Flynn in major trouble for speaking to Russia about sanctions

[boutons_deux]

Washington (CNN)

Hillary Clinton faulted President Donald Trump (http://www.cnn.com/specials/politics/president-donald-trump-45) for continuing to "ignore and surrender" to Russian meddling in a tweet on Wednesday,

asking whether the Republican who defeated her in the 2016 election will "protect the country."

The direct barb at Trump comes after US Cyber Command chief Adm. Mike Rogers told lawmakers on Tuesday (https://www.cnn.com/2018/02/27/politics/cybercom-rogers-trump-russian-cyber-threat/index.html)

that Trump has not granted him the authority to disrupt Russian election hacking operations where they originate.

[boutons_deux]

The White House chief calligrapher has a higher clearance than Jared Kushner

https://www.cnn.com/2018/02/28/politics/white-house-calligrapher-security-clearance/index.html

[Blake]

I can actually believe that -- but the only worse possible optics would be to resign right after a Mueller interview.

Oh if only. ....would have been delicious

[Blake]

lol "planning it for months" :lmao

lol pre-ejaculation by Pavlov djohn2oo8 RandomGuy dabom :lmao :lmao :lmao

Link

[TSA]

little bitch RandomGuy is on the run got to go with his method I guess

Is getting fired or demoted from evidence uncovered in the OIG investigation the "new normal" yes or no?

[TSA]

Link

djohn's own link of course. He's the shit on himself specialist

[clambake]

maybe.

thats all anyone needs to say nowadays.

[RandomGuy]

little bitch RandomGuy is on the run got to go with his method I guess

Is getting fired or demoted from evidence uncovered in the OIG investigation the "new normal" yes or no?

Already answered. Yes. So what? Why should I care?

[RandomGuy]

Is getting fired or demoted from evidence uncovered in the OIG investigation the "new normal" yes or no?

Yes. new normal = nothingburger.

People quit and are fired all the time.

https://www.turningleft.net/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/next-to-go-trump-administration.jpg

[TSA]

Already answered. Yes. So what? Why should I care?

These were top agents in the FBI and DOJ. They are expected to conduct themselves with integrity, independence, objectivity, and commitment to the rule of law. They didn’t. And the only reason they were caught was because of the OIG investigation, that should concern you.

[Blake]

djohn's own link of course. He's the shit on himself specialist

Chris misquoted the quote of course.

"Thinking about it for months" is different than "planning it for months"

[Chris]

"Thinking about it for months" is different than "planning it for months"

She had planned it before, had been thinking about it for months

Why are you so dumb?

[RandomGuy]

These were top agents in the FBI and DOJ. They are expected to conduct themselves with integrity, independence, objectivity, and commitment to the rule of law. They didn’t. And the only reason they were caught was because of the OIG investigation, that should concern you.

Why should I give a shit about any of that? You don't.

[dabom]

Resigns One day after testifying. :lol

[Pavlov]

lol "planning it for months" :lmao

lol pre-ejaculation by Pavlov djohn2oo8 RandomGuy dabom :lmao :lmao :lmaoSo she started planning her resignation after speaking with Mueller in November?

OK, you win.

[TSA]

Why should I give a shit about any of that? You don't.

I do. And you’re losing it bud. Time for you to take a step back and log off for a few days.

[vy65]

968965220306571264

She fine tho

[vy65]

This thread contains some of button's finest work in his lengthy and storied ST career. I salute you brother.

[DMC]

Yes. new normal = nothingburger.

People quit and are fired all the time.

https://www.turningleft.net/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/next-to-go-trump-administration.jpg

Why isn't Steve Bannon crossed off?

[TSA]

This thread contains some of button's finest work in his lengthy and storied ST career. I salute you brother.

I was hoping he’d go on a RandomGuy election night Melania meltdown and keep the pictures coming.

[Chris]

I guess I'm the only one who scrolls past bouton's articles 99% of the time :lol

[spurraider21]

I guess I'm the only one who scrolls past bouton's articles 99% of the time :lol

that's torture. i just have him on ignore. saves a lot of scroll time and clears a bunch of clutter

[Chris]

that's torture. i just have him on ignore. saves a lot of scroll time and clears a bunch of clutter

Probably a good idea. He never replies to anything.

[boutons_deux]

Adam Schiff Just Blew The Lid Off The GOP Russia Cover-Up For Trump

“At the outset of the Russia probe, both parties committed to a thorough investigation that would follow the facts wherever they lead.

As in any complex investigation, this requires compelling witnesses to testify who refuse to do so, and compelling the production of vital documents that can test the veracity of witness testimony and lead to new evidence.

To date, there are dozens of important witnesses who have yet been invited, let alone compelled to come before the committee.

And all too many of the witnesses who have appeared, have refused to answer direct questions of core investigative interest to the Committee, and have asserted unprecedented and risible claims of privilege.

Moreover, whole categories of vital documents, including financial and communications records held by third party service providers, can only be obtained through legal process, but to date the Majority has ignored or refused to entertain such requests that pertain to the Committee’s authorized Russia investigation.

The integrity and independence of the Committee and Congress’ investigative and enforcement powers are at stake.

To be credible, the Russia investigation cannot simply take witnesses at their word, or accept baseless assertions of privilege where none apply.

Instead, the Committee must verify assertions made by witnesses in testimony, compel testimony as well as the full production of responsive documents, and, where necessary, move to enforce subpoenas.”

Below is just a partial list of subpoenas urged by the Minority, but which the Chairman has thus far refused to issue:

Donald Trump Jr (https://www.politicususa.com/2018/02/25/adam-schiff-just-set-trump-off-new-fit.html). – The President’s son, a key campaign advisor, declined to answer the Committee’s questions regarding the preparation in 2017 of false and misleading public statements when the existence of the June 9, 2016 meeting at the Trump Tower was disclosed. He claimed that the attendance of lawyers during discussion between himself and his father would bring the entirety of father-son communication within the scope of the attorney-client privilege. The Committee must issue a subpoena to compel him to answer these questions.

Michael Cohen – Trump Organization attorney Michael Cohen has strenuously denied a claim contained in the Steele Dossier that he met with Russian officials in Prague or elsewhere. The Committee should verify his denials by compelling production of travel, phone, and transaction records and other documents.

Attorney General Jeff Sessions – Attorney General Sessions has refused to answer questions central the Committee’s inquiry, including whether the President ever sought to enlist him in efforts that could amount to obstruction of justice or the abuse of power. To date, neither the White House nor Sessions himself have asserted any privilege to prevent the Attorney General from answering these questions, and consequently the Committee must compel him to do so through a subpoena.

Corey Lewandowski – Corey Lewandoswki, Trump’s first campaign manager, refused during his February 2018 interview to answer questions about his activities and communications after his departure from the Trump campaign in June 2016, to include his interactions as a private citizen with President-elect and President Trump, including a conversation he had with the President on the day before his testimony. He claimed during his initial interview that he was unprepared to do so and he has since refused to reappear before the Committee. A subpoena is necessary to compel Lewandowski’s cooperation.

Steve Bannon – One of the Russia investigation’s few, bipartisan subpoenas was issued to Steve Bannon, whom the White House had barred from answering relevant questions based on an expansive claim of executive privilege that extends into the transition period and continues after Bannon left the White House. The White House has since permitted Bannon to answer only two dozen scripted, yes-or-no questions, while prohibiting him from answering a wide range of other questions related to the transition, his tenure at the White House, and even his communications since leaving the administration. The Committee should therefore initiate a contempt process to compel the White House to permit Bannon to testify to Congress fully and without constraints.

Hope Hicks – Unlike with Steve Bannon, the Majority refused to issue a subpoena to compel Hope Hicks’ testimony after the White House barred her, without formally invoking executive privilege, from answering questions related to various transition matters and the entirety of her ongoing tenure in the Trump Administration. This double standard is inexplicable. The Committee must issue a subpoena and, if necessary, move to initiate contempt proceedings to compel the White House to permit Hicks to testify to Congress fully and without constraints.

Deutsche Bank – Deutsche Bank has long been the lender of choice for the Trump Organization, financing major investments by Trump over the past twenty years when most other financial institutions would not. Given public statements from the Trump Organization about the centrality of Russian investment in their holdings, and allegations that Russia may exert financial influence over the President, the Committee must compel Deutsche Bank’s production of relevant records and testimony from key bank officials with insight into money transfers and other activity linked to Russia. Deutsche Bank has a history of laundering Russian money and it would negligent of the committee not to determine whether this is a lever the Russians hold over the President and his family.

Evidence of Comey-Trump Conversations – Days after firing FBI Director James Comey, President Trump tweeted that Comey “better hope there are no tapes” of their conversations. The Committee subsequently sent a letter to White House Counsel Don McGahn in June 2017 asking whether there were at any tape recordings, memoranda, or other documents within the possession of the White House which memorialized the President’s interactions with Comey. To date, the White House has not responded satisfactorily to this request, pointing the Committee to tweets by the President which do not address the Committee’s request and sidestepping whether the White House in fact possesses responsive memoranda or other material. Subsequent press reporting has revealed the existence of such documents, and a second bipartisan letter to the White House demanding a response or threatening the use of compulsory process has been ignored. The Committee must seek this information by subpoena.

Twitter – The Committee should issue a subpoena to Twitter to produce direct messages from and between the Twitter handles identified as relevant to the Russia investigation, including those of Guccifer 2.0, WikiLeaks, and Julian Assange. It has been publicly reported that a host of Trump campaign personnel were in touch with these individuals and Russian fronts, including Donald Jr., Roger Stone and Alexander Nix. Twitter has informed the Committee that it will not produce responsive communications absent compulsion.

Encrypted messaging applications – The Committee has learned from certain witnesses that, during periods relevant to the Committee’s investigation, they employed encrypted messaging applications to communicate. The makers of these applications should be compelled by subpoena to produce relevant communications—content at as well as metadata—sent to or from these witnesses.Phone and Other Communication Records – The Trump Organization and Donald Trump Jr. have produced records that redact phone metadata related to communications with specific phone numbers, including around the time of the Trump Tower meeting with the Russians. Moreover, several other witnesses have committed to provide specific communications, but have so far failed to do so. The Committee should issue relevant subpoenas to compel production and press the Trump Organization, in particular, to disclose to the Committee the phone numbers that have been redacted, so that the Committee can validate and cross-reference communications of interest, as well as follow up with the providers.

Adam Schiff showed how Republicans are refusing to issue subpoenas as a way of blocking the Russia investigation

https://www.politicususa.com/2018/02/28/adam-schiff-just-blew-the-lid-off-the-gop-russia-cover-up-for-trump.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+politicususa%2FfJAl+%28Politi cus+USA+%29

Schiff should read this into the House journal.

[spurraider21]

Probably a good idea. He never replies to anything.
yeah the only guys i have on ignore right now are booboo and UNT. probably will add avante at some point. sometimes randomguy tries his best to get on that list too

[boutons_deux]

Ex-CIA officer reveals Hope Hicks’ departure could answer ‘corrupt intent’ question at heart of Mueller probe

“Two big stories that are breaking right now.

One, a rare leak about the Russia probe coming from witnesses who were inside the room, detailing, that after all the discussion of obstruction, Bob Mueller, right now, is back to collusion and back to Donald Trump,”

MSNBC anchor Ari Melber reported.

“Here’s the story, Mueller’s investigators pressing witnesses on a question that we know the White House fears most:

Did Trump know about the Russian email hack against the Democrats in advance? And was he in on it?”


“Two, the other breaking story right now, top Trump aide Hope Hicks, resigning, she’s out. This news breaking literally a day after she faced Russia investigators,” Melber noted. “It appears that Hope Hicks did tell the truth about the lies, that people had been telling for Trump, when they worked for Trump. We only know that she told, as she put it, ‘white lies for Trump,’ because yesterday she was in the setting where she had to tell the truth.”

“That’s exactly right and I think you have to consider

the nature of those white lies and why did she have to tell those white lies, or whatever color the lies, were in the first place?”

Price explained.

“Was there this issue, Ari, of corrupt intent?

Was there corrupt intent when on board Air Force One she was the one relaying messages from Don, Jr on the ground, back to the president, and

back and forth crafting this — what we now know to be false — narrative about a meeting that they said at the time was for adoptions?” Price asked.

“Why did they feel the need to lie about it?”

“Was it some natural compulsion to tell untruths, or, and

this is what Mueller and his team are going to be looking at it,

was it an affirmative effort on the part of Trump officials to obstruct the Mueller probe?” Price continued.

https://www.rawstory.com/2018/02/ex-cia-officer-reveals-hope-hicks-departure-answer-corrupt-intent-question-heart-mueller-probe/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+TheRawStory+%28The+Raw+Story% 29

A lot of smart, experienced, serious people are into the Trash case, like a swarm of locust on crops.

I bet they are all communicating these aspects to Mueller's SWAT team, if Mueller's people hadn't already figured it out.

[DarrinS]

777

[TSA]

yeah the only guys i have on ignore right now are booboo and UNT. probably will add avante at some point. sometimes randomguy tries his best to get on that list too

I enjoyed RG’s posts for years. Dude’s lost it now though, Trump broke him.

[Chris]

969007186037952513

[dabom]

969007186037952513

:lol

[djohn2oo8]

969003079118086145

[TSA]

Because Trump said it the media will automatically rush to defend Horowitz and Sessions. When Horowitz releases his findings and recommends to Sessions to prosecute the media will have cornered themselves. Trump’s tweet was so obviously a set up I’m shocked you missed it.

968955274018131968

:bobo thread

[djohn2oo8]

969020843568304129

[Chris]

968955274018131968

:bobo thread

Anyone who has read The Art of the Deal knows exactly what Trump is doing. :bobo

[djohn2oo8]

969004774778703877

[Chris]

Russians offered dirt. None was delivered. Seth Rich died for delivering it.

[Reck]

Russians offered dirt. None was delivered. Seth Rich died for delivering it.

Prove it, Chris.

[Chris]

Prove it, Chris.

Kim Dotcom willing to testify.

[Pavlov]

Anyone who has read The Art of the Deal knows exactly what Trump is doing. :boboDid you read The Art of the Deal, Chris?

What specifically does it say about these situations?

[Pavlov]

Kim Dotcom willing to testify.In exchange for what?

[djohn2oo8]

969028224167632896
CROFL

[Chris]

Mueller going after anything that moves. Desperate!

[Pavlov]

Mueller going after anything that moves. Desperate!Why are you disparaging Mueller?

[Brazil]

:cry but but she was planning it for months :cry yeah... sure

:lmao

[dabom]

:cry but but she was planning it for months :cry yeah... sure

:lmao

:lol

[boutons_deux]

Mueller gonna rip out Trash's liver and throw it to the dogs.

I bet he's got lying and obstruction on Pence, too

[koriwhat]

Mueller gonna rip out Trash's liver and throw it to the dogs.

I bet he's got lying and obstruction on Pence, too

and i bet you'd love to finger hillary's ass why you're tossing bernie's salad all while having obama jack you off and mccain fuck you from the back.

[Chris]

:lol


969058143593422850

[Chris]

:lol


968874798771310592
968876148053520384


:lmao

[Chris]

969030181334679552

[Chris]

969057137136553984

[djohn2oo8]

It's been obvious for a while now that Trumpsters are willing to overlook Trump's crimes and point to Hillary as if that is a solid defense. It's coward behavior, and behavior of traitors. Such a shame they were born on US soil, or maybe they weren't. All the tweets won't stop Trump from leaving office very early. :downspin:

[DarrinS]

It's been obvious for a while now that Trumpsters are willing to overlook Trump's crimes and point to Hillary as if that is a solid defense. It's coward behavior, and behavior of traitors. Such a shame they were born on US soil, or maybe they weren't. All the tweets won't stop Trump from leaving office very early. :downspin:

What are his crimes?

[DarrinS]

I’ll wait

[Pavlov]

:lol


969058143593422850I did a search for that Hillary quote.

Couldn't find anything tbh.

Maybe you could help me find it, Darrin.

[DarrinS]

I did a search for that Hillary quote.

Couldn't find anything tbh.

Maybe you could help me find it, Darrin.


Why would I do that?

[Pavlov]

Why would I do that?You posted what appears to be a completely fake quote.

I guess you just want to leave it at that.

I'm not surprised.

[Pavlov]

968970472179281920

lol

[djohn2oo8]

I’ll wait

You have asked that question and I have responded at least twice before. If you wanted a response in Russian so you could better understand, you should have said so.

[djohn2oo8]

968970472179281920

lol

"All is well!!!!!!" lol

[Chris]

You have asked that question and I have responded at least twice before. If you wanted a response in Russian so you could better understand, you should have said so.

dodgerjohn

[Pavlov]

Jeez, it's just Wednesday. What the hell kind of Friday news dump could top today?

[djohn2oo8]

Jeez, it's just Wednesday. What the hell kind of Friday news dump could top today?

Lordy! Mueller circling the wagons.

[DMC]

DJohn single handedly keeping Twitter stocks up.

[djohn2oo8]

DJohn single handedly keeping Twitter stocks up.

The ones to thank for that is Trump and his entire cabinet being fuckin criminals :lol

[DMC]

The ones to thank for that is Trump and his entire cabinet being fuckin criminals :lol

They were criminals before they were in office. Why would that change? Same with most career politicians and way too successful businessmen.

[Chucho]

They were criminals before they were in office. Why would that change? Same with most career politicians and way too successful businessmen.

You expect someone who can't read a box score properly or form a thought without a Twitter post to adopt from to understand that? Sad.

[Chris]

969048936173527040

[boutons_deux]

" “This was a case of, ‘I’m done. Physically. Emotionally. Just drained,’” the friend told Politico. “Three years in that kind of environment is a lifetime.”

If she had stayed on, Hicks would have continued without one of her closest allies in the White House,

Josh Raffel, who will leave (https://www.cnn.com/2018/02/27/politics/josh-raffel-white-house-ivanka-trump-jared-kushner/index.html) his role as deputy communications director soon as well.

Raffel’s departure, as well as the apparent diminished roles of Jared Kushner and Ivanka Trump may have contributed to Hicks’ decision as well."

https://talkingpointsmemo.com/dc/hicks-resignation-longtime-coming?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A%20tpm-news%20%28TPMNews%29

Raffel, another scalp

[boutons_deux]

Golden State Warriors Skip White House, Take Students To African American Museum Instead

On Tuesday, the Golden State Warriors (https://www.huffingtonpost.com/topic/golden-state-warriors) took Washington, D.C., area students to the National Museum of African American History and Culture (https://www.huffingtonpost.com/topic/national-museum-of-african-american-history-and-culture) to celebrate the basketball team’s 2017 NBA Finals win.

Following Curry’s comments, Trump tweeted (https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/911572182060453893?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw&ref_url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.nba.com%2Farticle%2F2017% 2F09%2F23%2Fpresident-donald-trump-withdraws-white-house-offer-golden-state-warriors) that the team was uninvited (https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/trump-white-house-nba-champions_us_59c65aede4b06ddf45f83bbb).

https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/warriors-students-african-american-museum-white-house_us_5a959da4e4b036ab0142fb6e?utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=__TheMorningEmail__030118&utm_content=__TheMorningEmail__030118+CID_2d395737 6102bf8ccab37d1da87d5aad&utm_source=Email%20marketing%20software&utm_term=skipped%20a%20White%20House%20tour&ncid=newsltushpmgnews__TheMorningEmail__030118

Trash and his mafiya have turned the WH into a toxic shit hole.

[boutons_deux]

Scarborough Says Hope Hicks Has to ‘Get Ready For Trial’ and Mueller: ‘Things Could Get Ugly’“Hope Hicks also of course involved in that Air Force One meeting, the drafting of the memo (http://www.news.com.au/finance/work/leaders/air-force-one-flight-at-centre-of-mueller-investigation/news-story/e50ef8e11a72dc17198fe2c132e0c662),” Scarborough continued.

“She was just sort of a courier, but

at the same time, I mean, she’s got to get ready for Mueller.

She’s got to get ready for a trial.

I mean, it’s — things could get ugly.”

https://www.mediaite.com/tv/scarborough-says-hope-hicks-has-to-get-ready-for-mueller-and-trial-things-could-get-ugly/

[DarrinS]

You posted what appears to be a completely fake quote.

I guess you just want to leave it at that.

I'm not surprised.


I don’t know what you’re referring to.

[boutons_deux]

‘I know a lot’: Sex model jailed in Thailand claims to have video evidence of Trump-Kremlin links

https://www.rawstory.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/Anastasia-Vashukevich-Instagram.png

A Belarusian social media star is hoping to trade information she says links President Donald Trump to the Kremlin for her release from a Thai prison on sex charges.

Vashukevich, who calls herself Nastya Rybka on her Instagram account (@nastya_rybka.ru (https://www.instagram.com/nastya_rybka.ru/)), told the AP that she fears for her life and wants to trade information in the Trump-Russia probe for her own safety.
She has not offered any such evidence, which she previously claimed to have in an Instagram video, and it’s not clear whether she has any useful information.

The self-described “mistress” of Russian billionaire Oleg Deripaska

Deripaska is a metal tycoon who sued (https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/russian-oligarch-oleg-deripaska-sues-manafort-gates-ny-n836586) former Trump campaign manager Paul Manafort and his lieutenant Rick Gates over an $18.9 million investment the pair was supposed to make in Ukraine.

... sent a letter to the U.S. embassy in Bangkok seeking asylum in exchange for

“photo-video-audio” evidence of wrongdoing between Trump and the Kremlin,

and she also posted a video outlining her claims on Instagram.

“I didn’t want to tell you about many things. Now they’re trying to lock us up,” she says in the video, apparently made while in custody.

“But now I’m ready to put together all the pieces of the puzzle that you have been missing, and

back it up with audio and video regarding the ties of our esteemed lawmakers with Manafort, Trump

and all this buzz around the U.S. election.

I know a lot.”

https://www.rawstory.com/2018/03/i-know-a-lot-sx-model-jailed-in-thailand-claims-to-have-video-evidence-of-trump-kremlin-links/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+TheRawStory+%28The+Raw+Story% 29 (https://www.rawstory.com/2018/03/i-know-a-lot-sx-model-jailed-in-thailand-claims-to-have-video-evidence-of-trump-kremlin-links/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+TheRawStory+%28The+Raw+Story% 29)

[boutons_deux]

Trash's BFF and handler has a hard on for nuking Florida

Putin Nukes Florida in New Animated Video Showing Russia's Futuristic Weapons (https://gizmodo.com/putin-nukes-florida-in-new-animated-video-showing-russi-1823420164)

while the part of the video showing Florida was relatively brief, it wasn’t subtle.

If you had any doubt that it’s showing Florida,

take a look at this Google Maps image side-by-side with Russia’s attack video.

https://gizmodo.com/putin-nukes-florida-in-new-animated-video-showing-russi-1823420164?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+gizmodo%2Ffull+%28Gizmodo%29

[djohn2oo8]

969194298775306240

[djohn2oo8]

They were criminals before they were in office. Why would that change? Same with most career politicians and way too successful businessmen.

Because most politicians, are not indicted for conspiring against their own country.

[boutons_deux]

2020? :lol

[Blake]

Why are you so dumb?

Says dude that falls for fake tweets on the daily

And also doesn't know the difference between "planning to" and "thinking about it"

[Blake]

and i bet you'd love to finger hillary's ass why you're tossing bernie's salad all while having obama jack you off and mccain fuck you from the back.

The things kw thinks about

[djohn2oo8]

969240885086031872
And they had the nerve to say crooked Hillary lol

[RandomGuy]

What are his crimes?

Money laundering for one. Fraud, embezzlement, etc.

His business model has been to build luxury condos in out of the way, very corrupt places, where the government either looks the other way, or is actively taking a cut.

These condos are then marketed to low level mobsters, usually Russians, who are looking to get money out of Russia around sanctions and law enforcement. Condos are then purchased anonymously though shell companies.

This is what you find when you start poking around his businesses, which is why he drew a red line around them, and doesn't release his taxes. His people aren't that smart about it, and it wouldn't take much poking around by a competent auditor to find evidence of this, and likely other "accounting irregularities" that indicate fraud and embezzlement.

[RandomGuy]

I’ll wait

Do a bit of digging into the Azerbaijan location. That project was being used by the Iranian Republican Guard, among others, as a way to launder money around sanctions. The ruling family there is quite cozy with the Iranians, and built some of the worlds most expensive roads, in a very poor country. Easiest way to launder money is through construction, ask any organized crime organization.

Feel free to explain why a $300 million dollar hotel was situated in an industrial area away from downtown and on the opposite side of the city from the airport, and had no road links.

I'll wait.

[RandomGuy]

I assume we all agree money laundering is a crime, of course, other than TSA, who thinks it is ok, as long as it is a Republican doing it.

[clambake]

they're gonna shit a brick if you're right.

[RandomGuy]

I do. And you’re losing it bud. Time for you to take a step back and log off for a few days.

Bullshit you do. I do not believe for a second you give two shits about the rule of law, because all you do here is talk about how one side of the political spectrum does it, without ever commenting on issues when they relate to a Republican, and certainly not any of Trumps HUNDREDS of conflicts of interest, rampant nepotism, and general flaunting of laws by his administration.

If you only give a shit when Democrats are the ones doing something wrong, you don't really care about the rule of law. Period. Lie to yourself, but don't like to me.

[djohn2oo8]

969257231853203456

[djohn2oo8]

969258475430785029

[dabom]

:lol

[djohn2oo8]

:lol

And ol Trump said he wanted to prosecute all the leakers. Lordy!

[boutons_deux]

Trump’s rage at Sessions puts the president in serious danger

In the case of Trump’s efforts to hamstring the Russia probe, this is becoming increasingly clear.

At the same time, those obstruction efforts are failing to bring him closer to his own apparent goals, and may arguably be putting him in greater danger.

One might refer to this paradox as Trump’s “irrational instrumentalism.”



In recent months, Mueller’s team has questioned witnesses in detail about Trump’s private comments and state of mind in late July and early August of last year, around the time he issued a series of tweets belittling his “beleaguered” attorney general, these people said.

The thrust of the questions was to determine whether

the president’s goal was to oust Sessions in order to pick a replacement who would exercise control over the investigation into possible coordination between Russia and Trump associates during the 2016 election,

these people said. …

In mid-July, Trump started escalating his public criticisms of Sessions, including angry tweets. Around that time, according to people familiar with internal White House discussions,

the president discussed firing Sessions or forcing him out of the Justice Department.

Those discussions are of particular interest to Mueller’s investigators, as they seek to determine the president’s intentions, according to a person familiar with the probe.At the time, a White House adviser told a Washington Post reporter that

Trump was “stunned” that Sessions had not yet quit.

The president, this adviser added, had been

hoping the attorney general would be so embarrassed by Trump’s scathing comments that he would leave.


As has been widely noted, Trump’s assaults on Sessions, and his calls for prosecution of political opponents, reveal that he

views law enforcement as little more than an instrument at his political service.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/plum-line/wp/2018/03/01/trumps-rage-at-sessions-puts-the-president-in-serious-danger/?undefined=&utm_term=.9ead97133467&wpisrc=nl_most&wpmm=1

[RandomGuy]

they're gonna shit a brick if you're right.

This is my area of expertise. The risk factors are all there.

Country risk. Check.
Closely held non-public family business. Check.
Financial difficulties. Check.
Industry risk. Check

So many red flags, you would think you were on a GOT film set for a Lannister battle scene.

[boutons_deux]

Do a bit of digging into the Azerbaijan location.

it's Darrin, he don't do no research

Donald Trump’s Worst Deal

The President helped build a hotel in Azerbaijan that appears to be a corrupt operation engineered by oligarchs tied to Iran’s Revolutionary Guard.

https://media.newyorker.com/photos/59097eeffba4e90c8d8d8ecf/master/w_1298,c_limit/170313_r29531.jpg

(https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2017/03/13/donald-trumps-worst-deal)https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2017/03/13/donald-trumps-worst-deal

[RandomGuy]

Trash's BFF and handler has a hard on for nuking Florida

Putin Nukes Florida in New Animated Video Showing Russia's Futuristic Weapons (https://gizmodo.com/putin-nukes-florida-in-new-animated-video-showing-russi-1823420164)

while the part of the video showing Florida was relatively brief, it wasn’t subtle.

If you had any doubt that it’s showing Florida,

take a look at this Google Maps image side-by-side with Russia’s attack video.

https://gizmodo.com/putin-nukes-florida-in-new-animated-video-showing-russi-1823420164?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+gizmodo%2Ffull+%28Gizmodo%29





One has to wonder, if it wasn't a veiled threat after that column of Russian mercenaries got their asses literally shredded.

[TSA]

969258475430785029

969266897782038530

:lol djohn

[boutons_deux]

One has to wonder, if it wasn't a veiled threat after that column of Russian mercenaries got their asses literally shredded.

Russian "elections", free and fair as always, in a few weeks.

Pootin's Look-At-My-Big-Dick is primarily for domestic consumption.

[TSA]

Bullshit you do. I do not believe for a second you give two shits about the rule of law, because all you do here is talk about how one side of the political spectrum does it, without ever commenting on issues when they relate to a Republican, and certainly not any of Trumps HUNDREDS of conflicts of interest, rampant nepotism, and general flaunting of laws by his administration.

If you only give a shit when Democrats are the ones doing something wrong, you don't really care about the rule of law. Period. Lie to yourself, but don't like to me.

We weren't talking about Democrats or Republicans or Trump. We were talking about high ranking officials in the DOJ and FBI who are expected to conduct themselves with integrity, independence, objectivity, and commitment to the rule of law. Eight of these high ranking DOJ/FBI officials did not and you need someone to tell you why you should care. If you have to ask someone to convince you why the conduct of these DOJ/FBI officials is extremely concerning do you really care about the rule of law?

[boutons_deux]

We weren't talking about Democrats or Republicans or Trump. We were talking about high ranking officials in the DOJ and FBI who are expected to conduct themselves with integrity, independence, objectivity, and commitment to the rule of law. Eight of these high ranking DOJ/FBI officials did not and you need someone to tell you why you should care. If you have to ask someone to convince you why the conduct of these DOJ/FBI officials is extremely concerning do you really care about the rule of law?

Does your adored Trash "really care about the rule of law"?

TSA being dicked over by deflective propaganda from Repugs, Breitbart, etc and trying save Trash from being purged deservedly from office.

[djohn2oo8]

969266897782038530

:lol djohn

What's funny, I've posted Quotes from Burr 100 times before. And you disregarded them then. So Burr all good now? :lol

[TSA]

What's funny, I've posted Quotes from Burr 100 times before. And you disregarded them then. So Burr all good now? :lol

I don't recall saying much about any quotes you've posted from Burr. How many more fake news tweets do you plan on posting this week? You are on quite a roll.

[djohn2oo8]

969272500902297601

[djohn2oo8]

I don't recall saying much about any quotes you've posted from Burr. How many more fake news tweets do you plan on posting this week? You are on quite a roll.

You're the one with the "i was wrong about Pizzagate" thread. By the time this is over you will have plenty of those types of threads :lol

[Chucho]

You're the one with the "i was wrong about Pizzagate" thread. By the time this is over you will have plenty of those types of threads :lol

While you still wait to be right once...

[TSA]

969272500902297601

Where in the NYT article does it say that djohn?

[djohn2oo8]

Where in the NYT article does it say that djohn?

Copies of the messages were originally submitted by Mr. Waldman to the Senate committee. In January, one of Mr. Nunes’s staff members requested that copies be shared with the House committee as well, according to a person familiar with the request who was not authorized to talk about it publicly. Days later, the messages were published by Fox News, the person said. Fox’s report said that it had obtained the documents from a Republican source it did not name.

[djohn2oo8]

In a statement, a spokesman for Mr. Nunes, Jack Langer, did not dispute that the committee had leaked the messages, but called the premise of this article “absurd.”

Poor TSA. Getting long dicked yet again.

[Pavlov]

Remember when TSA said leaks bad after loving them for so long?

[TSA]

In a statement, a spokesman for Mr. Nunes, Jack Langer, did not dispute that the committee had leaked the messages, but called the premise of this article “absurd.”

Poor TSA. Getting long dicked yet again.

Why didn't you include the actual statement from Langer?

In a statement, a spokesman for Mr. Nunes, Jack Langer, did not dispute that the committee had leaked the messages, but called the premise of this article “absurd.”

“The New York Times, a prominent purveyor of leaks, is highlighting anonymous sources leaking information that accuses Republicans of leaking information,” he said. “I’m not sure if this coverage could possibly get more absurd.”

[djohn2oo8]

Remember when TSA said leaks bad after loving them for so long?
I surely do remember.

[Pavlov]

Why didn't you include the actual statement from Langer?

In a statement, a spokesman for Mr. Nunes, Jack Langer, did not dispute that the committee had leaked the messages, but called the premise of this article “absurd.”

“The New York Times, a prominent purveyor of leaks, is highlighting anonymous sources leaking information that accuses Republicans of leaking information,” he said. “I’m not sure if this coverage could possibly get more absurd.”Republican say leaks good, TSA say leaks good.

Pattern clear.

[spurraider21]

Why didn't you include the actual statement from Langer?

In a statement, a spokesman for Mr. Nunes, Jack Langer, did not dispute that the committee had leaked the messages, but called the premise of this article “absurd.”

“The New York Times, a prominent purveyor of leaks, is highlighting anonymous sources leaking information that accuses Republicans of leaking information,” he said. “I’m not sure if this coverage could possibly get more absurd.”
still a non-denial denial

[TSA]

A Foreign Power’s Recruitment Effort Is Not a Basis for a FISA Court Warrant

The fact that a foreign power is trying to recruit an American to become an agent for that foreign power is not a sufficient basis to issue a surveillance warrant against the American under FISA. It would, of course, be sufficient to issue a warrant against the foreign spies who are making the recruitment efforts, but it is not enough for a warrant against the American citizen who is the target of the recruitment effort.

To get a surveillance warrant under FISA (i.e., the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978, as codified at Title 50, U.S. Code, Sections 1801 et seq.), the FBI and the Justice Department must establish probable cause that the person to be monitored under the warrant is acting as an active, purposeful agent of a foreign power — not that the foreign power hopes to turn him into such an agent.

FISA defines “agent of a foreign power” — as that term is applicable to “U.S. persons” (i.e., American citizens and permanent-resident aliens) — as a person who:

(A) knowingly engages in clandestine intelligence gathering activities for or on behalf of a foreign power, which activities involve or may involve a violation of the criminal statutes of the United States;

(B) pursuant to the direction of an intelligence service or network of a foreign power, knowingly engages in any other clandestine intelligence activities for or on behalf of such foreign power, which activities involve or are about to involve a violation of the criminal statutes of the United States;

(C) knowingly engages in sabotage or international terrorism, or activities that are in preparation therefor, for or on behalf of a foreign power;

(D) knowingly enters the United States under a false or fraudulent identity for or on behalf of a foreign power or, while in the United States, knowingly assumes a false or fraudulent identity for or on behalf of a foreign power; or

(E) knowingly aids or abets any person in the conduct of activities described in subparagraph (A), (B), or (C) or knowingly conspires with any person to engage in activities described in subparagraph (A), (B), or (C).

(See Section 1801(b)(2)(A)-(E), emphasis added.)

In light of the legal standard that applies, it is inconceivable that the FISA warrant would have issued in the absence of this uncorroborated hearsay allegation — which is exactly what FBI deputy director Andrew McCabe stated in December 2017 House Intelligence Committee testimony (a Nunes memo assertion (at p.3, para.4) that the Schiff memo does not attempt to rebut), and exactly what is reported in the Grassley-Graham memo (at p.2: “The bulk of the application consists of allegations against Page that were disclosed to the FBI by Mr. Steele and are also outlined in the Steele dossier”). Schiff may be right that there were several layers of information in the warrant application about what Russia was doing regarding the election and Russia’s efforts to recruit foreign agents — including Page. But specifically with respect to Page, who was targeted for surveillance and as to whom the government was legally required to show probable cause that he was a knowing, active agent of a foreign power, without the Sechin/Divyekin allegation, there could have been no basis for the warrant.

https://www.nationalreview.com/2018/02/adam-schiff-memo-carter-page-fisa-warrant-fbi-should-have-interviewed/

[spurraider21]

interesting that you now like to use the actual US Code instead of relying on some interpretation by sundance

[Pavlov]

A Foreign Power’s Recruitment Effort Is Not a Basis for a FISA Court Warrant

The fact that a foreign power is trying to recruit an American to become an agent for that foreign power is not a sufficient basis to issue a surveillance warrant against the American under FISA. It would, of course, be sufficient to issue a warrant against the foreign spies who are making the recruitment efforts, but it is not enough for a warrant against the American citizen who is the target of the recruitment effort.

To get a surveillance warrant under FISA (i.e., the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978, as codified at Title 50, U.S. Code, Sections 1801 et seq.), the FBI and the Justice Department must establish probable cause that the person to be monitored under the warrant is acting as an active, purposeful agent of a foreign power — not that the foreign power hopes to turn him into such an agent.

FISA defines “agent of a foreign power” — as that term is applicable to “U.S. persons” (i.e., American citizens and permanent-resident aliens) — as a person who:

(A) knowingly engages in clandestine intelligence gathering activities for or on behalf of a foreign power, which activities involve or may involve a violation of the criminal statutes of the United States;

(B) pursuant to the direction of an intelligence service or network of a foreign power, knowingly engages in any other clandestine intelligence activities for or on behalf of such foreign power, which activities involve or are about to involve a violation of the criminal statutes of the United States;

(C) knowingly engages in sabotage or international terrorism, or activities that are in preparation therefor, for or on behalf of a foreign power;

(D) knowingly enters the United States under a false or fraudulent identity for or on behalf of a foreign power or, while in the United States, knowingly assumes a false or fraudulent identity for or on behalf of a foreign power; or

(E) knowingly aids or abets any person in the conduct of activities described in subparagraph (A), (B), or (C) or knowingly conspires with any person to engage in activities described in subparagraph (A), (B), or (C).

(See Section 1801(b)(2)(A)-(E), emphasis added.)

In light of the legal standard that applies, it is inconceivable that the FISA warrant would have issued in the absence of this uncorroborated hearsay allegation — which is exactly what FBI deputy director Andrew McCabe stated in December 2017 House Intelligence Committee testimony (a Nunes memo assertion (at p.3, para.4) that the Schiff memo does not attempt to rebut), and exactly what is reported in the Grassley-Graham memo (at p.2: “The bulk of the application consists of allegations against Page that were disclosed to the FBI by Mr. Steele and are also outlined in the Steele dossier”). Schiff may be right that there were several layers of information in the warrant application about what Russia was doing regarding the election and Russia’s efforts to recruit foreign agents — including Page. But specifically with respect to Page, who was targeted for surveillance and as to whom the government was legally required to show probable cause that he was a knowing, active agent of a foreign power, without the Sechin/Divyekin allegation, there could have been no basis for the warrant.

https://www.nationalreview.com/2018/02/adam-schiff-memo-carter-page-fisa-warrant-fbi-should-have-interviewed/So it was more than that.

lol McCarthy

[RandomGuy]

We weren't talking about Democrats or Republicans or Trump. We were talking about high ranking officials in the DOJ and FBI who are expected to conduct themselves with integrity, independence, objectivity, and commitment to the rule of law. Eight of these high ranking DOJ/FBI officials did not and you need someone to tell you why you should care. If you have to ask someone to convince you why the conduct of these DOJ/FBI officials is extremely concerning do you really care about the rule of law?

If you only give a shit when Democrats are the ones doing something wrong, you don't really care about the rule of law. Period. Lie to yourself, but don't lie to me.

I need to you to admit that you lie to yourself about giving a shit about government mismanagement or misdeeds. That's it.

[Brazil]

dat nothingburger keeps bringing the goods

[TSA]

If you only give a shit when Democrats are the ones doing something wrong, you don't really care about the rule of law. Period. Lie to yourself, but don't lie to me.

I need to you to admit that you lie to yourself about giving a shit about government mismanagement or misdeeds. That's it.

The DOJ and FBI aren’t Democrats. You can keep deflecting or answer the question. Does it concern you that 8 top officials in the DOJ and FBI did not conduct themselves with integrity, independence, objectivity, and commitment to the rule of law?

[clambake]

The DOJ and FBI aren’t Democrats. You can keep deflecting or answer the question. Does it concern you that 8 top officials in the DOJ and FBI did not conduct themselves with integrity, independence, objectivity, and commitment to the rule of law?

says who?

[boutons_deux]

Ex-US attorney rips Trump’s ‘abject humiliation’ of Sessions: He sees the attorney general as ‘his personal lapdog’

Harry Litman, a former U.S. attorney and deputy assistant attorney general, slammed Donald Trump’s relentless attacks on Jeff Sessions, calling it “despicable” that the president views the attorney general of the United States as “his personal lapdog.”

“How sad is it the president uses him as a punching bag when he was one of the earliest supporters, he was the first senator to climb onto Donald Trump’s campaign when nobody else would touch him?”

“He’s been there for the president, he’s traveled with the president, and because he can’t oversee the [special counsel Robert] Mueller investigation or, in Donald Trump’s words, ‘protect him,’ … Because of that, he’s going to keep getting beat up by the president.”

On the personal level—he’s one of the earliest, most loyal supporters, and he’s being savaged.

And savaged by tweet (https://www.rawstory.com/2018/02/disgraceful-trump-rage-tweets-jeff-sessions-not-enough-investigate-obama/), not personal conversation, which is totally schmucky of the president. (https://www.rawstory.com/2018/03/trumps-head-explodes-every-time-reads-jeff-sessions-furious-ag-stood-reports/)
It’s despicable at the management level,

but it’s really despicable,

this recurrent theme that

the president of the United States views the nation’s chief law enforcement officer as his personal lapdog and

the sort of pit bull to go after the rest of the body politic.”

https://www.rawstory.com/2018/03/ex-us-attorney-rips-trumps-abject-humiliation-sessions-sees-attorney-general-personal-lapdog/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+TheRawStory+%28The+Raw+Story% 29

none of which concerns Deflector-in-Chief TSA and similar ilk in the least.

[djohn2oo8]

Here's a live look at TSA

https://i.imgur.com/M46Xvbl.gif

[TSA]

Ex-US attorney rips Trump’s ‘abject humiliation’ of Sessions: He sees the attorney general as ‘his personal lapdog’

Harry Litman, a former U.S. attorney and deputy assistant attorney general, slammed Donald Trump’s relentless attacks on Jeff Sessions, calling it “despicable” that the president views the attorney general of the United States as “his personal lapdog.”

“How sad is it the president uses him as a punching bag when he was one of the earliest supporters, he was the first senator to climb onto Donald Trump’s campaign when nobody else would touch him?”

“He’s been there for the president, he’s traveled with the president, and because he can’t oversee the [special counsel Robert] Mueller investigation or, in Donald Trump’s words, ‘protect him,’ … Because of that, he’s going to keep getting beat up by the president.”

On the personal level—he’s one of the earliest, most loyal supporters, and he’s being savaged.

And savaged by tweet (https://www.rawstory.com/2018/02/disgraceful-trump-rage-tweets-jeff-sessions-not-enough-investigate-obama/), not personal conversation, which is totally schmucky of the president. (https://www.rawstory.com/2018/03/trumps-head-explodes-every-time-reads-jeff-sessions-furious-ag-stood-reports/)
It’s despicable at the management level,

but it’s really despicable,

this recurrent theme that

the president of the United States views the nation’s chief law enforcement officer as his personal lapdog and

the sort of pit bull to go after the rest of the body politic.”

https://www.rawstory.com/2018/03/ex-us-attorney-rips-trumps-abject-humiliation-sessions-sees-attorney-general-personal-lapdog/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+TheRawStory+%28The+Raw+Story% 29

none of which concerns Deflector-in-Chief TSA and similar ilk in the least.





Because Trump said it the media will automatically rush to defend Horowitz and Sessions. When Horowitz releases his findings and recommends to Sessions to prosecute the media will have cornered themselves.

[Chris]

interesting that you now like to use the actual US Code instead of relying on some interpretation by sundance

What do you think is going to happen Code Reader? We all know you don't anyone to interpret anything for you.

[spurraider21]

What do you think is going to happen Code Reader? We all know you don't anyone to interpret anything for you.
no i just didnt like it when sundance made shit up when the statute didn't support what he said

[boutons_deux]

A Lil’ Bit of Momentum Is Building for Devin Nunes to Get Canned From the House Intelligence Committee

Republican California Rep. Devin Nunes is in the soup again! This time, it’s a New York Times report (https://www.nytimes.com/2018/03/01/us/politics/senate-intelligence-nunes-leaks.html) which says that the Senate Intelligence Committee has concluded that the HouseIntelligence Committee, of which Nunes is chair, leaked an arcane bit of Russia-investigation evidence to Fox News that,

when taken out of context, was briefly embarrassing to Democratic Virginia Sen. Mark Warner.

The Times says that even the Republican chair of Senate Intel, North Carolina Sen. Richard Burr, was peeved:

Senator Richard M. Burr of North Carolina, the committee’s Republican chairman, and Senator Mark Warner of Virginia, the top Democrat, were so perturbed by the leak that they demanded a rare meeting with Speaker Paul D. Ryan last month to inform him of their findings.

They used the meeting with Mr. Ryan to raise broader concerns about the direction of the House Intelligence Committee under its chairman, Representative Devin Nunes of California, the officials said.


Burr is denying (https://twitter.com/mkraju/status/969266897782038530) the substance of the Times report;

CNN’s Manu Raju reports, though, that even if Burr is telling the truth (rather than simply trying to save face)

other Republicans are plenty suspicious of Nunes themselves:

https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2018/03/momentum-builds-to-can-devin-nunes-from-house-intel-role.html

What does Nunes expect to gain by committing treason by obstructing Trash's crimes and treason?

[Chris]

Schiff looks terrified :lol


969312870029606912

[Reck]

Schiff looks terrified :lol


969312870029606912

Schiff cant wrap anything up. He's the minority.

:lol Misfired

[koriwhat]

The things kw thinks about

lol

[Pavlov]

Schiff looks terrified :lol


969312870029606912It's hard to wrap it up when Nunes is dragging it down.

[Chris]

It's hard to wrap it up when Nunes is dragging it down.

I thought it was:

"Nunes :lol"


What happened?

[djohn2oo8]

Schiff cant wrap anything up. He's the minority.

:lol Misfired

969331895329873920

[Pavlov]

969021486144065536

Like clockwork. The trap is set.

lol TSA

[Pavlov]

I thought it was:

"Nunes :lol"


What happened?That hasn't changed.

It's :lol because he's so transparent in his conflict of interest and obstruction.

[Chris]

"Under attack from Trump, Sessions dines with Rosenstein in show of solidarity"

Jesus Christ the spin on this shit :lol

lol Axios

[TSA]

969021486144065536


lol TSA

You are proving my point you fool :lol

[Pavlov]

You are proving my point you fool :lolYeah, because Trump wanted to give Rosenstein all that goodwill too. :lol

Tell me TSA, do you see any historical precedent to the diners at this table?

Yes or no.

[TSA]

969331895329873920

Indicting Russians that will never be extradited based off a DNC paid for Crowdstrike report :rollin

[Pavlov]

Indicting Russians that will never be extradited based off a DNC paid for Crowdstrike report :rollinYou decided who hacked the DNC from reading an anonymous blog.

[TSA]

You decided who hacked the DNC from reading an anonymous blog.You have a strange definition of anonymous:

William Binney, former NSA Technical Director for World Geopolitical & Military Analysis; Co-founder of NSA’s Signals Intelligence Automation Research Center

Skip Folden, independent analyst, retired IBM Program Manager for Information Technology US (Associate VIPS)

Matthew Hoh, former Capt., USMC, Iraq & Foreign Service Officer, Afghanistan (associate VIPS)

Larry C Johnson, CIA & State Department (ret.)

Michael S. Kearns, Air Force Intelligence Officer (Ret.), Master SERE Resistance to Interrogation Instructor

John Kiriakou, Former CIA Counterterrorism Officer and former Senior Investigator, Senate Foreign Relations Committee

Linda Lewis, WMD preparedness policy analyst, USDA (ret.)

Lisa Ling, TSgt USAF (ret.) (associate VIPS)

Edward Loomis, Jr., former NSA Technical Director for the Office of Signals Processing

David MacMichael, National Intelligence Council (ret.)

Ray McGovern, former U.S. Army Infantry/Intelligence officer and CIA analyst

Elizabeth Murray, former Deputy National Intelligence Officer for Middle East, CIA

Coleen Rowley, FBI Special Agent and former Minneapolis Division Legal Counsel (ret.)

Cian Westmoreland, former USAF Radio Frequency Transmission Systems Technician and Unmanned Aircraft Systems whistleblower (Associate VIPS)

Kirk Wiebe, former Senior Analyst, SIGINT Automation Research Center, NSA

Sarah G. Wilton, Intelligence Officer, DIA (ret.); Commander, US Naval Reserve (ret.)

Ann Wright, U.S. Army Reserve Colonel (ret) and former U.S. Diplomat

[djohn2oo8]

969332949844971520

[Chris]

Gaetz has been going HAM this year :tu


969322314650173440

[Pavlov]

You have a strange definition of anonymous:

William Binney, former NSA Technical Director for World Geopolitical & Military Analysis; Co-founder of NSA’s Signals Intelligence Automation Research Center

Skip Folden, independent analyst, retired IBM Program Manager for Information Technology US (Associate VIPS)

Matthew Hoh, former Capt., USMC, Iraq & Foreign Service Officer, Afghanistan (associate VIPS)

Larry C Johnson, CIA & State Department (ret.)

Michael S. Kearns, Air Force Intelligence Officer (Ret.), Master SERE Resistance to Interrogation Instructor

John Kiriakou, Former CIA Counterterrorism Officer and former Senior Investigator, Senate Foreign Relations Committee

Linda Lewis, WMD preparedness policy analyst, USDA (ret.)

Lisa Ling, TSgt USAF (ret.) (associate VIPS)

Edward Loomis, Jr., former NSA Technical Director for the Office of Signals Processing

David MacMichael, National Intelligence Council (ret.)

Ray McGovern, former U.S. Army Infantry/Intelligence officer and CIA analyst

Elizabeth Murray, former Deputy National Intelligence Officer for Middle East, CIA

Coleen Rowley, FBI Special Agent and former Minneapolis Division Legal Counsel (ret.)

Cian Westmoreland, former USAF Radio Frequency Transmission Systems Technician and Unmanned Aircraft Systems whistleblower (Associate VIPS)

Kirk Wiebe, former Senior Analyst, SIGINT Automation Research Center, NSA

Sarah G. Wilton, Intelligence Officer, DIA (ret.); Commander, US Naval Reserve (ret.)

Ann Wright, U.S. Army Reserve Colonel (ret) and former U.S. Diplomat:lol you posted an anonymous blog about it, dude.

[Chris]

969332949844971520

https://media1.giphy.com/media/UR0NWyYwR8MG4/giphy.gif

[Pavlov]

You are proving my point you fool :lol


Yeah, because Trump wanted to give Rosenstein all that goodwill too. :lol

Tell me TSA, do you see any historical precedent to the diners at this table?

Yes or no.Well?

[Chris]

969325048220667904

[TSA]

969332949844971520

:rollin

[TSA]

Well?

Nope.

And thank you for proving my point you fool.

[Chris]

969322025905827841

[djohn2oo8]

969336608775340032

[vy65]

Didn't know Ford Motor Company was a Soros think tank

[djohn2oo8]

Well?

His tongue is tied.

[TSA]

His tongue is tied.

Your eyes are shut

[Chris]

Didn't know Ford Motor Company was a Soros think tank

Ever heard of the CFR? I'm guessing no.

[Chucho]

969332949844971520


Tweets helping connect the dots for djohn. Now he can score it for his "side" with more confidence.

[djohn2oo8]

According to TSA and Darrin, no Russians were involved :lmao

[Pavlov]

Nope.:lmao


And thank you for proving my point you fool.Thank you for proving your abject ignorance you fool.

[TSA]

:lmao

Thank you for proving your abject ignorance you fool.

?

[Pavlov]

?The historical symbolism is blatantly obvious to anyone who is not pushing a Trump 47-D chess narrative. These three guys at dinner with no one else in public last night for a huge reason.

[djohn2oo8]

969340372202803200

[Reck]

Gaetz has been going HAM this year :tu


969322314650173440

Sure, let's give an irresponsible president even more unchecked powers. :lol

[TSA]

The historical symbolism is blatantly obvious to anyone who is not pushing a Trump 47-D chess narrative. These three guys at dinner with no one else in public last night for a huge reason.

what's the historic symbolism?

[Chris]

Sure, let's give an irresponsible president even more unchecked powers. :lol

If its good for the goose, it's good for the gander.

[Pavlov]

what's the historic symbolism?Simple: these would be the three guys in line if Trump got the idea for a Saturday night massacre.

Now how does this fit your Trump 47-D Chess narrative, TSA?

[Chris]

Simple: these would be the three guys in line if Trump got the idea for a Saturday night massacre.

Now how does this fit your Trump 47-D Chess narrative, TSA?

Simple. When the IG report comes out like a bomb, the Left will say "well fuck he's an Obama guy" we can't spin this shit. Trump is setting the table. The Art of the Deal.

[Pavlov]

Simple. When the IG report comes out like a bomb, the Left will say "well fuck he's an Obama guy" we can't spin this shit. Trump is setting the table. The Art of the Deal.You didn't answer the question, Chris.

How does Sessions' dinner fit into that narrative?

[TSA]

Simple: these would be the three guys in line if Trump got the idea for a Saturday night massacre.

Now how does this fit your Trump 47-D Chess narrative, TSA?

Was there some picture of them having dinner before the Saturday night massacre or something? I wasn't even born when it happened so I'm not sure what you found so funny.

Your axios article makes Sessions the good guy and Trump the bad guy. The media is reacting exactly how I said it would. Again, thanks for proving my point you fool.

[Chris]

You didn't answer the question, Chris.

How does Sessions' dinner fit into that narrative?

Sessions eating dinner doesn't really concern me Pavlov.

[TSA]

Simple. When the IG report comes out like a bomb, the Left will say "well fuck he's an Obama guy" we can't spin this shit. Trump is setting the table. The Art of the Deal.

:bobo

[Pavlov]

Was there some picture of them having dinner before the Saturday night massacre or something?:lol


I wasn't even born when it happened so I'm not sure what you found so funny.I wasn't born during WWII but I know more than a couple things about it.

Again, thank you for proving your ignorance.


Your axios article makes Sessions the good guy and Trump the bad guy. The media is reacting exactly how I said it would. Again, thanks for proving my point you fool.You didn't answer the question: How does the dinner with these three men fit your Trump 47-D Chess narrative, TSA?

[Pavlov]

Sessions eating dinner doesn't really concern me Pavlov.There's a fair amount of reasoning suggesting it should, Chris -- but you only believe what you want to believe anyway.

lol crisis actors

[spurraider21]

lol crisis actors
Massive government conspiracy!

lacks budget to hire second actor

[TSA]

:lol

I wasn't born during WWII but I know more than a couple things about it.

Again, thank you for proving your ignorance. ok?


You didn't answer the question: How does the dinner with these three men fit your Trump 47-D Chess narrative, TSA?I never said the dinner fit any chess narrative, I said the article you posted did. And again, thank you for posting that article and proving my point you fool.

[TSA]

There's a fair amount of reasoning suggesting it should, Chris -- but you only believe what you want to believe anyway.

lol crisis actors

lol conspiracy dinner

[spurraider21]

lol conspiracy dinner
The conspiracy would be that the dinner was staged to make people believe something that isn’t true.

[Reck]

969347120208797696

Jesus Christ. Corrupt much?

[TSA]

The conspiracy would be that the dinner was staged to make people believe something that isn’t true.

It's Chumps conspiracy dinner not mine.

[djohn2oo8]

969347120208797696

Jesus Christ. Corrupt much?
:lmao

[Chris]

The conspiracy would be that the dinner was staged to make people believe something that isn’t true.

Axios said that the dinner was about showing solidarity in the face of the tyranny. I trust Axios tbh.

[Chris]

969347120208797696

Jesus Christ. Corrupt much?

Witch Hunt much?

[Blake]

I trust Axios tbh.

:lmao :lmao Chris

[Pavlov]

ok?These people are older than you. They know more than you. They had this public dinner with no one else for a reason -- and that reason is not to elevate Horowitz in the press. Horowitz wasn't there. :lol


I never said the dinner fit any chess narrative, I said the article you posted did. And again, thank you for posting that article and proving my point you fool.Again, thanks for proving your ignorance and doubling down on Trump 47-D chess narrative.

[TSA]

969347120208797696

Jesus Christ. Corrupt much?

Jesus Christ. Clickbait title much?

"It's standard procedure to probe foreign contacts and international business deals as part of a background check investigation"

[TSA]

These people are older than you. They know more than you. They had this public dinner with no one else for a reason -- and that reason is not to elevate Horowitz in the press. Horowitz wasn't there. :lol

Again, thanks for proving your ignorance and doubling down on Trump 47-D chess narrative.

Does the article you posted paint Sessions as the good guy and Trump as the bad guy yes or no?

[djohn2oo8]

969348625892552705

[Pavlov]

Does the article you posted paint Sessions as the good guy and Trump as the bad guy yes or no?It paints then as they have for months now tbh. Nothing has changed since Trump wanted to fire him.

Where do the other two fit in your conspiracy, TSA?

Your message is getting muddled.

[djohn2oo8]

969350117626171394
:lmao

[TSA]

969348625892552705

:lol Garland
:lol BOOM


"It's standard procedure to probe foreign contacts and international business deals as part of a background check investigation"
https://www.cnn.com/2018/03/01/politics/ivanka-trump-fbi-investigation/index.html

[spurraider21]

It's Chumps conspiracy dinner not mine.
He didn’t allege a conspiracy. The AG, deputy AG, and solicitor general had a meal with just the three of them in the public eye.

Is it a conspiracy to suggest that them eating together shows a degree of camarederie?

perhaps. A source close to Sessions, who has spoken with him, says that this meeting was "in no way planned as pushback or an act of solidarity against the president." The source said Solicitor General Noel Francisco requested the meeting some time ago to talk about carrying out various aspects of the department's and administration's agenda.

Axios said that the dinner was about showing solidarity in the face of the tyranny. I trust Axios tbh.
no it didn't

[djohn2oo8]

969348692275843072

[monosylab1k]

and i bet you'd love to finger hillary's ass why you're tossing bernie's salad all while having obama jack you off and mccain fuck you from the back.

:lmao koriwhat revealing his sexual fantasies

[monosylab1k]

:lol Garland
:lol BOOM


"It's standard procedure to probe foreign contacts and international business deals as part of a background check investigation"
https://www.cnn.com/2018/03/01/politics/ivanka-trump-fbi-investigation/index.html

TSA
wrong about pizzagate
My Team
Sacramento Kings
Post Count
8,609

:lol

[djohn2oo8]

969348669895069696
:lmao

[TSA]

It paints then as they have for months now tbh. Nothing has changed since Trump wanted to fire him.

Where do the other two fit in your conspiracy, TSA?

Your message is getting muddled.

I've never brought up the other two. My message has always been the same it's you trying to muddle it with a question like you just asked.

The media are defending Sessions and Horowitz since Trump "attacked" them. When Horowitz recommends charges to Sessions the media will have painted themselves into a corner since they've been propping them up.

[TSA]

He didn’t allege a conspiracy. The AG, deputy AG, and solicitor general had a meal with just the three of them in the public eye.

Is it a conspiracy to suggest that them eating together shows a degree of comradery?

That is exactly what Chump was suggesting, so yes it's Chump's conspiracy dinner.

[Pavlov]

I've never brought up the other two.Exactly. You were completely ignorant of the symbolism and I already thanked you for proving your ignorance.


The media are defending Sessions and Horowitz since Trump "attacked" them. When Horowitz recommends charges to Sessions the media will have painted themselves into a corner since they've been propping them up.What charges, TSA?

What are you saying will happen with the IG investigation?

[Pavlov]

That is exactly what Chump was suggesting, so yes it's Chump's conspiracy dinner.THE CAMARADERIE CONSPIRACY!

:lol TSA

[koriwhat]

:lmao koriwhat revealing his sexual fantasies

that'd be the worst smut film ever.

[djohn2oo8]

https://media.giphy.com/media/7oMx9hEaUaMZa/giphy.gif

[TSA]

Exactly. You were completely ignorant of the symbolism and I already thanked you for proving your ignorance.

What charges, TSA?

What are you saying will happen with the IG investigation?

you're a broken fucking record. Asked and answered yesterday.

[Pavlov]

you're a broken fucking record. Asked and answered yesterday.Yeah, it really wasn't.

You said you wanted to bet on it, then just said nothing.

What charges will be recommended by Horowitz against whom?

[djohn2oo8]

lol Ivanka will be wearing orange too.
5/5/2017

https://media.giphy.com/media/7oMx9hEaUaMZa/giphy.gif

[Chris]

What charges will be recommended by Horowitz against whom?

How could anyone who doesn't have clearance to see the IG report know that? You don't win arguments by asking impossible questions and then declaring victory when no one knows the answers.

[Pavlov]

How could anyone who doesn't have clearance to see the IG report know that? You don't win arguments by asking impossible questions and then declaring victory when no one knows the answers.TSA predicted Horowitz will recommend charges.

Someone has to be charged.

With something.

How can he predict charges without predicting what charges and to whom they would apply?

[boutons_deux]

Failure Condy Rice should be in prison with all the other Repug Iraq war criminals, not giving anybody advice about how to govern.

[boutons_deux]

Alabama Senator Says He Would Quit If He Were Sessions: I Wouldn’t Be Trump’s ‘Whipping Boy’

https://www.mediaite.com/tv/alabama-senator-says-he-would-quit-if-he-were-sessions-wouldnt-be-trumps-whipping-boy/

I predict Sessions will be remembered more for how Trash humiliated him than for anything Sessions will accomplish (which will be bad in any case).

[boutons_deux]

Nunes doesn’t deny leaking private text messages to Fox News, but blames press for reporting it

“I’m not sure if this coverage could possibly get more absurd.”

https://thinkprogress.org/devin-nunes-mark-warner-text-messages-fox-news-attacks-new-york-times-6f35b0b62cf8/

:lol The Best People, these Repugs

[TSA]

TSA predicted Horowitz will recommend charges.

Someone has to be charged.

With something.

How can he predict charges without predicting what charges and to whom they would apply?

I can predict recommended charges without predicting what charges and to whom because I don’t have access to the OIG report. An investigation going “no where” doesn’t lead to resignations or demotions of 8 top DOJ/FBI officials.

[TSA]

The State Department has officially approved a possible $47 million sale of Javelin antitank missiles and related equipment to Ukraine, the Pentagon announced Thursday.

The move marks a significant escalation of lethal aid to Ukraine in its ongoing struggles against Russia.

http://thehill.com/policy/defense/376351-us-approves-sale-of-210-anti-tank-missiles-to-ukraine
RandomGuy how’s this fit with your theory?

[Pavlov]

I can predict recommended charges without predicting what charges and to whom because I don’t have access to the OIG report. An investigation going “no where” doesn’t lead to resignations or demotions of 8 top DOJ/FBI officials.So it's just more innuendo.

CHARGES WILL BE RECOMMENDED! I GUARANTEE IT! I DON'T KNOW WHAT CHARGES OR AGAINST WHOM BUT BET ME!

[TSA]

Nunes doesn’t deny leaking private text messages to Fox News, but blames press for reporting it

“I’m not sure if this coverage could possibly get more absurd.”

https://thinkprogress.org/devin-nunes-mark-warner-text-messages-fox-news-attacks-new-york-times-6f35b0b62cf8/

:lol The Best People, these Repugs


“I think it was unfair to Hope Hicks that conversations as part of her testimony were leaked out of the committee. In fairness to her, I think that we should wait until we release the full transcripts of our witnesses to be talking in detail like that,” Schiff told CNN’s Wolf Blitzer.

Committee Democrats have been accused of being behind the leak, and Schiff did not deny to Blitzer that his side of the aisle was responsible.

http://amp.dailycaller.com/2018/03/01/adam-schiff-unfair-hope-hicks/

:lol the best people, these Dems

[Pavlov]

“I think it was unfair to Hope Hicks that conversations as part of her testimony were leaked out of the committee. In fairness to her, I think that we should wait until we release the full transcripts of our witnesses to be talking in detail like that,” Schiff told CNN’s Wolf Blitzer.

Committee Democrats have been accused of being behind the leak, and Schiff did not deny to Blitzer that his side of the aisle was responsible.

http://amp.dailycaller.com/2018/03/01/adam-schiff-unfair-hope-hicks/

:lol the best people, these DemsLeaks bad now.

[TSA]

So it's just more innuendo.

CHARGES WILL BE RECOMMENDED! I GUARANTEE IT! I DON'T KNOW WHAT CHARGES OR AGAINST WHOM BUT BET ME!

The job of the OIG is to investigate and recommend charges if criminal acts are found. You’re a fool if you think the longest running investigation since the Inspector General empowerment act was passed won’t be recommending charges.

[Pavlov]

The job of the OIG is to investigate and recommend charges if criminal acts are found. You’re a fool if you think the longest running investigation since the Inspector General empowerment act was passed won’t be recommending charges.What criminal acts do you think will be found, TSA?

And who acted criminally?

[TSA]

Leaks bad now.

This was an amusing leak as we found out Hope Hicks was so honest she admitted to lying about Trump being out of office if he didn’t want to take a phone call.

[TSA]

What criminal acts do you think will be found, TSA?

And who acted criminally?

That’s for Horowitz to decide. Have you read his investigation findings yet?

[Pavlov]

That’s for Horowitz to decide. Have you read his investigation findings yet?You've already decided for Horowitz that he will recommend criminal charges.

You did that without reading his investigation's findings.

So now decide for Horowitz what criminal charges he will be recommending and against whom.

[Pavlov]

This was an amusing leak as we found out Hope Hicks was so honest she admitted to lying about Trump being out of office if he didn’t want to take a phone call.So leak good?

Pick a lane.

[djohn2oo8]

So leak good?

Pick a lane.

:lmao

[Reck]

Jesus Christ. Clickbait title much?

"It's standard procedure to probe foreign contacts and international business deals as part of a background check investigation"

I'm sure the Trump (now criminal investigation) started just as "standard procedure." :lmao

[djohn2oo8]

I'm sure the Trump (now criminal investigation) started just as "standard procedure." :lmao
Funny how he left out the next paragraph right after that sentence.

[Chris]

I'm sure the Trump (now criminal investigation) started just as "standard procedure." :lmao

Started with a fake dossier paid for by Hillary. Not Papapoopoo. Not elite Russian hackers. Pure bullshit is what started this investigation. Definitely standard procedure pre-Trump Era.

[TSA]

You've already decided for Horowitz that he will recommend criminal charges.

You did that without reading his investigation's findings.

So now decide for Horowitz what criminal charges he will be recommending and against whom.

I predicted Horowitz will bring charges based on 8 top DOJ/FBI officials resigning/demoted from his investigation’s findings.

I’m content to sit back and let Horowitz decide what charges to recommend.

[djohn2oo8]

http://iruntheinternet.com/lulzdump/images/1354228594m.gif

Live look at TSA and crew

[djohn2oo8]

Started with a fake dossier paid for by Hillary. Not Papapoopoo. Not elite Russian hackers. Pure bullshit is what started this investigation. Definitely standard procedure pre-Trump Era.

Dossier didn't come out until after investigation started. Sorry.

[Reck]

http://iruntheinternet.com/lulzdump/images/1354228594m.gif

Live look at TSA and crew

Is the little kid, Chris? :lol

[djohn2oo8]

Oh and Chris seems rather upset tonight :lol

[djohn2oo8]

Is the little kid, Chris? :lol

Yup with TSA driving. Darrin and CC in the back.

[Chris]

Nunes: FBI may have violated criminal statutes in FISA application to spy on Trump adviser Carter Page



The FBI may have violated criminal statutes, as well as its own strict internal procedures, by using unverified information during the 2016 election to obtain a surveillance warrant on onetime Trump campaign aide Carter Page, the chairman of the House Intelligence Committee charged Thursday in a letter obtained by Fox News.

House Intelligence Committee Chairman Devin Nunes, R-Calif., wrote in his letter to Attorney General Jeff Sessions that “in this instance, it’s clear that basic operating guidance was violated.”

Nunes cited the Domestic Investigations and Operations Guide (DIOG), which was created by the bureau and approved by the Justice Department, to say he believed the FBI violated procedures requiring verified and documented evidence in applications to the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court.

An Oct. 2011 version of the operations guide states that the “accuracy of information contained within FISA applications is of utmost importance... Only documented and verified information may be used to support FBI applications to the court.”

The guidance also states that information in a FISA application must be “thoroughly vetted and confirmed.”

A memo released by the intelligence committee last month stated that the FBI and DOJ sought surveillance warrants to spy on Page by using an infamous, Democrat-funded anti-Trump dossier that included salacious and unverified allegations about Trump's connections to Russia.

HOUSE MEMO: DOSSIER WAS KEY TO FBI'S FISA WARRANT FOR CARTER PAGE

“Former and current DOJ and FBI leadership have confirmed to the committee that unverified information from the Steele dossier comprised an essential part of the FISA applications related to Carter Page,” Nunes wrote Thursday.

Nunes listed five criminal statues that were possibly violated, including conspiracy, obstruction of justice, contempt of court. It also cites statues that make it a crime to willfully deprive a person of a right protected by the Constitution and another preventing unauthorized electronic surveillance.

In the letter, Nunes asks Sessions whether these protocols requiring verified information have changed, and if not, what steps the DOJ or FBI taken to hold officials behind the Page application accountable.

The letter is carbon copied to FBI Director Christopher Wray and DOJ Inspector General Michael Horowitz.

Fox News has requested comment from the FBI, the Justice Department and the House Democrats on the Intelligence Committee.

Sessions acknowledged this week that Horowitz is probing the circumstances of the surveillance of Page.

SESSIONS: DOJ IG TO PROBE FISA ABUSE ALLEGATIONS

“We believe the Department of Justice must adhere to the high standards in the FISA court,” Sessions said during a news conference Tuesday. “Yes it will be investigated. And I think that's just the appropriate thing the inspector general will take that as one of the matters he'll deal with.”

That admission, though, put Sessions back in President Trump’s crosshairs Wednesday, with the president referring to Horowitz as an “Obama guy” and calling Sessions’ decision “disgraceful.”

House Intelligence Committee Republicans and Democrats have argued over whether the dossier was a primary or secondary element of the surveillance application.

Democrats released a rebuttal memo on Sunday, saying the dossier was corroborated by multiple sources.

But in his June 2017 testimony to the Senate Intelligence Committee, then-FBI Director Jim Comey said he still considered the dossier “unverified” and “salacious” three months after the October 2016 surveillance warrant was granted.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/03/01/nunes-fbi-may-have-violated-criminal-statutes-in-fisa-application-to-spy-on-trump-adviser-carter-page.html



https://media0.giphy.com/media/10Jpr9KSaXLchW/giphy.gif

[djohn2oo8]

Nunes: FBI may have violated criminal statutes in FISA application to spy on Trump adviser Carter Page






https://media0.giphy.com/media/10Jpr9KSaXLchW/giphy.gif
Nope. Sorry.

[TSA]

Nope. Sorry.

That’s why Sessions publicly ordered IG Horowitz to investigate it right?

http://iruntheinternet.com/lulzdump/images/1354228594m.gif

Live look at djohn2oo8 and crew

[djohn2oo8]

That’s why Sessions publicly ordered IG Horowitz to investigate it right?

http://iruntheinternet.com/lulzdump/images/1354228594m.gif

Live look at djohn2oo8 and crew

Yet you never said what you think the charges will be. Pussy. Pizzagate got you with your tail between dem legs.

[djohn2oo8]

969221077657440258
:lmao TSA theory

[spurraider21]

"It's over" :lmao

who is it over for?
what will they be charged with?

Stop being a pussy. Name names.
stop being a pussy, TSA, name the charges

[TSA]

969221077657440258
:lmao TSA theory

“I’m told”

Thanks for providing more evidence for my theory you fool.

Why would Sessions publicly order Horowitz to investigate the FISA warrant? Why would Trump tweet an “attack” on Sessions/Horowitz the next day? Why would Nunes request to Sessions come out the day after that?

It’s obvious where this is headed and the slow roll out to the public has begun. Horowitz report comes out this month. Your entire world is about to be flipped upside down.

[djohn2oo8]

Name. A. Charge.

[Reck]

“I’m told”

Thanks for providing more evidence for my theory you fool.

Why would Sessions publicly order Horowitz to investigate the FISA warrant? Why would Trump tweet an “attack” on Sessions/Horowitz the next day? Why would Nunes request to Sessions come out the day after that?

It’s obvious where this is headed and the slow roll out to the public has begun. Horowitz report comes out this month. Your entire world is about to be flipped upside down.

Unnamed sources bad now.

:lol TSA

[djohn2oo8]

Unnamed sources bad now.

:lol TSA

:lmao

[Spurminator]

Don't know about you guys but I just can't get away from all of these stories in the media defending Sessions and Horowitz.

[Chris]

969402082385002496

https://media.giphy.com/media/VJ2B0I6t2HEUE/giphy.gif

[Chris]

969404302291738625

https://media1.giphy.com/media/tyqcJoNjNv0Fq/giphy.gif

[spurraider21]

969402082385002496

https://media.giphy.com/media/VJ2B0I6t2HEUE/giphy.gif
where is the quote from butowsky?

[djohn2oo8]

969364786814312449 Reck Pavlov

Yeah TSA. That didn't go the way you thought it would.

[Chris]

where is the quote from butowsky?

http://amp.washingtontimes.com/news/2018/mar/1/more-cover-up-questions/?__twitter_impression=true

[Reck]

http://amp.washingtontimes.com/news/2018/mar/1/more-cover-up-questions/?__twitter_impression=true

Jesus Christ. What a lunatic that guy is. Puts TSA to shame.

Also Opinion piece.

Also no quotes from said guy.

[spurraider21]

http://amp.washingtontimes.com/news/2018/mar/1/more-cover-up-questions/?__twitter_impression=true
I read the entire article. There's no quote attributable to Butowsky.

[Chris]

I read the entire article. There's no quote attributable to Butowsky.

"in his discussions with Joel and Mary Rich"

Make sense now?

[spurraider21]

"in his discussions with Joel and Mary Rich"

Make sense now?
That's not a quote from Butowsky. That's a quote from the author.

[Chris]

That's not a quote from Butowsky. That's a quote from the author.

You're asking for something that doesn't tangibly exist yet afaik. Make sense now?

[spurraider21]

You're asking for something that doesn't tangibly exist yet afaik. Make sense now?
Yeah that was actually my point entirely.

[Chris]

Yeah that was actually my point entirely.

Quit being so passive aggressive then and just make your damn point. Pretty disingenuous imo

[Chris]

969357469196673024

[spurraider21]

Quit being so passive aggressive then and just make your damn point. Pretty disingenuous imo
wasnt disingenuous. asked if there was an actual butowsky quote since mr dotcom seemed so excited by these new devleopments