Flynn in major trouble for speaking to Russia about sanctions

[DarrinS]

Journalists don't understand what dependent random variables are tbh.

But they know what a narrative is. And they've been looping this one for months.

[baseline bum]

But they know what a narrative is. And they've been looping this one for months.

Shouldn't they be talking about it when he's under investigation from the FBI and has been for months?

[DarrinS]

Shouldn't they be talking about it when he's under investigation from the FBI and has been for months?

Sure, but after months have gone by, you would think they would have something by now. I'm not even thoroughly convinced that Guccifer 2.0 is Russian.

^That person wanted to make sure that people would think it's Russia.

[baseline bum]

Sure, but after months have gone by, you would think they would have something by now. I'm not even thoroughly convinced that Guccifer 2.0 is Russian.

Are they just not supposed to report an investigation into the president of the united states for treason? This deserves to be a continuing top story and I could give a shit if the GOP finds it inconvenient for getting their agenda enacted. They nominated a con-man to lead their party, now they have to deal with the consequences of that.

[DarrinS]

Are they just not supposed to report an investigation into the president of the united states for treason? This deserves to be a continuing top story and I could give a shit if the GOP finds it inconvenient for getting their agenda enacted. They nominated a con-man to lead their party, now they have to deal with the consequences of that.

That's all good, but eventually they need to produce something -- anything.

[pgardn]

Media narrative also gave Orange Hitler no chance against Crooked Hitlery.

^And I firmly believed that one.

What?

This caught more than the media by surprise.
There were people who voted for Trump that were in shock. There were people within his organization that got it wrong. So you can't believe the media because they got the election wrong?

Honest to a God that is just horrible logic.
Stick to the Democratic idiot from CNN that gave Hillary questions. Not trusting politicians that "news" organizations use for their commentary. FOX does the same thing.

[DarrinS]

What?

This caught more than the media by surprise.
There were people who voted for Trump that were in shock. There were people within his organization that got it wrong. So you can't believe the media because they got the election wrong?

Honest to a God that is just horrible logic.
Stick to the Democratic idiot from CNN that gave Hillary questions. Not trusting politicians that "news" organizations use for their commentary. FOX does the same thing.


I already admitted that I believed it, too. When MSM is trying to "hard sell" me on something, I'm now going to be skeptical. I could be completely wrong, but I'll wait to be proven wrong.

[baseline bum]

I already admitted that I believed it, too. When MSM is trying to "hard sell" me on something, I'm now going to be skeptical. I could be completely wrong, but I'll wait to be proven wrong.

What hard sell are they putting on? Are you watching Rachel Maddow or something?

[pgardn]

What?

This caught more than the media by surprise.
There were people who voted for Trump that were in shock. There were people within his organization that got it wrong. So you can't believe the media because they got the election wrong?

Honest to a God that is just horrible logic.
Stick to the Democratic idiot from CNN that gave Hillary questions. Not trusting politicians that "news" organizations use for their commentary. FOX does the same thing.

Addendum:

Chris Wallace is excellent on FOX. Today he shot huge holes in both Reince Preibus and the Freedom Cacus motives. Honest to God, I don't see how these Republicans are actually accepting TV interviews with him. I can see why Democrats stay away.

Imo you can find good journalism and reporters even on clearly slanted news organization networks/papers. No replacement for good tough questions.

[DarrinS]

What hard sell are they putting on? Are you watching Rachel Maddow or something?

The whole Trump-Russia collusion conspiratard theory. Has this not been talked about every night on major networks?

[DarrinS]

Addendum:

Chris Matthews is excellent on FOX. Today he shot huge holes in both Reince Preibus and the Freedom Cacus motives. Honest to God, I don't see how these Republicans are actually accepting TV interviews with him. I can see why Democrats stay away.

Imo you can find good journalism and reporters even on clearly slanted news organization networks/papers. No replacement for good tough questions.

I think you meant Chris Wallace.

[baseline bum]

Addendum:

Chris Matthews is excellent on FOX. Today he shot huge holes in both Reince Preibus and the Freedom Cacus motives. Honest to God, I don't see how these Republicans are actually accepting TV interviews with him. I can see why Democrats stay away.

Imo you can find good journalism and reporters even on clearly slanted news organization networks/papers. No replacement for good tough questions.

Are you thinking of Chris Wallace? I fucking love that guy. He was the only one to call Hillary on her no fly zone in Syria crap in the debates. I can't believe Trump never did, what a shithead.

[baseline bum]

The whole Trump-Russia collusion conspiratard theory. Has this not been talked about every night on major networks?

Conspiritard theory? The one the FBI is investigating? LOL you trying to act like this is on par with Bush blowing up the towers or Ted Cruz's dad killing Kennedy,

[pgardn]

I think you meant Chris Wallace.


Note the change.
Yep.

I watched Chris Matthews last night on a press "pat their backs" dinner. Thought it was self congratulatory bs with some good stuff thrown in.

[pgardn]

Are you thinking of Chris Wallace? I fucking love that guy. He was the only one to call Hillary on her no fly zone in Syria crap in the debates. I can't believe Trump never did, what a shithead.

Yes.

I changed it as you guys caught it. I guess there is a time delay on edits as it shows up unedited.

[Reck]

Media narrative also gave Orange Hitler no chance against Crooked Hitlery.

^And I firmly believed that one.

No, they went with what polls said.

Everyone was wrong. Including the so call experts. Trump was a true anomaly. Even Trump and his people thought they were going to lose on election night.

The FBI conducting an investigation into possible Trump Russian ties is not some make believe. It's something that's happening. Cant play the media narrative there.

[DarrinS]

Conspiritard theory? The one the FBI is investigating? LOL you trying to act like this is on par with Bush blowing up the towers or Ted Cruz's dad killing Kennedy,

Well, I call it a theory/allegation until I see evidence.

[baseline bum]

Everyone was wrong. Including the so call experts. Trump was a true anomaly. Even Trump and his people thought they were going to lose on election now.

Silver wasn't wrong. He had been talking for months about how vulnerable the Clinton firewall was to a slight polling error.

[DarrinS]

No, they went with what polls said.

Everyone was wrong. Including the so call experts. Trump was a true anomaly. Even Trump and his people thought they were going to lose on election now.

The FBI conducting an investigation into possible Trump Russian ties is not some make believe. It's something that's happening. Cant play the media narrative there.


It's been under investigation for months. Last weeks hearing wasn't a revelation.

[baseline bum]

Well, I call it a theory/allegation until I see evidence.

No, you called it a conspiritard theory even though it's something being actively investigated by the FBI. This isn't some random crap from Cosmored after he watched a few youtubes. Reporting on the biggest story in the world as it unfolds isn't pushing a conspiracy theory.

[Reck]

Silver wasn't wrong. He had been talking for months about how vulnerable the Clinton firewall was to a slight polling error.

Yeah he did talk about that but he also gave her like an 80% chance of winning the thing.

[baseline bum]

Yeah he did talk about that but he also gave her like an 80% chance of winning the thing.

No he didn't. He had Clinton with a 67% chance of winning when he released his final projection the morning everyone went to the polls.

[Reck]

It's been under investigation for months. Last weeks hearing wasn't a revelation.

It wasn't?

Did you know the FBI was investigating Trump and Russia? If so you were the ony one. I was very surprised Comey said that.

People did not know he was under ivestigation on election night. That could have effected things, imo.

[baseline bum]

It wasn't?

Did you know the FBI was investigating Trump and Russia? If so you were the ony one. I was very surprised Comey said that.

People did not know he was under ivestigation on election night. That could have effected things, imo.

Yeah that was a hell of a revelation from Comey.

[baseline bum]

Yes.

I changed it as you guys caught it. I guess there is a time delay on edits as it shows up unedited.

Wallace really grilled the hell out of Ryan too. Ryan kept talking about how Trumpcare was about freedom, and then Wallace said a 64 year old making $26,000 a year having her premiums go up from $1700 a year under Obamacare to $15,000 a year under Trumpcare wasn't freedom. I love watching Wallace, he always has hard hitting questions that cut right through all the political doublespeak his guests are always trying to spin.

[DarrinS]

It wasn't?

Did you know the FBI was investigating Trump and Russia? If so you were the ony one. I was very surprised Comey said that.

People did not know he was under ivestigation on election night. That could have effected things, imo.

I did.

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/03/01/us/politics/obama-trump-russia-election-hacking.html


"The F.B.I. is conducting a wide-ranging counterintelligence investigation into Russia’s meddling in the election, and is examining alleged links between Mr. Trump’s associates and the Russian government."

[DarrinS]

Wallace really grilled the hell out of Ryan too. Ryan kept talking about how Trumpcare was about freedom, and then Wallace said a 64 year old making $26,000 a year having her premiums go up from $1700 a year under Obamacare to $15,000 a year under Trumpcare wasn't freedom. I love watching Wallace, he always has hard hitting questions that cut right through all the political doublespeak his guests are always trying to spin.


I'm a fan of Wallace, too.

[baseline bum]

I'm a fan of Wallace, too.

I wish he would moderate every debate from here on out. He is the person I wanted to vote for after the third debate.

[Reck]

No he didn't. He had Clinton with a 67% chance of winning when he released his final projection the morning everyone went to the polls.

72% but who's counting.

http://fivethirtyeight.com/features/final-election-update-theres-a-wide-range-of-outcomes-and-most-of-them-come-up-clinton/

[benefactor]

Breaking:

FBI is now launching a full investigation on NASA for potentially staging the moon landings.

[baseline bum]

72% but who's counting.

http://fivethirtyeight.com/features/final-election-update-theres-a-wide-range-of-outcomes-and-most-of-them-come-up-clinton/

Hmmm, I remember it being 67% that morning, maybe it changed later in the day. Still, 72% is no guaranteed win. It wasn't anything like the almost certain win he projected for Obama over Romney in 2012.

[Kim Jong-il]

I'm just using common sense. If you're part of some secret collaboration with Putin, you don't go on TV and announce it. Also unusual that all those being investigated seem more than happy to come forth for questioning. Roger Stone has done several interviews in the last couple of days -- he doesn't seem too worried.
:lol no, it would be completely out of character for Donald Trump to be extremely arrogant to the point where he'd go boasting about shit when he oughta keep his mouth shut. He'd neeeeeeeeever do that.

[boutons_deux]

Washington Post Calls For House Investigation To Be Stopped, Nunes To Be Investigated. (http://www.dailykos.com/stories/2017/3/24/1646769/-Washington-Post-Calls-For-House-Investigation-Stopped-Nunes-To-Be-Investigated)

From the Washington Post (https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/global-opinions/shut-down-nuness-investigation--and-investigate-him-for-leaking/2017/03/23/48d3e020-0fe5-11e7-9d5a-a83e627dc120_story.html?utm_term=.6242b7e1cb71) Editorial Board:


He insisted that those who described those contacts to the press be tracked down and prosecuted.

He demanded that FBI Director James B. Comey confirm that such revelations “violate . . . a section of the Espionage Act that criminalizes the disclosure of information concerning the communication and intelligence activities of the United States.”
…
His committee’s investigation should be halted immediately — and Mr. Nunes deserves to be subject to the same leaking probe he demanded for the previous disclosures.
...
He was simply doing everything in his power to protect President Trump, for whom he has become a fierce, if erratic, guard dog.
...
It is time to discuss the formation of an independent, nonpartisan commission with full subpoena power, like those that investigated the attacks of 9/11 and the intelligence failures in Iraq. In the meantime, House leaders should put an end to the embarrassing travesty being directed by Mr. Nunes.


http://www.dailykos.com/story/2017/3/24/1646769/-Washington-Post-Calls-For-House-Investigation-Stopped-Nunes-To-Be-Investigated

[FuzzyLumpkins]

Think the GOP will actually want to take him down now the way he blew the ACA repeal?

I would think that a significant plurality in the party would prefer Pence.

[FuzzyLumpkins]

Journalists don't understand what dependent random variables are tbh.

Following the debates she was destroying him. Polls tightened towards the end particularly after Comey made the emails an issue again in the final weeks.

Plenty of places wrote about the dynamic. People that act like the media is monolithic (except muh right wing sites of course!) are the real problem.

[boutons_deux]

From Russia, With Oil
The “Mayflower Meeting” was an April 27th meeting at the Mayflower Hotel,

It is not clear precisely what was discussed at this meeting, but several things are known for certain.

written by Russian lobbyist Richard Burt, Trump promised to “make a deal under my administration that’s great for America but also good for Russia.”

The meeting was a 24-person “cocktail hour” held in the Mayflower’s VIP Senate Room.

Trump was there, and according to Heilbrunn, so were
(now Attorney-General) Jeff Sessions,
Trump’s son-in-law Jared Kushner,
Trump’s previous campaign chair Corey Lewandowski,
Iran-Contra figure (!) Bud McFarlane, and
Paul Manafort.

Also present were four ambassadors — from Russia, Italy, Singapore, and the Philippines—and

key figures from Rosneft, Russia’s state oil company.

(The Philippines are one of Rosneft’s primary expansion targets for coming years.)

Between December 5th and 7th of 2016, 19.5% of Rosneft was sold through a labyrinth of shell companies to parties unknown (http://www.reuters.com/article/us-russia-rosneft-privatisation-insight-idUSKBN1582OH).

The key brokers in this deal were Singapore, Italy, and the Qatari company Gencore, which on December 10th stated that it had received 0.54% of the company as its fee for facilitating the deal.

What was particularly surprising about this number was that

back in July of 2016, the Steele Dossier (https://www.buzzfeed.com/kenbensinger/these-reports-allege-trump-has-deep-ties-to-russia?utm_term=.nmpDDdnBWL#.twM4413Mzv) reported that Putin had offered Trump 19% of Rosneft (http://www.businessinsider.com/carter-page-trump-russia-igor-sechin-dossier-2017-1) in exchange for lifting U.S. sanctions on Russia.

While there has been a great deal of talk about how nobody should trust the Steele Dossier, it’s very curious that the exact amount of the missing Rosneft shares was described publicly by this dossier five months before the deal.

The allegation is an explicit quid pro quo:

Trump would as President further Russian interests,

eliminating oil sanctions and

ratifying Russian control of parts of Ukraine,

in exchange for 19% of Rosneft and

Russian intelligence assistance in winning the election.


https://medium.com/@yonatanzunger/from-russia-with-oil-4d027411bcc5#.eyj94meqx

[boutons_deux]

Mayflower meeting in April

A few weeks later, Assange starts leaking stuff on Hillary, weekly, strategically, to cut her traction.

Assange (and Comey) hand PVL Trash the WH in Nov

19.5% of Rosneft sold in Dec to unknown party

[DarrinS]

botox still referencing the Steele dossier :lol

[djohn2oo8]

846327513563480065

[djohn2oo8]

846188937261568001

[djohn2oo8]

846363700344901632

[djohn2oo8]

846384067532722176

[djohn2oo8]

846343634458939394

[djohn2oo8]

846385161738633216

[djohn2oo8]

846388861362147330

[djohn2oo8]

846392049175859200
:lmao

[DarrinS]

Copy/paste bot back on duty :lol

[djohn2oo8]

Copy/paste bot back on duty :lol

Doubt you are even capable of copy and paste. Nevertheless, you ain't deflecting nothing. You will take the shit sandwich and eat it.

[boutons_deux]

Trash called IC Nazis, so they have special motivation to pull no punches

[djohn2oo8]

846404706499002368
Nunes getting thrown under the bus already.

[boutons_deux]

Grassley Requests Info From Political Firm Behind Trump-Russia Dossier

Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley (R-IA) on Monday requested information from the political opposition research firm behind an explosive document containing allegations of ties between President Donald Trump and Russia.

Grassley sent (https://www.grassley.senate.gov/news/news-releases/grassley-probes-opposition-research-firm-behind-unsubstantiated-trump-dossier) a letter dated Friday to Fusion GPS requesting that the firm answer questions about who hired the company "to conduct opposition research relating to Mr. Trump and his associates," when its investigation took place and what relationship the firm had with the FBI, which reportedly paid the firm's investigator.

The document, which BuzzFeed published (https://www.buzzfeed.com/kenbensinger/these-reports-allege-trump-has-deep-ties-to-russia) in January, remains largely unsubstantiated, though in February CNN reported (http://www.cnn.com/2017/02/10/politics/russia-dossier-update/) that multiple unnamed sources within the U.S. intelligence community had corroborated certain communications detailed in it.

"When political opposition research becomes the basis for law enforcement or intelligence efforts, it raises substantial questions about the independence of law enforcement and intelligence from politics," Grassley wrote. "The Committee requires additional information to evaluate this situation."

He requested that the company reply in two weeks, by April 7.

Read the letter:

http://talkingpointsmemo.com/livewire/grassley-requests-info-from-political-firm-behind-trump-russia-dossier?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+tpm-news+%28TPMNews%29

[TSA]

846327513563480065

"Members of presidential transition teams routinely meet with foreign officials, and there is nothing inherently improper about sitting down with the Russian ambassador. Part of Mr. Kushner’s role during the campaign and the transition was to serve as a chief conduit to foreign governments and officials, and Ms. Hicks said he met with dozens of officials from a wide range of countries.

She added that Mr. Kushner was willing to talk to Senate investigators about the meetings with Mr. Kislyak and the banker, saying, “He isn’t trying to hide anything and wants to be transparent.”

https://mobile.nytimes.com/2017/03/27/us/politics/senate-jared-kushner-russia.html?referer=&_r=1&referer=https://t.co/x1ZQJe1sLD


djohn2008 I'm not on Twitter so wondering if you can tweet a question to Miller for me.

Can you ask if the FBI is also looking into Tony Podesta as he was paid to lobby for Russia's largest bank Sberbank.

[djohn2oo8]

"Members of presidential transition teams routinely meet with foreign officials, and there is nothing inherently improper about sitting down with the Russian ambassador. Part of Mr. Kushner’s role during the campaign and the transition was to serve as a chief conduit to foreign governments and officials, and Ms. Hicks said he met with dozens of officials from a wide range of countries.

She added that Mr. Kushner was willing to talk to Senate investigators about the meetings with Mr. Kislyak and the banker, saying, “He isn’t trying to hide anything and wants to be transparent.”

https://mobile.nytimes.com/2017/03/27/us/politics/senate-jared-kushner-russia.html?referer=&_r=1&referer=https://t.co/x1ZQJe1sLD


djohn2008 I'm not on Twitter so wondering if you can tweet a question to Miller for me.

Can you ask if the FBI is also looking into Tony Podesta as he was paid to lobby for Russia's largest bank Sberbank.

Why was Kushner s meeting undisclosed? :lmao TSA

[TSA]

Doubt you are even capable of copy and paste. Nevertheless, you ain't deflecting nothing. You will take the shit sandwich and eat it.

You've months to make your shit sandwich and no one's had to eat anything. 86 pages and not a single person charged with a crime.

[TSA]

Why was Kushner s meeting undisclosed? :lmao TSA

What's going to happen to Kushner? Is he going to be arrested like the other 10 people you've predicted will be arrested?

[djohn2oo8]

846407959047536640
CROFL

[djohn2oo8]

What's going to happen to Kushner? Is he going to be arrested like the other 10 people you've predicted will be arrested?

Why was his meeting undisclosed? Don't dodge the question.

[djohn2oo8]

846444986023514112
Ryan hasn't had a good week

[spurraider21]

Schumer can call for whatever he wants. Not gonna do shit

[boutons_deux]

Like boytoy Trash and his Pootin fellators, Nunes is compromised.

[TSA]

Why was his meeting undisclosed? Don't dodge the question.

Don't dodge the question lol. How would I or anyone else other than Kushner be able to answer that?

[TSA]

Why was his meeting undisclosed? Don't dodge the question.

Don't dodge the questions.

What's going to happen to Kushner? Is he going to be arrested like the other 10 people you've predicted will be arrested?

[djohn2oo8]

846367081977331712
TSA getting bodied by this fuck face

[djohn2oo8]

Don't dodge the questions.

What's going to happen to Kushner? Is he going to be arrested like the other 10 people you've predicted will be arrested?

I asked you why the meeting was undisclosed.

[djohn2oo8]

846365007881342980

[TSA]

846444986023514112
Ryan hasn't had a good week

Who is the most unreliable out of your Twitter tard brigade?

Griffin
Garland
Mensch
Schindler

[TSA]

846367081977331712
TSA getting bodied by this fuck face

I'm sure Dick Cheney will soon present his evidence lol

[TSA]

I asked you why the meeting was undisclosed.

And I answered. Your turn to answer my questions.

[djohn2oo8]

And I answered. Your turn to answer my questions.

No you didnt.

[djohn2oo8]

846438378757394433
:lol

[djohn2oo8]

Who is the most unreliable out of your Twitter tard brigade?

Griffin
Garland
Mensch
Schindler

You lost your account for being unreliable. :lmao

[SnakeBoy]

Has shit gotten real yet?

[djohn2oo8]

846405890555236352

[djohn2oo8]

846458763280338944
Not when you leave your own committee in the dark. :lmao nigga is testy as fuck

[djohn2oo8]

846450746245763073

[djohn2oo8]

846454927505416194

[djohn2oo8]

846446310966382592
:lmao

[djohn2oo8]

846406586625146881

[djohn2oo8]

846465920184827904

[DarrinS]

If you don't feel like reading John's redundant tweet dump, just watch CNN. They have all of today's talking points.

[djohn2oo8]

846448589744340993

[djohn2oo8]

If you don't feel like reading John's redundant tweet dump, just watch CNN. They have all of today's talking points.

Yet you keep posting In here. You keep reading them :lol

[djohn2oo8]

846428316735197185

[TSA]

No you didnt.

Here was my answer

"How would I or anyone else other than Kushner be able to answer that?"

Now are you going to keep dodging my questions?

[TSA]

You lost your account for being unreliable. :lmao

Who is the most unreliable out of your Twitter tard brigade?

Griffin
Garland
Mensch
Schindler

[djohn2oo8]

Here was my answer

"How would I or anyone else other than Kushner be able to answer that?"

Now are you going to keep dodging my questions?

So you still didn't answer :lmao

[djohn2oo8]

846472498271150081

Wow

[djohn2oo8]

Who is the most unreliable out of your Twitter tard brigade?

Griffin
Garland
Mensch
Schindler

All more reliable than you. Btw weren't you wrong about Clapper and FISA warrants?

[TSA]

846458763280338944
Not when you leave your own committee in the dark. :lmao nigga is testy as fuck

What is the committee investigating? Russian interference

Did Nunes source reveal anything having to do with the Russian investigation? No

[TSA]

So you still didn't answer :lmao

What did Kushner eat for breakfast this morning?

You now see how stupid your question was.

[djohn2oo8]

846467449893470209

[djohn2oo8]

846467677786947585

[djohn2oo8]

846467870955655168

[spurraider21]

What did Kushner eat for breakfast this morning?

You now see how stupid your question was.
Is this like when you asked me what clinton did in Haiti and then got mad that I wouldn't answer ?

[TSA]

All more reliable than you. Btw weren't you wrong about Clapper and FISA warrants?

If your Twitter tard brigade was reliable Trump, Flynn, Nunes, Priebus, and Kushner would all be awaiting trial for the crimes the brigade has claimed they committed. You are up to 85 pages of ridiculous claims and not a single one has come true. How many pages will this go with no charges?

[djohn2oo8]

846468030670536704

[spurraider21]

If your Twitter tard brigade was reliable Trump, Flynn, Nunes, Priebus, and Kushner would all be awaiting trial for the crimes the brigade has claimed they committed. You are up to 85 pages of ridiculous claims and not a single one has come true. How many pages will this go with no charges?
How many pages will pizza thread go?

:cry what does this art imply

[djohn2oo8]

846468414491295746

[TSA]

Is this like when you asked me what clinton did in Haiti and then got mad that I wouldn't answer ?

Is your name djohn?

[spurraider21]

Is your name djohn?
Are you a hypocrite?

[TSA]

How many pages will pizza thread go?

:cry what does this art imply

Go without what?

[TSA]

Are you a hypocrite?

Sure. We are all hypocrites at one point or another.

It's cute watching you jump into conversations not directed at you to bring up something from months ago.

[clambake]

What did Kushner eat for breakfast this morning?

You now see how stupid your question was.

as if kushner doesn't eat pizza.

please

[TSA]

as if kushner doesn't eat pizza.

please

1/10 and only because you said please

[clambake]

you gonna take my name, pepe?

[spurraider21]

Go without what?
Charges against podestas/clintons/alefantis

[spurraider21]

Sure. We are all hypocrites at one point or another.

It's cute watching you jump into conversations not directed at you to bring up something from months ago.
This is a public thread not a pm stream. I'm equally skeptical of all the "boom" material. But I find it ridiculous you (apparently consciously) hold different standards for these claims from the pizza claims

[TSA]

This is a public thread not a pm stream. I'm equally skeptical of all the "boom" material. But I find it ridiculous you (apparently consciously) hold different standards for these claims from the pizza claims

I never claimed Podesta/Clinton/Alefantis would be charged with anything nor did I accuse them of doing anything, unlike djohn2008. I find it ridiculous that even needed to be pointed out to you.

[boutons_deux]

WHY FBI CAN’T TELL ALL ON TRUMP, RUSSIA

The Federal Bureau of Investigation cannot tell us what we need to know about Donald Trump’s contacts with Russia.

Why?

Because doing so would jeopardize a long-running, ultra-sensitive operation targeting mobsters tied to Russian President Vladimir Putin — and to Trump.

But the Feds’ stonewalling risks something far more dangerous: Failing to resolve a crisis of trust in America’s president.

WhoWhatWhy provides the details of a two-month investigation in this 6,500-word exposé.

The FBI apparently knew, directly or indirectly, based upon available facts, that prior to Election Day, Trump and his campaign had personal and business dealings with certain individuals and entities linked to criminal elements — including reputed Russian gangsters — connected to Putin.

The same facts suggest that the FBI knew or should have known enough prior to the election to justify informing the public about its ongoing investigation of potentially compromising relationships between Trump, Putin, and Russian mobsters — even if it meant losing or exposing a valued informant.

http://whowhatwhy.org/2017/03/27/fbi-cant-tell-trump-russia/

[clambake]

he's very busy. he has to research the origin of the "dear leader" moniker and report back where it came from, who said it, who is saying it, and attach names to his brown nose report.

[TSA]

he's very busy. he has to research the origin of the "dear leader" moniker and report back where it came from, who said it, who is saying it, and attach names to his brown nose report.

you produce very little for trying so hard

[clambake]

thin crust please

[clambake]

you produce very little for trying so hard

oh you gave up on that?

quitter

[TSA]

WHY FBI CAN’T TELL ALL ON TRUMP, RUSSIA

The Federal Bureau of Investigation cannot tell us what we need to know about Donald Trump’s contacts with Russia.

Why?

Because doing so would jeopardize a long-running, ultra-sensitive operation targeting mobsters tied to Russian President Vladimir Putin — and to Trump.

But the Feds’ stonewalling risks something far more dangerous: Failing to resolve a crisis of trust in America’s president.

WhoWhatWhy provides the details of a two-month investigation in this 6,500-word exposé.

The FBI apparently knew, directly or indirectly, based upon available facts, that prior to Election Day, Trump and his campaign had personal and business dealings with certain individuals and entities linked to criminal elements — including reputed Russian gangsters — connected to Putin.

The same facts suggest that the FBI knew or should have known enough prior to the election to justify informing the public about its ongoing investigation of potentially compromising relationships between Trump, Putin, and Russian mobsters — even if it meant losing or exposing a valued informant.

http://whowhatwhy.org/2017/03/27/fbi-cant-tell-trump-russia/

"In his March 20 testimony before the House Intelligence Committee, FBI Director James Comey said that he could not go into detail about its probe into the Trump administration’s Russian connection.

If he had, we might have learned that, for more than three decades the FBI has had Trump Tower in its sights."

And the FBI held on to 30 years worth of damning information until after he was elected :rollin

[spurraider21]

I never claimed Podesta/Clinton/Alefantis would be charged with anything nor did I accuse them of doing anything, unlike djohn2008. I find it ridiculous that even needed to be pointed out to you.
If you didn't accuse them of doing good anything why did you think acosta would name drop them?

[djohn2oo8]

846488943835189248
Damn Nunes. So now people can go in the white house unauthorized? :lmao

[djohn2oo8]

846490510277644288
The committee you kept in the dark? :rollin

[djohn2oo8]

846490760782471168

[djohn2oo8]

846489401077194752
This kind of shit is not helping his cause :lmao

[TSA]

846490760782471168

What is the committee investigating? Russian interference

Did Nunes source reveal anything having to do with the Russian investigation? No

[djohn2oo8]

846489870528851972

[djohn2oo8]

What is the committee investigating? Russian interference

Did Nunes source reveal anything having to do with the Russian investigation? No

You are so fucking stupid :lmao

[djohn2oo8]

So why is Nunes still hiding that info from his committee TSA?

[djohn2oo8]

846493345929158660

[TSA]

So why is Nunes still hiding that info from his committee TSA?

The committee investigating Russian interference? Probably because Nunes flat out stated what he saw had nothing to do with the investigation into Russian interference.

[djohn2oo8]

846493755578503168
Pressures on now.

[djohn2oo8]

The committee investigating Russian interference? Probably because Nunes flat out stated what he saw had nothing to do with the investigation into Russian interference.

:lmao wow!! So he went to the WH in the dead of the night over something not related to Russia even though Nunes said it pertained to Trump? Even though he had said he had seen a briefing related to Russia? Even though the next day he said Trump was under surveillance? :lmao

[djohn2oo8]

846494701507219457
For you TSA.

[djohn2oo8]

846492226742112257

[djohn2oo8]

846496680023248897

[djohn2oo8]

846496958558679041

[djohn2oo8]

846497693430108161
You don't say

[TSA]

:lmao wow!! So he went to the WH in the dead of the night over something not related to Russia even though Nunes said it pertained to Trump? Even though he had said he had seen a briefing related to Russia? Even though the next day he said Trump was under surveillance? :lmao

Did you miss Nunes press conference where he repeatedly said the surveillance documents he saw had nothing to do with Russia?

[TSA]

846497693430108161
You don't say

"He said his sources on the matter, which he stressed was unrelated to Russia, could not deliver the documents to his committee, so he had to go to them."

Unrelated to Russia, you don't say.

[djohn2oo8]

Did you miss Nunes press conference where he repeatedly said the surveillance documents he saw had nothing to do with Russia?

CROFL. You are stupid

[djohn2oo8]

"He said his sources on the matter, which he stressed was unrelated to Russia, could not deliver the documents to his committee, so he had to go to them."

Unrelated to Russia, you don't say.

Could not deliver to the committee :lmao

TSA the fuck tard

[djohn2oo8]

Then Nunes cancelled an open hearing on Russia.

TSA taking more L's

[DarrinS]

Can't tell if this one is about Trump or Hillary.

846100444283912193

[TSA]

:lol taking more L's
:lol 0/6 on charges being brought
:lol 0/6 on jail time
:lol 0/20 on BOOM's

[djohn2oo8]

846499106910461952

[DarrinS]

Then Nunes cancelled an open hearing on Russia.

TSA taking more L's


If they can't answer any questions in public, what's the point?

[TSA]

I'm still waiting to hear what major trouble Flynn is in for speaking to Russia about sanctions. 89 pages and nothing so far. Maybe next week we'll get a BOOM.

[djohn2oo8]

846489256952516611
Probably Russians :lol

[djohn2oo8]

If they can't answer any questions in public, what's the point?

Not true. Comey sure answered alot.

[djohn2oo8]

846501277710340096

[djohn2oo8]

846498826978562048

[djohn2oo8]

846497960825438208

[djohn2oo8]

846497500836102144

[djohn2oo8]

846502268962832384

[DarrinS]

Not true. Comey sure answered alot.

Like what? What did he say that wasn't already known?

[djohn2oo8]

846501805961949185

[djohn2oo8]

Like what? What did he say that wasn't already known?

That Clapper had not seen any evidence. That the Russians will come back by the 2018 midterms.

[DarrinS]

That Clapper had not seen any evidence. That the Russians will come back by the 2018 midterms.

Boom! :lmao

[djohn2oo8]

Boom! :lmao

An impartial investigator with nothing to hide does not cancel an OPEN hearing no matter what questions are answered or not. Unless they are involved.

[djohn2oo8]

846499703739109376

[djohn2oo8]

846501184622018562

[TSA]

846499703739109376

Will Sessions be arrested before or after Priebus? :rollin

[Reck]

TSA getting shit on on two threads simultaneously...by 3 different people :lol

[TSA]

:lol not obsessed with TSA
:lol logs on first post of the day...TSA
:lol rent free

[boutons_deux]

Keith Olbermann decimates Devin Nunes: He’s acting ‘like a guy who’s about to flee the country’

Keith Olbermann on Monday railed into the drip, drip, drip of Donald Trump’s ties to Russia, noting the question is “not blowing over,” and instead boils down to one word: “Treason.”

“The Russia story continues to grow grimmer and bigger and deadlier,” Olbermann said in his latest installment of “The Resistance.”

“The word ‘treason’ has been invoked now by the most unlikely of sources,” he continued, noting even former George Bush ethics lawyer Richard Painter has used that term to describe the Trump-Russia connection.

Olbermann added the White House “seems to be setting up [former Gen. Mike] Flynn as its scapegoat,” and that House Intel Committee chairman Devin Nunes, who served on the Trump transition team, seems to be a “spasm of panic

“This is not blowing over, this has not stopped expanding,” Olbermann said, arguing the question is now whether the person we elected president is “loyal to the United States of America or loyal to the Russian Federation.”

http://www.rawstory.com/2017/03/keith-olbermann-decimates-devin-nunes-hes-acting-like-a-guy-whos-about-to-flee-the-country/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+TheRawStory+%28The+Raw+Story% 29

[boutons_deux]

Running Scared: Trump Has Total Twitter Meltdown Over Russia Investigation

Trump's Monday night tweets weren't the words of somebody who is confident in his innocence. They're the rantings of a man who is terrified of being caught.

http://15130-presscdn-0-89.pagely.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/trump-freak-out-701x393.jpg


In true Trump fashion, he blasted off a series of tweets full of the conspiracy theories that fuel his distorted view of the world.

Donald J. Trump (https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump)
(https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump)✔@realDonaldTrump (https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump)

Why isn't the House Intelligence Committee looking into the Bill & Hillary deal that allowed big Uranium to go to Russia, Russian speech....
8:26 PM - 27 Mar 2017 (https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/846533818811080704)



Donald J. Trump (https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump)
(https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump)✔@realDonaldTrump (https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump)

...money to Bill, the Hillary Russian "reset," praise of Russia by Hillary, or Podesta Russian Company. Trump Russia story is a hoax. #MAGA (https://twitter.com/hashtag/MAGA?src=hash)!
8:35 PM - 27 Mar 2017 (https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/846536212362018816)


Trumps unhinged Twitter rant suggests not only that the leader of the free world is a full-fledged, tinfoil-hat-wearing conspiracy theorist, but also that he is worried these investigations will turn something damning up.

http://www.politicususa.com/2017/03/27/running-scared-trump-total-twitter-meltdown-russia-investigation.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+politicususa%2FfJAl+%28Politi cus+USA+%29
Donald J. Trump (https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump)
(https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump)

[boutons_deux]

Nunes to O’Reilly: Democrats Want Me to Quit ‘Because They Know I’m Quite Effective’

http://www.mediaite.com/tv/nunes-to-oreilly-democrats-want-me-to-quit-because-they-know-im-quite-effective/
:lol

[boutons_deux]

Roger Stone's defense on everything is that he was lying the last time (http://www.dailykos.com/stories/2017/3/27/1647663/-Roger-Stone-s-defense-on-everything-is-that-he-was-lying-the-last-time)

Donald Trump did have a relationship with Vladimir Putin (http://www.usmagazine.com/celebrity-news/news/donald-trump-talks-vladimir-putin-relationship-in-2013-interview-w460547) and then, when that relationship became uncomfortable, he didn’t. And somehow, that’s okay.

Following the same pattern, former Trump political adviser Roger Stone previously said “I actually have communicated with Assange,” then

claimed that he had a “perfectly legal” back channel to WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange (https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2017/mar/05/roger-stone-trump-adviser-julian-assange).

He later deleted the tweet containing the second claim, but he didn’t back off his claimed pipeline into WikiLeaks.

He also claimed to have direct communication with the hackers who dipped into the DNC servers and obtained personal emails of Democratic operatives.
But now, of course, Stone says there’s no there there (http://www.politico.com/story/2017/03/roger-stone-they-have-no-proof-236526).

He was only talking about a friend of a friend kind of thing, and the idea that he was coordinating with the Russians in releasing documents to WikiLeaks is silly.

That Podesta thing, in which Stone predicted what WikiLeaks was going to publish before they published it? Coincidence.

The communications with the claimed front man for the hackers? Just a pat on the virtual back.


The tweet was just a hunch, he says, and the DMs never went anywhere, and only started because Stone had seen the hacker get banned from Twitter, didn't like it, and wanted to express support when he saw Twitter reverse its decision, to send "him a high-five saying, ‘Glad you're reinstated,’ because I'm against censorship.” …

But if he was communicating with Assange through an intermediary, I asked, why say in that Florida speech he was communicating with him himself — notably in the same week in August that he’d said on a separate conference call that he knew there more emails coming?
“I see no inconsistency there,” Stone said.


And you know Stone remains a serious threat to Democrats, because they’re trying to kill him …

He has also claimed that he may have been poisoned in December and targeted in a car accident two weeks ago in an effort to stop him from speaking out.

But the biggest thing offending Roger Stone these days isn’t secret Democratic hit men. It’s the sad denial he’s getting from the Trump regime.

A member of Trump’s circle for nearly 40 years, Stone officially departed the presidential campaign just a few months in, but remained close to the action and infighting.

After those first few months, Stone says, he received no money, directly or indirectly, from Trump or the Trump campaign, despite running several supportive operations and continuing to talk to Trump throughout, continuing in the last few weeks

(Trump has told him not to say “Mr. President,” he said, but to keep calling him “Donald”).


Stone also wants it known that he does have his limits.

“Technically, I wouldn't be a rat fucker. You see, rat fucker is sending 10 pizzas to the Democratic headquarters. That's stupid. That's puerile. That's not winning any votes. That's rat fucking,” Stone said.

“And any serious political operative wouldn't waste their time with stuff like that.”


So, based on past actions, if you get a big pizza order—it’s probably Roger Stone.

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2017/03/27/1647663/-Roger-Stone-s-defense-on-everything-is-that-he-was-lying-the-last-time?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+dailykos%2Findex+%28Daily+Kos %29

Holy Shit. Trash and his entourage are totally rotten, treasonous, lying assholes

[boutons_deux]

‘This is a lot of questions’: :lol

Nunes fumbles as Blitzer grills him over clandestine White House visit

Blitzer asked Nunes if he understands why it “might be conspicuous for the Chairman of the House Intelligence Committee to visit” the White House hours before unilaterally deciding to inform the president of potential intelligence gathered on Trump and members of his team.

Nunes argued there was nothing clandestine about meeting a source at the White House, adding, “if I wanted to, I could have snuck onto White House grounds at night when nobody would have seen me.”

Blitzer pressed Nunes on “who cleared [him] for admission” at the White House, arguing, “eventually these records, they’re going to come out anyhow.”



“Why not disclose it now if it’s going to be released in the near-future?” Blitzer asked. “You understand how all of this looks and why it’s causing such an uproar?”

Nunes argued the potential unmasking of additional names “bothered [him] enough for him to consider it “completely appropriate … to go to the president with this.”

At one point, Nunes grew exasperated by the magnitude of Blitzer’s question, complaining, “this is a lot of questions.”

“Do you understand why it might have been better to avoid this kind of meeting at the White House,” Blitzer asked again.

The CNN host also pressed Nunes about the president’s tweets alleging Obama had wiretapped him prior to the election.

“You don’t believe that, do you?” Blitzer asked, adding, “He should not feel vindicated?”

http://www.rawstory.com/2017/03/this-is-a-lot-of-questions-nunes-fumbles-as-blitzer-grills-him-over-clandestine-white-house-visit/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+TheRawStory+%28The+Raw+Story% 29

Even forever softball pitcher Wolfie is fastballing the stupid, ignorant, incompetent, clueless Nunes

[djohn2oo8]

846524781121941504
:lmao

[djohn2oo8]

846703440642428929
Cover up

[djohn2oo8]

846704529919873024

[djohn2oo8]

846725843850276865

[Reck]

The way these fucktard republicans are blatantly trying to do a cover up is fucked up.

[djohn2oo8]

846767133866504193

[djohn2oo8]

846736060394672128

[djohn2oo8]

846753534532112384

[boutons_deux]

846736060394672128

The Trash + Repug COVERUP is now BLATANT

Do the Dems have enough balls and spine to go for the kill?

[djohn2oo8]

846735709411164161
apparently it's amateur hour in the WH

[djohn2oo8]

846730155250728966

[djohn2oo8]

846750833534537728

[djohn2oo8]

846708334984151040

[djohn2oo8]

846772500075872257

[djohn2oo8]

846779305979981824

[djohn2oo8]

The Trash + Repug COVERUP is now BLATANT

Do the Dems have enough balls and spine to go for the kill?

They will. Just know the Intel Community is watching these Repugs.

[djohn2oo8]

846784282207117313

[boutons_deux]

Like Trash, Nunes is in way over his head

[Kim Jong-il]

Nunes always looks like he's on the verge of passing a kidney stone.

[tlongII]

Well this certainly looks bad in the Twitterverse.

[djohn2oo8]

846826423423766529
Alright then die in jail.

[djohn2oo8]

846825544213778432

[djohn2oo8]

846791535156977665

[boutons_deux]

C O V E R U P

[djohn2oo8]

846800182834532355

[TSA]

846826423423766529
Alright then die in jail.

:lmao

[djohn2oo8]

846837624039968768

[boutons_deux]

C O V E R U P

[djohn2oo8]

846837253410344960

[djohn2oo8]

846848765440987136

[TSA]

Since we are on the topic of Russia and money I thought I'd leave these here



From Russia with Money-GAI Report
http://www.g-a-i.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/Report-Skolkvovo-08012016-2.pdf

Podesta fails to disclose receipt of 75,000 shares of stock from Kremlin financed company
http://dailycaller.com/2017/03/26/exclusive-john-podesta-may-have-violated-federal-law-by-not-disclosing-75000-stock-shares/?utm_campaign=atdailycaller&utm_source=Twitter&utm_medium=Social

Funny how the ones crying Russia seem to have all the actual ties to Russia

[djohn2oo8]

846845625824043008
TSA's booty hole is clenching.

[TSA]

djohn2008 shooting blanks for 90 pages

[djohn2oo8]

846838949712556032

[djohn2oo8]

846850994633871361

[djohn2oo8]

846840095890165760

[djohn2oo8]

846846390554759172
:lmao

[djohn2oo8]

846849307617775616

[djohn2oo8]

846850583952838657

[djohn2oo8]

846852602654605314

Game over TSA. Manafort is going down.

[TSA]

846852602654605314

Game over TSA. Manafort is going down.

Sure thing, right after Podesta goes down :rollin


Joule Unlimited Technologies — financed in part by a Russian firm — originally awarded Podesta 100,000 shares of stock options when in 2010 he joined that board along with its Dutch-based entities: Joule Global Holdings, BV and the Stichting Joule Global Foundation.

When Podesta announced his departure from the Joule board in January 2014 to become President Obama’s special counsellor, the company officially issued him 75,000 common shares of stock.

The Schedule B section of the federal government’s form 278 which — requires financial disclosures for government officials — required Podesta to “report any purchase, sale or exchange by you, your spouse, or dependent children…of any property, stocks, bonds, commodity futures and other securities when the amount of the transaction exceeded $1,000.”


Schedule B is blank regarding his receipt of any stock from any company.

Liberals and conservatives alike tell TheDCNF Podesta should have disclosed the stock.

“Well Podesta should certainly have been more upfront in filling this out. Clearly, it should have been fully disclosed,” said Craig Holman, a lobbyist for the liberal group Public Citizen which was founded by Ralph Nader. “That’s the point of the personal financial disclosure forms, especially for anyone entering the White House,” he told TheDCNF in an interview.

“If the transfer of stock took place, it had to be disclosed,” added former U.S. Attorney Joseph DiGenova in an interview. “If he didn’t, clearly it’s a violation.”

The same year Podesta joined Joule, the company agreed to accept 1-Billion-Rubles — or $35 million — from Rusnano, a state-run and financed Russian company with close ties to President Vladimir Putin.

Anatoly Chubais, the company CEO and two other top Russian banking executives worked together with Podesta on the Joule boards. The board met six times a year.

Ron Hosko, a former FBI assistant director said because of the Kremlin backing, it was essential Podesta disclose the financial benefits he received from the company.

“I think in this case where you’re talking about foreign interests and foreign involvement, the collateral interest with these disclosure forms is put in the forefront of full disclosure of any foreign interest that you may have,” he told TheDCNF in an interview.

He added that Russian money was a continuing concern because it could “become a counterintelligence concern for America.”

“It’s a troubled question if you deliberately omit this information on the form,” Hosko, a 30-year veteran of the FBI told TheDCNF. “Were you completely truthful on this form that you filled out, yes or no?”

Podesta took possession of the stock in January 2014, the same month he entered the White House, according to WikiLeaks.

The existence of the 75,000 shares of Joule stock was first revealed by the Government Accountability Institute report issued last year.

But Podesta didn’t pocket all the shares. Correspondence from Podesta to Joule instructed the firm to transfer only 33,693 shares to Leonidio Holdings, a brand-new entity he incorporated only on December 20, 2013, about ten days before he entered the White House.

A January 4, 2014 letter to Joule corporate secretary Mark Solakian, Podesta requested the transfer to Leonidio of 25,146 shares of series C stock and 8,547shares of Series C-II. The letter was released by WikiLeaks last October.



Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2017/03/26/exclusive-john-podesta-may-have-violated-federal-law-by-not-disclosing-75000-stock-shares/#ixzz4cfF6tuf2

[TSA]

For your own sake djohn2008 I'd like to see just one of predictions come true, just one. You've put in far too much tweet time for a whole lot of nothing so far. Keep the faith.

[djohn2oo8]

846850159371862021

[djohn2oo8]

TSA you still going around saying Presidents order wiretaps? Oh yeah thats right. You lost your account behind that.

[djohn2oo8]

846861768412553216
:lmao

[TSA]

TSA you still going around saying Presidents order wiretaps? Oh yeah thats right. You lost your account behind that.

Going around these days saying the President can order surveillance without a court order.

Is our Priebus gets charged with obstruction of justice bet still on?

While you contemplate that let's take a look at all the people you have claimed are going down, and haven't gone down.

Trump
Pence
Manafort
Priebus
Kushner
Flynn
Nunes

Did I miss anyone?

[spurraider21]

Sessions?

[djohn2oo8]

846849405286334464

[djohn2oo8]

Sessions?

lol TSA

[djohn2oo8]

846780971626090496

[DarrinS]

Again, if you don't want to read endless pages of twitter dump, tune into to the Clinton News Network for exact same info. They are breathlessly reporting on this.

[TSA]

lol TSA

lol 0/8

[djohn2oo8]

846863964898299904

[djohn2oo8]

Again, if you don't want to read endless pages of twitter dump, tune into to the Clinton News Network for exact same info. They are breathlessly reporting on this.

No one asked you. Sit down and take the shit sandwich you voted for.

[DarrinS]

No one asked you. Sit down and take the shit sandwich you voted for.

Resist!

[TSA]

No one asked you. Sit down and take the shit sandwich you voted for.

whats an 0/8 shit sandwich taste like?

[djohn2oo8]

846838958717898752

[djohn2oo8]

whats an 0/8 shit sandwich taste like?

Where's your other account?

[djohn2oo8]

846863824938446848

[TSA]

Where's your other account?

Is our Priebus gets charged with obstruction of justice bet still on?

[djohn2oo8]

Is our Priebus gets charged with obstruction of justice bet still on?

Where is your other account? We're you wrong?

[TSA]

Again, if you don't want to read endless pages of twitter dump, tune into to the Clinton News Network for exact same info. They are breathlessly reporting on this.

If you're tired of laughing at the twitter dumps here's a pretty good read

From Russia, with panic
https://thebaffler.com/salvos/from-russia-with-panic-levine

[TSA]

Where is your other account? We're you wrong?

I killed the account because I was wrong.

I'm standing at 0/1

You are standing at 0/8 :rollin

Is our Priebus gets charged with obstruction of justice bet still on?

[djohn2oo8]

I killed the account because I was wrong.

I'm standing at 0/1

You are standing at 0/8 :rollin

Is our Priebus gets charged with obstruction of justice bet still on?

So you still don't understand how a FISA warrant works? Seems like you were wrong about Clapper too.

[djohn2oo8]

846734385009381376

[pgardn]

For your own sake djohn2008 I'd like to see just one of predictions come true, just one. You've put in far too much tweet time for a whole lot of nothing so far. Keep the faith.

"I said this to myself dontcha see"

Holy Mother of Contradictions:

I wish to pray to you today for a fellow who has been so true to your message...

-Amen

[TSA]

So you still don't understand how a FISA warrant works? Seems like you were wrong about Clapper too.

President doesn't need a FISA warrant or go through a court to order surveillance, and Clapper has been called to testify in front of the committee so his knowledge of the case is still obviously relevant. But none of this has anything to do with your continued avoidance of my question.

Is our Priebus gets charged with obstruction of justice bet still on?

[djohn2oo8]

President doesn't need a FISA warrant or go through a court to order surveillance, and Clapper has been called to testify in front of the committee so his knowledge of the case is still obviously relevant. But none of this has anything to do with your continued avoidance of my question.

Is our Priebus gets charged with obstruction of justice bet still on?

Christ almighty you still think a President can order a wiretap? :lmao

[djohn2oo8]

Clapper hasn't been briefed on anything after January 20th. :lmao TSA

[TSA]

Clapper hasn't been briefed on anything after January 20th. :lmao TSA

If he's so irrelevant you may want to stop linking tweets discussing Clapper being called to testify before the committee.

[TSA]

Christ almighty you still think a President can order a wiretap? :lmao
I know the President can order surveillance without a court order.

50 U.S. Code § 1802 - Electronic surveillance authorization without court order; certification by Attorney General; reports to Congressional committees; transmittal under seal;...of communication common carrier; applications; jurisdiction of court

(a)
(1) Notwithstanding any other law, the President, through the Attorney General, may authorize electronic surveillance without a court order under this subchapter to acquire foreign intelligence information for periods of up to one year if the Attorney General certifies in writing under oath that—
(A) the electronic surveillance is solely directed at—
(i) the acquisition of the contents of communications transmitted by means of communications used exclusively between or among foreign powers, as defined in section 1801(a)(1), (2), or (3) of this title; or
(ii) the acquisition of technical intelligence, other than the spoken communications of individuals, from property or premises under the open and exclusive control of a foreign power, as defined in section 1801(a)(1), (2), or (3) of this title;
(B) there is no substantial likelihood that the surveillance will acquire the contents of any communication to which a United States person is a party; and
(C) the proposed minimization procedures with respect to such surveillance meet the definition of minimization procedures under section 1801(h) of this title; and
if the Attorney General reports such minimization procedures and any changes thereto to the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence and the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence at least thirty days prior to their effective date, unless the Attorney General determines immediate action is required and notifies the committees immediately of such minimization procedures and the reason for their becoming effective immediately.
(2) An electronic surveillance authorized by this subsection may be conducted only in accordance with the Attorney General’s certification and the minimization procedures adopted by him. The Attorney General shall assess compliance with such procedures and shall report such assessments to the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence and the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence under the provisions of section 1808(a) of this title.
(3) The Attorney General shall immediately transmit under seal to the court established under section 1803(a) of this title a copy of his certification. Such certification shall be maintained under security measures established by the Chief Justice with the concurrence of the Attorney General, in consultation with the Director of National Intelligence, and shall remain sealed unless—
(A) an application for a court order with respect to the surveillance is made under sections 1801(h)(4) and 1804 of this title; or
(B) the certification is necessary to determine the legality of the surveillance under section 1806(f) of this title.
(4) With respect to electronic surveillance authorized by this subsection, the Attorney General may direct a specified communication common carrier to—
(A) furnish all information, facilities, or technical assistance necessary to accomplish the electronic surveillance in such a manner as will protect its secrecy and produce a minimum of interference with the services that such carrier is providing its customers; and
(B) maintain under security procedures approved by the Attorney General and the Director of National Intelligence any records concerning the surveillance or the aid furnished which such carrier wishes to retain.
The Government shall compensate, at the prevailing rate, such carrier for furnishing such aid.
(b) Applications for a court order under this subchapter are authorized if the President has, by written authorization, empowered the Attorney General to approve applications to the court having jurisdiction under section 1803 of this title, and a judge to whom an application is made may, notwithstanding any other law, grant an order, in conformity with section 1805 of this title, approving electronic surveillance of a foreign power or an agent of a foreign power for the purpose of obtaining foreign intelligence information, except that the court shall not have jurisdiction to grant any order approving electronic surveillance directed solely as described in paragraph (1)(A) of subsection (a) unless such surveillance may involve the acquisition of communications of any United States person.
(Pub. L. 95–511, title I, § 102, Oct. 25, 1978, 92 Stat. 1786; Pub. L. 108–458, title I, § 1071(e), Dec. 17, 2004, 118 Stat. 3691; Pub. L. 111–259, title VIII, § 806(a)(2), Oct. 7, 2010, 124 Stat. 2748.)

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/50/1802

[Reck]

So Trump is not an American now? :lol

The only way the president can order a wiretap without a court order is through his AG and that person has to be foreign born.

:lmao TSA not being able to clear this ABC hurdle. :lmao

[TSA]

:lol retard repeats exactly what I bolded

[Reck]

TSA daily struggles. :lol

[DarrinS]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gapRNpEjXUo

[Reck]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gapRNpEjXUo

*Watches video, never once heard Obama was spying on Trump.* :lmao

[DarrinS]

"if they found out how we knew what we knew about their … the Trump staff dealing with Russians – that they would try to compromise those sources and methods, meaning we no longer have access to that intelligence.”

[Reck]

"if they found out how we knew what we knew about their … the Trump staff dealing with Russians – that they would try to compromise those sources and methods, meaning we no longer have access to that intelligence.”

Nothing which isn't new or reported on.



"In the Obama administration’s last days, some White House officials scrambled to spread information about Russian efforts to undermine the presidential election — and about possible contacts between associates of President-elect Donald J. Trump (http://www.nytimes.com/topic/person/donald-trump?inline=nyt-per) and Russians — across the government. Former American officials say they had two aims: to ensure that such meddling isn’t duplicated in future American or European elections, and to leave a clear trail of intelligence for government investigators."

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/03/01/us/politics/obama-trump-russia-election-hacking.html

[Trill Clinton]

How long were the watergate investigations going on before they started talking impeachment?

[Spurminator]

How long were the watergate investigations going on before they started talking impeachment?

Nixon resigned two years after the initial Woodward report dropped in the Post.

[Kim Jong-il]

Nixon resigned two years after the initial Woodward report dropped in the Post.
I'm going to assume that two months into it, all the conservatives were smugly saying "Ooohhh if something so wrong happened then why hasn't anyone been arrested yet?" and so on.

[Trill Clinton]

Nixon resigned two years after the initial Woodward report dropped in the Post.

Ah okay, so this could take a while.

[TSA]

djohn2oo8 your girl Mensch is now gathering intel from known fake twitter accounts :lmao

847118204069662721

[spurraider21]

If only Nixon was smart enough to call the post fake news and the enemy of thr American people

[Quadzilla99]

"if they found out how we knew what we knew about their … the Trump staff dealing with Russians – that they would try to compromise those sources and methods, meaning we no longer have access to that intelligence.”

It's already been stated that Trump members may have talked to Russians they were surveiling. Probably what she was referring to. You guys are really grasping at straws at this point to try and prove that Trump himself was wiretapped given how many intelligence agencies have outright denied it.

[djohn2oo8]

TSA apparently still doesn't know a President cannot order a wiretap.