Yes Cohen told Congress under oath he had never been. And Mueller didn’t charge him for lying under oath about that.
How do you know Mueller hasn’t charged him? And where did he ask him about Prague?
Pavlov
03-02-2019, 02:31 PM
I don’t think the Sater testimony is going to turn out how Schiff thinks it will. Whole can of worms from the previous administration is about to be opened.
https://observer.com/2015/01/loretta-lynch-and-other-prosecutors-stand-accused-of-allowing-criminals-to-operate/amp/?__twitter_impression=trueRemember when you said the Acosta confirmation hearings were going to pwn the Dems because pizza?
You do this a lot.
It never goes the way you think it will.
djohn2oo8
03-02-2019, 02:31 PM
I don’t see a link to your statements. Proof?
djohn2oo8
03-02-2019, 02:32 PM
Remember when you said the Acosta confirmation hearings were going to pwn the Dems because pizza?
You do this a lot.
:lmao
Spurs Homer
03-02-2019, 02:33 PM
The dossier is not something that is discredited if something is proven to be inaccurate
so far nothing has been disproven and a few things have borne out to be spot on
cohen could have met someone in another city
or
it could turn out to be that another trump team criminal went in place of cohen
the fbi/mueller would not discount the dossier if one thing didnt check out
the fbi/mueller would not rely 100% on a single piece of evidence either and the dossier was just a piece of a lot of evidence
unless you are a comrade of trump team who needs very badly to call scoreboard on any tiny win
The dossier is not something that is discredited if something is proven to be inaccurate
so far nothing has been disproven and a few things have borne out to be spot on
cohen could have met someone in another city
or
it could turn out to be that another trump team criminal went in place of cohen
the fbi/mueller would not discount the dossier if one thing didnt check out
the fbi/mueller would not rely 100% on a single piece of evidence either and the dossier was just a piece of a lot of evidence
unless you are a comrade of trump team who needs very badly to call scoreboard on any tiny win
So the only way your position can be wrong is if your opponent is completely corrupt.
So you can’t say for sure. Got it.
Ignorance doesn't increase possibility.
A man you know died in a car accident on the ride home from your house. You however are unaware of it. Is it possible he could call you tonight?
koriwhat
03-02-2019, 02:40 PM
The dossier is not something that is discredited if something is proven to be inaccurate
so far nothing has been disproven and a few things have borne out to be spot on
cohen could have met someone in another city
or
it could turn out to be that another trump team criminal went in place of cohen
the fbi/mueller would not discount the dossier if one thing didnt check out
the fbi/mueller would not rely 100% on a single piece of evidence either and the dossier was just a piece of a lot of evidence
unless you are a comrade of trump team who needs very badly to call scoreboard on any tiny win
you have no clue... HRC/DNC > FUSIONGPS/STEELE > FBI... steele was X'ed from the fbi's list but was brought back in for the dossier bought by the cunt herself HRC. it's been a setup from the get go but you're too brainwashed to see.
djohn2oo8
03-02-2019, 02:42 PM
Ignorance doesn't increase possibility.
A man you know died in a car accident on the ride home from your house. You however are unaware of it. Is it possible he could call you tonight?
Funny thing here is you think you analogy makes sense.
Spurs Homer
03-02-2019, 02:46 PM
So the only way your position can be wrong is if your opponent is completely corrupt.
wrong
cohen could be uninvolved in a prague/europe mtg
or could be dissembling
or the detail in the dossier could be inaccurate
but what is very very clear is that- even just based on public evidence alone-
there is a really really high probability that trump team and russia conspired /colluded
were in bed together
if you cannot see that evidence in plain sight -you might be a slave to an agenda or part of a group of people unable to see
truth objectively
Spurs Homer
03-02-2019, 02:53 PM
you have no clue... HRC/DNC > FUSIONGPS/STEELE > FBI... steele was X'ed from the fbi's list but was brought back in for the dossier bought by the cunt herself HRC. it's been a setup from the get go but you're too brainwashed to see.
open your eyes
just to humor you;
even if your fox news/rt wing propaganda was half true
it still wouldnt fly
the fbi, republicans & dems alike, the judges - all repugs, the entire justice dept would have to be 100% corrupt
for your scenario to fly
or
the president who lies 9000 times, been sued 4000 times, cheated on all wives, committed tax fraud, etc
maybe just maybe he is a criminal
djohn2oo8
03-02-2019, 02:53 PM
wrong
cohen could be uninvolved in a prague/europe mtg
or could be dissembling
or the detail in the dossier could be inaccurate
but what is very very clear is that- even just based on public evidence alone-
there is a really really high probability that trump team and russia conspired /colluded
were in bed together
if you cannot see that evidence in plain sight -you might be a slave to an agenda or part of a group of people unable to see
truth objectively
Wouldnt bother with him. Mueller has the evidence that’s what counts
koriwhat
03-02-2019, 02:57 PM
open your eyes
just to humor you;
even if your fox news/rt wing propaganda was half true
it still wouldnt fly
the fbi, republicans & dems alike, the judges - all repugs, the entire justice dept would have to be 100% corrupt
for your scenario to fly
or
the president who lies 9000 times, been sued 4000 times, cheated on all wives, committed tax fraud, etc
maybe just maybe he is a criminal
my scenario? you mean the truth? lol
Spurs Homer
03-02-2019, 02:59 PM
Wouldnt bother with him. Mueller has the evidence that’s what counts
yup
the cult will go down with the trumptanic all the way to the ocean floor and when they hit the floor and are drawing their last breath
they will use that last breath to say
”deep state gurgle gurgle”
djohn2oo8
03-02-2019, 03:25 PM
Lol Trump pushing the I was just joking narrative when asking for Russia to hack Hillary’s emails. Sorry that don’t fly with Robert Mueller.
koriwhat
03-02-2019, 03:27 PM
yup
the cult will go down with the trumptanic all the way to the ocean floor and when they hit the floor and are drawing their last breath
they will use that last breath to say
”deep state gurgle gurgle”
lmao how you dismiss truth because it fucks with your weak narrative. hahahaha! the left is nothing but brain dead idiots i guess.
Chris
03-02-2019, 04:19 PM
The ides of March.
Winehole23
03-02-2019, 07:12 PM
1101992388233494529
Chris
03-02-2019, 07:15 PM
^ Yes, that's called propaganda.
djohn2oo8
03-02-2019, 07:21 PM
^ Yes, that's called propaganda.
Says Undercover Huber and Stealth Jeff follower :lol
Chris
03-02-2019, 07:26 PM
Says Undercover Huber and Stealth Jeff follower :lol
lol Kyle Griffin and David Hogg follower
Winehole23
03-02-2019, 07:31 PM
^ Yes, that's called propaganda.you might know, that's your specialty.
koriwhat
03-02-2019, 07:33 PM
lol Kyle Griffin and David Hogg follower
lol i bet he jacks off to daisy hogg tbh
Chris
03-02-2019, 07:47 PM
lol i bet he jacks off to daisy hogg tbh
djohn is a man?
djohn2oo8
03-02-2019, 07:57 PM
lol i bet he jacks off to daisy hogg tbh
You posed for another man who rolled your pant legs up and then let take a picture of your legs. Not only that, you let another grown ass man turn your pants into capris. And that’s after you let another man tattoos your calves. I don’t think you want to go into this territory
Spurs Homer
03-02-2019, 07:59 PM
You posed for another man who rolled your pant legs up and then let take a picture of your legs. And that’s after you let another man tattoos your calves. I don’t think you want to go into this territory
the thug tat artist worked on his backside lol
djohn2oo8
03-02-2019, 08:07 PM
the thug tat artist worked on his backside lol
And had the nerve to get them shits tatted on Both legs. Facing opposite directions
Spurs Homer
03-02-2019, 08:23 PM
And had the nerve to get them shits tatted on Both legs. Facing opposite directions
:lmao:lmao
koriwhat
03-02-2019, 08:32 PM
You posed for another man who rolled your pant legs up and then let take a picture of your legs. Not only that, you let another grown ass man turn your pants into capris. And that’s after you let another man tattoos your calves. I don’t think you want to go into this territory
making mountains out of mole hills is a tactic you weak fucks keep trying to use. too bad you're just a bitch and you trying to take jabs at me isn't going to accomplish a god damn thing.
pulling your pants up is such a topic, getting tattoos is more of a topic, etc... none of the above is even a topic at all but yall got nothing and cling to the same shit that trolls before you clung onto. yall got nothing because you are nothing.
now, lets proceed down this territory and see how it goes.
the thug tat artist worked on his backside lol
yeah i'm such a thug and so was my buddy who tattooed me. you're just a fucking retard! you are literally the dumbest fuck here.
And had the nerve to get them shits tatted on Both legs. Facing opposite directions
of course i have them going inwards but you have no concept of tattooing nor placement so your opinion is total bs.
Spurs Homer
03-02-2019, 08:37 PM
making mountains out of mole hills is a tactic you weak fucks keep trying to use. too bad you're just a bitch and you trying to take jabs at me isn't going to accomplish a god damn thing.
pulling your pants up is such a topic, getting tattoos is more of a topic, etc... none of the above is even a topic at all but yall got nothing and cling to the same shit that trolls before you clung onto. yall got nothing because you are nothing.
now, lets proceed down this territory and see how it goes.
yeah i'm such a thug and so was my buddy who tattooed me. you're just a fucking retard! you are literally the dumbest fuck here.
of course i have them going inwards but you have no concept of tattooing nor placement so your opinion is total bs.
None of my buddies ever placed me on my stomach and worked on me - I don't know why you would call a thug who did that to you - your buddy?
But whatever dude - I'm not here to judge!
koriwhat
03-02-2019, 09:18 PM
None of my buddies ever placed me on my stomach and worked on me - I don't know why you would call a thug who did that to you - your buddy?
But whatever dude - I'm not here to judge!
obviously you are here to judge. as well, they're tattoos and i can bet plenty of people you know have tattoos too but you're too pussy to tell them the same bs you claim here. you're a fucking retard man.
Chris
03-02-2019, 10:06 PM
https://twitter.com/GeorgePapa19/status/1101927377691500544
djohn2oo8
03-03-2019, 11:19 AM
1102232461193420802
Of course. And so has Mr. Mueller :)
djohn2oo8
03-03-2019, 11:44 AM
1102234139015692299
lol Drump. Thoughts and prayers
Spurs Homer
03-03-2019, 12:00 PM
So much evidence
so many crimes
so little time
Spurs Homer
03-03-2019, 12:02 PM
Someone needs to put a russian or nazi flag in chris pic of trump hugging the flag
womp womp
1102277998093484033
1102234139015692299
lol Drump. Thoughts and prayers
I can’t believe Mueller never thought to look into that considering how broad his scope was. At least we know Schiff’s budget and staff are superior to Mueller’s.
djohn2oo8
03-03-2019, 06:32 PM
I can’t believe Mueller never thought to look into that considering how broad his scope was. At least we know Schiff’s budget and staff are superior to Mueller’s.
Remind me again what you have been right about?
ElNono
03-03-2019, 07:18 PM
1101992388233494529
^ Yes, that's called propaganda.
You probably didn't look at the 2nd graph attached to that tweet...
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/D0sHF20U4AAOILR.jpg:large
Propaganda indeed.
Spurs Homer
03-03-2019, 07:24 PM
womp womp
1102277998093484033
lol
are you under the impression that the entire russia investigation hinges on one or two pieces of evidence?
Let me put it to you simply:
Say there are 1,000 pieces of evidence -
the prague mtg and manafort ecuadorian alleged mtg - turn out to be wrong....
that means there are still 998 pieces of evidence and about 950 of those show solid confirmed evidence of crimes.
:lmao:lmao
djohn2oo8
03-04-2019, 11:43 AM
1102607144891924482
djohn2oo8
03-04-2019, 11:57 AM
1102607144891924482
1102613451887775744
the emperor ain’t got no clothes
boutons_deux
03-04-2019, 12:10 PM
1102613451887775744
the emperor ain’t got no clothes
https://www.wearelatinlive.com/media/CACHE/images/hero/jbareham_160818_1191_0053.01/7aa4e5e2068beac831d4d6af98023f37.jpg
Spurs Homer
03-04-2019, 12:26 PM
:lmao:lmao
Spurs Homer
03-04-2019, 12:29 PM
Panic setting in...
Trump trying hard to say that - ''russia...if you're listening..."
was all a joke.
Not gonna work.
That was a solid piece of evidence of a conspiracy with the enemy that attacked us - in fact - that very same day that he said that in front of the world (July 27,2016) - was the very same day that Russia hacked later that evening.
Dude multiposts saying "panic setting in".
Meanwhile prognostication of an unseen report has swung from "probably nothing" to "shit is about to get real"
When it happens, then we'll talk about it. This shit has been about to get real now for 3 years.
boutons_deux
03-04-2019, 01:03 PM
Trump's Whiny Lies are Crushed By Senate Intel Vice-Chair:
'There's Plenty of Evidence' of Collusion (https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2019/3/3/1839111/-Trump-s-Whiny-Lies-are-Crushed-By-Senate-Intel-Vice-Chair-There-s-Plenty-of-Evidence-of-Collusion)
https://images.dailykos.com/images/19619/story_image/making_headway_onpage.jpg?1452690556
Last September
Burr told reporters that he had not seen any direct evidence of collusion
or conspiracy with Russia on the part of the President.
Note that he did not say it didn't happen, only that his committee had "no hard evidence" of it.
Sen. Mark Warner, the Vice-Chair of the Intelligence Committee appeared on CNN's State of the Union and explicitly contradicted Trump's distorted version of events (video below).
His remarks could not have been more clear:
"Anyone who says there's no evidence of collaboration -
there's plenty of evidence. [...]
The notion that there's no evidence is just factually wrong.
Just in the public domain there are literally reams and reams of evidence
of Russian outreach to Trump officials and
clear interest from Trump officials,
including the President's own son,
welcoming the opportunity to get dirt on Hillary Clinton."
https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2019/3/3/1839111/-Trump-s-Whiny-Lies-are-Crushed-By-Senate-Intel-Vice-Chair-There-s-Plenty-of-Evidence-of-Collusion?detail=emaildkre
... looking forward to the very probably HARDER evidence of collusion not in the public domain.
Spurs Homer
03-04-2019, 01:26 PM
Dude multiposts saying "panic setting in".
Meanwhile prognostication of an unseen report has swung from "probably nothing" to "shit is about to get real"
When it happens, then we'll talk about it. This shit has been about to get real now for 3 years.
Your daily defense of the criminal traitor fraud president is duly noted.
Thx!
1102607144891924482
That’s odd they don’t want Rosenstein to testify as he helped draft the letter to fire Comey.
djohn2oo8
03-04-2019, 01:28 PM
Dude multiposts saying "panic setting in".
Meanwhile prognostication of an unseen report has swung from "probably nothing" to "shit is about to get real"
When it happens, then we'll talk about it. This shit has been about to get real now for 3 years.
And you’ll be wrong again then like usual
djohn2oo8
03-04-2019, 01:29 PM
That’s odd they don’t want Rosenstein to testify as he helped draft the letter to fire Comey.
What’s your theory here?
1102545137681514498
Steele’s project was not intelligence-gathering. It was the crafting of a campaign narrative about a traitorous Trump–Russia espionage conspiracy, into which new developments were melded as they occurred. That’s why Steele and Simpson peddled the information to the media at the same time Steele was feeding it to the FBI and the Justice Department. Even Steele does not claim his reports were factual; in the British libel proceedings against him, he describes them as “unverified” “raw intelligence” that “warranted further investigation.”
The Clinton campaign’s Steele dossier was the sheer spinning of rank rumor.
djohn2oo8
03-04-2019, 01:32 PM
Yawn.
What’s your theory here?
I find it odd that one of the most important witnesses concerning the case for obstruction of justice isn’t being called by the House to testify.
Yawn.
Name one thing in the dossier Steele got right that wasn’t already publicly available.
Spurs Homer
03-04-2019, 01:35 PM
That’s odd they don’t want Rosenstein to testify as he helped draft the letter to fire Comey.
Oh yeah -
Rosenstein was ORDERED by Trump to write a memo to JUSTIFY his pre-planned firing of comey -
then Trump also wrote his own memo stating his own reasons for firing Comey -
I would love for Rosenstein to go testify to that!
:lmao:lmao
Especially since Rosenstein handed a copy of Trumps memo to McCabe - who handed it over to Mueller!
Pavlov
03-04-2019, 01:41 PM
Name one thing in the dossier Steele got right that wasn’t already publicly available.If you have any earlier sources for the privatization numbers for Rosneft, I'd love to see them.
If you have any earlier sources for the privatization numbers for Rosneft, I'd love to see them.
For someone who claims to have never believed in Trump/Russian collusion you sure do spend a lot time trying to defend it.
Oh yeah -
Rosenstein was ORDERED by Trump to write a memo to JUSTIFY his pre-planned firing of comey -
then Trump also wrote his own memo stating his own reasons for firing Comey -
I would love for Rosenstein to go testify to that!
:lmao:lmao
Especially since Rosenstein handed a copy of Trumps memo to McCabe - who handed it over to Mueller!
So why wouldn’t the House call him to testify?
djohn2oo8
03-04-2019, 01:46 PM
I find it odd that one of the most important witnesses concerning the case for obstruction of justice isn’t being called by the House to testify.
What’s your theory here?
Spurs Homer
03-04-2019, 01:47 PM
So why wouldn’t the House call him to testify?
I hope they do.
Answer my question. Directly. The one I asked weeks ago;
Why are you defending the president who defends the country that attacked the USA elections?
Or run like a pussy and spin the question.
Pavlov
03-04-2019, 01:47 PM
For someone who claims to have never believed in Trump/Russian collusion you sure do spend a lot time trying to defend it.Do you have an earlier source for the Rosneft privatization numbers, TSA?
Yes or no.
What’s your theory here?
I don’t have one. Do you find it odd that out of that long list a main witness wouldn’t be called?
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.5 Copyright © 2026 vBulletin Solutions Inc. All rights reserved.