Flynn in major trouble for speaking to Russia about sanctions

[ChumpDumper]

:lol It's hilarious when actual lawyers shit on Trumpette fantasies.

[TSA]

Really? “Prepare to die, c-cksucker” doesn't “rise to the level of a violent threat”? Even if the recipient didn't think he would follow through, it doesn't stop being one.

This is the problem with commentary like this, you need total suspension of reality to argue that point. Plus the prosecution job *is* to throw the book at him, because the judge eventually is the one that decides.

And, btw, you can see that he's very much agreeing that the prosecution simply stuck to the federal sentencing guidelines, because that's what prosecutors do. There wasn't anything weird about what the prosecution requested.

In the context of their decade long strange friendship no, it wasn’t a violent threat, it was shit talking, same thing that goes on here every day. Credico himself said it was nothing more than typical Stone shit talking.

The judge will decide, and it will be nothing close to the excessive try by the prosecution.

btw how many federal cases have you tried?

[TSA]

Lot of assumptions there to unpack, your "characterization" of the facts lacks credibility imho.



(Go ahead, beat your chest in public some more...)

:lol assumptions
:lol characterizations

Your boy Obama’s hand picked Inspector General said exactly that

https://www.justice.gov/storage/120919-examination.pdf

[ChumpDumper]

In the context of their decade long strange friendship no, it wasn’t a violent threat, it was shit talking, same thing that goes on here every day. Credico himself said it was nothing more than typical Stone shit talking.

The judge will decide, and it will be nothing close to the excessive try by the prosecution.

btw how many federal cases have you tried?:rollin

How many have you tried?

100?

200?

1000?

:lmao fucking rube

[ElNono]

In the context of their decade long strange friendship no, it wasn’t a violent threat, it was shit talking, same thing that goes on here every day. Credico himself said it was nothing more than typical Stone shit talking.

The judge will decide, and it will be nothing close to the excessive try by the prosecution.

The judge rarely matches the full request from the prosecution anyways, and normally it can also be lowered on appeals, that's not the point.

The point is whether the request was excessive in light of federal sentencing guidelines, which the prosecutors themselves don't have control over. I actually do not like these cookie cut guidelines, and it should be an integral part of criminal reform, IMO.

But, that's what prosecutors have to work with.


btw how many federal cases have you tried?

:lol why does this matter? My opinion is as good as anybody else's opinion.

[Spurs Homer]

There are two things in this life we can all count on...

#1) unlike Trump -

pay taxes


and

#2) stroll into this thread any day - 24/7 - and you will be just in time to witness TSA getting shit on by a multitude of posters


:rollin:rollin:rollin

[ElNono]

Nobody is getting shat on. Silly we can't just have a discussion without somebody turning it into a sporting event.

[ChumpDumper]

Nobody is getting shat on. Silly we can't just have a discussion without somebody turning it into a sporting event.Sorry, I like it when you post intelligent, thoughtful rejoinders that disprove fallacious posts.

[ElNono]

I can't say that what he posted was a lie or wrong, because he posted an opinion piece. I can only disagree with it, and back up why.

But I'm glad he did, so we can have that conversation. It's certainly much better than just posting tweet after tweet.

[Winehole23]

:lol assumptions
:lol characterizations

Your boy Obama’s hand picked Inspector General said exactly that

https://www.justice.gov/storage/120919-examination.pdfSaid what now?

Be as specific as you can, quoting from your own source.

Then compare it with what you said.

[ElNono]

Said what now?

Be as specific as you can, quoting from your own source.

Then compare it with what you said.

There's definitely a disconnect of what the report says and what TSA claims. At this point I'll just chalk it up to simply not accepting reality.

Sorta unfortunate too, he was drumming up that report for a solid year+?

[Winehole23]

There's definitely a disconnect of what the report says and what TSA claims. At this point I'll just chalk it up to simply not accepting reality.

Sorta unfortunate too, he was drumming up that report for a solid year+?Glossing an official report to suit the wishcasting is very on brand.

[Chris]

I can't say that what he posted was a lie or wrong, because he posted an opinion piece. I can only disagree with it, and back up why.

But I'm glad he did, so we can have that conversation. It's certainly much better than just posting tweet after tweet.

ok George Carlin

[Chris]

https://media.tenor.com/images/2c4d4cad3406cc58b96280d6a8be3c98/tenor.gif

[ElNono]

You're welcome Qhris

[ElNono]

The troll thingie

[Chris]

The troll thingie

get rekt :lol

[ElNono]

chop chop, those tweetards are not going to post themselves...

[Chris]

chop chop

I'm a trendsetter.

I set trends.

[Chris]

https://twitter.com/Shem_Infinite/status/1227823942217367552?s=19

[RandomGuy]

Did the Obama appointed Inspector General present evidence in his report that proved the FBI lied to the FISA court in order to obtain and warrant on Carter Page? Yes or no.

Are you saying we didn't land on the moon?

[RandomGuy]

why dont you have spurs homer on ignore? honest question

He needs people to troll. Putting someone on ignore would hinder that.

[TSA]

The judge rarely matches the full request from the prosecution anyways, and normally it can also be lowered on appeals, that's not the point.

The point is whether the request was excessive in light of federal sentencing guidelines, which the prosecutors themselves don't have control over. I actually do not like these cookie cut guidelines, and it should be an integral part of criminal reform, IMO.

But, that's what prosecutors have to work with.



:lol why does this matter? My opinion is as good as anybody else's opinion.

Do prosecutors have discretion on enhancements?

[ChumpDumper]

https://twitter.com/Shem_Infinite/status/1227823942217367552?s=19

Probably also not a lawyer.

[TSA]

Are you saying we didn't land on the moon?



Did the FBI director confirm the surveillance of Carter Page was illegal?

[TSA]

its the attorneys' job to strike jurors

https://mobile.twitter.com/Techno_Fog/status/1227817454178590720

[TSA]

Here’s What The Lead Roger Stone Juror Said During Jury Selection

-A former Democratic congressional candidate revealed Wednesday that she was the foreperson on the jury that convicted Roger Stone.
-Tomeka Hart said during the jury selection process that she did not “pay that close attention” to developments in the Russia investigation. She also said that Stone’s links to President Donald Trump would “absolutely not” affect her views at trial.
-But Hart’s social media posts show that she was closely tuned in to the Russia probe and that she considered Trump and his supporters to be racist.

“You’ve also indicated a fair amount of paying attention to news and social media including about political things?” Judge Amy Berman Jackson asked Hart.

“Yes,” she replied.

“And when we asked what you read or heard about the defendant, you do understand that he was involved in Mr. Trump’s campaign in some way?” Jackson asked.

“Yes,” she said.

“Is there anything about that that affects your ability to judge him fairly and impartially sitting here right now in this courtroom?” Jackson queried.

“Absolutely not,” Hart answered.

“What is it that you have read or heard about him?” asked Jackson.

“So nothing that I can recall specifically,” Hart replied. “I do watch sometimes paying attention but sometimes in the background CNN.”

“So I recall just hearing about him being part of the campaign and some belief or reporting around interaction with the Russian probe and interaction with him and people in the country, but I don’t have a whole lot of details. I don’t pay that close attention or watch C-SPAN,” she continued.

“Can you kind of wipe the slate clean and learn what you need to learn in this case from the evidence presented in the courtroom and no other source?” Jackson asked, to which Hart responded, “Yes.”

But Hart’s Twitter account suggests that she closely followed the Russia probe and other investigations involving Trump associates.

https://amp.dailycaller.com/2020/02/13/roger-stone-jury-selection?__twitter_impression=true

[TSA]

Fox News senior judicial analyst Andrew Napolitano argued Thursday that Roger Stone should get a new trial after unearthed tweets appear to show an "inherent bias" from a juror who voted to convict the longtime friend of President Trump.

"[Stone is] absolutely entitled to a new trial with a member of a jury making these types of revelations about the politics involved in the decisions to prosecute him," Napolitano said on "Fox & Friends."

"It is the duty of the judge to ensure that both the government and defendant get a fair trial, and if the judge discovers afterward that there was a built-in inherent bias on the part of a member of a jury against the defendant, that is an automatic trigger for a new trial," he later explained. "[U.S. District Judge Amy Berman Jackson is] going to have to call those jurors back in and interrogate them or make a decision on the spot."

https://thehill.com/homenews/media/482932-foxs-napolitano-roger-stone-absolutely-entitled-to-new-trial-after-jurors?amp&__twitter_impression=true


Napolitano bad now

[ChumpDumper]

I'm cool with a new trial if needed.

It's not like all the other jurors were the same.

[spurraider21]

you had 12 jurors unanimously agree that he was guilty on all 7 counts. im very skeptical that a new trial would change anything.

[boutons_deux]

I'm cool with a new trial if needed.

It's not like all the other jurors were the same.

rightwingnuts won't be happy until Stone is acquitted on all SEVEN counts.

Obviously the jury decided what a criminal Stone is.

[Chris]

its the attorneys' job to strike jurors

The defense moved to strike this person from the jury; the judge ruled she stayed.

[TSA]

rightwingnuts won't be happy until Stone is acquitted on all SEVEN counts.

Obviously the jury decided what a criminal Stone is.

Stone was guilty as evidenced by his text messages. Why he needlessly lied about something he didn't do is beyond me, but he does deserve a fair trial.

[spurraider21]

The defense moved to strike this person from the jury; the judge ruled she stayed.
:tu thanks

[Chris]

:tu thanks

:tu

[Thread]

Stone was guilty as evidenced by his text messages. Why he needlessly lied about something he didn't do is beyond me, but he does deserve a fair trial.

Stone & the old man are trying to stall long enough to delay his report date past the first Tuesday come November. But, they're way too early...that's why they're "acting" in broad daylight (nothing to lose).

So, they'll cut as many nights till then because he's going to have to sit in there till November.

Come the first Wednesday in November the old man is going to open the cell doors on numerous friends.

[RandomGuy]

Did the FBI director confirm the surveillance of Carter Page was illegal?

Are you saying we didn't land on the moon?

[Chris]

Are you saying we didn't land on the moon?

non sequitur

[koriwhat]

i can't wait to see all the shit libs in here balling their eyes out in the coming month or so due to the pardoning of both flynn and stone. :tu :lol

[RandomGuy]

non sequitur

Are you saying you can't find your ass with both hands?

[Spurs Homer]

i can't wait to see all the shit libs in here balling their eyes out in the coming month or so due to the pardoning of both flynn and stone. :tu :lol

criminals who abuse drugs like to defend other criminals

i understand - dirtbag

[TSA]

Are you saying we didn't land on the moon?

i broke the poor fella

[TSA]

https://mobile.twitter.com/themarketswork/status/1228063626084225024

[RandomGuy]

i broke the poor fella

Nah. Just tired of your dishonesty.

[koriwhat]

criminals who abuse drugs like to defend other criminals

i understand - dirtbag

who's abusing what exactly? do tell mr. Big Brain!

you're such a fucking retard :lmao

[TSA]

Nah. Just tired of your dishonesty.

Nah, I broke you. What’s dishonest about asking if the Director of the FBI confirmed the surveillance on Carter Page was illegal?

[ChumpDumper]

https://mobile.twitter.com/themarketswork/status/1228063626084225024:lol how long is this going to take?

[Winehole23]

TSA, all in on another improbable legal hail mary. Must be up to half a dozen or so, just in this thread.

[DMC]

TSA, all in on another improbable legal hail mary. Must be up to half a dozen or so, just in this thread.
Thanks for the color commentary, Gabby.

[ElNono]

Do prosecutors have discretion on enhancements?

Prosecutors have a lot of discretion in a number of areas. Not just raising but also lowering penalties. However, they do need to stay within the federal sentencing guidelines. Furthermore, prosecutors need to have their request signed off by the DOJ itself before they can present it in front of the judge. That’s why this whole thing is ridiculous in the first place and likely why prosecutors resigned. The DOJ signed off on this requests and a day later came back and pulled them.

[ElNono]

Fox News senior judicial analyst Andrew Napolitano argued Thursday that Roger Stone should get a new trial after unearthed tweets appear to show an "inherent bias" from a juror who voted to convict the longtime friend of President Trump.

"[Stone is] absolutely entitled to a new trial with a member of a jury making these types of revelations about the politics involved in the decisions to prosecute him," Napolitano said on "Fox & Friends."

"It is the duty of the judge to ensure that both the government and defendant get a fair trial, and if the judge discovers afterward that there was a built-in inherent bias on the part of a member of a jury against the defendant, that is an automatic trigger for a new trial," he later explained. "[U.S. District Judge Amy Berman Jackson is] going to have to call those jurors back in and interrogate them or make a decision on the spot."

https://thehill.com/homenews/media/482932-foxs-napolitano-roger-stone-absolutely-entitled-to-new-trial-after-jurors?amp&__twitter_impression=true


Napolitano bad now

If there was anything improper, it should definitely be brought up in appeals by the defense, including any claims of mistrial.

[ElNono]

What we shouldn’t be doing is sabotaging the judicial because the executive doesn’t like that a buddy of the president got caught red handed.

[Winehole23]

Thanks for the color commentary, Gabby.Discussion threads fullfil many conversational purposes.

Did you think this was debate club?

:lol

[boutons_deux]

Trash admin mysteriously spiked sanctions against Russian oligarch

the Treasury Department was in the process of formalizing new sanctions against Russian oligarch Oleg Deripaska (https://www.thedailybeast.com/us-readied-sanctions-on-russian-oligarch-oleg-deripaskas-associates-then-mysteriously-backed-off) in December —

and those plans were suddenly set aside without any explanation.

Deripaska had already been the subject of sanctions in April of 2018 for his involvement with imprisoned Donald Trump associate Paul Manafort.

Sanctions on Deripaska’s companies have since been lifted, :lol

but new ones were in the works.

What’s strange is that despite the signal, Treasury didn’t follow through and the sanctions—

which would have targeted the unnamed people and entities because of their proximity to Deripaska—

didn’t materialize.

“The two months of inaction has stirred suspicions of political interference in the sanctions process.”

the sudden silence reeks of meddling at some level.

the pulling of the action suggests that there was a political decision to pull it, not a technocratic decision,”

“In the latest episode of the sordid spectacle of Trump helping Putin,

attempted constraint of a Putin buddy has apparently once again been thwarted,”

https://www.rawstory.com/2020/02/trump-admin-mysteriously-spiked-sanctions-plan-against-russian-oligarch/ (https://www.rawstory.com/2020/02/trump-admin-mysteriously-spiked-sanctions-plan-against-russian-oligarch/)

[Spurs Homer]

DOJ DROPS-

mccabe criminal investigation-

like i told comrade TSA

patriots have nothing to worry about when they are doing their duty and investigating treason from traitors-



BOOM!!!

mccabe just another patriot unlawfully smeared by corrupt traitors

[boutons_deux]

DOJ DROPS-

mccabe criminal investigation-



Barr/Trash don't give shit about patriotism, only about loyalty to the Unitary Executive

McCabe still punished by losing pension money. Cruelty Is The Point

This is Barr trying to keep more DoJ staff from resigning.

I wonder what he traded with Trash? Trash now gets Barr to go after Comey?

[spurraider21]

Discussion threads fullfil many conversational purposes.

Did you think this was debate club?

:lol
its whatever he needs it to be at any particular time.

sometimes, its only good for pure debate. no narratives. other times, its pure narratives and ankle biting. sometimes its a place to gather personal information and email addresses about others. sometimes we can joke about morbid things. other times he clutches his pearls about off-color jokes.

[Winehole23]

{Posted too hastily.)

[TSA]

DOJ DROPS-

mccabe criminal investigation-

like i told comrade TSA

patriots have nothing to worry about when they are doing their duty and investigating treason from traitors-



BOOM!!!

mccabe just another patriot unlawfully smeared by corrupt traitors

:lol unlawfully smeared

McCabe lied under oath to FBI and OIG, that’s not up for debate.

He’s nowhere out of the woods yet, Durham is still knee deep in Crossfire Hurricane.

[TSA]

That take aged noticeably overnight.

1228367056829140995

:lol strolling in here and stepping on your own dick. Two completely different investigations you stupid fuck.

[Winehole23]

:lol strolling in here and stepping on your own dick. Two completely different investigations you stupid fuck.You are correct. I posted in haste.

[DMC]

Discussion threads fullfil many conversational purposes.

Did you think this was debate club?

:lol

I guess your conversational purpose is to give a play-by-play of what everyone else is doing.

[DMC]

its whatever he needs it to be at any particular time.

sometimes, its only good for pure debate. no narratives. other times, its pure narratives and ankle biting. sometimes its a place to gather personal information and email addresses about others. sometimes we can joke about morbid things. other times he clutches his pearls about off-color jokes.

All lies and innuendo.

[DMC]

You are correct. I posted in haste.

You got corrected post haste

[ChumpDumper]

You got corrected post haste


I guess your conversational purpose is to give a play-by-play of what everyone else is doing.

:lol

[RandomGuy]

Nah, I broke you. What’s dishonest about asking if the Director of the FBI confirmed the surveillance on Carter Page was illegal?

You didn't break me any more than Cosmored did. I just realized he was insane.

You are a sociopath, and not worth my time, any more than the insane person behind that moniker is.

[Spurs Homer]

:lol unlawfully smeared

McCabe lied under oath to FBI and OIG, that’s not up for debate.

He’s nowhere out of the woods yet, Durham is still knee deep in Crossfire Hurricane.

”lacked candor”


hahahahahaha!


traitor in chief - 16000 lies so far
every trump team member lied about russia treason


but go ahead and play the russian propaganda game for team russia

useful idiot

[ChumpDumper]

:lol unlawfully smeared

McCabe lied under oath to FBI and OIG, that’s not up for debate.

He’s nowhere out of the woods yet, Durham is still knee deep in Crossfire Hurricane.
https://media1.giphy.com/media/l0G192DqS37tOmAP6/giphy.gif

[boutons_deux]

Bill Barr installs outside prosecutor for ‘highly unusual’ review of Michael Flynn case

this review is “highly unusual” and

comes at a time when Barr has already intervened to reduce the recommended sentencing for longtime Trump ally Roger Stone.

“The intervention has contributed a turbulent period for the prosecutors’ office that oversees the seat of the federal government and some of the most politically sensitive investigations and cases —

some involving President Trump’s friends and allies, and some his critics and adversaries,”

https://www.rawstory.com/2020/02/bill-barr-installs-outside-prosecutor-for-highly-unusual-review-of-michael-flynn-case-nyt/?utm_source=&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=3741 (https://www.rawstory.com/2020/02/bill-barr-installs-outside-prosecutor-for-highly-unusual-review-of-michael-flynn-case-nyt/?utm_source=&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=3741)

Trash/Barr gonna whitewash confessed liar Flynn? who would be surprised?

I remember that Trash liked Flynn a lot and kept talking to him (about Russia, probably) after Flynn was disgraced and kicked out.

[Thread]

Bill Barr installs outside prosecutor for ‘highly unusual’ review of Michael Flynn case

this review is “highly unusual” and

comes at a time when Barr has already intervened to reduce the recommended sentencing for longtime Trump ally Roger Stone.

“The intervention has contributed a turbulent period for the prosecutors’ office that oversees the seat of the federal government and some of the most politically sensitive investigations and cases —

some involving President Trump’s friends and allies, and some his critics and adversaries,”

https://www.rawstory.com/2020/02/bill-barr-installs-outside-prosecutor-for-highly-unusual-review-of-michael-flynn-case-nyt/?utm_source=&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=3741 (https://www.rawstory.com/2020/02/bill-barr-installs-outside-prosecutor-for-highly-unusual-review-of-michael-flynn-case-nyt/?utm_source=&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=3741)

Trash/Barr gonna whitewash confessed liar Flynn? who would be surprised?

I remember that Trash like Flynn a lot and kept talking to him (about Russia, probably) after Flynn was disgraced and kicked out.





Once & again it's mostly just to stall (to delay report date) to get past Election Day when Trump can pardon these guys without having to worry about how it will effect Election Day.

He is beholden no longer after that 1st Tuesday come November.

[TSA]

https://mobile.twitter.com/benjaminwittes/status/1228385440148922368


fuck

[ChumpDumper]

"Deep State" has won every round so far tbh.

[boutons_deux]

Durham and his "preconceived notions" can take it up the ass

Pompeo Had Undisclosed Meeting With Russian Minister At Munich Conference

Secretary of State Mike Pompeo had a meeting with Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov at a security conference in Munich on Friday that

the State Department did not publicly disclose before nor after the fact.

https://talkingpointsmemo.com/news/pompeo-had-undisclosed-meeting-with-russian-minister-at-munich-conference?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+tpm-news+%28TPMNews%29 (https://talkingpointsmemo.com/news/pompeo-had-undisclosed-meeting-with-russian-minister-at-munich-conference?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+tpm-news+%28TPMNews%29)

The NatSec state has known for decades that Trash was under the influence, being groomed by the Russians.

And no doubt, Barr is and has been in agreement with the compromise of Trash and himself by the Russians.

[Spurs Homer]

Durham and his "preconceived notions" can take it up the ass

Pompeo Had Undisclosed Meeting With Russian Minister At Munich Conference

Secretary of State Mike Pompeo had a meeting with Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov at a security conference in Munich on Friday that

the State Department did not publicly disclose before nor after the fact.

https://talkingpointsmemo.com/news/pompeo-had-undisclosed-meeting-with-russian-minister-at-munich-conference?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+tpm-news+%28TPMNews%29 (https://talkingpointsmemo.com/news/pompeo-had-undisclosed-meeting-with-russian-minister-at-munich-conference?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+tpm-news+%28TPMNews%29)

The NatSec state has known for decades that Trash was under the influence, being groomed by the Russians.

And no doubt, Barr is and has been in agreement with the compromise of Trash and himself by the Russians.





It was Pompeo's yearly EVAL -

pretty sure he nailed it - with "10" scores all around!

[Chris]

https://twitter.com/Jim_Jordan/status/1228828324111278080?s=19

[spurraider21]

https://twitter.com/Jim_Jordan/status/1228828324111278080?s=19
:lol trump's DOJ

[Spurs Homer]

lol Gym "I shower with juveniles" Jordan...

[Chris]

:lol trump's DOJ

4d chess

[Chris]

https://twitter.com/TomFitton/status/1228859333116596224?s=19

[spurraider21]

https://twitter.com/TomFitton/status/1228859333116596224?s=19
More taxpayer money for another trial to find him guilty all over again

[Chris]

More taxpayer money for another trial to find him guilty all over again

How much taxpayer money went to the Mueller investigation?

[Chris]

https://twitter.com/SaraCarterDC/status/1228890913377837058?s=19

[Winehole23]

:lol trump's DOJ

Keeps declining to bring charges against deep state operatives.

Mysterious!

[Thread]

More taxpayer money for another trial to find him guilty all over again

By that time it'll be past Election Day & Trump will pardon him & he'll have not spent a night in prison.

[Spurs Homer]

60 minutes tonite reported on the

russian conspiracy regarding the ”crowdstrike/server”

peddled by russia and its assets (trump/GOP/Cultists)


anyone in america and the world can see that trump is a fucking guilty russian asset

great report by 60 minutes

(WH refused several times to comment on their russian propaganda)

[spurraider21]

By that time it'll be past Election Day & Trump will pardon him & he'll have not spent a night in prison.
Why not just go straight to the pardon

[Thread]

Why not just go straight to the pardon

Because there is some risk of offending/energizing voter(s).
Afterward it won't matter.
That's why he hasn't verbally committed to pardoning.

[ElNono]

Because there is some risk of offending/energizing voter(s).
Afterward it won't matter.
That's why he hasn't verbally committed to pardoning.

Why would that energize voters if the POTUS deems the pardon an act of justice?

[Thread]

Why would that energize voters if the POTUS deems the pardon an act of justice?

Dem's who weren't going to vote in November might get (energized) on the issue of (pardons) if presented, El. Why take a chance? (We) know he's going to pardon these guys. These guys know it.

Dem's believe it, but, they don't know it. Don't stick it in their face until AFTER, when (they) can't do anything about it.

[ElNono]

Dem's who weren't going to vote in November might get (energized) on the issue of (pardons) if presented, El. Why take a chance? (We) know he's going to pardon these guys. These guys know it.

Dem's believe it, but, they don't know it. Don't stick it in their face until AFTER, when (they) can't do anything about it.

t'was a rhetorical question... I don't really think it's just, but not that such a thing mattered to this or past presidents...

[Thread]

t'was a rhetorical question... I don't really think it's just, but not that such a thing mattered to this or past presidents...

Oh, okay, El. Understood.

[ChumpDumper]

:lmao Stone's lawyers suck

1229803883448414211

[boutons_deux]

‘Impeach him again!’ Assange sets off bombshells with Trump pardon claim

claims President Donald Trump dangled a pardon through a Republican lawmaker if he agreed to cover up Russia’s involvement in 2016 election hacking.

Assange’s lawyer Edward Fitzgerald told a London court (http://rawstory.com/2020/02/julian-assange-says-he-was-promised-a-trump-pardon-if-he-would-lie-about-russias-dnc-hacking/) Wednesday that former Rep. Dana Rohrabacher had passed along

the offer in exchange for testimony that Russia had nothing to do with DNC leaks —

and the allegation shocked legal experts and other social media users.

https://www.rawstory.com/2020/02/impeach-him-again-assange-sets-off-bombshells-with-trump-pardon-claim/?utm_source=&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=3774

assuming it's true, why would Trash want to protect Pootin since Pootin told Trash that Pootin didn't do it, and that it was Ukraine?

[boutons_deux]

Pompeo Had Undisclosed Meeting With Russian Diplomat At Munich Conference
https://talkingpointsmemo.com/news/pompeo-had-undisclosed-meeting-with-russian-minister-at-munich-conference?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+tpm-news+%28TPMNews%29

[Spurs Homer]

‘Impeach him again!’ Assange sets off bombshells with Trump pardon claim

claims President Donald Trump dangled a pardon through a Republican lawmaker if he agreed to cover up Russia’s involvement in 2016 election hacking.

Assange’s lawyer Edward Fitzgerald told a London court (http://rawstory.com/2020/02/julian-assange-says-he-was-promised-a-trump-pardon-if-he-would-lie-about-russias-dnc-hacking/) Wednesday that former Rep. Dana Rohrabacher had passed along

the offer in exchange for testimony that Russia had nothing to do with DNC leaks —

and the allegation shocked legal experts and other social media users.

https://www.rawstory.com/2020/02/impeach-him-again-assange-sets-off-bombshells-with-trump-pardon-claim/?utm_source=&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=3774

assuming it's true, why would Trash want to protect Pootin since Pootin told Trash that Pootin didn't do it, and that it was Ukraine?




Rohrbacher got his ass voted out of office in 2018 - serves him well -

but I am pretty sure there are still GOP (Govt of Putin) members in congress right now - that did this and more -

why would all of these GOP traitors fight for trump so hard during the hearings, the impeachment and on camera on Fox news every 5 minutes?

Because they were also in on the Russia conspiracy.

All of this will come out - but by then no one will care and trump will find some asshole to pardon him.

[DarrinS]

Rohrbacher got his ass voted out of office in 2018 - serves him well -

but I am pretty sure there are still GOP (Govt of Putin) members in congress right now - that did this and more -

why would all of these GOP traitors fight for trump so hard during the hearings, the impeachment and on camera on Fox news every 5 minutes?

Because they were also in on the Russia conspiracy.

All of this will come out - but by then no one will care and trump will find some asshole to pardon him.


^djohn v2.0

:lmao

[TSA]

‘Impeach him again!’ Assange sets off bombshells with Trump pardon claim

claims President Donald Trump dangled a pardon through a Republican lawmaker if he agreed to cover up Russia’s involvement in 2016 election hacking.

Assange’s lawyer Edward Fitzgerald told a London court (http://rawstory.com/2020/02/julian-assange-says-he-was-promised-a-trump-pardon-if-he-would-lie-about-russias-dnc-hacking/) Wednesday that former Rep. Dana Rohrabacher had passed along

the offer in exchange for testimony that Russia had nothing to do with DNC leaks —

and the allegation shocked legal experts and other social media users.

https://www.rawstory.com/2020/02/impeach-him-again-assange-sets-off-bombshells-with-trump-pardon-claim/?utm_source=&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=3774

assuming it's true, why would Trash want to protect Pootin since Pootin told Trash that Pootin didn't do it, and that it was Ukraine?




"Fitzgerald said a statement produced by Assange’s personal lawyer, Jennifer Robinson, included a description of “Mr Rohrabacher going to see Mr Assange and saying, on instructions from the president, he was offering a pardon or some other way out, if Mr Assange... said Russia had nothing to do with the DNC leaks.”

https://www.thedailybeast.com/trump-offered-assange-pardon-if-he-covered-up-russian-hack-court-hears?via=twitter_page

https://twitter.com/catgoggles/status/1230194426213011459

Assange publicly stated Russia was not involved in the DNC leaks 10 months prior to any meeting with Rohrabacher. You stupid fucks are still pushing the debunked Russiagate hoax even after djohn2oo8 packed up and went home :lmao

[spurraider21]

"Fitzgerald said a statement produced by Assange’s personal lawyer, Jennifer Robinson, included a description of “Mr Rohrabacher going to see Mr Assange and saying, on instructions from the president, he was offering a pardon or some other way out, if Mr Assange... said Russia had nothing to do with the DNC leaks.”

https://www.thedailybeast.com/trump-offered-assange-pardon-if-he-covered-up-russian-hack-court-hears?via=twitter_page

https://twitter.com/catgoggles/status/1230194426213011459

Assange publicly stated Russia was not involved in the DNC leaks 10 months prior to any meeting with Rohrabacher. You stupid fucks are still pushing the debunked Russiagate hoax even after djohn2oo8 (https://www.spurstalk.com/forums/member.php?u=14870) packed up and went home :lmao
public statement =/= testimony

[TSA]

public statement =/= testimony

point me to where Assange's lawyer says testimony

[spurraider21]

point me to where Assange's lawyer says testimony
if public comments are enough, then he's already satisfied that. would be weird to say "i'll pardon you if you do the thing you already did"

[TSA]

if public comments are enough, then he's already satisfied that. would be weird to say "i'll pardon you if you do the thing you already did"

So no one said testimony, not even Assange's laywer. Thanks.

[TSA]

https://twitter.com/DAlperovitch/status/1230241057624989697

Timing is interesting considering the Assange story that just dropped today.

[spurraider21]

So no one said testimony, not even Assange's laywer. Thanks.
true.

im just curious what the "deal" was for if he had already stated publicly that russia wasnt the source

[TSA]

true.

im just curious what the "deal" was for if he had already stated publicly that russia wasnt the source

There was no deal from Trump. https://mobile.twitter.com/DanaRohrabacher/status/1230251235527286784

[spurraider21]

There was no deal from Trump. https://mobile.twitter.com/DanaRohrabacher/status/1230251235527286784
ok, according to dana he was asked for evidence/information about what the source was, which is something different from the public statements

[TSA]

ok, according to dana he was asked for evidence/information about what the source was, which is something different from the public statements

ok...so?

[spurraider21]

ok...so?
i was curious and i got the answer to my question

there doesnt have to be an endgame for everything i post :lol

[TSA]

i was curious and i got the answer to my question

there doesnt have to be an endgame for everything i post :lol

ok

[boutons_deux]

Dana Rohrabacher pointedly did not deny a key allegation about his dealings with Assange: Ex-US Attorney

https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/979440728215502848/xmmPILC8_bigger.jpg (https://twitter.com/renato_mariotti)Renato Mariotti
(https://twitter.com/renato_mariotti)✔@renato_mariotti
(https://twitter.com/renato_mariotti)
(https://twitter.com/renato_mariotti)
Rohrabacher does not deny that he told Assange that

he would obtain a pardon if he denied Russian involvement in the hacking of Hillary Clinton’s emails.

=========

all Rohrabacher is really denying here is that Trump was in on the scheme to trade a pardon for a cover-up of Russian involvement —

he is not denying that the scheme took place at all.

Rohrabacher’s denials that Trump was involved appear doubtful,

given that in 2017 he openly suggested he was involved in a “confidential interaction (https://lawandcrime.com/awkward/interview-from-3-years-ago-appears-to-corroborate-assange-lawyers-claims-of-trump-pardon-dangling/)” with the White House regarding Assange.

https://www.rawstory.com/2020/02/dana-rohrabacher-pointedly-did-not-deny-a-key-allegation-about-his-dealings-with-assange-ex-us-attorney/ (https://www.rawstory.com/2020/02/dana-rohrabacher-pointedly-did-not-deny-a-key-allegation-about-his-dealings-with-assange-ex-us-attorney/)

Of course, Trash offered to pardon Assange to LIE about Pootin hacking USA. :lol

"Julian, If You Are Listening, LIE about my puppetmaster Pootin hacking USA"

============

and throws in some whataboutism conspiracy bullshit

Former GOP Rep. Dana Rohrabacher Pushes Seth Rich Conspiracy in Statement on Alleged Assange Pardon

Rohrabacher said. “Finally, we are all holding our breath waiting for an honest investigation into the murder of Seth Rich.”

https://www.mediaite.com/trump/former-gop-rep-dana-rohrabacher-pushes-seth-rich-conspiracy-in-statement-on-alleged-assange-pardon/ (https://www.mediaite.com/trump/former-gop-rep-dana-rohrabacher-pushes-seth-rich-conspiracy-in-statement-on-alleged-assange-pardon/)

[ChumpDumper]

:lol #SethRich

[Spurtacular]

:lol #SethRich

:lol #StillWithHer

[Spurs Homer]

Lol only the “best people”

Stone- 3 - yrs 4 months-
(cue the comrades scoffing at “only 3 yrs” )

here is a little copypasta for all COMRADES to chew on :



Hillary Clinton Benghazi "Investigation"
4 years
0 indictments
0 convictions

Hillary Clinton Email "Investigation"
2 years
0 indictments
0 convictions

Trump-Russia Investigation

15 months

34 Indictments/Charges (Individuals) (and counting)

3 Indictments/Charges (Companies)
5 GUILTY pleas (and counting)
5 CONVICTIONS (and counting)

Indicted: Paul Manafort
Indicted: Rick Gates
Indicted: George Papadopoulos
Indicted: Michael Flynn
Indicted: Michael Cohen
Indicted: Richard Pinedo
Indicted: Alex van der Zwaan
Indicted: Konstantin Kilimnik
Indicted: 12 Russian GRU officers
Indicted: Yevgeny Prigozhin
Indicted: Mikhail Burchik
Indicted: Aleksandra Krylova
Indicted: Anna Bogacheva
Indicted: Sergey Polozov
Indicted: Maria Bovda
Indicted: Dzheykhun Aslanov
Indicted: Vadim Podkopaev
Indicted: Irina Kaverzina
Indicted: Gleb Vasilchenko
Indicted: Internet Research Agency
Indicted: Concord Management

Found Guilty: Roger Stone
Guilty Plea: Michael Flynn
Guilty Plea: Michael Cohen
Guilty Plea: George Papadopolous
Guilty Plea: Richard Pinedo
Guilty Plea: Alex van der Zwaan
Guilty Plea: Rick Gates

Over 191 Criminal Charges (and counting):

Conspiracy against the USA (2 counts)
Conspiracy to launder money (2 counts)
Bank fraud (8 counts)
Bank fraud conspiracy (10 counts)
Subscribing to false tax returns (10 counts)
Making false statements (6 counts)
Failure to file reports of foreign bank accounts (14 counts)
Unregistered agent of a foreign principal (2 counts)
False FARA statements (2 counts)
Subscribing to false tax returns (10 counts)

Assisting in preparation of false tax documents (5 counts)
Conspiracy to defraud the United States (13 counts)
Conspiracy to commit wire fraud and bank fraud (2 counts)
Aggravated identity theft (24 counts)


dont forget- Assange and MORE coming....:rollin:rollin:rollin

[Spurs Homer]

Lol

”lock him up”

chants outside courtroom

[TSA]

:lol broke bitch welcher djohn is gonna crawl back from hiding

[TSA]

Lol only the “best people”

Stone- 3 - yrs 4 months-
(cue the comrades scoffing at “only 3 yrs” )

here is a little copypasta for all COMRADES to chew on :



Hillary Clinton Benghazi "Investigation"
4 years
0 indictments
0 convictions

Hillary Clinton Email "Investigation"
2 years
0 indictments
0 convictions

Trump-Russia Investigation

15 months

34 Indictments/Charges (Individuals) (and counting)

3 Indictments/Charges (Companies)
5 GUILTY pleas (and counting)
5 CONVICTIONS (and counting)

Indicted: Paul Manafort
Indicted: Rick Gates
Indicted: George Papadopoulos
Indicted: Michael Flynn
Indicted: Michael Cohen
Indicted: Richard Pinedo
Indicted: Alex van der Zwaan
Indicted: Konstantin Kilimnik
Indicted: 12 Russian GRU officers
Indicted: Yevgeny Prigozhin
Indicted: Mikhail Burchik
Indicted: Aleksandra Krylova
Indicted: Anna Bogacheva
Indicted: Sergey Polozov
Indicted: Maria Bovda
Indicted: Dzheykhun Aslanov
Indicted: Vadim Podkopaev
Indicted: Irina Kaverzina
Indicted: Gleb Vasilchenko
Indicted: Internet Research Agency
Indicted: Concord Management

Found Guilty: Roger Stone
Guilty Plea: Michael Flynn
Guilty Plea: Michael Cohen
Guilty Plea: George Papadopolous
Guilty Plea: Richard Pinedo
Guilty Plea: Alex van der Zwaan
Guilty Plea: Rick Gates

Over 191 Criminal Charges (and counting):

Conspiracy against the USA (2 counts)
Conspiracy to launder money (2 counts)
Bank fraud (8 counts)
Bank fraud conspiracy (10 counts)
Subscribing to false tax returns (10 counts)
Making false statements (6 counts)
Failure to file reports of foreign bank accounts (14 counts)
Unregistered agent of a foreign principal (2 counts)
False FARA statements (2 counts)
Subscribing to false tax returns (10 counts)

Assisting in preparation of false tax documents (5 counts)
Conspiracy to defraud the United States (13 counts)
Conspiracy to commit wire fraud and bank fraud (2 counts)
Aggravated identity theft (24 counts)


dont forget- Assange and MORE coming....:rollin:rollin:rollin

And not a single conviction having anything to do with Trump or his campaign conspiring with Russia or Wikileaks :rollin

1. "The investigation did not establish that members of the Trump Campaign conspired or coordinated with the Russian government in its election interference activities."

2. "The investigation examined whether [contacts between Russia and Trump figures] involved or resulted in coordination or a conspiracy with the Trump Campaign and Russia, including with respect to Russia providing assistance to the Campaign in exchange for any sort of favorable treatment in the future. Based on the available information, the investigation did not establish such coordination."

3. "The investigation did not establish that [Carter] Page coordinated with the Russian government in its efforts to interfere with the 2016 election."

4. "The Office did not identify evidence in those [contacts between Russians and people around Trump after the GOP convention] of coordination between the Campaign and the Russian government."

5. "The Office did not identify evidence of a connection between Manafort's sharing polling data and Russia's interference in the election ... [and] the investigation did not establish that Manafort otherwise coordinated with the Russian government on its election-interference efforts."

6. "The investigation did not establish that these [contacts between Russians and people around Trump during the transition] reflected or constituted coordination between the Trump Campaign and Russia in its election interference activities."

7. "The investigation did not identify evidence that any U.S. persons conspired or coordinated with the [Russian disinformation campaign]."

[ChumpDumper]

What is Techn:lol F:lolg saying?

[boutons_deux]

Trash and his mafiya are a CRIMINAL ENTERPRISE

add to S H list:

Trash's "banker of last resort" Deutsche Bank has been fined for money laundering and other crimes, and the banker in charge of Trash's loans committed suicide

Deutsche Bank's 5 biggest scandals

Espionage,

money laundering and

interest rate scams.

Germany's biggest lender has a global reputation for scandal – and

has paid hefty fines and

expensive settlements to make up for its wrongdoings.

https://www.dw.com/en/deutsche-banks-5-biggest-scandals/a-46510219 (https://www.dw.com/en/deutsche-banks-5-biggest-scandals/a-46510219)

[Spurs Homer]

And not a single conviction having anything to do with Trump or his campaign conspiring with Russia or Wikileaks :rollin

1. "The investigation did not establish that members of the Trump Campaign conspired or coordinated with the Russian government in its election interference activities."

2. "The investigation examined whether [contacts between Russia and Trump figures] involved or resulted in coordination or a conspiracy with the Trump Campaign and Russia, including with respect to Russia providing assistance to the Campaign in exchange for any sort of favorable treatment in the future. Based on the available information, the investigation did not establish such coordination."

3. "The investigation did not establish that [Carter] Page coordinated with the Russian government in its efforts to interfere with the 2016 election."

4. "The Office did not identify evidence in those [contacts between Russians and people around Trump after the GOP convention] of coordination between the Campaign and the Russian government."

5. "The Office did not identify evidence of a connection between Manafort's sharing polling data and Russia's interference in the election ... [and] the investigation did not establish that Manafort otherwise coordinated with the Russian government on its election-interference efforts."

6. "The investigation did not establish that these [contacts between Russians and people around Trump during the transition] reflected or constituted coordination between the Trump Campaign and Russia in its election interference activities."

7. "The investigation did not identify evidence that any U.S. persons conspired or coordinated with the [Russian disinformation campaign]."


hahahahahaha!!!!!!!



I can see how your stance would be if all these CONVICTS


were in the Obama administration!



*POTUS (Putin Owns the United States)

[boutons_deux]

And not a single conviction having anything to do with Trump or his campaign conspiring with Russia or Wikileaks :rollin

1. "The investigation did not establish that members of the Trump Campaign conspired or coordinated with the Russian government in its election interference activities."

2. "The investigation examined whether [contacts between Russia and Trump figures] involved or resulted in coordination or a conspiracy with the Trump Campaign and Russia, including with respect to Russia providing assistance to the Campaign in exchange for any sort of favorable treatment in the future. Based on the available information, the investigation did not establish such coordination."

3. "The investigation did not establish that [Carter] Page coordinated with the Russian government in its efforts to interfere with the 2016 election."

4. "The Office did not identify evidence in those [contacts between Russians and people around Trump after the GOP convention] of coordination between the Campaign and the Russian government."

5. "The Office did not identify evidence of a connection between Manafort's sharing polling data and Russia's interference in the election ... [and] the investigation did not establish that Manafort otherwise coordinated with the Russian government on its election-interference efforts."

6. "The investigation did not establish that these [contacts between Russians and people around Trump during the transition] reflected or constituted coordination between the Trump Campaign and Russia in its election interference activities."

7. "The investigation did not identify evidence that any U.S. persons conspired or coordinated with the [Russian disinformation campaign]."

Why have Trash, Barr, etc blocked Congressonal access to the Mueller docs and evidence, why has the report been so heavily redacted?

why have Trash and his mafiya, "forgotten", lied, obstructed for years about their Russian contacts

Why were/are so many people in Trash's Exec and mafiya connected to Russia?

DJT Jr, "Santino", accepted meeting to get dirt on Hillary from Russians, and pulled in others in Trash's mafiya?

Why has Moscow Mitch blocked Dem bills to strengthen US election security and networks?

[Splits]

https://i.imgur.com/44Fh6hT.png

[Spurs Homer]

https://i.imgur.com/44Fh6hT.png


lol butter emails!!!

[TSA]

lol butter emails!!!

lol but Russia!!!

[TSA]

that fucking bitch boy djohn2oo8 was lurking and was too scared to post anything :lmao

[ChumpDumper]

:lol Your best defense is "Well, sure all these people around Trump are felons, but not the KIND of felons some guy on the internet wanted them to be!"

[Spurs Homer]

:lol Your best defense is "Well, sure all these people around Trump are felons, but not the KIND of felons some guy on the internet wanted them to be!"

lol

he twists himself into pretzels for russia!

[Chris]

https://twitter.com/DailyCaller/status/1230588957634813972?s=19

[ChumpDumper]

https://twitter.com/DailyCaller/status/1230588957634813972?s=19What is Stone's path to exoneration?

His guilt isn't in question tbh.

[Spurtacular]

:lol Your best defense is "Well, sure all these people around Trump are felons, but not the KIND of felons some guy on the internet wanted them to be!"

:cry Stone told a white lie about the wikileaks everyone already knows about :cry

:lmao

[ElNono]

He got a fairly moderate sentence... we’ll see if he seeks a mistrial now.

[boutons_deux]

He got a fairly moderate sentence... we’ll see if he seeks a mistrial now.

He got half the sentence the DoJ prosecutors recommended, half being what Barr/Trash wanted.

How can Barr/Trash, wanting "exoneration" (pardon) be pissed at the sentence THEY wanted?

[ElNono]

He got half the sentence the DoJ prosecutors recommended, half being what Barr/Trash wanted.

How can Barr/Trash, wanting "exoneration" (pardon) be pissed at the sentence THEY wanted?

I doubt Dear Leader is happy with that sentence, he was whining again.

What he received is not uncommon, and well within the guidelines

[Spurs Homer]

I doubt Dear Leader is happy with that sentence, he was whining again.

What he received is not uncommon, and well within the guidelines


Judge clearly stated that Stone was -

Covering up trumps crimes -

meaning of course - trump accepted russia and wikileaks help -
Stone coordinated with wikileaks and trump team -

Barr prevented Mueller from getting to the bottom of the conspiracy -

prevented trump from being compelled to testify
trump jr and jared also spared because of Barrs interference and Muellers incompetence -


it will all come out once trump and barr are removed.

[boutons_deux]

Republicans ‘went nuts’ on intelligence officials who told them Russia is ready to support Trump’s re-election

President Donald Trump was furious when intelligence officials informed House Democratic investigators of this threat —

shortly before he announced he would be replacing the acting Director of National Intelligence with a hardcore partisan loyalist.

House Republicans who received the briefing also objected to the intelligence.

Shelby Pierson, Maguire’s election security chief, described a Russian elections-intrusion effort that never stopped from 2016.”

“‘The Republicans [on the committee] went nuts,’ over Pierson’s presentation,

Republicans didn’t understand :lol willful IGNORANCE :lol

why the Kremlin would try to boost Trump, :lol

since he had been so tough on Russia :lol

https://www.rawstory.com/2020/02/republicans-went-nuts-on-intelligence-officials-who-told-them-russia-is-ready-to-support-trumps-re-election-report/?utm_source=&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=3785&recip_id=298460&list_id=1 (https://www.rawstory.com/2020/02/republicans-went-nuts-on-intelligence-officials-who-told-them-russia-is-ready-to-support-trumps-re-election-report/?utm_source=&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=3785&recip_id=298460&list_id=1)

And Nunes ran the report of the meeting right to the WH

[boutons_deux]

Trash no nominate pro-Trash / no-experience Doug Collins (R-GA) as permanent (for a few months) to DNI

[Spurs Homer]

Republicans ‘went nuts’ on intelligence officials who told them Russia is ready to support Trump’s re-election

President Donald Trump was furious when intelligence officials informed House Democratic investigators of this threat —

shortly before he announced he would be replacing the acting Director of National Intelligence with a hardcore partisan loyalist.

House Republicans who received the briefing also objected to the intelligence.

Shelby Pierson, Maguire’s election security chief, described a Russian elections-intrusion effort that never stopped from 2016.”

“‘The Republicans [on the committee] went nuts,’ over Pierson’s presentation,

Republicans didn’t understand :lol willful IGNORANCE :lol

why the Kremlin would try to boost Trump, :lol

since he had been so tough on Russia :lol

https://www.rawstory.com/2020/02/republicans-went-nuts-on-intelligence-officials-who-told-them-russia-is-ready-to-support-trumps-re-election-report/?utm_source=&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=3785&recip_id=298460&list_id=1 (https://www.rawstory.com/2020/02/republicans-went-nuts-on-intelligence-officials-who-told-them-russia-is-ready-to-support-trumps-re-election-report/?utm_source=&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=3785&recip_id=298460&list_id=1)

And Nunes ran the report of the meeting right to the WH




Boiled down:

we are being attacked-again-


and the russian assets (trump/GOP/33% of the usa- known as the cult)
are fighting for russia

again


since americans will not wake the fuck up and begin to destroy this president, the GOP and the Cult


russia wins


usa fucked


thanks cultists!

[DarrinS]

Boiled down:

we are being attacked-again-


and the russian assets (trump/GOP/33% of the usa- known as the cult)
are fighting for russia

again


since americans will not wake the fuck up and begin to destroy this president, the GOP and the Cult


russia wins


usa fucked


thanks cultists!


They broke you

[TSA]

Republicans ‘went nuts’ on intelligence officials who told them Russia is ready to support Trump’s re-election

President Donald Trump was furious when intelligence officials informed House Democratic investigators of this threat —

shortly before he announced he would be replacing the acting Director of National Intelligence with a hardcore partisan loyalist.

House Republicans who received the briefing also objected to the intelligence.

Shelby Pierson, Maguire’s election security chief, described a Russian elections-intrusion effort that never stopped from 2016.”

“‘The Republicans [on the committee] went nuts,’ over Pierson’s presentation,

Republicans didn’t understand :lol willful IGNORANCE :lol

why the Kremlin would try to boost Trump, :lol

since he had been so tough on Russia :lol

https://www.rawstory.com/2020/02/republicans-went-nuts-on-intelligence-officials-who-told-them-russia-is-ready-to-support-trumps-re-election-report/?utm_source=&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=3785&recip_id=298460&list_id=1 (https://www.rawstory.com/2020/02/republicans-went-nuts-on-intelligence-officials-who-told-them-russia-is-ready-to-support-trumps-re-election-report/?utm_source=&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=3785&recip_id=298460&list_id=1)

And Nunes ran the report of the meeting right to the WH


Democrats and Republicans "went nuts" on intelligence officials :lol

https://twitter.com/jaketapper/status/1230841729391177728

https://twitter.com/jaketapper/status/1230841733145124866

[boutons_deux]

Trash/Barr/Repug strategy to is purge NatSec positions, to be replaced with Trash sycophants who will block information about Pootin actions to re-elect Trash

FBI Wray hasn't been 100% loyal

Barr has made a rule that ALL investigations must be signed off by Barr, or the investigation is blocked.

[TSA]

The OG Russiagate hoax pushers are back for round 2 :lmao

https://twitter.com/JohnBrennan/status/1230647803254333440

https://twitter.com/SallyQYates/status/1230842748233711616

https://twitter.com/SpeakerPelosi/status/1230703876501733377

https://twitter.com/RepAdamSchiff/status/1230656216025706497

https://twitter.com/SenSchumer/status/1230625766972559360

[ChumpDumper]

The OG Russiagate hoax pushers are back for round 2 :lmao

https://twitter.com/JohnBrennan/status/1230647803254333440

https://twitter.com/SallyQYates/status/1230842748233711616

https://twitter.com/SpeakerPelosi/status/1230703876501733377

https://twitter.com/RepAdamSchiff/status/1230656216025706497

https://twitter.com/SenSchumer/status/1230625766972559360

So why did he fire the dude?

What does the grocer say?

[TSA]

https://twitter.com/Mediaite/status/1230632006284914688

Another OG Russiagate hoax pusher back for round 2 :lmao

[TSA]

THE OG :lmao

https://twitter.com/DavidCornDC/status/1230731480709517313

[TSA]

https://twitter.com/aaronjmate/status/1230647946212974599

THE RUSSIANS ARE COMING :lmao

[boutons_deux]

https://twitter.com/aaronjmate/status/1230647946212974599

THE RUSSIANS ARE COMING :lmao

they are already here, been here since 2015, and been grooming, corrupting the corrupt Trash for 30 years.

[DMC]

Obama was the POTUS in 2015. Why didn't he do anything?

[boutons_deux]

Obama was the POTUS in 2015. Why didn't he do anything?

are you fucking stupid?

Obama and Congressional leaders were told in summer of 2016 that the Russians were meddling.

Obama wanted a joint announcement, but MOSCOW Mitch refused, threatening he would SLANDER Obama as playing politics against the Repugs if Obama announced Russian meddling w/o MM.

[DarrinS]

MSNBC contributor sounds the alarm

1230647803254333440

[DMC]

are you fucking stupid?

Obama and Congressional leaders were told in summer of 2016 that the Russians were meddling.

Obama wanted a joint announcement, but MOSCOW Mitch refused, threatening he would SLANDER Obama as playing politics against the Repugs if Obama announced Russian meddling w/o MM.

You just said they were there in 2015. So the Russians were in the US meddling in elections for a full year before the Obama admin caught on?

:lmao

You should stick to regurgitating shit no one reads. You fall on your face when you try to converse.

[TSA]

are you fucking stupid?

Obama and Congressional leaders were told in summer of 2016 that the Russians were meddling.

Obama wanted a joint announcement, but MOSCOW Mitch refused, threatening he would SLANDER Obama as playing politics against the Repugs if Obama announced Russian meddling w/o MM.


There have been folks out there who suggest somehow if we went out there and made big announcements and thumped our chests about a bunch of stuff, that somehow it would potentially spook the Russians. I think it doesn't read the thought process in Russia very well.

[TSA]

You just said they were there in 2015. So the Russians were in the US meddling in elections for a full year before the Obama admin caught on?

:lmao

You should stick to regurgitating shit no one reads. You fall on your face when you try to converse.

GFY

[Winehole23]

So why did he fire the dude?

What does the grocer say?
God forbid intel reports should ever contain information inconvenient to the ruling party's political narrative.

Can't have that.

[spurraider21]

Democrats and Republicans "went nuts" on intelligence officials :lol

https://twitter.com/jaketapper/status/1230841729391177728

https://twitter.com/jaketapper/status/1230841733145124866
jake tapper and cnn good now?

[ChumpDumper]

Why did the dude get fired, Trumpettes?

TSA?

Darrin?

DMC?

Qhris?

Derp?

Anyone?

[boutons_deux]

"There have been folks out there who suggest somehow if we went out there and made big announcements and thumped our chests about a bunch of stuff, that somehow it would potentially spook the Russians. I think it doesn't read the thought process in Russia very well."

That was months after Obama tried to get Moscow Mitch on USA's side against Pootin.

... so now we have Pootin's a American King Maker, and he has every intention of repeating.

America is fucked and unfuckable, and the TSAs / 42% are responsible for electing traitorous, anti-American Repugs.

[Winehole23]

Why did the dude get fired, Trumpettes?

TSA?

Darrin?

DMC?

Qhris?

Derp?

Anyone?They don't care. The only frame that matters anymore is whether it is advantageous to Trump.

Whatever is merely inexpedient for Trump -- like this brief8ng -- is axiomatically blamable on a vast, left wing conspiracy in cahoots with the media and the DEEP STATE.

[DarrinS]

1230901347035353088

[ChumpDumper]

Why would one need SIGINT if they have twitter and Facebook? It's not like they're going to use a different playbook.

[DarrinS]

Another bombshell

Another dud. Womp womp

The media aren't even embarrassed about it anymore.

[ChumpDumper]

Another bombshell

Another dud. Womp womp

The media aren't even embarrassed about it anymore.

Hey Darrin, do you think Trump is a good president?

[TSA]

The OG Russiagate hoax pushers are back for round 2 :lmao

https://twitter.com/JohnBrennan/status/1230647803254333440

https://twitter.com/SallyQYates/status/1230842748233711616

https://twitter.com/SpeakerPelosi/status/1230703876501733377

https://twitter.com/RepAdamSchiff/status/1230656216025706497

https://twitter.com/SenSchumer/status/1230625766972559360

Queen OG Russiagate hoax pusher checking in :lmao

https://twitter.com/HillaryClinton/status/1230904643393335298

[DarrinS]

Hey Darrin, do you think Trump is a good president?


^ChumpBot autoreply activated

[ChumpDumper]

Queen OG Russiagate hoax pusher checking in :lmao

https://twitter.com/HillaryClinton/status/1230904643393335298Hey TSA, why did Trump fire Maguire?

[ChumpDumper]

^ChumpBot autoreply activated:lol you're embarrassed

[DarrinS]

:lol you're embarrassed


I didn't vote for him in 2016, but I'm going to this year.

[TSA]

https://twitter.com/parkerwbriden/status/1230895474799972353

Democracy dies when the Russians figure out how to meme as well as us.

[ChumpDumper]

I didn't vote for him in 2016, but I'm going to this year.Do you think he's a good president?

Yes or no.

[DarrinS]

Do you think he's a good president?

Yes or no.


Yes

You can stop asking me now

[ChumpDumper]

Yes

You can stop asking me now:lmao

That only took three years.

#Darrin'sEmbarrassment

[Spurs Homer]

Remember that 80’s movie with preppy teen idol actors?

the one where the russians attacked and those teens rose up and fought the russkies?

red dawn? I think...


welp

those kids grew up
became disgusting fat republicans...


and when russia actually attacked the usa


those now grown kids


opened the fucking door and rolled out the red carpet


and attacked OTHER american citizens who still gave a shit

[ChumpDumper]

Democrats and Republicans "went nuts" on intelligence officials :lol

https://twitter.com/jaketapper/status/1230841729391177728

https://twitter.com/jaketapper/status/1230841733145124866Rube omitted the rest of the thread.

1230841734176878592
1230843345112616960

:lol

[Ball Buster]

Ahh, not this conspiracy theory bullshit again. There’s no evidence the Russian govt. did anything to affect the last election for Trump. Establishment Dems just make themselves look stupid repeating this nonsense.

[spurraider21]

Ahh, not this conspiracy theory bullshit again. There’s no evidence the Russian govt. did anything to affect the last election for Trump. Establishment Dems just make themselves look stupid repeating this nonsense.
you can call it a conspiracy theory, but the intelligence community basically unanimously agreed that russia tried to influence our election. i have no problem with taking appropriate security measures and being aware of it

i do think it becomes a lousy campaign point, however. i cringed when bernie brought up russia at the last debate when he was talking about the twitter berniebros

[Ball Buster]

https://twitter.com/aaronjmate/status/1230937106136039426?s=21

[Ball Buster]

you can call it a conspiracy theory, but the intelligence community basically unanimously agreed that russia tried to influence our election. i have no problem with taking appropriate security measures and being aware of it

i do think it becomes a lousy campaign point, however. i cringed when bernie brought up russia at the last debate when he was talking about the twitter berniebros

The conspiracy originated with the CIA. That’s why the intelligence community unanimously agreed.

The NSA never pursued anything regarding Russian interference, because they never found any evidence to support it.

[ChumpDumper]

The conspiracy originated with the CIA. That’s why the intelligence community unanimously agreed.

The NSA never pursued anything regarding Russian interference, because they never found any evidence to support it.?

TOP-SECRET NSA REPORT DETAILS RUSSIAN HACKING EFFORT DAYS BEFORE 2016 ELECTION
(https://theintercept.com/2017/06/05/top-secret-nsa-report-details-russian-hacking-effort-days-before-2016-election/)

I mean a woman went to prison for leaking the NSA report on Russian interference.:lol

[Ball Buster]

?

TOP-SECRET NSA REPORT DETAILS RUSSIAN HACKING EFFORT DAYS BEFORE 2016 ELECTION
(https://theintercept.com/2017/06/05/top-secret-nsa-report-details-russian-hacking-effort-days-before-2016-election/)

I mean a woman went to prison for leaking the NSA report on Russian interference.:lol

Did they ever find any evidence of Russian interference in the election?

[ChumpDumper]

Did they ever find any evidence of Russian interference in the election?:lmao is TOP-SECRET NSA REPORT DETAILS RUSSIAN HACKING EFFORT DAYS BEFORE 2016 ELECTION somehow ambiguous to you?

[Ball Buster]

:lmao is TOP-SECRET NSA REPORT DETAILS RUSSIAN HACKING EFFORT DAYS BEFORE 2016 ELECTION somehow ambiguous to you?


“the types of systems we observed Russian actors targeting or compromising are not involved in vote tallying.”

So there was a detailed report... with no evidence. :lol

[spurraider21]

So there was a detailed report... with no evidence. :lol
there are ways to influence an election without vote tallying being compromised

[Ball Buster]

there are ways to influence an election without vote tallying being compromised

Exactly. They can flood the internet with ad purchases too. Amirite?

Russian accounts spent a total of $4,700 on Google ads in 2016https://www.c-span.org/video/?c4766980/user-clip-russian-accounts-spent-total-4700-google-ads-2016

[ChumpDumper]

Exactly. They can flood the internet with ad purchases too. Amirite?

Russian accounts spent a total of $4,700 on Google ads in 2016https://www.c-span.org/video/?c4766980/user-clip-russian-accounts-spent-total-4700-google-ads-2016You do know that social media accounts are free, right?

Please acknowledge that you know this.

[koriwhat]

Exactly. They can flood the internet with ad purchases too. Amirite?

Russian accounts spent a total of $4,700 on Google ads in 2016https://www.c-span.org/video/?c4766980/user-clip-russian-accounts-spent-total-4700-google-ads-2016

lol and bloomberg is in a 100m hole rn with ads... he should've worked with the russians. :lmao

[ChumpDumper]

Are you guys actively trying to look stupid?

Serious question.

[Ball Buster]

You do know that social media accounts are free, right?

Please acknowledge that you know this.

Sure, everyone can use Facebook. Were the Russian troll farms that vast, did they really impact the election through social media?

There's evidence the Russian troll farms were a very small outfit, very overstated by US media.

[spurraider21]

Sure, everyone can use Facebook. Were the Russian troll farms that vast, did they really impact the election through social media?

There's evidence the Russian troll farms were a very small outfit, very overstated by US media.
how about the DNC email leak?

[ChumpDumper]

Sure, everyone can use Facebook. Were the Russian troll farms that vast, did they really impact the election through social media?

There's evidence the Russian troll farms were a very small outfit, very overstated by US media.Evidence from whom?

I'll take the link to that, thanks.

I wouldn't even be sure it would take that many people to make bots and generate/amplify misinformation.

[ChumpDumper]

how about the DNC email leak?Seth Rich, obviously.

[Ball Buster]

Evidence from whom?

I'll take the link to that, thanks.

What are you saying happened in the 2016 election. Trump won because of Russian influence on our election? What did they do?

[Ball Buster]

Evidence from whom?

I'll take the link to that, thanks.

I wouldn't even be sure it would take that many people to make bots and generate/amplify misinformation.

This is your Russian troll farm. The building that changed the results of our election.

https://www.npr.org/sections/parallels/2018/03/15/594062887/some-russians-see-u-s-investigation-into-russian-election-meddling-as-a-soap-ope

[ChumpDumper]

This is your Russian troll farm. The building that changed the results of our election.

https://www.npr.org/sections/parallels/2018/03/15/594062887/some-russians-see-u-s-investigation-into-russian-election-meddling-as-a-soap-ope:lmao your goalpost moves.

How big did you expect it to be?

Pentagon-sized?

WTC-sized?

[ChumpDumper]

What are you saying happened in the 2016 election. Trump won because of Russian influence on our election? What did they do?I'm saying they did what the NSA and other agencies said they did.

You started out saying the NSA found no evidence of interference whatsoever. You've been backtracking and throwing out fallacy after fallacy ever since.

You were wrong. Just accept your being wrong.

[TSA]

there are ways to influence an election without vote tallying being compromised

https://twitter.com/CarpeDonktum/status/1230915222459777026

good thing there were crickets added or I might have voted for Bloomberg

[spurraider21]

https://twitter.com/CarpeDonktum/status/1230915222459777026

good thing there were crickets added or I might have voted for Bloomberg
i dont think you've ever seen a post from me that said "hillary lost the election because russia"

there isn't really a way to quantify the impact. all the IC reports, as i recall, said they werent trying to quantify the impact. i still think its relevant enough that a foreign power sought to influence the outcome of our election

[ChumpDumper]

https://twitter.com/CarpeDonktum/status/1230915222459777026

good thing there were crickets added or I might have voted for Bloomberg:lol not even what he said.

That tweet is a great example of misinformation.:tu

[Ball Buster]

What are you saying happened?


Just accept your being wrong.

Ah, you can't explain in your own words what the impact of the Russians were on the election.

Ok.

[ChumpDumper]

i dont think you've ever seen a post from me that said "hillary lost the election because russia"

there isn't really a way to quantify the impact. all the IC reports, as i recall, said they werent trying to quantify the impact. i still think its relevant enough that a foreign power sought to influence the outcome of our electionAs long as they think it will benefit Dennison, they will defend foreign interference to the death.

[ChumpDumper]

Ah, you can't explain in your own words what the impact of the Russians were on the election.

Ok.I can't quantify it, but I do believe the email leaks had a significant influence on the election.

Can you say you were completely wrong about your NSA claim?

[Ball Buster]

I can't quantify it, but I do believe the email leaks had a significant influence on the election.

Can you say you were completely wrong about your NSA claim?

I'm not wrong. I claimed the NSA never pursued any action against the Russians because they never had any evidence of foreign interference.

[koriwhat]

I'm not wrong. I claimed the NSA never pursued any action against the Russians because they never had any evidence of foreign interference.

welp, he "believes" and that's all there is to it. like always CumDumpster is a pathetic faggot!

[ChumpDumper]

I'm not wrong. I claimed the NSA never pursued any action against the Russians because they never had any evidence of foreign interference.:lmao what "action" would they have "pursued" otherwise?

And I just posted their evidence. Again, I have to ask if you're deliberately trying to look stupid.

[ChumpDumper]

welp, he "believes" and that's all there is to it. like always CumDumpster is a pathetic faggot!:lol still posting about me

[Ball Buster]

:lmao what "action" would they have "pursued" otherwise?

And I just posted their evidence. Again, I have to ask if you're deliberately trying to look stupid.

None of what you posted shows how Russia changed the results of the election. Why are you so butt-hurt about Hillary's bogus claims?

[Ball Buster]

The report shows there were 3 different hackers.. ooh :lol Tried some email phishing on a local office, THIS IS HUGE!


The FBI would not comment about whether it is pursuing a criminal investigation into the cyber attack on VR Systems.

Hint, they never did.

[koriwhat]

Why are you so butt-hurt about Hillary's bogus claims?

because he's a "male feminist" :lmao

[ChumpDumper]

None of what you posted shows how Russia changed the results of the election.I never made any quantitative claim.

Why are you so butthurt about being wrong?

[ChumpDumper]

because he's a "male feminist" :lmaoYou look like a little girl.

[Ball Buster]

I never made any quantitative claim.

Why are you so butthurt about being wrong?

You didn't even read the article you posted. :lol

[ChumpDumper]

You didn't even read the article you posted. :lolSure I did. Cherry picking isn't helping you. And that's just one report that they did NOT want public.

[Winehole23]

This is how you do it

1230967366906974209

[Spurs Homer]

This is how you do it

1230967366906974209


THIS.


if you are NOT a traitor



this is how you respond



remember- bernie was just advised that russia wants to also HELP bernie


bernie didnt equivocate or play cute


he acted like


AN AMERICAN!

[koriwhat]

This is how you do it

1230967366906974209

yeah so sure from the mouth of USSR's biggest supporter and honeymooner. fucking die already 2face-bernout!

[DMC]

Putin? No.. but if it was Marx.. that's different.

[SnakeBoy]

This is how you do it

1230967366906974209

Commie code speak for help me comrade

[Winehole23]

Commie code speak for help me comradeWas FDR a commie too?

[Winehole23]

Putin? No.. but if it was Marx.. that's different.Marx was German.

[TSA]

This is how you do it

1230967366906974209No...this is how you do it

https://mobile.twitter.com/JenniferJJacobs/status/1230980928345923595

What is he hiding?!?!?

We need an FBI investigation!!!

We need FISA warrants on his campaign members now!!!

[TSA]

THIS.


if you are NOT a traitor



this is how you respond



remember- bernie was just advised that russia wants to also HELP bernie


bernie didnt equivocate or play cute


he acted like


AN AMERICAN!

:lol “just advised”

[TSA]

https://mobile.twitter.com/k_ovfefe2/status/1230978708401422338

[spurraider21]

No...this is how you do it

https://mobile.twitter.com/JenniferJJacobs/status/1230980928345923595

What is he hiding?!?!?

We need an FBI investigation!!!

We need FISA warrants on his campaign members now!!!
how is anything being hid? US officials have been on top of it.

[TSA]

how is anything being hid? US officials have been on top of it.

Bernie Sanders should have immediately announced after the briefing a month ago that the Russians were trying to help him. His reluctance to do so only further implicates him as a co-conspirator in their scheme to alter the US elections. Democracy is dead.

[TSA]

https://mobile.twitter.com/JRubinBlogger/status/1230969300133072897

:lmao the MSM left has officially gone off the Russian deep end

[Spurs Homer]

Bernie Sanders should have immediately announced after the briefing a month ago that the Russians were trying to help him. His reluctance to do so only further implicated him as a co-conspirator in their scheme to alter the US elections. Democracy is dead.


bullfuckingshit

the info was

CLASSIFIED


he was bound to secrecy and only commented when info became public



trump


onnthe other hand...

[spurraider21]

Bernie Sanders should have immediately announced after the briefing a month ago that the Russians were trying to help him. His reluctance to do so only further implicates him as a co-conspirator in their scheme to alter the US elections. Democracy is dead.
announce to who? law enforcement is already on top of it

[TSA]

announce to who? law enforcement is already on top of it

Anyone being supported by Russia must immediately make a statement to the public saying Russia is supporting them. It’s the only way we’ll have a fair election.

[TSA]

https://mobile.twitter.com/ChuckRossDC/status/1230976995200315392

[ChumpDumper]

Bernie Sanders should have immediately announced after the briefing a month ago that the Russians were trying to help him. His reluctance to do so only further implicates him as a co-conspirator in their scheme to alter the US elections. Democracy is dead. Did the Russians personally approach him or his staff?

Just how stupid are you?

[Spurs Homer]

https://mobile.twitter.com/ChuckRossDC/status/1230976995200315392


lol cuck ross!

[Spurtacular]

Did the Russians personally approach him or his staff?

Just how stupid are you?

What exactly are you lashing out about, neutered chump?

[DMC]

Marx was German.

So was Hitler.

[spurraider21]

Anyone being supported by Russia must immediately make a statement to the public saying Russia is supporting them. It’s the only way we’ll have a fair election.
oh, ok. snark it is

[Winehole23]

So was Hitler.Karl Marx wrote Abe Lincoln a letter of congratulations when he was elected POTUS. Abe Lincoln returned the letter, even found a point of agreement with Marx, did that make him a commie?

[ElNono]

The OG Russiagate hoax pushers are back for round 2 :lmao

https://twitter.com/JohnBrennan/status/1230647803254333440

https://twitter.com/SallyQYates/status/1230842748233711616

https://twitter.com/SpeakerPelosi/status/1230703876501733377

https://twitter.com/RepAdamSchiff/status/1230656216025706497

https://twitter.com/SenSchumer/status/1230625766972559360

Not sure what’s so hilarious. They actually did get briefed by US intelligence. Also not sure what the media has to do with this? Reporting actual news bad now?

[ElNono]

This is how you do it

1230967366906974209

Big dick Bernie

[Winehole23]

how is anything being hid? US officials have been on top of it.LE approached Sanders to inform him. The analogy fails.

[DarrinS]

LE approached Sanders to inform him. The analogy fails.

I'm glad they didn't start some dumbass invstigation. Crossfire Geriatric. :lol

[spurraider21]

I'm glad they didn't start some dumbass invstigation. Crossfire Geriatric. :lol
they investigated enough to learn about the efforts

[Spurtacular]

Big dick Bernie

You're talking about the same guy who got bullied on his own stage by a few BLM wankers. :lmao

[Winehole23]

I'm glad they didn't start some dumbass invstigation. Crossfire Geriatric. :lol

How do you know they haven't?

If a presidential campaign has been compromised or infiltrated -- or even approached -- by foreign agents, why wouldn't that be a legit basis for investigation?

[ElNono]

You're talking about the same guy who got bullied on his own stage by a few BLM wankers. :lmao

Blue or Black?

[Winehole23]

How do you know they haven't?

If a presidential campaign has been compromised or infiltrated -- or even approached -- by foreign agents, why wouldn't that be a legit basis for investigation? DarrinS?
TSA?
Chris?

Anyone?

[DarrinS]

How do you know they haven't?

If a presidential campaign has been compromised or infiltrated -- or even approached -- by foreign agents, why wouldn't that be a legit basis for investigation?


Well, we definitely shouldn't compromise them with our own agents.

[DarrinS]

they investigated enough to learn about the efforts

I'm guessing the efforts are quite weak compared to the money and ads put out by the candidates.

I'm not worried about Russian "efforts" to help Sanders.

[Ball Buster]

https://twitter.com/aaronjmate/status/1230969701108502529?s=21

[TSA]

How do you know they haven't?

If a presidential campaign has been compromised or infiltrated -- or even approached -- by foreign agents, why wouldn't that be a legit basis for investigation?

Which Russian agents approached the Trump campaign? Don’t even try using Mifsud lol.

If the Trump campaign was in fact approached by “Russian agents” why do the FBI forge documents presented to the FISC to obtain a FISA warrant?

[Spurtacular]

Blue or Black?

Dat willfully ignorant thing.

[Ball Buster]

https://twitter.com/abbymartin/status/1231058046006128640?s=21

[Chris]

DarrinS?
TSA?
Chris?

Anyone?

Don't @ me faggot.

[spurraider21]

https://twitter.com/abbymartin/status/1231058046006128640?s=21
:lol why are you melting down over this

its not a big deal. there is no allegation that he has coordinated with them, or solicited any help. he's been in contact with US officials about it, so its all above water.

[TSA]

:lol why are you melting down over this

its not a big deal. there is no allegation that he has coordinated with them, or solicited any help. he's been in contact with US officials about it, so its all above water.

Hate break it to you but you’re now supporting a Russian agent.

[Winehole23]

Which Russian agents approached the Trump campaign? Don’t even try using Mifsud lol.

If the Trump campaign was in fact approached by “Russian agents” why do the FBI forge documents presented to the FISC to obtain a FISA warrant?Lol guilty conscience.

I was talking about Bernie.

:lol